WEBVTT 00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.940 Welcome to today's deep dive. Today, we've got 00:00:02.940 --> 00:00:05.299 a pretty unique digital artifact on the table 00:00:05.299 --> 00:00:07.540 for you. Yeah, we aren't looking at a stack of 00:00:07.540 --> 00:00:10.400 academic journals or a newly released book this 00:00:10.400 --> 00:00:12.660 time. Right. Instead, we're looking at a single 00:00:12.660 --> 00:00:16.289 snapshot of the Internet, a Wikipedia page. Specifically 00:00:16.289 --> 00:00:19.109 one detailing the history and the recent evolution 00:00:19.109 --> 00:00:21.890 of an American political organization. Yeah, 00:00:21.929 --> 00:00:24.089 an organization originally known as the Law School 00:00:24.089 --> 00:00:27.149 Democrats of America. And if you pull this page 00:00:27.149 --> 00:00:30.910 up in your mind's eye, it has that classic utilitarian 00:00:30.910 --> 00:00:34.170 Wikipedia layout. Locked in light mode. Exactly. 00:00:34.189 --> 00:00:36.270 And there's actually a banner across the very 00:00:36.270 --> 00:00:39.969 top promoting a WikiLoves Ramadan 2026 campaign. 00:00:40.289 --> 00:00:43.189 Which really grounds it in time. Examining a 00:00:43.189 --> 00:00:45.950 Wikipedia page as a primary source offers this 00:00:45.950 --> 00:00:48.189 really distinct perspective because you aren't 00:00:48.189 --> 00:00:50.030 just reading the history of an organization. 00:00:50.369 --> 00:00:52.429 You're reading the history the organization wants 00:00:52.429 --> 00:00:54.950 to project. Right. It reveals the mechanics of 00:00:54.950 --> 00:00:57.890 how these niche specialized student groups attempt 00:00:57.890 --> 00:01:00.490 to scale their operations over time. Now, before 00:01:00.490 --> 00:01:02.329 we dig into the specifics of that narrative, 00:01:02.570 --> 00:01:04.909 we really need to establish some ground rules 00:01:04.909 --> 00:01:07.189 for you listening today. Yes. Very important. 00:01:07.769 --> 00:01:10.310 Because the source material we're examining covers 00:01:10.310 --> 00:01:14.290 a highly politically active, explicitly partisan 00:01:14.290 --> 00:01:17.189 organization, one that is fundamentally aligned 00:01:17.189 --> 00:01:20.290 with the Democratic Party, this deep dive is 00:01:20.290 --> 00:01:23.209 going to remain entirely neutral. Strictly impartial. 00:01:23.310 --> 00:01:26.750 We are not taking sides here and we aren't endorsing 00:01:26.750 --> 00:01:30.629 or validating or criticizing any political viewpoints, 00:01:30.750 --> 00:01:33.010 platforms or parties mentioned. Our methodology 00:01:33.010 --> 00:01:35.959 is purely analytical today. We are treating this 00:01:35.959 --> 00:01:38.519 Wikipedia entry strictly as an informational 00:01:38.519 --> 00:01:41.340 document. Exactly. The mission for this deep 00:01:41.340 --> 00:01:44.140 dive is just to explore how a niche student group 00:01:44.140 --> 00:01:46.560 managed to evolve into a nationwide network. 00:01:47.120 --> 00:01:48.980 We want to extract those underlying mechanics 00:01:48.980 --> 00:01:51.019 of how political pipelines are actually built. 00:01:51.140 --> 00:01:53.280 OK, let's untack this. The origin story of the 00:01:53.280 --> 00:01:55.239 law school Democrats of America, according to 00:01:55.239 --> 00:01:58.000 the text, begins exactly 20 years ago. Right. 00:01:58.079 --> 00:02:01.299 The founding takes place in 2006 and it's situated 00:02:01.299 --> 00:02:03.760 at Harvard Law School. The text credits a student 00:02:03.760 --> 00:02:05.859 named David Bird with officially founding the 00:02:05.859 --> 00:02:08.060 organization. And looking at their initial footprint, 00:02:08.280 --> 00:02:10.599 they totally bypassed the typical trajectory 00:02:10.599 --> 00:02:13.300 of a new campus club. Yeah, they didn't start 00:02:13.300 --> 00:02:15.520 with small campus meetings. No, their inaugural 00:02:15.520 --> 00:02:18.479 event was an immediate national convention hosted 00:02:18.479 --> 00:02:20.840 right there on the Harvard campus. Which signals 00:02:20.840 --> 00:02:24.180 a very specific level of ambition, especially 00:02:24.180 --> 00:02:26.460 since the text highlights they secured Howard 00:02:26.460 --> 00:02:28.560 Dean to deliver the keynote address for that 00:02:28.560 --> 00:02:32.340 first convention. And in 2006, Howard Dean was 00:02:32.340 --> 00:02:34.580 not just a prominent figure. He was the sitting 00:02:34.580 --> 00:02:36.419 chairman of the Democratic National Committee. 00:02:36.620 --> 00:02:38.979 Right, so he brought the weight. of a former 00:02:38.979 --> 00:02:41.620 presidential candidate directly to a brand new 00:02:41.620 --> 00:02:44.460 student initiative. Securing the DNC chairman 00:02:44.460 --> 00:02:47.240 right out of the gate establishes a massive structural 00:02:47.240 --> 00:02:50.120 link to the party apparatus. But what's fascinating 00:02:50.120 --> 00:02:53.740 here is the highly deliberate structural nuance 00:02:53.740 --> 00:02:56.879 they operate under despite that proximity. What's 00:02:56.879 --> 00:02:59.300 fascinating here is that exact nuance because 00:02:59.300 --> 00:03:02.400 the Wikipedia info box clearly lists their mother 00:03:02.400 --> 00:03:04.919 party as the Democratic Party. Sure. But the 00:03:04.919 --> 00:03:07.120 opening paragraph draws a very sharp boundary. 00:03:07.560 --> 00:03:09.960 The text explicitly states that while the group 00:03:09.960 --> 00:03:12.659 is partisan, they are not officially affiliated 00:03:12.659 --> 00:03:15.580 with the DNC. That distinction between alignment 00:03:15.580 --> 00:03:18.400 and affiliation is such a critical piece of strategy. 00:03:18.719 --> 00:03:21.639 It really is. By operating as an independent 00:03:21.639 --> 00:03:24.860 entity, they get to leverage the brand recognition 00:03:24.860 --> 00:03:27.419 of the mother party. And the broader voter base. 00:03:27.699 --> 00:03:30.500 Exactly. They mobilize members to support Democratic 00:03:30.500 --> 00:03:33.930 candidates. But by avoiding official affiliation, 00:03:34.050 --> 00:03:36.550 they insulate themselves from the party's internal 00:03:36.550 --> 00:03:39.229 bureaucracy. They aren't beholden to top -down 00:03:39.229 --> 00:03:41.870 administrative mandates. Or the complex funding 00:03:41.870 --> 00:03:43.930 restrictions that govern official party organs. 00:03:44.250 --> 00:03:47.050 They remain agile. Which functions basically 00:03:47.050 --> 00:03:50.129 like an auxiliary force. They can set local priorities 00:03:50.129 --> 00:03:52.830 without waiting for authorization. And we see 00:03:52.830 --> 00:03:55.150 that independent structure reflected in their 00:03:55.150 --> 00:03:57.740 current central leadership. The text identifies 00:03:57.740 --> 00:04:00.080 the current leaders as President Mark Jayhawk 00:04:00.080 --> 00:04:02.819 III and Executive Vice President Spencer Jones. 00:04:03.120 --> 00:04:05.759 And the mission they're pursuing under this leadership 00:04:05.759 --> 00:04:08.460 extends way beyond a standard get -out -the -vote 00:04:08.460 --> 00:04:10.840 operation. Yeah, their state and national goals 00:04:10.840 --> 00:04:13.240 involve defending the rule of law and expanding 00:04:13.240 --> 00:04:16.259 access to justice. And most notably, constructing 00:04:16.259 --> 00:04:18.720 what the text refers to as a civic pipeline. 00:04:19.100 --> 00:04:22.160 A civic pipeline. That is the operative concept 00:04:22.160 --> 00:04:24.199 here for understanding their long -term utility. 00:04:24.779 --> 00:04:27.680 Because a pipeline implies a systematic process, 00:04:27.800 --> 00:04:31.399 right? Intake, refinement, deployment. They aren't 00:04:31.399 --> 00:04:33.360 just aggregating volunteers for one election. 00:04:33.540 --> 00:04:36.620 They are organizing a highly specialized talent 00:04:36.620 --> 00:04:39.120 pool. Individuals who will eventually become 00:04:39.120 --> 00:04:42.259 the lawyers, judges, and policymakers shaping 00:04:42.259 --> 00:04:45.060 the landscape. Grasping the mechanics of that 00:04:45.060 --> 00:04:47.939 pipeline is essential to understanding how these 00:04:47.939 --> 00:04:50.100 political movements sustain themselves across 00:04:50.100 --> 00:04:52.980 decades. They capture talent at the educational 00:04:52.980 --> 00:04:55.480 level. Here's where it gets really interesting, 00:04:55.620 --> 00:04:58.160 because having a lofty mission statement is common, 00:04:58.300 --> 00:05:00.980 but the text provides a detailed breakdown of 00:05:00.980 --> 00:05:03.420 how this translates to the ground game. Right, 00:05:03.459 --> 00:05:06.389 the boots on the ground action. Since 2006, the 00:05:06.389 --> 00:05:08.689 article notes hundreds of law students have been 00:05:08.689 --> 00:05:11.089 deployed into local and national elections. And 00:05:11.089 --> 00:05:13.569 the activities listed represent a really calculated 00:05:13.569 --> 00:05:15.970 deployment of skills. They do canvassing and 00:05:15.970 --> 00:05:18.629 phone banking, which is the bedrock of any grassroots 00:05:18.629 --> 00:05:21.129 campaign. But they pair that traditional retail 00:05:21.129 --> 00:05:24.250 politics with highly specific legal work. The 00:05:24.250 --> 00:05:26.730 text specifically names legal research and voter 00:05:26.730 --> 00:05:28.850 protection. Which demonstrates the return on 00:05:28.850 --> 00:05:31.240 investment of using law students. Yeah, anyone 00:05:31.240 --> 00:05:33.500 can knock on a door. But voter protection requires 00:05:33.500 --> 00:05:35.879 a working knowledge of election law. You have 00:05:35.879 --> 00:05:38.980 to interpret legal precedents in real time. The 00:05:38.980 --> 00:05:41.939 text explicitly outlines their ultimate goal 00:05:41.939 --> 00:05:45.160 here, ensuring every eligible voter can cast 00:05:45.160 --> 00:05:47.939 a ballot and having every single ballot counted. 00:05:48.480 --> 00:05:50.920 They apply their academic training directly to 00:05:50.920 --> 00:05:52.939 the mechanical vulnerabilities of the electoral 00:05:52.939 --> 00:05:55.399 process. And to coordinate that on a national 00:05:55.399 --> 00:05:58.040 scale, you need a centralized gathering point. 00:05:58.240 --> 00:06:00.579 Which brings us to their primary annual milestone, 00:06:00.920 --> 00:06:03.720 the National Convention. The text notes this 00:06:03.720 --> 00:06:05.939 typically happens over a weekend in either February 00:06:05.939 --> 00:06:09.199 or March. Very strategic timing. It positions 00:06:09.199 --> 00:06:11.800 them to mobilize just ahead of major primary 00:06:11.800 --> 00:06:14.800 seasons. The anatomy of these conventions really 00:06:14.800 --> 00:06:17.540 mirrors a professional legal conference. The 00:06:17.540 --> 00:06:19.959 Wikipedia page outlines a weekend built around 00:06:19.959 --> 00:06:22.660 discussion panels and keynote addresses. Various 00:06:22.660 --> 00:06:25.160 networking receptions and a formal election for 00:06:25.160 --> 00:06:27.600 a new board of directors. It serves a dual purpose. 00:06:27.660 --> 00:06:29.779 It's an administrative requirement, but also 00:06:29.779 --> 00:06:32.660 a massive retention tool. And the geographic 00:06:32.660 --> 00:06:35.839 footprint is worth noting. The text lists host 00:06:35.839 --> 00:06:39.240 cities that map directly onto major centers of 00:06:39.240 --> 00:06:41.879 legal and political power. Boston, New York City, 00:06:41.980 --> 00:06:44.740 Chicago. Traditional strongholds and major legal 00:06:44.740 --> 00:06:47.560 markets. They've also hosted in Columbus, Ohio, 00:06:47.819 --> 00:06:49.959 placing them right in a swing state capital. 00:06:50.160 --> 00:06:51.980 And naturally, they return to Washington, D .C. 00:06:52.000 --> 00:06:54.180 frequently. The text specifically notes their 00:06:54.180 --> 00:06:56.839 2011 national convention took place at the Georgetown 00:06:56.839 --> 00:06:59.800 University Law Center. Literally blocks away 00:06:59.800 --> 00:07:02.180 from the federal judiciary and the Capitol. And 00:07:02.180 --> 00:07:04.620 that proximity is reflected in the speakers they 00:07:04.620 --> 00:07:07.420 get. Beyond Howard Dean, the text provides a 00:07:07.420 --> 00:07:09.379 roster of notable political figures who have 00:07:09.379 --> 00:07:11.959 addressed them. The speaker list is highly revealing. 00:07:12.379 --> 00:07:15.740 The text names former New York Congressman Charles 00:07:15.740 --> 00:07:19.160 B. Rangel and Illinois Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky. 00:07:19.240 --> 00:07:21.579 Direct representation from the federal legislative 00:07:21.579 --> 00:07:24.560 branch. Then you have Alexi G. Nolias, the former 00:07:24.560 --> 00:07:26.560 Illinois treasurer and U .S. Senate candidate. 00:07:26.839 --> 00:07:29.620 Alongside Doug Gansler, the former Maryland attorney 00:07:29.620 --> 00:07:32.279 general. Exposing the membership to the mechanics 00:07:32.279 --> 00:07:34.980 of state -level executive power. But the inclusion 00:07:34.980 --> 00:07:37.240 of Bob Shrum on that list is perhaps the most 00:07:37.240 --> 00:07:40.110 interesting detail to me. Bob Trump, the Democratic 00:07:40.110 --> 00:07:42.370 political consultant. Yeah, he's not an elected 00:07:42.370 --> 00:07:44.850 official. He's the strategist behind the scenes. 00:07:45.110 --> 00:07:47.370 Bringing a political consultant to address future 00:07:47.370 --> 00:07:50.930 lawyers reinforces that pipeline concept. It 00:07:50.930 --> 00:07:52.930 shows them their legal training doesn't restrict 00:07:52.930 --> 00:07:55.550 them to the courtroom. Exactly. Legal professionals 00:07:55.550 --> 00:07:58.569 often serve as the strategic architects of these 00:07:58.569 --> 00:08:00.750 movements. It paints a picture of a highly sophisticated 00:08:00.750 --> 00:08:03.839 machine. Which makes a certain artifact hidden 00:08:03.839 --> 00:08:06.199 at the top of this Wikipedia page incredibly 00:08:06.199 --> 00:08:10.019 compelling. Oh, the warning banner. Yes. If you 00:08:10.019 --> 00:08:12.740 view the page as it appeared in September 2025, 00:08:13.120 --> 00:08:16.079 you are immediately confronted with a massive, 00:08:16.120 --> 00:08:19.100 prominent warning banner placed by Wikipedia's 00:08:19.100 --> 00:08:21.399 editors. Right beneath the article's title. It 00:08:21.399 --> 00:08:23.899 highlights the friction between a political organization's 00:08:23.899 --> 00:08:27.240 PR goals and Wikipedia's mandate for neutrality. 00:08:27.600 --> 00:08:29.839 The banner explicitly warns that the article 00:08:29.839 --> 00:08:33.059 contains promotional content. It calls on users 00:08:33.059 --> 00:08:36.059 to improve the page by removing promotional language 00:08:36.059 --> 00:08:39.320 and inappropriate external links. It even includes 00:08:39.320 --> 00:08:42.279 boilerplate warnings directing users to read 00:08:42.279 --> 00:08:45.519 advice if the article is about you. And a scam 00:08:45.519 --> 00:08:48.009 warning. in case someone is asking for money 00:08:48.009 --> 00:08:49.909 to edit the article. Looking at the language 00:08:49.909 --> 00:08:52.210 used throughout the page, you can see exactly 00:08:52.210 --> 00:08:55.409 why it triggered that banner. Phrases like being 00:08:55.409 --> 00:08:58.450 committed to defending the rule of law and equipping 00:08:58.450 --> 00:09:01.370 the next generation of civic -minded legal leaders. 00:09:01.669 --> 00:09:03.289 It doesn't read like an impartial historical 00:09:03.289 --> 00:09:05.610 record. It reads like a polished press release. 00:09:05.950 --> 00:09:08.289 Designed to attract donors and recruit high -tier 00:09:08.289 --> 00:09:11.490 talent, an edit war on Wikipedia is essentially 00:09:11.490 --> 00:09:14.139 a battle over digital territory. Because it's 00:09:14.139 --> 00:09:16.320 often the first search result for prospective 00:09:16.320 --> 00:09:18.919 members or journalists. So there's a massive 00:09:18.919 --> 00:09:21.940 incentive to sanitize the page and frame their 00:09:21.940 --> 00:09:23.820 history in the most impactful light possible. 00:09:24.220 --> 00:09:26.179 pushing against the platform's neutral editors. 00:09:26.440 --> 00:09:29.320 And the timing of that September 2025 warning 00:09:29.320 --> 00:09:32.259 banner is the critical detail here. Because it 00:09:32.259 --> 00:09:35.019 coincides directly with a massive structural 00:09:35.019 --> 00:09:38.100 and branding shift for the organization. In 2025, 00:09:38.460 --> 00:09:41.100 the group officially changed its name. They dropped 00:09:41.100 --> 00:09:44.159 the word school from their title. Transitioning 00:09:44.159 --> 00:09:47.039 from the Law School Democrats of America to just 00:09:47.039 --> 00:09:51.289 the Law Democrats of America, the LDA. Dropping 00:09:51.289 --> 00:09:53.490 the word school represents a fundamental pivot. 00:09:53.690 --> 00:09:55.830 They dramatically expanded the tent of their 00:09:55.830 --> 00:09:57.990 membership. The text notes, they expanded in 00:09:57.990 --> 00:10:00.830 both directions, opening membership to pre -law 00:10:00.830 --> 00:10:03.190 students. Capturing them before they even enter 00:10:03.190 --> 00:10:05.850 the academy. And opening it to active legal professionals, 00:10:05.889 --> 00:10:08.289 retaining them long after they graduate. They 00:10:08.289 --> 00:10:11.029 transformed from a transient student group into 00:10:11.029 --> 00:10:13.490 a permanent, lifelong professional network. And 00:10:13.490 --> 00:10:16.330 the Wikipedia page explicitly provides the stated 00:10:16.330 --> 00:10:19.980 rationale for this 2025 rebrand. The text claims 00:10:19.980 --> 00:10:22.059 this broader network was created in response 00:10:22.059 --> 00:10:25.139 to recent attacks on legal education and the 00:10:25.139 --> 00:10:27.980 rule of law. With a stated goal to advance democracy, 00:10:28.279 --> 00:10:31.100 civil rights and broader civic change. If we 00:10:31.100 --> 00:10:33.480 connect this to the bigger picture, the language 00:10:33.480 --> 00:10:36.059 here indicates a major shift. A shift from an 00:10:36.059 --> 00:10:39.159 offensive, electorally focused posture. to a 00:10:39.159 --> 00:10:41.720 highly defensive one. In 2006, the focus was 00:10:41.720 --> 00:10:44.200 mobilizing students to support campaigns. But 00:10:44.200 --> 00:10:46.440 by 2025, they are framing their existence around 00:10:46.440 --> 00:10:48.639 defending the institutions of the legal system 00:10:48.639 --> 00:10:51.779 itself. Expanding their ranks to fortify their 00:10:51.779 --> 00:10:55.240 position. And that defensive posture is formalized 00:10:55.240 --> 00:10:57.779 in their newly established signature initiative. 00:10:58.000 --> 00:11:00.120 The March for the Rule of Law. Which is not a 00:11:00.120 --> 00:11:02.600 standard political rally. The components listed 00:11:02.600 --> 00:11:05.019 in the article include a nationwide series of 00:11:05.019 --> 00:11:07.059 teachings. And the implementation of litigation 00:11:07.059 --> 00:11:10.179 trainings. All culminating in a weekend of coordinated 00:11:10.179 --> 00:11:13.240 marches across the U .S. The inclusion of litigation 00:11:13.240 --> 00:11:16.480 trainings alongside public marches is a profound 00:11:16.480 --> 00:11:19.580 escalation in their tactical playbook. It signals 00:11:19.580 --> 00:11:22.620 they view the actual courtroom as a primary arena 00:11:22.620 --> 00:11:25.840 for political action. They're moving beyond teaching 00:11:25.840 --> 00:11:28.679 members how to advocate for policies. They are 00:11:28.679 --> 00:11:31.000 actively training a network on how to utilize 00:11:31.000 --> 00:11:33.960 litigation as a tool. You can clearly see how 00:11:33.960 --> 00:11:36.220 this specialized approach differentiates them 00:11:36.220 --> 00:11:38.720 from the broader political ecosystem. If you 00:11:38.720 --> 00:11:40.480 scroll to the See Also section at the bottom 00:11:40.480 --> 00:11:43.840 of the page, it links to affiliated groups. The 00:11:43.840 --> 00:11:46.639 College Democrats, the College Democrats of America, 00:11:46.960 --> 00:11:49.419 the Young Democrats, and the High School Democrats. 00:11:49.799 --> 00:11:52.179 Those are massive demographic -based organizations 00:11:52.179 --> 00:11:55.350 categorized by age. But the Law Democrats of 00:11:55.350 --> 00:11:58.149 America operates as a highly specialized skill 00:11:58.149 --> 00:12:00.710 -based tactical unit. They take that generalized 00:12:00.710 --> 00:12:03.629 political energy and funnel it into a highly 00:12:03.629 --> 00:12:05.870 regulated professional discipline. So what does 00:12:05.870 --> 00:12:08.250 this all mean? For you listening to this analysis, 00:12:08.450 --> 00:12:10.789 we have just traced a fascinating organizational 00:12:10.789 --> 00:12:15.090 evolution simply by decoding a single Wikipedia 00:12:15.090 --> 00:12:18.110 page. We watched a localized effort at Harvard 00:12:18.110 --> 00:12:22.490 Law in 2006 transform into a nationwide professionalized 00:12:22.490 --> 00:12:25.789 pipeline. We analyzed how they maintain strategic 00:12:25.789 --> 00:12:28.049 independence from their mother party. How they 00:12:28.049 --> 00:12:30.570 deploy specialized legal talent into the electoral 00:12:30.570 --> 00:12:32.850 process. And how they maneuver to shape their 00:12:32.850 --> 00:12:34.889 public narrative, even triggering an editorial 00:12:34.889 --> 00:12:37.610 dispute on Wikipedia. Finally, we examined their 00:12:37.610 --> 00:12:40.610 2025 rebrand, expanding their ranks to utilize 00:12:40.610 --> 00:12:42.950 the courts to defend their vision of civic change. 00:12:43.210 --> 00:12:45.490 This raises an important question, and it is 00:12:45.490 --> 00:12:48.289 a concept worth analyzing as we observe the intersection 00:12:48.289 --> 00:12:51.129 of law and politics moving forward. Consider 00:12:51.129 --> 00:12:55.190 the LDA's 2025 pivot, expanding to working professionals 00:12:55.190 --> 00:12:57.669 and heavily emphasizing litigation trainings. 00:12:57.850 --> 00:13:00.370 In response to what they view as a tax on the 00:13:00.370 --> 00:13:03.309 rule of law. If the actual mechanics of legal 00:13:03.309 --> 00:13:06.350 education and the literal courtroom are increasingly 00:13:06.350 --> 00:13:08.990 being recognized as the primary battlegrounds 00:13:08.990 --> 00:13:11.730 for organized political action, how might that 00:13:11.730 --> 00:13:13.809 fundamentally change the way future generations 00:13:13.809 --> 00:13:16.450 of lawyers view their core function? Will they 00:13:16.450 --> 00:13:18.730 view themselves primarily as neutral officers 00:13:18.730 --> 00:13:22.139 of the court? Or as ideological advocates for 00:13:22.139 --> 00:13:24.000 whom the court is simply the most effective tool. 00:13:24.299 --> 00:13:27.059 That structural shift in how the legal profession 00:13:27.059 --> 00:13:29.740 operates is exactly why examining these digital 00:13:29.740 --> 00:13:32.100 artifacts is so vital. It reveals the machinery 00:13:32.100 --> 00:13:35.279 operating just beneath the surface. Thank you 00:13:35.279 --> 00:13:37.100 for joining us today and letting us unpack the 00:13:37.100 --> 00:13:39.240 history and strategy embedded in this source 00:13:39.240 --> 00:13:41.840 material. Keep analyzing the structures around 00:13:41.840 --> 00:13:43.679 you and we will see you on the next deep dive.