WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.180
Welcome to the psychology undergrad. Pull up

00:00:03.180 --> 00:00:05.580
a chair. I hope you brought caffeine because

00:00:05.580 --> 00:00:08.000
looking at this stack of papers on the table,

00:00:08.000 --> 00:00:11.039
we are going to need it. It is definitely a heavy

00:00:11.039 --> 00:00:13.080
load this week. I feel like every time we open

00:00:13.080 --> 00:00:15.439
the human sexuality syllabus, the reading list

00:00:15.439 --> 00:00:20.239
like just doubles. Tell me about it. Honestly,

00:00:20.760 --> 00:00:23.239
this is the module everyone in the lecture hall

00:00:23.239 --> 00:00:26.079
has been whispering about. We are finally tackling

00:00:26.079 --> 00:00:29.070
the pornography unit. But before we get into

00:00:29.070 --> 00:00:32.030
it, I have to be real with you. I was dreading

00:00:32.030 --> 00:00:34.609
this study session. I kind of expected this to

00:00:34.609 --> 00:00:38.929
be a moral panic lecture. Just a lot of finger

00:00:38.929 --> 00:00:41.429
wagging and back in my day kind of stuff. Forget

00:00:41.429 --> 00:00:44.619
that. It's such a loaded topic. We aren't here

00:00:44.619 --> 00:00:47.000
to preach. We are here to prep for the final.

00:00:47.200 --> 00:00:49.200
And if you actually look at the data we have

00:00:49.200 --> 00:00:52.859
spread out here from the 2017 pilot studies all

00:00:52.859 --> 00:00:55.880
the way to this massive frontiers in child and

00:00:55.880 --> 00:00:59.820
adolescent psychiatry paper from late 2025, the

00:00:59.820 --> 00:01:02.079
shift in the academic consensus is just, it's

00:01:02.079 --> 00:01:04.239
undeniable. This isn't really about morality

00:01:04.239 --> 00:01:06.079
in the traditional sense. It's about public health.

00:01:06.230 --> 00:01:09.370
It's wild. Okay, so to kick off this study session,

00:01:09.849 --> 00:01:12.730
let's look at the sheer scale of the issue. I

00:01:12.730 --> 00:01:14.650
highlighted this metric from the Cindy Pierce

00:01:14.650 --> 00:01:17.170
notes. This is from her TEDx material. Oh, yeah,

00:01:17.170 --> 00:01:19.390
I saw that. She breaks down the traffic stats.

00:01:20.269 --> 00:01:22.269
If you take the number of clicks on internet

00:01:22.269 --> 00:01:25.269
porn sites in a single month, just one month,

00:01:25.310 --> 00:01:28.590
it equals the traffic of Netflix, Twitter, and

00:01:28.590 --> 00:01:33.239
Amazon. Wait. Combined. No. That can't be right.

00:01:33.500 --> 00:01:36.159
Combine. Combine. Just think about the bandwidth

00:01:36.159 --> 00:01:38.879
that represents, I mean, Netflix alone is massive.

00:01:39.359 --> 00:01:42.400
Amazon is the global marketplace. Twitter is,

00:01:42.400 --> 00:01:45.560
well, the town square. And porn traffic swallows

00:01:45.560 --> 00:01:48.280
them all whole. Right. It suggests this isn't

00:01:48.280 --> 00:01:50.980
a niche vice anymore. Statistically speaking,

00:01:51.140 --> 00:01:53.920
it is the primary way a huge chunk of the human

00:01:53.920 --> 00:01:56.719
population interacts with the internet. It is

00:01:56.719 --> 00:01:58.680
the water we are swimming in. Yeah. But here

00:01:58.680 --> 00:02:01.000
is the hook. that really stopped me into, I think

00:02:01.000 --> 00:02:02.879
this is going to be on the exam. Yeah. Warren

00:02:02.879 --> 00:02:05.859
Binford, in her lecture notes, uses this phrase.

00:02:06.079 --> 00:02:07.819
Oh, I know what you're going to say. Digital

00:02:07.819 --> 00:02:09.900
castration. Yeah. I circled that twice in red.

00:02:10.000 --> 00:02:12.000
It's such an aggressive term. It sounds like

00:02:12.000 --> 00:02:13.840
sci -fi, doesn't it? Yeah. But she's talking

00:02:13.840 --> 00:02:17.259
about a very real phenomenon. We are seeing 18

00:02:17.259 --> 00:02:20.879
to 25 -year -old men, physically healthy, testosterone

00:02:20.879 --> 00:02:23.879
levels are fine, prime of their biological lives.

00:02:24.680 --> 00:02:28.240
who are unable to be aroused by real life partners.

00:02:28.300 --> 00:02:30.879
Wow. They're effectively castrated by their own

00:02:30.879 --> 00:02:33.460
consumption habits because they've rewired their

00:02:33.460 --> 00:02:36.300
arousal templates for pixels, not people. And

00:02:36.300 --> 00:02:39.259
that is the core mission of this study session,

00:02:39.259 --> 00:02:43.199
right? We have to unpack how this super normal

00:02:43.199 --> 00:02:45.599
stimulus, that's the term psychology today uses,

00:02:46.319 --> 00:02:48.500
how it interacts with the developing brain. Right.

00:02:48.639 --> 00:02:50.740
We need to figure out, is this just a bad habit?

00:02:51.300 --> 00:02:54.199
Is it an addiction or? And this is where that

00:02:54.199 --> 00:02:57.400
new 2025 research throws a curveball. Yeah. Is

00:02:57.400 --> 00:02:59.939
it actually a form of trauma? The trauma angle

00:02:59.939 --> 00:03:01.819
is heavy. I mean, I really want to push back

00:03:01.819 --> 00:03:03.620
on that when we get there, because trauma is

00:03:03.620 --> 00:03:05.340
a big word to throw around for watching videos.

00:03:05.379 --> 00:03:07.319
For sure. But let's stick to the syllabus structure

00:03:07.319 --> 00:03:10.560
for now. OK. Section one, prevalence and the

00:03:10.560 --> 00:03:13.360
new normal. What is Dad's telling us? The landscape

00:03:13.360 --> 00:03:15.360
has completely shifted from what the textbooks

00:03:15.360 --> 00:03:17.919
used to say even like 10 years ago. Totally.

00:03:18.000 --> 00:03:19.960
If you look at the Recovery Alberta notes and

00:03:19.960 --> 00:03:23.439
the Cindy Pierce material, the age of onset You

00:03:23.439 --> 00:03:26.180
know, the first exposure has just cratered. Cratered

00:03:26.180 --> 00:03:29.180
is the right word. We are seeing boys exposed

00:03:29.180 --> 00:03:32.300
around age 10 on average. 10 years old. 10. That

00:03:32.300 --> 00:03:35.280
is fourth grade. They are still trading Pokemon

00:03:35.280 --> 00:03:39.379
cards. And girls around 12 or 13. But the crucial

00:03:39.379 --> 00:03:41.979
variable here isn't just the age, it's the mechanism

00:03:41.979 --> 00:03:44.780
of delivery. Right. In previous developmental

00:03:44.780 --> 00:03:48.000
psych models, exposure happened via, like, magazines

00:03:48.000 --> 00:03:51.120
found in the woods or a stolen VHS tape. It was

00:03:51.120 --> 00:03:54.060
static, finite, and hard to access. And now?

00:03:54.280 --> 00:03:58.120
It is 90 % mobile devices. Which changes the

00:03:58.120 --> 00:04:00.719
parenting dynamic entirely. You can't monitor

00:04:00.719 --> 00:04:02.759
a screen that's four inches wide, lives in a

00:04:02.759 --> 00:04:04.539
backpack, and goes to the bathroom with them.

00:04:04.680 --> 00:04:07.439
No way. But there's this really specific mechanism

00:04:07.439 --> 00:04:09.539
in the Cindy Pierce notes about how they find

00:04:09.539 --> 00:04:12.139
it. She calls it the boobies algorithm. Right.

00:04:12.439 --> 00:04:14.780
This is critical because it just debunks the

00:04:14.780 --> 00:04:17.759
bad kid myth. We often assume kids are out there

00:04:17.759 --> 00:04:20.680
actively hunting for hardcore content. Exactly.

00:04:21.420 --> 00:04:23.860
Pierce notes that parents freak out when they

00:04:23.860 --> 00:04:26.439
see the browser history, but the entry point

00:04:26.439 --> 00:04:29.379
is usually so innocent. A 10 -year -old boy types

00:04:29.379 --> 00:04:32.319
in boobies. He doesn't use the clinical term

00:04:32.319 --> 00:04:34.879
breasts, of course not. No, and he certainly

00:04:34.879 --> 00:04:37.120
isn't being in the graphic porn terms yet. He

00:04:37.120 --> 00:04:40.560
uses a child's word. But the algorithm, it doesn't

00:04:40.560 --> 00:04:43.040
care that the user is 10. It doesn't care about

00:04:43.040 --> 00:04:46.370
innocence. It operates on one metric. Engagement.

00:04:46.850 --> 00:04:49.769
And engaging in the algorithm's code means extreme.

00:04:50.129 --> 00:04:52.550
So it sees boobies, and it says, OK, that's a

00:04:52.550 --> 00:04:54.209
start. But if I show you this graphic video,

00:04:54.629 --> 00:04:56.750
you're 400 % more likely to stay on the site.

00:04:56.850 --> 00:04:59.189
So it escalates immediately. Instantly. From

00:04:59.189 --> 00:05:02.230
a curious search to hardcore suggestions, because

00:05:02.230 --> 00:05:04.470
that is what retains the click. And it's not

00:05:04.470 --> 00:05:07.209
always even a search, is it? The CDC source with

00:05:07.209 --> 00:05:09.829
Sonya Thompson mentions this trap effect. This

00:05:09.829 --> 00:05:11.670
one really freaked me out. The pop -up trap.

00:05:11.930 --> 00:05:14.449
Yes. There's a case study in the notes of a boy

00:05:14.449 --> 00:05:16.569
named Joseph. He was nine years old. He wasn't

00:05:16.569 --> 00:05:18.949
looking for girls. He was playing a video game

00:05:18.949 --> 00:05:22.370
on a free site. A pop -up ad appeared. He clicked

00:05:22.370 --> 00:05:24.529
it thinking it was part of the game. And he was

00:05:24.529 --> 00:05:27.089
just lured in. It wasn't a search. It was a stumble.

00:05:27.850 --> 00:05:31.129
And Thompson makes this distinction between curiosity

00:05:31.129 --> 00:05:35.329
and craving. That's a key psychological distinction

00:05:35.329 --> 00:05:37.389
for us. Totally. You think it's just curiosity

00:05:37.389 --> 00:05:40.500
at first, the seeking system in the brain? But

00:05:40.500 --> 00:05:43.980
the content is so hyper stimulating that the

00:05:43.980 --> 00:05:47.279
brain gets hooked Before the kid even cognitively

00:05:47.279 --> 00:05:49.620
processes what they're seeing so it becomes a

00:05:49.620 --> 00:05:51.800
craving almost instantly Yeah, that brings us

00:05:51.800 --> 00:05:53.899
to the content itself because if I'm reading

00:05:53.899 --> 00:05:56.540
the recovery Alberta notes correctly our definitions

00:05:56.540 --> 00:05:59.560
of porn are like completely outdated how so what

00:05:59.560 --> 00:06:02.680
we consider vanilla or soft core now would have

00:06:02.680 --> 00:06:05.439
been illegal or at least deeply underground 20

00:06:05.439 --> 00:06:07.779
years ago. This is the normalization of violence

00:06:07.779 --> 00:06:11.199
aspect. The source notes that historically, hardcore

00:06:11.199 --> 00:06:14.019
meant showing genitals or actual intercourse.

00:06:14.139 --> 00:06:17.899
Right. Pretty basic stuff. Today, if you go to

00:06:17.899 --> 00:06:20.939
the front page of a tube site, hardcore involves

00:06:20.939 --> 00:06:24.600
violent anal penetration, deep oral sex to the

00:06:24.600 --> 00:06:27.720
point of vomiting. Literally gagging as a fetish.

00:06:27.819 --> 00:06:30.920
Yeah. and themes of incest and gang rape. And

00:06:30.920 --> 00:06:33.839
the terrifying part is that the source says this

00:06:33.839 --> 00:06:37.100
extreme stuff is now accepted as soft core in

00:06:37.100 --> 00:06:39.819
the mainstream. It's the default setting. The

00:06:39.819 --> 00:06:43.459
baseline for arousal has just, it's moved. We

00:06:43.459 --> 00:06:45.540
have to pause on the morality of that for a second.

00:06:46.180 --> 00:06:48.699
Even from a secular... you know, psychological

00:06:48.699 --> 00:06:51.139
perspective. What does that do to a developing

00:06:51.139 --> 00:06:53.579
moral compass? I mean, if you watch people being

00:06:53.579 --> 00:06:55.939
gagged and slapped and treated like garbage every

00:06:55.939 --> 00:06:59.100
day for five years, doesn't that shift your window

00:06:59.100 --> 00:07:02.269
of what acceptable human behavior is? It has

00:07:02.269 --> 00:07:05.050
to. It's systematic desensitization. We use that

00:07:05.050 --> 00:07:07.189
in therapy to help people get over phobias, right?

00:07:07.430 --> 00:07:08.970
You expose them to the thing they fear until

00:07:08.970 --> 00:07:11.829
they feel nothing. So here, we are exposing kids

00:07:11.829 --> 00:07:13.970
to violence and degradation. Until they feel

00:07:13.970 --> 00:07:15.970
nothing. We are essentially boiling the frog.

00:07:16.089 --> 00:07:18.629
And the parents are totally in the dark. I circled

00:07:18.629 --> 00:07:21.750
this stat. 75 % of parents think their kids haven't

00:07:21.750 --> 00:07:26.470
seen it. Versus the reality, which is over 68%.

00:07:26.600 --> 00:07:29.740
and up to 90 % in some cohorts, having seen it.

00:07:29.839 --> 00:07:32.920
That is a massive awareness gap. It is cognitive

00:07:32.920 --> 00:07:35.899
dissonance on a parental level. Denial is a powerful

00:07:35.899 --> 00:07:38.139
drug. Well, speaking of drugs, let's move to

00:07:38.139 --> 00:07:40.079
section two. We've got to put our neuropsych

00:07:40.079 --> 00:07:42.240
hats on. We need to talk about the construction

00:07:42.240 --> 00:07:44.759
zone. This is probably going to be the technical

00:07:44.759 --> 00:07:47.720
part of the exam. This is crucial. If you don't

00:07:47.720 --> 00:07:50.079
understand the adolescent brain architecture,

00:07:50.439 --> 00:07:52.920
none of this makes any sense. The psychology

00:07:52.920 --> 00:07:55.660
today, and Warren Binford notes, break this down.

00:07:56.100 --> 00:07:58.120
You have to imagine the brain as a construction

00:07:58.120 --> 00:08:00.459
site where the foreman has like walked off the

00:08:00.459 --> 00:08:02.399
job. Right. And the two main players we need

00:08:02.399 --> 00:08:05.779
to know are the prefrontal cortex, the PFC, and

00:08:05.779 --> 00:08:08.339
the limbic system. Specifically, the nucleus

00:08:08.339 --> 00:08:11.060
accumbens. Correct. So the limbic system is the

00:08:11.060 --> 00:08:13.100
primitive engine. It's the emotional brain, the

00:08:13.100 --> 00:08:16.550
reward center. In teenage the nucleus accumbens,

00:08:16.569 --> 00:08:18.689
that's the part that screams do that again when

00:08:18.689 --> 00:08:21.949
it gets dopamine, is fully mature. It's fully

00:08:21.949 --> 00:08:24.269
gassed up. Totally. It is a Ferrari engine. But

00:08:24.269 --> 00:08:26.709
the prefrontal cortex. That's the brake system.

00:08:26.810 --> 00:08:29.230
That's the rational decision -making impulse

00:08:29.230 --> 00:08:32.970
control center. And crucially, it is not finished.

00:08:33.110 --> 00:08:36.110
This is the myelination gap. Exactly. Myelination

00:08:36.110 --> 00:08:38.690
is the process of insulating the neural pathways

00:08:38.690 --> 00:08:41.149
with this fatty sheath so signals can move fast.

00:08:41.429 --> 00:08:43.970
It connects the brakes to the engine. Right.

00:08:44.110 --> 00:08:46.590
that connection to the prefrontal cortex isn't

00:08:46.590 --> 00:08:49.889
finished until the mid -20s. So adolescents have

00:08:49.889 --> 00:08:52.970
a heightened sensitivity to rewards. They feel

00:08:52.970 --> 00:08:56.730
the gas way more intensely than adults, but they

00:08:56.730 --> 00:08:59.370
have a much lower capacity to regulate the impulse.

00:08:59.769 --> 00:09:01.669
So you have a Ferrari engine, bicycle brakes,

00:09:01.710 --> 00:09:04.210
and you drive it onto a track made of ice. And

00:09:04.210 --> 00:09:07.269
then you flood that system with a supernormal

00:09:07.269 --> 00:09:10.210
stimulus. Explain that term. Supernormal stimulus.

00:09:10.370 --> 00:09:12.429
Sounds like a superpower. It's a mythology term,

00:09:12.429 --> 00:09:15.220
actually. It refers to an artificial version

00:09:15.220 --> 00:09:17.620
of a stimulus that is way more attractive than

00:09:17.620 --> 00:09:20.080
the real thing, like a bird that prefers a giant

00:09:20.080 --> 00:09:23.559
plastic egg over its own real egg. Internet porn

00:09:23.559 --> 00:09:26.200
is high speed, it's infinite, it's novel, and

00:09:26.200 --> 00:09:29.039
it's perfectly lit. It is a super normal stimulus

00:09:29.039 --> 00:09:32.659
compared to real life interaction. And when you

00:09:32.659 --> 00:09:35.179
drop that into a developing limbic system? You

00:09:35.179 --> 00:09:37.899
hijack the reward system. It's a dopamine loop.

00:09:38.240 --> 00:09:40.519
But here is the technical nuance we need to get

00:09:40.519 --> 00:09:43.269
right. It's not just that they like it. It's

00:09:43.269 --> 00:09:45.730
about receptor downregulation. Okay, walk us

00:09:45.730 --> 00:09:47.990
through that. When you flood the brain with way

00:09:47.990 --> 00:09:50.769
too much dopamine, the brain says, whoa, this

00:09:50.769 --> 00:09:54.149
is too loud. To protect itself, it actually starts

00:09:54.149 --> 00:09:56.769
to kill off dopamine receptors. Turns down the

00:09:56.769 --> 00:09:59.549
volume. It turns down the volume. That's downregulation.

00:09:59.690 --> 00:10:02.500
So now... normal things, like hanging out with

00:10:02.500 --> 00:10:04.559
friends, eating a good meal, or just regular

00:10:04.559 --> 00:10:06.940
sex they don't register. Exactly. You feel numb.

00:10:07.120 --> 00:10:09.820
The baseline is too low. The Psychology Today

00:10:09.820 --> 00:10:12.860
source compares this explicitly to drug tolerance.

00:10:13.360 --> 00:10:16.240
You need more extreme, more novel, more shocking

00:10:16.240 --> 00:10:19.539
content just to feel normal, let alone high.

00:10:19.740 --> 00:10:23.019
Which explains why they spiral from boobies to...

00:10:22.889 --> 00:10:25.730
choking and vomiting videos. They aren't necessarily

00:10:25.730 --> 00:10:28.149
deviants. They're just chasing the dopamine dragon

00:10:28.149 --> 00:10:30.470
because their receptors are fried. Precisely.

00:10:30.570 --> 00:10:32.309
And while we are on brain structure, we have

00:10:32.309 --> 00:10:35.049
to talk about pruning. This is the other side

00:10:35.049 --> 00:10:37.289
of the coin. Use it or lose it. It is the fundamental

00:10:37.289 --> 00:10:40.289
rule of adolescent brain development. The brain

00:10:40.289 --> 00:10:43.269
looks at which pathways are being used and it

00:10:43.269 --> 00:10:45.169
strengthens them. That's the myelination. And

00:10:45.169 --> 00:10:46.870
the ones that aren't being used. It marks them

00:10:46.870 --> 00:10:49.190
as waste and it just cuts them away. Pruning.

00:10:49.509 --> 00:10:52.710
So if a young man is spending two hours a day

00:10:52.700 --> 00:10:55.539
Strengthening the pathway for digital voyeurism,

00:10:55.960 --> 00:10:59.000
for solitary sexual gratification via a screen.

00:10:59.200 --> 00:11:01.700
He is building a superhighway for isolation.

00:11:02.500 --> 00:11:05.080
And meanwhile, the pathways for reading facial

00:11:05.080 --> 00:11:08.100
cues, for handling awkward silence, for emotional

00:11:08.100 --> 00:11:10.980
intimacy. Those are overgrown trails that the

00:11:10.980 --> 00:11:13.720
brain might just decide to, uh, pave over. That

00:11:13.720 --> 00:11:16.440
is the risk. You are biologically prioritizing

00:11:16.440 --> 00:11:19.100
isolation over connection. You are hardwiring

00:11:19.100 --> 00:11:21.580
the brain to be alone. And we see the physical

00:11:21.580 --> 00:11:24.009
result of that? Going back to Cindy Pierce and

00:11:24.009 --> 00:11:26.750
the fraternity guys, the porn induced erectile

00:11:26.750 --> 00:11:29.250
dysfunction. Yeah. This is the most concrete

00:11:29.250 --> 00:11:31.649
evidence of the wiring change. These are 20 -year

00:11:31.649 --> 00:11:35.029
-old men. Vascularly, they are fine. Right. But

00:11:35.029 --> 00:11:37.230
they cannot get an erection with a real woman.

00:11:37.309 --> 00:11:38.990
Because their brain doesn't recognize her as

00:11:38.990 --> 00:11:41.769
a sexual stimulus? Exactly. She doesn't have

00:11:41.769 --> 00:11:44.049
4K resolution. She doesn't have a mute button.

00:11:44.330 --> 00:11:46.529
She doesn't change position every 15 seconds.

00:11:47.309 --> 00:11:50.720
The brain has been conditioned. Pavlovian style

00:11:50.720 --> 00:11:55.059
to respond to pixels. A real person is a sensory

00:11:55.059 --> 00:11:57.799
mismatch. Totally. It's like trying to eat a

00:11:57.799 --> 00:12:00.059
raw apple after you've been living on pure high

00:12:00.059 --> 00:12:02.080
fructose corn syrup for 10 years. Apple just

00:12:02.080 --> 00:12:04.139
doesn't taste like anything. That is a perfect

00:12:04.139 --> 00:12:07.379
analogy. It's a desensitization to reality. Okay,

00:12:07.440 --> 00:12:09.399
that's the hardware. Let's shift gears to section

00:12:09.399 --> 00:12:13.049
three. Social psychology, because the brain isn't

00:12:13.049 --> 00:12:16.049
just wiring itself in a vacuum. It's downloading

00:12:16.049 --> 00:12:19.769
software, the social scripts. Cindy Pierce has

00:12:19.769 --> 00:12:22.470
this term compliance training. This is where

00:12:22.470 --> 00:12:24.549
the sociology intersects with the psychology.

00:12:24.940 --> 00:12:27.279
Pierce argues that society already socializes

00:12:27.279 --> 00:12:29.799
girls to be nice, to be assertive, but not a

00:12:29.799 --> 00:12:32.200
bitch. And then porn comes in and reinforces

00:12:32.200 --> 00:12:34.820
a very specific script. Women are there to provide

00:12:34.820 --> 00:12:37.460
services. They endure pain. They are compliant.

00:12:37.620 --> 00:12:39.779
But wait, isn't that just like a feminist critique?

00:12:39.960 --> 00:12:42.179
Is there actual data backing up that this changes

00:12:42.179 --> 00:12:45.120
how people think? Well, look at the orgasm gap

00:12:45.120 --> 00:12:48.379
data. The script in porn is usually insertion,

00:12:48.620 --> 00:12:50.480
aggressive thrusting, and then the woman has

00:12:50.480 --> 00:12:53.340
an earth shattering orgasm within minutes. It

00:12:53.340 --> 00:12:56.190
looks easy. It looks mechanical. But the biological

00:12:56.190 --> 00:12:59.230
reality is that 70 % of women do not climax from

00:12:59.230 --> 00:13:02.370
penetration alone. The anatomy of the clitoris,

00:13:02.509 --> 00:13:05.750
which Cindy Pierce notes has 8 ,000 nerve endings,

00:13:06.570 --> 00:13:09.669
is often just ignored in mainstream porns groups

00:13:09.669 --> 00:13:11.769
because it's not visual enough for the camera.

00:13:12.169 --> 00:13:14.470
So you have young women watching this thinking,

00:13:14.470 --> 00:13:17.149
I'm supposed to orgasm just from this piston

00:13:17.149 --> 00:13:19.850
action. And when they don't, they think they're

00:13:19.850 --> 00:13:22.929
broken. And many admit to faking it to please

00:13:22.929 --> 00:13:25.149
their partner, which just reinforces the bad

00:13:25.149 --> 00:13:27.450
script. It's a feedback loop of misinformation.

00:13:27.769 --> 00:13:29.549
So the boys think they're doing it right because

00:13:29.549 --> 00:13:31.629
the porn and the faking tells them so. Exactly.

00:13:31.750 --> 00:13:33.669
Speaking of boys getting the wrong data, I laughed

00:13:33.669 --> 00:13:35.350
out loud at the penis size part of the notes.

00:13:35.950 --> 00:13:38.929
But then I realized how sad it is. The body dysmorphia

00:13:38.929 --> 00:13:41.909
is massive. The average penis size in pornography

00:13:41.909 --> 00:13:44.870
is around eight inches. Which is, statistically,

00:13:45.230 --> 00:13:48.500
a unicorn. It is a massive statistical outlier,

00:13:48.820 --> 00:13:52.580
but the average real -world penis is 5 .1 inches.

00:13:52.879 --> 00:13:54.720
And Cindy Pierce tells that story about the fraternity

00:13:54.720 --> 00:13:57.639
brothers. She reveals this stat to them that

00:13:57.639 --> 00:14:00.779
5 .1 is normal, and they literally jump up and

00:14:00.779 --> 00:14:02.919
high -five each other. Think about the psychology

00:14:02.919 --> 00:14:05.360
of that moment. They have been carrying the secret

00:14:05.360 --> 00:14:08.220
shame, thinking they are inadequate because their

00:14:08.220 --> 00:14:10.679
reference point is a fictionalized, surgically

00:14:10.679 --> 00:14:13.860
altered camera angle tricked industry standard.

00:14:14.080 --> 00:14:16.220
It's just heartbreaking that they needed a lady

00:14:16.220 --> 00:14:19.080
in her 40s to come into a frat house to tell

00:14:19.080 --> 00:14:21.399
them they are normal. It shows how much silence

00:14:21.399 --> 00:14:23.620
there is around this. But there is a darker side

00:14:23.620 --> 00:14:25.600
to these social scripts too. We can't just talk

00:14:25.600 --> 00:14:27.559
about insecurity. We have to talk about Warren

00:14:27.559 --> 00:14:30.360
Binford's points on hostile sexism. Yeah, this

00:14:30.360 --> 00:14:32.120
isn't just about feeling bad about yourself.

00:14:32.279 --> 00:14:34.659
This is about how they view women. The research

00:14:34.659 --> 00:14:36.700
suggests that heavy porn consumption in males

00:14:36.700 --> 00:14:39.299
is linked to what they call regressive attitudes.

00:14:39.779 --> 00:14:42.179
They start seeing women less as equals and more

00:14:42.179 --> 00:14:45.200
as objects or or even threats to their dominance.

00:14:45.600 --> 00:14:48.100
So if your primary teacher of sexuality shows

00:14:48.100 --> 00:14:50.590
women enjoying degradation. It becomes harder

00:14:50.590 --> 00:14:52.909
to respect female authority in the workplace

00:14:52.909 --> 00:14:55.929
or the classroom. And that bleeds into the bystander

00:14:55.929 --> 00:14:58.549
apathy point Binford makes. This really scared

00:14:58.549 --> 00:15:01.750
me. It should. There is a correlation between

00:15:01.750 --> 00:15:05.710
heavy porn use in both men and women, actually.

00:15:05.750 --> 00:15:08.610
And women do. Yeah, in both men and women. And

00:15:08.610 --> 00:15:11.389
a decreased likelihood of intervening in a sexual

00:15:11.389 --> 00:15:13.669
assault. Hold on. Explain the mechanism there.

00:15:14.230 --> 00:15:16.590
Why would watching porn make you less likely

00:15:16.590 --> 00:15:20.909
to help someone? The theory is normative desensitization.

00:15:21.740 --> 00:15:25.480
If you consume media where non -consensual or

00:15:25.480 --> 00:15:28.519
pseudo -consensual behavior is the norm, where

00:15:28.519 --> 00:15:31.740
women saying no eventually means yes, it just

00:15:31.740 --> 00:15:33.759
numbs your radar. You become a passive witness.

00:15:34.000 --> 00:15:36.019
Exactly. You see something in real life that

00:15:36.019 --> 00:15:38.279
looks like harassment, but your brain has seen

00:15:38.279 --> 00:15:40.379
thousands of hours of that being presented as

00:15:40.379 --> 00:15:42.539
entertainment so the alarm bells don't ring.

00:15:42.679 --> 00:15:45.519
So we are morally numbing ourselves to real -world

00:15:45.519 --> 00:15:48.500
suffering. We are training ourselves to be spectators

00:15:48.500 --> 00:15:51.190
of abuse. That's a good way to put it. That is

00:15:51.190 --> 00:15:53.570
heavy. It is. It's the blurring of the line between

00:15:53.570 --> 00:15:56.009
violence and sex. Okay, speaking of heavy, we

00:15:56.009 --> 00:15:59.389
need to get to the new stuff. Section four. Advanced

00:15:59.389 --> 00:16:03.289
Theory. This is the 2025 paper from Frontiers

00:16:03.289 --> 00:16:05.730
in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. This is the

00:16:05.730 --> 00:16:07.850
centerpiece of the new curriculum. And I have

00:16:07.850 --> 00:16:09.389
to be honest, when I first read the abstract,

00:16:09.549 --> 00:16:13.370
I was skeptical. They're proposing we view early

00:16:13.370 --> 00:16:16.570
porn exposure not as a habit, but as a form of

00:16:16.570 --> 00:16:20.139
trauma. Capital T trauma. Yes. Capital T trauma.

00:16:20.320 --> 00:16:23.259
I had the same reaction. Usually trauma is reserved

00:16:23.259 --> 00:16:27.519
for, you know, war zones, physical abuse or severe

00:16:27.519 --> 00:16:29.679
neglect. It feels like we might be watering down

00:16:29.679 --> 00:16:31.539
the definition. Exactly. Are we just being dramatic?

00:16:31.580 --> 00:16:33.480
But then you look at their methodology. They

00:16:33.480 --> 00:16:36.019
are comparing the neurological footprint of early

00:16:36.019 --> 00:16:39.679
porn exposure to the ACEs framework adverse childhood

00:16:39.679 --> 00:16:42.299
experiences. Right. And they argue that trauma

00:16:42.299 --> 00:16:45.299
is defined as an event that exceeds an individual's

00:16:45.299 --> 00:16:48.159
internal resources to cope. Okay, that definition

00:16:48.159 --> 00:16:50.340
I can work with. So if a child sees violent,

00:16:50.480 --> 00:16:53.139
hardcore sex, they cannot cognitively process

00:16:53.139 --> 00:16:54.919
it. They don't have the files in their brain

00:16:54.919 --> 00:16:57.120
to sort that information. It creates a state

00:16:57.120 --> 00:16:59.720
of shock and overwhelming arousal that the system

00:16:59.720 --> 00:17:02.320
just can't handle. And the paper makes this fascinating

00:17:02.320 --> 00:17:05.140
distinction between the bonding system and the

00:17:05.140 --> 00:17:07.880
sexual system. Right. This is key. In a healthy

00:17:07.880 --> 00:17:11.769
development, the bonding system love Trust safety

00:17:11.769 --> 00:17:14.450
develops first. The sexual system comes online

00:17:14.450 --> 00:17:17.130
later, during puberty, and integrates into the

00:17:17.130 --> 00:17:19.910
bonding system. But porn trauma flips the script.

00:17:20.049 --> 00:17:22.170
It attacks the developing sexual system before

00:17:22.170 --> 00:17:25.190
the bonding system is ready. It introduces the

00:17:25.190 --> 00:17:28.230
erotization of violence before the child understands

00:17:28.230 --> 00:17:31.710
love or consent. It pairs arousal with degradation.

00:17:32.029 --> 00:17:34.569
And the paper applies the classic trauma responses.

00:17:34.750 --> 00:17:38.720
Fight. flight dissociation, specifically to porn

00:17:38.720 --> 00:17:40.900
consumers. Let's walk through those because this

00:17:40.900 --> 00:17:43.059
helps explain the behaviors we see on campus.

00:17:43.119 --> 00:17:45.579
Good idea. What does flight look like here? Flight

00:17:45.579 --> 00:17:48.490
is usually about escaping a threat. Here, the

00:17:48.490 --> 00:17:51.089
threat is the complexity of the real world. So

00:17:51.089 --> 00:17:54.069
flight manifests as disconnecting, social isolation,

00:17:54.430 --> 00:17:56.430
depression. So the addiction itself becomes the

00:17:56.430 --> 00:17:58.450
escape. Exactly. The addiction to the screen

00:17:58.450 --> 00:18:01.430
becomes the bunker. They are fleeing reality

00:18:01.430 --> 00:18:03.490
into the digital world because the real world

00:18:03.490 --> 00:18:05.950
feels too demanding or scary compared to the

00:18:05.950 --> 00:18:08.789
easy, reliable reward of the screen. OK. And

00:18:08.789 --> 00:18:11.470
fight. This seems like the one that leads to

00:18:11.470 --> 00:18:13.410
the hostile sexism we talked about. Exactly.

00:18:13.930 --> 00:18:16.750
Fight manifests as identifying with the aggressor.

00:18:16.990 --> 00:18:20.430
To avoid feeling humiliated or weak, which is

00:18:20.430 --> 00:18:22.490
how the child felt when they first saw the scary

00:18:22.490 --> 00:18:25.690
content, they adopt the persona of the dominant

00:18:25.690 --> 00:18:28.049
performer. And that leads to? It can lead to

00:18:28.049 --> 00:18:31.029
sexual coercion, dominant behaviors, or antisocial

00:18:31.029 --> 00:18:34.309
actions. They are trying to regain control by

00:18:34.309 --> 00:18:37.789
becoming the perpetrator. And dissociation. This

00:18:37.789 --> 00:18:40.430
one seems particularly relevant for girls or

00:18:40.430 --> 00:18:43.289
victims of what the paper calls re -victimization.

00:18:43.650 --> 00:18:46.269
Dissociation is the freeze response. It's mentally

00:18:46.269 --> 00:18:49.190
leaving the room. The paper suggests that exposure

00:18:49.190 --> 00:18:51.930
to degrading content can teach a child, especially

00:18:51.930 --> 00:18:55.009
a girl, that their role is to surrender. So during

00:18:55.009 --> 00:18:57.450
sex, they dissociate. They check out. Starfishing.

00:18:57.609 --> 00:18:59.670
Right. And this makes them compliant, which fits

00:18:59.670 --> 00:19:02.029
the porn script, but it also makes them incredibly

00:19:02.029 --> 00:19:04.869
vulnerable to abuse because they aren't present

00:19:04.869 --> 00:19:08.289
to assert boundaries. to turn themselves into

00:19:08.289 --> 00:19:10.670
objects. That is devastating. It's not just learning

00:19:10.670 --> 00:19:13.829
bad tricks, it's fundamentally breaking the mechanism

00:19:13.829 --> 00:19:16.410
of self -protection. It's a staining of the psyche

00:19:16.410 --> 00:19:19.549
if we want to get philosophical. Even using secular

00:19:19.549 --> 00:19:22.450
terms, it's a loss of innocence. You are exposing

00:19:22.450 --> 00:19:24.829
a child to adult degradation before they have

00:19:24.829 --> 00:19:27.069
a self -concept. We have to talk about the legal

00:19:27.069 --> 00:19:30.190
side of this because if it's trauma, if it's

00:19:30.190 --> 00:19:33.529
actual psychological damage, why is it so accessible?

00:19:34.089 --> 00:19:38.200
Section 5. Law and Ethics. We have the Canadian

00:19:38.200 --> 00:19:40.559
context from the Justice Department notes. Right.

00:19:40.819 --> 00:19:43.640
So legally, the age of consent in Canada is 16.

00:19:43.740 --> 00:19:45.680
That's the baseline. But there are exceptions.

00:19:45.920 --> 00:19:47.900
And this always confuses people on the exams.

00:19:48.440 --> 00:19:50.339
The close -in -age exception. It's important

00:19:50.339 --> 00:19:53.160
nuance. A 14 -year -old can legally be with a

00:19:53.160 --> 00:19:55.259
16 -year -old because the gap is less than five

00:19:55.259 --> 00:19:58.529
years. The law recognizes that peers exploring

00:19:58.529 --> 00:20:00.869
sexuality is different from an adult exploiting

00:20:00.869 --> 00:20:03.170
a child. Right. No exploitation, no position

00:20:03.170 --> 00:20:05.990
of trust. Exactly. But the definition of child

00:20:05.990 --> 00:20:08.529
pornography is broader than people think. It's

00:20:08.529 --> 00:20:10.869
not just photos. It includes written or audio

00:20:10.869 --> 00:20:13.210
material that advocates sexual activity with

00:20:13.210 --> 00:20:15.890
minors. So a story about it counts? Potentially,

00:20:16.109 --> 00:20:18.430
yes. The law is trying to create a hard boundary.

00:20:18.829 --> 00:20:20.960
But then we have the regulation debate. Warren

00:20:20.960 --> 00:20:23.700
Binford brings up this uniquely American but

00:20:23.700 --> 00:20:26.759
globally relevant tension. She says Americans

00:20:26.759 --> 00:20:30.180
love sex, guns, and money. And freedom of speech.

00:20:30.359 --> 00:20:33.339
Right. And the argument is often made that regulating

00:20:33.339 --> 00:20:36.220
the internet infringes on speech. But Binford

00:20:36.220 --> 00:20:38.640
pushes back hard. She asks a question that I

00:20:38.640 --> 00:20:41.119
think we need to wrestle with. What's that? Should

00:20:41.119 --> 00:20:44.460
the... freedom of speech argument protect a hundred

00:20:44.460 --> 00:20:47.559
billion dollar industry that is actively exploiting

00:20:47.559 --> 00:20:50.200
children's developing brains. She calls for treating

00:20:50.200 --> 00:20:52.380
it like a utility, right? It's like we regulate

00:20:52.380 --> 00:20:55.240
water. You can't pump sewage into the tap water

00:20:55.240 --> 00:20:57.500
and say, hey, freedom of fluids. Exactly. We

00:20:57.500 --> 00:20:59.799
regulate electricity. Why don't we regulate the

00:20:59.799 --> 00:21:01.579
Internet so it doesn't have hazardous material

00:21:01.579 --> 00:21:04.460
for kids? Precisely. She wants age verification

00:21:04.460 --> 00:21:07.079
that actually works because right now the Click

00:21:07.079 --> 00:21:10.220
here if you are 18 button is a joke. It's not

00:21:10.220 --> 00:21:12.440
a barrier, it's speed bump. It's barely a speed

00:21:12.440 --> 00:21:15.259
bump. It's a welcome mat. It effectively transfers

00:21:15.259 --> 00:21:17.440
liability to the user. Well, you lied, so it's

00:21:17.440 --> 00:21:20.039
not our fault. Which is, yeah. And the legal

00:21:20.039 --> 00:21:22.599
system is lagging so far behind the technology.

00:21:23.099 --> 00:21:25.839
We are trying to apply 20th century laws to a

00:21:25.839 --> 00:21:29.039
21st century super stimulus. OK, we have been

00:21:29.039 --> 00:21:31.779
pretty dark for this whole session. My cortisol

00:21:31.779 --> 00:21:34.579
levels are spiking. I feel you. Let's move to

00:21:34.579 --> 00:21:38.539
section six. Applied psychology, interventions

00:21:38.539 --> 00:21:41.750
and hope. Please tell me there is hope. There

00:21:41.750 --> 00:21:43.970
is absolutely hope, and it goes back to the brain

00:21:43.970 --> 00:21:46.990
science we started with. Neuroplasticity. The

00:21:46.990 --> 00:21:50.690
brain is plastic. It can change. Exactly. Neuroplasticity

00:21:50.690 --> 00:21:53.490
cuts both ways. Just as the brain rewired itself

00:21:53.490 --> 00:21:55.730
to get addicted to porn, it can rewire itself

00:21:55.730 --> 00:21:58.609
back. The synapses that are pruned can't necessarily

00:21:58.609 --> 00:22:01.529
grow back instantly, but new pathways can be

00:22:01.529 --> 00:22:03.529
formed. Cindy Pierce has that great case study

00:22:03.529 --> 00:22:05.589
about the detox. The fraternity brother. This

00:22:05.589 --> 00:22:07.309
is a great anecdotal evidence point. He quit

00:22:07.309 --> 00:22:09.269
porn for six months. Cold turkey. You have the

00:22:09.269 --> 00:22:11.500
result? His erectile dysfunction. disappeared

00:22:11.500 --> 00:22:14.039
his depression lifted and and this is the most

00:22:14.039 --> 00:22:16.819
interesting part his fantasy highlight reel changed

00:22:16.819 --> 00:22:19.539
he told Pierce that he stopped fantasizing about

00:22:19.539 --> 00:22:22.220
the violent aggressive stuff and started fantasizing

00:22:22.220 --> 00:22:25.599
about connection and real intimacy again he detoxed

00:22:25.599 --> 00:22:28.140
his brain he lowered his tolerance threshold

00:22:28.140 --> 00:22:31.259
he did But there is a warning here. Another student

00:22:31.259 --> 00:22:33.640
in the study only quit for two months. And when

00:22:33.640 --> 00:22:36.599
he went back to it, thinking he was cured, the

00:22:36.599 --> 00:22:39.339
symptoms crept back almost immediately. So it's

00:22:39.339 --> 00:22:41.740
not a quick fix. It's a lifestyle change. It

00:22:41.740 --> 00:22:43.839
requires long -term maintenance. Exactly. It's

00:22:43.839 --> 00:22:45.740
like getting in shape. You can't go to the gym

00:22:45.740 --> 00:22:47.940
for two months and then expect to stay fit while

00:22:47.940 --> 00:22:50.460
eating junk food for the rest of the year. The

00:22:50.460 --> 00:22:53.519
brain is an organ. It responds to what you feed

00:22:53.519 --> 00:22:55.640
it. So that's the intervention for the user.

00:22:55.839 --> 00:22:58.460
What about prevention? We need to talk about

00:22:58.460 --> 00:23:01.559
communication strategies. Because clearly, whatever

00:23:01.559 --> 00:23:04.480
parents are doing now isn't working. The experts,

00:23:04.799 --> 00:23:07.380
Pierce, Binford, all of them, agree on one thing.

00:23:07.700 --> 00:23:11.180
The talk is dead. You mean the one big birds

00:23:11.180 --> 00:23:13.259
and bees speech where the dad sweats and the

00:23:13.259 --> 00:23:15.200
kid looks at the floor? Right. That doesn't work.

00:23:15.299 --> 00:23:17.420
It's too late and it's too awkward. It needs

00:23:17.420 --> 00:23:19.519
to be a continuous conversation and it needs

00:23:19.519 --> 00:23:22.960
to start early. How early? Pierre suggests using

00:23:22.960 --> 00:23:26.440
anatomical names penis, vulva, by age three.

00:23:26.579 --> 00:23:29.079
Get rid of the shame. Exactly. If you can't say

00:23:29.079 --> 00:23:31.160
the words, you can't talk about the problem.

00:23:31.619 --> 00:23:34.339
If a kid only knows the word peepee, they aren't

00:23:34.339 --> 00:23:36.380
equipped to talk about sexual boundaries. That

00:23:36.380 --> 00:23:39.059
makes sense. And I love the fire drill approach

00:23:39.059 --> 00:23:41.599
she mentions. Oh, this is practical gold. Tell

00:23:41.599 --> 00:23:44.079
us about the fire drill. You know how we do fire

00:23:44.079 --> 00:23:46.200
drills so kids know what to do before there is

00:23:46.200 --> 00:23:48.259
smoke. Yeah. You do the same for the internet.

00:23:48.740 --> 00:23:50.519
You tell your kids before they see anything,

00:23:50.640 --> 00:23:52.819
you say, hey, the internet is big and weird.

00:23:52.940 --> 00:23:55.200
If you see something naked or scary or gross

00:23:55.200 --> 00:23:57.359
on the screen, come tell me. And the important

00:23:57.359 --> 00:23:59.460
part. You will not be in trouble. We will just

00:23:59.460 --> 00:24:02.420
fix it. That you will not be in trouble part

00:24:02.420 --> 00:24:05.079
is key. Yeah. Because if the kid thinks they'll

00:24:05.079 --> 00:24:08.000
lose their iPad or that mom will be mad. They

00:24:08.000 --> 00:24:09.779
will hide it. And if they hide it, the shame

00:24:09.779 --> 00:24:12.599
grows. And shame is the fertilizer for addiction.

00:24:12.880 --> 00:24:15.900
You have to be a safe harbor. And finally, porn

00:24:15.900 --> 00:24:18.660
literacy. This is what we're doing right now,

00:24:18.759 --> 00:24:22.000
basically. It is. We don't just ban it. We explain

00:24:22.000 --> 00:24:24.470
it. We explain that these are actors, there is

00:24:24.470 --> 00:24:27.269
lighting, there is editing, that the women are

00:24:27.269 --> 00:24:30.390
often in pain but acting like they aren't. Deconstruct

00:24:30.390 --> 00:24:33.170
the media. Yes. If a kid can look at a video

00:24:33.170 --> 00:24:35.809
and say, that's fake, that's acting, that's not

00:24:35.809 --> 00:24:38.549
real life, they are inoculated against the worst

00:24:38.549 --> 00:24:40.609
effects. They can critically analyze it rather

00:24:40.609 --> 00:24:43.490
than absorbing it as truth. It's like showing

00:24:43.490 --> 00:24:45.150
them the behind the scenes of a horror movie

00:24:45.150 --> 00:24:46.829
so they aren't scared of the monster anymore.

00:24:46.950 --> 00:24:49.529
Look, it's just a guy in a rubber suit. Exactly.

00:24:50.180 --> 00:24:52.700
demystify it, take away its power. All right,

00:24:52.779 --> 00:24:55.660
class, let's wrap this up. We have covered a

00:24:55.660 --> 00:24:59.279
lot. We have. We went from the dopamine -fueled

00:24:59.279 --> 00:25:01.940
adolescent brain rushing on gas with no breaks

00:25:01.940 --> 00:25:04.880
to the social scripts of sexism and compliance,

00:25:05.339 --> 00:25:07.900
all the way to the potential trauma of early

00:25:07.900 --> 00:25:11.279
exposure. And the digital castration of a generation.

00:25:11.319 --> 00:25:14.039
Yeah. It's a lot to process. My brain is definitely

00:25:14.039 --> 00:25:17.339
full. But we promised an exam question, a final

00:25:17.339 --> 00:25:19.299
provocative thought to leave you with. Right.

00:25:19.400 --> 00:25:21.960
So here is the question I want you to mull over.

00:25:22.400 --> 00:25:26.339
If we accept the core tenet of biology and psychology,

00:25:26.680 --> 00:25:29.400
that the organism is shaped by its environment.

00:25:29.559 --> 00:25:31.880
Nature and nurture. Exactly. If the environment

00:25:31.880 --> 00:25:34.519
shapes the organism, then we have to ask, what

00:25:34.519 --> 00:25:36.960
kind of human being is inevitably designed by

00:25:36.960 --> 00:25:39.200
an environment where the primary sexual teacher

00:25:39.200 --> 00:25:42.240
is an algorithm that rewards extreme violence?

00:25:42.359 --> 00:25:45.559
Wow. If the input is dehumanization, can the

00:25:45.559 --> 00:25:48.259
output be anything other than a dehumanized society?

00:25:48.509 --> 00:25:50.849
That is a terrifying question. Yeah. But one

00:25:50.849 --> 00:25:53.670
we have to answer. It's the question of our generation.

00:25:53.789 --> 00:25:56.089
All right. I need to go touch some grass. Class

00:25:56.089 --> 00:25:57.750
dismissed. Good luck with the reading. See you

00:25:57.750 --> 00:25:58.670
next semester. See you then.
