Chapter 1. Breaking news. Life just randomly
happened. Scientists are now telling us that
life, yes, actual, breathing, thinking, meme
-making life just poofed into existence from
a lucky chemical soup billions of years ago.
Let's get this straight. One day there was a
puddle. That puddle was full of chemicals. and
then through a totally unexplained, never -before
-seen, but totally real process. Bam. Life happened,
and here we are using Wi -Fi to debate it. But
wait. What is abiogenesis? Abiogenesis is the
idea that life arose spontaneously from non -living
chemicals without any intelligent guidance. According
to this theory, at some point in Earth's early
history, basic chemicals somehow organized themselves
into complex molecules, which then somehow formed
self -replicating structures, which somehow became
the first primitive cells. Notice how somehow
keeps showing up? Yeah, that's a problem. This
means that at one point there were just chemicals,
and the next moment, boom, life began. No blueprints.
No programmer. No intelligence. Just raw, mindless
physics magically making life happen. But here's
the problem. Trust the science, even if it's
not science. Now, before you ask, has this ever
been observed? No. Of course not. Silly you.
Science doesn't work like that anymore. Who needs
observation when you have imagination? Abiogenesis
has been tested in labs for decades. Bro scientist,
we see you and has failed every single time.
But it must have happened because we're here.
Circular reasoning at its finest. What's more,
no scientist ever saw it. Imagine the same guy
demanding, demanding seeing and believing. As
if he sees his own memory in his closet. And
let's not forget, if you doubt it, you just don't
understand science. Why can't abiogenesis be
observed in a lab? If abiogenesis really happened
naturally on early Earth, then we should be able
to recreate it in controlled laboratory conditions,
right? Well, here's why that never works. Time
constraints. Evolutionary scientists claim it
took millions or billions of years for life to
appear. Unfortunately, no scientist has that
kind of patience. Now ask yourself, can these
millions of years be observed? Yet the atheist
in the name of science wants us to believe this
as science, but at the same time claiming that
he as an atheist believes only what is observed.
Wow! If one has to lie straight and fool people,
we can't see it today because perfect conditions
are missing. Take note, this perfect condition
assumes order to produce an output, but atheist
claims its chance, that is, randomness, produced
the output. The early Earth supposedly had just
the right mix of heat, lightning, chemical soups,
and magic to make abiogenesis happen. Yet, when
scientists try to replicate those conditions,
all they get is a mess of chemicals and zero
life. Yet, we have to believe this unobserved
reality just because our all -wise atheist says
it. But don't forget this guy will believe only
what he sees. Seeing and believing is his rule.
Intelligent intervention. Atheist scientist,
not God. Any lab experiment trying to create
life is run by highly intelligent scientists
adjusting variables, meaning it's not natural,
but guided. If intelligence is required to create
life in a lab, then how did it happen without
intelligence by random chance billions of years
ago? Self -replication is a mystery. Even if
you somehow get complex molecules to form, they
still have to start copying themselves for life
to continue. No one has ever demonstrated how
mindless chemistry makes molecules start self
-replicating without already having a functioning
system in place. So basically, abiogenesis cannot
be observed in a lab because we can't make it
happen, and when scientists do try, they need
intelligent guidance, which contradicts the whole
point. Science says, trust us, it's all random.
All right, ladies and gentlemen, gather round
for today's totally scientific thought experiment.
So we're told that life, the universe, and everything
is just one big cosmic oopsie -daisy random,
unguided accident where dirt magically turned
into brains and bacteria worked really, really
hard to turn into elephants. A motivational story,
really. But here's the kicker. The very same
scientists who preach, randomness did it, are
the same people who expect their experiments
to work every single time. Uniformity? Pfft,
who needs that? Let's talk about the uniformity
in nature problem, or what I like to call, why
atheist scientists secretly love God but won't
admit it. You see, these same people go to work
every day, walk into a lab and expect gravity
to still be gravity. No floating test tubes,
please. But wait. They want us to believe in
randomness. Atoms to behave like, well, atoms.
Because exploding labs are bad. Chemicals to
react exactly the same way they did yesterday.
Science only works if it's repeatable. Do you
see the irony here? These guys don't step into
the lab thinking, oh boy, I sure hope bacteria
evolved into an elephant overnight. No, they
expect order. predictability and structure, things
that randomness could never produce. But when
it comes to the origin of life, suddenly it's
randomness, not uniformity of nature. It was
all just chaos, bro. Trust me. Just give us more
grant money. And here's the best part. They need
you to believe this nonsense so they can keep
selling it to you in textbooks, documentaries,
and cool CGI videos of fish walking on land.
Why doesn't gravity take a day off? Let's really
push this randomness thing to its limits. 1.
Why doesn't gravity just decide to turn off on
Tuesdays? Seriously, I could use the weight loss.
Why don't atoms just wake up one morning and
go, Nah, I'm tired of being an atom. I think
I'll be a unicorn today. If randomness is king,
why do we expect science to even make sense?
If everything is just the accidental byproduct
of a meaningless explosion, why do we live in
a world of perfect mathematical precision, logical
structure, and repeatable experiments? The truth?
Because the universe was designed, not random.
They trust regularity for grant money, but preach
randomness for you to buy their books. They want
to be rich on both ends. We who learn from them
are real fools. Atheist scientists depend on
the uniformity of nature to keep their jobs,
publish their papers, and make money. But when
it comes to explaining how the universe got here,
suddenly it's, random chance guys just believe.
They don't trust randomness when mixing chemicals.
They don't trust randomness when building rockets.
They don't trust randomness when diagnosing diseases.
But when it comes to where life and intelligence
came from suddenly, they want you to believe
pure, unguided chaos made all of this happen.
Translation, shut up and believe the randomness
so we can keep making money. The Bible had it
right the whole time. While they're busy selling
you fairy tales, the Bible has had the answer
all along. Genesis 1 -1, in the beginning God
created the heavens and the earth. Not randomness,
but a creator. Colossians 1 .16 -17, by him all
things were created, and in him all things hold
together. That includes gravity, atoms, and your
brain. Hebrews 1 .3, he upholds the universe
by the word of his power. That's why your coffee
cup isn't floating away right now. Meanwhile,
pseudoscience atheist says, one day a lightning
bolt hit a puddle and made you. Yeah, no thanks.
Final thoughts. So let's sum it up. Science depends
on order, predictability, and laws that never
change. Evolutionary scientists preach that everything
started by random chaos. But they still need
uniformity to keep their jobs and get taxpayers
grant money. And they want you to believe randomness
so they can sell their nonsense through their
books. So, tell me again, who's really trusting
this kind of science to make atheists rich if
you trust order, laws, and logic? Guess what?
You just admitted the universe was designed.
But don't worry, the atheists will be back tomorrow,
using uniform scientific laws to prove randomness
caused everything, while cashing in their research
grants by believing in order. but selling us
their books based on randomness so that they
can become rich and making us fools who believe
them. So, what do you think? Is it unseen randomness
or observed order and design?