WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.020
Welcome back to the deep dive. Today we are tackling

00:00:03.020 --> 00:00:06.379
a subject that is going to sound at first blush,

00:00:06.540 --> 00:00:08.779
like the driest thing we could possibly choose.

00:00:09.320 --> 00:00:11.359
It's something you likely ignored on your way

00:00:11.359 --> 00:00:13.679
to work today. Or maybe you're sitting inside

00:00:13.679 --> 00:00:16.539
one right now and taking it completely for granted.

00:00:16.719 --> 00:00:18.940
We are talking about multifamily residential

00:00:18.940 --> 00:00:22.460
housing. It does have a certain bureaucratic

00:00:22.460 --> 00:00:24.859
ring to it, doesn't it? Yeah. Multifamily residential.

00:00:24.899 --> 00:00:27.480
Yeah, totally. Sounds like a file you'd lose

00:00:27.480 --> 00:00:29.199
in a cabinet at the planning department. It really

00:00:29.199 --> 00:00:32.469
does. It sounds like zoning code. But as I was,

00:00:32.469 --> 00:00:34.469
you know, reading through the stack of research

00:00:34.469 --> 00:00:36.670
for this, I realized we aren't really talking

00:00:36.670 --> 00:00:38.729
about buildings. We're talking about the history

00:00:38.729 --> 00:00:41.789
of how humanity stacks itself. That's a great

00:00:41.789 --> 00:00:43.710
way to put it. It's the story of what happens

00:00:43.710 --> 00:00:46.229
when we run out of land or when we want to be

00:00:46.229 --> 00:00:48.210
close to the action. And we have to figure out

00:00:48.210 --> 00:00:51.710
how to live on top of each other without killing

00:00:51.710 --> 00:00:53.850
each other. That is the fundamental tension of

00:00:53.850 --> 00:00:55.890
urbanization, isn't it? I mean, how do you compress

00:00:55.890 --> 00:00:59.149
a population into a small footprint while maintaining

00:00:59.149 --> 00:01:03.000
dignity, safety and hygiene? And the answer for

00:01:03.000 --> 00:01:05.579
the last 2 ,000 years has been the multifamily

00:01:05.579 --> 00:01:08.379
unit in one form or another. So our mission today

00:01:08.379 --> 00:01:11.140
is to decode the jargon. We're going to talk

00:01:11.140 --> 00:01:14.719
about MDUs, tenements, six -packs, dingbats.

00:01:14.939 --> 00:01:17.519
All the good stuff. And really understand the

00:01:17.519 --> 00:01:19.819
invisible economics and the history behind these

00:01:19.819 --> 00:01:22.280
structures. Because whether you live in a detached

00:01:22.280 --> 00:01:24.659
house with a white picket fence or on the 40th

00:01:24.659 --> 00:01:27.540
floor of a condo, this ecosystem affects your

00:01:27.540 --> 00:01:30.159
taxes, it affects your commute, and it dictates

00:01:30.159 --> 00:01:32.569
the vibe of your city. It dictates who can live

00:01:32.569 --> 00:01:34.150
in your city, period. It's that fundamental.

00:01:34.370 --> 00:01:37.129
Right. So before we get into all the weird architectural

00:01:37.129 --> 00:01:39.150
stuff, and trust me, there are some very weird

00:01:39.150 --> 00:01:41.989
ones, we need to lay the groundwork. We need

00:01:41.989 --> 00:01:44.310
to define terms. Yeah. Because I think a lot

00:01:44.310 --> 00:01:46.750
of people, myself included, use words like apartment

00:01:46.750 --> 00:01:49.170
and condo interchangeably. But they aren't the

00:01:49.170 --> 00:01:51.840
same thing, are they? Not at all. And, you know,

00:01:51.859 --> 00:01:54.819
confusing them really obscures what's actually

00:01:54.819 --> 00:01:56.680
happening in the housing market. So let's start

00:01:56.680 --> 00:01:59.420
with the physical reality versus the legal reality.

00:01:59.879 --> 00:02:02.519
Multifamily residential or MDU, which you'll

00:02:02.519 --> 00:02:04.500
see in the documents. That's the physical description.

00:02:04.739 --> 00:02:07.099
It refers to a classification of housing where

00:02:07.099 --> 00:02:09.580
multiple separate housing units are contained

00:02:09.580 --> 00:02:12.280
within one building or a complex of buildings.

00:02:12.500 --> 00:02:14.120
So that's the hardware, the physical thing you

00:02:14.120 --> 00:02:15.900
can touch. Correct. The hardware is multiple

00:02:15.900 --> 00:02:18.800
families under one roof. Yeah. Now, this doesn't

00:02:18.800 --> 00:02:21.750
just mean skyscrapers. It could be stacked vertically,

00:02:21.990 --> 00:02:24.129
which is the classic apartment block we all picture.

00:02:24.250 --> 00:02:26.530
Yeah, the tower. Or it could be arranged side

00:02:26.530 --> 00:02:30.009
by side, like row houses or townhouses. If the

00:02:30.009 --> 00:02:32.430
structure is continuous and shares party walls,

00:02:32.729 --> 00:02:35.289
it generally falls under this umbrella. Okay,

00:02:35.370 --> 00:02:37.110
so that's the hardware. Then I guess apartment

00:02:37.110 --> 00:02:40.949
and condo are the software, the operating system.

00:02:41.090 --> 00:02:43.389
That's a good analogy. Yeah. Those terms describe

00:02:43.389 --> 00:02:46.400
the legal ownership model. When we say apartment

00:02:46.400 --> 00:02:49.000
in the truest sense, particularly in North America,

00:02:49.219 --> 00:02:52.120
we're usually describing a rental model. Right.

00:02:52.219 --> 00:02:54.860
The building is owned by a single entity, a landlord,

00:02:55.139 --> 00:02:58.219
a pension fund, a REIT, and the occupants lease

00:02:58.219 --> 00:03:00.699
the space. You pay for the right to stay, but

00:03:00.699 --> 00:03:03.159
you own nothing but your furniture. Right. A

00:03:03.159 --> 00:03:07.180
condominium or condo is a legal innovation. Physically,

00:03:07.280 --> 00:03:09.699
it might look exactly the same as the rental

00:03:09.699 --> 00:03:11.780
building next door. Indistinguishable from the

00:03:11.780 --> 00:03:15.599
outside. Exactly. But legally. You own the specific

00:03:15.599 --> 00:03:18.879
unit you live in, the box of air, so to speak,

00:03:19.039 --> 00:03:21.520
and you hold a shared interest in the common

00:03:21.520 --> 00:03:24.419
elements. The hallways, the roof, the elevators.

00:03:24.439 --> 00:03:26.819
The swimming pool, the gym, all the stuff that

00:03:26.819 --> 00:03:28.639
breaks. So if the roof leaks in an apartment

00:03:28.639 --> 00:03:31.379
building, I call the landlord. If the roof leaks

00:03:31.379 --> 00:03:34.419
in a condo. You and your neighbors all open your

00:03:34.419 --> 00:03:37.199
checkbooks. Or more likely, your homeowners association

00:03:37.199 --> 00:03:40.280
has a special assessment. That sounds less fun.

00:03:40.439 --> 00:03:42.770
It has its pros and cons. But this distinction

00:03:42.770 --> 00:03:44.710
matters because it changes how neighborhoods

00:03:44.710 --> 00:03:47.449
evolve. A neighborhood of condos has very different

00:03:47.449 --> 00:03:49.830
incentives than a neighborhood of rentals. Absolutely.

00:03:49.949 --> 00:03:52.349
The owners in a condo building have a long term

00:03:52.349 --> 00:03:55.750
stake in the property value. Renters, by definition,

00:03:55.830 --> 00:03:58.270
are more transient. And then you have more niche

00:03:58.270 --> 00:04:00.409
legal wrappers like co -ops, which we can get

00:04:00.409 --> 00:04:03.050
into later, or intentional communities like co

00:04:03.050 --> 00:04:06.069
-housing. Right. But the core concept is the

00:04:06.069 --> 00:04:08.650
MDU, the physical act of sharing a structure.

00:04:09.080 --> 00:04:11.900
And this is where we hit the first major hurdle,

00:04:12.039 --> 00:04:14.699
because in many parts of the world and specifically

00:04:14.699 --> 00:04:17.439
here in the U .S., if you go to a town hall meeting

00:04:17.439 --> 00:04:19.800
and say, I want to build a multifamily unit,

00:04:20.100 --> 00:04:24.180
you aren't greeted with open arms. No. You're

00:04:24.180 --> 00:04:26.420
usually greeted with pitchforks. Or lawsuits.

00:04:26.939 --> 00:04:29.259
That's the more modern version of the pitchfork.

00:04:29.519 --> 00:04:33.860
Why? What is the visceral reaction against this?

00:04:33.980 --> 00:04:36.160
Usually the argument is it's going to ruin the

00:04:36.160 --> 00:04:37.899
neighborhood or it's going to bankrupt the town.

00:04:38.360 --> 00:04:40.339
The economic argument is usually the loudest.

00:04:40.379 --> 00:04:42.399
It's the one people feel most comfortable saying

00:04:42.399 --> 00:04:45.100
out loud. Existing homeowners often believe that

00:04:45.100 --> 00:04:47.300
high -density housing will drain local resources.

00:04:47.959 --> 00:04:51.000
More kids in the schools, more cars on the roads,

00:04:51.240 --> 00:04:53.319
more strain on the police and fire departments.

00:04:53.480 --> 00:04:56.000
They see it as a net negative. Yes. They assume

00:04:56.000 --> 00:04:57.980
that these new residents will cost the city more

00:04:57.980 --> 00:05:00.019
than they pay in taxes. And it feels intuitive,

00:05:00.199 --> 00:05:02.620
right? I mean, if I have a house on a quarter

00:05:02.620 --> 00:05:05.139
acre lot and next door you build a complex with

00:05:05.139 --> 00:05:08.220
20 families on a quarter acre lot, surely those

00:05:08.220 --> 00:05:10.600
20 families are going to use 20 times the services.

00:05:10.899 --> 00:05:13.399
They might use more services in absolute terms.

00:05:13.480 --> 00:05:17.060
That's true. But the per capita math and more

00:05:17.060 --> 00:05:19.540
importantly, the per acre math tells a completely

00:05:19.540 --> 00:05:22.439
different story. This is the concept of beneficial

00:05:22.439 --> 00:05:24.959
fiscal externalities. All right. Walk me through

00:05:24.959 --> 00:05:27.069
the math. Because I think most people, myself

00:05:27.069 --> 00:05:29.870
included, assume single -family homes are the

00:05:29.870 --> 00:05:33.089
gold standard for a city's tax base. That's what

00:05:33.089 --> 00:05:35.269
you want, right? Big houses, big property tax

00:05:35.269 --> 00:05:37.910
bills. It's actually the opposite in most cases.

00:05:37.970 --> 00:05:40.810
Think about infrastructure. Roads, sewer lines,

00:05:41.029 --> 00:05:43.009
water pipes, electrical grids, these are linear

00:05:43.009 --> 00:05:45.569
assets. You pay for them by the mile, by the

00:05:45.569 --> 00:05:48.089
foot. Okay. If you have a street with huge lots

00:05:48.089 --> 00:05:50.970
and houses spread far apart, you might have 50

00:05:50.970 --> 00:05:54.329
feet. of road, sewer, and water line for just

00:05:54.329 --> 00:05:56.709
one taxpaying household. Right. And that one

00:05:56.709 --> 00:05:59.310
family has to generate enough tax revenue to

00:05:59.310 --> 00:06:02.250
maintain that 50 feet of infrastructure forever.

00:06:02.629 --> 00:06:05.529
The repaving, the pipe replacement. Exactly.

00:06:05.670 --> 00:06:08.589
Forever. Now take that same 50 feet of road frontage

00:06:08.589 --> 00:06:10.629
and put up a four -story apartment building with

00:06:10.629 --> 00:06:13.129
eight units. Now you have eight households paying

00:06:13.129 --> 00:06:16.069
property taxes to support that same 50 feet of

00:06:16.069 --> 00:06:18.500
pipe and asphalt. The infrastructure cost per

00:06:18.500 --> 00:06:21.240
person plummets. The revenue per acre for the

00:06:21.240 --> 00:06:23.920
city skyrockets. So the single family home is

00:06:23.920 --> 00:06:26.680
actually... A luxury item for the city, like

00:06:26.680 --> 00:06:28.800
the city is subsidizing that spread out lifestyle.

00:06:29.100 --> 00:06:32.079
In many cases, yes. The research from groups

00:06:32.079 --> 00:06:34.079
that study municipal finance is pretty clear

00:06:34.079 --> 00:06:37.100
on this. Low density suburbs often don't generate

00:06:37.100 --> 00:06:39.879
enough tax revenue to cover their own long term

00:06:39.879 --> 00:06:42.100
infrastructure replacement costs. So where does

00:06:42.100 --> 00:06:44.360
the money come from? They essentially rely on

00:06:44.360 --> 00:06:46.459
the high density commercial and residential cores

00:06:46.459 --> 00:06:49.860
to subsidize their roads and pipes. The Walmart.

00:06:50.350 --> 00:06:52.350
the office park, and the apartment building are

00:06:52.350 --> 00:06:54.629
paying to fix the pipes in the leafy suburbs.

00:06:54.910 --> 00:06:57.730
That is a massive flip of the script. The person

00:06:57.730 --> 00:06:59.730
in the apartment building is actually subsidizing

00:06:59.730 --> 00:07:01.970
the person in the big house with the yard. From

00:07:01.970 --> 00:07:04.910
a revenue per acre standpoint, absolutely. Multi

00:07:04.910 --> 00:07:07.189
-family housing is a cash cow for municipalities.

00:07:07.569 --> 00:07:09.329
It allows you to provide services efficiently,

00:07:09.550 --> 00:07:13.350
fire, police, garbage collection. It's all cheaper

00:07:13.350 --> 00:07:15.629
per household when people are closer together.

00:07:15.970 --> 00:07:17.990
Okay, so the economic argument against them is

00:07:17.990 --> 00:07:20.959
shaky at best. Very shaky. What about the safety

00:07:20.959 --> 00:07:23.339
argument? I feel like this one is deeply ingrained

00:07:23.339 --> 00:07:25.699
in pop culture, you know, the towering inferno.

00:07:26.120 --> 00:07:28.579
If I live in a box surrounded by other people's

00:07:28.579 --> 00:07:30.660
boxes and someone falls asleep with a cigarette,

00:07:30.899 --> 00:07:33.980
aren't we all doomed? This is a classic example

00:07:33.980 --> 00:07:36.800
of the availability heuristic. We see a dramatic

00:07:36.800 --> 00:07:40.379
fire on the news, a huge apartment block ablaze,

00:07:40.420 --> 00:07:42.899
and we assume it's the norm. Because it's a memorable

00:07:42.899 --> 00:07:46.560
image. Exactly. But if you look at the 2025 Pew

00:07:46.560 --> 00:07:49.220
data provided in our source stack, it's a myth.

00:07:50.099 --> 00:07:52.000
Modern multifamily buildings are statistically

00:07:52.000 --> 00:07:54.620
safer than single -family homes regarding fire.

00:07:54.860 --> 00:07:57.180
How is that possible? I can jump out the window

00:07:57.180 --> 00:07:58.720
of my house. I can't jump out the window of the

00:07:58.720 --> 00:08:01.759
10th floor. True. But in a modern single -family

00:08:01.759 --> 00:08:04.939
home, you have very few passive defenses. The

00:08:04.939 --> 00:08:07.160
wood frame is flammable. The layout is open.

00:08:07.339 --> 00:08:09.839
You have drywall that lasts maybe 20 minutes

00:08:09.839 --> 00:08:12.540
in a fire. And you almost never have sprinklers

00:08:12.540 --> 00:08:14.980
unless you're very wealthy. Okay. In a modern

00:08:14.980 --> 00:08:16.920
multifamily building, the engineering is completely

00:08:16.920 --> 00:08:18.500
different. The building codes are incredibly

00:08:18.500 --> 00:08:21.519
strict. You have concrete fire separations between

00:08:21.519 --> 00:08:25.160
units, so a fire in Unit 402 stays in Unit 402

00:08:25.160 --> 00:08:27.699
for hours before spreading. It's compartmentalized.

00:08:27.920 --> 00:08:30.939
Exactly. It's designed to contain the fire to

00:08:30.939 --> 00:08:34.059
the unit of origin. Plus, you have mandatory

00:08:34.059 --> 00:08:37.019
sprinkler systems, pressurized stairwells that

00:08:37.019 --> 00:08:40.220
keep smoke out so you can escape, and alarm systems

00:08:40.220 --> 00:08:42.220
that automatically dial the fire department.

00:08:42.379 --> 00:08:44.340
That's a good point. In a single -family home,

00:08:44.440 --> 00:08:46.820
if your smoke detector goes off, it just makes

00:08:46.820 --> 00:08:49.779
noise. Right. It wakes you up, hopefully. In

00:08:49.779 --> 00:08:53.559
a modern MDU, it summons professional help. The

00:08:53.559 --> 00:08:55.639
data shows that the death rate from fires is

00:08:55.639 --> 00:08:58.100
significantly lower in these high -density environments.

00:08:58.480 --> 00:09:01.299
So our intuition is failing us again. We see

00:09:01.299 --> 00:09:04.159
density as danger, but density actually allows

00:09:04.159 --> 00:09:06.399
for professional -grade safety systems that you

00:09:06.399 --> 00:09:08.960
just can't afford in a private house. Precisely.

00:09:09.220 --> 00:09:11.980
We are scared of the stranger's negligence. But

00:09:11.980 --> 00:09:13.860
we forget about the engineering that mitigates

00:09:13.860 --> 00:09:16.019
it. We trust our own habits more than we trust

00:09:16.019 --> 00:09:18.879
concrete and sprinklers. That makes sense. Okay,

00:09:18.919 --> 00:09:21.740
let's pivot to history. Because looking at some

00:09:21.740 --> 00:09:23.700
of these modern buildings, specifically the ones

00:09:23.700 --> 00:09:25.820
popping up in every American city right now,

00:09:25.940 --> 00:09:29.299
you'd think stacking people was a new idea. But

00:09:29.299 --> 00:09:31.639
this goes back way, way before the elevator,

00:09:31.759 --> 00:09:35.230
doesn't it? Oh, long before. As long as there

00:09:35.230 --> 00:09:37.250
have been cities with limited walls, there have

00:09:37.250 --> 00:09:39.529
been apartments. If we look at ancient Rome,

00:09:39.730 --> 00:09:42.889
the vast majority of the population, maybe 90%,

00:09:42.889 --> 00:09:46.990
lived in apartment blocks called insuli. Insuli.

00:09:47.070 --> 00:09:49.990
That means islands, right? Yes. They were islands

00:09:49.990 --> 00:09:52.730
of humanity in the urban sea. And these weren't

00:09:52.730 --> 00:09:55.090
small. They were routinely six or seven stories

00:09:55.090 --> 00:09:57.490
high. Some even went higher before they were

00:09:57.490 --> 00:10:01.029
regulated. Six stories in ancient Rome without

00:10:01.029 --> 00:10:04.039
steel. Without modern concrete, that sounds terrifying.

00:10:04.360 --> 00:10:06.980
It was. It absolutely was. They were built of

00:10:06.980 --> 00:10:09.820
timber and mud brick, often by speculative landlords,

00:10:10.179 --> 00:10:12.840
Crassus was famous for this, who wanted to maximize

00:10:12.840 --> 00:10:15.559
rent by cutting corners on construction. The

00:10:15.559 --> 00:10:18.120
slumlords of the ancient world. Exactly. They

00:10:18.120 --> 00:10:20.919
were prone to collapse and fire. The poet Juvenal

00:10:20.919 --> 00:10:22.600
wrote about how you couldn't sleep in Rome for

00:10:22.600 --> 00:10:24.899
fear of either a fire starting below you or your

00:10:24.899 --> 00:10:26.940
neighbor's building collapsing onto yours. And

00:10:26.940 --> 00:10:28.980
I'm imagining the walk up to the sixth floor,

00:10:29.159 --> 00:10:32.399
no elevator, carrying your water, probably smelling

00:10:32.399 --> 00:10:34.159
your neighbor's cooking and everything else.

00:10:34.379 --> 00:10:37.259
It was a tough life. And the social hierarchy

00:10:37.259 --> 00:10:41.419
was vertical. The lower floors, the piano nobile.

00:10:41.799 --> 00:10:44.240
were for the wealthier tenants. Why? You didn't

00:10:44.240 --> 00:10:46.259
have to climb as far, the apartments were larger,

00:10:46.399 --> 00:10:49.460
and in case of fire, you could get out. The higher

00:10:49.460 --> 00:10:52.220
you went, the smaller the rooms got, the shabbier

00:10:52.220 --> 00:10:54.320
the construction and the poorer the tenant. So

00:10:54.320 --> 00:10:56.659
it's the exact opposite of the modern penthouse.

00:10:56.899 --> 00:10:58.919
The best address was on the first floor, not

00:10:58.919 --> 00:11:01.340
the top. The penthouse used to be the cheap seat.

00:11:01.519 --> 00:11:04.200
It's the invention of the elevator that completely

00:11:04.200 --> 00:11:06.759
inverted that dynamic. That's fascinating. And

00:11:06.759 --> 00:11:09.080
this isn't just a Roman thing. Not at all. We

00:11:09.080 --> 00:11:11.940
see this pattern globally. Look at Shibam in

00:11:11.940 --> 00:11:14.100
Yemen. I saw photos of this. It looks like a

00:11:14.100 --> 00:11:16.399
mirage. It's literally skyscrapers made of mud.

00:11:16.620 --> 00:11:19.240
They call it the Manhattan of the desert. These

00:11:19.240 --> 00:11:21.740
are adobe towers. Some are 500 years old, reaching

00:11:21.740 --> 00:11:25.139
7, 8, even 11 stories high. How do they not just

00:11:25.139 --> 00:11:27.820
dissolve in the rain? The mud brick is constantly

00:11:27.820 --> 00:11:31.419
maintained. They re -plaster the exteriors. But

00:11:31.419 --> 00:11:34.220
here, the density wasn't just about space. It

00:11:34.220 --> 00:11:37.600
was about defense. By building vertical and clustering

00:11:37.600 --> 00:11:40.460
together, the city became a fortress wall against

00:11:40.460 --> 00:11:43.080
Bedouin raids. So the apartment building is also

00:11:43.080 --> 00:11:45.879
a castle. In a sense. And you see other examples.

00:11:46.000 --> 00:11:48.620
The malice houses in Madrid or the Casbah in

00:11:48.620 --> 00:11:51.500
Algiers. Humanity has always found ways to stack

00:11:51.500 --> 00:11:54.360
up when horizontal expansion wasn't an option.

00:11:54.779 --> 00:11:57.519
So if this is such a natural human adaptation

00:11:57.519 --> 00:12:01.149
to city life. Why is it illegal to build it in

00:12:01.149 --> 00:12:03.049
so much of the United States? And I don't use

00:12:03.049 --> 00:12:05.830
the word illegal lightly. In many cities on the

00:12:05.830 --> 00:12:07.870
majority of the residential land, you literally

00:12:07.870 --> 00:12:11.409
cannot build anything other than a detached Singh

00:12:11.409 --> 00:12:13.889
family home. This brings us to the weaponization

00:12:13.889 --> 00:12:16.870
of zoning. We have to be clear based on the historical

00:12:16.870 --> 00:12:19.929
sources. Zoning didn't start purely as a way

00:12:19.929 --> 00:12:22.490
to separate factories from homes, which is. the

00:12:22.490 --> 00:12:24.669
benevolent explanation you learn in school. That's

00:12:24.669 --> 00:12:26.730
the story, right? We don't want a loud, smoky

00:12:26.730 --> 00:12:28.909
factory next to where our kids play. And that

00:12:28.909 --> 00:12:31.769
was part of it. But in the U .S. context, early

00:12:31.769 --> 00:12:34.850
zoning and the ban on multifamily housing were

00:12:34.850 --> 00:12:37.820
explicitly designed to segregate. The sources

00:12:37.820 --> 00:12:40.000
are pretty blunt about this. It wasn't just about

00:12:40.000 --> 00:12:43.220
character in an architectural sense. No. In the

00:12:43.220 --> 00:12:45.700
early 20th century, you couldn't legally say

00:12:45.700 --> 00:12:48.139
we don't want African -Americans or immigrants

00:12:48.139 --> 00:12:50.779
in this neighborhood. The Supreme Court struck

00:12:50.779 --> 00:12:54.700
down racial zoning in 1917. OK. So cities and

00:12:54.700 --> 00:12:57.700
developers needed a new tool. You could say we

00:12:57.700 --> 00:12:59.200
don't want apartment buildings in this neighborhood.

00:12:59.419 --> 00:13:01.639
And since racial minorities and lower income

00:13:01.639 --> 00:13:03.679
workers were the primary residents of apartment

00:13:03.679 --> 00:13:07.129
buildings, the ban on the structure. became a

00:13:07.129 --> 00:13:09.450
proxy for a ban on the people. It's a proxy war.

00:13:09.570 --> 00:13:11.990
You ban the building type to ban the demographic

00:13:11.990 --> 00:13:14.889
you associate with it. Correct. And the legal

00:13:14.889 --> 00:13:17.470
language was barely coded. People would argue

00:13:17.470 --> 00:13:19.570
in court that apartment buildings brought parasites

00:13:19.570 --> 00:13:22.309
into a neighborhood. It was a way to maintain

00:13:22.309 --> 00:13:25.149
class and racial homogeneity without ever mentioning

00:13:25.149 --> 00:13:27.110
race. And we are still living with that legacy.

00:13:27.509 --> 00:13:30.789
Deeply. It's known as exclusionary zoning. It

00:13:30.789 --> 00:13:34.389
requires large lot sizes, deep setbacks, bans

00:13:34.389 --> 00:13:37.179
anything that shares a wall. It artificially

00:13:37.179 --> 00:13:39.960
inflates the cost of housing to ensure only a

00:13:39.960 --> 00:13:42.259
certain economic class can even get a foot in

00:13:42.259 --> 00:13:44.519
the door. And there was a note in the research

00:13:44.519 --> 00:13:47.659
connecting this to labor markets. It frames zoning

00:13:47.659 --> 00:13:50.480
as a form of labor regulation. Can you explain

00:13:50.480 --> 00:13:52.980
that? Yeah, this is a more modern economic take

00:13:52.980 --> 00:13:55.779
on it. Think about a booming city like San Francisco

00:13:55.779 --> 00:13:58.059
or New York or Boston. There are high paying

00:13:58.059 --> 00:14:01.279
jobs there. But if you ban new multifamily housing,

00:14:01.419 --> 00:14:04.100
you artificially cap the number of people who

00:14:04.100 --> 00:14:05.820
can live there. You create a housing shortage.

00:14:05.919 --> 00:14:08.700
You create a massive housing shortage. This means

00:14:08.700 --> 00:14:11.080
a teacher, a firefighter, a barista, a nurse.

00:14:11.559 --> 00:14:13.960
All essential workers simply cannot afford to

00:14:13.960 --> 00:14:16.220
live anywhere near where they work. You are effectively

00:14:16.220 --> 00:14:19.440
regulating the labor market by physically walling

00:14:19.440 --> 00:14:21.679
off the workforce for the jobs. Which destroys

00:14:21.679 --> 00:14:23.740
the local economy in the long run, right? Because

00:14:23.740 --> 00:14:25.899
if the barista has to commute two hours, eventually

00:14:25.899 --> 00:14:28.860
there are no baristas. Or the price of coffee

00:14:28.860 --> 00:14:31.500
goes up to $15 to cover the wage premium needed

00:14:31.500 --> 00:14:33.779
to get someone to commute that far. It creates

00:14:33.779 --> 00:14:36.580
a brittle, expensive, and inequitable economy.

00:14:36.899 --> 00:14:39.389
Wow. Okay, I want to step away from the politics

00:14:39.389 --> 00:14:41.009
for a second and go on a bit of a world tour.

00:14:41.210 --> 00:14:43.269
Yeah. Because one thing I loved about this research

00:14:43.269 --> 00:14:46.110
is seeing how different cultures solve this stacking

00:14:46.110 --> 00:14:48.889
problem. It seems like the form the building

00:14:48.889 --> 00:14:51.429
takes depends entirely on what problem they are

00:14:51.429 --> 00:14:53.529
trying to solve. It's a mix of problem solving

00:14:53.529 --> 00:14:56.750
and cultural values. Geography, economy, history,

00:14:56.870 --> 00:15:00.149
and ideology all shape the building. It's architectural

00:15:00.149 --> 00:15:03.029
DNA. Let's start with the problem of extreme

00:15:03.029 --> 00:15:06.190
lack of space. That has to be Hong Kong. The

00:15:06.190 --> 00:15:08.809
densest place on earth, yeah. In Hong Kong, you

00:15:08.809 --> 00:15:11.169
see the evolution of the stack in real time.

00:15:11.769 --> 00:15:13.909
Historically, you had the Tong Lao. Describe

00:15:13.909 --> 00:15:15.610
that for me. What does it look and feel like?

00:15:15.830 --> 00:15:18.769
The Tong Lao is a type of shop house. It's usually

00:15:18.769 --> 00:15:21.649
low rise, maybe three to five stories. No elevator,

00:15:21.750 --> 00:15:24.809
no garage. The ground floor is a shop, a restaurant,

00:15:25.049 --> 00:15:27.789
a hardware store, a tailor. And the family lives

00:15:27.789 --> 00:15:30.269
above it, often in very cramped conditions. So

00:15:30.269 --> 00:15:33.509
it's mixed use by default. Completely. It creates

00:15:33.509 --> 00:15:37.250
a very vibrant, chaotic street life because the

00:15:37.250 --> 00:15:39.789
living and the commerce are fused together. The

00:15:39.789 --> 00:15:42.370
buildings are narrow, deep, and they often have

00:15:42.370 --> 00:15:44.710
these illegal balconies and additions hanging

00:15:44.710 --> 00:15:46.549
off them. But those are disappearing, right?

00:15:46.669 --> 00:15:48.730
I read that. They're being demolished rapidly.

00:15:49.289 --> 00:15:51.269
In the search material, they mention the ones

00:15:51.269 --> 00:15:53.909
near the old Kai Tok airport. Those buildings

00:15:53.909 --> 00:15:56.250
had to be short because planes were flying right

00:15:56.250 --> 00:15:58.529
over the rooftops. It was famous for it. You

00:15:58.529 --> 00:16:00.610
could practically see what people were watching

00:16:00.610 --> 00:16:03.659
on TV. Pretty much. Now that the airport moved,

00:16:03.980 --> 00:16:06.340
those height limits are gone, and developers

00:16:06.340 --> 00:16:08.659
are tearing down entire blocks of tonglos to

00:16:08.659 --> 00:16:11.120
build towers. And that leads to the toothpick

00:16:11.120 --> 00:16:13.620
apartment, which is such a great evocative name.

00:16:13.799 --> 00:16:16.960
It really is. Imagine a building footprint that

00:16:16.960 --> 00:16:19.600
is tiny. Maybe the size is just one of those

00:16:19.600 --> 00:16:23.480
old tonglos, but they extruded upward 20 or 30

00:16:23.480 --> 00:16:25.600
stories. So it looks like a needle. A needle

00:16:25.600 --> 00:16:28.389
sticking out of the urban fabric. It stands tall

00:16:28.389 --> 00:16:30.769
and skinny, surrounded by the shorter, older

00:16:30.769 --> 00:16:33.549
buildings. Usually is one apartment per floor

00:16:33.549 --> 00:16:36.169
to maximize window access on the tiny lot. Which

00:16:36.169 --> 00:16:39.269
sounds luxurious, private elevator lobby, but

00:16:39.269 --> 00:16:42.690
also incredibly isolating and probably expensive.

00:16:43.090 --> 00:16:45.669
And often claustrophobic. You're surrounded by

00:16:45.669 --> 00:16:48.889
other towers. But it solves the problem. How

00:16:48.889 --> 00:16:50.970
do you add density when you only have a postage

00:16:50.970 --> 00:16:53.750
stamp of land? You go up drastically. Now let's

00:16:53.750 --> 00:16:56.399
look at a different problem. The blur of work

00:16:56.399 --> 00:16:59.419
and life. We see this in South Korea with the

00:16:59.419 --> 00:17:01.740
office tell. The office tell, a portmanteau of

00:17:01.740 --> 00:17:04.740
office and hotel, is fascinating because it addresses

00:17:04.740 --> 00:17:07.819
the intense work culture of Seoul. These are

00:17:07.819 --> 00:17:09.819
units designed to be legal for both residential

00:17:09.819 --> 00:17:12.299
and commercial use. So I could run my business

00:17:12.299 --> 00:17:14.339
out of it during the day and sleep there at night.

00:17:14.500 --> 00:17:16.960
That's the idea. You might have a desk and a

00:17:16.960 --> 00:17:18.900
meeting table in the same room as your bed and

00:17:18.900 --> 00:17:21.359
kitchenette. The furniture is often convertible.

00:17:21.400 --> 00:17:23.759
The bed folds into the wall to become a couch.

00:17:23.940 --> 00:17:26.140
It's the ultimate working -from -home setup,

00:17:26.259 --> 00:17:28.440
but built into the architecture from the start.

00:17:28.559 --> 00:17:30.160
Removes the friction of the commute entirely.

00:17:30.660 --> 00:17:32.880
It's for the young professional who practically

00:17:32.880 --> 00:17:36.019
lives at work anyway. It acknowledges the reality

00:17:36.019 --> 00:17:38.799
of the modern economy in a way that Western zoning,

00:17:38.940 --> 00:17:42.019
which strictly separates home and office, often

00:17:42.019 --> 00:17:45.660
doesn't. Let's move over to India. I was intrigued

00:17:45.660 --> 00:17:48.319
by the term Vatara in Karnataka. Yeah, the Vatara

00:17:48.319 --> 00:17:50.259
is interesting. It's specific to urban areas

00:17:50.259 --> 00:17:53.220
in that state. Think of it as a two -story complex

00:17:53.220 --> 00:17:56.440
with homes arranged in a row. It's similar to

00:17:56.440 --> 00:17:59.500
a low -rise apartment complex, but with a very

00:17:59.500 --> 00:18:03.099
particular local style. It's a step up from a

00:18:03.099 --> 00:18:05.720
shared tenement, but more communal than a detached

00:18:05.720 --> 00:18:08.440
house. So it's a kind of middle -density solution.

00:18:08.859 --> 00:18:11.279
Exactly. It's that missing middle housing that

00:18:11.279 --> 00:18:13.200
a lot of urbanists in the West are trying to

00:18:13.200 --> 00:18:16.109
bring back. Moving to Europe, we see a housing

00:18:16.109 --> 00:18:19.650
type born from pure ideology, the Eastern Bloc.

00:18:19.789 --> 00:18:22.089
The Plattenbau. Just saying the word feels heavy.

00:18:22.390 --> 00:18:24.809
Plattenbau. You mean slab building or panel building?

00:18:24.950 --> 00:18:27.890
You see these in East Germany and the panel lock

00:18:27.890 --> 00:18:30.990
in Czechia and Slovakia. These are the massive

00:18:30.990 --> 00:18:33.789
gray concrete towers built during the communist

00:18:33.789 --> 00:18:36.170
era. They get a bad rap. We usually use them

00:18:36.170 --> 00:18:39.089
as shorthand for dystopia in movies. Aesthetically,

00:18:39.150 --> 00:18:41.450
they are stark. There's no denying that. But

00:18:41.450 --> 00:18:43.730
we have to give them credit. They solved a massive

00:18:43.730 --> 00:18:46.349
housing crisis after World War II. Cities were

00:18:46.349 --> 00:18:48.869
rubble. So it was a practical solution. It was

00:18:48.869 --> 00:18:52.049
industrial efficiency applied to the home. They

00:18:52.049 --> 00:18:54.589
used prefabricated concrete panels manufactured

00:18:54.589 --> 00:18:58.190
in factories and assembled on -site, like, giant

00:18:58.190 --> 00:19:01.089
Lego sets. The goal wasn't individuality or beauty.

00:19:01.269 --> 00:19:04.329
It was equality in speed. Everyone gets a unit.

00:19:04.450 --> 00:19:06.690
Everyone gets central heat. Everyone gets a roof.

00:19:06.930 --> 00:19:09.880
Exactly. And interestingly, today... Many of

00:19:09.880 --> 00:19:11.680
these are being renovated and are actually quite

00:19:11.680 --> 00:19:14.160
popular. They're structurally sound. The apartments

00:19:14.160 --> 00:19:16.519
are surprisingly spacious. And the green spaces

00:19:16.519 --> 00:19:18.279
between the buildings, which were part of the

00:19:18.279 --> 00:19:22.180
original master plan, are now mature parks. So

00:19:22.180 --> 00:19:24.619
time has been kind to them in a way. In some

00:19:24.619 --> 00:19:27.640
ways, yes. The stigma is fading for a new generation

00:19:27.640 --> 00:19:30.240
that just sees them as affordable housing with

00:19:30.240 --> 00:19:32.559
good transit links. Let's jump across the channel

00:19:32.559 --> 00:19:35.450
to the UK. Here, the problem wasn't so much ideology.

00:19:35.670 --> 00:19:38.609
It was the industrial squeeze. The sheer number

00:19:38.609 --> 00:19:41.009
of people flooding into cities for factory work

00:19:41.009 --> 00:19:43.690
created some really specific and sometimes grim

00:19:43.690 --> 00:19:46.990
housing types. The UK has a very rich taxonomy

00:19:46.990 --> 00:19:49.609
of multifamily housing. It's fascinating. You

00:19:49.609 --> 00:19:52.150
have the bedsit, which is iconic. The bedsit

00:19:52.150 --> 00:19:54.789
feels like the setting of every sad British song

00:19:54.789 --> 00:19:57.650
from the 1980s. It is the bottom rung of the

00:19:57.650 --> 00:20:01.170
ladder, a bedsitting room. You take a large Victorian

00:20:01.170 --> 00:20:03.950
house and chop it up. You get one room that serves

00:20:03.950 --> 00:20:06.890
as your bedroom, living room, and often has a

00:20:06.890 --> 00:20:09.569
little kitchenette, a hot plate, and a mini fridge

00:20:09.569 --> 00:20:13.549
in the corner. But, and here's the friction point,

00:20:13.710 --> 00:20:15.829
you share the bathroom down the hall with five

00:20:15.829 --> 00:20:18.329
other strangers. That lack of private plumbing

00:20:18.329 --> 00:20:20.869
is the defining feature. It's what makes it a

00:20:20.869 --> 00:20:23.390
bedsit and not a studio. And it's why they are

00:20:23.390 --> 00:20:26.359
disappearing, right? It is. Tenancy reform since

00:20:26.359 --> 00:20:29.180
the 80s and rising property prices have pushed

00:20:29.180 --> 00:20:32.539
landlords to squeeze tiny, often windowless bathrooms

00:20:32.539 --> 00:20:35.539
into the units to create self -contained studios.

00:20:35.920 --> 00:20:38.700
The shared bathroom bed sit is becoming a relic.

00:20:38.740 --> 00:20:40.460
But then you have something really clever like

00:20:40.460 --> 00:20:42.920
the Tyneside Flat in northeast England. I love

00:20:42.920 --> 00:20:44.920
the Tyneside Flat. It's architecturally brilliant.

00:20:45.079 --> 00:20:47.240
It solves the social problem. How do you give

00:20:47.240 --> 00:20:49.660
people density without making them feel like

00:20:49.660 --> 00:20:51.980
they live in an ant farm? How does it work? From

00:20:51.980 --> 00:20:53.680
the street, it looks like a standard terraced

00:20:53.680 --> 00:20:55.529
house. What Americans would call a row house.

00:20:56.069 --> 00:20:58.609
Two stories high. But it's actually two separate

00:20:58.609 --> 00:21:01.250
flats, one on the ground floor, one on top. Okay,

00:21:01.329 --> 00:21:03.549
that's a duplex. We have those. Ah, but here's

00:21:03.549 --> 00:21:06.730
the genius. There is no shared lobby. You have

00:21:06.730 --> 00:21:09.089
two front doors on the street, side by side.

00:21:09.250 --> 00:21:11.289
Wait, really? So even if I live upstairs, I have

00:21:11.289 --> 00:21:13.769
my own front door opening to the sidewalk? Yes.

00:21:14.220 --> 00:21:16.599
You open your door and immediately go up a private

00:21:16.599 --> 00:21:19.480
staircase that runs behind the ground floor flat's

00:21:19.480 --> 00:21:22.180
front rooms. It preserves the illusion of owning

00:21:22.180 --> 00:21:25.240
the house. You don't have to awkwardly nod at

00:21:25.240 --> 00:21:27.759
your neighbor in a communal hallway. It maintains

00:21:27.759 --> 00:21:30.299
that British sense of privacy within a dense

00:21:30.299 --> 00:21:33.119
structure. That's amazing. I wish we had more

00:21:33.119 --> 00:21:35.279
of that here. Me too. And then the sources mention

00:21:35.279 --> 00:21:37.759
the clothes in Glasgow and the court in Liverpool.

00:21:38.099 --> 00:21:41.430
These sound much grimmer. They were. These are

00:21:41.430 --> 00:21:43.769
from the peak of the Industrial Revolution, 1800

00:21:43.769 --> 00:21:47.549
to 1870. The close in Glasgow refers to these

00:21:47.549 --> 00:21:49.650
high -density tenements, three or four stories,

00:21:49.809 --> 00:21:51.950
built around a cul -de -sac or a shared courtyard.

00:21:52.269 --> 00:21:54.789
Cramped. Very. And the court was even worse.

00:21:54.990 --> 00:21:57.630
In places like Liverpool and Leeds, these were

00:21:57.630 --> 00:21:59.589
back -to -back terrace houses built around a

00:21:59.589 --> 00:22:02.150
short, dead -end alley. No through -ventilation,

00:22:02.269 --> 00:22:04.869
shared water pumps, overflowing privies. They

00:22:04.869 --> 00:22:07.680
were incubators for disease. So we see both the

00:22:07.680 --> 00:22:11.500
ingenuity and the desperation of industrial housing.

00:22:11.680 --> 00:22:13.240
It's the full spectrum. Okay, let's bring it

00:22:13.240 --> 00:22:15.980
back to North America. We have some incredibly

00:22:15.980 --> 00:22:19.940
strange mutations of multifamily housing. But

00:22:19.940 --> 00:22:21.940
before we get to the weird stuff, we need to

00:22:21.940 --> 00:22:24.759
talk about the baseline. We need to talk about

00:22:24.759 --> 00:22:28.119
the row house. The row house, or townhouse, is

00:22:28.119 --> 00:22:30.779
the ancestor of most American urban density.

00:22:31.099 --> 00:22:33.839
It's the side -by -side stack. Is there a difference

00:22:33.839 --> 00:22:36.420
between a row house, a townhouse, and a brownstone?

00:22:36.500 --> 00:22:39.180
Or is this just real estate marketing? It's mostly

00:22:39.180 --> 00:22:41.680
marketing and geography at this point. Structurally,

00:22:41.779 --> 00:22:44.440
they are the same. Narrow, multi -story houses

00:22:44.440 --> 00:22:48.019
sharing sidewalls. Brownstone is just a New York

00:22:48.019 --> 00:22:51.299
City -specific term for a row house clad in Triassic

00:22:51.299 --> 00:22:53.299
sandstone from New Jersey. So it's about the

00:22:53.299 --> 00:22:56.150
facade material. Exactly. And townhouse historically

00:22:56.150 --> 00:22:58.710
meant a rich family's city residence as opposed

00:22:58.710 --> 00:23:01.250
to their country house. But now developers use

00:23:01.250 --> 00:23:04.309
it to make new -build row houses sound fancy.

00:23:04.589 --> 00:23:06.730
Okay, so that's the standard. But in New England,

00:23:06.849 --> 00:23:08.849
they took the concept of stacking and created

00:23:08.849 --> 00:23:11.529
something unique. Enter the triple -decker. The

00:23:11.529 --> 00:23:13.529
triple -decker is legendary in Massachusetts

00:23:13.529 --> 00:23:16.269
and Rhode Island. It's essentially a detached

00:23:16.269 --> 00:23:19.630
timber frame house. But it has three identical

00:23:19.630 --> 00:23:22.170
sprawling apartments stacked one on top of the

00:23:22.170 --> 00:23:24.410
other, usually with big porches on the front.

00:23:24.720 --> 00:23:28.019
Why did this specific form take off there? It

00:23:28.019 --> 00:23:31.559
was the immigrant dream machine. You, an Irish

00:23:31.559 --> 00:23:34.059
or Italian or Polish factory worker in the late

00:23:34.059 --> 00:23:37.619
19th century, save up money. You buy a plot of

00:23:37.619 --> 00:23:40.119
land and build a triple -ducker. Okay. You live

00:23:40.119 --> 00:23:42.839
in the middle floor. You rent the top floor to

00:23:42.839 --> 00:23:44.880
a cousin or another family from your village

00:23:44.880 --> 00:23:47.680
to help pay the mortgage. And maybe your aging

00:23:47.680 --> 00:23:49.380
parents live on the bottom floor so they don't

00:23:49.380 --> 00:23:51.420
have to climb stairs. It's an intergenerational

00:23:51.420 --> 00:23:54.359
wealth -building tool. Exactly. It allowed working

00:23:54.359 --> 00:23:56.660
class families to become landlords and build

00:23:56.660 --> 00:23:59.359
equity. It's a tragedy that so many towns banned

00:23:59.359 --> 00:24:01.859
them in the 20th century, calling them fire traps

00:24:01.859 --> 00:24:04.099
and tenements. Which brings us to the six pack,

00:24:04.319 --> 00:24:06.660
which sounds like beer, but I'm guessing it's

00:24:06.660 --> 00:24:09.119
not. In the New England definition, a six pack

00:24:09.119 --> 00:24:11.599
is just two triple deckers pushed together, sharing

00:24:11.599 --> 00:24:14.839
a central party wall. Six units, one building.

00:24:15.200 --> 00:24:18.000
Simple. But wait, the notes say if I go to Australia

00:24:18.000 --> 00:24:19.940
and asked for a six pack, I get something totally

00:24:19.940 --> 00:24:22.549
different. You do. In Australia, a six -pack

00:24:22.549 --> 00:24:25.930
refers to those ubiquitous, usually pretty ugly

00:24:25.930 --> 00:24:29.230
brick apartment blocks from the 1960s and 70s.

00:24:29.349 --> 00:24:31.930
Usually two or three stories, a walk -up, very

00:24:31.930 --> 00:24:34.369
generic styling. They might have four, six, or

00:24:34.369 --> 00:24:37.289
eight apartments. They are the vanilla of Australian

00:24:37.289 --> 00:24:39.470
housing. I love how language morphs like that.

00:24:39.630 --> 00:24:43.390
Okay, moving to Chicago. The four plus one. This

00:24:43.390 --> 00:24:45.289
sounds like a math problem. It's a loophole problem.

00:24:45.410 --> 00:24:48.170
Yeah. In the 1960s and 70s, Chicago zoning had

00:24:48.170 --> 00:24:50.869
height limits for wood frame buildings and also

00:24:50.869 --> 00:24:53.349
had parking requirements. Developers figured

00:24:53.349 --> 00:24:55.390
out that if they raised the first floor up half

00:24:55.390 --> 00:24:57.730
a level, they could tuck a parking garage underneath.

00:24:58.029 --> 00:25:00.890
So the building's on stilts? Kind of. You have

00:25:00.890 --> 00:25:03.150
a concrete or masonry base. That's the parking,

00:25:03.309 --> 00:25:05.910
the plus one. Then you put four stories of cheap

00:25:05.910 --> 00:25:08.079
wood frame apartments on top of it. And let me

00:25:08.079 --> 00:25:10.839
guess, the lobby is just a weird staircase down

00:25:10.839 --> 00:25:13.299
to the parking garage. It's usually an awkward

00:25:13.299 --> 00:25:15.059
half -flight of stairs up to the first floor.

00:25:15.200 --> 00:25:17.859
They are aesthetically challenged. They've been

00:25:17.859 --> 00:25:20.759
called the ugliest buildings in Chicago. But

00:25:20.759 --> 00:25:22.759
they provided a ton of affordable housing on

00:25:22.759 --> 00:25:25.099
the north side at the time. And speaking of aesthetically

00:25:25.099 --> 00:25:27.539
challenged, we have to talk about Los Angeles

00:25:27.539 --> 00:25:31.920
and the dingbat. Ah, the dingbat. An icon of

00:25:31.920 --> 00:25:35.480
mid -century L .A., it is the direct result of

00:25:35.480 --> 00:25:38.319
the car taking over the city. Describe a dingbat

00:25:38.319 --> 00:25:40.859
for the listener who hasn't seen one. Okay. It's

00:25:40.859 --> 00:25:43.400
a two - or three -story boxy building, usually

00:25:43.400 --> 00:25:46.319
covered in stucco. The entire ground floor frontage

00:25:46.319 --> 00:25:49.059
is just carport. You pull your car right in under

00:25:49.059 --> 00:25:51.299
the overhanging apartment. It makes the building

00:25:51.299 --> 00:25:53.819
look like it's on skinny legs. It's a soft story

00:25:53.819 --> 00:25:56.220
building, right, which is a problem in earthquakes.

00:25:56.359 --> 00:25:58.400
A huge problem. They're being retrofitted now.

00:25:58.519 --> 00:26:01.039
But the key feature is that the parking is front

00:26:01.039 --> 00:26:04.200
and center. It's not hidden. The building worships

00:26:04.200 --> 00:26:05.980
the car. And they always have those fantastic

00:26:05.980 --> 00:26:08.720
names on the front, right? The starbursts and

00:26:08.720 --> 00:26:11.599
decorative flourishes. Yes. That's where the

00:26:11.599 --> 00:26:13.599
name Dingbat comes from. Those little decorative

00:26:13.599 --> 00:26:16.279
blacks. And the cursive script on the facade.

00:26:16.579 --> 00:26:21.079
The Capri. The Tahitian. The Royal Palms. They

00:26:21.079 --> 00:26:23.380
tried to evoke a bit of Hollywood glamour for

00:26:23.380 --> 00:26:26.140
what was essentially a cheap wooden box above

00:26:26.140 --> 00:26:28.490
a parking spot. I love them. They have so much

00:26:28.490 --> 00:26:30.930
character. But they are being replaced, aren't

00:26:30.930 --> 00:26:34.109
they, by the new king of American multifamily

00:26:34.109 --> 00:26:37.529
housing, the OnePlus 5? If you live in any growing

00:26:37.529 --> 00:26:40.589
American city today, you have seen these. You

00:26:40.589 --> 00:26:41.990
might be complaining about one being built down

00:26:41.990 --> 00:26:43.589
the street right now. They're everywhere. They

00:26:43.589 --> 00:26:45.369
all look the same. Why do they all look the same?

00:26:45.410 --> 00:26:47.289
It's like this Lego block style with different

00:26:47.289 --> 00:26:49.809
colored panels. It's the building code. It's

00:26:49.809 --> 00:26:51.990
pure economics driven by the international building

00:26:51.990 --> 00:26:55.440
code. We call them five over ones. Break down

00:26:55.440 --> 00:26:58.140
that structure for me. Sure. The one on the bottom

00:26:58.140 --> 00:27:00.579
is a concrete podium that's a fireproof construction

00:27:00.579 --> 00:27:03.220
type. It usually holds the retail on the ground

00:27:03.220 --> 00:27:05.920
floor or the parking garage. On top of that podium,

00:27:06.039 --> 00:27:08.079
you are allowed by code to stack five stories

00:27:08.079 --> 00:27:11.000
of wood frame construction. Wood. Five stories

00:27:11.000 --> 00:27:15.539
of wood sounds flimsy. It's engineered wood trusses,

00:27:15.539 --> 00:27:19.049
oriented strand board. And crucially, it's allowed

00:27:19.049 --> 00:27:22.289
because of modern sprinkler technology. The codes

00:27:22.289 --> 00:27:24.670
change to say, OK, you can build this tall with

00:27:24.670 --> 00:27:27.470
wood if you sprinkle the heck out of it. Wood

00:27:27.470 --> 00:27:30.589
is cheap. Concrete and steel are expensive. So

00:27:30.589 --> 00:27:32.950
developers maximize the wood. And that's why

00:27:32.950 --> 00:27:34.930
they are everywhere. It's the financial sweet

00:27:34.930 --> 00:27:37.069
spot of maximum rent for minimum construction

00:27:37.069 --> 00:27:39.369
costs. Exactly. It's the triple -decker of the

00:27:39.369 --> 00:27:42.049
21st century just on a massive corporate scale.

00:27:42.230 --> 00:27:44.569
And then there's the garlo, which I just love

00:27:44.569 --> 00:27:47.359
as a portmanteau. Garage and bungalow. How is

00:27:47.359 --> 00:27:49.319
that different from a garage apartment? A garage

00:27:49.319 --> 00:27:52.279
apartment is a living unit over the garage. A

00:27:52.279 --> 00:27:54.740
garlo has the apartment and the garage at the

00:27:54.740 --> 00:27:57.880
same level. It's a very specific, compact design.

00:27:58.160 --> 00:28:00.619
I want to go inside the walls now. We've talked

00:28:00.619 --> 00:28:03.700
about the exterior shapes and the zoning, but

00:28:03.700 --> 00:28:06.500
the way these units are laid out inside dictates

00:28:06.500 --> 00:28:09.180
how we actually live. And some of these layouts

00:28:09.180 --> 00:28:11.940
are wild. The interior geography is just as important

00:28:11.940 --> 00:28:14.559
as the zoning map. It dictates privacy and family

00:28:14.559 --> 00:28:16.500
life. Let's start with the railroad apartment.

00:28:16.660 --> 00:28:19.460
This is a classic New York tenement thing. Right.

00:28:19.900 --> 00:28:23.359
Think about a long, narrow building lot. To fit

00:28:23.359 --> 00:28:25.799
as many people as possible, they didn't waste

00:28:25.799 --> 00:28:28.700
any space on hallways. So how do you get from

00:28:28.700 --> 00:28:30.759
room to room? You walk through the other rooms.

00:28:31.039 --> 00:28:34.000
The front door opens into the living room, which

00:28:34.000 --> 00:28:36.259
has a doorway into a bedroom. which has a doorway

00:28:36.259 --> 00:28:38.700
into the next bedroom, which opens into the kitchen

00:28:38.700 --> 00:28:41.240
in the back. That is a privacy nightmare. If

00:28:41.240 --> 00:28:42.759
I'm in the middle bedroom and I need a glass

00:28:42.759 --> 00:28:44.220
of water at night, I have to walk through your

00:28:44.220 --> 00:28:46.759
bedroom. Precisely. It was designed for large

00:28:46.759 --> 00:28:50.019
families where that kind of Western middle -class

00:28:50.019 --> 00:28:53.759
privacy wasn't a priority or an option. It forces

00:28:53.759 --> 00:28:56.640
a very specific communal type of living. And

00:28:56.640 --> 00:28:58.640
it's called a railroad apartment because the

00:28:58.640 --> 00:29:01.509
rooms are linked like train cars. Exactly. Then

00:29:01.509 --> 00:29:04.309
you have the basic single room solution. Studio,

00:29:04.609 --> 00:29:07.470
efficiency, bachelor apartment. Are these all

00:29:07.470 --> 00:29:09.509
the same thing? More or less. The terminology

00:29:09.509 --> 00:29:12.529
is regional. Studio or efficiency is common in

00:29:12.529 --> 00:29:16.009
the U .S. Studio flat in the U .K. Bachelor or

00:29:16.009 --> 00:29:18.009
bachelorette is very common in Canada and South

00:29:18.009 --> 00:29:19.789
Africa. And now we have the micro apartment.

00:29:20.130 --> 00:29:22.869
Which is just the modern, sometimes glamorized

00:29:22.869 --> 00:29:25.630
version of the single room dwelling. But even

00:29:25.630 --> 00:29:28.509
smaller, often under 300 square feet. with very

00:29:28.509 --> 00:29:30.809
clever built -in furniture to make it functional.

00:29:31.029 --> 00:29:34.069
And what about lofts? People love a good loft

00:29:34.069 --> 00:29:37.509
conversion. A true loft is a specific thing.

00:29:37.589 --> 00:29:40.170
It's not just any apartment with high ceilings.

00:29:40.650 --> 00:29:43.250
Technically, it means you're utilizing the vertical

00:29:43.250 --> 00:29:46.470
space between the structural floors of a former

00:29:46.470 --> 00:29:49.109
factory or warehouse. So you're living in the

00:29:49.109 --> 00:29:52.220
space where... machines used to be. Right. And

00:29:52.220 --> 00:29:54.640
often you'll see the original cast iron columns

00:29:54.640 --> 00:29:56.839
supporting the structure, not the original load

00:29:56.839 --> 00:29:59.220
-bearing walls. It's a very distinct industrial

00:29:59.220 --> 00:30:01.480
aesthetic. Now let's talk about the bottom of

00:30:01.480 --> 00:30:03.400
the market again. We mentioned the bedsit, but

00:30:03.400 --> 00:30:06.420
in the U .S. we had the SRO, single room occupancy.

00:30:06.640 --> 00:30:09.619
The SRO is the most misunderstood and I think

00:30:09.619 --> 00:30:12.319
tragically lost form of urban housing. These

00:30:12.319 --> 00:30:14.180
were essentially hotels for permanent residents.

00:30:14.400 --> 00:30:16.140
What did you get for your rent? You rented a

00:30:16.140 --> 00:30:19.140
room. You had a bed, a dresser, and maybe a sink

00:30:19.140 --> 00:30:20.819
in the corner. You shared a bathroom and maybe

00:30:20.819 --> 00:30:23.240
a communal kitchen down the hall. This used to

00:30:23.240 --> 00:30:26.220
be how the working poor or elderly people on

00:30:26.220 --> 00:30:28.279
fixed incomes or young men just arriving in the

00:30:28.279 --> 00:30:31.640
city survived. It was the absolute bottom rung

00:30:31.640 --> 00:30:33.759
of the housing ladder. If you had very little

00:30:33.759 --> 00:30:36.299
money, you could still afford an SRO. It kept

00:30:36.299 --> 00:30:38.880
you off the street. It was safe and private,

00:30:38.940 --> 00:30:41.759
if not spacious. So what happened? Why are they

00:30:41.759 --> 00:30:44.160
basically gone? We regulated them out of existence.

00:30:45.180 --> 00:30:47.420
In the mid -20th century, cities started passing

00:30:47.420 --> 00:30:50.819
laws saying every legal housing unit must have

00:30:50.819 --> 00:30:52.960
a private bathroom and a private kitchen. Which

00:30:52.960 --> 00:30:55.400
sounds benevolent. Everyone deserves their own

00:30:55.400 --> 00:30:57.880
kitchen. It sounds great, but it raised the minimum

00:30:57.880 --> 00:31:01.000
cost of housing dramatically. If you force a

00:31:01.000 --> 00:31:03.480
developer to put a kitchen and bath in every

00:31:03.480 --> 00:31:06.980
single unit, the rent doubles or triples. We

00:31:06.980 --> 00:31:09.460
effectively made cheap housing illegal. We sawed

00:31:09.460 --> 00:31:11.779
off the bottom rung of the ladder. We sawed it

00:31:11.779 --> 00:31:14.200
off and now we wonder why homelessness has exploded

00:31:14.200 --> 00:31:16.220
in so many cities. That is a heavy realization.

00:31:16.619 --> 00:31:19.140
By demanding higher standards, we actually hurt

00:31:19.140 --> 00:31:21.319
the people we were trying to protect. It's a

00:31:21.319 --> 00:31:24.099
classic case of unintended consequences in housing

00:31:24.099 --> 00:31:28.079
policy. We replace cheap private rooms with either

00:31:28.079 --> 00:31:30.099
expensive apartments or congregate shelters.

00:31:30.380 --> 00:31:32.039
And then you have the rooming house, which is

00:31:32.039 --> 00:31:34.200
slightly different. Yes. A rooming house is typically

00:31:34.200 --> 00:31:36.680
a larger house where four or more bedrooms are

00:31:36.680 --> 00:31:38.980
rented out individually. The tenancy is short

00:31:38.980 --> 00:31:42.180
term, often week to week. It's a different legal

00:31:42.180 --> 00:31:44.779
classification from an apartment building. And

00:31:44.779 --> 00:31:46.680
in the Indian subcontinent, there's the mess.

00:31:46.900 --> 00:31:50.000
A mess or a boarding house there is interesting.

00:31:50.380 --> 00:31:53.200
You get a single bedroom. Shared facilities,

00:31:53.579 --> 00:31:56.079
but it often includes meals and sometimes even

00:31:56.079 --> 00:31:58.839
a maid service. The very common setup for students

00:31:58.839 --> 00:32:00.799
or young professionals moving to a new city.

00:32:00.900 --> 00:32:03.619
On the complete flip side of the ownership spectrum,

00:32:03.920 --> 00:32:06.559
we have the co -op. I feel like this is a New

00:32:06.559 --> 00:32:09.880
York obsession. The board, the interview. It

00:32:09.880 --> 00:32:12.279
sounds terrifying. The housing cooperative is

00:32:12.279 --> 00:32:15.779
a fascinating legal beast. In a co -op, you do

00:32:15.779 --> 00:32:17.680
not own your apartment. You don't get a deed.

00:32:17.900 --> 00:32:19.900
Wait, I pay a million dollars for a place on

00:32:19.900 --> 00:32:22.819
the Upper West Side and I don't own it. No. The

00:32:22.819 --> 00:32:25.400
building itself is owned by a non -profit corporation.

00:32:26.420 --> 00:32:29.099
When you buy an apartment, you're actually buying

00:32:29.099 --> 00:32:32.039
shares in that corporation. So I'm a shareholder.

00:32:32.259 --> 00:32:34.740
You're a shareholder, and your shares come with

00:32:34.740 --> 00:32:37.400
a proprietary lease, which gives you the right

00:32:37.400 --> 00:32:40.640
to occupy a specific unit. The number of shares

00:32:40.640 --> 00:32:43.680
you own corresponds to the size and desirability

00:32:43.680 --> 00:32:46.440
of your apartment. So I'm a business partner

00:32:46.440 --> 00:32:49.339
with my neighbors, and my lease is just a perk

00:32:49.339 --> 00:32:51.799
of being a shareholder. Exactly. And because

00:32:51.799 --> 00:32:54.700
you are buying into a business partnership, the

00:32:54.700 --> 00:32:57.160
current shareholders, the board, get to decide

00:32:57.160 --> 00:32:59.220
if they want you as a partner. That's why they

00:32:59.220 --> 00:33:01.859
can reject you for seemingly no reason. If you

00:33:01.859 --> 00:33:04.539
go bankrupt or stop paying your monthly maintenance

00:33:04.539 --> 00:33:06.880
fees, the neighbors have to cover your share

00:33:06.880 --> 00:33:09.099
to keep the boiler running and pay the building's

00:33:09.099 --> 00:33:11.799
mortgage. So they are financially terrified of

00:33:11.799 --> 00:33:14.119
bad tenants. So the interviews are incredibly

00:33:14.119 --> 00:33:16.819
intrusive. They want to know your financials,

00:33:16.819 --> 00:33:20.000
your social life, your dog's temperament. In

00:33:20.000 --> 00:33:22.099
Australia, this model corresponds to something

00:33:22.099 --> 00:33:24.920
called company title, which is much less common

00:33:24.920 --> 00:33:27.180
now. It's a gated community where the gate is

00:33:27.180 --> 00:33:29.640
a board of directors with a calculator. That's

00:33:29.640 --> 00:33:31.660
a perfect way to describe it. And then finally,

00:33:31.759 --> 00:33:34.640
we have co -housing. This is the hippie cousin

00:33:34.640 --> 00:33:36.660
of the co -op. This is where you have a private

00:33:36.660 --> 00:33:39.180
home but share a big kitchen and do laundry together.

00:33:39.690 --> 00:33:42.250
It's an intentional community. The architecture

00:33:42.250 --> 00:33:45.450
is designed to force interaction. The homes are

00:33:45.450 --> 00:33:47.190
usually clustered around a common green space.

00:33:47.509 --> 00:33:49.650
The cars are parked on the periphery, so you

00:33:49.650 --> 00:33:52.029
have to walk through the common courtyard to

00:33:52.029 --> 00:33:53.569
get to your front door. You're forced to see

00:33:53.569 --> 00:33:55.609
your neighbors. Right. And you have a common

00:33:55.609 --> 00:33:58.529
house where residents are expected to help cook

00:33:58.529 --> 00:34:00.470
dinner for the whole community a few nights a

00:34:00.470 --> 00:34:02.650
week. It's social engineering through architecture,

00:34:02.970 --> 00:34:05.849
trying to recreate the village. It works for

00:34:05.849 --> 00:34:08.250
some people. It's a powerful antidote to loneliness.

00:34:08.969 --> 00:34:11.349
For others, it's a nightmare of committees and

00:34:11.349 --> 00:34:13.789
chore wheels. I can just imagine the arguments

00:34:13.789 --> 00:34:16.670
about whose turn it is to clean the common house

00:34:16.670 --> 00:34:19.429
kitchen. It definitely takes a specific personality

00:34:19.429 --> 00:34:22.170
type to thrive in that environment. One last

00:34:22.170 --> 00:34:24.769
category to clarify because the terms get so

00:34:24.769 --> 00:34:28.170
jumbled. Row houses, townhouses, and terraces.

00:34:28.269 --> 00:34:32.550
The great tomato -to -motto of housing. So row

00:34:32.550 --> 00:34:34.769
house in the U .S. is the same as a terraced

00:34:34.769 --> 00:34:37.710
house in the U .K.? Essentially, yes. The concept

00:34:37.710 --> 00:34:40.570
is three or more houses built in a row sharing

00:34:40.570 --> 00:34:42.849
party walls on either side. And then there's

00:34:42.849 --> 00:34:45.590
the back -to -back house. That's a specific and

00:34:45.590 --> 00:34:48.530
now very rare type of terraced house from the

00:34:48.530 --> 00:34:51.380
Industrial Revolution. Not only do they share

00:34:51.380 --> 00:34:54.059
walls on the sides, they also share a wall at

00:34:54.059 --> 00:34:56.500
the rear with another house. So you only have

00:34:56.500 --> 00:34:59.340
windows on one side. Yes. No through breeze,

00:34:59.579 --> 00:35:02.739
very little light. They were notoriously unhealthy

00:35:02.739 --> 00:35:05.519
and were banned for a long time. And the Q -type,

00:35:05.639 --> 00:35:08.480
that sounds modern. Very. It's a late 20th century

00:35:08.480 --> 00:35:11.239
UK townhouse design. They're arranged in blocks

00:35:11.239 --> 00:35:13.880
of four, with each house forming a corner of

00:35:13.880 --> 00:35:15.989
the block. It's a space -efficient way to give

00:35:15.989 --> 00:35:18.690
everyone a corner unit. And finally, semi -detached,

00:35:18.730 --> 00:35:21.010
just to be clear. One building, two separate

00:35:21.010 --> 00:35:23.369
houses side by side, sharing a single central

00:35:23.369 --> 00:35:26.150
wall. A duplex, essentially. We have covered

00:35:26.150 --> 00:35:28.389
a massive amount of ground here. We've gone from

00:35:28.389 --> 00:35:30.789
the mud skyscrapers of Yemen to the fireproof

00:35:30.789 --> 00:35:33.969
concrete of modern America. We've seen how zoning

00:35:33.969 --> 00:35:36.650
can be used as a weapon and how tax codes make

00:35:36.650 --> 00:35:38.710
apartments the financial heroes of the city.

00:35:39.079 --> 00:35:41.340
It really reframes the way you look at a skyline,

00:35:41.380 --> 00:35:43.460
doesn't it? Or even just a simple three -story

00:35:43.460 --> 00:35:45.519
brick building on a side street. It does. So

00:35:45.519 --> 00:35:48.059
if we have to distill this down, if the listener

00:35:48.059 --> 00:35:50.619
takes one thing away from this deep dive, what

00:35:50.619 --> 00:35:54.199
should it be? I think it's this. We need to stop

00:35:54.199 --> 00:35:57.599
viewing multifamily housing as a problem to be

00:35:57.599 --> 00:36:01.079
managed or a threat to our neighborhoods. The

00:36:01.079 --> 00:36:04.380
history shows us that density is a tool. It's

00:36:04.380 --> 00:36:07.000
an adaptation. A human adaptation. Right. It's

00:36:07.000 --> 00:36:08.960
the most efficient and often the most vibrant

00:36:08.960 --> 00:36:12.239
and creative way for humans to inhabit a planet

00:36:12.239 --> 00:36:15.980
with limited space. The resistance to it is often

00:36:15.980 --> 00:36:18.800
based on myths and prejudices that are hundreds

00:36:18.800 --> 00:36:21.579
of years old. And the economic reality that these

00:36:21.579 --> 00:36:24.119
buildings often subsidize the suburbs is something

00:36:24.119 --> 00:36:25.920
that really needs to be part of the conversation

00:36:25.920 --> 00:36:28.559
at every single town council meeting. Absolutely.

00:36:28.639 --> 00:36:31.559
The beneficial fiscal externality. isn't just

00:36:31.559 --> 00:36:34.199
jargon. It's the money that paves your roads

00:36:34.199 --> 00:36:37.300
and funds your library. So here's my final provocative

00:36:37.300 --> 00:36:39.860
thought for you, the listener. The next time

00:36:39.860 --> 00:36:42.320
you're walking your dog or driving to work, look

00:36:42.320 --> 00:36:44.219
at the buildings around you. Don't just see an

00:36:44.219 --> 00:36:46.639
apartment complex and tune it out. Look closer.

00:36:46.780 --> 00:36:50.360
Ask yourself, is that a dingbat? Is that a four

00:36:50.360 --> 00:36:53.300
plus one? Is it a toothpick trying to break through?

00:36:53.360 --> 00:36:55.480
Try to spot the history in the architecture.

00:36:55.880 --> 00:36:58.599
What economic forces, what building codes, what

00:36:58.599 --> 00:37:01.260
cultural values made that building look the way

00:37:01.260 --> 00:37:03.619
it does? And think about the invisible lines,

00:37:03.679 --> 00:37:07.019
the zoning maps that decided why that building

00:37:07.019 --> 00:37:09.539
stops right there and why the block next to it,

00:37:09.639 --> 00:37:12.000
filled with single family homes, looks completely

00:37:12.000 --> 00:37:14.619
different. Think about who was allowed to live

00:37:14.619 --> 00:37:17.320
there and who was excluded. By the very design

00:37:17.320 --> 00:37:19.099
of the neighborhood. Because whether we are in

00:37:19.099 --> 00:37:22.679
a Roman insulae or a shiny new OnePlus 5, we

00:37:22.679 --> 00:37:24.420
are all just trying to figure out how to live

00:37:24.420 --> 00:37:26.380
together in the stack. And hopefully with good

00:37:26.380 --> 00:37:29.519
plumbing, unlike the Romans. Hopefully. Thanks

00:37:29.519 --> 00:37:31.480
for diving deep with us. We'll see you next time.
