WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.960
OK, so let's unpack this. We live in a world

00:00:03.960 --> 00:00:07.040
that is just absolutely obsessed with categorization.

00:00:07.259 --> 00:00:09.839
Oh, completely. I mean, it's the way our brains

00:00:09.839 --> 00:00:12.720
are wired, right? Right. We want to know, is

00:00:12.720 --> 00:00:15.759
this person an athlete or are they an artist?

00:00:15.779 --> 00:00:19.320
Right. Is this band indie rock or they're pop?

00:00:19.679 --> 00:00:22.640
Are you the guy in the dive bar with the sticky

00:00:22.640 --> 00:00:25.260
floor? Yeah. Or are you the guy in the tuxedo

00:00:25.260 --> 00:00:27.199
at the symphony hall? We love our little boxes.

00:00:27.399 --> 00:00:29.879
Well. It is human nature. I mean, we categorize

00:00:29.879 --> 00:00:32.359
to understand things. It's a survival mechanism,

00:00:32.399 --> 00:00:34.640
really. If we can label something, we feel like

00:00:34.640 --> 00:00:36.679
we can predict it. Exactly. But the problem with

00:00:36.679 --> 00:00:40.140
those boxes is that they are inherently limiting.

00:00:40.840 --> 00:00:44.200
And usually the most interesting things, the

00:00:44.200 --> 00:00:46.299
things that actually change culture, they happen

00:00:46.299 --> 00:00:48.280
right on the jagged edges where those boxes start

00:00:48.280 --> 00:00:50.840
to tear apart. The friction point. Exactly. And

00:00:50.840 --> 00:00:53.859
today we are taking a deep dive into the story

00:00:53.859 --> 00:00:56.479
of someone who doesn't just, you know, tear the

00:00:56.479 --> 00:00:59.399
cardboard, he essentially takes the boxes, sets

00:00:59.399 --> 00:01:02.640
them on fire, and then conducts a full orchestra

00:01:02.640 --> 00:01:04.799
while they burn. That is a great way to put it.

00:01:05.019 --> 00:01:07.760
We are talking about Ellis Ludwig Leone. A truly

00:01:07.760 --> 00:01:10.420
fascinating subject. Because if you look at the

00:01:10.420 --> 00:01:13.120
contemporary soundscape, let's say the last 10

00:01:13.120 --> 00:01:14.959
to 15 years of music coming out of New York,

00:01:15.420 --> 00:01:18.760
Ellis Ludwig Leone occupies a very specific,

00:01:18.900 --> 00:01:21.200
almost impossible coordinate. He really does.

00:01:21.319 --> 00:01:23.500
I mean, most people, if they know the name at

00:01:23.500 --> 00:01:26.599
all, they know him as the brain behind the band

00:01:26.599 --> 00:01:29.280
San Fermin. Yes. And if you've heard them, you

00:01:29.280 --> 00:01:32.200
know it's not your typical four dudes in a garage

00:01:32.200 --> 00:01:35.280
situation. Not at all. It's big. It's brassy.

00:01:35.459 --> 00:01:38.560
It's complicated. It feels huge. But here's where

00:01:38.560 --> 00:01:40.760
it gets really interesting for this deep dive.

00:01:41.180 --> 00:01:43.879
That band is just the tip of the iceberg. It

00:01:43.879 --> 00:01:46.579
really is. It might even be a red herring. Precisely.

00:01:46.719 --> 00:01:49.099
Because if we limit our view of him to just,

00:01:49.099 --> 00:01:52.879
you know, indie pop bandleader, we miss the much

00:01:52.879 --> 00:01:56.040
larger, much stranger picture entirely. Right.

00:01:56.379 --> 00:01:58.159
This is a composer who treats a pop band like

00:01:58.159 --> 00:02:00.799
a symphony orchestra. And conversely, he treats

00:02:00.799 --> 00:02:02.879
a symphony orchestra like a storytelling device.

00:02:04.000 --> 00:02:06.400
He is applying the rigor of classical composition

00:02:06.400 --> 00:02:09.330
to the chaotic energy of a rock club. Which is

00:02:09.330 --> 00:02:12.270
wild. So our mission today, our goal for this

00:02:12.270 --> 00:02:15.750
deep dive is to figure out how a kid from rural

00:02:15.750 --> 00:02:18.870
Massachusetts went from playing competitive basketball.

00:02:19.009 --> 00:02:20.949
Which we definitely need to talk about. Oh, absolutely.

00:02:21.069 --> 00:02:22.810
I want to put a huge pin in the basketball thing

00:02:22.810 --> 00:02:25.729
because it's actually so important. But how he

00:02:25.729 --> 00:02:28.889
goes from that to writing ballets for the New

00:02:28.889 --> 00:02:31.169
York City Ballet and leading one of the most

00:02:31.169 --> 00:02:34.599
ambitious touring acts in indie music. It is

00:02:34.599 --> 00:02:37.000
a journey into the architecture of sound. The

00:02:37.000 --> 00:02:39.400
architecture of sound? I love that. That is the

00:02:39.400 --> 00:02:41.099
theme I really want you to keep in mind today

00:02:41.099 --> 00:02:43.360
as we go through this. Whether he is writing

00:02:43.360 --> 00:02:46.919
for a sweaty rock venue or Lincoln Center, Ludwig

00:02:46.919 --> 00:02:49.780
Leone is building structures. He is an architect

00:02:49.780 --> 00:02:52.539
first and a musician second. OK, so let's look

00:02:52.539 --> 00:02:55.039
at the blueprints. We have a massive stack of

00:02:55.039 --> 00:02:57.460
sources here for this deep dive. We do. We've

00:02:57.460 --> 00:03:00.379
got biographical data, career history, extensive

00:03:00.379 --> 00:03:03.479
lists of compositions, discographies, interviews,

00:03:03.680 --> 00:03:05.719
you name it. And honestly, just scanning the

00:03:05.719 --> 00:03:07.879
list of his works is a little dizzying. It is

00:03:07.879 --> 00:03:10.180
a lot to take in. You have a track listing for

00:03:10.180 --> 00:03:12.719
a pop album sitting right next to a commission

00:03:12.719 --> 00:03:16.360
for the Alabama Symphony Orchestra. It literally

00:03:16.360 --> 00:03:18.789
looks like a clerical error. Which speaks perfectly

00:03:18.789 --> 00:03:21.069
to that refusal to be categorized that we mentioned

00:03:21.069 --> 00:03:23.849
earlier. But to understand how he got there,

00:03:24.289 --> 00:03:25.969
we have to go back to the beginning. The foundation.

00:03:26.289 --> 00:03:28.490
Exactly. We need to look at the foundation. Because

00:03:28.490 --> 00:03:30.569
you don't just wake up one day and decide to

00:03:30.569 --> 00:03:33.210
write a ballet and a rock album in the exact

00:03:33.210 --> 00:03:36.330
same week. Right. That duality has to be baked

00:03:36.330 --> 00:03:38.629
in from the start. Let's do it. Origin story

00:03:38.629 --> 00:03:43.069
time. So Ellis Ledwig Leone, born in 1989 in

00:03:43.069 --> 00:03:46.150
Rhode Island, but he grew up in Berkeley, Massachusetts.

00:03:46.229 --> 00:03:48.580
Now I look this up. Berkeley, Massachusetts is

00:03:48.580 --> 00:03:50.639
very much not Berkeley, California. No, it is

00:03:50.639 --> 00:03:53.020
decidedly not. Right. It is a rural community

00:03:53.020 --> 00:03:56.819
on the South Coast. It's quiet. It's isolated.

00:03:57.159 --> 00:03:58.580
It's the kind of place we have a lot of space

00:03:58.580 --> 00:04:00.259
to think, but also the kind of place where you

00:04:00.259 --> 00:04:02.580
might get incredibly bored if you don't have

00:04:02.580 --> 00:04:05.139
an active imagination. Right. But his house,

00:04:05.520 --> 00:04:08.960
probably not so quiet. Or at least visually loud,

00:04:08.960 --> 00:04:11.500
if that makes sense. Because his parents were

00:04:11.500 --> 00:04:14.080
both painters and former visual arts professors.

00:04:14.300 --> 00:04:16.740
And this is a really crucial detail. Yeah. We

00:04:16.740 --> 00:04:19.540
so often talk about musical families, where the

00:04:19.540 --> 00:04:22.040
dad played jazz or the mom was an opera singer.

00:04:22.819 --> 00:04:25.649
But growing up in a visual arts household, is

00:04:25.649 --> 00:04:28.529
fundamentally different. How so? Well, imagine

00:04:28.529 --> 00:04:30.730
growing up in an environment where the primary

00:04:30.730 --> 00:04:34.069
language isn't just English, it's color, it's

00:04:34.069 --> 00:04:37.490
texture, it's balance and composition. When you

00:04:37.490 --> 00:04:40.470
are raised by visual artists, you learn to see

00:04:40.470 --> 00:04:42.670
the world differently from day one. You learn

00:04:42.670 --> 00:04:45.129
about foreground and background. I was actually

00:04:45.129 --> 00:04:46.589
thinking about that when I was going through

00:04:46.589 --> 00:04:50.529
the sources. Do you think he sees music? Like

00:04:50.529 --> 00:04:52.410
when he's writing a song, is he thinking in terms

00:04:52.410 --> 00:04:55.569
of painting? It is highly probable. I mean, there

00:04:55.569 --> 00:04:58.310
is a clinical concept called synesthesia where

00:04:58.310 --> 00:05:00.449
senses actually overlap. Right. Where you hear

00:05:00.449 --> 00:05:03.329
a C major chord and see the color yellow. Exactly.

00:05:03.480 --> 00:05:06.639
But even without that specific clinical diagnosis,

00:05:07.060 --> 00:05:09.180
the vocabulary of visual art is definitely there

00:05:09.180 --> 00:05:11.300
in his work. When you listen to his arrangements,

00:05:11.439 --> 00:05:13.579
especially in Sanfermin or his orchestral work,

00:05:13.980 --> 00:05:16.000
he doesn't just write a simple melody and slack

00:05:16.000 --> 00:05:18.319
some chords under it. No, definitely not. He

00:05:18.319 --> 00:05:22.259
layers. He creates immense density. He uses instruments,

00:05:22.660 --> 00:05:24.680
almost like a painter uses a palette knife. Oh,

00:05:24.680 --> 00:05:26.540
that's interesting. He's adding a sharp splash

00:05:26.540 --> 00:05:29.360
of brass here to brighten the image or a wide

00:05:29.360 --> 00:05:32.089
wash of strings over there to create depth. It's

00:05:32.089 --> 00:05:34.949
very, very textural. It's not linear. It's spatial.

00:05:35.269 --> 00:05:38.250
Exactly. He is quite literally filling a canvas.

00:05:38.990 --> 00:05:41.189
So he's painting with sound. That makes perfect

00:05:41.189 --> 00:05:44.529
sense given the background. But here's the curve

00:05:44.529 --> 00:05:46.329
ball. And this is the part I really wanted to

00:05:46.329 --> 00:05:49.509
dig into earlier. He wasn't just the artsy kid

00:05:49.509 --> 00:05:51.290
sitting in the corner sketching in a notebook

00:05:51.290 --> 00:05:53.470
while everyone else was outside. No, he was not.

00:05:53.509 --> 00:05:55.550
He played competitive basketball, which is a

00:05:55.550 --> 00:05:58.910
detail I absolutely love because it completely

00:05:58.910 --> 00:06:02.089
shatters the stereotype of the fragile, brooding

00:06:02.089 --> 00:06:04.589
indoor composer. Right. I mean, I'm picturing

00:06:04.589 --> 00:06:06.910
this guy practicing these intricate scales on

00:06:06.910 --> 00:06:09.889
the piano for three hours and then lacing up

00:06:09.889 --> 00:06:12.029
his sneakers and running suicide drills on the

00:06:12.029 --> 00:06:13.790
court. It feels like two completely different

00:06:13.790 --> 00:06:16.949
people inhabiting the same body. It seems contradictory

00:06:16.949 --> 00:06:19.790
on On the surface, yes. But I want to challenge

00:06:19.790 --> 00:06:22.490
that assumption. Because if you really think

00:06:22.490 --> 00:06:25.550
about it, there is a very strong parallel between

00:06:25.550 --> 00:06:28.029
the two. Really? Between piano and basketball?

00:06:28.269 --> 00:06:32.110
Absolutely. Both require intense, repetitive,

00:06:32.389 --> 00:06:35.009
almost grueling discipline. You don't get good

00:06:35.009 --> 00:06:37.449
at classical piano by just feeling the music.

00:06:37.689 --> 00:06:39.589
And you don't get good at basketball by just

00:06:39.589 --> 00:06:41.930
showing up to the game. Yeah, that's true. It's

00:06:41.930 --> 00:06:44.329
trill work. It's repetition. It's building muscle

00:06:44.329 --> 00:06:47.259
memory until the action becomes instinct. The

00:06:47.259 --> 00:06:49.959
grind is exactly the same. But I want to pause

00:06:49.959 --> 00:06:51.660
on this basketball detail for another second

00:06:51.660 --> 00:06:53.439
because I think it's more than just a fun fact

00:06:53.439 --> 00:06:56.079
about his work ethic. We have a note here from

00:06:56.079 --> 00:06:58.740
one of the interviews in our sources where Ludwig

00:06:58.740 --> 00:07:01.480
Leoni talks specifically about the role of the

00:07:01.480 --> 00:07:04.379
point guard. Right. And this is where the psychology

00:07:04.379 --> 00:07:06.540
of the composer really starts to reveal itself.

00:07:07.000 --> 00:07:08.779
If you think about the point guard in basketball,

00:07:09.560 --> 00:07:11.540
they aren't just out there scoring points. No,

00:07:11.620 --> 00:07:13.519
they're running the play. They are the floor

00:07:13.519 --> 00:07:15.779
general. They have to see the spatial geometry

00:07:15.779 --> 00:07:18.120
of 10 massive people moving around the court

00:07:18.120 --> 00:07:20.600
in real time. They have to know where everyone

00:07:20.600 --> 00:07:22.480
is supposed to be before they even get there.

00:07:22.620 --> 00:07:25.279
Which is exactly what a conductor does. Exactly.

00:07:25.699 --> 00:07:29.319
A conductor or a composer writing for eight distinct

00:07:29.319 --> 00:07:33.290
instruments is managing traffic. They are anticipating

00:07:33.290 --> 00:07:35.589
the crash before it happens. They are controlling

00:07:35.589 --> 00:07:38.730
the flow of time and energy. Ludwig Leone has

00:07:38.730 --> 00:07:40.689
this great quote where he compares the flow state

00:07:40.689 --> 00:07:43.490
of a fast break in basketball to the flow state

00:07:43.490 --> 00:07:46.069
of navigating a really complex polyrhythm in

00:07:46.069 --> 00:07:52.240
music. completely strips the elitism out of the

00:07:52.240 --> 00:07:54.000
classical side of things. It really does. It

00:07:54.000 --> 00:07:56.720
turns the orchestra into a team sport. It makes

00:07:56.720 --> 00:07:58.920
the conductor the point guard. And I think it

00:07:58.920 --> 00:08:00.540
explains the aggression in some of his music,

00:08:00.800 --> 00:08:03.240
too. The aggression. Yes. We tend to think of

00:08:03.240 --> 00:08:07.180
the genre chamber pop as delicate, you know,

00:08:07.399 --> 00:08:09.879
tea and doilies, polite little string sections.

00:08:10.000 --> 00:08:12.199
Yeah. But if you listen to a track like Jackrabbit,

00:08:12.379 --> 00:08:14.240
which we will definitely discuss later. We are

00:08:14.240 --> 00:08:16.639
absolutely talking about Jackrabbit. That track

00:08:16.639 --> 00:08:20.339
isn't delicate. It's athletic. It's muscular.

00:08:20.819 --> 00:08:23.819
It practically sweats. It's a contact sport.

00:08:23.980 --> 00:08:26.060
The brass section isn't asking for permission.

00:08:26.220 --> 00:08:29.600
It's driving the lane hard. Exactly. There is

00:08:29.600 --> 00:08:32.779
a real physicality to his music. It drives. It

00:08:32.779 --> 00:08:35.519
has momentum It's not passive background music

00:08:35.519 --> 00:08:37.759
and don't forget while he was doing the classical

00:08:37.759 --> 00:08:39.620
piano thing and the competitive basketball thing

00:08:39.620 --> 00:08:42.240
He was also doing the very normal teenager thing

00:08:42.240 --> 00:08:44.580
which is playing in a string of high school rock

00:08:44.580 --> 00:08:47.799
bands Oh, right the classic garage band phase

00:08:47.799 --> 00:08:51.200
the loud messy. Let's completely annoy the neighbors

00:08:51.200 --> 00:08:54.200
phase exactly But notice the duality starting

00:08:54.200 --> 00:08:57.679
even back then in high school by day He's studying

00:08:57.679 --> 00:08:59.960
the intricate mathematical structure of classical

00:08:59.960 --> 00:09:03.200
piano. Bach, Beethoven, the strict rules of harmony.

00:09:03.820 --> 00:09:06.059
But by night, he's probably banging out power

00:09:06.059 --> 00:09:08.460
chords in a rock band, where the only real rule

00:09:08.460 --> 00:09:10.820
is, be as loud as possible. It's two different

00:09:10.820 --> 00:09:13.279
worlds. And most kids eventually choose one lane.

00:09:13.620 --> 00:09:15.639
They either get serious, go to the conservatory

00:09:15.639 --> 00:09:18.600
and drop the rock stuff, or they buy a van and

00:09:18.600 --> 00:09:20.769
abandon the classical training. He didn't choose.

00:09:20.990 --> 00:09:22.649
He just kept widening the highway so he could

00:09:22.649 --> 00:09:25.129
drive in both lanes at the exact same time. And

00:09:25.129 --> 00:09:26.789
speaking of that highway, we have to talk about

00:09:26.789 --> 00:09:29.830
a really critical pit stop. So he's 15 years

00:09:29.830 --> 00:09:32.490
old. He goes to a summer program at the Berklee

00:09:32.490 --> 00:09:35.029
College of Music in Boston. And he meets a guy

00:09:35.029 --> 00:09:38.269
named Alan Tate. This is what I would call a

00:09:38.269 --> 00:09:41.309
true catalyst moment in his life. Without this

00:09:41.309 --> 00:09:43.639
specific meeting, The rest of the story we're

00:09:43.639 --> 00:09:45.500
talking about today probably doesn't happen.

00:09:45.779 --> 00:09:48.059
Alan Tate, if you know Sanfermin at all, you

00:09:48.059 --> 00:09:50.500
know that voice. Oh, you can't miss it. It's

00:09:50.500 --> 00:09:53.639
this deep, incredible baritone. It sounds like

00:09:53.639 --> 00:09:56.220
it's coming from the bottom of a very dark well.

00:09:56.679 --> 00:09:59.220
And they met when they were 15. 15 years old.

00:09:59.320 --> 00:10:01.360
Yeah. And consider the odds of that for a second.

00:10:01.740 --> 00:10:03.659
You meet someone at a summer camp as a teenager,

00:10:04.279 --> 00:10:06.580
and that person ends up becoming your primary

00:10:06.580 --> 00:10:09.740
creative partner for the next two decades. It

00:10:09.740 --> 00:10:12.379
never happens. Usually summer camp friends drift

00:10:12.379 --> 00:10:15.100
apart after a few months of texting. It's wild.

00:10:15.200 --> 00:10:17.179
It's like meeting your Lenin or McCartney in

00:10:17.179 --> 00:10:19.779
sophomore homeroom. But let's talk about that

00:10:19.779 --> 00:10:21.580
voice for a second because it's not just a cool

00:10:21.580 --> 00:10:25.220
voice. Why was Tate's specific vocal register

00:10:25.220 --> 00:10:28.259
so important for what Ellis wanted to build musically?

00:10:28.820 --> 00:10:30.659
Let's go back to the architecture metaphor again.

00:10:30.679 --> 00:10:33.620
Okay. If you are building a massive musical structure,

00:10:33.870 --> 00:10:37.029
with violins, trumpets, synthesizers, and female

00:10:37.029 --> 00:10:39.450
vocals, all of which are usually operating in

00:10:39.450 --> 00:10:42.470
a much higher sonic register, you need a foundation.

00:10:42.490 --> 00:10:44.710
You need a floor. You need something to anchor

00:10:44.710 --> 00:10:48.110
the whole thing to the earth. Alan Tate's voice

00:10:48.110 --> 00:10:52.669
is that anchor. It is steady. It's low, and it's

00:10:52.669 --> 00:10:54.649
incredibly resonant. It allows Ellis to build

00:10:54.649 --> 00:10:56.929
all these frantic, high -energy, high -pitch

00:10:56.929 --> 00:10:59.450
arrangements on top of it without the song just

00:10:59.450 --> 00:11:01.210
floating away into the stratosphere. So Tate

00:11:01.210 --> 00:11:03.330
literally provides the gravity for the music.

00:11:03.509 --> 00:11:05.389
Exactly. And it highlights the importance of

00:11:05.389 --> 00:11:08.049
those early networks. But I think it also tells

00:11:08.049 --> 00:11:10.649
us something profound about Lev Clione's loyalty

00:11:10.649 --> 00:11:13.570
and his artistic vision. He recognized something

00:11:13.570 --> 00:11:15.509
essential in Tate's voice, even when they were

00:11:15.509 --> 00:11:17.789
kids. Or perhaps they just clicked personally.

00:11:17.870 --> 00:11:20.230
But either way, he held onto that connection.

00:11:20.899 --> 00:11:23.860
Tate became the definitive voice of San Fermin.

00:11:24.220 --> 00:11:26.659
So let's recap where he's at. He's got the visual

00:11:26.659 --> 00:11:28.820
art background from his parents, the athletic

00:11:28.820 --> 00:11:31.940
discipline from basketball, the rock band experience,

00:11:32.100 --> 00:11:34.419
the classical piano chops, and now he's got his

00:11:34.419 --> 00:11:37.080
lead singer on speed dial. Right. But he doesn't

00:11:37.080 --> 00:11:38.840
just start the band and hit the road immediately.

00:11:38.940 --> 00:11:41.399
He goes to Yale. And this is where the classical

00:11:41.399 --> 00:11:44.360
composer identity really solidifies for him.

00:11:44.519 --> 00:11:48.259
He attends Yale University and graduates in 2011

00:11:48.259 --> 00:11:50.639
with a degree in classical composition. Which

00:11:50.639 --> 00:11:53.500
is serious stuff. Yale isn't exactly a garage

00:11:53.500 --> 00:11:56.480
band rehearsal space that's heavy academic rigor

00:11:56.480 --> 00:11:58.720
that is learning every single rule before you're

00:11:58.720 --> 00:12:00.639
allowed to break them. It is very traditional

00:12:00.639 --> 00:12:03.080
in many ways. Yeah. But what stands out in the

00:12:03.080 --> 00:12:05.379
source material we reviewed is that he wasn't

00:12:05.379 --> 00:12:08.299
just sitting quietly in a lecture hall analyzing

00:12:08.299 --> 00:12:11.269
Mozart scores. He was busy. He was incredibly

00:12:11.269 --> 00:12:14.309
active. He began writing music for his own bands

00:12:14.309 --> 00:12:16.809
and various ensembles while he was still studying.

00:12:17.210 --> 00:12:19.509
He was taking the theoretical concepts from the

00:12:19.509 --> 00:12:21.970
classroom and testing them in real time. He didn't

00:12:21.970 --> 00:12:24.389
wait for the fancy diploma to start doing the

00:12:24.389 --> 00:12:27.889
actual work. Not at all. And that immense drive

00:12:27.889 --> 00:12:31.870
led to another massive trajectory altering connection.

00:12:32.289 --> 00:12:34.909
While he was still a junior at Yale, he started

00:12:34.909 --> 00:12:37.370
working as an assistant for the composer, Nico

00:12:37.370 --> 00:12:39.399
Moly. Okay, for those listening who might not

00:12:39.399 --> 00:12:42.259
know, can you give us the deep dive on Nico Mulli?

00:12:42.460 --> 00:12:45.980
Gladly. Because why is that name drop so important?

00:12:46.279 --> 00:12:48.139
To the average person, that name might not mean

00:12:48.139 --> 00:12:51.519
much, but in this specific musical world, it's

00:12:51.519 --> 00:12:54.840
a huge deal. Nico Mulli is an absolute giant

00:12:54.840 --> 00:12:57.179
in the contemporary classical world, but more

00:12:57.179 --> 00:12:59.539
importantly for our story, he is essentially

00:12:59.539 --> 00:13:02.919
the prototype for the modern genre -less composer.

00:13:03.100 --> 00:13:05.659
The guy who breaks the boxes. Exactly. He is

00:13:05.659 --> 00:13:07.720
known for exactly the kind of thing Ludwig Lyon

00:13:07.720 --> 00:13:10.200
eventually does, blurring the lines completely.

00:13:10.740 --> 00:13:13.000
Moody has written grand operas for the Metropolitan

00:13:13.000 --> 00:13:15.399
Opera, but he's also worked intimately with massive

00:13:15.399 --> 00:13:17.759
indie bands like Grizzly Bear, The National,

00:13:17.919 --> 00:13:20.299
and Björk. He exists in both of those worlds

00:13:20.299 --> 00:13:22.460
completely comfortably. So getting to assist

00:13:22.460 --> 00:13:24.460
a guy like that, that's not just an internship,

00:13:24.580 --> 00:13:26.639
that's a master class in how to build a career.

00:13:27.059 --> 00:13:29.240
It is an apprenticeship in the truest, oldest

00:13:29.240 --> 00:13:31.860
sense of the word. But let's look at the timeline

00:13:31.860 --> 00:13:34.799
here, and what the Nico Mulli connection implies

00:13:34.799 --> 00:13:37.539
about the New York music ecosystem. Okay. It's

00:13:37.539 --> 00:13:40.240
not just that he got a good job. It's about who

00:13:40.240 --> 00:13:42.179
holds the keys to the city, right? It's about

00:13:42.179 --> 00:13:46.399
access. Precisely. Mulli is essentially the central

00:13:46.399 --> 00:13:49.980
hub of a very specific, very influential wheel

00:13:49.980 --> 00:13:53.399
in Manhattan. To sit in that room, to see exactly

00:13:53.399 --> 00:13:56.080
how Mulli works day to day, it teaches you the

00:13:56.080 --> 00:13:58.120
kitchen sink aesthetic. What do you mean by that?

00:13:58.480 --> 00:14:01.480
If you look at Mully's work, how he effortlessly

00:14:01.480 --> 00:14:03.399
integrates electronic beats with the Renaissance

00:14:03.399 --> 00:14:06.159
lute or a traditional choir with a synthesizer

00:14:06.159 --> 00:14:09.139
drone, you see the exact blueprint for what Ellis

00:14:09.139 --> 00:14:11.919
would later do with Sam Fairman. Ah, I see. He

00:14:11.919 --> 00:14:14.120
learned by watching Mully that there are absolutely

00:14:14.120 --> 00:14:16.860
no illegal combinations of instruments. So it's

00:14:16.860 --> 00:14:19.720
permission. Working for Mully gave him the permission

00:14:19.720 --> 00:14:22.840
to be weird, to try things that shouldn't work.

00:14:23.200 --> 00:14:27.100
Yes. And on a purely practical level, it bridges

00:14:27.100 --> 00:14:30.820
the gap between being a Yale student who writes

00:14:30.820 --> 00:14:33.639
academic papers about music and being a working

00:14:33.639 --> 00:14:36.419
artist who actually survives in the cutthroat

00:14:36.419 --> 00:14:38.340
ecosystem of New York City. Right, because you

00:14:38.340 --> 00:14:41.620
have to pay rent. Exactly. It established a lasting

00:14:41.620 --> 00:14:44.240
professional relationship, but more importantly,

00:14:44.519 --> 00:14:47.919
it likely showed Ludwig Lyon that a career straddling

00:14:47.919 --> 00:14:51.379
these two seemingly opposed worlds was actually

00:14:51.379 --> 00:14:54.039
financially and logistically possible. He saw

00:14:54.039 --> 00:14:56.200
someone doing it successful. Okay, so he graduates

00:14:56.200 --> 00:14:58.580
Yale in 2011. He's got the Ivy League degree.

00:14:58.659 --> 00:15:00.799
He's got the master apprentice mentorship with

00:15:00.799 --> 00:15:03.539
Nico Mouli. Now comes the turning point, the

00:15:03.539 --> 00:15:05.580
real origin of the sound, the cabin in the woods

00:15:05.580 --> 00:15:08.080
moment. Yes, the Banff residency. Yes, so he

00:15:08.080 --> 00:15:10.159
takes an artistic residency. at the Banff Center

00:15:10.159 --> 00:15:13.000
for Arts and Creativity in Alberta, Canada. Now,

00:15:13.220 --> 00:15:14.980
I looked this place up while prepping for this.

00:15:15.059 --> 00:15:17.960
It's stunning. It is gorgeous, but it is secluded.

00:15:18.100 --> 00:15:20.220
I mean, it's away from the noise of New York,

00:15:20.320 --> 00:15:23.139
away from the academic pressure of Yale. It's

00:15:23.139 --> 00:15:25.840
basically just giant mountains and a lot of snow.

00:15:26.139 --> 00:15:28.580
And we really need applause on this, because

00:15:28.580 --> 00:15:32.889
on paper, an artist residency... Sounds like

00:15:32.889 --> 00:15:35.429
a luxury vacation. Right. It sounds amazing.

00:15:35.610 --> 00:15:37.269
You go to Canada, you look at some beautiful

00:15:37.269 --> 00:15:39.029
mountains, you write some nice songs. Sounds

00:15:39.029 --> 00:15:41.149
incredibly relaxing, right? Sign me up tomorrow.

00:15:41.850 --> 00:15:45.289
But it is definitely not a vacation. Have you

00:15:45.289 --> 00:15:47.690
ever actually tried to be creative when you have

00:15:47.690 --> 00:15:50.009
absolute zero distractions? Oh, it's brutal.

00:15:50.809 --> 00:15:52.830
When there is no internet, no phone ringing?

00:15:53.100 --> 00:15:55.360
no friends to meet for coffee down the street.

00:15:55.700 --> 00:15:58.200
It's actually terrifying. It's the classic blank

00:15:58.200 --> 00:16:00.679
page problem, but the blank page is your entire

00:16:00.679 --> 00:16:03.559
life for six straight weeks. Exactly. Isolation

00:16:03.559 --> 00:16:06.159
can be a powerful tool for a composer, but it

00:16:06.159 --> 00:16:09.019
is a crucible. When you strip away all the daily

00:16:09.019 --> 00:16:11.559
inputs, the traffic noise, the phone calls, the

00:16:11.559 --> 00:16:13.940
social obligations, you are left with just your

00:16:13.940 --> 00:16:16.500
own internal noise, and you have to sort through

00:16:16.500 --> 00:16:18.429
it. And I read in the background notes from the

00:16:18.429 --> 00:16:20.990
sources that he spent weeks up there, essentially

00:16:20.990 --> 00:16:24.590
entirely alone in a small hut. No cell service,

00:16:24.669 --> 00:16:27.350
just him and a keyboard. And that kind of silence

00:16:27.350 --> 00:16:30.309
is deafeningly loud. This is the crucial moment

00:16:30.309 --> 00:16:33.129
for the Sansherman album. Up until this exact

00:16:33.129 --> 00:16:36.610
point, Ellis is a student. He's constantly surrounded

00:16:36.610 --> 00:16:40.070
by professors, by Nico Mulli, by the bustle of

00:16:40.070 --> 00:16:43.360
Yale in New York. Suddenly... He's in the middle

00:16:43.360 --> 00:16:45.679
of the Canadian wilderness, and he has to ask

00:16:45.679 --> 00:16:48.580
himself the scariest question an artist can ask.

00:16:48.980 --> 00:16:51.100
What do I actually sound like? When no one else

00:16:51.100 --> 00:16:53.480
is in the room? Exactly. And the sound he found

00:16:53.480 --> 00:16:55.879
up there wasn't quiet. That's the grand irony

00:16:55.879 --> 00:16:59.019
of this whole thing. He's in this silent, pristine,

00:16:59.240 --> 00:17:02.879
snowy landscape, and he writes an album that

00:17:02.879 --> 00:17:06.660
is explosive. It's chaotic, it's dense, and it's

00:17:06.660 --> 00:17:09.480
full of dozens of voices. I think that is the

00:17:09.480 --> 00:17:11.859
key psychological insight here. He was writing

00:17:11.859 --> 00:17:14.539
the company he wished he had. Oh, wow. He was

00:17:14.539 --> 00:17:16.740
populating that lonely cabin with imaginary friends

00:17:16.740 --> 00:17:18.839
here at the baritone, the soprano, the sweeping

00:17:18.839 --> 00:17:21.500
brass section. He literally built a massive party

00:17:21.500 --> 00:17:23.779
in the middle of nowhere specifically because

00:17:23.779 --> 00:17:26.000
he was lonely. That is such a cool way to look

00:17:26.000 --> 00:17:28.480
at it. The album is a direct reaction to the

00:17:28.480 --> 00:17:30.900
silence. It's him fighting back against the isolation.

00:17:31.180 --> 00:17:33.240
And this is a very crucial distinction for you

00:17:33.240 --> 00:17:35.420
listening to understand. He didn't get a bunch

00:17:35.420 --> 00:17:37.359
of guys together in a damp rehearsal room in

00:17:37.359 --> 00:17:39.980
Brooklyn and jam for hours until they found a

00:17:39.980 --> 00:17:42.420
cool song. Which is how 99 % of bands start.

00:17:42.599 --> 00:17:45.299
Exactly. He went to a secluded place and he wrote

00:17:45.299 --> 00:17:48.470
the entire album. He composed it on paper. Like

00:17:48.470 --> 00:17:50.750
a symphony. That's a huge difference in methodology.

00:17:51.029 --> 00:17:52.970
It is a defining difference between a traditional

00:17:52.970 --> 00:17:56.069
rock band and a project led by a classical composer.

00:17:56.609 --> 00:17:59.430
He wrote the score first, and then, once the

00:17:59.430 --> 00:18:02.289
music fully existed on the page or in his early

00:18:02.289 --> 00:18:04.769
demos, he had to go out into the real world and

00:18:04.769 --> 00:18:07.109
find the specific people capable of executing

00:18:07.109 --> 00:18:10.390
it. Which brings us to 2013. The self -titled

00:18:10.390 --> 00:18:12.930
album San for Men is officially released on downtown

00:18:12.930 --> 00:18:16.190
records, and people absolutely loved it. Critical

00:18:16.190 --> 00:18:19.009
acclaim is the phrase heavily used across our

00:18:19.009 --> 00:18:21.509
sources. It really resonated. It hit a nerve

00:18:21.509 --> 00:18:23.650
in the indie music scene. But because he wrote

00:18:23.650 --> 00:18:26.589
it first and because it was this massive, complex,

00:18:26.809 --> 00:18:29.049
orchestral pop sound with all these imaginary

00:18:29.049 --> 00:18:31.190
friends, he couldn't just hire a drummer and

00:18:31.190 --> 00:18:33.730
a bass player and go play a club. No. He had

00:18:33.730 --> 00:18:36.910
inadvertently created a logistical monster. The

00:18:36.910 --> 00:18:39.630
music completely demanded more. This prompted

00:18:39.630 --> 00:18:42.210
the formation of an eight -person touring band.

00:18:42.390 --> 00:18:45.059
Eight people. In a van. Let's just talk about

00:18:45.059 --> 00:18:47.359
the grim economic reality of that for a second.

00:18:47.519 --> 00:18:50.140
It is an absolute economic nightmare. Most indie

00:18:50.140 --> 00:18:53.359
bands are a duo or a trio for a very specific

00:18:53.359 --> 00:18:56.460
reason. Math. Yeah. Fewer mouths to feed at the

00:18:56.460 --> 00:18:59.460
diner, fewer hotel rooms to book, everyone fits

00:18:59.460 --> 00:19:01.839
in one vehicle. Precisely. To tour with eight

00:19:01.839 --> 00:19:04.599
people plus all their instruments plus the sound

00:19:04.599 --> 00:19:07.420
gear means you are splitting every single guarantee

00:19:07.420 --> 00:19:10.700
check from a venue eight ways. which leaves basically

00:19:10.700 --> 00:19:13.680
nothing. You need two vans or a very expensive

00:19:13.680 --> 00:19:16.880
bus. The profit margins are razor thin, if they

00:19:16.880 --> 00:19:19.380
exist at all. Artistically, however, it was a

00:19:19.380 --> 00:19:21.700
strict necessity. He couldn't compromise. Right.

00:19:21.839 --> 00:19:24.420
If you want those sweeping brass textures, the

00:19:24.420 --> 00:19:26.980
intricate female and male vocal interplay, the

00:19:26.980 --> 00:19:29.200
live violin, the complex percussion, you need

00:19:29.200 --> 00:19:31.700
actual physical bodies on stage making those

00:19:31.700 --> 00:19:34.039
sounds. It speaks directly to his composer -first

00:19:34.039 --> 00:19:36.970
mentality. He simply wasn't willing to compromise

00:19:36.970 --> 00:19:39.250
the architecture of the sound just to make curing

00:19:39.250 --> 00:19:42.829
cheaper or easier. He essentially prioritized

00:19:42.829 --> 00:19:45.230
the integrity of the composition over the profitability

00:19:45.230 --> 00:19:48.079
of the tour. That is an incredibly rare move

00:19:48.079 --> 00:19:50.319
in today's music industry. So let's look at what

00:19:50.319 --> 00:19:53.119
that sound actually is. We've got four main studio

00:19:53.119 --> 00:19:55.839
albums listed here in the sources. The self -titled

00:19:55.839 --> 00:19:59.480
debut in 2013, Jack Rabbit in 2015, Belong in

00:19:59.480 --> 00:20:03.059
2017, and the cormorant parts I & II in 2020.

00:20:03.480 --> 00:20:05.660
And notice the progression and the constant control

00:20:05.660 --> 00:20:08.740
there. He is the sole songwriter and producer

00:20:08.740 --> 00:20:10.660
for all of them. The genre label gets thrown

00:20:10.660 --> 00:20:12.839
around a lot in the press clippings we have here,

00:20:13.099 --> 00:20:16.140
chamber pop, indie pop. But let's really unpack

00:20:16.140 --> 00:20:17.700
chamber pop because it sounds like something

00:20:17.700 --> 00:20:19.779
you'd listen to while drinking chamomile tea

00:20:19.779 --> 00:20:22.339
with your pinky out. But Sanford and Rock's pretty

00:20:22.339 --> 00:20:25.079
hard life. It is a fusion term, certainly. Yeah.

00:20:25.259 --> 00:20:26.619
But we keep throwing it around. So I want to

00:20:26.619 --> 00:20:28.319
really take that apart for the listener because

00:20:28.319 --> 00:20:30.700
usually. When you mix an orchestra with a rock

00:20:30.700 --> 00:20:33.059
band, it sounds like a cheap gimmick. Yeah, like

00:20:33.059 --> 00:20:35.740
when a legacy metal band plays with a local symphony.

00:20:35.940 --> 00:20:38.220
Exactly. It just sounds like two entirely separate

00:20:38.220 --> 00:20:40.740
things glued together. The oil and water problem.

00:20:41.099 --> 00:20:43.299
Right. The violin sounds like it's just awkwardly

00:20:43.299 --> 00:20:45.519
floating on top of the drums, not actually part

00:20:45.519 --> 00:20:48.720
of the groove. Precisely. But Ludwig Lyon does

00:20:48.720 --> 00:20:50.740
something fundamentally different with his arrangements.

00:20:51.279 --> 00:20:54.380
He treats the human voice as an instrument, and

00:20:54.380 --> 00:20:56.640
he treats the physical instruments as voices.

00:20:57.339 --> 00:21:00.000
In the source material, specifically in the liner

00:21:00.000 --> 00:21:02.680
notes for the album Belong, he talks extensively

00:21:02.680 --> 00:21:05.539
about interlocking textures. Help me visualize

00:21:05.539 --> 00:21:08.259
that. What does interlocking mean in this context?

00:21:08.480 --> 00:21:11.980
Okay, imagine a standard rock song. Usually the

00:21:11.980 --> 00:21:14.099
electric guitar strums a big distorted chord,

00:21:14.660 --> 00:21:16.940
and that sound fills up all the sonic space in

00:21:16.940 --> 00:21:19.700
the middle. It's a wall of sound. Sure. In Ellis's

00:21:19.700 --> 00:21:22.299
writing, that one guitar part might be completely

00:21:22.299 --> 00:21:24.859
split up. The cello takes the low end of the

00:21:24.859 --> 00:21:27.420
chord, the trumpet takes the middle stab, and

00:21:27.420 --> 00:21:29.880
the violin takes the high fluttering notes. Oh,

00:21:29.880 --> 00:21:32.519
wow. So the chord itself is actually three different

00:21:32.519 --> 00:21:34.539
human beings standing 10 feet apart from each

00:21:34.539 --> 00:21:37.299
other on the stage. Yes. It creates this incredible

00:21:37.299 --> 00:21:41.019
3D audio effect, but it's also incredibly fragile.

00:21:41.220 --> 00:21:43.319
If one person misses their cue by a fraction

00:21:43.319 --> 00:21:46.160
of a second, the whole chord falls apart. That's

00:21:46.160 --> 00:21:49.019
terrifying. That's the chamber element of chamber

00:21:49.019 --> 00:21:53.410
pop. the absolute reliance on the entire ensemble

00:21:53.410 --> 00:21:57.809
to create a single unified sound. It's high stakes

00:21:57.809 --> 00:22:00.130
musical Jenga. That makes the live show sound

00:22:00.130 --> 00:22:02.009
incredible to watch. You're literally watching

00:22:02.009 --> 00:22:04.789
them construct the music in real time piece by

00:22:04.789 --> 00:22:07.410
piece. Exactly. If we look at the trajectory

00:22:07.410 --> 00:22:10.329
of the four albums, you can really see the evolution

00:22:10.329 --> 00:22:13.549
of this interlocking concept. San Furman, the

00:22:13.549 --> 00:22:15.589
debut, is the grand thesis statement. Right.

00:22:15.789 --> 00:22:17.710
It's operatic. It's introducing all the characters.

00:22:17.789 --> 00:22:19.849
It's very theatrical. Then comes Jack Rabbit

00:22:19.849 --> 00:22:22.309
in 2015. We mentioned this one earlier. Jack

00:22:22.309 --> 00:22:24.890
Rabbit is the panic attack. It really is. It's

00:22:24.890 --> 00:22:27.829
faster. It's much more aggressive. The athleticism

00:22:27.829 --> 00:22:30.369
we talked about with the basketball analogy is

00:22:30.369 --> 00:22:32.470
all over this record. The themes are about running

00:22:32.470 --> 00:22:35.549
away, hiding, being hunted. Then belong in 2017.

00:22:35.849 --> 00:22:38.049
That one feels like the identity crisis. It's

00:22:38.049 --> 00:22:40.410
a bit more song focused, a bit more vulnerable.

00:22:40.910 --> 00:22:42.950
It's asking, where do I actually fit in all this?

00:22:43.069 --> 00:22:46.089
And finally, The Cormorant in 2020. This is a

00:22:46.089 --> 00:22:48.490
massive double album. It feels like walking through

00:22:48.490 --> 00:22:51.930
a memory palace. It's ghostly, very atmospheric.

00:22:52.269 --> 00:22:54.430
It circles back to some of the sweeping themes

00:22:54.430 --> 00:22:57.329
from the first record, but with a lot more maturity.

00:22:57.650 --> 00:23:00.029
It's less about the initial bang and much more

00:23:00.029 --> 00:23:02.779
about the lingering haunt. It's a hell of a run

00:23:02.779 --> 00:23:05.720
of records. And throughout all of this, the collaboration

00:23:05.720 --> 00:23:08.799
is the key. We mentioned Alan Tate from the summer

00:23:08.799 --> 00:23:11.619
camp days, but in 2020 they actually took it

00:23:11.619 --> 00:23:14.079
a step further. They founded a record label together

00:23:14.079 --> 00:23:17.819
called Better Company. Yes, with Alan Tate and

00:23:17.819 --> 00:23:21.220
their longtime manager Thomas Winkler. And this

00:23:21.220 --> 00:23:24.099
is highly significant for his career arc. It

00:23:24.099 --> 00:23:27.099
shows a definitive shift from just being the

00:23:27.099 --> 00:23:29.440
working artist to becoming the industry creator.

00:23:29.539 --> 00:23:31.740
Taking control of the business side of the art.

00:23:31.980 --> 00:23:35.220
And better company. Even the name itself suggests

00:23:35.220 --> 00:23:37.839
a curatorial approach. It suggests they want

00:23:37.839 --> 00:23:39.900
to actively surround themselves with other artists

00:23:39.900 --> 00:23:43.299
they respect. It's about creating a new, sustainable

00:23:43.299 --> 00:23:45.759
ecosystem. Maybe one that treats independent

00:23:45.759 --> 00:23:47.799
artists better than the traditional music industry

00:23:47.799 --> 00:23:50.180
machinery does. So he's got the critically acclaimed,

00:23:50.619 --> 00:23:52.799
successful touring band. He's got his own record

00:23:52.799 --> 00:23:55.279
label. For most people, that's a full career.

00:23:55.579 --> 00:23:57.839
That's a job well done, time to retire to the

00:23:57.839 --> 00:24:00.279
beach situation. Absolutely. But for Ellis Lyde

00:24:00.279 --> 00:24:03.759
McLeone, that's seemingly just his day job. This

00:24:03.759 --> 00:24:05.940
is where we pivot to the other side of his brain.

00:24:06.359 --> 00:24:08.960
The classical composer. The other lane on the

00:24:08.960 --> 00:24:11.599
highway. Exactly. And I really want to emphasize

00:24:11.599 --> 00:24:15.579
this for you listening. This isn't a side hustle,

00:24:15.980 --> 00:24:18.900
right? This isn't some bored rock star releasing

00:24:18.900 --> 00:24:21.279
a vanity project of synthesizer noodles because

00:24:21.279 --> 00:24:24.299
he has too much free time in the studio This

00:24:24.299 --> 00:24:27.839
is a robust highly respected, separate career,

00:24:28.380 --> 00:24:30.859
running entirely parallel to the pop band. The

00:24:30.859 --> 00:24:33.380
list of institutions he's written for is genuinely

00:24:33.380 --> 00:24:35.420
intimidating. I mean, we're talking the New York

00:24:35.420 --> 00:24:38.740
City Ballet, the Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra,

00:24:39.200 --> 00:24:41.759
the Brooklyn Youth Chorus, the Ataca Quartet.

00:24:41.839 --> 00:24:44.339
These are absolute top tier cultural institutions.

00:24:44.579 --> 00:24:46.759
They do not commission hobbyists. They commission

00:24:46.759 --> 00:24:49.410
serious proven composers. Let's look at some

00:24:49.410 --> 00:24:51.529
of these titles because I feel like titles in

00:24:51.529 --> 00:24:53.990
classical music can be, well, let's be honest,

00:24:54.130 --> 00:24:56.230
kind of boring. Very academic. Yeah, Symphony

00:24:56.230 --> 00:25:01.410
No. 4 in G major. Total snooze. But Ellis, he's

00:25:01.410 --> 00:25:03.730
giving us titles that sound like short stories

00:25:03.730 --> 00:25:07.250
or cool indie films. They are incredibly evocative.

00:25:07.529 --> 00:25:09.670
Take the piece he wrote for the Alabama Symphony

00:25:09.670 --> 00:25:12.049
Orchestra back in 2015. How to fake your death.

00:25:12.430 --> 00:25:15.130
Yes. How to fake your death. I mean, come on.

00:25:15.170 --> 00:25:16.690
That's a movie I want to buy a ticket for right

00:25:16.690 --> 00:25:19.190
now. For an orchestra piece, it immediately sets

00:25:19.190 --> 00:25:21.910
a tone before a single note is played. It's noir.

00:25:22.349 --> 00:25:25.009
It's mysterious. It's got a dark sense of humor.

00:25:25.089 --> 00:25:27.769
And it suggests a specific narrative. He isn't

00:25:27.769 --> 00:25:29.910
just exploring a musical key abstractly. He's

00:25:29.910 --> 00:25:32.410
telling a distinct story. It subverts the rigid

00:25:32.410 --> 00:25:35.180
expectation of the symphony hall. You walk in

00:25:35.180 --> 00:25:37.220
expecting something formal and stuffy, and he

00:25:37.220 --> 00:25:39.500
hands you a pulp crime novel. Oh, look at the

00:25:39.500 --> 00:25:41.960
piece for the harpist, Lavinia Meijer. Shadowy

00:25:41.960 --> 00:25:45.279
figures. Again, highly visual, very mysterious.

00:25:45.759 --> 00:25:48.119
And then there's his chamber music, processional

00:25:48.119 --> 00:25:50.759
for a doomed wedding. That is easily my favorite

00:25:50.759 --> 00:25:52.779
title on this entire list. It's so inherently

00:25:52.779 --> 00:25:55.099
dramatic, but processional for a doomed wedding.

00:25:55.539 --> 00:25:57.299
It makes you wonder immediately, is the music

00:25:57.299 --> 00:26:00.319
incredibly sad? Is it chaotic? Is it actually

00:26:00.319 --> 00:26:03.420
funny? It suggests a complete subversion of tradition.

00:26:04.000 --> 00:26:06.119
Because think about it. A wedding processional

00:26:06.119 --> 00:26:10.599
is supposed to be joyous, orderly, hopeful. Right.

00:26:10.700 --> 00:26:13.200
Walking down the aisle. By adding the word doomed

00:26:13.200 --> 00:26:16.440
to the title, he twists the entire conceptual

00:26:16.440 --> 00:26:19.150
framework. It connects right back to that chamber

00:26:19.150 --> 00:26:22.150
pop idea, taking a very traditional established

00:26:22.150 --> 00:26:25.650
form and injecting it with raw modern anxiety.

00:26:26.289 --> 00:26:28.710
It's pure irony. It also shows he's not taking

00:26:28.710 --> 00:26:31.730
himself entirely too seriously, or rather he's

00:26:31.730 --> 00:26:34.289
taking the music very seriously, but he's allowing

00:26:34.289 --> 00:26:36.769
the audience to have a fun entry point that isn't

00:26:36.769 --> 00:26:39.410
just dry music theory. Yes. You don't need a

00:26:39.410 --> 00:26:41.869
master's degree from Yale to understand the vibe

00:26:41.869 --> 00:26:44.450
of a doomed wedding. Which is absolutely key

00:26:44.450 --> 00:26:46.519
for accessibility. I also noticed some of the

00:26:46.519 --> 00:26:48.720
choral works have really, really specific titles.

00:26:48.960 --> 00:26:51.799
Lying in a Field, age 67, and Singing in a Chorus,

00:26:51.960 --> 00:26:54.220
age 14. Those were commissioned for the Brooklyn

00:26:54.220 --> 00:26:56.319
Youth Chorus. What stands out to you about those

00:26:56.319 --> 00:26:58.700
specific titles? The pinpoint specificity of

00:26:58.700 --> 00:27:04.319
the ages. Age 67. Age 14. It strongly suggests

00:27:04.319 --> 00:27:07.339
a deep focus on time. On the process of aging.

00:27:07.859 --> 00:27:11.099
On the unreliability of memory. It grounds the

00:27:11.099 --> 00:27:13.720
somewhat abstract airy sound of a large choir

00:27:13.720 --> 00:27:16.299
in a very specific grounded human experience.

00:27:16.980 --> 00:27:19.059
It forces you to think about the long timeline

00:27:19.059 --> 00:27:21.920
of a single life. It's cool because he's writing

00:27:21.920 --> 00:27:25.599
these pieces for a youth chorus, literal kids,

00:27:25.680 --> 00:27:28.400
but the title reference is being 67 years old.

00:27:29.019 --> 00:27:31.259
There's a beautiful juxtaposition there between

00:27:31.259 --> 00:27:33.730
the performers and the subject matter. and we

00:27:33.730 --> 00:27:36.150
see that same avant -garde edge in other titles

00:27:36.150 --> 00:27:38.210
too. Look at speech after the removal of the

00:27:38.210 --> 00:27:40.049
larynx. That was written for the ataca quartet.

00:27:40.109 --> 00:27:43.170
Whoa, that sounds intense. That sounds like body

00:27:43.170 --> 00:27:45.369
horror. It is highly experimental. It pushes

00:27:45.369 --> 00:27:47.529
boundaries. It suggests he's using string instruments

00:27:47.529 --> 00:27:50.250
to explore the very limits of communication or

00:27:50.250 --> 00:27:52.890
the physical loss of a voice. It shows he's not

00:27:52.890 --> 00:27:55.109
afraid to make the audience feel deeply uncomfortable.

00:27:55.289 --> 00:27:57.170
We also have to talk about the ballet connection

00:27:57.170 --> 00:27:59.349
because that's a whole different world. He collaborates

00:27:59.349 --> 00:28:01.670
frequently with a choreographer named Troy Schumacher.

00:28:02.069 --> 00:28:04.670
Yes. On works like Common Ground for the New

00:28:04.670 --> 00:28:07.470
York City Ballet and the Impulse Wants Company

00:28:07.470 --> 00:28:10.230
for Ballet Collective. Writing for dance just

00:28:10.230 --> 00:28:11.970
has to be fundamentally different than writing

00:28:11.970 --> 00:28:14.609
for a rock band, right? It requires a completely

00:28:14.609 --> 00:28:17.049
different rhythmic sensibility. When you write

00:28:17.049 --> 00:28:19.490
a song for a rock band, you are usually locked

00:28:19.490 --> 00:28:21.910
tightly into a groove. The drummer drives the

00:28:21.910 --> 00:28:25.069
bus. It's usually 44 time. The goal is to keep

00:28:25.069 --> 00:28:26.990
the audience's heads bobbing. Right, keep the

00:28:26.990 --> 00:28:29.630
momentum forward. But when you write for ballet...

00:28:29.339 --> 00:28:32.859
You have to actively visualize human bodies moving

00:28:32.859 --> 00:28:36.000
through space. The music has to physically breathe

00:28:36.000 --> 00:28:38.700
with the dancer's lungs. It has to have open

00:28:38.700 --> 00:28:41.339
space for physical expression. Dancers count

00:28:41.339 --> 00:28:44.579
music in a very specific, almost elastic way.

00:28:45.079 --> 00:28:47.259
The fact that Ellis can toggle so easily between

00:28:47.259 --> 00:28:50.519
the rigid metronomic drive of a pop song and

00:28:50.519 --> 00:28:53.279
the fluid expanding dynamics of a ballet score

00:28:53.279 --> 00:28:56.440
is a massive testament to his sheer versatility.

00:28:56.650 --> 00:28:58.470
He's also done a lot of work specifically with

00:28:58.470 --> 00:29:00.630
the harp. I'm seeing the name Lavinia Meijer

00:29:00.630 --> 00:29:03.190
pop up a lot in these source lists. Sweet for

00:29:03.190 --> 00:29:06.390
flute and harp, night loops. The harp is a fascinating

00:29:06.390 --> 00:29:09.170
instrument for a composer like him. It's incredibly

00:29:09.170 --> 00:29:12.009
resonant, it's highly textural, but it's also

00:29:12.009 --> 00:29:15.430
surprisingly rhythmic. It fits his painting with

00:29:15.430 --> 00:29:18.150
sound aesthetic absolutely perfectly. Yeah, it

00:29:18.150 --> 00:29:20.849
can do a lot. It can be sharply percussive, almost

00:29:20.849 --> 00:29:23.190
like an acoustic guitar, or it can be completely

00:29:23.190 --> 00:29:25.619
fluid, like water washing over the track. And

00:29:25.619 --> 00:29:28.079
he's not just composing his own stuff from scratch.

00:29:28.339 --> 00:29:30.740
He's also highly sought after as an arranger.

00:29:31.079 --> 00:29:33.339
He's doing work for other indie artists like

00:29:33.339 --> 00:29:36.240
Wild Pink on their critically acclaimed album,

00:29:36.380 --> 00:29:38.859
A Billion Little Lights, and for bands like Pure

00:29:38.859 --> 00:29:41.319
Bathing Culture. That is the ultimate mark of

00:29:41.319 --> 00:29:44.559
a musician's musician. When other established

00:29:44.559 --> 00:29:46.539
artists who are incredibly talented in their

00:29:46.539 --> 00:29:48.799
own right, when they need that extra layer of

00:29:48.799 --> 00:29:51.619
texture, that harmonic complexity, that indescribable

00:29:51.619 --> 00:29:54.240
magic sauce they call Ellis. He's the guy you

00:29:54.240 --> 00:29:56.559
call when you want to make your standard indie

00:29:56.559 --> 00:29:59.059
rock album sound like it was recorded live inside

00:29:59.059 --> 00:30:00.900
a gothic cathedral. Or when you want to give

00:30:00.900 --> 00:30:03.920
a simple song immense cinematic weight. He essentially

00:30:03.920 --> 00:30:07.079
brings the gravity to their projects. So we've

00:30:07.079 --> 00:30:09.640
established he's a sponge. He soaks up visual

00:30:09.640 --> 00:30:11.880
art from his parents, athletics from the court,

00:30:12.160 --> 00:30:14.039
classical training from Yale, rock music from

00:30:14.039 --> 00:30:17.160
the garage. But who are the people he's actually

00:30:17.160 --> 00:30:20.059
listening to? Who's on Ellis Ludwig Leone's personal

00:30:20.059 --> 00:30:22.420
playlist? The list of influences provided in

00:30:22.420 --> 00:30:26.779
our source material is. Well, it's eclectic,

00:30:26.819 --> 00:30:30.099
to say the very least. It is a Venn diagram of

00:30:30.099 --> 00:30:33.490
genres that really shouldn't touch. but he forcibly

00:30:33.490 --> 00:30:35.910
overlaps them. Let's run through it. Sufjan Stevens

00:30:35.910 --> 00:30:38.630
is first. That one makes perfect logical sense.

00:30:39.170 --> 00:30:41.529
Sufjan is essentially the modern godfather of

00:30:41.529 --> 00:30:44.130
this kind of orchestral indie movement. Yeah.

00:30:44.130 --> 00:30:46.450
Massive arrangements, deeply emotional storytelling,

00:30:46.809 --> 00:30:49.390
a banjo playing right next to an oboe. If you

00:30:49.390 --> 00:30:51.690
like Sanfermin, you almost certainly have Sufjan's

00:30:51.690 --> 00:30:53.950
Illinois or Age of Ads in your record collection.

00:30:54.009 --> 00:30:56.029
The National is next on the list. Again, very

00:30:56.029 --> 00:30:58.470
logical. The National... Especially the work

00:30:58.470 --> 00:31:01.390
produced by the Dessner Brothers expertly bridges

00:31:01.390 --> 00:31:04.069
that indie rock and modern classical divide.

00:31:04.329 --> 00:31:06.569
Right. It's highly emotional. It's driving. And

00:31:06.569 --> 00:31:08.890
it features those iconic baritone vocals from

00:31:08.890 --> 00:31:11.349
Matt Berninger. You can draw a very direct straight

00:31:11.349 --> 00:31:15.089
line from them to Sanferman. But then we get

00:31:15.089 --> 00:31:17.410
to Miles Davis. And here's where it gets truly

00:31:17.410 --> 00:31:21.529
fascinating. Because why Miles Davis? Yeah, Sanferman

00:31:21.529 --> 00:31:24.230
does not sound anything like Kind of Blue. Not

00:31:24.230 --> 00:31:27.589
superficially, no. But think about Miles Davis's

00:31:27.589 --> 00:31:30.809
core approach to harmony. Think about his incredibly

00:31:30.809 --> 00:31:34.170
deliberate use of empty space. Think about the

00:31:34.170 --> 00:31:36.910
sheer complexity of his underlying chord structures.

00:31:37.390 --> 00:31:39.710
And most importantly, think about reinvention.

00:31:40.269 --> 00:31:42.349
Miles never stayed in one box for more than a

00:31:42.349 --> 00:31:44.970
few years. Exactly. He went from cool jazz to

00:31:44.970 --> 00:31:48.029
modal jazz to wild fusion to electric funk. He

00:31:48.029 --> 00:31:49.910
essentially burned the boxes every time he got

00:31:49.910 --> 00:31:52.990
comfortable. Ludwig Lyon likely admires that

00:31:52.990 --> 00:31:55.210
fearless, restless approach to musical structure

00:31:55.210 --> 00:31:57.829
and change, and the jazz concept that the silence

00:31:57.829 --> 00:32:00.109
between the notes is just as important as the

00:32:00.109 --> 00:32:02.029
notes themselves. That makes total sense. It's

00:32:02.029 --> 00:32:04.029
about adopting the attitude of the music, not

00:32:04.029 --> 00:32:06.349
just mimicking the sound. Okay, then we have

00:32:06.349 --> 00:32:08.410
the heavy classical hitters, Charles Ives and

00:32:08.410 --> 00:32:10.769
Benjamin Britten. Charles Ives is the great American

00:32:10.769 --> 00:32:13.230
experimentalist. He famously layered entirely

00:32:13.230 --> 00:32:15.390
different clashing songs on top of each other

00:32:15.390 --> 00:32:17.890
to create this wild cacophony and invent new

00:32:17.890 --> 00:32:21.190
textures. Like two marching bands crossing paths.

00:32:21.670 --> 00:32:24.829
Precisely. He captured the messy, chaotic sound

00:32:24.829 --> 00:32:28.190
of marching bands in town squares. Ludwig Lyon's

00:32:28.190 --> 00:32:30.710
work often feels like a modern digital interpretation

00:32:30.710 --> 00:32:33.410
of that layering pristine pop sounds with rigid

00:32:33.410 --> 00:32:35.670
classical structures to see what sparks fly.

00:32:36.049 --> 00:32:38.230
And Britten. Benjamin Britten was an absolute

00:32:38.230 --> 00:32:40.990
master of vocal writing and 20th century opera.

00:32:41.509 --> 00:32:43.569
He inherently knew how to write for the human

00:32:43.569 --> 00:32:46.190
voice in a way that was instantly dramatic and

00:32:46.190 --> 00:32:49.099
deeply theatrical. Given how intensely vocal

00:32:49.099 --> 00:32:51.819
heavy San Fermin is, with the constant male and

00:32:51.819 --> 00:32:54.660
female dynamic interplay, and considering Ellis's

00:32:54.660 --> 00:32:57.299
choral works, Britten is a very clear direct

00:32:57.299 --> 00:33:00.460
ancestor to his style. And finally on the list,

00:33:01.019 --> 00:33:03.420
Paul Simon. The quintessential American songwriter.

00:33:03.839 --> 00:33:05.400
Because you can have all the sweeping violins

00:33:05.400 --> 00:33:07.380
and harps in the world, but if the core song,

00:33:07.519 --> 00:33:09.480
the underlying melody, the actual lyric, if that

00:33:09.480 --> 00:33:11.839
isn't solid, the whole grand structure falls

00:33:11.839 --> 00:33:14.579
apart. Paul Simon is the absolute master of the

00:33:14.579 --> 00:33:16.680
foundational craft of songwriting. So if you

00:33:16.680 --> 00:33:19.259
put all these wildly different people in a blender

00:33:19.259 --> 00:33:22.680
Sufjan's raw emotion, Miles Davis's structural

00:33:22.680 --> 00:33:26.160
complexity, Ives's fearless experimentation,

00:33:26.980 --> 00:33:29.980
Britain's vocal drama, and Paul Simon's tight

00:33:29.980 --> 00:33:33.099
storytelling, you get Ellis Ludwig Lyon. He is

00:33:33.099 --> 00:33:35.000
standing right in the center of that impossible

00:33:35.000 --> 00:33:37.460
Venn diagram. He takes the clear storytelling

00:33:37.460 --> 00:33:40.500
of Paul Simon, adds the dense texture of Britain,

00:33:40.940 --> 00:33:43.279
and drives the whole thing forward with the nerveth

00:33:43.279 --> 00:33:45.660
energy of the national. It's a pretty powerful

00:33:45.660 --> 00:33:48.019
cocktail. It really is. Yeah. And I think it

00:33:48.019 --> 00:33:51.299
perfectly explains why his career looks the chaotic,

00:33:51.480 --> 00:33:53.259
beautiful way it does. He isn't trying to just

00:33:53.259 --> 00:33:55.980
be one of those things. He is actively synthesizing

00:33:55.980 --> 00:33:58.880
them all into something new. So as we wrap up

00:33:58.880 --> 00:34:01.259
this deep dive, what does this all mean for us,

00:34:01.400 --> 00:34:03.720
for you listening? I think Ellis Ludwig Leone

00:34:03.720 --> 00:34:06.279
represents a very necessary modern archetype

00:34:06.279 --> 00:34:09.139
of the composer. For a very long time, culture

00:34:09.139 --> 00:34:11.860
told artists... to just pick a lane and stay

00:34:11.860 --> 00:34:14.099
in it. You are high art, or you are low art.

00:34:14.280 --> 00:34:17.079
Exactly. You are classical, or you are pop. You

00:34:17.079 --> 00:34:19.380
play dive bars, or you play concert halls. He

00:34:19.380 --> 00:34:21.519
just said, no thanks, I'll do both. Exactly.

00:34:21.980 --> 00:34:25.239
He completely refuses to be siloed. He uses the

00:34:25.239 --> 00:34:27.519
complex tools of the orchestra to tell accessible

00:34:27.519 --> 00:34:30.980
pop stories. And he uses the raw energy of rock

00:34:30.980 --> 00:34:35.739
to invigorate stale classical forms. He proves...

00:34:36.289 --> 00:34:38.409
definitively, that you don't ever have to choose

00:34:38.409 --> 00:34:41.250
between intellectual complexity and emotional

00:34:41.250 --> 00:34:43.630
accessibility. That's really inspiring, honestly.

00:34:43.750 --> 00:34:45.690
Whether you're a working musician or just someone

00:34:45.690 --> 00:34:47.849
trying to figure out your own complicated career

00:34:47.849 --> 00:34:50.429
path, you don't have to choose between the basketball

00:34:50.429 --> 00:34:52.250
part of you and the piano part of you. You can

00:34:52.250 --> 00:34:54.550
integrate them. Integration is absolutely the

00:34:54.550 --> 00:34:57.429
key word. He integrates his influences, his rigorous

00:34:57.429 --> 00:35:00.110
training, and his disparate interests into one

00:35:00.110 --> 00:35:02.619
cohesive whole. I want to leave everyone listening

00:35:02.619 --> 00:35:04.900
with a final thought to chew on. We talked about

00:35:04.900 --> 00:35:07.639
that incredible title earlier, processional for

00:35:07.639 --> 00:35:10.820
a doomed wedding. Yes. We live in an era heavily

00:35:10.820 --> 00:35:13.880
dictated by algorithms, Spotify, Apple Music,

00:35:14.019 --> 00:35:16.800
YouTube. They all want to predict exactly what

00:35:16.800 --> 00:35:18.320
you like based on what you already clicked. They

00:35:18.320 --> 00:35:19.800
want you to be predictable. They want to play

00:35:19.800 --> 00:35:21.960
you the exact same song over and over again,

00:35:22.000 --> 00:35:23.800
just slightly different. They want to put you

00:35:23.800 --> 00:35:26.480
in a neat little genre box so they can sell targeted

00:35:26.480 --> 00:35:29.800
ads to you. The algorithm absolutely hates ambiguity.

00:35:30.219 --> 00:35:33.070
Exactly. But artists like Ellis Ludwig Leone,

00:35:33.130 --> 00:35:35.309
they are the ambiguity. They are the glitch in

00:35:35.309 --> 00:35:37.869
the system. They are the surprise. So my question

00:35:37.869 --> 00:35:41.309
for you is this. In a world of sterile playlists

00:35:41.309 --> 00:35:43.869
that categorize everything by incredibly narrow

00:35:43.869 --> 00:35:47.289
genres, are artists like Ludwig Leone the only

00:35:47.289 --> 00:35:51.789
ones truly keeping the surprise, the doomed romance,

00:35:51.809 --> 00:35:54.769
if you will, of musical discovery alive? That

00:35:54.769 --> 00:35:57.130
is a brilliant question and definitely one worth

00:35:57.130 --> 00:35:59.440
pondering today. Go listen to How to Fake Your

00:35:59.440 --> 00:36:01.500
Death and then immediately chase it with a loud

00:36:01.500 --> 00:36:03.480
Sanfermin track. See if you can hear the hidden

00:36:03.480 --> 00:36:05.440
connection. Thanks for taking this deep dive

00:36:05.440 --> 00:36:07.119
with us. Until next time. See ya.
