WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.200
When we look back at the Victorian era, we have

00:00:02.200 --> 00:00:06.519
this very rigid mental map. Oh, absolutely. We

00:00:06.519 --> 00:00:11.119
see the stiff collars, the London fog, the repressed

00:00:11.119 --> 00:00:14.119
emotions. And if I ask you to picture a Victorian

00:00:14.119 --> 00:00:16.820
poetess, you probably conjure up a very specific

00:00:16.820 --> 00:00:20.160
image. Right. Someone safe, maybe a bit fragile,

00:00:20.460 --> 00:00:23.440
writing quiet verses in a parlor. Exactly. Someone

00:00:23.440 --> 00:00:26.800
devout, writing about flowers and Jesus and not

00:00:26.800 --> 00:00:29.480
much else. The angel in the house, as the saying

00:00:29.480 --> 00:00:32.380
goes. It's an incredibly sticky archetype. It

00:00:32.380 --> 00:00:35.240
frames women of that era as purely domestic,

00:00:35.500 --> 00:00:38.840
passive creatures who existed solely to, you

00:00:38.840 --> 00:00:40.600
know, soothe the brows of their husbands and

00:00:40.600 --> 00:00:42.880
manage the household. Right. And then if I say

00:00:42.880 --> 00:00:45.280
the name Rosetti, most people immediately pivot.

00:00:45.689 --> 00:00:47.549
They go straight to Dante Gabriel Rossetti. Of

00:00:47.549 --> 00:00:50.109
course. The wild hair, the wombats in the garden,

00:00:50.189 --> 00:00:54.149
the opium, the bohemian king of the pre -Raphaelite

00:00:54.149 --> 00:00:56.049
brotherhood. He was a massive personality. He

00:00:56.049 --> 00:00:57.770
sucked up a lot of the oxygen in the room, in

00:00:57.770 --> 00:01:00.729
any room he was in, really. But today, we are

00:01:00.729 --> 00:01:03.030
pushing him to the side. We are focusing on the

00:01:03.030 --> 00:01:05.950
other Rossetti, Christina Rossetti. And the reason

00:01:05.950 --> 00:01:08.390
we're doing this deep dive is that the pious

00:01:08.390 --> 00:01:12.569
spinster image, it's not just incomplete, it's

00:01:12.569 --> 00:01:15.959
actively misleading. It's a total misreading

00:01:15.959 --> 00:01:18.019
of her character and her work. Because if you

00:01:18.019 --> 00:01:20.920
dig into the letters, the biographies, and critically

00:01:20.920 --> 00:01:23.939
the reception of her work at the time, you don't

00:01:23.939 --> 00:01:26.200
find a passive observer. You find a woman who

00:01:26.200 --> 00:01:30.219
was arguably, well, one of the darkest, most

00:01:30.219 --> 00:01:32.400
complex, and most technically brilliant poets

00:01:32.400 --> 00:01:34.540
of the entire 19th century. I'm really glad you

00:01:34.540 --> 00:01:36.480
used the word darkest, because even though she's

00:01:36.480 --> 00:01:38.120
the one who wrote some of the Christmas carols

00:01:38.120 --> 00:01:41.700
we all sing. Her mind was dwelling in some very

00:01:41.700 --> 00:01:44.840
shadowy, very intense places. It's a huge contradiction.

00:01:45.099 --> 00:01:47.200
A huge one. And, you know, after Elizabeth Barrett

00:01:47.200 --> 00:01:49.900
Browning died in 1861, the critics didn't really

00:01:49.900 --> 00:01:52.079
look for a man to replace her as the great poet

00:01:52.079 --> 00:01:54.659
of the age. They looked directly at Christina

00:01:54.659 --> 00:01:57.099
Rossetti and essentially said, she is the one.

00:01:57.140 --> 00:02:00.140
She is the foremost female poet of her day. That's

00:02:00.140 --> 00:02:02.200
a heavy crown to wear, especially in that era.

00:02:02.400 --> 00:02:05.430
It is. But she wore it differently. She's such

00:02:05.430 --> 00:02:08.270
an enigma because she lived at the absolute epicenter

00:02:08.270 --> 00:02:11.409
of the coolest, loudest, most revolutionary art

00:02:11.409 --> 00:02:14.050
movement in London. The Pre -Raphaelites. Exactly.

00:02:14.430 --> 00:02:18.169
Yet she cultivated this persona of silence and

00:02:18.169 --> 00:02:21.090
refusal. A quiet rebel is a great way to put

00:02:21.090 --> 00:02:24.590
it. She navigated severe nervous breakdowns,

00:02:24.590 --> 00:02:27.710
this intense religious extremism, and a really,

00:02:27.750 --> 00:02:30.009
really complicated relationship with the concept

00:02:30.009 --> 00:02:32.750
of love and marriage. So that is our mission

00:02:32.750 --> 00:02:35.520
today. We're going to strip away that saintly

00:02:35.520 --> 00:02:39.240
lady veneer. We need to understand how she operated

00:02:39.240 --> 00:02:41.979
within the pre -Raphaelite brotherhood, not just

00:02:41.979 --> 00:02:44.780
as a pretty face on a canvas, but as a sharp,

00:02:44.819 --> 00:02:47.439
insightful critic. A participant, not just a

00:02:47.439 --> 00:02:49.960
muse. Exactly. And we're going to deconstruct

00:02:49.960 --> 00:02:52.500
the absolute fever dream that is Goblin Market.

00:02:52.680 --> 00:02:54.460
I mean, we have to. We could spend the whole

00:02:54.460 --> 00:02:56.539
time on just that poem. We really could. And

00:02:56.539 --> 00:02:58.699
I really want to understand why she chose loneliness.

00:02:59.120 --> 00:03:00.979
Because looking at the source material, it wasn't

00:03:00.979 --> 00:03:02.539
an accident. It wasn't because she didn't have

00:03:02.539 --> 00:03:05.580
options. It feels like it was a strategy. A strategy

00:03:05.580 --> 00:03:07.539
of self -preservation. That's a great way to

00:03:07.539 --> 00:03:09.699
frame it. She was protecting something. We have

00:03:09.699 --> 00:03:12.240
a lot of ground to cover. Biographies, letters,

00:03:12.599 --> 00:03:15.659
publication history, the poetry itself. Let's

00:03:15.659 --> 00:03:18.039
start at the very beginning. The Rossetti Hothouse.

00:03:18.650 --> 00:03:20.590
because she wasn't just born into a standard

00:03:20.590 --> 00:03:22.710
British middle -class family, was she? Oh, not

00:03:22.710 --> 00:03:25.669
even close. If you walked into 38 Charlotte Street

00:03:25.669 --> 00:03:29.389
in London around, say, 1835, you wouldn't feel

00:03:29.389 --> 00:03:30.969
like you were in England. You'd feel like you

00:03:30.969 --> 00:03:33.689
walked into a political salon in Naples. Really?

00:03:33.909 --> 00:03:36.530
That's specific? Absolutely. Christina was born

00:03:36.530 --> 00:03:39.530
there in 1830, the youngest of four. Her father,

00:03:39.669 --> 00:03:41.949
Gabriello Rossetti, wasn't just a dad. He was

00:03:41.949 --> 00:03:45.009
a political exile, a revolutionary. Okay, so

00:03:45.009 --> 00:03:47.729
the sources describe him as a poet and a carbonero.

00:03:48.240 --> 00:03:50.479
A revolutionary. Yes. He was from the Abruzzo

00:03:50.479 --> 00:03:53.879
region of Italy. He had to flee in 1824 because

00:03:53.879 --> 00:03:56.039
his poetry was a little too supportive of the

00:03:56.039 --> 00:03:57.900
revolutionary cause against the Bourbon monarchy.

00:03:58.360 --> 00:04:00.900
So he lands in London, manages to become a professor

00:04:00.900 --> 00:04:03.379
of Italian at King's College, and turns his home

00:04:03.379 --> 00:04:07.060
into this magnet for every Italian exile scholar,

00:04:07.319 --> 00:04:09.400
artist, and revolutionary passing through the

00:04:09.400 --> 00:04:11.879
city. So the house is just buzzing with politics

00:04:11.879 --> 00:04:15.789
and poetry and Italian accents. Constantly. Christina

00:04:15.789 --> 00:04:17.930
is growing up with Dante Alighieri effectively

00:04:17.930 --> 00:04:20.389
being the fifth child in the family. She was

00:04:20.389 --> 00:04:22.850
steeped in it from birth. Essentially. And Petrarch.

00:04:23.089 --> 00:04:25.889
The house was loud, intellectual, and bilingual.

00:04:26.350 --> 00:04:29.449
And then you have her mother, Frances Polidori.

00:04:29.550 --> 00:04:31.470
And this is where the literary pedigree gets

00:04:31.470 --> 00:04:35.399
really gothic. Okay, I'm ready. Francis was the

00:04:35.399 --> 00:04:38.139
sister of John William Polidori. Wait, Polidori.

00:04:38.300 --> 00:04:40.480
That's Lord Byron's physician, right? That Polidori?

00:04:40.639 --> 00:04:43.139
The very same. The man who was there at the Villa

00:04:43.139 --> 00:04:46.639
Diodati in 1816 during the year without a summer,

00:04:46.800 --> 00:04:50.100
the night Mary Shelley started writing Frankenstein.

00:04:50.139 --> 00:04:53.899
No way. Yes. Polidori actually wrote The Vampire

00:04:53.899 --> 00:04:56.300
during that same trip, which basically invented

00:04:56.300 --> 00:04:59.540
the modern aristocratic vampire genre. So on

00:04:59.540 --> 00:05:01.019
her father's side, you have Italian political

00:05:01.019 --> 00:05:03.079
revolutionaries. Right. And on her mother's side,

00:05:03.139 --> 00:05:05.519
you have... The guy who literally invented the

00:05:05.519 --> 00:05:07.839
vampire. That explains a lot about the tone of

00:05:07.839 --> 00:05:09.920
Christina's work, doesn't it? It explains everything.

00:05:10.079 --> 00:05:12.680
The passion, the darkness, the morbidity. It

00:05:12.680 --> 00:05:16.079
wasn't a normal childhood. Far from it. And the

00:05:16.079 --> 00:05:18.620
siblings, Dante Gabriel, William Michael, and

00:05:18.620 --> 00:05:21.199
Maria, they were a powerhouse quartet, as one

00:05:21.199 --> 00:05:23.500
biographer puts it. Incredibly bright, competitive,

00:05:23.800 --> 00:05:26.439
creative, and very, very close. They even had

00:05:26.439 --> 00:05:28.100
nicknames for each other. They called themselves

00:05:28.100 --> 00:05:30.600
the Two Storms, which were Dante and Christina.

00:05:30.839 --> 00:05:33.439
The passionate ones. Right. And the Two Palms,

00:05:33.439 --> 00:05:36.300
which were William and Maria. And the young Christina.

00:05:36.519 --> 00:05:39.019
The sources say she wasn't the gloomy recluse

00:05:39.019 --> 00:05:41.459
yet. She was the lively one, the stormy one.

00:05:41.600 --> 00:05:44.600
Very lively. There's a fantastic anecdote where,

00:05:44.720 --> 00:05:47.459
before she could even write, she dictated her

00:05:47.459 --> 00:05:50.540
first story to her mother. It was about a dervish

00:05:50.540 --> 00:05:52.980
named Hassan. I mean, that just shows the confidence.

00:05:53.019 --> 00:05:55.379
She was surrounded by words and stories, so she

00:05:55.379 --> 00:05:57.660
just joined in. And she was educated entirely

00:05:57.660 --> 00:06:00.620
at home. Entirely. Absorbing everything. Religious

00:06:00.620 --> 00:06:03.060
tracks, fairy tales, classics like Keats and

00:06:03.060 --> 00:06:05.660
Scott, and a lot of gothic horror novels like

00:06:05.660 --> 00:06:08.680
Anne Radcliffe's The Mysteries of Udolpho. So

00:06:08.680 --> 00:06:11.379
she had a rich inner world. But she wasn't a

00:06:11.379 --> 00:06:14.399
shut -in. She liked London. Oh, she loved London.

00:06:14.639 --> 00:06:16.759
Unlike her parents, who always felt the pain

00:06:16.759 --> 00:06:19.899
of exile, Christina felt completely at home.

00:06:20.079 --> 00:06:23.779
She visited the zoo, Madame Tussauds. The sources

00:06:23.779 --> 00:06:25.819
show she was engaging with the world, curious.

00:06:26.360 --> 00:06:29.740
But then we see this massive shift in the 1840s.

00:06:30.000 --> 00:06:32.779
A crisis hits the family, and it seems to be

00:06:32.779 --> 00:06:34.720
the trauma that defines the rest of her life.

00:06:34.899 --> 00:06:38.000
What happened? The whole world fell apart. The

00:06:38.000 --> 00:06:41.040
economy of the family completely collapsed. Her

00:06:41.040 --> 00:06:43.720
father's health failed catastrophically. He developed

00:06:43.720 --> 00:06:46.199
chronic bronchitis. He was losing his sight,

00:06:46.279 --> 00:06:49.000
and he was likely suffering from a severe debilitating

00:06:49.000 --> 00:06:51.259
depression. He had to give up his teaching post

00:06:51.259 --> 00:06:53.790
at King's College. Which means the money stopped

00:06:53.790 --> 00:06:55.930
coming in. The main source of income was gone.

00:06:56.230 --> 00:06:58.889
Exactly. And in Victorian London, that is a precipice

00:06:58.889 --> 00:07:01.329
you do not want to fall over. The slide from

00:07:01.329 --> 00:07:04.230
middle class respectability to poverty was terrifyingly

00:07:04.230 --> 00:07:06.269
quick. And the family dynamics just inverted.

00:07:06.610 --> 00:07:08.949
Completely. The mother, Frances, who had been

00:07:08.949 --> 00:07:11.310
managing this intellectual household, had to

00:07:11.310 --> 00:07:13.970
go out and start teaching Italian. Her sister,

00:07:14.050 --> 00:07:16.410
Maria, who was brilliant in her own right, had

00:07:16.410 --> 00:07:19.050
to go out and work as a live -in governess. and

00:07:19.050 --> 00:07:21.089
from what i read christina viewed the prospect

00:07:21.089 --> 00:07:24.129
of being a governess with absolute horror she

00:07:24.129 --> 00:07:27.060
dreaded it It was the standard fate for a refined,

00:07:27.360 --> 00:07:29.959
educated woman with no money, but to her it meant

00:07:29.959 --> 00:07:33.000
servitude. It meant a total loss of your autonomy,

00:07:33.199 --> 00:07:35.519
your time, your intellectual freedom. But she

00:07:35.519 --> 00:07:38.000
didn't have to do it. No, and here is the tragedy.

00:07:38.500 --> 00:07:40.959
Because she was the youngest and always seen

00:07:40.959 --> 00:07:43.560
as the delicate one, she was the one left at

00:07:43.560 --> 00:07:46.519
home, left to care for her sick, depressed, and

00:07:46.519 --> 00:07:49.019
probably very difficult father while everyone

00:07:49.019 --> 00:07:51.399
else was out working to keep the family afloat.

00:07:51.680 --> 00:07:54.100
That is an absolute pressure cooker. Yeah. You're

00:07:54.100 --> 00:07:56.319
a teenager, you're creative, you're full of this

00:07:56.319 --> 00:07:59.180
stormy energy, and you're trapped in a dark house

00:07:59.180 --> 00:08:01.720
with a dying parent watching your family slide

00:08:01.720 --> 00:08:04.040
into poverty. And the result was, unfortunately,

00:08:04.360 --> 00:08:08.120
predictable. At age 14 in 1845, she suffered

00:08:08.120 --> 00:08:10.160
a severe nervous breakdown. She had to leave

00:08:10.160 --> 00:08:12.439
what little formal schooling she had, and the

00:08:12.439 --> 00:08:14.899
lively child just vanished. She became withdrawn,

00:08:15.240 --> 00:08:17.740
melancholic, and suffered from a range of physical

00:08:17.740 --> 00:08:20.129
ailments for the rest of her life. And this is

00:08:20.129 --> 00:08:21.709
where the religion takes hold isn't it? It's

00:08:21.709 --> 00:08:24.050
not just a comfort. It becomes an entire operating

00:08:24.050 --> 00:08:26.800
system for her life. An operating system is the

00:08:26.800 --> 00:08:29.360
perfect analogy. It wasn't just going to church.

00:08:29.420 --> 00:08:32.379
This was a specific, intense flavor of Christianity.

00:08:33.080 --> 00:08:35.960
She, her mother, and her sister Maria became

00:08:35.960 --> 00:08:38.460
deeply involved in the Anglo -Catholic movement.

00:08:38.720 --> 00:08:41.259
Sometimes called the Oxford movement or Tractarianism.

00:08:41.320 --> 00:08:43.460
Exactly. Can you break that down for us? How

00:08:43.460 --> 00:08:45.120
was that different from regular Church of England

00:08:45.120 --> 00:08:47.659
services at the time? Think of it as the Church

00:08:47.659 --> 00:08:50.360
of England trying to reclaim its Catholic heritage

00:08:50.360 --> 00:08:53.519
before the Reformation. It was all about high

00:08:53.519 --> 00:08:55.850
ritual, heavy on... symbolism, the importance

00:08:55.850 --> 00:08:58.769
of confession, and a very, very intense focus

00:08:58.769 --> 00:09:01.970
on personal sin, self -examination, and the path

00:09:01.970 --> 00:09:04.330
to redemption. So it's not a casual Sunday faith?

00:09:04.490 --> 00:09:07.230
Not at all. It was a rigorous, demanding spiritual

00:09:07.230 --> 00:09:10.549
lifestyle. And for Christina, this became the

00:09:10.549 --> 00:09:13.340
lens through which she saw everything. Every

00:09:13.340 --> 00:09:15.519
earthly pleasure had to be weighed against the

00:09:15.519 --> 00:09:18.139
eternal soul. It provided a structure for her

00:09:18.139 --> 00:09:20.379
suffering, giving meaning to her pain, but it

00:09:20.379 --> 00:09:23.279
also imposed incredible restrictions on her.

00:09:23.399 --> 00:09:26.519
So she creates this rigid, ascetic framework

00:09:26.519 --> 00:09:29.100
for herself, right as her brother, Dante Gabriel,

00:09:29.399 --> 00:09:32.179
is about to launch the most rebellious, colorful,

00:09:32.379 --> 00:09:34.840
and sensual art movement in Britain. The Pre

00:09:34.840 --> 00:09:37.490
-Raphaelite Brotherhood. established in 1848.

00:09:37.610 --> 00:09:39.730
The timing is just incredible. Talk about a clash

00:09:39.730 --> 00:09:42.409
of worlds. It's a fundamental split in the Rossetti

00:09:42.409 --> 00:09:45.850
siblings. You have Dante and his friends, the

00:09:45.850 --> 00:09:48.789
PRB, who are all about nature, bright colors,

00:09:48.929 --> 00:09:52.309
truth to life, challenging the stuffy royal academy,

00:09:52.529 --> 00:09:55.529
and living this very bohemian, sometimes scandalous

00:09:55.529 --> 00:09:58.190
lifestyle. And right in the middle of it is Christina,

00:09:58.450 --> 00:10:01.190
the Anglo -Catholic ascetic. It seems like she

00:10:01.190 --> 00:10:03.220
would have run a mile away. But she couldn't.

00:10:03.220 --> 00:10:05.120
It was her family. And she wasn't just in the

00:10:05.120 --> 00:10:07.179
room. She was the face of it. That's the deepest

00:10:07.179 --> 00:10:10.519
irony. If you look at the very first PRB paintings,

00:10:10.779 --> 00:10:12.940
you are looking at Christina Rossetti. She was

00:10:12.940 --> 00:10:15.259
the model for the Virgin Mary, wasn't she? Yes,

00:10:15.320 --> 00:10:18.059
in two of Dante Gabriel's earliest and most important

00:10:18.059 --> 00:10:20.539
paintings. She's Mary in The Girlhood of Mary

00:10:20.539 --> 00:10:24.100
Virgin from 1848. And she's Mary again in Ecce

00:10:24.100 --> 00:10:26.720
and Silla Domini, which means Behold the Handmaiden

00:10:26.720 --> 00:10:30.139
of the Lord in 1850. So she is literally the

00:10:30.139 --> 00:10:33.480
icon of the movement's debut. Literally, when

00:10:33.480 --> 00:10:35.580
people thought of the pre -Raphaelite woman in

00:10:35.580 --> 00:10:37.419
those first couple years, they were thinking

00:10:37.419 --> 00:10:40.720
of her face, those heavy eyelids, the long neck,

00:10:40.860 --> 00:10:43.799
that contemplative, serious expression. It's

00:10:43.799 --> 00:10:46.340
so strange to think of her as the visual symbol

00:10:46.340 --> 00:10:51.029
of revolution. She was... At best, sort of ambivalent

00:10:51.029 --> 00:10:53.809
about. Ambivalent is the perfect word. She supported

00:10:53.809 --> 00:10:56.649
her brothers fiercely, but she was never seduced

00:10:56.649 --> 00:10:59.210
by the lifestyle. She saw the vanity in it. But

00:10:59.210 --> 00:11:01.230
this is where the popular narrative usually stops.

00:11:01.649 --> 00:11:04.169
She was the sister who sat for the paintings.

00:11:04.370 --> 00:11:07.190
It's a footnote. But she was writing for them,

00:11:07.190 --> 00:11:10.049
too. She absolutely was. The PRB had a literary

00:11:10.049 --> 00:11:13.159
journal called The Germ. Which is a terrible

00:11:13.159 --> 00:11:15.799
name, by the way. A truly awful name. It sounds

00:11:15.799 --> 00:11:17.500
infectious, like you need to wash your hands

00:11:17.500 --> 00:11:19.080
after reading it. And it didn't last long, did

00:11:19.080 --> 00:11:21.120
it? No, only four issues. It was a commercial

00:11:21.120 --> 00:11:23.720
disaster. But Christina published seven poems

00:11:23.720 --> 00:11:27.299
in it. She used a pseudonym, Ellen Allen. But

00:11:27.299 --> 00:11:29.080
anyone in their circle would have known it was

00:11:29.080 --> 00:11:31.820
her. So at 20 years old, she's in print, right

00:11:31.820 --> 00:11:34.340
alongside her famous brother and his friends.

00:11:34.799 --> 00:11:37.620
Right. So she wasn't just a muse. She was a creator.

00:11:37.899 --> 00:11:40.519
And frankly, if you read the journal now, modern

00:11:40.519 --> 00:11:42.759
critics often argue her contributions were the

00:11:42.759 --> 00:11:44.840
strongest and most mature pieces in the whole

00:11:44.840 --> 00:11:47.080
publication. And she wasn't just a creator. She

00:11:47.080 --> 00:11:49.779
was a critic, a very sharp one. I want to dive

00:11:49.779 --> 00:11:52.159
into that poem in the artist's studio because

00:11:52.159 --> 00:11:54.379
when I read this, I felt like I was witnessing

00:11:54.379 --> 00:11:59.240
a very polite, very poetic murder. It is a devastatingly

00:11:59.240 --> 00:12:01.659
sharp piece of analysis. It was written in 1856.

00:12:02.019 --> 00:12:04.460
So by this time, her brother Dante Gabriel is

00:12:04.460 --> 00:12:06.500
completely obsessed with Elizabeth Siddle, who

00:12:06.500 --> 00:12:09.720
was his primary muse and future wife. And he

00:12:09.720 --> 00:12:12.360
is painting her over and over and over again

00:12:12.360 --> 00:12:15.779
as a saint, as a tragic heroine, as a lover.

00:12:15.980 --> 00:12:17.620
And Christina's watching this happen. She's in

00:12:17.620 --> 00:12:19.539
the studio. She walks into the studio, sees all

00:12:19.539 --> 00:12:21.679
these canvases, and she writes, One face looks

00:12:21.679 --> 00:12:24.179
out from all his canvases. One self -same figure

00:12:24.179 --> 00:12:27.120
sits or walks or leans. She describes how how

00:12:27.120 --> 00:12:29.919
he paints the woman as a queen, a nameless girl,

00:12:30.139 --> 00:12:32.759
a saint, an angel. But then the poem pivots.

00:12:32.980 --> 00:12:35.399
It pivots hard. She says the artist feeds upon

00:12:35.399 --> 00:12:38.440
her face by day and night. Feeds upon her face.

00:12:38.500 --> 00:12:40.480
That's not romantic language. That is predatory.

00:12:40.580 --> 00:12:43.460
It's almost vampire language going back to her

00:12:43.460 --> 00:12:46.299
uncle. It is. It's about consumption, not adoration.

00:12:46.720 --> 00:12:49.399
And then she delivers the killing blow, the lines

00:12:49.399 --> 00:12:51.820
that just stop you in your tracks. She says he

00:12:51.820 --> 00:12:55.120
paints her not as she is, but as she fills his

00:12:55.120 --> 00:12:58.759
dream. Wow. Not as she is, but as she fills his

00:12:58.759 --> 00:13:01.019
dream. One of the most profound critiques of

00:13:01.019 --> 00:13:03.700
the male gaze ever written. She is saying that

00:13:03.700 --> 00:13:06.879
this so -called pre -Raphaelite worship of women

00:13:06.879 --> 00:13:09.320
isn't actually about the women at all. It's about

00:13:09.320 --> 00:13:12.799
male artistic ego. It's narcissism. The artist

00:13:12.799 --> 00:13:15.519
is just projecting his own fantasy onto a silent

00:13:15.519 --> 00:13:18.220
object. Precisely. He doesn't love the woman.

00:13:18.320 --> 00:13:20.399
He loves his own artistic vision of the woman.

00:13:20.460 --> 00:13:23.059
He's feeding his own dream, not seeing her reality.

00:13:23.340 --> 00:13:26.120
And she's calling out her own brother. For erasing

00:13:26.120 --> 00:13:28.500
the humanity of the woman he claims to love.

00:13:28.639 --> 00:13:31.500
That must have been incredibly tense. Incredibly.

00:13:31.720 --> 00:13:33.879
And she could only write that because she was

00:13:33.879 --> 00:13:36.039
on the inside. She knew what it felt like to

00:13:36.039 --> 00:13:38.779
be the face on the canvas, to be told to sit

00:13:38.779 --> 00:13:41.100
still and look holy while the men discussed art

00:13:41.100 --> 00:13:43.840
with a capital A. She's asserting that the muse

00:13:43.840 --> 00:13:47.139
has eyes and a mind and she's judging the artist.

00:13:47.340 --> 00:13:50.080
It completely upends the power dynamic. That

00:13:50.080 --> 00:13:52.440
creates such a tension in her life. She's part

00:13:52.440 --> 00:13:54.720
of this revolutionary group, but she's also the

00:13:54.720 --> 00:13:56.460
moral conscience sitting in the corner taking

00:13:56.460 --> 00:13:59.179
notes. And that tension, that internal pressure,

00:13:59.279 --> 00:14:02.710
it just... explodes in 1862 when she publishes

00:14:02.710 --> 00:14:05.309
her own collection goblin market and other poems

00:14:05.309 --> 00:14:07.870
this is the big one this is the moment she steps

00:14:07.870 --> 00:14:11.269
out of everyone's shadow and weirdly her brother

00:14:11.269 --> 00:14:14.110
dante gabriel illustrated it Which is fascinating,

00:14:14.210 --> 00:14:16.549
isn't it? Because his illustrations are incredibly

00:14:16.549 --> 00:14:18.690
sensual. The frontispiece shows the two sisters

00:14:18.690 --> 00:14:21.090
in bed together, and the title page shows the

00:14:21.090 --> 00:14:23.970
goblins swarming Lizzie. He really leaned into

00:14:23.970 --> 00:14:26.370
the strange, seductive, and slightly sinister

00:14:26.370 --> 00:14:28.750
vibe of the title poem. Okay, we have to talk

00:14:28.750 --> 00:14:30.750
about Goblin Market. If you are listening to

00:14:30.750 --> 00:14:32.389
this and you haven't read it, you need to stop

00:14:32.389 --> 00:14:36.149
and find it online. It is, it's wild. It's unlike

00:14:36.149 --> 00:14:38.450
anything else. It's a narrative poem, it's quite

00:14:38.450 --> 00:14:41.110
long, and it's about two sisters, Laura and Lizzie,

00:14:41.190 --> 00:14:44.210
who live together in a cottage. And every evening,

00:14:44.289 --> 00:14:46.610
they hear these goblin merchants selling fruit

00:14:46.610 --> 00:14:48.889
down by the river. Come by our orchard fruits.

00:14:49.149 --> 00:14:51.529
Come by, come by. It's one of the most famous

00:14:51.529 --> 00:14:54.269
and hypnotic opening sequences in Victorian poetry.

00:14:54.870 --> 00:14:57.210
The goblins themselves are described as these

00:14:57.210 --> 00:14:59.750
animalistic creatures. One has a cat's face,

00:14:59.870 --> 00:15:02.090
one's like a rat. And the fruit they're selling.

00:15:02.840 --> 00:15:05.220
It's not just apples and pears. No, it's this

00:15:05.220 --> 00:15:08.559
lush, exotic, overwhelming list. Plump, unpecked

00:15:08.559 --> 00:15:11.460
cherries, wild, freeborn cranberries, pineapples,

00:15:11.460 --> 00:15:14.259
blackberries, apricots, strawberries. The description

00:15:14.259 --> 00:15:17.919
is pure sensory overload. It's meant to be intoxicating.

00:15:18.080 --> 00:15:20.639
And Laura, the curious sister, is entranced.

00:15:20.799 --> 00:15:23.850
But they have no money. So she pays with the

00:15:23.850 --> 00:15:26.009
lock of her golden hair and a tear. Which is

00:15:26.009 --> 00:15:28.629
already a massive red flag in any fairy tale

00:15:28.629 --> 00:15:31.809
logic. You never, ever give a goblin a piece

00:15:31.809 --> 00:15:33.889
of yourself. Your hair, your name, anything.

00:15:34.440 --> 00:15:36.860
It's a huge mistake. Yeah. And she eats the fruit.

00:15:36.940 --> 00:15:39.720
And the poem describes it as this ecstatic, almost

00:15:39.720 --> 00:15:43.220
transcendent experience. She sucked and sucked

00:15:43.220 --> 00:15:45.759
and sucked the more fruits which that unknown

00:15:45.759 --> 00:15:48.320
orchard bore. But then she goes home, and the

00:15:48.320 --> 00:15:50.820
next day she begins to waste away. She's suffering

00:15:50.820 --> 00:15:53.100
from a terrible withdrawal. She longs for more

00:15:53.100 --> 00:15:55.000
fruit, but she can no longer hear the goblins

00:15:55.000 --> 00:15:57.940
cry. He's aging rapidly, her hair turns gray,

00:15:58.039 --> 00:16:01.080
and she's clearly dying. The fruit has acted

00:16:01.080 --> 00:16:03.399
like a poison or a powerful addiction. So the

00:16:03.399 --> 00:16:06.090
other... Sister Lizzie, the good, cautious sister,

00:16:06.230 --> 00:16:08.909
decides she has to save Laura. She goes to the

00:16:08.909 --> 00:16:11.490
goblins to get fruit for her. Right. but she's

00:16:11.490 --> 00:16:13.429
smart she takes a silver penny she's going to

00:16:13.429 --> 00:16:15.549
conduct a proper transaction she wants to buy

00:16:15.549 --> 00:16:18.350
the fruit and take it home but the goblins aren't

00:16:18.350 --> 00:16:20.690
interested in commerce they turn violent they

00:16:20.690 --> 00:16:22.490
don't want her money they want her to eat exactly

00:16:22.490 --> 00:16:25.049
and they attack her they try to force feed her

00:16:25.049 --> 00:16:27.850
the fruit they pull her hair tear her dress they

00:16:27.850 --> 00:16:30.250
squeezed out the juice that served all her face

00:16:30.250 --> 00:16:33.590
and lodged in every dimple they basically assault

00:16:33.590 --> 00:16:36.610
her with this fruit and this scene Reading it,

00:16:36.629 --> 00:16:39.370
it's incredibly intense. It feels like a symbolic

00:16:39.370 --> 00:16:42.870
sexual assault. It is vividly assaultive. But

00:16:42.870 --> 00:16:45.169
Lizzie stands there like a rock, refusing to

00:16:45.169 --> 00:16:48.450
open her mouth. Like a lily in a flood, the poem

00:16:48.450 --> 00:16:51.289
says. She endures the abuse without partaking.

00:16:51.309 --> 00:16:53.529
She just lets them cover her in juice. And then

00:16:53.529 --> 00:16:56.269
she runs home. She runs home, covered in this

00:16:56.269 --> 00:16:58.730
sticky juice and pulp, and she tells Laura to

00:16:58.730 --> 00:17:01.789
kiss it off her face. Her exact words are, hug

00:17:01.789 --> 00:17:04.490
me, kiss me, suck my juices, eat me, drink me,

00:17:04.569 --> 00:17:07.289
love me. Which is, I mean, that is some astonishingly

00:17:07.289 --> 00:17:10.029
charged language. It is, and Laura kisses the

00:17:10.029 --> 00:17:12.450
juice off Lizzie's face, and it acts as a painful

00:17:12.450 --> 00:17:15.089
antidote. It burns her looks like poison, but

00:17:15.089 --> 00:17:17.609
then it breaks the fever. It cures her. She is

00:17:17.609 --> 00:17:21.309
saved. Okay, so. What on earth is this poem about?

00:17:21.509 --> 00:17:23.329
Because I've seen interpretations that range

00:17:23.329 --> 00:17:25.250
from, you know, it's a charming story for children,

00:17:25.349 --> 00:17:27.509
all the way to it's about heroin addiction and

00:17:27.509 --> 00:17:30.349
it's a coded exploration of lesbian desire. And

00:17:30.349 --> 00:17:34.029
the incredible answer is yes. It is all of those

00:17:34.029 --> 00:17:36.970
things and more. That's the genius of Rossetti.

00:17:37.190 --> 00:17:40.170
The poem acts as a mirror for whatever the critic

00:17:40.170 --> 00:17:43.750
wants to find. It supports multiple, even contradictory

00:17:43.750 --> 00:17:46.250
interpretations at the same time. Let's break

00:17:46.250 --> 00:17:48.059
some of those down. The religious angle seems

00:17:48.059 --> 00:17:49.940
like the most obvious starting point since we

00:17:49.940 --> 00:17:52.400
know she was so devout. It's a crystal clear

00:17:52.400 --> 00:17:55.359
allegory of sin and redemption from an Anglo

00:17:55.359 --> 00:17:58.779
-Catholic perspective. Laura is Eve falling into

00:17:58.779 --> 00:18:01.359
temptation by eating the forbidden fruit. She

00:18:01.359 --> 00:18:04.269
represents fallen humanity. And Lizzie. Lizzie

00:18:04.269 --> 00:18:06.910
acts as a Christ figure. She goes into the wilderness,

00:18:07.150 --> 00:18:10.029
into the darkness, she willingly suffers violence

00:18:10.029 --> 00:18:12.910
and humiliation, and she offers her own body,

00:18:13.049 --> 00:18:15.990
eat me, drink me, as a Eucharistic sacrifice

00:18:15.990 --> 00:18:19.650
to save her sister. It fits the theology perfectly.

00:18:20.160 --> 00:18:22.819
The saving grace is mediated through a pure figure.

00:18:23.059 --> 00:18:24.920
That tracks completely. But then you have the

00:18:24.920 --> 00:18:26.980
social angle, which is maybe even more radical

00:18:26.980 --> 00:18:29.299
for its time. This is where her real world experience

00:18:29.299 --> 00:18:31.819
comes in. This isn't just theory for her. Right.

00:18:31.839 --> 00:18:33.839
Tell us more about her work at the Highgate Penitentiary,

00:18:33.839 --> 00:18:36.099
because this grounds the poem in a very real,

00:18:36.299 --> 00:18:41.210
very grim reality. Yes. From 1859 to 1870, so

00:18:41.210 --> 00:18:43.269
right when she was writing Goblin Market, Rossetti

00:18:43.269 --> 00:18:45.549
volunteered at the St. Mary Magdalene Penitentiary

00:18:45.549 --> 00:18:48.130
in Highgate. This was a house of refuge for so

00:18:48.130 --> 00:18:51.549
-called fallen women prostitutes, unmarried mothers,

00:18:51.809 --> 00:18:53.910
women who had been cast out of polite society.

00:18:54.289 --> 00:18:56.369
So she is spending her days listening to the

00:18:56.369 --> 00:18:59.170
stories of women who have been ruined by sexual

00:18:59.170 --> 00:19:01.690
temptation, ruined by the market. Precisely.

00:19:01.690 --> 00:19:04.470
She saw the real world consequences. In Victorian

00:19:04.470 --> 00:19:07.269
society, a respectable woman has one primary

00:19:07.269 --> 00:19:10.720
commodity. her virtue. Once it's spent or sold,

00:19:10.920 --> 00:19:13.859
she's worthless. She's cast out. In Goblin Market,

00:19:14.140 --> 00:19:16.000
Rossetti is writing a radically different ending.

00:19:16.200 --> 00:19:18.980
How so? Usually in Victorian novels and poems,

00:19:19.140 --> 00:19:21.380
the fallen woman dies. That's the only way to

00:19:21.380 --> 00:19:23.799
restore social order. Think of Little Emily and

00:19:23.799 --> 00:19:26.000
David Copperfield. But in this poem, the fallen

00:19:26.000 --> 00:19:28.240
woman, Laura, is saved. And crucially, she's

00:19:28.240 --> 00:19:30.500
not saved by a man or a priest or by marriage.

00:19:30.680 --> 00:19:33.240
She's saved by another woman, by her sister.

00:19:33.440 --> 00:19:35.960
That is a massive subversion of the trope. It's

00:19:35.960 --> 00:19:40.720
female solidarity is the... of redemption. And

00:19:40.720 --> 00:19:55.859
then... There's the erotic interpretation because

00:19:55.859 --> 00:19:58.700
you cannot read those lines without blushing

00:19:58.700 --> 00:20:00.859
a little. The language is so physical. You really

00:20:00.859 --> 00:20:04.019
can't. The poem is drenched in sensuality, the

00:20:04.019 --> 00:20:06.779
sucking of the fruit, the juices, the final scene

00:20:06.779 --> 00:20:10.259
between the sisters. It's incredibly oral, incredibly

00:20:10.259 --> 00:20:13.240
lush. Many modern critics have argued that the

00:20:13.240 --> 00:20:15.720
goblins represent male sexual aggression and

00:20:15.720 --> 00:20:18.740
the fruit is forbidden sexual knowledge. The

00:20:18.740 --> 00:20:20.619
attack on Lizzie, where they smear their fluids

00:20:20.619 --> 00:20:23.359
on her face, is vividly violent and can be read

00:20:23.359 --> 00:20:25.839
as a symbolic rape. And the final scene is this

00:20:25.839 --> 00:20:28.480
incredibly intimate physical moment between two

00:20:28.480 --> 00:20:31.400
women that is both healing and intensely erotic.

00:20:31.500 --> 00:20:33.279
It's a work of immense and immensely controlled

00:20:33.279 --> 00:20:35.900
desire. It feels like she's channeling all this

00:20:35.900 --> 00:20:38.380
repressed energy. We know she lived a very contained,

00:20:38.599 --> 00:20:41.279
chaste life, but the poem is an explosion of

00:20:41.279 --> 00:20:43.859
sensory detail and barely suppressed passion.

00:20:44.160 --> 00:20:46.240
It's like the repression is a powerful fuel.

00:20:46.440 --> 00:20:48.480
I think that's exactly it. By locking everything

00:20:48.480 --> 00:20:51.339
down in her daily life, she built up this incredible...

00:20:51.589 --> 00:20:53.569
pressure that could only be vented into the poetry

00:20:53.569 --> 00:20:56.789
if she had lived a loose bohemian life like her

00:20:56.789 --> 00:20:58.529
brother she might never have written something

00:20:58.529 --> 00:21:00.990
this strange and this intense the constraint

00:21:00.990 --> 00:21:04.130
forced the creativity into this bizarre brilliant

00:21:04.130 --> 00:21:07.230
unforgettable shape speaking of her locking everything

00:21:07.230 --> 00:21:11.349
down we have to talk about her love life or um

00:21:11.869 --> 00:21:14.769
Her lack of one. Because looking at the biography,

00:21:14.970 --> 00:21:17.230
she had options. This wasn't a case of her sitting

00:21:17.230 --> 00:21:19.670
alone because she was unwanted or unlovable.

00:21:19.809 --> 00:21:21.990
She was sitting alone because she said no. She

00:21:21.990 --> 00:21:24.789
was a master of renunciation. She had three major

00:21:24.789 --> 00:21:26.970
suitors that we know of, and she rejected all

00:21:26.970 --> 00:21:29.509
of them, each for a very specific principled

00:21:29.509 --> 00:21:31.190
reason. Let's run through the roster. Suitor

00:21:31.190 --> 00:21:34.339
number one, James Collinson. Collinson was a

00:21:34.339 --> 00:21:36.460
painter and one of the seven founding members

00:21:36.460 --> 00:21:38.980
of the Pre -Raphaelite Brotherhood. He painted

00:21:38.980 --> 00:21:41.579
a very lovely, very sensitive portrait of Christina.

00:21:41.960 --> 00:21:45.000
They were engaged in 1848. It was a done deal.

00:21:45.160 --> 00:21:47.559
So what happened? Collinson had a crisis of faith.

00:21:47.740 --> 00:21:50.579
He was tormented by religious doubt. He'd been

00:21:50.579 --> 00:21:52.599
a Roman Catholic, converted to the Church of

00:21:52.599 --> 00:21:55.140
England to join the PRB, and then, while engaged

00:21:55.140 --> 00:21:57.759
to Christina, he decided he had to revert to

00:21:57.759 --> 00:22:00.640
Roman Catholicism. And for Christina, the devout

00:22:00.640 --> 00:22:03.240
Anglo -Catholic? That was the deal breaker. A

00:22:03.240 --> 00:22:06.960
total deal breaker. The gap between Anglo -Catholicism

00:22:06.960 --> 00:22:09.259
and Roman Catholicism might seem small to us

00:22:09.259 --> 00:22:12.420
today, but in mid -19th century England, it was

00:22:12.420 --> 00:22:15.480
a chasm. The Oxford movement defined itself in

00:22:15.480 --> 00:22:17.980
opposition to Rome. For her, it was a matter

00:22:17.980 --> 00:22:20.980
of eternal truth. She broke the engagement in

00:22:20.980 --> 00:22:24.559
1850. And it devastated her. Absolutely. The

00:22:24.559 --> 00:22:26.539
sources say she collapsed in the hallway when

00:22:26.539 --> 00:22:28.579
she saw him by chance afterwards. It broke her

00:22:28.579 --> 00:22:30.480
heart, but she would not compromise on her theology.

00:22:31.150 --> 00:22:33.849
Faith came first. Okay, suitor number two. This

00:22:33.849 --> 00:22:35.509
one seems to have been the big love of her life.

00:22:36.250 --> 00:22:38.910
Charles Bagot Cayley. The absent -minded scholar.

00:22:39.190 --> 00:22:41.970
He was a linguist, a translator of Dante. By

00:22:41.970 --> 00:22:43.990
all accounts, they were soulmates. They had a

00:22:43.990 --> 00:22:46.650
deep intellectual and emotional bond. Her brother

00:22:46.650 --> 00:22:48.750
William wrote that she loved him deeply, more

00:22:48.750 --> 00:22:50.750
than anyone else. So what was the problem this

00:22:50.750 --> 00:22:53.289
time? He wasn't agnostic, or at least he had

00:22:53.289 --> 00:22:55.089
what she considered to be religious scruples.

00:22:55.250 --> 00:22:57.369
He just wasn't religious enough. But she loved

00:22:57.369 --> 00:22:59.859
him. She connected with him intellectually. but

00:22:59.859 --> 00:23:01.700
she wouldn't marry him because he didn't share

00:23:01.700 --> 00:23:04.680
her specific faith. She turned him down in 1866.

00:23:05.319 --> 00:23:07.740
She remained incredibly close friends with him

00:23:07.740 --> 00:23:09.880
until he died. She even acted as the executor

00:23:09.880 --> 00:23:12.859
of his will, but she wouldn't marry him. In her

00:23:12.859 --> 00:23:15.539
view, marriage was a sacrament, a spiritual union

00:23:15.539 --> 00:23:18.579
ordained by God. If they weren't aligned on the

00:23:18.579 --> 00:23:21.359
eternal stuff, she couldn't do it. That is a

00:23:21.359 --> 00:23:24.079
level of integrity, or you could say stubbornness,

00:23:24.119 --> 00:23:26.460
that is hard to wrap your head around today,

00:23:26.599 --> 00:23:30.220
to give up what seems to be... true love for

00:23:30.220 --> 00:23:32.480
a theological principle. It's the concept of

00:23:32.480 --> 00:23:35.559
renunciation made real. She genuinely believed

00:23:35.559 --> 00:23:37.740
that by giving up earthly happiness, she was

00:23:37.740 --> 00:23:40.380
keeping herself pure for something greater. But

00:23:40.380 --> 00:23:42.680
you feel the cost of that choice in her poetry.

00:23:42.900 --> 00:23:45.440
There is so much longing, so much grief for what

00:23:45.440 --> 00:23:47.380
might have been. It's not the poetry of someone

00:23:47.380 --> 00:23:49.440
who doesn't care. It's the poetry of someone

00:23:49.440 --> 00:23:51.779
who wants it desperately, but holds herself back.

00:23:52.019 --> 00:23:54.200
There's that famous painting by the symbolist

00:23:54.200 --> 00:23:57.119
Fernand Knopf, I Lock My Door Upon Myself. Yes,

00:23:57.200 --> 00:24:00.400
inspired by a line from her poem, Who Shall Deliver

00:24:00.400 --> 00:24:03.819
Me? That line, I lock my door upon myself, is

00:24:03.819 --> 00:24:06.140
essentially her motto. She controlled her world

00:24:06.140 --> 00:24:08.299
by shutting it out. And there was a third suitor,

00:24:08.319 --> 00:24:10.319
wasn't there? John Brett. Yes, another painter.

00:24:10.420 --> 00:24:12.480
He was very persistent, but she just shut him

00:24:12.480 --> 00:24:14.900
down completely. And her poem, No Thank You,

00:24:14.960 --> 00:24:17.460
John, is thought to be about him. It's hilariously,

00:24:17.519 --> 00:24:20.440
brutally blunt. I never said I loved you, John.

00:24:20.599 --> 00:24:22.900
Why will you tease me day by day? She doesn't

00:24:22.900 --> 00:24:25.279
pull any punches. None at all. I have no heart.

00:24:25.839 --> 00:24:27.579
Perhaps I have not, but then you're mad to take

00:24:27.579 --> 00:24:29.500
offense that I don't give you what I have not

00:24:29.500 --> 00:24:32.839
got. It's almost a modern breakup text. She wasn't

00:24:32.839 --> 00:24:35.240
afraid to be direct and final. Let's move to

00:24:35.240 --> 00:24:37.740
her later years. Because while she's writing

00:24:37.740 --> 00:24:40.839
these beautiful, melancholy poems and navigating

00:24:40.839 --> 00:24:44.160
these complex emotional decisions, her body is

00:24:44.160 --> 00:24:46.160
effectively attacking her. Her health was always

00:24:46.160 --> 00:24:48.859
fragile ever since that breakdown at 14. But

00:24:48.859 --> 00:24:51.720
in 1872, she was diagnosed with Graves' disease.

00:24:52.329 --> 00:24:54.509
It's a serious autoimmune disorder affecting

00:24:54.509 --> 00:24:57.049
the thyroid. And in the 19th century, the treatment

00:24:57.049 --> 00:25:00.250
for that was? Basically nothing effective. It

00:25:00.250 --> 00:25:02.890
was a terrible ordeal. It caused her eyes to

00:25:02.890 --> 00:25:05.329
protrude, it darkened her skin, it made her hair

00:25:05.329 --> 00:25:07.690
fall out, and it caused heart palpitations and

00:25:07.690 --> 00:25:10.930
extreme fatigue. It was disfiguring and exhausting,

00:25:11.210 --> 00:25:13.490
and she had a near -fatal crisis with it that

00:25:13.490 --> 00:25:15.990
left her an invalid for years. And that wasn't

00:25:15.990 --> 00:25:19.289
the end of it. No. Later, in 1893, she developed

00:25:19.289 --> 00:25:21.470
breast cancer. She really went through the wringer

00:25:21.470 --> 00:25:23.890
physically. She underwent a mastectomy, which

00:25:23.890 --> 00:25:27.269
was a brutal, agonizing surgery in 1893 without

00:25:27.269 --> 00:25:30.549
modern anesthetic or aftercare. The cancer returned,

00:25:30.750 --> 00:25:33.690
and she eventually died in December 1894. But

00:25:33.690 --> 00:25:35.509
before she died, she wrote quite a bit about

00:25:35.509 --> 00:25:38.369
death. And her attitude wasn't one of fear. It

00:25:38.369 --> 00:25:41.430
was almost a kind of coolness. Indifference is

00:25:41.430 --> 00:25:43.529
a good word for it. Look at her most famous poem

00:25:43.529 --> 00:25:46.769
on the subject, Song. It starts, When I am dead,

00:25:46.789 --> 00:25:49.769
my dearest, sing no sad songs for me. Plant thou

00:25:49.769 --> 00:25:52.829
no roses at my head, nor shady cypress tree.

00:25:53.009 --> 00:25:55.869
She tells her lover not to mourn. She says, Just

00:25:55.869 --> 00:25:58.990
let me be. And if thou wilt, remember, and if

00:25:58.990 --> 00:26:02.220
thou wilt, forget. It's so strikingly modern.

00:26:02.420 --> 00:26:05.200
She's rejecting the entire Victorian obsession

00:26:05.200 --> 00:26:08.720
with elaborate mourning rituals, the black crepe,

00:26:08.740 --> 00:26:11.380
the weeping, the monumental funerals. What do

00:26:11.380 --> 00:26:12.880
you think she's saying there? She's saying, I'll

00:26:12.880 --> 00:26:14.859
be in the twilight. I'll be dreaming. I won't

00:26:14.859 --> 00:26:16.500
know if you're crying or not. Your grief is for

00:26:16.500 --> 00:26:18.920
you, not for me. It doesn't matter. It's a very

00:26:18.920 --> 00:26:21.400
stoic, almost comforting view of the afterlife

00:26:21.400 --> 00:26:25.500
as a place of quiet rest, not fire and brimstone

00:26:25.500 --> 00:26:28.630
judgment. Speaking of funerals and graves, we

00:26:28.630 --> 00:26:30.650
cannot end this deep dive without talking about

00:26:30.650 --> 00:26:33.390
the Highgate Cemetery incident. Because this

00:26:33.390 --> 00:26:36.650
story is. It's like something Edgar Allan Poe

00:26:36.650 --> 00:26:38.329
would have written, but it actually happened

00:26:38.329 --> 00:26:40.809
to her family. It is the ultimate gothic horror

00:26:40.809 --> 00:26:43.890
story of the London literary scene. So Christina

00:26:43.890 --> 00:26:46.609
is buried in the Rossetti family grave in Highgate

00:26:46.609 --> 00:26:49.250
Cemetery, but that grave was already infamous

00:26:49.250 --> 00:26:52.009
long before she was laid to rest there. Because

00:26:52.009 --> 00:26:54.910
of Elizabeth Siddle, Dante Gabriel's wife? Exactly.

00:26:55.460 --> 00:26:58.119
When Elizabeth died of a laudanum overdose in

00:26:58.119 --> 00:27:00.700
1862, the same year Goblin Market was published,

00:27:01.259 --> 00:27:04.640
Dante was overcome with grief and guilt. He felt

00:27:04.640 --> 00:27:06.519
he had neglected her for his art and his other

00:27:06.519 --> 00:27:09.019
affairs. So he makes this grand dramatic gesture.

00:27:09.299 --> 00:27:12.279
The grandest. At the funeral, just before the

00:27:12.279 --> 00:27:14.440
coffin was sealed, he took the only manuscript

00:27:14.440 --> 00:27:16.839
of his unpublished poems, his life's work up

00:27:16.839 --> 00:27:19.200
to that point, and he slid the book into her

00:27:19.200 --> 00:27:21.400
coffin, tucking it into her famous red hair.

00:27:21.920 --> 00:27:24.160
He buried his art with his muse. I have given

00:27:24.160 --> 00:27:26.140
everything to the grave. It's very dramatic.

00:27:26.359 --> 00:27:28.980
Very. It was the ultimate romantic gesture. But

00:27:28.980 --> 00:27:32.700
fast forward seven years to 1869. Dante is now

00:27:32.700 --> 00:27:34.859
more famous, but his eyesight is failing. He

00:27:34.859 --> 00:27:36.920
can't paint as much. And his friends are urging

00:27:36.920 --> 00:27:39.779
him to publish a new book of poetry. And he realizes

00:27:39.779 --> 00:27:42.559
the only copies of his best early poems are decomposing

00:27:42.559 --> 00:27:44.880
six feet under in Highgate Cemetery. Oh, no.

00:27:45.319 --> 00:27:48.079
I know what's coming. I still hate it every time

00:27:48.079 --> 00:27:50.640
I hear it. He authorizes the exhumation. He gets

00:27:50.640 --> 00:27:52.960
permission from the. home secretary. In the dead

00:27:52.960 --> 00:27:55.259
of night, with a fire lit beside the grave to

00:27:55.259 --> 00:27:58.240
ward off noxious fumes, a group of men dig up

00:27:58.240 --> 00:28:00.740
his wife to retrieve a book of poems. That is

00:28:00.740 --> 00:28:04.599
just monstrous. It is profoundly macabre. Dante

00:28:04.599 --> 00:28:06.640
couldn't bring himself to go. He sat in a friend's

00:28:06.640 --> 00:28:09.940
house waiting. But the manuscript was retrieved.

00:28:10.299 --> 00:28:12.940
According to eyewitnesses, Seidel's body was

00:28:12.940 --> 00:28:15.440
remarkably preserved and her red hair had continued

00:28:15.440 --> 00:28:18.240
to grow, filling the coffin. The book was taken

00:28:18.240 --> 00:28:21.150
out. disinfected and published and christina

00:28:21.150 --> 00:28:23.130
knew about this the whole family knew the whole

00:28:23.130 --> 00:28:26.490
family knew it was a dark cloud over them christina

00:28:26.490 --> 00:28:29.089
with her profound sense of the sacred and the

00:28:29.089 --> 00:28:32.470
profane must have been horrified she knew her

00:28:32.470 --> 00:28:34.910
brother had desecrated his wife's grave for the

00:28:34.910 --> 00:28:37.250
sake of his career and then she had to be buried

00:28:37.250 --> 00:28:40.509
in that same plot eventually yes it really highlights

00:28:40.509 --> 00:28:42.690
the fundamental difference between them dante

00:28:42.690 --> 00:28:45.450
sacrificed other people even the dead for his

00:28:45.450 --> 00:28:48.859
art christina sacrificed herself her for her

00:28:48.859 --> 00:28:51.619
faith. She is buried in that same grave, but

00:28:51.619 --> 00:28:54.480
her legacy is completely untainted by that kind

00:28:54.480 --> 00:28:57.539
of monstrous selfishness. They had a very powerful

00:28:57.539 --> 00:29:00.019
distinction to make. But despite all this darkness,

00:29:00.160 --> 00:29:03.019
the exhumation, the illness, the constant renunciation,

00:29:03.460 --> 00:29:06.680
her public legacy is surprisingly bright. I mean

00:29:06.680 --> 00:29:08.380
that literally. We're talking about Christmas.

00:29:08.460 --> 00:29:10.700
We are. If you go to a church service or even

00:29:10.700 --> 00:29:13.039
just a shopping mall in December, you will hear

00:29:13.039 --> 00:29:15.420
Christina Rossetti. She wrote the poem In the

00:29:15.420 --> 00:29:17.819
Bleak Midwinter. I had no idea that was her.

00:29:17.920 --> 00:29:20.440
I've seen that every year. It was published posthumously.

00:29:20.579 --> 00:29:23.039
The composer Gustav Holst set it to music in

00:29:23.039 --> 00:29:25.740
1906. And later, another composer, Harold Dark,

00:29:25.880 --> 00:29:28.900
did a version. It's consistently voted the best

00:29:28.900 --> 00:29:31.019
Christmas carol of all time by choir masters

00:29:31.019 --> 00:29:32.779
and experts. And there's another one too, right?

00:29:32.940 --> 00:29:35.519
Love came down at Christmas. Another staple.

00:29:35.759 --> 00:29:38.339
So the woman who wrote about goblin fruit and

00:29:38.339 --> 00:29:41.339
spiritual self -flagellation also scripted the

00:29:41.339 --> 00:29:43.839
coziest, most beloved moments of the holiday

00:29:43.839 --> 00:29:46.400
season. Contradictions just keep piling up. It

00:29:46.400 --> 00:29:48.519
shows her incredible range. She could do this.

00:29:48.559 --> 00:29:51.539
Simple, pure, perfect, devotional lyric just

00:29:51.539 --> 00:29:53.700
as well as the complex, knotted psychological

00:29:53.700 --> 00:29:57.480
drama. And In the Bleak Midwinter is actually

00:29:57.480 --> 00:30:00.819
a profound piece of theology. It contrasts the

00:30:00.819 --> 00:30:03.440
majesty of God with the humble, freezing reality

00:30:03.440 --> 00:30:06.940
of the stable. Earth stood hard as iron, water

00:30:06.940 --> 00:30:09.819
like a stone. It's beautiful and real. And her

00:30:09.819 --> 00:30:12.319
influence didn't stop in the church. The modernists

00:30:12.319 --> 00:30:15.039
who came after, they respected her. They did,

00:30:15.220 --> 00:30:17.859
which is rare. Usually the modernist people like

00:30:17.859 --> 00:30:21.099
T .S. Eliot and Virginia Woolf despised the Victorians.

00:30:21.140 --> 00:30:22.599
They thought they were stuffy and sentimental.

00:30:22.920 --> 00:30:25.079
But Virginia Woolf wrote about Rossetti with

00:30:25.079 --> 00:30:27.720
real respect. She saw that Rossetti wasn't just

00:30:27.720 --> 00:30:30.240
spilling her emotions on the page. She was a

00:30:30.240 --> 00:30:32.819
master craftsman. She cut away everything unnecessary,

00:30:33.099 --> 00:30:36.960
creating these hard gem -like poems. The poet

00:30:36.960 --> 00:30:39.420
Philip Larkin was a huge admirer, too. And we

00:30:39.420 --> 00:30:41.319
found some bizarrely contentious... Temporary

00:30:41.319 --> 00:30:43.099
pop culture connections when we were researching

00:30:43.099 --> 00:30:46.240
this. Very weird ones. J .K. Rowling. The title

00:30:46.240 --> 00:30:48.259
of her first crime novel, The Cuckoo's Calling,

00:30:48.460 --> 00:30:51.200
is a direct quote from Rossetti's poem, A Dirge.

00:30:51.279 --> 00:30:53.900
And the Beatles? Is there a Beatles connection?

00:30:54.579 --> 00:30:57.619
Indirectly via Yoko Ono, her song Who Has Seen

00:30:57.619 --> 00:31:00.380
the Wind from her 1970 album Plastic Ono Band.

00:31:00.519 --> 00:31:03.259
The lyrics are almost verbatim from Rossetti's

00:31:03.259 --> 00:31:05.579
children's poem of the same name. That's amazing.

00:31:05.779 --> 00:31:08.039
And Bear McCreary, the composer who does the

00:31:08.039 --> 00:31:10.440
music for huge shows like The Walking Dead and

00:31:10.440 --> 00:31:13.240
video games like God of War. He composed a beautiful

00:31:13.240 --> 00:31:16.339
choral piece based on her poem song When I Am

00:31:16.339 --> 00:31:19.710
Dead, My Dearest. Her work is just, it's everywhere.

00:31:19.809 --> 00:31:21.470
It's in the hymnals. It's in the universities.

00:31:21.509 --> 00:31:23.549
It's in the pop charts. It's in detective novels.

00:31:23.789 --> 00:31:26.390
One last fun fact to humanize her completely.

00:31:26.970 --> 00:31:29.410
We think of her as this ethereal spirit, this

00:31:29.410 --> 00:31:32.369
saintly, otherworldly figure. But she was also,

00:31:32.549 --> 00:31:35.549
well, a nerd. She was a stamp collector. Get

00:31:35.549 --> 00:31:38.470
out. Seriously. A serious philatelist. She started

00:31:38.470 --> 00:31:41.809
collecting stamps in 1847. The first adhesive

00:31:41.809 --> 00:31:44.450
postage stamp, the Penny Black, was only issued

00:31:44.450 --> 00:31:47.769
in 1840. So she was a very early adopter of this

00:31:47.769 --> 00:31:50.470
new hobby. That is fantastic. I love that detail.

00:31:50.670 --> 00:31:54.069
It's such a mundane, earthly, orderly hobby for

00:31:54.069 --> 00:31:56.740
someone with such a tumultuous inner world. The

00:31:56.740 --> 00:31:58.400
sources say she wrote letters to her brothers,

00:31:58.559 --> 00:32:00.480
asking them to save stamps for her from their

00:32:00.480 --> 00:32:03.180
travels. It makes her so real. It reminds you

00:32:03.180 --> 00:32:05.180
she was a person sitting in a room, maybe a little

00:32:05.180 --> 00:32:07.599
bored, carefully sticking stamps in a book while

00:32:07.599 --> 00:32:09.359
also thinking about the vastness of eternity.

00:32:09.680 --> 00:32:12.000
It grounds her. So if we have to summarize the

00:32:12.000 --> 00:32:14.240
Rossetti paradox, what is it? She's a contradiction

00:32:14.240 --> 00:32:17.700
in every possible way. She is. She's the model

00:32:17.700 --> 00:32:20.359
who critiqued the artist's gaze. The passionate

00:32:20.359 --> 00:32:22.579
romantic who rejected marriage for religion.

00:32:23.000 --> 00:32:26.059
The quiet recluse who engaged directly with the

00:32:26.059 --> 00:32:28.839
grimmest social problems of her city. It feels

00:32:28.839 --> 00:32:31.480
like her power, her entire creative engine, came

00:32:31.480 --> 00:32:33.920
from that one word we used earlier, refusal.

00:32:34.200 --> 00:32:37.799
I think so. In a world that was shouting, her

00:32:37.799 --> 00:32:40.440
brother, the critics, the industrial revolution,

00:32:40.720 --> 00:32:44.220
she found her power in silence, in saying no.

00:32:44.589 --> 00:32:47.309
She built a fortress around her soul. And by

00:32:47.309 --> 00:32:50.190
locking the door upon herself, she actually preserved

00:32:50.190 --> 00:32:52.630
her genius. She didn't burn out in a blaze of

00:32:52.630 --> 00:32:55.470
glory like her brother. She burned inward, like

00:32:55.470 --> 00:32:57.670
a star collapsing into itself. And the result

00:32:57.670 --> 00:32:59.789
of that collapse, the light it gives off, is

00:32:59.789 --> 00:33:02.930
Goblin Market. The result is Goblin Market. So

00:33:02.930 --> 00:33:05.109
that is our challenge to you, the listener. Go

00:33:05.109 --> 00:33:07.430
read it, but don't read it as a sweet nursery

00:33:07.430 --> 00:33:10.009
rhyme. Read it as the controlled explosion of

00:33:10.009 --> 00:33:12.470
a repressed genius who saw everything and said

00:33:12.470 --> 00:33:14.650
almost nothing. Until she picked up her pen.

00:33:15.029 --> 00:33:17.369
It's a wild, unforgettable ride. Thanks for diving

00:33:17.369 --> 00:33:18.869
deep with us. We'll see you on the next one.

00:33:18.950 --> 00:33:19.390
Goodbye everyone.
