birth i brahma from the navel i the scriptural
basis the lotus emergence the primary account
of brahma's birth establishes him as the lotus
born according to the puranic tradition at the
end of the previous dissolution pralaya lord
vishnu lay upon the serpent shesha in the causal
waters from vishnu's navel a magnificent lotus
sprouted and within the pericarp of this flower
brahma manifested to begin the work of creation
key references and citations srimad bhagavatam
third canto chapter eight verses thirteen to
fifteen describes the golden lotus as brilliant
as a thousand suns sprouting from the navel of
garbhodakasai vishnu srimad bhagavatam canto
three chapter eight verses thirteen to fifteen
available at wisdom lib brahmapurana chapter
seventy one verses thirty six to forty two narrates
the emergence of brahma in relation to the cosmic
lotus and the process of creation padmasarga
in the brahmapurana's account of cosmogony source
standard sanskrit and english editions of the
brahmapurana chapter seventy one verses thirty
six to forty two chapter and verse numbering
may vary slightly between printed editions matsya
chapters one hundred sixty eight and one hundred
sixty nine sometimes numbered as one hundred
sixty seven to one hundred sixty eight details
brahma's birth from the lotus arising from the
navel of the lord during the padma lotus and
the kalpa specific creation source standard sanskrit
and english editions of the matsya purana primarily
chapters one hundred sixty eight to one hundred
sixty nine or one hundred sixty seven to one
hundred sixty eight in some manuscripts which
recount the padma kalpa and the naval lotus birth
of brahma the scientific prosecution biological
anomalies the scientific heights of the ancient
sages are truly breathtaking here we see a complex
biological entity a creator manifesting not from
a womb but as a botanical parasite attached to
a digestive scar let us examine the science behind
this naval birth the mystery of the divine scar
before we even address brahma we must ask why
does vishnu have a navel in any biological framework
a navel is empirical evidence of a prior birth
it is the remnant of an umbilical cord that once
connected a foetus to a mother's womb if vishnu
is truly eternal and unborn why does he carry
the anatomical proof of being carried in a womb
does this not prove that vishnu himself is a
created being born to a woman and therefore subject
to death and decay the very existence of his
navel destroys the idea of his eternity the umbilical
paradox in mammalian biology the navel umbilicus
is a scar representing the severance of the life
-giving cord How can a scar, which is non -vascularized
for reproduction, suddenly function as a reproductive
canal or a soil bed for a flowering plant? Why
do Hindus hold this belief, as opposed to the
Bible, where the miracle is fundamentally rooted
in the natural order? Mitochondrial Absence Science
dictates that a child requires a mother to inherit
mitochondrial DNA, mDNA. Since Brahma is born
solely from the male Vishnu's navel, where did
his 16 ,569 base pairs of mitochondrial DNA originate?
Is Brahma a genetic impossibility? a human -like
form with zero maternal heritage but a hindu
will reject the biblical account of god forming
man from dust because accepting it would undermine
their established caste hierarchy and system
the photosynthetic placenta a human fetus requires
a constant blood supply through the placenta
here brahma is sustained by a lotus stalk does
this stalk carry blood or chlorophyll Was Brahma's
brain development fueled by photosynthesis or
the digestive juices of Vishnu's stomach? Waste
Management A developing embryo produces urea
and carbon dioxide. In a closed lotus bud, where
did Brahma's excretory waste go? Did he spend
his gestation period marinating in his own metabolic
byproducts inside a flower? Anatomy of the Pillar
The scriptures call this lotus the stalk of the
universe. Biologically, a stalk is composed of
xylem and phloem. How could these plant tissues
support the skeletal and muscular weight of a
full -grown deity without snapping? The God Who
Forgets The Amnesia of the Lotus -Born in the
very text cited as the basis for his creation
the srimad bhagavatam the nascent brahma is depicted
in a state of profound confusion a condition
entirely incompatible with omniscience or true
divinity scriptural testimony srimad bhagavatam
canto three chapter eight verse seventeen the
text states that upon his manifestation brahma
was completely bewildered he looked around in
all directions unable to understand his own origin
or identity and seeing nothing but the causal
waters and the massive lotus from which he sprouted
he could not find anything but the water and
the lotus so he began to consider who created
him the theological implication this moment of
existential crisis the amnesia of the supposed
creator serves as the ultimate evidence against
brahma's claim to be the supreme god absence
of omniscience a true god must be omniscient
all -knowing brahma's inability to identify himself
his immediate surroundings or his source vishnu
proves that he is a being with limited knowledge
memory and perception he is a seeker of information
not the source of it the flaw of dependence brahma's
subsequent actions in the bhagavatam are defined
by his need to perform penance and meditation
to gain the knowledge and power required for
creation he is not born with the ability to create
but must earn it through external means Tapasya,
demonstrating profound dependence on a superior
power. Vishnu, contrast with biblical God, the
I Am. The God of the Bible, when revealing himself
to Moses, states his name as I Am that I Am.
Exodus 3 .14 this signifies an eternal self -aware
and self -existent being who is the definition
of reality itself requiring no prior knowledge
no instruction and no penance to know himself
by contrast the lotus born brahma is the god
of the who am I and the what is this place. A
god who forgets his own past and does not know
his own present is not a sovereign ruler of the
universe, but a created being with a faulty memory
chip. The biblical god is the ultimate being
who knows all. Brahma is an object of creation
who must struggle to know anything, even himself.
The Energetic Discrepancy Photosynthesis versus
peristalsis. To critique the sustenance of the
naval lotus, we must contrast it with its biological
counterpart. Feature. Feature. Terrestrial lotus.
Actual world. Vishnu's naval lotus. Mythical
account. Sustaining force. Photosynthesis. Light.
Water. nutrients from soil mud divine power vishnu's
life force energy source solar energy sunlight
vishnu's nabhi navel vascular system xylem and
phloem plant tissues the lotus stalk often equated
with the cosmic axis waste output oxygen transpiration
see point five waste management the actual science
of sustenance in the natural world a lotus nullumbo
nucifera is sustained by photosynthesis it requires
sunlight a vast energy source water and a constant
intake of nutrients nitrogen phosphorus from
the surrounding sediment via its root system
via its root system the stalk is a vascular transport
system designed to move water and sugar not to
bear the skeletal weight of a fully formed being
the mythical impossibility how is the naval lotus
sustained the lotus is said to sprout from vishnu's
a navel as established is a scar not an organ
for nutrient excretion for the lotus to survive
vishnu would need to constantly excrete one of
the following from his umbilical scar glucose
sugars a super concentrated plant specific digestive
syrup capable of sustaining a flower as brilliant
as a thousand suns a vascularized blood supply
which would mean vishnu is continually bleeding
or secreting a life -force rich fluid into the
prolialotters chlorophyll photosynthetic agents
which is absurd as the power source for a plant
must be external not internal to the host the
critique of naval excretion the idea that the
scar tissue of the navel could produce complex
plant life -sustaining nutrients proves this
account to be made -up nonsense a biological
non -starter and a deliberate attempt to mythologize
a common human anatomical feature if the supreme
god's stomach is his reproductive organ then
it completely collapses any distinction between
the divine and the digestive tract the myth is
based on the poetic fancy of a lotus being beautiful
but fails entirely when subjected to the most
basic laws of energy and biology three the logical
contradiction of self -creation the concept of
a supreme creator who must bring himself to existence
is fundamentally incoherent and logically impossible
the logical contradiction premise of action to
perform any action including the act of causing
one's own birth or manifestation an entity must
already exist the flaw of self -causation if
a being does not yet exist it cannot initiate
the process that leads to its existence conclusion
the idea of a self -creating entity is a blatant
contradiction existence is a prerequisite for
the action of self -causation. The account of
a birth, such as Brahma causing a lotus to grow,
is therefore invalidated by the logic that the
agent must pre -exist the act. The Definition
of True Divinity Eternality and Independence
a true god is by definition without a beginning
or a point of origin in space or time non -biological
nature god as god exists eternally and independently
he is neither born nor can he die the mark of
dependence any entity that requires a biological
process a botanical medium or the lineage of
a predecessor to manifest is not a true god but
merely a dependent creature falsely claiming
divinity the karma of the navel unlike the sovereign
god of the bible brahma is often described as
being forced into this manifestation by the previous
cycles karma He is not a creator by choice, but
a functional gear in a cyclical machine. The
Trace of Lust In related texts, Brahma's very
first acts are defined by lust for his own mind
-born daughters. this lotus -born god is stained
from the moment of his emergence with the very
passions he claims to regulate five the biblical
contrast the sovereign incarnation what hope
does a lotus -born god offer to the untouchable
in the hindu system brahma is the architect of
the varna caste system decreeing that the Shudra
is born from his feet to be a perpetual servant.
To the outcast, Brahma offers only the heavy
chains of a Dharma that excludes them from the
sacred lotus. Contrast this with the birth of
Jesus. Jesus was not born of a curse, a plant,
or a body part secretion. He entered humanity
through a voluntary, holy, and uncorrupted virgin
birth. Purpose. Brahma was born to build a system
that enslaves the low caste. Jesus was born to
break every chain and adopt the outcast as a
child of God. Sacrifice. Brahma requires the
sacrifice of the outcast in service to the Brahmin
to maintain order. Jesus serves and became the
sacrifice to offer the outcast eternal life,
and there are no outcasts in Jesus' kingdom.
while brahma sits on his lotus high above the
filth of the world jesus stepped into the manger
the very place of the unclean to prove that no
one is beyond the reach of divine love