WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.620
Welcome to today's deep dive. We are genuinely

00:00:03.620 --> 00:00:05.620
thrilled you could take some time to join us

00:00:05.620 --> 00:00:08.199
for this conversation. Today, we're tackling

00:00:08.199 --> 00:00:10.960
a subject that you simply cannot escape right

00:00:10.960 --> 00:00:13.619
now. No, you really can't. It's debated in politics.

00:00:13.720 --> 00:00:16.100
It casually pops up in movies and television.

00:00:16.239 --> 00:00:20.379
It's all over social media. And it's highly likely

00:00:20.379 --> 00:00:22.899
that you or someone in your immediate circle

00:00:22.899 --> 00:00:25.980
has a very strong opinion about it. Oh, absolutely.

00:00:26.539 --> 00:00:28.480
We're talking about medical cannabis. It's a

00:00:28.480 --> 00:00:31.260
topic that carries a tremendous amount of cultural

00:00:31.260 --> 00:00:34.320
baggage. When you look at the landscape of information

00:00:34.320 --> 00:00:37.420
out there, you are met with a wall of noise.

00:00:37.619 --> 00:00:39.719
Just a total wall. Yeah. You have one headline

00:00:39.719 --> 00:00:41.859
claiming it's a miracle cure for just about everything.

00:00:42.060 --> 00:00:44.579
And then the very next headline is warning of

00:00:44.579 --> 00:00:47.359
dire consequences. It becomes a real challenge

00:00:47.359 --> 00:00:49.859
to parse out what is actually grounded in reality.

00:00:50.100 --> 00:00:51.719
Which is exactly why we're sitting down to do

00:00:51.719 --> 00:00:54.789
this today. Core mission for this deep dive is

00:00:54.789 --> 00:00:57.329
to cut right through that static. We want to

00:00:57.329 --> 00:01:00.689
bypass the hearsay, the pop culture myths and

00:01:00.689 --> 00:01:03.490
the loud political opinions. To do that, we are

00:01:03.490 --> 00:01:05.650
going straight to the source material. We're

00:01:05.650 --> 00:01:08.049
pulling our insights today from a highly comprehensive,

00:01:08.510 --> 00:01:11.489
thoroughly cited Wikipedia article dedicated

00:01:11.489 --> 00:01:14.489
specifically to the topic of medical cannabis.

00:01:14.769 --> 00:01:17.530
And our goal here is to extract what the rigorous

00:01:17.530 --> 00:01:20.310
science. the pharmacology, and the historical

00:01:20.310 --> 00:01:23.420
records actually tell us about this plant. We

00:01:23.420 --> 00:01:25.379
want to serve this up to you in a way that is

00:01:25.379 --> 00:01:27.780
easy to digest and hopefully give you a solid

00:01:27.780 --> 00:01:30.780
foundation of facts. So as you are listening

00:01:30.780 --> 00:01:32.980
today, I want you to ask yourself how much of

00:01:32.980 --> 00:01:34.840
what you currently believe about medical cannabis

00:01:34.840 --> 00:01:37.439
comes from a laboratory and how much is just

00:01:37.439 --> 00:01:39.959
cultural osmosis. That is the perfect mindset

00:01:39.959 --> 00:01:42.319
to carry into this discussion. My goal today

00:01:42.319 --> 00:01:44.739
is to look at the evidence with strict impartiality.

00:01:45.120 --> 00:01:47.540
We're going to examine the modest potential benefits

00:01:47.540 --> 00:01:49.700
and we are going to weigh them directly against

00:01:49.700 --> 00:01:52.480
the established documented risks. the actual

00:01:52.480 --> 00:01:55.200
science. Exactly. The science we're going to

00:01:55.200 --> 00:01:57.840
look at is compelling, but it also serves as

00:01:57.840 --> 00:02:01.500
a fantastic exercise in thinking critically about

00:02:01.500 --> 00:02:05.500
how modern medicine is evaluated categorized

00:02:05.500 --> 00:02:08.300
and ultimately approved. OK, let's unpack this,

00:02:08.439 --> 00:02:10.280
because the very first thing that jumps out from

00:02:10.280 --> 00:02:12.479
the research is the sheer botanical challenge

00:02:12.479 --> 00:02:15.879
of dealing with this plant. It's a huge hurdle.

00:02:16.020 --> 00:02:17.460
I mean, think about what happens when you go

00:02:17.460 --> 00:02:19.919
to the pharmacy to pick up a typical government

00:02:19.919 --> 00:02:22.439
approved medication. You're usually getting something

00:02:22.439 --> 00:02:25.479
incredibly precise. Right. You get a pill that

00:02:25.479 --> 00:02:28.319
contains one, maybe two active chemicals and

00:02:28.319 --> 00:02:32.629
some binding agents, but a cannabis plant. You

00:02:32.629 --> 00:02:35.349
are dealing with over 400 different chemicals.

00:02:35.590 --> 00:02:39.110
Over 400. Wow. And out of those, about 70 are

00:02:39.110 --> 00:02:41.330
classified specifically as cannabinoids. Just

00:02:41.330 --> 00:02:44.310
a massive cocktail. Yes. And this chemical density

00:02:44.310 --> 00:02:46.930
is the fundamental reason why medical cannabis

00:02:46.930 --> 00:02:49.849
is so notoriously difficult for the medical community

00:02:49.849 --> 00:02:52.990
to study. Because there's so much going on. Precisely.

00:02:53.349 --> 00:02:55.990
Researchers prefer to isolate a single variable

00:02:55.990 --> 00:02:59.349
to see exactly what it does. But here, you aren't

00:02:59.349 --> 00:03:01.830
dealing with a single isolated variable. You're

00:03:01.830 --> 00:03:05.009
dealing with a complex botanical cocktail. I

00:03:05.009 --> 00:03:07.169
can imagine that makes running a controlled trial

00:03:07.169 --> 00:03:09.550
a bit of a nightmare. How does the human body

00:03:09.550 --> 00:03:12.509
even process a cocktail like that? That is where

00:03:12.509 --> 00:03:15.449
the endocannabinoid system comes into play. Humans

00:03:15.449 --> 00:03:18.330
actually have specific receptors built into our

00:03:18.330 --> 00:03:21.569
biology that interact directly with these chemicals.

00:03:21.849 --> 00:03:24.430
Okay. The two primary ones that researchers focus

00:03:24.430 --> 00:03:28.129
on are known as CB1 and CB2. So we have a built

00:03:28.129 --> 00:03:30.889
-in lock. And the plant provides the keys. That's

00:03:30.889 --> 00:03:32.909
a great way to put it. But do those two receptors

00:03:32.909 --> 00:03:35.050
do the same thing? Not at all. They have very

00:03:35.050 --> 00:03:37.650
distinct functions. Okay. CB1 receptors are found

00:03:37.650 --> 00:03:40.110
in high concentrations of the brain. When those

00:03:40.110 --> 00:03:42.409
receptors are activated, they produce the psychoactive

00:03:42.409 --> 00:03:44.629
effects that's the high typically associated

00:03:44.629 --> 00:03:47.270
with cannabis. And the other one. CB2 receptors,

00:03:47.389 --> 00:03:49.830
on the other hand, are located peripherally throughout

00:03:49.830 --> 00:03:52.550
the body's immune system and tissues. Activating

00:03:52.550 --> 00:03:55.150
a CV2 receptor doesn't produce a psychoactive

00:03:55.150 --> 00:03:57.990
effect. Instead, it's thought to modulate things

00:03:57.990 --> 00:04:00.909
like pain and inflammation. So the effect a patient

00:04:00.909 --> 00:04:03.009
feels isn't just about the fact that they consumed

00:04:03.009 --> 00:04:05.629
cannabis. It depends entirely on which of those

00:04:05.629 --> 00:04:07.969
70 cannabinoids are hitting which receptors.

00:04:08.210 --> 00:04:11.129
The source material puts a huge emphasis on the

00:04:11.129 --> 00:04:14.110
ratio between two specific chemicals, CCD and

00:04:14.110 --> 00:04:17.610
THC. Yes, the ratio between those two dictates

00:04:17.610 --> 00:04:20.790
the entire therapeutic outcome. Tetrahydrocannabinol,

00:04:20.850 --> 00:04:24.009
or THC, is the primary psychoactive cannabinoid.

00:04:24.029 --> 00:04:26.610
It hits those CB1 receptors in the brain hard.

00:04:26.829 --> 00:04:28.910
Right. That's the one that causes the high. Yes.

00:04:29.529 --> 00:04:33.329
Cannabidol, or CBD, is non -psychoactive. What

00:04:33.329 --> 00:04:36.329
a major 2014 review pointed out is that CBD actually

00:04:36.329 --> 00:04:39.250
attenuates, meaning it reduces or blunts the

00:04:39.250 --> 00:04:41.970
psychoactive impact of THC. Wait, so the CBD

00:04:41.970 --> 00:04:45.029
actively fights the high of the THC? In a sense,

00:04:45.069 --> 00:04:48.449
yes. It changes how the THC binds. So if a patient

00:04:48.449 --> 00:04:51.149
uses a product with high THC and low CBD, they

00:04:51.149 --> 00:04:53.069
will experience a strong psychoactive effect.

00:04:53.310 --> 00:04:55.709
Got it. If the product has high CBD and low THC,

00:04:55.730 --> 00:04:57.550
they might get the anti -inflammatory benefits

00:04:57.550 --> 00:04:59.829
without the cognitive impairment. The balance

00:04:59.829 --> 00:05:02.129
of those two molecules changes the medicine entirely.

00:05:02.470 --> 00:05:05.290
That alone makes standardizing a dose complicated.

00:05:05.610 --> 00:05:07.930
Highly complicated. But then the source dives

00:05:07.930 --> 00:05:10.089
into how the method of consumption completely

00:05:10.089 --> 00:05:13.129
changes the equation. The medical field uses

00:05:13.129 --> 00:05:16.910
a term called bioavailability. Which is basically

00:05:16.910 --> 00:05:19.250
how much of the substance actually makes it into

00:05:19.250 --> 00:05:22.069
your system to have an effect. Exactly. If someone

00:05:22.069 --> 00:05:25.370
smokes or vapes cannabis, the bioavailability

00:05:25.370 --> 00:05:28.930
ranges anywhere from 10 to 35 percent. But if

00:05:28.930 --> 00:05:31.129
they consume it orally, like in a brownie or

00:05:31.129 --> 00:05:34.089
a gummy, that number drops to about 6 percent.

00:05:34.269 --> 00:05:36.829
A substantial drop. Yeah. Here's where it gets

00:05:36.829 --> 00:05:39.029
really interesting, though. It isn't just the

00:05:39.029 --> 00:05:41.889
amount that gets absorbed. the entire timeline

00:05:41.889 --> 00:05:44.810
of the effect shifts. Right. I think a lot of

00:05:44.810 --> 00:05:46.810
people assume that eating it and inhaling it

00:05:46.810 --> 00:05:48.430
are basically the same thing, just a different

00:05:48.430 --> 00:05:51.410
delivery method. But the journey of an edible

00:05:51.410 --> 00:05:54.290
cannabis product through the human body is completely

00:05:54.290 --> 00:05:56.449
different. It follows a totally different metabolic

00:05:56.449 --> 00:05:59.829
pathway. When cannabis is inhaled, the compounds

00:05:59.829 --> 00:06:02.269
pass through the lungs directly into the bloodstream

00:06:02.269 --> 00:06:05.209
and straight to the brain. Very fast. The onset

00:06:05.209 --> 00:06:07.870
of the effect is almost immediate. But when you

00:06:07.870 --> 00:06:09.930
eat an edible, it has to travel through your

00:06:09.930 --> 00:06:12.290
gastrointestinal tract, and then it goes to the

00:06:12.290 --> 00:06:14.750
liver first. And this process is called first

00:06:14.750 --> 00:06:17.050
-pass metabolism. Correct. And the liver doesn't

00:06:17.050 --> 00:06:19.949
just pass it along, does it? It actually alters

00:06:19.949 --> 00:06:22.310
the chemistry. Your liver acts like a chemical

00:06:22.310 --> 00:06:25.089
laboratory. It takes the primary psychoactive

00:06:25.089 --> 00:06:28.949
molecule, standard delta -9 -THC, and converts

00:06:28.949 --> 00:06:31.610
it into a completely new metabolic product called

00:06:31.610 --> 00:06:35.009
11 -hydroxy -THC. which according to the text

00:06:35.009 --> 00:06:37.509
is far more potent. Think of it as a supercharged

00:06:37.509 --> 00:06:41.069
variant. It is highly psychoactive. And this

00:06:41.069 --> 00:06:44.050
specific liver metabolism explains a lot of the

00:06:44.050 --> 00:06:46.009
confusion surrounding edibles. That makes so

00:06:46.009 --> 00:06:48.069
much sense. It explains why they have such uniquely

00:06:48.069 --> 00:06:51.290
potent effects compared to inhalation, and crucially,

00:06:51.290 --> 00:06:54.220
why they take so long to kick in. a patient might

00:06:54.220 --> 00:06:56.199
not feel the peak effects for two to six hours

00:06:56.199 --> 00:06:58.800
after ingestion. That delayed onset must cause

00:06:58.800 --> 00:07:01.480
so many dosage errors. Someone takes a dose,

00:07:01.680 --> 00:07:04.220
feels nothing an hour later, takes more, and

00:07:04.220 --> 00:07:06.000
then the liver finally finishes processing that

00:07:06.000 --> 00:07:07.980
supercharged variant. It happens frequently.

00:07:08.300 --> 00:07:11.019
Eventually, the liver processes it a second time,

00:07:11.120 --> 00:07:13.420
breaking it down into an inactive byproduct,

00:07:13.620 --> 00:07:16.980
11 -COHTHC, that your body just flushes out.

00:07:17.740 --> 00:07:21.000
But that metabolic detour through the liver creates

00:07:21.000 --> 00:07:23.620
a pharmacological response. that is distinct

00:07:23.620 --> 00:07:25.759
from smoking. So you have this unpredictable

00:07:25.759 --> 00:07:28.720
delayed effect with edibles. When you pair that

00:07:28.720 --> 00:07:30.800
with the sheer chemical complexity of the plant

00:07:30.800 --> 00:07:34.160
itself, it completely reframes why doctors have

00:07:34.160 --> 00:07:36.139
such a hard time writing a standard prescription

00:07:36.139 --> 00:07:38.800
for it. It's a logistical nightmare for a prescriber.

00:07:38.959 --> 00:07:41.600
But left to the million dollar question, what

00:07:41.600 --> 00:07:43.519
does the research actually say about whether

00:07:43.519 --> 00:07:46.379
or not it works as a medicine? To evaluate that

00:07:46.379 --> 00:07:48.699
fairly, we need to look at the highest level

00:07:48.699 --> 00:07:50.699
of clinical evidence available in the source.

00:07:51.360 --> 00:07:54.120
The text references a scoping review that analyzed

00:07:54.120 --> 00:07:57.139
72 different systematic reviews. Just to clarify

00:07:57.139 --> 00:07:59.399
for you listening, a systematic review is already

00:07:59.399 --> 00:08:02.019
a summary of many individual trials. So a scoping

00:08:02.019 --> 00:08:04.939
review of 72 systematic reviews is a bird's eye

00:08:04.939 --> 00:08:07.740
view of a mountain of data. A very large mountain.

00:08:07.860 --> 00:08:09.579
And the overall conclusion from all that data.

00:08:09.740 --> 00:08:12.399
The evidence for cannabis -based medicines is

00:08:12.399 --> 00:08:15.680
decidedly mixed. Broadly speaking, it is inconclusive,

00:08:15.839 --> 00:08:17.680
and the researchers noted that the underlying

00:08:17.680 --> 00:08:20.120
studies are generally of low to moderate quality.

00:08:20.730 --> 00:08:24.089
So definitely not a magical cure -all. No, not

00:08:24.089 --> 00:08:26.750
at all. But the text does highlight specific

00:08:26.750 --> 00:08:29.949
areas where it shows genuine documented promise.

00:08:30.389 --> 00:08:33.429
It provides modest relief for chronic pain, specifically

00:08:33.429 --> 00:08:36.009
neuropathic pain, where the nerves themselves

00:08:36.009 --> 00:08:38.950
are misfiring. Yes. It also showed slight improvements

00:08:38.950 --> 00:08:41.610
in sleep and physical function for patients dealing

00:08:41.610 --> 00:08:44.309
with those chronic pain conditions. It also has

00:08:44.309 --> 00:08:46.669
proven somewhat effective in managing chemotherapy

00:08:46.669 --> 00:08:50.799
-induced nausea and vomiting, or CINV. Though

00:08:50.799 --> 00:08:52.759
the medical guidelines usually suggest using

00:08:52.759 --> 00:08:55.100
it only after conventional anti -nausea treatments

00:08:55.100 --> 00:08:57.419
have failed, right? Correct. Primarily because

00:08:57.419 --> 00:08:59.500
of the side effects we'll discuss shortly. There

00:08:59.500 --> 00:09:01.639
is also a major milestone mentioned regarding

00:09:01.639 --> 00:09:04.320
the FDA. Now, the FDA has not approved whole

00:09:04.320 --> 00:09:07.080
plant cannabis, but they have approved a specific

00:09:07.080 --> 00:09:10.460
purified CBD medication for treating two very

00:09:10.460 --> 00:09:13.700
severe rare forms of childhood epilepsy. Lennox

00:09:13.700 --> 00:09:16.909
-Gastaut syndrome and Dravet syndrome. Yes. That

00:09:16.909 --> 00:09:20.909
represents a tangible, recognized medical breakthrough.

00:09:21.250 --> 00:09:23.509
Absolutely. Those are debilitating conditions

00:09:23.509 --> 00:09:26.870
and the CBD treatment offers real relief. Yeah.

00:09:26.990 --> 00:09:29.169
However, we also need to address the areas where

00:09:29.169 --> 00:09:31.710
public perception has heavily outpaced the scientific

00:09:31.710 --> 00:09:34.470
reality. The gaps between what people think and

00:09:34.470 --> 00:09:37.549
what science proves. Yes. And the most glaring

00:09:37.549 --> 00:09:39.690
gap there is in mental health. The mental health

00:09:39.690 --> 00:09:42.370
gap. You hear people say casually all the time

00:09:42.370 --> 00:09:44.389
that they use cannabis to treat their anxiety

00:09:44.389 --> 00:09:46.690
or their depression. It's practically a given

00:09:46.690 --> 00:09:49.009
in certain circles. But what does the actual

00:09:49.009 --> 00:09:52.029
clinical data say? According to a major 2019

00:09:52.029 --> 00:09:55.210
systematic review, there is a distinct lack of

00:09:55.210 --> 00:09:57.490
evidence that cannabinoids are effective in treating

00:09:57.490 --> 00:10:00.450
depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, ADHD,

00:10:01.070 --> 00:10:04.350
Tourette's syndrome, or PTSD. Wait, really? None

00:10:04.350 --> 00:10:06.429
of them. The clinical evidence just isn't there.

00:10:06.529 --> 00:10:08.850
Now, the relationship is nuanced. Some individual

00:10:08.850 --> 00:10:11.570
users will absolutely self -report relief. Sure.

00:10:11.710 --> 00:10:13.889
But when researchers look at observational studies

00:10:13.889 --> 00:10:16.730
and conduct rigorous clinical trials, the overall

00:10:16.730 --> 00:10:19.289
evidence remains inconclusive at best. That is

00:10:19.289 --> 00:10:21.710
a stark contrast to the narratives you see on

00:10:21.710 --> 00:10:23.730
social media, where it is often presented as

00:10:23.730 --> 00:10:26.389
a perfect natural remedy for anxiety. And that

00:10:26.389 --> 00:10:28.830
contrast brings up a critical factor in clinical

00:10:28.830 --> 00:10:32.200
trials, the placebo effect. Ah. the media attention

00:10:32.200 --> 00:10:34.500
and cultural hype surrounding cannabis therapies

00:10:34.500 --> 00:10:38.539
are enormous. And while media hype does not correlate

00:10:38.539 --> 00:10:42.379
with actual clinical outcomes, researchers have

00:10:42.379 --> 00:10:44.559
found that it significantly boosts the placebo

00:10:44.559 --> 00:10:46.860
effect in these trials. Because patients expect

00:10:46.860 --> 00:10:49.019
it to work. Exactly. They've been told by the

00:10:49.019 --> 00:10:51.080
culture that it works, so their brain creates

00:10:51.080 --> 00:10:53.740
that relief during the trial. What stands out

00:10:53.740 --> 00:10:55.980
to you as a listener when you consider how much

00:10:55.980 --> 00:10:58.460
cultural hype might actually be altering medical

00:10:58.460 --> 00:11:01.460
results? It really highlights the power of expectation.

00:11:01.919 --> 00:11:04.399
It serves as a powerful reminder to question

00:11:04.399 --> 00:11:08.019
our expectations versus the cold clinical realities.

00:11:08.379 --> 00:11:10.000
Speaking of realities, we need to talk about

00:11:10.000 --> 00:11:12.919
the risks. The idea that cannabis is a completely

00:11:12.919 --> 00:11:16.480
harmless natural herb is a myth the source material

00:11:16.480 --> 00:11:19.139
actively dismantles. It does. Short -term use

00:11:19.139 --> 00:11:21.899
comes with common, usually mild adverse effects.

00:11:22.440 --> 00:11:25.440
Dizziness, feeling tired, vomiting. At higher

00:11:25.440 --> 00:11:28.039
doses, it can impair motor coordination, alter

00:11:28.039 --> 00:11:31.139
your judgment, and even induce paranoia or hallucinations.

00:11:31.379 --> 00:11:33.919
Those are the acute effects. But we must also

00:11:33.919 --> 00:11:36.820
look at the serious psychiatric risks, specifically

00:11:36.820 --> 00:11:40.039
regarding psychosis. Right. Exposure to THC can

00:11:40.039 --> 00:11:43.279
cause acute, transient psychotic symptoms, even

00:11:43.279 --> 00:11:46.120
in completely healthy individuals. But the long

00:11:46.120 --> 00:11:49.080
-term data requires careful attention. A 2007

00:11:49.080 --> 00:11:51.899
meta -analysis concluded that cannabis use reduced

00:11:51.899 --> 00:11:55.220
the average age of onset of psychosis by 2 .7

00:11:55.220 --> 00:11:57.580
years compared to non -users. Almost three years

00:11:57.580 --> 00:11:59.639
earlier. That is a significant acceleration.

00:12:00.179 --> 00:12:02.320
It is. Furthermore, another literature review

00:12:02.320 --> 00:12:04.879
from 2004 found that cannabis use is associated

00:12:04.879 --> 00:12:07.220
with a twofold increase in the risk of developing

00:12:07.220 --> 00:12:10.330
psychosis. Twofold. Yes. Now, the text uses a

00:12:10.330 --> 00:12:12.190
very specific phrase here that we should clarify.

00:12:12.490 --> 00:12:14.870
It states that cannabis is neither necessary

00:12:14.870 --> 00:12:17.830
nor sufficient to cause psychosis on its own.

00:12:17.929 --> 00:12:20.090
Let me make sure I have that right. Neither necessary

00:12:20.090 --> 00:12:22.549
nor sufficient means that someone doesn't need

00:12:22.549 --> 00:12:25.360
to use cannabis to develop psychosis. And just

00:12:25.360 --> 00:12:27.600
using cannabis isn't enough to guarantee they

00:12:27.600 --> 00:12:30.179
will get it. It isn't the sole cause. Precisely.

00:12:30.179 --> 00:12:33.120
It acts as a major catalyst, especially for vulnerable

00:12:33.120 --> 00:12:36.019
populations. If someone has an underlying genetic

00:12:36.019 --> 00:12:38.779
predisposition to psychotic disorders like schizophrenia,

00:12:39.139 --> 00:12:42.840
introducing cannabis, especially high THC doses,

00:12:43.159 --> 00:12:45.620
acts as a significant trigger. That's a major

00:12:45.620 --> 00:12:48.440
risk factor. It is. This is why the medical community

00:12:48.440 --> 00:12:51.340
emphasizes that long -term treatment, particularly

00:12:51.340 --> 00:12:54.720
in adolescents, must be weighed carefully. The

00:12:54.720 --> 00:12:56.879
developing adolescent brain is much more susceptible

00:12:56.879 --> 00:13:00.240
to lasting cognitive deficits. The text also

00:13:00.240 --> 00:13:02.539
firmly notes it should not be used during pregnancy.

00:13:02.899 --> 00:13:05.580
And while we are on the topic of unexpected medical

00:13:05.580 --> 00:13:08.019
outcomes, there is a detail in the text that

00:13:08.019 --> 00:13:10.220
blew my mind. We just talked about how cannabis

00:13:10.220 --> 00:13:12.500
is used to treat nausea in chemotherapy patients.

00:13:12.700 --> 00:13:15.039
Yes. But there is a paradoxical condition called

00:13:15.039 --> 00:13:18.340
cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome, or CHS. The

00:13:18.340 --> 00:13:21.100
irony of CHS is striking. Oh, really? While cannabis

00:13:21.100 --> 00:13:23.820
can suppress nausea in the short term, Chronic,

00:13:23.820 --> 00:13:26.440
heavy, long -term use of cannabis can actually

00:13:26.440 --> 00:13:29.100
trigger severe intractable nausea and vomiting.

00:13:29.299 --> 00:13:31.919
The very symptom it's famous for treating becomes

00:13:31.919 --> 00:13:34.899
the symptom it continuously causes. It just goes

00:13:34.899 --> 00:13:36.759
to show how much we still have to learn about

00:13:36.759 --> 00:13:38.980
the long -term pharmacology of this plant. We

00:13:38.980 --> 00:13:41.600
really do. But ironically, while modern science

00:13:41.600 --> 00:13:43.759
is still trying to figure it out, the history

00:13:43.759 --> 00:13:46.120
of humans using this plant goes back further

00:13:46.120 --> 00:13:49.019
than almost anyone realizes. The historical timeline

00:13:49.019 --> 00:13:52.500
is remarkable. It truly is a global story that

00:13:52.500 --> 00:13:55.120
stretches back thousands of years. We're talking

00:13:55.120 --> 00:13:58.860
ancient, ancient roots. The text traces the use

00:13:58.860 --> 00:14:03.120
of cannabis back 10 ,000 years to Taiwan. 10

00:14:03.120 --> 00:14:05.519
,000 years. Back then, it was primarily used

00:14:05.519 --> 00:14:08.480
for its tough fiber. In Chinese, it's known as

00:14:08.480 --> 00:14:10.759
Dama, with the characters roughly translating

00:14:10.759 --> 00:14:13.039
to big hemp. And its transition from industrial

00:14:13.039 --> 00:14:15.730
fiber into medicine happened quite early. By

00:14:15.730 --> 00:14:20.370
2737 BCE, Emperor Shen Nung in China, who acted

00:14:20.370 --> 00:14:23.029
as an early pharmacologist, was documenting its

00:14:23.029 --> 00:14:25.149
medical benefits. He recommended it for a wide

00:14:25.149 --> 00:14:27.649
variety of ailments, including gout, rheumatism,

00:14:27.710 --> 00:14:30.029
and my personal favorite, absent -mindedness.

00:14:30.190 --> 00:14:32.870
Which is pretty funny. Right. Given the modern

00:14:32.870 --> 00:14:35.289
stereotype of the forgetful stoner, it feels

00:14:35.289 --> 00:14:38.070
a little counterintuitive today. But it shows

00:14:38.070 --> 00:14:40.230
just how differently the plant was viewed and

00:14:40.230 --> 00:14:42.690
utilized. It became one of the 50 fundamental

00:14:42.690 --> 00:14:45.309
herbs in traditional Chinese medicine. Its use

00:14:45.309 --> 00:14:48.059
wasn't confined to Asia either. As civilizations

00:14:48.059 --> 00:14:51.100
traded and expanded, so did the medical applications

00:14:51.100 --> 00:14:53.559
of the plant. Yes. If we move over to ancient

00:14:53.559 --> 00:14:56.580
Egypt around 1550 BCE, there's a medical text

00:14:56.580 --> 00:14:59.399
called the Ebers Papyrus. A very famous text.

00:14:59.639 --> 00:15:02.100
It reveals they were using cannabis and suppositories

00:15:02.100 --> 00:15:05.090
to relieve the pain of hemorrhoids. a very practical,

00:15:05.190 --> 00:15:08.490
if unpleasant, application. Then you have the

00:15:08.490 --> 00:15:11.049
ancient Greeks, who were using it to dress sores

00:15:11.049 --> 00:15:13.309
on their horses. Oh, dang. They would also use

00:15:13.309 --> 00:15:15.690
the dried leaves for human nosebleeds, and they'd

00:15:15.690 --> 00:15:18.769
steep the seeds to expel tapeworms. It was a

00:15:18.769 --> 00:15:21.889
versatile staple of ancient pharmacopoeias. In

00:15:21.889 --> 00:15:24.100
the medieval Islamic world, Arabic physicians

00:15:24.100 --> 00:15:27.000
utilized it extensively from the 8th to the 18th

00:15:27.000 --> 00:15:29.480
centuries, primarily as an anti -inflammatory

00:15:29.480 --> 00:15:31.820
and a pain reliever. It was everywhere. But its

00:15:31.820 --> 00:15:33.980
introduction to modern Western medicine is typically

00:15:33.980 --> 00:15:36.220
credited to an Irish physician named William

00:15:36.220 --> 00:15:39.460
Brooke O'Shaughnessy. Oh, right. In the 1830s,

00:15:39.460 --> 00:15:41.840
O'Shaughnessy was working in India. He observed

00:15:41.840 --> 00:15:44.519
the local medical use of cannabis, conducted

00:15:44.519 --> 00:15:47.200
a series of his own experiments, and essentially

00:15:47.200 --> 00:15:49.779
brought it back to England with him in 1842.

00:15:50.429 --> 00:15:52.789
And from there, it spread quickly through Europe

00:15:52.789 --> 00:15:55.649
and over to the United States. It was even officially

00:15:55.649 --> 00:15:58.309
listed in the United States Pharmacopeia in 1850.

00:15:58.389 --> 00:16:00.529
So it was just a standard medicine. It enjoyed

00:16:00.529 --> 00:16:03.490
a period of widespread acceptance. But then,

00:16:03.570 --> 00:16:06.350
by the end of the 19th century, cannabis virtually

00:16:06.350 --> 00:16:08.929
vanished from Western hospitals and doctor's

00:16:08.929 --> 00:16:11.600
bags. Just disappeared. And if we connect this

00:16:11.600 --> 00:16:14.419
to the bigger picture, the reason for its sudden

00:16:14.419 --> 00:16:17.580
decline wasn't initially a cultural shift or

00:16:17.580 --> 00:16:20.440
a political ban. It was technological. Let me

00:16:20.440 --> 00:16:22.659
guess. Was there a new miracle drug that replaced

00:16:22.659 --> 00:16:25.750
it? Not a new drug. A new tool. The invention

00:16:25.750 --> 00:16:28.789
of the hypodermic syringe. Oh, wow. The needle

00:16:28.789 --> 00:16:30.809
changed everything. It revolutionized medicine.

00:16:31.029 --> 00:16:33.549
The hypodermic needle allowed doctors to inject

00:16:33.549 --> 00:16:36.269
drugs directly into the bloodstream for an immediate

00:16:36.269 --> 00:16:38.690
measurable effect. This was game changer for

00:16:38.690 --> 00:16:41.690
pain management. But cannabis is highly lipophilic,

00:16:41.690 --> 00:16:45.230
meaning its active compounds bind to fat. It

00:16:45.230 --> 00:16:47.289
is not water soluble. Meaning you can't just

00:16:47.289 --> 00:16:49.490
mix it with water and inject it. Exactly. You

00:16:49.490 --> 00:16:52.269
cannot safely inject a standard botanical cannabis

00:16:52.269 --> 00:16:56.230
extract. So as synthetic drugs and water -soluble

00:16:56.230 --> 00:16:59.110
opium derivatives rose in popularity because

00:16:59.110 --> 00:17:02.230
they could be easily injected, cannabis was largely

00:17:02.230 --> 00:17:04.869
left behind. That makes total sense. It simply

00:17:04.869 --> 00:17:07.750
didn't fit the new, fast -acting medical technology

00:17:07.750 --> 00:17:10.660
of the era. That is a fascinating piece of medical

00:17:10.660 --> 00:17:12.539
history. I had always assumed it disappeared

00:17:12.539 --> 00:17:15.079
strictly because of prohibition laws. No, the

00:17:15.079 --> 00:17:17.000
technology pushed it out first. Of course, the

00:17:17.000 --> 00:17:19.599
political decline followed eventually, culminating

00:17:19.599 --> 00:17:21.980
in the 1970 Controlled Substances Act in the

00:17:21.980 --> 00:17:24.859
U .S., which banned it entirely. Which brings

00:17:24.859 --> 00:17:27.720
us to the complicated, often contradictory modern

00:17:27.720 --> 00:17:30.380
landscape. Yes. Now, as we discuss this next

00:17:30.380 --> 00:17:32.559
part, I want to reiterate our mission today.

00:17:32.759 --> 00:17:35.200
We are looking at the legal and cultural landscape

00:17:35.200 --> 00:17:37.579
strictly through the impartial lens of our source

00:17:37.579 --> 00:17:39.839
material. We're not taking sides. We're just

00:17:39.839 --> 00:17:41.579
reporting the facts of where things currently

00:17:41.579 --> 00:17:44.740
stand. And where things stand is a state of deep

00:17:44.740 --> 00:17:47.019
contradiction, particularly in the United States.

00:17:47.099 --> 00:17:49.700
You have a massive ongoing clash between state

00:17:49.700 --> 00:17:53.289
and federal law. In the U .S., 38 states and

00:17:53.289 --> 00:17:55.450
the District of Columbia have legalized cannabis

00:17:55.450 --> 00:17:58.170
for medical purposes. This wave actually started

00:17:58.170 --> 00:18:01.789
back in 1996 when California passed Proposition

00:18:01.789 --> 00:18:04.730
215. Yet despite the majority of states legalizing

00:18:04.730 --> 00:18:07.569
it at the federal level, it remains a schedule

00:18:07.569 --> 00:18:10.630
illegal drug. By definition, that means the federal

00:18:10.630 --> 00:18:12.809
government views it as having a high potential

00:18:12.809 --> 00:18:17.509
for abuse and no accepted medical use. Internationally,

00:18:17.509 --> 00:18:19.859
the landscape has been shifting as well. For

00:18:19.859 --> 00:18:22.440
decades, cannabis was classified under the highly

00:18:22.440 --> 00:18:24.640
restrictive Schedule V by the United Nations,

00:18:24.859 --> 00:18:27.579
which is the same category as heroin. Wow. But

00:18:27.579 --> 00:18:29.819
in December 2020, following formal recommendations

00:18:29.819 --> 00:18:32.460
from the World Health Organization, the UN voted

00:18:32.460 --> 00:18:35.140
to remove cannabis from Schedule V. So they changed

00:18:35.140 --> 00:18:37.680
their stance. They acknowledged its medical utility,

00:18:38.000 --> 00:18:39.920
though it still remains strictly controlled under

00:18:39.920 --> 00:18:42.279
Schedule V of international treaties. But even

00:18:42.279 --> 00:18:45.019
within the U .S. federal system, there is a bizarre

00:18:45.019 --> 00:18:48.180
paradox that the text points out. While whole

00:18:48.180 --> 00:18:50.519
plant botanical cannabis is federally illegal

00:18:50.519 --> 00:18:53.539
and considered to have no medical value, the

00:18:53.539 --> 00:18:56.319
FDA has actually approved synthetic cannabinoid

00:18:56.319 --> 00:18:59.480
pills. Yes. Drugs like dronabinol, which is sold

00:18:59.480 --> 00:19:02.400
under the brand name Marinol. That is pure synthetic

00:19:02.400 --> 00:19:06.559
Delta 9 THC. Right. There was also nabiloni sold

00:19:06.559 --> 00:19:09.079
as sesame. These were approved all the way back

00:19:09.079 --> 00:19:12.640
in 1985. So the government technically recognizes

00:19:12.640 --> 00:19:15.680
the medical value of the isolated chemical molecules,

00:19:15.920 --> 00:19:18.920
but maintains a total ban on the botanical plant

00:19:18.920 --> 00:19:21.829
that produces them. And this legal gray area

00:19:21.829 --> 00:19:24.269
creates a massive headache for the patients who

00:19:24.269 --> 00:19:26.470
rely on it, specifically regarding insurance.

00:19:26.869 --> 00:19:29.390
Because whole plant cannabis lacks FDA approval,

00:19:29.630 --> 00:19:31.750
health insurance companies rarely, if ever, cover

00:19:31.750 --> 00:19:34.069
medical marijuana prescriptions. Exactly. This

00:19:34.069 --> 00:19:35.789
leaves patients having to pay entirely out of

00:19:35.789 --> 00:19:37.990
pocket for their medicine, which can be prohibitively

00:19:37.990 --> 00:19:40.390
expensive. It is a significant economic barrier

00:19:40.390 --> 00:19:42.670
that stems directly from the regulatory classification

00:19:42.670 --> 00:19:45.630
and is a classification that deeply divides the

00:19:45.630 --> 00:19:48.109
major medical organizations. The source outlines

00:19:48.109 --> 00:19:50.809
this divide perfectly. On one side, you have

00:19:50.809 --> 00:19:53.130
groups like the American Nurses Association and

00:19:53.130 --> 00:19:55.490
the American Public Health Association. They

00:19:55.490 --> 00:19:58.009
strongly support patient access to medical cannabis.

00:19:58.349 --> 00:20:00.190
And on the other side. You have organizations

00:20:00.190 --> 00:20:02.829
like the American Academy of Pediatrics and the

00:20:02.829 --> 00:20:06.150
American Psychiatric Association actively opposing

00:20:06.150 --> 00:20:09.650
its legalization, citing the risks to vulnerable

00:20:09.650 --> 00:20:12.289
populations that we discussed earlier. However.

00:20:12.799 --> 00:20:15.480
Despite being on opposite sides of the legalization

00:20:15.480 --> 00:20:19.079
debate, there is a remarkable consensus among

00:20:19.079 --> 00:20:21.759
these groups on one specific point. Which is?

00:20:21.940 --> 00:20:23.839
Almost all of these organizations, including

00:20:23.839 --> 00:20:25.900
the American Medical Association and the American

00:20:25.900 --> 00:20:29.099
Heart Association, agree that cannabis should

00:20:29.099 --> 00:20:31.420
be rescheduled at the federal level. Not necessarily

00:20:31.420 --> 00:20:33.799
to legalize it for everyone, but to allow for

00:20:33.799 --> 00:20:36.460
better science, right? Exactly. As long as it

00:20:36.460 --> 00:20:38.740
remains a schedule -like drug. Conducting the

00:20:38.740 --> 00:20:41.740
rigorous, large -scale, randomized clinical trials

00:20:41.740 --> 00:20:44.519
that the medical community relies on is incredibly

00:20:44.519 --> 00:20:47.400
difficult due to governmental red tape. It blocks

00:20:47.400 --> 00:20:50.089
our research. Rescheduling the drug would remove

00:20:50.089 --> 00:20:52.809
those barriers. It would allow scientists to

00:20:52.809 --> 00:20:55.150
finally gather the high -quality data needed

00:20:55.150 --> 00:20:57.549
to definitively answer the questions we've been

00:20:57.549 --> 00:21:00.049
discussing today. So what does this all mean?

00:21:00.170 --> 00:21:02.750
We've covered the complex chemistry of CB1 and

00:21:02.750 --> 00:21:05.609
CB2 receptors, the unpredictability of edibles,

00:21:05.809 --> 00:21:08.950
the mixed clinical evidence, the very real psychiatric

00:21:08.950 --> 00:21:12.630
risks, the 10 ,000 -year history, and the modern

00:21:12.630 --> 00:21:15.380
legal mess. What it means is that we have to

00:21:15.380 --> 00:21:18.140
embrace the nuance. Yeah. Medical cannabis is

00:21:18.140 --> 00:21:21.420
not the magical, side effect -free cure -all

00:21:21.420 --> 00:21:24.140
that some advocates claim it to be. The evidence

00:21:24.140 --> 00:21:26.200
for treating mental health conditions like anxiety

00:21:26.200 --> 00:21:28.779
or depression is just not supported by the data

00:21:28.779 --> 00:21:31.259
right now. And the risks of psychosis and cognitive

00:21:31.259 --> 00:21:33.500
impairment in adolescents are real and need to

00:21:33.500 --> 00:21:36.069
be respected. But at the same time, it is clearly

00:21:36.069 --> 00:21:38.829
not a substance without medicinal value. It offers

00:21:38.829 --> 00:21:41.890
genuine documented relief for chronic neuropathic

00:21:41.890 --> 00:21:45.150
pain, specific childhood epilepsies, and severe

00:21:45.150 --> 00:21:48.109
nausea. It's both. Ultimately, it is a highly

00:21:48.109 --> 00:21:51.730
complex botanical cocktail that modern single

00:21:51.730 --> 00:21:54.849
molecule science is still struggling to perfectly

00:21:54.849 --> 00:21:58.589
categorize, study, and regulate. Critical thinking

00:21:58.589 --> 00:22:01.529
and demanding high quality evidence is absolutely

00:22:01.529 --> 00:22:04.289
essential. when navigating this topic. It really

00:22:04.289 --> 00:22:07.210
requires us to hold two competing ideas in our

00:22:07.210 --> 00:22:09.710
head at the same time. It has tangible benefits

00:22:09.710 --> 00:22:12.650
and it carries serious risks. It's a medicine,

00:22:12.769 --> 00:22:14.769
but it doesn't behave like any other medicine

00:22:14.769 --> 00:22:16.890
in the pharmacy. And this raises an important

00:22:16.890 --> 00:22:18.609
question, something for you to think about long

00:22:18.609 --> 00:22:21.559
after this deep dive ends. We know that the cannabis

00:22:21.559 --> 00:22:23.740
plant developed its complex chemical profile

00:22:23.740 --> 00:22:27.240
naturally. Over thousands of years, cultivators

00:22:27.240 --> 00:22:29.579
have grown land -raised strains like Afghani

00:22:29.579 --> 00:22:32.559
and Hindu Kush in specific regions, resulting

00:22:32.559 --> 00:22:35.519
in an intricate web of over 400 chemicals that

00:22:35.519 --> 00:22:37.799
work together in ways we still don't fully grasp.

00:22:38.160 --> 00:22:40.380
Since our modern pharmaceutical model is almost

00:22:40.380 --> 00:22:42.700
entirely based on isolating single molecules

00:22:42.700 --> 00:22:45.900
to treat single symptoms, what other highly complex

00:22:45.900 --> 00:22:49.180
botanical medicines might we be completely overlooking

00:22:49.180 --> 00:22:52.400
or... failing to understand simply because they

00:22:52.400 --> 00:22:54.720
don't fit neatly into a hypodermic needle or

00:22:54.720 --> 00:22:57.220
a standardized pill. That is a brilliant thought

00:22:57.220 --> 00:22:59.839
to end on. It challenges how we view the future

00:22:59.839 --> 00:23:02.759
of medicine itself. We want to thank you so much

00:23:02.759 --> 00:23:04.900
for joining us on this deep dive into medical

00:23:04.900 --> 00:23:07.660
cannabis. We hope we helped clear away some of

00:23:07.660 --> 00:23:10.099
the smoke again, no pun intended, and gave you

00:23:10.099 --> 00:23:12.579
some solid, impartial facts to chew on. Keep

00:23:12.579 --> 00:23:14.920
asking questions, keep thinking critically about

00:23:14.920 --> 00:23:16.900
the information you consume, and keep learning.

00:23:17.059 --> 00:23:18.420
We will catch you on the next one.
