WEBVTT

00:00:00.780 --> 00:00:03.919
Imagine holding a piece of mail that basically

00:00:03.919 --> 00:00:07.160
single -handedly invented the modern serial killer.

00:00:07.290 --> 00:00:10.429
Yeah, and we mean literally no weapon, no DNA

00:00:10.429 --> 00:00:13.990
or anything, just a standard 1888 postcard. Right.

00:00:14.070 --> 00:00:17.089
Smeared with red ink, featuring just a few scribbled

00:00:17.089 --> 00:00:19.410
words that, you know, managed to terrify an entire

00:00:19.410 --> 00:00:21.969
nation. And totally derail a police investigation

00:00:21.969 --> 00:00:25.750
for well over a century. It's just wild. So welcome

00:00:25.750 --> 00:00:29.109
to this custom tailored deep dive crafted specifically

00:00:29.109 --> 00:00:31.530
for you. Glad you're here with us today. We are

00:00:31.530 --> 00:00:34.409
pulling all our insights entirely from a really

00:00:34.409 --> 00:00:37.119
comprehensive Wikipedia article. Yeah, it details

00:00:37.119 --> 00:00:40.439
the history, the text and the massive controversy

00:00:40.439 --> 00:00:44.359
surrounding the the Saucy Jackie postcard. And

00:00:44.359 --> 00:00:47.000
our mission here isn't just to recount some gruesome

00:00:47.000 --> 00:00:49.380
historical event just for the shock value. No,

00:00:49.420 --> 00:00:51.219
definitely not. We're going to examine how a

00:00:51.219 --> 00:00:54.859
simple handwritten taunt became this huge cornerstone

00:00:54.859 --> 00:00:57.439
of true crime history. Exactly, because it really

00:00:57.439 --> 00:00:59.820
blurred the lines between a killer's authentic

00:00:59.820 --> 00:01:03.000
communication and, well, a highly calculated

00:01:03.000 --> 00:01:05.840
media hoax. OK, let's unpack this. To really

00:01:05.840 --> 00:01:08.400
grasp the gravity of that little piece of cardboard,

00:01:08.819 --> 00:01:10.939
we have to look at the mechanics of London's

00:01:10.939 --> 00:01:13.799
communication network back in the autumn of 1888.

00:01:14.040 --> 00:01:15.959
Right, because it wasn't just dropping a letter

00:01:15.959 --> 00:01:18.780
in a local mailbox. Exactly. The central news

00:01:18.780 --> 00:01:21.400
agency, which is who received this postcard,

00:01:21.920 --> 00:01:24.719
wasn't just a local newspaper. It was a major

00:01:24.719 --> 00:01:29.090
wire service. Oh, wow. So like. A huge hub. Yeah.

00:01:29.430 --> 00:01:31.689
If a piece of sensational news landed on their

00:01:31.689 --> 00:01:34.349
desks, it was immediately telegraphed to daily

00:01:34.349 --> 00:01:36.930
papers across the entire country. I mean, that

00:01:36.930 --> 00:01:39.090
structural detail really changes everything.

00:01:39.250 --> 00:01:41.689
It does. The sender wasn't just hoping to spook

00:01:41.689 --> 00:01:44.829
like a local beat cop. They were broadcasting

00:01:44.829 --> 00:01:47.390
to the entire British empire. Yep. They understood

00:01:47.390 --> 00:01:50.129
exactly how to get maximum amplification. And

00:01:50.129 --> 00:01:52.629
to understand why this specific broadcast was

00:01:52.629 --> 00:01:55.590
so incredibly effective. I want to read the verbatim

00:01:55.590 --> 00:01:58.150
text from our source. Yeah, lay it on us. So

00:01:58.150 --> 00:02:00.989
the postcard was postmarked October 1st, 1888,

00:02:00.989 --> 00:02:04.349
and it reads, quote, I was not cutting dear old

00:02:04.349 --> 00:02:06.430
boss when I gave you the tip. You'll hear about

00:02:06.430 --> 00:02:09.169
Saucy Jackie's work tomorrow. Double event this

00:02:09.169 --> 00:02:11.710
time. Number one squealed a bit. Couldn't finish

00:02:11.710 --> 00:02:14.389
straight off. Had not time to get ears off for

00:02:14.389 --> 00:02:17.090
police. Thanks for keeping last letter back till

00:02:17.090 --> 00:02:19.610
I got to work again. It is so chilling. And then,

00:02:19.629 --> 00:02:22.009
you know, it has that infamous signature, quote,

00:02:22.469 --> 00:02:25.680
Jack the Ripper. The syntax itself is just incredibly

00:02:25.680 --> 00:02:27.659
jarring. Yeah, it's so casual. Right. The author

00:02:27.659 --> 00:02:31.819
uses this breezy, almost jovial, tone -like dear

00:02:31.819 --> 00:02:34.400
old boss and saucy Jackie. While discussing the

00:02:34.400 --> 00:02:36.759
brutal murder of human beings. Exactly. It mimics

00:02:36.759 --> 00:02:40.280
the cadence of a coworker casually updating you

00:02:40.280 --> 00:02:43.120
on some mundane office project. That's a great

00:02:43.120 --> 00:02:45.360
way to put it. And the impact of that tone was

00:02:45.360 --> 00:02:48.939
really amplified by the... totally chaotic environment

00:02:48.939 --> 00:02:50.680
at Scotland Yard at the time. Oh, right. Because

00:02:50.680 --> 00:02:52.819
they were basically dealing with the 1888 equivalent

00:02:52.819 --> 00:02:55.280
of an unmoderated internet comment section. Pretty

00:02:55.280 --> 00:02:57.719
much. I mean, they were receiving hundreds of

00:02:57.719 --> 00:03:00.060
letters from random people claiming to be the

00:03:00.060 --> 00:03:02.620
killer. A total Victorian spam filter nightmare.

00:03:03.020 --> 00:03:05.819
Yeah. You have this mountain of trolls fighting

00:03:05.819 --> 00:03:07.699
for attention right in the middle of the biggest

00:03:07.699 --> 00:03:11.199
story in the world. But this particular postcard

00:03:11.199 --> 00:03:14.819
somehow bypassed that filter. It did. The investigators

00:03:14.819 --> 00:03:17.259
deemed it so potentially authentic that they

00:03:17.259 --> 00:03:20.139
took the incredibly rare step of publishing a

00:03:20.139 --> 00:03:23.280
facsimile of it, which was huge. They literally

00:03:23.280 --> 00:03:26.120
printed copies of the killer's handwriting and

00:03:26.120 --> 00:03:29.259
distributed it on broadsheets all across London,

00:03:29.419 --> 00:03:32.379
just desperately hoping like a landlord or a

00:03:32.379 --> 00:03:34.300
sibling would recognize the script. They were

00:03:34.300 --> 00:03:37.360
really grasping at straws, but their desperation

00:03:37.360 --> 00:03:40.520
was fueled by a very specific operational reason.

00:03:40.680 --> 00:03:43.259
The text itself. Yeah. The postcard referenced

00:03:43.259 --> 00:03:46.539
keeping the quote last letter back. Right. This

00:03:46.539 --> 00:03:49.240
was a direct allusion to the Dear Boss letter,

00:03:49.759 --> 00:03:51.460
which is another piece of correspondence they

00:03:51.460 --> 00:03:53.819
received just days earlier. And the key thing

00:03:53.819 --> 00:03:56.699
is, at the exact moment this postcard arrived

00:03:56.699 --> 00:03:59.500
at the Central News Agency, the existence of

00:03:59.500 --> 00:04:02.360
that previous Dear Boss letter was a closely

00:04:02.360 --> 00:04:05.419
guarded police secret. Right. So the author knew

00:04:05.419 --> 00:04:07.379
about a piece of evidence that hadn't been leaked

00:04:07.379 --> 00:04:10.000
to the public yet. Which, I mean, that alone

00:04:10.000 --> 00:04:12.080
would make any detective sit up in their chair.

00:04:12.340 --> 00:04:14.319
Absolutely. But that takes us into the physical

00:04:14.319 --> 00:04:16.839
crime scene itself. Yeah. Because the postcard

00:04:16.839 --> 00:04:20.019
goes way beyond just referencing other male.

00:04:20.220 --> 00:04:22.540
Yeah, it gets a lot more gruesome. It mentions

00:04:22.540 --> 00:04:26.339
a double event, which we know refers to the murders

00:04:26.339 --> 00:04:29.160
of Elizabeth Stride and Catherine Eddowes. Both

00:04:29.160 --> 00:04:31.740
killed in the early morning hours of September

00:04:31.740 --> 00:04:34.560
30. Right. And then there is that incredibly

00:04:34.560 --> 00:04:37.250
macabre apology. The author claims they didn't

00:04:37.250 --> 00:04:40.050
have time to, quote, get ears off for police.

00:04:40.290 --> 00:04:42.930
And that detail that is the mechanical linchpin

00:04:42.930 --> 00:04:45.480
of the entire investigation at that time. Because

00:04:45.480 --> 00:04:47.600
of what the medical examiners found. Exactly.

00:04:47.879 --> 00:04:49.779
When they assessed Catherine Eddowes at the crime

00:04:49.779 --> 00:04:52.759
scene, they documented these really severe facial

00:04:52.759 --> 00:04:55.079
mutilations. Right. And among those injuries,

00:04:55.279 --> 00:04:57.500
the lobe and the oracle of her right ear were

00:04:57.500 --> 00:05:00.220
completely severed. Oh, man. However, the killer

00:05:00.220 --> 00:05:02.920
had been interrupted, so they actually left the

00:05:02.920 --> 00:05:04.819
severed pieces at the scene. So the freezing

00:05:04.819 --> 00:05:07.500
on the postcard had not time to get ears off.

00:05:07.939 --> 00:05:10.500
It perfectly aligns with the physical reality

00:05:10.500 --> 00:05:13.620
of the crime scene. It's a perfect match. And

00:05:13.620 --> 00:05:15.939
just like the previous letter, this gruesome

00:05:15.939 --> 00:05:18.639
detail regarding the severed ear had been completely

00:05:18.639 --> 00:05:21.040
held back from the press. Which, if we look at

00:05:21.040 --> 00:05:23.439
standard investigative techniques, that is the

00:05:23.439 --> 00:05:26.379
holy grail. Oh yeah. Held back information is

00:05:26.379 --> 00:05:29.439
the ultimate tool to weed out false confessors.

00:05:29.680 --> 00:05:31.439
Like if someone writes to you about a severed

00:05:31.439 --> 00:05:33.339
ear and you have a victim in the morgue with

00:05:33.339 --> 00:05:37.220
a severed ear, the case seems closed. It really

00:05:37.220 --> 00:05:39.360
does. But I have to push back on this conclusion

00:05:39.360 --> 00:05:41.920
based strictly on the timeline our sources provide.

00:05:42.079 --> 00:05:44.519
Okay, let's hear it. So the double event murders

00:05:44.519 --> 00:05:46.959
happened in the early morning of September 30.

00:05:47.079 --> 00:05:50.319
Right. This postcard, however, was postmarked

00:05:50.319 --> 00:05:53.980
on October 1st. Ah. That is a minimum of 24 to

00:05:53.980 --> 00:05:56.759
30 hours after the killings. What's fascinating

00:05:56.759 --> 00:05:59.620
here is how that 24 -hour window completely changes

00:05:59.620 --> 00:06:01.819
the evidentiary value of the artifact. Because

00:06:01.819 --> 00:06:04.759
it's a huge gap. Right. You are zeroing in on

00:06:04.759 --> 00:06:07.819
the exact variable that shifts this from a definitively

00:06:07.819 --> 00:06:10.779
closed case to a massive historical quagmire.

00:06:11.000 --> 00:06:13.500
I mean, a 24 -hour gap in a densely populated,

00:06:13.759 --> 00:06:15.680
highly agitated district like Whitechapel. That

00:06:15.680 --> 00:06:18.259
is in eternity. Oh, completely. You have police

00:06:18.259 --> 00:06:20.660
officers, mortuary workers, medical personnel,

00:06:21.240 --> 00:06:23.319
local residents, all just swarming the area.

00:06:23.920 --> 00:06:26.920
The idea that a detail as sensational as a severed

00:06:26.920 --> 00:06:29.579
ear could remain completely contained for over

00:06:29.579 --> 00:06:33.259
a day seems honestly highly improbable. It's

00:06:33.259 --> 00:06:35.980
almost impossible. One mortuary assistant mentions

00:06:35.980 --> 00:06:38.750
it at a pub. And by midnight, half the neighborhood

00:06:38.750 --> 00:06:41.829
is whispering about it. Exactly. If the postcard

00:06:41.829 --> 00:06:44.970
had been postmarked just, say, two hours after

00:06:44.970 --> 00:06:47.329
the murders, before the bodies were even transported,

00:06:47.709 --> 00:06:50.610
it would be ironclad proof of authorship. And

00:06:50.610 --> 00:06:52.790
some historical authors do argue the timeline

00:06:52.790 --> 00:06:54.910
is tight enough to support its authenticity,

00:06:55.170 --> 00:06:57.829
right? They do. However, the delay introduces

00:06:57.829 --> 00:07:00.170
a massive vulnerability in the police theory.

00:07:00.449 --> 00:07:02.689
It really opens the door to the possibility that

00:07:02.689 --> 00:07:05.300
the author was not the killer. Right. It could

00:07:05.300 --> 00:07:07.699
have simply been an opportunistic observer who

00:07:07.699 --> 00:07:10.060
heard a morbid rumor on the street and decided

00:07:10.060 --> 00:07:12.319
to weaponize it. Which requires a staggering

00:07:12.319 --> 00:07:15.180
level of cynicism. Oh, absolutely. I mean, someone

00:07:15.180 --> 00:07:17.540
hears about a woman being brutally mutilated,

00:07:18.000 --> 00:07:21.120
and their immediate instinct is to write a taunting

00:07:21.120 --> 00:07:23.980
letter to a wire service pretending to be the

00:07:23.980 --> 00:07:26.240
murderer. It's incredibly dark. But if we accept

00:07:26.240 --> 00:07:28.899
the timeline allows for a hoaxer, we have to

00:07:28.899 --> 00:07:31.660
look at motive. Who has the insider knowledge,

00:07:32.180 --> 00:07:34.660
the writing skills to craft this specific persona,

00:07:35.339 --> 00:07:38.100
and the direct line to the central news agency?

00:07:38.339 --> 00:07:40.699
And that points the finger directly at the media

00:07:40.699 --> 00:07:43.100
itself. Here's where it gets really interesting.

00:07:43.339 --> 00:07:46.040
Yeah, because the landscape of the 19th century

00:07:46.040 --> 00:07:49.079
penny press was just fiercely competitive. We

00:07:49.079 --> 00:07:51.439
are talking about newspapers that relied entirely

00:07:51.439 --> 00:07:54.060
on daily street sales. Right. There were no long

00:07:54.060 --> 00:07:56.319
-term subscriptions protecting their bottom line

00:07:56.319 --> 00:07:58.740
back then. They needed sensational headlines

00:07:58.740 --> 00:08:01.839
every single day to survive. And an elusive,

00:08:01.980 --> 00:08:04.680
taunting murderer was basically the most lucrative

00:08:04.680 --> 00:08:06.740
narrative imaginable. And the police themselves

00:08:06.740 --> 00:08:08.839
actually began to realize they were being played.

00:08:08.879 --> 00:08:12.040
They did. According to our sources, senior Scotland

00:08:12.040 --> 00:08:14.779
Yard officials eventually claimed to have identified

00:08:14.779 --> 00:08:17.720
a specific journalist as the author of both The

00:08:17.720 --> 00:08:20.920
Saucy Jack postcard and the Dear Boss letter.

00:08:21.199 --> 00:08:24.660
Yeah. In 1913, Chief Inspector John Littlechild

00:08:24.660 --> 00:08:27.040
explicitly stated that investigators believed

00:08:27.040 --> 00:08:29.600
a journalist named Thomas J. Bulling, who was

00:08:29.600 --> 00:08:32.960
often called Tom Bullin, was responsible for

00:08:32.960 --> 00:08:35.299
the correspondence. And Bulling's employment

00:08:35.299 --> 00:08:37.899
makes this theory incredibly compelling. Because

00:08:37.899 --> 00:08:40.139
he didn't just work for any random newspaper.

00:08:40.360 --> 00:08:42.809
He works for the Central News Agency. the very

00:08:42.809 --> 00:08:45.970
organization that supposedly received these letters.

00:08:46.129 --> 00:08:47.750
It's like the call is coming from inside the

00:08:47.750 --> 00:08:50.129
house. Exactly. He didn't have to bypass police

00:08:50.129 --> 00:08:52.690
security or mailroom clerks. He was already inside

00:08:52.690 --> 00:08:54.529
the building. He had the perfect vantage point.

00:08:54.870 --> 00:08:57.230
He could monitor incoming police intelligence,

00:08:57.809 --> 00:09:00.509
intercept real news, and then just inject his

00:09:00.509 --> 00:09:03.350
own manufactured drama directly into the national

00:09:03.350 --> 00:09:06.139
wire. The audacity of that is just mind -boggling.

00:09:06.240 --> 00:09:08.899
It really is. And the theory doesn't just rely

00:09:08.899 --> 00:09:11.440
on the suspicions of a 1913 police inspector.

00:09:11.539 --> 00:09:14.320
No, the source material jumps forward to 1931,

00:09:14.679 --> 00:09:17.580
where we get an outright confession. Wait, really?

00:09:17.600 --> 00:09:20.240
An actual confession? Yeah. A journalist named

00:09:20.240 --> 00:09:23.379
Fred Bess, who worked for a highly sensationalist

00:09:23.379 --> 00:09:26.700
paper called The Star, publicly claimed that

00:09:26.700 --> 00:09:29.620
he and his colleague Tom Bullin wrote the entire

00:09:29.620 --> 00:09:32.759
Jack the Ripper correspondence. Wow. And what

00:09:32.759 --> 00:09:35.399
was their motive? To, quote, keep the business

00:09:35.399 --> 00:09:38.700
alive. That is a phenomenal admission of manipulation.

00:09:39.100 --> 00:09:42.399
Isn't it? They realized that a nameless, faceless

00:09:42.399 --> 00:09:45.100
string of murders would eventually lose the public's

00:09:45.100 --> 00:09:47.159
interest. But a theatrical villain who writes

00:09:47.159 --> 00:09:50.279
letters to the police... mocks their incompetence

00:09:50.279 --> 00:09:53.320
and uses a terrifying moniker. That guarantees

00:09:53.320 --> 00:09:55.539
front -poached sales indefinitely. I just find

00:09:55.539 --> 00:09:57.759
myself fixated on the mechanics of how they pulled

00:09:57.759 --> 00:09:59.700
it off right under Scotland Yard's nose. Oh,

00:09:59.799 --> 00:10:02.299
the logistics are fascinating. If Bullen is at

00:10:02.299 --> 00:10:04.919
the wire service and Best is at the star, they

00:10:04.919 --> 00:10:07.000
essentially have a symbiotic loop. Yeah, think

00:10:07.000 --> 00:10:09.379
about it. Bullen creates the letter and puts

00:10:09.379 --> 00:10:12.220
it on the wire. Then Best publishes it with massive

00:10:12.379 --> 00:10:15.759
Screaming headlines the public panics the police

00:10:15.759 --> 00:10:18.159
waste thousands of man hours hunting a phantom

00:10:18.159 --> 00:10:21.279
and then best writes an editorial Slamming the

00:10:21.279 --> 00:10:24.059
police for their failure. It's a completely self

00:10:24.059 --> 00:10:26.899
-sustaining Ecosystem of manufactured outrage

00:10:26.899 --> 00:10:29.259
if we connect this to the bigger picture. Yeah,

00:10:29.679 --> 00:10:32.409
we are basically witnessing the birth of the

00:10:32.409 --> 00:10:35.230
modern true crime industrial complex. Exactly.

00:10:35.690 --> 00:10:37.889
The media didn't just observe and report on these

00:10:37.889 --> 00:10:40.570
tragic events. They actively shaped the historical

00:10:40.570 --> 00:10:43.009
narrative. They literally gave the killer his

00:10:43.009 --> 00:10:45.669
voice and his name. Right. Before those letters,

00:10:45.730 --> 00:10:47.710
Jack the Ripper did not exist. There was only

00:10:47.710 --> 00:10:50.149
the Whitechapel murderer. Best in Bowling constructed

00:10:50.149 --> 00:10:52.450
a mythos that completely hijacked the reality

00:10:52.450 --> 00:10:54.809
of the crime. It totally recontextualizes the

00:10:54.809 --> 00:10:57.029
entire case. But what's really incredible is

00:10:57.029 --> 00:11:00.230
that this narrative isn't just relying on a 1931

00:11:00.230 --> 00:11:02.409
confession from an aging journalist. No, we can

00:11:02.409 --> 00:11:04.970
actually test this theory today. Yeah. Our sources

00:11:04.970 --> 00:11:08.110
highlight a 2018 study by researcher Andrea Nini,

00:11:08.450 --> 00:11:11.850
who applied modern forensic linguistics to this

00:11:11.850 --> 00:11:14.269
19th century mystery. And the way this science

00:11:14.269 --> 00:11:17.350
works on Victorian text is wild. Wait, how do

00:11:17.350 --> 00:11:19.330
you even run forensics on text from that long

00:11:19.330 --> 00:11:21.549
ago? Well, forensic linguistics looks past the

00:11:21.549 --> 00:11:24.509
handwriting entirely. It analyzes the subconscious

00:11:24.509 --> 00:11:28.090
syntactic DNA of the text. Syntactic DNA, like

00:11:28.090 --> 00:11:31.070
the grammatical structure? Exactly. An algorithm

00:11:31.070 --> 00:11:33.570
processes the structure of the sentences, the

00:11:33.570 --> 00:11:36.490
choice of idioms, and the morphological quirks

00:11:36.490 --> 00:11:38.970
of the author. Oh, wow. It's basically comparing

00:11:38.970 --> 00:11:41.250
the architectural blueprints of how a specific

00:11:41.250 --> 00:11:43.980
person builds a thought. And NeNe didn't just

00:11:43.980 --> 00:11:46.399
look at the two famous letters, right? He ran

00:11:46.399 --> 00:11:49.980
this analysis across a massive corpus of over

00:11:49.980 --> 00:11:53.590
200 hoax letters from the era. Yeah, a huge sample

00:11:53.590 --> 00:11:57.250
size. And the algorithm found that the Saucy

00:11:57.250 --> 00:11:59.990
Jackie postcard and the Dear Boss letter shared

00:11:59.990 --> 00:12:03.370
incredibly specific, highly improbable structural

00:12:03.370 --> 00:12:05.330
similarities. Like what kind of similarities?

00:12:05.470 --> 00:12:07.570
Things like the use of certain phrasal verbs

00:12:07.570 --> 00:12:10.190
and identical grammatical habits. The algorithm

00:12:10.190 --> 00:12:12.750
clustered these two texts together, distinctly

00:12:12.750 --> 00:12:15.450
isolated from the rest of the hoax mail. So modern

00:12:15.450 --> 00:12:18.110
linguistic algorithms effectively validated a

00:12:18.110 --> 00:12:21.570
1930s journalist confession. did. The scientific

00:12:21.570 --> 00:12:23.610
corroboration makes the journalist hoax theory

00:12:23.610 --> 00:12:26.230
the most robust explanation we have. Because

00:12:26.230 --> 00:12:28.929
the linguistic fingerprint shows one author crafted

00:12:28.929 --> 00:12:31.970
the persona. Meaning the entire ripper correspondence

00:12:31.970 --> 00:12:34.389
was likely a singular coordinated fabrication.

00:12:34.690 --> 00:12:37.149
Which brings us to the most absurd twist in this

00:12:37.149 --> 00:12:40.090
entire deep dive. Oh yeah, this is the craziest

00:12:40.090 --> 00:12:43.509
part. We're using 21st century algorithmic analysis

00:12:43.509 --> 00:12:46.590
to study the phrasing of a document that Scotland

00:12:46.590 --> 00:12:50.070
Yard literally managed to lose. Yep. The physical

00:12:50.070 --> 00:12:53.070
Saucy Jackie postcard is missing. It just vanished

00:12:53.070 --> 00:12:55.850
from the police archives. The Dear Boss letter

00:12:55.850 --> 00:12:58.769
was also lost for decades before being anonymously

00:12:58.769 --> 00:13:02.309
returned in 1987, but the postcard remains a

00:13:02.309 --> 00:13:05.070
ghost. How does a police force just lose the

00:13:05.070 --> 00:13:07.350
most famous piece of evidence in their history?

00:13:07.509 --> 00:13:10.210
Well, the archiving standards of the 1880s metropolitan

00:13:10.210 --> 00:13:13.730
police were practically non -existent by modern

00:13:13.730 --> 00:13:15.990
standards. Clearly. There was no rigorous chain

00:13:15.990 --> 00:13:18.889
of custody. Crucial evidence was routinely pinned

00:13:18.889 --> 00:13:21.309
to bulletin boards. Bulletin boards. Yeah. It

00:13:21.309 --> 00:13:23.330
was passed around public houses by detectives

00:13:23.330 --> 00:13:25.710
seeking leads and frequently taken home by retiring

00:13:25.710 --> 00:13:28.509
officers as macabre souvenirs. That is unbelievable.

00:13:28.629 --> 00:13:31.070
So we are running advanced scientific diagnostics

00:13:31.070 --> 00:13:34.519
on photographs and facsimiles. Exactly. The only

00:13:34.519 --> 00:13:36.460
reason we can even analyze the text today is

00:13:36.460 --> 00:13:39.019
because the police were desperate enough in 1888

00:13:39.019 --> 00:13:41.899
to print the killer's marketing material in the

00:13:41.899 --> 00:13:44.679
Sunday papers. The irony is profound. It really

00:13:44.679 --> 00:13:48.200
is. The very act that amplified the hoax is the

00:13:48.200 --> 00:13:50.700
only reason the artifact survived in the historical

00:13:50.700 --> 00:13:53.539
record. So what does this all mean? Big question.

00:13:53.799 --> 00:13:55.860
We started by looking at a piece of cardboard

00:13:55.860 --> 00:13:58.740
that seemed to offer a direct window into the

00:13:58.740 --> 00:14:02.360
mind of a monster. Right. But as we map the timeline,

00:14:02.620 --> 00:14:06.200
The 24 -hour delay in the postmark exposed a

00:14:06.200 --> 00:14:08.899
fatal flaw. And then we uncovered the cutthroat

00:14:08.899 --> 00:14:11.320
mechanics of the Victorian penny press. Where

00:14:11.320 --> 00:14:14.419
journalists like Bullen and Best allegedly manufactured

00:14:14.419 --> 00:14:16.779
a supervillain just to keep their printing presses

00:14:16.779 --> 00:14:19.679
running. And we saw modern forensic linguistics

00:14:19.679 --> 00:14:22.399
cut through the fog of history to link these

00:14:22.399 --> 00:14:24.840
fabricated letters together. The Saucy Jackie

00:14:24.840 --> 00:14:27.720
postcard is almost certainly not a killer's confession.

00:14:27.980 --> 00:14:31.879
It is a masterful, cynical piece of media manipulation.

00:14:32.080 --> 00:14:34.620
It serves as a stark historical precedent. We

00:14:34.620 --> 00:14:36.799
frequently discuss the modern crisis of viral

00:14:36.799 --> 00:14:39.440
misinformation and algorithm -driven clickbait.

00:14:39.720 --> 00:14:42.100
Which feels like such a new problem. Right. But

00:14:42.100 --> 00:14:44.440
this postcard proves that the weaponization of

00:14:44.440 --> 00:14:46.860
false narratives for profit is fundamentally

00:14:46.860 --> 00:14:50.279
baked into media history. A fake news story in

00:14:50.279 --> 00:14:53.980
1888 was powerful enough to permanently derail

00:14:53.980 --> 00:14:56.320
one of the largest police investigations in British

00:14:56.320 --> 00:14:59.440
history. The technology to spread the lie has

00:14:59.440 --> 00:15:02.600
evolved, but the human susceptibility to a terrifying

00:15:02.600 --> 00:15:05.659
narrative hasn't changed a bit. This raises an

00:15:05.659 --> 00:15:08.100
important question, one that forces us to rethink

00:15:08.100 --> 00:15:11.580
the legacy of this entire era. If the famous

00:15:11.580 --> 00:15:14.360
moniker Jack the Ripper and the taunting persona

00:15:14.360 --> 00:15:16.860
were entirely invented by journalists trying

00:15:16.860 --> 00:15:19.820
to keep the business alive, Does that mean the

00:15:19.820 --> 00:15:22.460
most infamous serial killer in history is, in

00:15:22.460 --> 00:15:25.139
a very real way, a fictional character? Just

00:15:25.139 --> 00:15:28.000
overlaid onto a series of tragic, unsolved murders.

00:15:28.259 --> 00:15:30.740
Exactly. I mean, our entire cultural archetype

00:15:30.740 --> 00:15:33.539
of a serial killer, the blueprint for over a

00:15:33.539 --> 00:15:35.919
century of true crime media, is based entirely

00:15:35.919 --> 00:15:38.340
on a fabricated character. We remember Jack the

00:15:38.340 --> 00:15:40.340
Ripper. We remember the Phantom villain, the

00:15:40.340 --> 00:15:42.639
catchy moniker, and the taunting letters. But

00:15:42.639 --> 00:15:45.919
in the process of mythologizing a piece of literal

00:15:45.919 --> 00:15:57.240
junk mail, the actual tragic The true crime genre

00:15:57.240 --> 00:15:59.539
was basically born by erasing the humanity of

00:15:59.539 --> 00:16:01.720
the victims to make room for a fictionalized

00:16:01.720 --> 00:16:03.360
comic book villain. Thank you for joining us

00:16:03.360 --> 00:16:05.559
on this deep dive. Keep questioning the narrative.
