WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.540
21 number one hits in a row. Not a single miss.

00:00:05.059 --> 00:00:08.539
No slumps. No like awkward sophomore slumps.

00:00:08.960 --> 00:00:11.580
No experimental phases that alienate the fan

00:00:11.580 --> 00:00:15.439
base. Just nothing but hits. Yeah. Zero margin

00:00:15.439 --> 00:00:18.980
for error. It's wild. I want you to imagine executing

00:00:18.980 --> 00:00:22.980
your job with absolute undisputed flawless commercial

00:00:22.980 --> 00:00:26.579
perfection for nearly seven entire years. I mean

00:00:26.579 --> 00:00:28.890
the sheer pressure of that. Right. The pressure

00:00:28.890 --> 00:00:30.929
of waking up on day 2000, knowing you haven't

00:00:30.929 --> 00:00:33.350
made a single mistake yet and knowing, you know,

00:00:33.390 --> 00:00:34.969
the entire industry is basically just waiting

00:00:34.969 --> 00:00:36.929
for you to finally drop the ball. It's the kind

00:00:36.929 --> 00:00:39.509
of pressure that completely defies the laws of

00:00:39.509 --> 00:00:41.909
probability, honestly, because at a certain point

00:00:41.909 --> 00:00:44.289
it stops being about the music itself. Oh, totally.

00:00:44.369 --> 00:00:47.070
It starts becoming an exercise in structural

00:00:47.070 --> 00:00:49.030
engineering. Like how long can you keep the tower

00:00:49.030 --> 00:00:51.210
standing before a slight breeze just knocks the

00:00:51.210 --> 00:00:54.710
whole thing over? Exactly. And that is exactly

00:00:54.710 --> 00:00:56.710
what we're getting into today. Welcome to this

00:00:56.710 --> 00:00:59.789
deep dive. Today we are looking at a very specific

00:00:59.789 --> 00:01:03.070
artifact from music history. We're digging into

00:01:03.070 --> 00:01:05.750
the historical record of the 1986 country music

00:01:05.750 --> 00:01:07.769
hit. You've got the touch by the band Alabama.

00:01:08.170 --> 00:01:10.030
Such a fascinating track to look at. It really

00:01:10.030 --> 00:01:13.140
is. But our mission today isn't just to review

00:01:13.140 --> 00:01:15.599
a single piece of music. For you listening right

00:01:15.599 --> 00:01:19.060
now, we are dissecting the mechanics of a historic

00:01:19.060 --> 00:01:21.959
uninterrupted winning streak in the music industry.

00:01:22.079 --> 00:01:23.959
Yeah, how they actually pulled it off. Right.

00:01:24.099 --> 00:01:26.200
We are going to look at the exact formula it

00:01:26.200 --> 00:01:28.599
takes to build a monolithic pop culture tower,

00:01:29.060 --> 00:01:31.219
the gatekeepers you have to appease to keep it

00:01:31.219 --> 00:01:34.400
standing, and more importantly, what happens

00:01:34.400 --> 00:01:36.859
when you finally decide to pull the wrong block

00:01:36.859 --> 00:01:38.739
and the whole thing just comes crashing down?

00:01:38.909 --> 00:01:42.069
It is really the ultimate case study in commercial

00:01:42.069 --> 00:01:44.980
art. because this particular song isn't just

00:01:44.980 --> 00:01:48.879
a hit. It serves as the climax, like the absolute

00:01:48.879 --> 00:01:52.299
apex of an era of commercial dominance that we

00:01:52.299 --> 00:01:54.459
rarely see in any medium, let alone something

00:01:54.459 --> 00:01:56.900
as fickle as the 1980s music industry. Okay,

00:01:56.900 --> 00:01:58.780
let's unpack this, because to understand how

00:01:58.780 --> 00:02:01.500
you build a 21 -song tower, you really have to

00:02:01.500 --> 00:02:03.060
look at the bricks. You have to look at the foundation,

00:02:03.239 --> 00:02:07.200
yeah. So in December 1986, Alabama poured a very

00:02:07.200 --> 00:02:09.659
specific kind of concrete to keep their streak

00:02:09.659 --> 00:02:12.490
alive. Let's... Let's look at the specs here.

00:02:12.490 --> 00:02:15.490
Let's do it. They release You've Got, The Touch,

00:02:16.169 --> 00:02:18.550
as the second and final single from their album,

00:02:18.710 --> 00:02:20.949
which was appropriately titled The Touch. It

00:02:20.949 --> 00:02:23.590
comes out under RCA Nashville. Right, a massive

00:02:23.590 --> 00:02:26.729
label. Huge. And it clocks in at exactly four

00:02:26.729 --> 00:02:29.689
minutes and 15 seconds. And the writing credits

00:02:29.689 --> 00:02:33.610
go to the trio of Lisa Palace, John Gerard, and

00:02:33.610 --> 00:02:36.310
Will Robinson, with production handled by Harold

00:02:36.310 --> 00:02:39.449
Shedd alongside the band themselves. What's fascinating

00:02:39.449 --> 00:02:42.689
here is the absolute precision of that packaging.

00:02:42.889 --> 00:02:44.550
I mean, when you hear that list of names, you

00:02:44.550 --> 00:02:46.129
aren't just hearing a list of guys who happen

00:02:46.129 --> 00:02:47.849
to be hanging around the studio. Right, it's

00:02:47.849 --> 00:02:50.949
not a jam session. Exactly. You are hearing the

00:02:50.949 --> 00:02:53.569
machinery of the Nashville co -writing system

00:02:53.569 --> 00:02:56.469
at work. In the mid -80s, you didn't leave a

00:02:56.469 --> 00:02:58.949
multi -year winning streak to chance. or to,

00:02:58.949 --> 00:03:00.830
you know, the whims of inspiration. You bring

00:03:00.830 --> 00:03:03.090
in the pros. You brought in architects. Harold

00:03:03.090 --> 00:03:04.909
Shedd and those specific writers were brought

00:03:04.909 --> 00:03:07.849
in because they understood the formula. The historical

00:03:07.849 --> 00:03:10.930
record explicitly describes this song as a ballad

00:03:10.930 --> 00:03:13.469
performed in the band's signature mellow style.

00:03:13.629 --> 00:03:16.310
Signature mellow style. Yes. And that phrase,

00:03:16.310 --> 00:03:18.870
signature mellow style, is the key to everything.

00:03:19.289 --> 00:03:21.969
They aren't experimenting. They are engineering

00:03:21.969 --> 00:03:25.300
a product. designed to slide perfectly into a

00:03:25.300 --> 00:03:27.379
groove they've already carved out with the album's

00:03:27.379 --> 00:03:29.659
previous hit, which was, Touch Me When We're

00:03:29.659 --> 00:03:32.180
Dancing. See, I look at that phrase, signature

00:03:32.180 --> 00:03:35.659
mellow style, and I immediately think of like

00:03:35.659 --> 00:03:37.340
McDonald's french fries. Okay, I see where you're

00:03:37.340 --> 00:03:39.280
going with this. Right. because people don't

00:03:39.280 --> 00:03:42.599
go to McDonald's hoping the chef tried a crazy

00:03:42.599 --> 00:03:45.419
new artisanal seasoning today. They go because

00:03:45.419 --> 00:03:48.020
they want the exact same fry they had in 1980.

00:03:48.120 --> 00:03:50.740
They want consistency. Exactly. So my question

00:03:50.740 --> 00:03:54.240
is, if a band releases a ballad that sounds exactly

00:03:54.240 --> 00:03:56.599
like what people expect, are they just playing

00:03:56.599 --> 00:03:59.659
it safe to protect their status? I mean, at what

00:03:59.659 --> 00:04:02.400
point does a signature style just become a creative

00:04:02.400 --> 00:04:04.840
safety net? Well, I wouldn't call it just playing

00:04:04.840 --> 00:04:07.960
it safe, actually. I think that severely understates

00:04:07.960 --> 00:04:09.719
the difficulty of what they were doing. Oh, really?

00:04:10.080 --> 00:04:13.439
How so? Because delivering a flawless pop country

00:04:13.439 --> 00:04:16.740
ballad 21 times without boring, the audience

00:04:16.740 --> 00:04:21.160
takes absolute genius. Mastery and safety might

00:04:21.160 --> 00:04:23.360
look identical from the outside, but creating

00:04:23.360 --> 00:04:26.199
that exact same emotional response without sounding

00:04:26.199 --> 00:04:29.360
like a total rehash is a razor's edge. Okay,

00:04:29.500 --> 00:04:31.779
that's a fair point. It's hard to be consistently

00:04:31.779 --> 00:04:35.300
good without being boring. Exactly. But you're

00:04:35.300 --> 00:04:38.259
right to look at the commercial motive. By late

00:04:38.259 --> 00:04:41.459
1986, Alabama wasn't just a band, they were an

00:04:41.459 --> 00:04:44.319
institution. And institutions are, by nature,

00:04:44.819 --> 00:04:46.560
naturally risk averse. They have too much to

00:04:46.560 --> 00:04:48.680
lose. Right. Just look at the physical release

00:04:48.680 --> 00:04:51.079
itself. The B -side, like the bonus track you'd

00:04:51.079 --> 00:04:52.759
get when you bought the physical vinyl single,

00:04:53.139 --> 00:04:55.939
was a song called True True Housewife. Oh, man.

00:04:56.170 --> 00:04:58.730
Talk about Know Your Demographic. Isn't it wild?

00:04:58.930 --> 00:05:01.069
It shows a production team that knows exactly

00:05:01.069 --> 00:05:03.649
who is buying the records, exactly what their

00:05:03.649 --> 00:05:05.889
daily lives look like, and exactly what kind

00:05:05.889 --> 00:05:07.889
of emotional validation they want from their

00:05:07.889 --> 00:05:11.189
music. It is a highly, highly calibrated product.

00:05:11.449 --> 00:05:13.470
And when you say highly calibrated, we need to

00:05:13.470 --> 00:05:15.370
put the hard numbers to this because this brings

00:05:15.370 --> 00:05:17.569
us right into the sheer scale of the tower they

00:05:17.569 --> 00:05:20.339
had built. The numbers are staggering. They really

00:05:20.339 --> 00:05:23.199
are. You've got the touch hit number one on the

00:05:23.199 --> 00:05:25.860
Billboard Hot Country singles chart in April

00:05:25.860 --> 00:05:29.699
1987. But it wasn't just an American phenomenon.

00:05:29.720 --> 00:05:31.759
Really, the cross borders. Yeah, it hit number

00:05:31.759 --> 00:05:34.060
one on the Canadian RPM country tracks too. So

00:05:34.060 --> 00:05:36.579
it dominated the entire North American continent.

00:05:36.879 --> 00:05:40.500
And this was their 21st consecutive chart topper.

00:05:41.180 --> 00:05:44.139
21 number ones in a row. If we connect this to

00:05:44.139 --> 00:05:47.629
the bigger picture. The sheer statistical improbability

00:05:47.629 --> 00:05:51.110
of that is just, it's mind blowing. This uninterrupted

00:05:51.110 --> 00:05:54.029
streak dated all the way back to August 1980

00:05:54.029 --> 00:05:56.589
with their song, Tennessee River. So that's almost

00:05:56.589 --> 00:05:59.370
seven years. Yes, for nearly seven years. From

00:05:59.370 --> 00:06:01.470
the dawn of the decade right through to the late

00:06:01.470 --> 00:06:04.449
80s, this group maintained the exact pulse of

00:06:04.449 --> 00:06:07.100
the public. But to really understand how rare

00:06:07.100 --> 00:06:09.160
that is, you have to remember how the industry

00:06:09.160 --> 00:06:11.500
worked before the internet. Right. No algorithms

00:06:11.500 --> 00:06:13.639
to help you out. Exactly. There was no Spotify.

00:06:13.819 --> 00:06:17.019
There was no viral TikTok trend to push a song

00:06:17.019 --> 00:06:19.000
up the charts overnight. Right. You had radio

00:06:19.000 --> 00:06:22.399
gatekeepers. Precisely. Radio programmers were

00:06:22.399 --> 00:06:25.459
highly risk averse gatekeepers. If you strayed

00:06:25.459 --> 00:06:28.259
from the formula, a radio station manager in

00:06:28.259 --> 00:06:31.379
Ohio or Texas would simply refuse to put your

00:06:31.379 --> 00:06:34.000
vinyl record on the turntable. And then your

00:06:34.000 --> 00:06:37.160
streak is done. Right there. To not have a single

00:06:37.160 --> 00:06:39.680
miss, to never release a track that stalled at

00:06:39.680 --> 00:06:43.000
number two or number five, just because a few

00:06:43.000 --> 00:06:45.759
key radio stations didn't like the vibe, requires

00:06:45.759 --> 00:06:49.220
an alignment of songwriting, timing, cultural

00:06:49.220 --> 00:06:52.079
mood, and marketing that is almost impossible

00:06:52.079 --> 00:06:54.220
to replicate today. Here's where it gets really

00:06:54.220 --> 00:06:57.019
interesting. Let's bring back that Jenga analogy

00:06:57.019 --> 00:06:59.300
from earlier. Oh, I love the Jenga analogy. It

00:06:59.300 --> 00:07:02.180
fits perfectly. So in 1980, they pull the first

00:07:02.180 --> 00:07:04.899
block, Tennessee River, and place it on top.

00:07:05.100 --> 00:07:07.600
The tower is completely solid. But with every

00:07:07.600 --> 00:07:09.660
single consecutive number one hit over the next

00:07:09.660 --> 00:07:11.660
six years, they are pulling another block. And

00:07:11.660 --> 00:07:13.980
it gets more and more unstable. Exactly. The

00:07:13.980 --> 00:07:16.560
tower gets taller and taller and visually more

00:07:16.560 --> 00:07:19.500
impressive to everyone in the industry. But structurally,

00:07:20.019 --> 00:07:21.740
the pressure to not be the single that makes

00:07:21.740 --> 00:07:24.139
the whole thing topple over becomes immense.

00:07:24.259 --> 00:07:26.839
You can't make a single wrong move. Right. By

00:07:26.839 --> 00:07:28.740
the time they are recording, you've got the touch.

00:07:29.399 --> 00:07:32.759
They are placing the 21st block on a tower that

00:07:32.759 --> 00:07:36.740
is basically swaying in the wind. Just imagine

00:07:36.740 --> 00:07:39.300
the psychological weight of walking into a studio

00:07:39.300 --> 00:07:42.279
and knowing, if this goes to number two, I am

00:07:42.279 --> 00:07:44.519
the one who ruined the streak. Oh, it would be

00:07:44.519 --> 00:07:46.699
paralyzing. Because when you have a tower that

00:07:46.699 --> 00:07:49.779
tall, you do not make sudden movements. You stick

00:07:49.779 --> 00:07:52.160
to the signature mellow style. You stick to the

00:07:52.160 --> 00:07:55.350
fries. Yes. You rely on the formula that has

00:07:55.350 --> 00:07:58.790
kept the tower standing for 20 blocks. The market

00:07:58.790 --> 00:08:01.550
rewards consistency. The radio stations know

00:08:01.550 --> 00:08:03.490
exactly what they're getting. The fans know what

00:08:03.490 --> 00:08:05.569
they're buying. Everyone's happy. Right, so the

00:08:05.569 --> 00:08:08.350
risk of deviating from the formula becomes existential.

00:08:08.850 --> 00:08:10.829
It's no longer just about whether a song is good.

00:08:11.009 --> 00:08:12.649
It's about whether the song can bear the weight

00:08:12.649 --> 00:08:14.750
of the 20 songs that came before it. Which makes

00:08:14.750 --> 00:08:17.209
what happens next so completely fascinating.

00:08:17.389 --> 00:08:19.629
Yeah. Because every Jenga tower eventually falls.

00:08:19.810 --> 00:08:23.139
They always do. Always. And the streak was officially

00:08:23.139 --> 00:08:26.060
broken by the very next follow -up single, released

00:08:26.060 --> 00:08:30.220
in November 1987. This song was called Tartop.

00:08:30.839 --> 00:08:33.139
And it didn't just miss the number one spot by

00:08:33.139 --> 00:08:35.679
a hair, it peaked at number seven. Which, you

00:08:35.679 --> 00:08:37.639
know, to be fair, is a very respectable chart

00:08:37.639 --> 00:08:39.360
position for almost any other band in the world.

00:08:39.419 --> 00:08:42.139
Oh, absolutely. Number seven is a massive life

00:08:42.139 --> 00:08:44.259
-changing hit for a normal artist. For sure.

00:08:44.360 --> 00:08:46.159
But for a band that hasn't seen anything but

00:08:46.159 --> 00:08:49.559
number one for nearly seven years, A number seven

00:08:49.559 --> 00:08:52.220
is a commercial earthquake. The tower has hit

00:08:52.220 --> 00:08:55.000
the floor. But the most crucial detail from the

00:08:55.000 --> 00:08:58.960
historical record is the why. The Y is everything.

00:08:59.120 --> 00:09:01.679
Yeah, because Tartop is explicitly described

00:09:01.679 --> 00:09:04.460
in the sources as semi -autobiographical. And

00:09:04.460 --> 00:09:07.000
there is the mechanism of the failure. That is

00:09:07.000 --> 00:09:09.720
the exact pivot point. Let's analyze that stark

00:09:09.720 --> 00:09:11.259
contrast because it tells us everything about

00:09:11.259 --> 00:09:13.340
how pop music works. Okay, lay it out. On one

00:09:13.340 --> 00:09:16.539
side you have, you've got the climax of the Strik,

00:09:17.059 --> 00:09:19.460
a song written by three outside writers, carefully

00:09:19.460 --> 00:09:23.059
produced to fit a universally appealing, comfortable,

00:09:23.539 --> 00:09:25.919
mellow ballad formula. Very safe. Very safe.

00:09:26.200 --> 00:09:29.879
Because that kind of song is a mirror. The audience

00:09:29.879 --> 00:09:32.159
can project their own romantic feelings, their

00:09:32.159 --> 00:09:35.759
own spouse, their own life onto the lyrics. It's

00:09:35.759 --> 00:09:38.490
a blank canvas for the listener. So it's basically

00:09:38.490 --> 00:09:40.750
do the emotional work for them. Precisely. On

00:09:40.750 --> 00:09:43.929
the other side, you have Tartop. By stepping

00:09:43.929 --> 00:09:47.149
into semi -autobiographical territory, the band

00:09:47.149 --> 00:09:49.429
is no longer acting as a mirror. They are acting

00:09:49.429 --> 00:09:51.490
as a window. Oh, that's a great way to put it.

00:09:51.629 --> 00:09:53.509
They are asking the audience to look at them.

00:09:53.629 --> 00:09:55.809
They are removing the blank canvas and saying,

00:09:56.049 --> 00:10:00.200
here is our specific personal history. The listener

00:10:00.200 --> 00:10:03.320
is suddenly an observer, not a participant. And

00:10:03.320 --> 00:10:05.639
the radio programmers and a fraction of the fans

00:10:05.639 --> 00:10:07.759
just rejected that shift. Wait, I have to jump

00:10:07.759 --> 00:10:09.799
in here. Because this feels like a brutal lesson

00:10:09.799 --> 00:10:12.419
from the music industry. Alabama basically had

00:10:12.419 --> 00:10:15.000
to choose. Keep feeding the machine to stay at

00:10:15.000 --> 00:10:17.740
number one or tell the truth and drop to number

00:10:17.740 --> 00:10:20.240
seven. Yep, that was the trade -off. In 1987,

00:10:20.779 --> 00:10:23.039
they chose the truth. They dropped their incredibly

00:10:23.039 --> 00:10:25.919
successful signature mellow style for a moment.

00:10:26.240 --> 00:10:28.559
to release something inherently more vulnerable,

00:10:28.879 --> 00:10:30.480
and the market immediately punishes them for

00:10:30.480 --> 00:10:33.039
it. What does that say to you about the industry's

00:10:33.039 --> 00:10:36.259
appetite for authenticity versus a comfortable

00:10:36.259 --> 00:10:39.059
formula? I mean, it says that the market's relationship

00:10:39.059 --> 00:10:41.639
with an artist is entirely conditional. Audiences

00:10:41.639 --> 00:10:43.740
claim they want authenticity. We hear that word

00:10:43.740 --> 00:10:45.740
thrown around constantly in culture today. Oh,

00:10:45.740 --> 00:10:47.940
all the time. Everyone wants to be authentic.

00:10:48.059 --> 00:10:50.899
Right. But... What the commercial data often

00:10:50.899 --> 00:10:53.779
shows and what this broken streak vividly illustrates

00:10:53.779 --> 00:10:56.600
is that audiences actually want reliability.

00:10:56.960 --> 00:11:00.320
They form a parasocial bond, not with the actual

00:11:00.320 --> 00:11:02.700
human beings in the band, but with the feeling

00:11:02.700 --> 00:11:05.860
the band's music gives them. When Alabama shifted

00:11:05.860 --> 00:11:08.759
from providing a universal romantic feeling to

00:11:08.759 --> 00:11:12.200
sharing a semi -autobiographical story, a portion

00:11:12.200 --> 00:11:14.360
of that audience simply didn't make the jump

00:11:14.360 --> 00:11:16.159
with them. They just wanted the feeling back.

00:11:16.360 --> 00:11:18.399
Exactly. The formula is comfortable because it

00:11:18.399 --> 00:11:20.879
doesn't challenge the listener. Authenticity

00:11:20.879 --> 00:11:22.860
is risky because it demands a different kind

00:11:22.860 --> 00:11:25.759
of attention, and commercial radio is not built

00:11:25.759 --> 00:11:28.759
for challenging attention. That is just wild

00:11:28.759 --> 00:11:30.940
to me. You try to show the world who you really

00:11:30.940 --> 00:11:34.059
are and the world says, that's nice, but we prefer

00:11:34.059 --> 00:11:36.840
the meticulously engineered ballad, please. Pretty

00:11:36.840 --> 00:11:39.419
much. But the story doesn't end in defeat, which

00:11:39.419 --> 00:11:42.379
is the best part of all this. Immediately after

00:11:42.379 --> 00:11:45.639
Tartop broke the streak, they turned right around

00:11:45.639 --> 00:11:48.820
in early 1988 and started a brand new streak

00:11:48.820 --> 00:11:51.279
with the song Face to Face. which highlights

00:11:51.279 --> 00:11:53.500
their incredible resilience both as a business

00:11:53.500 --> 00:11:56.100
and as artists. Yeah, they didn't just give up.

00:11:56.360 --> 00:11:58.919
No, a lesser group might have spiraled after

00:11:58.919 --> 00:12:02.139
losing a record breaking streak. The psychological

00:12:02.139 --> 00:12:05.000
blow of the tower falling could have led to second

00:12:05.000 --> 00:12:08.120
guessing every single creative decision, firing

00:12:08.120 --> 00:12:10.879
the producers, panicking. Totally, just tearing

00:12:10.879 --> 00:12:13.659
it all down. Instead, they absorbed the feedback,

00:12:14.120 --> 00:12:16.179
recalibrated their approach, and immediately

00:12:16.179 --> 00:12:18.679
returned to the top of the mountain. It proves

00:12:18.679 --> 00:12:20.700
that the foundation they built wasn't a fluke.

00:12:20.860 --> 00:12:22.960
They knew exactly how the machine worked, and

00:12:22.960 --> 00:12:24.720
they proved they could just turn it back on whenever

00:12:24.720 --> 00:12:27.379
they wanted. Speaking of perfectly engineered

00:12:27.379 --> 00:12:31.460
emotional products targeting very specific demographics,

00:12:32.899 --> 00:12:36.379
I have to bring up a bizarre but absolutely essential

00:12:36.379 --> 00:12:38.799
piece of trivia that shows up in the record for

00:12:38.799 --> 00:12:40.600
this song. I know exactly what you're gonna say.

00:12:40.779 --> 00:12:43.759
because it paints such a vivid picture of how

00:12:43.759 --> 00:12:46.379
wonderfully crowded and chaotic the pop culture

00:12:46.379 --> 00:12:49.860
landscape was at this exact moment in 1986. It

00:12:49.860 --> 00:12:52.580
really is a perfect snapshot of how weird pop

00:12:52.580 --> 00:12:55.200
culture is. I can't ignore it. Yeah. If you look

00:12:55.200 --> 00:12:58.240
this song up online today, databases and encyclopedias

00:12:58.240 --> 00:13:01.240
explicitly take the time to note that this Alabama

00:13:01.240 --> 00:13:04.759
song, You've Got the Touch, is entirely unrelated

00:13:04.759 --> 00:13:07.139
to Stan Bush's song of a very similar title,

00:13:07.259 --> 00:13:10.299
The Touch, from the 1986 Transformers animated

00:13:10.299 --> 00:13:12.460
movie. This raises such an important question

00:13:12.460 --> 00:13:15.620
about how we archive culture and how linguistic

00:13:15.620 --> 00:13:17.899
blank canvases work. Right. Why do we even need

00:13:17.899 --> 00:13:20.440
that warning? Well, encyclopedias have to make

00:13:20.440 --> 00:13:22.779
these distinctions because human memory is messy

00:13:22.779 --> 00:13:24.379
and search algorithms rhythms are completely

00:13:24.379 --> 00:13:27.360
literal. But when you step back, it's a fascinating

00:13:27.360 --> 00:13:29.779
reflection of cultural convergence. You've got

00:13:29.779 --> 00:13:32.659
the touch is just a floating idiom. It's a phrase

00:13:32.659 --> 00:13:35.279
that means everything and nothing all at once.

00:13:35.480 --> 00:13:38.259
It's the ultimate blank canvas phrase. Exactly.

00:13:38.720 --> 00:13:41.360
And because of that, you have two completely

00:13:41.360 --> 00:13:44.580
different corners of 1986 pop culture, pulling

00:13:44.580 --> 00:13:46.779
it down from the ether at the exact same time.

00:13:46.990 --> 00:13:50.070
On one side, you have the pinnacle of country

00:13:50.070 --> 00:13:52.690
music commercial dominance, crafting a mellow

00:13:52.690 --> 00:13:56.009
romantic ballad to sell to housewives. And on

00:13:56.009 --> 00:13:58.450
the other side, you have a heavy driving synth

00:13:58.450 --> 00:14:01.529
rock anthem backing up animated action packed

00:14:01.529 --> 00:14:04.269
alien robots fighting to the death in a cartoon

00:14:04.269 --> 00:14:07.509
movie. It is exactly like showing up to a massive

00:14:07.509 --> 00:14:11.450
1986 New Year's Eve party wearing the exact same

00:14:11.450 --> 00:14:13.940
outfit as someone else across the room. Except

00:14:13.940 --> 00:14:16.000
in this case, one person is a mellow country

00:14:16.000 --> 00:14:18.299
singer holding an acoustic guitar, and the other

00:14:18.299 --> 00:14:20.940
is an action -packed laser -blasting Autobot.

00:14:21.360 --> 00:14:22.679
And they just kind of look each other from across

00:14:22.679 --> 00:14:24.419
the punch bowl and give a little nod. Life phrase!

00:14:24.580 --> 00:14:27.740
Thanks, you two. The fact that the historical

00:14:27.740 --> 00:14:29.580
record actually has to put up a guardrail to

00:14:29.580 --> 00:14:32.059
keep people from confusing an Alabama love song

00:14:32.059 --> 00:14:34.679
with an Autobot battle anthem is just a delightful

00:14:34.679 --> 00:14:37.399
quirk of history. It's so good. But it reinforces

00:14:37.399 --> 00:14:39.179
the point we made earlier about the Nashville

00:14:39.179 --> 00:14:42.200
system. Both of these songs were hyper -manufactured

00:14:42.200 --> 00:14:44.620
emotional products of the 1980s. Oh, that's true.

00:14:45.039 --> 00:14:47.299
One was manufactured for romantic vulnerability,

00:14:47.379 --> 00:14:49.659
and the other was manufactured to sell plastic

00:14:49.659 --> 00:14:53.100
robot toys to 10 -year -olds. They both utilized

00:14:53.100 --> 00:14:55.980
the exact same linguistic tool to get the job

00:14:55.980 --> 00:14:58.679
done. It really is the best kind of trivia, because

00:14:58.679 --> 00:15:00.980
it connects directly back to the mechanics of

00:15:00.980 --> 00:15:05.629
the industry. OK, so... What does this all mean

00:15:05.629 --> 00:15:07.850
for you, the listener? Bringing it back home.

00:15:08.370 --> 00:15:11.669
Always. We've traveled from the specific bricks

00:15:11.669 --> 00:15:14.529
of a perfect country ballad, through the immense

00:15:14.529 --> 00:15:17.870
pressure of a 21 -song Jenga tower, the commercial

00:15:17.870 --> 00:15:20.769
sting of an autobiographical misstep, and even

00:15:20.769 --> 00:15:22.990
into the realm of animated robots. Quite the

00:15:22.990 --> 00:15:25.350
journey. But bringing it back to your daily life.

00:15:25.500 --> 00:15:28.360
where you were lying on your own signature mellow

00:15:28.360 --> 00:15:31.259
style. Are there areas in your work, your hobbies,

00:15:31.399 --> 00:15:33.259
or your relationships where you figured out the

00:15:33.259 --> 00:15:35.460
exact formula for success and you're basically

00:15:35.460 --> 00:15:37.419
just playing the hits because it's safe and you

00:15:37.419 --> 00:15:39.600
know it works? That's a tough question to ask

00:15:39.600 --> 00:15:42.460
yourself. It is. And more importantly, are you

00:15:42.460 --> 00:15:44.980
terrified of your own tartop moment? Are you

00:15:44.980 --> 00:15:48.220
avoiding taking a personal, authentic risk simply

00:15:48.220 --> 00:15:50.299
because you're afraid of breaking a streak you've

00:15:50.299 --> 00:15:52.850
built up over the years? That is really the core

00:15:52.850 --> 00:15:55.409
takeaway here. Success is so often measured by

00:15:55.409 --> 00:15:58.049
what we can consistently output without failing.

00:15:58.909 --> 00:16:01.850
The industry and society at large rewards the

00:16:01.850 --> 00:16:03.990
streak. They reward the 21 number ones. They

00:16:03.990 --> 00:16:07.629
absolutely do. But true growth, both creatively

00:16:07.629 --> 00:16:10.549
and personally, might actually be measured by

00:16:10.549 --> 00:16:12.710
the streaks we are willing to intentionally break.

00:16:13.289 --> 00:16:15.549
It takes courage to step away from a winning

00:16:15.549 --> 00:16:18.250
formula, to stop being a mirror for everyone

00:16:18.250 --> 00:16:21.110
else's expectations, and to try something real.

00:16:21.250 --> 00:16:23.450
Even if it costs you. Right. Even if it means

00:16:23.450 --> 00:16:25.649
you only peak at number seven for a while. Growth

00:16:25.649 --> 00:16:27.789
is the streak you're willing to break. I love

00:16:27.789 --> 00:16:30.769
that. Which leaves us with one final thought

00:16:30.769 --> 00:16:33.490
to mull over as we wrap up this deep dive. Let's

00:16:33.490 --> 00:16:36.330
hear it. We started by imagining 21 flawless

00:16:36.330 --> 00:16:39.600
days at work. But if a 21 song streak of perfect

00:16:39.600 --> 00:16:41.860
number ones is finally broken, simply because

00:16:41.860 --> 00:16:44.840
an artist decides to release something semi -autobiographical,

00:16:45.399 --> 00:16:48.840
it forces us to ask, is ultimate unbroken commercial

00:16:48.840 --> 00:16:51.159
perfection only possible when you keep your true

00:16:51.159 --> 00:16:53.100
personal story completely out of the music?
