WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.720
Welcome to the Deep Dive. Whether you're prepping

00:00:03.720 --> 00:00:05.759
for a literature seminar, catching up on the

00:00:05.759 --> 00:00:08.640
roots of romanticism, or you're just insanely

00:00:08.640 --> 00:00:11.380
curious about the bizarre intersections of nature

00:00:11.380 --> 00:00:14.460
and memory. And industrial history. Yes, exactly.

00:00:14.599 --> 00:00:17.059
Industrial history. You are in the exact right

00:00:17.059 --> 00:00:19.780
place. Today, we're immersing ourselves in the

00:00:19.780 --> 00:00:22.280
world of English literature, looking at one of

00:00:22.280 --> 00:00:24.559
the absolute heavyweights of poetry. William

00:00:24.559 --> 00:00:27.219
Wordsworth. That's the one. We are pulling all

00:00:27.219 --> 00:00:29.719
our insights today from a single, highly detailed

00:00:29.719 --> 00:00:32.820
source. It's a comprehensive Wikipedia article

00:00:32.820 --> 00:00:37.399
dedicated to his famous 1798 poem, Lines Written

00:00:37.399 --> 00:00:40.810
a Few Miles Above Tintern Abbey. It is a phenomenal

00:00:40.810 --> 00:00:43.049
piece of writing to explore, especially when

00:00:43.049 --> 00:00:45.350
you look beyond just the text on the page. Right.

00:00:45.570 --> 00:00:47.350
This is a poem that didn't just capture a single

00:00:47.350 --> 00:00:49.890
moment in time. It effectively helped launch

00:00:49.890 --> 00:00:53.530
an entire literary movement. And yet, the story

00:00:53.530 --> 00:00:55.549
behind its creation, and maybe more importantly,

00:00:55.729 --> 00:00:58.649
the gritty reality that Wordsworth intentionally

00:00:58.649 --> 00:01:01.670
left out of its verses. The stuff he hid. Exactly,

00:01:01.789 --> 00:01:03.670
the stuff he cropped out. It gives us a completely

00:01:03.670 --> 00:01:06.099
new lens through which to view it. So our mission

00:01:06.099 --> 00:01:08.900
for this deep dive is twofold. First, we want

00:01:08.900 --> 00:01:10.920
to explore the here mechanics of this masterpiece.

00:01:11.239 --> 00:01:13.799
We're going to look at how a poem composed entirely

00:01:13.799 --> 00:01:16.379
in the head of a 20 -something poet became a

00:01:16.379 --> 00:01:18.579
cornerstone of the legendary lyrical ballads

00:01:18.579 --> 00:01:21.700
collection. And second, we're going to uncover

00:01:21.700 --> 00:01:24.859
the hidden, smoke -choked industrial reality

00:01:24.859 --> 00:01:27.700
of the landscape that Wordsworth actively cropped

00:01:27.700 --> 00:01:30.280
out of his poetic frame. Okay, let's unpack this.

00:01:30.920 --> 00:01:32.879
To really understand what Wordsworth is doing

00:01:32.879 --> 00:01:36.040
here, we have to set the stage. The date is July

00:01:36.040 --> 00:01:40.260
13th, 1798. Okay. William Wordsworth is on a

00:01:40.260 --> 00:01:42.870
walking tour with his sister Dorothy. They are

00:01:42.870 --> 00:01:45.109
tracing the banks of the River Wye, which is

00:01:45.109 --> 00:01:47.810
this breathtakingly scenic, steep -sided valley

00:01:47.810 --> 00:01:50.549
situated in the Welsh borders. I've seen pictures.

00:01:50.650 --> 00:01:52.909
It's gorgeous. It really is. But reading through

00:01:52.909 --> 00:01:55.129
the historical context, this isn't just a random

00:01:55.129 --> 00:01:57.769
pleasant hike for Wordsworth. This is a profound,

00:01:57.950 --> 00:02:00.909
heavy return. He had visited this exact same

00:02:00.909 --> 00:02:04.689
spot five years earlier in August of 1793. And

00:02:04.689 --> 00:02:06.930
looking at his biography from that time, 1793

00:02:06.930 --> 00:02:09.550
Wordsworth was a very different guy. He was 23

00:02:09.550 --> 00:02:11.770
years old, fresh out of France during the reign

00:02:11.770 --> 00:02:14.280
of... terror. He was separated from his lover

00:02:14.280 --> 00:02:17.939
and his child by war. And by all accounts, he

00:02:17.939 --> 00:02:20.599
was deeply, deeply troubled. Yeah, he was going

00:02:20.599 --> 00:02:23.340
through a lot. Fast forward five years to 1798

00:02:23.340 --> 00:02:26.300
and he has matured significantly. He's also in

00:02:26.300 --> 00:02:29.539
the early stages of his legendary creative partnership

00:02:29.539 --> 00:02:32.340
with fellow poet Samuel Taylor Coleridge. Right.

00:02:32.419 --> 00:02:34.659
In fact, they're right in the middle of publishing

00:02:34.659 --> 00:02:37.060
a groundbreaking collection of poetry called

00:02:37.060 --> 00:02:40.539
Lyrical Ballads. Which brings us to the absolutely

00:02:40.539 --> 00:02:42.750
incredible incredible creative process behind

00:02:42.750 --> 00:02:46.610
this specific poem. The origin story is almost

00:02:46.610 --> 00:02:50.189
mythical, but Wordsworth himself insisted it

00:02:50.189 --> 00:02:52.729
was the absolute truth. I love this part. He

00:02:52.729 --> 00:02:54.629
claimed that he composed the entire poem in his

00:02:54.629 --> 00:02:57.409
head. The process started the moment he and Dorothy

00:02:57.409 --> 00:03:00.110
left Tintern and he didn't physically write down

00:03:00.110 --> 00:03:02.289
a single line until they finally reached Bristol.

00:03:02.509 --> 00:03:04.810
Days later. Days later. I was reading that in

00:03:04.810 --> 00:03:06.490
the source notes and it's just staggering when

00:03:06.490 --> 00:03:08.699
you think about it. Holding all of that intricate

00:03:08.699 --> 00:03:10.979
language, the specific rhythm, the emotional

00:03:10.979 --> 00:03:13.740
weight entirely in your mind while walking miles

00:03:13.740 --> 00:03:16.319
across a rugged countryside. It's a massive cognitive

00:03:16.319 --> 00:03:18.659
feat. He doesn't touch a pen until the poem has

00:03:18.659 --> 00:03:21.000
reached total mental completion. We are talking

00:03:21.000 --> 00:03:24.780
about 159 lines of densely philosophical poetry.

00:03:25.840 --> 00:03:29.020
And he was clearly thrilled with the result,

00:03:29.159 --> 00:03:31.020
even though the lyrical balance collection was

00:03:31.020 --> 00:03:32.599
already at the printer. It was basically done.

00:03:32.840 --> 00:03:34.419
It was in the final stages of the publication

00:03:34.419 --> 00:03:36.919
process. But he essentially stopped the presses.

00:03:37.340 --> 00:03:40.020
He had this new poem inserted at the absolute

00:03:40.020 --> 00:03:43.300
11th hour, positioning it as the concluding poem

00:03:43.300 --> 00:03:45.900
of the entire book. Wow. And scholars generally

00:03:45.900 --> 00:03:48.659
agree that this placement was perfect. It represents

00:03:48.659 --> 00:03:51.800
the absolute climax of Wordsworth's first great

00:03:51.800 --> 00:03:54.879
period of creative output. It sets the stage,

00:03:55.020 --> 00:03:58.460
prefiguring so much of the distinctively Wordsworthian

00:03:58.460 --> 00:04:00.659
voice that would define the rest of his career.

00:04:00.860 --> 00:04:02.620
When we look at the structure of the poem itself,

00:04:02.919 --> 00:04:05.800
the source notes that classifying it has historically

00:04:05.800 --> 00:04:08.819
been a bit tricky. Yeah, it doesn't fit neatly

00:04:08.819 --> 00:04:11.680
into a box. Right. He leans into that classic

00:04:11.680 --> 00:04:14.240
18th century locodescriptive style, the kind

00:04:14.240 --> 00:04:16.939
of poetry dedicated to mapping out a specific

00:04:16.939 --> 00:04:19.819
physical place, but he elevates it. He abandons

00:04:19.819 --> 00:04:22.860
traditional rigid stanzas. Exactly. He uses these

00:04:22.860 --> 00:04:26.259
incredibly fluid rolling verse paragraphs written

00:04:26.259 --> 00:04:28.860
in tightly structured decasolabic blank verse.

00:04:29.139 --> 00:04:31.779
The consensus today seems to categorize it as

00:04:31.779 --> 00:04:34.769
a conversation poem. That's right. The conversation

00:04:34.769 --> 00:04:37.930
poem was an organic development of that older

00:04:37.930 --> 00:04:40.769
landscape poetry genre. It creates a sense of

00:04:40.769 --> 00:04:43.050
immediacy and intimacy. Like he's just talking

00:04:43.050 --> 00:04:46.319
to you. Exactly. Wordsworth himself noted in

00:04:46.319 --> 00:04:48.560
the second edition of Lyrical Ballads that he

00:04:48.560 --> 00:04:51.120
didn't venture to call it an ode, but he hoped

00:04:51.120 --> 00:04:53.040
that the impassioned music of the versification

00:04:53.040 --> 00:04:56.060
would give it that same kind of emotional weight

00:04:56.060 --> 00:04:58.800
and resonance. Here's where it gets really interesting.

00:04:59.259 --> 00:05:02.100
With all this talk of loco -descriptive poetry

00:05:02.100 --> 00:05:05.319
and capturing a specific physical place, we have

00:05:05.319 --> 00:05:07.920
to talk about the title. The poem is universally

00:05:07.920 --> 00:05:10.970
abbreviated as simply Tintern Abbey. But if you

00:05:10.970 --> 00:05:13.290
read the text closely, Tintern Abbey itself never

00:05:13.290 --> 00:05:14.889
actually appears in the poem. That's a brilliant

00:05:14.889 --> 00:05:17.170
irony, isn't it? The full title is lines written

00:05:17.170 --> 00:05:19.610
or sometimes composed a few miles above Tintern

00:05:19.610 --> 00:05:22.910
Abbey on revisiting the banks of the Y during

00:05:22.910 --> 00:05:26.449
a tour, July 13, 1798. That's a mouthful. It

00:05:26.449 --> 00:05:29.250
is. But the ruined abbey is essentially just

00:05:29.250 --> 00:05:32.110
a geographical marker for the title. It's a GPS

00:05:32.110 --> 00:05:35.379
coordinate for the reader. The poem itself isn't

00:05:35.379 --> 00:05:37.439
a tour guide's description of crumbling Gothic

00:05:37.439 --> 00:05:40.379
architecture. No, not at all. It completely transcends

00:05:40.379 --> 00:05:43.600
the standard nature poetry of the era by employing

00:05:43.600 --> 00:05:46.120
a much more internal intellectual engagement

00:05:46.120 --> 00:05:48.240
with the landscape. It's entirely about his own

00:05:48.240 --> 00:05:51.319
mind. Looking at the source notes here, critics

00:05:51.319 --> 00:05:54.240
usually break his internal monologue down into

00:05:54.240 --> 00:05:57.139
three distinct phases or movements of memory.

00:05:57.420 --> 00:06:00.180
Let's break those down. Yeah. The first part

00:06:00.180 --> 00:06:03.579
covers lines 1 through 49. Wordsworth returns

00:06:03.579 --> 00:06:07.379
to the River Wye after five long years. He listens

00:06:07.379 --> 00:06:10.000
to the waters rolling from their mountain springs

00:06:10.000 --> 00:06:13.019
with a soft... inland murmur. Beautiful imagery.

00:06:13.300 --> 00:06:15.620
It is. And he describes the feeling of this return

00:06:15.620 --> 00:06:18.819
as a sense of tranquil restoration. Tranquil

00:06:18.819 --> 00:06:21.899
restoration. It's such a beautifully evocative

00:06:21.899 --> 00:06:24.379
phrase. He's looking at this natural beauty,

00:06:24.540 --> 00:06:26.899
but he realizes it's not just a pretty view to

00:06:26.899 --> 00:06:29.259
him anymore. In those opening lines, he recognizes

00:06:29.259 --> 00:06:31.839
that over the past five years, living in lonely

00:06:31.839 --> 00:06:34.720
rooms and amid the din of towns and cities, he

00:06:34.720 --> 00:06:37.459
had so deeply internalized this specific landscape

00:06:37.459 --> 00:06:40.420
that it sustained him while he was away. The

00:06:40.420 --> 00:06:43.459
Wikipedia article points out that this internalized

00:06:43.459 --> 00:06:45.980
landscape practically becomes the basis for an

00:06:45.980 --> 00:06:49.040
out -of -body experience for him. Truly. He isn't

00:06:49.040 --> 00:06:51.639
just looking at trees and water. He is accessing

00:06:51.639 --> 00:06:54.120
a reservoir of peace that he has carried inside

00:06:54.120 --> 00:06:56.759
his own nervous system since his youth. It's

00:06:56.759 --> 00:06:59.240
almost a meditative state where the heavy burden

00:06:59.240 --> 00:07:01.379
of the world is lightened. And that naturally

00:07:01.379 --> 00:07:04.100
flows into the second movement of the poem, spanning

00:07:04.100 --> 00:07:07.920
lines 49 to 1 and 11. Here he draws a sharp...

00:07:08.120 --> 00:07:10.519
almost melancholy contrast between his youth

00:07:10.519 --> 00:07:13.160
and his current mature perspective. The five

00:07:13.160 --> 00:07:15.319
-year difference. Exactly. He reflects on what

00:07:15.319 --> 00:07:17.439
he calls his thoughtless youth, a time when he

00:07:17.439 --> 00:07:19.639
bounded over the mountains like a roe, driven

00:07:19.639 --> 00:07:22.699
by a purely physical, almost reckless enthusiasm

00:07:22.699 --> 00:07:26.040
for the landscape. It's that sheer, untamed energy

00:07:26.040 --> 00:07:28.180
of a 20 -something just absorbing the physical

00:07:28.180 --> 00:07:30.399
thrill of nature. The colors and forms were,

00:07:30.560 --> 00:07:33.899
to him, an appetite, a feeling, and a love, with

00:07:33.899 --> 00:07:36.480
no need for deeper thought. But now as an older

00:07:36.480 --> 00:07:40.180
man that dizzying, aching joy is gone. It's faded.

00:07:40.379 --> 00:07:42.579
But it's replaced by something far more profound.

00:07:43.139 --> 00:07:45.720
What's fascinating here is the sheer philosophical

00:07:45.720 --> 00:07:49.079
shift Wordsworth is pulling off. He realizes

00:07:49.079 --> 00:07:51.699
that the power of this scenery hasn't just provided

00:07:51.699 --> 00:07:53.860
him with comforting memories. It has fundamentally

00:07:53.860 --> 00:07:56.339
altered his understanding of the universe. That's

00:07:56.339 --> 00:07:59.399
a huge leap. It is. His engagement with nature

00:07:59.399 --> 00:08:02.480
verges on pantheism, the belief that the divine

00:08:02.480 --> 00:08:04.920
is present within the natural world itself. I

00:08:04.920 --> 00:08:07.279
love those famous lines where he describes this

00:08:07.279 --> 00:08:09.959
shift. He says, he has felt a presence that disturbs

00:08:09.959 --> 00:08:12.540
me with the joy of elevated thoughts, a sense

00:08:12.540 --> 00:08:15.279
sublime of something far more deeply interfused,

00:08:15.319 --> 00:08:18.170
whose dwelling is the light of setting sun. He

00:08:18.170 --> 00:08:20.529
feels the imminence of what he calls emotion

00:08:20.529 --> 00:08:23.850
and a spirit that impels all thinking things,

00:08:24.050 --> 00:08:26.029
all objects of all thought, and rolls through

00:08:26.029 --> 00:08:29.209
all things. That is heavy. Very heavy. This is

00:08:29.209 --> 00:08:31.910
why this poem is an absolute cornerstone of romanticism.

00:08:31.990 --> 00:08:33.370
He isn't just saying, hey, look at this pretty

00:08:33.370 --> 00:08:36.210
river. He is asserting that through this profound,

00:08:36.450 --> 00:08:39.309
quiet connection with nature, he has found the

00:08:39.309 --> 00:08:42.610
anchor of my purest thoughts, the nurse, the

00:08:42.610 --> 00:08:45.429
guide, the guardian of my heart and soul of all

00:08:45.429 --> 00:08:48.330
my moral being. The natural world has literally

00:08:48.330 --> 00:08:51.269
shaped his morality. Yes. It's an incredibly

00:08:51.269 --> 00:08:54.409
elevated way to view a walk in the woods. And

00:08:54.409 --> 00:08:57.210
then we arrive at the third and final movement

00:08:57.210 --> 00:09:01.789
of the poem from line 111 to 159. Earlier, we

00:09:01.789 --> 00:09:04.389
mentioned that this is a conversation poem. Up

00:09:04.389 --> 00:09:05.990
until this point, it really just feels like we

00:09:05.990 --> 00:09:08.190
are eavesdropping on his internal monologue.

00:09:08.330 --> 00:09:11.070
Just listening to him think. Exactly. But suddenly,

00:09:11.269 --> 00:09:13.769
out of nowhere, a silent listener is revealed.

00:09:14.049 --> 00:09:17.080
Yes. The focus pivots entirely outward. The silent

00:09:17.080 --> 00:09:19.399
listener is his sister, Dorothy, who's apparently

00:09:19.399 --> 00:09:21.679
been walking beside him this whole time. He addresses

00:09:21.679 --> 00:09:23.779
her directly as my dearest friend, my dear, dear

00:09:23.779 --> 00:09:27.220
friend. He shares this massive pantheistic vision

00:09:27.220 --> 00:09:29.940
with her, expressing the deep conviction that

00:09:29.940 --> 00:09:33.360
all which we behold is full of blessings. He

00:09:33.360 --> 00:09:36.220
looks at her and sees his own past thoughtless

00:09:36.220 --> 00:09:39.039
youth reflected in her wild eyes. That's a really

00:09:39.039 --> 00:09:41.740
tender moment. It is. It's the shared vision,

00:09:41.860 --> 00:09:44.139
the shared experience of the landscape that he

00:09:44.139 --> 00:09:47.340
believes will continue to create a lasting, unbreakable

00:09:47.340 --> 00:09:50.899
bond between them even after he is gone. Which

00:09:50.899 --> 00:09:53.299
makes me want to pause and ask you, the listener.

00:09:53.950 --> 00:09:55.950
Have you ever returned to a childhood haunt,

00:09:55.970 --> 00:09:58.769
a park, a street, a specific house, and realized

00:09:58.769 --> 00:10:00.990
it means something entirely different to your

00:10:00.990 --> 00:10:03.190
adult self? That's a great question. That the

00:10:03.190 --> 00:10:05.970
physical place is exactly the same, but the lens

00:10:05.970 --> 00:10:08.090
you are viewing it through has completely changed.

00:10:08.330 --> 00:10:10.950
That relatable, deeply human shift in perspective

00:10:10.950 --> 00:10:13.370
is exactly the magic trick Wordsworth is pulling

00:10:13.370 --> 00:10:15.690
off here. He claimed that by internalizing the

00:10:15.690 --> 00:10:17.730
landscape in this way, he was now able to see

00:10:17.730 --> 00:10:20.669
into the life of things. And through that enabled,

00:10:20.789 --> 00:10:23.250
elevated vision, he claimed to hear oftentimes

00:10:23.340 --> 00:10:26.340
the still sad music of humanity. He claimed that,

00:10:26.440 --> 00:10:29.360
sure. But reading through the critical reception

00:10:29.360 --> 00:10:32.440
in the source, did he really? Because this brings

00:10:32.440 --> 00:10:34.860
us to what scholars call the erasure controversy.

00:10:35.320 --> 00:10:37.799
Yes. Wordsworth claims to hear the sad music

00:10:37.799 --> 00:10:40.320
of humanity. But modern critics point out that

00:10:40.320 --> 00:10:41.940
he actually went out of his way to put on some

00:10:41.940 --> 00:10:44.460
serious noise canceling headphones when he wrote

00:10:44.460 --> 00:10:46.799
this. This is where the literary analysis of

00:10:46.799 --> 00:10:48.799
the late 20th century really cracked the poem

00:10:48.799 --> 00:10:52.019
wide open. We have to look at the actual historical

00:10:52.019 --> 00:10:54.980
and socioeconomic context of the late 18th century.

00:10:55.100 --> 00:10:58.019
Right. A prominent critic named Marjorie Levinson

00:10:58.019 --> 00:11:01.139
has forcefully argued. that Wordsworth managed

00:11:01.139 --> 00:11:04.019
to see into the life of things only by deliberately

00:11:04.019 --> 00:11:07.039
narrowing and skewing his field of vision. She

00:11:07.039 --> 00:11:10.440
contends that he actively, perhaps ruthlessly,

00:11:10.620 --> 00:11:13.440
excludes certain sites and meanings that conflicted

00:11:13.440 --> 00:11:16.039
with his theme of tranquil restoration. Because

00:11:16.039 --> 00:11:18.820
the Monmouthshire area around the River Wye wasn't

00:11:18.820 --> 00:11:21.379
just some untouched, pristine wilderness where

00:11:21.379 --> 00:11:24.100
a poet could wander lonely as a cloud. It was

00:11:24.100 --> 00:11:26.980
a bustling, polluted hub of industry. In the

00:11:26.980 --> 00:11:29.240
poem, Wordsworth looks up at the steep woods

00:11:29.240 --> 00:11:31.659
and playfully assumes that the wreaths of smoke

00:11:31.659 --> 00:11:34.139
rising from the trees in silence are evidence

00:11:34.139 --> 00:11:37.320
of some wandering vagrant, or perhaps a hermit's

00:11:37.320 --> 00:11:40.080
cave. In reality, that smoke was almost certainly

00:11:40.080 --> 00:11:43.240
toxic. Yikes. It was coming from local ironworks,

00:11:43.360 --> 00:11:46.200
from widespread charcoal burning, or from local

00:11:46.200 --> 00:11:48.740
paperworks. This wasn't a well -kept secret either.

00:11:49.080 --> 00:11:52.159
The industrial presence was undeniable and highly

00:11:52.159 --> 00:11:54.419
visible. There's actual visual proof of this,

00:11:54.539 --> 00:11:56.940
right? Yes, there is a famous print by an artist

00:11:56.940 --> 00:12:00.080
named Thomas Hearn from 1795, just three years

00:12:00.080 --> 00:12:03.360
before Wordsworth's walk, titled Iron Forge at

00:12:03.360 --> 00:12:06.860
Tintern. It depicts a massive, smoky, industrialized

00:12:06.860 --> 00:12:09.039
operation right there in the valley. So he essentially

00:12:09.039 --> 00:12:11.779
photoshopped the smog out of his poem. He absolutely

00:12:11.779 --> 00:12:14.179
did. But doing so completely changes the reality

00:12:14.179 --> 00:12:16.980
of the scene. He turned an industrial iron forge

00:12:16.980 --> 00:12:20.000
into a romantic... fire because a hermit fits

00:12:20.000 --> 00:12:22.779
the vibe of tranquil restoration, while a sweaty,

00:12:22.879 --> 00:12:25.399
soot -covered ironworker definitely does not.

00:12:25.539 --> 00:12:28.039
If we connect this to the bigger picture, we

00:12:28.039 --> 00:12:30.700
can look at a fascinating study by Crystal Lake.

00:12:31.519 --> 00:12:33.840
Lake decided to compare Wordsworth's masterpiece

00:12:33.840 --> 00:12:37.240
to other poems written about Tintern Abbey right

00:12:37.240 --> 00:12:40.059
around the same exact time. This part is so revealing.

00:12:40.500 --> 00:12:42.440
She noted that Wordsworth completely avoided

00:12:42.440 --> 00:12:44.720
direct engagement with the present industrial

00:12:44.720 --> 00:12:48.480
manifestation of humanity. He even ignored the

00:12:48.480 --> 00:12:51.379
past evidence of humanity, the actual crumbling

00:12:51.379 --> 00:12:53.879
ruins of the Abbey itself. Right, the namesake

00:12:53.879 --> 00:12:55.980
of the poem. Lake concludes that this perfectly

00:12:55.980 --> 00:12:59.220
confirms Marjorie Levinson's argument. The local

00:12:59.220 --> 00:13:01.779
politics and the gritty, noisy reality of the

00:13:01.779 --> 00:13:04.320
Monmouthshire landscape required total erasure

00:13:04.320 --> 00:13:06.480
if Wordsworth was going to successfully advance

00:13:06.480 --> 00:13:09.240
his aesthetic and philosophical agenda. When

00:13:09.240 --> 00:13:11.340
you look at what those other contemporary poets

00:13:11.340 --> 00:13:13.399
were writing, the contrast is mind -blowing.

00:13:13.620 --> 00:13:15.519
The source lists several of them, and they are

00:13:15.519 --> 00:13:17.549
not holding back. No, they aren't. You have the

00:13:17.549 --> 00:13:20.269
Reverend Dr. Snead Davies writing an epistle

00:13:20.269 --> 00:13:23.389
in the 1790s. When Davies approached Tintern

00:13:23.389 --> 00:13:25.850
Abbey by boat, he didn't just write about tranquil

00:13:25.850 --> 00:13:29.029
greenery and rolling waters. He explicitly noted

00:13:29.029 --> 00:13:31.429
the presence of naked quarries tearing into the

00:13:31.429 --> 00:13:34.129
earth before describing the ruins bathed in evening

00:13:34.129 --> 00:13:36.529
light, which gave him a sense of pleasurable

00:13:36.529 --> 00:13:39.649
sadness. Davies really set the emotional tone

00:13:39.649 --> 00:13:42.210
for the poets that followed, establishing that

00:13:42.210 --> 00:13:45.289
blend of ruin and melancholy. But he bracketed

00:13:45.289 --> 00:13:48.450
the human traces both past and present far more

00:13:48.450 --> 00:13:50.769
directly than Wordsworth ever did. OK, so then

00:13:50.769 --> 00:13:52.649
you have another local clergyman, the Reverend

00:13:52.649 --> 00:13:55.330
Duncombe Davis, writing around 1790. Because

00:13:55.330 --> 00:13:58.250
he was actually from the area, he gets deep into

00:13:58.250 --> 00:14:00.649
the weeds of the local industry. He knew exactly

00:14:00.649 --> 00:14:03.210
what was going on. I have to say, reading Duncombe

00:14:03.210 --> 00:14:05.389
Davis's description in the source was amazing

00:14:05.389 --> 00:14:08.769
because it is so unapologetically gritty. He

00:14:08.769 --> 00:14:10.570
writes about how the monks are long gone and

00:14:10.570 --> 00:14:13.879
now black forges smoke and noisy hammers. beat

00:14:13.879 --> 00:14:16.480
where sooty cyclops puffing drink and sweat.

00:14:16.600 --> 00:14:19.259
Sooty cyclops. He literally compares the local

00:14:19.259 --> 00:14:23.019
iron workers to sweaty, sooty cyclops. He goes

00:14:23.019 --> 00:14:25.299
on to describe the smelting process in vivid

00:14:25.299 --> 00:14:28.059
detail, ultimately reflecting that his present

00:14:28.059 --> 00:14:31.019
industrious era of hard work is actually more

00:14:31.019 --> 00:14:33.919
virtuous than the lazy monastic past. It's a

00:14:33.919 --> 00:14:37.220
striking contrast. And interestingly, Duncan

00:14:37.220 --> 00:14:39.820
Davis anticipates Wordsworth by drawing a moral

00:14:39.820 --> 00:14:42.340
lesson from the scenery. But his lesson uses

00:14:42.340 --> 00:14:45.899
the actual physical ruins of the abbey. He notes

00:14:45.899 --> 00:14:48.460
the ivy -swathed stones holding the crumbling

00:14:48.460 --> 00:14:51.000
walls together and tells the reader to cling,

00:14:51.200 --> 00:14:54.059
like the ivy, round a falling friend. Which is

00:14:54.059 --> 00:14:56.159
a bit on the nose as far as metaphors go, but

00:14:56.159 --> 00:14:58.139
you can't deny he's actually using the landscape

00:14:58.139 --> 00:14:59.860
that's right in front of him. Very true. And

00:14:59.860 --> 00:15:01.840
there were others, right? Edmund Gardner wrote

00:15:01.840 --> 00:15:04.320
a sonnet in the 1790s where he looks at the ruined

00:15:04.320 --> 00:15:07.259
abbey and concludes, Man's but a temple of a

00:15:07.259 --> 00:15:10.679
shorter date. And around 1800, the Reverend Luke

00:15:10.679 --> 00:15:12.519
Booker wrote a sonnet where he embarks on the

00:15:12.519 --> 00:15:15.320
river at sunset, hoping to sail peacefully to

00:15:15.320 --> 00:15:17.940
the eternal ocean at death. What all these contemporary

00:15:17.940 --> 00:15:20.600
examples show us is that the action of Wordsworth's

00:15:20.600 --> 00:15:23.919
poem takes place in a moral and literary landscape

00:15:23.919 --> 00:15:26.279
that was already well established by other writers.

00:15:26.539 --> 00:15:30.019
His highly retrospective mood draws heavily on

00:15:30.019 --> 00:15:32.519
a specific 18th century emotional sensibility.

00:15:32.580 --> 00:15:35.720
It was part of a larger trend. Exactly. You can

00:15:35.720 --> 00:15:39.080
find that same exact sensibility in Edward Jurningham's

00:15:39.080 --> 00:15:41.779
poetry, which focuses entirely on the natural

00:15:41.779 --> 00:15:44.480
adornments of moss and flowers reclaiming the

00:15:44.480 --> 00:15:47.519
ruins. Or even in J .M .W. Turner's famous watercolor

00:15:47.519 --> 00:15:50.519
painting of the Abbey, which minimizes the modern

00:15:50.519 --> 00:15:53.399
world to highlight the romantic decay. That makes

00:15:53.399 --> 00:15:55.279
a lot of sense. The conclusion scholars draw

00:15:55.279 --> 00:15:57.600
here isn't necessarily that Wordsworth was being

00:15:57.600 --> 00:16:00.500
actively deceitful or malicious. Rather, he made

00:16:00.500 --> 00:16:03.320
a deliberate, highly calculated artistic choice.

00:16:03.789 --> 00:16:05.929
He preferred the broader, philosophical picture

00:16:05.929 --> 00:16:09.429
over specific, distracting human details. It

00:16:09.429 --> 00:16:11.289
fits seamlessly within the aesthetic context

00:16:11.289 --> 00:16:13.889
of his time, even if it requires a massive amount

00:16:13.889 --> 00:16:16.509
of selective blindness. It's the ultimate curation

00:16:16.509 --> 00:16:19.549
of memory. He needed the landscape to be pure

00:16:19.549 --> 00:16:22.679
so his internal philosophy could be pure. Which

00:16:22.679 --> 00:16:24.679
brings us perfectly to how this poem continues

00:16:24.679 --> 00:16:27.740
to resonate today. Even with its selective blindness,

00:16:28.080 --> 00:16:31.120
the core emotional truth of the poem, the desperate

00:16:31.120 --> 00:16:34.480
desire to hold on to a memory, is so strong that

00:16:34.480 --> 00:16:36.899
modern writers are still responding to it centuries

00:16:36.899 --> 00:16:39.960
later. The Wikipedia article outlines two very

00:16:39.960 --> 00:16:43.100
notable American responses in recent years. First,

00:16:43.179 --> 00:16:45.080
there is the former U .S. Poet Laureate Billy

00:16:45.080 --> 00:16:48.080
Collins. In March of 1997, Collins published

00:16:48.080 --> 00:16:50.740
a poem in Poetry Magazine. He playfully engaged

00:16:50.740 --> 00:16:53.899
with Wordsworth's famously long title by giving

00:16:53.899 --> 00:16:56.659
his own poem an equally long one. Lines composed

00:16:56.659 --> 00:16:59.759
3 ,000 miles from Tintern Abbey. Huh. Collins

00:16:59.759 --> 00:17:01.679
specifically zeroes in on that middle section

00:17:01.679 --> 00:17:03.720
of Wordsworth's poem, the part that deals with

00:17:03.720 --> 00:17:06.160
the memory of his former visit, the gleams of

00:17:06.160 --> 00:17:08.980
half -extinguished thought, and the sad perplexity

00:17:08.980 --> 00:17:11.259
of trying to revive the picture of the mind.

00:17:11.640 --> 00:17:13.660
And our source notes another poet, simply named

00:17:13.660 --> 00:17:16.200
Mills, who restates Wordsworth's grand sentiment

00:17:16.200 --> 00:17:19.079
in a much more direct pedestrian way. Mills writes,

00:17:19.259 --> 00:17:21.680
I was here before, a long time ago, and now I

00:17:21.680 --> 00:17:24.019
am here again. It really distills it down. It

00:17:24.019 --> 00:17:26.980
does. The source points out that this elaborates

00:17:26.980 --> 00:17:30.380
on a deeply universal thesis. No matter how hard

00:17:30.380 --> 00:17:33.440
you try, revisiting a place or an occasion will

00:17:33.440 --> 00:17:35.859
always fall short of recreating the absolute

00:17:35.859 --> 00:17:38.220
freshness, the shock of that first impression.

00:17:38.460 --> 00:17:41.180
We can never truly go back. The river is technically

00:17:41.180 --> 00:17:43.559
the same river, but the person looking at it

00:17:43.559 --> 00:17:45.819
has a completely different mind. This raises

00:17:45.819 --> 00:17:47.400
an important question, though, about the very

00:17:47.400 --> 00:17:49.579
nature of how we perceive that beauty in the

00:17:49.579 --> 00:17:52.539
first place. Wordsworth relies entirely on his

00:17:52.539 --> 00:17:54.960
eyes and ears, the steep cliffs, the rolling

00:17:54.960 --> 00:17:57.779
waters. But what if you remove those senses?

00:17:58.430 --> 00:18:00.490
This brings us to a much more recent response

00:18:00.490 --> 00:18:03.529
from 2023 by the deafblind writer John Lee Clark.

00:18:03.809 --> 00:18:06.250
This part of the source material completely fascinated

00:18:06.250 --> 00:18:08.930
me. It's incredibly moving. John Lee Clark wrote

00:18:08.930 --> 00:18:11.390
a piece called A Protactile Version of Tintern

00:18:11.390 --> 00:18:13.789
Abbey. Because he is deafblind, he approaches

00:18:13.789 --> 00:18:16.490
the poem entirely outside the visual and auditory

00:18:16.490 --> 00:18:18.789
realms that Wordsworth so heavily relied on.

00:18:18.950 --> 00:18:21.450
He translates the experience into the protactile

00:18:21.450 --> 00:18:23.630
language, which relies on physical touch and

00:18:23.630 --> 00:18:26.130
somatic engagement rather than visual signs or

00:18:26.130 --> 00:18:28.650
spoken words. The source describes Clark's work

00:18:28.650 --> 00:18:31.650
as a tangential attempt to embrace Wordsworth's

00:18:31.650 --> 00:18:34.069
challenge through physical rather than conceptual

00:18:34.069 --> 00:18:37.089
means. Clark is attempting to capture the profound

00:18:37.319 --> 00:18:40.220
beauty of a place without sight. He uses tactile

00:18:40.220 --> 00:18:43.339
language to evoke sensory depth, mapping the

00:18:43.339 --> 00:18:45.519
landscape onto the body itself. It's a completely

00:18:45.519 --> 00:18:48.480
novel angle. It forces the reader to appreciate

00:18:48.480 --> 00:18:52.180
a familiar classic text in a brand new way. And

00:18:52.180 --> 00:18:54.440
in doing so, Kroc might actually be getting closer

00:18:54.440 --> 00:18:57.059
to reviling that deeply inward experience that

00:18:57.059 --> 00:18:58.839
Wordsworth considered so crucial to communicate,

00:18:59.079 --> 00:19:01.500
taking the visual out of it entirely and relying

00:19:01.500 --> 00:19:04.240
purely on the internal sensory feeling of a space,

00:19:04.339 --> 00:19:06.259
the physical weight of the air, the vibration.

00:19:06.539 --> 00:19:09.039
of the ground it's a brilliant modern evolution

00:19:09.039 --> 00:19:11.619
of the internalized landscape wordsworth was

00:19:11.619 --> 00:19:14.680
trying to describe absolutely Both of these modern

00:19:14.680 --> 00:19:17.180
responses, from Billy Collins trying to bridge

00:19:17.180 --> 00:19:20.519
the gap of memory across 3 ,000 miles to John

00:19:20.519 --> 00:19:23.619
Lee Clark bridging the sensory gap through procactile

00:19:23.619 --> 00:19:26.160
translation, prove that Wordsworth tapped into

00:19:26.160 --> 00:19:29.220
something incredibly durable. The desire to hold

00:19:29.220 --> 00:19:31.740
on to a feeling, to let a landscape shape your

00:19:31.740 --> 00:19:34.579
inner life and anchor your morality, is a universal

00:19:34.579 --> 00:19:38.089
human instinct. So what does this all mean? When

00:19:38.089 --> 00:19:40.549
we put all these pieces together, the breathless

00:19:40.549 --> 00:19:43.130
mental composition on the road to Bristol, the

00:19:43.130 --> 00:19:46.069
pantheistic philosophy, the sweaty cyclops of

00:19:46.069 --> 00:19:48.150
the iron forge that got left on the cutting room

00:19:48.150 --> 00:19:51.150
floor, we see that lines written a few miles

00:19:51.150 --> 00:19:53.869
above Tintern Abbey is so much more than a poem

00:19:53.869 --> 00:19:55.910
about a ruined building. Especially since the

00:19:55.910 --> 00:19:57.710
building isn't even described in the text. Right.

00:19:57.809 --> 00:20:00.529
It is an absolute masterclass in how memory shapes

00:20:00.529 --> 00:20:03.269
our moral being. It shows us how a single landscape

00:20:03.269 --> 00:20:06.329
can anchor our purest thoughts. But it also reveals

00:20:06.329 --> 00:20:09.079
that art... And perhaps memory itself sometimes

00:20:09.079 --> 00:20:11.980
requires us to crop out the ugly, noisy, toxic

00:20:11.980 --> 00:20:14.440
industrial smoke in order to find our own tranquil

00:20:14.440 --> 00:20:17.039
restoration. Which leaves us with a final thought

00:20:17.039 --> 00:20:20.920
to mull over. If Wordsworth, whether subconsciously

00:20:20.920 --> 00:20:23.759
or totally consciously, erased the noisy ironworks,

00:20:23.940 --> 00:20:26.880
the paper mills, and the sooty forges to construct

00:20:26.880 --> 00:20:29.740
his perfectly idealized memory of the River Wye,

00:20:29.799 --> 00:20:33.799
wait, sorry, I mean, if he erased all that, what

00:20:33.799 --> 00:20:36.269
parts of your own past are you editing out? When

00:20:36.269 --> 00:20:37.930
you look back at your own favorite memories,

00:20:38.130 --> 00:20:39.970
the ones that bring you comfort on a hard day,

00:20:40.049 --> 00:20:41.990
how much of your inner peace relies not just

00:20:41.990 --> 00:20:44.049
on what you choose to remember, but on what you

00:20:44.049 --> 00:20:46.230
actively choose to forget? A brilliant question

00:20:46.230 --> 00:20:48.190
to leave you with. Keep questioning the frame,

00:20:48.329 --> 00:20:50.509
keep examining your own landscapes, and keep

00:20:50.509 --> 00:20:52.029
seeking your own tranquil restoration.
