WEBVTT

00:00:00.560 --> 00:00:06.379
Hello! In The Crown of Aragon, 639 years ago,

00:00:06.900 --> 00:00:13.619
it was December 27th, 1387. My name is Jonathan

00:00:13.619 --> 00:00:17.300
Seyfried, I'm a PhD candidate in history at the

00:00:17.300 --> 00:00:21.260
University of New Mexico, and this is The Historian's

00:00:21.260 --> 00:00:25.960
Notebook, a podcast about how history gets made.

00:00:26.800 --> 00:00:31.059
Season one is titled Molt Cara Companyona. we're

00:00:31.059 --> 00:00:34.020
looking at a document from each day of the first

00:00:34.020 --> 00:00:38.780
year of the reign of King Joan I of Aragon and

00:00:38.780 --> 00:00:43.240
Queen Violant de Bar. Let's begin today's

00:00:43.240 --> 00:01:11.519
document. I gotta tell you, as I was looking

00:01:11.519 --> 00:01:17.040
through the registers of the letters of Joan

00:01:17.040 --> 00:01:23.579
and Violant for the beginning of 1387, I didn't

00:01:23.579 --> 00:01:30.760
expect to luck out in the way that I did. And

00:01:30.760 --> 00:01:38.049
what I mean is that right away on December 26th

00:01:38.049 --> 00:01:44.189
and December 27th, I found a pairing of letters

00:01:44.189 --> 00:01:49.090
from Joann and Violent on the same subject. And

00:01:49.090 --> 00:01:53.390
maybe it wasn't luck at all. Maybe they're just

00:01:53.390 --> 00:01:56.390
constantly doing this. What am I talking about?

00:01:56.409 --> 00:02:00.549
I'm talking about how they would work in tandem

00:02:00.549 --> 00:02:06.340
on particular issues Joan would send a letter,

00:02:07.019 --> 00:02:09.860
and then Violant would send a letter to the

00:02:09.860 --> 00:02:14.039
same recipient on the same subject. Maybe this

00:02:14.039 --> 00:02:20.639
was standard practice? Maybe other couples did

00:02:20.639 --> 00:02:25.439
this? Elite couples in royal families? I don't

00:02:25.439 --> 00:02:30.419
know, but I will say that I looked very, very

00:02:30.419 --> 00:02:33.659
closely at an instance of this later on in their

00:02:33.659 --> 00:02:39.159
reign, an episode that took place in 1393. And

00:02:39.159 --> 00:02:45.560
it was just very interesting to me in that case,

00:02:45.840 --> 00:02:49.180
how Joan and Violant were working together,

00:02:49.180 --> 00:02:54.599
advocating on a particular issue. So today's

00:02:54.599 --> 00:02:58.949
document, what we're going to see is that Violante

00:02:58.949 --> 00:03:05.110
is writing a letter to Juan Fernandez de Heredia,

00:03:05.550 --> 00:03:09.490
the master of Rhodes, the same person who was

00:03:09.490 --> 00:03:11.229
the recipient of the letter we were focusing

00:03:11.229 --> 00:03:15.550
on yesterday. And the language of this letter

00:03:15.550 --> 00:03:21.810
is nearly identical to what Joan had written.

00:03:22.949 --> 00:03:29.919
So a day passes. And we have this letter from

00:03:29.919 --> 00:03:36.599
Violante also advocating for Bernardo Maloll to

00:03:36.599 --> 00:03:41.180
get the new job in some monastery somewhere.

00:03:42.919 --> 00:03:48.479
And the descriptors that Violant assigns to

00:03:48.479 --> 00:03:52.539
Maloll are pretty much the same. It's not like

00:03:52.539 --> 00:03:56.199
a word -for -word copy. There's kind of different

00:03:56.199 --> 00:03:59.879
choices made about how to exactly phrase it.

00:04:00.039 --> 00:04:04.259
But the meaning is really identical. And also

00:04:04.259 --> 00:04:07.280
the length of the letter is almost identical

00:04:07.280 --> 00:04:11.120
to the one that Joan had written the day before.

00:04:11.939 --> 00:04:15.300
So why aren't they done at the same time? Why

00:04:15.300 --> 00:04:19.459
is one dated a day before the other? Is this

00:04:19.689 --> 00:04:23.930
an intentional thing so that Joan's letter arrives

00:04:23.930 --> 00:04:28.689
first and that, you know, there's a statement

00:04:28.689 --> 00:04:34.069
here about sort of the proper order in which

00:04:34.069 --> 00:04:37.370
the letters should be written. The person with

00:04:37.370 --> 00:04:42.649
more power, the Duke versus the person with presumably

00:04:42.649 --> 00:04:47.870
lesser power, the Duchess. It's possible. I do

00:04:47.870 --> 00:04:51.730
not know enough to answer that question. So

00:04:51.730 --> 00:04:58.910
this really gets into some other questions that

00:04:58.910 --> 00:05:02.569
you might have about the routine of the royal

00:05:02.569 --> 00:05:08.649
chancery. What was going on that produced the

00:05:08.649 --> 00:05:13.120
documents that we have to look at today? You may have gathered

00:05:13.120 --> 00:05:16.620
from my explanation yesterday that this is not

00:05:16.620 --> 00:05:19.199
in their handwriting. What we're looking at is

00:05:19.199 --> 00:05:24.220
not in the handwriting of the sender, for the

00:05:24.220 --> 00:05:27.139
most part. I mean, I think I could probably safely

00:05:27.139 --> 00:05:33.600
say that 99 % of the outgoing letters that we're

00:05:33.600 --> 00:05:37.160
looking at in the archive of the Crown of Aragon

00:05:37.160 --> 00:05:40.139
for this time and place, you know, this general

00:05:40.139 --> 00:05:45.509
time and place, you know, their copies, their

00:05:45.509 --> 00:05:49.350
copies of outgoing letters, and I would say that

00:05:49.350 --> 00:05:55.269
really you can count on the idea that the scribes

00:05:55.269 --> 00:05:58.449
were writing down the originals of the outgoing

00:05:58.449 --> 00:06:03.009
letters also as the person was dictating to them

00:06:03.009 --> 00:06:06.949
what should be said. And furthermore, I would

00:06:06.949 --> 00:06:11.269
say that it is definitely possible. I think that

00:06:11.269 --> 00:06:13.910
you really have to get into a close reading to

00:06:13.910 --> 00:06:19.110
know this next thing with any kind of definitive

00:06:19.110 --> 00:06:25.730
measure, but it's possible that the person who's

00:06:25.730 --> 00:06:29.629
responsible for the letter, the powerful person,

00:06:29.810 --> 00:06:33.050
the duke, the duchess, the king, the queen, they're

00:06:33.050 --> 00:06:37.399
telling the scribe the topic. of the letter and

00:06:37.399 --> 00:06:42.100
what they want communicated. And the scribe is

00:06:42.100 --> 00:06:45.519
basically composing the whole thing, bringing

00:06:45.519 --> 00:06:50.360
it to that authority figure and saying, is this

00:06:50.360 --> 00:06:52.860
good? And the authority figure says, yep, that's

00:06:52.860 --> 00:06:58.480
good. And then they send it out. Then. whether

00:06:58.480 --> 00:07:01.800
the letter is an original composition in the

00:07:01.800 --> 00:07:05.439
person's hand, like in Joan's own handwriting

00:07:05.439 --> 00:07:09.860
or Violant's own handwriting, or whether it's

00:07:09.860 --> 00:07:13.019
something that was originally handwritten by

00:07:13.019 --> 00:07:20.560
the scribe, it then goes to the staff of the

00:07:20.560 --> 00:07:27.670
chancery where it gets copied into the sheaf

00:07:27.670 --> 00:07:34.170
of papers probably unbound initially although

00:07:34.170 --> 00:07:39.310
not sure about that and after it gets copied

00:07:39.310 --> 00:07:42.629
down then it gets folded up and maybe there's

00:07:42.629 --> 00:07:46.310
like a seal applied to it and and then it's sent

00:07:46.310 --> 00:07:52.670
off so what we have what we're looking at are

00:07:52.670 --> 00:07:58.660
those copies of the outgoing letters. And that's

00:07:58.660 --> 00:08:04.600
why we've got that probata documentation at the

00:08:04.600 --> 00:08:11.300
end, because that particular scribe, that staff

00:08:11.300 --> 00:08:16.079
member of the royal chancery, is saying, on my

00:08:16.079 --> 00:08:20.779
honor, these are the words that were in this

00:08:20.779 --> 00:08:26.560
letter. And they're basically putting their own

00:08:26.560 --> 00:08:31.680
name to that. Essentially, it's like a legal

00:08:31.680 --> 00:08:36.240
testimony that that what they have copied is

00:08:36.240 --> 00:08:40.899
true word for word as to what was sent out. I

00:08:40.899 --> 00:08:44.720
mean, you can just imagine the kinds of disasters

00:08:44.720 --> 00:08:49.639
that could happen if there's sloppiness happening

00:08:49.639 --> 00:08:54.179
so that the meaning of what you think you sent

00:08:54.179 --> 00:08:57.019
that's in the copy, you consult it later, and

00:08:57.019 --> 00:08:58.799
then what actually got sent out is different.

00:08:58.820 --> 00:09:00.840
I mean, it could cause a really big problem.

00:09:01.279 --> 00:09:03.460
So, you know, there was there was some pressure

00:09:03.460 --> 00:09:07.820
on these scribes to get it right. And at the

00:09:07.820 --> 00:09:12.000
same time, you can really tell that occasionally

00:09:12.000 --> 00:09:18.200
they were working at a really furious pace. the

00:09:18.200 --> 00:09:24.179
timing of all this is pretty interesting because

00:09:24.179 --> 00:09:30.039
it's super clear that there were backlogs. So

00:09:30.039 --> 00:09:33.860
in the registers, there's time jumps. Like sometimes

00:09:33.860 --> 00:09:37.580
you'll be reading a letter from one day and then

00:09:37.580 --> 00:09:39.600
the next letter is from the next day and it's

00:09:39.600 --> 00:09:43.399
all very orderly. And then suddenly there's something

00:09:43.399 --> 00:09:46.840
from a month prior thrown in there. And then

00:09:46.840 --> 00:09:50.500
it goes back to the, and so you're kind of left

00:09:50.500 --> 00:09:52.740
wondering like, oh my gosh, did like this one

00:09:52.740 --> 00:09:55.799
get forgotten somewhere? Like, what is the explanation

00:09:55.799 --> 00:09:59.460
for this? And then other times it's just like,

00:09:59.600 --> 00:10:03.179
clear that there were a whole stack of of letters

00:10:03.179 --> 00:10:06.700
from around like a two-week period and the dates

00:10:06.700 --> 00:10:10.399
are all like jumbled and so it's going back and

00:10:10.399 --> 00:10:12.519
then forward and then back and then forward you

00:10:12.519 --> 00:10:15.899
know two days three days and and so you can tell

00:10:15.899 --> 00:10:19.360
that there was a bit of a backlog in the chancery

00:10:19.360 --> 00:10:24.139
at that time so it's i think pretty interesting

00:10:24.139 --> 00:10:27.440
to notice those kinds of things While we're on

00:10:27.440 --> 00:10:31.159
the topic of the material object of the register

00:10:31.159 --> 00:10:36.460
itself, I want to point out that there's, well,

00:10:36.539 --> 00:10:38.679
I want to address something that you've probably

00:10:38.679 --> 00:10:41.779
noticed. There's holes. There's holes in these

00:10:41.779 --> 00:10:47.639
papers. Those kind of globs that you see that

00:10:47.639 --> 00:10:52.039
are just kind of looking like damage to the paper.

00:10:53.540 --> 00:10:58.120
Those are wormholes. Those are good old bookworms.

00:10:58.220 --> 00:11:02.200
Some of them might be kind of insects, but from

00:11:02.200 --> 00:11:05.580
what I've heard, those are like literally worms

00:11:05.580 --> 00:11:08.100
that are like burrowing through these things

00:11:08.100 --> 00:11:12.179
as they were in storage and left alone for at

00:11:12.179 --> 00:11:17.100
times, you know, a couple centuries. So some

00:11:17.100 --> 00:11:22.759
of the documents have just a ton. of damage and

00:11:22.759 --> 00:11:26.500
others are relatively minor. What you're looking

00:11:26.500 --> 00:11:30.860
at in today's document I would call, relatively

00:11:30.860 --> 00:11:35.759
speaking, minor damage. So there's a bunch of

00:11:35.759 --> 00:11:39.519
holes, but overall it's pretty minor damage.

00:11:40.580 --> 00:11:43.720
Okay, one other thing that I wanted to mention

00:11:43.720 --> 00:11:49.350
about the format of the letter here. is that

00:11:49.350 --> 00:11:52.889
there's some things that are consistent and other

00:11:52.889 --> 00:11:56.110
things that are not consistent as you look from

00:11:56.110 --> 00:12:00.309
letter to letter in these registers. Here's what's

00:12:00.309 --> 00:12:05.029
consistent. The name of the recipient appears

00:12:05.470 --> 00:12:08.649
at the beginning of the letter, not always right

00:12:08.649 --> 00:12:11.950
away as in the case in this particular letter.

00:12:12.190 --> 00:12:15.110
Sometimes it's within the first couple lines

00:12:15.110 --> 00:12:18.470
because the sender could appear at the very beginning

00:12:18.470 --> 00:12:21.649
of the letter. You'll find it though within,

00:12:21.669 --> 00:12:25.549
you'll find the recipient's name absolutely within

00:12:25.549 --> 00:12:29.029
the first couple lines of the letter. Sometimes

00:12:29.029 --> 00:12:33.789
you luck out and the recipient is at the very

00:12:33.789 --> 00:12:39.379
beginning. like in this case. Okay, in this situation

00:12:39.379 --> 00:12:46.419
we see maestro amigo, master friend, and we know

00:12:46.419 --> 00:12:49.740
that it's again Heredia, the master of roads,

00:12:50.240 --> 00:12:53.779
because in the last line, the little short line,

00:12:53.960 --> 00:12:58.940
the bottom left corner, we see in this situation

00:12:58.940 --> 00:13:03.220
it's roads. It's not roadie. like we had in Joan's

00:13:03.220 --> 00:13:06.460
letter, here it's Rhodes with an S. This is,

00:13:06.460 --> 00:13:13.120
I think, scribal preference in how to refer to

00:13:13.120 --> 00:13:15.539
Rhodes, which is interesting. That gets into

00:13:15.539 --> 00:13:20.080
something that's not consistent. But let me just

00:13:20.080 --> 00:13:22.879
talk about two other things that are consistent.

00:13:24.340 --> 00:13:29.860
The probata, the notation about the scribe saying

00:13:29.860 --> 00:13:35.549
I here, testify that this is a true copy of what

00:13:35.549 --> 00:13:39.950
got sent out, that is always at the lower right

00:13:39.950 --> 00:13:45.269
below the document. One other thing that's consistent

00:13:45.269 --> 00:13:48.909
in all the documents is that on the last line

00:13:48.909 --> 00:13:53.649
of the block of the document's text is the date.

00:13:54.850 --> 00:13:58.990
And what's kind of fun about this document that

00:13:58.990 --> 00:14:02.190
we're looking at today is that you can clearly

00:14:02.190 --> 00:14:06.250
see that on the last line of the text block there,

00:14:06.870 --> 00:14:15.129
the letters S, E, T. That is set. It's seven.

00:14:15.950 --> 00:14:22.769
And so what we have here is the date of a seven,

00:14:23.009 --> 00:14:29.289
but there it looks like they're missing the 80.

00:14:30.629 --> 00:14:32.070
Oh, no, no, they've got it in there. They've

00:14:32.070 --> 00:14:37.710
got it in there. Sorry. So it's 1387. Okay. And

00:14:37.710 --> 00:14:40.490
we'll talk about, well, at the beginning of the

00:14:40.490 --> 00:14:44.409
line, you can clearly see December there with

00:14:44.409 --> 00:14:50.950
a macron at the end. Okay. So the date is reliably

00:14:50.950 --> 00:14:53.970
at the end of the document. What's not consistent?

00:14:55.300 --> 00:14:59.899
name spellings, as we've seen, and then also

00:14:59.899 --> 00:15:04.279
where the sender is located. So in this situation,

00:15:04.480 --> 00:15:09.340
we see La Duquessa de Girona at the bottom left,

00:15:09.340 --> 00:15:14.500
like right above where Master of Rhodes is written

00:15:14.500 --> 00:15:18.320
there. And so, you know, in yesterday's document,

00:15:18.840 --> 00:15:23.360
we had Primogenit at the top. So that can kind

00:15:23.360 --> 00:15:27.120
of float around. Okay, so there's a couple other

00:15:27.120 --> 00:15:29.059
things I could talk about, consistency or not

00:15:29.059 --> 00:15:32.720
consistency, but oh my gosh, we're already really

00:15:32.720 --> 00:15:37.120
at like 15 minutes here. So I just want to mention

00:15:37.120 --> 00:15:39.659
something about the content of the document,

00:15:39.799 --> 00:15:43.019
that what we're looking at here is an example

00:15:43.019 --> 00:15:47.259
of influence, that the secular authorities are

00:15:47.259 --> 00:15:51.789
influencing or attempting to influence ecclesiastical

00:15:51.789 --> 00:15:54.049
appointments in the Crown of Aragon. That's really

00:15:54.049 --> 00:15:58.330
what this document is doing. So questions that

00:15:58.330 --> 00:16:01.710
come up. Goodness, I've already mentioned a few.

00:16:02.110 --> 00:16:04.549
We can really repeat a lot of the questions that

00:16:04.549 --> 00:16:08.769
I thought of yesterday with the letter from Joanne.

00:16:09.049 --> 00:16:14.509
I think my major question here is how is this

00:16:14.509 --> 00:16:18.720
letter an example or an illustration of the way

00:16:18.720 --> 00:16:20.740
that the two of them were working in tandem.

00:16:21.279 --> 00:16:27.700
And how unusual was that compared to other elite

00:16:27.700 --> 00:16:33.159
couples? I'm also really wondering still about

00:16:33.159 --> 00:16:39.379
whether this was a composition from Violant

00:16:39.379 --> 00:16:43.809
herself or whether the scribe basically composed

00:16:43.809 --> 00:16:47.990
it because she told him to, and she just kind

00:16:47.990 --> 00:16:52.769
of signed off on it. That's really the major

00:16:52.769 --> 00:16:57.529
mystery that I would love to know about this.

00:17:00.090 --> 00:17:04.789
Last but not least, I want to know the gender

00:17:04.789 --> 00:17:08.630
dynamics that we see in this letter. What is

00:17:08.630 --> 00:17:13.049
it an illustrative example of in terms of Violant's

00:17:13.049 --> 00:17:18.869
authority as a duchess. Also the way that she

00:17:18.869 --> 00:17:22.750
has more clout in particular situations because

00:17:22.750 --> 00:17:27.890
of her connections to French nobility and French

00:17:27.890 --> 00:17:32.509
royalty. I really want to know about how this

00:17:32.509 --> 00:17:35.329
is kind of like a situation where she might have

00:17:35.329 --> 00:17:40.390
more power overall than Joanne because she has

00:17:40.390 --> 00:17:45.289
more connections in France and this pope is French

00:17:45.289 --> 00:17:51.309
so that's really one of the largest questions

00:17:51.309 --> 00:17:54.609
that that I have one of the most burning questions

00:17:54.609 --> 00:17:58.650
because in this podcast you're one of the main

00:17:58.650 --> 00:18:04.450
goals is for me to figure out some information

00:18:04.450 --> 00:18:08.680
about what was going on in terms of gender between

00:18:08.680 --> 00:18:11.420
Joan and Violant and how they related to

00:18:11.420 --> 00:18:16.579
the outside world and how it affected their political

00:18:16.579 --> 00:18:22.839
authority. Alright, that does it for today. Thanks

00:18:22.839 --> 00:18:26.380
for listening to this episode of the Historian's

00:18:26.380 --> 00:18:30.980
Notebook, Season 1, Molt Cara Companyona. If you

00:18:30.980 --> 00:18:33.319
are leaving with more questions than you arrived

00:18:33.319 --> 00:18:37.519
with, I have done my job. Remember, the motto

00:18:37.519 --> 00:18:41.740
of the Historian's Notebook is, dissatisfaction

00:18:41.740 --> 00:18:46.980
guaranteed. Visit the website, jonathanseyfried.net

00:18:46.980 --> 00:18:50.420
to see an image of today's document with

00:18:50.420 --> 00:18:55.039
those wormholes and additional show notes. And

00:18:55.039 --> 00:18:57.619
listen again tomorrow to hear about the next

00:18:57.619 --> 00:19:01.200
day. in the first year of the reign of King Joan

00:19:01.200 --> 00:19:06.759
of Aragon and Queen Violant de Bar. In the meantime,

00:19:07.460 --> 00:19:08.019
take care.
