WEBVTT

00:00:01.840 --> 00:00:05.379
Greetings, this is Andy Johnson. Topic of today's

00:00:05.379 --> 00:00:08.980
presentation is the importance of arguments.

00:00:09.419 --> 00:00:13.820
Arguments are not bad things. Arguments are good

00:00:13.820 --> 00:00:19.480
things. In fact, they are essential things. Now,

00:00:19.539 --> 00:00:23.699
an argument in an academic setting is not two

00:00:23.699 --> 00:00:27.500
people yelling at each other. An argument in

00:00:27.500 --> 00:00:31.679
this setting is the process of engagement. where

00:00:31.679 --> 00:00:35.539
you put forth a proposition and support it using

00:00:35.539 --> 00:00:39.600
reason, evidence, and analysis while another

00:00:39.600 --> 00:00:44.020
listens. And when you're finished propositioning

00:00:44.020 --> 00:00:48.320
and supporting, the other puts forth a counterargument

00:00:48.320 --> 00:00:52.920
while you listen. Focusing only on the initial

00:00:52.920 --> 00:00:56.960
proposition, this process continues until one

00:00:56.960 --> 00:01:01.939
of five things occur. One, you persuade the other

00:01:01.939 --> 00:01:05.280
or others of the correctness of your proposition.

00:01:06.519 --> 00:01:10.859
Two, you get persuaded of the wrongness of your

00:01:10.859 --> 00:01:15.900
proposition. Three, you find areas of agreement

00:01:15.900 --> 00:01:21.140
and compromise. Four, you have a better understanding

00:01:21.140 --> 00:01:24.780
of the other but recognize that differences are

00:01:24.780 --> 00:01:29.219
irreconcilable. or five, one of you gets mad

00:01:29.219 --> 00:01:33.340
and leaves in a huff. Now, the argumentative

00:01:33.340 --> 00:01:37.500
process, argumentation process is the foundation

00:01:37.500 --> 00:01:42.859
of academic discourse within the academy. It's

00:01:42.859 --> 00:01:47.900
worked for centuries, enabling our various academic

00:01:47.900 --> 00:01:53.200
fields to continually evolve. These arguments

00:01:53.200 --> 00:01:57.069
usually take place in academic journals, academic

00:01:57.069 --> 00:02:00.769
conferences, and various other academic presentations.

00:02:01.909 --> 00:02:05.250
Yeah, you say, but we're not in an academic setting,

00:02:05.450 --> 00:02:09.810
you liberal egghead. Yes, this is a well -stated

00:02:09.810 --> 00:02:13.830
proposition with which I agree. We are not in

00:02:13.830 --> 00:02:19.009
an academic setting. However, in a non -academic

00:02:19.009 --> 00:02:23.889
setting, constructive argumentation is still

00:02:24.240 --> 00:02:28.539
the best way to move the conversation forward.

00:02:29.639 --> 00:02:32.960
Here, propositions are still made and supported

00:02:32.960 --> 00:02:38.759
using reason, evidence, and analysis. In fact,

00:02:39.180 --> 00:02:42.000
the white men in tight pants who designed our

00:02:42.000 --> 00:02:47.060
democracy 250 years ago also believed the argumentative

00:02:47.060 --> 00:02:50.520
process to be so important that they built it

00:02:50.520 --> 00:02:55.560
into our form of governments. Today we have courts

00:02:55.560 --> 00:02:58.960
and legislative bodies where arguments are heard,

00:02:59.340 --> 00:03:03.000
propositions are supported, and decisions are

00:03:03.000 --> 00:03:07.300
made. So the importance of argument, as stated

00:03:07.300 --> 00:03:10.800
previously, the argumentative process promotes

00:03:10.800 --> 00:03:15.419
change, growth, and evolution. Argument invites

00:03:15.419 --> 00:03:20.360
us to revisit and review our view on things.

00:03:20.580 --> 00:03:24.879
And then we either reify or revise our thinking.

00:03:26.020 --> 00:03:30.939
Now, changes in thinking don't indicate a flip

00:03:30.939 --> 00:03:34.860
-flopper or a spineless fraud. It doesn't mean

00:03:34.860 --> 00:03:38.180
that a person lacks strong conviction about things.

00:03:38.680 --> 00:03:44.020
It means that the person is alive. And things

00:03:44.020 --> 00:03:48.789
that are alive change and grow when they encounter

00:03:48.789 --> 00:03:54.189
new information or have new experiences. Things

00:03:54.189 --> 00:03:58.770
that are dead stay the same and eventually wither

00:03:58.770 --> 00:04:03.930
away. It's the ability to change and grow in

00:04:03.930 --> 00:04:08.110
our thinking that has been hardwired into our

00:04:08.110 --> 00:04:12.819
species. It's what enabled our ancestors to leave

00:04:12.819 --> 00:04:17.540
the trees and evolve on the plains of the savannas

00:04:17.540 --> 00:04:22.160
millions of years ago. Yet some would prefer

00:04:22.160 --> 00:04:25.480
to stay in the trees teaching children to sound

00:04:25.480 --> 00:04:29.500
out words instead of teaching them to read. They

00:04:29.500 --> 00:04:34.120
see and hear only what they understand and information

00:04:34.120 --> 00:04:37.610
or experiences that differ. from the current

00:04:37.610 --> 00:04:40.730
ways of thinking are discarded or explained away.

00:04:41.769 --> 00:04:46.189
They wave their arms in screech and anger when

00:04:46.189 --> 00:04:49.689
they encounter words like balanced literacy or

00:04:49.689 --> 00:04:54.709
three -queueing. They live in clans of like -thinking

00:04:54.709 --> 00:04:58.930
individuals. And this has resulted in cognitive

00:04:58.930 --> 00:05:02.670
inbreeding and all sorts of wacky mutations such

00:05:02.670 --> 00:05:07.689
as letters, professional development. There will

00:05:07.689 --> 00:05:12.029
be no dissent. While essential for a healthy

00:05:12.029 --> 00:05:15.850
functioning democracy, autocracies have never

00:05:15.850 --> 00:05:20.230
been comfortable with arguments. Arguments to

00:05:20.230 --> 00:05:22.750
get people believe in the wrong sorts of things,

00:05:23.089 --> 00:05:27.110
they say. There'd be chaos if people were allowed

00:05:27.110 --> 00:05:30.610
to go around believing whatever they want, they

00:05:30.610 --> 00:05:35.089
say. And besides, arguments are not needed if

00:05:35.089 --> 00:05:39.009
you are right about everything, they say. And

00:05:39.009 --> 00:05:42.230
I'll point out here that Donald Trump has insisted

00:05:42.230 --> 00:05:46.850
that he's been right about everything. Throughout

00:05:46.850 --> 00:05:50.149
the centuries, the more powerful have always

00:05:50.149 --> 00:05:53.850
tried to quash the arguments made by the less

00:05:53.850 --> 00:05:57.759
powerful. They believe that people won't start

00:05:57.759 --> 00:06:01.319
believing the wrong sorts of things if they can't

00:06:01.319 --> 00:06:05.079
hear the arguments. So they quash them. Governments,

00:06:05.459 --> 00:06:08.439
political movements, and even religions have

00:06:08.439 --> 00:06:12.000
stayed in power far longer than they should have

00:06:12.000 --> 00:06:16.759
by eliminating the argumentative process. And

00:06:16.759 --> 00:06:20.160
it's worth noting that Trump's FCC and Justice

00:06:20.160 --> 00:06:24.019
Department have done all sorts of things to eliminate

00:06:24.220 --> 00:06:28.439
the argument. These actions represent the very

00:06:28.439 --> 00:06:33.959
worst unpatriotic, un -American impulses. So

00:06:33.959 --> 00:06:37.660
what are we talking about here, you ask? Religion,

00:06:38.560 --> 00:06:42.639
politics, or reading instruction? To which I

00:06:42.639 --> 00:06:47.439
say, yes. But the book I'm working on is about

00:06:47.439 --> 00:06:50.139
the science of reading, so I'll be putting this

00:06:50.139 --> 00:06:52.519
in the context of reading instruction.
