WEBVTT

00:00:10.759 --> 00:00:14.099
What is going on, everybody? Welcome to my weekly

00:00:14.099 --> 00:00:16.920
mixtape, the show that takes the classic mixtape

00:00:16.920 --> 00:00:20.359
approach to building a modern playlist. I'm your

00:00:20.359 --> 00:00:23.100
host, Brian Colburn, and we are back for episode

00:00:23.100 --> 00:00:27.420
two of this second season of the show, the rebirth,

00:00:27.559 --> 00:00:31.300
if you will. I am so excited to be back on the

00:00:31.300 --> 00:00:34.299
mic talking music with everybody, and I am so

00:00:34.299 --> 00:00:37.920
grateful for the awesome feedback we got on last

00:00:37.920 --> 00:00:41.840
week's. six degrees of Kevin Bacon, the music

00:00:41.840 --> 00:00:45.679
edition playlist. That one was a lot of fun.

00:00:45.799 --> 00:00:49.579
And like I said, there are well over a year's

00:00:49.579 --> 00:00:53.920
worth of different playlist ideas that you, the

00:00:53.920 --> 00:00:57.179
fellow mixtapers have sent in to me sitting on

00:00:57.179 --> 00:01:00.439
this online randomizer for me. And I am once

00:01:00.439 --> 00:01:03.810
again. Going to spin the wheel and see what tonight's

00:01:03.810 --> 00:01:07.329
topic is. But before I do that, if you want to

00:01:07.329 --> 00:01:10.950
submit an idea for a future My Weekly Mixtape

00:01:10.950 --> 00:01:14.500
episode, be sure to hit me up. myweeklymixtape

00:01:14.500 --> 00:01:18.560
at gmail .com or on almost all the social media

00:01:18.560 --> 00:01:22.879
haunts at myweeklymixtape. Send in your suggestions

00:01:22.879 --> 00:01:25.719
and I will add them to this list. They can be

00:01:25.719 --> 00:01:28.700
serious. They can be fun. They could be absurd.

00:01:28.859 --> 00:01:32.040
Whatever you've got, I am going to take your

00:01:32.040 --> 00:01:36.159
suggestions and try to turn them into a serviceable

00:01:36.159 --> 00:01:40.620
playlist. So without wasting any time, let's

00:01:40.620 --> 00:01:43.480
spin the wheel and see what this week's topic

00:01:43.480 --> 00:01:52.299
is going to be. All right, something I know a

00:01:52.299 --> 00:01:55.760
little something about. Patreon mixtaper Cactus

00:01:55.760 --> 00:02:00.840
Pete chimed in with best hit songs redone acoustically.

00:02:01.310 --> 00:02:03.349
Now, anyone that knows Colburn & Company, I've

00:02:03.349 --> 00:02:06.049
been doing that for over 10 years now, obviously

00:02:06.049 --> 00:02:08.810
doing my solo stuff acoustically since around

00:02:08.810 --> 00:02:12.530
2007, almost, Jesus, almost on 20 years now.

00:02:12.889 --> 00:02:17.909
I love acoustic remakes and acoustic reimaginings

00:02:17.909 --> 00:02:20.770
of songs. So this is going to be an extremely

00:02:20.770 --> 00:02:24.050
fun topic for me. Now, instinctively, I know

00:02:24.050 --> 00:02:27.009
my mind is going to immediately go to all of

00:02:27.009 --> 00:02:29.289
the Colburn & Company staples, all the songs

00:02:29.289 --> 00:02:31.800
we play show after show. But I'm going to try

00:02:31.800 --> 00:02:34.479
to stay away from some of those because a lot

00:02:34.479 --> 00:02:37.759
of those songs, while we remade them acoustically,

00:02:37.840 --> 00:02:40.300
some of the bands haven't. And in some instances,

00:02:40.360 --> 00:02:42.419
they have. And I'm definitely going to work a

00:02:42.419 --> 00:02:45.139
couple in there because they're just too good

00:02:45.139 --> 00:02:49.460
to not. But that being said, Cactus Pete's example.

00:02:50.189 --> 00:02:53.310
was Bon Jovi's acoustic take of Something for

00:02:53.310 --> 00:02:54.849
the Pain. If you haven't seen that, look it up

00:02:54.849 --> 00:02:57.610
on YouTube. It is an incredible version with

00:02:57.610 --> 00:03:00.349
some amazing live harmonies. I mean, this is

00:03:00.349 --> 00:03:02.710
Bon Jovi. I don't know if it was quite at the

00:03:02.710 --> 00:03:05.770
80s peak, but they were still at the top of their

00:03:05.770 --> 00:03:08.509
game at this point. Definitely worth taking the

00:03:08.509 --> 00:03:10.349
time to check out. Something for the Pain is

00:03:10.349 --> 00:03:14.229
easily a top 10 Bon Jovi song for me. So I love

00:03:14.229 --> 00:03:16.240
that he went with that one. And I should also

00:03:16.240 --> 00:03:18.740
take this opportunity to thank Pete for being

00:03:18.740 --> 00:03:21.900
such an awesome part of the Patreon mixtaper

00:03:21.900 --> 00:03:24.819
community, which you can find over at patreon

00:03:24.819 --> 00:03:28.520
.com forward slash my weekly mixtape. You can

00:03:28.520 --> 00:03:31.219
sign up for free. There are different tiers there

00:03:31.219 --> 00:03:33.699
that help support the show. But none of that

00:03:33.699 --> 00:03:36.939
is required. I just appreciate the support and

00:03:36.939 --> 00:03:39.400
staying in touch with the other fellow mixtapers.

00:03:39.639 --> 00:03:41.919
Once again, if you want to do that, it's patreon

00:03:41.919 --> 00:03:46.840
.com forward slash my weekly mixtape. So now

00:03:46.840 --> 00:03:50.479
I am going to take a long, hard dive into acoustic

00:03:50.479 --> 00:03:53.740
remakes and reimaginings. And what I'm going

00:03:53.740 --> 00:03:57.159
to do is actually pull up my Apple Music playlist

00:03:57.159 --> 00:04:02.479
because not to cheat, I have a ton. of acoustic

00:04:02.479 --> 00:04:05.400
versions from my ears and radio, some of which

00:04:05.400 --> 00:04:08.919
are not officially released. And some of them

00:04:08.919 --> 00:04:11.659
immediately come to my mind. So I want to make

00:04:11.659 --> 00:04:14.000
sure I'm looking at the cloud status. And if

00:04:14.000 --> 00:04:16.699
I see uploaded, that means there's a good chance

00:04:16.699 --> 00:04:19.120
it's not on streaming. And there are a few that

00:04:19.120 --> 00:04:21.639
I might put a little pin in to talk about later

00:04:21.639 --> 00:04:24.100
on, because some of these you definitely need

00:04:24.100 --> 00:04:26.779
to look up, even if it's just on YouTube. I'm

00:04:26.779 --> 00:04:28.560
going to do my absolute best, though, to keep

00:04:28.560 --> 00:04:30.819
this playlist of songs that you can find on all

00:04:30.819 --> 00:04:32.800
your favorite streaming sites. So that way you

00:04:32.800 --> 00:04:35.959
can kind of play along at home as you're listening

00:04:35.959 --> 00:04:39.600
to the podcast. So as I'm scrolling through my

00:04:39.600 --> 00:04:41.860
acoustic playlist here, some things that are

00:04:41.860 --> 00:04:44.540
immediately coming to mind. I want to try to

00:04:44.540 --> 00:04:47.639
find versions of songs that really lean heavily

00:04:47.639 --> 00:04:52.120
into the quote unquote remake or reimagining.

00:04:52.509 --> 00:04:55.490
aspect of the playlist, because you think about

00:04:55.490 --> 00:04:59.829
any MTV unplugged show from the nineties, especially,

00:05:00.050 --> 00:05:03.269
but even into the two thousands, certain songs

00:05:03.269 --> 00:05:07.769
are just the originals done on acoustic guitar.

00:05:07.870 --> 00:05:10.670
I immediately think of about a girl by Nirvana.

00:05:10.670 --> 00:05:13.310
You listen to the version on bleach, and then

00:05:13.310 --> 00:05:16.870
you listen to the version that is on MTV unplugged.

00:05:16.930 --> 00:05:21.079
Basically it is. a heavier song played acoustically

00:05:21.079 --> 00:05:25.100
with not much reimagining done to it. So as much

00:05:25.100 --> 00:05:27.699
as those are incredible, I want to try to come

00:05:27.699 --> 00:05:30.420
up with a list of songs that you could pair up

00:05:30.420 --> 00:05:33.839
against the original track, play them back to

00:05:33.839 --> 00:05:37.459
back, and get two completely different vibes,

00:05:37.759 --> 00:05:40.579
two completely different feelings, almost as

00:05:40.579 --> 00:05:43.300
if you're listening to two completely different

00:05:43.300 --> 00:05:47.250
songs. albeit by the same artist. And I think

00:05:47.250 --> 00:05:49.990
the first one that immediately jumps out to me,

00:05:50.110 --> 00:05:53.930
during the MTV Unplugged craze in the 90s, a

00:05:53.930 --> 00:05:58.189
lot of artists from my parents' era, the quote

00:05:58.189 --> 00:06:01.769
-unquote classic rock era, reinvented themselves

00:06:01.769 --> 00:06:07.490
in the 90s by having a hit moment via MTV Unplugged.

00:06:07.490 --> 00:06:11.300
Rod Stewart immediately comes to mind. Neil Young,

00:06:11.620 --> 00:06:15.439
Bruce Springsteen, Bob Dylan, The Eagles, all

00:06:15.439 --> 00:06:19.300
of those happened. However, when you think about

00:06:19.300 --> 00:06:23.680
completely flipping a song on its side, the fact

00:06:23.680 --> 00:06:27.240
that this track on streaming starts with the

00:06:27.240 --> 00:06:31.420
words, see if you could spot this one. I have

00:06:31.420 --> 00:06:34.759
to start this playlist with Eric Clapton's Layla

00:06:34.759 --> 00:06:38.420
from his Unplugged album and his MTV Unplugged

00:06:38.420 --> 00:06:42.480
special. That version is so far removed from

00:06:42.480 --> 00:06:45.220
the original Derek and the Dominoes version that

00:06:45.220 --> 00:06:47.879
it almost takes you a moment to realize what's

00:06:47.879 --> 00:06:51.319
happening. The crowd is behind. As the riff starts,

00:06:51.519 --> 00:06:54.540
you can hear the applause kind of roll into the

00:06:54.540 --> 00:06:57.100
song because it took that extra split second

00:06:57.100 --> 00:06:59.319
for them to figure out what song he was playing.

00:06:59.600 --> 00:07:03.180
And as somebody who... had Derek and the Dominoes,

00:07:03.180 --> 00:07:06.399
Layla and other assorted love songs playing in

00:07:06.399 --> 00:07:09.620
a heavy rotation growing up via my parents. One

00:07:09.620 --> 00:07:12.639
of my first CDs was Eric Clapton's Timepieces,

00:07:12.660 --> 00:07:16.680
which had Layla on it. Hearing it this way completely

00:07:16.680 --> 00:07:19.680
blew my mind because I knew the song, but I never

00:07:19.680 --> 00:07:22.339
heard it like this before. And this one really

00:07:22.339 --> 00:07:26.139
jumped out to me. And I really feel like it reintroduced

00:07:26.139 --> 00:07:30.430
Eric Clapton to the 90s generation. Because here

00:07:30.430 --> 00:07:33.129
he was, one of these quote -unquote classic rock

00:07:33.129 --> 00:07:37.029
acts, using the popularity of MTV at the time.

00:07:37.110 --> 00:07:39.649
Which MTV is going away in a lot of countries

00:07:39.649 --> 00:07:43.329
right now. But during the 90s, MTV was the pulse

00:07:43.329 --> 00:07:46.870
of what was popular. And these classic rock acts

00:07:46.870 --> 00:07:51.550
used MTV Unplugged as a way to introduce themselves

00:07:51.550 --> 00:07:55.029
to a new generation who may not have been exposed

00:07:55.029 --> 00:07:58.399
to their music otherwise. The 90s were a really

00:07:58.399 --> 00:08:00.399
interesting time when you think about it, because

00:08:00.399 --> 00:08:02.819
there were people that would listen to just as

00:08:02.819 --> 00:08:05.220
much Neil Young as they would Pearl Jam. And

00:08:05.220 --> 00:08:07.600
then guess what happens? Pearl Jam and Neil Young

00:08:07.600 --> 00:08:09.920
come together to do an album together. There

00:08:09.920 --> 00:08:12.779
was a lot of cross -pollination of music, and

00:08:12.779 --> 00:08:16.199
MTV Unplugged played a huge part in it. But when

00:08:16.199 --> 00:08:18.480
you listen to the original version of Layla,

00:08:18.560 --> 00:08:21.540
and then you listen to what he did on the acoustic

00:08:21.540 --> 00:08:25.920
version. It is a complete remake of that song.

00:08:25.980 --> 00:08:28.220
You can play them back to back and they feel

00:08:28.220 --> 00:08:30.699
like two separate pieces of music. So that's

00:08:30.699 --> 00:08:34.039
kind of what I'm going for here. Coming out of

00:08:34.039 --> 00:08:36.960
Eric Clapton, I do want to throw in one that

00:08:36.960 --> 00:08:39.419
Colburn and Company has been playing actually

00:08:39.419 --> 00:08:43.120
both versions of for well over a decade. There's

00:08:43.120 --> 00:08:45.580
the original hit from one of my favorite albums

00:08:45.580 --> 00:08:48.710
of the 90s, August and Everything After. And

00:08:48.710 --> 00:08:51.110
then there's the slowed down reimagining that

00:08:51.110 --> 00:08:53.629
you can find on Across the Wire live in New York

00:08:53.629 --> 00:08:56.850
City. But actually, I'm going to go with a different

00:08:56.850 --> 00:08:59.169
album, which is my personal favorite version

00:08:59.169 --> 00:09:02.789
of this song. It's from New Amsterdam, live at

00:09:02.789 --> 00:09:06.049
Heineken Music Hall. This one was released after

00:09:06.049 --> 00:09:08.690
I was married, so I want to say it was 2005 or

00:09:08.690 --> 00:09:12.330
2006. Don't quote me on that. But it's Counting

00:09:12.330 --> 00:09:16.590
Crows and Rain King. a staple of their live set

00:09:16.590 --> 00:09:19.789
for many, many years. Season one, there is an

00:09:19.789 --> 00:09:22.450
album dive on August and Everything After where

00:09:22.450 --> 00:09:24.769
I had the original Counting Crows drummer, Steve

00:09:24.769 --> 00:09:27.370
Bowman, on the show. And we actually talked about

00:09:27.370 --> 00:09:30.269
the fact that they played these two versions.

00:09:30.350 --> 00:09:32.629
And I don't want to spoil it now. Go back and

00:09:32.629 --> 00:09:36.230
check that episode out. But Rain King is this

00:09:36.230 --> 00:09:40.429
really upbeat, poppy Counting Crows song. But

00:09:40.429 --> 00:09:42.769
then you listen to the slowed down version that

00:09:42.769 --> 00:09:45.549
you get on either Across a Wire or New Amsterdam,

00:09:45.710 --> 00:09:50.570
and it's stripped down to a slower, drawn out

00:09:50.570 --> 00:09:54.389
ballad. And you really get drawn into the lyrics

00:09:54.389 --> 00:09:57.110
of this version. And that's something that really

00:09:57.110 --> 00:09:59.809
resonates with me, especially when it comes to

00:09:59.809 --> 00:10:02.929
The Counting Crows. Adam's lyrics are such a

00:10:02.929 --> 00:10:05.950
huge part of what makes me love this band. And

00:10:05.950 --> 00:10:08.070
on the original, sure, I know all the words and

00:10:08.070 --> 00:10:10.710
I sing along with all of them. But when you listen

00:10:10.710 --> 00:10:14.470
to it slowed down, the lyrics really sink in.

00:10:15.149 --> 00:10:18.110
And the song just becomes a different animal.

00:10:18.350 --> 00:10:21.269
And to me, that's where the quote unquote remake

00:10:21.269 --> 00:10:24.169
and reimagining comes into play. And I'll tell

00:10:24.169 --> 00:10:26.990
you, Eric Clapton into Counting Crows in the

00:10:26.990 --> 00:10:31.210
90s. That's MTV right there. That's not even

00:10:31.210 --> 00:10:34.159
a jump musically. Because in the 90s, like I

00:10:34.159 --> 00:10:36.960
said, classic rock artists were just as welcome

00:10:36.960 --> 00:10:40.179
on MTV as the up -and -coming artists. There

00:10:40.179 --> 00:10:43.519
was such a cross -pollination of it that I feel

00:10:43.519 --> 00:10:46.000
like that's something that gets lost now because

00:10:46.000 --> 00:10:48.980
the only way cross -pollination in music happens

00:10:48.980 --> 00:10:52.220
now is if young people are getting exposed to

00:10:52.220 --> 00:10:55.399
these songs on TikTok. Because TikTok is now,

00:10:55.480 --> 00:10:59.100
I hate to say it, your new MTV. But Rain King

00:10:59.100 --> 00:11:03.019
is such a classic Counting Crows song. And, you

00:11:03.019 --> 00:11:04.799
know, look, at the end of the slow versions,

00:11:04.879 --> 00:11:08.320
he doesn't do the yeah. So thank God for that,

00:11:08.399 --> 00:11:10.120
because I think that would kill it. Although

00:11:10.120 --> 00:11:12.100
we've done that a few times doing it live just

00:11:12.100 --> 00:11:14.299
to see if anybody was paying attention. And that

00:11:14.299 --> 00:11:18.240
always goes over well. But Rain King out of Layla

00:11:18.240 --> 00:11:20.879
to start this acoustic reimaginings playlist

00:11:20.879 --> 00:11:25.059
off. And now I'm in a real 90s mood here. And

00:11:25.059 --> 00:11:28.039
I could very easily just stay. in the nineties

00:11:28.039 --> 00:11:31.759
MTV unplugged and crank out a 10 song playlist

00:11:31.759 --> 00:11:34.600
that will make perfect sense here. But we'll

00:11:34.600 --> 00:11:36.740
see where that goes. Cause I have way too many

00:11:36.740 --> 00:11:38.820
songs in this playlist that I want to kind of

00:11:38.820 --> 00:11:40.740
branch out of the nineties a little bit, but

00:11:40.740 --> 00:11:42.980
for now I'm going to stay here because I like

00:11:42.980 --> 00:11:45.080
where we're going right now. And I'm going to

00:11:45.080 --> 00:11:47.399
do something similar to rain King, where I take

00:11:47.399 --> 00:11:51.639
an upbeat, faster song and slow it down. Only

00:11:51.639 --> 00:11:54.860
this time it's going to be a heavier quote unquote

00:11:54.860 --> 00:11:58.980
song. that is stripped down to its core and made

00:11:58.980 --> 00:12:03.759
slow, where, once again, you really have to pay

00:12:03.759 --> 00:12:05.799
attention to the lyrics. And the lyrics in this

00:12:05.799 --> 00:12:08.539
song stand out no matter what version you're

00:12:08.539 --> 00:12:12.139
listening to. Sorry, Dave Coulier, but we are

00:12:12.139 --> 00:12:14.240
going to go with Alanis Morissette's You Oughta

00:12:14.240 --> 00:12:17.759
Know, originally from Jagged Little Pill. The

00:12:17.759 --> 00:12:20.419
live unplugged version is the version that you

00:12:20.419 --> 00:12:23.419
will find on streaming. Here is where I have

00:12:23.419 --> 00:12:26.960
to say... Streaming gets a thumbs down for me

00:12:26.960 --> 00:12:32.580
and my physical media collection is the jackpot

00:12:32.580 --> 00:12:37.559
because only available on the ironic import CD

00:12:37.559 --> 00:12:40.159
single. Do those words make sense to anybody

00:12:40.159 --> 00:12:44.539
out there? Import CD single. Kids in the 90s,

00:12:44.539 --> 00:12:48.480
for some reason, overseas got CD singles that

00:12:48.480 --> 00:12:51.519
featured songs that you could not get on CD here

00:12:51.519 --> 00:12:54.870
in the US. And a lot of stores like Tower Records,

00:12:55.029 --> 00:12:57.610
Sam Goody Record Town had a small section of

00:12:57.610 --> 00:13:01.669
import CDs. And one of the ones that I immediately

00:13:01.669 --> 00:13:06.409
grabbed was the import CD single of Ironic because

00:13:06.409 --> 00:13:10.070
one of the bonus tracks was Alanis' performance

00:13:10.070 --> 00:13:15.330
from the 38th Annual Grammy Awards. Now, it is

00:13:15.330 --> 00:13:17.970
very similar to the version on the Unplugged

00:13:17.970 --> 00:13:21.120
album, but there was something about... the Grammy

00:13:21.120 --> 00:13:24.299
Awards performance that hit me the first time

00:13:24.299 --> 00:13:27.720
I heard it, and I never looked back from that

00:13:27.720 --> 00:13:32.639
version. It is so vulnerable. The lyrics on the

00:13:32.639 --> 00:13:36.299
original are vulnerable as it is, but when you

00:13:36.299 --> 00:13:40.220
hear her singing it in such a soft, mellow tone,

00:13:40.419 --> 00:13:44.179
the anger behind the lyrics and what she's saying

00:13:44.179 --> 00:13:48.320
just takes on a whole new meaning. The graphic

00:13:48.320 --> 00:13:52.519
nature of the lyrics stick out even more than

00:13:52.519 --> 00:13:55.720
they do on the original heavy version, because

00:13:55.720 --> 00:13:58.460
as much as I love the heavy version, you got

00:13:58.460 --> 00:14:01.840
Flea laying down that incredible bass line, but

00:14:01.840 --> 00:14:04.720
you're rocking out to the song. That is why it's

00:14:04.720 --> 00:14:07.039
one of her biggest hits. Yeah, you're paying

00:14:07.039 --> 00:14:10.100
attention to the lyrics, but when she's really

00:14:10.100 --> 00:14:12.519
taking it down to just a piano and her voice,

00:14:12.740 --> 00:14:15.200
you're forced to listen to the words and hear

00:14:15.200 --> 00:14:17.850
what she has to say. And you can play these two

00:14:17.850 --> 00:14:21.330
back to back and get two completely different

00:14:21.330 --> 00:14:24.590
versions, similar to Rain King, maybe even a

00:14:24.590 --> 00:14:26.669
step more because of the graphic nature of the

00:14:26.669 --> 00:14:30.529
song. But now that I've got the female contingent

00:14:30.529 --> 00:14:33.289
started on this playlist, I want to stay with

00:14:33.289 --> 00:14:36.330
that. And when I think about female acoustic

00:14:36.330 --> 00:14:41.049
performances in the 90s, you have to do a record

00:14:41.049 --> 00:14:45.929
scratch right at Heart's The Road Home. This

00:14:45.929 --> 00:14:50.370
is Anne and Nancy Wilson at their best. John

00:14:50.370 --> 00:14:54.769
Paul Jones produced this acoustic show for MTV.

00:14:54.870 --> 00:14:59.090
He plays bass on it. This is such an incredible

00:14:59.090 --> 00:15:04.309
moment in time. It sounds like a studio album

00:15:04.309 --> 00:15:08.259
done live. It is so... Perfect. The performance

00:15:08.259 --> 00:15:12.779
backed by the symphony orchestra behind the acoustic

00:15:12.779 --> 00:15:17.059
setting of the band. You had the dimly lit candles

00:15:17.059 --> 00:15:20.700
hanging around the stage, setting the scene,

00:15:20.840 --> 00:15:23.480
the carpeting on the ground. It felt like you

00:15:23.480 --> 00:15:26.820
were in this living room performance, sitting

00:15:26.820 --> 00:15:30.519
with them in front of you, giving you this moment

00:15:30.519 --> 00:15:35.710
in time that is. just on a completely different

00:15:35.710 --> 00:15:38.570
level than anything you'd heard from them in

00:15:38.570 --> 00:15:42.389
the past. Now, mind you, this is a classic rock

00:15:42.389 --> 00:15:46.610
act that somehow reinvented themselves in the

00:15:46.610 --> 00:15:49.610
80s with the teased -up hair. They had enough

00:15:49.610 --> 00:15:53.690
Aquanet in their hair during the self -titled

00:15:53.690 --> 00:15:56.850
album and Bad Animals that could probably kill

00:15:56.850 --> 00:15:59.690
the ozone layer, but then they stripped it back

00:15:59.690 --> 00:16:03.220
down. and The Road Home took one of their biggest

00:16:03.220 --> 00:16:07.059
hits from the 80s, their take on I -10's Alone.

00:16:07.539 --> 00:16:10.899
Yes, Alone is a cover song. I've said this every

00:16:10.899 --> 00:16:12.720
time I've talked about this song on the podcast,

00:16:12.980 --> 00:16:15.559
but in case you haven't heard my spiel yet, the

00:16:15.559 --> 00:16:18.580
Cliff Notes version, it was originally recorded

00:16:18.580 --> 00:16:23.399
in the early 80s by I -10, and then Valerie Stevenson

00:16:23.399 --> 00:16:27.259
and John Stamos, yes, Uncle Jesse, recorded a

00:16:27.259 --> 00:16:30.500
version for a CBS show called Dreams. But then

00:16:30.500 --> 00:16:35.980
in 1987, On Bad Animals Heart made the song Theirs.

00:16:36.000 --> 00:16:39.820
However, that was the 80s power ballad version.

00:16:40.059 --> 00:16:44.740
And by 1995, power ballads were no longer the

00:16:44.740 --> 00:16:48.220
in sound. Not only were they not the in sound,

00:16:48.460 --> 00:16:51.480
they were almost mocked because of the whole

00:16:51.480 --> 00:16:55.600
Nirvana killed that hair band sound of the 80s.

00:16:55.600 --> 00:16:59.659
We're now in the 90s grunge movement era. And

00:16:59.659 --> 00:17:03.320
somehow Heart was able to take their sound, pulling

00:17:03.320 --> 00:17:06.720
songs from their 70s catalog and 80s catalog,

00:17:06.920 --> 00:17:10.460
and making them sound like they fit in with everything

00:17:10.460 --> 00:17:13.740
that was out in the 90s. Unplugged was still

00:17:13.740 --> 00:17:17.900
all the rage and their version of Alone. Again,

00:17:18.000 --> 00:17:21.059
this is probably the closest thing that I would

00:17:21.059 --> 00:17:25.440
say, yes, it's remade, not so much reimagined.

00:17:25.440 --> 00:17:28.859
It is slower. Then the power ballad version.

00:17:29.480 --> 00:17:34.440
But again, it's a focus on the vocals and vocals

00:17:34.440 --> 00:17:38.619
in this song. Make the hair on my arms stand

00:17:38.619 --> 00:17:41.779
up. It puts a lump in my throat. I mean, this

00:17:41.779 --> 00:17:46.299
is a powerful live performance. Her voice. This

00:17:46.299 --> 00:17:49.779
might be one of her all time best live performances.

00:17:49.859 --> 00:17:52.420
And I'm putting that up against her version of

00:17:52.420 --> 00:17:55.440
Stairway to Heaven from the Kennedy Center Honors

00:17:55.440 --> 00:17:59.380
performance. This version of Alone is just on

00:17:59.380 --> 00:18:02.319
another level. Then you add the fact that John

00:18:02.319 --> 00:18:04.779
Paul Jones is walking his bass through the song,

00:18:04.839 --> 00:18:07.859
being a bass player, and Ramble On by Led Zeppelin

00:18:07.859 --> 00:18:10.299
being one of my favorite bass lines of all time.

00:18:10.500 --> 00:18:14.420
Hearing him work his magic in this song. Just,

00:18:14.420 --> 00:18:17.099
oh my God, these two versions, I can listen to

00:18:17.099 --> 00:18:19.859
the Bad Animals version and the Road Home version

00:18:19.859 --> 00:18:22.799
back to back. Yes, they're similar, but they

00:18:22.799 --> 00:18:24.940
hit me in a different way. So I feel like this

00:18:24.940 --> 00:18:29.579
one deserves to be on this playlist. But because

00:18:29.579 --> 00:18:32.900
Alone is a cover song, I feel like I can dive

00:18:32.900 --> 00:18:35.099
into that well just one more time and add in

00:18:35.099 --> 00:18:37.500
a second cover song, but bring us into the modern

00:18:37.500 --> 00:18:40.519
era now. Because I have touched on a ton of 90s

00:18:40.519 --> 00:18:42.380
stuff and I want to bring in some newer bands.

00:18:43.049 --> 00:18:45.049
Well, I mean, this band's been around for 20

00:18:45.049 --> 00:18:47.690
plus years, but as far as I'm concerned, they're

00:18:47.690 --> 00:18:50.349
so frigging underrated. This is one of those

00:18:50.349 --> 00:18:52.910
bands that I feel like should be on every Southern

00:18:52.910 --> 00:18:56.710
rock fans radar. And if they aren't, it's a crime.

00:18:56.950 --> 00:18:59.910
I was blessed enough to have Paul Jackson on

00:18:59.910 --> 00:19:02.890
for an episode during season one. And yes, I

00:19:02.890 --> 00:19:06.049
am talking about Blackberry Smoke and I am going

00:19:06.049 --> 00:19:08.789
to go with their cover of, well, you know, it's

00:19:08.789 --> 00:19:11.250
my favorite artist of all time. And when a new

00:19:11.250 --> 00:19:14.299
band that I am fond of, covers my favorite artist

00:19:14.299 --> 00:19:17.619
of all time, reimagines my favorite artist all

00:19:17.619 --> 00:19:21.599
time, and gives me goosebumps, it has to be included

00:19:21.599 --> 00:19:25.680
on this list. So following up Hearts Alone, I

00:19:25.680 --> 00:19:28.880
am going with Blackberry Smoke featuring Amanda

00:19:28.880 --> 00:19:32.920
Shires on violin and their cover of You Got Lucky

00:19:32.920 --> 00:19:37.279
from Tom Petty's Long After Dark album. You Got

00:19:37.279 --> 00:19:40.839
Lucky is a quintessential 80s Tom Petty song.

00:19:41.369 --> 00:19:43.950
Yet when I listen to Blackberry Smoke's version,

00:19:44.049 --> 00:19:46.410
if someone said to me, hey, this band just wrote

00:19:46.410 --> 00:19:49.049
and recorded this song in 2018, that was the

00:19:49.049 --> 00:19:51.910
year the Southern Ground Sessions came out, I

00:19:51.910 --> 00:19:55.789
would 100 % believe you. They do such an incredible

00:19:55.789 --> 00:19:59.170
job on this song. And once again, it's a slowed

00:19:59.170 --> 00:20:02.410
down version. And it really makes you listen

00:20:02.410 --> 00:20:05.170
to the lyrics. And it really makes you listen

00:20:05.170 --> 00:20:10.049
to the melody. Amanda Shire's violin is so soothing.

00:20:10.569 --> 00:20:14.109
It just glides you through the song. And I don't

00:20:14.109 --> 00:20:16.049
want to give too much away because I want you

00:20:16.049 --> 00:20:18.630
to go back and listen to the ultimate Blackberry

00:20:18.630 --> 00:20:22.569
Smoke playlist episode. But one spoiler out of

00:20:22.569 --> 00:20:25.569
20 songs, we do talk about this song in that

00:20:25.569 --> 00:20:28.450
episode. And I would much rather you hear the

00:20:28.450 --> 00:20:30.869
story come out of Paul's mouth than mine because

00:20:30.869 --> 00:20:34.369
he lived it. I'm just enjoying every moment of

00:20:34.369 --> 00:20:38.349
it. That said, this is just one of those covers

00:20:38.349 --> 00:20:41.490
that... I put it neck and neck with the original.

00:20:41.569 --> 00:20:43.950
Now, Tom Petty's my favorite artist of all time.

00:20:44.150 --> 00:20:47.269
So for me to say that, that's how absolutely

00:20:47.269 --> 00:20:49.730
incredible I think this version is. And if you

00:20:49.730 --> 00:20:52.470
haven't heard it, you owe it to yourself to press

00:20:52.470 --> 00:20:55.710
pause, not stop, press pause, and head over to

00:20:55.710 --> 00:20:58.529
myweeklymixtape .com to listen to this song right

00:20:58.529 --> 00:21:00.950
now because I have the playlist embedded on the

00:21:00.950 --> 00:21:03.910
episode page. And just for a recap, we started

00:21:03.910 --> 00:21:07.269
things off with Eric Clapton's Layla, Counting

00:21:07.269 --> 00:21:10.670
Crows' Rain King, Alanis Morissette's You Oughta

00:21:10.670 --> 00:21:14.309
Know, Hearts Alone, and Blackberry Smoke's cover

00:21:14.309 --> 00:21:17.049
of Tom Petty's You Got Lucky. Once again, that

00:21:17.049 --> 00:21:20.369
playlist is embedded on the episode page over

00:21:20.369 --> 00:21:25.650
at myweeklymixtape .com. And with that, now I

00:21:25.650 --> 00:21:27.849
am going to start with the second half of this

00:21:27.849 --> 00:21:30.509
playlist. And I feel like, yes, I'm going to

00:21:30.509 --> 00:21:33.069
go back to the 90s, but we have to talk at least

00:21:33.069 --> 00:21:35.789
one of the big four of grunge. Because when you

00:21:35.789 --> 00:21:39.990
think about Pearl Jam, Nirvana, Alice in Chains,

00:21:40.230 --> 00:21:43.630
Stone Temple Pilots, and I'll stop myself in

00:21:43.630 --> 00:21:46.650
my tracks right there to say I understand that

00:21:46.650 --> 00:21:48.910
Soundgarden is part of the Big Four when you

00:21:48.910 --> 00:21:52.650
talk about Seattle grunge. However, Soundgarden

00:21:52.650 --> 00:21:57.029
never did an MTV Unplugged, so I am using Nirvana,

00:21:57.369 --> 00:22:01.130
Pearl Jam, Alice in Chains, and Stone Temple

00:22:01.130 --> 00:22:04.930
Pilots in this Big Four scenario. However, those

00:22:04.930 --> 00:22:08.470
four bands, again, with no disrespect to Soundgarden,

00:22:08.759 --> 00:22:12.299
were all huge parts of the grunge scene as well

00:22:12.299 --> 00:22:16.160
as the unplugged acoustic scene. I can choose

00:22:16.160 --> 00:22:19.819
one from any of those bands and it easily will

00:22:19.819 --> 00:22:22.480
slide right in. I think the one I'm going to

00:22:22.480 --> 00:22:25.579
go with, though, was a bit of a reimagining again.

00:22:25.799 --> 00:22:27.680
Because I'm trying to think, when I think about

00:22:27.680 --> 00:22:30.400
Alice in Chains Unplugged, as much as I love

00:22:30.400 --> 00:22:33.880
the performance on that album and Nirvana and

00:22:33.880 --> 00:22:36.700
Pearl Jam's Unplugged, they were faithful to

00:22:36.700 --> 00:22:40.190
the originals. played acoustically. However,

00:22:40.450 --> 00:22:44.109
when Stone Temple Pilots did plush acoustically

00:22:44.109 --> 00:22:47.990
and slowed it down, and Scott Weiland's vocals

00:22:47.990 --> 00:22:51.789
layered over to DeLeo Brothers' guitar work,

00:22:52.029 --> 00:22:57.109
it's just so sonic. There's so many layers in

00:22:57.109 --> 00:23:02.089
this simplistic version. It has more depth than

00:23:02.089 --> 00:23:04.430
the original because the distortion kind of brings

00:23:04.430 --> 00:23:07.269
everything to the center on the studio track.

00:23:07.789 --> 00:23:10.250
This one opens up and it feels like the band

00:23:10.250 --> 00:23:13.430
is sitting around you and surrounding you with

00:23:13.430 --> 00:23:17.789
the song. And the lyrics really just cut you

00:23:17.789 --> 00:23:21.170
when you listen to this. And it feels so vulnerable.

00:23:21.509 --> 00:23:26.029
And once again, I had to seek it out on an import

00:23:26.029 --> 00:23:29.630
CD single back in the 90s, long prior to the

00:23:29.630 --> 00:23:32.089
Thank You Greatest Hits compilation. You had

00:23:32.089 --> 00:23:35.250
to find it on the Sex Type Thing CD single. And

00:23:35.250 --> 00:23:37.619
I think that CD single at the time was... Well

00:23:37.619 --> 00:23:40.920
over $10, and it was only a couple tracks. But

00:23:40.920 --> 00:23:45.019
to me, worth every, now, apologize for the pun

00:23:45.019 --> 00:23:48.799
here, pretty penny I spent on it, because this

00:23:48.799 --> 00:23:53.259
version is truly one for the ages. So much so

00:23:53.259 --> 00:23:56.240
that I feel like I was validated when they included

00:23:56.240 --> 00:24:00.579
it on the Thank You compilation. Now, a lot of

00:24:00.579 --> 00:24:02.319
the songs I've been talking about tonight so

00:24:02.319 --> 00:24:06.400
far have been hits. And this next song I feel

00:24:06.400 --> 00:24:10.180
is a hit, but I feel like people that are outside

00:24:10.180 --> 00:24:13.880
of the heavier music community might not see

00:24:13.880 --> 00:24:17.279
this one as much of a hit. This might be to the

00:24:17.279 --> 00:24:20.420
mainstream audience, the deep cut of my 10 song

00:24:20.420 --> 00:24:23.119
playlist. And I'm perfectly okay with that. I

00:24:23.119 --> 00:24:24.980
know there's a lot of people that listen to heavier

00:24:24.980 --> 00:24:28.339
music on here and heavier music sometimes doesn't

00:24:28.339 --> 00:24:31.279
translate well acoustically. However, there is

00:24:31.279 --> 00:24:34.710
a band that I feel could easily be. the most

00:24:34.710 --> 00:24:38.789
underrated. I'll include them in new metal. Although

00:24:38.789 --> 00:24:42.150
I considered him to be much more than that from

00:24:42.150 --> 00:24:45.890
that genre as a whole. And that's going to be

00:24:45.890 --> 00:24:51.490
seven dust. Lejean's vocals are something that

00:24:51.490 --> 00:24:55.730
should be studied. He can do the heaviest of

00:24:55.730 --> 00:25:01.210
heavy and take it down to something that pulls

00:25:01.210 --> 00:25:05.400
at your heartstrings. The guy's got a range unlike

00:25:05.400 --> 00:25:09.099
anything I've ever heard. And there's a reason

00:25:09.099 --> 00:25:14.299
why so many heavy bands look up to Seven Dust.

00:25:14.460 --> 00:25:17.960
It's why when they're the opening band on the

00:25:17.960 --> 00:25:21.579
bill, people are packed in the house to see them.

00:25:21.779 --> 00:25:26.319
I have never seen Seven Dust disappoint any audience

00:25:26.319 --> 00:25:30.579
in all the times I've seen them. Now, in 2004,

00:25:30.819 --> 00:25:33.400
they released an album, Southside Double Wide

00:25:33.400 --> 00:25:36.680
Acoustic Live. However, I'm going to jump a decade

00:25:36.680 --> 00:25:39.960
further and go with their Time Travelers and

00:25:39.960 --> 00:25:42.640
Bonfires album that they recorded in studio.

00:25:42.839 --> 00:25:46.980
It was a split album, all acoustic. It was six

00:25:46.980 --> 00:25:51.609
re -recorded songs and six brand new songs. The

00:25:51.609 --> 00:25:54.109
album was recorded at Architect Studios, which

00:25:54.109 --> 00:25:56.529
is up in New Jersey. That has nothing to do with

00:25:56.529 --> 00:25:58.529
this, but considering it's from my area, I'd

00:25:58.529 --> 00:26:01.769
like to point that out. And they closed the album

00:26:01.769 --> 00:26:06.529
with an incredible reimagining of the opening

00:26:06.529 --> 00:26:11.009
song from their self -titled album, Black. And

00:26:11.009 --> 00:26:14.750
when you listen to this version, yes, it's acoustic,

00:26:14.970 --> 00:26:20.009
but it is just as heavy as the original electric

00:26:20.009 --> 00:26:24.180
version. but it's heavy in a completely different

00:26:24.180 --> 00:26:29.059
way. The original makes you want to run through

00:26:29.059 --> 00:26:33.180
a wall. The version on Time Travelers and Bonfires

00:26:33.180 --> 00:26:39.539
cuts into your soul, and it is so powerful. You

00:26:39.539 --> 00:26:42.319
listen to them back to back. Obviously, the chorus,

00:26:42.420 --> 00:26:47.099
it sang similarly, but it is two different vibes,

00:26:47.200 --> 00:26:49.119
and the fact that they were able to take this

00:26:49.119 --> 00:26:53.410
incredible... song from their catalog and reimagine

00:26:53.410 --> 00:26:55.890
it the way that they did i don't think i could

00:26:55.890 --> 00:26:58.869
do this playlist without talking about this song

00:26:58.869 --> 00:27:02.670
so time travelers and bonfires if you're a fan

00:27:02.670 --> 00:27:04.609
of seven dust and you haven't heard this album

00:27:04.609 --> 00:27:08.230
you need you you owe it to yourself to give it

00:27:08.230 --> 00:27:11.250
a full listen yes it's not as heavy as what you

00:27:11.250 --> 00:27:13.869
expect from all their stuff But if you're familiar

00:27:13.869 --> 00:27:16.730
with Southside Double Wide Acoustic Live, you

00:27:16.730 --> 00:27:19.269
already know that Seven Dust can bring it acoustically

00:27:19.269 --> 00:27:24.130
just as heavy as they can do electric. Now, I've

00:27:24.130 --> 00:27:26.230
been staying kind of on this entire playlist

00:27:26.230 --> 00:27:28.650
from the 90s up. I want to dip back a little

00:27:28.650 --> 00:27:31.549
bit. I want to go back to the late 80s here.

00:27:32.630 --> 00:27:36.569
And we're going to stay heavy. Because when you

00:27:36.569 --> 00:27:38.730
have one of the biggest hard rock albums of the

00:27:38.730 --> 00:27:42.470
80s come out in 1987, that's Appetite for Destruction.

00:27:42.839 --> 00:27:46.279
and you follow it up with a split EP, half live

00:27:46.279 --> 00:27:50.700
and half acoustic, GNR Lies, you have my attention.

00:27:51.519 --> 00:27:54.660
And the attention you have is when you take one

00:27:54.660 --> 00:27:57.839
of the heaviest songs on Appetite, You're Crazy,

00:27:58.079 --> 00:28:02.400
and you strip it down to a bluesy acoustic jam.

00:28:03.720 --> 00:28:07.079
It sounds like the band is sitting around a campfire,

00:28:07.319 --> 00:28:11.809
having a couple drinks, and just... Getting into

00:28:11.809 --> 00:28:15.049
a groove on a song that normally wouldn't groove

00:28:15.049 --> 00:28:20.509
the way it does on Appetite. Once again, bringing

00:28:20.509 --> 00:28:23.910
your attention to the lyrics. However, don't

00:28:23.910 --> 00:28:26.390
be fooled by the fact that it's slow and bluesy

00:28:26.390 --> 00:28:28.829
because some of the high notes that Axl hits

00:28:28.829 --> 00:28:33.670
in that are just as electric as the version on

00:28:33.670 --> 00:28:35.710
Appetite for Destruction. And I'm going to go

00:28:35.710 --> 00:28:38.349
out on a limb here. I'll be curious if people

00:28:38.349 --> 00:28:42.269
agree with me or disagree with me. But I personally

00:28:42.269 --> 00:28:46.930
prefer the version on GNR Lies over the Appetite

00:28:46.930 --> 00:28:49.490
for Destruction version. Now, let me say this.

00:28:49.910 --> 00:28:53.990
The GNR Lies version does not belong on Appetite

00:28:53.990 --> 00:28:56.589
for Destruction. The version they have on that

00:28:56.589 --> 00:29:00.009
album is perfect for Appetite. But if you put

00:29:00.009 --> 00:29:03.589
the songs back to back, GNR Lies version for

00:29:03.589 --> 00:29:06.490
some reason just takes the cake for me. I'd be

00:29:06.490 --> 00:29:09.430
curious if you feel the same. So please keep

00:29:09.430 --> 00:29:12.829
this conversation going, myweeklymixtape at gmail

00:29:12.829 --> 00:29:16.109
.com or at myweeklymixtape on all the socials.

00:29:16.109 --> 00:29:18.230
Which version do you like better? And I'm sure

00:29:18.230 --> 00:29:20.289
a lot of people might lean towards Appetite.

00:29:20.329 --> 00:29:23.170
And honestly, I can't argue it. They're both

00:29:23.170 --> 00:29:25.609
incredible versions, but there's just something

00:29:25.609 --> 00:29:28.930
that's so raw. They're both raw. They really

00:29:28.930 --> 00:29:31.769
are. But there's something acoustically that

00:29:31.769 --> 00:29:35.420
makes it even more raw. It feels the lyrics in

00:29:35.420 --> 00:29:38.299
it feel more guttural coming out of Axl on the

00:29:38.299 --> 00:29:41.400
version on lies. Some of you might agree with

00:29:41.400 --> 00:29:43.420
me. Some of you might disagree with me. And this

00:29:43.420 --> 00:29:45.880
is one of those situations that I think no matter

00:29:45.880 --> 00:29:47.960
which side of the argument you stand on, we're

00:29:47.960 --> 00:29:50.440
all winners because both versions kick absolute

00:29:50.440 --> 00:29:52.960
ass. But you know what? I'm going to take it

00:29:52.960 --> 00:29:55.059
even a step further, and I'm going to throw a

00:29:55.059 --> 00:29:58.559
poll up on the episode page at myweeklymixtape

00:29:58.559 --> 00:30:01.259
.com. I want to know which version of You're

00:30:01.259 --> 00:30:04.240
Crazy the Mixtapers do prefer. Is it the version

00:30:04.240 --> 00:30:07.200
from Appetite for Destruction or GNR Lies? So

00:30:07.200 --> 00:30:09.720
head over to the episode page and throw a vote

00:30:09.720 --> 00:30:12.799
at the one you prefer more. Again, no right or

00:30:12.799 --> 00:30:14.579
wrong answers here because I love them both.

00:30:14.759 --> 00:30:17.099
But let's see what everyone else has to say.

00:30:18.359 --> 00:30:22.140
Now I'm scrolling through my playlist here. Because

00:30:22.140 --> 00:30:26.960
I'm trying to find... Here it is. Okay. Like

00:30:26.960 --> 00:30:30.440
I said, I enjoy the GNRLies version of You're

00:30:30.440 --> 00:30:35.799
Crazy more than the Appetite version. Not by

00:30:35.799 --> 00:30:39.920
much, but just edges it out. And here's another

00:30:39.920 --> 00:30:42.099
instance that that happens for me. And the reason

00:30:42.099 --> 00:30:44.019
I had to look it up is because I couldn't tell

00:30:44.019 --> 00:30:48.079
you this EP's name off the top of my head. It's

00:30:48.079 --> 00:30:51.339
known as B -Sides from 1x1, but I had to read

00:30:51.339 --> 00:30:57.660
it. It's called 00020225. And I'm going to go

00:30:57.660 --> 00:31:00.519
with the Foo Fighters acoustic version of Times

00:31:00.519 --> 00:31:04.799
Like These. I understand that people love Times

00:31:04.799 --> 00:31:07.720
Like These as the fast version with Taylor Hawkins'

00:31:07.839 --> 00:31:11.200
incredible drums and the energy that that song

00:31:11.200 --> 00:31:15.430
brings. The studio version on 1x1 rocks more.

00:31:15.529 --> 00:31:20.250
I'll never argue that. But times like these from

00:31:20.250 --> 00:31:26.650
this EP hits me harder in the feels. And this

00:31:26.650 --> 00:31:28.970
is one that I would love to know from Foo Fighter

00:31:28.970 --> 00:31:32.890
fans because times like these is one of the band's

00:31:32.890 --> 00:31:36.630
biggest hits. And this, along with Everlong,

00:31:36.930 --> 00:31:41.440
have been done fully acoustic and slow. And they've

00:31:41.440 --> 00:31:44.900
both been done in that half acoustic, half slow,

00:31:44.980 --> 00:31:48.000
half rock and half fast version where they're,

00:31:48.000 --> 00:31:51.059
the two are kind of merged together. So I'd be

00:31:51.059 --> 00:31:54.480
very curious where Foo Fighters fans stand on

00:31:54.480 --> 00:31:57.160
this. I tend to lean more towards the acoustic

00:31:57.160 --> 00:32:00.299
one because the lyrics really grab and resonate

00:32:00.299 --> 00:32:03.519
with me more, but in zero disrespect to the rock

00:32:03.519 --> 00:32:05.799
and version, because of course I always want

00:32:05.799 --> 00:32:09.119
to rock out too. But for this playlist. I feel

00:32:09.119 --> 00:32:12.839
like this version fits in really, really well

00:32:12.839 --> 00:32:16.059
coming out of the heavier side with Seven Dust

00:32:16.059 --> 00:32:19.420
and GNR. And now we're bringing it back down

00:32:19.420 --> 00:32:21.819
a little bit. And you know what? Hopefully I

00:32:21.819 --> 00:32:23.819
remember to do all this by the time the episode

00:32:23.819 --> 00:32:26.599
launches. I'm going to put another poll on the

00:32:26.599 --> 00:32:29.980
episode page. I'll be curious which version of

00:32:29.980 --> 00:32:33.180
times like these you like better, the one by

00:32:33.180 --> 00:32:36.460
one version or the acoustic EP version. So I'll

00:32:36.460 --> 00:32:39.480
throw that up on there as well. Once again, that's

00:32:39.480 --> 00:32:42.579
myweeklymixtape .com in case you forgot the last

00:32:42.579 --> 00:32:45.420
five times I mentioned him. And now we're at

00:32:45.420 --> 00:32:48.940
the point to the last song of this playlist.

00:32:49.559 --> 00:32:51.859
And we talked about this artist before because

00:32:51.859 --> 00:32:54.240
we ended the first side with Blackberry Smokes'

00:32:54.359 --> 00:32:56.839
You Got Lucky. Did you really think I was going

00:32:56.839 --> 00:32:59.480
to do an acoustic remakes and reimaginings playlist

00:32:59.480 --> 00:33:03.259
and not include Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers'

00:33:03.319 --> 00:33:07.299
Learning to Fly from 2006's Bonnaroo performance?

00:33:08.089 --> 00:33:11.109
That's featured on the live anthology. I talked

00:33:11.109 --> 00:33:13.829
about this song on the spellbinding episode of

00:33:13.829 --> 00:33:17.609
season one. This version makes the hair on my

00:33:17.609 --> 00:33:21.150
arm stand up every single time I hear it. Stevie

00:33:21.150 --> 00:33:25.890
Nicks with her majestic background vocals, slowing

00:33:25.890 --> 00:33:30.569
this fun and upbeat song down to almost a gospel

00:33:30.569 --> 00:33:34.029
nature. To me, it's the perfect way to close

00:33:34.029 --> 00:33:37.559
out this 10 song reimagining playlist. It's the

00:33:37.559 --> 00:33:40.559
opening track on Into the Great Wide Open. And

00:33:40.559 --> 00:33:43.880
it's the closing track on this Acoustic Remakes

00:33:43.880 --> 00:33:46.880
and Reimaginings playlist. This version, the

00:33:46.880 --> 00:33:50.319
video, is up on YouTube. And at the end, Tom

00:33:50.319 --> 00:33:53.299
is singing the chorus over and over again with

00:33:53.299 --> 00:33:56.220
the audience singing it back. And once the audience

00:33:56.220 --> 00:33:59.680
takes the chorus over, Tom starts riffing over

00:33:59.680 --> 00:34:03.039
the audience. And it is so beautiful. It is literally

00:34:03.039 --> 00:34:07.720
like Tom is... preaching the gospel of music

00:34:07.720 --> 00:34:12.059
to this amazing audience. I had the chance on

00:34:12.059 --> 00:34:15.280
their Mojo tour to see this version performed

00:34:15.280 --> 00:34:18.699
live. My father and I went together, and I will

00:34:18.699 --> 00:34:21.659
never forget him and I being a part of that audience

00:34:21.659 --> 00:34:25.340
sing -along. It is one of the most beautiful

00:34:25.340 --> 00:34:29.500
live performances I have ever seen, up there

00:34:29.500 --> 00:34:32.960
with Grace Potter doing I Shall Be Released at

00:34:32.960 --> 00:34:35.840
the Love for Levon concert. This is something

00:34:35.840 --> 00:34:38.559
that if you haven't heard it, you need to, again,

00:34:38.699 --> 00:34:42.039
pause. Don't hit stop. Hit pause and go listen

00:34:42.039 --> 00:34:44.820
to it, along with the rest of the songs we talked

00:34:44.820 --> 00:34:47.940
about, because all of them are embedded on the

00:34:47.940 --> 00:34:51.719
episode page over at myweeklymixtape .com. But

00:34:51.719 --> 00:34:54.079
now I'm going to take you through all the songs

00:34:54.079 --> 00:34:56.440
we've talked about on this 10 -song playlist.

00:34:56.780 --> 00:35:00.460
We had Eric Clapton's Layla, Counting Crows'

00:35:00.539 --> 00:35:03.699
Rain King, Alanis Morissette's You Oughta Know.

00:35:04.380 --> 00:35:08.360
Hearts Alone, Blackberry Smokes, You Got Lucky,

00:35:08.719 --> 00:35:12.800
Stone Temple Pilots, Plush, Seven Dusts, Black,

00:35:13.199 --> 00:35:17.079
Guns N' Roses, You're Crazy, Foo Fighters, Times

00:35:17.079 --> 00:35:20.019
Like These, and Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers,

00:35:20.079 --> 00:35:23.000
Learning to Fly. Once again, you can hear all

00:35:23.000 --> 00:35:27.599
of these songs over on the episode page at myweeklymixtape

00:35:27.599 --> 00:35:31.139
.com. Now, like I said, I've been scrolling through

00:35:31.139 --> 00:35:34.320
this playlist. And I have a couple of songs that

00:35:34.320 --> 00:35:37.860
are listed as uploaded in my cloud status. And

00:35:37.860 --> 00:35:41.599
what that means on Apple Music is they're not

00:35:41.599 --> 00:35:44.800
available on streaming. So here are a few more

00:35:44.800 --> 00:35:49.320
that I like to consider. The CD Jackpot, Physical

00:35:49.320 --> 00:35:55.119
Media 1, Streaming 0. And those are Billy Squire's

00:35:55.119 --> 00:35:59.860
The Stroke. It's on a CD called 80s Hits Stripped.

00:35:59.980 --> 00:36:04.320
He takes the stroke. and strips it down to a

00:36:04.320 --> 00:36:08.719
bluesy acoustic version. It's just a guitar and

00:36:08.719 --> 00:36:11.900
Billy's voice. You've never heard the stroke

00:36:11.900 --> 00:36:15.840
like this before. And it is something that I

00:36:15.840 --> 00:36:18.000
wish I could have put on this playlist, but it's

00:36:18.000 --> 00:36:21.320
not on streaming. So honorable mention by far.

00:36:21.539 --> 00:36:25.179
I also want to give a shout out to Bon Jovi.

00:36:25.260 --> 00:36:27.760
I know Cactus Pete talked about something for

00:36:27.760 --> 00:36:30.980
the pain when he chimed in with this topic. I

00:36:30.980 --> 00:36:33.539
want to give a shout out to Living on a Prayer,

00:36:33.780 --> 00:36:37.320
the version that was done at the America A Tribute

00:36:37.320 --> 00:36:40.320
to Heroes concert that took place in the days

00:36:40.320 --> 00:36:43.659
following 9 -11. They took the version that was

00:36:43.659 --> 00:36:47.619
Prayer 94 on the Crossroad Greatest Hits album

00:36:47.619 --> 00:36:51.460
in the 90s and stripped it down even more. And

00:36:51.460 --> 00:36:57.269
it is so beautiful. It is so well done. The moment

00:36:57.269 --> 00:36:59.630
that they played this song in a few days after

00:36:59.630 --> 00:37:02.670
9 -11 just takes it to a completely different

00:37:02.670 --> 00:37:05.829
level. This is one that you definitely need to

00:37:05.829 --> 00:37:09.730
find the CD. The entire America Tribute to Heroes

00:37:09.730 --> 00:37:13.809
double CD set is worth the purchase. The fact

00:37:13.809 --> 00:37:16.269
that it's not on streaming, to me, as far as

00:37:16.269 --> 00:37:19.670
I'm concerned, is criminal. Bruce Springsteen's

00:37:19.670 --> 00:37:22.909
My City of Ruins. Oh, my God. You want to talk

00:37:22.909 --> 00:37:25.760
about a song that just... pulls your heart out

00:37:25.760 --> 00:37:28.159
and shows it to you. That's a version right there.

00:37:28.460 --> 00:37:31.159
And then one other one that's an honorable mention,

00:37:32.079 --> 00:37:36.000
Evanescence's cover of Bananarama's Cruel Summer.

00:37:36.199 --> 00:37:39.760
You can only find that on the Bitter Truth CD

00:37:39.760 --> 00:37:44.059
if you bought it at Target. It's the Target special

00:37:44.059 --> 00:37:47.420
edition. There is a video version up on YouTube,

00:37:47.519 --> 00:37:51.019
and these three I will embed the videos of on

00:37:51.019 --> 00:37:54.329
the episode page at myweeklymixtape .com. for

00:37:54.329 --> 00:37:56.230
you to check out because I feel like these three

00:37:56.230 --> 00:37:59.690
need to be highlighted in this discussion. They

00:37:59.690 --> 00:38:01.610
didn't make the playlist because they're not

00:38:01.610 --> 00:38:04.630
on streaming. Boo on you, streaming services.

00:38:04.949 --> 00:38:08.590
Get these songs on there. Let people hear them.

00:38:09.110 --> 00:38:13.349
Physical Media 1, Streaming 0, like I said. With

00:38:13.349 --> 00:38:15.630
that, I want to thank Cactus Pete for chiming

00:38:15.630 --> 00:38:18.070
in with this really fun topic. I had a great

00:38:18.070 --> 00:38:19.989
time scrolling through this playlist. I've got

00:38:19.989 --> 00:38:23.139
about... Oh, a few hundred more. So I could definitely

00:38:23.139 --> 00:38:26.260
do a volume two of this. I'm sure you guys can

00:38:26.260 --> 00:38:28.579
too. I want to know what songs you would add

00:38:28.579 --> 00:38:32.179
to this acoustic remakes and reimaginings playlist.

00:38:32.440 --> 00:38:37.880
My weekly mixtape at gmail .com or at my weekly

00:38:37.880 --> 00:38:41.019
mixtape on all the social media haunts. Let's

00:38:41.019 --> 00:38:44.500
keep this conversation going outside of the podcast

00:38:44.500 --> 00:39:06.130
because. If you want to support the show, but

00:39:06.130 --> 00:39:09.650
that is only if you want to. None of it is required.

00:39:10.010 --> 00:39:13.590
I appreciate. all the support you guys show me

00:39:13.590 --> 00:39:17.989
and my weekly mixtape week in and week out. If

00:39:17.989 --> 00:39:20.809
there's a topic you want to hear on a future,

00:39:20.849 --> 00:39:24.230
my weekly mixtape episode, email it to me, post

00:39:24.230 --> 00:39:27.420
it on social media. Post it on the Patreon. Let

00:39:27.420 --> 00:39:30.440
me add it to this list. I want to be challenged.

00:39:30.619 --> 00:39:33.719
I want to be stumped. Let's keep this mixtape

00:39:33.719 --> 00:39:36.940
or conversation going week in and week out. My

00:39:36.940 --> 00:39:40.139
name is Brian Colburn. I thank you all for listening.

00:39:40.179 --> 00:39:43.300
And until next time, enjoy the ultimate acoustic

00:39:43.300 --> 00:39:47.000
remakes and reimaginings playlist. See you next

00:39:47.000 --> 00:39:47.280
time.
