WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.419
Imagine for a second, right, that you're walking

00:00:02.419 --> 00:00:05.320
down the street on a typical weekend. You know,

00:00:05.320 --> 00:00:06.980
you're just running errands. Maybe grabbing a

00:00:06.980 --> 00:00:09.060
coffee or something. Exactly. And you happen

00:00:09.060 --> 00:00:12.259
to be wearing this homemade, slightly goofy punny

00:00:12.259 --> 00:00:14.419
t -shirt. Okay. Next thing you know, you are

00:00:14.419 --> 00:00:16.859
completely surrounded by police, placed under

00:00:16.859 --> 00:00:20.579
arrest, and you are facing the very real threat

00:00:20.579 --> 00:00:26.429
of up to 14 years in prison. Wow. 14 years. Yeah,

00:00:26.469 --> 00:00:28.690
14 years under severe counterterrorism laws.

00:00:28.969 --> 00:00:31.589
I mean, it sounds like a heavy handed plot from

00:00:31.589 --> 00:00:34.429
a dystopian novel. It really does. But what happens

00:00:34.429 --> 00:00:37.310
when that exact scenario plays out in a modern

00:00:37.310 --> 00:00:40.090
democracy? Like how does a country actually draw

00:00:40.090 --> 00:00:43.329
the line between civil disobedience, severe property

00:00:43.329 --> 00:00:46.530
damage and literal terrorism? It's a question

00:00:46.530 --> 00:00:49.299
that. Honestly, it completely challenges the

00:00:49.299 --> 00:00:52.100
foundation of how society manages protest, especially

00:00:52.100 --> 00:00:54.979
in an era of globalized conflict. Welcome to

00:00:54.979 --> 00:00:57.439
today's Deep Dive. Our mission today is to unpack

00:00:57.439 --> 00:01:00.200
this massive, highly detailed Wikipedia article

00:01:00.200 --> 00:01:03.299
regarding a UK -based direct action group called

00:01:03.299 --> 00:01:05.879
Palestine Action. Over the last few years, and

00:01:05.879 --> 00:01:09.340
culminating right now in early 2026, this group

00:01:09.340 --> 00:01:12.379
has been at the absolute center of a historic

00:01:12.379 --> 00:01:15.719
ongoing legal earthquake in the UK regarding

00:01:15.719 --> 00:01:19.040
free speech and terrorism laws. It's a huge case.

00:01:19.219 --> 00:01:21.459
It is. And we've got a thick stack of sources

00:01:21.459 --> 00:01:24.439
detailing their specific tactics, the government's

00:01:24.439 --> 00:01:27.040
unprecedented response and the massive civil

00:01:27.040 --> 00:01:29.480
liberties backlash that followed all of it. And

00:01:29.480 --> 00:01:32.400
just a really quick but crucial note for you

00:01:32.400 --> 00:01:34.900
listening before we dive in. Because the source

00:01:34.900 --> 00:01:37.560
material involves the highly politically charged

00:01:37.560 --> 00:01:40.819
ongoing conflict in Gaza and Israel, we are putting

00:01:40.819 --> 00:01:43.640
our personal opinions entirely aside today. Absolutely.

00:01:43.799 --> 00:01:45.540
Entirely aside. We aren't here to take sides.

00:01:45.659 --> 00:01:47.599
We aren't endorsing any viewpoints or making

00:01:47.599 --> 00:01:49.719
judgments on the underlying conflict. We are

00:01:49.719 --> 00:01:52.599
strictly acting as impartial guides. Our only

00:01:52.599 --> 00:01:55.579
job is to unpack the facts, the events and the

00:01:55.579 --> 00:01:58.120
legal battles exactly as they are presented in

00:01:58.120 --> 00:01:59.950
the text. in front of us. With those boundaries

00:01:59.950 --> 00:02:01.810
in place, let's look at how this actually started.

00:02:02.010 --> 00:02:03.969
So according to the sources, Palisade Action

00:02:03.969 --> 00:02:07.629
was founded in July 2020 by Huda Amori and Richard

00:02:07.629 --> 00:02:10.419
Barnard. Right. And to understand their trajectory,

00:02:10.539 --> 00:02:12.240
you really have to look closely at their stated

00:02:12.240 --> 00:02:15.180
goal. The group's purpose, in their own words,

00:02:15.319 --> 00:02:18.419
is ending global participation in what they describe

00:02:18.419 --> 00:02:21.500
as Israel's genocidal and apartheid regime. OK.

00:02:21.680 --> 00:02:24.840
And to achieve this, they chose a very specific

00:02:24.840 --> 00:02:28.800
focus, which was the UK arms industry. They explicitly

00:02:28.800 --> 00:02:31.539
accused these companies of being complicit in

00:02:31.539 --> 00:02:33.960
conducting a genocide. And their chosen method

00:02:33.960 --> 00:02:36.719
to stop this wasn't, you know, organizing traditional

00:02:36.719 --> 00:02:39.659
marches. with banners or lobbying politicians.

00:02:39.800 --> 00:02:41.460
No, it was direct action. Yeah, direct action.

00:02:41.599 --> 00:02:44.139
And the scale and audacity of their tactics were

00:02:44.139 --> 00:02:46.560
definitely notable. They specifically targeted

00:02:46.560 --> 00:02:49.000
major players like the Israeli weapons manufacturer

00:02:49.000 --> 00:02:51.879
Elbit Systems and the aerospace company Leonardo.

00:02:52.280 --> 00:02:55.039
Huge companies. Massive. Activists would show

00:02:55.039 --> 00:02:57.500
up in bright red boiler suits, scale the roofs

00:02:57.500 --> 00:02:59.460
of drone factories, and just occupy them for

00:02:59.460 --> 00:03:01.780
days on end to halt production. I mean, in one

00:03:01.780 --> 00:03:03.680
instance, they broke into the University of Manchester

00:03:03.680 --> 00:03:06.580
and physically removed two bus of Chaim Wiseman,

00:03:06.740 --> 00:03:09.139
the first president of Israel. Right. They also

00:03:09.139 --> 00:03:12.080
targeted historic buildings, splashing red paint

00:03:12.080 --> 00:03:14.400
all over Somerset County Hall and the University

00:03:14.400 --> 00:03:17.080
of Cambridge's Senate House using repurposed

00:03:17.080 --> 00:03:19.800
fire extinguishers. Yeah, it was a highly visual,

00:03:19.960 --> 00:03:23.699
incredibly physical campaign aimed at maximum

00:03:23.699 --> 00:03:26.099
disruption. But we have to look at the actual

00:03:26.099 --> 00:03:28.139
physical and financial impact of those campaigns,

00:03:28.280 --> 00:03:31.370
too, because this wasn't just. minor graffiti

00:03:31.370 --> 00:03:33.789
that washes off with a power hose. No, not at

00:03:33.789 --> 00:03:37.449
all. We are talking about activists taking sledgehammers

00:03:37.449 --> 00:03:40.210
to windows. We are talking about severe physical

00:03:40.210 --> 00:03:42.729
danger to people on site. Yeah, the sources mentioned

00:03:42.729 --> 00:03:45.629
a break -in at Elbit's Aztec West premises in

00:03:45.629 --> 00:03:48.909
August 2024. Right. Two police officers and a

00:03:48.909 --> 00:03:51.330
company employee were injured there. One police

00:03:51.330 --> 00:03:53.430
officer was actually struck on the spine with

00:03:53.430 --> 00:03:55.650
a sledgehammer. Wow. Yeah, and they were unable

00:03:55.650 --> 00:03:57.849
to work for three months. That is a life -altering

00:03:57.849 --> 00:04:00.620
injury. Definitely. In another case, four activists

00:04:00.620 --> 00:04:03.300
used a cherry picker style vehicle to reach and

00:04:03.300 --> 00:04:05.719
smash second floor windows. So the financial

00:04:05.719 --> 00:04:07.900
damages quickly stretched into the millions of

00:04:07.900 --> 00:04:10.340
pounds. And the sources indicate these pressure

00:04:10.340 --> 00:04:12.840
campaigns actually achieved their stated goals

00:04:12.840 --> 00:04:16.540
in several instances, like the repeated occupations

00:04:16.540 --> 00:04:19.060
and property damage at an Elbit subsidiary in

00:04:19.060 --> 00:04:22.459
Oldham actually preceded its permanent closure

00:04:22.459 --> 00:04:25.839
and sale. And that Aztec West site we just mentioned

00:04:25.839 --> 00:04:28.259
eventually closed unexpectedly, too, even though

00:04:28.259 --> 00:04:31.399
its lease ran all the way until 2029. Right.

00:04:31.459 --> 00:04:34.399
And beyond the physical sites, these direct actions

00:04:34.399 --> 00:04:37.279
caused multi -day shutdowns and allegedly contributed

00:04:37.279 --> 00:04:41.160
to the loss of a massive 2 .1 billion pound contract

00:04:41.160 --> 00:04:44.120
between Elbit UK and the Ministry of Defense.

00:04:44.259 --> 00:04:46.579
2 .1 billion. Yeah, billion. So they were causing

00:04:46.579 --> 00:04:49.519
real... tangible economic disruption to these

00:04:49.519 --> 00:04:52.019
massive defense contractors. And that economic

00:04:52.019 --> 00:04:54.060
disruption, combined with the escalating nature

00:04:54.060 --> 00:04:56.199
of the targets, eventually pushed the situation

00:04:56.199 --> 00:04:58.519
to a breaking point. Because when a group starts

00:04:58.519 --> 00:05:00.839
successfully interfering with billions of pounds

00:05:00.839 --> 00:05:03.360
of defense contracts, the state's tolerance for

00:05:03.360 --> 00:05:06.000
that disruption just drops to zero. Which brings

00:05:06.000 --> 00:05:09.420
us to June 2025. This was the flashpoint that

00:05:09.420 --> 00:05:11.279
completely changed the trajectory of the group

00:05:11.279 --> 00:05:13.300
and the government's response. The RAF Bryce

00:05:13.300 --> 00:05:16.579
Norton incident. Yes. Activists riding electric

00:05:16.579 --> 00:05:19.240
scooters managed to completely infiltrate the

00:05:19.240 --> 00:05:22.220
RAF Bryce Norton military base. Just right onto

00:05:22.220 --> 00:05:24.860
a military base. Right onto the base. And once

00:05:24.860 --> 00:05:27.160
inside the perimeter. They used their signature

00:05:27.160 --> 00:05:30.160
repurposed fire extinguishers, but instead of

00:05:30.160 --> 00:05:32.600
spraying a brick wall, they sprayed red paint

00:05:32.600 --> 00:05:35.600
directly into the engines of two Royal Air Force

00:05:35.600 --> 00:05:40.139
Airbus A330 MRTT refueling planes. Wow. They

00:05:40.139 --> 00:05:42.500
also painted the runway red to symbolize the

00:05:42.500 --> 00:05:44.800
blood of Palestinians killed in Gaza, and they

00:05:44.800 --> 00:05:47.279
left a flag at the base. The dueling narratives

00:05:47.279 --> 00:05:50.000
that emerged around this specific event are fascinating

00:05:50.000 --> 00:05:53.319
to analyze. Palestine Action justified the break

00:05:53.319 --> 00:05:55.720
in by claiming these specific refueling planes

00:05:55.720 --> 00:05:58.319
were actively supplying U .S. and Israeli fighter

00:05:58.319 --> 00:06:00.759
jets. So they were framing their vandalism of

00:06:00.759 --> 00:06:03.379
military hardware as a direct act of genocide

00:06:03.379 --> 00:06:05.519
prevention and the prevention of British war

00:06:05.519 --> 00:06:07.500
crimes. Right. They called it genocide prevention.

00:06:07.839 --> 00:06:10.439
But the UK Ministry of Defense, backed by independent

00:06:10.439 --> 00:06:12.939
reporting from the BBC, countered that claim

00:06:12.939 --> 00:06:15.459
directly. What did they say? They stated unequivocally

00:06:15.459 --> 00:06:18.129
that those two specific aircraft had not refueled

00:06:18.129 --> 00:06:20.389
or supported the Israeli Air Force. However,

00:06:20.610 --> 00:06:23.490
the BBC did note that those jets had been used

00:06:23.490 --> 00:06:26.550
for British air operations in Yemen, Iraq, and

00:06:26.550 --> 00:06:28.970
Syria. Okay, so they were active military planes.

00:06:29.129 --> 00:06:31.810
Exactly. And regardless of where the planes had

00:06:31.810 --> 00:06:34.290
been deployed, the very act of infiltrating a

00:06:34.290 --> 00:06:37.329
highly secure military installation and damaging

00:06:37.329 --> 00:06:40.430
state military assets, well, that was viewed

00:06:40.430 --> 00:06:42.550
by the government as an intolerable threat to

00:06:42.550 --> 00:06:45.480
national security. Yet breaking into Briz Norton

00:06:45.480 --> 00:06:48.139
was clearly the final straw. The government's

00:06:48.139 --> 00:06:51.480
response was incredibly swift, led by Home Secretary

00:06:51.480 --> 00:06:55.920
Yvette Cooper. On July 5, 2025, Palestine Action

00:06:55.920 --> 00:06:58.279
was officially prescribed as a terrorist group

00:06:58.279 --> 00:07:01.540
under the Terrorism Act 2000. Let's pause and

00:07:01.540 --> 00:07:04.240
unpack what prescription actually means for you,

00:07:04.339 --> 00:07:06.480
the everyday citizen on the street. Yeah, please

00:07:06.480 --> 00:07:09.060
do. Because it fundamentally alters your legal

00:07:09.060 --> 00:07:11.660
reality. Prescription doesn't just mean the group's

00:07:11.660 --> 00:07:13.819
leaders are arrested. Under the Terrorism Act

00:07:13.819 --> 00:07:16.519
2000, simply being a member of the group, fundraising

00:07:16.519 --> 00:07:19.220
for it, or even wearing items of clothing that

00:07:19.220 --> 00:07:21.339
arouse a reasonable suspicion of support becomes

00:07:21.339 --> 00:07:23.779
a severe criminal. offense. Just wearing a piece

00:07:23.779 --> 00:07:26.600
of clothing. Yes. And expressing an opinion supportive

00:07:26.600 --> 00:07:29.019
of the group if the state deems it reckless as

00:07:29.019 --> 00:07:31.319
to whether it encourages others to support them,

00:07:31.439 --> 00:07:34.839
that's illegal too. The maximum penalty for membership

00:07:34.839 --> 00:07:38.060
or inviting support is up to 14 years in prison.

00:07:38.259 --> 00:07:40.439
And the political mechanics of how this got passed

00:07:40.439 --> 00:07:43.899
into law are wild to me. The government didn't

00:07:43.899 --> 00:07:46.300
just hold a straightforward vote on banning Palestine

00:07:46.300 --> 00:07:48.959
action. No, they didn't. They bundled the group

00:07:48.959 --> 00:07:52.170
into a single voting order with two violent neo

00:07:52.170 --> 00:07:55.029
-Nazi groups, including one literally called

00:07:55.029 --> 00:07:58.230
the Maniacs Murder Cult. Yes, the Maniacs Murder

00:07:58.230 --> 00:08:00.050
Cult and another called the Russian Imperial

00:08:00.050 --> 00:08:02.490
Movement. It was a highly calculated legislative

00:08:02.490 --> 00:08:05.310
maneuver. Members of parliament couldn't vote

00:08:05.310 --> 00:08:07.750
to ban the neo -Nazis but spare the protest group

00:08:07.750 --> 00:08:10.889
or vice versa. They had to ban all three simultaneously

00:08:10.889 --> 00:08:13.730
or none at all. Which is crazy. And this move

00:08:13.730 --> 00:08:15.689
faced heavy criticism in the House of Lords.

00:08:16.379 --> 00:08:18.939
Baroness Jones openly called it a sneaky way

00:08:18.939 --> 00:08:21.399
to force the vote through because it put immense

00:08:21.399 --> 00:08:24.160
political pressure on MPs. I mean, nobody wants

00:08:24.160 --> 00:08:26.459
to be the politician who votes against banning

00:08:26.459 --> 00:08:28.920
a group called the maniacs murder cult. Exactly.

00:08:29.100 --> 00:08:31.699
And the strategy worked perfectly. The House

00:08:31.699 --> 00:08:35.740
of Commons voted 385 to 26 in favor of prescription.

00:08:36.269 --> 00:08:38.570
The fallout from that vote was immediate. It

00:08:38.570 --> 00:08:40.830
triggered a massive wave of arrests that really

00:08:40.830 --> 00:08:43.110
demonstrates how broadly counterterrorism laws

00:08:43.110 --> 00:08:45.509
can sweep up the general public. Between July

00:08:45.509 --> 00:08:49.970
and November 2025, over 2 ,545 individuals were

00:08:49.970 --> 00:08:52.370
arrested by British police. Over two and a half

00:08:52.370 --> 00:08:54.990
thousand people. Yes. And the vast majority of

00:08:54.990 --> 00:08:56.950
these people weren't scaling buildings or holding

00:08:56.950 --> 00:08:59.429
sledgehammers. Most of them were arrested simply

00:08:59.429 --> 00:09:01.730
for holding cardboard signs at protests that

00:09:01.730 --> 00:09:04.850
read, I oppose genocide. I support Palestine

00:09:04.850 --> 00:09:07.529
action. Right. We even have that absurd example

00:09:07.529 --> 00:09:09.389
from the source text of a man being arrested

00:09:09.389 --> 00:09:12.049
and eventually de -arrested simply for wearing

00:09:12.049 --> 00:09:14.649
a mocking T -shirt that said plasticine action.

00:09:14.710 --> 00:09:16.429
The punny T -shirt you mentioned at the start.

00:09:16.570 --> 00:09:18.590
Yeah. Imagine the sheer amount of police paperwork

00:09:18.590 --> 00:09:21.330
and taxpayer money generated over a plasticine

00:09:21.330 --> 00:09:24.049
pun. But it completely changed the landscape

00:09:24.049 --> 00:09:26.409
of public demonstration. You could just be swept

00:09:26.409 --> 00:09:29.529
up in a terror raid for a joke. And that sweeping

00:09:29.529 --> 00:09:32.110
action came with a staggering financial cost

00:09:32.110 --> 00:09:35.070
to the public. Just policing the ban over a single

00:09:35.070 --> 00:09:37.809
four day period cost the Metropolitan Police

00:09:37.809 --> 00:09:40.750
over eight point seven three million pounds.

00:09:40.850 --> 00:09:42.730
Almost nine million pounds in four days. Yeah.

00:09:43.080 --> 00:09:45.460
When you factor in the long -term investigation

00:09:45.460 --> 00:09:48.700
and casework costs, the total quickly exceeded

00:09:48.700 --> 00:09:51.899
10 million pounds. Wow. The strain on the justice

00:09:51.899 --> 00:09:54.980
system was immense. Internal reports suggested

00:09:54.980 --> 00:09:57.620
they were preparing for over 400 trials, taking

00:09:57.620 --> 00:10:01.360
up 200 full days of court time just to process

00:10:01.360 --> 00:10:03.320
the supporters who had been holding signs or

00:10:03.320 --> 00:10:05.039
wearing T -shirts. I mean, you can't just arrest

00:10:05.039 --> 00:10:07.700
2 ,500 people for holding cardboard signs without

00:10:07.700 --> 00:10:09.759
triggering a massive civil liberties backlash.

00:10:09.919 --> 00:10:11.799
You really can't. The pushback from human rights

00:10:11.799 --> 00:10:14.480
organizations... was fierce and immediate. Amnesty

00:10:14.480 --> 00:10:17.080
International, Liberty, and United Nations experts

00:10:17.080 --> 00:10:19.840
accused the UK government of fundamentally conflating

00:10:19.840 --> 00:10:23.100
protest with terrorism. Amnesty called it an

00:10:23.100 --> 00:10:26.220
unprecedented legal overreach. They argued that

00:10:26.220 --> 00:10:28.220
the UK's definition of terrorism was becoming

00:10:28.220 --> 00:10:30.559
dangerously broad compared to other democratic

00:10:30.559 --> 00:10:34.120
nations. And a declassified intelligence assessment

00:10:34.120 --> 00:10:38.000
published in September 2025 actually bolstered

00:10:38.000 --> 00:10:40.210
that argument. It did. It admitted that the vast

00:10:40.210 --> 00:10:42.889
majority of Palestine actions activities, the

00:10:42.889 --> 00:10:45.710
sit -ins, the graffiti, the petty vandalism,

00:10:45.730 --> 00:10:48.490
did not meet the legal standard of terrorism.

00:10:49.009 --> 00:10:52.470
It noted that their actions mostly related to

00:10:52.470 --> 00:10:56.370
minor property damage. Alan Green, a senior counterterrorism

00:10:56.370 --> 00:10:58.570
researcher cited in the sources, pointed out

00:10:58.570 --> 00:11:00.870
that relying on property damage to label a group

00:11:00.870 --> 00:11:03.710
as terrorists marked a radical departure from

00:11:03.710 --> 00:11:05.789
how these severe laws had been used previously.

00:11:06.169 --> 00:11:08.909
And this created a profound chilling effect across

00:11:08.909 --> 00:11:11.710
the wider culture. It wasn't just activists on

00:11:11.710 --> 00:11:13.990
the front lines who were worried anymore. Normal

00:11:13.990 --> 00:11:16.250
people, writers and journalists were suddenly

00:11:16.250 --> 00:11:18.529
terrified of running afoul of the Terrorism Act.

00:11:18.669 --> 00:11:21.360
Like Sally Rooney. Yeah, the acclaimed author

00:11:21.360 --> 00:11:23.559
Sally Rooney actually provided a witness statement

00:11:23.559 --> 00:11:26.019
saying she genuinely feared her books would be

00:11:26.019 --> 00:11:28.279
pulled from UK shelves. Because she had publicly

00:11:28.279 --> 00:11:30.620
pledged support for Palestine Action before the

00:11:30.620 --> 00:11:33.720
ban. Exactly. She was worried it could theoretically

00:11:33.720 --> 00:11:36.620
be illegal for her British publishers or the

00:11:36.620 --> 00:11:40.000
BBC to pay her royalties, just on the suspicion

00:11:40.000 --> 00:11:42.240
she might use that money to support the newly

00:11:42.240 --> 00:11:44.960
prescribed group. That's a huge chilling effect

00:11:44.960 --> 00:11:47.960
on free speech. It is. And the prominent journalist

00:11:47.960 --> 00:11:50.500
Owen Jones had to write a column in The Guardian

00:11:50.500 --> 00:11:53.820
carefully stating right up front that he wasn't

00:11:53.820 --> 00:11:56.080
supporting the group just so he could report

00:11:56.080 --> 00:11:58.980
on the situation without risking 14 years in

00:11:58.980 --> 00:12:01.789
prison. But while high profile writers were worrying

00:12:01.789 --> 00:12:03.549
about their publishing contracts and columns,

00:12:03.610 --> 00:12:06.470
the human toll inside the UK prison system was

00:12:06.470 --> 00:12:08.750
escalating dramatically for the activists who

00:12:08.750 --> 00:12:10.470
were actually locked up. Right. We have to talk

00:12:10.470 --> 00:12:12.809
about the Filton 18. This was a group of activists

00:12:12.809 --> 00:12:15.370
arrested following a raid on an Albit Systems

00:12:15.370 --> 00:12:18.250
headquarters in Bristol. Some of these individuals

00:12:18.250 --> 00:12:21.110
faced pretrial detention that stretched far beyond

00:12:21.110 --> 00:12:23.669
a year. To put that in legal context, the usual

00:12:23.669 --> 00:12:26.289
custody time limit in the UK before a trial must

00:12:26.289 --> 00:12:29.750
begin is six months. Six months. Yes. These individuals

00:12:29.750 --> 00:12:32.110
were being held in maximum security conditions

00:12:32.110 --> 00:12:34.789
for double that time without having faced a jury

00:12:34.789 --> 00:12:37.409
or been convicted of a crime. And the psychological

00:12:37.409 --> 00:12:39.909
and physical toll of that indefinite detention

00:12:39.909 --> 00:12:43.070
sparked the prisoners for Palestine hunger strikes.

00:12:44.039 --> 00:12:46.639
Activists in multiple high security prisons like

00:12:46.639 --> 00:12:49.500
Belmarsh, White Moor and Franklin refused food.

00:12:49.659 --> 00:12:52.100
And this wasn't a symbolic weekend fast. No,

00:12:52.120 --> 00:12:54.940
some of these prisoners refused food for an agonizing

00:12:54.940 --> 00:12:58.879
73 days. 73 days. Going 73 days without food

00:12:58.879 --> 00:13:01.960
causes catastrophic, often irreversible damage

00:13:01.960 --> 00:13:04.820
to the human body. It does. The sheer desperation

00:13:04.820 --> 00:13:07.419
of that situation drew major international attention.

00:13:07.639 --> 00:13:10.480
Even Greta Thunberg traveled to London in December

00:13:10.480 --> 00:13:13.659
2025 to protest in solidarity. with the hunger

00:13:13.659 --> 00:13:15.620
strikers. And she ended up getting arrested by

00:13:15.620 --> 00:13:18.279
London police as well. She did, which brings

00:13:18.279 --> 00:13:21.139
us to a critical juncture in the timeline. The

00:13:21.139 --> 00:13:23.559
formal organization of Palestine Action had dissolved

00:13:23.559 --> 00:13:26.080
following the ban, advising its supporters to

00:13:26.080 --> 00:13:29.179
stay safe. But the monumental legal fight over

00:13:29.179 --> 00:13:31.360
whether that initial ban was actually lawful

00:13:31.360 --> 00:13:34.000
was just getting started. Let's jump to the legal

00:13:34.000 --> 00:13:35.759
earthquake that brings us right up to the present

00:13:35.759 --> 00:13:38.960
day, early 2026. Huda Amori, the co -founder

00:13:38.960 --> 00:13:40.940
of the group, took the UK government to the high

00:13:40.940 --> 00:13:43.340
court to challenge the prescription. But right

00:13:43.340 --> 00:13:45.559
before the trial started, there was a highly

00:13:45.559 --> 00:13:48.720
controversial procedural moment. The original

00:13:48.720 --> 00:13:51.720
judge, Mr. Justice Chamberlain, who had initially

00:13:51.720 --> 00:13:55.059
granted permission for the appeal, was inexplicably

00:13:55.059 --> 00:13:58.000
removed from the case without any rationale provided

00:13:58.000 --> 00:14:00.460
to the public. Yeah, he was replaced by a three

00:14:00.460 --> 00:14:03.019
-judge panel consisting of Dame Victoria Sharp,

00:14:03.340 --> 00:14:07.179
Mrs. Justice Stein, and Mr. Justice Swift. Campaigners

00:14:07.179 --> 00:14:09.840
and legal observers immediately raised red flags

00:14:09.840 --> 00:14:12.779
about this sudden switch. Groups like Defend

00:14:12.779 --> 00:14:15.539
Our Juries noted that Justices Stein and Swift

00:14:15.539 --> 00:14:18.259
had historically ruled in favor of government

00:14:18.259 --> 00:14:21.620
interests in protest cases. And even more concerning

00:14:21.620 --> 00:14:24.299
to the activists, Dame Sharpe's brother reportedly

00:14:24.299 --> 00:14:27.379
had financial interests in the very defense company's

00:14:27.379 --> 00:14:29.740
Palestine action had been targeting. That's a

00:14:29.740 --> 00:14:32.279
huge conflict of interest. It set the stage for

00:14:32.279 --> 00:14:35.460
a highly tense, suspicious legal battle. And

00:14:35.460 --> 00:14:38.019
the hearing itself was incredibly dramatic, highlighting

00:14:38.019 --> 00:14:40.700
the strange nature of national security trials.

00:14:40.840 --> 00:14:43.259
How so? On the final day, the courtroom was actually

00:14:43.259 --> 00:14:45.480
closed to the public so government lawyers could

00:14:45.480 --> 00:14:47.980
present confidential secret evidence. So no one

00:14:47.980 --> 00:14:50.799
could see what they were arguing. Exactly. Amore's

00:14:50.799 --> 00:14:53.960
own legal team had to leave the room. She was

00:14:53.960 --> 00:14:56.860
instead represented by a special advocate. Now,

00:14:56.940 --> 00:14:59.179
a special advocate is a state appointed lawyer

00:14:59.179 --> 00:15:01.259
who is allowed to see the secret government evidence,

00:15:01.539 --> 00:15:04.059
but they are legally forbidden from communicating

00:15:04.059 --> 00:15:06.259
with the person they are representing about what

00:15:06.259 --> 00:15:09.590
that evidence actually is. Wow. It makes mounting

00:15:09.590 --> 00:15:12.470
a defense incredibly difficult. Extremely. But

00:15:12.470 --> 00:15:15.730
despite all of those hurdles, the secret evidence,

00:15:15.889 --> 00:15:18.169
the special advocate, the controversial judge

00:15:18.169 --> 00:15:22.490
panel, the high court delivered an absolute bombshell

00:15:22.490 --> 00:15:26.970
verdict on February 13th, 2026. In a unanimous

00:15:26.970 --> 00:15:29.350
decision, the judges ruled that the prescription

00:15:29.350 --> 00:15:31.990
of Palestine action was unlawful. We really need

00:15:31.990 --> 00:15:33.970
to break down the nuance of why they ruled that

00:15:33.970 --> 00:15:35.809
way because it is vital for understanding the

00:15:35.809 --> 00:15:37.570
distinction the law is trying to make. Right.

00:15:37.649 --> 00:15:39.809
The judges did not excuse the group's actions.

00:15:39.870 --> 00:15:41.730
In fact, they explicitly described Palestine

00:15:41.730 --> 00:15:44.529
Action as an organization that promotes its political

00:15:44.529 --> 00:15:47.169
cause through criminality. So they weren't saying

00:15:47.169 --> 00:15:50.049
infiltrating a military base or smashing a window

00:15:50.049 --> 00:15:52.639
is perfectly legal behavior. Not at all. They

00:15:52.639 --> 00:15:55.039
acknowledged the sledgehammers, the damage, the

00:15:55.039 --> 00:15:58.200
danger. They even noted that a very small number

00:15:58.200 --> 00:16:00.720
of their actions did technically amount to terrorist

00:16:00.720 --> 00:16:02.919
action under the broad definition of the law.

00:16:03.080 --> 00:16:05.700
Okay, so then why overturn the ban? The core

00:16:05.700 --> 00:16:08.580
of their ruling was about proportionality. They

00:16:08.580 --> 00:16:11.500
determined that banning the entire massive network

00:16:11.500 --> 00:16:14.240
and consequently criminalizing all of its casual

00:16:14.240 --> 00:16:16.120
supporters, the people just holding cardboard

00:16:16.120 --> 00:16:19.600
signs or wearing T -shirts, was a disproportionate

00:16:19.600 --> 00:16:21.899
interference with the fundamental human rights

00:16:21.899 --> 00:16:25.100
to freedom of expression and freedom of association.

00:16:25.500 --> 00:16:27.360
That makes a lot of sense. They pointed out a

00:16:27.360 --> 00:16:30.399
very logical alternative. If members of the group

00:16:30.399 --> 00:16:33.759
commit vandalism or assault, you prosecute those

00:16:33.759 --> 00:16:36.100
specific individuals for vandalism or assault.

00:16:36.360 --> 00:16:39.799
Right. deploy the Terrorism Act to ban everyone

00:16:39.799 --> 00:16:42.019
who happens to agree with their underlying political

00:16:42.019 --> 00:16:44.580
cause. They found that the home secretary had

00:16:44.580 --> 00:16:46.820
failed to apply her own policy correctly when

00:16:46.820 --> 00:16:49.799
she used a sledgehammer to crack a nut, so to

00:16:49.799 --> 00:16:53.779
speak. So as of right now, March 2026, where

00:16:53.779 --> 00:16:56.620
do things actually stand? Just to be clear for

00:16:56.620 --> 00:16:59.580
everyone listening, the ban provisionally remains

00:16:59.580 --> 00:17:02.100
in place for the moment. Yes. The newly appointed

00:17:02.100 --> 00:17:04.680
home secretary, Shabana Mahmood, immediately

00:17:04.680 --> 00:17:07.200
announced she would contest the ruling. She's

00:17:07.200 --> 00:17:09.200
been granted leave to appeal, which basically

00:17:09.200 --> 00:17:11.039
means the court has given her official permission

00:17:11.039 --> 00:17:13.279
to challenge this ruling at the next level up

00:17:13.279 --> 00:17:15.119
in the court of appeal. So the legal fight is

00:17:15.119 --> 00:17:18.400
far from over. Far from it. However, the Metropolitan

00:17:18.400 --> 00:17:21.579
Police did confirm they would stop making arrests

00:17:21.579 --> 00:17:24.200
simply in connection with supporting Palestine

00:17:24.200 --> 00:17:26.440
action while this gets sorted out in the courts.

00:17:26.920 --> 00:17:29.859
This entire saga raises an incredibly important

00:17:29.859 --> 00:17:32.700
question for us to reflect on. This deep dive

00:17:32.700 --> 00:17:35.259
isn't just about one specific activist group

00:17:35.259 --> 00:17:37.500
or one specific conflict in the Middle East.

00:17:37.619 --> 00:17:40.279
It serves as a massive stress test for modern

00:17:40.279 --> 00:17:42.740
democracy as a whole. It really does. In an era

00:17:42.740 --> 00:17:45.359
defined by intense information flow and complex

00:17:45.359 --> 00:17:48.019
global conflicts, how do we define the boundaries

00:17:48.019 --> 00:17:51.039
of protest? Where does disruptive and even highly

00:17:51.039 --> 00:17:53.500
criminal civil disobedience end? And where does

00:17:53.500 --> 00:17:56.579
actual terrorism begin? And the way a state answers

00:17:56.579 --> 00:17:59.220
that question dictates the health of its civil

00:17:59.220 --> 00:18:02.359
liberties. When severe counterterrorism laws

00:18:02.359 --> 00:18:04.859
are used to manage domestic protest and property

00:18:04.859 --> 00:18:08.460
damage, the ripple effects touch everyone from

00:18:08.460 --> 00:18:11.039
an activist on a roof to an author writing a

00:18:11.039 --> 00:18:13.319
book to a person wearing a punny T -shirt on

00:18:13.319 --> 00:18:16.180
a Saturday afternoon. Absolutely. It really forces

00:18:16.180 --> 00:18:18.180
you to look at the future of protest differently.

00:18:19.279 --> 00:18:21.710
I want to leave you with a final. thought to

00:18:21.710 --> 00:18:24.130
mullover if the legal definition of terrorism

00:18:24.130 --> 00:18:27.009
continues to expand to encompass severe property

00:18:27.009 --> 00:18:29.630
damage and economic disruption aimed at forcing

00:18:29.630 --> 00:18:32.869
political change What happens tomorrow when different

00:18:32.869 --> 00:18:35.789
movements adopt these exact same tactics? It's

00:18:35.789 --> 00:18:38.230
a great question. Imagine climate activists systematically

00:18:38.230 --> 00:18:41.049
destroying fossil fuel infrastructure or infiltrating

00:18:41.049 --> 00:18:43.589
oil refineries to prevent environmental collapse.

00:18:44.089 --> 00:18:46.910
Under the precedents debated in this case, will

00:18:46.910 --> 00:18:48.730
environmental groups be classified alongside

00:18:48.730 --> 00:18:51.309
violent terror cells? Yeah. And taking it back

00:18:51.309 --> 00:18:54.509
even further, if today's anti -terror laws existed

00:18:54.509 --> 00:18:58.109
a century ago, With the suffragettes, who famously

00:18:58.109 --> 00:19:00.970
smashed windows and set fires to secure women

00:19:00.970 --> 00:19:03.569
the right to vote, have been locked away for

00:19:03.569 --> 00:19:06.450
14 years as a prescribed terrorist organization.

00:19:07.069 --> 00:19:09.130
It's a heavy question about the future of dissent,

00:19:09.130 --> 00:19:11.250
but one we all definitely need to be asking.

00:19:11.369 --> 00:19:13.349
It is. Thank you so much for joining us on this

00:19:13.349 --> 00:19:14.509
deep dive. Thank you for listening.
