WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.100
Welcome back to the Deep Dive. I want to start

00:00:02.100 --> 00:00:06.099
today with a bit of a Matrix moment. Okay, I'm

00:00:06.099 --> 00:00:07.960
intrigued. You know that scene, right, where

00:00:07.960 --> 00:00:11.279
Neo finally stops seeing the walls and the furniture,

00:00:11.380 --> 00:00:14.839
and he just starts seeing the green code cascading

00:00:14.839 --> 00:00:17.120
down? Oh yeah, the code that's making up the

00:00:17.120 --> 00:00:19.440
reality around him? Exactly. He stops seeing

00:00:19.440 --> 00:00:21.440
the illusion and starts seeing the software.

00:00:21.699 --> 00:00:24.219
I know exactly the one. Right. So I want to try

00:00:24.219 --> 00:00:26.839
to do that today, but for the physical world.

00:00:27.559 --> 00:00:31.559
I want you. and everyone listening to just take

00:00:31.559 --> 00:00:33.700
a look around for a second. It's a good exercise.

00:00:34.140 --> 00:00:36.000
Seriously. If you're at home, look out the window.

00:00:36.200 --> 00:00:38.179
If you're walking your dog, just look at the

00:00:38.179 --> 00:00:40.679
street. If you're driving, maybe keep your eyes

00:00:40.679 --> 00:00:42.539
on the road, but look at the strip mall you just

00:00:42.539 --> 00:00:44.979
passed. What do you see? And more importantly,

00:00:45.100 --> 00:00:47.560
why do you see it? Well, normally you see a house

00:00:47.560 --> 00:00:51.979
or a factory or a skyscraper. And you think,

00:00:52.119 --> 00:00:54.399
okay, that skyscraper's there because a developer

00:00:54.399 --> 00:00:56.840
bought the land and decided to build a tall building.

00:00:57.380 --> 00:01:00.420
Simple enough. Or that factory is way over on

00:01:00.420 --> 00:01:02.240
the edge of town because, you know, land was

00:01:02.240 --> 00:01:04.420
probably cheap out there. We tend to think the

00:01:04.420 --> 00:01:07.439
layout of our world is, I don't know, organic.

00:01:07.719 --> 00:01:10.620
We think it's the result of the free market or

00:01:10.620 --> 00:01:13.180
just the natural way cities grow over time. It

00:01:13.180 --> 00:01:16.579
just sort of happened. Exactly. But as we went

00:01:16.579 --> 00:01:19.040
through the research for this deep dive, I realized

00:01:19.040 --> 00:01:22.680
the American city is about as organic as a microchip.

00:01:22.829 --> 00:01:26.170
It is engineered. It is coded. And that code

00:01:26.170 --> 00:01:27.829
is what we're talking about today. We are talking

00:01:27.829 --> 00:01:31.409
about zoning. And I can hear the collective groan

00:01:31.409 --> 00:01:33.849
of the audience right now. Oh, absolutely. Zoning.

00:01:34.170 --> 00:01:38.310
It sounds like the absolute tedious peak of local

00:01:38.310 --> 00:01:40.629
bureaucracy. It really does. It brings to mind

00:01:40.629 --> 00:01:43.750
late night city council meetings, bad coffee,

00:01:43.930 --> 00:01:46.069
stacks of paper. And people arguing about the

00:01:46.069 --> 00:01:48.069
height of offense. It sounds incredibly boring.

00:01:48.439 --> 00:01:50.579
It sounds like the driest topic we could possibly

00:01:50.579 --> 00:01:52.420
pick. Yeah. But here's the headline I want to

00:01:52.420 --> 00:01:53.799
start with and the reason we were doing this.

00:01:53.879 --> 00:01:57.439
Okay. This boring bureaucracy is arguably the

00:01:57.439 --> 00:02:00.140
most powerful social engineering tool in American

00:02:00.140 --> 00:02:02.680
history. That is not an exaggeration at all.

00:02:02.739 --> 00:02:05.239
It is the operating system of the built environment.

00:02:05.519 --> 00:02:07.780
It determines who your neighbors are. It determines

00:02:07.780 --> 00:02:10.240
if you can walk to a grocery store or if you

00:02:10.240 --> 00:02:12.280
have to get in a car and drive. It determines

00:02:12.280 --> 00:02:15.150
how much your house is worth. Or if you can even

00:02:15.150 --> 00:02:17.669
afford a house in the first place. And as we're

00:02:17.669 --> 00:02:20.530
going to see, it has determined quite strictly

00:02:20.530 --> 00:02:24.009
how segregated our society remains to this day.

00:02:24.110 --> 00:02:27.050
It's the invisible architecture. And to understand

00:02:27.050 --> 00:02:29.590
it, we have to understand that this system, I

00:02:29.590 --> 00:02:31.969
mean, it didn't just appear out of the ether.

00:02:32.030 --> 00:02:35.150
It was invented. It was invented. It was invented

00:02:35.150 --> 00:02:38.129
for very specific reasons that have, frankly,

00:02:38.229 --> 00:02:41.469
nothing to do with fence heights. So our mission

00:02:41.469 --> 00:02:43.900
today. is to unpack this beast. We're going to

00:02:43.900 --> 00:02:46.199
look at how a system that was originally designed

00:02:46.199 --> 00:02:49.659
just to stop nuisances, like, you know, simply

00:02:49.659 --> 00:02:51.699
keeping a slaughterhouse away from a kindergarten.

00:02:51.939 --> 00:02:54.039
Which everyone agrees is a good idea. Right.

00:02:54.360 --> 00:02:57.360
How did that simple idea somehow mutate into

00:02:57.360 --> 00:03:02.000
this massive tool for wealth creation and exclusion?

00:03:02.460 --> 00:03:05.020
It's a fascinating and kind of scary evolution.

00:03:05.259 --> 00:03:07.340
But before we get into the history, which involves

00:03:07.340 --> 00:03:09.340
everything from laundromats to mountain lions,

00:03:09.500 --> 00:03:12.039
weirdly enough. It gets weird. We probably need

00:03:12.039 --> 00:03:15.000
to agree on terms. When you and I say zoning,

00:03:15.240 --> 00:03:17.580
what are we actually defining? Yeah, let's get

00:03:17.580 --> 00:03:19.020
the definitions out of the way so we can get

00:03:19.020 --> 00:03:21.319
to the drama. Yeah. Because for me, zoning just

00:03:21.319 --> 00:03:23.199
feels like a map with colors on it, you know,

00:03:23.219 --> 00:03:25.620
red, yellow, blue. That's the visual representation

00:03:25.620 --> 00:03:29.180
for sure. But strictly speaking, zoning is a

00:03:29.180 --> 00:03:31.580
system of laws that divides a jurisdiction's

00:03:31.580 --> 00:03:34.800
land into districts or zones. Yeah. And within

00:03:34.800 --> 00:03:37.520
those zones, the law limits two main things,

00:03:37.780 --> 00:03:41.400
use and form. Use and form. Okay, let's break

00:03:41.400 --> 00:03:43.560
those down. Use seems straightforward enough.

00:03:43.740 --> 00:03:46.840
Use is the what. What activity is allowed to

00:03:46.840 --> 00:03:49.520
happen on this square of dirt? Can you build

00:03:49.520 --> 00:03:51.580
a house? Can you build a smelting plant? Can

00:03:51.580 --> 00:03:53.520
you open a Starbucks? So you can't build a house

00:03:53.520 --> 00:03:55.560
in a factory zone. Right. In a strict zoning

00:03:55.560 --> 00:03:58.060
regime, these are mutually exclusive. You cannot

00:03:58.060 --> 00:04:00.080
put the Starbucks in the smelting plant zone,

00:04:00.219 --> 00:04:02.460
and you certainly can't put the smelting plant

00:04:02.460 --> 00:04:05.319
in the residential zone. Got it. And form, what's

00:04:05.319 --> 00:04:08.840
that? Form is the how. It dictates what the building

00:04:08.840 --> 00:04:11.639
physically looks like. How tall can it be? How

00:04:11.639 --> 00:04:13.659
far back from the street does it have to be?

00:04:13.699 --> 00:04:16.920
That's the setback. How much of the lot can be

00:04:16.920 --> 00:04:20.220
covered in concrete versus, say, grass? This

00:04:20.220 --> 00:04:23.259
is often called the bulk regulation. So use is

00:04:23.259 --> 00:04:27.899
no factories here, and form is your porch can

00:04:27.899 --> 00:04:30.639
only be 10 feet from the sidewalk. Precisely.

00:04:30.680 --> 00:04:34.199
And the scope of this is just... While it regulates

00:04:34.199 --> 00:04:36.839
everything, it's not just big categories. It

00:04:36.839 --> 00:04:39.019
gets more specific. Oh, incredibly granular.

00:04:39.240 --> 00:04:41.720
Some zoning codes will specify whether you can

00:04:41.720 --> 00:04:44.639
sell furniture in a specific spot or how many

00:04:44.639 --> 00:04:46.839
square feet of paved space you can have in your

00:04:46.839 --> 00:04:48.959
driveway. Now, here's the part that I got stuck

00:04:48.959 --> 00:04:51.800
on when I was reading. I own my house. I pay

00:04:51.800 --> 00:04:54.180
the mortgage. I pay the taxes. If I want to build

00:04:54.180 --> 00:04:56.279
a shed in the backyard to sell homemade pickles,

00:04:56.459 --> 00:04:58.519
or if I want to build a roller coaster for my

00:04:58.519 --> 00:05:00.220
kids, why does the government have the right

00:05:00.220 --> 00:05:02.720
to stop me? Isn't that a violation of my property

00:05:02.720 --> 00:05:04.839
rights? And you have just hit on the central

00:05:04.839 --> 00:05:06.620
tension of the last hundred years. It feels like

00:05:06.620 --> 00:05:09.319
it should be my land, my rules. You would think

00:05:09.319 --> 00:05:12.439
that owning land means you control it. But legally,

00:05:12.720 --> 00:05:15.899
zoning relies on a concept called police power.

00:05:16.319 --> 00:05:19.860
Police power. That sounds intense. It sounds

00:05:19.860 --> 00:05:21.959
like it involved handcuffs and SWAT teams. It

00:05:21.959 --> 00:05:24.360
does sound that way, doesn't it? But in constitutional

00:05:24.360 --> 00:05:28.480
law, it's much, much broader. Police power doesn't

00:05:28.480 --> 00:05:30.980
just mean law enforcement officers. It refers

00:05:30.980 --> 00:05:33.720
to the inherent capacity of the states to regulate

00:05:33.720 --> 00:05:36.660
behavior and enforce order within their territory.

00:05:36.920 --> 00:05:39.040
And what's the justification for that? The betterment

00:05:39.040 --> 00:05:42.160
of the health, safety, morals, and general welfare

00:05:42.160 --> 00:05:45.110
of their inhabitants. Ah. General welfare, that's

00:05:45.110 --> 00:05:47.209
the magic phrase. That is the catch -all. The

00:05:47.209 --> 00:05:50.290
argument is, your right to build a pickle shed

00:05:50.290 --> 00:05:53.050
or a roller coaster ends where your neighbor's

00:05:53.050 --> 00:05:56.389
right to a rat -free, quiet, safe existence begins.

00:05:56.430 --> 00:05:59.110
So my rights end at my property line. Basically.

00:05:59.230 --> 00:06:01.850
And the state delegates this police power to

00:06:01.850 --> 00:06:03.990
your local town council. So when the planning

00:06:03.990 --> 00:06:07.410
board tells you no, they are essentially flexing

00:06:07.410 --> 00:06:10.029
the same constitutional muscle as a cop arresting

00:06:10.029 --> 00:06:12.589
a bank robber. They are maintaining order. That

00:06:12.589 --> 00:06:14.769
puts a very different spin on the local planning

00:06:14.769 --> 00:06:16.870
board meeting. They aren't just bureaucrats.

00:06:16.889 --> 00:06:19.829
They're exercising state power. Exactly. And

00:06:19.829 --> 00:06:22.129
to understand how they got that power, we have

00:06:22.129 --> 00:06:24.930
to wind the clock back. Because this didn't start

00:06:24.930 --> 00:06:27.629
with some grand plan to make cities beautiful.

00:06:27.850 --> 00:06:30.209
No. Looking at the history, it seems incredibly

00:06:30.209 --> 00:06:32.550
reactive. It wasn't some founding father who

00:06:32.550 --> 00:06:34.870
loved urban planning. Not at all. It started

00:06:34.870 --> 00:06:37.410
in the Wild West, essentially. California, late

00:06:37.410 --> 00:06:40.310
19th century. This is where we see the first

00:06:40.310 --> 00:06:43.970
real attempts at land use control. And it brings

00:06:43.970 --> 00:06:47.389
us to the wash house ordinances. Wash houses.

00:06:47.629 --> 00:06:49.709
OK, so for the modern listener, a wash house

00:06:49.709 --> 00:06:51.930
implies the laundromat with, you know, coin operated

00:06:51.930 --> 00:06:54.970
machines. Yeah. But in 1880s California, this

00:06:54.970 --> 00:06:57.509
was an industrial operation. It absolutely was.

00:06:57.589 --> 00:07:01.589
You have to imagine large vats of boiling water,

00:07:01.709 --> 00:07:04.889
steam, chemicals, open fires to heat the iron.

00:07:05.029 --> 00:07:06.730
All in wooden buildings probably? Often in wooden

00:07:06.730 --> 00:07:08.889
buildings. They were significant fire hazards

00:07:08.889 --> 00:07:11.310
and they were noisy. They were industrial. So

00:07:11.310 --> 00:07:14.769
looking at Modesto, California in 1885, they

00:07:14.769 --> 00:07:17.230
pass an ordinance banning wash houses from certain

00:07:17.230 --> 00:07:19.649
areas of the city. On paper, you can see why

00:07:19.649 --> 00:07:21.930
a city might want to do that. If I'm living in

00:07:21.930 --> 00:07:25.829
a wooden house in Modesto in 1885, Maybe I don't

00:07:25.829 --> 00:07:28.129
want a fire -prone industrial laundry next door.

00:07:28.310 --> 00:07:30.449
That sounds like a legitimate safety concern.

00:07:30.670 --> 00:07:32.470
That was the legal argument. Health and safety.

00:07:32.649 --> 00:07:35.290
It always is. But we have to look at the context.

00:07:35.470 --> 00:07:38.089
Who owned the laundries in California at that

00:07:38.089 --> 00:07:40.810
time? It was predominantly, if not almost exclusively,

00:07:41.029 --> 00:07:43.949
Chinese residents. Exactly. This was the era

00:07:43.949 --> 00:07:47.110
of the Chinese Exclusion Act. Anti -Chinese sentiment

00:07:47.110 --> 00:07:49.470
was the dominant political force in California.

00:07:49.470 --> 00:07:51.709
So this wasn't really about fire safety. Well,

00:07:51.750 --> 00:07:54.930
the law was about fire safety. But the motivation

00:07:54.930 --> 00:07:58.709
was something else entirely. Modesto passes this

00:07:58.709 --> 00:08:01.689
ordinance. Then Los Angeles follows suit between

00:08:01.689 --> 00:08:05.329
1904 and 1909. They created specific districts

00:08:05.329 --> 00:08:07.750
where laundries were illegal. And the boundaries

00:08:07.750 --> 00:08:10.050
of those districts just happened to align with

00:08:10.050 --> 00:08:11.870
where the white residents lived. You got it.

00:08:11.910 --> 00:08:14.670
It was a master class in using a neutral law

00:08:14.670 --> 00:08:17.250
to achieve a discriminatory outcome. Right. The

00:08:17.250 --> 00:08:19.629
law didn't say no Chinese people allowed. No,

00:08:19.670 --> 00:08:22.459
it said no laundries allowed. But since the laundries

00:08:22.459 --> 00:08:24.740
were the economic engine of the Chinese community,

00:08:25.079 --> 00:08:27.939
the result was exclusion. This seems to be the

00:08:27.939 --> 00:08:30.680
recurring theme of our research today. The tool

00:08:30.680 --> 00:08:34.039
is technical. It's about fire safety or noise.

00:08:34.299 --> 00:08:37.090
But the motive is social. That's the pattern.

00:08:37.210 --> 00:08:40.009
And it wasn't just laundries. Los Angeles started

00:08:40.009 --> 00:08:42.950
using these early laws to separate other nuisances.

00:08:42.970 --> 00:08:44.850
We're talking about slaughterhouses, tanneries.

00:08:44.990 --> 00:08:46.850
Things that smell bad. Things that smell really

00:08:46.850 --> 00:08:50.649
bad. And crucially for L .A. oil drilling. I

00:08:50.649 --> 00:08:53.169
always forget that L .A. was basically one giant

00:08:53.169 --> 00:08:55.870
oil field back then. Massive. It was there will

00:08:55.870 --> 00:08:58.590
be blood meets the beach. You had oil derricks

00:08:58.590 --> 00:09:00.289
popping up in people's front yards. They were

00:09:00.289 --> 00:09:02.590
loud. They smelled like sulfur. And they occasionally,

00:09:02.649 --> 00:09:05.370
you know, exploded. OK, so. I'm going to play

00:09:05.370 --> 00:09:08.070
devil's advocate here again. If I bought a nice

00:09:08.070 --> 00:09:11.350
bundalow, I definitely do not want an oil derrick

00:09:11.350 --> 00:09:13.590
or a slaughterhouse next to my porch. Of course

00:09:13.590 --> 00:09:15.710
not. That seems like a very rational thing for

00:09:15.710 --> 00:09:18.230
the government to prevent. It is rational. And

00:09:18.230 --> 00:09:20.850
that is why zoning survived the courts initially,

00:09:21.029 --> 00:09:24.289
because at its core, separating a slaughterhouse

00:09:24.289 --> 00:09:26.870
from a kindergarten is a good idea. No one argues

00:09:26.870 --> 00:09:28.850
with that. The problem is that once you establish

00:09:28.850 --> 00:09:31.899
the legal power. To separate uses based on nuisance,

00:09:32.159 --> 00:09:34.840
you can start defining nuisance in very subjective

00:09:34.840 --> 00:09:37.320
ways. Right. A slaughterhouse is a nuisance.

00:09:37.480 --> 00:09:39.799
Is an apartment building a nuisance? Is a corner

00:09:39.799 --> 00:09:42.039
store a nuisance? Is a family with a different

00:09:42.039 --> 00:09:44.700
skin color a nuisance? That's where the slippery

00:09:44.700 --> 00:09:47.179
slope begins. So while California was dealing

00:09:47.179 --> 00:09:49.980
with wash houses and oil wells focusing on use,

00:09:50.220 --> 00:09:53.299
New York City was dealing with a totally different

00:09:53.299 --> 00:09:55.700
problem. A very different problem. They were

00:09:55.700 --> 00:09:59.080
dealing with form. And specifically, they were

00:09:59.080 --> 00:10:02.419
dealing with the sun. The sun. Or rather the

00:10:02.419 --> 00:10:05.340
lack of it. This takes us to 1915, right? Yes.

00:10:05.639 --> 00:10:08.360
The catalyst here is a specific building. The

00:10:08.360 --> 00:10:10.559
Equitable Building at 120 Broadway. It's still

00:10:10.559 --> 00:10:12.360
there today. You can go see it. And the problem

00:10:12.360 --> 00:10:14.639
wasn't that it was too tall necessarily. It was

00:10:14.639 --> 00:10:17.799
that it was fat. It was massive. It went straight

00:10:17.799 --> 00:10:19.860
up from the property line. It covered the entire

00:10:19.860 --> 00:10:22.399
lot. It didn't taper at all. So it was just a

00:10:22.399 --> 00:10:24.980
giant block. A giant stone block that blocked

00:10:24.980 --> 00:10:27.259
the windows of neighboring buildings and cast

00:10:27.259 --> 00:10:29.759
a shadow that extended for blocks. It literally

00:10:29.759 --> 00:10:31.639
stole the sunshine from the... streets below.

00:10:31.799 --> 00:10:34.879
And people were terrified. They looked at this

00:10:34.879 --> 00:10:37.039
thing and thought, if every building in Manhattan

00:10:37.039 --> 00:10:40.500
is built like this, New York will become a dark,

00:10:40.500 --> 00:10:44.940
dank maze. No light, no air, just canyons of

00:10:44.940 --> 00:10:48.000
stone. It was a very real, very visceral fear.

00:10:48.179 --> 00:10:52.299
So in 1916, New York City passed the first citywide

00:10:52.299 --> 00:10:55.100
zoning resolution. This is really the grandfather

00:10:55.100 --> 00:10:57.960
of modern zoning in America. But they didn't

00:10:57.960 --> 00:10:59.759
ban skyscrapers. I mean, that would have been

00:10:59.759 --> 00:11:01.940
impossible in New York. No, that would have killed

00:11:01.940 --> 00:11:04.679
the real estate market dead. Instead, they mandated

00:11:04.679 --> 00:11:07.980
setbacks. Explain setbacks for us, because this

00:11:07.980 --> 00:11:10.200
fundamentally changed how our cities look. Imagine

00:11:10.200 --> 00:11:12.860
a wedding cake. OK. The base is wide. Then as

00:11:12.860 --> 00:11:15.159
you go up, the next layer is a bit smaller. back

00:11:15.159 --> 00:11:17.200
from the edge then the next layer is smaller

00:11:17.200 --> 00:11:20.220
again the 1916 law said that once a building

00:11:20.220 --> 00:11:22.399
reached a certain height a height based on the

00:11:22.399 --> 00:11:24.519
width of the street it was on it had to step

00:11:24.519 --> 00:11:26.759
back so the higher you go the skinnier the building

00:11:26.759 --> 00:11:30.139
has to get exactly this allowed light and air

00:11:30.139 --> 00:11:32.259
to actually reach the sidewalk it stopped the

00:11:32.259 --> 00:11:35.879
streets from becoming dark tunnels and this literally

00:11:35.879 --> 00:11:39.019
shaped the skyline of new york city for decades

00:11:39.019 --> 00:11:41.440
if you look at the empire state building or the

00:11:41.440 --> 00:11:44.860
chrysler building they have that stepped tapering

00:11:44.860 --> 00:11:47.639
shape. That classic art deco look. That's not

00:11:47.639 --> 00:11:49.860
just an artistic choice. That's the law. It was

00:11:49.860 --> 00:11:52.889
the law. And it was popularized by this illustrator,

00:11:53.029 --> 00:11:56.129
Hugh Ferris. He drew these moody, futuristic,

00:11:56.429 --> 00:11:59.590
almost gothic renderings of what the city would

00:11:59.590 --> 00:12:02.250
look like under these new laws. He made zoning

00:12:02.250 --> 00:12:05.529
look almost romantic. Wow. He turned a bureaucratic

00:12:05.529 --> 00:12:07.590
rule about angles into a whole architectural

00:12:07.590 --> 00:12:10.830
style. So we have California banning uses to

00:12:10.830 --> 00:12:13.490
separate people and industries. We have New York

00:12:13.490 --> 00:12:16.429
regulating form to save the sunlight. But how

00:12:16.429 --> 00:12:19.090
did this go from just a few big cities to the

00:12:19.090 --> 00:12:21.240
standard operation? procedure for the entire

00:12:21.240 --> 00:12:23.279
United States. For that, we have to look at the

00:12:23.279 --> 00:12:25.799
federal government and specifically a man named

00:12:25.799 --> 00:12:27.960
Herbert Hoover. Herbert Hoover. Before he was

00:12:27.960 --> 00:12:29.559
president, he was the secretary of commerce.

00:12:29.700 --> 00:12:32.100
And Hoover was an engineer by trade. He was a

00:12:32.100 --> 00:12:34.519
huge believer in standardization, efficiency

00:12:34.519 --> 00:12:37.559
and order. He wanted to increase home ownership

00:12:37.559 --> 00:12:40.320
in America. And he saw zoning as a tool for that.

00:12:40.600 --> 00:12:43.399
He saw it as a way to protect property values,

00:12:43.659 --> 00:12:45.919
which he believed would encourage people to buy

00:12:45.919 --> 00:12:48.259
homes and feel secure in their investment. So

00:12:48.259 --> 00:12:51.299
he didn't want every city in America reinventing

00:12:51.299 --> 00:12:53.710
the wheel. trying to write their own zoning laws

00:12:53.710 --> 00:12:56.330
from scratch. Right. His team at the Commerce

00:12:56.330 --> 00:12:58.750
Department drafted something called the Standard

00:12:58.750 --> 00:13:03.429
State Zoning Enabling Act, or SZEA. It was published

00:13:03.429 --> 00:13:06.830
in 1922 and revised in 1924. It was basically

00:13:06.830 --> 00:13:09.029
a template. It was a copy and paste job. The

00:13:09.029 --> 00:13:10.950
federal government basically said to the states,

00:13:11.049 --> 00:13:13.690
hey, you want to do zoning? Here is a pre -written

00:13:13.690 --> 00:13:16.590
law that lets your town set it up just past this.

00:13:16.789 --> 00:13:19.120
And they did. They absolutely did. It swept the

00:13:19.120 --> 00:13:21.659
country. This is why zoning laws in a small town

00:13:21.659 --> 00:13:25.000
in Ohio often look legally very similar to zoning

00:13:25.000 --> 00:13:27.379
laws in a suburb of Seattle. They're all working

00:13:27.379 --> 00:13:29.539
off the same hundred -year -old template. The

00:13:29.539 --> 00:13:31.820
same template provided by Herbert Hoover. Okay,

00:13:31.860 --> 00:13:36.419
so the system is in place. But Americans, we

00:13:36.419 --> 00:13:38.539
don't like being told what to do with our property.

00:13:38.960 --> 00:13:41.340
If I buy a plot of land and I want to maximize

00:13:41.340 --> 00:13:43.799
my profit, surely I'm going to fight back against

00:13:43.799 --> 00:13:46.139
these rules. Oh, the fight was immediate. And

00:13:46.139 --> 00:13:48.460
this brings us to the single most important legal

00:13:48.460 --> 00:13:51.700
case in the history of zoning. The big one. Village

00:13:51.700 --> 00:13:55.460
of Euclid, Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co. from 1926.

00:13:56.000 --> 00:13:59.559
This is the Euclidean and Euclidean zoning. I

00:13:59.559 --> 00:14:01.100
admit, when I first heard that term, I thought

00:14:01.100 --> 00:14:03.409
it was about geometry. Like Euclid the mathematician.

00:14:03.769 --> 00:14:06.029
A lot of people do. It's a common mistake. But

00:14:06.029 --> 00:14:08.450
no, it refers to the village of Euclid, a suburb

00:14:08.450 --> 00:14:11.529
of Cleveland. And this case is the reason zoning

00:14:11.529 --> 00:14:13.690
as we know it exists today. So set the scene

00:14:13.690 --> 00:14:16.509
for us. What happened in Euclid? Ambler Realty

00:14:16.509 --> 00:14:19.289
Company owned a large tract of land, about 68

00:14:19.289 --> 00:14:22.190
acres. It was prime real estate. It sat right

00:14:22.190 --> 00:14:24.809
between a railroad and a main road. Perfect for

00:14:24.809 --> 00:14:27.500
industry. Perfect. In a free market, this land

00:14:27.500 --> 00:14:29.960
was destined for factories, warehouses. That's

00:14:29.960 --> 00:14:31.820
where the money was. But the village of Euclid

00:14:31.820 --> 00:14:34.340
had other ideas. The village passed a comprehensive

00:14:34.340 --> 00:14:37.419
zoning ordinance, and they zoned a huge chunk

00:14:37.419 --> 00:14:40.480
of Ambler's land for residential use only. So

00:14:40.480 --> 00:14:42.259
Ambler Realty is sitting there doing the math.

00:14:42.500 --> 00:14:45.080
If I sell this for factories, it's worth, say,

00:14:45.259 --> 00:14:47.980
$10 ,000 an acre. If I had to sell it for houses,

00:14:48.059 --> 00:14:51.100
it's worth maybe $2 ,500 an acre. That's right.

00:14:51.220 --> 00:14:53.720
The government, with the stroke of a pen, just

00:14:53.720 --> 00:14:56.220
wiped out 75 % of their land's value. So they

00:14:56.220 --> 00:14:59.480
sued. They sued. And their argument was powerful.

00:14:59.840 --> 00:15:02.940
They said this was a taking of property without

00:15:02.940 --> 00:15:05.139
due process, a violation of the 14th Amendment.

00:15:05.419 --> 00:15:07.759
They said, you didn't physically take my land,

00:15:07.820 --> 00:15:10.139
but you took its value. You took my right to

00:15:10.139 --> 00:15:12.980
use it. And initially the lower court agreed

00:15:12.980 --> 00:15:16.159
with them. They did. The trial court judge actually

00:15:16.159 --> 00:15:19.299
called zoning an illegitimate device. He saw

00:15:19.299 --> 00:15:21.500
right through it. He said it would lead to economic

00:15:21.500 --> 00:15:24.039
segregation and that you can't just strip value

00:15:24.039 --> 00:15:26.460
from people to make the town look nice. But then

00:15:26.460 --> 00:15:28.379
it went all the way to the Supreme Court. And

00:15:28.379 --> 00:15:31.059
the Supreme Court, in a landmark decision, reversed

00:15:31.059 --> 00:15:33.379
the lower court. They sided with the village

00:15:33.379 --> 00:15:36.840
of Euclid. Why? How did they justify that massive

00:15:36.840 --> 00:15:39.190
loss of value for the property owner? They went

00:15:39.190 --> 00:15:41.769
right back to that nuisance argument. Justice

00:15:41.769 --> 00:15:44.429
Sutherland wrote the opinion. He famously said,

00:15:44.529 --> 00:15:52.399
That is the famous quote. A pig in the parlor.

00:15:52.460 --> 00:15:56.139
And by separating uses, keeping the pigs, which

00:15:56.139 --> 00:15:58.379
were factories, out of the parlor, which were

00:15:58.379 --> 00:16:00.480
the residential neighborhoods, the government

00:16:00.480 --> 00:16:02.379
is protecting the health and safety of the community.

00:16:02.679 --> 00:16:04.700
And that protection is more important than the

00:16:04.700 --> 00:16:07.360
developer's profit. They ruled that it outweighed

00:16:07.360 --> 00:16:09.659
the financial loss of the developer. And boom,

00:16:09.879 --> 00:16:12.759
Euclidean zoning becomes the law of the land.

00:16:13.120 --> 00:16:15.860
Separation of uses. Houses here, shops there,

00:16:15.980 --> 00:16:18.860
factories way over there. the government officially

00:16:18.860 --> 00:16:21.039
has the right to decide. But there's another

00:16:21.039 --> 00:16:23.259
really important case we have to mention, which

00:16:23.259 --> 00:16:25.799
actually happened before Euclid, that sets up

00:16:25.799 --> 00:16:28.759
the racial dynamic perfectly. Okay. Buchanan

00:16:28.759 --> 00:16:32.539
v. Worley in 1917. This one is fascinating because...

00:16:32.700 --> 00:16:35.019
On the surface, it seems like a win for civil

00:16:35.019 --> 00:16:36.820
rights. But when you dig into the reasoning,

00:16:36.960 --> 00:16:40.720
it's purely capitalistic. It is. So in 1910,

00:16:40.799 --> 00:16:43.000
the city of Baltimore tried to pass a zoning

00:16:43.000 --> 00:16:45.639
law that was explicitly racial. It designated

00:16:45.639 --> 00:16:49.240
blocks as either black or white. Wow. They weren't

00:16:49.240 --> 00:16:52.000
even hiding it. No laundries excused. This block

00:16:52.000 --> 00:16:53.919
is for black people. This block is for white

00:16:53.919 --> 00:16:56.419
people. No subtlety at all. And other cities

00:16:56.419 --> 00:16:59.799
followed. Atlanta, Louisville, St. Louis. But

00:16:59.799 --> 00:17:03.240
in 1917, the Supreme Court struck this down in

00:17:03.240 --> 00:17:06.920
Buchanan v. Worley. So they said, you can't segregate

00:17:06.920 --> 00:17:09.759
by race. That sounds good. It does sound good.

00:17:09.819 --> 00:17:13.099
But, and this is the absolute key, they didn't

00:17:13.099 --> 00:17:15.180
strike it down because they believed in racial

00:17:15.180 --> 00:17:17.980
equality or integration. They struck it down

00:17:17.980 --> 00:17:22.009
because it violated the right to contract. So

00:17:22.009 --> 00:17:25.089
it wasn't it's wrong to discriminate. It was

00:17:25.089 --> 00:17:27.529
it's wrong to tell a white property owner they

00:17:27.529 --> 00:17:29.529
can't sell to a black buyer if they want to.

00:17:29.690 --> 00:17:32.250
Exactly. It was a property rights ruling, not

00:17:32.250 --> 00:17:34.450
a civil rights ruling. They said the government

00:17:34.450 --> 00:17:36.970
cannot interfere with the sale and alienation

00:17:36.970 --> 00:17:39.250
of property based on the color of the buyer's

00:17:39.250 --> 00:17:42.670
skin. So explicit racial zoning is dead in 1917.

00:17:42.990 --> 00:17:45.390
But we know cities didn't just give up and integrate.

00:17:45.799 --> 00:17:48.140
Not even close. They just got smarter. They found

00:17:48.140 --> 00:17:49.799
the loophole. What was the loophole? Since they

00:17:49.799 --> 00:17:52.059
couldn't zone by race, they started zoning by

00:17:52.059 --> 00:17:54.880
type of housing. They created single family residential

00:17:54.880 --> 00:17:56.839
zones. Which effectively did the same thing.

00:17:57.000 --> 00:17:59.720
Right. If you ban apartments, you are in effect

00:17:59.720 --> 00:18:02.059
banning the people who live in apartments and

00:18:02.059 --> 00:18:04.220
historically who lived in apartments. Lower income

00:18:04.220 --> 00:18:07.380
workers. Yeah. Immigrants. Minorities. Exactly.

00:18:07.440 --> 00:18:10.819
So you get segregation by class, which functions

00:18:10.819 --> 00:18:13.299
as a very effective proxy for segregation by

00:18:13.299 --> 00:18:16.980
race, all while appearing race neutral on paper.

00:18:17.140 --> 00:18:19.960
The law just says single family detached homes

00:18:19.960 --> 00:18:23.450
on one acre lots. It doesn't mention race. We

00:18:23.450 --> 00:18:25.910
aren't banning black families. We are just banning

00:18:25.910 --> 00:18:27.809
buildings that aren't single -family mansions.

00:18:27.809 --> 00:18:30.450
It was devious. And incredibly effective. It

00:18:30.450 --> 00:18:33.089
basically created the American suburbs as we

00:18:33.089 --> 00:18:35.289
note them today. Now, whenever I talk about zoning,

00:18:35.450 --> 00:18:38.049
someone always brings up the outlier. The one

00:18:38.049 --> 00:18:40.930
city that zigs while everyone else sags. Yeah,

00:18:40.930 --> 00:18:44.440
yes. Houston, Texas. The no zoning city. I hear

00:18:44.440 --> 00:18:46.059
this all the time from my libertarian friends.

00:18:46.200 --> 00:18:48.319
Look at Houston. They have no zoning and it works

00:18:48.319 --> 00:18:50.740
fine. Or from critics who say Houston has no

00:18:50.740 --> 00:18:53.200
zoning and it's a chaotic, ugly mess. Right.

00:18:53.259 --> 00:18:55.180
So what's the reality? Well, let's burst the

00:18:55.180 --> 00:18:57.539
myth a little bit. Houston doesn't have traditional

00:18:57.539 --> 00:19:00.319
use zoning. It's true. Voters there rejected

00:19:00.319 --> 00:19:04.460
it three separate times in 1948, 1962 and 1993.

00:19:04.819 --> 00:19:07.819
They are very proud of that fact. But I sense

00:19:07.819 --> 00:19:10.019
a but coming. But if you drive around Houston,

00:19:10.240 --> 00:19:12.900
does it look like a chaotic jumble of factories

00:19:12.900 --> 00:19:15.900
next to nurseries? No. No, it doesn't. It looks

00:19:15.900 --> 00:19:18.160
like every other Sunbelt city. It looks like

00:19:18.160 --> 00:19:21.460
Atlanta. It looks like Phoenix. It's sprawling

00:19:21.460 --> 00:19:24.299
and car dependent. So why is that? If there's

00:19:24.299 --> 00:19:26.339
no zoning, why isn't there a steel mill next

00:19:26.339 --> 00:19:28.839
to the elementary school? Two big reasons. First,

00:19:28.980 --> 00:19:30.920
they have deed restrictions. These are private

00:19:30.920 --> 00:19:33.240
rules, not government rules. Yes, private covenants.

00:19:33.380 --> 00:19:35.920
When a developer builds a subdivision in Houston,

00:19:36.160 --> 00:19:38.839
they write strict rules into the deeds of the

00:19:38.839 --> 00:19:41.680
houses. Like what? You can only use this for

00:19:41.680 --> 00:19:43.839
a single -family home. You can't run a business

00:19:43.839 --> 00:19:47.059
here. You must cut your grass every week. And

00:19:47.059 --> 00:19:49.660
the city enforces these private rules. The city

00:19:49.660 --> 00:19:51.900
attorney's office handles the enforcement. So

00:19:51.900 --> 00:19:53.839
instead of the government saying this is a residential

00:19:53.839 --> 00:19:56.660
zone, the private developer says this is a residential

00:19:56.660 --> 00:19:59.619
neighborhood and the city backs them up. So the

00:19:59.619 --> 00:20:01.940
outcome is identical. The outcome is functionally

00:20:01.940 --> 00:20:03.980
identical. And the second reason. What's that?

00:20:04.359 --> 00:20:07.579
Development regulations. Houston still has rules

00:20:07.579 --> 00:20:10.819
about setbacks. And crucially, they have strict,

00:20:11.099 --> 00:20:13.640
and I mean strict, parking requirements. Ah,

00:20:13.720 --> 00:20:16.019
the parking requirements. The hidden killer.

00:20:16.339 --> 00:20:18.900
They are the hidden killer of density. If you

00:20:18.900 --> 00:20:22.339
legally force every business to have a massive

00:20:22.339 --> 00:20:25.839
parking lot, say, 10 spots for every 1 ,000 square

00:20:25.839 --> 00:20:28.460
feet of retail space. You physically cannot build

00:20:28.460 --> 00:20:30.700
a walkable neighborhood. You can't. It's impossible.

00:20:30.799 --> 00:20:33.420
If 60 % of your city's land has to be asphalt.

00:20:33.640 --> 00:20:35.640
for cars. You force everything to be spread out.

00:20:35.799 --> 00:20:38.140
So the no zoning city is actually just a privatized

00:20:38.140 --> 00:20:40.599
zoning city with really aggressive parking mandates.

00:20:41.220 --> 00:20:43.700
Precisely. It's a distinction without a difference,

00:20:43.819 --> 00:20:46.920
really. It's a failed control group in the great

00:20:46.920 --> 00:20:49.140
American experiment. OK, let's talk about the

00:20:49.140 --> 00:20:52.599
bill. The cost. Because this isn't just about

00:20:52.599 --> 00:20:55.299
aesthetics or history. This hits our wallets

00:20:55.299 --> 00:20:58.339
every single month. We're in a housing affordability

00:20:58.339 --> 00:21:01.240
crisis in this country. A severe one. The rent

00:21:01.240 --> 00:21:04.099
is too damn high. How much of that is zoning's

00:21:04.099 --> 00:21:06.759
fault? A significant amount. I mean, it comes

00:21:06.759 --> 00:21:10.079
down to basic supply and demand. And zoning,

00:21:10.299 --> 00:21:13.240
by its very nature, artificially limits supply.

00:21:13.559 --> 00:21:15.680
Give me an example of how that works mechanically.

00:21:15.900 --> 00:21:19.259
Okay, let's talk about minimum lot sizes. This

00:21:19.259 --> 00:21:22.099
is a very common zoning tool. A town might say,

00:21:22.200 --> 00:21:24.759
you can only build a house here if the lot is

00:21:24.759 --> 00:21:28.019
at least one acre. One acre. That's huge. In

00:21:28.019 --> 00:21:30.740
a dense city, you could fit 10, 15 townhouses

00:21:30.740 --> 00:21:32.599
on an acre. You could fit an apartment building

00:21:32.599 --> 00:21:35.640
with 50 units. Right. So instead of 50 homes

00:21:35.640 --> 00:21:38.220
for 50 families, the law says you can only have

00:21:38.220 --> 00:21:42.170
one home for one wealthy family. drastically

00:21:42.170 --> 00:21:45.410
legally reduce the supply of housing on that

00:21:45.410 --> 00:21:47.890
piece of land. And when supply is low and demand

00:21:47.890 --> 00:21:50.650
is high. Prices skyrocket. Economists have a

00:21:50.650 --> 00:21:52.369
concept for this. They call it the zoning tax.

00:21:52.609 --> 00:21:54.250
This isn't a check you write to the government,

00:21:54.349 --> 00:21:57.369
right? No, it's not a literal tax. It's the difference

00:21:57.369 --> 00:22:00.329
between the actual cost of construction, the

00:22:00.329 --> 00:22:03.470
materials, the labor, the raw land and the final

00:22:03.470 --> 00:22:06.529
price of the house. It's the artificial inflation

00:22:06.529 --> 00:22:09.509
of the value due to regulatory scarcity. It's

00:22:09.509 --> 00:22:11.690
the premium you pay just for the permission to

00:22:11.690 --> 00:22:13.589
exist. That's a great way to put it. I saw some

00:22:13.589 --> 00:22:15.269
numbers on this in our notes and they were staggering.

00:22:15.470 --> 00:22:19.069
In San Francisco, that zoning tax is estimated

00:22:19.069 --> 00:22:22.230
at over $400 ,000 per home. Let that sink in.

00:22:22.490 --> 00:22:24.970
$400 ,000 of the price tag isn't the bricks,

00:22:25.109 --> 00:22:27.829
the wood, or the labor. It's not the profit the

00:22:27.829 --> 00:22:30.750
developer made. It is just air. It's the cost

00:22:30.750 --> 00:22:32.809
of permission to exist in a restricted market.

00:22:33.029 --> 00:22:35.460
And it's not just San Francisco. No. In Seattle,

00:22:35.579 --> 00:22:37.859
New York City and L .A., it's around $200 ,000.

00:22:38.119 --> 00:22:41.400
Chicago and D .C., around $80 ,000. That effectively

00:22:41.400 --> 00:22:43.460
prices out an entire generation of people. I

00:22:43.460 --> 00:22:45.440
mean, $200 ,000 is the down payment. It's the

00:22:45.440 --> 00:22:46.960
whole mortgage in other parts of the country.

00:22:47.099 --> 00:22:49.000
It does. And it hurts the economy as a whole.

00:22:49.140 --> 00:22:52.119
There was a fascinating study in 2017 that suggested

00:22:52.119 --> 00:22:55.259
if just three metro areas, New York, San Francisco

00:22:55.259 --> 00:22:57.859
and San Jose, deregulated their zoning to the

00:22:57.859 --> 00:23:01.059
level of the median U .S. city, U .S. GDP could

00:23:01.059 --> 00:23:04.690
wise by almost 9%. 9%. Other studies have put

00:23:04.690 --> 00:23:07.890
it as high as 12%. That's trillions of dollars.

00:23:07.990 --> 00:23:11.109
How? Because right now, zoning prevents labor

00:23:11.109 --> 00:23:13.890
mobility. It prevents people from moving to where

00:23:13.890 --> 00:23:16.269
the most productive jobs are. If a talented software

00:23:16.269 --> 00:23:18.549
engineer can't afford to live in Silicon Valley,

00:23:18.789 --> 00:23:21.230
they don't move there. They take a lower productivity

00:23:21.230 --> 00:23:24.109
job somewhere else. We are leaving massive economic

00:23:24.109 --> 00:23:26.190
growth on the table because we refuse to build

00:23:26.190 --> 00:23:28.930
apartments. And speaking of Silicon Valley, let's

00:23:28.930 --> 00:23:31.130
talk about Los Altos Hills. The ultimate example.

00:23:31.839 --> 00:23:34.140
Los Altos Hills is a town in Silicon Valley.

00:23:34.759 --> 00:23:37.539
The entire town, and I mean essentially the whole

00:23:37.539 --> 00:23:41.599
thing, is zoned residential with a one acre minimum

00:23:41.599 --> 00:23:44.740
lot size. And only one primary dwelling is allowed

00:23:44.740 --> 00:23:47.460
on each of those one acre lots. Correct. The

00:23:47.460 --> 00:23:50.359
courts upheld this back in the 1970s. So effectively,

00:23:50.500 --> 00:23:53.039
this town has legally banned anyone who cannot

00:23:53.039 --> 00:23:56.059
afford an acre of land in one of the most expensive

00:23:56.059 --> 00:23:58.470
real estate markets on planet Earth. It is a

00:23:58.470 --> 00:24:01.250
velvet rope around the entire city. It's a gated

00:24:01.250 --> 00:24:04.109
community disguised as a municipality. It is.

00:24:04.150 --> 00:24:06.289
And this leads us directly into the social engineering

00:24:06.289 --> 00:24:09.230
aspect, because when you ask these towns why

00:24:09.230 --> 00:24:11.869
they do this, usually they give you some excuse

00:24:11.869 --> 00:24:15.869
about traffic or school overcrowding. But sometimes.

00:24:16.859 --> 00:24:18.900
Sometimes they tell you the quiet part out loud.

00:24:19.119 --> 00:24:21.519
Yeah, I saw this quote from Barrington Hills,

00:24:21.660 --> 00:24:23.940
Illinois. It's incredible. This was a few years

00:24:23.940 --> 00:24:26.619
back. They have a five -acre minimum lot size.

00:24:26.759 --> 00:24:29.839
That's acres. Five acres. And officials there

00:24:29.839 --> 00:24:32.180
actually told the Chicago Tribune that this helped

00:24:32.180 --> 00:24:35.319
keep out the riffraff. Keep out the riffraff.

00:24:35.359 --> 00:24:37.299
I mean, at least they're honest. It's stark.

00:24:37.819 --> 00:24:40.119
But it's not just about lot size. It gets even

00:24:40.119 --> 00:24:42.259
more personal. It's about the very definition

00:24:42.259 --> 00:24:44.880
of family. This brings us to a Supreme Court

00:24:44.880 --> 00:24:48.119
case I'd never even heard of. Village of Belterre

00:24:48.119 --> 00:24:51.079
v. Boras. This is a crucial one, especially for

00:24:51.079 --> 00:24:53.539
college towns. The village of Belterre, New York,

00:24:53.599 --> 00:24:56.339
had a zoning ordinance that defined a family

00:24:56.339 --> 00:24:58.920
very strictly. It said a family is people related

00:24:58.920 --> 00:25:01.880
by blood, adoption, or marriage. So a traditional

00:25:01.880 --> 00:25:03.980
nuclear family, essentially. Right. And then

00:25:03.980 --> 00:25:06.160
it restricted the number of unrelated people

00:25:06.160 --> 00:25:08.279
who could live together in one house to just

00:25:08.279 --> 00:25:11.519
two. Two. So a group of six college students

00:25:11.519 --> 00:25:14.740
renting a large house to save money. Illegal.

00:25:14.819 --> 00:25:18.240
Six elderly women, like the Golden Girls, trying

00:25:18.240 --> 00:25:20.940
to live together for companionship and to save

00:25:20.940 --> 00:25:23.599
money. Also illegal. Did the Supreme Court really

00:25:23.599 --> 00:25:27.200
uphold that? They did. In 1974, they said the

00:25:27.200 --> 00:25:29.380
government has a legitimate interest in protecting

00:25:29.380 --> 00:25:31.819
traditional family values and keeping neighborhoods

00:25:31.819 --> 00:25:34.839
quiet. They said boarding houses and fraternity

00:25:34.839 --> 00:25:37.640
houses bring noise and traffic. But it effectively

00:25:37.640 --> 00:25:40.440
targets the poor and the young. If I can't afford

00:25:40.440 --> 00:25:43.039
a house on my own, my only option is to have

00:25:43.039 --> 00:25:45.880
roommates and this town is telling me that having

00:25:45.880 --> 00:25:48.980
roommates is a crime. It creates a huge barrier

00:25:48.980 --> 00:25:51.680
to entry. And this is where the politics get

00:25:51.680 --> 00:25:54.359
very, very messy. We tend to think of regulation

00:25:54.359 --> 00:25:57.240
as a liberal thing and deregulation as a conservative

00:25:57.240 --> 00:25:59.779
thing. But in zoning, those lines are completely

00:25:59.779 --> 00:26:02.680
blurred. Right. The data I saw shows that support

00:26:02.680 --> 00:26:05.539
for banning apartments, multifamily housing is

00:26:05.539 --> 00:26:07.859
concentrated among affluent homeowners. And there

00:26:07.859 --> 00:26:09.880
is no substantial difference between liberal

00:26:09.880 --> 00:26:11.960
and conservative homeowners on this issue. When

00:26:11.960 --> 00:26:15.180
it comes to their own backyard, ideology goes

00:26:15.180 --> 00:26:18.119
right out the window. Everyone becomes a NIMBY.

00:26:18.859 --> 00:26:22.000
Not in my backyard. So a liberal homeowner might

00:26:22.000 --> 00:26:24.819
have a Black Lives Matter sign on the lawn. But

00:26:24.819 --> 00:26:27.099
then they'll go to a city council meeting and

00:26:27.099 --> 00:26:29.799
fight tooth and nail against a new duplex that

00:26:29.799 --> 00:26:32.220
would allow black families to actually live in

00:26:32.220 --> 00:26:34.740
that neighborhood. It's the classic, I love humanity,

00:26:34.980 --> 00:26:36.400
I just don't want them parking in front of my

00:26:36.400 --> 00:26:38.500
driveway. That's it, exactly. And we have to

00:26:38.500 --> 00:26:40.839
talk about the environmental cost, too. The irony

00:26:40.839 --> 00:26:43.700
here is just so thick. Right. Zoning was originally

00:26:43.700 --> 00:26:46.759
about health, fresh air, separation from industrial

00:26:46.759 --> 00:26:50.210
smoke. But by enforcing low density, by making

00:26:50.210 --> 00:26:53.309
everything spread out so far, zoning forces car

00:26:53.309 --> 00:26:55.710
culture. You have to drive everywhere. You have

00:26:55.710 --> 00:26:57.890
to. You can't walk to the grocery store if the

00:26:57.890 --> 00:26:59.650
zoning code says the grocery store has to be

00:26:59.650 --> 00:27:01.609
three miles away across a six -lane highway.

00:27:01.910 --> 00:27:04.569
So we are all driving more, longer commutes,

00:27:04.609 --> 00:27:08.269
more emissions. Exactly. We are pushing development

00:27:08.269 --> 00:27:11.589
out to the fringes, to the exurbs, where carbon

00:27:11.589 --> 00:27:14.410
emissions per capita are much higher. And we

00:27:14.410 --> 00:27:17.150
are creating sedentary lifestyles because walking

00:27:17.150 --> 00:27:19.710
isn't a viable form of transportation for most

00:27:19.710 --> 00:27:21.750
Americans. So the tool designed to protect public

00:27:21.750 --> 00:27:24.710
health is now contributing to obesity and climate

00:27:24.710 --> 00:27:29.029
change. A tragic irony. Now, sometimes this NMB

00:27:29.029 --> 00:27:32.750
-ism, this desire to stop development, gets weird.

00:27:33.420 --> 00:27:35.519
I mean, really weird. You want to talk about

00:27:35.519 --> 00:27:36.759
the mountain lions? I want to talk about the

00:27:36.759 --> 00:27:39.000
mountain lions. The Woodside incident. This is

00:27:39.000 --> 00:27:42.059
a classic. It just happened in 2022. Okay, so

00:27:42.059 --> 00:27:44.859
Woodside, California. Very wealthy town in Silicon

00:27:44.859 --> 00:27:47.200
Valley. The state of California passed a law,

00:27:47.319 --> 00:27:50.200
SB 9, saying towns had to allow more housing.

00:27:50.640 --> 00:27:52.839
Woodside didn't want to do it. So what was their

00:27:52.839 --> 00:27:55.500
brilliant plan? Their plan was to declare the

00:27:55.500 --> 00:27:58.220
entire town a mountain lion habitat. The whole

00:27:58.220 --> 00:28:00.299
town. The manicured lawns, the swimming pools,

00:28:00.480 --> 00:28:02.960
the tennis courts. All of it. The whole town.

00:28:03.380 --> 00:28:05.980
Their argument was that because mountain lions

00:28:05.980 --> 00:28:08.240
might potentially walk through, they couldn't

00:28:08.240 --> 00:28:10.920
possibly build any duplexes. They were trying

00:28:10.920 --> 00:28:13.319
to use an environmental loophole to get out of

00:28:13.319 --> 00:28:16.299
building affordable housing. That is bold. Did

00:28:16.299 --> 00:28:19.519
it work? No, not for a second. The California

00:28:19.519 --> 00:28:22.019
Attorney General, Rob Bonta, shut it down immediately.

00:28:22.619 --> 00:28:25.039
He basically sent them a letter saying, a developed

00:28:25.039 --> 00:28:27.900
suburb is not a protected habitat. Stop acting

00:28:27.900 --> 00:28:30.849
in bad faith. Acting good faith. That seems to

00:28:30.849 --> 00:28:33.410
be the struggle here. Towns are using every trick

00:28:33.410 --> 00:28:35.710
in the book. They are. And it's not just animals.

00:28:35.829 --> 00:28:38.930
It's signs. Lawn signs are actually a huge zoning

00:28:38.930 --> 00:28:41.069
battleground. Really? First Amendment issues.

00:28:41.190 --> 00:28:44.329
Huge First Amendment issues. Zoning regulates

00:28:44.329 --> 00:28:47.549
signage to prevent what they call visual clutter.

00:28:47.750 --> 00:28:50.170
But the courts have consistently ruled you can't

00:28:50.170 --> 00:28:52.549
regulate the content of the sign. So you can

00:28:52.549 --> 00:28:54.769
say no signs bigger than three feet by three

00:28:54.769 --> 00:28:57.210
feet, but you can't say no political sign. Exactly.

00:28:57.210 --> 00:28:59.940
Or no for. For sale signs. This was a big issue

00:28:59.940 --> 00:29:02.240
in the 70s. Some towns tried to ban for sale

00:29:02.240 --> 00:29:04.460
signs. Why would they do that? They claimed they

00:29:04.460 --> 00:29:07.019
wanted to prevent panic selling or blockbusting

00:29:07.019 --> 00:29:09.680
when minority families started moving into a

00:29:09.680 --> 00:29:12.839
neighborhood. But the courts struck that down.

00:29:12.900 --> 00:29:16.640
They said, you can't ban communication just because

00:29:16.640 --> 00:29:19.099
you don't like the message it might send. And

00:29:19.099 --> 00:29:22.279
then there's religion? R -L -U -I -P -A, the

00:29:22.279 --> 00:29:25.180
Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons

00:29:25.180 --> 00:29:28.349
Act. This is a federal law that protects religious

00:29:28.349 --> 00:29:31.609
institutions from discrimination in zoning. Because

00:29:31.609 --> 00:29:34.410
churches are often in residential areas and neighbors

00:29:34.410 --> 00:29:36.509
often complain about the traffic or the noise.

00:29:36.690 --> 00:29:39.250
Or more controversially, about the social services

00:29:39.250 --> 00:29:41.589
they provide. There was this heartbreaking case

00:29:41.589 --> 00:29:44.450
in Gloversville, New York. A free Methodist church

00:29:44.450 --> 00:29:46.849
wanted to open a shelter. For the homeless? For

00:29:46.849 --> 00:29:49.430
the homeless. They wanted to provide 40 beds.

00:29:49.470 --> 00:29:51.470
It was negative four degrees outside. And zoning

00:29:51.470 --> 00:29:54.160
stopped them. The zoning board said a shelter

00:29:54.160 --> 00:29:56.940
wasn't a permitted use in that zone. They effectively

00:29:56.940 --> 00:29:59.299
blocked the church from saving lives in freezing

00:29:59.299 --> 00:30:02.220
weather because it violated the code. That is

00:30:02.220 --> 00:30:05.079
where the rubber meets the road. We're arguing

00:30:05.079 --> 00:30:07.819
about codes and maps and neighborhood character,

00:30:08.019 --> 00:30:10.400
and people are literally freezing to death on

00:30:10.400 --> 00:30:12.519
the street. It highlights the central tension

00:30:12.519 --> 00:30:14.619
between protecting the stability of a neighborhood

00:30:14.619 --> 00:30:17.740
and meeting basic human needs. The system, as

00:30:17.740 --> 00:30:20.940
designed, prioritizes the former. And here's

00:30:20.940 --> 00:30:23.019
the hopeful part of the deep dive. Maybe things

00:30:23.019 --> 00:30:26.160
are changing. We are seeing a shift in the 21st

00:30:26.160 --> 00:30:28.279
century that I don't think anyone predicted 20

00:30:28.279 --> 00:30:30.599
years ago. The pendulum is definitely swinging

00:30:30.599 --> 00:30:34.579
back. For 100 years, local towns had total control.

00:30:34.779 --> 00:30:37.579
The state said, here, you take the power. Now

00:30:37.579 --> 00:30:39.920
states are realizing the towns have, in many

00:30:39.920 --> 00:30:42.680
cases, abused that power. So they're taking it

00:30:42.680 --> 00:30:44.980
back. Let's talk about the pioneers. Minneapolis,

00:30:45.380 --> 00:30:48.079
what did they do? Minneapolis, 2018. They became

00:30:48.079 --> 00:30:51.119
the first major U .S. city to end exclusionary

00:30:51.119 --> 00:30:53.960
single -family zoning. Just ended it. Well, they

00:30:53.960 --> 00:30:56.119
didn't ban single -family homes. They just said,

00:30:56.140 --> 00:30:58.319
you can only build single -family homes. They

00:30:58.319 --> 00:31:01.319
legalized triplexes, essentially citywide. They

00:31:01.319 --> 00:31:03.920
also completely abolished off -street parking

00:31:03.920 --> 00:31:06.700
minimums. That is radical. That is undoing 100

00:31:06.700 --> 00:31:09.039
years of Euclidean thinking. It was a massive

00:31:09.039 --> 00:31:11.619
deal. And then Oregon followed. A state law,

00:31:11.859 --> 00:31:15.140
House Bill 2001 in 2019. What did that do? It

00:31:15.140 --> 00:31:17.480
said, if you are a city with more than 10 ,000

00:31:17.480 --> 00:31:20.200
people, you have to allow duplexes everywhere.

00:31:20.500 --> 00:31:22.819
If you have more than 25 ,000 people, you have

00:31:22.819 --> 00:31:25.720
to allow triplexes and fourplexes. So the state

00:31:25.720 --> 00:31:28.079
of Oregon looked at the local towns and said,

00:31:28.220 --> 00:31:30.539
you aren't building enough housing, so we are

00:31:30.539 --> 00:31:33.140
overriding your local rules. That's exactly it.

00:31:33.220 --> 00:31:35.339
You lost your privileges. California did the

00:31:35.339 --> 00:31:38.660
same with SB 9 in 2021, allowing up to four units

00:31:38.660 --> 00:31:41.059
on what used to be single family lots. And over

00:31:41.059 --> 00:31:43.140
on the East Coast, my home state, Massachusetts.

00:31:44.210 --> 00:31:47.369
The MBTA community's law. This is fascinating

00:31:47.369 --> 00:31:50.809
policy. It requires towns near public transit,

00:31:50.970 --> 00:31:53.829
near the T or the commuter rail two zone for

00:31:53.829 --> 00:31:57.009
multifamily housing as of right. The logic being

00:31:57.009 --> 00:31:59.950
we, the taxpayers of the whole state, built this

00:31:59.950 --> 00:32:02.930
expensive train station. You, the local wealthy

00:32:02.930 --> 00:32:04.950
town, shouldn't be allowed to block people from

00:32:04.950 --> 00:32:07.230
living near it. It makes perfect sense. But it's

00:32:07.230 --> 00:32:09.609
a huge fight. The town of Milton voted not to

00:32:09.609 --> 00:32:13.329
comply in early 2024. They just defied the state

00:32:13.329 --> 00:32:15.200
law. law. So what happens now? Now the attorney

00:32:15.200 --> 00:32:18.220
general is suing them. This is the active battlefront

00:32:18.220 --> 00:32:20.339
of American domestic policy right now. It's happening

00:32:20.339 --> 00:32:23.579
in real time. And the politics are so fascinating

00:32:23.579 --> 00:32:26.559
because it's bipartisan. You have this weird,

00:32:26.599 --> 00:32:30.140
strange bedfellows coalition. The YMBY coalition.

00:32:30.240 --> 00:32:32.819
Yes. In my backyard. You have Republican governors

00:32:32.819 --> 00:32:35.920
like Charlie Baker and Mitt Romney in Massachusetts

00:32:35.920 --> 00:32:39.259
or governors in red states like Montana pushing

00:32:39.259 --> 00:32:41.720
for this. Why? Because they believe in market

00:32:41.720 --> 00:32:44.400
freedom. They believe in property rights. If

00:32:44.400 --> 00:32:47.359
I own the land, let me build on it. Deregulation

00:32:47.359 --> 00:32:50.579
is a conservative value. And at the same time,

00:32:50.579 --> 00:32:52.980
you have progressive Democrats pushing for it.

00:32:53.039 --> 00:32:55.099
For completely different reasons. They're focused

00:32:55.099 --> 00:32:58.140
on affordability, social equity and climate change.

00:32:58.859 --> 00:33:01.079
Density reduces carbon footprints and allows

00:33:01.079 --> 00:33:03.859
for more economic and racial integration. So

00:33:03.859 --> 00:33:05.960
the libertarians and the democratic socialists

00:33:05.960 --> 00:33:08.279
are high -fiving each other over duplexes. It's

00:33:08.279 --> 00:33:10.259
one of the few places in American politics where

00:33:10.259 --> 00:33:12.140
the horseshoe theory is actually working. So

00:33:12.140 --> 00:33:14.160
let's wrap this up. We've covered wash houses,

00:33:14.440 --> 00:33:17.660
wedding cakes, the Supreme Court, and mountain

00:33:17.660 --> 00:33:20.279
lions. What is the big takeaway here? I think

00:33:20.279 --> 00:33:22.740
if we look at the big picture, zoning started

00:33:22.740 --> 00:33:25.700
as a reasonable attempt to fix the chaos of the

00:33:25.700 --> 00:33:29.519
Industrial Revolution. It was about health, light,

00:33:29.759 --> 00:33:33.259
and safety. It was about stopping factories from

00:33:33.259 --> 00:33:35.779
poisoning neighborhoods. A pig in the parlor.

00:33:35.880 --> 00:33:38.059
Right. It was about keeping the pig out of the

00:33:38.059 --> 00:33:41.559
parlor, but it mutated. It did. It mutated. It

00:33:41.559 --> 00:33:43.799
became a mechanism for wealth protection that

00:33:43.799 --> 00:33:46.859
accidentally, or in many cases, purposefully

00:33:46.859 --> 00:33:49.500
broke the housing market and segregated the country.

00:33:49.779 --> 00:33:52.940
It prioritized the property values of the haves

00:33:52.940 --> 00:33:56.099
over the basic needs of the have nots. And now,

00:33:56.140 --> 00:33:58.519
for the first time in a century, we're actively

00:33:58.519 --> 00:34:01.670
trying to undo that Euclidean knot. We're trying

00:34:01.670 --> 00:34:04.109
to blend uses back together. We're trying to

00:34:04.109 --> 00:34:06.589
return to the way we built cities for thousands

00:34:06.589 --> 00:34:10.070
of years before 1960. Organic, mixed, walkable.

00:34:10.329 --> 00:34:12.309
A place where the grocery store is next to the

00:34:12.309 --> 00:34:14.329
barbershop and the barbershop has an apartment

00:34:14.329 --> 00:34:16.690
on top of it. I want to leave our listeners with

00:34:16.690 --> 00:34:18.510
a final thought. You mentioned this to me before

00:34:18.510 --> 00:34:20.090
we started recording and it really stuck with

00:34:20.090 --> 00:34:23.090
me. It's a question of values, really. I want

00:34:23.090 --> 00:34:25.710
you to imagine your own neighborhood right where

00:34:25.710 --> 00:34:28.099
you live. And imagine the zoning laws changed

00:34:28.099 --> 00:34:31.079
tomorrow to allow a small grocery store on the

00:34:31.079 --> 00:34:33.579
corner or a duplex next door to you. Would you

00:34:33.579 --> 00:34:36.099
see that as the destruction of your investment?

00:34:36.280 --> 00:34:39.059
Would you be angry about the potential for more

00:34:39.059 --> 00:34:42.179
traffic and, you know, noise? Or would you see

00:34:42.179 --> 00:34:44.360
it as the creation of a real community, a place

00:34:44.360 --> 00:34:46.179
where you could walk to get a gallon of milk,

00:34:46.300 --> 00:34:48.340
a place where your kid's teacher could afford

00:34:48.340 --> 00:34:51.139
to live? Because ultimately, a city isn't just

00:34:51.139 --> 00:34:53.360
a collection of property values. It's a collection

00:34:53.360 --> 00:34:55.750
of people. Something to think about next time

00:34:55.750 --> 00:34:57.849
you look out that window. Thanks for listening

00:34:57.849 --> 00:34:59.469
to The Deep Dive. See you next time.
