WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.060
If you've ever assumed that a profoundly important

00:00:03.060 --> 00:00:05.620
piece of lost history has to be buried at the

00:00:05.620 --> 00:00:07.919
bottom of the ocean in some shipwreck. Right.

00:00:08.000 --> 00:00:10.259
Or sealed away in a collapsed military bunker

00:00:10.259 --> 00:00:14.400
somewhere. Exactly. Well, today's deep dive is

00:00:14.400 --> 00:00:16.899
going to completely upend how you think about

00:00:16.899 --> 00:00:19.559
the survival of historical artifacts. I mean,

00:00:19.640 --> 00:00:23.239
imagine holding a physical window into a critical,

00:00:23.339 --> 00:00:26.280
brutal moment in time. A literal document capturing

00:00:26.280 --> 00:00:29.429
the raw reality of a war. Yeah. and shot by some

00:00:29.429 --> 00:00:31.910
of the greatest visual artists of the 20th century.

00:00:32.590 --> 00:00:34.929
But now imagine that this incredibly important

00:00:34.929 --> 00:00:40.070
artifact just vanishes. Completely disappears

00:00:40.070 --> 00:00:42.609
from the historical record. For over 70 years.

00:00:42.859 --> 00:00:45.039
You'd think you would need an army of archaeologists

00:00:45.039 --> 00:00:47.939
to unearth it. But when this totally lost artifact

00:00:47.939 --> 00:00:50.600
was finally discovered, it wasn't in some hidden

00:00:50.600 --> 00:00:52.960
high -tech vault. No, not at all. It was just

00:00:52.960 --> 00:00:55.119
hiding in plain sight, literally sitting on a

00:00:55.119 --> 00:00:57.640
shelf in a standard everyday administrative office.

00:00:57.719 --> 00:01:00.899
It's wild. It really forces a complete recalibration

00:01:00.899 --> 00:01:03.179
of how we view the curation and preservation

00:01:03.179 --> 00:01:05.420
of our own history. Oh, absolutely. We operate

00:01:05.420 --> 00:01:07.500
under this comforting assumption that, you know,

00:01:07.819 --> 00:01:09.700
culturally significant items are always treated

00:01:09.700 --> 00:01:12.799
with reverence. That they're instantly recognized

00:01:12.799 --> 00:01:14.879
and carefully protected behind museum glass.

00:01:14.980 --> 00:01:16.560
Right, like someone always knows what they are.

00:01:16.680 --> 00:01:19.980
But the reality of historical preservation is...

00:01:19.799 --> 00:01:22.260
It's often incredibly messy, it's accidental,

00:01:22.680 --> 00:01:25.480
and it's completely reliant on the most mundane

00:01:25.480 --> 00:01:27.920
circumstances you can possibly imagine. Which

00:01:27.920 --> 00:01:30.280
is exactly why we are so excited to bring you

00:01:30.280 --> 00:01:32.439
along on this journey today. We have a fascinating

00:01:32.439 --> 00:01:35.120
stack of material concerning a highly specific,

00:01:35.459 --> 00:01:38.599
truly remarkable artifact from 1938. A really

00:01:38.599 --> 00:01:41.099
unique piece of media. Yeah, it perfectly bridges

00:01:41.099 --> 00:01:44.060
the gap between high art, the visceral tragedy

00:01:44.060 --> 00:01:47.200
of war, and, well, urgent grassroots activism.

00:01:47.680 --> 00:01:50.280
We're talking about an 18 -minute black -and

00:01:50.280 --> 00:01:53.180
-white silent documentary film. Released under

00:01:53.180 --> 00:01:55.760
the English title with the Abraham Lincoln Brigade

00:01:55.760 --> 00:01:59.060
in Spain. Yes, alongside its French title, Avec

00:01:59.060 --> 00:02:02.359
la Brigade Abraham Lincoln en España. As the

00:02:02.359 --> 00:02:05.560
title explicitly suggests, it documents the involvement

00:02:05.560 --> 00:02:08.639
of the Lincoln Brigade, which were American volunteers

00:02:08.639 --> 00:02:10.979
fighting during the Spanish Civil War. Okay.

00:02:11.159 --> 00:02:13.800
Let's unpack this because before we can even

00:02:13.800 --> 00:02:16.919
get into the staggering story of how this physical

00:02:16.919 --> 00:02:20.659
film managed to slip through the cracks of history

00:02:20.659 --> 00:02:24.659
for over seven decades, we have to look at what

00:02:24.659 --> 00:02:28.060
this 18 minute reel actually is. Right. Because

00:02:28.060 --> 00:02:30.379
it's not normal. No, the composition of this

00:02:30.379 --> 00:02:33.340
documentary is highly unconventional. This wasn't

00:02:33.340 --> 00:02:36.099
a standard Hollywood production. No studio backing.

00:02:36.330 --> 00:02:39.189
Exactly. You didn't have a single director sitting

00:02:39.189 --> 00:02:42.250
in a canvas chair shouting, action, while a unified

00:02:42.250 --> 00:02:44.770
crew captured a scripted scene. Far from it,

00:02:44.770 --> 00:02:47.689
actually. The directing team is listed as Henri

00:02:47.689 --> 00:02:50.479
Cartier -Bresson and Herbert Klein. Which, I

00:02:50.479 --> 00:02:52.259
mean, that is already a powerhouse pairing. It

00:02:52.259 --> 00:02:54.680
really is. But the actual footage, like the visual

00:02:54.680 --> 00:02:57.379
DNA of the film itself, is a combination of work

00:02:57.379 --> 00:02:59.419
from multiple drastically different sources.

00:02:59.740 --> 00:03:01.819
You have footage shot directly by both Cartier

00:03:01.819 --> 00:03:03.599
-Bresson and Klein on the front lines. Right.

00:03:03.740 --> 00:03:06.800
But then they actively integrated newsreel material

00:03:06.800 --> 00:03:09.400
shot by the legendary war photographer Robert

00:03:09.400 --> 00:03:12.039
Capa. And then alongside that, even more front

00:03:12.039 --> 00:03:14.120
line footage contributed by a fourth individual,

00:03:14.620 --> 00:03:16.419
Jacques Lemaire. What's fascinating here is that

00:03:16.419 --> 00:03:19.360
the final product isn't a traditional single

00:03:19.360 --> 00:03:23.259
perspective narrative. You are looking at a literal

00:03:23.259 --> 00:03:26.479
mosaic of visual reporting. A mosaic is a great

00:03:26.479 --> 00:03:28.680
way to put it. Yeah, because you have four distinct

00:03:28.680 --> 00:03:31.319
contributors, all operating with totally different

00:03:31.319 --> 00:03:33.840
instincts, and they're pooling their visual evidence

00:03:33.840 --> 00:03:36.780
to create a cohesive document. Cartier -Bresson,

00:03:36.919 --> 00:03:39.360
for instance, is historically known for his geometric

00:03:39.360 --> 00:03:41.460
composition. His eye for the human element, right?

00:03:41.460 --> 00:03:43.580
Exactly, the decisive moment just outside the

00:03:43.580 --> 00:03:45.979
immediate blast radius. But then you contrast

00:03:45.979 --> 00:03:48.520
that with Robert Capa. His entire philosophy

00:03:48.520 --> 00:03:51.759
was about getting as close to the visceral, terrifying

00:03:51.759 --> 00:03:54.840
reality of combat as humanly possible. So his

00:03:54.840 --> 00:03:57.439
newsreel footage brings this gritty, kinetic

00:03:57.439 --> 00:04:01.139
chaos to the film. Yes. And then Klein and Lamar

00:04:01.139 --> 00:04:03.840
provide the connective tissue. They are piecing

00:04:03.840 --> 00:04:06.219
together a comprehensive reality of the Spanish

00:04:06.219 --> 00:04:08.460
Civil War from these wildly different visual

00:04:08.460 --> 00:04:10.539
fragments. It's basically the ultimate group

00:04:10.539 --> 00:04:13.060
project, but you know with life or death stakes.

00:04:13.460 --> 00:04:15.819
You have these four distinct artists all with

00:04:15.819 --> 00:04:18.540
their own eyes, their own aesthetic philosophies,

00:04:18.680 --> 00:04:20.660
and they are bringing all these distinct pieces

00:04:20.660 --> 00:04:24.360
together to build one singular urgent message.

00:04:24.600 --> 00:04:28.000
It's a massive collaborative effort. But um...

00:04:28.040 --> 00:04:29.660
I actually have to push back on the mechanics

00:04:29.660 --> 00:04:31.860
of this a little bit. OK, go for it. If you have

00:04:31.860 --> 00:04:34.759
four different people shooting footage, some

00:04:34.759 --> 00:04:37.680
of it contemplative documentary footage, some

00:04:37.680 --> 00:04:41.279
of it chaotic newsreel combat material like Kappa

00:04:41.279 --> 00:04:45.129
stuff, how does an 18 minute silent film keep

00:04:45.129 --> 00:04:47.649
from becoming just an incomprehensible chaotic

00:04:47.649 --> 00:04:50.089
mess. That's a very fair question. I mean, without

00:04:50.089 --> 00:04:52.329
a voiceover narration to guide the audience,

00:04:52.689 --> 00:04:54.790
and without a single unified director controlling

00:04:54.790 --> 00:04:57.790
the lighting and blocking of every frame, how

00:04:57.790 --> 00:04:59.930
does it maintain any sort of clear narrative

00:04:59.930 --> 00:05:02.470
focus? Well, that is the fundamental challenge

00:05:02.470 --> 00:05:04.790
of silent documentary editing. And the answer

00:05:04.790 --> 00:05:07.829
lies entirely in how they wielded the sheer overwhelming

00:05:07.829 --> 00:05:10.029
urgency of the subject matter. So it's about

00:05:10.029 --> 00:05:13.459
the feeling, not the plot. Exactly. The focus

00:05:13.459 --> 00:05:16.459
isn't maintained by a rigid three -act cinematic

00:05:16.459 --> 00:05:19.740
script. It is maintained through emotional juxtaposition.

00:05:20.439 --> 00:05:23.060
The editors had to rely purely on the thematic

00:05:23.060 --> 00:05:25.379
collision of images. Can you give an example

00:05:25.379 --> 00:05:28.399
of that? Sure. You might cut from Campa's chaotic,

00:05:28.660 --> 00:05:31.480
dust -choked footage of soldiers under fire and

00:05:31.480 --> 00:05:34.740
go directly to Cartier -Bresson's quiet, devastating

00:05:34.740 --> 00:05:37.319
shot of a civilian reacting to the destruction

00:05:37.319 --> 00:05:40.079
of their home. Oh, wow. That's a harsh contrast.

00:05:40.300 --> 00:05:43.139
It is. The shared reality of the Spanish Civil

00:05:43.139 --> 00:05:45.439
War and the specific focus on the volunteers

00:05:45.439 --> 00:05:48.199
of the Lincoln Brigade acted as the unifying

00:05:48.199 --> 00:05:51.319
blue. These contributors weren't trying to showcase

00:05:51.319 --> 00:05:53.740
their individual artistic flair. They were putting

00:05:53.740 --> 00:05:56.459
their egos aside. Yes, actively subordinating

00:05:56.459 --> 00:05:58.680
their individual egos and their distinct visual

00:05:58.680 --> 00:06:02.399
styles to a much larger, immediate cause. Every

00:06:02.399 --> 00:06:04.720
single frame was selected and placed in a specific

00:06:04.720 --> 00:06:08.220
order to elicit a very specific, undeniable emotional

00:06:08.220 --> 00:06:10.939
response from the viewer. And that leads us directly

00:06:10.939 --> 00:06:13.720
to the real driving force behind the film's creation.

00:06:13.980 --> 00:06:16.740
Because looking at the sheer logistical effort

00:06:16.740 --> 00:06:19.779
required to stitch this mosaic together, it's

00:06:19.779 --> 00:06:22.300
clear this documentary was absolutely not made

00:06:22.300 --> 00:06:24.540
for traditional cinematic glory. Not at all.

00:06:24.759 --> 00:06:26.899
Cartier, Bresson, and Klein weren't aiming for

00:06:26.899 --> 00:06:29.879
a glamorous premiere in a giant movie palace

00:06:29.879 --> 00:06:33.019
with like a red carpet and velvet ropes. This

00:06:33.019 --> 00:06:36.819
film was conceived and deployed as a highly specific

00:06:36.819 --> 00:06:40.079
tactical tool for a very urgent mission. Right,

00:06:40.120 --> 00:06:43.000
the ultimate driving purpose of With the Abraham

00:06:43.000 --> 00:06:45.329
Lincoln Brigade. in Spain was strictly financial.

00:06:45.569 --> 00:06:47.569
It was created to raise money. But not for a

00:06:47.569 --> 00:06:50.199
Hollywood studio. No. crucially not to turn a

00:06:50.199 --> 00:06:52.660
profit. The funds generated by this film were

00:06:52.660 --> 00:06:55.420
explicitly urgently meant to help wounded volunteers

00:06:55.420 --> 00:06:57.420
from the International Brigades return home from

00:06:57.420 --> 00:06:59.600
the Spanish Civil War. So it was an immediate

00:06:59.600 --> 00:07:02.360
plea for logistical and medical relief. Exactly.

00:07:02.500 --> 00:07:04.740
So what does this all mean for the actual audience

00:07:04.740 --> 00:07:07.000
experience? Yeah. Because the physical format

00:07:07.000 --> 00:07:09.379
they used to distribute this film is a massive

00:07:09.379 --> 00:07:12.699
part of why it was so effective and, well, ultimately

00:07:12.699 --> 00:07:15.459
why it vanished. The format strategy is brilliant

00:07:15.459 --> 00:07:18.639
in its utility. So, the documentary was initially

00:07:18.639 --> 00:07:23.860
shot on 35mm film. Now, 35mm is your standard

00:07:23.860 --> 00:07:26.399
professional theatrical gauge. It's what they

00:07:26.399 --> 00:07:28.980
use in actual cinemas. Right. It provides a lush,

00:07:28.980 --> 00:07:31.779
high quality image, but it's heavy. It requires

00:07:31.779 --> 00:07:34.740
massive, expensive projection equipment, and

00:07:34.740 --> 00:07:37.220
it's meant for wide distribution in traditional

00:07:37.220 --> 00:07:39.560
commercial entertainment venues. But they didn't

00:07:39.560 --> 00:07:43.019
stick to 35 millimeter. No. The creators specifically

00:07:43.019 --> 00:07:45.699
went out of their way to produce a 16 millimeter

00:07:45.699 --> 00:07:47.980
version of the documentary. Which completely

00:07:47.980 --> 00:07:49.819
strips away the glamour of commercial cinema.

00:07:50.300 --> 00:07:52.740
By dropping down to 16 millimeter, you're weaponizing

00:07:52.740 --> 00:07:54.579
the film for portability. Yes. You're taking

00:07:54.579 --> 00:07:56.680
it out of the massive movie palace and bringing

00:07:56.680 --> 00:07:59.300
it directly to the community level. The sources

00:07:59.300 --> 00:08:02.160
show that this 16 millimeter version was produced

00:08:02.160 --> 00:08:04.720
specifically to be shown in union halls and local

00:08:04.720 --> 00:08:07.660
clubs. You literally just need a guy with a portable

00:08:07.660 --> 00:08:10.180
projector case and a white sheet hung up on a

00:08:10.180 --> 00:08:12.240
wall. It's the definition of grassroots media,

00:08:12.439 --> 00:08:15.699
a tool for direct immediate action. Exactly.

00:08:16.199 --> 00:08:18.420
You set up this clanking projector in a local

00:08:18.420 --> 00:08:22.360
union hall. You show this stark, silent, 18 minute

00:08:22.360 --> 00:08:25.860
mosaic of a brutal war featuring fellow working

00:08:25.860 --> 00:08:28.329
class volunteers. And as soon as the screen goes

00:08:28.329 --> 00:08:30.949
dark, you immediately pass the hat to raise money

00:08:30.949 --> 00:08:33.629
for the wounded soldiers they just watched. You're

00:08:33.629 --> 00:08:35.690
hitting on the core psychological brilliance

00:08:35.690 --> 00:08:38.629
of that format shift. The emotional weight of

00:08:38.629 --> 00:08:41.950
that specific viewing context cannot be overstated.

00:08:42.269 --> 00:08:45.070
No, it can't. By bringing the film into a union

00:08:45.070 --> 00:08:47.629
hall, the filmmakers completely dismantled the

00:08:47.629 --> 00:08:49.809
protective barrier that usually exists between

00:08:49.809 --> 00:08:52.730
a cinema audience and the silver screen. I want

00:08:52.730 --> 00:08:54.909
to dig into that barrier a bit because the shift

00:08:54.909 --> 00:08:58.629
from 35 millimeters in a to 16 millimeter in

00:08:58.629 --> 00:09:02.210
a union hall, it fundamentally changes the actual

00:09:02.210 --> 00:09:04.330
physical relationship the audience has with the

00:09:04.330 --> 00:09:06.230
media. How so? Think about live music. If you

00:09:06.230 --> 00:09:08.889
go see a massive rock band play at a giant stadium

00:09:08.889 --> 00:09:11.169
concert, there's an inherent distance there.

00:09:11.350 --> 00:09:12.730
You bought a ticket, you were sitting in the

00:09:12.730 --> 00:09:14.950
dark, and you were passively consuming a spectacle.

00:09:15.549 --> 00:09:17.250
The transaction is complete. Right, you're just

00:09:17.250 --> 00:09:20.629
an observer. But if you see that exact same band

00:09:20.629 --> 00:09:23.629
play an intimate, stripped down acoustic set

00:09:23.629 --> 00:09:26.649
in the back room of your local pub, The relationship

00:09:26.649 --> 00:09:28.669
is entirely different. You're breathing the same

00:09:28.669 --> 00:09:31.210
air. That's a great analogy. If the singer mentions

00:09:31.210 --> 00:09:33.289
they need gas money to get to the next town and

00:09:33.289 --> 00:09:36.389
points to a tip jar on the bar, you feel a deep,

00:09:36.690 --> 00:09:39.409
personal, social obligation to put a dollar in.

00:09:40.230 --> 00:09:42.289
You aren't just an audience member anymore. You

00:09:42.289 --> 00:09:45.450
are a participant. Did the 16 millimeter format

00:09:45.450 --> 00:09:47.970
do that for the Spanish Civil War? That acoustic

00:09:47.970 --> 00:09:50.450
pub set analogy perfectly captures the social

00:09:50.450 --> 00:09:53.690
mechanics at play here. Yes, absolutely. When

00:09:53.690 --> 00:09:56.649
you show a 35 -millimeter film in a grand ornate

00:09:56.649 --> 00:09:59.090
theater, the audience expects to be entertained.

00:09:59.389 --> 00:10:01.090
They're insulated by the architecture of the

00:10:01.090 --> 00:10:03.169
cinema. But when you're sitting on a creaky folding

00:10:03.169 --> 00:10:05.690
chair in your local union hall... A space dedicated

00:10:05.690 --> 00:10:08.610
to community and solidarity. Exactly. A space

00:10:08.610 --> 00:10:10.909
for the protection of your own livelihood. And

00:10:10.909 --> 00:10:13.389
you watch a 16 -millimeter projection of wounded

00:10:13.389 --> 00:10:16.370
volunteers... That insulation just evaporates.

00:10:16.730 --> 00:10:19.110
The war is no longer an abstract geopolitical

00:10:19.110 --> 00:10:21.070
spectacle happening thousands of miles away.

00:10:21.149 --> 00:10:23.610
It becomes an intimately local issue. Your neighbors

00:10:23.610 --> 00:10:25.529
are sitting right next to you watching you watch

00:10:25.529 --> 00:10:28.830
the film. The 16 millimeter projection creates

00:10:28.830 --> 00:10:31.789
a communal intimacy that forces an immediate

00:10:31.789 --> 00:10:34.580
response. The filmmakers didn't just want the

00:10:34.580 --> 00:10:36.940
audience to feel bad. They wanted them to reach

00:10:36.940 --> 00:10:39.000
into their pockets right then and there. It was

00:10:39.000 --> 00:10:41.820
highly effective utilitarian filmmaking. But

00:10:41.820 --> 00:10:44.500
that incredible grassroots utility was actually

00:10:44.500 --> 00:10:46.960
a double -edged sword, wasn't it? Because the

00:10:46.960 --> 00:10:49.460
film was treated as a functional tool, like a

00:10:49.460 --> 00:10:52.639
hammer or a collection plate. Right. And once

00:10:52.639 --> 00:10:56.039
the immediate moment in 1938 passed, once that

00:10:56.039 --> 00:10:58.740
specific fundraising campaign was over and the

00:10:58.740 --> 00:11:00.460
wounded volunteers were either brought home or

00:11:00.460 --> 00:11:03.460
lost, nobody thought to preserve the tool itself.

00:11:03.639 --> 00:11:05.960
The job was done. Yeah. And the physical film

00:11:05.960 --> 00:11:08.000
just slipped right through the cracks of history.

00:11:08.480 --> 00:11:10.419
It went from being an urgent, life -saving piece

00:11:10.419 --> 00:11:14.360
of media to literally vanishing for an astonishing

00:11:14.360 --> 00:11:17.879
72 years. For decades, film historians, archivists,

00:11:17.940 --> 00:11:20.080
and scholars of the Spanish Civil War believed

00:11:20.080 --> 00:11:22.809
that... with the Abraham Lincoln Brigade in Spain,

00:11:23.850 --> 00:11:26.210
simply did not exist anymore in physical form.

00:11:26.289 --> 00:11:28.429
It was officially classified as a lost film,

00:11:28.750 --> 00:11:31.370
which is a tragically common fate for media from

00:11:31.370 --> 00:11:34.669
that era, particularly grassroots 16 millimeter

00:11:34.669 --> 00:11:37.610
media that wasn't legally protected or physically

00:11:37.610 --> 00:11:40.210
vaulted by massive Hollywood studios. People

00:11:40.210 --> 00:11:42.350
just assumed it had degraded, been thrown away

00:11:42.350 --> 00:11:45.210
or destroyed. Here's where it gets really interesting,

00:11:45.389 --> 00:11:48.330
though, because the film wasn't actually destroyed.

00:11:48.700 --> 00:11:51.419
It didn't burn up in a warehouse fire, and it

00:11:51.419 --> 00:11:54.539
wasn't lost at sea. No, it wasn't. In 2010, a

00:11:54.539 --> 00:11:57.460
curator named Juan Salas finally discovered a

00:11:57.460 --> 00:11:59.840
surviving print of the documentary, and he didn't

00:11:59.840 --> 00:12:03.019
find it in some sealed, climate -controlled subterranean

00:12:03.019 --> 00:12:05.559
archive in Europe. He found it in an office in

00:12:05.559 --> 00:12:08.000
New York. Specifically, in the Administrative

00:12:08.000 --> 00:12:09.940
Office of the Veterans of the Lincoln Brigade.

00:12:10.250 --> 00:12:12.730
If we connect this to the bigger picture, it

00:12:12.730 --> 00:12:15.210
forces a profound realization about how much

00:12:15.210 --> 00:12:17.149
of our global history is likely just sitting

00:12:17.149 --> 00:12:19.370
around in entirely mundane environments. Oh,

00:12:19.389 --> 00:12:21.970
absolutely. We have this highly romanticized

00:12:21.970 --> 00:12:25.070
cinematic idea of historical discovery. We picture

00:12:25.070 --> 00:12:27.629
archaeologists carefully sweeping sand off a

00:12:27.629 --> 00:12:30.590
tomb in the desert, or deep -sea divers illuminating

00:12:30.590 --> 00:12:33.129
the rusted hull of a sunken dreadnought. Like

00:12:33.129 --> 00:12:36.070
Indiana Jones stuff. Exactly. But the reality

00:12:36.070 --> 00:12:40.279
is often much more bureaucratic. Here, an incredibly

00:12:40.279 --> 00:12:44.639
vital 1938 documentary featuring irreplaceable

00:12:44.639 --> 00:12:47.100
frontline footage captured by world -renowned

00:12:47.100 --> 00:12:50.100
figures like Cartier -Bresson and Coppa was just

00:12:50.100 --> 00:12:52.460
sitting quietly in an administrative office.

00:12:52.519 --> 00:12:54.879
Surrounded by filing cabinets and copy machines.

00:12:55.679 --> 00:12:58.039
I have to challenge this whole concept of a lost

00:12:58.039 --> 00:13:01.100
film, though, because when archivists say lost,

00:13:01.600 --> 00:13:03.360
they make it sound like it was buried under a

00:13:03.360 --> 00:13:05.830
mountain. But it wasn't lost in that sense. It

00:13:05.830 --> 00:13:08.350
was in an office. Well, lost to the public record.

00:13:08.429 --> 00:13:10.570
But it's exactly like when you were frantically

00:13:10.570 --> 00:13:13.230
tearing your entire house apart searching for

00:13:13.230 --> 00:13:15.490
your glasses. You're stressed. You're looking

00:13:15.490 --> 00:13:17.529
under the couch cushions. You're convinced they

00:13:17.529 --> 00:13:19.629
are gone forever. Oh, I know that feeling. And

00:13:19.629 --> 00:13:21.769
then you walk past a hallway mirror and realize

00:13:21.769 --> 00:13:23.090
they've just been sitting on top of your head

00:13:23.090 --> 00:13:25.860
the entire time. The film. was in the office

00:13:25.860 --> 00:13:28.639
of the veterans of the Lincoln Brigade. The exact

00:13:28.639 --> 00:13:31.559
literal organization of the very people the film

00:13:31.559 --> 00:13:33.960
was originally made to support. I know, I know.

00:13:34.220 --> 00:13:37.399
How does an organization like that just lose

00:13:37.399 --> 00:13:39.740
a masterpiece about themselves inside their own

00:13:39.740 --> 00:13:42.539
office for seven decades? It sounds like an impossible

00:13:42.539 --> 00:13:44.860
irony, I know, but it actually makes complete

00:13:44.860 --> 00:13:47.720
logistical sense when you examine how human institutions

00:13:47.720 --> 00:13:50.279
function over long periods of time. An office

00:13:50.279 --> 00:13:53.059
is not an archive. Okay, that's true. To a film

00:13:53.059 --> 00:13:55.679
historian, the documentary is lost because it

00:13:55.679 --> 00:13:58.879
is not cataloged in a recognized, accessible

00:13:58.879 --> 00:14:01.840
cinematic database. But to the people actually

00:14:01.840 --> 00:14:04.179
working in that veteran's office over those 72

00:14:04.179 --> 00:14:07.399
years, that film was likely just a mysterious,

00:14:07.700 --> 00:14:10.440
unmarked metal canister. Just sitting on a dusty

00:14:10.440 --> 00:14:12.720
top shelf. Or shoved to the back of a supply

00:14:12.720 --> 00:14:16.500
closet. As decades pass, generations of staff

00:14:16.500 --> 00:14:19.179
turn over and institutional memory simply fades

00:14:19.179 --> 00:14:22.210
away. The people working in that office in 1980

00:14:22.210 --> 00:14:26.570
or 1990 or 2005 had absolutely no idea that the

00:14:26.570 --> 00:14:28.629
tarnished canister next to the spare printer

00:14:28.629 --> 00:14:31.009
paper contained an 18 -minute piece of missing

00:14:31.009 --> 00:14:32.570
global history. They were just trying to get

00:14:32.570 --> 00:14:34.919
through their work day. Exactly. They were focused

00:14:34.919 --> 00:14:36.879
on their day -to -day administrative work, answering

00:14:36.879 --> 00:14:39.259
phones, organizing audience. It becomes part

00:14:39.259 --> 00:14:41.220
of the furniture. Your brain just filters it

00:14:41.220 --> 00:14:43.419
out as part of the baseline reality of the room.

00:14:43.419 --> 00:14:45.919
It just blends in. It takes a curator, someone

00:14:45.919 --> 00:14:48.899
like Juan Salas, walking into that space and

00:14:48.899 --> 00:14:51.279
actively looking with an external archivist's

00:14:51.279 --> 00:14:54.019
eye to realize that the glasses are sitting right

00:14:54.019 --> 00:14:56.220
there on top of the organization's head. And

00:14:56.220 --> 00:14:58.919
the sheer serendipity of Juan Salas finding it

00:14:58.919 --> 00:15:02.320
in 2010 completely changed the trajectory of

00:15:02.320 --> 00:15:06.299
this document. because that unlikely rediscovery

00:15:06.299 --> 00:15:09.559
in a mundane office setting directly paved the

00:15:09.559 --> 00:15:11.919
way for the film to be elevated to the absolute

00:15:11.919 --> 00:15:15.059
highest tier of American historical preservation.

00:15:15.340 --> 00:15:18.419
It really did. In 2017, just seven years after

00:15:18.419 --> 00:15:20.559
it was pulled from that office shelf with the

00:15:20.559 --> 00:15:22.740
Abraham Lincoln Brigade in Spain was officially

00:15:22.740 --> 00:15:25.139
selected for preservation in the United States

00:15:25.139 --> 00:15:27.840
National Film Registry of the Library of Congress.

00:15:28.200 --> 00:15:30.759
That is a staggering promotion from a clanking

00:15:30.759 --> 00:15:33.679
16 millimeter projector in a smoky union hall.

00:15:34.019 --> 00:15:36.299
It is the ultimate institutional validation,

00:15:37.019 --> 00:15:39.720
and the specific criteria cited by the Library

00:15:39.720 --> 00:15:42.860
of Congress for its induction is incredibly revealing.

00:15:42.919 --> 00:15:45.659
They don't just save everything. They selected

00:15:45.659 --> 00:15:49.700
this specific 18 -minute film for being culturally,

00:15:50.080 --> 00:15:52.919
historically, or aesthetically significant. Culturally,

00:15:53.159 --> 00:15:55.899
historically, or aesthetically significant. Those

00:15:55.899 --> 00:15:59.659
are heavy academic words for a film that was

00:15:59.659 --> 00:16:02.279
essentially born to be a collection plate. This

00:16:02.279 --> 00:16:04.340
raises an important question about how the mere

00:16:04.340 --> 00:16:07.620
passage of time fundamentally alters the perceived

00:16:07.620 --> 00:16:11.320
value and purpose of media. In 1938, this film

00:16:11.320 --> 00:16:15.000
was purely ruthlessly utilitarian. It was a functional

00:16:15.000 --> 00:16:17.759
mechanism to extract cash for wounded soldiers.

00:16:18.120 --> 00:16:20.460
Exactly. Nobody in that Union Hall was stroking

00:16:20.460 --> 00:16:22.620
their chin and marveling at Cartier -Bresson's

00:16:22.620 --> 00:16:24.600
geometric framing. They were looking at the blood

00:16:24.600 --> 00:16:26.139
and the rubble. They're looking at their neighbors

00:16:26.139 --> 00:16:28.340
on the screen. But with the passage of time,

00:16:28.559 --> 00:16:30.460
the fading of the immediate conflict and its

00:16:30.460 --> 00:16:33.480
subsequent loss and rediscovery, the object has

00:16:33.480 --> 00:16:36.799
transformed. It has shed its temporary fundraising

00:16:36.799 --> 00:16:39.559
skin. It is now an immortalized historical artifact.

00:16:39.740 --> 00:16:41.820
We now have the luxury of viewing it for its

00:16:41.820 --> 00:16:44.500
aesthetic value. The stark black and white imagery,

00:16:45.000 --> 00:16:47.700
the brilliant silent montage, the historic collision

00:16:47.700 --> 00:16:50.580
of Cartier -Bresson, Klein, Kappa, and Le Maire's

00:16:50.580 --> 00:16:53.679
visual styles. Time has elevated a functional,

00:16:53.679 --> 00:16:56.340
desperate object into a cultural pillar. But

00:16:56.340 --> 00:16:58.019
I want to press you on that elevation because

00:16:58.019 --> 00:17:01.340
it feels like a double -edged sword. By taking

00:17:01.340 --> 00:17:04.299
this incredibly grassroots, union -hole film,

00:17:04.819 --> 00:17:06.779
a film that was literally designed to be shown

00:17:06.779 --> 00:17:10.920
on a cheap Portable 16 millimeter projector to

00:17:10.920 --> 00:17:13.059
raise urgent funds from working -class people

00:17:13.059 --> 00:17:15.680
Yeah, and placing it into the pristine perfectly

00:17:15.680 --> 00:17:18.079
climate controlled official sterile vaults of

00:17:18.079 --> 00:17:20.920
the Library of Congress Do we risk sanitizing

00:17:20.920 --> 00:17:23.740
it right do we strip away its raw desperate original

00:17:23.740 --> 00:17:26.319
soul by? putting it behind metaphorical museum

00:17:26.319 --> 00:17:28.980
glass and labeling it aesthetically significant.

00:17:29.259 --> 00:17:31.740
You are identifying the constant inherent tragedy

00:17:31.740 --> 00:17:33.880
in all historical preservation. Yes, it does

00:17:33.880 --> 00:17:36.460
sanitize the experience. By preserving the physical

00:17:36.460 --> 00:17:39.180
object, you inevitably permanently alter its

00:17:39.180 --> 00:17:41.359
context. Unavoidable. The Library of Congress

00:17:41.359 --> 00:17:44.440
guarantees that those exact 18 minutes of visual

00:17:44.440 --> 00:17:47.140
footage will survive for centuries. Scholars

00:17:47.140 --> 00:17:49.140
unborn will be able to study Kappa's framing.

00:17:49.680 --> 00:17:53.000
But no archive, no matter how advanced, can ever

00:17:53.000 --> 00:17:55.700
truly preserve the smell of the sweat and tobacco

00:17:55.700 --> 00:17:58.839
in that 1930s Union Hall. It can't preserve the

00:17:58.839 --> 00:18:01.079
loud mechanical whirring of the 16 millimeter

00:18:01.079 --> 00:18:03.549
projector. or the heavy, desperate silence in

00:18:03.549 --> 00:18:05.630
the room as the hat is passed to save a neighbor's

00:18:05.630 --> 00:18:08.509
life. We lose the acoustic pub set entirely.

00:18:08.789 --> 00:18:11.349
Yeah. But the brutal reality is that the alternative

00:18:11.349 --> 00:18:14.410
is letting the film rot away in an unmarked canister

00:18:14.410 --> 00:18:16.730
in a filing cabinet until the celluloid turns

00:18:16.730 --> 00:18:19.609
to dust. And the visual evidence of those volunteers

00:18:19.609 --> 00:18:23.019
is erased from the earth forever. We willingly

00:18:23.019 --> 00:18:26.240
sacrifice the raw original context in order to

00:18:26.240 --> 00:18:28.839
secure the survival of the visual memory. Which

00:18:28.839 --> 00:18:31.119
brings us to exactly why this journey matters

00:18:31.119 --> 00:18:33.480
so deeply for you our listener today. We've set

00:18:33.480 --> 00:18:36.119
this time tracking an 18 -minute black -and -white

00:18:36.119 --> 00:18:38.460
silent film from its creation on the battlefields

00:18:38.460 --> 00:18:41.599
of 1938 through the Union Halls into a forgotten

00:18:41.599 --> 00:18:44.299
office closet and finally into the most prestigious

00:18:44.299 --> 00:18:46.900
archive in the country. It's an incredible journey.

00:18:47.220 --> 00:18:49.599
But this deep dive really isn't just about an

00:18:49.599 --> 00:18:52.220
old movie. It's a powerful testament to the fact

00:18:52.220 --> 00:18:56.299
that media, history, and human stories are terrifyingly

00:18:56.299 --> 00:18:59.559
fragile. It shows us that grassroots efforts,

00:19:00.180 --> 00:19:02.640
the things made quickly, made cheaply, made for

00:19:02.640 --> 00:19:05.039
a strictly functional purpose and shown in local

00:19:05.039 --> 00:19:07.920
community spaces. They often possess a lasting

00:19:07.920 --> 00:19:11.079
aesthetic and historical value that completely

00:19:11.079 --> 00:19:14.440
outlives their initial utilitarian goals. That's

00:19:14.440 --> 00:19:16.339
the real takeaway here. The things happening

00:19:16.339 --> 00:19:18.680
right now in your community, the local efforts,

00:19:19.140 --> 00:19:21.299
the raw footage captured on phones during community

00:19:21.299 --> 00:19:23.700
organizing, the functional messages being passed

00:19:23.700 --> 00:19:26.759
around today, well... That is a definitive history

00:19:26.759 --> 00:19:28.460
of tomorrow. And that leads to a final thought

00:19:28.460 --> 00:19:30.380
I want to leave you with. Building directly on

00:19:30.380 --> 00:19:32.299
everything we've uncovered today about how easily

00:19:32.299 --> 00:19:34.700
history hides in plain sight. We just explored

00:19:34.700 --> 00:19:37.420
how an 18 -minute physical reel of film shot

00:19:37.420 --> 00:19:40.200
by masters of their craft managed to sit completely

00:19:40.200 --> 00:19:42.440
forgotten in a mundane administrative office

00:19:42.440 --> 00:19:44.900
for over seven decades. Right under everyone's

00:19:44.900 --> 00:19:48.309
noses. It went entirely unnoticed by the very

00:19:48.309 --> 00:19:51.369
people whose legacy it contained before finally

00:19:51.369 --> 00:19:54.690
being recognized as a national pressure. So take

00:19:54.690 --> 00:19:57.910
a moment to consider our current infinitely expanding

00:19:57.910 --> 00:20:00.130
digital world. Oh, that's an interesting parallel.

00:20:00.309 --> 00:20:02.750
What crucial pieces of our modern history, you

00:20:02.750 --> 00:20:05.990
know, urgent grassroots footage, vital on the

00:20:05.990 --> 00:20:08.190
ground reporting, the digital equivalent of a

00:20:08.190 --> 00:20:11.589
16 millimeter Union Hall film are currently sitting

00:20:11.589 --> 00:20:15.319
lost on an old forgotten external hard drive

00:20:15.319 --> 00:20:17.240
tossed in the back of your desk drawer. Just

00:20:17.240 --> 00:20:20.160
collecting dust. Or floating anonymously on an

00:20:20.160 --> 00:20:22.460
obsolete, abandoned server that no one has locked

00:20:22.460 --> 00:20:26.000
into for a decade. What massive, defining piece

00:20:26.000 --> 00:20:28.980
of our era's story is just waiting in plain sight

00:20:28.980 --> 00:20:31.519
right now, hoping against hope to be accidentally

00:20:31.519 --> 00:20:33.299
rediscovered by someone who knows what they're

00:20:33.299 --> 00:20:36.400
looking at 70 years from today? That is a profound

00:20:36.400 --> 00:20:39.480
and slightly terrifying thought to end on. Thank

00:20:39.480 --> 00:20:41.240
you so much for joining us in this deep dive

00:20:41.240 --> 00:20:43.859
into the fascinating, unlikely journey of VIF

00:20:43.859 --> 00:20:46.180
with the Abraham Lincoln Brigade in Spain. We'll

00:20:46.180 --> 00:20:46.779
catch you next time.
