WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.879
Welcome back to another deep dive. Today we are

00:00:02.879 --> 00:00:06.700
wading into waters that I think for most of us

00:00:06.700 --> 00:00:09.519
feel a little bit like drowning. We are talking

00:00:09.519 --> 00:00:11.779
about a phrase that just dominates the headlines.

00:00:11.919 --> 00:00:15.380
It fills up our social media feeds. And let's

00:00:15.380 --> 00:00:17.539
be honest, it probably raises your blood pressure

00:00:17.539 --> 00:00:20.899
just hearing it. It definitely triggers a visceral

00:00:20.899 --> 00:00:23.300
reaction. It's that, you know, tightness in the

00:00:23.300 --> 00:00:26.219
chest you get when you open Twitter or X or whatever

00:00:26.219 --> 00:00:28.510
and you just see everyone screaming. We are talking

00:00:28.510 --> 00:00:31.109
about the culture war. And the mission for this

00:00:31.109 --> 00:00:34.229
deep dive is it's a bit different than usual.

00:00:34.289 --> 00:00:36.270
Usually when people talk about this, they want

00:00:36.270 --> 00:00:38.250
to argue in the war. They want to debate the

00:00:38.250 --> 00:00:40.789
latest outrage, the banned book, the protest,

00:00:41.090 --> 00:00:44.109
the tweet of the day. We aren't doing that. No.

00:00:44.559 --> 00:00:46.979
We are not here to fight the war. We are here

00:00:46.979 --> 00:00:48.859
to look at the map. Yes. We want to take the

00:00:48.859 --> 00:00:50.859
back off the wash and see the gears turning.

00:00:51.140 --> 00:00:53.500
We want to understand the machinery. Because

00:00:53.500 --> 00:00:55.039
when I was going through the stack of research

00:00:55.039 --> 00:00:57.020
for this, and we have a massive stack today,

00:00:57.100 --> 00:00:59.460
listeners, ranging from 19th century German history

00:00:59.460 --> 00:01:03.259
to modern algorithmic studies, global political

00:01:03.259 --> 00:01:06.799
science, I realized something. I realized I didn't

00:01:06.799 --> 00:01:09.140
actually know what this thing was. Is it organic?

00:01:09.359 --> 00:01:12.079
Do we all just... naturally hate each other now?

00:01:12.400 --> 00:01:15.920
Or is this a machine? Is it a strategy? And that

00:01:15.920 --> 00:01:18.200
is the central question. It really is. And the

00:01:18.200 --> 00:01:21.079
answer, as we go through the sources, it points

00:01:21.079 --> 00:01:23.819
heavily toward machine. Right. It's a manufactured

00:01:23.819 --> 00:01:26.959
phenomenon with a history, a structure, and a

00:01:26.959 --> 00:01:30.040
surprisingly large global footprint. And spoiler

00:01:30.040 --> 00:01:32.980
alert. It did not start on Facebook. No, far

00:01:32.980 --> 00:01:35.260
from it. So let's start at the very beginning.

00:01:35.379 --> 00:01:37.140
Before we even get into the history, we need

00:01:37.140 --> 00:01:39.659
a working definition. Good idea. Because culture

00:01:39.659 --> 00:01:41.359
war is one of those terms that gets thrown around

00:01:41.359 --> 00:01:45.319
so loosely, it almost loses its meaning. When

00:01:45.319 --> 00:01:47.780
the sources define it, what are we actually looking

00:01:47.780 --> 00:01:51.079
at? So stripped of all the buzzwords, the core

00:01:51.079 --> 00:01:52.980
definition we're working with is that a culture

00:01:52.980 --> 00:01:56.379
war is a conflict, often metaphorical, but sometimes

00:01:56.379 --> 00:01:59.620
very real between social groups. Okay. But here's

00:01:59.620 --> 00:02:03.219
the key part. It's not just a disagreement. It

00:02:03.219 --> 00:02:05.980
is a struggle to politically impose a specific

00:02:05.980 --> 00:02:10.180
ideology or a set of values on mainstream society.

00:02:10.419 --> 00:02:13.719
That word impose feels like the heavy lifter

00:02:13.719 --> 00:02:16.080
there. It's not just I like chocolate. You like

00:02:16.080 --> 00:02:18.300
vanilla. Exactly. I like chocolate. You like

00:02:18.300 --> 00:02:21.500
vanilla is pluralism. That's a healthy society.

00:02:21.840 --> 00:02:24.680
You do your thing. I do my thing. Right. A culture

00:02:24.680 --> 00:02:27.919
war is your preference for vanilla is an existential

00:02:27.919 --> 00:02:30.240
threat to the nation. And I need to pass laws

00:02:30.240 --> 00:02:32.979
to make sure vanilla is marginalized. It's a

00:02:32.979 --> 00:02:35.319
struggle for dominance. It's a struggle for reality.

00:02:35.539 --> 00:02:38.300
It is. It's about defining reality. It's taking

00:02:38.300 --> 00:02:40.979
a private preference or a moral belief and recognizing

00:02:40.979 --> 00:02:43.580
it into a public policy requirement. Right. Turning

00:02:43.580 --> 00:02:46.180
your taste into my law. Precisely. And in doing

00:02:46.180 --> 00:02:49.020
so, it creates what sociologists call a cleavage

00:02:49.020 --> 00:02:51.439
in society. Which sounds painful. It is painful.

00:02:51.539 --> 00:02:53.659
It's a split. And the goal of the people waging

00:02:53.659 --> 00:02:55.819
these wars on either side is often to make sure

00:02:55.819 --> 00:02:58.539
that split is as wide and, you know, as unbridgeable

00:02:58.539 --> 00:03:00.580
as possible. They want a canyon. They want you

00:03:00.580 --> 00:03:03.560
to feel that you cannot possibly coexist with

00:03:03.560 --> 00:03:05.659
a person on the other side of that canyon. OK,

00:03:05.740 --> 00:03:08.819
so if that's the mechanism imposing values to

00:03:08.819 --> 00:03:11.319
create a split, where does it come from? If I

00:03:11.319 --> 00:03:13.580
ask the average person on the street, when did

00:03:13.580 --> 00:03:16.520
the culture war start? They'd probably say the

00:03:16.520 --> 00:03:20.280
1960s. Right. Woodstock, hippies. Vietnam, the

00:03:20.280 --> 00:03:22.560
counterculture, all of that. That's the standard

00:03:22.560 --> 00:03:25.280
answer. Right. Or maybe they'd point to the 1990s

00:03:25.280 --> 00:03:27.340
with Newt Gingrich and the Contract of America.

00:03:27.520 --> 00:03:30.180
But the research took us back a lot further to

00:03:30.180 --> 00:03:33.240
a place in time I really, really did not expect.

00:03:33.719 --> 00:03:37.620
We are talking about 1870s Germany. Yes. We have

00:03:37.620 --> 00:03:40.080
to talk about the Kulturkampf. Which is, that's

00:03:40.080 --> 00:03:41.879
just the German word for culture war, right?

00:03:41.960 --> 00:03:44.099
It is. The English phrase we use today is what

00:03:44.099 --> 00:03:46.680
linguists call a Kalk. It's a loan translation.

00:03:46.699 --> 00:03:49.610
We literally just translated Kulturkampf. Kultur

00:03:49.610 --> 00:03:52.650
meaning culture, Kampf meaning struggle or war.

00:03:52.909 --> 00:03:55.050
But they weren't fighting about gender pronouns

00:03:55.050 --> 00:03:59.349
or gastos in 1871 Berlin. No. What was the original

00:03:59.349 --> 00:04:01.449
culture war about? It was a heavyweight title

00:04:01.449 --> 00:04:04.569
fight between two massive powers. In one corner,

00:04:04.629 --> 00:04:08.370
you had the newly unified German Empire, led

00:04:08.370 --> 00:04:11.009
by the Iron Chancellor Otto von Bismarck. Okay.

00:04:11.110 --> 00:04:12.830
In the other corner, you had the Catholic Church,

00:04:12.990 --> 00:04:16.110
led by Pope Pius IX. Bismarck versus the Pope.

00:04:16.269 --> 00:04:19.079
That is... High stakes. That's like Godzilla

00:04:19.079 --> 00:04:22.100
versus Kong for the 19th century. Extremely high

00:04:22.100 --> 00:04:23.839
stakes. And you have to understand the context.

00:04:24.459 --> 00:04:27.639
Germany had just become a nation state in 1871.

00:04:27.860 --> 00:04:31.040
Right. Brand new. Bismarck is obsessed with unity.

00:04:31.240 --> 00:04:34.420
He wants a strong, modern, secular state where

00:04:34.420 --> 00:04:36.480
everyone speaks German and salutes the Kaiser.

00:04:37.259 --> 00:04:39.259
And he looks at the Catholic Church, which makes

00:04:39.259 --> 00:04:41.920
up about a third of the population, and he sees

00:04:41.920 --> 00:04:44.220
a problem. What's the problem? They're just going

00:04:44.220 --> 00:04:46.040
to church, aren't they? Bismarck didn't see it

00:04:46.040 --> 00:04:48.449
that way. He saw a group of people whose ultimate

00:04:48.449 --> 00:04:51.449
loyalty wasn't to the Kaiser or the German Constitution.

00:04:51.930 --> 00:04:56.290
But to Rome. But to a foreign power. The Vatican.

00:04:56.370 --> 00:04:58.670
He called them Reichsfeinde. Which means? Enemies

00:04:58.670 --> 00:05:00.970
of the empire. He believed that if push came

00:05:00.970 --> 00:05:03.449
to shove, a good Catholic would listen to the

00:05:03.449 --> 00:05:06.069
Pope, not the Chancellor. So it was a question

00:05:06.069 --> 00:05:08.290
of sovereignty. Who's really in charge here?

00:05:08.370 --> 00:05:11.899
Precisely. So he launched the Kulturkampf. And

00:05:11.899 --> 00:05:14.000
this wasn't just, you know, rhetoric or mean

00:05:14.000 --> 00:05:16.699
tweets. He passed what were called the May laws.

00:05:16.879 --> 00:05:19.819
The May laws. The state took control of educating

00:05:19.819 --> 00:05:22.680
the clergy. They established a special court

00:05:22.680 --> 00:05:25.660
for ecclesiastical affairs. They made civil marriage

00:05:25.660 --> 00:05:28.740
mandatory, taking that power away from the church.

00:05:29.000 --> 00:05:32.639
Wow. At the height of this, almost all the Catholic

00:05:32.639 --> 00:05:36.370
bishops in Prussia were either imprisoned. So

00:05:36.370 --> 00:05:38.589
when we talk about culture war today being nasty,

00:05:38.829 --> 00:05:41.310
it's not imprisoning bishops nasty. Not yet.

00:05:41.389 --> 00:05:44.480
Not quite. But the dynamic is identical. It was

00:05:44.480 --> 00:05:47.120
a secular modernizing state trying to break the

00:05:47.120 --> 00:05:49.259
power of traditional religious authority. And

00:05:49.259 --> 00:05:51.139
there's another layer to this that often gets

00:05:51.139 --> 00:05:53.040
missed, which I found really interesting in the

00:05:53.040 --> 00:05:54.980
notes. The ethnic element. The Polish connection.

00:05:55.040 --> 00:05:57.279
Right. A lot of the Catholics in the Prussian

00:05:57.279 --> 00:06:00.399
territories were ethnic Poles. So for Bismarck,

00:06:00.399 --> 00:06:02.860
attacking the church was also a way to suppress

00:06:02.860 --> 00:06:06.300
Polish nationalism and force Germanization. Which

00:06:06.300 --> 00:06:09.639
sounds eerily familiar to modern debates. It's

00:06:09.639 --> 00:06:12.379
never just about the stated issue, is it? Never.

00:06:12.540 --> 00:06:15.939
It's about identity, ethnicity, and who belongs

00:06:15.939 --> 00:06:18.740
in the nation. That is the DNA of the culture

00:06:18.740 --> 00:06:20.920
war. It's always about who gets to define the

00:06:20.920 --> 00:06:24.079
soul of the nation. Is Germany a secular Protestant

00:06:24.079 --> 00:06:27.500
empire? Or is there room for Polish Catholics?

00:06:28.060 --> 00:06:32.379
Bismarck said no. So the term exists in the 1870s.

00:06:32.459 --> 00:06:35.139
How does it get to America? Does it just hop

00:06:35.139 --> 00:06:38.889
on a boat? It hybridated for a long time. The

00:06:38.889 --> 00:06:41.569
term would pop up in obscure academic papers

00:06:41.569 --> 00:06:44.329
or newspapers in the 1920s and 40s, usually referring

00:06:44.329 --> 00:06:46.670
back to Germany. But it wasn't something regular

00:06:46.670 --> 00:06:49.689
people said. An intellectual curiosity. Exactly.

00:06:49.689 --> 00:06:52.740
But the feeling. The dynamic that arrived in

00:06:52.740 --> 00:06:55.060
the U .S. way before the word did. The sources

00:06:55.060 --> 00:06:57.660
point to the 1920s as the first real American

00:06:57.660 --> 00:07:00.540
culture war. And the parallels between the 1920s

00:07:00.540 --> 00:07:02.439
and the 2020s are actually staggering. Really?

00:07:02.740 --> 00:07:04.579
Oh, yeah. If you look at the societal pressures,

00:07:04.660 --> 00:07:06.680
it's almost a mirror image. OK, set the scene

00:07:06.680 --> 00:07:08.459
for us. All right. So you have the roaring 20s.

00:07:08.459 --> 00:07:10.839
World War I is over. You have this massive explosion

00:07:10.839 --> 00:07:13.839
of technology and urbanization, radios, cars,

00:07:14.139 --> 00:07:16.639
movies. And for the first time in American history.

00:07:17.050 --> 00:07:19.730
More Americans live in cities than in the countryside.

00:07:19.910 --> 00:07:22.550
And the cities are where the sin is. In the eyes

00:07:22.550 --> 00:07:25.350
of the rural traditionalists, yes. The cities

00:07:25.350 --> 00:07:28.329
had jazz. They had flappers with short hair and

00:07:28.329 --> 00:07:31.129
short skirts. They had speakeasies. All the fun

00:07:31.129 --> 00:07:35.170
stuff. And crucially, they had immigrants. Millions

00:07:35.170 --> 00:07:37.430
of Catholics and Jews arriving from southern

00:07:37.430 --> 00:07:40.069
and eastern Europe. So the rural Protestant majority

00:07:40.069 --> 00:07:43.889
feels besieged. They feel like they're losing

00:07:43.889 --> 00:07:46.379
their country. They feel like their values are

00:07:46.379 --> 00:07:48.879
being eroded by these aliens in the cities who

00:07:48.879 --> 00:07:51.139
drink alcohol and listen to syncopated music.

00:07:51.199 --> 00:07:53.180
So you get a massive backlash. And this is the

00:07:53.180 --> 00:07:55.639
era of prohibition. This is the era of prohibition,

00:07:55.639 --> 00:07:57.379
which we often think of as a health thing. But

00:07:57.379 --> 00:08:00.459
it was a direct culture war attack on the drinking

00:08:00.459 --> 00:08:03.160
habits of urban immigrants. The German beer halls,

00:08:03.360 --> 00:08:06.829
the Irish pubs. Exactly. And you also see the

00:08:06.829 --> 00:08:10.009
resurgence of the KKK in the 20s, but not just

00:08:10.009 --> 00:08:12.870
as anti -black. In this era, they were explicitly

00:08:12.870 --> 00:08:15.649
anti -Catholic and anti -immigrant. Right. They

00:08:15.649 --> 00:08:18.550
were trying to enforce a 100 percent Americanism.

00:08:18.569 --> 00:08:20.990
Right. That was Protestant and rural. And this

00:08:20.990 --> 00:08:23.769
all culminated in an election that sounds like

00:08:23.769 --> 00:08:28.079
a total nightmare. 1928. Al Smith. Oh, poor Al

00:08:28.079 --> 00:08:30.959
Smith. He was the perfect villain for the culture

00:08:30.959 --> 00:08:33.379
warriors of the time. He was the Democratic nominee.

00:08:33.600 --> 00:08:35.879
And he was the governor of New York, the ultimate

00:08:35.879 --> 00:08:38.779
city slicker. He was a wet. He wanted to end

00:08:38.779 --> 00:08:42.779
prohibition. And most damning of all, he was

00:08:42.779 --> 00:08:45.639
Catholic. The first Catholic major party nominee.

00:08:46.269 --> 00:08:48.769
And the attacks on him were just vicious. We

00:08:48.769 --> 00:08:52.009
think fake news is new. People circulated pamphlets

00:08:52.009 --> 00:08:53.809
claiming that the Pope was going to build a tunnel

00:08:53.809 --> 00:08:57.169
from Rome to the White House to give Smith his

00:08:57.169 --> 00:09:00.250
daily orders. A tunnel under the Atlantic Ocean.

00:09:00.429 --> 00:09:02.889
A literal tunnel. It's funny. We look back at

00:09:02.889 --> 00:09:04.590
that now and laugh about the tunnel, but people

00:09:04.590 --> 00:09:06.909
really believed it. They did. It speaks to the

00:09:06.909 --> 00:09:09.269
level of fear. It taps into that primal fear

00:09:09.269 --> 00:09:12.409
of foreign influence. And Smith got absolutely

00:09:12.409 --> 00:09:15.309
crushed. Right. The country wasn't ready. The

00:09:15.309 --> 00:09:18.250
traditional forces won that battle. But the war,

00:09:18.330 --> 00:09:20.590
the divide between urban modernists and rural

00:09:20.590 --> 00:09:23.190
traditionalists, it never went away. It just

00:09:23.190 --> 00:09:25.769
simmered. OK, let's fast forward a bit. We move

00:09:25.769 --> 00:09:28.250
through the mid -century and we have to talk

00:09:28.250 --> 00:09:31.210
about a group that keeps popping up in our research

00:09:31.210 --> 00:09:34.250
like a bad penny. Yes. The John Birch Society.

00:09:34.389 --> 00:09:36.470
The John Birch Society is like the Kevin Bacon

00:09:36.470 --> 00:09:39.289
of right wing conspiracy theories. Everything

00:09:39.289 --> 00:09:41.269
connects back to them. Who are they? Founded

00:09:41.269 --> 00:09:46.159
in 1958 by Robert Welch. They were ostensibly

00:09:46.159 --> 00:09:49.500
an anti -communist group, but they were extreme.

00:09:49.600 --> 00:09:52.740
I mean, truly extreme. How so? They believed

00:09:52.740 --> 00:09:55.820
that President Eisenhower, a five -star general,

00:09:55.980 --> 00:09:59.539
the hero of D -Day, was a secret communist agent.

00:09:59.980 --> 00:10:01.759
Eisenhower, the guy who built the highway system?

00:10:02.179 --> 00:10:04.840
A commie. In their world, yes. They believed

00:10:04.840 --> 00:10:07.460
there was a massive internal conspiracy to destroy

00:10:07.460 --> 00:10:10.039
American sovereignty and values. They thought

00:10:10.039 --> 00:10:11.980
the civil rights movement was a communist plot.

00:10:12.220 --> 00:10:14.139
And water fluoridation. And water fluoridation,

00:10:14.259 --> 00:10:16.720
yes. And while they were marginalized by mainstream

00:10:16.720 --> 00:10:20.299
Republicans for a while, their ideas, they didn't

00:10:20.299 --> 00:10:22.960
die. The sources trace a direct line from them

00:10:22.960 --> 00:10:25.179
to the modern Christian right. It's a straight

00:10:25.179 --> 00:10:27.559
line. You can trace the personnel and the tactics

00:10:27.559 --> 00:10:29.919
from the John Birch Society to people like Phyllis

00:10:29.919 --> 00:10:33.019
Schlafly. She was the anti -feminist icon, right?

00:10:33.100 --> 00:10:34.700
The one who stopped the Equal Rights Amendment.

00:10:34.980 --> 00:10:37.639
Correct. And she started her career promoting

00:10:37.639 --> 00:10:40.450
John Birch Society literature. Then you have

00:10:40.450 --> 00:10:43.330
Tim LaHaye, who wrote the massive bestselling

00:10:43.330 --> 00:10:46.190
Left Behind series about the rapture. He was

00:10:46.190 --> 00:10:48.909
deeply influenced by this Bircher style of paranoia,

00:10:48.909 --> 00:10:51.809
the idea that the world is divided into us, the

00:10:51.809 --> 00:10:54.990
faithful, and them, the conspirators, globalists.

00:10:55.169 --> 00:10:57.029
So they built the infrastructure, they built

00:10:57.029 --> 00:10:59.350
the mailing lists, they built the sense of persecution.

00:10:59.590 --> 00:11:02.769
Yes. But we still don't have the name yet. When

00:11:02.769 --> 00:11:05.409
does culture war become a household term in the

00:11:05.409 --> 00:11:09.110
United States? 1991. The pivot point. Enter James

00:11:09.110 --> 00:11:11.809
Davison Hunter. James Davison Hunter is a sociologist

00:11:11.809 --> 00:11:14.389
at the University of Virginia. And he publishes

00:11:14.389 --> 00:11:17.850
a book called Culture Wars, The Struggle to Define

00:11:17.850 --> 00:11:20.370
America. And this book hits the intellectual

00:11:20.370 --> 00:11:23.529
scene like a bomb because he finally gave a name

00:11:23.529 --> 00:11:25.370
to what everyone was feeling. What was his big

00:11:25.370 --> 00:11:27.289
insight? Because he wasn't just saying people

00:11:27.289 --> 00:11:29.690
disagree. He was saying something fundamental

00:11:29.690 --> 00:11:32.230
had changed in the American landscape. Right.

00:11:32.309 --> 00:11:35.129
His thesis was that the old lines of division

00:11:35.129 --> 00:11:37.960
in America were dissolving. For most of history,

00:11:38.100 --> 00:11:40.340
the divide was denominational Protestant versus

00:11:40.340 --> 00:11:43.600
Catholic versus Jew. Or it was economic labor

00:11:43.600 --> 00:11:46.799
versus capital. Hunter said, no, the new divide

00:11:46.799 --> 00:11:49.679
is ideological. He called it progressivism versus

00:11:49.679 --> 00:11:53.139
orthodoxy. OK, break those down. What does he

00:11:53.139 --> 00:11:56.220
mean by orthodoxy in this context? Orthodoxy,

00:11:56.220 --> 00:11:59.139
in Hunter's definition, is the belief that moral

00:11:59.139 --> 00:12:02.450
truth is external, transcendent. and unchangeable

00:12:02.450 --> 00:12:05.830
fixed it is fixed it comes from god or scripture

00:12:05.830 --> 00:12:09.009
or natural law you don't get to vote on it It

00:12:09.009 --> 00:12:11.809
was true in 1890, and it is true in 1990. And

00:12:11.809 --> 00:12:14.070
progressivism. Progressivism is the belief that

00:12:14.070 --> 00:12:16.750
moral truth is an ongoing process. It evolves.

00:12:16.950 --> 00:12:19.429
We discover it through reason, science, and social

00:12:19.429 --> 00:12:22.269
change. It's adaptable. It's adaptable. As society

00:12:22.269 --> 00:12:24.909
learns more, our morals should shift. And his

00:12:24.909 --> 00:12:27.149
key observation, which I found really fascinating,

00:12:27.429 --> 00:12:29.769
was about who ends up sharing a foxhole in this

00:12:29.769 --> 00:12:32.470
new war. Yes, this is the aha moment of the whole

00:12:32.470 --> 00:12:34.450
book. Right. He pointed out that an Orthodox

00:12:34.450 --> 00:12:37.779
Jew An Orthodox Catholic and an Evangelical Protestant

00:12:37.779 --> 00:12:40.059
suddenly found that they had more in common with

00:12:40.059 --> 00:12:42.019
each other than they did with the progressive

00:12:42.019 --> 00:12:44.419
members of their own faiths. That's the realignment.

00:12:44.480 --> 00:12:47.580
The Orthodox Jew and the Evangelical agree on

00:12:47.580 --> 00:12:49.960
the nature of truth, even if their theology differs

00:12:49.960 --> 00:12:52.820
on the details. Exactly. They both agree that

00:12:52.820 --> 00:12:55.940
there is a book, and the book says X. Meanwhile,

00:12:56.279 --> 00:12:59.139
the Reformed Jew and the liberal Protestant agree

00:12:59.139 --> 00:13:01.259
that the book is a metaphor, and we need to...

00:13:01.450 --> 00:13:03.649
Update our views. And because they disagree on

00:13:03.649 --> 00:13:05.830
the nature of reality, they clash on everything

00:13:05.830 --> 00:13:09.289
else. Everything. Abortion, gun politics, separation

00:13:09.289 --> 00:13:13.649
of church and state, privacy, drug use, homosexuality,

00:13:13.690 --> 00:13:16.409
censorship. Hunter argued these aren't separate

00:13:16.409 --> 00:13:19.490
arguments. They are battles in a single war over

00:13:19.490 --> 00:13:22.659
who gets to define reality. Is reality fixed

00:13:22.659 --> 00:13:25.340
by God or defined by us? Now, there's another

00:13:25.340 --> 00:13:27.759
theory in the stack about why this exploded in

00:13:27.759 --> 00:13:30.200
the early 90s specifically. And it's a psychological

00:13:30.200 --> 00:13:33.379
one involving the Cold War. This is from historian

00:13:33.379 --> 00:13:36.179
Kristen Kobes -Demez. This is one of my favorite

00:13:36.179 --> 00:13:38.240
insights in the research because it explains

00:13:38.240 --> 00:13:40.940
the timing. It's the vacuum theory. Tell us about

00:13:40.940 --> 00:13:44.740
the vacuum. So for 40 years. From the late 40s

00:13:44.740 --> 00:13:48.299
to 1989, American conservatives, and specifically

00:13:48.299 --> 00:13:51.340
evangelicals, had a clear, terrifying enemy,

00:13:51.539 --> 00:13:55.139
the Soviet Union. Godless communism. Right. It

00:13:55.139 --> 00:13:57.360
was an existential threat. It could end the world.

00:13:57.480 --> 00:13:59.519
It was easy to rally the troops. We have to be

00:13:59.519 --> 00:14:02.500
strong to fight the Reds. Very easy. And Dumez

00:14:02.500 --> 00:14:05.120
argues that they constructed a specific identity

00:14:05.120 --> 00:14:07.740
around that. They championed strict masculine

00:14:07.740 --> 00:14:10.360
gender roles and the traditional nuclear family,

00:14:10.460 --> 00:14:12.480
not just because the Bible said so, but because

00:14:12.480 --> 00:14:14.720
they viewed it as a defense strategy. A strong

00:14:14.720 --> 00:14:17.480
father protects the nation from communism. Softness

00:14:17.480 --> 00:14:19.899
equals death. The family unit was the bunker.

00:14:20.059 --> 00:14:23.460
But then... 1991 comes along. The Berlin Wall

00:14:23.460 --> 00:14:26.600
is down. The Soviet Union collapses. We won.

00:14:26.899 --> 00:14:29.519
We won. But for a movement built on fighting

00:14:29.519 --> 00:14:32.139
an existential threat, victory is a catastrophe.

00:14:32.379 --> 00:14:34.700
Right. If the dragon is dead, what does the dragon

00:14:34.700 --> 00:14:37.980
slayer do? The external threat vanished. The

00:14:37.980 --> 00:14:40.100
defining antagonist that held the coalition together

00:14:40.100 --> 00:14:43.039
was gone. So they needed a new dragon. Exactly.

00:14:43.159 --> 00:14:45.639
Dumez argues that the leadership transferred

00:14:45.639 --> 00:14:48.259
that threat perception. They took all that fear,

00:14:48.419 --> 00:14:51.080
all that organizational energy and that militant

00:14:51.080 --> 00:14:53.460
mindset, and they turned it inward. The call

00:14:53.460 --> 00:14:56.460
is coming from inside the house. Literally. The

00:14:56.460 --> 00:14:59.059
new threat wasn't nuclear missiles. It was feminism.

00:14:59.279 --> 00:15:02.700
It was gay rights. It was secular humanism. They

00:15:02.700 --> 00:15:05.440
framed these domestic changes as just as dangerous

00:15:05.440 --> 00:15:08.159
to the nation's survival as the Soviets had been.

00:15:08.440 --> 00:15:11.100
Wow. They argued that moral rot would destroy

00:15:11.100 --> 00:15:14.259
America just as surely as a nuclear bomb. And

00:15:14.259 --> 00:15:16.480
that sets the stage perfectly for the declaration

00:15:16.480 --> 00:15:20.700
of war. 1992. The 1992 Republican National Convention

00:15:20.700 --> 00:15:23.379
in Houston. I looked up the video of this speech.

00:15:23.519 --> 00:15:25.879
Pat Buchanan. It is intense. It's legendary.

00:15:26.220 --> 00:15:27.919
It doesn't look like a modern political speech.

00:15:28.059 --> 00:15:30.120
It looks like a sermon from a pulpit. Remember.

00:15:30.720 --> 00:15:32.720
Buchanan had run against the sitting president,

00:15:32.940 --> 00:15:35.720
George H .W. Bush, in the primary. He represented

00:15:35.720 --> 00:15:38.379
the insurgent, paleo -conservative wing. Right.

00:15:38.559 --> 00:15:41.600
He lost. But he got a primetime speaking slot

00:15:41.600 --> 00:15:44.320
to unite the party. He did not give a let's all

00:15:44.320 --> 00:15:48.159
get along speech. No, he threw a grenade. He

00:15:48.159 --> 00:15:50.940
said, and I'm quoting here, there is a religious

00:15:50.940 --> 00:15:54.039
war going on in our country for the soul of America.

00:15:54.960 --> 00:15:58.259
It is a cultural war as critical to the kind

00:15:58.259 --> 00:16:01.019
of nation we will one day be, as was the Cold

00:16:01.019 --> 00:16:03.659
War itself. There it is. He explicitly links

00:16:03.659 --> 00:16:06.500
it to the Cold War. He's telling the base the

00:16:06.500 --> 00:16:09.279
war isn't over. The battlefield just changed.

00:16:09.419 --> 00:16:12.580
And he listed the targets. Environmentalists,

00:16:12.659 --> 00:16:15.759
feminists, abortion, homosexual rights. He basically

00:16:15.759 --> 00:16:18.080
said, if you aren't with us, you are against

00:16:18.080 --> 00:16:21.379
America. It was a watershed moment. Strategically,

00:16:21.379 --> 00:16:23.700
it's debated. Many political scientists think

00:16:23.700 --> 00:16:26.059
it actually hurt George H .W. Bush in the short

00:16:26.059 --> 00:16:28.620
term. How so? It made the party look angry and

00:16:28.620 --> 00:16:31.159
exclusionary, and moderate suburban women drifted

00:16:31.159 --> 00:16:33.139
toward Bill Clinton. But in the long term? In

00:16:33.139 --> 00:16:35.759
the long term, it worked. It energized the base.

00:16:35.980 --> 00:16:38.340
It proved that culture war rhetoric motivates

00:16:38.340 --> 00:16:40.700
the core voters. It gets people to the polls.

00:16:41.000 --> 00:16:43.799
Two years later, in 1994, the Republicans took

00:16:43.799 --> 00:16:45.600
control of Congress for the first time in 40

00:16:45.600 --> 00:16:48.320
years. The Republican Revolution. Driven largely

00:16:48.320 --> 00:16:51.080
by this cultural angst. And one of the specific

00:16:51.080 --> 00:16:53.940
battles in that 94 era was the history wars,

00:16:54.179 --> 00:16:57.620
which, again, reading the notes, I felt like

00:16:57.620 --> 00:16:59.659
I was reading a newspaper from today. The debate

00:16:59.659 --> 00:17:01.980
over the national history standards. Right. You

00:17:01.980 --> 00:17:05.220
had Dick Cheney's wife attacking these proposed

00:17:05.220 --> 00:17:07.779
education standards. She said they were too depressing.

00:17:07.960 --> 00:17:10.819
Right. Too much about slavery, the KKK, the Great

00:17:10.819 --> 00:17:13.539
Depression. She wanted celebratory history. And

00:17:13.539 --> 00:17:15.519
the other side wanted critical history. It's

00:17:15.519 --> 00:17:18.000
the exact same script. It is. The question was.

00:17:18.460 --> 00:17:20.900
Should history class be about building patriotism

00:17:20.900 --> 00:17:24.180
and myths? Or should it be an honest accounting

00:17:24.180 --> 00:17:27.680
of failures? It is the exact same debate we are

00:17:27.680 --> 00:17:30.519
having today about critical race theory or the

00:17:30.519 --> 00:17:33.339
1619 Project. The script hasn't changed in 30

00:17:33.339 --> 00:17:35.799
years. Only the acronyms have. It really does

00:17:35.799 --> 00:17:38.339
feel like we are stuck in a lute. We are. Because

00:17:38.339 --> 00:17:41.119
the underlying value clash imposing one view

00:17:41.119 --> 00:17:43.420
of the nation over the other hasn't been resolved.

00:17:43.740 --> 00:17:45.539
OK, so that's the history. We know where it came

00:17:45.539 --> 00:17:47.099
from. But now I want to get to the part of the

00:17:47.099 --> 00:17:49.519
outline that challenges the whole premise. Segment

00:17:49.519 --> 00:17:52.819
four. Is this war even real? This is where we

00:17:52.819 --> 00:17:55.180
have to put on our skepticism hats. Because there

00:17:55.180 --> 00:17:57.220
is a school of thought that says we normal people

00:17:57.220 --> 00:18:00.119
actually get along fine. Right. This is the Wolf

00:18:00.119 --> 00:18:03.029
thesis. Political scientist Alan Wolf. wrote

00:18:03.029 --> 00:18:05.490
a book in the late 90s called One Nation After

00:18:05.490 --> 00:18:08.130
All. Okay. He went out and did qualitative interviews

00:18:08.130 --> 00:18:10.630
with middle class Americans in the suburbs, and

00:18:10.630 --> 00:18:12.769
he found that they weren't screaming at each

00:18:12.769 --> 00:18:15.730
other. They were pragmatic. They were moderate.

00:18:15.890 --> 00:18:19.109
They were tolerant. Yes. He argued that the culture

00:18:19.109 --> 00:18:23.119
war was a myth invented by elites. It was politicians

00:18:23.119 --> 00:18:26.359
and cable news hosts screaming for ratings while

00:18:26.359 --> 00:18:28.839
real people just wanted to mow their lawns, raise

00:18:28.839 --> 00:18:30.759
their kids, and get along with their neighbors.

00:18:30.980 --> 00:18:33.420
That sounds nice. Is it still true? That's the

00:18:33.420 --> 00:18:36.440
scary part. The data suggests Wolf was right

00:18:36.440 --> 00:18:40.319
then, but he's wrong now. What changed? The conflict

00:18:40.319 --> 00:18:43.980
trickled down. We have sorted. A meta -analysis

00:18:43.980 --> 00:18:47.380
of data from 1992 to 2012 showed that culture

00:18:47.380 --> 00:18:49.779
war attitudes have become foundational elements

00:18:49.779 --> 00:18:52.190
of people's belief systems. Meaning what? It

00:18:52.190 --> 00:18:54.390
used to be that you picked a political party

00:18:54.390 --> 00:18:57.670
because of your union or your taxes or your family

00:18:57.670 --> 00:19:00.230
tradition. And maybe you disagreed with the party

00:19:00.230 --> 00:19:03.170
on abortion or guns, but you stayed. Sure. Now

00:19:03.170 --> 00:19:04.970
it's the opposite. If you have a strong view

00:19:04.970 --> 00:19:07.509
on guns or abortion, you pick your party based

00:19:07.509 --> 00:19:10.170
on that. You even pick your church based on your

00:19:10.170 --> 00:19:12.650
politics. So we are stacking our identities.

00:19:12.769 --> 00:19:15.500
All the flags are the same color. Yes. And that

00:19:15.500 --> 00:19:17.500
means we don't just disagree with the other side.

00:19:17.640 --> 00:19:19.640
We don't know them. We don't live near them.

00:19:19.720 --> 00:19:21.859
We don't worship with them. We have physically

00:19:21.859 --> 00:19:24.279
and socially sorted ourselves into two different

00:19:24.279 --> 00:19:26.599
countries. But there's still this element of

00:19:26.599 --> 00:19:30.039
fabrication, the idea that someone wants us to

00:19:30.039 --> 00:19:32.440
be fighting. E .J. Dionne has this great quote.

00:19:32.500 --> 00:19:35.119
He said, the division is between those who want

00:19:35.119 --> 00:19:37.819
to have a culture war and those who don't. Who

00:19:37.819 --> 00:19:40.240
wants a culture war? Who benefits from us being

00:19:40.240 --> 00:19:43.230
angry? People who need to mobilize a base but

00:19:43.230 --> 00:19:46.609
don't have popular economic policies or organizations

00:19:46.609 --> 00:19:50.430
that need to raise money. Sociologist Scott Meltzer

00:19:50.430 --> 00:19:54.069
did a fascinating deep dive on the NRA, the National

00:19:54.069 --> 00:19:56.599
Rifle Association. I thought the NRA was just

00:19:56.599 --> 00:19:59.099
about gun safety originally. It was. For a long

00:19:59.099 --> 00:20:01.740
time, it was a sportsman's club. Hunting, marksmanship,

00:20:01.900 --> 00:20:04.940
safety, conservation. But Meltzer argues they

00:20:04.940 --> 00:20:07.440
intentionally pivoted to a culture war footing

00:20:07.440 --> 00:20:11.200
in the late 70s. How? They started framing gun

00:20:11.200 --> 00:20:14.720
ownership not as a hobby, but as a proxy for

00:20:14.720 --> 00:20:18.200
freedom, for masculinity, and for real America.

00:20:18.480 --> 00:20:21.519
They're coming for your guns. Exactly. They created

00:20:21.519 --> 00:20:25.019
a narrative of victimization. Elites in Washington

00:20:25.019 --> 00:20:27.680
want to take your heritage away. This creates

00:20:27.680 --> 00:20:30.480
a much tighter bond than I like shooting targets.

00:20:30.700 --> 00:20:32.880
Right. It creates an in -group and an out -group.

00:20:33.019 --> 00:20:35.019
And once you have an out -group, you can mobilize

00:20:35.019 --> 00:20:37.359
people and raise money. Fear pays better than

00:20:37.359 --> 00:20:39.400
hobbies. Much better. The notes also mention

00:20:39.400 --> 00:20:41.480
focus on the family doing something similar with

00:20:41.480 --> 00:20:44.619
the media. Yes. Susan B. Ridgely writes about

00:20:44.619 --> 00:20:47.200
how Focus on the Family realized that if their

00:20:47.200 --> 00:20:50.140
followers watched mainstream news, CBS, NBC,

00:20:50.480 --> 00:20:52.759
they might hear perspectives that soften their

00:20:52.759 --> 00:20:56.079
views or normalized liberal ideas. So they built

00:20:56.079 --> 00:20:59.500
an alternative news ecosystem. Radio shows, magazines,

00:20:59.819 --> 00:21:03.160
yes. They told their followers, the mainstream

00:21:03.160 --> 00:21:05.859
media is lying to you. We are the only source

00:21:05.859 --> 00:21:08.599
of truth. They depicted the traditional family

00:21:08.599 --> 00:21:12.079
as being under constant siege. That is the precursor

00:21:12.079 --> 00:21:14.140
to the social media bubbles we live in today.

00:21:14.319 --> 00:21:17.180
It's the direct ancestor. They bifurcated reality.

00:21:17.539 --> 00:21:20.339
You create a closed loop where your followers

00:21:20.339 --> 00:21:22.960
only hear what you want them to hear. Now, this

00:21:22.960 --> 00:21:24.960
leads to a theory that might upset some people,

00:21:25.059 --> 00:21:28.480
but it's in the data, the asymmetry thesis. This

00:21:28.480 --> 00:21:30.579
is from political scientists Grossman and Hopkins.

00:21:31.200 --> 00:21:33.259
it's essential for understanding why the two

00:21:33.259 --> 00:21:35.319
parties talk past each other what's the theory

00:21:35.319 --> 00:21:37.740
they argue that the two parties are not mirror

00:21:37.740 --> 00:21:39.900
images they are structurally different beasts

00:21:39.900 --> 00:21:42.920
the republican party they argue functions as

00:21:42.920 --> 00:21:45.279
an ideological movement meaning meaning it is

00:21:45.279 --> 00:21:47.700
organized around a core set of conservative principles

00:21:47.700 --> 00:21:51.400
small government Tradition, liberty. It's easier

00:21:51.400 --> 00:21:53.720
to unify an ideological movement around abstract

00:21:53.720 --> 00:21:57.519
culture war ideas like freedom or the flag. The

00:21:57.519 --> 00:22:00.200
messaging is top down and cohesive. And the Democrats.

00:22:00.400 --> 00:22:02.960
The Democratic Party functions as a coalition

00:22:02.960 --> 00:22:06.160
of social groups. You have labor unions. You

00:22:06.160 --> 00:22:08.619
have environmentalists. You have black voters.

00:22:08.900 --> 00:22:13.059
You have LGBTQ activists. You have urban professionals.

00:22:13.339 --> 00:22:16.579
It's a big tent. A very big, messy tent. And

00:22:16.579 --> 00:22:18.960
these groups often don't agree with each other.

00:22:19.240 --> 00:22:21.799
A union pipe fitter might not agree with an environmental

00:22:21.799 --> 00:22:24.700
activist. A conservative black churchgoer might

00:22:24.700 --> 00:22:27.079
not agree with an LGBTQ activist. It's harder

00:22:27.079 --> 00:22:29.079
to get everyone on the same page. It is much

00:22:29.079 --> 00:22:31.579
harder for Democrats to wage a coherent culture

00:22:31.579 --> 00:22:34.839
war because they are trying to herd cats. Republicans

00:22:34.839 --> 00:22:37.859
are marching in formation. So Republicans are

00:22:37.859 --> 00:22:40.500
structurally better equipped to fight these battles.

00:22:40.660 --> 00:22:42.819
Correct. Which is why they often initiate them.

00:22:42.880 --> 00:22:45.140
They have the machinery to keep the message disciplined.

00:22:45.380 --> 00:22:48.180
Let's move into the modern era, the digital age.

00:22:48.650 --> 00:22:50.950
Segment five, how did the Internet change the

00:22:50.950 --> 00:22:53.329
machinery? Well, if the 90s was the declaration

00:22:53.329 --> 00:22:56.089
of war, the Internet was the distribution of

00:22:56.089 --> 00:22:58.130
weapons to everyone. We have to talk about the

00:22:58.130 --> 00:23:00.349
Great Awakening. This is Jonathan Haidt's term.

00:23:00.589 --> 00:23:04.210
Around 2012, we see a massive spike in terms

00:23:04.210 --> 00:23:07.009
like privilege, microaggression, and oppression

00:23:07.009 --> 00:23:10.569
in media usage. Right. This coincided with the

00:23:10.569 --> 00:23:13.390
rise of social media. Young progressives started

00:23:13.390 --> 00:23:15.549
using these platforms to call out injustice.

00:23:16.130 --> 00:23:18.740
Cancel culture. Depending on who you ask, yes.

00:23:18.880 --> 00:23:21.640
It was a new form of activism. And it produced

00:23:21.640 --> 00:23:24.539
a reaction. The own the libs phenomenon. This

00:23:24.539 --> 00:23:26.759
is crucial. Political analyst Nicole Hemmer points

00:23:26.759 --> 00:23:29.420
out that owning the libs became a substitute

00:23:29.420 --> 00:23:32.650
for actual ideology. How so? During the Cold

00:23:32.650 --> 00:23:35.210
War, conservatives had cohesive policy platforms

00:23:35.210 --> 00:23:38.650
about taxes or foreign policy. Today, for many

00:23:38.650 --> 00:23:41.309
online, the platform is the anger of the opponent.

00:23:41.509 --> 00:23:43.390
If the liberals are mad, I must be doing something

00:23:43.390 --> 00:23:46.430
right. Exactly. Anger of the other side is the

00:23:46.430 --> 00:23:48.789
victory condition. It's effective polarization.

00:23:49.029 --> 00:23:52.029
It's based on feelings, not policy. I vote for

00:23:52.029 --> 00:23:54.069
the guy who makes the people I hate scream. And

00:23:54.069 --> 00:23:56.329
pop culture became the battlefield. We have to

00:23:56.329 --> 00:24:00.259
talk about Gamergate. 2014 is a year that lives

00:24:00.259 --> 00:24:02.680
in infamy for Internet historians. I remember

00:24:02.680 --> 00:24:04.920
it happening, and I remember being so confused.

00:24:05.160 --> 00:24:10.420
It was about video game journalism ethics. Ostensibly.

00:24:10.680 --> 00:24:13.359
That was the cover story. Yeah. But really, it

00:24:13.359 --> 00:24:15.400
was a test run for the modern political landscape.

00:24:15.480 --> 00:24:18.319
It was a backlash by a group of mostly young,

00:24:18.500 --> 00:24:22.640
white, male gamers against what they saw as the

00:24:22.640 --> 00:24:24.819
intrusion of feminist and progressive values

00:24:24.819 --> 00:24:27.920
into their hobby. Keep politics out of my games.

00:24:28.259 --> 00:24:31.099
Right. But the reaction was incredibly toxic.

00:24:32.039 --> 00:24:34.839
Harassment, doxing, death threats against female

00:24:34.839 --> 00:24:37.480
developers and critics. It was a mob. And this

00:24:37.480 --> 00:24:39.359
is where Steve Bannon enters the chat. Steve

00:24:39.359 --> 00:24:41.220
Bannon, who was running Breitbart News at the

00:24:41.220 --> 00:24:43.099
time and would go on to run Donald Trump's campaign,

00:24:43.319 --> 00:24:45.980
looked at Gamergate. And he didn't see a bunch

00:24:45.980 --> 00:24:48.079
of angry kids. He saw a gold mine. He saw an

00:24:48.079 --> 00:24:50.500
army. He literally said, you can come in through

00:24:50.500 --> 00:24:52.859
Gamergate and then get turned on to politics

00:24:52.859 --> 00:24:55.680
and Trump. He realized that these young men felt

00:24:55.680 --> 00:24:57.460
displaced. They felt like their culture was being

00:24:57.460 --> 00:24:59.700
taken away. So he could harness that grievance.

00:24:59.819 --> 00:25:02.039
And weaponize it politically. It's terrifyingly

00:25:02.039 --> 00:25:04.240
brilliant. You take people's passions, their

00:25:04.240 --> 00:25:06.559
movies, their games, their Star Wars, and you

00:25:06.559 --> 00:25:09.059
turn that passion into political rage. And because

00:25:09.059 --> 00:25:11.000
people care more about their hobbies than they

00:25:11.000 --> 00:25:14.339
do about the marginal tax rate. It works. Pop

00:25:14.339 --> 00:25:17.180
culture is the last front. That's why we fight

00:25:17.180 --> 00:25:19.160
about the Little Mermaid or Barbie now. It's

00:25:19.160 --> 00:25:21.900
all part of the war. OK, we've been very U .S.

00:25:21.900 --> 00:25:24.980
centric so far, but as we promised in the intro,

00:25:25.220 --> 00:25:27.980
this is a global disease. Let's look at the global

00:25:27.980 --> 00:25:30.460
fronts. Segment six. Let's start with Australia

00:25:30.460 --> 00:25:33.900
because they have something they explicitly call

00:25:33.900 --> 00:25:36.940
the history wars. I found this fascinating. It

00:25:36.940 --> 00:25:39.140
was a battle between two prime ministers. Yes.

00:25:39.480 --> 00:25:42.740
In the 90s and early 2000s. Paul Keating from

00:25:42.740 --> 00:25:45.440
the Labor Party versus John Howard from the Liberal

00:25:45.440 --> 00:25:48.180
National Coalition. And the battlefield was the

00:25:48.180 --> 00:25:50.099
country's origin story. What was the disagreement?

00:25:50.420 --> 00:25:53.259
Keating wanted to face the dark past. He gave

00:25:53.259 --> 00:25:56.059
the famous Redfern Park speech, admitting that

00:25:56.059 --> 00:25:58.319
white settlers committed murders, stole land,

00:25:58.420 --> 00:26:00.200
and stole children from Aboriginal families.

00:26:00.380 --> 00:26:03.240
He wanted a clear -eyed view of history. Okay.

00:26:03.299 --> 00:26:06.400
And Howard? John Howard pushed back hard. He

00:26:06.400 --> 00:26:10.019
coined the term Black Armband History. He said,

00:26:10.329 --> 00:26:12.410
I don't want Australians wearing a black armband

00:26:12.410 --> 00:26:14.549
of mourning forever. We should be proud of our

00:26:14.549 --> 00:26:17.750
achievements. And he refused to apologize. He

00:26:17.750 --> 00:26:20.269
refused to issue an official apology to the stolen

00:26:20.269 --> 00:26:22.910
generations. He used a phrase that we hear in

00:26:22.910 --> 00:26:25.450
the U .S. all the time now regarding reparations.

00:26:26.829 --> 00:26:29.029
Intergenerational guilt. Right. I didn't do it.

00:26:29.470 --> 00:26:32.069
He argued that current Australians shouldn't

00:26:32.069 --> 00:26:34.029
feel guilty for the sins of their ancestors.

00:26:34.529 --> 00:26:37.569
And this war is still hot in Australia. Extremely.

00:26:37.950 --> 00:26:42.369
Just recently, in 2023, they had the voice referendum,

00:26:42.609 --> 00:26:45.650
a vote to give indigenous people a constitutional

00:26:45.650 --> 00:26:49.009
voice in parliament. It failed. Wow. And the

00:26:49.009 --> 00:26:51.609
rhetoric around it was pure culture war. We're

00:26:51.609 --> 00:26:53.450
also seeing a backlash against welcome to country

00:26:53.450 --> 00:26:55.869
ceremonies, which are like land acknowledgments.

00:26:55.970 --> 00:26:58.130
And in Australia, climate change is part of this

00:26:58.130 --> 00:27:00.890
too, right? Oh, hugely. In Australia, accepting

00:27:00.890 --> 00:27:02.869
climate science is seen by the right as a sign

00:27:02.869 --> 00:27:05.500
of being a city elite. It's a badge of identity

00:27:05.500 --> 00:27:08.039
to deny it. It's not about the thermometer. It's

00:27:08.039 --> 00:27:10.519
about whose team you were on. Let's hop to Europe.

00:27:10.599 --> 00:27:12.700
What does the culture war look like there? In

00:27:12.700 --> 00:27:15.660
Europe, it's often about memory laws. Meaning

00:27:15.660 --> 00:27:18.019
the government legislating how you remember history?

00:27:18.440 --> 00:27:21.980
Yes. Look at Poland. The Law and Justice Party.

00:27:22.359 --> 00:27:25.759
P .S. passed laws that effectively criminalized

00:27:25.759 --> 00:27:28.700
the phrase Polish death camps. Right. They wanted

00:27:28.700 --> 00:27:31.119
to ensure the narrative was that Poland was solely

00:27:31.119 --> 00:27:33.980
a victim of Nazi Germany, never a collaborator.

00:27:34.059 --> 00:27:36.319
Even though history is messy and there were collaborators.

00:27:36.440 --> 00:27:39.599
Correct. But the state wants a clean nationalist

00:27:39.599 --> 00:27:42.599
narrative. We were the hero's victims. And we

00:27:42.599 --> 00:27:45.720
see this with statues, too. Statues are flashpoints

00:27:45.720 --> 00:27:48.359
everywhere. In the U .K., you had the statue

00:27:48.359 --> 00:27:51.000
of slave trader Edward Colston thrown into the

00:27:51.000 --> 00:27:54.319
harbor. In Poland, in Ukraine, they are tearing

00:27:54.319 --> 00:27:56.900
down Soviet war memorials. Which is complicated,

00:27:57.140 --> 00:27:59.079
right, because the Soviets drove out the Nazi.

00:27:59.319 --> 00:28:02.119
Exactly. Some older generations see those statues

00:28:02.119 --> 00:28:04.839
as symbols of liberation from Hitler, but younger

00:28:04.839 --> 00:28:07.400
nationalists see them as symbols of Soviet oppression.

00:28:07.680 --> 00:28:10.299
A different kind of occupation. Yes. In Ukraine,

00:28:10.440 --> 00:28:13.660
de -Russification is in full swing renaming streets,

00:28:13.880 --> 00:28:16.240
removing Lenin. It's a war over public space.

00:28:16.460 --> 00:28:18.500
Who gets to stand at the town square? Who owns

00:28:18.500 --> 00:28:21.359
the past owns the future. It's true. Even in

00:28:21.359 --> 00:28:23.759
Vienna recently, they rejected a monument to

00:28:23.759 --> 00:28:27.019
a Polish king, Jan Sobieski, who saved Vienna

00:28:27.019 --> 00:28:31.339
from the Ottomans in 1683. Why? He's a hero in

00:28:31.339 --> 00:28:33.920
Vienna, isn't he? It was. But the city government

00:28:33.920 --> 00:28:35.900
feared that putting up a statue of a Christian

00:28:35.900 --> 00:28:38.799
king fighting the Turks would be used to incite

00:28:38.799 --> 00:28:41.079
Islamophobia and anti -Turkish sentiment today.

00:28:41.240 --> 00:28:43.819
So history is held hostage by current politics.

00:28:43.839 --> 00:28:47.640
Always. Now, the most disturbing global example

00:28:47.640 --> 00:28:50.380
on our stack, I think, is Africa. Because this

00:28:50.380 --> 00:28:52.380
isn't just organic conflict. This looks like

00:28:52.380 --> 00:28:54.920
an export. Political scientist Constance G. Anthony

00:28:54.920 --> 00:28:58.319
calls it neocolonialism. That's a heavy word.

00:28:58.420 --> 00:29:00.740
How does she justify that? She argues that the

00:29:00.740 --> 00:29:03.619
U .S., specifically U .S. conservatives, exported

00:29:03.619 --> 00:29:06.799
their culture war to Africa. Ow. Money and strings

00:29:06.799 --> 00:29:08.779
attached to aid. Under the Bush administration,

00:29:09.140 --> 00:29:12.000
HIV is relief. PEPFAR was often tied to evangelical

00:29:12.000 --> 00:29:14.359
leadership and abstinence -only programs. Okay.

00:29:14.640 --> 00:29:17.180
Then, under Obama, aid was sometimes tied to

00:29:17.180 --> 00:29:20.180
LGBTQ tolerance. So African nations became a

00:29:20.180 --> 00:29:22.700
proxy battlefield for American policy fights.

00:29:23.019 --> 00:29:25.819
Yes. And the result has been intense polarization.

00:29:26.880 --> 00:29:29.299
Zambian scholars argue that American religious

00:29:29.299 --> 00:29:31.599
conservatives, feeling like they were losing

00:29:31.599 --> 00:29:34.140
the battle on gay marriage in the U .S., poured

00:29:34.140 --> 00:29:36.799
resources into Africa to hold the line there.

00:29:37.049 --> 00:29:38.829
So they are fighting the war in Uganda because

00:29:38.829 --> 00:29:41.750
they lost in New York. Essentially. And they

00:29:41.750 --> 00:29:44.750
frame it as resisting a Western gay agenda, which

00:29:44.750 --> 00:29:46.970
is deeply ironic because the anti -gay rhetoric

00:29:46.970 --> 00:29:48.869
is often imported from the Western Christian

00:29:48.869 --> 00:29:51.990
right. It's a hall of mirrors. It is. And now

00:29:51.990 --> 00:29:55.329
we see disinformation flooding West Africa. Kuminon

00:29:55.329 --> 00:29:58.390
theories, anti -vax conspiracies, studies show

00:29:58.390 --> 00:30:00.950
this is being pushed by American, French, and

00:30:00.950 --> 00:30:03.849
pro -Russian actors. So a guy in Nigeria is reading

00:30:03.849 --> 00:30:06.309
QAnon theories that were invented to influence

00:30:06.309 --> 00:30:09.109
a swing voter in Michigan. It's a globalized

00:30:09.109 --> 00:30:11.150
marketplace of outrage. OK, bring it back to

00:30:11.150 --> 00:30:13.890
the present day. Segment seven. What is on the

00:30:13.890 --> 00:30:16.289
laundry list right now? If we look at the map

00:30:16.289 --> 00:30:18.329
today, where are the fires burning? It's a rapid

00:30:18.329 --> 00:30:20.970
fire list. Gender and sexuality are number one.

00:30:21.230 --> 00:30:24.910
Trans rights, drag queens, story hours. The term

00:30:24.910 --> 00:30:27.910
groomer has been weaponized to conflate education

00:30:27.910 --> 00:30:30.589
with abuse. Then education. Critical race theory.

00:30:31.509 --> 00:30:34.849
Book bans or expurgation, as some are calling

00:30:34.849 --> 00:30:37.349
it. The homeschooling movement, which is about

00:30:37.349 --> 00:30:39.769
withdrawing from the corrupt public system. And

00:30:39.769 --> 00:30:42.049
public health. We can't ignore what happened

00:30:42.049 --> 00:30:45.309
during COVID. The mask. The mask became the ultimate

00:30:45.309 --> 00:30:48.009
culture war symbol. Oh, yeah. It ceased to be

00:30:48.009 --> 00:30:50.970
a piece of fabric to stop a virus. It became

00:30:50.970 --> 00:30:53.549
a uniform. If you wore it, you were a liberal

00:30:53.549 --> 00:30:56.220
sheep. If you didn't, you were a selfish conservative.

00:30:56.559 --> 00:30:58.299
I remember the governor of North Dakota, Doug

00:30:58.299 --> 00:31:00.819
Burgum, literally begging people to stop making

00:31:00.819 --> 00:31:03.380
masks a senseless culture war issue. He was almost

00:31:03.380 --> 00:31:06.099
crying. And it didn't work. Because once the

00:31:06.099 --> 00:31:08.359
machine decides something is a symbol, logic

00:31:08.359 --> 00:31:11.059
leaves the room. This feeds into what the sources

00:31:11.059 --> 00:31:14.559
call the feedback loop. Right. A 2023 study showed

00:31:14.559 --> 00:31:16.859
that disinformation actors know we are primed

00:31:16.859 --> 00:31:19.339
to fight. So they intentionally toss in polarizing

00:31:19.339 --> 00:31:23.039
claims, fake stories, exaggerated outrage, because

00:31:23.039 --> 00:31:25.400
they know we will pick them up. We use the lies

00:31:25.400 --> 00:31:28.819
as rhetorical ammunition. Exactly. We parrot

00:31:28.819 --> 00:31:30.720
the disinformation because it helps us win the

00:31:30.720 --> 00:31:33.200
argument. The utility of the lie is more important

00:31:33.200 --> 00:31:36.180
than the truth of the lie. That is grim. It is.

00:31:36.380 --> 00:31:39.299
But recognizing it is the first step. So let's

00:31:39.299 --> 00:31:41.000
try to land this plane. We've been on a journey.

00:31:41.359 --> 00:31:44.220
Bismarck's Prussia, the Roaring Twenties, the

00:31:44.220 --> 00:31:48.160
Cold War vacuum, Gamergate. The global export

00:31:48.160 --> 00:31:51.339
to Africa, it's a massive, sprawling beast. It

00:31:51.339 --> 00:31:54.200
is. But if we synthesize all of this, if we try

00:31:54.200 --> 00:31:56.920
to find the so what, what is the takeaway for

00:31:56.920 --> 00:31:59.640
the listener? For me, the takeaway is that culture

00:31:59.640 --> 00:32:01.980
war is rarely just about the issue on the surface.

00:32:02.180 --> 00:32:05.220
It is a political technology. It is a tool used

00:32:05.220 --> 00:32:08.220
to create in -groups and out -groups. When policy

00:32:08.220 --> 00:32:10.619
differences aren't enough to unite a base or

00:32:10.619 --> 00:32:13.099
when the world gets too complex, you manufacture

00:32:13.099 --> 00:32:15.619
a cultural threat. It's about identity. It's

00:32:15.619 --> 00:32:17.980
about saying, I am this kind of person and that

00:32:17.980 --> 00:32:20.359
person over there is an existential threat to

00:32:20.359 --> 00:32:22.319
my way of life. And in a world of information

00:32:22.319 --> 00:32:25.259
overload, that binary friend versus enemy is

00:32:25.259 --> 00:32:27.519
a very comforting way to organize the world.

00:32:27.930 --> 00:32:30.230
It's simpler than dealing with complex tax codes

00:32:30.230 --> 00:32:32.529
or health care tradeoffs. It feels good to be

00:32:32.529 --> 00:32:35.569
a soldier in a righteous war. So here is the

00:32:35.569 --> 00:32:37.930
provocative final thought for our listeners to

00:32:37.930 --> 00:32:40.509
mull over today. We've established that this

00:32:40.509 --> 00:32:43.369
is a machine. It's driven by elites, amplified

00:32:43.369 --> 00:32:45.849
by algorithms and funded by special interests.

00:32:46.049 --> 00:32:49.250
Right. So if the culture war is a tool used to

00:32:49.250 --> 00:32:53.180
consolidate. power or attention? At what point

00:32:53.180 --> 00:32:55.579
does participating in it stop being a defense

00:32:55.579 --> 00:32:58.339
of your values and start being just a manipulation

00:32:58.339 --> 00:33:01.660
of your identity? That is the question. Are you

00:33:01.660 --> 00:33:04.220
fighting for what you believe in? Or are you

00:33:04.220 --> 00:33:06.240
just a foot soldier in someone else's strategy

00:33:06.240 --> 00:33:08.440
game? Next time you see that outrage bait in

00:33:08.440 --> 00:33:10.500
your feed, maybe pause. Look for the strings.

00:33:10.720 --> 00:33:13.160
Look for the culture cams. Stay skeptical. Thank

00:33:13.160 --> 00:33:15.619
you for listening to The Deep Dive. Stay curious,

00:33:15.660 --> 00:33:18.039
stay critical, and we'll see you next time. Goodbye.
