WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.259
December 2nd, 2016. That date, I think, is when

00:00:03.259 --> 00:00:05.219
the script just completely flipped. Oh, absolutely.

00:00:05.719 --> 00:00:07.160
If you were into hip hop back then, you remember

00:00:07.160 --> 00:00:10.400
it. You had childish Gambino Donald Glover coming

00:00:10.400 --> 00:00:14.500
off this massive success with, because the internet.

00:00:14.720 --> 00:00:17.399
He was the witty punchline guy. Exactly. The

00:00:17.399 --> 00:00:20.600
existential rapper. Yeah. The assumption was,

00:00:20.800 --> 00:00:23.140
okay, for his third album, he's just going to

00:00:23.140 --> 00:00:25.320
double down on the bars. And instead you press

00:00:25.320 --> 00:00:27.359
play and the first thing you hear is a scream.

00:00:27.539 --> 00:00:31.300
A literal scream. And then. Was it a glockenspiel?

00:00:31.440 --> 00:00:33.299
A glockenspiel, yeah. And this heavy distorted

00:00:33.299 --> 00:00:35.060
guitar, it sounds like it was pulled right out

00:00:35.060 --> 00:00:37.880
of, you know, 1971. We are, of course, doing

00:00:37.880 --> 00:00:41.399
a deep dive into Awaken My Love. It's been a

00:00:41.399 --> 00:00:43.899
few years, but looking at the sources we've got

00:00:43.899 --> 00:00:46.020
here, production notes, the rollout, the reviews,

00:00:46.240 --> 00:00:48.939
it's so clear this wasn't just another album.

00:00:49.119 --> 00:00:51.280
No, it felt like a career suicide mission that

00:00:51.280 --> 00:00:54.159
somehow turned into a total resurrection. That

00:00:54.159 --> 00:00:55.719
is a perfect way to frame it. And that's our

00:00:55.719 --> 00:00:57.420
mission for this deep dive, right? To figure

00:00:57.420 --> 00:00:59.799
out how he did it. It's more than just the sound.

00:00:59.899 --> 00:01:02.780
It's the whole methodology. How do you go from

00:01:02.780 --> 00:01:06.219
Fruity Loops rap beats to recording live funk

00:01:06.219 --> 00:01:09.079
that sounds like it was pressed on vinyl 40 years

00:01:09.079 --> 00:01:11.180
ago? And we also have to get into the cost of

00:01:11.180 --> 00:01:13.840
it all. The cosplay accusations from some critics

00:01:13.840 --> 00:01:16.120
and, of course, the controversy around the cover

00:01:16.120 --> 00:01:18.819
art. Yeah, that's still a lingering issue. Okay,

00:01:18.879 --> 00:01:20.500
so let's start with what you call the great departure.

00:01:21.219 --> 00:01:23.819
It's easy to just say, he stopped rapping, but

00:01:23.819 --> 00:01:26.700
it's, uh, it's... so much deeper than that it's

00:01:26.700 --> 00:01:29.579
a complete change in his musical vocabulary completely

00:01:29.579 --> 00:01:32.200
well look at camp or because the internet the

00:01:32.200 --> 00:01:34.900
music's engine was the lyricism the beat was

00:01:34.900 --> 00:01:37.980
just there to carry the words on awaken my love

00:01:37.980 --> 00:01:41.280
the engine is the groove it's all psychedelic

00:01:41.280 --> 00:01:47.920
soul p funk rmb and glover's voice here it's

00:01:47.920 --> 00:01:50.319
an instrument it's about texture not just rhymes

00:01:51.040 --> 00:01:53.099
You mentioned the screaming at the top. For a

00:01:53.099 --> 00:01:54.459
first -time listener, that's got to be the most

00:01:54.459 --> 00:01:56.840
jarring part. Oh, for sure. The critics call

00:01:56.840 --> 00:01:58.659
it a bold departure, which is, you know, polite

00:01:58.659 --> 00:02:00.799
critics speak for what on earth is happening.

00:02:00.840 --> 00:02:03.140
He's really straining his voice. Whispering.

00:02:03.299 --> 00:02:07.120
Yes. All these wild inflections. It's straight

00:02:07.120 --> 00:02:09.379
out of the George Clinton and Funkadelic playbook.

00:02:09.580 --> 00:02:11.879
He isn't trying to sound pretty. He's trying

00:02:11.879 --> 00:02:14.879
to sound effective in that very specific funk

00:02:14.879 --> 00:02:17.180
world. OK, let's define that context for a second.

00:02:17.219 --> 00:02:19.479
We keep throwing around P -Funk. So for anyone

00:02:19.479 --> 00:02:22.300
who just knows Redbone from the radio, what are

00:02:22.300 --> 00:02:25.389
we actually talking about? So P -Funk is basically

00:02:25.389 --> 00:02:28.389
the Parliament Funkadelic universe that George

00:02:28.389 --> 00:02:30.969
Clinton created in the 70s. It wasn't just funk

00:02:30.969 --> 00:02:33.750
music. It was a whole mythology. Like Afrofuturism?

00:02:34.349 --> 00:02:37.169
Afrofuturism, psychedelia, sci -fi, all mixed

00:02:37.169 --> 00:02:39.729
with these heavy, almost rock guitars and soulful

00:02:39.729 --> 00:02:42.430
harmonies. So when Rolling Stone called this

00:02:42.430 --> 00:02:44.990
album an enthralling trip, they were getting

00:02:44.990 --> 00:02:47.490
it. He didn't just borrow a beat. He tried to

00:02:47.490 --> 00:02:50.229
recreate that whole chaotic atmosphere. It really

00:02:50.229 --> 00:02:51.889
is like a time machine. You listen to me and

00:02:51.889 --> 00:02:55.169
your mama. And you were just not in 2016 anymore.

00:02:55.349 --> 00:02:57.370
And that was completely intentional. What's amazing

00:02:57.370 --> 00:02:59.210
is that before we even got the music, he gave

00:02:59.210 --> 00:03:02.270
us the map. Ah, the rollout. He's almost better

00:03:02.270 --> 00:03:04.550
at marketing than he is at music sometimes. He's

00:03:04.550 --> 00:03:07.270
a master of it. And this whole thing was an exercise

00:03:07.270 --> 00:03:10.250
in world building. So let's go back. June 17th,

00:03:10.250 --> 00:03:13.870
2016, he tweets a link. Just pharaohs .earth,

00:03:13.870 --> 00:03:16.449
right? That was it. And it wasn't a pre -save

00:03:16.449 --> 00:03:18.530
link. It was an app. And when you opened it,

00:03:18.550 --> 00:03:21.150
you were just... drifting in space exactly looking

00:03:21.150 --> 00:03:24.069
at this little blue planet with a clock counting

00:03:24.069 --> 00:03:27.590
down it forced you to slow down to engage with

00:03:27.590 --> 00:03:30.490
this visual before you heard a single note so

00:03:30.490 --> 00:03:33.229
when the countdown finally hit zero the app crashes

00:03:33.229 --> 00:03:36.129
you down to earth and it puts you on a map in

00:03:36.129 --> 00:03:38.870
joshua tree california it was an invitation to

00:03:38.870 --> 00:03:41.169
a physical event the big concert experiences

00:03:41.169 --> 00:03:44.050
yes you could buy tickets through the app for

00:03:44.050 --> 00:03:47.469
these shows in september 2016. this was almost

00:03:47.469 --> 00:03:49.539
three months before they album dropped he debuted

00:03:49.539 --> 00:03:51.520
the whole thing live in the middle of the desert

00:03:51.520 --> 00:03:53.340
i mean talk about setting a mood and he leaned

00:03:53.340 --> 00:03:55.990
right into it The reports from the show are wild.

00:03:56.270 --> 00:03:58.469
Glover wearing glow -in -the -dark tribal paint

00:03:58.469 --> 00:04:01.669
on his braids, a pink and yellow skirt. Wow.

00:04:01.889 --> 00:04:04.789
The whole band had a similar kind of tribal neon

00:04:04.789 --> 00:04:07.250
vibe. So this is the moment when thousands of

00:04:07.250 --> 00:04:09.469
fans realized, wait a minute, he's not rapping.

00:04:09.770 --> 00:04:11.849
That's the tension. You've got all these kids

00:04:11.849 --> 00:04:14.330
in the desert who are probably expecting 3 ,005,

00:04:14.389 --> 00:04:18.009
and instead they get this 11 -song funk opera.

00:04:18.069 --> 00:04:20.790
It was a huge gamble. But he didn't leave everyone

00:04:20.790 --> 00:04:23.689
else out, did he? No. Later on, he updated the

00:04:23.689 --> 00:04:26.490
Pharos app. You could watch the performance of

00:04:26.490 --> 00:04:29.310
Me and Your Mama through a VR headset on your

00:04:29.310 --> 00:04:32.329
phone. Which is kind of ironic. A tech -forward

00:04:32.329 --> 00:04:35.930
way to experience an album that sounds so deliberately

00:04:35.930 --> 00:04:39.610
anti -digital. Exactly. Which brings us to the

00:04:39.610 --> 00:04:41.949
production. To me, this is the most impressive

00:04:41.949 --> 00:04:43.670
part. It just doesn't sound like it was made

00:04:43.670 --> 00:04:46.329
on a laptop in 2016. Right, when everything sounded

00:04:46.329 --> 00:04:48.269
like it was made on a laptop. This was the big

00:04:48.269 --> 00:04:50.829
technical pivot. It's still him and Ludwig Göransson,

00:04:50.870 --> 00:04:53.310
his usual guy. But instead of being digital wizards,

00:04:53.310 --> 00:04:55.430
they just... They stripped it all back. They

00:04:55.430 --> 00:04:58.029
went for total analog fidelity. The instrument

00:04:58.029 --> 00:05:00.949
list in the liner notes is just wild. I'm seeing

00:05:00.949 --> 00:05:04.129
glockenspiel bottles like literal glass bottles,

00:05:04.209 --> 00:05:07.670
a cello banjo, harpsichord, a B3 organ. And that

00:05:07.670 --> 00:05:09.910
cello banjo is such a perfect example of the

00:05:09.910 --> 00:05:12.329
detail they went into. I got to ask, what does

00:05:12.329 --> 00:05:15.189
a cello banjo even bring to the table? It's all

00:05:15.189 --> 00:05:17.949
about the texture. It has a lower pitch, this

00:05:17.949 --> 00:05:20.569
kind of plunky resonance sound that you just

00:05:20.569 --> 00:05:23.089
can't fake with a synth. It gives everything.

00:05:23.399 --> 00:05:26.279
a muddy, organic, wooden feel. They wanted that

00:05:26.279 --> 00:05:28.680
70s grit. And it wasn't just the instruments.

00:05:28.899 --> 00:05:31.279
It was the voices, too. Right. They brought in

00:05:31.279 --> 00:05:33.800
Brent Jones and the Best Life Singers. That gives

00:05:33.800 --> 00:05:36.839
you that big, choral, communal feeling, which

00:05:36.839 --> 00:05:39.620
was so central to the original P -Funk idea.

00:05:40.120 --> 00:05:42.720
It's a village, not just one guy. So when you

00:05:42.720 --> 00:05:45.389
hear an album that sounds this retro... the first

00:05:45.389 --> 00:05:47.410
thing you assume is that it's just full of samples.

00:05:47.610 --> 00:05:49.589
That's the common assumption, and this is where

00:05:49.589 --> 00:05:52.449
it gets really amazing. The album is almost entirely

00:05:52.449 --> 00:05:55.730
original composition. Wait, seriously? Seriously.

00:05:55.870 --> 00:05:58.470
The only major sample on the whole record is

00:05:58.470 --> 00:06:01.389
on the track Riot, which samples Funkadelic's

00:06:01.389 --> 00:06:03.910
Good to Your Ear Hole. Everything else, Have

00:06:03.910 --> 00:06:05.810
Some Love, Boogeyman, all those grooves that

00:06:05.810 --> 00:06:08.189
sound like they were ripped from 1974. They made

00:06:08.189 --> 00:06:10.810
them from scratch. From scratch. Glover, Gernson,

00:06:10.870 --> 00:06:13.910
and their team of musicians. I mean, that's incredibly

00:06:13.910 --> 00:06:15.850
difficult. It's so much harder to write a song

00:06:15.850 --> 00:06:18.889
that sounds like a classic than it is to just

00:06:18.889 --> 00:06:21.689
sample one. It requires a level of music theory

00:06:21.689 --> 00:06:25.230
that, frankly, a lot of rappers don't have. They

00:06:25.230 --> 00:06:27.790
studied that era so closely they were able to

00:06:27.790 --> 00:06:30.230
basically manufacture a fake memory for the listener.

00:06:30.389 --> 00:06:32.709
So let's talk about the key tracks, Me and Your

00:06:32.709 --> 00:06:35.399
Mama. The lead single. It's really the thesis

00:06:35.399 --> 00:06:37.800
statement for the album. It starts as a lullaby

00:06:37.800 --> 00:06:39.720
and then that beat switch hits you and it's like,

00:06:39.779 --> 00:06:43.899
OK, abandon all expectations right now. And then,

00:06:43.939 --> 00:06:46.339
of course, the monster hit Redbone. The breakout

00:06:46.339 --> 00:06:49.839
won a Grammy for best traditional R &amp;B performance.

00:06:50.019 --> 00:06:52.899
Think about that. Traditional. The Academy basically

00:06:52.899 --> 00:06:55.779
said, yep, this rapper now fits in the canon

00:06:55.779 --> 00:06:58.560
of traditional soul. And that high pitched vocal.

00:06:59.399 --> 00:07:01.139
It sounds like it's pitch shifted up, but it's

00:07:01.139 --> 00:07:03.680
not. It's not. That's him singing in his head

00:07:03.680 --> 00:07:06.420
voice, pushing his falsetto to its absolute limit.

00:07:06.480 --> 00:07:09.240
It gives the song that vulnerable, almost paranoid

00:07:09.240 --> 00:07:11.620
feeling. Then there's terrified. A smoother cut.

00:07:11.800 --> 00:07:14.100
A little more sinister, kind of prince -esque,

00:07:14.120 --> 00:07:16.959
but still in that same analog world. Okay, we

00:07:16.959 --> 00:07:18.680
have to talk about the visuals. The album cover.

00:07:18.819 --> 00:07:21.060
If you see it once, you just never forget it.

00:07:21.199 --> 00:07:24.040
It is so striking. It's a photo by the creative

00:07:24.040 --> 00:07:27.120
director Ibra Ak of the model Giannina Oteto.

00:07:27.560 --> 00:07:30.670
The look on her face. It's like ecstasy and terror

00:07:30.670 --> 00:07:33.310
all at once. Her eyes are rolled back. It's incredibly

00:07:33.310 --> 00:07:35.850
intense. And the headdress was designed by Laura

00:07:35.850 --> 00:07:38.509
Wass. But what's really cool is if you were watching

00:07:38.509 --> 00:07:40.709
Glover's show Atlanta, you might have actually

00:07:40.709 --> 00:07:42.930
seen it before the album even came out. Oh, right.

00:07:43.050 --> 00:07:45.720
The Easter egg. Exactly. The artwork was just

00:07:45.720 --> 00:07:47.860
sitting in the background in the Juneteenth episode.

00:07:48.199 --> 00:07:50.600
He loves to cross pollinate his projects like

00:07:50.600 --> 00:07:52.660
that. And the cover itself is another one of

00:07:52.660 --> 00:07:55.220
those homages. A very direct one. It's a nod

00:07:55.220 --> 00:07:58.899
to the cover of Funkadelic's 1971 album Maggot

00:07:58.899 --> 00:08:01.600
Brain, which has a woman screaming with her head

00:08:01.600 --> 00:08:03.750
coming out of the dirt. But we can't really talk

00:08:03.750 --> 00:08:05.889
about the cover without getting into the controversy

00:08:05.889 --> 00:08:08.370
that came out later. No, we can't. And it's a

00:08:08.370 --> 00:08:10.910
serious issue that really clashes with the whole

00:08:10.910 --> 00:08:14.209
utopian community vibe of the music itself. So

00:08:14.209 --> 00:08:16.750
this is about the model, Jeannie Notato. What

00:08:16.750 --> 00:08:19.329
exactly happened? Well, years later, she came

00:08:19.329 --> 00:08:21.850
forward and accused Ibraak and the whole team

00:08:21.850 --> 00:08:24.670
of mistreatment over payment. She said she was

00:08:24.670 --> 00:08:27.689
paid very little for the shoot. Extremely low

00:08:27.689 --> 00:08:30.589
pay. and she says the promise was that they'd

00:08:30.589 --> 00:08:33.590
get residuals or royalties once the album blew

00:08:33.590 --> 00:08:36.330
up the classic do it for the exposure line basically

00:08:36.330 --> 00:08:39.269
and according to her that money never came she

00:08:39.269 --> 00:08:42.590
said it's been an exhausting emotional and overall

00:08:42.590 --> 00:08:46.029
sad thing to deal with she felt really exploited

00:08:46.029 --> 00:08:48.649
did she ever pursue legal action She said her

00:08:48.649 --> 00:08:51.269
lawyers tried to contact Gambino's team but were

00:08:51.269 --> 00:08:53.769
reportedly ignored. It's just, it's a really

00:08:53.769 --> 00:08:56.190
bitter footnote on such an iconic image. Yeah,

00:08:56.190 --> 00:08:58.450
it definitely complicates how you see that cover

00:08:58.450 --> 00:09:01.149
now. You see the art, but you can't unknow the

00:09:01.149 --> 00:09:03.330
allegations behind it. It makes you ask, can

00:09:03.330 --> 00:09:06.029
the art really be about community if the process

00:09:06.029 --> 00:09:08.549
of making it wasn't? Shissing back to the reception.

00:09:09.509 --> 00:09:13.250
The album drops. Fans are shocked. What did the

00:09:13.250 --> 00:09:15.370
critics think? Was it a masterpiece or a mistake?

00:09:15.879 --> 00:09:18.519
It was completely divisive, a total love it or

00:09:18.519 --> 00:09:20.740
hate it situation. Let's start with the praise.

00:09:21.100 --> 00:09:23.120
Okay, so you had the New York Times. They called

00:09:23.120 --> 00:09:25.500
it both homage and parody. They thought he captured

00:09:25.500 --> 00:09:28.059
the whole spirit of the 70s, the sensuality,

00:09:28.080 --> 00:09:30.620
the politics, the humor. And The Guardian was

00:09:30.620 --> 00:09:33.620
on board too. They called it a prog -tinged freak

00:09:33.620 --> 00:09:37.480
funk opus. Rolling Stone loved it. The positive

00:09:37.480 --> 00:09:39.840
reviews all basically respected the ambition,

00:09:39.919 --> 00:09:42.700
the big swing he took. But not everyone was convinced.

00:09:43.059 --> 00:09:46.220
No. The main criticism was about authenticity.

00:09:46.740 --> 00:09:49.340
Vice was probably the harshest. They called it

00:09:49.340 --> 00:09:53.600
pure funkadelic cosplay. Ouch. Cosplay is a loaded

00:09:53.600 --> 00:09:56.240
word. It implies he's just dressing up. And that

00:09:56.240 --> 00:09:58.360
was the core of the critique. Is this a genuine

00:09:58.360 --> 00:10:01.559
expression or is Donald Glover, the actor, just

00:10:01.559 --> 00:10:04.500
playing the role of a 70s funk singer? Pitchfork

00:10:04.500 --> 00:10:06.820
questioned if it was just mimicry. Even Robert

00:10:06.820 --> 00:10:09.340
Criscow, the dean of American rock critics, had

00:10:09.340 --> 00:10:11.399
an opinion. Yeah, he called it overrated and

00:10:11.399 --> 00:10:14.519
romantic P -funk rec show. So you have this huge

00:10:14.519 --> 00:10:17.240
divide. Is it a brilliant tribute or is it just

00:10:17.240 --> 00:10:19.440
a hollow imitation? But despite what the critics

00:10:19.440 --> 00:10:21.980
were arguing about, the audience seemed to love

00:10:21.980 --> 00:10:24.779
it. They did. Commercially, it was a big success.

00:10:25.000 --> 00:10:27.000
Debuted at number five on the Billboard 200,

00:10:27.299 --> 00:10:29.679
went platinum. And the awards followed. Well,

00:10:29.840 --> 00:10:32.500
Redbone was the awards magnet. It won the Grammy.

00:10:32.899 --> 00:10:35.639
And the album itself got nominated for Album

00:10:35.639 --> 00:10:38.059
of the Year. So the Recording Academy, at least,

00:10:38.100 --> 00:10:41.100
saw it as a legitimate and important R &amp;B record.

00:10:41.600 --> 00:10:43.539
So why do you think it connected so deeply with

00:10:43.539 --> 00:10:45.700
the audience, even when some critics were so

00:10:45.700 --> 00:10:48.799
skeptical? I think for a lot of Glover's younger

00:10:48.799 --> 00:10:52.419
fans, millennials, Gen Z, this was their first

00:10:52.419 --> 00:10:54.940
real exposure to this kind of funk. They'd never

00:10:54.940 --> 00:10:57.960
listened to Maggot Brain. Exactly. So to them,

00:10:57.960 --> 00:11:00.820
this sound was new and original. Glover was the

00:11:00.820 --> 00:11:04.500
bridge translating 1970s analog soul for a 2016

00:11:04.500 --> 00:11:08.299
digital audience. So when you zoom out, we started

00:11:08.299 --> 00:11:10.750
with a punchline rapper. And we ended with a

00:11:10.750 --> 00:11:13.269
Grammy -winning funk singer. It's a story of

00:11:13.269 --> 00:11:15.710
total reinvention. He looked at what everyone

00:11:15.710 --> 00:11:18.210
expected him to do, make another rap album, and

00:11:18.210 --> 00:11:20.730
he just did the absolute opposite. It's all about

00:11:20.730 --> 00:11:23.009
expectation, isn't it? If he had dropped a mediocre

00:11:23.009 --> 00:11:25.269
rap album, people might have just shrugged. But

00:11:25.269 --> 00:11:27.570
because he tried something this hard, he forced

00:11:27.570 --> 00:11:30.250
everyone to listen differently. And that tension

00:11:30.250 --> 00:11:32.230
we talked about, imitation versus innovation,

00:11:32.570 --> 00:11:35.740
that really is the album's legacy. It is derivative.

00:11:35.940 --> 00:11:39.059
It sounds just like the 70s, but it was presented

00:11:39.059 --> 00:11:40.639
to an audience who had never heard that before.

00:11:40.799 --> 00:11:42.419
And the fact that they built it all from the

00:11:42.419 --> 00:11:45.820
ground up with real instruments. Yeah. That feels

00:11:45.820 --> 00:11:47.960
like the innovation part. It wasn't lazy. It

00:11:47.960 --> 00:11:50.139
was a reconstruction, a very heartfelt one, even

00:11:50.139 --> 00:11:52.200
if the business side of the cover art makes that

00:11:52.200 --> 00:11:54.259
whole love and community message a little more

00:11:54.259 --> 00:11:56.779
complicated. It's a complex legacy for a very

00:11:56.779 --> 00:11:59.559
complex album. So here's a final thought for

00:11:59.559 --> 00:12:02.419
you to chew on as you go about your day. We always

00:12:02.419 --> 00:12:05.279
say we want artists to evolve. Right. But when

00:12:05.279 --> 00:12:07.960
an artist completely changes lanes like this,

00:12:08.080 --> 00:12:10.919
do we judge them on how well they pull off the

00:12:10.919 --> 00:12:13.600
new style? Or do we kind of penalize them for

00:12:13.600 --> 00:12:16.240
leaving the old one behind? And to add to that,

00:12:16.299 --> 00:12:18.879
thinking about the payment controversy, how do

00:12:18.879 --> 00:12:21.700
we square the utopian spirit of the music, the

00:12:21.700 --> 00:12:24.860
choirs, the stay woke message with the cold business

00:12:24.860 --> 00:12:27.960
reality behind the curtain? Can the art truly

00:12:27.960 --> 00:12:30.940
be utopian if the process wasn't? Heavy questions.

00:12:31.500 --> 00:12:34.879
for a very funky album. Go listen to Redbone

00:12:34.879 --> 00:12:37.139
again. Maybe you'll hear it a little differently

00:12:37.139 --> 00:12:39.179
this time. Thanks for diving in with us. Thank

00:12:39.179 --> 00:12:39.340
you.
