WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.419
Okay, let's unpack this. You know that specific,

00:00:03.859 --> 00:00:06.559
creeping anxiety you get when a band you've loved

00:00:06.559 --> 00:00:10.080
for a decade announces a hiatus? Oh, it is the

00:00:10.080 --> 00:00:12.320
worst feeling. It really is. Like, it's a very

00:00:12.320 --> 00:00:14.779
polite word, hiatus, but for a fan, it feels

00:00:14.779 --> 00:00:17.100
exactly like a breakup. It does, yeah. And then

00:00:17.100 --> 00:00:19.239
comes the waiting game. You're watching the individual

00:00:19.239 --> 00:00:21.300
members kind of holding your breath, wondering

00:00:21.300 --> 00:00:25.120
who is going to be the breakout star, and maybe

00:00:25.120 --> 00:00:27.320
more terrifyingly, who is going to struggle to

00:00:27.320 --> 00:00:30.039
find their footing. I mean, it is the... single

00:00:30.039 --> 00:00:32.960
most high stakes moment in the pop music ecosystem.

00:00:33.399 --> 00:00:35.539
We call it the transition phase, but really it's

00:00:35.539 --> 00:00:38.740
a trial by fire. History is just absolutely littered

00:00:38.740 --> 00:00:42.380
with members of massive stadium filling groups

00:00:42.380 --> 00:00:45.020
who stepped out solo and just they couldn't replicate

00:00:45.020 --> 00:00:48.020
the magic. Exactly. It's the Justin Timberlake

00:00:48.020 --> 00:00:52.070
leaving NSYNC archetype. Or Beyonce leaving Destiny's

00:00:52.070 --> 00:00:54.130
Child. You go from having three or four people

00:00:54.130 --> 00:00:56.850
to lean on to suddenly being the only person

00:00:56.850 --> 00:00:59.250
standing under that spotlight. Which is an incredible

00:00:59.250 --> 00:01:02.270
amount of pressure. Huge pressure. And today

00:01:02.270 --> 00:01:04.849
for our deep dive, we are getting into one of

00:01:04.849 --> 00:01:07.870
those massive pop culture moments. We are talking

00:01:07.870 --> 00:01:10.650
about the transition from girl group superstardom

00:01:10.650 --> 00:01:14.120
to the solo career. Specifically, we are looking

00:01:14.120 --> 00:01:17.120
at Perry, formerly of Little Mix, and her debut

00:01:17.120 --> 00:01:20.079
solo single, Forget About Us, which dropped back

00:01:20.079 --> 00:01:24.040
on April 12, 2024. And just to set the stage

00:01:24.040 --> 00:01:26.519
here for you listening, we have a really interesting

00:01:26.519 --> 00:01:29.340
stack of sources for this deep dive. We aren't

00:01:29.340 --> 00:01:31.620
just reacting to a song. No, we've got a lot

00:01:31.620 --> 00:01:33.299
of ground to cover. We really do. We're looking

00:01:33.299 --> 00:01:35.060
at everything from the initial production credits

00:01:35.060 --> 00:01:38.060
and the hard chart data to critical reviews from

00:01:38.060 --> 00:01:41.019
major publications, places like Billboard, NME,

00:01:41.480 --> 00:01:43.379
and the Shields Gazette. We've got the numbers,

00:01:43.780 --> 00:01:46.379
we've got the, well, sorry, the speculation,

00:01:46.400 --> 00:01:48.680
and we've got the music theory. But our mission

00:01:48.680 --> 00:01:51.659
today isn't just to review a pop song. If you

00:01:51.659 --> 00:01:53.980
really look at the materials we have, this is

00:01:53.980 --> 00:01:56.219
a case study in rebranding. Definitely. It's

00:01:56.219 --> 00:01:58.939
all about artistic independence. How does an

00:01:58.939 --> 00:02:01.280
artist who has spent years as one -fourth of

00:02:01.280 --> 00:02:04.340
a harmonizing unit establish a completely singular

00:02:04.340 --> 00:02:07.140
identity? Right. How do you tell the world, this

00:02:07.140 --> 00:02:10.330
is who I am now? without alienating the millions

00:02:10.330 --> 00:02:12.530
of people who loved who you were. Exactly the

00:02:12.530 --> 00:02:14.490
challenge. And let me tell you, there are some

00:02:14.490 --> 00:02:16.870
surprising connections in here. When I was prepping

00:02:16.870 --> 00:02:18.830
for this and looking at the songwriting credits,

00:02:19.129 --> 00:02:23.050
my jaw actually dropped. It is definitively not

00:02:23.050 --> 00:02:26.270
the team you might expect for a standard pop

00:02:26.270 --> 00:02:28.909
debut. It is a fascinating list. It tells you

00:02:28.909 --> 00:02:31.740
a lot about the strategy behind the sound. So

00:02:31.740 --> 00:02:33.900
let's get right into the origin story of Forget

00:02:33.900 --> 00:02:37.520
About Us. Usually, the narrative we're sold is

00:02:37.520 --> 00:02:39.719
the artists locking themselves away in a cabin

00:02:39.719 --> 00:02:42.439
with an acoustic guitar to, you know, find themselves.

00:02:42.580 --> 00:02:45.120
The classic indie pop myth. Right, the myth.

00:02:45.699 --> 00:02:48.639
But this track started with a pretty famous voice

00:02:48.639 --> 00:02:51.280
on the other end of the line. It did. The spark

00:02:51.280 --> 00:02:53.680
for this track actually came from Ed Sheeran.

00:02:53.879 --> 00:02:56.300
Ed Sheeran, I mean, I feel like he's everywhere,

00:02:56.439 --> 00:02:59.520
but it's still a massive cosign for a debut solo

00:02:59.520 --> 00:03:01.740
single. It absolutely is, but I think we need

00:03:01.740 --> 00:03:04.159
to pause and analyze that for a second. Because

00:03:04.159 --> 00:03:06.460
while getting a song from Ed Sheeran is a gift,

00:03:06.979 --> 00:03:09.979
it's also a bit of a Trojan horse. How so? Like,

00:03:09.979 --> 00:03:12.699
what makes it a trick? Well, Sheeran has such

00:03:12.699 --> 00:03:15.840
distinct melodic fingerprint. We call it the

00:03:15.840 --> 00:03:18.259
Sheeranification of Pop. Oh, I like that term.

00:03:18.400 --> 00:03:20.719
Right. His demos usually sound very much like

00:03:20.719 --> 00:03:24.060
him. the cadence, the rhythm, that specific acoustic

00:03:24.060 --> 00:03:26.139
strumming pattern. Yeah, you can hear it immediately.

00:03:26.419 --> 00:03:30.099
Exactly. So if you are a new solo artist trying

00:03:30.099 --> 00:03:33.520
to define your unique sound, the easiest trap

00:03:33.520 --> 00:03:37.400
to fall into is just releasing basically Ed Sheeran

00:03:37.400 --> 00:03:39.680
featuring you. That makes total sense. You don't

00:03:39.680 --> 00:03:41.419
want to sound like a cover artist on your own

00:03:41.419 --> 00:03:43.960
debut single. You really don't. Yeah. And according

00:03:43.960 --> 00:03:46.400
to an interview Perry did with NME, that was

00:03:46.400 --> 00:03:49.219
the exact crossroads she faced. Sheeran sent

00:03:49.219 --> 00:03:52.370
her a demo version of the track. Now, the commercially

00:03:52.370 --> 00:03:55.069
safe route is to just learn the vocals, record

00:03:55.069 --> 00:03:57.110
it, and ride the shear and waves straight to

00:03:57.110 --> 00:03:59.210
the top of the charts. But she didn't do that.

00:03:59.229 --> 00:04:01.090
And this is the part of the story I really love.

00:04:01.530 --> 00:04:03.930
She took that demo to her home studio in London,

00:04:04.229 --> 00:04:06.509
and she didn't just record it. She completely

00:04:06.509 --> 00:04:08.669
reworked it. That is the key distinction here.

00:04:08.969 --> 00:04:10.949
She specifically mentioned that she changed the

00:04:10.949 --> 00:04:13.569
concept and the lyrics. She wanted to fit her

00:04:13.569 --> 00:04:16.449
specific perspective on past relationships. She

00:04:16.449 --> 00:04:19.209
told NME it was about making the song, quote,

00:04:19.769 --> 00:04:23.300
the truth. The truth. That is such a heavy phrase

00:04:23.300 --> 00:04:26.279
for a breezy pop song. It signals to the listener

00:04:26.279 --> 00:04:28.680
right away, I'm not just singing someone else's

00:04:28.680 --> 00:04:31.720
words anymore. Precisely. In a group, you are

00:04:31.720 --> 00:04:34.560
often singing a consensus. You're singing a sentiment

00:04:34.560 --> 00:04:36.620
that everyone in the room agrees on. Right, it's

00:04:36.620 --> 00:04:39.680
a collective voice. But solo, you have to sing

00:04:39.680 --> 00:04:43.680
your specific reality. If she had just sung Sharon's

00:04:43.680 --> 00:04:46.279
lyrics exactly as they were, she would just be

00:04:46.279 --> 00:04:49.569
a vocalist. by rewriting it to fit her actual

00:04:49.569 --> 00:04:52.110
life, she becomes an artist. So she's got the

00:04:52.110 --> 00:04:54.089
skeleton of the song from Sheeran and she's putting

00:04:54.089 --> 00:04:56.569
her own flesh and blood on it in London. But

00:04:56.569 --> 00:04:58.050
then we really have to talk about the rest of

00:04:58.050 --> 00:05:00.050
the team because while Ed Sheeran is the headline

00:05:00.050 --> 00:05:02.709
name, if you look at the credits, there is a

00:05:02.709 --> 00:05:05.269
name that might legitimately shock you. David

00:05:05.269 --> 00:05:07.750
Hodges. Yes. This is where the production credits

00:05:07.750 --> 00:05:09.490
get really interesting. Okay, for the listener

00:05:09.490 --> 00:05:11.550
who might not check the liner notes of every

00:05:11.550 --> 00:05:14.589
single album, who is David Hodges? He is formally

00:05:14.589 --> 00:05:17.629
of the rock band Evanescence. Evanescence. Like,

00:05:17.889 --> 00:05:21.029
bring me to life, goth rock, early 2000s, Evanescence.

00:05:21.209 --> 00:05:24.639
The very same. That is wild to me. You have Perry

00:05:24.639 --> 00:05:27.379
from Little Mix, Ed Sheeran the acoustic pop

00:05:27.379 --> 00:05:30.920
king, and a guy from a goth rock band. It sounds

00:05:30.920 --> 00:05:33.959
like a complete mishmash. It sounds like a train

00:05:33.959 --> 00:05:35.699
wreck on paper, doesn't it? Oh, yeah. But if

00:05:35.699 --> 00:05:38.000
you actually analyze the musical structure of

00:05:38.000 --> 00:05:40.699
it, it makes perfect sense. Think about Evanescence

00:05:40.699 --> 00:05:42.939
songs. Yes, they were heavy. Yes, they had guitars.

00:05:43.279 --> 00:05:46.740
But they were built on massive, soaring, anthemic

00:05:46.740 --> 00:05:49.079
melodies. Oh, that's true. Big choruses. Big

00:05:49.079 --> 00:05:51.500
choruses that you can literally scream in a stadium.

00:05:51.579 --> 00:05:53.839
I see. It's not about the electric guitars at

00:05:53.839 --> 00:05:55.399
all, it's about the architecture of the song

00:05:55.399 --> 00:05:58.600
itself. Exactly. David Hodges has become a very

00:05:58.600 --> 00:06:01.160
prolific songwriter in the pop space because

00:06:01.160 --> 00:06:04.259
he understands how to build that wall of sound

00:06:04.259 --> 00:06:06.839
crescendo. He brings a certain structural drama

00:06:06.839 --> 00:06:09.980
that pure pop producers sometimes miss. So you

00:06:09.980 --> 00:06:13.100
combine Sheeran's rhythmic hookiness with Hodges's

00:06:13.100 --> 00:06:15.199
stadium rock structure. Plus you have Stephen

00:06:15.199 --> 00:06:17.079
Solomon and Andrew Goldstein on production as

00:06:17.079 --> 00:06:19.540
well. Right. What did the critics actually make

00:06:19.540 --> 00:06:21.259
of the final sound? Because when I listened to

00:06:21.259 --> 00:06:24.180
it, I certainly didn't hear goth rock. No, absolutely

00:06:24.180 --> 00:06:27.699
not. The consensus from the sources is that this

00:06:27.699 --> 00:06:30.740
is a pop ballad, but with a very specific twist.

00:06:31.620 --> 00:06:33.740
Multiple sources, including Billboard and the

00:06:33.740 --> 00:06:36.839
Shields Gazette, pointed out distinct country

00:06:36.839 --> 00:06:39.420
influences. Country, really? I mean, she's from

00:06:39.420 --> 00:06:41.279
South Shields, not Nashville. It's fascinating,

00:06:41.500 --> 00:06:43.720
right? But they aren't talking about banjos and

00:06:43.720 --> 00:06:46.199
fiddles here. They are talking about country

00:06:46.199 --> 00:06:48.600
sensibilities. OK, what does that mean in this

00:06:48.600 --> 00:06:50.680
context? Well, Billboard actually described it

00:06:50.680 --> 00:06:52.839
as having Katy Perry and Kelly Clarkson vibes.

00:06:53.199 --> 00:06:56.079
Oh. I can totally hear the Kelly Clarks in comparison.

00:06:56.339 --> 00:06:59.459
That big belted out energy. Like, Since You've

00:06:59.459 --> 00:07:02.540
Been Gone isn't country, but it has that driving

00:07:02.540 --> 00:07:05.720
organic band in a room feel. Exactly. It's about

00:07:05.720 --> 00:07:07.980
the instrumentation feeling grounded and real.

00:07:08.500 --> 00:07:10.660
NME used a phrase I quite like. They called it

00:07:10.660 --> 00:07:13.939
a sun dappled stomper. Sun dappled stomper. That

00:07:13.939 --> 00:07:16.540
is poetry right there. It sounds like the perfect

00:07:16.540 --> 00:07:18.759
description for a song release in April, right

00:07:18.759 --> 00:07:20.500
as everyone is getting ready for summer. That

00:07:20.500 --> 00:07:23.220
was the exact vibe they were going for. Attitude

00:07:23.220 --> 00:07:25.259
magazine and the Shields Gazette both framed

00:07:25.259 --> 00:07:27.879
it as a song of the summer contender. It's polished.

00:07:28.199 --> 00:07:30.319
It's bright. It feels like driving with the top

00:07:30.319 --> 00:07:33.439
down. Yeah. But what really anchors it, and this

00:07:33.439 --> 00:07:36.160
is something almost every single review mentioned,

00:07:36.740 --> 00:07:40.100
is the vocal performance. Now we know Perry can

00:07:40.100 --> 00:07:42.240
sing. I mean, she was in Little Mix. You don't

00:07:42.240 --> 00:07:45.019
survive a decade in that group without serious

00:07:45.019 --> 00:07:48.639
pipes. But. Was there anything specific the critics

00:07:48.639 --> 00:07:51.560
noted about this vocal performance? Holly Alton

00:07:51.560 --> 00:07:53.319
from the Shields Gazette wrote a really detailed

00:07:53.319 --> 00:07:56.120
breakdown of the vocals. She specifically noted

00:07:56.120 --> 00:07:58.740
Perry's range. She talked about how Perry navigates

00:07:58.740 --> 00:08:00.939
the lower notes and the verses before finishing

00:08:00.939 --> 00:08:03.449
with that massive high note. Can we talk about

00:08:03.449 --> 00:08:04.970
those low notes for a second? Because I feel

00:08:04.970 --> 00:08:07.050
like in pop music, everyone obsesses over the

00:08:07.050 --> 00:08:09.470
high notes, the money notes, you know? Oh, always.

00:08:09.629 --> 00:08:12.089
But staying in that lower register without sounding

00:08:12.089 --> 00:08:14.410
muddy or losing your breath is actually really,

00:08:14.410 --> 00:08:17.949
really hard. It is incredibly difficult. It requires

00:08:17.949 --> 00:08:20.189
a lot of breath control and vocal resonance.

00:08:20.470 --> 00:08:22.149
If you don't have the technique, you just disappear

00:08:22.149 --> 00:08:25.009
into the production mix. But Perry stays very

00:08:25.009 --> 00:08:28.029
present and very rich in those low verses. It

00:08:28.029 --> 00:08:30.230
pulls you in. It does. It creates a sense of

00:08:30.230 --> 00:08:32.090
intimacy, like she's talking directly to you.

00:08:32.159 --> 00:08:33.720
And then, of course, she hits you with the high

00:08:33.720 --> 00:08:35.840
note at the end just to remind you exactly who

00:08:35.840 --> 00:08:39.600
she is. Aliser James at Attitude called it a

00:08:39.600 --> 00:08:42.860
powerhouse vocal. And that is so important for

00:08:42.860 --> 00:08:45.779
a debut single. It's basically a three -minute

00:08:45.779 --> 00:08:48.360
resume sent out to the world. It says, hello,

00:08:48.720 --> 00:08:51.159
I'm here. And yes, I can still out sing almost

00:08:51.159 --> 00:08:54.019
anyone on the radio. So we have the sound. It's

00:08:54.019 --> 00:08:55.799
polished. It's pop. It's got a little bit of

00:08:55.799 --> 00:08:58.620
country sensibility and big vocals. But let's

00:08:58.620 --> 00:09:00.860
go back to that idea of the truth in the lyrics.

00:09:01.259 --> 00:09:03.740
Because when a massive pop star releases a song

00:09:03.740 --> 00:09:06.259
called Forget About Us, the Internet does what

00:09:06.259 --> 00:09:08.759
the Internet does. The rumor mill fires up. The

00:09:08.759 --> 00:09:11.500
rumor mill went into absolute overdrive. Everyone

00:09:11.500 --> 00:09:13.059
was trying to figure out who the song was about.

00:09:13.320 --> 00:09:15.860
It is inevitable. The sources mentioned that

00:09:15.860 --> 00:09:18.059
fans and critics immediately started speculating

00:09:18.059 --> 00:09:20.539
that the lyrics might refer to her ex -fiance,

00:09:20.700 --> 00:09:23.059
Zayn Malik. I mean, it's the low hanging fruit

00:09:23.059 --> 00:09:25.559
of pop culture speculation, right? High profile

00:09:25.559 --> 00:09:28.919
breakup, super famous ex. It is. But I think

00:09:28.919 --> 00:09:31.720
focusing solely on the gossip misses the entire

00:09:31.720 --> 00:09:34.539
point of the songwriting. If you actually look

00:09:34.539 --> 00:09:37.480
at the lyrical analysis provided in the sources,

00:09:38.100 --> 00:09:39.879
particularly from Attitude, they view it very

00:09:39.879 --> 00:09:42.120
differently. How so? They describe the lyrics

00:09:42.120 --> 00:09:45.399
not as gossip fodder, but as a mature take on

00:09:45.399 --> 00:09:47.659
relationships. That's an interesting distinction.

00:09:48.200 --> 00:09:50.639
Because a breakup song usually implies anger

00:09:50.639 --> 00:09:54.039
or intense sadness. You know, the typical I Hate

00:09:54.039 --> 00:09:57.049
You anthem. But Forget About Us feels different.

00:09:57.169 --> 00:09:59.730
It does. It isn't a burn book. It's a look back

00:09:59.730 --> 00:10:03.230
at past relationships and friendships. It acknowledges

00:10:03.230 --> 00:10:05.509
that things didn't work out, but it doesn't seem

00:10:05.509 --> 00:10:07.590
to dwell in bitterness at all. Right. It fits

00:10:07.590 --> 00:10:09.629
that country sensibility we talked about earlier.

00:10:09.970 --> 00:10:12.129
It's storytelling, it's looking back, but ultimately

00:10:12.129 --> 00:10:14.129
moving forward. It's almost like she's saying,

00:10:14.250 --> 00:10:16.870
I hope you're doing well, but we are definitively

00:10:16.870 --> 00:10:19.370
done. Which is actually a much more grown up

00:10:19.370 --> 00:10:22.970
sentiment than, say, I keyed your car. And Perry...

00:10:22.970 --> 00:10:25.809
really leaned into that narrative for the rollout.

00:10:25.970 --> 00:10:27.590
Do you remember the caption she used when she

00:10:27.590 --> 00:10:30.250
first teased the song on social media? Yeah,

00:10:30.330 --> 00:10:33.309
it was. Here's the truth of it. That is brilliant

00:10:33.309 --> 00:10:36.250
marketing psychology. Really? Why is that? Because

00:10:36.250 --> 00:10:39.309
it signals intimacy. It breaks the fourth wall.

00:10:39.990 --> 00:10:42.730
When you are in a girl group, the narrative is

00:10:42.730 --> 00:10:45.289
almost always shared. It's our story. Right,

00:10:45.289 --> 00:10:48.090
the collective. When you go solo, you have to

00:10:48.090 --> 00:10:50.289
convince the audience that they are finally meeting

00:10:50.289 --> 00:10:53.830
the real you by saying, Here's the truth. She's

00:10:53.830 --> 00:10:56.470
inviting the listener into her confidence. She's

00:10:56.470 --> 00:10:58.450
building a parasocial bond immediately. Like

00:10:58.450 --> 00:11:00.669
she's whispering a secret to you. OK, the other

00:11:00.669 --> 00:11:02.269
girls aren't here now. Let me tell you what really

00:11:02.269 --> 00:11:05.210
happened. Exactly. It creates a personal narrative,

00:11:05.429 --> 00:11:07.529
which is absolutely crucial when you are trying

00:11:07.529 --> 00:11:10.529
to separate yourself from a massive group identity.

00:11:10.909 --> 00:11:13.870
So she teases the truth. She drops the single.

00:11:14.409 --> 00:11:16.789
Now let's talk about the visuals and the rollout.

00:11:16.830 --> 00:11:19.210
Because she did not do this by halves. She went

00:11:19.210 --> 00:11:21.669
big. She certainly did. Let's talk about the

00:11:21.669 --> 00:11:23.950
music video. Filmed in Cape Town, South Africa.

00:11:24.169 --> 00:11:27.809
Which provides just a stunning, expansive backdrop.

00:11:28.110 --> 00:11:30.370
Again, fitting that sun -dappled vibe we mentioned.

00:11:30.470 --> 00:11:32.669
Yeah, it wasn't filmed on some dark soundstage

00:11:32.669 --> 00:11:35.370
in Burbank. Right. It feels organic and huge.

00:11:35.570 --> 00:11:38.710
And it was directed by Jake Nava. Who is a massive

00:11:38.710 --> 00:11:41.690
name in British music videos. He is royalty.

00:11:41.970 --> 00:11:45.029
He's worked with Beyonce, Adele. Hiring him is

00:11:45.029 --> 00:11:46.750
a statement of intent. It tells the industry,

00:11:47.129 --> 00:11:49.610
I am not an indie artist experimenting. I'm a

00:11:49.610 --> 00:11:51.710
main pop girl. And we should mention she teased

00:11:51.710 --> 00:11:54.110
it on the Jonathan Ross show on April 13th, right

00:11:54.110 --> 00:11:56.870
before the full release on April 19th. Yes. And

00:11:56.870 --> 00:11:58.870
the rollout wasn't just digital. She was physically

00:11:58.870 --> 00:12:01.590
out there. The sources detail a pretty extensive

00:12:01.590 --> 00:12:03.970
promotional tour. She was doing listening parties

00:12:03.970 --> 00:12:07.149
across London for fans and critics. Those listening

00:12:07.149 --> 00:12:10.049
parties are so incredibly smart. Think about

00:12:10.049 --> 00:12:12.590
it. You invite your hardcore fans into a room.

00:12:13.070 --> 00:12:15.070
You play them the song before anyone else in

00:12:15.070 --> 00:12:17.710
the world hears it. You make them feel like insiders.

00:12:17.870 --> 00:12:20.110
And then they go online and defend the song with

00:12:20.110 --> 00:12:22.190
their lives because they feel like they're literally

00:12:22.190 --> 00:12:25.090
part of the team. Exactly. It mobilizes the base.

00:12:25.549 --> 00:12:27.889
And she wasn't just in the UK. She was doing

00:12:27.889 --> 00:12:31.110
radio visits in France, the UK, and Amsterdam.

00:12:31.259 --> 00:12:34.740
Oh, wow. Amsterdam, too. Yes. It shows a real

00:12:34.740 --> 00:12:37.360
desire to compete on an international level right

00:12:37.360 --> 00:12:39.720
out of the gate. She wasn't just resting on her

00:12:39.720 --> 00:12:42.019
UK fame. And we can't forget the live performances.

00:12:42.100 --> 00:12:44.240
And this is honestly where my anxiety would have

00:12:44.240 --> 00:12:46.019
picked in. She hit the festival circuit. Well,

00:12:46.139 --> 00:12:48.019
the ball circuit, I should say. Yes. Capital

00:12:48.019 --> 00:12:52.240
FM's summertime ball in June 2024 and then the

00:12:52.240 --> 00:12:55.519
Jingle Bell ball in December 2024. These are

00:12:55.519 --> 00:12:58.559
huge stadium events. We're talking Wembley Stadium.

00:12:59.200 --> 00:13:02.879
80 ,000 people. Talk about a trial by fire. You've

00:13:02.879 --> 00:13:05.159
spent a decade with three other girls on stage

00:13:05.159 --> 00:13:07.720
to banter with, to harmonize with. If you forget

00:13:07.720 --> 00:13:10.440
a lyric, someone else is singing. Suddenly, you

00:13:10.440 --> 00:13:13.299
are on that stage completely alone. It's the

00:13:13.299 --> 00:13:15.700
ultimate test of stage presence. You have to

00:13:15.700 --> 00:13:17.659
fill that space physically and sonically all

00:13:17.659 --> 00:13:20.620
by yourself. The sources confirm she played those

00:13:20.620 --> 00:13:23.059
gigs, which shows she was ready to stand on her

00:13:23.059 --> 00:13:26.019
own two feet immediately. So she did the work.

00:13:26.259 --> 00:13:29.299
She had the song, the big video, the international

00:13:29.299 --> 00:13:33.000
promo tour, the stadium shows. The big question

00:13:33.000 --> 00:13:35.960
is, did it actually work? Let's look at the scoreboard.

00:13:36.120 --> 00:13:37.919
This is where we get to see the actual result

00:13:37.919 --> 00:13:40.539
of that rebranding. The song debuted at number

00:13:40.539 --> 00:13:44.019
10 on the UK singles chart. Top 10 debut. Now

00:13:44.019 --> 00:13:46.830
I can hear a cynical listener saying, Only number

00:13:46.830 --> 00:13:49.950
10. Little Mix used to get number ones all the

00:13:49.950 --> 00:13:52.549
time. And that is a very dangerous comparison

00:13:52.549 --> 00:13:54.669
to make. We have to contextualize this. In the

00:13:54.669 --> 00:13:57.029
current streaming era, the charts are incredibly

00:13:57.029 --> 00:13:59.909
stagnant. It is very hard to break into the top

00:13:59.909 --> 00:14:02.490
10 as a new solo act, even if you're already

00:14:02.490 --> 00:14:04.110
famous. That's true. It's a totally different

00:14:04.110 --> 00:14:07.049
landscape now. A top 10 debut validates that

00:14:07.049 --> 00:14:09.700
the core audience migrated with her. It proves

00:14:09.700 --> 00:14:12.360
she has standalone fan base and the sources say

00:14:12.360 --> 00:14:14.419
it did even better on the sales charts, right?

00:14:14.519 --> 00:14:16.960
It did. It topped the UK singles downloads chart

00:14:16.960 --> 00:14:19.639
and peaked at number two on a sales chart. What

00:14:19.639 --> 00:14:21.620
does that actually tell us? Because nobody downloads

00:14:21.620 --> 00:14:23.740
music anymore, right? We all just stream on our

00:14:23.740 --> 00:14:27.559
phones. Casual listeners stream, super fans buy.

00:14:28.500 --> 00:14:31.539
Topping the download chart means her core audience

00:14:31.539 --> 00:14:34.879
is highly engaged and willing to spend actual

00:14:34.879 --> 00:14:37.789
money to support her. That is a much more valuable

00:14:37.789 --> 00:14:40.350
metric for a long -term career than passive streaming

00:14:40.350 --> 00:14:42.610
numbers. That is a really good point. You can't

00:14:42.610 --> 00:14:44.889
build a massive arena tour on people who just

00:14:44.889 --> 00:14:46.450
have you on a background playlist while they

00:14:46.450 --> 00:14:48.269
do dishes. You need people who will buy the ticket.

00:14:48.549 --> 00:14:51.750
Correct. And that silver certification, which

00:14:51.750 --> 00:14:55.450
in the UK means 200 ,000 units shifted, confirms

00:14:55.450 --> 00:14:58.090
that commercial viability. It wasn't just a UK

00:14:58.090 --> 00:14:59.950
thing either. I saw some other countries popping

00:14:59.950 --> 00:15:03.129
up in the data. Yes. It charted in Ireland. It

00:15:03.129 --> 00:15:05.289
hit the Hot Singles chart in New Zealand and

00:15:05.289 --> 00:15:08.350
the Heatseeker chart in Sweden. It shows global

00:15:08.350 --> 00:15:10.529
curiosity. Now, you mentioned earlier that this

00:15:10.529 --> 00:15:12.470
is a case study. We have the single. We have

00:15:12.470 --> 00:15:14.889
the success. But what is this leading towards?

00:15:15.230 --> 00:15:17.330
This is the lead single for her debut album,

00:15:17.490 --> 00:15:20.850
which is self -titled Perry. But here's the wrinkle

00:15:20.850 --> 00:15:22.730
in the timeline that I found most interesting.

00:15:23.649 --> 00:15:27.610
The single dropped in April 2024. The album is

00:15:27.610 --> 00:15:30.700
slated for 2025. Whoa, wait, the single came

00:15:30.700 --> 00:15:34.080
out in April 2024, but the album is 2025. That

00:15:34.080 --> 00:15:37.659
is a massive gap. In pop ears, that's like an

00:15:37.659 --> 00:15:39.980
entire century. It is a very long time. Usually

00:15:39.980 --> 00:15:42.440
you drop the single and the album comes out like

00:15:42.440 --> 00:15:44.960
six weeks later to capitalize on the hype. Why

00:15:44.960 --> 00:15:47.100
wait a full year? It creates a very long runway.

00:15:47.519 --> 00:15:49.919
It suggests a strategy of building momentum slowly,

00:15:50.259 --> 00:15:52.720
releasing more singles, and establishing a real

00:15:52.720 --> 00:15:55.419
catalog before dropping the full project. It's

00:15:55.419 --> 00:15:58.059
a marathon, not a sprint. It also gives listeners

00:15:58.059 --> 00:16:00.779
time to get used to Perry, the solo artist, versus

00:16:00.779 --> 00:16:03.320
Perry from Little Mix. Exactly. Prevents a flash

00:16:03.320 --> 00:16:05.320
in the pan effect. And looking at the critical

00:16:05.320 --> 00:16:07.620
reception we talked about, that strategy seems

00:16:07.620 --> 00:16:09.919
to be working. Lars Brandl at Billboard called

00:16:09.919 --> 00:16:12.600
it a polished pop ballad. Holly Alton hailed

00:16:12.600 --> 00:16:15.580
it as the perfect pop debut. Perfect pop debut.

00:16:15.659 --> 00:16:17.519
You really can't ask for a better quote than

00:16:17.519 --> 00:16:20.059
that to put on your promotional poster. It validates

00:16:20.059 --> 00:16:22.559
the choice to go with a sound that is familiar,

00:16:22.919 --> 00:16:26.320
but elevated. She didn't try to release an experimental

00:16:26.320 --> 00:16:29.419
jazz odyssey. She released a polished, high quality

00:16:29.419 --> 00:16:31.919
pop song that played directly to her strengths.

00:16:32.419 --> 00:16:34.600
So let's recap the journey here. We started with

00:16:34.600 --> 00:16:37.440
an Ed Sheeran demo. Perry takes it, reworks it

00:16:37.440 --> 00:16:39.600
in her London home studio to make it the truth.

00:16:39.870 --> 00:16:42.750
She teams up with a rock veteran from Evanescence

00:16:42.750 --> 00:16:45.730
to build this country pop anthem structure. She

00:16:45.730 --> 00:16:48.090
launches it with a massive video in Cape Town,

00:16:48.509 --> 00:16:51.409
hits the top 10, tops the sales charts, and sets

00:16:51.409 --> 00:16:54.269
the stage for a 2025 album. It is a textbook

00:16:54.269 --> 00:16:56.970
execution of the solo launch. It really is. It

00:16:56.970 --> 00:16:58.870
feels like she managed to thread that needle

00:16:58.870 --> 00:17:02.269
of being new, but also being the Perry everyone

00:17:02.269 --> 00:17:04.569
fell in love with years ago. And that brings

00:17:04.569 --> 00:17:06.470
me to a provocative thought for you listening

00:17:06.470 --> 00:17:08.970
to Takeaway. I've been thinking about this while

00:17:08.970 --> 00:17:10.970
reviewing all these sources. OK, late on us.

00:17:10.990 --> 00:17:13.029
What's the big takeaway? We often obsess over

00:17:13.029 --> 00:17:15.869
reinvention in pop music. We want artists to

00:17:15.869 --> 00:17:17.930
shock us. We want the Miley Cyrus sticking her

00:17:17.930 --> 00:17:20.309
tongue out moment. We want them to destroy their

00:17:20.309 --> 00:17:22.089
old image and build something radically different.

00:17:22.509 --> 00:17:25.089
Right. The good girl gone bad narrative. We expect

00:17:25.089 --> 00:17:27.190
them to dye their hair and start singing heavy

00:17:27.190 --> 00:17:30.289
metal. Exactly. But Perry's approach with Forget

00:17:30.289 --> 00:17:33.230
About Us raises a completely different question.

00:17:33.650 --> 00:17:36.859
Is there more value in refinement? than reinvention.

00:17:36.960 --> 00:17:38.799
Oh, that's interesting. So instead of burning

00:17:38.799 --> 00:17:41.220
it down, you just polish it up. Exactly. When

00:17:41.220 --> 00:17:43.500
you come from a massive group like Little Mix,

00:17:44.200 --> 00:17:46.279
maybe the boldest move isn't to run away from

00:17:46.279 --> 00:17:48.819
pop, but to look the audience in the eye and

00:17:48.819 --> 00:17:52.359
say, I can do this better than anyone else. By

00:17:52.359 --> 00:17:55.039
bridging the gap with familiar excellence, she

00:17:55.039 --> 00:17:57.579
might be building a more sustainable foundation

00:17:57.579 --> 00:18:00.319
than if she had tried to shock the system just

00:18:00.319 --> 00:18:02.519
for the sake of headlines. That is a great point.

00:18:02.799 --> 00:18:04.680
Sometimes just being really, really good at what

00:18:04.680 --> 00:18:06.700
you do is the most radical statement of all.

00:18:06.900 --> 00:18:09.240
Indeed. It's about confidence in your craft,

00:18:09.579 --> 00:18:11.779
not just your image. Well, thank you so much

00:18:11.779 --> 00:18:14.160
for walking us through this deep dive. It's fascinating

00:18:14.160 --> 00:18:16.200
to peek behind the curtain of a song like this.

00:18:16.420 --> 00:18:18.380
It's not just a melody, it's a full business

00:18:18.380 --> 00:18:20.579
strategy. My pleasure. And for you listening,

00:18:20.799 --> 00:18:22.920
I have a little homework assignment. Next time

00:18:22.920 --> 00:18:24.859
Forget About Us comes on your playlist, and it

00:18:24.859 --> 00:18:26.900
probably will because it's catchy as heck. Do

00:18:26.900 --> 00:18:29.480
me a favor. Wait for that bridge. Don't just

00:18:29.480 --> 00:18:32.059
sing along. Really listen to how she navigates

00:18:32.059 --> 00:18:34.480
those low notes before she belts it out. That

00:18:34.480 --> 00:18:36.759
is the sound of an artist claiming her space.

00:18:37.299 --> 00:18:38.880
Thanks for listening, and we'll catch you on

00:18:38.880 --> 00:18:39.740
the next deep dive.
