WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.339
Welcome back to The Deep Dive. Today, we're tuning

00:00:03.339 --> 00:00:06.280
the time machine to a remarkably specific and

00:00:06.280 --> 00:00:09.400
frankly, kind of chaotic moment in music history.

00:00:09.519 --> 00:00:11.160
Oh, absolutely. We're looking at a song that

00:00:11.160 --> 00:00:12.939
you definitely know, or at least you know the

00:00:12.939 --> 00:00:15.300
nursery rhyme that birthed it. But the story

00:00:15.300 --> 00:00:18.960
behind how it became a hit is, well, it's wilder

00:00:18.960 --> 00:00:21.579
than you'd expect. We are talking about Don't

00:00:21.579 --> 00:00:23.379
Let the Rain Come Down, also known as Cricket

00:00:23.379 --> 00:00:25.579
Little Man. It is such a fascinating track to

00:00:25.579 --> 00:00:28.100
dig into because, you know, on the surface, it

00:00:28.100 --> 00:00:31.370
feels like this breeze. Just a catchy folk pop

00:00:31.370 --> 00:00:33.710
tune. Right. But when we really look at the source

00:00:33.710 --> 00:00:35.810
material, this song is actually a perfect storm

00:00:35.810 --> 00:00:40.009
of. copyright confusion, logistical nightmares

00:00:40.009 --> 00:00:42.810
involving these massive vocal groups, and a genre

00:00:42.810 --> 00:00:45.530
mashup that by all rights really shouldn't have

00:00:45.530 --> 00:00:47.829
worked at all. But it did work. And I guess that's

00:00:47.829 --> 00:00:49.789
our mission for today's deep dive. We need to

00:00:49.789 --> 00:00:52.310
figure out exactly how a song based on an old

00:00:52.310 --> 00:00:55.130
English nursery rhyme managed to become a chart

00:00:55.130 --> 00:00:57.369
-topping smash hit right in the middle of, frankly,

00:00:57.469 --> 00:00:59.929
the most hostile environment imaginable for folk

00:00:59.929 --> 00:01:02.429
music. Hostile is definitely the right word for

00:01:02.429 --> 00:01:04.370
it. We really have to set the scene here for

00:01:04.370 --> 00:01:07.170
you. The date we're looking at is February 19th.

00:01:07.180 --> 00:01:10.680
Ground zero. Exactly. Ground zero. If you follow

00:01:10.680 --> 00:01:13.840
music history at all, February 1964 is when the

00:01:13.840 --> 00:01:15.760
Beatles arrived in America. Yep. They appear

00:01:15.760 --> 00:01:18.560
on Ed Sullivan, and suddenly the entire culture

00:01:18.560 --> 00:01:21.140
just pivots. The British invasion. Right. The

00:01:21.140 --> 00:01:23.319
airwaves are instantly dominated by electric

00:01:23.319 --> 00:01:26.579
guitars, mop tops, screaming teenagers. Rock

00:01:26.579 --> 00:01:28.819
and roll is completely rewriting the rule book

00:01:28.819 --> 00:01:30.540
overnight. Right. Everyone is just losing their

00:01:30.540 --> 00:01:33.159
minds over, I want to hold your hand. And then

00:01:33.159 --> 00:01:35.959
in walks this group, the Serendipity Singers,

00:01:35.959 --> 00:01:39.540
with a song that... Isn't rock and roll. Not

00:01:39.540 --> 00:01:41.739
at all. It doesn't have electric guitars. It's

00:01:41.739 --> 00:01:44.819
this weird blend of traditional folk and calypso.

00:01:45.000 --> 00:01:47.379
It is a massive anomaly. Yeah. It's this folk

00:01:47.379 --> 00:01:49.680
calypso hybrid based on a nursery rhyme. And

00:01:49.680 --> 00:01:52.379
it's climbing the charts while Lennon and McCartney

00:01:52.379 --> 00:01:55.060
are essentially strangling the life out of any

00:01:55.060 --> 00:01:57.280
competition. Yeah, it's crazy. It really speaks

00:01:57.280 --> 00:01:59.780
to how diverse the music scene actually was in

00:01:59.780 --> 00:02:02.780
1964, even if, you know, our collective memory

00:02:02.780 --> 00:02:04.840
just tends to focus strictly on the British invasion.

00:02:04.959 --> 00:02:07.980
So let's unpack this. I think we have to start

00:02:07.980 --> 00:02:09.840
with the source material of the song itself.

00:02:10.539 --> 00:02:13.300
Because the lyrics aren't new, I think most people

00:02:13.300 --> 00:02:15.439
listening probably heard this rhyme before they

00:02:15.439 --> 00:02:17.979
could even walk. Yes. The foundational text,

00:02:18.159 --> 00:02:21.139
so to speak, is the traditional English nursery

00:02:21.139 --> 00:02:25.020
rhyme. There was a crooked man. Right. You know

00:02:25.020 --> 00:02:27.860
the one. He walked a crooked mile, he found a

00:02:27.860 --> 00:02:30.460
crooked sixpence, bought a crooked cat. It's

00:02:30.460 --> 00:02:34.099
classic stuff. Very Mother Goose. But here is

00:02:34.099 --> 00:02:36.259
where we need to get into the weeds of how folk

00:02:36.259 --> 00:02:39.280
music actually operates as a business. Because

00:02:39.280 --> 00:02:41.400
usually with these really old rhymes, they're

00:02:41.400 --> 00:02:44.280
considered public domain, right? Generally speaking,

00:02:44.439 --> 00:02:46.919
yes. If a song or a rhyme is hundreds of years

00:02:46.919 --> 00:02:49.659
old, nobody owns it. Because the author is long

00:02:49.659 --> 00:02:52.500
gone. Exactly. The author is dead or entirely

00:02:52.500 --> 00:02:54.879
unknown. You can record it, I can record it,

00:02:54.919 --> 00:02:57.340
and we don't owe royalties to anyone. The credit

00:02:57.340 --> 00:02:59.520
on the record label usually just says traditional.

00:03:00.030 --> 00:03:01.590
Okay, but the version we're talking about today,

00:03:01.650 --> 00:03:04.150
the one that hit the charts in the 60s, it didn't

00:03:04.150 --> 00:03:06.990
just spontaneously appear out of the ether. Our

00:03:06.990 --> 00:03:09.590
sources point to a bit of a, I guess, a prequel

00:03:09.590 --> 00:03:12.770
in 1960. That's right. If we track the genealogy

00:03:12.770 --> 00:03:15.990
of this specific musical adaptation, we have

00:03:15.990 --> 00:03:18.729
to go back four years prior to the big hit. A

00:03:18.729 --> 00:03:21.389
singer named Jimmy Rogers recorded a version

00:03:21.389 --> 00:03:23.710
of this. And just to clarify for everyone, this

00:03:23.710 --> 00:03:27.009
is the pop singer Jimmy Rogers, not the legendary

00:03:27.009 --> 00:03:30.219
country yodeler from 1920. Right, right. The

00:03:30.219 --> 00:03:33.300
1960s pop singer. Yeah. So he recorded it, but,

00:03:33.340 --> 00:03:35.900
and this is important, he released it on his

00:03:35.900 --> 00:03:38.780
album At Home with Jimmy Rogers, an evening of

00:03:38.780 --> 00:03:41.300
folk songs, but he didn't call it Don't Let the

00:03:41.300 --> 00:03:43.439
Rain Come Down. What did he call it? He titled

00:03:43.439 --> 00:03:45.439
it Crooked Little House. Crooked Little House.

00:03:45.539 --> 00:03:48.219
Okay. Now, looking at the historical records

00:03:48.219 --> 00:03:50.979
for that 1960 album, this is where the legal

00:03:50.979 --> 00:03:53.479
plot starts to thicken. The liner notes don't

00:03:53.479 --> 00:03:55.860
say traditional. They do not. They list two very

00:03:55.860 --> 00:03:58.240
specific songwriters. Yeah. Ursel Hickey and

00:03:58.240 --> 00:04:00.919
Ed E. Miller. Okay, wait. Why is that significant?

00:04:01.080 --> 00:04:04.020
If it's a centuries -old nursery rhyme, how can

00:04:04.020 --> 00:04:05.860
Hickey and Miller just claim that they wrote

00:04:05.860 --> 00:04:08.620
it? This is a really key insight into the music

00:04:08.620 --> 00:04:10.400
business, especially during that folk revival

00:04:10.400 --> 00:04:12.740
era. You can't copyright the lyrics of There

00:04:12.740 --> 00:04:15.560
Was a Crooked Man. Those belong to history. But

00:04:15.560 --> 00:04:18.519
you can copyright a specific musical arrangement

00:04:18.519 --> 00:04:22.839
or a new melody or modified structure. What Hickey

00:04:22.839 --> 00:04:26.240
and Miller did was they took the raw clay of

00:04:26.240 --> 00:04:28.819
the nursery rhyme, and they sculpted it into

00:04:28.819 --> 00:04:31.560
a modern verse chorus pop structure. Oh, I see.

00:04:31.680 --> 00:04:33.680
They're the ones who added that infectious don't

00:04:33.680 --> 00:04:36.699
let the rain come down hook. Ah, so they essentially

00:04:36.699 --> 00:04:38.959
built the house even if they didn't manufacture

00:04:38.959 --> 00:04:41.920
the bricks themselves. Precisely. In legal terms,

00:04:42.180 --> 00:04:45.079
they created a derivative work, and that gave

00:04:45.079 --> 00:04:47.459
them a completely valid copyright claim over

00:04:47.459 --> 00:04:50.160
that specific version of the song. Which brings

00:04:50.160 --> 00:04:54.079
us to 1964. The Serendipity Singers released

00:04:54.079 --> 00:04:56.899
their version, which, as we know, becomes the

00:04:56.899 --> 00:04:59.259
massive hit. You would assume Hickey and Miller

00:04:59.259 --> 00:05:01.379
were thrilled just sitting back and watching

00:05:01.379 --> 00:05:03.639
those fat royalty checks roll in. You would definitely

00:05:03.639 --> 00:05:06.079
assume that. But this is where it gets messy.

00:05:06.360 --> 00:05:08.800
When the Serendipity Singers released their version,

00:05:08.920 --> 00:05:11.740
those names, Hickey and Miller, were largely

00:05:11.740 --> 00:05:14.040
absent from the initial labeling. You're kidding,

00:05:14.240 --> 00:05:17.019
really? Yeah. The initial pressings often credited

00:05:17.019 --> 00:05:19.339
the song as traditional, or in some cases, they

00:05:19.339 --> 00:05:21.560
credited the adaptation to the Serendipity Singers'

00:05:21.579 --> 00:05:24.220
own musical director. It is a classic example

00:05:24.220 --> 00:05:28.379
of just how murky folk music copyrights were

00:05:28.379 --> 00:05:31.480
in the early 60s. There was this prevailing attitude

00:05:31.480 --> 00:05:34.360
in the industry of, oh, it's a folk song. It

00:05:34.360 --> 00:05:36.920
belongs to the people. Nobody owns it. That feels

00:05:36.920 --> 00:05:39.879
like a massive oversight. I mean, imagine you're

00:05:39.879 --> 00:05:42.180
Hickey or Miller. You're driving in your car.

00:05:42.279 --> 00:05:45.000
You turn on the radio and you hear your specific

00:05:45.000 --> 00:05:47.959
melody, your specific original hook being sung

00:05:47.959 --> 00:05:50.720
by this huge group. And the DJ comes on and says

00:05:50.720 --> 00:05:52.899
it's an old traditional tune. It must have been

00:05:52.899 --> 00:05:55.629
infuriating for them. And obviously it was. legally

00:05:55.629 --> 00:05:57.649
actionable. It was eventually rectified, thankfully.

00:05:57.910 --> 00:06:01.110
Later reissues of the Serendipity Singers recording

00:06:01.110 --> 00:06:04.009
did correct the credits. They finally listed

00:06:04.009 --> 00:06:06.410
Ursel Hickey and Eddie Miller as the writers,

00:06:06.569 --> 00:06:09.879
but for a very distinct Very lucrative window

00:06:09.879 --> 00:06:12.060
of time. The biggest folk hit in the country

00:06:12.060 --> 00:06:14.660
was essentially sailing under a false flag regarding

00:06:14.660 --> 00:06:16.800
its authorship. Justice for Hickey and Miller.

00:06:16.899 --> 00:06:18.480
I'm glad they got their names back on there eventually.

00:06:18.680 --> 00:06:20.540
It really just goes to show that even in the

00:06:20.540 --> 00:06:23.879
whole peace and love communal folk era, the music

00:06:23.879 --> 00:06:26.639
business was still very much a business. Absolutely.

00:06:26.680 --> 00:06:28.420
The music industry has never been a charity,

00:06:28.480 --> 00:06:30.740
no matter what genre we're talking about. Very

00:06:30.740 --> 00:06:34.639
true. OK, so we have. The song's origin and the

00:06:34.639 --> 00:06:37.339
copyright drama. Now let's talk about the vehicle

00:06:37.339 --> 00:06:39.360
that actually carried the song up the charts.

00:06:39.579 --> 00:06:42.959
The Serendipity Singers themselves. A truly fascinating

00:06:42.959 --> 00:06:46.060
group. And calling them a group? might actually

00:06:46.060 --> 00:06:48.139
be an understatement. Yeah, looking at the notes

00:06:48.139 --> 00:06:50.579
here, there were nine members. Nine members.

00:06:50.660 --> 00:06:53.199
That is not a band. That is a baseball team.

00:06:53.560 --> 00:06:57.160
That's a jury minus the alternates. It practically

00:06:57.160 --> 00:06:59.540
is a small village, and you really have to try

00:06:59.540 --> 00:07:01.879
to imagine the logistics of that. In the modern

00:07:01.879 --> 00:07:04.980
era, you know, we are so used to this solo pop

00:07:04.980 --> 00:07:07.660
star or maybe a four -piece rock band. Right.

00:07:07.779 --> 00:07:09.980
The idea of a nine -person folk group trying

00:07:09.980 --> 00:07:12.519
to get radio play, trying to organize tours,

00:07:12.680 --> 00:07:14.639
trying to just physically fit on a stage together.

00:07:15.629 --> 00:07:18.089
It's wild to think about. Honestly, how do you

00:07:18.089 --> 00:07:20.750
fit nine people on a stage or even worse in a

00:07:20.750 --> 00:07:22.649
1960s recording booth? It feels like it would

00:07:22.649 --> 00:07:24.550
just be absolute chaos. Like who is in charge

00:07:24.550 --> 00:07:26.810
of ordering lunch for nine lead singers? It's

00:07:26.810 --> 00:07:29.709
a logistical nightmare, surely. But they actually

00:07:29.709 --> 00:07:32.769
had a very specific, very disciplined way of

00:07:32.769 --> 00:07:35.290
handling the performance aspect, especially for

00:07:35.290 --> 00:07:37.470
their live shows and their TV appearances. How

00:07:37.470 --> 00:07:41.920
so? Well, there's this great video. from a special

00:07:41.920 --> 00:07:45.120
called My Music Folk Rewind that captures their

00:07:45.120 --> 00:07:47.420
stage choreography. They didn't just walk out

00:07:47.420 --> 00:07:49.560
and stand in disorganized clump around a couple

00:07:49.560 --> 00:07:51.519
of microphones. Okay, paint the picture for us.

00:07:51.660 --> 00:07:55.100
How do you organize nine acoustic folk singers

00:07:55.100 --> 00:07:57.540
without them constantly bumping into each other's

00:07:57.540 --> 00:07:59.759
guitars? They organize themselves into a matrix,

00:08:00.040 --> 00:08:03.100
specifically three groups of three. A matrix

00:08:03.100 --> 00:08:05.079
of folk singers? That sounds very mathematical.

00:08:05.519 --> 00:08:07.899
It was highly structured. Visually, you have

00:08:07.899 --> 00:08:09.740
these three distinct trios standing together.

00:08:10.319 --> 00:08:12.300
And the arrangement of the song actually leaned

00:08:12.300 --> 00:08:14.379
right into that visual structure. Oh, really?

00:08:14.560 --> 00:08:17.279
Yeah. Each subgroup of three would sing a specific

00:08:17.279 --> 00:08:19.879
verse. So you'd have trio A take the first verse,

00:08:20.040 --> 00:08:22.339
trio B take the second, trio C takes the third,

00:08:22.420 --> 00:08:25.300
and so on. Oh, that's clever. So you get these

00:08:25.300 --> 00:08:27.860
different vocal textures for each verse. It keeps

00:08:27.860 --> 00:08:30.560
the listener's ear interested because the actual

00:08:30.560 --> 00:08:33.620
tone of the vocals changes every 30 seconds or

00:08:33.620 --> 00:08:36.039
so. Exactly. It completely prevents listener

00:08:36.039 --> 00:08:40.720
fatigue. And then for the chorus. That massive,

00:08:40.940 --> 00:08:44.460
don't let the rain come down hook, all nine members

00:08:44.460 --> 00:08:46.580
would join in together. That must have been just

00:08:46.580 --> 00:08:49.840
a massive wall of sound. It creates this huge,

00:08:50.080 --> 00:08:53.899
incredibly powerful communal vibe, a real sing

00:08:53.899 --> 00:08:56.419
-along energy. And we have to remember the context

00:08:56.419 --> 00:08:59.879
here. This is right at the tail end. Of the Hootenanny

00:08:59.879 --> 00:09:02.360
era in American culture. The Hootenanny era.

00:09:02.539 --> 00:09:04.360
Let's break that down for someone who might not

00:09:04.360 --> 00:09:06.000
know the term, because honestly, it sounds like

00:09:06.000 --> 00:09:08.600
a cartoon character. Fair enough. So just prior

00:09:08.600 --> 00:09:10.360
to the Beatles changing everything, there was

00:09:10.360 --> 00:09:12.720
a very popular television show called Hootenanny.

00:09:12.860 --> 00:09:16.019
OK. And the vibe of this show and the subculture

00:09:16.019 --> 00:09:18.399
it represented was very collegiate, very clean

00:09:18.399 --> 00:09:20.559
cut. It was all about these big groups singing

00:09:20.559 --> 00:09:23.580
together. Lots of audience participation, acoustic

00:09:23.580 --> 00:09:26.120
guitars, matching sweaters. Right. Not the gritty

00:09:26.120 --> 00:09:29.009
Greenwich Village scene. Exactly. It wasn't about

00:09:29.009 --> 00:09:32.750
the brooding, poetic solo artist sitting in a

00:09:32.750 --> 00:09:36.850
dark corner cafe. It was about volume and harmony

00:09:36.850 --> 00:09:40.169
and smiling. The serendipity singers were perfectly

00:09:40.169 --> 00:09:42.570
engineered for that specific hootenanny aesthetic.

00:09:42.809 --> 00:09:45.169
So they are maximizing that power in numbers

00:09:45.169 --> 00:09:47.350
approach. It's almost like a choir, but cooler.

00:09:47.549 --> 00:09:49.269
A choir in turtlenecks, essentially. But they

00:09:49.269 --> 00:09:50.950
did something else, too. We touched on it briefly

00:09:50.950 --> 00:09:52.750
in the intro, but this wasn't just a straight

00:09:52.750 --> 00:09:54.970
standard folk song like Michael Rowe, The Boat

00:09:54.970 --> 00:09:57.149
Ashore. They did something to the underlying

00:09:57.149 --> 00:09:59.730
rhythm that really set it apart from their peers.

00:09:59.950 --> 00:10:01.710
They did. And this is where we have to give a

00:10:01.710 --> 00:10:03.429
lot of credit to the group's musical director,

00:10:03.590 --> 00:10:06.110
Bob Bowers. Bob Bowers. Right. He is the one

00:10:06.110 --> 00:10:08.090
credited with the arrangement of the hit single.

00:10:08.590 --> 00:10:12.230
He took this basic folk concept and gave it a

00:10:12.230 --> 00:10:15.570
Calypso music -based adaptation. Calypso. Now,

00:10:15.629 --> 00:10:17.409
when I think of Calypso in the context of the

00:10:17.409 --> 00:10:20.250
early 60s, I immediately think of Harry Belafonte,

00:10:20.490 --> 00:10:23.389
Deo, the Banana Boat song. And he is the gold

00:10:23.389 --> 00:10:26.379
standard for that era. Yeah. But mixing that

00:10:26.379 --> 00:10:29.000
Caribbean syncopated rhythm with a traditional

00:10:29.000 --> 00:10:31.539
English nursery rhyme about a crooked man, that

00:10:31.539 --> 00:10:35.080
is a phenomenally bold creative choice. Can you

00:10:35.080 --> 00:10:38.299
explain syncopated for us? What actually makes

00:10:38.299 --> 00:10:41.259
it sound calypso compared to just a standard

00:10:41.259 --> 00:10:45.220
folk guy strumming a guitar? Sure. In a standard

00:10:45.220 --> 00:10:48.320
march or a very simple folk song, the emphasis

00:10:48.320 --> 00:10:51.159
is usually on the one and the three beats. It's

00:10:51.159 --> 00:10:54.639
very rigid. Very predictable. Down, up, down,

00:10:54.779 --> 00:10:57.820
up. Like a metronome. Right. Calypso shifts that

00:10:57.820 --> 00:11:00.860
emphasis. It deliberately puts the accent on

00:11:00.860 --> 00:11:04.000
the offbeats. It gives the music a sway, a highly

00:11:04.000 --> 00:11:06.059
danceable quality. It makes you want to move

00:11:06.059 --> 00:11:08.779
your hips, not just tap your foot. So Bob Bowers

00:11:08.779 --> 00:11:11.200
takes There Was a Crooked Man, which historically

00:11:11.200 --> 00:11:13.840
is recited in this very stiff, almost marching

00:11:13.840 --> 00:11:18.360
meter, and he forces it into this swaying, relaxed

00:11:18.360 --> 00:11:21.399
Caribbean beat. Exactly. And along with group

00:11:21.399 --> 00:11:23.500
members Brian Sennett and John Madden, who are

00:11:23.500 --> 00:11:25.539
also specifically noted in the historical records

00:11:25.539 --> 00:11:27.179
in the context of the recording and arrangement,

00:11:27.340 --> 00:11:29.120
they managed to make it work seamlessly. Wait,

00:11:29.159 --> 00:11:31.039
hold on a second. John Madden. I knew you were

00:11:31.039 --> 00:11:32.659
going to stop at that name. I have to ask, are

00:11:32.659 --> 00:11:34.840
we talking about the legendary football coach,

00:11:35.019 --> 00:11:37.559
the video game icon? We are not. Okay, thank

00:11:37.559 --> 00:11:39.960
you for clarifying that. Because I was picturing

00:11:39.960 --> 00:11:42.159
the guy with the telestrator drawing yellow lines

00:11:42.159 --> 00:11:44.620
over the sheet music. Boom. Tough singing. You

00:11:44.620 --> 00:11:46.080
had to hit the high note right here. That would

00:11:46.080 --> 00:11:48.200
be an amazing piece of history, but no, this

00:11:48.200 --> 00:11:50.500
is a different John Madden entirely. Okay. But

00:11:50.500 --> 00:11:54.340
yes, this creative team forged a sound that was

00:11:54.340 --> 00:11:57.440
completely distinct. Yeah. It wasn't pure traditional

00:11:57.440 --> 00:12:00.759
folk like Peter, Paul, and Mary, and it certainly

00:12:00.759 --> 00:12:03.639
wasn't pure authentic Calypso. It was this highly

00:12:03.639 --> 00:12:06.740
polished, pop -friendly fusion. And they released

00:12:06.740 --> 00:12:09.399
this very polished fusion on Phillips Records.

00:12:09.720 --> 00:12:11.259
That's right. It came out on the Phillips label.

00:12:11.500 --> 00:12:14.059
The B -side was a track called Freedom Star.

00:12:14.340 --> 00:12:16.519
Yeah. And here's a crucial detail. This single

00:12:16.519 --> 00:12:19.019
was actually the debut recording for the group.

00:12:19.159 --> 00:12:21.639
It was on their premiere album, conveniently

00:12:21.639 --> 00:12:24.870
titled The Serendipity Singers. That is a heck

00:12:24.870 --> 00:12:27.149
of a debut to come right out of the gate with

00:12:27.149 --> 00:12:30.250
a genre -bending nine -voice hit. And we keep

00:12:30.250 --> 00:12:32.730
coming back to the date, but it is just so incredibly

00:12:32.730 --> 00:12:36.389
significant. Released in February 1964. It really

00:12:36.389 --> 00:12:38.629
is the context that makes this chart story so

00:12:38.629 --> 00:12:41.149
special. I cannot stress enough how much the

00:12:41.149 --> 00:12:43.490
Beatles sucked the oxygen out of the room in

00:12:43.490 --> 00:12:46.509
February 1964. I was actually reading about the

00:12:46.509 --> 00:12:49.070
Billboard charts from that specific window of

00:12:49.070 --> 00:12:53.070
time. At one point in early 64, the Beatles famously

00:12:53.070 --> 00:12:55.409
held the top five spots on the Billboard chart

00:12:55.409 --> 00:12:57.610
simultaneously. It was an absolute monopoly.

00:12:58.350 --> 00:13:01.789
They were an unstoppable cultural force. So for

00:13:01.789 --> 00:13:04.549
a debut folk group singing a nursery rhyme with

00:13:04.549 --> 00:13:07.610
acoustic instruments to break through that impenetrable

00:13:07.610 --> 00:13:10.649
wall of noise, it's a huge testament to how undeniable

00:13:10.649 --> 00:13:13.029
that hook was. So let's look at the actual numbers,

00:13:13.070 --> 00:13:15.389
because breaking through is probably an understatement.

00:13:15.409 --> 00:13:17.690
This thing wasn't just a minor blip on the radar.

00:13:17.850 --> 00:13:20.190
Not at all. It was a legitimate smash. In the

00:13:20.190 --> 00:13:22.250
United States, it reached number six on the Billboard

00:13:22.250 --> 00:13:27.029
Hot 100. Number six. Top ten. In the era of the

00:13:27.029 --> 00:13:29.950
Beatles. That is incredible. It is. And if you

00:13:29.950 --> 00:13:31.590
look at the adult contemporary chart, it went

00:13:31.590 --> 00:13:33.750
even higher. It hit number two. Okay, that makes

00:13:33.750 --> 00:13:35.850
a lot of sense. The teenagers are all screaming

00:13:35.850 --> 00:13:38.289
for Ringo and Paul, but the parents, the parents

00:13:38.289 --> 00:13:39.970
are probably finding the Beatles a bit loud,

00:13:40.049 --> 00:13:43.809
maybe a bit scary. Exactly. The Serendipity Singers

00:13:43.809 --> 00:13:46.330
offered a safe harbor for adult listeners. It

00:13:46.330 --> 00:13:49.129
was upbeat. It was melodic. You could clearly

00:13:49.129 --> 00:13:52.129
understand every single word of the lyrics. It

00:13:52.129 --> 00:13:54.950
appealed to that slightly older demographic that

00:13:54.950 --> 00:13:57.129
just wasn't quite ready to grow their hair out

00:13:57.129 --> 00:13:59.500
yet. But what's even more interesting to me,

00:13:59.519 --> 00:14:01.480
looking at the sources, is the regional breakdown.

00:14:01.899 --> 00:14:04.679
Because back then, radio was a lot more fragmented

00:14:04.679 --> 00:14:07.779
than it is today. You had local surveys and local

00:14:07.779 --> 00:14:10.360
DJs that held massive influence. Oh, absolutely.

00:14:10.580 --> 00:14:13.220
The national Billboard chart is an average, but

00:14:13.220 --> 00:14:15.440
the local charts tell the real story of what

00:14:15.440 --> 00:14:17.139
people were actually requesting on the phone

00:14:17.139 --> 00:14:19.679
lines in their hometowns. And in some major markets,

00:14:19.940 --> 00:14:22.379
this song wasn't just top 10. It was number one.

00:14:22.539 --> 00:14:24.379
Where are we talking? What markets? One of the

00:14:24.379 --> 00:14:27.659
biggest was the WLS silver dollar survey. WLS,

00:14:27.820 --> 00:14:30.179
that's the big powerhouse AM station in Chicago,

00:14:30.379 --> 00:14:32.299
right? Huge station. If you made it to the top

00:14:32.299 --> 00:14:34.320
of WLS, you basically owned the entire Midwest.

00:14:34.639 --> 00:14:38.340
They had a massive 50 ,000 watt clear channel

00:14:38.340 --> 00:14:40.480
signal that you could pick up three states away

00:14:40.480 --> 00:14:43.559
at night. Wow. And on that WLS survey, don't

00:14:43.559 --> 00:14:45.720
let the rain come down. Hit number one on April

00:14:45.720 --> 00:14:49.919
17th, 1964. Number one in Chicago. Take that,

00:14:50.039 --> 00:14:52.879
Lennon and McCartney. It didn't stop there. It

00:14:52.879 --> 00:14:54.840
also topped the local surveys in Louisville,

00:14:54.919 --> 00:14:57.820
Minneapolis and Pittsburgh. So it had this incredibly

00:14:57.820 --> 00:15:01.500
broad appeal across the Midwest and the industrial

00:15:01.500 --> 00:15:04.360
north. It really resonated with working class

00:15:04.360 --> 00:15:06.899
folks in those cities. And it wasn't just contained

00:15:06.899 --> 00:15:09.039
to the U .S. borders either. The crooked little

00:15:09.039 --> 00:15:11.919
man went international. He certainly traveled.

00:15:12.159 --> 00:15:15.000
The single reached number seven on the CAJM hit

00:15:15.000 --> 00:15:17.740
parade in Canada. And it went all the way across

00:15:17.740 --> 00:15:20.379
the globe to New Zealand, where it hit number

00:15:20.379 --> 00:15:23.029
six on the leverhead parade. That is massive

00:15:23.029 --> 00:15:25.990
reach for a debut single about a crooked house.

00:15:26.190 --> 00:15:28.350
It really proves that a good melody is a good

00:15:28.350 --> 00:15:30.529
melody, regardless of where you are in the world.

00:15:30.629 --> 00:15:33.009
And regardless of genre, too. And that brings

00:15:33.009 --> 00:15:35.529
us to the lasting legacy of this song. Because

00:15:35.529 --> 00:15:38.490
once a song hits that level of absolute ubiquity,

00:15:38.590 --> 00:15:41.700
other artists start eyeing it. It becomes part

00:15:41.700 --> 00:15:44.240
of the standard repertoire. The covers. Who else

00:15:44.240 --> 00:15:45.940
decided to take a crack at The Crooked Little

00:15:45.940 --> 00:15:47.659
Man? Well, keeping with the whole folk revival

00:15:47.659 --> 00:15:49.899
theme, the Brothers Four covered it. They put

00:15:49.899 --> 00:15:52.419
it on their album, More Big Folk Hits. Which

00:15:52.419 --> 00:15:54.299
makes sense. That's right in their wheelhouse.

00:15:54.419 --> 00:15:56.980
There were direct competitors, essentially. Exactly.

00:15:57.019 --> 00:15:59.600
It's like Coke and Pepsi. If one has a hit flavor,

00:15:59.740 --> 00:16:01.120
the other is going to release their own version

00:16:01.120 --> 00:16:03.799
of it. But then you also have Trini Lopez. Trini

00:16:03.799 --> 00:16:06.440
Lopez. The guy who did If I Had a Hammer. Right.

00:16:06.500 --> 00:16:09.539
He included it on his record, The Folk Album.

00:16:09.850 --> 00:16:13.470
which came out in 1965. And Trini Lopez is such

00:16:13.470 --> 00:16:15.529
an interesting figure to bring up here because

00:16:15.529 --> 00:16:19.070
he already straddled that line between folk and

00:16:19.070 --> 00:16:22.700
Latin pop. He was famous for playing at PJ's

00:16:22.700 --> 00:16:25.899
in Hollywood, doing these incredibly high -energy

00:16:25.899 --> 00:16:28.659
go -go sets. So for him, the calypso element

00:16:28.659 --> 00:16:30.940
of the song was probably the main selling point.

00:16:31.379 --> 00:16:34.159
100%. He could lean into that syncopated rhythm

00:16:34.159 --> 00:16:36.279
even harder than the Serendipity Singers did.

00:16:36.399 --> 00:16:39.340
It was just a perfect natural fit for his performance

00:16:39.340 --> 00:16:41.639
style. It really does seem like a song that can

00:16:41.639 --> 00:16:43.720
shapeshift. It can be traditional folk. It can

00:16:43.720 --> 00:16:46.320
be pop. It can be calypso. It can be Latin infused.

00:16:46.799 --> 00:16:50.159
That fluidity is the key to its survival. A very

00:16:50.159 --> 00:16:52.360
rigid song usually doesn't survive interpretation

00:16:52.360 --> 00:16:56.220
well. But a simple, highly structural song like

00:16:56.220 --> 00:16:59.059
this one allows the next artist to project their

00:16:59.059 --> 00:17:01.340
own unique style right onto it. Yeah. And we

00:17:01.340 --> 00:17:03.980
really can't forget the UK in all of this. While

00:17:03.980 --> 00:17:05.500
the Serendipity Singers were dealing with the

00:17:05.500 --> 00:17:08.019
British invasion over here, the song actually

00:17:08.019 --> 00:17:10.650
invaded Britain in return. Did the serendipity

00:17:10.650 --> 00:17:12.750
singers hit the charts over there? Actually,

00:17:12.829 --> 00:17:15.630
no, they didn't. In the UK, the hit version of

00:17:15.630 --> 00:17:18.130
the song was by a guy named Ronnie Hilton. His

00:17:18.130 --> 00:17:20.769
version peaked at number 21 on the UK charts

00:17:20.769 --> 00:17:24.079
in 1964. So Ronnie Hilton carried the torch across

00:17:24.079 --> 00:17:25.859
the Atlantic. It's funny how that happens in

00:17:25.859 --> 00:17:28.400
music history. Different artists completely capturing

00:17:28.400 --> 00:17:30.460
different geographic territories with the exact

00:17:30.460 --> 00:17:33.200
same song. It reminds me of how sometimes a movie

00:17:33.200 --> 00:17:35.019
is released with a completely different title

00:17:35.019 --> 00:17:37.819
or poster in different countries just to suit

00:17:37.819 --> 00:17:40.099
the local taste. It's the exact same principle.

00:17:40.400 --> 00:17:43.059
The UK audience already knew Ronnie Hilton. He

00:17:43.059 --> 00:17:46.059
was a familiar voice. They didn't know this massive

00:17:46.059 --> 00:17:49.380
nine piece American college group. Right. So

00:17:49.380 --> 00:17:51.440
Hilton's cover becomes the definitive version

00:17:51.440 --> 00:17:53.809
for them. But whether it's Ronnie Hilton, the

00:17:53.809 --> 00:17:56.690
Brothers Four, Trini Lopez, or the Serendipity

00:17:56.690 --> 00:18:00.509
Singers, that core repetitive hook of don't let

00:18:00.509 --> 00:18:03.470
the rain come down is what drives the whole thing.

00:18:03.569 --> 00:18:05.069
It really does just stick in your brain. I've

00:18:05.069 --> 00:18:06.750
honestly been tapping my foot under the desk

00:18:06.750 --> 00:18:08.529
this whole time just thinking about the chorus.

00:18:08.829 --> 00:18:11.539
It's a total earworm. It's scientifically designed

00:18:11.539 --> 00:18:13.680
to be. So let's bring this all together. We start

00:18:13.680 --> 00:18:15.740
with a simple nursery rhyme that's been around

00:18:15.740 --> 00:18:18.180
for centuries. There was a crooked man. Right,

00:18:18.259 --> 00:18:20.400
just an oral tradition passed down from parent

00:18:20.400 --> 00:18:23.380
to child. Then in 1960, Jimmy Rogers records

00:18:23.380 --> 00:18:26.240
it as Cricket Little House, and Hickey and Miller

00:18:26.240 --> 00:18:28.480
do the heavy lifting on the songwriting adaptation,

00:18:28.960 --> 00:18:31.480
turning a simple rhyme into a robust pop song

00:18:31.480 --> 00:18:34.119
structure. Laying the legal and musical groundwork

00:18:34.119 --> 00:18:38.059
for what was to come. Then, February 1964 hits.

00:18:38.339 --> 00:18:41.359
The Serendipity Singers, all nine of them, team

00:18:41.359 --> 00:18:43.819
up with their musical director, Bob Bowers. They

00:18:43.819 --> 00:18:46.619
speed it up. They throw in a syncopated calypso

00:18:46.619 --> 00:18:49.460
beat and they organize themselves into a highly

00:18:49.460 --> 00:18:52.500
choreographed vocal matrix. It really was a perfect

00:18:52.500 --> 00:18:54.940
storm of arrangement and timing. And despite

00:18:54.940 --> 00:18:57.619
the critic confusion early on, Hickey and Miller

00:18:57.619 --> 00:19:00.619
eventually get their due. The song travels the

00:19:00.619 --> 00:19:03.180
world, hits number one in major markets like

00:19:03.180 --> 00:19:06.220
Chicago and Pittsburgh, and miraculously holds

00:19:06.220 --> 00:19:08.140
its own against the juggernaut of the Beatles.

00:19:08.460 --> 00:19:11.849
It is a classic unlikely success story. But I

00:19:11.849 --> 00:19:14.289
think the real key takeaway here, for me at least,

00:19:14.329 --> 00:19:16.690
is the absolute power of arrangement. How so?

00:19:16.930 --> 00:19:18.990
Dig into that a bit more for us. Well, just think

00:19:18.990 --> 00:19:21.210
about the actual lyrics. The cat has a kitten.

00:19:21.309 --> 00:19:23.650
The kitten has a mouse. They all live together

00:19:23.650 --> 00:19:25.509
in a little crooked house. It's nonsense. It's

00:19:25.509 --> 00:19:28.109
imagery written for toddlers. On paper, if you

00:19:28.109 --> 00:19:30.490
walked in and pitched those lyrics to a record

00:19:30.490 --> 00:19:32.630
executive today, they would laugh you right out

00:19:32.630 --> 00:19:34.329
of the room. I have a hit song about a crooked

00:19:34.329 --> 00:19:36.150
cat. Yeah, I don't see that meeting going very

00:19:36.150 --> 00:19:39.509
well. They just yell next. Exactly. But Bob Bowers.

00:19:39.920 --> 00:19:42.480
And the group. They completely changed the delivery.

00:19:42.720 --> 00:19:44.940
They took something old and dusty, gave it a

00:19:44.940 --> 00:19:46.779
rhythm that fundamentally made people want to

00:19:46.779 --> 00:19:49.299
dance, and they used those nine distinct voices

00:19:49.299 --> 00:19:52.859
to create a sense of power and excitement. They

00:19:52.859 --> 00:19:55.319
proved that you can reinvent a completely traditional

00:19:55.319 --> 00:19:58.319
concept just by changing the sonic rap it comes

00:19:58.319 --> 00:20:00.519
in. It's not just what you say, it's how you

00:20:00.519 --> 00:20:02.819
sing it. And I guess how many people you have

00:20:02.819 --> 00:20:05.519
singing it with you. Exactly. They turned a solo

00:20:05.519 --> 00:20:08.420
spoken rhyme into a massive community event.

00:20:08.640 --> 00:20:12.140
And in 1964, even with the Beatles changing the

00:20:12.140 --> 00:20:14.680
entire cultural landscape, people still clearly

00:20:14.680 --> 00:20:16.619
wanted that sense of community. You know, it

00:20:16.619 --> 00:20:18.279
leaves me with a thought to pass on to everyone

00:20:18.279 --> 00:20:20.079
listening. We don't really see this anymore in

00:20:20.079 --> 00:20:22.759
music. The idea of a nine person vocal group

00:20:22.759 --> 00:20:26.730
having a mainstream top 10 pop hit. It is incredibly

00:20:26.730 --> 00:20:28.930
rare these days. I mean, you have K -pop groups,

00:20:28.990 --> 00:20:31.190
which are certainly large and highly choreographed,

00:20:31.190 --> 00:20:34.109
but in the Western folk or pop tradition, it's

00:20:34.109 --> 00:20:37.109
almost extinct. And also just the source material

00:20:37.109 --> 00:20:39.930
itself. We talk all the time about sampling in

00:20:39.930 --> 00:20:42.829
modern hip hop, which is usually taking an audio

00:20:42.829 --> 00:20:45.349
piece of an old record. But this is sampling

00:20:45.349 --> 00:20:47.710
a piece of historical culture. Can you imagine

00:20:47.710 --> 00:20:51.130
a modern pop star taking Humpty Dumpty or Jack

00:20:51.130 --> 00:20:53.869
and Jill, putting a heavy trap beat behind it

00:20:53.869 --> 00:20:56.369
and going straight to number one on Billboard?

00:20:56.750 --> 00:20:58.849
You know what? We've seen stranger things happen

00:20:58.849 --> 00:21:01.650
on the Internet. We've seen 19th century sea

00:21:01.650 --> 00:21:04.789
shanties go completely viral on TikTok. Maybe

00:21:04.789 --> 00:21:06.990
public domain nursery rhymes are the next big

00:21:06.990 --> 00:21:09.289
frontier for pop music. There you go. The next

00:21:09.289 --> 00:21:12.109
big trend. Little Miss Muffet featuring Drake.

00:21:12.269 --> 00:21:14.490
You heard it here first on the Deep Dive. I will

00:21:14.490 --> 00:21:16.390
definitely keep an eye on the charts. If it happens,

00:21:16.470 --> 00:21:18.410
we'll have to do another Deep Dive on it. Absolutely,

00:21:18.490 --> 00:21:21.130
we will. Well, that is all the time we have for

00:21:21.130 --> 00:21:23.450
today. We hope you enjoyed this look back at

00:21:23.450 --> 00:21:25.509
the crooked little man and his very unexpected

00:21:25.509 --> 00:21:27.769
journey to pop stardom. It was a real pleasure

00:21:27.769 --> 00:21:30.369
to revisit. Thanks for listening, and we will

00:21:30.369 --> 00:21:32.130
catch you on the next deep dive.
