WEBVTT

00:00:06.059 --> 00:00:09.800
Welcome to the bed. We'll go ahead and give you

00:00:09.800 --> 00:00:12.580
the story. This is all going to happen super

00:00:12.580 --> 00:00:47.390
fast. Welcome to the emergency room. Okay, let's

00:00:47.390 --> 00:00:50.250
get into it. We're seeing, right now, one of

00:00:50.250 --> 00:00:53.270
the biggest social transformations of this century.

00:00:53.909 --> 00:00:56.990
The world is, well, it's getting older. Fast,

00:00:57.210 --> 00:00:59.890
and this isn't some abstract idea, right? Not

00:00:59.890 --> 00:01:02.630
at all. It's probably the defining challenge

00:01:02.630 --> 00:01:04.790
that's reshaping our entire healthcare system

00:01:04.790 --> 00:01:07.329
as we speak. Yeah, and the sources we're looking

00:01:07.329 --> 00:01:09.849
at today make that demographic shift. I mean,

00:01:09.989 --> 00:01:12.560
it's just... It's crystal clear. It's staggering,

00:01:12.739 --> 00:01:14.739
really. You're talking about the fastest growing

00:01:14.739 --> 00:01:17.739
part in the US population. And if you look globally,

00:01:17.879 --> 00:01:20.579
the numbers are just massive. How massive? Well,

00:01:20.640 --> 00:01:23.099
by 2050, something like half the world is going

00:01:23.099 --> 00:01:25.540
to be living in a country where one in five people

00:01:25.540 --> 00:01:28.579
is over the age of 60. One in five, wow. Yeah.

00:01:28.840 --> 00:01:32.700
I mean, that's a revolutionary shift in how we

00:01:32.700 --> 00:01:35.079
live, but also in what our trauma centers are

00:01:35.079 --> 00:01:37.579
going to be facing every single day. And that's

00:01:37.579 --> 00:01:39.519
exactly what we're here to talk about. This deep

00:01:39.519 --> 00:01:42.400
dive is all about geriatric trauma. We've designed

00:01:42.400 --> 00:01:44.620
this as a critical review guide for you, the

00:01:44.620 --> 00:01:47.939
learner, to really zero in on that crucial 20

00:01:47.939 --> 00:01:51.680
% of information that gives you 80 % of the clinical

00:01:51.680 --> 00:01:53.700
understanding you need. The Pareto principle

00:01:53.700 --> 00:01:57.019
for trauma. Exactly. We're focusing on the unique

00:01:57.019 --> 00:02:00.900
physiology, the management priorities, really

00:02:00.900 --> 00:02:03.280
hitting on the nursing implications and what

00:02:03.280 --> 00:02:05.260
you need to do in those first critical minutes.

00:02:05.659 --> 00:02:07.939
And the stakes are just. They couldn't be higher.

00:02:08.439 --> 00:02:10.879
Yeah. Injury is now the fifth leading cause of

00:02:10.879 --> 00:02:13.639
death in the elderly. The fifth. And the data.

00:02:13.949 --> 00:02:16.849
It's totally unequivocal. An older adult will

00:02:16.849 --> 00:02:19.330
have a much higher mortality rate, even when

00:02:19.330 --> 00:02:22.169
their injuries, by the standard scores, look

00:02:22.169 --> 00:02:24.949
exactly the same as a younger patient's. So if

00:02:24.949 --> 00:02:27.310
the injury itself isn't the only thing driving

00:02:27.310 --> 00:02:29.370
that mortality, we have to be looking somewhere

00:02:29.370 --> 00:02:31.569
else. It's not just the crash or the fall. That's

00:02:31.569 --> 00:02:33.250
the whole point. What's driving this? Yeah, what

00:02:33.250 --> 00:02:36.229
is it? It's this complex mix. The sources call

00:02:36.229 --> 00:02:39.919
them host factors. So the aging of their organ

00:02:39.919 --> 00:02:42.379
systems, the burden of all the diseases they

00:02:42.379 --> 00:02:45.479
already have, frailty, and this is a big one.

00:02:46.379 --> 00:02:49.520
Our failure to triage them correctly in the acute

00:02:49.520 --> 00:02:51.860
setting. So we miss the signs. We miss the subtle

00:02:51.860 --> 00:02:56.879
signs. And if we do, the outcome is just devastatingly

00:02:56.879 --> 00:02:58.460
different than it would be for a 40 -year -old

00:02:58.460 --> 00:03:00.919
with the same injury. OK. So it's a race against

00:03:00.919 --> 00:03:02.939
the patient's own body. A race against their

00:03:02.939 --> 00:03:05.159
limitations. Exactly. All right. Let's start

00:03:05.159 --> 00:03:08.340
with the absolute core concept here. The thing

00:03:08.340 --> 00:03:09.919
that explains almost everything else we're going

00:03:09.919 --> 00:03:13.259
to talk about. Decreased physiologic reserve.

00:03:14.000 --> 00:03:16.439
What does that phrase actually mean when we're

00:03:16.439 --> 00:03:19.259
standing in a loud chaotic trauma bay? It's the

00:03:19.259 --> 00:03:21.280
body's safety margin. That's the easiest way

00:03:21.280 --> 00:03:22.860
to think about it. OK. I mean, in a practical

00:03:22.860 --> 00:03:24.840
sense, aging just means that cellular function

00:03:24.840 --> 00:03:27.379
is declining everywhere in all the systems. Right.

00:03:27.659 --> 00:03:30.360
So as those cells get less efficient, the big

00:03:30.360 --> 00:03:33.699
systems, the heart, the lungs, the kidneys, they

00:03:33.699 --> 00:03:36.580
lose their ability to perform above just their

00:03:36.580 --> 00:03:38.900
normal baseline. So they have no surge capacity.

00:03:39.210 --> 00:03:41.830
Exactly. They have no surge. So when that elderly

00:03:41.830 --> 00:03:44.969
patient gets hit with a major trauma, their body's

00:03:44.969 --> 00:03:47.449
adaptive mechanisms, the very things designed

00:03:47.449 --> 00:03:49.909
to cope with massive stress like blood loss,

00:03:50.189 --> 00:03:53.030
they're just impaired. They lack that safety

00:03:53.030 --> 00:03:56.610
margin to fight back. So a younger person has

00:03:56.610 --> 00:03:59.770
this like deep reserve tank they can pull from

00:03:59.770 --> 00:04:02.009
to compensate for shock or fight off an infection

00:04:02.009 --> 00:04:06.819
for hours. But the older patient's tank is It's

00:04:06.819 --> 00:04:09.039
already running on fumes. That's a perfect analogy.

00:04:09.199 --> 00:04:11.060
The tank is almost empty to begin with. So how

00:04:11.060 --> 00:04:14.080
much warning do we actually get before they crash?

00:04:14.379 --> 00:04:16.259
Very, very little. That's the terrifying part.

00:04:16.540 --> 00:04:18.620
The sources really stress that insults that a

00:04:18.620 --> 00:04:21.120
younger patient would just tolerate. you know,

00:04:21.259 --> 00:04:22.860
a minor fracture, a little bit of blood loss.

00:04:22.860 --> 00:04:25.660
Right. That can lead to just devastating, often

00:04:25.660 --> 00:04:28.480
fatal results in an elderly patient. Their adaptive

00:04:28.480 --> 00:04:31.120
response is blunted and it's instantaneous. They

00:04:31.120 --> 00:04:33.220
start so much closer to that failure point. So

00:04:33.220 --> 00:04:35.959
once they tip over that edge into real shock.

00:04:36.399 --> 00:04:38.699
Recovery is incredibly difficult. Their mechanisms

00:04:38.699 --> 00:04:41.259
for adaptation are already exhausted or they

00:04:41.259 --> 00:04:43.319
just don't work anymore. That completely changes

00:04:43.319 --> 00:04:46.220
the urgency. It means we have to treat even what

00:04:46.220 --> 00:04:48.879
looks like mild instability as a code red event.

00:04:49.160 --> 00:04:51.180
Absolutely. And that brings us right to the next

00:04:51.180 --> 00:04:54.839
factor. Pre -existing conditions. PECs. Right.

00:04:55.079 --> 00:04:57.779
The compounders. The sources highlighted five

00:04:57.779 --> 00:05:00.660
that really, really impact outcomes. What are

00:05:00.660 --> 00:05:02.920
the five we have to be screening for immediately?

00:05:03.220 --> 00:05:06.079
OK. So the five high impact PECs from the research

00:05:06.079 --> 00:05:11.060
are cirrhosis, coagulopathy, COPD, That's chronic

00:05:11.060 --> 00:05:13.560
obstructive pulmonary disease, ischemic heart

00:05:13.560 --> 00:05:15.980
disease, and diabetes. OK, that's a big list.

00:05:16.160 --> 00:05:18.920
It is. And the presence of any one of these just

00:05:18.920 --> 00:05:22.000
tanks their already limited reserve and totally

00:05:22.000 --> 00:05:24.040
changes the patient's prognosis. Let's break

00:05:24.040 --> 00:05:26.620
down why these five are so bad in a trauma. I

00:05:26.620 --> 00:05:28.860
mean, beyond just having the diagnosis. For sure.

00:05:28.939 --> 00:05:31.980
Let's think of it as failing defenses. So cirrhosis.

00:05:32.339 --> 00:05:35.180
That compromises the liver. The liver makes clotting

00:05:35.180 --> 00:05:38.319
factors. It metabolizes waste. Post -trauma,

00:05:38.519 --> 00:05:40.540
that patient is at huge risk for just bleeding

00:05:40.540 --> 00:05:43.060
out. They can't clot. And they can't clear all

00:05:43.060 --> 00:05:44.819
the inflammatory toxins that get released during

00:05:44.819 --> 00:05:47.040
shock. OK, what about coagulopathy if they already

00:05:47.040 --> 00:05:49.259
have a bleeding problem? That's just a catastrophic

00:05:49.259 --> 00:05:52.459
risk multiplier from second one, especially with

00:05:52.459 --> 00:05:54.139
hidden bleeding in the head, which we'll get

00:05:54.139 --> 00:05:56.800
to. And COPD. That's a direct attack on their

00:05:56.800 --> 00:05:59.060
respiratory reserve. These patients already have

00:05:59.060 --> 00:06:01.709
trouble getting air out. Their lungs are stiff.

00:06:01.910 --> 00:06:03.889
Their functional reserve is tiny. So there's

00:06:03.889 --> 00:06:06.629
no wiggle room. Zero. Yeah. A little bit of pain

00:06:06.629 --> 00:06:08.850
from a rib fracture that makes them breathe shallow.

00:06:09.209 --> 00:06:11.370
That can cause a complete respiratory collapse.

00:06:11.810 --> 00:06:14.990
Fast. OK. And ischemic heart disease? That means

00:06:14.990 --> 00:06:17.430
their heart muscle is already weak. So when you

00:06:17.430 --> 00:06:20.209
hit it with the massive stress of trauma, the

00:06:20.209 --> 00:06:22.769
need for high cardiac output. It can't keep up.

00:06:22.910 --> 00:06:25.769
It can't. They're a huge risk for a heart attack

00:06:25.769 --> 00:06:28.069
right there in the trauma bay, which can just

00:06:28.069 --> 00:06:29.970
trigger the whole collapse into irreversible

00:06:29.970 --> 00:06:32.629
shock. And finally, diabetes. Diabetes messes

00:06:32.629 --> 00:06:35.629
with everything. Immune function, vascular health.

00:06:36.490 --> 00:06:38.810
They're a much higher risk for infection, for

00:06:38.810 --> 00:06:42.250
poor wound healing, and the stress of the trauma

00:06:42.250 --> 00:06:45.379
itself. sends their blood sugar into chaos, which

00:06:45.379 --> 00:06:47.540
just accelerates all the bad outcomes. That list

00:06:47.540 --> 00:06:50.180
covers a huge number of people. Do we know how

00:06:50.180 --> 00:06:52.759
common this kind of stacked risk is? The data

00:06:52.759 --> 00:06:56.639
is pretty wild. In one study, a full one -fourth

00:06:56.639 --> 00:07:00.540
of all trauma patients over 65 had at least one

00:07:00.540 --> 00:07:03.720
of these five packs. A quarter of them. And here's

00:07:03.720 --> 00:07:06.740
the real need -to -know takeaway from that. Patients

00:07:06.740 --> 00:07:09.459
with one or more of these conditions were nearly

00:07:09.459 --> 00:07:11.899
two times more likely to die after their trauma

00:07:11.899 --> 00:07:15.300
than patients who had none. Two times? Yeah.

00:07:15.620 --> 00:07:17.560
This isn't just, you know, statistical noise.

00:07:17.639 --> 00:07:20.779
This is a fundamental driver of who lives and

00:07:20.779 --> 00:07:23.279
who dies. So it's an exponential increase in

00:07:23.279 --> 00:07:25.300
risk just based on who the patient is before

00:07:25.300 --> 00:07:27.500
we even get to the injury. Exactly. Let's dig

00:07:27.500 --> 00:07:29.879
into that relationship between age, the pecs,

00:07:30.160 --> 00:07:33.689
and mortality. The data visualization and the

00:07:33.689 --> 00:07:35.790
source material really drives this home. It's

00:07:35.790 --> 00:07:37.990
not a straight line, is it? No, it's a compounding

00:07:37.990 --> 00:07:40.769
effect, a stacking effect. Your mortality risk

00:07:40.769 --> 00:07:42.529
doesn't just go up because you're old. It goes

00:07:42.529 --> 00:07:45.529
up significantly by decade 70s, 80s, 90s. Right.

00:07:45.790 --> 00:07:48.209
But then it gets compounded by how many of those

00:07:48.209 --> 00:07:50.329
pecs the patient is carrying? Zero, one to two,

00:07:50.410 --> 00:07:53.149
or three or more? So it's a multiplier. A seven

00:07:53.149 --> 00:07:55.910
-year -old with zero pecs has a manageable risk.

00:07:56.240 --> 00:07:58.819
But a 70 -year -old with three or more pecs might

00:07:58.819 --> 00:08:01.120
have a risk profile that's actually worse than

00:08:01.120 --> 00:08:03.480
someone in their late 80s with fewer conditions.

00:08:03.500 --> 00:08:05.600
That's it. Exactly. It's about their physiological

00:08:05.600 --> 00:08:08.180
age, not their chronological age. And their physiological

00:08:08.180 --> 00:08:11.300
age is defined by these conditions. Right. The

00:08:11.300 --> 00:08:14.439
expert insight here is that while the injury

00:08:14.439 --> 00:08:17.839
severity is, of course, the primary driver, a

00:08:17.839 --> 00:08:20.579
catastrophic injury is always bad. These host

00:08:20.579 --> 00:08:24.259
factors play a huge additive and often exponential

00:08:24.259 --> 00:08:28.050
role. It's a severe trauma plus zero reserve.

00:08:28.410 --> 00:08:31.050
So you have to manage the injury and the host.

00:08:31.170 --> 00:08:33.450
You have to. That vulnerability really sets the

00:08:33.450 --> 00:08:36.029
stage. But how does that fragility actually play

00:08:36.029 --> 00:08:38.549
out when they get injured? Let's talk about the

00:08:38.549 --> 00:08:40.970
mechanisms. Okay. We often think of big car crashes,

00:08:41.210 --> 00:08:43.210
but the sources point to falls as the single

00:08:43.210 --> 00:08:45.929
most common fatal mechanism. That's a really

00:08:45.929 --> 00:08:48.370
important distinction. Not just common, but the

00:08:48.370 --> 00:08:50.769
most common killer. It is. The risk of falling

00:08:50.769 --> 00:08:53.649
just goes up dramatically with age. sensory decline,

00:08:54.049 --> 00:08:56.289
balance problems, medications, and it's often

00:08:56.289 --> 00:09:00.070
a seemingly simple ground -level fall. You know,

00:09:00.190 --> 00:09:02.909
tripping on a rug. But the consequences are anything

00:09:02.909 --> 00:09:05.610
but simple. And what's the specific risk from

00:09:05.610 --> 00:09:08.149
falls we absolutely have to hammer home? Traumatic

00:09:08.149 --> 00:09:11.669
brain injury. TBI. Falls are the number one cause

00:09:11.669 --> 00:09:14.690
of TBI in the elderly. Wow. And get this, nearly

00:09:14.690 --> 00:09:16.990
half of all the deaths from ground -level falls

00:09:16.990 --> 00:09:20.549
are a direct result of a TBI. Half? Why is that?

00:09:20.789 --> 00:09:23.750
It's because of cerebral atrophy. As you age,

00:09:24.330 --> 00:09:26.269
your brain shrinks a little bit. That leaves

00:09:26.269 --> 00:09:28.549
a bigger space between the surface of the brain

00:09:28.549 --> 00:09:30.870
and the inside of the skull. Right. So during

00:09:30.870 --> 00:09:33.049
a minor fall, the brain has more room to move

00:09:33.049 --> 00:09:35.409
around and tear the tiny little bridging veins

00:09:35.409 --> 00:09:38.330
that connect it to the skull. That leads to a

00:09:38.330 --> 00:09:41.029
subdural hemorrhage. Low impact, catastrophic

00:09:41.029 --> 00:09:43.659
result. And beyond the TBI risk, there's another

00:09:43.659 --> 00:09:45.919
really devastating outcome related to falls,

00:09:46.419 --> 00:09:48.759
specifically hip fractures. This one speaks to

00:09:48.759 --> 00:09:51.179
the long term cost. This is a heartbreaking one.

00:09:51.279 --> 00:09:53.659
The loss of independence is huge. The sources

00:09:53.659 --> 00:09:55.960
say that one half of elderly patients who suffer

00:09:55.960 --> 00:09:58.240
a hip fracture will no longer be able to live

00:09:58.240 --> 00:10:00.320
independently. Half of them. That means months

00:10:00.320 --> 00:10:03.379
of rehab. And often it means a permanent move

00:10:03.379 --> 00:10:06.399
to assisted living. The focus has to be on fall

00:10:06.399 --> 00:10:08.879
prevention in the first place. OK, let's shift

00:10:08.879 --> 00:10:12.360
to motor vehicle crashes. The sources say older

00:10:12.360 --> 00:10:15.179
people are generally safer drivers. They drive

00:10:15.179 --> 00:10:18.639
less. They drive slower. Right. On familiar roads.

00:10:19.139 --> 00:10:22.379
So when fatalities do happen, what's the context?

00:10:22.620 --> 00:10:24.779
What are the clues we need to look for? It's

00:10:24.779 --> 00:10:26.779
interesting. The fatalities usually happen during

00:10:26.779 --> 00:10:29.679
the day. on weekends and they typically involve

00:10:29.679 --> 00:10:32.580
other cars. That points to issues at intersections

00:10:32.580 --> 00:10:35.539
or complex moves that need quick reaction times.

00:10:36.080 --> 00:10:38.679
And what are the underlying physical things that

00:10:38.679 --> 00:10:41.379
contribute? Slower reaction time is a huge one.

00:10:41.559 --> 00:10:44.080
Vision and hearing impairment too. But one that's

00:10:44.080 --> 00:10:47.179
really underappreciated is limited neck mobility.

00:10:47.360 --> 00:10:49.240
From arthritis. Yeah, from arthritis in the neck.

00:10:49.379 --> 00:10:51.379
If an older patient can't turn their head easily,

00:10:51.480 --> 00:10:53.779
they can't scan traffic, they end up with these

00:10:53.779 --> 00:10:55.539
huge functional blind spots, they never see the

00:10:55.539 --> 00:10:58.480
other car coming. That makes so much sense. And

00:10:58.480 --> 00:11:00.460
is there a hidden medical cause we should be

00:11:00.460 --> 00:11:03.559
thinking about? Yes. And this is critical for

00:11:03.559 --> 00:11:05.799
your differential diagnosis. You always have

00:11:05.799 --> 00:11:08.200
to consider that the crash itself might have

00:11:08.200 --> 00:11:10.759
been caused by a physiological event. Like a

00:11:10.759 --> 00:11:13.629
heart attack. Exactly. A heart attack, a stroke,

00:11:13.889 --> 00:11:16.730
a cardiac dysrhythmia. Yeah. You can't just treat

00:11:16.730 --> 00:11:18.769
the trauma from the crash. You have to look for

00:11:18.769 --> 00:11:20.909
the medical crisis that made them lose control

00:11:20.909 --> 00:11:23.190
in the first place. So assume they had a medical

00:11:23.190 --> 00:11:25.509
event until you prove otherwise. You got it.

00:11:25.590 --> 00:11:28.629
Let's talk about burns. The sources are really

00:11:28.629 --> 00:11:30.889
clear that burns are just devastating for the

00:11:30.889 --> 00:11:33.690
elderly. Why is the mortality so high here? It

00:11:33.690 --> 00:11:35.870
comes right back to that loss of physiologic

00:11:35.870 --> 00:11:38.909
reserve and the physical changes in their skin.

00:11:39.509 --> 00:11:42.690
How so? An older patient's body just can't meet

00:11:42.690 --> 00:11:46.190
the immense demands of a burn injury. The hypermetabolism,

00:11:46.330 --> 00:11:48.470
the massive fluid shifts, the constant threat

00:11:48.470 --> 00:11:50.950
of infection. It's too much for their systems.

00:11:51.649 --> 00:11:53.950
Their reaction times are also slower, so they're

00:11:53.950 --> 00:11:55.870
exposed to the heat for longer. And there is

00:11:55.870 --> 00:11:58.409
a fascinating little detail, a smallest detail,

00:11:58.490 --> 00:12:00.889
about how their skin itself changes. This is

00:12:00.889 --> 00:12:03.850
a great clinical pearl. A common mechanism is

00:12:03.850 --> 00:12:06.309
spilling hot liquid on their leg. In a younger

00:12:06.309 --> 00:12:08.629
person, that might be a partial thickness burn

00:12:08.629 --> 00:12:10.769
that can heal on its own, because they have a

00:12:10.769 --> 00:12:13.549
lot of hair follicles that act as reservoirs

00:12:13.549 --> 00:12:17.110
for new skin cells. But in older patients, because

00:12:17.110 --> 00:12:19.049
they have fewer of those follicles in their skin,

00:12:19.490 --> 00:12:22.210
that same spill often results in a full thickness

00:12:22.210 --> 00:12:24.769
burn. Which needs surgery. Exactly. Extensive

00:12:24.769 --> 00:12:28.350
surgery, grafting, a long recovery. All things

00:12:28.350 --> 00:12:31.110
that just hammer their already tiny physiologic

00:12:31.110 --> 00:12:33.669
reserve. That's a brilliant example. Finally,

00:12:33.850 --> 00:12:36.519
penetrating injuries. Blunt trauma is more common,

00:12:36.559 --> 00:12:39.139
but where does this fit in? It's the fourth most

00:12:39.139 --> 00:12:41.259
common cause of traumatic death in people over

00:12:41.259 --> 00:12:44.759
65. But the critical implication here is often

00:12:44.759 --> 00:12:47.480
psychological. How do you mean? A lot of the

00:12:47.480 --> 00:12:49.799
deaths from gunshot wounds in the elderly are

00:12:49.799 --> 00:12:52.759
related to intentional self -harm or suicide.

00:12:53.039 --> 00:12:56.059
Ah. So as clinicians, we have to recognize that

00:12:56.059 --> 00:12:58.139
hidden aspect and make sure we're getting mental

00:12:58.139 --> 00:13:00.240
health and social services involved right away

00:13:00.240 --> 00:13:02.600
if the patient survives. We've set the stage

00:13:02.600 --> 00:13:04.259
with the vulnerabilities and the mechanisms.

00:13:04.509 --> 00:13:07.289
Let's move into the acute management. The core

00:13:07.289 --> 00:13:09.990
principles are still ATLS, right? But we have

00:13:09.990 --> 00:13:12.909
to adapt them. Yeah, the structure of ABCDE is

00:13:12.909 --> 00:13:15.970
the same. But how you interpret the findings

00:13:15.970 --> 00:13:19.190
and, crucially, your threshold for intervention,

00:13:19.769 --> 00:13:22.009
that changes dramatically. So this is where we

00:13:22.009 --> 00:13:24.950
need to know what looks normal but is actually

00:13:24.950 --> 00:13:27.690
a disaster waiting to happen. Exactly. That table

00:13:27.690 --> 00:13:30.590
from the source, table 11 -1, that details the

00:13:30.590 --> 00:13:33.179
system changes. That's the Rosetta Stone for

00:13:33.179 --> 00:13:36.019
adapting ATLS to a geriatric patient. Let's start

00:13:36.019 --> 00:13:38.740
with A for airway. What are the key challenges

00:13:38.740 --> 00:13:42.200
here? It's twofold, really, anatomically. First,

00:13:42.320 --> 00:13:44.399
they lose their protective airway reflexes, so

00:13:44.399 --> 00:13:46.879
the aspiration risk is sky high. You have to

00:13:46.879 --> 00:13:49.019
make the decision to intubate much sooner. And

00:13:49.019 --> 00:13:51.019
the second part? The second is the arthritis

00:13:51.019 --> 00:13:54.169
in their jaw, in their neck. It can make just

00:13:54.169 --> 00:13:56.370
opening their mouth difficult, let alone manipulating

00:13:56.370 --> 00:13:58.649
the cervical spine for intubation. So a difficult

00:13:58.649 --> 00:14:01.610
procedure gets even harder. What's a really practical

00:14:01.610 --> 00:14:04.029
hands -on tip for managing the airway right away,

00:14:04.470 --> 00:14:06.409
especially with mask ventilation? The big one

00:14:06.409 --> 00:14:09.169
is about dentures. OK. If the dentures are not

00:14:09.169 --> 00:14:11.950
in the way, leave them in during bag mask ventilation.

00:14:12.350 --> 00:14:14.029
They provide structure and help you get a much

00:14:14.029 --> 00:14:16.129
better seal with a mask. And if they don't have

00:14:16.129 --> 00:14:20.710
any teeth? intubating might be easier, but bagging

00:14:20.710 --> 00:14:22.789
them is way harder because their cheeks just

00:14:22.789 --> 00:14:25.610
collapse in. The trick is to place some gauze

00:14:25.610 --> 00:14:27.929
between their gums and their cheek to create

00:14:27.929 --> 00:14:30.610
that seal you need. That's a great tip. What

00:14:30.610 --> 00:14:33.309
about the medications for RSI, that rapid sequence

00:14:33.309 --> 00:14:36.169
intubation? This is a huge, smallest detail.

00:14:36.330 --> 00:14:38.870
You have to reduce the doses of your sedatives,

00:14:39.049 --> 00:14:42.629
barbiturates, benzodiazepines by 20 to 40 percent.

00:14:42.750 --> 00:14:45.269
20 to 40? Why so much? Because of their reduced

00:14:45.269 --> 00:14:47.950
reserve and slower metabolism. If you give them

00:14:47.950 --> 00:14:50.629
a standard adult dose, you risk causing immediate,

00:14:50.990 --> 00:14:53.590
profound, and possibly fatal hypotension. Got

00:14:53.590 --> 00:14:56.450
it. Okay, on to B for breathing. The source talks

00:14:56.450 --> 00:14:58.990
about insidious failure here. What's going on

00:14:58.990 --> 00:15:00.889
with their respiratory mechanics? Everything

00:15:00.889 --> 00:15:03.269
is working against them. Their chest, wall, and

00:15:03.269 --> 00:15:05.309
lungs are stiffer, so it's more work to take

00:15:05.309 --> 00:15:09.090
a breath. gas exchange is less efficient. And

00:15:09.090 --> 00:15:11.509
critically, their functional residual capacity,

00:15:11.710 --> 00:15:15.370
the FRC, is much smaller. And the FRC is what,

00:15:15.370 --> 00:15:17.149
the air left in your lungs after you breathe

00:15:17.149 --> 00:15:19.629
out? Exactly. It's your buffer. When that shrinks,

00:15:19.710 --> 00:15:22.590
you have zero room for error. A small injury,

00:15:23.009 --> 00:15:25.850
pain from a rib fracture, even just lying flat

00:15:25.850 --> 00:15:29.009
for a CT scan can cause their small airways to

00:15:29.009 --> 00:15:31.429
collapse. And the hidden danger here is in the

00:15:31.429 --> 00:15:34.399
vital signs, right? Yes. This is so important.

00:15:35.039 --> 00:15:37.340
Aging suppresses the heart rate response to a

00:15:37.340 --> 00:15:39.700
lack of oxygen. So they don't get tachycardic

00:15:39.700 --> 00:15:42.259
when they're hypoxic. They might not. That critical

00:15:42.259 --> 00:15:45.039
warning sign might be completely absent. So respiratory

00:15:45.039 --> 00:15:47.700
failure can present insidiously. You look at

00:15:47.700 --> 00:15:49.840
the monitor, the heart rate is fine, but their

00:15:49.840 --> 00:15:52.440
O2 sat is plummeting. So the implication for

00:15:52.440 --> 00:15:55.250
us is... Be aggressive. Don't wait for the classic

00:15:55.250 --> 00:15:57.750
signs. Exactly. Your threshold for intubating

00:15:57.750 --> 00:16:00.250
has to be much, much lower. And you have to manage

00:16:00.250 --> 00:16:02.809
rib fractures like your hair is on fire. Older

00:16:02.809 --> 00:16:05.190
patients just do not tolerate them well at all.

00:16:05.509 --> 00:16:07.490
It's a fast track to pneumonia. OK, let's go

00:16:07.490 --> 00:16:10.649
to C for circulation. This feels like the biggest

00:16:10.649 --> 00:16:13.470
pitfall in geriatric trauma failing to recognize

00:16:13.470 --> 00:16:16.129
shock because the vitals look OK. It's probably

00:16:16.129 --> 00:16:18.440
the most common and most deadly mistake. What's

00:16:18.440 --> 00:16:21.840
the physiology behind this masked response? It's

00:16:21.840 --> 00:16:24.860
what we call the fixed response. Age -related

00:16:24.860 --> 00:16:27.259
changes mean they often have a fixed heart rate

00:16:27.259 --> 00:16:29.559
and a fixed cardiac output. They can't speed

00:16:29.559 --> 00:16:32.340
up. So unlike a younger person who gets tachycardic

00:16:32.340 --> 00:16:34.860
when they're bleeding. The older patient's response

00:16:34.860 --> 00:16:37.200
is to clamp down their peripheral blood vessels.

00:16:37.580 --> 00:16:39.940
They increase their systemic vascular resistance,

00:16:40.039 --> 00:16:42.700
or SVR, to try and maintain their blood pressure.

00:16:42.840 --> 00:16:45.179
And if they're on beta blockers? It's even worse.

00:16:45.360 --> 00:16:48.570
Up to 20 % of them are. The beta blocker just

00:16:48.570 --> 00:16:50.669
makes it physiologically impossible for the heart

00:16:50.669 --> 00:16:52.950
to speed up, even if they're bleeding to death.

00:16:53.269 --> 00:16:55.610
So if tachycardia, the classic sign of shock,

00:16:55.809 --> 00:16:58.330
is gone, how do we spot it? This is where the

00:16:58.330 --> 00:17:00.490
source flags a huge shift in our assessment.

00:17:01.129 --> 00:17:03.269
What is the new definition of hypotension for

00:17:03.269 --> 00:17:05.369
this group? This is the number you need to burn

00:17:05.369 --> 00:17:08.049
into your brain. A systolic blood pressure of

00:17:08.049 --> 00:17:11.089
110 millimeter Hg should be your threshold for

00:17:11.089 --> 00:17:14.349
identifying hypotension in anyone over 65. 110.

00:17:14.509 --> 00:17:17.269
110. Because so many of them have high blood

00:17:17.269 --> 00:17:20.529
pressure to begin with, a BP of 12 ,880 might

00:17:20.529 --> 00:17:23.150
actually be profound shock for them. If they

00:17:23.150 --> 00:17:25.730
hit 110, you have to assume they're in significant

00:17:25.730 --> 00:17:28.970
shock and act immediately. Wow. That one number

00:17:28.970 --> 00:17:32.670
changes everything. So the new mantra is, do

00:17:32.670 --> 00:17:36.529
not equate BP with shock. What's the clinical

00:17:36.529 --> 00:17:39.190
implication for managing that? If you see any

00:17:39.190 --> 00:17:41.759
evidence of circulatory failure, Even if it looks

00:17:41.759 --> 00:17:44.319
mild, you have to assume they are bleeding, period.

00:17:44.759 --> 00:17:46.660
And you need to look for definitive evidence

00:17:46.660 --> 00:17:49.759
of tissue hypoperfusion that bypasses those masked

00:17:49.759 --> 00:17:52.099
vital signs. With labs. Like labs. You have to

00:17:52.099 --> 00:17:54.059
use serum markers, like lactate and base deficit.

00:17:54.599 --> 00:17:56.660
A high lactate is a five alarm fire. It tells

00:17:56.660 --> 00:17:58.940
you that cells are starving for oxygen, no matter

00:17:58.940 --> 00:18:00.720
what the blood pressure cuff says. So what's

00:18:00.720 --> 00:18:03.119
the plan for treatment? You go fast to aggressive,

00:18:03.380 --> 00:18:05.380
balanced resuscitation. blood products early.

00:18:05.900 --> 00:18:07.720
And you need to consider advanced monitoring

00:18:07.720 --> 00:18:11.140
sooner. A central line, a focused cardiac ultrasound

00:18:11.140 --> 00:18:13.940
to guide your fluid resuscitation. You have to

00:18:13.940 --> 00:18:15.940
walk this tightrope between giving them enough

00:18:15.940 --> 00:18:18.200
fluid, but not so much that you put their already

00:18:18.200 --> 00:18:20.619
stiff heart into failure. Okay, let's move to

00:18:20.619 --> 00:18:24.599
D for disability. Neurological assessment. This

00:18:24.599 --> 00:18:26.640
is complicated by brain atrophy and, of course,

00:18:27.019 --> 00:18:30.599
medications. Right. That cerebral atrophy creates

00:18:30.599 --> 00:18:33.559
what we call the silent space. It allows a bleed

00:18:33.559 --> 00:18:36.180
in the head, like a subdural, to get pretty big

00:18:36.180 --> 00:18:38.819
before it starts causing symptoms. So a normal

00:18:38.819 --> 00:18:41.759
neuro exam, a normal GCS, it doesn't mean they're

00:18:41.759 --> 00:18:44.380
okay. It absolutely does not. It could be a deadly

00:18:44.380 --> 00:18:46.740
deception. But the number one highest priority

00:18:46.740 --> 00:18:49.380
here seems to be their coagulation status. This

00:18:49.380 --> 00:18:51.839
is the single most actionable life or death point

00:18:51.839 --> 00:18:55.039
in the D assessment. So many older patients are

00:18:55.039 --> 00:18:57.700
on anticoagulants or antiplatelets. Blood thinners.

00:18:58.200 --> 00:19:01.960
Right. Warfarin, xarelto, eliquis, plavix, aspirin.

00:19:02.299 --> 00:19:04.599
This puts them at an incredibly high risk for

00:19:04.599 --> 00:19:07.200
intracranial hemorrhage. Early identification

00:19:07.200 --> 00:19:09.900
and timely, aggressive reversal of those drugs

00:19:09.900 --> 00:19:12.019
is the single most important thing we can do

00:19:12.019 --> 00:19:14.019
to improve their outcome. Let's get into the

00:19:14.019 --> 00:19:16.420
weeds on reversal, the smallest details. What

00:19:16.420 --> 00:19:19.440
about those newer drugs, the DOACs? Okay, so

00:19:19.440 --> 00:19:21.779
for warfarin, it's pretty straightforward. You

00:19:21.779 --> 00:19:25.319
give prothrombin complex, concentrate, PCC, plasma,

00:19:25.720 --> 00:19:28.740
and vitamin K. PCC is the fastest, but here's

00:19:28.740 --> 00:19:31.279
the really scary part. With the newer drugs,

00:19:31.460 --> 00:19:34.759
the DOACs, their standard coagulation labs, like

00:19:34.759 --> 00:19:37.660
an INR, might look perfectly normal. Wait, so

00:19:37.660 --> 00:19:39.819
the lab test is normal, but they're still at

00:19:39.819 --> 00:19:42.279
high risk of bleeding. Exactly. It's a terrifying

00:19:42.279 --> 00:19:44.819
clinical moment. The lab is lying to you. There

00:19:44.819 --> 00:19:46.900
are specific reversal agents for some of these

00:19:46.900 --> 00:19:48.799
newer drugs, but they're not always available.

00:19:49.000 --> 00:19:51.099
The bottom line is you have to find out what

00:19:51.099 --> 00:19:53.420
drug they're on and start the reversal protocol

00:19:53.420 --> 00:19:55.539
immediately if you even suspect a head injury.

00:19:55.940 --> 00:19:57.980
You can't wait for a lab test that might be falsely

00:19:57.980 --> 00:20:00.500
reassuring. Okay, last one in the primary survey,

00:20:00.700 --> 00:20:03.220
E for exposure and environment. The priority

00:20:03.220 --> 00:20:05.640
here is preventing hypothermia. Why are they

00:20:05.640 --> 00:20:08.259
so at risk for getting cold? multiple reasons.

00:20:08.700 --> 00:20:11.440
They have less subcutaneous fat to insulate them,

00:20:11.720 --> 00:20:14.140
nutritional issues, chronic conditions. All of

00:20:14.140 --> 00:20:16.119
it just dramatically increases their risk for

00:20:16.119 --> 00:20:18.480
hypothermia. And hypothermia is bad in trauma

00:20:18.480 --> 00:20:21.660
because it messes up your ability to clot, creating

00:20:21.660 --> 00:20:24.599
a vicious cycle of bleeding, and it increases

00:20:24.599 --> 00:20:27.240
the risk of lethal cardiac arrhythmias. And what's

00:20:27.240 --> 00:20:29.420
the nursing priority? Balancing the need for

00:20:29.420 --> 00:20:32.220
a quick exam with preventing other problems.

00:20:32.339 --> 00:20:35.400
You have to do the exam. But the priority is

00:20:35.400 --> 00:20:38.220
early liberation from spine boards and c -collars

00:20:38.220 --> 00:20:40.619
once you've cleared the spine. To prevent pressure

00:20:40.619 --> 00:20:43.000
sores, pressure injuries, and delirium. You have

00:20:43.000 --> 00:20:45.980
to pad their bony prominences immediately and

00:20:45.980 --> 00:20:49.039
be relentless about keeping them warm with forced

00:20:49.039 --> 00:20:52.180
air warmers and warm fluids. Let's circle back

00:20:52.180 --> 00:20:54.680
and really synthesize some of the system changes

00:20:54.680 --> 00:20:57.299
from that table and the source material. Let's

00:20:57.299 --> 00:20:59.640
start with cardiac again. What does that fixed

00:20:59.640 --> 00:21:01.599
output really mean when we're trying to give

00:21:01.599 --> 00:21:04.200
fluids? It means you have a tiny, tiny therapeutic

00:21:04.200 --> 00:21:06.430
window. If you don't give enough fluid, they

00:21:06.430 --> 00:21:09.130
crash from hypovolemia. If you give too much,

00:21:09.490 --> 00:21:11.950
their stiff, weak heart can't handle the volume,

00:21:12.190 --> 00:21:14.450
and you push them into congestive heart failure

00:21:14.450 --> 00:21:18.109
and pulmonary edema. It requires exquisite, careful

00:21:18.109 --> 00:21:20.769
titration. Okay, and the renal system. You mentioned

00:21:20.769 --> 00:21:23.509
a paradox where normal labs don't mean normal

00:21:23.509 --> 00:21:25.750
function. This is a huge spot for medication

00:21:25.750 --> 00:21:29.210
errors. Kidney function goes down with age, but

00:21:29.210 --> 00:21:31.750
because they also have less muscle mass, they

00:21:31.750 --> 00:21:34.390
don't produce as much creatinine. So their serum

00:21:34.390 --> 00:21:37.410
creatinine level might look normal, but it's

00:21:37.410 --> 00:21:40.390
not reflecting their true underlying kidney dysfunction.

00:21:41.109 --> 00:21:42.910
So you have to assume their kidneys are worse

00:21:42.910 --> 00:21:45.470
than the labs say they are. Always. You have

00:21:45.470 --> 00:21:47.630
to assume renal insufficiency and adjust your

00:21:47.630 --> 00:21:49.910
drug doses accordingly, especially for drugs

00:21:49.910 --> 00:21:52.250
cleared by the kidneys. And how does the kidney

00:21:52.250 --> 00:21:55.190
also mask hypovolemia? This is another tricky

00:21:55.190 --> 00:21:58.190
one. The aging kidney doesn't respond as well

00:21:58.190 --> 00:22:00.690
to the hormone that tells it to hold on to water

00:22:00.690 --> 00:22:03.339
when the body is dehydrated. So they keep making

00:22:03.339 --> 00:22:05.720
urine even if they're in shock? They can, yeah.

00:22:06.000 --> 00:22:08.660
Urine flow might look normal or even high, despite

00:22:08.660 --> 00:22:11.680
the patient being profoundly hypovolemic. So

00:22:11.680 --> 00:22:14.039
you can't use urine output alone as a reliable

00:22:14.039 --> 00:22:17.119
guide for your resuscitation. Let's move to three

00:22:17.119 --> 00:22:19.700
specific injuries that the source's flag is being

00:22:19.700 --> 00:22:22.259
extra high -risk, starting with rib fractures.

00:22:22.599 --> 00:22:25.039
The source calls it the pneumonia trap. It's

00:22:25.039 --> 00:22:27.619
a perfect name for it. It is the single most

00:22:27.619 --> 00:22:30.900
common cause of early problems after chest trauma

00:22:30.900 --> 00:22:33.509
in this group. The incidence of pneumonia can

00:22:33.509 --> 00:22:36.890
be as high as 30%. And the mortality risk goes

00:22:36.890 --> 00:22:40.049
up with every single additional rib that's broken.

00:22:40.849 --> 00:22:43.630
So the goals are pain control and pulmonary hygiene.

00:22:44.029 --> 00:22:46.750
But the source warns about the narcotic pitfall.

00:22:47.390 --> 00:22:50.390
What's that? This is critical. You have to give

00:22:50.390 --> 00:22:52.349
them pain medicine so they can take deep breaths

00:22:52.349 --> 00:22:55.450
and cough. But if you give them too much... You

00:22:55.450 --> 00:22:57.589
cause respiratory depression and delirium. So

00:22:57.589 --> 00:22:59.869
you make the problem worse. Exactly. You get

00:22:59.869 --> 00:23:02.009
the opposite of what you want. They stop breathing

00:23:02.009 --> 00:23:04.369
deeply, and that just accelerates the collapse

00:23:04.369 --> 00:23:06.349
into pneumonia. It's a vicious cycle. So what

00:23:06.349 --> 00:23:08.710
are the strategies to avoid that? First, you

00:23:08.710 --> 00:23:10.329
have to be vigilant, watching their breathing,

00:23:10.529 --> 00:23:13.230
not just their O2 sat. Second, when you do use

00:23:13.230 --> 00:23:15.569
narcotics, use smaller doses of shorter acting

00:23:15.569 --> 00:23:18.069
ones. They clear faster. Third, and this is key,

00:23:18.650 --> 00:23:21.730
prioritize non -narcotic options, regional nerve

00:23:21.730 --> 00:23:24.589
blocks, epidurals. They provide great pain relief

00:23:24.589 --> 00:23:26.829
without the systemic side effects. Okay, next,

00:23:27.069 --> 00:23:28.769
traumatic brain injury. We know it's common in

00:23:28.769 --> 00:23:31.009
falls. What's the core challenge here? The challenge

00:23:31.009 --> 00:23:33.049
is that their high mortality isn't just because

00:23:33.049 --> 00:23:35.349
of the injury itself, but because of their inability

00:23:35.349 --> 00:23:38.769
to recover. And making the diagnosis is incredibly

00:23:38.769 --> 00:23:42.019
difficult. Why? Because of their baseline. Pre

00:23:42.019 --> 00:23:44.980
-existing dementia or delirium makes it really

00:23:44.980 --> 00:23:47.059
hard to tell if a change in their mental status

00:23:47.059 --> 00:23:49.819
is from the TBI or something else. You just can't

00:23:49.819 --> 00:23:52.099
rely on the GCS score alone. So the management

00:23:52.099 --> 00:23:54.799
priority is? Liberal use of CT scans. You just

00:23:54.799 --> 00:23:56.920
have to have a very, very low threshold to scan

00:23:56.920 --> 00:23:58.700
them, especially if they're on any kind of blood

00:23:58.700 --> 00:24:01.200
thinner. And again, if you find a bleed, the

00:24:01.200 --> 00:24:04.279
absolute priority is aggressive early reversal

00:24:04.279 --> 00:24:07.640
of that anticoagulant. Lastly, pelvic fractures.

00:24:08.160 --> 00:24:10.259
In younger people, these aren't always a huge

00:24:10.259 --> 00:24:13.220
deal unless there's major bleeding. What's different

00:24:13.220 --> 00:24:15.480
here? The risk profile just skyrockets. They're

00:24:15.480 --> 00:24:17.839
usually from ground level falls onto osteoporotic

00:24:17.839 --> 00:24:20.779
bone. And mortality from a pelvic fracture is

00:24:20.779 --> 00:24:23.220
four times higher in older patients than in younger

00:24:23.220 --> 00:24:25.900
ones. Four times? Wow. Is there a hidden risk

00:24:25.900 --> 00:24:29.140
even with stable looking fractures? Yes. The

00:24:29.140 --> 00:24:31.900
need for blood. The sources show that the need

00:24:31.900 --> 00:24:34.359
for blood transfusion is much, much higher in

00:24:34.359 --> 00:24:37.000
the elderly, even for fractures that look stable

00:24:37.000 --> 00:24:39.420
on the x -ray. You have to have a low threshold

00:24:39.420 --> 00:24:42.079
to start your massive transfusion protocol if

00:24:42.079 --> 00:24:44.519
they're unstable at all. And the long -term outcome

00:24:44.519 --> 00:24:48.019
is, again, about independence. Absolutely. They're

00:24:48.019 --> 00:24:49.980
much less likely to return to an independent

00:24:49.980 --> 00:24:52.319
lifestyle after a pelvic fracture. It really

00:24:52.319 --> 00:24:55.099
reinforces that fall prevention is the absolute

00:24:55.099 --> 00:24:57.539
mainstay of reducing the death and disability

00:24:57.539 --> 00:25:00.319
from these injuries. Let's move into a few special

00:25:00.319 --> 00:25:03.279
circumstances, starting with a revisit to medications.

00:25:03.859 --> 00:25:05.700
Beta blockers. You mentioned them, but let's

00:25:05.700 --> 00:25:08.279
just hammer this home. We have to. Up to 20 %

00:25:08.279 --> 00:25:10.970
of elderly patients are on them. They physiologically

00:25:10.970 --> 00:25:13.509
block the heart rate response to shock. It makes

00:25:13.509 --> 00:25:16.349
your standard trauma assessment totally unreliable.

00:25:16.730 --> 00:25:18.789
You have to know if they're on one, and if they

00:25:18.789 --> 00:25:20.210
are, you have to switch your brain to looking

00:25:20.210 --> 00:25:22.329
at lactate and base deficit instead of heart

00:25:22.329 --> 00:25:24.650
rate. And for anticoagulants, what's the action

00:25:24.650 --> 00:25:27.029
plan the second they roll through the door? Zero

00:25:27.029 --> 00:25:29.430
tolerance for delay. You have to immediately

00:25:29.430 --> 00:25:31.890
find out which drug they're on, talk to the family,

00:25:32.210 --> 00:25:34.990
call the pharmacy, and start the specific reversal

00:25:34.990 --> 00:25:38.680
agent immediately. Every minute you wait, especially

00:25:38.680 --> 00:25:41.160
with a head injury, is brain tissue being lost.

00:25:41.640 --> 00:25:44.220
Okay, let's talk about elder maltreatment. This

00:25:44.220 --> 00:25:46.660
is a tough topic, but one the sources say is

00:25:46.660 --> 00:25:49.940
dangerously under -recognized. It's hugely underestimated.

00:25:50.720 --> 00:25:53.420
The data suggests it might be as common as child

00:25:53.420 --> 00:25:56.579
maltreatment. but only a fraction of cases ever

00:25:56.579 --> 00:25:59.319
get reported. Physical maltreatment shows up

00:25:59.319 --> 00:26:02.480
in as many as 14 % of geriatric trauma admissions.

00:26:02.660 --> 00:26:04.720
And it's not just physical abuse, right? It's

00:26:04.720 --> 00:26:07.079
neglect, too. Right. And the signs of neglect

00:26:07.079 --> 00:26:09.119
can be really subtle. You have to look for things

00:26:09.119 --> 00:26:11.660
like poor hygiene, dehydration, malnutrition,

00:26:12.259 --> 00:26:14.380
or a caregiver who just won't leave the patient

00:26:14.380 --> 00:26:16.920
alone with the staff. And if we do suspect physical

00:26:16.920 --> 00:26:19.480
abuse, what are the specific physical findings

00:26:19.480 --> 00:26:21.079
we should be looking for? What's the checklist?

00:26:21.259 --> 00:26:22.940
Okay, so you're looking for injuries that just

00:26:22.940 --> 00:26:25.319
don't match the story of the simple fall. Things

00:26:25.319 --> 00:26:28.019
like bruises in weird places, the inner arms

00:26:28.019 --> 00:26:30.720
or thighs, the scalp behind the ears, on the

00:26:30.720 --> 00:26:33.279
buttocks, areas that don't get hit in a normal

00:26:33.279 --> 00:26:35.500
fall. Right. You're also looking for multiple

00:26:35.500 --> 00:26:38.359
bruises clustered together, or bruises shaped

00:26:38.359 --> 00:26:40.759
like an object, like a belt or a hand. What else?

00:26:41.099 --> 00:26:43.579
Abrasions from restraints, usually around the

00:26:43.579 --> 00:26:46.619
armpits or on the wrists and ankles. Untreated

00:26:46.619 --> 00:26:48.920
pressure sores in places other than their lower

00:26:48.920 --> 00:26:51.940
back. And maybe the biggest red flag is injuries

00:26:51.940 --> 00:26:54.500
in different stages of healing. that points to

00:26:54.500 --> 00:26:57.799
repeated trauma over time. That's a very clear,

00:26:57.940 --> 00:27:00.259
actionable list. So what's the bottom line, ethically,

00:27:00.759 --> 00:27:02.859
if the story and the injuries don't add up? You

00:27:02.859 --> 00:27:05.500
have to report it immediately to the appropriate

00:27:05.500 --> 00:27:08.059
authorities. And if maltreatment is confirmed

00:27:08.059 --> 00:27:10.740
or even just suspected, your primary ethical

00:27:10.740 --> 00:27:13.180
duty is the removal of that patient from the

00:27:13.180 --> 00:27:16.119
abusive situation. Which brings us to the final

00:27:16.119 --> 00:27:19.180
and maybe most important piece of this, establishing

00:27:19.180 --> 00:27:23.289
goals of care. Given the scats, They're 12 %

00:27:23.289 --> 00:27:25.609
of the population, but almost 30 % of trauma

00:27:25.609 --> 00:27:28.349
deaths. This feels like a conversation that needs

00:27:28.349 --> 00:27:31.470
to happen early. It has to happen early. The

00:27:31.470 --> 00:27:33.309
chances of them returning to their prior level

00:27:33.309 --> 00:27:37.069
of independence after a severe trauma are frankly

00:27:37.069 --> 00:27:40.740
low. So an early honest conversation with the

00:27:40.740 --> 00:27:42.640
patient, if possible, and their family about

00:27:42.640 --> 00:27:45.819
their goals is essential. It's not about giving

00:27:45.819 --> 00:27:48.359
up. It's about respecting their autonomy. So

00:27:48.359 --> 00:27:51.440
why is it so crucial to do this in the middle

00:27:51.440 --> 00:27:54.680
of a chaotic trauma resuscitation? Because the

00:27:54.680 --> 00:27:57.579
default in trauma is aggressive, maximal care.

00:27:58.039 --> 00:28:00.420
And without knowing the patient's wishes, we

00:28:00.420 --> 00:28:03.500
might start down a path of surgeries, ventilators,

00:28:04.059 --> 00:28:06.640
pressers. Things that might only prolong their

00:28:06.640 --> 00:28:08.759
suffering without actually improving their quality

00:28:08.759 --> 00:28:11.099
of life. So you bring in palliative care? You

00:28:11.099 --> 00:28:13.839
bring in palliative care early. They are the

00:28:13.839 --> 00:28:16.059
experts at navigating these conversations, at

00:28:16.059 --> 00:28:18.119
managing symptoms, and at making sure the care

00:28:18.119 --> 00:28:19.980
we provide is actually aligned with what the

00:28:19.980 --> 00:28:22.079
patient would have wanted. This has been an incredibly

00:28:22.079 --> 00:28:25.420
important deep dive. To recap, I think the central

00:28:25.420 --> 00:28:27.420
lesson for anyone listening is that geriatric

00:28:27.420 --> 00:28:29.700
trauma demands a totally different way of thinking.

00:28:29.819 --> 00:28:32.180
It really does. You cannot look for the classic

00:28:32.180 --> 00:28:34.289
signs of shock. You have to assume it's there,

00:28:34.509 --> 00:28:36.450
even with a normal heart rate. You have to look

00:28:36.450 --> 00:28:39.549
for that evidence of tissue hypoperfusion, that

00:28:39.549 --> 00:28:42.289
systolic BP of 110, the high lactate, the base

00:28:42.289 --> 00:28:45.609
deficit. And you have to reverse anticoagulation

00:28:45.609 --> 00:28:48.329
aggressively and immediately. And the focus has

00:28:48.329 --> 00:28:52.049
to be on managing the host. the pecs, the frailty,

00:28:52.470 --> 00:28:55.329
that fixed cardiac response, just as much, if

00:28:55.329 --> 00:28:57.829
not more, than the injury itself. Absolutely.

00:28:58.069 --> 00:29:00.809
All those small details, the gauze for the adential

00:29:00.809 --> 00:29:03.309
is patient. Knowing that a normal creatinine

00:29:03.309 --> 00:29:06.470
is a lie, cutting your RSI drug doses, that's

00:29:06.470 --> 00:29:08.869
what makes the difference between recovery and

00:29:08.869 --> 00:29:11.039
a catastrophic outcome. And that leads us to

00:29:11.039 --> 00:29:12.940
our final thought for you to chew on. The sources

00:29:12.940 --> 00:29:15.099
note that today's elderly are more active and

00:29:15.099 --> 00:29:17.200
mobile than ever, which puts them at higher risk.

00:29:17.259 --> 00:29:19.779
Right. So if we think about the specific vulnerabilities

00:29:19.779 --> 00:29:22.700
we've discussed, the massive TBI risk from a

00:29:22.700 --> 00:29:25.059
simple fall, the devastating mortality from small

00:29:25.059 --> 00:29:28.339
burns, what societal or infrastructure changes

00:29:28.339 --> 00:29:30.900
things outside the hospital might have the biggest

00:29:30.900 --> 00:29:33.220
public health impact here. That's a great question.

00:29:33.299 --> 00:29:36.299
I mean, Is it safer driving technology in cars

00:29:36.299 --> 00:29:38.940
that accounts for slower reaction times? Is it

00:29:38.940 --> 00:29:42.000
massive community -wide fall prevention programs

00:29:42.000 --> 00:29:44.079
that actually go into people's homes and fix

00:29:44.079 --> 00:29:46.559
the loose rugs and poor lighting? Or changing

00:29:46.559 --> 00:29:49.420
building codes to prevent the kind of minor scald

00:29:49.420 --> 00:29:52.480
burn that turns fatal? Exactly. It forces us

00:29:52.480 --> 00:29:54.759
to look beyond the trauma bay and into the world

00:29:54.759 --> 00:29:57.519
these patients are living in every day. A profound

00:29:57.519 --> 00:30:00.000
thought to end on as we close out this deep dive.
