WEBVTT

00:00:08.300 --> 00:00:11.839
Opening AI for language learning explores artificial

00:00:11.839 --> 00:00:14.500
intelligence through informal conversations between

00:00:14.500 --> 00:00:17.019
two longtime colleagues in language education

00:00:17.019 --> 00:00:20.940
and digital technologies, Mat Schulze and Phil

00:00:20.940 --> 00:00:25.359
Hubbard. Language educators, learners, and enthusiasts

00:00:25.359 --> 00:00:28.160
are invited to an informed discussion where emerging

00:00:28.160 --> 00:00:34.340
technology meets human communication. Well, Mat,

00:00:34.359 --> 00:00:40.619
here we are back again. Yes, Phil. What's on

00:00:40.619 --> 00:00:43.740
the menu today? What are we doing? Well, I'd

00:00:43.740 --> 00:00:49.280
like to talk about a specific kind of GenAI SIPD,

00:00:49.539 --> 00:00:54.020
going back to our paper that started this, the

00:00:54.020 --> 00:00:56.979
generative AI sustained integrated professional

00:00:56.979 --> 00:01:01.899
development. And this is one of our recommendations,

00:01:02.060 --> 00:01:08.189
which is, you know, do it. Somewhat collaboratively

00:01:08.189 --> 00:01:12.090
don't do everything by yourself So I engaged

00:01:12.090 --> 00:01:18.129
in one such thing recently Sounds good Seymour

00:01:18.129 --> 00:01:23.750
I went to a conference So it was TESOL 

00:01:23.750 --> 00:01:29.030
2026 in Salt Lake City from March 24th to 27th

00:01:29.030 --> 00:01:32.769
I was giving a presentation there, but mostly

00:01:32.769 --> 00:01:36.819
I wanted to see what practice -focused organization

00:01:36.819 --> 00:01:41.519
like TESOL was doing with AI, because a lot of

00:01:41.519 --> 00:01:44.700
the conferences we go to are either mixed research

00:01:44.700 --> 00:01:48.280
and practice with a heavy emphasis on research

00:01:48.280 --> 00:01:52.680
or really almost pure research, even though it

00:01:52.680 --> 00:01:58.780
may be applied research. That's an interesting

00:01:58.780 --> 00:02:02.590
one coming basically from another angle. What

00:02:02.590 --> 00:02:04.909
are they doing? What's happening with AI and

00:02:04.909 --> 00:02:10.810
TESOL? Well, I didn't go last year, so this is

00:02:10.810 --> 00:02:12.949
kind of catching up. I can't say what happened

00:02:12.949 --> 00:02:16.409
in 2025, but now they seem to be doing a lot

00:02:16.409 --> 00:02:21.629
more than they were doing in 2024. I arrived

00:02:21.629 --> 00:02:25.870
at the conference before it began, so I had the

00:02:25.870 --> 00:02:30.750
entire time. My presentation had been... nicely

00:02:30.750 --> 00:02:35.150
placed on the last day in the last slot. And

00:02:35.150 --> 00:02:37.569
because I was doing it with a colleague, Deborah

00:02:37.569 --> 00:02:40.909
Healy, we had to have everything organized in

00:02:40.909 --> 00:02:43.830
advance so I couldn't be working on my slides

00:02:43.830 --> 00:02:49.509
instead of going to the conference. And that

00:02:49.509 --> 00:02:53.110
meant I had a lot of time to do this. So I went

00:02:53.110 --> 00:02:57.069
to as many AI sessions of one sort or another

00:02:57.069 --> 00:02:59.849
as I could. find, and often there was more than

00:02:59.849 --> 00:03:02.449
one at the same time, so I had to make choices,

00:03:03.569 --> 00:03:11.530
presentations and panels and posters, but I also

00:03:11.530 --> 00:03:15.430
checked out relevant exhibitors in the exhibit

00:03:15.430 --> 00:03:18.550
hall, a couple of which I'd known about before,

00:03:18.550 --> 00:03:21.550
and then the interest section meetings, especially

00:03:21.550 --> 00:03:24.650
for the call interest section and the teacher

00:03:24.650 --> 00:03:29.719
ed interest section. I also visited the TESOL

00:03:29.719 --> 00:03:32.620
publications booth and I'll say a little bit

00:03:32.620 --> 00:03:35.520
more on that later, but they've got some publications

00:03:35.520 --> 00:03:41.979
out. Nice. This does sound like a lot. So overall,

00:03:42.159 --> 00:03:46.360
what was your impression? What did you kind of

00:03:46.360 --> 00:03:50.979
take home, as they say? Well, I have a lot of

00:03:50.979 --> 00:03:55.199
notes and maybe half of them I'm actually able

00:03:55.199 --> 00:04:02.009
to decipher. One of them actually looked like

00:04:02.009 --> 00:04:04.810
it was written with the Enigma machine. But anyway,

00:04:05.770 --> 00:04:09.949
I also took photos of slides and picked up a

00:04:09.949 --> 00:04:12.990
lot of things. So there was way too much that

00:04:12.990 --> 00:04:16.329
we have time to talk about here, but some general

00:04:16.329 --> 00:04:21.350
takeaways, interesting balance between skepticism

00:04:21.350 --> 00:04:24.720
and excitement. So there were some presentations

00:04:24.720 --> 00:04:28.240
that were, you know, were not jumping into the

00:04:28.240 --> 00:04:31.839
hype. There was some hype, of course, and some

00:04:31.839 --> 00:04:35.660
what I would think of as naive application people

00:04:35.660 --> 00:04:39.199
who had recently discovered this and were presenting

00:04:39.199 --> 00:04:41.199
it, but there were teachers in the audience who

00:04:41.199 --> 00:04:47.740
that was appropriate for. A lot on ethics, sometimes

00:04:47.740 --> 00:04:50.259
as part of the talk, but sometimes the main thing.

00:04:50.420 --> 00:04:55.100
There was a whole call intersection panel on

00:04:55.100 --> 00:05:01.399
AI ethics, and also a lot on critical AI literacy,

00:05:02.079 --> 00:05:05.800
going beyond just saying, well, here's what AI

00:05:05.800 --> 00:05:09.319
is and here's how you use it, but some of the

00:05:09.319 --> 00:05:14.600
things that we've talked about before. And commercial

00:05:14.600 --> 00:05:17.259
developers, where they're in the exhibit hall,

00:05:17.680 --> 00:05:23.060
they were mostly small -scale startups, as opposed

00:05:23.060 --> 00:05:27.060
to the giant players that used to show up back

00:05:27.060 --> 00:05:29.740
in the era of CD -ROMs where you had to spend

00:05:29.740 --> 00:05:34.920
multi -million dollars on projects in order to

00:05:34.920 --> 00:05:39.220
have a whole set of multimedia materials to go.

00:05:40.000 --> 00:05:42.920
Duolingo was there, so certainly a big player

00:05:42.920 --> 00:05:46.509
there. But a lot of these were focused on what

00:05:46.509 --> 00:05:50.209
I think of as school solutions, which made sense.

00:05:52.189 --> 00:05:56.470
A couple of them do have materials that can be

00:05:56.470 --> 00:05:59.410
used well independently, but in a lot of cases,

00:05:59.550 --> 00:06:05.430
they're trying to bring in schools or even school

00:06:05.430 --> 00:06:09.560
districts language. language organizations of

00:06:09.560 --> 00:06:13.139
various sorts and try to sell whole solutions

00:06:13.139 --> 00:06:16.000
to them either to support their curriculum or

00:06:16.000 --> 00:06:19.899
even embed the curriculum. So again, I'll say

00:06:19.899 --> 00:06:25.240
more about that in a bit. Great. Yeah, this a

00:06:25.240 --> 00:06:29.420
lot seems to have been going on at the TESOL

00:06:29.420 --> 00:06:33.220
conference. You said earlier the year before

00:06:33.220 --> 00:06:37.560
you didn't go, but you went in in 2004. I'm sure

00:06:37.560 --> 00:06:40.660
you've been going to TESOL quite regularly. You

00:06:40.660 --> 00:06:43.920
must have had some expectations looking at this

00:06:43.920 --> 00:06:47.100
AI in particular. So what were your expectations

00:06:47.100 --> 00:06:51.759
and where they met basically from your perspective?

00:06:52.339 --> 00:06:55.120
Well, it was even though I had been going to

00:06:55.120 --> 00:07:02.370
TESOL almost every year since 1984, This was

00:07:02.370 --> 00:07:05.310
different for me. My experience was different

00:07:05.310 --> 00:07:09.290
from previous conferences. In what way? How was

00:07:09.290 --> 00:07:15.110
it different? Well, for years, I've gone to conferences.

00:07:15.250 --> 00:07:17.490
I've always been interested in focusing on the

00:07:17.490 --> 00:07:23.930
technology stuff. But I was going in the, I think,

00:07:24.589 --> 00:07:27.269
in the position of someone who already knew a

00:07:27.269 --> 00:07:31.339
whole lot and was even deemed an expert in particular

00:07:31.339 --> 00:07:36.899
elements of call. I joined TESOL call intersection

00:07:36.899 --> 00:07:40.939
in its first year in 1984, and I've grown up

00:07:40.939 --> 00:07:47.079
with the field. We've certainly seen lots of

00:07:47.079 --> 00:07:50.860
changes in the last 40 plus years, but the changes

00:07:50.860 --> 00:07:55.259
have not been so dramatic and so rapid as with

00:07:55.259 --> 00:08:00.370
AI. For me, instead of you know, just hanging

00:08:00.370 --> 00:08:03.470
out with friends. Teesaw used to have what they

00:08:03.470 --> 00:08:05.529
call the electronic village and I would tend

00:08:05.529 --> 00:08:07.930
to camp in there and volunteer to help people

00:08:07.930 --> 00:08:11.430
out and things like that. Now I'm going to sessions,

00:08:11.889 --> 00:08:14.470
kind of like I'm a graduate student all over

00:08:14.470 --> 00:08:17.810
again and trying to learn as much as I can during

00:08:17.810 --> 00:08:24.930
these four days. And what I discovered really

00:08:24.930 --> 00:08:27.550
quickly, I already knew going in is that I'm

00:08:27.550 --> 00:08:31.649
not an AI expert. I can consider myself a call

00:08:31.649 --> 00:08:34.909
expert in a lot of areas anyway, but I'm not

00:08:34.909 --> 00:08:38.830
an AI expert. One of the talks, in fact, that

00:08:38.830 --> 00:08:43.649
I went to that I'll mention later, Jane Freeman

00:08:43.649 --> 00:08:46.789
from the University of Toronto basically said,

00:08:46.789 --> 00:08:51.129
none of us are AI literate, and then proceeded

00:08:51.129 --> 00:08:55.590
to give a really good talk that showed that she

00:08:55.590 --> 00:09:01.809
knows a lot. So I think she's right. I don't

00:09:01.809 --> 00:09:04.470
know her and obviously I wasn't at that presentation,

00:09:04.549 --> 00:09:11.590
but I agree. We're not too literate about things.

00:09:11.909 --> 00:09:15.690
It's very much a learning process. So what are

00:09:15.690 --> 00:09:17.809
we going to do about that then if we are these

00:09:17.809 --> 00:09:22.419
kind of semi -literate people? We can always

00:09:22.419 --> 00:09:25.240
fall back on how we think we know more than we

00:09:25.240 --> 00:09:32.919
do. I still think I know more than I do. And

00:09:32.919 --> 00:09:35.600
of course, how we don't know what we don't know.

00:09:36.080 --> 00:09:38.700
So there's that. That's not very productive.

00:09:39.200 --> 00:09:42.059
I actually want to be AI literate, whatever that

00:09:42.059 --> 00:09:46.440
means, both in general and for the specific purpose

00:09:46.440 --> 00:09:51.610
of language education. I hear you. I think it's

00:09:51.610 --> 00:09:54.830
a challenge we all face. And yes, it has a lot

00:09:54.830 --> 00:09:57.669
to do with motivation, right? The interest in

00:09:57.669 --> 00:10:00.450
learning about AI, which is something the two

00:10:00.450 --> 00:10:04.789
of us certainly share. And I think, yeah, that's

00:10:04.789 --> 00:10:07.129
the main thing one can ask for. It's an openness,

00:10:07.470 --> 00:10:10.570
it's a willingness to learn. And then, yeah.

00:10:12.129 --> 00:10:16.830
So thinking about this AI literacy, it gets thrown

00:10:16.830 --> 00:10:21.059
around a lot. I've heard that term, the concept,

00:10:21.200 --> 00:10:23.759
the phrase very often. It's almost becoming,

00:10:24.700 --> 00:10:26.700
from my personal perspective, a little bit hollow

00:10:26.700 --> 00:10:30.100
because it's used so often. And it seems to be

00:10:30.100 --> 00:10:34.240
used in many different ways, which means it loses

00:10:34.240 --> 00:10:38.720
some of its meaning. Speaking personally, I would

00:10:38.720 --> 00:10:41.980
say I'm not really sure what AI literacy actually

00:10:41.980 --> 00:10:45.259
means in very practical terms. What am I going

00:10:45.259 --> 00:10:47.659
to do about it? If I want to have it, basically,

00:10:47.679 --> 00:10:53.769
what do I need? So I think it is important to

00:10:53.769 --> 00:10:57.429
poke a couple of holes into the things we think

00:10:57.429 --> 00:11:01.210
we know. Because this is the only way to make

00:11:01.210 --> 00:11:05.730
sure that we actually at least know where the

00:11:05.730 --> 00:11:09.690
gap is for us. Where are the things that we don't

00:11:09.690 --> 00:11:14.840
yet know or maybe can't know. This reminded me

00:11:14.840 --> 00:11:17.059
of this phrase I heard very often when going

00:11:17.059 --> 00:11:19.720
to London, England, basically in the London Underground,

00:11:19.919 --> 00:11:22.159
there was always this disembodied voice telling

00:11:22.159 --> 00:11:26.799
you, mind the gap. The doors are opening, mind

00:11:26.799 --> 00:11:32.919
the gap. So what are examples of some specific

00:11:32.919 --> 00:11:36.340
experiences you had at TESOL, where you probably

00:11:36.340 --> 00:11:38.679
minded the gap also, where you learned something

00:11:38.679 --> 00:11:46.059
new? Well, at first, facing what to share, I

00:11:46.059 --> 00:11:49.899
thought, oh, I'll give a lot of different examples

00:11:49.899 --> 00:11:52.700
and say a little bit about each one. And I realized

00:11:52.700 --> 00:11:57.779
that that just doesn't give people as much to

00:11:57.779 --> 00:11:59.620
take away. They might as well just look at the

00:11:59.620 --> 00:12:03.840
list of abstracts. So instead, I'm going to talk

00:12:03.840 --> 00:12:09.580
about a few areas that had an impact on me for

00:12:09.580 --> 00:12:13.600
one reason or another. and that I think represents

00:12:13.600 --> 00:12:16.159
something of the range of what was there. So

00:12:16.159 --> 00:12:21.840
the first example by a presenter named Miriam

00:12:21.840 --> 00:12:26.460
Moore, who was offering a four -part critical

00:12:26.460 --> 00:12:32.379
AI literacy framework. And the four parts, well,

00:12:32.419 --> 00:12:35.879
first of all, this is, I think, embedded in a

00:12:35.879 --> 00:12:39.769
pedagogy. class of hers, although it's also available

00:12:39.769 --> 00:12:45.169
in more workshopy kind of format for teachers

00:12:45.169 --> 00:12:46.929
to use for their own professional development.

00:12:47.590 --> 00:12:50.629
So it starts with, not surprisingly the way we

00:12:50.629 --> 00:12:55.669
did, with what is AI? But then it goes to, instead

00:12:55.669 --> 00:13:01.429
of saying, OK, ethics or chat bots or translation,

00:13:02.570 --> 00:13:06.070
the second part is, what are my rights and responsibilities?

00:13:06.700 --> 00:13:10.200
That's a good one. The third part, who makes

00:13:10.200 --> 00:13:14.840
the rules for AI? And then the fourth one, how

00:13:14.840 --> 00:13:18.840
does the language about AI influence our beliefs

00:13:18.840 --> 00:13:22.159
and how we use it? This is an Emily Bender sort

00:13:22.159 --> 00:13:30.460
of thing. And interestingly, she mentioned the

00:13:30.460 --> 00:13:35.129
Mystery Hype Theater AI Hype Theater 3000. and

00:13:35.129 --> 00:13:40.590
also introduced Usta to a book by Karen Howe

00:13:40.590 --> 00:13:44.990
called Empire of AI. So she reads and interprets

00:13:44.990 --> 00:13:49.629
in these areas, but she's not trying to say,

00:13:50.169 --> 00:13:55.970
don't use AI. She's trying to say, here is what

00:13:55.970 --> 00:14:03.899
it means to be critically AI literate. She had

00:14:03.899 --> 00:14:11.480
this really interesting demo explaining how a

00:14:11.480 --> 00:14:15.100
chat bot works and how a large language model

00:14:15.100 --> 00:14:17.799
works. She asked for six volunteers from the

00:14:17.799 --> 00:14:22.519
audience and she had them get up. Then she said,

00:14:22.759 --> 00:14:25.960
I've got you in this order and each one of you

00:14:25.960 --> 00:14:30.159
is going to get to say one word. the first in

00:14:30.159 --> 00:14:32.779
answer to a question I'll ask and then the next

00:14:32.779 --> 00:14:35.559
person has to put a word in that makes sense

00:14:35.559 --> 00:14:37.860
following that first word and also makes sense

00:14:37.860 --> 00:14:43.179
for the question and so the question was What

00:14:43.179 --> 00:14:47.340
is the FIFA World Cup and the first person said

00:14:47.340 --> 00:14:52.679
it and the next person is and then a and then

00:14:52.679 --> 00:14:57.750
soccer tournament And the sixth one was, it was

00:14:57.750 --> 00:14:59.529
kind of at the end, the sixth one had to come

00:14:59.529 --> 00:15:02.889
up with something and said, worldwide. And so

00:15:02.889 --> 00:15:07.629
it was, you know, what's a probable next word?

00:15:09.090 --> 00:15:14.830
That's what it's doing, you know. It's text extruding

00:15:14.830 --> 00:15:18.389
machines. Anyway. It does it so much more quickly

00:15:18.389 --> 00:15:21.230
than six people can, you know. Yeah. Well, yeah,

00:15:21.230 --> 00:15:24.250
but I think it was a beautiful demonstration.

00:15:24.509 --> 00:15:27.500
Yeah. It's a very neat idea. You know, simple,

00:15:27.620 --> 00:15:31.440
but also quite engaging, I'm sure for the volunteers,

00:15:31.580 --> 00:15:34.940
but for the audience as well. So there were a

00:15:34.940 --> 00:15:38.299
number of useful professional development ideas,

00:15:38.320 --> 00:15:41.740
a couple of ones that stuck out for me and that

00:15:41.740 --> 00:15:46.320
I probably should do more myself. One was instead

00:15:46.320 --> 00:15:51.100
of just studying ethics or even looking at, you

00:15:51.100 --> 00:15:53.120
know, what is your institutional stuff? How do

00:15:53.120 --> 00:15:55.950
you figure it out? figure out what to tell your

00:15:55.950 --> 00:15:59.269
students. Start with something like a personal

00:15:59.269 --> 00:16:03.049
ethical checklist. So what does it really mean

00:16:03.049 --> 00:16:05.309
for you? It seems to me there's going to be a

00:16:05.309 --> 00:16:07.529
lot of thought that has to go into that. And

00:16:07.529 --> 00:16:11.730
then something I've done piecemeal but not systematically

00:16:11.730 --> 00:16:16.850
is conduct a privacy audit of all the AI platforms

00:16:16.850 --> 00:16:21.169
you use and see exactly what's in those privacy

00:16:21.169 --> 00:16:23.169
statements, what you have control of, what you

00:16:23.169 --> 00:16:26.250
don't have control of. Oh, the privacy statements.

00:16:26.350 --> 00:16:28.110
Yeah, I was wondering how you would do an audit

00:16:28.110 --> 00:16:30.570
basically, but yeah, read the privacy statements.

00:16:30.769 --> 00:16:34.909
That's a very good first step. And also notice

00:16:34.909 --> 00:16:37.470
what's not there potentially that should be.

00:16:38.429 --> 00:16:43.509
OK, so that's the first example. The second one,

00:16:43.509 --> 00:16:45.789
this is the one I mentioned earlier, Jane Freeman

00:16:45.789 --> 00:16:49.169
from University of Toronto. This was part of

00:16:49.169 --> 00:16:55.000
a panel on AI for program administrators. And

00:16:55.000 --> 00:16:58.620
she was talking in general about the development

00:16:58.620 --> 00:17:02.659
of expertise. And as I noted earlier, she was

00:17:02.659 --> 00:17:05.980
the one who quoted, none of us are AI literate,

00:17:06.200 --> 00:17:08.960
that this expertise is something evolving as

00:17:08.960 --> 00:17:12.400
the AI evolves. And it really dovetails nicely

00:17:12.400 --> 00:17:16.339
with our sustained integrated professional development

00:17:16.339 --> 00:17:21.140
idea, especially the sustained part of it. So

00:17:21.140 --> 00:17:25.769
she gave an example from from medicine using

00:17:25.769 --> 00:17:30.910
this analogy of puppet versus puppeteer and said,

00:17:31.069 --> 00:17:34.029
okay, if you've got an undergraduate who wants

00:17:34.029 --> 00:17:36.769
to be a doctor. So a first year undergraduate

00:17:36.769 --> 00:17:40.349
is basically a puppet in the sense of they don't

00:17:40.349 --> 00:17:44.329
have a lot of agency. They do what the instructor

00:17:44.329 --> 00:17:48.589
tells them to do. They work on things because

00:17:48.589 --> 00:17:50.799
they don't have. the knowledge yet, and they

00:17:50.799 --> 00:17:53.720
don't have the skills. And at the top, the puppeteer

00:17:53.720 --> 00:17:56.480
is ultimately like the full -fledged doctor,

00:17:58.519 --> 00:18:02.339
the attending physician, for example. And then

00:18:02.339 --> 00:18:04.859
various levels in between of the first -year

00:18:04.859 --> 00:18:07.420
medical student is above the first -year graduate

00:18:07.420 --> 00:18:11.000
and so on. And it all seems to have to do with

00:18:11.000 --> 00:18:17.559
this locus of control. And then she applies this

00:18:17.559 --> 00:18:24.559
to AI. and says, okay, we can show people can

00:18:24.559 --> 00:18:28.720
immediately make use of ChatGPT, for example,

00:18:29.079 --> 00:18:31.880
or any of the other ones to get a question answered

00:18:31.880 --> 00:18:34.579
and to produce something. You've mentioned before,

00:18:34.740 --> 00:18:38.220
it's like you can ask it to produce a lesson

00:18:38.220 --> 00:18:41.880
plan before you know anything about how to produce

00:18:41.880 --> 00:18:46.099
a lesson plan yourself. And that's the idea.

00:18:47.069 --> 00:18:50.049
The AI is the puppeteer. It's telling you what

00:18:50.049 --> 00:18:55.349
you should put into a lesson plan. But it's not

00:18:55.349 --> 00:18:58.569
a person. It's not a skilled teacher, as you

00:18:58.569 --> 00:19:02.490
point out. It's drawing on various resources

00:19:02.490 --> 00:19:08.809
to put something coherent seeming together. And

00:19:08.809 --> 00:19:13.569
so she uses the term, the two sort of opposite

00:19:13.569 --> 00:19:18.970
terms are cognitive offloading. and distributed

00:19:18.970 --> 00:19:24.269
cognition. And if you're engaged in cognitive

00:19:24.269 --> 00:19:28.710
offloading, for example, you're trying to learn

00:19:28.710 --> 00:19:34.990
how to write a particular kind of email. Let's

00:19:34.990 --> 00:19:40.410
say you have an email and you're asking someone

00:19:40.410 --> 00:19:44.819
to sponsor your research, for example. And you

00:19:44.819 --> 00:19:47.500
don't know how to do that. So you ask CHAP GPT

00:19:47.500 --> 00:19:50.099
to write it for you. And then you look at it

00:19:50.099 --> 00:19:52.099
and you go, oh, that's okay. And you send it

00:19:52.099 --> 00:19:56.000
out. You haven't learned anything. It doesn't

00:19:56.000 --> 00:19:58.599
directly represent you. You're the puppet there.

00:20:00.619 --> 00:20:03.920
And if you're cognitive offloading and you're

00:20:03.920 --> 00:20:08.259
already an expert at something and you can glance

00:20:08.259 --> 00:20:10.240
at the output and say, okay, that's good. And

00:20:10.240 --> 00:20:14.970
you can also put in better input. then you're

00:20:14.970 --> 00:20:16.869
in a better position. So it's the same thing

00:20:16.869 --> 00:20:19.710
with use of AI is you want to move from being

00:20:19.710 --> 00:20:23.470
the puppet to being the puppeteer. And you can

00:20:23.470 --> 00:20:27.329
only be the puppeteer if you already have significant

00:20:27.329 --> 00:20:32.309
domain knowledge and skill. And this is anyway,

00:20:32.589 --> 00:20:36.589
that's if I interpreted her work correctly, it

00:20:36.589 --> 00:20:42.670
comes down to learning how to use AI in a way

00:20:42.670 --> 00:20:46.099
that while it supports student and teacher agency,

00:20:46.599 --> 00:20:54.960
it's agency in areas where they can have some

00:20:54.960 --> 00:20:58.480
engagement with distributed cognition and not

00:20:58.480 --> 00:21:05.920
just cognitive offloading. This whole concept

00:21:05.920 --> 00:21:09.640
of cognitive offloading is very interesting.

00:21:09.740 --> 00:21:13.809
We should probably put a pin in and think about

00:21:13.809 --> 00:21:16.609
that one again. Because there's also, of course,

00:21:17.470 --> 00:21:19.490
positive cognitive offloading, right? That helps

00:21:19.490 --> 00:21:24.049
learning if I offload stuff that I don't really

00:21:24.049 --> 00:21:26.690
need to do again in order to learn something

00:21:26.690 --> 00:21:29.509
new. Yeah. And I think part of this, too, had

00:21:29.509 --> 00:21:34.349
to do with it was like a lot of models in order

00:21:34.349 --> 00:21:39.250
to be simple and clear. go back and poke holes

00:21:39.250 --> 00:21:41.670
in it and say, okay, what it really comes down

00:21:41.670 --> 00:21:47.869
to is that if you are a novice, that you're trying

00:21:47.869 --> 00:21:52.369
to, let's take the lesson plan example. You could

00:21:52.369 --> 00:21:56.869
actually use examples of lesson plans produced

00:21:56.869 --> 00:22:01.849
by AI to help and deconstruct them and say, oh,

00:22:01.930 --> 00:22:04.529
I see here like four different lesson plans.

00:22:04.970 --> 00:22:08.769
What do they have in common? that need to go

00:22:08.769 --> 00:22:11.410
into lesson plans. And how does that compare

00:22:11.410 --> 00:22:14.750
to a teacher -produced lesson plan that, you

00:22:14.750 --> 00:22:18.690
know, my instructor brought up in class? And

00:22:18.690 --> 00:22:22.029
so those, that's where I think the interaction

00:22:22.029 --> 00:22:28.730
could be useful. Okay. The third area, and this

00:22:28.730 --> 00:22:33.450
involves some multiple characters, is the exhibitors.

00:22:34.029 --> 00:22:39.529
And as I mentioned, there were several more or

00:22:39.529 --> 00:22:44.730
less startups, I think, as well as Duolingo is

00:22:44.730 --> 00:22:51.750
the 800 pound gorilla in the room. And then other

00:22:51.750 --> 00:22:54.930
publishers like Pearson, for example, doing things

00:22:54.930 --> 00:22:58.089
with AI, but always connected to what they already

00:22:58.089 --> 00:23:02.289
have as essentially a textbook driven infrastructure.

00:23:04.170 --> 00:23:08.450
So one of these, actually two of them were ones

00:23:08.450 --> 00:23:12.490
that I had touched base with briefly at Calico

00:23:12.490 --> 00:23:17.690
last year. One of them is called FlowSpeak. I

00:23:17.690 --> 00:23:21.490
talked to the developer Matt Sussman there and

00:23:21.490 --> 00:23:25.950
FlowSpeak has basically semi -structured scenarios

00:23:25.950 --> 00:23:32.670
where you interact with an AI and it's across

00:23:32.670 --> 00:23:39.049
a number of It's tied into the common European

00:23:39.049 --> 00:23:43.289
framework. And so the stated goal is to help

00:23:43.289 --> 00:23:47.390
students get from B1 to B2 level and then from

00:23:47.390 --> 00:23:53.150
B2 to C1 level. It's not to produce, it's somebody

00:23:53.150 --> 00:23:56.349
from the beginning and it's not to take them

00:23:56.349 --> 00:23:59.210
to the high end. So I like the fact that it's

00:23:59.210 --> 00:24:02.450
kind of scaled in that way with a progression.

00:24:02.940 --> 00:24:08.839
A second one, which I'd also seen at Calico last

00:24:08.839 --> 00:24:13.819
year, Pangea Chat. And this is run by Will Jordan

00:24:13.819 --> 00:24:19.200
Cooley. And it started mostly as an idea of texting

00:24:19.200 --> 00:24:24.180
or audio chat with friends. And those friends

00:24:24.180 --> 00:24:28.660
can be actual friends or they can be people in

00:24:28.660 --> 00:24:32.589
other places that are co -learners with you.

00:24:33.150 --> 00:24:35.630
And I believe the main thing there was the AI

00:24:35.630 --> 00:24:38.369
would support and giving feedback on the interaction.

00:24:39.230 --> 00:24:45.150
But now they've gone to having a full on AI chat

00:24:45.150 --> 00:24:47.589
bot where you can practice without another human

00:24:47.589 --> 00:24:52.390
just with the chat bot. It helps you produce

00:24:52.390 --> 00:24:56.029
your target language. It helps you understand

00:24:56.029 --> 00:25:01.160
what's being said to you and just Kind of helps

00:25:01.160 --> 00:25:04.519
you learn on the go. So that one I'm interested

00:25:04.519 --> 00:25:08.420
in learning a little bit more about one called

00:25:08.420 --> 00:25:12.480
Unicorn Tutor AI and the guy talked to there

00:25:12.480 --> 00:25:20.559
was Albert Kano. And this one is. It's more of

00:25:20.559 --> 00:25:24.380
a. It's almost like a learning management system.

00:25:25.099 --> 00:25:30.200
with AI built in where an institution would,

00:25:30.200 --> 00:25:33.980
for example, feed its curriculum in, they turn

00:25:33.980 --> 00:25:39.240
it into AI lessons. So they build off of the

00:25:39.240 --> 00:25:42.819
material so that you can have conversations with

00:25:42.819 --> 00:25:45.740
avatars about the material. And those avatars

00:25:45.740 --> 00:25:49.619
can be playing roles of characters within the

00:25:49.619 --> 00:25:53.500
material or playing more of a tutorial role.

00:25:53.789 --> 00:25:57.329
I didn't get very deeply into it, but it was

00:25:57.329 --> 00:26:03.670
interesting to me because it has very good tracking

00:26:03.670 --> 00:26:07.289
for teachers. Although like a lot of the tracking,

00:26:07.529 --> 00:26:11.809
I think it provides so much information for teachers

00:26:11.809 --> 00:26:15.410
to actually go through and see what's going on.

00:26:15.730 --> 00:26:17.769
My guess is what they're going to, and maybe

00:26:17.769 --> 00:26:21.289
they already do this, is build an agentic AI

00:26:21.289 --> 00:26:24.549
on top of it that actually does a lot of the

00:26:24.549 --> 00:26:27.630
tracking, interpreting of the tracking data,

00:26:27.630 --> 00:26:30.329
and then makes recommendations for the teacher

00:26:30.329 --> 00:26:32.869
to look, you know, into something in more depth.

00:26:33.289 --> 00:26:37.430
I don't know yet. Albert, if you're listening,

00:26:37.710 --> 00:26:40.390
maybe you can contact me and tell me what I've

00:26:40.390 --> 00:26:43.289
got right and wrong here. It's also white label,

00:26:43.690 --> 00:26:46.609
which is a term I'd heard before, but didn't

00:26:46.609 --> 00:26:49.029
remember exactly what it meant. And that means

00:26:49.029 --> 00:26:54.180
you give them your stuff and you put what they

00:26:54.180 --> 00:26:56.759
deliver to the students and to the teachers actually

00:26:56.759 --> 00:27:01.019
has your institutional name on it. So they, rather

00:27:01.019 --> 00:27:04.660
than presenting themselves as Unicorn Tutor AI.

00:27:05.420 --> 00:27:10.299
So that's interesting. The last one, something

00:27:10.299 --> 00:27:14.519
called Chattybots, and this is from eslvideo

00:27:14.519 --> 00:27:19.339
.com, where students take existing materials

00:27:19.339 --> 00:27:23.880
that they have So these can be conversations,

00:27:24.140 --> 00:27:27.539
role plays. There's one, just describe a picture

00:27:27.539 --> 00:27:31.220
so they provide the picture. And then you interact

00:27:31.220 --> 00:27:34.019
with the AI conversationally to do whatever it

00:27:34.019 --> 00:27:37.019
is. The role play, of course, can be a role play

00:27:37.019 --> 00:27:40.619
and describing the picture. Presumably the AI

00:27:40.619 --> 00:27:43.220
knows something about the picture too and then

00:27:43.220 --> 00:27:45.920
can tell you what you're getting right and wrong

00:27:45.920 --> 00:27:49.410
and so on. This also has the option of teachers

00:27:49.410 --> 00:27:51.569
building their own chats to go with the pictures

00:27:51.569 --> 00:27:58.569
and videos. Okay, the last one is the publications.

00:27:59.190 --> 00:28:03.829
And TESOL, I think if I got it correct, has only

00:28:03.829 --> 00:28:07.329
three publications out at the moment that are

00:28:07.329 --> 00:28:11.740
sort of teacher materials in AI. Other things

00:28:11.740 --> 00:28:14.759
they have I suspect have more and more AI built

00:28:14.759 --> 00:28:17.960
into them So one of these is what they call a

00:28:17.960 --> 00:28:20.200
zip guide and they have this for various topics

00:28:20.200 --> 00:28:27.140
But one of them is AI in ESL EFL It's six pages

00:28:27.140 --> 00:28:32.279
on plasticized paper so that you can carry it

00:28:32.279 --> 00:28:36.000
around and Not worry about it getting damaged

00:28:36.000 --> 00:28:39.859
has a lot of information distilled into those

00:28:39.880 --> 00:28:46.019
six pages, has sections on increasing AI expertise,

00:28:46.599 --> 00:28:52.480
using AI for specific needs. One page is focused

00:28:52.480 --> 00:28:57.200
on prioritizing process over product, which is

00:28:57.200 --> 00:29:01.319
something I like. It's where students, for example,

00:29:01.359 --> 00:29:07.339
learn about AI limitations, ethics, and creating

00:29:07.339 --> 00:29:10.460
guidelines for student use. One thing I found

00:29:10.460 --> 00:29:13.980
interesting in the introduction, there's a list

00:29:13.980 --> 00:29:19.259
of statements about AI. The first one is something

00:29:19.259 --> 00:29:25.779
along the lines of, it's okay not to use AI if

00:29:25.779 --> 00:29:29.559
you're uncomfortable with it. That's, in fact,

00:29:29.839 --> 00:29:36.619
number one in their list of statements. Six pages

00:29:36.619 --> 00:29:42.200
already, right? Yeah, so that's, I mean, we've

00:29:42.200 --> 00:29:46.220
talked about this. It comes down to, yeah, you

00:29:46.220 --> 00:29:48.619
don't have to use AI, but you need to know about

00:29:48.619 --> 00:29:55.440
AI. Right. Because, well, we believe that anyway.

00:29:56.759 --> 00:30:01.230
So the second one is a book. called AI Enhanced

00:30:01.230 --> 00:30:04.309
ELT, Innovative Strategies to Transform Your

00:30:04.309 --> 00:30:07.690
Classroom. That one on the inside cover, it has

00:30:07.690 --> 00:30:12.089
nine best practices, covers a lot of what we

00:30:12.089 --> 00:30:20.250
do in our framework, ethics, prompting, assessment.

00:30:21.190 --> 00:30:25.009
What I really found useful in it for me is it

00:30:25.009 --> 00:30:30.390
has a large number of tools. that some of which

00:30:30.390 --> 00:30:33.349
are language specific, some of which are language

00:30:33.349 --> 00:30:35.490
learning specific, some of which are general,

00:30:35.910 --> 00:30:38.210
but how they can be adapted for language learning.

00:30:39.089 --> 00:30:42.269
And yeah, the most comprehensive list I've seen

00:30:42.269 --> 00:30:46.869
to date with annotations about them presented

00:30:46.869 --> 00:30:51.289
both as short paragraphs about each one and also

00:30:51.289 --> 00:30:56.769
in a nice table so that you can see which ones

00:30:56.769 --> 00:30:59.980
do what sorts of things. So that's something

00:30:59.980 --> 00:31:03.279
I want to get into a little more Deeply because

00:31:03.279 --> 00:31:06.319
as you know since I'm I'm not currently teaching

00:31:06.319 --> 00:31:11.119
a language class I I don't pay as much attention

00:31:11.119 --> 00:31:14.779
to this as I do the more general generated eyes

00:31:14.779 --> 00:31:22.799
and the third one is It's a box consisting of

00:31:22.799 --> 00:31:27.819
a hundred no prep activity cards for AI and these

00:31:27.819 --> 00:31:32.940
activity cards just have anything from five minutes

00:31:32.940 --> 00:31:38.460
to about 30 minute activities. You pick one out

00:31:38.460 --> 00:31:42.400
at random and it says, here's what the goal is.

00:31:42.420 --> 00:31:46.380
They have them divided by skill area and so on.

00:31:47.799 --> 00:31:51.819
For example, number 60 is called dramatic storytelling.

00:31:53.000 --> 00:31:56.549
It says, open an AI in voice mode. and then gives

00:31:56.549 --> 00:32:01.150
you a prompt, tell me a story about X. And then

00:32:01.150 --> 00:32:06.470
now tell it again in a different voice. So an

00:32:06.470 --> 00:32:09.730
angry voice, an excited voice, a sad voice. And

00:32:09.730 --> 00:32:13.710
then you have students pair up and discuss what

00:32:13.710 --> 00:32:17.470
they notice different. The goal is to get them

00:32:17.470 --> 00:32:22.670
a little more aware of how voice tone and intonation

00:32:22.670 --> 00:32:26.730
impact the meaning of something. So I think it

00:32:26.730 --> 00:32:29.670
might need a better prompt, but the fact that

00:32:29.670 --> 00:32:31.549
these things are out there, they're a good place

00:32:31.549 --> 00:32:34.470
to start because they are specific to language

00:32:34.470 --> 00:32:38.569
teaching and they've been done by people who

00:32:38.569 --> 00:32:41.130
know something about language teaching rather

00:32:41.130 --> 00:32:45.150
than by people who know technology and not something

00:32:45.150 --> 00:32:47.890
about language teaching. So I hope to see more

00:32:47.890 --> 00:32:52.829
of this in 2027. This is especially the last

00:32:52.829 --> 00:32:56.720
part. concrete materials that TESOL seems to

00:32:56.720 --> 00:33:00.240
put out there. It sounds to me like this is also

00:33:00.240 --> 00:33:03.700
relevant for other language teachers or teachers

00:33:03.700 --> 00:33:09.240
of other languages other than English. In general,

00:33:09.460 --> 00:33:12.599
coming back to the actual conference experience

00:33:12.599 --> 00:33:18.819
and participating in a conference, what can teachers

00:33:18.819 --> 00:33:22.720
do? What are the next steps? You started talking

00:33:22.720 --> 00:33:25.160
off about collaboration. How does this actually

00:33:25.160 --> 00:33:29.160
work? Yeah. Well, I mentioned my own take on

00:33:29.160 --> 00:33:33.279
this as we've gone through. I do think it's important

00:33:33.279 --> 00:33:38.519
as I did to personalize it. So I picked on things

00:33:38.519 --> 00:33:41.799
that I thought were either interesting to me

00:33:41.799 --> 00:33:45.559
intrinsically or interesting to me in trying

00:33:45.559 --> 00:33:53.430
to build my value. as a teacher educator. So

00:33:53.430 --> 00:33:57.849
what do you think? I agree. It has a lot to do

00:33:57.849 --> 00:34:00.650
with the people. And I think there's even better

00:34:00.650 --> 00:34:03.069
saying, especially in the times of artificial

00:34:03.069 --> 00:34:05.549
intelligence, it's about the people, basically.

00:34:05.970 --> 00:34:08.630
Of course, one listens to these talks or takes

00:34:08.630 --> 00:34:10.929
photographs of the slides, takes notes and thinks

00:34:10.929 --> 00:34:16.889
that that's all very good. But I think I always

00:34:16.889 --> 00:34:21.469
get the most out of Often these conversations

00:34:21.469 --> 00:34:25.070
happen during breaks or in the evenings, actually

00:34:25.070 --> 00:34:29.429
talking to people. Because once you know a little

00:34:29.429 --> 00:34:33.510
bit more about the person, it becomes embodied

00:34:33.510 --> 00:34:38.829
knowledge almost basically. Things get clearer

00:34:38.829 --> 00:34:42.710
for me in some way if I have the chance to interact

00:34:42.710 --> 00:34:47.190
with the presenter, with an author of some...

00:34:47.130 --> 00:34:52.829
tool or material or whichever one it is. Well,

00:34:52.849 --> 00:34:56.769
you've never been to TESOL, but there are lots

00:34:56.769 --> 00:35:01.329
of lots of other conferences. Maybe we should

00:35:01.329 --> 00:35:04.369
do the same thing since we're both going to Calico

00:35:04.369 --> 00:35:08.659
and Uricall this year. As I always say, my English

00:35:08.659 --> 00:35:11.599
is not good enough for TESOL, basically. That's

00:35:11.599 --> 00:35:15.260
why I didn't go. Of course, teaching German,

00:35:15.519 --> 00:35:18.900
there's kind of less reason for going to TESOL.

00:35:19.239 --> 00:35:22.719
But yeah, certainly those conferences on computer

00:35:22.719 --> 00:35:25.800
-assisted language learning that we both often

00:35:25.800 --> 00:35:29.760
attend are a good opportunity. Let's think of

00:35:29.760 --> 00:35:33.699
something. I'd like to get our slogan in here,

00:35:33.739 --> 00:35:37.840
because this also, I think, applies to conferences

00:35:37.840 --> 00:35:41.280
in some way. Let's remember, artificial intelligence

00:35:41.280 --> 00:35:45.400
is no substitute for natural ignorance. Well,

00:35:45.420 --> 00:35:49.280
indeed. Let's keep learning. Till next time.

00:35:57.480 --> 00:36:00.519
We are grateful for the support for opening AI

00:36:00.519 --> 00:36:03.199
for language learning by the Language and Applied

00:36:03.199 --> 00:36:05.679
Research Center at San Diego State University

00:36:05.679 --> 00:36:08.159
and the Southern Area International Languages

00:36:08.159 --> 00:36:11.179
Network, SAILN, which is part of the California

00:36:11.179 --> 00:36:14.280
World Languages Project. Mari Ocando Finol is

00:36:14.280 --> 00:36:17.019
the production coordinator of OAILL. Our theme

00:36:17.019 --> 00:36:20.639
music is by Tillmann Spiegl. Our editor is Chris

00:36:20.639 --> 00:36:23.820
Brown. Live conversations are moderated and promoted

00:36:23.820 --> 00:36:26.719
by me, Shahnaz Ahmadeian. Until next time.
