1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:02,320
This is the reading instruction show.

2
00:00:02,320 --> 00:00:04,800
I'm your host is always Dr. Andy Johnson.

3
00:00:04,800 --> 00:00:14,560
The topic of today's podcast is this two causes of ineffective reading instruction.

4
00:00:14,560 --> 00:00:17,320
Now let's define our terms.

5
00:00:17,320 --> 00:00:22,000
Ineffective reading instruction is instruction in which children a.

6
00:00:22,000 --> 00:00:26,520
Do not move forward in their ability to create meaning with print.

7
00:00:26,520 --> 00:00:35,480
B. Learn to dislike reading and C. Do not engage in voluntary reading.

8
00:00:35,480 --> 00:00:42,040
Now nobody wants ineffective reading instruction even though it seems like some people like

9
00:00:42,040 --> 00:00:47,640
Emily Hanford and Louisa Mote's even though it seems like they get up every day and say

10
00:00:47,640 --> 00:00:54,240
hmm how can we promote ineffective reading instruction.

11
00:00:54,240 --> 00:00:59,760
But ineffective reading instruction seems to be rampant and we're going to look at

12
00:00:59,760 --> 00:01:04,160
just two causes of ineffective reading instruction.

13
00:01:04,160 --> 00:01:09,120
Cause number one it's called the myth of standardization.

14
00:01:09,120 --> 00:01:16,160
It is erroneously assumed that students are standardized products and that a standardized

15
00:01:16,160 --> 00:01:24,160
one size fits all program can be purchased and implemented with fidelity with great success.

16
00:01:24,160 --> 00:01:30,560
All we have to do is buy the right program and this is based on the crazy wacky nutty

17
00:01:30,560 --> 00:01:38,480
idea that all struggling readers are the same and it's based on this inaccurate assumption

18
00:01:38,480 --> 00:01:45,800
that a struggling reader in black water Arizona needs the exact same program implemented in

19
00:01:45,800 --> 00:01:53,160
exactly the same way as a struggling reader in a dynamic in a soda or new castle Australia

20
00:01:53,160 --> 00:01:59,400
or Mumbai India pardon me and Karachi Pakistan.

21
00:01:59,400 --> 00:02:08,000
So schools buy expensive overly complex reading programs that don't work and then teachers

22
00:02:08,000 --> 00:02:15,360
must struggle to make the child to fit the program instead of making the program fit

23
00:02:15,360 --> 00:02:17,760
the child.

24
00:02:17,760 --> 00:02:25,120
And when the expensive reading program doesn't work as is inevitably the case what do you

25
00:02:25,120 --> 00:02:27,160
think happens next.

26
00:02:27,160 --> 00:02:33,360
Well, they force the child to do more of what isn't working so it won't work even more

27
00:02:33,360 --> 00:02:39,240
or they blame the teacher or they blame the parents or they look for another program to

28
00:02:39,240 --> 00:02:46,320
buy and groups like the science of reading these advocates are pressuring school districts

29
00:02:46,320 --> 00:02:54,120
to buy these very expensive one size fits all programs that have been approved by science

30
00:02:54,120 --> 00:03:02,000
of reading experts who in reality seem to know nothing about reading and even less about

31
00:03:02,000 --> 00:03:04,560
reading science.

32
00:03:04,560 --> 00:03:11,280
Now wouldn't life be grand if good reading instruction was simply a matter of buying

33
00:03:11,280 --> 00:03:19,600
the right overly expensive reading program and implementing it with fidelity in our teacher

34
00:03:19,600 --> 00:03:26,200
preparation programs we could strap all the child development classes and ed psychology

35
00:03:26,200 --> 00:03:32,600
classes and get rid of all the teaching methods courses think how much money we would save.

36
00:03:32,600 --> 00:03:39,960
We could instead have only one or two program implemented courses where students would learn

37
00:03:39,960 --> 00:03:47,520
to read and follow the directions with fidelity and the title of my next book would be by

38
00:03:47,520 --> 00:03:51,600
the right overly expensive program.

39
00:03:51,600 --> 00:03:58,280
But children are not standardized products and what works with one person or group does

40
00:03:58,280 --> 00:04:04,520
not always work with another and by the way reading programs don't teach children to

41
00:04:04,520 --> 00:04:08,720
read there's not a program in the world teachers do.

42
00:04:08,720 --> 00:04:16,240
We must invest in teachers which means professional legitimate professional teacher professional

43
00:04:16,240 --> 00:04:17,800
development.

44
00:04:17,800 --> 00:04:24,400
The second cause of ineffective reading instruction is a lack of understanding related to the reading

45
00:04:24,400 --> 00:04:33,400
process more specifically inaccurate information about how the brain creates meaning with print.

46
00:04:33,400 --> 00:04:40,320
So the idea is get in the way of new understandings and understandings also get in the way of new

47
00:04:40,320 --> 00:04:42,040
understandings.

48
00:04:42,040 --> 00:04:51,080
Now let me explain the lack of success with struggling readers is connected with correlated

49
00:04:51,080 --> 00:04:58,320
with the simplistic understanding of reading that's prevalent within the radio documentary

50
00:04:58,320 --> 00:05:06,560
community that's prevalent outside the literacy experts community.

51
00:05:06,560 --> 00:05:12,560
Based on the phonological processing model here reading is thought to be just sounding

52
00:05:12,560 --> 00:05:19,600
out words instruction based on this model consists of sounding out word instruction with the

53
00:05:19,600 --> 00:05:22,680
goal of creating good sound or outers.

54
00:05:22,680 --> 00:05:29,000
However, there's very little transfer of the sound or outer skills to authentic reading

55
00:05:29,000 --> 00:05:36,520
situations and there's no significant improvement in reading comprehension.

56
00:05:36,520 --> 00:05:42,960
That's the phonological processing model that reading is simply sounding out words.

57
00:05:42,960 --> 00:05:49,280
Now the neurocognitive model that's in contrast this provides a more complete understanding

58
00:05:49,280 --> 00:05:55,440
of reading based on the latest research and cognitive science neuroscience eye movement

59
00:05:55,440 --> 00:06:03,880
and miscue analysis here reading is understood to be creating meaning with print instruction

60
00:06:03,880 --> 00:06:10,600
based on this model consists of multiple types of activities and experiences that are used

61
00:06:10,600 --> 00:06:18,840
to develop the cognitive processes necessary for students to create meaning with print.

62
00:06:18,840 --> 00:06:24,440
Reading is not sounding out words it's creating meaning with print.

63
00:06:24,440 --> 00:06:29,320
Now the neurocognitive model of reading is based on two theories the cognitive constructive

64
00:06:29,320 --> 00:06:34,440
learning theory and the interactive theory of reading.

65
00:06:34,440 --> 00:06:39,960
Now according to the interactive theory of reading reading is creating meaning with print

66
00:06:39,960 --> 00:06:47,000
but during the active reading what's in the head interacts with what's on the page to

67
00:06:47,000 --> 00:06:52,560
create meaning hence the name interactive theory.

68
00:06:52,560 --> 00:06:58,320
And again reading is not simply sounding out words it's creating meaning with print we

69
00:06:58,320 --> 00:07:03,280
use what's in our head to make sense of what's on the page that's why when our head is full

70
00:07:03,280 --> 00:07:09,040
of stuff we can read more successfully and comprehend more about that stuff.

71
00:07:09,040 --> 00:07:13,560
I know a lot about reading instruction when I read books about reading instruction that

72
00:07:13,560 --> 00:07:19,200
interacts I read quickly I comprehend a lot when I read about financial planning there's

73
00:07:19,200 --> 00:07:25,680
nothing in the head I read slowly I comprehend little what's in the head interacts with

74
00:07:25,680 --> 00:07:28,000
what's on the page.

75
00:07:28,000 --> 00:07:33,040
Now let's take a look at the three queuing systems and I know Emily Hanford and Louisa

76
00:07:33,040 --> 00:07:39,400
Mott's and all you science of reading monkeys your little flags are going up but listen carefully

77
00:07:39,400 --> 00:07:45,520
as we are reading we use the knowledge stored in our cortex to constantly reach out and

78
00:07:45,520 --> 00:07:50,880
micro predict the words in the sentences as we're reading I movement research, miscue

79
00:07:50,880 --> 00:07:59,480
analysis others show that this is called recognizing words different from identifying listen carefully

80
00:07:59,480 --> 00:08:06,360
these micro predictions enable our brain to work more efficiently our brain uses three

81
00:08:06,360 --> 00:08:13,280
queuing systems to make these micro predictions to recognize words during the act of reading

82
00:08:13,280 --> 00:08:19,040
these queuing systems are the semantic the syntactic and the graph of phonetic they're

83
00:08:19,040 --> 00:08:25,240
called queuing systems because they cue the brain as to what the next word might possibly

84
00:08:25,240 --> 00:08:34,800
be they're called systems because they interconnect and interact with these other systems to work

85
00:08:34,800 --> 00:08:41,240
in conjunction they don't work separately they work together and I can hear the squeal

86
00:08:41,240 --> 00:08:47,160
of the phonics penguins right now they're saying teaching children to use queuing systems

87
00:08:47,160 --> 00:08:53,680
doesn't work doesn't work he's ruining America what about the children who protect the children

88
00:08:53,680 --> 00:08:59,160
mothers for liberty mothers for liberty to these penguins I would say take the fish out

89
00:08:59,160 --> 00:09:09,840
of your ears and listen we don't teach queuing systems that's not what it is if you're going

90
00:09:09,840 --> 00:09:17,360
to be against something for God's sakes at least understand what that something is to

91
00:09:17,360 --> 00:09:23,580
understand the three queuing systems you must first understand the difference between recognizing

92
00:09:23,580 --> 00:09:32,800
words and identifying words recognizing words is seen a word on the page and instantly knowing

93
00:09:32,800 --> 00:09:40,480
what that word is however when we encounter words on the page that are still in our lexicon

94
00:09:40,480 --> 00:09:46,240
that's the dictionary in our head if they're in our lexicon we don't recognize them we

95
00:09:46,240 --> 00:09:55,240
must identify them identifying words as when you consciously employ some strategy to figure

96
00:09:55,240 --> 00:10:02,840
out what that word is hmm I don't recognize it I will use this strategy there are four

97
00:10:02,840 --> 00:10:11,080
word identification strategies that we consciously employ morphemic analysis morpheme is the

98
00:10:11,080 --> 00:10:17,200
smallest unit of meaning looking at parts of the word we recognize analogy or large

99
00:10:17,200 --> 00:10:23,720
unit phonics looking for letter patterns context clues or semantics and phonics yes

100
00:10:23,720 --> 00:10:31,600
four and each of these word identification strategies should be taught using very direct

101
00:10:31,600 --> 00:10:40,280
and very explicit instruction we teach word identification strategies not just one is the

102
00:10:40,280 --> 00:10:48,520
science of reading people would have it but all four we don't teach queuing systems you

103
00:10:48,520 --> 00:10:56,040
include activities to develop them so that students are able to recognize words automatically

104
00:10:56,040 --> 00:11:04,440
or almost automatically using a minimum of cognitive space in short term memory the three

105
00:11:04,440 --> 00:11:11,320
queuing systems semantic this is the most efficient of the three in terms of space and

106
00:11:11,320 --> 00:11:18,720
speed required in our working memory semantics refers to meaning as you read you use context

107
00:11:18,720 --> 00:11:25,480
and background knowledge to recognize words and figure out what the next word might be

108
00:11:25,480 --> 00:11:31,320
the syntactic queuing system syntax has to do with grammar and the structure of the language

109
00:11:31,320 --> 00:11:38,560
as your brain reads you also use your knowledge of grammar set and structure word order tense

110
00:11:38,560 --> 00:11:45,880
plurality prefixes suffixes nouns and verbs and function words to recognize words this

111
00:11:45,880 --> 00:11:51,080
is the second most efficient queuing system but it works in conjunction with the other

112
00:11:51,080 --> 00:11:59,080
two the third one the phonetic or phonologic queuing systems uses letter sounds to predict

113
00:11:59,080 --> 00:12:05,040
what the next word might be we use minimal letter clues and of the three queuing systems

114
00:12:05,040 --> 00:12:12,560
this is this one is least efficient in terms of cognitive space why because it focuses

115
00:12:12,560 --> 00:12:17,320
on individual letters and letter patterns instead of words and ideas doesn't mean we

116
00:12:17,320 --> 00:12:26,360
don't teach it no but know this working memory has a very limited capacity it can hold about

117
00:12:26,360 --> 00:12:32,480
seven bits of information seven plus or minus two for about 15 seconds before it begins

118
00:12:32,480 --> 00:12:41,160
to fade we can hold just a few letters or we could hold a few words or a few ideas and

119
00:12:41,160 --> 00:12:47,600
since ideas contain far more information than individual letters it's more efficient

120
00:12:47,600 --> 00:12:56,040
to focus on ideas or meaning rather than individual letters this has been the reading instruction

121
00:12:56,040 --> 00:13:04,840
show I am your host as always Dr. Andy Johnson we have been talking about two causes of ineffective

122
00:13:04,840 --> 00:13:09,160
reading instruction and I'll just share I have three more the third cause and I won't

123
00:13:09,160 --> 00:13:18,760
go into it but its teachers have been disempowered the fourth cause classrooms have become overcrowded

124
00:13:18,760 --> 00:13:26,760
and underfunded and the fifth cause of ineffective reading instruction is testing madness.

125
00:13:26,760 --> 00:13:51,600
All right we'll talk about these other three in the next podcast.

