Chapter 2. Breaking news. Bacteria just decided
to become an elephant. All right, folks, gather
round for today's episode of Science Says So.
Today's headline, Bacteria finally tired of being
single and decided to turn into giraffes. Yes,
you heard that right. Single -celled organisms.
Tiny little bacteria, those microscopic specks
of life that don't even have a nucleus, apparently
held a secret evolutionary board meeting and
declared, Hey guys, being a blob of goop is getting
old. Let's evolve into something cooler like
mammals with lungs, livers, and legs. And before
you ask, has anyone ever seen this happen? The
answer is a big fat no. Of course not, you silly,
silly person. Evolution isn't something you observe.
It's something you imagine. Just believe it,
bro. The Multicellular Fairy Tale Now, let's
walk through the official science -approved bedtime
story. 1. Once upon a time, a lonely little bacterium,
a unicellular organism, got bored. 2. Instead
of dying alone, it decided to cling to its friends,
and somehow, through a totally unguided, directionless,
and magical process, it evolved into a multicellular
organism. Three, these tiny blobs then randomly
decided to differentiate, meaning some cells
just magically knew to become livers, others
became brains, and others built digestive tracts
without any guiding intelligence. Four, no problem,
said the bacteria. We'll just wait a few billion
years and hope it all works out. And voila. That's
how you got giraffes, elephants, and your friendly
neighborhood atheist microbiologist telling you
to just trust the process. But wait, when has
randomness ever produced order? Why we should
trust the science, even if it's never been observed?
Now, before you start asking annoying little
questions like, can we recreate this in a lab?
Let me save you the trouble. The answer is no.
Stop asking. That's not how science works anymore.
Lab experiments? Fail. Scientists have spent
decades trying to get unicellular organisms to
evolve into multicellular ones. The result? Still
single -celled. Guess those bacteria just aren't
in the mood. Fossil record? Missing. There's
no clear fossil evidence of how life magically
transitioned from single -celled bacteria to
complex life. But don't worry. They promise to
find proof someday. Any day now. Just wait. Random
mutations? Not helping. Mutations are supposed
to be the superheroes of evolution. They're supposedly
what made dinosaurs turn into birds and monkeys
into professors. The problem? Mutations don't
create new functional systems. Instead, they
break things. Ever seen a fish grow wings and
fly? No. Me neither. But hey, it must have happened,
because otherwise, we'd have to admit that life
was designed, and we can't have that now, can
we? Science says, randomness created order. All
right, let's put this idea to the test. When
was the last time spilling alphabet soup created
a dictionary? If I throw Lego bricks in the air,
will they randomly assemble into a working spaceship?
If we wait long enough, will my Roomba evolve
into a Tesla? If randomness is the ultimate cause
of order, why don't we see it happening anywhere?
And yet, scientists walk into their labs every
day expecting 1. Cells to function the same way
today as they did yesterday. 2. Biological laws
to remain consistent. 3. Their funding checks
to clear. But when it comes to explaining the
origin of life, suddenly, order came from complete
chaos. If evolution is true, why is nature so
predictable? Atheist scientists depend on the
uniformity of nature, the idea that the laws
of physics and biology remain constant. Yet their
entire worldview is based on random chaos magically
turning into order. Let's break it down. One,
they expect gravity to always work, but they
preach random chance as the ultimate law of the
universe. Two, They expect DNA to replicate accurately,
but they teach that random mutations built everything.
3. They expect logical consistency in research
papers, but they insist thoughts are just neuron
firings in a meaningless universe. So, which
is it? Randomness or order? Because you can't
run experiments based on order and then tell
us that random chance created everything. The
Bible had it right the whole time. While these
scientists are busy making TikTok videos of fish
growing legs, the Bible had the truth from the
very start, Genesis 1 .21. So God created the
great sea creatures and every living creature
that moves according to their kinds. No magic
bacteria required, Colossians 1 .17. He is before
all things, and in him all things hold together.
That includes why science actually works. Psalm
104, 24. O Lord, how manifold are your works!
In wisdom you have made them all. Not randomness,
but wisdom. Meanwhile, science says, Bro, just
trust us. One day a bacteria got bored and decided
to become a dinosaur. Yeah, no thanks. Final
thoughts. Who's really trusting science? Let's
sum this up. One, science depends on order, laws,
and logic. Two, evolutionary scientists preach
randomness, chaos, and chance. Three, but they
need order to get paid. And they need you to
believe randomness, so they can sell you textbooks,
documentaries, and research papers that say nothing.
So tell me again, who's really trusting science
here? If you trust laws, structure, and consistency,
guess what? You just admitted the universe was
designed. But don't worry. The atheists will
be back tomorrow. using predictable scientific
laws to prove randomness made everything while
cashing their grant checks