WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.279
Welcome to today's deep dive learner. We are

00:00:03.279 --> 00:00:05.599
we're so glad you're here with us today. Our

00:00:05.599 --> 00:00:09.179
mission is to basically completely dismantle

00:00:09.179 --> 00:00:12.439
how you think about that. loose change rattling

00:00:12.439 --> 00:00:15.320
around in your car's cup holder. Yeah, it's it

00:00:15.320 --> 00:00:17.559
really challenges the whole idea that currency

00:00:17.559 --> 00:00:20.379
is just this sterile means to an end, you know.

00:00:20.539 --> 00:00:23.579
Exactly. We have a single source document today,

00:00:23.699 --> 00:00:25.539
which is the Wikipedia article on the Australian

00:00:25.539 --> 00:00:27.640
two dollar coin. Yeah. And we're going to use

00:00:27.640 --> 00:00:30.379
it to prove that this tiny, you know, seemingly

00:00:30.379 --> 00:00:33.420
mundane piece of metal is actually a master class

00:00:33.420 --> 00:00:36.719
in heavy industrial logistics, behavioral economics

00:00:36.719 --> 00:00:38.799
and some deeply moving cultural storytelling.

00:00:38.939 --> 00:00:40.719
Right, because when you actually stop and read

00:00:40.719 --> 00:00:43.740
the specific object, I mean, it acts less like

00:00:43.740 --> 00:00:46.399
a financial token and, well, more like a highly

00:00:46.399 --> 00:00:48.840
condensed cultural timeline. I promise you, by

00:00:48.840 --> 00:00:50.640
the end of this conversation, you will never

00:00:50.640 --> 00:00:52.659
look at a handful of change the same way again.

00:00:53.240 --> 00:00:55.479
We are talking about an everyday item that somehow

00:00:55.479 --> 00:00:58.509
bridges the British monarchy. incredible aboriginal

00:00:58.509 --> 00:01:01.289
resilience, and completely unironically brightly

00:01:01.289 --> 00:01:03.750
colored children's television characters. That's

00:01:03.750 --> 00:01:06.530
a pretty wild mix. It really is. Okay, let's

00:01:06.530 --> 00:01:09.430
unpack this. Before we get into the historical

00:01:09.430 --> 00:01:12.090
gravity stamped onto the coin, we need to understand

00:01:12.090 --> 00:01:15.650
its physical blueprint. Like, why does this unusually

00:01:15.650 --> 00:01:19.030
dense, heavy little disc even exist in the first

00:01:19.030 --> 00:01:21.590
place? Well, the existence of this coin is rooted

00:01:21.590 --> 00:01:24.349
entirely in a pretty harsh economic reality,

00:01:24.510 --> 00:01:26.870
which is the cost to mint ratio. Right. The two

00:01:26.870 --> 00:01:29.530
dollar coin was officially born on June 20th,

00:01:29.549 --> 00:01:32.230
1988, but the Australian government had actually

00:01:32.230 --> 00:01:36.069
been engineering its release since the mid 1970s.

00:01:36.250 --> 00:01:39.140
Really? The mid -70s? Yeah. They spent over a

00:01:39.140 --> 00:01:42.180
decade just plotting the demise of the old $2

00:01:42.180 --> 00:01:44.900
paper note. Over 10 years just to swap paper

00:01:44.900 --> 00:01:47.299
for metal? I mean, that seems like an enormous

00:01:47.299 --> 00:01:49.620
administrative headache for a $2 denomination.

00:01:49.980 --> 00:01:51.980
It was a massive undertaking, yeah, but it was

00:01:51.980 --> 00:01:54.379
driven by this concept of circulatory life. I

00:01:54.379 --> 00:01:56.340
mean, we all know paper tears into grades, right?

00:01:56.359 --> 00:01:59.659
Yeah. The sheer financial burden of printing

00:01:59.659 --> 00:02:02.859
low denomination notes is just staggering. A

00:02:02.859 --> 00:02:05.680
heavily used $2 note might only survive in the

00:02:05.680 --> 00:02:08.340
economy for, say, six months before the central

00:02:08.340 --> 00:02:10.379
bank has to collect it, destroy it, and then

00:02:10.379 --> 00:02:13.199
pay to print a replacement. Wow. Six months.

00:02:13.560 --> 00:02:15.680
Yeah, so over a 30 -year timeline, you're paying

00:02:15.680 --> 00:02:18.979
to replace that exact same $2 value, like, 60

00:02:18.979 --> 00:02:22.520
times. But a metal coin is minted once and can

00:02:22.520 --> 00:02:25.199
circulate for decades with almost zero maintenance,

00:02:25.599 --> 00:02:28.139
so it was just a pure cost -saving necessity.

00:02:28.319 --> 00:02:31.439
That makes perfect economic sense, but the physical

00:02:31.439 --> 00:02:33.580
specifications they ultimately landed on are

00:02:33.580 --> 00:02:36.039
just wild to me. It's essentially like a physical

00:02:36.039 --> 00:02:38.699
zip file. That's a great way to put it. It packs

00:02:38.699 --> 00:02:41.740
this relatively high economic value into a remarkably

00:02:41.740 --> 00:02:45.409
small surprisingly heavy frame. The dimensions

00:02:45.409 --> 00:02:47.710
listed in the source are incredibly specific,

00:02:48.090 --> 00:02:51.550
so it weighs exactly 6 .60 grams. It's a chunky

00:02:51.550 --> 00:02:54.770
2 .80 millimeters thick, but its diameter is

00:02:54.770 --> 00:02:57.229
only 20 .50 millimeters. Right, which gives it

00:02:57.229 --> 00:02:59.430
an incredibly dense weight -to -size ratio, and

00:02:59.430 --> 00:03:02.250
they used a really specific alloy for it. 92

00:03:02.250 --> 00:03:05.729
% copper, 6 % aluminum, and 2 % nickel. Okay,

00:03:05.729 --> 00:03:07.870
so that's what gives it that durable golden color.

00:03:08.090 --> 00:03:10.030
Exactly, but that diameter you mentioned, the

00:03:10.030 --> 00:03:12.009
20 .50 millimeters, that's the true quirk of

00:03:12.009 --> 00:03:14.129
its engineering. Because it means the dollar

00:03:14.129 --> 00:03:16.509
coin is physically smaller than the Australian

00:03:16.509 --> 00:03:19.129
one dollar coin. So I kind of have to push back

00:03:19.129 --> 00:03:21.430
on this design choice here. If the government

00:03:21.430 --> 00:03:24.650
spent a decade engineering this, why intentionally

00:03:24.650 --> 00:03:26.590
make the two dollar coin smaller than the one

00:03:26.590 --> 00:03:29.689
dollar coin? Doesn't that invite massive confusion,

00:03:29.729 --> 00:03:31.810
especially for tourists visiting the country

00:03:31.810 --> 00:03:34.629
who naturally assume bigger coins equal more

00:03:34.629 --> 00:03:37.319
money? Oh, it completely invites confusion. And

00:03:37.319 --> 00:03:39.560
it was a major concern at the time. But, well,

00:03:39.800 --> 00:03:41.740
the mint was trapped by the existing physical

00:03:41.740 --> 00:03:43.780
ecosystem of Australian currency. What do you

00:03:43.780 --> 00:03:46.819
mean? Well, by the time 1988 rolled around, the

00:03:46.819 --> 00:03:48.819
one dollar coin had already been introduced in

00:03:48.819 --> 00:03:51.800
1984. And the silver coins, the large 50 cent,

00:03:51.879 --> 00:03:54.240
20 cent, the 10 cent, the five cent, they were

00:03:54.240 --> 00:03:57.000
already thoroughly entrenched in every vending

00:03:57.000 --> 00:03:59.879
machine, parking meter and payphone in the entire

00:03:59.879 --> 00:04:02.469
country. Ah, so they couldn't just make it bigger

00:04:02.469 --> 00:04:04.789
than the one dollar coin because it would either

00:04:04.789 --> 00:04:08.830
rival that massive 50 cent piece or require retrofitting

00:04:08.830 --> 00:04:12.349
millions of coin mechanisms. Precisely. They

00:04:12.349 --> 00:04:14.990
had to thread a very tight mechanical needle.

00:04:15.990 --> 00:04:18.050
I mean, the vending machine industry dictates

00:04:18.050 --> 00:04:20.589
coin sizes just as much as the government does.

00:04:20.769 --> 00:04:22.930
That makes sense. So the two dollar coin had

00:04:22.930 --> 00:04:25.370
to be heavy enough to register its value, but

00:04:25.370 --> 00:04:27.689
small enough to not be confused with the silver

00:04:27.689 --> 00:04:31.029
coins. To compensate for the really small diameter,

00:04:31.410 --> 00:04:33.910
they made it exceptionally thick. Furthermore,

00:04:34.189 --> 00:04:36.310
they had to ensure it was tactically unique for

00:04:36.310 --> 00:04:38.509
the visually impaired. Which brings us to the

00:04:38.509 --> 00:04:41.370
edges. The Wikipedia article details this beautifully.

00:04:42.029 --> 00:04:43.949
It doesn't just have a rough edge, right? It

00:04:43.949 --> 00:04:46.550
has this interrupted milled edge. Yeah, the milling

00:04:46.550 --> 00:04:49.250
is fascinating. There are exactly 20 notches,

00:04:49.430 --> 00:04:51.189
but they're mathematically grouped into four

00:04:51.189 --> 00:04:53.529
lots of five grooves, and each of those lots

00:04:53.529 --> 00:04:56.370
is separated by exactly seven millimeters of

00:04:56.370 --> 00:04:59.519
perfectly smooth edge. It's pure tactile engineering.

00:04:59.699 --> 00:05:01.720
You can feel exactly what denomination you are

00:05:01.720 --> 00:05:03.620
holding without ever pulling it out of your pocket.

00:05:03.920 --> 00:05:08.000
And through this bizarre twist of global numismatic

00:05:08.000 --> 00:05:11.259
synchronicity, those exact dimensions, the 20

00:05:11.259 --> 00:05:13.959
.5 millimeter diameter and the specific interrupted

00:05:13.959 --> 00:05:17.959
milling meal, the Australian $2 coin shares the

00:05:17.959 --> 00:05:20.720
exact same physical profile as the 10 Swedish

00:05:20.720 --> 00:05:23.800
Kroner coin. Oh, wow. I love that. Two entirely

00:05:23.800 --> 00:05:25.860
different economies, thousands of miles apart,

00:05:26.339 --> 00:05:28.620
arriving at the exact same physical zip file.

00:05:28.839 --> 00:05:31.100
Yeah, it's a really funny coincidence. Okay,

00:05:31.139 --> 00:05:33.680
so we've established this dense, golden, mathematically

00:05:33.680 --> 00:05:36.720
precise canvas. Let's look at the artwork actually

00:05:36.720 --> 00:05:39.420
stamped onto this highly durable surface. Because

00:05:39.420 --> 00:05:41.620
there are two sides to this coin, and they present

00:05:41.620 --> 00:05:44.259
an astonishing, almost jarring contrast between

00:05:44.259 --> 00:05:47.079
two very different historical worlds. They absolutely

00:05:47.079 --> 00:05:49.699
do. Let's start with the obverse, commonly known

00:05:49.699 --> 00:05:52.139
as the head side. By tradition, this side is

00:05:52.139 --> 00:05:54.199
reserved for the reigning monarch. So for the

00:05:54.199 --> 00:05:56.540
vast majority of this coin's circulatory life,

00:05:56.800 --> 00:05:59.860
from 1988 all the way to 2023, that meant Queen

00:05:59.860 --> 00:06:02.480
Elizabeth II. But even that portrait wasn't static,

00:06:02.620 --> 00:06:04.730
was it? It functioned almost like a slow -moving

00:06:04.730 --> 00:06:07.209
clock of her reign. Yeah, it evolved in distinct

00:06:07.209 --> 00:06:11.230
eras. So from 1988 to 1998, the Mint used a portrait

00:06:11.230 --> 00:06:14.089
sculpted by Raphael McClough. Then they shifted

00:06:14.089 --> 00:06:17.129
to a more mature depiction by Ian Rank, broadly.

00:06:17.470 --> 00:06:20.269
Right. Later in 2019, they introduced an effigy

00:06:20.269 --> 00:06:23.870
by artist Jody Clark. It's basically a chronological

00:06:23.870 --> 00:06:26.089
rotation of artistic interpretation capturing

00:06:26.089 --> 00:06:28.029
the passage of time. And of course, the clock

00:06:28.029 --> 00:06:31.250
keeps ticking. Following her death, 2024 saw

00:06:31.250 --> 00:06:33.709
the debut of King Charles III on the obverse

00:06:33.709 --> 00:06:36.629
designed by Dan Thorne. So on one side of this

00:06:36.629 --> 00:06:40.110
tiny piece of metal, you have the ultimate unyielding

00:06:40.110 --> 00:06:42.860
symbol of British institutional power. a literal

00:06:42.860 --> 00:06:45.220
crown, but then you flip it over to the reverse

00:06:45.220 --> 00:06:47.379
side, the tail side, which was originally designed

00:06:47.379 --> 00:06:49.680
by Horst Hahn, and you are confronted with something

00:06:49.680 --> 00:06:52.000
altogether different. You really are. The reverse

00:06:52.000 --> 00:06:53.759
side features what was initially intended to

00:06:53.759 --> 00:06:56.699
be an archetype of an aboriginal elder. However,

00:06:56.899 --> 00:06:59.180
the specific visual inspiration for this design

00:06:59.180 --> 00:07:02.160
carries profound historical weight. The image

00:07:02.160 --> 00:07:04.540
is actually based on a drawing by an artist named

00:07:04.540 --> 00:07:07.279
Ainsley Roberts. And the subject of that drawing

00:07:07.279 --> 00:07:10.410
was a man named Goya Changere. who was historically

00:07:10.410 --> 00:07:13.149
known by the moniker One Pound Jimmy. Right.

00:07:13.629 --> 00:07:15.649
Yes. And while he was known by that name in popular

00:07:15.649 --> 00:07:18.069
culture at the time, the true gravity of his

00:07:18.069 --> 00:07:20.670
story comes from the fact that Jungari was a

00:07:20.670 --> 00:07:24.189
Warlpiri and Mataraman from the Northern Territory.

00:07:24.610 --> 00:07:26.810
Crucially, the Wikipedia article notes that he

00:07:26.810 --> 00:07:29.810
was one of the few survivors of the 1928 Coniston

00:07:29.810 --> 00:07:32.230
massacre. Which was one of the last recognized

00:07:32.230 --> 00:07:35.079
massacres of Aboriginal people. perpetrated by

00:07:35.079 --> 00:07:37.540
British authorities in central Australia. Exactly.

00:07:37.879 --> 00:07:40.660
What's fascinating here is the stark objective

00:07:40.660 --> 00:07:43.139
duality resting right in the palm of your hand.

00:07:43.600 --> 00:07:45.740
On one side of the single coin, you have the

00:07:45.740 --> 00:07:48.399
reigning monarch of the British Empire. On the

00:07:48.399 --> 00:07:50.860
literal other side. permanently bound to the

00:07:50.860 --> 00:07:53.339
same piece of metal, you have a man who survived

00:07:53.339 --> 00:07:55.720
a massacre perpetrated by the forces of that

00:07:55.720 --> 00:07:58.100
very same empire. That is just an extraordinary

00:07:58.100 --> 00:08:00.439
historical tension. It really is. And the design

00:08:00.439 --> 00:08:02.879
surrounds him with the Southern Cross constellation

00:08:02.879 --> 00:08:06.420
and native glass trees anchoring his image entirely

00:08:06.420 --> 00:08:09.379
to the Australian landscape. It is, you know,

00:08:09.699 --> 00:08:11.459
incredibly heavy when you actually stop to think

00:08:11.459 --> 00:08:14.110
about it. And it makes me want to ask you. and

00:08:14.110 --> 00:08:17.290
our learner listening, how does a deeply tragic

00:08:17.290 --> 00:08:20.769
historical event like the Coniston massacre become

00:08:20.769 --> 00:08:23.550
memorialized on the most common item of daily

00:08:23.550 --> 00:08:26.709
commerce? Like when this coin is carelessly exchanged

00:08:26.709 --> 00:08:29.209
for a pack of gum or left as a tip on a cafe

00:08:29.209 --> 00:08:32.490
table, does that constant mundane transaction

00:08:32.490 --> 00:08:35.990
trivialize his story? Or does stamping his face

00:08:35.990 --> 00:08:38.450
into a metal designed to outlast us all somehow

00:08:38.450 --> 00:08:42.029
immortalize it? That's, I mean, it raises an

00:08:42.029 --> 00:08:43.830
important question about the function of public

00:08:43.830 --> 00:08:45.649
memorials, doesn't it? Yeah. There is certainly

00:08:45.649 --> 00:08:47.730
an argument that placing profound historical

00:08:47.730 --> 00:08:50.669
trauma onto pocket change risks diminishing its

00:08:50.669 --> 00:08:53.350
gravity through sheer repetition. Yeah. But the

00:08:53.350 --> 00:08:55.590
alternative perspective is that it guarantees

00:08:55.590 --> 00:08:58.690
unprecedented visibility. It ensures that Goya

00:08:58.690 --> 00:09:00.990
Tsenggeroi's face and the broader history of

00:09:00.990 --> 00:09:03.529
Aboriginal resilience is interacted with by millions

00:09:03.529 --> 00:09:06.250
of people every single day. It weaves that history

00:09:06.250 --> 00:09:08.610
into the literal fabric of the nation's economy.

00:09:08.889 --> 00:09:11.230
That's a really powerful way to look at it. Interestingly,

00:09:11.470 --> 00:09:13.870
the source notes that the designer, Horse Han,

00:09:14.049 --> 00:09:16.549
had his initials included on the coins minted

00:09:16.549 --> 00:09:20.850
in 1988 and 1989. But from 1990 onwards, those

00:09:20.850 --> 00:09:23.450
initials were removed. Oh, so the artwork ceased

00:09:23.450 --> 00:09:26.370
to be an artist's personal creation and just

00:09:26.370 --> 00:09:28.809
became a permanent cultural symbol. Exactly.

00:09:28.929 --> 00:09:31.529
It stands entirely on its own as a national emblem

00:09:31.529 --> 00:09:35.529
now. Wow. So for decades, that incredibly solemn

00:09:35.529 --> 00:09:38.970
duality was the only version of the $2 coin spinning

00:09:38.970 --> 00:09:42.230
through the economy. But then we hit this massive

00:09:42.230 --> 00:09:45.629
turning point. The Royal Australian Mint seemingly

00:09:45.629 --> 00:09:47.889
realizes that this highly durable piece of metal

00:09:47.889 --> 00:09:50.110
doesn't just have to be a static monument. It

00:09:50.110 --> 00:09:53.470
can be a dynamic evolving canvas. And we enter

00:09:53.470 --> 00:09:55.789
what I like to call the era of color. Oh, this

00:09:55.789 --> 00:09:58.669
is a true watershed moment in 2012. The Mint

00:09:58.669 --> 00:10:01.549
released a special $2 coin to commemorate Remembrance

00:10:01.549 --> 00:10:03.950
Day. The standard design featured a poppy flower

00:10:03.950 --> 00:10:06.450
with the words, Lest We Forget, but they took

00:10:06.450 --> 00:10:08.669
this unprecedented step. What'd they do? They

00:10:08.669 --> 00:10:11.409
released a limited run of 500 ,000 coins where

00:10:11.409 --> 00:10:13.909
the center poppy was physically painted red with

00:10:13.909 --> 00:10:16.649
a black core. This was Australia's very first

00:10:16.649 --> 00:10:19.149
colored circulating coin. I have to pause here

00:10:19.149 --> 00:10:21.009
because the engineering required to pull that

00:10:21.009 --> 00:10:23.190
off is just staggering. We just talked about

00:10:23.190 --> 00:10:24.950
how these coins live in pockets with keys, they

00:10:24.950 --> 00:10:26.850
get dropped on concrete, they go through washing

00:10:26.850 --> 00:10:30.429
machines. The mint had to figure out how to apply

00:10:30.429 --> 00:10:33.309
pigment to a mass circulating piece of metal

00:10:33.309 --> 00:10:36.169
so that the color actually survives the violence

00:10:36.169 --> 00:10:38.549
of daily commerce. And they proved it could be

00:10:38.549 --> 00:10:42.289
done. The red poppy survived circulation. And

00:10:42.289 --> 00:10:44.649
once they successfully demonstrated that durability,

00:10:45.350 --> 00:10:47.889
the floodgates of design completely opened. It's

00:10:47.889 --> 00:10:49.409
like they realized they could turn the national

00:10:49.409 --> 00:10:52.230
currency into, you know, highly durable circulating

00:10:52.230 --> 00:10:54.889
trading cards. Yeah. The evolution is rapid.

00:10:55.389 --> 00:10:58.960
Just a year later, In 2013, they release a coin

00:10:58.960 --> 00:11:01.720
with a purple circle for the 60th anniversary

00:11:01.720 --> 00:11:04.240
of the Queen's coronation. Thematically, they

00:11:04.240 --> 00:11:06.360
stayed in that solemn commemorative space for

00:11:06.360 --> 00:11:09.440
a few years. In 2014 and 2015, for the centenary

00:11:09.440 --> 00:11:13.220
of ANZAC and to honor the poem In Flanders Fields,

00:11:13.580 --> 00:11:16.419
we see intricate colored designs, green doves,

00:11:16.639 --> 00:11:19.320
red stripes. They even managed to print a sunset

00:11:19.320 --> 00:11:22.480
orange sky onto the medal. But then... They take

00:11:22.480 --> 00:11:25.600
a hard left turn away from military anniversaries.

00:11:25.840 --> 00:11:28.000
And this is where it gets incredibly fun. They

00:11:28.000 --> 00:11:30.139
realize the power of distribution. They start

00:11:30.139 --> 00:11:32.399
partnering directly with Woolworth supermarkets

00:11:32.399 --> 00:11:34.980
to release the coins. Yeah, it becomes super

00:11:34.980 --> 00:11:37.879
mainstream. Right. In 2016, they drop a series

00:11:37.879 --> 00:11:40.120
for the Rio Olympics and Paralympics featuring

00:11:40.120 --> 00:11:43.490
the bright Olympic ring colors. In 2017, they

00:11:43.490 --> 00:11:46.090
do a whole series based on the beloved children's

00:11:46.090 --> 00:11:48.529
book, Possum Magic. And the color palettes become

00:11:48.529 --> 00:11:51.409
wildly complex at this point. We're seeing vibrant

00:11:51.409 --> 00:11:54.929
pinks, purples, blues, and navy circulating out

00:11:54.929 --> 00:11:56.850
in the wild. Here's where it really peaks for

00:11:56.850 --> 00:12:00.129
me. Okay. In 2019, they literally put Mr. Squiggle,

00:12:00.429 --> 00:12:02.809
a character, with a pencil for a nose from a

00:12:02.809 --> 00:12:05.350
classic children's TV show, onto the legal tender

00:12:05.350 --> 00:12:07.659
of a sovereign nation. It's brilliant. We're

00:12:07.659 --> 00:12:09.980
talking about turquoise, yellow, and bright pink

00:12:09.980 --> 00:12:12.440
coins being handed back to you as change when

00:12:12.440 --> 00:12:14.840
you buy groceries. And more recently, they've

00:12:14.840 --> 00:12:17.460
done cherry blossoms for the 2020 Tokyo Olympics,

00:12:18.019 --> 00:12:20.320
bright orange for firefighters, and a deeply

00:12:20.320 --> 00:12:23.000
striking black, red, and yellow design for the

00:12:23.000 --> 00:12:26.100
Aboriginal flag in 2021. If we look at the behavioral

00:12:26.100 --> 00:12:29.379
economics of this shift, it is remarkable. Introducing

00:12:29.379 --> 00:12:32.259
vibrant color combined with those limited run

00:12:32.259 --> 00:12:34.399
distribution deals through supermarket tills,

00:12:34.740 --> 00:12:37.559
it completely rewired the public's relationship

00:12:37.559 --> 00:12:40.840
with the coin. How so? Well, it took people who

00:12:40.840 --> 00:12:43.179
were entirely passive spenders and turned them

00:12:43.179 --> 00:12:45.840
into active, obsessive collectors practically

00:12:45.840 --> 00:12:47.639
overnight. Oh, people started hoarding their

00:12:47.639 --> 00:12:50.159
change. They did. The velocity of money actually

00:12:50.159 --> 00:12:52.500
slowed down in this specific denomination because

00:12:52.500 --> 00:12:55.559
people refused to spend the colorful ones. The

00:12:55.559 --> 00:12:58.340
currency became a nationwide treasure hunt, which

00:12:58.340 --> 00:13:01.620
perfectly sets up the sheer logistical nightmare

00:13:01.620 --> 00:13:04.200
of how these coins actually get into our pockets

00:13:04.200 --> 00:13:07.419
because these colorful collectible disks don't

00:13:07.419 --> 00:13:10.620
just magically manifest in cash registers. There

00:13:10.620 --> 00:13:13.340
is a massive industrial machine dictating supply

00:13:13.340 --> 00:13:16.200
and the Wikipedia data on the minting figures

00:13:16.200 --> 00:13:19.320
reveals some completely fascinating, quirky economics.

00:13:19.580 --> 00:13:22.259
Yeah, everything traces back to the Royal Australian

00:13:22.259 --> 00:13:24.580
Mint in Canberra. That is the sole facility.

00:13:24.559 --> 00:13:26.500
where every one of these coins has ever been

00:13:26.500 --> 00:13:29.200
struck. The logistical scale of replacing the

00:13:29.200 --> 00:13:31.840
paper note back in 1988 is hard to overstate.

00:13:31.879 --> 00:13:35.220
Right. To ensure a smooth transition and prevent

00:13:35.220 --> 00:13:38.019
a currency shortage, they had to absolutely flood

00:13:38.019 --> 00:13:42.940
the market. They minted a staggering 160 .9 million

00:13:42.940 --> 00:13:46.139
two dollar coins in that first year alone. 160

00:13:46.139 --> 00:13:49.179
.9 million. Just try to visualize that mountain

00:13:49.179 --> 00:13:51.740
of heavy metal just injecting thousands of tons

00:13:51.740 --> 00:13:54.350
of copper and aluminium into the economy. simultaneously,

00:13:54.350 --> 00:13:57.710
and that massive initial drop created a fascinating

00:13:57.710 --> 00:14:00.389
long -term ripple effect. It really did. Because

00:14:00.389 --> 00:14:02.809
they over -indexed so heavily in 1988, by the

00:14:02.809 --> 00:14:05.690
time 1991 rolled around, the market was completely

00:14:05.690 --> 00:14:07.769
saturated. There were just too many coins. So

00:14:07.769 --> 00:14:10.330
how many standard $2 coins did the mint produce

00:14:10.330 --> 00:14:13.470
for general circulation in 1991? Exactly zero.

00:14:13.529 --> 00:14:15.789
Not a single one. Wow. And that anomaly isn't

00:14:15.789 --> 00:14:17.769
just ancient history either. It repeated itself

00:14:17.769 --> 00:14:20.509
very recently. In 2023, there were again zero

00:14:20.509 --> 00:14:23.129
standard $2 coins minted for circulation. That's

00:14:23.129 --> 00:14:25.590
crazy. To give you a baseline for how dramatic

00:14:25.590 --> 00:14:28.389
that drop is, the source notes that the average

00:14:28.389 --> 00:14:31.450
mintage from 1989 to 2008 usually sat around

00:14:31.450 --> 00:14:34.590
22 million per year. So going from 22 million

00:14:34.590 --> 00:14:37.409
to absolute zero illustrates just how meticulously

00:14:37.409 --> 00:14:39.450
the mint has to monitor the physical wear and

00:14:39.450 --> 00:14:42.129
tear or the hoarding behaviors of the public

00:14:42.129 --> 00:14:45.389
just to balance the supply. It is a logistical

00:14:45.389 --> 00:14:48.580
high wire act. But speaking of the rules of the

00:14:48.580 --> 00:14:51.240
game, there is one legal rule in the Wikipedia

00:14:51.240 --> 00:14:53.539
article that we have to discuss because it sounds

00:14:53.539 --> 00:14:56.019
completely made up. The legal tender limit. Yes,

00:14:56.179 --> 00:14:58.440
there is a strict legal tender limit on the $2

00:14:58.440 --> 00:15:01.700
coin. By law, you cannot pay a debt using $2

00:15:01.700 --> 00:15:04.360
coins if the total amount exceeds 10 times the

00:15:04.360 --> 00:15:06.860
face value of the coin, meaning the maximum amount

00:15:06.860 --> 00:15:08.580
you can legally force someone to accept in $2

00:15:08.580 --> 00:15:11.519
coins in a single transaction is $20. Ten coins.

00:15:11.519 --> 00:15:14.419
That is the hard legal ceiling. OK, I am pushing

00:15:14.419 --> 00:15:17.320
back on this aggressively. Money is money. If

00:15:17.320 --> 00:15:19.779
I owe my mechanic 50 bucks and I hand him a stack

00:15:19.779 --> 00:15:23.340
of 25 legally minted government -approved $2

00:15:23.340 --> 00:15:27.320
coins, why on earth is it baked into the legislation

00:15:27.320 --> 00:15:29.240
of the country that he can refuse my payment?

00:15:29.740 --> 00:15:31.779
Is the government literally just trying to save

00:15:31.779 --> 00:15:34.759
us from having our pockets ripped open by the

00:15:34.759 --> 00:15:37.659
sheer weight of these dense little disks? I know.

00:15:37.700 --> 00:15:40.649
It sounds totally absurd on its face. But if

00:15:40.649 --> 00:15:43.070
we connect this to the bigger picture, legal

00:15:43.070 --> 00:15:45.350
tender laws are not just about defining what

00:15:45.350 --> 00:15:47.809
has value. They are fundamentally designed to

00:15:47.809 --> 00:15:50.590
prevent economic friction. The law exists to

00:15:50.590 --> 00:15:52.669
prevent people from weaponizing heavy coinage.

00:15:53.230 --> 00:15:55.970
Weaponizing coinage. Yes. Imagine a scenario

00:15:55.970 --> 00:15:58.090
where a disgruntled citizen decides to pay off

00:15:58.090 --> 00:16:01.629
a $10 ,000 municipal tax debt entirely in $2

00:16:01.629 --> 00:16:04.230
coins just to spite the local government. Oh

00:16:04.230 --> 00:16:06.789
my gosh. That transaction would require wheelbarrows.

00:16:06.909 --> 00:16:09.210
It would require multiple bank tellers hours

00:16:09.210 --> 00:16:11.809
of manual labor just to count and verify the

00:16:11.809 --> 00:16:14.409
payment. It grinds the efficiency of everyday

00:16:14.409 --> 00:16:16.789
trade to an absolute halt. Okay, when you put

00:16:16.789 --> 00:16:19.990
it that way. Right. So the $20 limit ensures

00:16:19.990 --> 00:16:22.789
that while the coin holds valid economic value,

00:16:23.169 --> 00:16:25.190
it cannot be used as an administrative weapon

00:16:25.190 --> 00:16:28.389
to harass a creditor. Legal tender simply means

00:16:28.389 --> 00:16:30.710
a creditor is legally obligated to accept it

00:16:30.710 --> 00:16:33.450
to clear debt. This law protects the creditor

00:16:33.450 --> 00:16:35.909
from being buried in copper. That is brilliant.

00:16:36.210 --> 00:16:39.149
The fact that weaponizing heavy craneage is a

00:16:39.149 --> 00:16:41.590
legitimate economic threat that requires parliamentary

00:16:41.590 --> 00:16:45.129
legislation just adds to the mythos of this little

00:16:45.129 --> 00:16:48.370
coin. So let's step back and look at the incredible

00:16:48.370 --> 00:16:50.570
journey we've just taken learner. We started

00:16:50.570 --> 00:16:53.590
with a dry economic need to replace a fragile,

00:16:53.710 --> 00:16:56.669
easily destroyed paper note because it was costing

00:16:56.669 --> 00:16:59.070
the government too much money. Yeah. And that

00:16:59.070 --> 00:17:01.149
utilitarian requirement resulted in the engineering

00:17:01.149 --> 00:17:04.130
of a physically tiny, surprisingly dense golden

00:17:04.130 --> 00:17:06.750
disk with mathematically milled edges designed

00:17:06.750 --> 00:17:09.210
to trick vending machines. And that purely functional

00:17:09.210 --> 00:17:11.509
piece of metal accidentally evolved into one

00:17:11.509 --> 00:17:13.529
of the most dynamic cultural canvases in the

00:17:13.529 --> 00:17:16.049
country. I mean, it holds the solemn permanent

00:17:16.049 --> 00:17:18.529
historical tension of the British monarchy resting

00:17:18.529 --> 00:17:21.339
back to back. with Goya Chungarai, a survivor

00:17:21.339 --> 00:17:24.420
of devastating colonial violence. It then pioneered

00:17:24.420 --> 00:17:26.920
color printing technology that survived washing

00:17:26.920 --> 00:17:29.880
machines, turning everyday grocery shoppers into

00:17:29.880 --> 00:17:32.980
avid numismatic hoarders. It celebrated everything

00:17:32.980 --> 00:17:35.740
from the solemnity of war veterans to the sheer

00:17:35.740 --> 00:17:39.279
joy of Pasa Magic and Mr. Squiggle. And crucially,

00:17:39.559 --> 00:17:41.640
we learned that you are legally barred from using

00:17:41.640 --> 00:17:44.400
a wheelbarrow full of them to pay off your mortgage.

00:17:44.640 --> 00:17:47.079
It is an almost unbelievable amount of history,

00:17:47.400 --> 00:17:50.200
physics, and utility packed into 6 .6 grams of

00:17:50.200 --> 00:17:52.700
metal. It really is. So the next time you reach

00:17:52.700 --> 00:17:54.859
into your pocket or you look at that loose change

00:17:54.859 --> 00:17:57.279
resting in your car's cup holder, remember what

00:17:57.279 --> 00:17:59.779
you are actually looking at. You aren't just

00:17:59.779 --> 00:18:02.019
holding transactional currency. You are holding

00:18:02.019 --> 00:18:05.200
a highly engineered, deeply storied piece of

00:18:05.200 --> 00:18:08.339
an entire nation's identity. But Lerner, I want

00:18:08.339 --> 00:18:10.599
to leave you with one final provocative thought

00:18:10.599 --> 00:18:13.759
to mull over today. We established early on that

00:18:13.759 --> 00:18:16.500
the $2 coin was born entirely because it had

00:18:16.500 --> 00:18:19.220
a longer physical circulatory life than a paper

00:18:19.220 --> 00:18:22.019
note. Its physical permanence was its entire

00:18:22.019 --> 00:18:25.299
reason for being. But as we accelerate closer

00:18:25.299 --> 00:18:28.700
and closer toward a fully cashless society, a

00:18:28.700 --> 00:18:31.400
world where we just tap our phones and the physical

00:18:31.400 --> 00:18:34.259
longevity of currency no longer matters, what

00:18:34.259 --> 00:18:36.859
happens to this incredible storytelling medium?

00:18:36.900 --> 00:18:38.960
That's a great question. When the coins eventually

00:18:38.960 --> 00:18:42.039
stop circulating, does this portable tactile

00:18:42.039 --> 00:18:44.460
history, you know, the colored poppies, the tributes

00:18:44.460 --> 00:18:46.839
to aboriginal resilience, the faces we carry

00:18:46.839 --> 00:18:49.539
in our pockets, does it just vanish into vaults?

00:18:49.630 --> 00:18:53.089
Or will we find a new, equally pervasive way

00:18:53.089 --> 00:18:54.950
to hold onto our history? Something to think

00:18:54.950 --> 00:18:57.309
about. Definitely. Thank you so much for joining

00:18:57.309 --> 00:18:59.650
us on this deep dive. Keep asking questions.

00:19:00.009 --> 00:19:01.829
Keep looking closely at the everyday objects

00:19:01.829 --> 00:19:04.009
hiding in plain sight around you. And we'll see

00:19:04.009 --> 00:19:04.490
you next time.
