WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.500
Welcome back to the Deep Dive. Today we are,

00:00:02.720 --> 00:00:05.599
we're not just talking about a dinosaur. We are

00:00:05.599 --> 00:00:08.460
talking about, well, I think it's fair to say

00:00:08.460 --> 00:00:10.080
we're talking about the dinosaur. Right. And

00:00:10.080 --> 00:00:12.779
I really don't say that lightly. No, you're absolutely

00:00:12.779 --> 00:00:15.339
right. It really is the, you know, the definitive

00:00:15.339 --> 00:00:17.239
article, isn't it? It holds a special place.

00:00:17.420 --> 00:00:19.399
It really does. I was thinking about this on

00:00:19.399 --> 00:00:22.820
the way in. If you walk into any kindergarten

00:00:22.820 --> 00:00:24.620
classroom, pretty much anywhere in the world,

00:00:24.739 --> 00:00:28.000
and you ask a five -year -old to draw a dinosaur.

00:00:29.039 --> 00:00:30.640
What are they going to draw? They're going to

00:00:30.640 --> 00:00:32.299
draw one of two things. It's either going to

00:00:32.299 --> 00:00:35.219
be a Tyrannosaurus Rex, you know, big teeth,

00:00:35.340 --> 00:00:38.700
tiny little arms. Or this one, the one with the

00:00:38.700 --> 00:00:41.140
three horns and the big shield on its head. Exactly.

00:00:41.439 --> 00:00:44.320
We are talking about Triceratops. And I feel

00:00:44.320 --> 00:00:46.280
like everyone listening right now has a very,

00:00:46.299 --> 00:00:49.460
very specific image in their head. It's probably

00:00:49.460 --> 00:00:51.679
a plastic toy you had when you were growing up.

00:00:51.759 --> 00:00:54.490
Oh, for sure. Maybe it was from a certain. a

00:00:54.490 --> 00:00:57.890
movie franchise set on an island it's that toy

00:00:57.890 --> 00:01:00.329
box version of the animal which is a great starting

00:01:00.329 --> 00:01:02.170
point i mean it's iconic for a reason but the

00:01:02.170 --> 00:01:06.180
reality of this animal is It's just so much stranger,

00:01:06.379 --> 00:01:09.260
so much more dynamic, and frankly, so much more

00:01:09.260 --> 00:01:12.040
terrifying than that static little plastic toy.

00:01:12.180 --> 00:01:14.379
That is exactly the mission today. We are going

00:01:14.379 --> 00:01:16.859
to take that toy box version and, well, we're

00:01:16.859 --> 00:01:18.239
going to upgrade it. We're going to look at the

00:01:18.239 --> 00:01:20.840
sources. And we have a huge stack today from

00:01:20.840 --> 00:01:23.079
the original 19th century descriptions to some

00:01:23.079 --> 00:01:25.760
really cutting edge papers from the last couple

00:01:25.760 --> 00:01:27.640
of years. And we're going to find out that this

00:01:27.640 --> 00:01:31.060
animal was a marvel of social complexity, a biological

00:01:31.060 --> 00:01:35.760
shapeshifter, and maybe. just maybe a little

00:01:35.760 --> 00:01:38.060
bit bristly. And we absolutely have to talk about

00:01:38.060 --> 00:01:40.420
cowboys. We absolutely have to talk about cowboys.

00:01:40.459 --> 00:01:42.879
I tease that and I promise we will get to the

00:01:42.879 --> 00:01:45.319
Wild West. Yeah. But before we get to the lassoes

00:01:45.319 --> 00:01:47.120
and the ranchers, let's just ground ourselves

00:01:47.120 --> 00:01:49.159
in the name. Yeah. Because it's one of the few

00:01:49.159 --> 00:01:51.099
scientific names that the general public actually

00:01:51.099 --> 00:01:54.579
knows and, you know. uses correctly. It is, yeah.

00:01:54.680 --> 00:01:56.879
It's a linguistic masterpiece, really. It's derived

00:01:56.879 --> 00:01:59.120
straight from ancient Greek. You have tri, which

00:01:59.120 --> 00:02:02.459
means three. Right. You have kiras, which means

00:02:02.459 --> 00:02:05.060
horn. Okay. And then you have emphomes, meaning

00:02:05.060 --> 00:02:08.379
face. Triceratops. Literally. Three horned face.

00:02:08.539 --> 00:02:11.740
It's so elegant, so descriptive. It's perfect.

00:02:11.979 --> 00:02:15.139
It doesn't require a degree in Latin to get the

00:02:15.139 --> 00:02:17.360
picture in your head. You hear the name and you

00:02:17.360 --> 00:02:19.919
see the animal. It is perfect branding. But here's

00:02:19.919 --> 00:02:22.400
the so what question to kick us off. Why does

00:02:22.400 --> 00:02:26.069
this specific dinosaur matter so much? I mean,

00:02:26.090 --> 00:02:28.729
aside from being incredibly cool looking on a

00:02:28.729 --> 00:02:31.669
lunchbox. Well, scientifically, it is. It's foundational.

00:02:31.930 --> 00:02:35.349
It's incredibly important. In phylogenetic taxonomy,

00:02:35.449 --> 00:02:38.689
that's the science of how we classify organisms

00:02:38.689 --> 00:02:42.169
based on their evolutionary relationships. Triceratops

00:02:42.169 --> 00:02:44.750
is actually used as a reference point, as a pillar

00:02:44.750 --> 00:02:47.250
to define what a dinosaur is. Wait, really? Say

00:02:47.250 --> 00:02:49.590
more about that. It's the standard unit. Basically,

00:02:49.590 --> 00:02:52.719
yes. The clade or the group that we call dinosauria,

00:02:52.740 --> 00:02:54.819
it's technically defined as all descendants of

00:02:54.819 --> 00:02:56.840
the most recent common ancestor of Triceratops

00:02:56.840 --> 00:02:59.060
and modern birds. That is heavy. So it's not

00:02:59.060 --> 00:03:00.900
just a random participant in the group. It's

00:03:00.900 --> 00:03:02.879
one of the two pillars that holds up the entire

00:03:02.879 --> 00:03:05.800
definition. Precisely. If you aren't related

00:03:05.800 --> 00:03:09.199
to Triceratops or birds in that specific way,

00:03:09.300 --> 00:03:12.159
by that definition, you aren't a dinosaur. So

00:03:12.159 --> 00:03:15.659
in a very real technical sense, Triceratops anchors

00:03:15.659 --> 00:03:18.580
the entire family tree. And beyond that, historically,

00:03:18.879 --> 00:03:21.139
it's significant because of when it lived, right?

00:03:21.219 --> 00:03:23.080
It's right at the very, very end. Exactly right.

00:03:23.180 --> 00:03:25.740
It was one of the very last non -avian dinosaurs

00:03:25.740 --> 00:03:28.360
standing. It lived at the end of the Maastrichtian

00:03:28.360 --> 00:03:32.479
age for about 68 to 66 million years ago. So

00:03:32.479 --> 00:03:35.460
it was there right up until the asteroid hit.

00:03:35.539 --> 00:03:38.120
If you could go back in time and stand on the

00:03:38.120 --> 00:03:40.259
ground on that final day, you know, just before

00:03:40.259 --> 00:03:43.439
the impact and look up at the sky. The animal

00:03:43.439 --> 00:03:45.599
standing next to you in that forest was very,

00:03:45.659 --> 00:03:48.340
very likely a Triceratops. Talk about witnessing

00:03:48.340 --> 00:03:51.120
the end of an era. It's the final boss of the

00:03:51.120 --> 00:03:53.639
Cretaceous. In many ways, yes. It was the culmination

00:03:53.639 --> 00:03:56.460
of 150 million years of dinosaur evolution. Okay,

00:03:56.500 --> 00:03:58.340
so we know what it is. We know why it matters.

00:03:58.620 --> 00:04:00.280
But I want to go back to when we didn't know

00:04:00.280 --> 00:04:03.180
what it was. Because the discovery story of Triceratops

00:04:03.180 --> 00:04:05.659
is, well, it's a comedy of errors. It's almost

00:04:05.659 --> 00:04:07.979
unbelievable. It really is. And it highlights

00:04:07.979 --> 00:04:10.139
something so important about paleontology. Even

00:04:10.139 --> 00:04:13.770
the absolute... best experts, the giants of the

00:04:13.770 --> 00:04:16.290
field, can get it completely wrong if they don't

00:04:16.290 --> 00:04:18.230
have the whole picture. So let's set the scene.

00:04:18.329 --> 00:04:21.550
It's 1887. We are deep in the American West.

00:04:21.829 --> 00:04:25.610
The Bone Wars are raging. Oh, absolutely. This

00:04:25.610 --> 00:04:28.430
is the peak of the rivalry between Ockneal Charles

00:04:28.430 --> 00:04:31.350
Marsh and Edward Drinker Cope. They're sending

00:04:31.350 --> 00:04:33.750
teams out all over the West, trying to one -up

00:04:33.750 --> 00:04:36.790
each other, naming new species as fast as they

00:04:36.790 --> 00:04:39.129
can dig them up. It's a frantic, competitive

00:04:39.129 --> 00:04:42.569
time. And into this scene walks a geologist named

00:04:42.569 --> 00:04:45.189
George Lyman Cannon. He's working near Denver,

00:04:45.329 --> 00:04:47.430
Colorado. Right. And you have to picture Denver

00:04:47.430 --> 00:04:49.990
in 1887. It's not the metropolis it is today.

00:04:50.110 --> 00:04:52.470
This was a rugged country. Yeah. And Cannon is

00:04:52.470 --> 00:04:54.430
out there doing his geology work, and he finds

00:04:54.430 --> 00:04:56.930
a fossil. Not a whole skeleton, I'm guessing.

00:04:57.110 --> 00:04:59.009
No, and that's the entire problem. It's just

00:04:59.009 --> 00:05:01.930
a pair of large brow horns, the ones over the

00:05:01.930 --> 00:05:04.529
eyes, and they're attached to a fragment of the

00:05:04.529 --> 00:05:06.569
skull roof. It's just the very top of the head.

00:05:06.769 --> 00:05:09.310
Okay. So he wraps them up, puts them in a crate.

00:05:09.639 --> 00:05:12.120
And sends them off to the expert. He sends them

00:05:12.120 --> 00:05:16.100
to Othniel Charles Marsh. And we have to contextualize

00:05:16.100 --> 00:05:19.100
Marsh. This man was at Yale. He was one of the

00:05:19.100 --> 00:05:22.319
titans of early American paleontology. He's the

00:05:22.319 --> 00:05:24.720
guy who named Stegosaurus, Apatosaurus, Allosaurus.

00:05:25.500 --> 00:05:27.560
If anyone in the world should know a dinosaur

00:05:27.560 --> 00:05:30.379
when they see one, it's O .C. Marsh. So Marsh

00:05:30.379 --> 00:05:32.860
gets this crate. He opens it up. He sees two

00:05:32.860 --> 00:05:36.259
massive bone horns. What goes through his mind?

00:05:36.360 --> 00:05:38.870
What's his process? Well, he looks at the horns,

00:05:39.050 --> 00:05:41.730
for sure. But more importantly, he looks at the

00:05:41.730 --> 00:05:44.129
notes on the geology. The person who sent it

00:05:44.129 --> 00:05:47.129
noted the rock formation it came from. Marsh,

00:05:47.350 --> 00:05:49.850
based on what he knew at the time, assumes that

00:05:49.850 --> 00:05:52.509
Formotion is from the Pliocene epoch. And for

00:05:52.509 --> 00:05:54.589
those of us who don't have the geologic timescale

00:05:54.589 --> 00:05:57.290
tattooed on our arms, what does Pliocene mean

00:05:57.290 --> 00:05:59.670
in this context? It means relatively recent,

00:05:59.910 --> 00:06:02.230
geologically speaking. We're talking a few million

00:06:02.230 --> 00:06:05.449
years ago. Crucially, this is long, long after

00:06:05.449 --> 00:06:08.019
the dinosaurs went extinct. Ah. So right off

00:06:08.019 --> 00:06:10.040
the bat, he's ruling out dinosaur. He thinks

00:06:10.040 --> 00:06:11.939
he's looking at a mammal. Exactly. He thinks

00:06:11.939 --> 00:06:14.319
these aren't dinosaur fossils at all. He concludes

00:06:14.319 --> 00:06:16.759
they must belong to some kind of giant extinct

00:06:16.759 --> 00:06:20.420
species of bison. Yes. He formally describes

00:06:20.420 --> 00:06:24.300
it and names it bison alticornis, which means

00:06:24.300 --> 00:06:27.860
the high horned bison. That is just fantastic.

00:06:27.920 --> 00:06:31.860
So the very first triceratops fossils ever cataloged

00:06:31.860 --> 00:06:34.740
were put in the books as a type of cow. A very

00:06:34.740 --> 00:06:37.399
large, very strange cow. But, you know, to be

00:06:37.399 --> 00:06:39.420
fair to Marsh, if you just saw those two brow

00:06:39.420 --> 00:06:42.240
horns in isolation, which are made of bone and

00:06:42.240 --> 00:06:44.480
probably looked a bit like the bony cores of

00:06:44.480 --> 00:06:46.839
modern cattle horns, and you were told the rocks

00:06:46.839 --> 00:06:48.959
they came from are only a few million years old,

00:06:49.040 --> 00:06:52.040
a giant bison isn't an absurd conclusion. I guess

00:06:52.040 --> 00:06:53.899
that's convergent evolution where different animals

00:06:53.899 --> 00:06:56.939
evolve similar shapes. Precisely. But the universe

00:06:56.939 --> 00:06:59.379
wasn't done messing with them yet. Because the

00:06:59.379 --> 00:07:01.779
next big find, and this is my absolute favorite

00:07:01.779 --> 00:07:04.740
part of the whole story, involves a literal cowboy.

00:07:05.220 --> 00:07:08.939
This is the story of Edmund B. Wilson in 1888.

00:07:09.300 --> 00:07:11.740
1888. So a year later, we're in Wyoming now,

00:07:11.819 --> 00:07:13.899
and Edmund is a cowboy. He's not a scientist,

00:07:13.980 --> 00:07:16.300
not a geologist. He's presumably out there on

00:07:16.300 --> 00:07:18.180
horseback checking fences or looking for stray

00:07:18.180 --> 00:07:20.600
cattle. And he's riding along a ravine, minding

00:07:20.600 --> 00:07:22.740
his own business, and he sees something. He sees

00:07:22.740 --> 00:07:25.540
a monstrous skull, as it was later described,

00:07:25.779 --> 00:07:28.560
poking out of the side of the ravine. Now, you

00:07:28.560 --> 00:07:30.319
have to try and imagine that. You're on a horse

00:07:30.319 --> 00:07:32.879
miles from civilization. You've probably never

00:07:32.879 --> 00:07:35.319
seen a dinosaur skeleton in a museum because

00:07:35.319 --> 00:07:38.399
they barely existed yet. And a skull the size

00:07:38.399 --> 00:07:41.420
of a small car is staring at you from out of

00:07:41.420 --> 00:07:44.459
the dirt. It must have been, I mean, terrifying

00:07:44.459 --> 00:07:46.819
or at least deeply confusing. What would you

00:07:46.819 --> 00:07:50.579
even think that was? A dragon? Who knows? And

00:07:50.579 --> 00:07:52.800
Edmund, being a practical man of the West, decides

00:07:52.800 --> 00:07:54.879
he wants to retrieve it. Maybe he thinks it's

00:07:54.879 --> 00:07:57.139
worth money. Maybe he just wants the world's

00:07:57.139 --> 00:07:59.939
greatest trophy for the ranch house. But he doesn't

00:07:59.939 --> 00:08:01.980
have a rock hammer. He doesn't have plaster jackets.

00:08:02.339 --> 00:08:05.000
He has a rope. He has a lasso. This is the most

00:08:05.000 --> 00:08:07.259
American scientific method I have ever heard

00:08:07.259 --> 00:08:09.860
of. I'm going to lasso the science out of the

00:08:09.860 --> 00:08:11.860
ground. It really is. The story goes that he

00:08:11.860 --> 00:08:14.019
throws his lasso around one of the horns. He

00:08:14.019 --> 00:08:15.720
ties the other end to the horn of his saddle

00:08:15.720 --> 00:08:18.279
and he spurs his horse. He tries to yank this

00:08:18.279 --> 00:08:21.160
massive fossil out of the cliff face by brute

00:08:21.160 --> 00:08:23.720
force. And I'm guessing physics happens. Physics

00:08:23.720 --> 00:08:26.779
happens. The fossilized horn, which is essentially

00:08:26.779 --> 00:08:29.759
rock, snaps right off. Oh, that hurts my soul.

00:08:33.700 --> 00:08:36.860
And to make it worse, the jolt of the horn breaking

00:08:36.860 --> 00:08:39.659
off causes the rest of the massive skull to tumble

00:08:39.659 --> 00:08:42.330
down into the cleft of the ravine. out of reach

00:08:42.330 --> 00:08:45.350
but wilson he has the horn he takes that broken

00:08:45.350 --> 00:08:48.169
piece rides back to the ranch and shows it to

00:08:48.169 --> 00:08:50.330
his boss and his boss is the connection right

00:08:50.330 --> 00:08:53.289
yes his boss is a rancher and an amateur fossil

00:08:53.289 --> 00:08:56.929
collector named charles arthur guernsey and guernsey

00:08:56.929 --> 00:08:59.629
thankfully knows who to call he shows the horn

00:08:59.629 --> 00:09:02.379
to a man named john bell hatcher And we need

00:09:02.379 --> 00:09:04.639
to put a pin in Hatcher. He's a major character

00:09:04.639 --> 00:09:07.000
in this story. He is the fossil hunter's fossil

00:09:07.000 --> 00:09:09.559
hunter. If Marsh is the academic general back

00:09:09.559 --> 00:09:12.139
at Yale, Hatcher is the guy on the front lines,

00:09:12.220 --> 00:09:14.840
the Indiana Jones of this whole operation. He

00:09:14.840 --> 00:09:17.320
was unbelievably tough and had an incredible

00:09:17.320 --> 00:09:19.940
eye for finding fossils. So Hatcher sees this

00:09:19.940 --> 00:09:22.460
horn. And what does he think? Does he think bison?

00:09:22.559 --> 00:09:26.259
No way. Hatcher sees this horn and he knows immediately

00:09:26.259 --> 00:09:28.399
this isn't a mammal. He knows this is something

00:09:28.399 --> 00:09:31.179
reptilian and something enormous. He gets Guernsey

00:09:31.179 --> 00:09:33.379
to take him out to the ravine. He manages to

00:09:33.379 --> 00:09:35.480
recover the skull. This very skull becomes the

00:09:35.480 --> 00:09:38.820
holotype, the defining specimen, YPM 1820. And

00:09:38.820 --> 00:09:41.659
he sends it to Marsh back at Yale. Okay. So now

00:09:41.659 --> 00:09:45.700
Marsh has a complete monstrous skull. with a

00:09:45.700 --> 00:09:48.919
beak, with giant brow horns. Surely now, he says,

00:09:49.059 --> 00:09:51.379
okay, definitely not a bison. Well, partially.

00:09:51.600 --> 00:09:54.820
He immediately realizes it's a reptile. He recognizes

00:09:54.820 --> 00:09:57.639
it as belonging to a group he had named earlier

00:09:57.639 --> 00:10:00.440
based on fragments, Ceratops. So he initially

00:10:00.440 --> 00:10:03.179
calls it Ceratops horridus. But then, as his

00:10:03.179 --> 00:10:05.399
team is cleaning the skull up, they find something

00:10:05.399 --> 00:10:08.019
Marsh hadn't seen before, a third horn. The nose

00:10:08.019 --> 00:10:11.529
horn. The nose horn in Triceratops. Oh, so that's

00:10:11.529 --> 00:10:13.309
the final piece of the puzzle. Exactly. That

00:10:13.309 --> 00:10:15.370
third horn on the nose convinces Marsh this is

00:10:15.370 --> 00:10:17.850
a whole new genus distinct from Ceratops. He

00:10:17.850 --> 00:10:20.830
renames it Triceratops' three -horned face. And

00:10:20.830 --> 00:10:23.149
remarkably, to his credit, he publishes a correction.

00:10:23.269 --> 00:10:25.549
He goes back and says, you know that giant bison,

00:10:25.549 --> 00:10:27.409
Bisoneltichornis? That was actually one of these.

00:10:27.490 --> 00:10:30.049
My mistake. That's good science. You have to

00:10:30.049 --> 00:10:32.190
be willing to say, I was wrong. But once they

00:10:32.190 --> 00:10:34.529
knew what to look for, the floodgates opened,

00:10:34.649 --> 00:10:36.889
didn't they? This is where Hatcher really shines.

00:10:37.500 --> 00:10:40.120
It was an absolute avalanche of fossils. Between

00:10:40.120 --> 00:10:44.279
1889 and 1891, just the three -year period, John

00:10:44.279 --> 00:10:46.700
Bell Hatcher went on an absolute tear in Wyoming.

00:10:46.960 --> 00:10:50.960
He collected 31 more or less complete skulls.

00:10:50.980 --> 00:10:54.899
31 skulls in three years. That is an insane level

00:10:54.899 --> 00:10:57.440
of productivity. It's staggering physical labor.

00:10:57.559 --> 00:10:59.320
You have to understand, these aren't chicken

00:10:59.320 --> 00:11:02.019
bones. A triceratops skull with the surrounding

00:11:02.019 --> 00:11:05.360
rock matrix can weigh thousands of pounds. Hatcher

00:11:05.360 --> 00:11:07.500
and his team were digging these out. with pickaxes

00:11:07.500 --> 00:11:10.039
and shovels, wrapping them in burlap and plaster,

00:11:10.320 --> 00:11:12.659
loading them onto horse -drawn wagons, and dragging

00:11:12.659 --> 00:11:15.039
them for miles across the Badlands to the nearest

00:11:15.039 --> 00:11:17.379
railhead. And I've read that Hatcher basically

00:11:17.379 --> 00:11:19.600
destroyed his health doing this work, right?

00:11:19.620 --> 00:11:22.539
The physical toll was immense. He did. He worked

00:11:22.539 --> 00:11:24.700
himself to the bone, often in brutal conditions.

00:11:24.940 --> 00:11:27.120
But because he sent back this incredible wealth

00:11:27.120 --> 00:11:29.940
of material, this library of skulls, March started

00:11:29.940 --> 00:11:31.779
noticing differences between them. Differences

00:11:31.779 --> 00:11:34.259
like what? Well, you know, no two skulls were

00:11:34.259 --> 00:11:37.000
exactly alike. Some had slightly longer brow

00:11:37.000 --> 00:11:40.159
horns that curved upwards more. Some had taller,

00:11:40.259 --> 00:11:43.500
more fan -shaped frills. Some had a big, robust

00:11:43.500 --> 00:11:46.500
nose horn. Some had virtually no nose horn at

00:11:46.500 --> 00:11:48.360
all, just a little bump. And because this was

00:11:48.360 --> 00:11:51.320
the 1800s, and the race was on to name as many

00:11:51.320 --> 00:11:54.149
new species as possible. Marsh went naming crazy.

00:11:54.350 --> 00:11:56.570
He was a classic splitter. If it looks slightly

00:11:56.570 --> 00:11:59.110
different, he gave it a new species name. He

00:11:59.110 --> 00:12:02.250
named Triceratops alatus, Triceratops flabilatus,

00:12:02.450 --> 00:12:04.950
Triceratops calicornis, Triceratops serratus.

00:12:04.950 --> 00:12:06.850
I think he named something like eight or nine

00:12:06.850 --> 00:12:09.190
species in just a couple of years. And this really

00:12:09.190 --> 00:12:11.769
sets the stage for a debate that, honestly, we

00:12:11.769 --> 00:12:13.750
are still having today over a century later.

00:12:14.329 --> 00:12:16.789
Are these all different species living side by

00:12:16.789 --> 00:12:19.570
side? Or is it just one animal that changes shape

00:12:19.570 --> 00:12:22.309
as it grows and ages? That is the central question

00:12:22.309 --> 00:12:24.710
of triceratops science. But before we can even

00:12:24.710 --> 00:12:26.529
get to the shape -shifting, we need to understand

00:12:26.529 --> 00:12:29.169
the baseline. We need to build the beast. If

00:12:29.169 --> 00:12:32.110
you are standing next to a fully grown triceratops

00:12:32.110 --> 00:12:34.590
hortus, what are you looking at? You are looking

00:12:34.590 --> 00:12:38.340
at a biological tank. A meat mountain. laughs

00:12:38.340 --> 00:12:40.500
that that's an accurate description. The sources

00:12:40.500 --> 00:12:43.259
consistently put them at 8 to 9 meters long.

00:12:43.340 --> 00:12:46.460
That's 26 to 30 feet. And weighing anywhere from

00:12:46.460 --> 00:12:49.480
6 to 10 metric tons, some estimates go even higher,

00:12:49.639 --> 00:12:52.059
up to 12. To put that in perspective for everyone,

00:12:52.200 --> 00:12:54.860
that's the size and weight of a very large African

00:12:54.860 --> 00:12:57.500
bull elephant. But it's lower to the ground,

00:12:57.679 --> 00:13:00.519
much bulkier, more powerfully built. And a huge

00:13:00.519 --> 00:13:02.759
chunk of that size, a disproportionate amount,

00:13:02.860 --> 00:13:06.259
is just the head. It has one of the largest skulls

00:13:06.259 --> 00:13:09.059
of any land animal in history. The skull alone

00:13:09.059 --> 00:13:12.059
can be 2 .5 meters long. That's over eight feet.

00:13:12.159 --> 00:13:14.519
Eight feet for just the head. Just the head.

00:13:14.580 --> 00:13:16.399
So think about a standard doorway in your house.

00:13:16.539 --> 00:13:18.799
The entire skull wouldn't fit through it lengthwise.

00:13:18.840 --> 00:13:21.580
It's longer than your doorway is tall. I can't

00:13:21.580 --> 00:13:23.740
even process that. The head is almost a third

00:13:23.740 --> 00:13:26.080
of the entire animal's length. How does that

00:13:26.080 --> 00:13:27.700
not just tip over? How do you even lift that?

00:13:28.200 --> 00:13:30.879
Massive, massive neck muscles and a very specific

00:13:30.879 --> 00:13:33.809
skeletal structure to support it. The first few

00:13:33.809 --> 00:13:36.090
vertebrae of the neck, the cervical vertebrae,

00:13:36.090 --> 00:13:38.789
are actually fused together into a solid block

00:13:38.789 --> 00:13:41.870
of bone called a syncervical. Ah, like a handle.

00:13:42.149 --> 00:13:45.769
Exactly. It creates a rigid, powerful attachment

00:13:45.769 --> 00:13:49.090
point for the enormous ligaments and muscles

00:13:49.090 --> 00:13:51.779
needed to swing that head around. But let's look

00:13:51.779 --> 00:13:54.019
at the business end of that skull, the mouth.

00:13:54.259 --> 00:13:56.639
It's got that beak. It looked like a giant parrot

00:13:56.639 --> 00:13:59.480
beak, but on a rhino. Yes, the rostral bone at

00:13:59.480 --> 00:14:02.080
the front. It's narrow and very deep, which means

00:14:02.080 --> 00:14:04.960
it was incredibly strong. This wasn't for delicate

00:14:04.960 --> 00:14:07.679
nibbling. This was for grasping and plucking

00:14:07.679 --> 00:14:11.149
huge bunches of vegetation. It would have been

00:14:11.149 --> 00:14:13.610
covered in a sharp keratin sheath, and it could

00:14:13.610 --> 00:14:16.470
probably snap through cycad trunks or thick branches

00:14:16.470 --> 00:14:18.970
with ease. But inside the mouth, behind the beak,

00:14:19.029 --> 00:14:20.990
it gets even weirder. They didn't have molars

00:14:20.990 --> 00:14:23.309
for grinding like a cow, right? Not at all. They

00:14:23.309 --> 00:14:24.950
had something far more complex and efficient.

00:14:25.049 --> 00:14:28.129
We call them dental batteries. This is just fascinating

00:14:28.129 --> 00:14:30.210
biological engineering. Okay, break that down

00:14:30.210 --> 00:14:32.389
for me. What is a dental battery? Imagine on

00:14:32.389 --> 00:14:35.789
each side of the jaw you have 36 to 40 columns

00:14:35.789 --> 00:14:38.169
of teeth, all packed tightly together to form

00:14:38.169 --> 00:14:40.429
one continuous cutting surface. Okay, a wall

00:14:40.429 --> 00:14:42.690
of teeth. A wall of teeth. But in each of those

00:14:42.690 --> 00:14:44.929
columns, there were three to five teeth stacked

00:14:44.929 --> 00:14:47.649
vertically, one on top of the other inside the

00:14:47.649 --> 00:14:51.090
jawbone. Stacked, like PEZ dispensers for teeth.

00:14:51.330 --> 00:14:54.129
That is the perfect analogy. As the top tooth,

00:14:54.289 --> 00:14:56.350
the one in use, wore down from chewing tough

00:14:56.350 --> 00:14:58.590
plants, it would fall out and the next one in

00:14:58.590 --> 00:15:00.029
the column would have already moved up to replace

00:15:00.029 --> 00:15:03.570
it. It was a constant conveyor belt of new sharp

00:15:03.570 --> 00:15:05.590
teeth. So how many teeth are we talking about

00:15:05.590 --> 00:15:07.870
in total? At any given time, you could be looking

00:15:07.870 --> 00:15:11.809
at a total of 432 to 800 teeth packed into that

00:15:11.809 --> 00:15:14.629
mouth. That is a lot of teeth for an herbivore.

00:15:14.669 --> 00:15:17.649
A huge number. And the way they worked was unique.

00:15:17.909 --> 00:15:20.330
If you watch a cow chew, they grind their food

00:15:20.330 --> 00:15:23.009
side to side. Triceratops didn't do that. Their

00:15:23.009 --> 00:15:25.289
jaw mechanics meant that the teeth slid past

00:15:25.289 --> 00:15:27.490
each other vertically in a high angle shear.

00:15:27.690 --> 00:15:29.490
So they weren't grinding the plants to a pulp.

00:15:29.570 --> 00:15:31.649
They were slicing and dicing them. Exactly. Like

00:15:31.649 --> 00:15:34.289
a set of self -sharpening scissors or biological

00:15:34.289 --> 00:15:37.830
garden shears. They were processing huge volumes

00:15:37.830 --> 00:15:41.070
of fibrous plant material, palms, cycads, tough

00:15:41.070 --> 00:15:43.710
ferns. These are not easy plants to eat. They

00:15:43.710 --> 00:15:45.899
were like living wood shippers. Okay, moving

00:15:45.899 --> 00:15:48.320
back from that incredible head, we have this

00:15:48.320 --> 00:15:52.039
massive, robust body. And there was a huge debate

00:15:52.039 --> 00:15:54.860
for a very long time about how they actually

00:15:54.860 --> 00:15:58.000
stood, how they held up all that weight. The

00:15:58.000 --> 00:16:00.360
four -limb debate. Yes, this is a classic in

00:16:00.360 --> 00:16:02.639
paleontology. If you look at the old paintings,

00:16:02.820 --> 00:16:05.120
the famous murals by Charles R. Knight from the

00:16:05.120 --> 00:16:08.279
early 1900s, Triceratops is shown with its front

00:16:08.279 --> 00:16:11.419
legs sprawled out wide to the sides, almost like

00:16:11.419 --> 00:16:13.480
a lizard or a crocodile. Like it's in the middle

00:16:13.480 --> 00:16:15.730
of a push -up, permanently. Right. And the logic

00:16:15.730 --> 00:16:19.009
at the time was that the head was so absurdly

00:16:19.009 --> 00:16:22.470
heavy, they needed that wide, stable base of

00:16:22.470 --> 00:16:24.710
support to keep from toppling over. There's always

00:16:24.710 --> 00:16:27.710
a but. But the biomechanics, the skeletal reconstruction,

00:16:27.809 --> 00:16:30.409
and most importantly, the trackways, the fossilized

00:16:30.409 --> 00:16:32.509
footprints they left behind, they all tell a

00:16:32.509 --> 00:16:35.190
different story. The current consensus is that

00:16:35.190 --> 00:16:37.269
they had an intermediate stance. What does that

00:16:37.269 --> 00:16:39.470
mean, intermediate? It means the hind legs were

00:16:39.470 --> 00:16:41.990
fully upright, columnar, right under the hips

00:16:41.990 --> 00:16:44.360
like an elephant's. The front limbs were also

00:16:44.360 --> 00:16:46.940
mostly upright, but the elbows were slightly

00:16:46.940 --> 00:16:50.539
bowed out to the sides. It's not a full sprawl,

00:16:50.539 --> 00:16:52.379
but it's not a perfectly straight pillar either.

00:16:52.620 --> 00:16:55.000
So more like a modern rhinoceros than a lizard.

00:16:55.220 --> 00:16:57.860
Much, much more like a rhino. They were active,

00:16:58.039 --> 00:17:00.980
capable walkers. They weren't just lumbering,

00:17:00.980 --> 00:17:03.980
sprawling beasts. But their hands were weird.

00:17:04.079 --> 00:17:06.799
They retained a primitive condition. Primitive

00:17:06.799 --> 00:17:08.839
how? Well, if you look at your own hand, you

00:17:08.839 --> 00:17:11.279
can rotate your forearm so your palm faces down.

00:17:11.579 --> 00:17:14.630
That's called pronation. Most quadrupeds do this.

00:17:15.190 --> 00:17:16.950
Triceratops couldn't, or at least not fully.

00:17:17.210 --> 00:17:19.950
Its hands were semi -supinated, so its fingers

00:17:19.950 --> 00:17:22.589
pointed out away from the body. So as walking

00:17:22.589 --> 00:17:24.490
with its hands turned out permanently, that seems

00:17:24.490 --> 00:17:26.970
awkward. It does to us, but it clearly worked

00:17:26.970 --> 00:17:29.390
for them. And it gets weirder. It only walked

00:17:29.390 --> 00:17:31.730
on the first three fingers of each hand. Those

00:17:31.730 --> 00:17:35.789
had hoof -like claws. Digits four and five, your

00:17:35.789 --> 00:17:38.289
ring and pinky fingers, were vestigial. They

00:17:38.289 --> 00:17:39.670
were just little nubs that didn't even touch

00:17:39.670 --> 00:17:41.789
the ground and had no claws. It's amazing the

00:17:41.789 --> 00:17:44.089
level of detail we can get from just the bones.

00:17:44.750 --> 00:17:47.309
But recently, we've been getting incredible details

00:17:47.309 --> 00:17:49.529
about the stuff that covered the bones. Let's

00:17:49.529 --> 00:17:51.529
talk about skin. This is really exciting stuff.

00:17:51.630 --> 00:17:54.190
For a hundred years, we just assumed leathery,

00:17:54.190 --> 00:17:57.130
elephant -like skin. It was a default guess.

00:17:57.470 --> 00:18:00.630
But in 2002, a specimen was found in Wyoming,

00:18:00.849 --> 00:18:03.940
nicknamed the Lane specimen. And this one is

00:18:03.940 --> 00:18:06.299
special. It has skin impressions. It does. It's

00:18:06.299 --> 00:18:08.980
preserved via a very rare process called clay

00:18:08.980 --> 00:18:11.720
templating. Basically, after the animal died,

00:18:11.900 --> 00:18:14.440
bacteria formed a slimy mat over the dead body.

00:18:14.980 --> 00:18:17.559
Clay then settled on top of that mat, creating

00:18:17.559 --> 00:18:20.119
a perfect, high -fidelity mold of the skin texture

00:18:20.119 --> 00:18:22.180
before everything rotted away. So what does it

00:18:22.180 --> 00:18:25.269
look like? Is it just scaly? It has large hexagonal

00:18:25.269 --> 00:18:27.309
scales, of course. That's the base texture. But

00:18:27.309 --> 00:18:29.549
in the center of some of the larger scales, particularly

00:18:29.549 --> 00:18:32.230
on the back and tail, there are these conical

00:18:32.230 --> 00:18:34.890
projections, like little nipples or bumps rising

00:18:34.890 --> 00:18:36.769
up out of the middle of the scale. And what does

00:18:36.769 --> 00:18:38.910
that imply? Why is that significant? Well, in

00:18:38.910 --> 00:18:41.630
modern animals, and especially in other dinosaurs

00:18:41.630 --> 00:18:45.170
like Psittacosaurus, which is a very early distant

00:18:45.170 --> 00:18:49.009
cousin of Triceratops, structures exactly like

00:18:49.009 --> 00:18:51.369
that are known to be anchor points for quills

00:18:51.369 --> 00:18:56.299
or bristles. So. A fluffy triceratops. A porcupine

00:18:56.299 --> 00:18:58.599
dino? Maybe not fluffy like a kitten. Think more

00:18:58.599 --> 00:19:01.420
like the sparse, thick bristles on a wild boar

00:19:01.420 --> 00:19:04.960
or the quills on a porcupine. It completely challenges

00:19:04.960 --> 00:19:08.339
that classic image of a purely scaly reptilian

00:19:08.339 --> 00:19:10.640
tank. It might have been a spiky, bristly tank.

00:19:10.740 --> 00:19:12.640
Which honestly somehow makes it even scarier.

00:19:12.779 --> 00:19:14.779
It has a whole new texture to the animal that

00:19:14.779 --> 00:19:16.859
we missed for over a century. It's a fantastic

00:19:16.859 --> 00:19:19.460
reminder that there's always more to learn. Okay,

00:19:19.559 --> 00:19:21.829
let's get to the main event. The part everyone

00:19:21.829 --> 00:19:24.349
knows. The headgear. The three horns and the

00:19:24.349 --> 00:19:27.450
giant frill. Why? What is the point? Why invest

00:19:27.450 --> 00:19:30.529
so much biological energy in growing these massive

00:19:30.529 --> 00:19:32.769
heavy bone structures? This is the million -dollar

00:19:32.769 --> 00:19:34.869
question, and there isn't one simple answer.

00:19:35.009 --> 00:19:36.970
We have three main theories that all probably

00:19:36.970 --> 00:19:39.170
play a part. Let's start with Theory A, the one

00:19:39.170 --> 00:19:41.569
we all learned as kids. Defense against predators.

00:19:41.890 --> 00:19:44.940
The weapons theory. They evolved these horns

00:19:44.940 --> 00:19:47.559
to fight off hungry predators like Tyrannosaurus

00:19:47.559 --> 00:19:51.299
rex. And unlike some childhood myths, this one

00:19:51.299 --> 00:19:54.180
actually holds a lot of water. We have hard,

00:19:54.279 --> 00:19:57.279
direct evidence for this. The smoking gun. Or

00:19:57.279 --> 00:19:59.359
the smoking tooth mark, I guess. There is a famous

00:19:59.359 --> 00:20:02.079
Triceratops specimen that has a partially healed

00:20:02.079 --> 00:20:04.759
bite mark on its brow horn. The spacing of the

00:20:04.759 --> 00:20:07.400
punctures, the shape of the marks, they match

00:20:07.400 --> 00:20:10.339
Tyrannosaurus teeth perfectly. So a T -Rex literally

00:20:10.339 --> 00:20:12.930
bit this thing on the horn. bit it, and broke

00:20:12.930 --> 00:20:15.329
it. But here is the crucial part of that story.

00:20:15.809 --> 00:20:18.970
The bone shows signs of healing. There's callous

00:20:18.970 --> 00:20:21.880
formation around the break. Which means the Triceratops

00:20:21.880 --> 00:20:24.759
survived the encounter. Exactly. It fought a

00:20:24.759 --> 00:20:27.180
T -Rex, took a bite to the face, and lived to

00:20:27.180 --> 00:20:30.019
tell the tale. We also see healed puncture wounds

00:20:30.019 --> 00:20:32.420
on the squamosal bone, that's the side part of

00:20:32.420 --> 00:20:35.119
the frill, that also match predator bites. So

00:20:35.119 --> 00:20:37.160
yes, they absolutely used these horns to defend

00:20:37.160 --> 00:20:39.000
themselves, and they were effective. That is

00:20:39.000 --> 00:20:41.240
just so satisfying to know. The epic battle of

00:20:41.240 --> 00:20:43.119
the giants was a real thing. But what about Theory

00:20:43.119 --> 00:20:45.759
B, the Civil War? Did they use these weapons

00:20:45.759 --> 00:20:48.900
on each other? Intraspecific combat. Fighting

00:20:48.900 --> 00:20:51.160
for mates, fighting for territory. For a long

00:20:51.160 --> 00:20:53.299
time, this was just speculation. It made sense.

00:20:53.380 --> 00:20:55.420
You know, modern horn animals do it. But then

00:20:55.420 --> 00:20:58.259
came the specimen known as Big John. Big John.

00:20:58.619 --> 00:21:00.819
Sounds like a wrestler. Might as well have been.

00:21:01.119 --> 00:21:04.660
Big John is a massive Triceratops specimen, one

00:21:04.660 --> 00:21:07.000
of the largest ever found. And he has a very

00:21:07.000 --> 00:21:11.200
distinct keyhole -shaped hole in his frill. It's

00:21:11.200 --> 00:21:14.039
a traumatic puncture wound. And when you analyze

00:21:14.039 --> 00:21:16.680
the shape and size of that hole, it is a perfect

00:21:16.680 --> 00:21:19.380
match for the tip of another Triceratops' brow

00:21:19.380 --> 00:21:22.170
horn. So he got stabbed in the head by another

00:21:22.170 --> 00:21:24.890
Triceratops. He did. And again, just like the

00:21:24.890 --> 00:21:27.549
T -Rex bite, the bone around the hole shows signs

00:21:27.549 --> 00:21:30.130
of healing. So this wasn't necessarily a fight

00:21:30.130 --> 00:21:32.289
to the death, but it was violent. They were locking

00:21:32.289 --> 00:21:34.970
horns and wrestling, and sometimes they missed

00:21:34.970 --> 00:21:37.009
and stabbed each other in the face shield. Is

00:21:37.009 --> 00:21:39.220
that a one -off, or is it common? It seems to

00:21:39.220 --> 00:21:41.400
be pretty common. There was a statistical analysis

00:21:41.400 --> 00:21:43.819
done that looked at a large sample of skulls.

00:21:43.819 --> 00:21:47.180
They found that about 14 % of Triceratops skulls

00:21:47.180 --> 00:21:48.980
have these kinds of traumatic injuries on the

00:21:48.980 --> 00:21:53.289
frill and face. 14%. 1 in 7. That's a high injury

00:21:53.289 --> 00:21:55.509
rate. That suggests this was a regular part of

00:21:55.509 --> 00:21:57.650
their lives. It does. And what's really interesting

00:21:57.650 --> 00:21:59.809
is when they did the same analysis on Centrosaurus,

00:21:59.970 --> 00:22:02.130
another type of horned dinosaur with different

00:22:02.130 --> 00:22:04.549
horn arrangements, they didn't find those kinds

00:22:04.549 --> 00:22:08.049
of cranial injuries, which suggests Centrosaurus

00:22:08.049 --> 00:22:10.789
may be fought by flank butting or body blows,

00:22:11.109 --> 00:22:14.089
while Triceratops was specifically engaging in

00:22:14.089 --> 00:22:16.970
head -to -head combat, locking horns. Like modern

00:22:16.970 --> 00:22:19.910
deer or antelope do today. Exactly. But then

00:22:19.910 --> 00:22:22.869
that brings us to Theory C. The display theory.

00:22:23.130 --> 00:22:25.789
Maybe it's not all about violence. This is the

00:22:25.789 --> 00:22:28.930
idea that the frill is basically a giant billboard.

00:22:29.029 --> 00:22:31.569
Right. Think about that frill. It's a massive

00:22:31.569 --> 00:22:34.769
surface area of bone. We know from grooves on

00:22:34.769 --> 00:22:36.549
the surface that it was covered in a network

00:22:36.549 --> 00:22:38.390
of blood vessels. So it could have been flush

00:22:38.390 --> 00:22:40.099
with blood. It could have been flushed with the

00:22:40.099 --> 00:22:43.000
blood to produce vibrant colors. Red, blue, complex

00:22:43.000 --> 00:22:45.460
patterns. It was very likely used for sexual

00:22:45.460 --> 00:22:47.839
selection males, showing off their big, colorful

00:22:47.839 --> 00:22:51.220
frills to attract mates, or for species identification.

00:22:51.440 --> 00:22:53.619
A way to say, hey, I'm a triceratops, you're

00:22:53.619 --> 00:22:55.940
a triceratops, let's hang out. But there's a

00:22:55.940 --> 00:22:58.319
complication with the sex appeal only theory,

00:22:58.480 --> 00:23:02.119
right? And it has to do with the babies. A very

00:23:02.119 --> 00:23:05.420
good catch. Yes. Studies of juvenile skulls,

00:23:05.420 --> 00:23:07.880
some of them very small, show that the frill

00:23:07.880 --> 00:23:10.420
and horns start developing very early in life,

00:23:10.619 --> 00:23:13.920
long before the animal is sexually mature. If

00:23:13.920 --> 00:23:15.900
the frill was only for attracting a mate, you

00:23:15.900 --> 00:23:19.039
wouldn't expect a toddler triceratops to be investing

00:23:19.039 --> 00:23:21.640
all that energy into growing one yet. So it's

00:23:21.640 --> 00:23:23.920
probably a mix of all three. It's not one or

00:23:23.920 --> 00:23:26.019
the other. Almost certainly. Evolution is thrifty.

00:23:26.410 --> 00:23:28.690
If you have a giant, metabolically expensive

00:23:28.690 --> 00:23:31.250
structure on your head, you're going to use it

00:23:31.250 --> 00:23:33.970
for everything you possibly can. Species recognition,

00:23:34.490 --> 00:23:37.130
defense against predators, wrestling with rivals,

00:23:37.250 --> 00:23:40.230
showing off to mates, and maybe even thermoregulation

00:23:40.230 --> 00:23:42.829
pumping blood into it to cool down on a hot day.

00:23:43.009 --> 00:23:45.509
A Swiss Army knife of a face. A Swiss Army face.

00:23:45.670 --> 00:23:47.369
I like that. Okay, speaking of faces changing

00:23:47.369 --> 00:23:49.549
over time, we need to talk about the shape -shifting.

00:23:50.130 --> 00:23:51.930
Because this is the part of the deep dive where

00:23:51.930 --> 00:23:54.450
the science gets really, really trippy and controversial.

00:23:55.019 --> 00:23:57.900
This is where we enter the modern era of triceratops

00:23:57.900 --> 00:24:00.180
research, largely driven by the work of Jack

00:24:00.180 --> 00:24:02.819
Horner, Mark Goodwin, and John Scanella. And

00:24:02.819 --> 00:24:05.079
it starts with ontogeny. Ontogeny just means

00:24:05.079 --> 00:24:07.720
growth, right? The study of how an animal changes

00:24:07.720 --> 00:24:11.819
from a baby to an adult. Exactly. In 2006, Horner

00:24:11.819 --> 00:24:14.769
and Goodwin published a landmark study. They

00:24:14.769 --> 00:24:17.630
looked at a growth series of triceratops skulls

00:24:17.630 --> 00:24:21.009
from tiny melon -sized baby skulls all the way

00:24:21.009 --> 00:24:23.410
up to the mass of adults. And what they found

00:24:23.410 --> 00:24:25.730
was that the animal undergoes a radical transformation

00:24:25.730 --> 00:24:28.309
as it ages. It's not just getting bigger. The

00:24:28.309 --> 00:24:30.769
whole head is changing shape. Completely. When

00:24:30.769 --> 00:24:32.869
a triceratops is a baby, its little brow horns

00:24:32.869 --> 00:24:35.410
are just short, straight nubs. As it grows into

00:24:35.410 --> 00:24:37.869
a juvenile, the horns actually elongate and curve

00:24:37.869 --> 00:24:40.910
backward over the frill. Backward. But every

00:24:40.910 --> 00:24:44.180
toy, every movie has them pointing forward. That's

00:24:44.180 --> 00:24:47.099
the adult form. As the animal hits adolescence,

00:24:47.220 --> 00:24:50.140
something incredible happens. The horns stop

00:24:50.140 --> 00:24:52.660
growing backward, the base of the horn remodels,

00:24:52.680 --> 00:24:54.599
and they reorient themselves to start growing

00:24:54.599 --> 00:24:56.880
forward and upward. That sounds painful. How

00:24:56.880 --> 00:24:59.140
does that even work? It involves a lot of bone

00:24:59.140 --> 00:25:01.380
resorption and redeposition. It's a very dynamic

00:25:01.380 --> 00:25:03.599
process. And as they become adults, the horns

00:25:03.599 --> 00:25:05.640
eventually hollow out at the base, probably to

00:25:05.640 --> 00:25:07.579
save weight. But the biggest change, the one

00:25:07.579 --> 00:25:10.099
that sparked the big controversy, is what happens

00:25:10.099 --> 00:25:13.029
to the frill. And this leads us... Directly to

00:25:13.029 --> 00:25:15.109
the biggest debate in recent dinosaur science,

00:25:15.430 --> 00:25:18.750
the Taurosaurus debate. The Taurosaurus debate.

00:25:18.890 --> 00:25:21.470
Okay, some context is needed here. Taurosaurus

00:25:21.470 --> 00:25:24.609
was another dinosaur identified way back in 1891

00:25:24.609 --> 00:25:28.170
by Marsh, right alongside Triceratops. It looks

00:25:28.170 --> 00:25:31.109
very, very similar. Three horns, big frill, but

00:25:31.109 --> 00:25:34.210
with two key differences. It has a much longer,

00:25:34.289 --> 00:25:37.569
more elongated, almost rectangular frill, and

00:25:37.569 --> 00:25:40.529
that frill has two large holes in it. Two big

00:25:40.529 --> 00:25:42.789
windows called fenestri. Whereas Triceratops

00:25:42.789 --> 00:25:44.750
is famous for having a relatively short, solid

00:25:44.750 --> 00:25:47.440
frill. No holes. Correct. For over 100 years,

00:25:47.559 --> 00:25:49.599
everyone agreed. Triceratops is one species.

00:25:49.819 --> 00:25:52.299
Taurosaurus is another. They were cousin species,

00:25:52.700 --> 00:25:54.720
maybe living in the same place at the same time,

00:25:54.740 --> 00:25:57.400
but distinct animals. Until 2010. Until John

00:25:57.400 --> 00:25:59.599
Scanella and Jack Horner published a paper with

00:25:59.599 --> 00:26:02.119
a bombshell hypothesis. Taurosaurus does not

00:26:02.119 --> 00:26:04.119
exist. Excuse me. What do you mean it doesn't

00:26:04.119 --> 00:26:07.079
exist? We have the skulls. They argued that Taurosaurus

00:26:07.079 --> 00:26:10.339
is not a separate species. It is simply a very,

00:26:10.380 --> 00:26:13.400
very old, fully mature geriatric growth stage

00:26:13.400 --> 00:26:16.420
of Triceratops. So Triceratops is the teenager

00:26:16.420 --> 00:26:18.660
and the adult, and Corosaurus is the grandpa.

00:26:18.900 --> 00:26:21.440
That is exactly their argument. Their hypothesis

00:26:21.440 --> 00:26:25.420
is based on this idea of metaplastic bone. The

00:26:25.420 --> 00:26:28.359
bone of the frill isn't like cement. It's living

00:26:28.359 --> 00:26:30.880
tissue that can change throughout an animal's

00:26:30.880 --> 00:26:33.980
life. They argue that as a triceratops gets really

00:26:33.980 --> 00:26:37.359
old, past what we'd consider a prime adult, its

00:26:37.359 --> 00:26:40.380
frill keeps lengthening and flaring out. To keep

00:26:40.380 --> 00:26:42.539
it from getting ridiculously heavy, the bone

00:26:42.539 --> 00:26:45.359
thins out in two specific spots, and eventually,

00:26:45.599 --> 00:26:48.259
those spots resorb completely, opening up into

00:26:48.259 --> 00:26:50.559
the holes we see in Torsorus. That is a wild

00:26:50.559 --> 00:26:52.539
theory. What was the evidence they presented?

00:26:52.839 --> 00:26:55.279
Well, their primary line of evidence was demographic.

00:26:55.440 --> 00:26:57.799
They pointed out that we find lots and lots of

00:26:57.799 --> 00:27:00.720
juvenile and sub -adult triceratops, but we have...

00:27:00.779 --> 00:27:03.420
never, ever found a confirmed juvenile Taurosaurus.

00:27:03.619 --> 00:27:06.740
That is suspicious. Very suspicious. It is. If

00:27:06.740 --> 00:27:09.740
Taurosaurus is a real breeding species, where

00:27:09.740 --> 00:27:13.140
are its babies? Where are the teenagers? All

00:27:13.140 --> 00:27:15.940
the Taurosaurus specimens we have are huge, mature

00:27:15.940 --> 00:27:19.079
animals. They also pointed to a few intermediate

00:27:19.079 --> 00:27:21.440
specimens, skulls that look like they are halfway

00:27:21.440 --> 00:27:24.099
between the two forms, with thinning bone where

00:27:24.099 --> 00:27:26.079
the holes would eventually open. So case closed.

00:27:26.339 --> 00:27:28.980
The textbooks need to be rewritten. Taurosaurus

00:27:28.980 --> 00:27:32.430
is dead. Not so fast. This is science. We love

00:27:32.430 --> 00:27:35.329
to argue. Other paleontologists, people like

00:27:35.329 --> 00:27:38.109
Andrew Farke, Nicholas Longrich, Daniel Field,

00:27:38.369 --> 00:27:41.450
they push back hard. What's their counter argument?

00:27:41.609 --> 00:27:43.750
Where are the holes in the theory, so to speak?

00:27:44.109 --> 00:27:46.150
They have several counterarguments. First, they

00:27:46.150 --> 00:27:47.930
argue that some of the known Taurosaurus specimens

00:27:47.930 --> 00:27:50.410
actually look skeletally mature in their bone

00:27:50.410 --> 00:27:52.390
texture, suggesting they weren't fully grown

00:27:52.390 --> 00:27:55.089
yet, which contradicts the geriatric stage idea.

00:27:55.289 --> 00:27:57.630
And conversely, they've found some absolutely

00:27:57.630 --> 00:28:00.410
massive Triceratops skulls that look extremely

00:28:00.410 --> 00:28:03.009
old. The bones are fully fused and rubbed. All

00:28:03.009 --> 00:28:05.089
the signs of old age are there. But they still

00:28:05.089 --> 00:28:08.849
have the classic solid short frill. So if Triceratops

00:28:08.849 --> 00:28:10.450
is supposed to turn into Taurosaurus when it

00:28:10.450 --> 00:28:13.539
gets old, Why are there these really old triceratops

00:28:13.539 --> 00:28:16.019
that haven't turned yet? Exactly. That's a major

00:28:16.019 --> 00:28:18.660
sticking point. And finally, they argue that

00:28:18.660 --> 00:28:20.960
the proposed mechanism, the bone growing, then

00:28:20.960 --> 00:28:24.019
thinning, then opening holes, is an unprecedented

00:28:24.019 --> 00:28:27.579
and incredibly complex transformation that we

00:28:27.579 --> 00:28:30.319
don't see in any other known animal. So where

00:28:30.319 --> 00:28:33.430
do we stand on this today? Is it 50 -50? It's

00:28:33.430 --> 00:28:35.809
still a very active debate. The consensus has

00:28:35.809 --> 00:28:38.569
not fully landed on one side. There was a more

00:28:38.569 --> 00:28:41.549
recent study in 2022 by Mallon and others that

00:28:41.549 --> 00:28:44.089
argued they have found sub -adult Taurosaurus

00:28:44.089 --> 00:28:47.329
specimens, which, if true, would be strong evidence

00:28:47.329 --> 00:28:50.430
that it's a real separate species. But the shapeshifter

00:28:50.430 --> 00:28:52.789
idea, regardless of whether it's right in this

00:28:52.789 --> 00:28:55.170
specific case, has fundamentally changed how

00:28:55.170 --> 00:28:57.849
we look at all dinosaurs. How so? It's forced

00:28:57.849 --> 00:28:59.730
us to accept that we can't just assume a different

00:28:59.730 --> 00:29:01.509
shape means a different animal. It might just

00:29:01.509 --> 00:29:03.569
be a different age. or even a different sex.

00:29:03.869 --> 00:29:05.730
It makes you wonder how many other dinosaurs

00:29:05.730 --> 00:29:08.410
in the museum are just distinct ages of each

00:29:08.410 --> 00:29:10.890
other. Jack Horner has famously estimated that

00:29:10.890 --> 00:29:13.950
up to a third of all named dinosaur species might

00:29:13.950 --> 00:29:16.349
just be growth stages of other known dinosaurs.

00:29:16.690 --> 00:29:20.349
We might be vastly, vastly overestimating dinosaur

00:29:20.349 --> 00:29:22.569
diversity. That blows my mind. The implications

00:29:22.569 --> 00:29:25.009
of that are huge. Okay. Okay, let's step away

00:29:25.009 --> 00:29:26.890
from the bones for a minute and look at the world

00:29:26.890 --> 00:29:30.329
they actually lived in. Part 5, Life in the Late

00:29:30.329 --> 00:29:33.549
Cretaceous. We are in Laramidia. This was an

00:29:33.549 --> 00:29:36.130
island continent. During the late Cretaceous,

00:29:36.130 --> 00:29:38.809
a shallow sea called the Western Interior Seaway

00:29:38.809 --> 00:29:42.329
split North America in two. Laramidia was the

00:29:42.329 --> 00:29:44.990
western strip, what is now Montana, Wyoming,

00:29:45.349 --> 00:29:48.450
the Dakotas, Alberta. And the environment itself,

00:29:48.609 --> 00:29:52.210
what would it look and feel like? Humid. Subtropical.

00:29:52.289 --> 00:29:54.329
You should be thinking of coastal floodplains,

00:29:54.349 --> 00:29:57.410
swampy forests, meandering rivers. Think Louisiana

00:29:57.410 --> 00:29:59.849
or the Florida Everglades, but the trees are

00:29:59.849 --> 00:30:02.750
conifers, ferns, and early palms. And based on

00:30:02.750 --> 00:30:04.869
the fossil record, if you were to take a walk

00:30:04.869 --> 00:30:06.390
through that forest, you would essentially trip

00:30:06.390 --> 00:30:09.029
over a triceratops. They were unbelievably abundant.

00:30:09.490 --> 00:30:12.150
The paleontologist Robert Backer, who is another

00:30:12.150 --> 00:30:14.910
famous and colorful figure in the field, estimated

00:30:14.910 --> 00:30:17.549
that at the very, very end of the Cretaceous,

00:30:17.569 --> 00:30:20.089
in the ecosystems preserved in the Hell Creek

00:30:20.089 --> 00:30:24.140
Formation, Triceratops made up five -sixths of

00:30:24.140 --> 00:30:27.440
the entire large dinosaur fauna. Five -sixths?

00:30:27.460 --> 00:30:30.180
That's more than 80%. It's overwhelmingly dominant.

00:30:30.319 --> 00:30:32.700
It's an ecosystem completely controlled by this

00:30:32.700 --> 00:30:35.700
one mega herbivore. The famous fossil hunter

00:30:35.700 --> 00:30:39.519
Barnum Brown once claimed he saw 500 Triceratops

00:30:39.519 --> 00:30:42.380
skulls in the field in a single season. They

00:30:42.380 --> 00:30:44.920
were the bison or the cows of the Cretaceous,

00:30:44.920 --> 00:30:46.519
at least in terms of their sheer numbers. Were

00:30:46.519 --> 00:30:49.480
they social like cows? Did they live in big herds?

00:30:49.900 --> 00:30:51.680
That's the tricky question. The evidence is ambiguous.

00:30:51.779 --> 00:30:53.819
We usually find their remains in isolation. A

00:30:53.819 --> 00:30:55.880
single skull here, a partial skeleton there.

00:30:56.039 --> 00:30:58.819
We don't have those massive bone beds of thousands

00:30:58.819 --> 00:31:01.160
of Triceratops all dying together like we do

00:31:01.160 --> 00:31:02.960
with some duck -billed dinosaurs. So they were

00:31:02.960 --> 00:31:05.059
probably lungers. That was the traditional view.

00:31:05.140 --> 00:31:09.240
Mostly solitary. But... There are a few tantalizing

00:31:09.240 --> 00:31:12.180
exceptions. There is a fossil site in Montana

00:31:12.180 --> 00:31:14.420
that has the remains of three juveniles preserved

00:31:14.420 --> 00:31:17.319
together, maybe a little youth gang. And another

00:31:17.319 --> 00:31:19.940
site in Wyoming has three individuals of varying

00:31:19.940 --> 00:31:22.900
sizes, a large one, a medium one, and a small

00:31:22.900 --> 00:31:25.240
one found together, perhaps a small family unit.

00:31:25.400 --> 00:31:27.839
And there's that one specific pathology you mentioned

00:31:27.839 --> 00:31:30.700
earlier. Oh, the stepped -on tail. Yes. There's

00:31:30.700 --> 00:31:32.940
a triceratops vertebra from the tail that shows

00:31:32.940 --> 00:31:36.200
a healed crush injury, the best explanation anyone

00:31:36.200 --> 00:31:38.720
has come up with. Another triceratops accidentally

00:31:38.720 --> 00:31:40.880
stepped on its tail. Which implies they were

00:31:40.880 --> 00:31:42.579
walking close enough together to step on each

00:31:42.579 --> 00:31:44.759
other's tails. Exactly. So the current thinking

00:31:44.759 --> 00:31:47.119
is maybe they lived in small family groups or

00:31:47.119 --> 00:31:50.299
had loose associations, but probably not those

00:31:50.299 --> 00:31:53.039
thundering herds of thousands that you see in

00:31:53.039 --> 00:31:55.059
movies. Now, you mentioned the environment was

00:31:55.059 --> 00:31:57.890
warm and subtropical. Let's talk metabolism.

00:31:58.190 --> 00:32:00.769
Yeah. Was Triceratops warm -blooded like a mammal

00:32:00.769 --> 00:32:04.069
or cold -blooded like a lizard? The great metabolism

00:32:04.069 --> 00:32:07.509
debate. This seesaws back and forth constantly

00:32:07.509 --> 00:32:10.630
in paleontology. For a long time, the idea of

00:32:10.630 --> 00:32:13.849
gigantothermy was popular. The idea that they

00:32:13.849 --> 00:32:16.529
were so huge, they just stayed warm by retaining

00:32:16.529 --> 00:32:19.109
heat. Like a giant living pizza stone, it takes

00:32:19.109 --> 00:32:21.759
all day to cool down. A perfect analogy. But

00:32:21.759 --> 00:32:25.380
a very recent study in 2022 by Jasmina Wayman

00:32:25.380 --> 00:32:27.980
and her colleagues looked at the chemical signals

00:32:27.980 --> 00:32:30.980
of metabolism preserved in the fossil bone, and

00:32:30.980 --> 00:32:32.900
their results suggested that Triceratops might

00:32:32.900 --> 00:32:36.180
have been... Ectothermic. Cold -blooded. A 10

00:32:36.180 --> 00:32:38.740
-ton cold -blooded animal. Or at least having

00:32:38.740 --> 00:32:41.359
a much lower metabolic rate, more similar to

00:32:41.359 --> 00:32:44.339
modern reptiles than to birds or mammals, which

00:32:44.339 --> 00:32:46.259
is really weird because all the evidence suggests

00:32:46.259 --> 00:32:48.980
their earlier, smaller ancestors were warm -blooded.

00:32:49.160 --> 00:32:51.400
So they might have evolved back to a slower metabolism.

00:32:51.559 --> 00:32:54.160
That seems counterintuitive. It's possible. If

00:32:54.160 --> 00:32:56.200
you're a giant animal living in a warm, stable

00:32:56.200 --> 00:32:58.579
climate, generating too much of your own internal

00:32:58.579 --> 00:33:00.920
heat can actually be a problem. You risk overheating.

00:33:01.039 --> 00:33:03.519
So maybe for an animal this big, slowing down...

00:33:03.529 --> 00:33:05.349
the internal furnace was actually a selective

00:33:05.349 --> 00:33:07.609
advantage just lounging in the ferns soaking

00:33:07.609 --> 00:33:10.569
up the sun and eating palms eating a lot of palms

00:33:10.569 --> 00:33:13.869
and this leads to a really cool ecological detail

00:33:13.869 --> 00:33:17.970
niche partitioning we know for a fact they lived

00:33:17.970 --> 00:33:21.430
alongside another giant herbivore the duck -billed

00:33:21.430 --> 00:33:24.210
dinosaur edmontosaurus right so you have two

00:33:24.210 --> 00:33:27.450
massive plant eaters in the same forest how did

00:33:27.450 --> 00:33:29.009
they not just eat all the same food and start

00:33:29.009 --> 00:33:31.619
each other out Isotope studies of the enamel

00:33:31.619 --> 00:33:34.000
in their teeth give us the answer. The different

00:33:34.000 --> 00:33:35.960
chemical signatures show they were eating different

00:33:35.960 --> 00:33:38.819
things from the same environment. Triceratops,

00:33:38.859 --> 00:33:41.420
with its powerful beak and shearing teeth, was

00:33:41.420 --> 00:33:43.779
eating tougher, lower -growing vegetation things

00:33:43.779 --> 00:33:47.200
like ferns and cycads. And Montasaurus, with

00:33:47.200 --> 00:33:49.700
its broader beak, was likely browsing on softer

00:33:49.700 --> 00:33:51.819
plants or things that were slightly higher up.

00:33:51.900 --> 00:33:54.339
They split the menu. Nature always finds a way

00:33:54.339 --> 00:33:56.640
to pack more species in. It really does. So let's

00:33:56.640 --> 00:33:58.480
bring this incredible deep dive in for landing.

00:33:58.990 --> 00:34:01.630
We started with a bison mistake. We went through

00:34:01.630 --> 00:34:04.269
the wild story of the cowboy and the lasso. We

00:34:04.269 --> 00:34:06.390
built this biological tank with a parrot's beak

00:34:06.390 --> 00:34:09.409
and garden shears for teeth. We covered the epic

00:34:09.409 --> 00:34:12.190
battles with T -Rex, the brawls with each other,

00:34:12.289 --> 00:34:14.630
and the mind -bending idea of a shape -shifting

00:34:14.630 --> 00:34:18.530
skull. It's an amazing journey. From a few fragmentary

00:34:18.530 --> 00:34:21.789
horns to a complex, living, breathing animal

00:34:21.789 --> 00:34:24.750
that dominated its world. What's the single biggest

00:34:24.750 --> 00:34:26.889
takeaway for you? When you think of Triceratops

00:34:26.889 --> 00:34:29.699
now, what's the image that comes to mind? For

00:34:29.699 --> 00:34:31.519
me, it's resilience. This was one of the last

00:34:31.519 --> 00:34:33.760
ones standing. It evolved to be unbelievably

00:34:33.760 --> 00:34:36.699
robust, to be adaptable. It survived predator

00:34:36.699 --> 00:34:38.679
attacks that would kill almost anything else.

00:34:38.800 --> 00:34:41.139
It survived brutal injuries from its own kind.

00:34:41.380 --> 00:34:44.199
It so thoroughly dominated its landscape that

00:34:44.199 --> 00:34:46.239
it made up the vast majority of all large animals.

00:34:46.579 --> 00:34:49.579
It's the ultimate survivor. Right up until the

00:34:49.579 --> 00:34:52.340
day, survival was no longer an option. And for

00:34:52.340 --> 00:34:55.050
me, it's the mystery that's still left. The Taurosaurus

00:34:55.050 --> 00:34:57.670
question is still unresolved. We're still debating

00:34:57.670 --> 00:34:59.690
about the bristles. We're still piecing together

00:34:59.690 --> 00:35:02.789
its social behavior. Even with hundreds of skulls,

00:35:02.789 --> 00:35:04.829
we are still arguing about the fundamental nature

00:35:04.829 --> 00:35:07.070
of what it actually was. And that's the beauty

00:35:07.070 --> 00:35:09.769
of paleontology, isn't it? The past is never

00:35:09.769 --> 00:35:12.369
a closed book. There's always another fossil,

00:35:12.489 --> 00:35:14.409
another discovery that can change everything.

00:35:14.809 --> 00:35:17.190
Here's my final provocative thought for you,

00:35:17.269 --> 00:35:20.940
the listener, today. We talked early on about

00:35:20.940 --> 00:35:23.420
how Triceratops is used to define the entire

00:35:23.420 --> 00:35:26.880
group Dinosauria. It's one of the two anchors,

00:35:26.920 --> 00:35:29.900
binding the mighty Triceratops to the modern

00:35:29.900 --> 00:35:32.739
songbird. Yes, the two killers of Dinosauria.

00:35:33.119 --> 00:35:35.599
But think about that shapeshifter concept again.

00:35:36.319 --> 00:35:38.760
If Taurosaurus, an animal that looked different

00:35:38.760 --> 00:35:40.760
enough to be named a separate species for 100

00:35:40.760 --> 00:35:44.739
years, is just an old Triceratops, and if Jack

00:35:44.739 --> 00:35:47.019
Horner is even partially right that maybe a third

00:35:47.019 --> 00:35:49.719
of all dinosaur species are just different growth

00:35:49.719 --> 00:35:52.519
stages, I want you to reconsider the next time

00:35:52.519 --> 00:35:55.019
you walk through a museum. Look at the skeletons

00:35:55.019 --> 00:35:57.380
lined up in the hall. How many of those are actually

00:35:57.380 --> 00:35:59.500
unique species, and how many might just be the

00:35:59.500 --> 00:36:01.760
teenager version of the skeleton standing right

00:36:01.760 --> 00:36:03.760
next to the adult version? It makes you look

00:36:03.760 --> 00:36:05.739
at the concept of biodiversity in a whole new

00:36:05.739 --> 00:36:08.179
way. Are we looking at a prehistoric zoo filled

00:36:08.179 --> 00:36:10.760
with hundreds of different species? Or are we

00:36:10.760 --> 00:36:12.860
looking at a combination nursery, high school,

00:36:12.900 --> 00:36:15.119
and retirement home for just a handful of very

00:36:15.119 --> 00:36:17.920
changeable ones? A nursery and a retirement home.

00:36:18.019 --> 00:36:21.260
I love that. On that note, thanks for diving

00:36:21.260 --> 00:36:24.079
deep with us today. Keep asking questions and

00:36:24.079 --> 00:36:26.960
keep looking at the bones. And please don't lasso

00:36:26.960 --> 00:36:29.039
the fossils. Please do not lasso the fossils.

00:36:29.159 --> 00:36:29.840
We'll see you next time.
