WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.379
Welcome back to The Deep Dive. We are doing something

00:00:02.379 --> 00:00:06.019
a little different today. Usually when we talk

00:00:06.019 --> 00:00:08.980
about the medieval period, specifically that

00:00:08.980 --> 00:00:11.939
really gritty, dark stretch of the late 14th

00:00:11.939 --> 00:00:14.599
century, we're looking at it through the eyes

00:00:14.599 --> 00:00:18.100
of the guys with the swords, the kings, the knights.

00:00:18.920 --> 00:00:22.059
the military strategist. Standard blood and mud

00:00:22.059 --> 00:00:25.000
narrative. Exactly. It's the Hundred Years' War.

00:00:25.239 --> 00:00:27.239
It's the aftermath of the Black Death. It is,

00:00:27.339 --> 00:00:29.519
by all accounts, a terrible time to be alive

00:00:29.519 --> 00:00:31.739
in France. It's a truly awful time. But today

00:00:31.739 --> 00:00:34.880
we are looking at this exact same period through

00:00:34.880 --> 00:00:37.539
a lens that, well, it feels like it shouldn't

00:00:37.539 --> 00:00:39.380
exist. We are looking at it through the eyes

00:00:39.380 --> 00:00:41.840
of a woman who didn't just survive this chaos,

00:00:41.979 --> 00:00:44.140
but actually shaped the political and intellectual

00:00:44.140 --> 00:00:46.640
landscape of Europe. And she's a complete anomaly.

00:00:46.960 --> 00:00:48.560
I mean, if you look at the sociological data

00:00:48.560 --> 00:00:51.899
of the 1400s, Christine de Pizan is a statistical

00:00:51.899 --> 00:00:54.780
impossibility. A statistical impossibility. I

00:00:54.780 --> 00:00:56.820
love that. Yes. She's the first woman in Europe

00:00:56.820 --> 00:00:59.320
to make a living solely by her pen. We aren't

00:00:59.320 --> 00:01:01.140
talking about a nun writing in a cloister for

00:01:01.140 --> 00:01:04.079
the glory of God. And we aren't talking about

00:01:04.079 --> 00:01:06.379
a queen writing letters. We are talking about

00:01:06.379 --> 00:01:09.739
a working mother, an immigrant, a widow, who

00:01:09.739 --> 00:01:12.480
built what was essentially a freelance publishing

00:01:12.480 --> 00:01:14.870
empire. In the middle of a civil war. In the

00:01:14.870 --> 00:01:17.189
middle of a civil war. It's insane. That is the

00:01:17.189 --> 00:01:19.810
hook for me, the freelancer angle. Because when

00:01:19.810 --> 00:01:22.109
you dig into these sources, the biographies,

00:01:22.109 --> 00:01:24.810
the analysis of her manuscripts, you realize

00:01:24.810 --> 00:01:28.049
she feels incredibly modern. So modern. She's

00:01:28.049 --> 00:01:30.030
dealing with the gig economy. She's dealing with

00:01:30.030 --> 00:01:32.230
mansplaining. She's dealing with the glass ceiling.

00:01:32.609 --> 00:01:34.469
And she's doing it while the king of France is

00:01:34.469 --> 00:01:36.870
going mad and the English are invading. It is,

00:01:36.890 --> 00:01:40.390
at its core, a survival story. We often categorize

00:01:40.390 --> 00:01:44.989
her as a feminist writer. And she certainly was

00:01:44.989 --> 00:01:47.590
that, perhaps the very first. For sure. But before

00:01:47.590 --> 00:01:50.409
she was an ideologue, she was a survivor. She

00:01:50.409 --> 00:01:52.469
used her intellect as a weapon because, well,

00:01:52.569 --> 00:01:54.750
it was the only thing she had left. So our mission

00:01:54.750 --> 00:01:57.730
today is to unpack that weapon. We have a massive

00:01:57.730 --> 00:02:00.510
stack of notes here covering her entire bibliography,

00:02:00.549 --> 00:02:03.469
from her poetry to her military manuals and the

00:02:03.469 --> 00:02:06.230
historical records of her life. It's a lot. It

00:02:06.230 --> 00:02:08.169
is a lot. We're going to figure out how she pulled

00:02:08.169 --> 00:02:10.509
this off, how she managed to tell knights how

00:02:10.509 --> 00:02:14.289
to fight wars, and why in 2024 she was literally

00:02:14.289 --> 00:02:16.810
dipped in gold, rising out of the Seine at the

00:02:16.810 --> 00:02:19.729
Olympic opening ceremony. It is quite the journey.

00:02:19.830 --> 00:02:22.569
And to understand how she ends up as a gold statue,

00:02:22.870 --> 00:02:25.289
you have to understand where she started, because

00:02:25.289 --> 00:02:27.710
she wasn't actually French. Right. She was an

00:02:27.710 --> 00:02:30.330
outsider from day one. Right. Let's get into

00:02:30.330 --> 00:02:32.449
the origin story. She was born in Venice, is

00:02:32.449 --> 00:02:35.689
that correct? Yes. In 1364, born Cristina de

00:02:35.689 --> 00:02:39.069
Pizzano, her father, Tommaso di Benvenuto de

00:02:39.069 --> 00:02:41.530
Pizzano, was, I mean, he was a very big deal

00:02:41.530 --> 00:02:43.870
in Venice. Okay. He was a physician, a counselor

00:02:43.870 --> 00:02:47.150
of the Republic, and crucially, a court astrologer.

00:02:47.229 --> 00:02:49.629
And being an astrologer back then wasn't like

00:02:49.629 --> 00:02:51.969
writing horoscopes for the Sunday paper. This

00:02:51.969 --> 00:02:53.689
was serious science, wasn't it? Oh, absolutely.

00:02:53.889 --> 00:02:55.530
It was intertwined with medicine and governance.

00:02:55.669 --> 00:02:58.289
In the medieval worldview, the microcosm of the

00:02:58.289 --> 00:03:01.219
human body, was directly linked to the macrocosm

00:03:01.219 --> 00:03:03.319
of the stars. So it's all connected. It's all

00:03:03.319 --> 00:03:06.000
connected. Kings relied on astrologers to make

00:03:06.000 --> 00:03:08.659
major political decisions to determine the health

00:03:08.659 --> 00:03:10.819
of the state, even to time their military campaigns.

00:03:11.240 --> 00:03:14.800
And Tommaso, her father, was so good at it that

00:03:14.800 --> 00:03:17.159
he got headhunted. Headhunted by kings. That's

00:03:17.159 --> 00:03:18.960
a good resume builder. He was a bidding war,

00:03:19.120 --> 00:03:20.939
actually. The King of Hungary and King Charles

00:03:20.939 --> 00:03:24.639
V of France both wanted him. And he chose France.

00:03:24.759 --> 00:03:27.879
Camus chose France. So in 1368, when Christine

00:03:27.879 --> 00:03:30.300
was just a toddler, maybe four years old, the

00:03:30.300 --> 00:03:32.919
family packs up and moves to Paris. Talk about

00:03:32.919 --> 00:03:35.680
a career upgrade, but also a massive culture

00:03:35.680 --> 00:03:37.879
shock, I'd imagine. Moving from the Venetian

00:03:37.879 --> 00:03:40.879
Republic to the Kingdom of France. It was a completely

00:03:40.879 --> 00:03:43.819
different world. But this move is crucial for

00:03:43.819 --> 00:03:45.939
understanding Christine. She grows up in the

00:03:45.939 --> 00:03:48.139
royal court of Charles V. And this wasn't just

00:03:48.139 --> 00:03:50.960
any court. No, this was an environment of intense

00:03:50.960 --> 00:03:53.879
intellectualism. Charles wasn't just a warrior

00:03:53.879 --> 00:03:56.159
king. He was known as Charles the Wise for a

00:03:56.159 --> 00:03:59.060
reason. He founded the Royal Library at the Louvre.

00:03:59.259 --> 00:04:01.659
He surrounded himself with translators, philosophers,

00:04:01.879 --> 00:04:04.740
scientists. So she's growing up privileged, surrounded

00:04:04.740 --> 00:04:07.599
by books. But she's still a girl in the 14th

00:04:07.599 --> 00:04:09.659
century. Usually that means learning to sew,

00:04:09.780 --> 00:04:11.620
not learning to read Latin. And this is where

00:04:11.620 --> 00:04:14.939
her father comes in. Tommaso was surprisingly

00:04:14.939 --> 00:04:18.319
progressive for his time. We have records that

00:04:18.319 --> 00:04:20.300
suggest a bit of tension in the household about

00:04:20.300 --> 00:04:23.439
this. Oh, really? Yeah. Christine's mother thought

00:04:23.439 --> 00:04:26.279
she should focus on the distaff duties, you know,

00:04:26.300 --> 00:04:29.579
spinning, weaving, managing a household, the

00:04:29.579 --> 00:04:32.079
traditional female curriculum. The expected path.

00:04:32.339 --> 00:04:35.959
The expected path. But Tommaso, he saw she was

00:04:35.959 --> 00:04:39.379
bright. He saw this spark in her. And he decided

00:04:39.379 --> 00:04:41.079
to give her access to the intellectual life of

00:04:41.079 --> 00:04:43.839
the court. He wanted her to have a real education.

00:04:43.899 --> 00:04:47.399
That specific detail really stands out. The parent

00:04:47.399 --> 00:04:50.350
who breaks the mold. If Thomas hadn't insisted

00:04:50.350 --> 00:04:52.089
on that education, we wouldn't be having this

00:04:52.089 --> 00:04:53.689
conversation. Not at all. She would have just

00:04:53.689 --> 00:04:56.569
been another anonymous medieval wife. Precisely.

00:04:56.970 --> 00:05:00.589
That education was a dormant asset. She didn't

00:05:00.589 --> 00:05:02.490
need it immediately. She was being groomed for

00:05:02.490 --> 00:05:04.889
marriage after all, but it was being banged for

00:05:04.889 --> 00:05:06.550
later. She was reading the classics. She was

00:05:06.550 --> 00:05:08.970
learning Italian and French. She was just absorbing

00:05:08.970 --> 00:05:11.230
the political conversations of the court. So

00:05:11.230 --> 00:05:14.029
she has this idyllic intellectual childhood.

00:05:14.149 --> 00:05:17.240
And then, as was the custom. She gets married.

00:05:17.439 --> 00:05:21.879
Yes. In 1379, she was 15 years old. She marries

00:05:21.879 --> 00:05:24.699
a man named Etienne du Castel. And usually in

00:05:24.699 --> 00:05:26.699
these historical deep dives, this is where we

00:05:26.699 --> 00:05:29.120
hear about the terrible arranged marriage to

00:05:29.120 --> 00:05:32.240
a much older grumpy guy. Yeah. But that wasn't

00:05:32.240 --> 00:05:34.660
the case here, was it? Surprisingly, no. By all

00:05:34.660 --> 00:05:36.800
accounts, it was a happy marriage, a love match

00:05:36.800 --> 00:05:39.639
even. Wow. Etienne was a royal secretary and

00:05:39.639 --> 00:05:42.079
notary, so he was also an educated man. He was

00:05:42.079 --> 00:05:44.540
on the rise at court. Christine writes about

00:05:44.540 --> 00:05:46.779
him later with genuine affection, calling him

00:05:46.779 --> 00:05:49.199
her sweet friend. They had three children together.

00:05:49.379 --> 00:05:51.699
It was good. So at this point, her life seems

00:05:51.699 --> 00:05:54.040
set. She's a damoiselle of the court, comfortable,

00:05:54.279 --> 00:05:57.240
happy, married to a man she actually likes, with

00:05:57.240 --> 00:05:59.819
a father who is the king's right -hand man. It

00:05:59.819 --> 00:06:02.519
was the dream. But as we know, the late Middle

00:06:02.519 --> 00:06:05.000
Ages rarely lets anyone stay comfortable for

00:06:05.000 --> 00:06:08.639
long. No. The 1380s arrive, and the wheel of

00:06:08.639 --> 00:06:12.110
fortune turns downward. Sharply. We call it the

00:06:12.110 --> 00:06:14.110
triple tragedy in the outline. Let's walk through

00:06:14.110 --> 00:06:16.449
this because it's just hit after hit. It really

00:06:16.449 --> 00:06:19.610
is. It starts in 1380 when King Charles V dies,

00:06:19.930 --> 00:06:22.750
her father's patron. Okay, so that's a big deal

00:06:22.750 --> 00:06:25.790
for the family. Huge deal. This is bad for Tommaso

00:06:25.790 --> 00:06:28.009
because he loses his primary protector and his

00:06:28.009 --> 00:06:30.769
source of income. The new king, Charles VI, is

00:06:30.769 --> 00:06:32.949
young and the court dynamics change completely.

00:06:33.370 --> 00:06:36.129
Tommaso loses influence and his salary becomes

00:06:36.129 --> 00:06:38.689
irregular. The money starts drying up. It does.

00:06:39.149 --> 00:06:42.689
Then, in 1388, Tommaso himself dies. So the patriarch

00:06:42.689 --> 00:06:44.870
is gone. And apparently Tommaso was great at

00:06:44.870 --> 00:06:47.350
science but bad at finance. He was terrible with

00:06:47.350 --> 00:06:49.649
money. He lived large while the money was coming

00:06:49.649 --> 00:06:51.569
in, you know, the big intellectual at court.

00:06:51.910 --> 00:06:54.569
But he left very little savings. So suddenly,

00:06:54.670 --> 00:06:57.410
the safety net is fraying. Christine and her

00:06:57.410 --> 00:06:59.870
husband Etienne are now responsible for the whole

00:06:59.870 --> 00:07:02.149
extended family. And then the knockout blow,

00:07:02.290 --> 00:07:06.290
1389. 1389. Etienne de Castel goes on a mission

00:07:06.290 --> 00:07:08.750
to Beauvais with the king. An epidemic breaks

00:07:08.750 --> 00:07:11.329
out. It's likely the plague or similar fever.

00:07:11.490 --> 00:07:13.290
It's always the plague. It's always the plague.

00:07:13.350 --> 00:07:16.230
He contracts it and dies within days. Just gone.

00:07:16.550 --> 00:07:20.730
Gone. Suddenly, at age 25, Christine is a widow.

00:07:21.209 --> 00:07:23.970
But she's not just a widow. She is now the head

00:07:23.970 --> 00:07:26.310
of a household. She has three small children.

00:07:26.629 --> 00:07:29.670
She has her own widowed mother to support. And

00:07:29.670 --> 00:07:31.829
she has a niece living with them. And no financial

00:07:31.829 --> 00:07:34.310
safety net. Nothing. This is where the story

00:07:34.310 --> 00:07:37.209
shifts from privileged court life to legal nightmare.

00:07:37.610 --> 00:07:40.990
I read that she spent years in court just trying

00:07:40.990 --> 00:07:42.829
to get the money her husband was owed. That's

00:07:42.829 --> 00:07:45.529
right. For years, Etienne was a royal secretary,

00:07:45.629 --> 00:07:48.930
which meant the crown owed him back wages. Significant

00:07:48.930 --> 00:07:50.670
amounts of money. So there's money out there

00:07:50.670 --> 00:07:54.160
that's technically hers? Technically. But trying

00:07:54.160 --> 00:07:56.639
to collect that money as a widow was a bureaucratic

00:07:56.639 --> 00:07:59.360
hellscape. She was hit with lawsuits from people

00:07:59.360 --> 00:08:02.240
claiming Etienne owed them money. She talks about

00:08:02.240 --> 00:08:04.220
this in her writings, the sheer humiliation of

00:08:04.220 --> 00:08:06.800
having to navigate this male -dominated legal

00:08:06.800 --> 00:08:09.399
system where nobody took her seriously. There's

00:08:09.399 --> 00:08:12.279
this specific imagery she uses later, describing

00:08:12.279 --> 00:08:15.160
herself waiting in ante rooms, being sneered

00:08:15.160 --> 00:08:17.899
at by clerks, being given the runaround. It sounds

00:08:17.899 --> 00:08:20.699
absolutely exhausting. She calls it a labyrinth.

00:08:20.970 --> 00:08:24.149
She had to learn property law on the fly. She

00:08:24.149 --> 00:08:26.610
was being cheated by asset managers who saw a

00:08:26.610 --> 00:08:29.790
young widow and thought, easy target. She writes

00:08:29.790 --> 00:08:32.730
about having to play the damsel in distress to

00:08:32.730 --> 00:08:35.169
get anyone to listen to her while privately she

00:08:35.169 --> 00:08:37.029
was hardening into steel. She had to become her

00:08:37.029 --> 00:08:39.490
own lawyer. There's a specific detail in the

00:08:39.490 --> 00:08:42.490
records where the way she is addressed in documents

00:08:42.490 --> 00:08:46.409
changes. Yes, it's so telling. In June 1389,

00:08:46.750 --> 00:08:48.990
there's a judgment concerning a lawsuit against

00:08:48.990 --> 00:08:52.070
her by the Archbishop of Sens. In it, she is

00:08:52.070 --> 00:08:54.669
formally called demoiselle and widow of Estienne

00:08:54.669 --> 00:08:57.169
du Castel. So her identity is now defined by

00:08:57.169 --> 00:08:59.730
loss. It marks this stark transition. She is

00:08:59.730 --> 00:09:01.549
no longer defined by her father or her living

00:09:01.549 --> 00:09:04.169
husband. She is a woman alone facing financial

00:09:04.169 --> 00:09:06.210
ruin. And this is the catalyst. This is the moment

00:09:06.210 --> 00:09:08.450
where she decides, I have to do something. She

00:09:08.450 --> 00:09:09.950
didn't start writing because she just had so

00:09:09.950 --> 00:09:12.169
many creative ideas bursting out of her, right?

00:09:12.350 --> 00:09:15.230
She wrote to eat. Exactly. It was a hustle, a

00:09:15.230 --> 00:09:17.629
desperate hustle. She needed income. Yeah. And

00:09:17.629 --> 00:09:20.330
she took stock and realized that the one asset

00:09:20.330 --> 00:09:23.190
she had, thanks to her father and her upbringing,

00:09:23.389 --> 00:09:26.549
was her education. She could write. So let's

00:09:26.549 --> 00:09:28.970
talk about that hustle. Because becoming a professional

00:09:28.970 --> 00:09:31.889
writer in 14th century Paris isn't like uploading

00:09:31.889 --> 00:09:35.169
an e -book to Amazon. Not even close. How did

00:09:35.169 --> 00:09:37.559
the book trade actually work back then? It was

00:09:37.559 --> 00:09:39.700
a very transitional period for books. We were

00:09:39.700 --> 00:09:43.899
moving from the era of continuous rolls to the

00:09:43.899 --> 00:09:46.340
bound codex books as we recognize them today.

00:09:46.480 --> 00:09:49.440
So actual books with pages. Right. And there

00:09:49.440 --> 00:09:51.259
was a rising demand for these books among the

00:09:51.259 --> 00:09:53.480
nobility. They were building private libraries

00:09:53.480 --> 00:09:56.559
as status symbols. But there were no publishers

00:09:56.559 --> 00:09:58.779
in the modern sense. You needed a patron. You

00:09:58.779 --> 00:10:00.980
needed a rich duke to pay you to write the book.

00:10:01.179 --> 00:10:03.340
Precisely. It was a gift economy. You would write

00:10:03.340 --> 00:10:05.279
a book, have it beautifully bound and illustrated,

00:10:05.460 --> 00:10:08.129
and present it to a prince or a duke. In exchange,

00:10:08.529 --> 00:10:10.629
they were expected to give you a gift of money.

00:10:10.850 --> 00:10:14.110
Oh, expected. Expected. It wasn't a salary. It

00:10:14.110 --> 00:10:16.730
was a reward. That sounds incredibly unstable.

00:10:17.129 --> 00:10:19.970
What if the duke didn't like it or just forgot

00:10:19.970 --> 00:10:23.570
to pay you? That happened constantly. And Christine

00:10:23.570 --> 00:10:26.509
was incredibly savvy about this. She didn't just

00:10:26.509 --> 00:10:29.250
attach herself to one person. She realized the

00:10:29.250 --> 00:10:32.289
political landscape was volatile, so she maneuvered

00:10:32.289 --> 00:10:34.470
between different factions. So she didn't put

00:10:34.470 --> 00:10:37.259
all her eggs in one basket. No way. She wrote

00:10:37.259 --> 00:10:38.899
for the Duke of Orleans. She wrote for the Duke

00:10:38.899 --> 00:10:40.679
of Burgundy. She wrote for the Duke of Barrie.

00:10:40.700 --> 00:10:43.080
She diversified her client base. She was a freelancer.

00:10:43.340 --> 00:10:46.039
She was the ultimate freelancer. And she knew

00:10:46.039 --> 00:10:49.580
how to market herself. This part is genius. She

00:10:49.580 --> 00:10:51.740
would take a work she had written, write a new

00:10:51.740 --> 00:10:54.559
prologue dedicating it to a specific duke, and

00:10:54.559 --> 00:10:57.620
present it to him as a gift. And then? Then she

00:10:57.620 --> 00:11:00.080
might take the very same text, write a different

00:11:00.080 --> 00:11:02.639
prologue for a different noble, and present it

00:11:02.639 --> 00:11:04.799
to them. That is brilliant. Here you go, Duke

00:11:04.799 --> 00:11:06.950
Philip. I wrote this just for you. Just, you

00:11:06.950 --> 00:11:08.870
know, ignore the fact that I gave a copy to Duke

00:11:08.870 --> 00:11:11.250
Louis last week. Essentially, yes. It was about

00:11:11.250 --> 00:11:13.870
maximizing her intellectual property. And she

00:11:13.870 --> 00:11:17.389
started with what was popular. In 1393, she began

00:11:17.389 --> 00:11:19.870
writing love ballads. OK, so she starts with

00:11:19.870 --> 00:11:22.529
the pop hits. Exactly. These are trendy. They

00:11:22.529 --> 00:11:24.230
were emotional. They caught the attention of

00:11:24.230 --> 00:11:27.389
the court. Her collection, St. Balad's, was a

00:11:27.389 --> 00:11:30.389
hit. It was about a grieving widow, which was

00:11:30.389 --> 00:11:33.049
obviously autobiographical, but it's stylized

00:11:33.049 --> 00:11:35.250
enough to be entertaining. So she gets her foot

00:11:35.250 --> 00:11:37.590
in the door with the romance stuff, but she doesn't

00:11:37.590 --> 00:11:40.809
stay there. She quickly pivots to much more serious

00:11:40.809 --> 00:11:45.129
subjects. Philosophy, history, politics. She

00:11:45.129 --> 00:11:48.070
realized that to be taken seriously and to secure

00:11:48.070 --> 00:11:50.490
the bigger payouts, she needed to write serious

00:11:50.490 --> 00:11:53.269
books. One of the works that really stands out

00:11:53.269 --> 00:11:55.649
from this early period is The Letter of Othea

00:11:55.649 --> 00:12:00.960
to Hector. Yes, this came out around 1400. And

00:12:00.960 --> 00:12:03.139
it's a fascinating text. It's a mix of mythology

00:12:03.139 --> 00:12:06.139
and statecraft. What's the premise? The premise

00:12:06.139 --> 00:12:09.120
is that Othea, the goddess of wisdom, is tutoring

00:12:09.120 --> 00:12:11.960
the Trojan hero, Hector. Okay, I see what she's

00:12:11.960 --> 00:12:13.720
doing there. It's a Trojan horse, unintended.

00:12:14.100 --> 00:12:15.820
On the surface, it's a collection of mythological

00:12:15.820 --> 00:12:18.279
stories, very entertaining, very visual. But

00:12:18.279 --> 00:12:21.179
deeply, it's a treatise on how to be a good leader.

00:12:21.620 --> 00:12:24.679
And the gender dynamics are key here. She's using

00:12:24.679 --> 00:12:27.919
a female goddess to teach a male hero how to

00:12:27.919 --> 00:12:31.259
be a leader. Exactly. And the subtext is clear.

00:12:31.980 --> 00:12:35.500
Christine is Othea. She is the woman with the

00:12:35.500 --> 00:12:38.460
wisdom, teaching the men of the court how to

00:12:38.460 --> 00:12:42.519
govern. And she didn't just write the text. She

00:12:42.519 --> 00:12:44.879
managed the entire production. Let's touch on

00:12:44.879 --> 00:12:46.679
that production aspect, because she wasn't just

00:12:46.679 --> 00:12:48.480
sitting alone in a room writing. She was running

00:12:48.480 --> 00:12:51.440
a business. She was. By this point, she had scribes

00:12:51.440 --> 00:12:54.720
working for her to copy her texts. She hired

00:12:54.720 --> 00:12:57.100
illuminators. the artists who painted the gold

00:12:57.100 --> 00:12:59.100
leaf in the miniatures in the margins. So she's

00:12:59.100 --> 00:13:02.019
like a general contractor for luxury goods. That's

00:13:02.019 --> 00:13:03.879
a perfect way to put it. We know she employed

00:13:03.879 --> 00:13:06.480
a specific illuminator who art historians now

00:13:06.480 --> 00:13:09.919
call the master of the apetra dosea. Wow. She

00:13:09.919 --> 00:13:12.139
was incredibly particular about how the books

00:13:12.139 --> 00:13:14.580
looked because she knew the visual appeal was

00:13:14.580 --> 00:13:16.919
what sold them to the Dukes. That is such a boss

00:13:16.919 --> 00:13:19.419
move. She's running a production house. But while

00:13:19.419 --> 00:13:21.480
she's building this business, she also starts

00:13:21.480 --> 00:13:23.299
getting involved in some pretty heated literary

00:13:23.299 --> 00:13:26.809
beefs. We have to talk about the Romance of the

00:13:26.809 --> 00:13:30.029
Rose controversy. Oh, yes. This is a defining

00:13:30.029 --> 00:13:33.549
moment for her. So, for context, the Romance

00:13:33.549 --> 00:13:35.830
of the Rose was the blockbuster of the Middle

00:13:35.830 --> 00:13:38.549
Ages. Like the Harry Potter of its day. Bigger,

00:13:38.549 --> 00:13:41.590
probably. It was started by Guillaume Deloris

00:13:41.590 --> 00:13:44.690
and finished by Jean Domen. It had been around

00:13:44.690 --> 00:13:46.980
for over a century. Everyone read it. But it

00:13:46.980 --> 00:13:49.340
wasn't exactly respectful toward women, was it?

00:13:49.399 --> 00:13:51.139
Not at all. Especially the second half written

00:13:51.139 --> 00:13:54.240
by Jean de Moon. It was a satire, yes. But it

00:13:54.240 --> 00:13:56.799
depicted women as seducers, as manipulative,

00:13:56.860 --> 00:13:59.840
as objects. It was deeply, deeply misogynistic.

00:13:59.840 --> 00:14:01.620
It used coarse language. And the establishment

00:14:01.620 --> 00:14:03.940
loved it. The intellectual elite defended it.

00:14:03.960 --> 00:14:06.440
It was a classic. It was an allegory. Until Christine.

00:14:06.620 --> 00:14:09.379
In 1402, she basically calls it out. She says

00:14:09.379 --> 00:14:12.679
it's vulgar, immoral, and slanderous. And she's

00:14:12.679 --> 00:14:14.720
not just complaining to her friends. She takes

00:14:14.720 --> 00:14:17.299
this public... She engages in a letter -rating

00:14:17.299 --> 00:14:20.340
campaign against some of the most powerful intellectuals

00:14:20.340 --> 00:14:23.460
in Paris, including royal secretaries like Jean

00:14:23.460 --> 00:14:25.539
Montreuil and Gontier Cole. So these are the

00:14:25.539 --> 00:14:28.320
big dogs? These were the literary bros of the

00:14:28.320 --> 00:14:30.960
15th century. They were defending the book, saying

00:14:30.960 --> 00:14:34.100
it was satire, it was high art, and they... Christine

00:14:34.100 --> 00:14:36.019
just didn't get it. And they must have loved

00:14:36.019 --> 00:14:38.039
that, a woman telling them their favorite book

00:14:38.039 --> 00:14:40.860
is trash. Oh, they were furious. Their responses

00:14:40.860 --> 00:14:42.980
are preserved and they are so condescending,

00:14:43.059 --> 00:14:45.200
they basically pat her on the head and say, oh,

00:14:45.220 --> 00:14:47.139
you sweet little woman, you just don't have the

00:14:47.139 --> 00:14:49.460
intellect to understand Master Jean de Moon.

00:14:49.759 --> 00:14:52.860
But she didn't back down. No, she doubled down.

00:14:53.299 --> 00:14:56.019
She used this brilliant rhetorical strategy called

00:14:56.019 --> 00:14:58.860
antiphrasis. Okay, what's that? She would start

00:14:58.860 --> 00:15:01.600
by belittling her own style, saying, oh. I'm

00:15:01.600 --> 00:15:03.779
just a woman of small understanding. My pen is

00:15:03.779 --> 00:15:06.360
clumsy. Disarming them? Totally disarming them.

00:15:06.460 --> 00:15:08.600
And then she would dismantle their arguments

00:15:08.600 --> 00:15:11.779
with surgical precision. She cited the church

00:15:11.779 --> 00:15:14.620
fathers. She cited classical philosophy. She

00:15:14.620 --> 00:15:17.340
asked a very simple, cutting question. Does this

00:15:17.340 --> 00:15:19.679
book make men better? Does it make them more

00:15:19.679 --> 00:15:23.120
moral? No. It encourages them to treat women

00:15:23.120 --> 00:15:25.639
like cattle. It's the Columbo method. Just one

00:15:25.639 --> 00:15:27.960
more thing, and then she destroys you. It is.

00:15:28.279 --> 00:15:30.659
And Simone de Beauvoir later credited this moment,

00:15:30.779 --> 00:15:33.860
this debate, as the first time a woman publicly

00:15:33.860 --> 00:15:37.740
took up her pen in defense of her sex. Wow. It

00:15:37.740 --> 00:15:40.460
was the birth of the querelle des femmes, the

00:15:40.460 --> 00:15:43.000
woman question. And this leads directly into

00:15:43.000 --> 00:15:45.539
her most famous work, The Book of the City of

00:15:45.539 --> 00:15:49.419
Ladies, published in 1405. This book is incredible.

00:15:49.600 --> 00:15:52.419
This is essentially a response to all that misogyny

00:15:52.419 --> 00:15:55.019
she was fighting. It is. If the Romance of the

00:15:55.019 --> 00:15:57.519
Rose controversy was the battle, the City of

00:15:57.519 --> 00:15:59.340
Ladies was the fortress she built afterwards.

00:15:59.559 --> 00:16:01.620
I love that analogy. The concept is brilliant.

00:16:01.860 --> 00:16:04.059
Christine describes herself sitting in her study,

00:16:04.220 --> 00:16:07.899
just depressed. She's read so many books written

00:16:07.899 --> 00:16:10.440
by men saying that women are wicked and flawed.

00:16:10.659 --> 00:16:12.480
And she starts to internalize it. She wonders,

00:16:12.600 --> 00:16:14.799
is God a mistake maker? Why are women so terrible?

00:16:15.129 --> 00:16:16.570
Which is heartbreaking, honestly, that feeling

00:16:16.570 --> 00:16:18.590
of the weight of the culture just crushing her

00:16:18.590 --> 00:16:22.110
self -esteem. It is. But then, three allegorical

00:16:22.110 --> 00:16:24.950
figures appear to her. Reason, rectitude, and

00:16:24.950 --> 00:16:27.509
justice. The dream team. The dream team. These

00:16:27.509 --> 00:16:30.090
three luminous ladies tell her, Christine, wake

00:16:30.090 --> 00:16:32.610
up. These men are wrong, and we are going to

00:16:32.610 --> 00:16:35.450
help you build a city. A literal city. A symbolic

00:16:35.450 --> 00:16:38.309
city. A fortress built to protect and appreciate

00:16:38.309 --> 00:16:41.590
women. And the building blocks of this city are

00:16:41.590 --> 00:16:43.950
the stories of great women from history. So she's

00:16:43.950 --> 00:16:46.250
building it out of stories. Yes. She goes through

00:16:46.250 --> 00:16:49.710
history, biblical, classical, contemporary, and

00:16:49.710 --> 00:16:52.149
pulls out every example of a strong, virtuous,

00:16:52.289 --> 00:16:54.509
intelligent woman she can find. She brings in

00:16:54.509 --> 00:16:59.090
everyone, saints, queens, warriors. And she engages

00:16:59.090 --> 00:17:01.470
in some amazing revisionist history. My favorite

00:17:01.470 --> 00:17:03.970
example is Medusa. Oh, the Medusa bit is crucial.

00:17:04.599 --> 00:17:06.980
Because usually Medusa is the monster, right?

00:17:07.400 --> 00:17:10.519
Snakes for hair, turns men to stone. Right. A

00:17:10.519 --> 00:17:12.940
villain to be slain by Perseus, the ultimate

00:17:12.940 --> 00:17:16.599
monster. Christine reimagines her. She portrays

00:17:16.599 --> 00:17:18.960
Medusa not as a monster, but as a beautiful woman

00:17:18.960 --> 00:17:21.519
who was harmed by men and whose story was twisted

00:17:21.519 --> 00:17:23.480
by them. How does she explain the whole turning

00:17:23.480 --> 00:17:26.220
men to stone thing? She argues that her power

00:17:26.220 --> 00:17:28.640
was actually just her incredible beauty and intellect

00:17:28.640 --> 00:17:31.000
that stunned men into silence. They were petrified

00:17:31.000 --> 00:17:33.019
by her brilliance. She completely flicks the

00:17:33.019 --> 00:17:36.119
script. Completely. She argues that the only

00:17:36.119 --> 00:17:38.720
reason negative stereotypes about women persist

00:17:38.720 --> 00:17:41.259
is because women have been excluded from the

00:17:41.259 --> 00:17:43.420
conversation. If you don't write your own history,

00:17:43.519 --> 00:17:45.500
someone else will write it for you. Exactly.

00:17:45.599 --> 00:17:47.460
And she uses theological arguments, too. She

00:17:47.460 --> 00:17:49.779
says men and women are both created in God's

00:17:49.779 --> 00:17:52.980
image, so they both have souls capable of goodness.

00:17:53.440 --> 00:17:57.079
It was a systematic dismantling of sexism using

00:17:57.079 --> 00:17:59.839
the very religious and logical tools that men

00:17:59.839 --> 00:18:02.150
use to enforce it. And she didn't just leave

00:18:02.150 --> 00:18:04.130
it at high -level allegory. She also wrote a

00:18:04.130 --> 00:18:07.029
sequel, right? A more practical guide. Yes. The

00:18:07.029 --> 00:18:09.509
Treasure of the City of Ladies, also known as

00:18:09.509 --> 00:18:11.430
the Book of Three Virtues. And what was that

00:18:11.430 --> 00:18:14.069
one about? This is the practical guide. If city

00:18:14.069 --> 00:18:16.589
ladies was the theory, treasure was the practice.

00:18:16.869 --> 00:18:20.170
It was advice for women of all estates. Princesses,

00:18:20.170 --> 00:18:22.509
merchants' wives, peasants. All estates. So not

00:18:22.509 --> 00:18:24.789
just for the nobility. No, that's what's so important.

00:18:24.869 --> 00:18:26.910
She's talking to everyone. What kind of advice?

00:18:27.170 --> 00:18:29.799
How to survive. How to manage your money, how

00:18:29.799 --> 00:18:31.900
to deal with your husband, how to navigate the

00:18:31.900 --> 00:18:35.039
social perils of the 15th century. She was very

00:18:35.039 --> 00:18:38.039
pragmatic. For example, she told wives of merchants

00:18:38.039 --> 00:18:40.339
to understand their husband's business accounts.

00:18:40.579 --> 00:18:42.839
Oh, that's smart. She said, don't just leave

00:18:42.839 --> 00:18:45.059
it to him. If he dies, you need to know where

00:18:45.059 --> 00:18:48.200
the money is. She was speaking from her own traumatic

00:18:48.200 --> 00:18:51.220
experience. Of course. And she was a huge advocate

00:18:51.220 --> 00:18:54.700
for education. A massive advocate. She explicitly

00:18:54.700 --> 00:18:57.380
argued that if you sent little girls to school

00:18:57.380 --> 00:19:00.420
and taught them the same subjects as boys, they

00:19:00.420 --> 00:19:02.900
would learn just as fully. Which was a radical

00:19:02.900 --> 00:19:06.259
statement in 1405. Hugely radical. She was arguing

00:19:06.259 --> 00:19:08.759
for nurture in a world that believed everything

00:19:08.759 --> 00:19:11.190
was about nature. She also practiced what she

00:19:11.190 --> 00:19:13.990
preached regarding female competence. In the

00:19:13.990 --> 00:19:16.789
text, she mentions a female manuscript illustrator

00:19:16.789 --> 00:19:19.730
named Anastasia. Yes, this is such a great detail.

00:19:19.829 --> 00:19:22.150
She describes Anastasia as the most talented

00:19:22.150 --> 00:19:25.450
illustrator of her day, specifically for painting

00:19:25.450 --> 00:19:27.430
flower borders and backgrounds in manuscripts.

00:19:27.789 --> 00:19:29.509
She's giving another professional woman a shout

00:19:29.509 --> 00:19:31.910
out. It's a lovely moment of professional solidarity.

00:19:32.490 --> 00:19:34.950
Christine is making sure that another talented

00:19:34.950 --> 00:19:37.750
woman's name is recorded in history. So she's

00:19:37.750 --> 00:19:40.509
firmly established as this intellectual heavyweight.

00:19:40.569 --> 00:19:43.609
She's the voice of women in Europe. But the world

00:19:43.609 --> 00:19:46.170
outside her study is getting worse. Much worse.

00:19:46.289 --> 00:19:50.150
France is sliding into chaos. It was. And you

00:19:50.150 --> 00:19:52.130
really have to understand the political context

00:19:52.130 --> 00:19:56.309
to get her later work. King Charles VI, the son

00:19:56.309 --> 00:19:58.849
of the wise king she grew up with, was suffering

00:19:58.849 --> 00:20:01.670
from severe mental health crises. This is the

00:20:01.670 --> 00:20:05.009
king who thought he was made of glass. Yes. He

00:20:05.009 --> 00:20:06.849
would have these breakdowns where he didn't know

00:20:06.849 --> 00:20:08.609
who he was or he thought he was made of glass

00:20:08.609 --> 00:20:11.670
and would shatter if touched. A glass king. That

00:20:11.670 --> 00:20:13.609
is a terrifying metaphor for the state of the

00:20:13.609 --> 00:20:16.970
nation. It created a massive power vacuum. And

00:20:16.970 --> 00:20:19.269
when there's a vacuum, people rush to fill it.

00:20:19.829 --> 00:20:22.109
Specifically, two rival factions of the royal

00:20:22.109 --> 00:20:24.829
family. The Armagnacs and the Burgundians. Exactly.

00:20:25.009 --> 00:20:27.990
It was essentially a civil war between the king's

00:20:27.990 --> 00:20:30.950
brother, Louis of Orleans, and the king's cousin.

00:20:31.400 --> 00:20:33.480
John the Fearless of Burgundy. And Christina's

00:20:33.480 --> 00:20:35.039
right in the middle of this. She knows these

00:20:35.039 --> 00:20:37.519
men. They are her patrons. She was terrified.

00:20:37.980 --> 00:20:40.819
She viewed France as this sacred entity founded

00:20:40.819 --> 00:20:44.160
by Trojan descendants. She wanted stability above

00:20:44.160 --> 00:20:47.140
all else. She believed in a strong monarchy.

00:20:47.240 --> 00:20:50.039
So she pivots again. She pivots again. She stops

00:20:50.039 --> 00:20:52.079
writing just about women and starts writing political

00:20:52.079 --> 00:20:55.240
theory. In 1407, she writes The Book of the Body

00:20:55.240 --> 00:20:57.740
Politics. Right. And here she uses that classic

00:20:57.740 --> 00:21:00.160
medieval metaphor of the body to explain society.

00:21:00.559 --> 00:21:03.279
The king is the head, the nobles are the arms,

00:21:03.420 --> 00:21:05.519
the people are the legs. And the message is?

00:21:05.740 --> 00:21:07.619
The message is that for the body to function,

00:21:07.799 --> 00:21:11.259
every part needs to do its job. If the arms attack

00:21:11.259 --> 00:21:14.829
the head, the body dies. She favored hereditary

00:21:14.829 --> 00:21:16.730
monarchy because she looked at the Italian city

00:21:16.730 --> 00:21:18.910
-states, which were more Republican or run by

00:21:18.910 --> 00:21:22.069
guilds, and she thought, that's chaotic. That's

00:21:22.069 --> 00:21:24.130
not profitable for the common good. She wanted

00:21:24.130 --> 00:21:26.690
order above all else. She was desperate for order.

00:21:26.970 --> 00:21:30.549
In 1407, things got much worse. John the Fearless

00:21:30.549 --> 00:21:32.990
had Louis of Orleans assassinated in the streets

00:21:32.990 --> 00:21:35.750
of Paris. Oh, just out in the open. Out in the

00:21:35.750 --> 00:21:39.690
open. The Cold War turned hot. So Christine wrote

00:21:39.690 --> 00:21:42.950
the Book of Peace in 1413, addressing the Dauphin,

00:21:43.150 --> 00:21:45.250
the heir to the throne, urging him to end the

00:21:45.250 --> 00:21:48.849
civil war. She quotes the Bible, every kingdom

00:21:48.849 --> 00:21:51.589
divided in itself will be made desolate. But

00:21:51.589 --> 00:21:54.109
the peace didn't hold. And this leads to what

00:21:54.109 --> 00:21:56.029
I think is the most surprising part of her entire

00:21:56.029 --> 00:21:59.109
bibliography. She writes a manual on warfare.

00:21:59.569 --> 00:22:02.210
The Book of Feats of Arms and of Chivalry, published

00:22:02.210 --> 00:22:06.240
in 1410. A woman. Writing a manual on how to

00:22:06.240 --> 00:22:09.079
wage war. In 1410, that seems wildly out of her

00:22:09.079 --> 00:22:11.900
lane. It is audacious. So audacious. And she

00:22:11.900 --> 00:22:14.099
acknowledges that in the preface. She apologizes

00:22:14.099 --> 00:22:17.339
to Minerva, the goddess of war, basically saying,

00:22:17.359 --> 00:22:19.539
I know I'm a woman, but I have to do this because

00:22:19.539 --> 00:22:21.720
the men are doing it wrong. I love that. So how

00:22:21.720 --> 00:22:23.160
did she even know this stuff? He's never held

00:22:23.160 --> 00:22:25.799
a sword. She was a researcher, a meticulous researcher.

00:22:25.940 --> 00:22:28.259
She interviewed knights. She read the classical

00:22:28.259 --> 00:22:31.579
texts, specifically Vigisius' De Re Militari,

00:22:31.660 --> 00:22:33.900
which was the standard Roman military text. So

00:22:33.900 --> 00:22:36.680
she did her homework. She did. But she didn't

00:22:36.680 --> 00:22:39.099
just translate Vigisius. She updated him for

00:22:39.099 --> 00:22:42.259
her time. She wrote about modern siege warfare,

00:22:42.579 --> 00:22:44.839
about the use of cannons, about logistics and

00:22:44.839 --> 00:22:47.019
supply lines. What kind of stuff is she covering?

00:22:47.140 --> 00:22:49.359
Is it just hit them with the pointy end? Oh,

00:22:49.380 --> 00:22:51.940
no, it's sophisticated. Yeah. She discusses the

00:22:51.940 --> 00:22:54.599
just war theory, the idea that war should only

00:22:54.599 --> 00:22:57.380
be waged by sovereign kings to protect their

00:22:57.380 --> 00:23:00.079
subjects or execute justice. So not for personal

00:23:00.079 --> 00:23:02.759
gain. Right. It cannot be for personal gain or

00:23:02.759 --> 00:23:05.059
vengeance. Yeah. And she talks about the laws

00:23:05.059 --> 00:23:07.339
of war, how to treat prisoners, why you shouldn't

00:23:07.339 --> 00:23:10.250
kill noncombatants. She even had opinions on

00:23:10.250 --> 00:23:13.369
trial by combat, right? She hated it. She opposed

00:23:13.369 --> 00:23:15.369
trial by combat because she didn't believe that

00:23:15.369 --> 00:23:17.430
winning a fight proved you were right. It just

00:23:17.430 --> 00:23:19.289
proved you were stronger or luckier. That's a

00:23:19.289 --> 00:23:21.849
very logical modern take. It is. She was very

00:23:21.849 --> 00:23:24.650
practical. She admitted that war involves, and

00:23:24.650 --> 00:23:27.690
I'm quoting here, raping, killings, forced executions,

00:23:27.710 --> 00:23:30.869
and arsons. She didn't romanticize it, even though

00:23:30.869 --> 00:23:33.210
she was writing about chivalry. She saw it as

00:23:33.210 --> 00:23:35.509
a grim necessity that needed strict regulation.

00:23:36.200 --> 00:23:38.400
Now, here is a detail that made me angry when

00:23:38.400 --> 00:23:41.680
I read it. This book was good. It was useful.

00:23:41.759 --> 00:23:44.700
It was so useful that it was printed and used

00:23:44.700 --> 00:23:48.019
for a long time, but her name didn't always stay

00:23:48.019 --> 00:23:50.960
on it. This is a classic example of erasure.

00:23:51.099 --> 00:23:53.960
It's infuriating. The book was printed later

00:23:53.960 --> 00:23:56.559
in the 15th century by a publisher named Antoine

00:23:56.559 --> 00:23:59.339
Verar, and in some editions, Verar just stripped

00:23:59.339 --> 00:24:02.279
her name off it. Or, even worse, he would claim

00:24:02.279 --> 00:24:04.880
it was a translation of a male author. Because,

00:24:04.880 --> 00:24:07.359
God forbid, a knight takes military advice from

00:24:07.359 --> 00:24:10.519
a woman. Exactly. Even William Caxton, the famous

00:24:10.519 --> 00:24:13.359
English printer, published it in 1489 for King

00:24:13.359 --> 00:24:15.720
Henry VII. It was considered a standard manual.

00:24:16.220 --> 00:24:18.140
But the fact that a woman wrote it was often

00:24:18.140 --> 00:24:19.880
obscured because it undermined the authority

00:24:19.880 --> 00:24:22.180
of the text in the eyes of men. They wanted the

00:24:22.180 --> 00:24:25.980
knowledge, but not the author. Ugh. So she tries

00:24:25.980 --> 00:24:28.130
to save France with her pen. She writes about

00:24:28.130 --> 00:24:30.470
peace. She writes about war. But the situation

00:24:30.470 --> 00:24:32.230
in France just keeps getting worse. It does.

00:24:32.289 --> 00:24:34.690
It gets much, much worse. In 1415, the French

00:24:34.690 --> 00:24:36.750
suffer a devastating defeat at the Battle of

00:24:36.750 --> 00:24:39.390
Agincourt against the English. Agincourt. A generation

00:24:39.390 --> 00:24:42.109
of French nobility is wiped out by English longbows.

00:24:42.670 --> 00:24:46.190
The mud, the blood. It was a national catastrophe.

00:24:46.609 --> 00:24:48.769
And Christine is getting older at this point.

00:24:48.869 --> 00:24:52.529
She's seen decades of this endless war and chaos.

00:24:52.869 --> 00:24:54.650
She's tired. You can feel it in her writing.

00:24:54.750 --> 00:24:57.630
In 1418, she published his letter concerning

00:24:57.630 --> 00:25:00.960
the prison of human life. The tone here is very

00:25:00.960 --> 00:25:03.380
different from her earlier work. How so? It's

00:25:03.380 --> 00:25:06.140
pessimistic, deeply pessimistic. She views the

00:25:06.140 --> 00:25:08.480
soul as being trapped in the body, trapped in

00:25:08.480 --> 00:25:10.759
this hellish existence on Earth. It was written

00:25:10.759 --> 00:25:12.900
as a consolation for women who had lost family

00:25:12.900 --> 00:25:15.440
members in the war. But you can feel her own

00:25:15.440 --> 00:25:18.259
despair bleeding through. And then the war comes

00:25:18.259 --> 00:25:21.779
to her death step, literally. In 1418, the Burgundians

00:25:21.779 --> 00:25:24.079
capture Paris. It's a bloodbath in the streets.

00:25:24.539 --> 00:25:26.599
Christine flees. Where does she go? Historians

00:25:26.599 --> 00:25:28.500
believe she retreated to the Dominican convent

00:25:28.500 --> 00:25:31.640
of Procy. Her daughter was a nun there. And she

00:25:31.640 --> 00:25:33.940
effectively retires from public life. She stops

00:25:33.940 --> 00:25:36.339
writing. She just goes silent. For 11 years,

00:25:36.579 --> 00:25:39.599
Paris is occupied by the English. The Burgundians

00:25:39.599 --> 00:25:41.200
have taken over. It seems like everything she

00:25:41.200 --> 00:25:44.440
fought for is lost. Silence for 11 years. She's

00:25:44.440 --> 00:25:46.460
in the convent watching her country fall apart.

00:25:47.079 --> 00:25:49.920
The king of Bourges, the disinherited Dauphin,

00:25:50.099 --> 00:25:52.869
is hiding in the south. It looks like the end

00:25:52.869 --> 00:25:56.529
of France. It really does. But then, 1429. A

00:25:56.529 --> 00:25:59.390
miracle happens. Or at least what Christine perceives

00:25:59.390 --> 00:26:02.029
as a miracle. A young peasant girl from nowhere

00:26:02.029 --> 00:26:05.049
named Joan of Arc appears. Joan of Arc. She claims

00:26:05.049 --> 00:26:08.089
to hear voices from God. She convinces the Dauphin

00:26:08.089 --> 00:26:11.109
to give her an army. She lifts the siege of Orléans.

00:26:11.839 --> 00:26:14.680
It's an unbelievable turn of events. And Christine

00:26:14.680 --> 00:26:17.380
picks up her pen one last time. She does. After

00:26:17.380 --> 00:26:19.940
11 years of silence, she breaks it to write The

00:26:19.940 --> 00:26:22.859
Tale of Joan of Arc, or Didier de Chahand Arc.

00:26:22.980 --> 00:26:25.339
And she gets it published just days after Charles

00:26:25.339 --> 00:26:28.740
VII's coronation in Rheims, which Joan made happen.

00:26:28.920 --> 00:26:30.960
What's the vibe of this last work? Is she still

00:26:30.960 --> 00:26:33.440
pessimistic? Not at all. The optimism is back

00:26:33.440 --> 00:26:36.859
with a vengeance. She is ecstatic. She sees Joan

00:26:36.859 --> 00:26:39.730
as the fulfillment of ancient prophecies. From

00:26:39.730 --> 00:26:42.769
Merlin the Sibyl Bede. She sees her as a destined

00:26:42.769 --> 00:26:45.690
savior. Yes. But more importantly, she sees Joan

00:26:45.690 --> 00:26:48.309
as the ultimate validation of her life's work.

00:26:48.529 --> 00:26:50.970
It's poetic, isn't it? The first professional

00:26:50.970 --> 00:26:53.230
woman writer ends her career by celebrating the

00:26:53.230 --> 00:26:55.789
first female military leader to save France.

00:26:56.009 --> 00:26:58.109
It is the perfect bookend to her life. It's almost

00:26:58.109 --> 00:27:00.690
too perfect, she writes. What honor for the female

00:27:00.690 --> 00:27:03.250
sex. It is perfectly obvious that God has especially

00:27:03.250 --> 00:27:06.890
chosen her. She felt vindicated. All those arguments

00:27:06.890 --> 00:27:09.130
she made in the city of ladies about women being

00:27:09.130 --> 00:27:12.809
capable of greatness. Joan was the living proof.

00:27:13.269 --> 00:27:16.849
A woman doing what all the men could not. Sadly,

00:27:16.869 --> 00:27:19.029
Christine didn't live to see the end of Joan's

00:27:19.029 --> 00:27:23.329
story. No. Christine died around 1430. Joan was

00:27:23.329 --> 00:27:26.269
captured and executed in 1431. So Christine likely

00:27:26.269 --> 00:27:28.230
died believing that Joan had won and that France

00:27:28.230 --> 00:27:30.829
was saved. It seems so. She missed the tragic

00:27:30.829 --> 00:27:33.289
ending, which is perhaps a small mercy. She died

00:27:33.289 --> 00:27:36.089
with hope. So Christine passes away, but her

00:27:36.089 --> 00:27:37.809
books did die with her. Let's talk about her

00:27:37.809 --> 00:27:39.950
legacy. She wasn't just forgotten, was she? Not

00:27:39.950 --> 00:27:42.109
immediately, no. Her advice books remained in

00:27:42.109 --> 00:27:44.829
print until the 16th century. Powerful women

00:27:44.829 --> 00:27:47.150
read them. Like who? Anne of France, who was

00:27:47.150 --> 00:27:50.640
regent, used Christine's work as a guide. Queen

00:27:50.640 --> 00:27:53.099
Elizabeth I of England, one of the most powerful

00:27:53.099 --> 00:27:55.720
women in history, had copies of the City of Ladies

00:27:55.720 --> 00:27:58.380
and Feats of Arms in her library. I read that

00:27:58.380 --> 00:28:01.700
Elizabeth I even had tapestries featuring scenes

00:28:01.700 --> 00:28:04.460
from the City of Ladies. She did. Imagine that.

00:28:05.200 --> 00:28:07.579
Visuals of a city built by women hanging on the

00:28:07.579 --> 00:28:10.559
walls of the Virgin Queen. That is direct influence.

00:28:11.559 --> 00:28:13.660
Christine helped shape the queens who came after

00:28:13.660 --> 00:28:15.859
her. But then as time goes on, the erasure starts

00:28:15.859 --> 00:28:18.380
to happen. It does. As we moved into the 17th

00:28:18.380 --> 00:28:20.799
and 18th centuries, the Enlightenment, the literary

00:28:20.799 --> 00:28:23.599
canon, narrowed, and women were pushed out of

00:28:23.599 --> 00:28:25.299
the history of political thought. So how was

00:28:25.299 --> 00:28:27.839
she remembered? Christine was dismissed. She

00:28:27.839 --> 00:28:29.940
was labeled a blue stocking, a minor poet, or

00:28:29.940 --> 00:28:32.619
just a curiosity. You know, oh, look, a medieval

00:28:32.619 --> 00:28:35.180
woman who could write. How quaint. Her political

00:28:35.180 --> 00:28:37.099
and military insights were completely ignored.

00:28:37.359 --> 00:28:39.809
Until the modern era. The revival really kicks

00:28:39.809 --> 00:28:42.269
off in the 20th century. You have scholars like

00:28:42.269 --> 00:28:44.910
Mathilde Legle and later, of course, Simone de

00:28:44.910 --> 00:28:47.349
Beauvoir rediscovering her. And Judy Chicago?

00:28:47.730 --> 00:28:51.029
Yes. Judy Chicago, in her famous artwork The

00:28:51.029 --> 00:28:54.630
Dinner Party in 1979, gave Christine a place

00:28:54.630 --> 00:28:57.329
setting at the table. Scholars started to realize,

00:28:57.450 --> 00:28:59.970
wait, this isn't just a poet. This is a political

00:28:59.970 --> 00:29:02.509
theorist. This is a military strategist. And

00:29:02.509 --> 00:29:05.430
we have to mention the 2024 Paris Olympics because

00:29:05.430 --> 00:29:07.910
that felt like a huge mainstream moment for her.

00:29:08.069 --> 00:29:10.109
It was. That was such a huge moment. During the

00:29:10.109 --> 00:29:12.029
opening ceremony, there was that segment honoring

00:29:12.029 --> 00:29:15.849
10 pioneering French women with gold statues

00:29:15.849 --> 00:29:18.230
rising out of the sand. And Christine de Pizan

00:29:18.230 --> 00:29:21.069
was one of them, holding her books. From a convent

00:29:21.069 --> 00:29:24.089
in Poissy to a gold statue in front of the whole

00:29:24.089 --> 00:29:27.299
world, that is quite a journey. It is. And it

00:29:27.299 --> 00:29:29.819
validates her mission in a way. She wanted to

00:29:29.819 --> 00:29:31.640
be remembered. She wanted women to be remembered.

00:29:31.880 --> 00:29:34.039
She built the city of ladies so that women wouldn't

00:29:34.039 --> 00:29:36.480
be forgotten. And in the end, she became the

00:29:36.480 --> 00:29:38.940
cornerstone of that city. So let's unpack this.

00:29:39.119 --> 00:29:41.279
What does all this mean for us today? What's

00:29:41.279 --> 00:29:43.299
the big takeaway? I think the biggest takeaway

00:29:43.299 --> 00:29:46.519
is her resilience and her use of intellect as

00:29:46.519 --> 00:29:49.240
a weapon. She was in a hostile world, legally,

00:29:49.559 --> 00:29:51.740
financially, culturally. She didn't have a sword.

00:29:51.900 --> 00:29:53.759
She didn't have political office. She had a pen.

00:29:54.190 --> 00:29:56.470
And she wasn't afraid to use it. And she used

00:29:56.470 --> 00:29:59.210
it to carve out a space for herself and for other

00:29:59.210 --> 00:30:01.890
women. She forced the men of her time to listen

00:30:01.890 --> 00:30:04.769
to her. She engaged them on their own turf theology,

00:30:05.170 --> 00:30:08.670
law, military strategy. And she beat them at

00:30:08.670 --> 00:30:11.049
their own game. And she recognized the power

00:30:11.049 --> 00:30:14.019
of storytelling. She understood that if you let

00:30:14.019 --> 00:30:16.519
a culture tell you that you are less than for

00:30:16.519 --> 00:30:19.099
long enough, you start to believe it. The way

00:30:19.099 --> 00:30:21.339
she almost did at the start of City of Ladies.

00:30:21.500 --> 00:30:23.380
Exactly. So she created a counter -narrative.

00:30:23.660 --> 00:30:26.359
The City of Ladies was a safe space for the female

00:30:26.359 --> 00:30:28.980
mind. She showed that representation matters.

00:30:29.160 --> 00:30:31.220
It really makes you think about the stories we

00:30:31.220 --> 00:30:33.460
tell today. It absolutely does. Okay, I have

00:30:33.460 --> 00:30:35.099
a thought experiment for you and for everyone

00:30:35.099 --> 00:30:37.839
listening. Christine built her city of ladies

00:30:37.839 --> 00:30:41.440
using the figures of her time saints, mythological

00:30:41.440 --> 00:30:44.769
queens, Amazons. Right, her heroes. If we were

00:30:44.769 --> 00:30:47.730
to build a modern city of ladies today, an allegorical

00:30:47.730 --> 00:30:49.730
city to protect and validate the contributions

00:30:49.730 --> 00:30:52.829
of women, or really any marginalized group, who

00:30:52.829 --> 00:30:55.049
would be our architects? Who are the modern reason,

00:30:55.289 --> 00:30:58.569
rectitude, and justice? That is a powerful question.

00:30:58.809 --> 00:31:02.410
And, you know, to build on that, does the fact

00:31:02.410 --> 00:31:05.250
that she had to reimagine Medusa to... take a

00:31:05.250 --> 00:31:07.769
figure known as a monster and reveal her as a

00:31:07.769 --> 00:31:10.509
survivor. Does it sound familiar? It sounds incredibly

00:31:10.509 --> 00:31:12.390
familiar. We are still having these cultural

00:31:12.390 --> 00:31:14.789
conversations today about how we treat women

00:31:14.789 --> 00:31:17.569
in media, how we interpret their stories. Think

00:31:17.569 --> 00:31:21.150
of movies like Wicked or Maleficent telling the

00:31:21.150 --> 00:31:24.240
story from. The witch's perspective. Christine

00:31:24.240 --> 00:31:26.539
de Pizan started that conversation 600 years

00:31:26.539 --> 00:31:29.240
ago. She certainly did. And that is where we

00:31:29.240 --> 00:31:31.259
are going to leave it for today. Thank you for

00:31:31.259 --> 00:31:33.680
joining us on this deep dive into the life of

00:31:33.680 --> 00:31:35.720
the incredible Christine de Pizan. Keep reading.

00:31:35.799 --> 00:31:37.400
Keep questioning. See you next time.
