WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.720
Welcome to The Deep Dive, the show that extracts

00:00:02.720 --> 00:00:04.660
the revolutionary insight from your source material,

00:00:04.960 --> 00:00:08.179
offering you a shortcut to being instantly well

00:00:08.179 --> 00:00:11.099
-informed. Today, we are taking an immersive

00:00:11.099 --> 00:00:14.320
plunge into the extraordinary life and work of

00:00:14.320 --> 00:00:17.160
Henri Matisse. And when you talk about 20th century

00:00:17.160 --> 00:00:19.679
visual art, the conversation, well, it almost

00:00:19.679 --> 00:00:22.140
always starts with two names, Pablo Picasso and,

00:00:22.199 --> 00:00:24.820
of course, Henri Matisse. Right. Matisse in particular

00:00:24.820 --> 00:00:27.640
is just one of the definitive figures. He's responsible

00:00:27.640 --> 00:00:30.079
for these revolutionary developments in painting

00:00:30.079 --> 00:00:33.820
and sculpture, drawing. He effectively charted

00:00:33.820 --> 00:00:35.759
the course for the next half century of visual

00:00:35.759 --> 00:00:38.060
aesthetic. Absolutely. And our mission today

00:00:38.060 --> 00:00:41.520
is to follow a man who. really against all odds

00:00:41.520 --> 00:00:44.380
and all expectations, just constantly reinvented

00:00:44.380 --> 00:00:46.700
himself. A few times over. We're tracing the

00:00:46.700 --> 00:00:49.359
path of a wealthy grain merchant's son who starts

00:00:49.359 --> 00:00:51.759
out as a law student, of all things, and then

00:00:51.759 --> 00:00:55.159
transforms from this meticulous traditional copyist.

00:00:55.219 --> 00:00:57.960
The ultimate conformist. Exactly. Into a wild

00:00:57.960 --> 00:01:00.840
beast of color. And then, after surviving cancer

00:01:00.840 --> 00:01:03.619
and war, he finishes his career as a wheelchair

00:01:03.619 --> 00:01:07.420
-bound master, creating these monumental, joyous

00:01:07.420 --> 00:01:10.709
works with only scissors and paper. It's a journey

00:01:10.709 --> 00:01:13.510
of, what, three profound transformations? At

00:01:13.510 --> 00:01:15.909
least. And that half -century trajectory really

00:01:15.909 --> 00:01:19.290
underlines his defining identity. His core contribution,

00:01:19.349 --> 00:01:22.049
I think, remains his innovative, expressive use

00:01:22.049 --> 00:01:23.989
of color. Oh, without a doubt. He learned to

00:01:23.989 --> 00:01:26.290
wield it with the precision of a master surgeon.

00:01:26.569 --> 00:01:29.150
And then there's his incredibly fluid original

00:01:29.150 --> 00:01:31.760
draughtsmanship, whether he was... working in

00:01:31.760 --> 00:01:34.500
painting, printmaking, sculpture, or collage.

00:01:34.579 --> 00:01:37.040
He was always exploring that purest possible

00:01:37.040 --> 00:01:39.459
relationship between line and color. Okay, so

00:01:39.459 --> 00:01:41.719
let's unpack this. We have to start where, you

00:01:41.719 --> 00:01:44.140
know, no great revolutionary ever should, in

00:01:44.140 --> 00:01:46.620
the dull precision of the French legal system.

00:01:47.040 --> 00:01:49.280
Henri -Emile Benoit Matisse was born in northern

00:01:49.280 --> 00:01:51.579
France, Le Cateau Cambresi, on the very last

00:01:51.579 --> 00:01:54.859
day of 1869. And the expectation from his father,

00:01:54.959 --> 00:01:57.400
who was a successful grain merchant, was, well,

00:01:57.540 --> 00:01:59.939
it was simple. Stability. Stability and convention.

00:02:00.340 --> 00:02:03.340
That meant a solid education and a proper, respectable

00:02:03.340 --> 00:02:05.900
career. And he followed that track, didn't he?

00:02:05.920 --> 00:02:09.219
I mean, quite diligently. He moves to Paris in

00:02:09.219 --> 00:02:12.259
1887 to study law. He qualifies, and then he

00:02:12.259 --> 00:02:14.240
goes back north to work as a court administrator.

00:02:14.240 --> 00:02:16.800
You just have to pause and imagine that. The

00:02:16.800 --> 00:02:19.580
father of Fauvism, the man who would tear up

00:02:19.580 --> 00:02:22.659
the entire rulebook of color, spending his days

00:02:22.659 --> 00:02:25.740
managing paperwork and enforcing rules in a provincial

00:02:25.740 --> 00:02:28.860
court. Right. The sheer psychological contrast

00:02:28.860 --> 00:02:32.159
between that starting point and, say, his final

00:02:32.159 --> 00:02:36.030
cutouts is. It's just staggering. It is. And

00:02:36.030 --> 00:02:38.090
that structured, almost obsessive nature, that

00:02:38.090 --> 00:02:40.949
commitment to process, it never really left him.

00:02:41.009 --> 00:02:44.250
But the legal detour, it ended abruptly and fortunately

00:02:44.250 --> 00:02:48.509
for art history in 1889. The appendicitis. He

00:02:48.509 --> 00:02:50.789
suffered from appendicitis. And during his convalescence,

00:02:50.830 --> 00:02:53.469
his mother brought him some art supplies, a beginner's

00:02:53.469 --> 00:02:55.669
painting box, just to keep him occupied while

00:02:55.669 --> 00:02:58.469
he recovered. And that right there is the discovery

00:02:58.469 --> 00:03:01.060
of. A kind of paradise, as he later called it.

00:03:01.099 --> 00:03:03.180
That's the moment. He picks up the brush and

00:03:03.180 --> 00:03:05.759
the entire trajectory of his life changes. He

00:03:05.759 --> 00:03:08.219
decides then and there he's going to be an artist.

00:03:08.400 --> 00:03:11.240
A decision which, you know, naturally brought

00:03:11.240 --> 00:03:14.039
profound disappointment to his very conventional

00:03:14.039 --> 00:03:18.199
father. Of course. That tension between his early

00:03:18.199 --> 00:03:21.759
conformity and his later radicalism is, I think,

00:03:21.780 --> 00:03:24.500
really key to understanding his discipline. And

00:03:24.500 --> 00:03:27.319
despite the radical choice. His initial path

00:03:27.319 --> 00:03:29.780
was rigorously traditional. I mean, he spent

00:03:29.780 --> 00:03:32.360
years in the formal French academy system. He

00:03:32.360 --> 00:03:34.770
wasn't just whimming it. Not at all. first at

00:03:34.770 --> 00:03:36.729
the Academy Julian under the highly conservative

00:03:36.729 --> 00:03:39.889
William Adolph Bouguereau, and later at the prestigious

00:03:39.889 --> 00:03:42.250
École Nationale des Beaux -Arts under Gustave

00:03:42.250 --> 00:03:45.210
Moreau. This was not a quick dive into the avant

00:03:45.210 --> 00:03:48.750
-garde. It was a slow, traditional climb. And

00:03:48.750 --> 00:03:51.210
his early works, they really reflect this foundation.

00:03:51.569 --> 00:03:54.050
He wasn't immediately experimenting. He was mastering

00:03:54.050 --> 00:03:56.409
the language of the past. It's well documented

00:03:56.409 --> 00:03:58.550
that he spent a huge amount of time in the Louvre,

00:03:58.610 --> 00:04:01.810
copying four works by Jean -Baptiste Simeon Charnin,

00:04:01.990 --> 00:04:04.590
the 18th century master of... still life. And

00:04:04.590 --> 00:04:07.689
that focus on Chardin shows this real admiration

00:04:07.689 --> 00:04:11.569
for detail and for structure. But his education

00:04:11.569 --> 00:04:14.229
didn't stop there. He studied Poussin for classical

00:04:14.229 --> 00:04:17.449
composition, Watteau for elegance, and Manet

00:04:17.449 --> 00:04:20.149
for, you know, modernizing the canvas. And of

00:04:20.149 --> 00:04:22.569
course, the Japanese art. Crucially, he absorbed

00:04:22.569 --> 00:04:25.089
Japanese art, which would later have a massive

00:04:25.089 --> 00:04:27.529
influence on his flattening of perspective. But

00:04:27.529 --> 00:04:30.189
the greatest conceptual leap came from Paul Cezanne.

00:04:31.240 --> 00:04:33.980
We often talk about color with Matisse, but the

00:04:33.980 --> 00:04:36.540
source material really highlights that Cézanne's

00:04:36.540 --> 00:04:39.480
sense of pictorial structure was his main inspiration.

00:04:39.839 --> 00:04:42.199
It was. So what did he take from Cézanne that

00:04:42.199 --> 00:04:44.199
wasn't just surface technique? Well, Cézanne

00:04:44.199 --> 00:04:46.480
was trying to find the underlying geometry and

00:04:46.480 --> 00:04:48.959
architecture of nature. He didn't just paint

00:04:48.959 --> 00:04:51.139
apples. He painted the sphere, the cone, the

00:04:51.139 --> 00:04:53.480
cylinder. The forms beneath the surface. Exactly.

00:04:53.800 --> 00:04:56.860
For Matisse, this provided the intellectual scaffolding

00:04:56.860 --> 00:04:59.040
he needed. He realized that structure didn't

00:04:59.040 --> 00:05:01.959
have to mean detail. It meant organization. And

00:05:01.959 --> 00:05:03.959
this foundation of rigorous structure is what

00:05:03.959 --> 00:05:06.680
allowed him later on to be so expressive with

00:05:06.680 --> 00:05:09.079
color without collapsing into total chaos. He

00:05:09.079 --> 00:05:11.180
understood the rules. He understood the rules

00:05:11.180 --> 00:05:13.879
before he broke them. And that structural curiosity

00:05:13.879 --> 00:05:16.120
leads us directly to the great color revelation

00:05:16.120 --> 00:05:19.819
of 1896. He's already working, but he's still

00:05:19.819 --> 00:05:22.480
using a fairly dark sort of earth toned palette.

00:05:22.699 --> 00:05:25.000
Very traditional. Then he travels to Belle Isle

00:05:25.000 --> 00:05:27.660
off the coast of Brittany and meets the Australian

00:05:27.660 --> 00:05:31.759
painter John Russell. This encounter is. It's

00:05:31.759 --> 00:05:34.620
perhaps the single most transformative non -family

00:05:34.620 --> 00:05:37.720
relationship in his entire life. Russell was

00:05:37.720 --> 00:05:40.360
connected to the true radicals of the time. He

00:05:40.360 --> 00:05:42.259
was friends with Van Gogh, wasn't he? Close friends

00:05:42.259 --> 00:05:45.000
with Vincent Van Gogh. He actually gave Matisse

00:05:45.000 --> 00:05:47.500
a Van Gogh drawing. Wow, imagine the impact of

00:05:47.500 --> 00:05:49.699
that. Yeah. Holding a piece of raw, explosive

00:05:49.699 --> 00:05:51.779
Van Gogh energy when you're still thinking in

00:05:51.779 --> 00:05:54.300
browns and grays. Right. And Russell didn't just

00:05:54.300 --> 00:05:56.920
introduce him to Impressionism. He directly taught

00:05:56.920 --> 00:05:59.639
him color theory. Matisse later credited Russell

00:05:59.639 --> 00:06:02.500
as his real teacher in color. And his style just

00:06:02.500 --> 00:06:05.000
changed completely. He abandoned the somber palette

00:06:05.000 --> 00:06:08.000
entirely for bright, unmodulated tones practically

00:06:08.000 --> 00:06:10.720
overnight. It wasn't just a whim, though. No,

00:06:10.800 --> 00:06:13.519
it was a technical shift toward neo -impressionism,

00:06:13.519 --> 00:06:17.100
or divisionism. Russell was explaining how to

00:06:17.100 --> 00:06:20.220
use pure color and let the viewer's eye mix it

00:06:20.220 --> 00:06:23.490
optically. Like pointillism. Very similar. This

00:06:23.490 --> 00:06:25.509
technique, the short, controlled application

00:06:25.509 --> 00:06:28.629
of dots or dashes of color, is visible in his

00:06:28.629 --> 00:06:31.170
early bright works. It shows that structured

00:06:31.170 --> 00:06:34.589
approach to radical color use. He exhibits five

00:06:34.589 --> 00:06:37.050
of these brighter pieces that year, and two are

00:06:37.050 --> 00:06:39.410
immediately purchased by the state. So there

00:06:39.410 --> 00:06:41.550
was validation early on. Proof that the shift

00:06:41.550 --> 00:06:44.050
was noticed and validated, yes. So he's having

00:06:44.050 --> 00:06:46.949
this moment of artistic validation, but his personal

00:06:46.949 --> 00:06:49.839
life is... Well, it's getting more complex. He

00:06:49.839 --> 00:06:51.980
already has a daughter, Marguerite, from an earlier

00:06:51.980 --> 00:06:55.980
relationship. In 1898, he marries Emilie Noelle

00:06:55.980 --> 00:06:58.439
Pereira, and they have two sons, Jean and Pierre,

00:06:58.639 --> 00:07:00.779
and they raise Marguerite together. Emilie and

00:07:00.779 --> 00:07:02.660
Marguerite became his frequent models, sort of

00:07:02.660 --> 00:07:05.139
stabilizing the home front as he faced the chaos

00:07:05.139 --> 00:07:07.339
of the art world. They provided that foundation,

00:07:07.639 --> 00:07:10.420
but soon that foundation came under immense strain.

00:07:11.060 --> 00:07:13.240
Matisse went into considerable debt, partly because

00:07:13.240 --> 00:07:15.420
he was investing what little money he had into.

00:07:15.899 --> 00:07:19.600
Masterpieces he couldn't afford. A Rodin, a Gauguin,

00:07:19.839 --> 00:07:23.240
and that crucial Cezanne III bathers, all of

00:07:23.240 --> 00:07:25.639
which he had to sell years later. But the real

00:07:25.639 --> 00:07:29.060
crisis hit around 1902. The Humbert Affair. Which

00:07:29.060 --> 00:07:31.439
wasn't just a private financial setback. It was

00:07:31.439 --> 00:07:34.800
a huge public scandal. Precisely. It was a notoriously

00:07:34.800 --> 00:07:37.899
complex and sensational swindle in France. The

00:07:37.899 --> 00:07:40.339
Humbert family defrauded scores of people out

00:07:40.339 --> 00:07:42.680
of millions of francs by claiming to possess

00:07:42.680 --> 00:07:46.439
a fabulous secret inheritance kept locked in

00:07:46.439 --> 00:07:49.689
a safe. And this somehow entangled Amelie's parents.

00:07:50.189 --> 00:07:52.889
It did. They were essentially scapegoats or secondary

00:07:52.889 --> 00:07:55.569
participants. But the resulting public shame

00:07:55.569 --> 00:07:58.350
and the sheer weight of financial ruin left the

00:07:58.350 --> 00:08:00.870
family completely devastated. And the practical

00:08:00.870 --> 00:08:03.110
consequence was that Matisse, the struggling

00:08:03.110 --> 00:08:04.970
artist whose career was just starting to turn

00:08:04.970 --> 00:08:08.149
bright, suddenly became the sole desperate breadwinner

00:08:08.149 --> 00:08:10.350
for seven people. It's a pressure cooker environment.

00:08:10.550 --> 00:08:12.870
And that stress, that need to provide for a large

00:08:12.870 --> 00:08:15.689
family amid public notoriety, it forces him to

00:08:15.689 --> 00:08:18.050
make another tactical retreat. It's a fascinating

00:08:18.050 --> 00:08:20.550
sort of counterintuitive move. It really is.

00:08:20.709 --> 00:08:24.170
Between 1902 and 1903, the man known for pure

00:08:24.170 --> 00:08:27.490
color adopted a somber, dark, and form -focused

00:08:27.490 --> 00:08:30.470
style. Why? Art historians believe this was a

00:08:30.470 --> 00:08:32.690
conscious effort to produce works that were more

00:08:32.690 --> 00:08:34.889
conventional and therefore more saleable. He

00:08:34.889 --> 00:08:36.330
was just trying to pay the bills. He was trying

00:08:36.330 --> 00:08:39.070
to pay the bills. He also focused intensely on

00:08:39.070 --> 00:08:41.590
sculpture during this time, completing The Slave

00:08:41.590 --> 00:08:45.049
in 1903. This is the structuralist, practical

00:08:45.049 --> 00:08:48.789
side of Matisse showing through. He adapts his

00:08:48.789 --> 00:08:51.470
aesthetic goals to immediate material necessity.

00:08:51.909 --> 00:08:54.389
You have to wonder how profoundly that threat

00:08:54.389 --> 00:08:56.850
of financial ruin and the need for saleability

00:08:56.850 --> 00:08:59.450
shapes the work of an artist whose signature

00:08:59.450 --> 00:09:02.289
contribution will be pure radical color. Well,

00:09:02.370 --> 00:09:04.190
it taught him resilience and gave him a clear

00:09:04.190 --> 00:09:06.809
focus. When he finally returned to radical color,

00:09:06.929 --> 00:09:08.809
it wasn't out of some frivolous experimentation.

00:09:09.029 --> 00:09:11.710
No, it was an informed choice. A deliberate artistic

00:09:11.710 --> 00:09:14.629
stance. The brief return to earth tones just

00:09:14.629 --> 00:09:16.429
serves as a reminder that this revolutionary

00:09:16.429 --> 00:09:19.289
lived a very grounded, anxious life. And that

00:09:19.289 --> 00:09:21.529
grounded anxiety didn't hold the color back for

00:09:21.529 --> 00:09:24.629
long. The period of financial stress gives way,

00:09:24.789 --> 00:09:27.909
almost violently, to the explosion of color that

00:09:27.909 --> 00:09:30.330
defines the first great modern movement he led.

00:09:31.039 --> 00:09:34.419
Fauvism. Fauvism, meaning wild beasts, was a

00:09:34.419 --> 00:09:36.940
movement built on the rejection of that restrictive

00:09:36.940 --> 00:09:39.759
application of color theory we saw in Neo -Impressionism.

00:09:39.879 --> 00:09:42.659
He'd done that, and now he was moving on. Right.

00:09:42.860 --> 00:09:45.620
Matisse and Andre Duran were the undisputed leaders.

00:09:45.879 --> 00:09:48.259
While the Sialistic origins were around 1900,

00:09:48.600 --> 00:09:51.440
the key explosive period was very, very short,

00:09:51.580 --> 00:09:55.340
1904 to 1908. The initial steps were a bit hesitant,

00:09:55.419 --> 00:09:58.559
though. His first solo exhibition in 1904 at

00:09:58.559 --> 00:10:01.330
Ambroise Villard's gallery. It didn't really

00:10:01.330 --> 00:10:03.529
land. No, but then comes the transformational

00:10:03.529 --> 00:10:06.570
summer of 1904. Ah, in St. Tropez. He spends

00:10:06.570 --> 00:10:08.590
that summer painting in St. Tropez alongside

00:10:08.590 --> 00:10:11.210
the neo -impressionists Paul Signac and Henri

00:10:11.210 --> 00:10:13.570
Edmond Cross. This isn't just a vacation. It's

00:10:13.570 --> 00:10:15.990
another deep immersion in structured color application.

00:10:16.250 --> 00:10:18.970
And that results in luxe, calme volute. Exactly.

00:10:19.870 --> 00:10:23.830
Luxury, calm, and pleasure. Visually, you can

00:10:23.830 --> 00:10:27.070
still see the influence of divisionism, the controlled

00:10:27.070 --> 00:10:29.750
dots of pure color. But the subject matter is

00:10:29.750 --> 00:10:32.450
already classical and decorative, anticipating

00:10:32.450 --> 00:10:35.509
his later nice period. But the real launch, the

00:10:35.509 --> 00:10:37.149
big bang that put him in the movement on the

00:10:37.149 --> 00:10:41.350
map, was the 1905 Salon d 'Automne. This is one

00:10:41.350 --> 00:10:43.529
of the most famous moments of critical hostility

00:10:43.529 --> 00:10:45.970
in all of art history. It was an incredible spectacle.

00:10:46.190 --> 00:10:48.649
Matisse exhibited the open window and the sensational

00:10:48.649 --> 00:10:51.350
woman with a hat. A portrait of his wife, Amélie.

00:10:51.669 --> 00:10:54.049
Yes, and these works were defined by areas of

00:10:54.049 --> 00:10:57.409
pure, shocking, unmixed color greens, yellows,

00:10:57.409 --> 00:11:00.830
blues, used not to describe nature, but to express

00:11:00.830 --> 00:11:03.850
feeling and structure. And the critic Louis Vassell,

00:11:03.970 --> 00:11:05.750
walking through the room filled with these paintings,

00:11:05.970 --> 00:11:08.690
he sees a traditional, tame, Renaissance -style

00:11:08.690 --> 00:11:10.929
sculpture in the center. Right. And he utters

00:11:10.929 --> 00:11:13.830
the unforgettable phrase. Donatello chez le fauve,

00:11:13.929 --> 00:11:16.570
Donatello among the wild beasts. The name stuck,

00:11:16.769 --> 00:11:19.009
instantly defining the movement. And the critics

00:11:19.009 --> 00:11:22.080
were just in open revolt. The reaction was visceral.

00:11:22.220 --> 00:11:26.159
The art was called grotesque, savage. One famous

00:11:26.159 --> 00:11:28.820
critic declared, a pot of paint has been flung

00:11:28.820 --> 00:11:31.000
in the face of the public. They just saw anarchy.

00:11:31.080 --> 00:11:33.480
Total anarchy. It's hard for us now, you know,

00:11:33.519 --> 00:11:36.820
we're a colletum to abstraction. But to grasp

00:11:36.820 --> 00:11:40.559
how truly shocking it was for color to be completely

00:11:40.559 --> 00:11:43.600
liberated from the local color of the object

00:11:43.600 --> 00:11:47.330
was, it was a huge deal. But the critical shaming

00:11:47.330 --> 00:11:50.009
was immediately mitigated by some very powerful

00:11:50.009 --> 00:11:53.350
validation. The Steins. Gertrude and Leo Stein,

00:11:53.590 --> 00:11:55.809
the great American patrons in Paris, recognized

00:11:55.809 --> 00:11:58.409
the revolutionary quality immediately. And they

00:11:58.409 --> 00:12:00.809
bought Woman with a Hat. And that purchase was

00:12:00.809 --> 00:12:03.309
just crucial, wasn't it? Absolutely. To be denounced

00:12:03.309 --> 00:12:05.950
so publicly and then championed privately by

00:12:05.950 --> 00:12:08.750
such sophisticated collectors, it gave Matisse

00:12:08.750 --> 00:12:10.570
the morale and perhaps more importantly, the

00:12:10.570 --> 00:12:12.889
financial runway he needed to continue the experiment.

00:12:13.169 --> 00:12:15.610
It signaled that this wasn't just madness. It

00:12:15.610 --> 00:12:17.610
was the next frontier. What's fascinating is

00:12:17.610 --> 00:12:19.450
that even at the height of all that controversy,

00:12:19.789 --> 00:12:21.590
there were people who recognized the underlying

00:12:21.590 --> 00:12:24.509
structure. The poet and critic Dioma Pollinare

00:12:24.509 --> 00:12:27.250
called Matisse's art eminently reasonable in

00:12:27.250 --> 00:12:30.820
1907. He saw the logic beneath the wild colors.

00:12:31.039 --> 00:12:33.899
And the tension between wildness and reason persisted.

00:12:34.139 --> 00:12:37.139
Even after Fauvism formally dissipated as a movement,

00:12:37.399 --> 00:12:39.799
his works continued to cause an uproar abroad.

00:12:40.120 --> 00:12:44.639
Oh, yes. Take The Blue Nude from 1907. When it

00:12:44.639 --> 00:12:46.860
was exhibited at the 1913 Armory Show in Chicago,

00:12:47.179 --> 00:12:49.379
it was so reviled that it was symbolically burned

00:12:49.379 --> 00:12:52.200
in effigy by students. Burned in effigy, years

00:12:52.200 --> 00:12:54.279
after he painted it, he was still the international

00:12:54.279 --> 00:12:57.419
flashpoint for modern art. He was, and Fauvism

00:12:57.419 --> 00:12:59.700
as a collective movement declined quickly after

00:12:59.700 --> 00:13:02.879
about three major shows. But Matisse's personal

00:13:02.879 --> 00:13:05.919
trajectory certainly didn't slow. He entered

00:13:05.919 --> 00:13:09.259
a period from 1906 to 1917 where he developed

00:13:09.259 --> 00:13:11.779
an even more rigorous, maybe cubist -influenced

00:13:11.779 --> 00:13:14.600
style, emphasizing flattened forms and decorative

00:13:14.600 --> 00:13:16.700
patterns. And this is where that contradiction

00:13:16.700 --> 00:13:18.779
between the radical art and the artist's lifestyle

00:13:18.779 --> 00:13:21.460
becomes so prominent. It really does. He was

00:13:21.460 --> 00:13:23.740
physically active in the vibrant, often chaotic

00:13:23.740 --> 00:13:26.169
Montparnasse scene. but he held himself apart.

00:13:26.389 --> 00:13:29.210
He maintained this fastidious, almost boringly

00:13:29.210 --> 00:13:31.830
conservative appearance suit and tie, beard neatly

00:13:31.830 --> 00:13:34.570
trimmed, and kept strict bourgeois work habits.

00:13:34.809 --> 00:13:37.889
He was the antithesis. of the bohemian stereotype

00:13:37.889 --> 00:13:40.830
completely yet he was creating the most radical

00:13:40.830 --> 00:13:44.210
art in paris and that rigor was essential because

00:13:44.210 --> 00:13:47.009
his work was now being driven not just by formal

00:13:47.009 --> 00:13:49.909
experimentation but by his absorption of global

00:13:49.909 --> 00:13:53.529
non -western influences he started traveling

00:13:53.529 --> 00:13:56.490
widely bringing the exotic back into his studio

00:13:56.490 --> 00:13:58.710
the first major influence came from his trip

00:13:58.710 --> 00:14:02.429
to algeria in 1906 this is where he began studying

00:14:02.429 --> 00:14:05.710
african art and primitivism which deeply influenced

00:14:05.929 --> 00:14:07.830
the way he treated the human body, stripping

00:14:07.830 --> 00:14:10.429
it back to essential, powerful forms. You can

00:14:10.429 --> 00:14:13.549
see it so clearly in New Blue. Then, around 1910,

00:14:13.629 --> 00:14:16.049
the emphasis seems to shift to pattern and color

00:14:16.049 --> 00:14:18.549
geometry. That's right. He viewed a major exhibition

00:14:18.549 --> 00:14:20.809
of Islamic art in Munich, which was a revelation

00:14:20.809 --> 00:14:22.990
for him, and then he traveled to Spain for two

00:14:22.990 --> 00:14:25.289
months to study Moorish architecture and decoration.

00:14:25.610 --> 00:14:27.870
The Islamic influence is so critical, isn't it?

00:14:28.110 --> 00:14:30.669
It provided him with a system of decorative abstraction.

00:14:31.169 --> 00:14:34.789
He realized that pure non -representational patterns

00:14:34.789 --> 00:14:37.389
could convey a sense of depth, rhythm and life

00:14:37.389 --> 00:14:39.990
without needing traditional perspective or shading.

00:14:40.210 --> 00:14:42.590
This is where the term decorative stops being

00:14:42.590 --> 00:14:44.649
an insult and becomes a serious artistic tool

00:14:44.649 --> 00:14:47.330
for him. And these influences all culminated

00:14:47.330 --> 00:14:49.570
in his highly productive and significant trips

00:14:49.570 --> 00:14:53.230
to Morocco in 1912 and 1913. So what were the

00:14:53.230 --> 00:14:55.370
specific artistic shifts that came out of those

00:14:55.370 --> 00:14:58.059
Moroccan journeys? They led to a dramatic new

00:14:58.059 --> 00:15:01.000
boldness. He started applying intense, unmodulated

00:15:01.000 --> 00:15:04.519
color, meaning flat, pure swaths of paint. And

00:15:04.519 --> 00:15:06.980
critically, he incorporated black as a color.

00:15:07.139 --> 00:15:09.860
That's a huge shift. Before this, black was often

00:15:09.860 --> 00:15:12.440
used for outline or for shadow. For Matisse,

00:15:12.539 --> 00:15:15.259
black became an active, light -absorbing, balancing

00:15:15.259 --> 00:15:17.379
element in its own right. He treated it with

00:15:17.379 --> 00:15:19.799
the same respect as a vibrant red or a deep blue.

00:15:20.460 --> 00:15:22.659
You can see this boldness in masterpieces like

00:15:22.659 --> 00:15:25.720
Le Tellier Rouge from 1911, which is just a stunning

00:15:25.720 --> 00:15:28.620
example of monochrome color used to create structure.

00:15:28.820 --> 00:15:31.200
And Morocco also cemented some of his recurring

00:15:31.200 --> 00:15:34.779
themes. The odalisques. those reclining women

00:15:34.779 --> 00:15:37.740
set in orientalist interiors, and the introduction

00:15:37.740 --> 00:15:39.980
of the goldfish in aquariums. Which became a

00:15:39.980 --> 00:15:41.980
kind of symbol for him. A symbol of a tranquil,

00:15:42.159 --> 00:15:44.539
self -contained world. It reappeared throughout

00:15:44.539 --> 00:15:47.720
his career. And this global expansion and artistic

00:15:47.720 --> 00:15:50.519
consolidation perfectly aligned with his relationship

00:15:50.519 --> 00:15:52.639
with one of the most forward -thinking collectors

00:15:52.639 --> 00:15:55.600
of the time. Sergei Shukin, the Russian textile

00:15:55.600 --> 00:15:58.720
magnate. He was arguably the most loyal and important

00:15:58.720 --> 00:16:01.460
early patron. And that relationship led to one

00:16:01.460 --> 00:16:04.769
of his most significant creations. The two -painting

00:16:04.769 --> 00:16:08.009
commission, La Danse, The Dance, and its companion

00:16:08.009 --> 00:16:12.090
piece, Music, both completed in 1910. These are

00:16:12.090 --> 00:16:14.409
just monumental works. They were designed for

00:16:14.409 --> 00:16:17.389
Shukin's grand Moscow staircase. La Danse depicts

00:16:17.389 --> 00:16:20.009
five nude figures dancing in a circle, and it's

00:16:20.009 --> 00:16:21.929
filled with this incredible sense of frantic,

00:16:21.929 --> 00:16:24.350
raw energy. Using only three colors. Just three.

00:16:24.629 --> 00:16:26.870
The green of the earth, the blue of the sky,

00:16:27.049 --> 00:16:29.320
and the reddish -orange of the bodies. It's an

00:16:29.320 --> 00:16:31.740
ultimate simplification, a powerful expression

00:16:31.740 --> 00:16:34.519
of primitive joy. And music, the companion piece,

00:16:34.779 --> 00:16:37.480
it provides the necessary counterpoint. It does.

00:16:37.620 --> 00:16:40.100
Instead of frenetic movement, you have five figures.

00:16:40.600 --> 00:16:42.980
Completely static, almost meditative playing

00:16:42.980 --> 00:16:45.980
instruments. The contrast between the sheer energy

00:16:45.980 --> 00:16:49.620
of the dance and the profound calm of music demonstrates

00:16:49.620 --> 00:16:52.899
his capacity for both the decorative and monumental.

00:16:53.320 --> 00:16:55.899
All financed by a Russian collector who trusted

00:16:55.899 --> 00:16:58.539
his radical vision completely. That trust and

00:16:58.539 --> 00:17:00.919
that support system were so vital. And it brings

00:17:00.919 --> 00:17:03.379
us to the two key elements of the Parisian art

00:17:03.379 --> 00:17:06.039
world during this period. The patronage networks

00:17:06.039 --> 00:17:09.640
and, of course, the inescapable rivalry with

00:17:09.640 --> 00:17:12.980
public. The rivalry with Picasso, who was 11

00:17:12.980 --> 00:17:15.819
years his junior, it's legendary. They were lifelong

00:17:15.819 --> 00:17:17.920
friends, often trading works and visiting each

00:17:17.920 --> 00:17:20.380
other's studios. But their competitive spirit

00:17:20.380 --> 00:17:23.000
drove so much of 20th century innovation. It

00:17:23.000 --> 00:17:25.119
really did. If we unpack their fundamental difference.

00:17:25.589 --> 00:17:28.230
What really stands out? I think the key is observation

00:17:28.230 --> 00:17:31.109
versus invention. Matisse remained fundamentally

00:17:31.109 --> 00:17:34.309
tethered to nature and observation. Even when

00:17:34.309 --> 00:17:36.390
he simplified a figure, he drew from a model.

00:17:36.529 --> 00:17:38.910
His art always started from a visible reality.

00:17:39.349 --> 00:17:42.509
Whereas Picasso... Picasso, by contrast, worked

00:17:42.509 --> 00:17:45.549
primarily from imagination, from invention and

00:17:45.549 --> 00:17:48.470
intellectual conception. He took the visual world

00:17:48.470 --> 00:17:50.930
and radically reinterpreted it internally before

00:17:50.930 --> 00:17:53.630
he ever presented it. And that difference...

00:17:53.920 --> 00:17:56.900
shaped their shared subject matter. Both of them

00:17:56.900 --> 00:18:00.319
painted women and still lives incessantly. Right,

00:18:00.460 --> 00:18:03.140
but Matisse tended to integrate his figures and

00:18:03.140 --> 00:18:06.299
objects into these richly patterned, fully realized

00:18:06.299 --> 00:18:09.180
interiors where the wallpaper and the background

00:18:09.180 --> 00:18:11.700
are just as vital as the figure itself. And Picasso

00:18:11.700 --> 00:18:14.000
was more likely to just strip the figure bare

00:18:14.000 --> 00:18:17.039
or explode it across the canvas, making the figure

00:18:17.039 --> 00:18:20.000
itself the universe. Exactly. They both pushed

00:18:20.000 --> 00:18:22.099
the boundaries of abstraction through simplification.

00:18:22.480 --> 00:18:25.400
When Picasso developed cubism, Matisse responded

00:18:25.400 --> 00:18:27.720
not by imitating it, but by doubling down on

00:18:27.720 --> 00:18:30.420
flatness and structure, creating works like The

00:18:30.420 --> 00:18:32.440
Red Studio. So they were always in dialogue.

00:18:32.740 --> 00:18:34.599
Always looking over their shoulders, challenging

00:18:34.599 --> 00:18:36.400
each other's breakthroughs. And the people who

00:18:36.400 --> 00:18:39.059
financed this rivalry were often the same core

00:18:39.059 --> 00:18:41.900
group of American patrons in Paris, specifically

00:18:41.900 --> 00:18:45.720
the Steins. Gertrude, Leo, Michael, and Michael's

00:18:45.720 --> 00:18:48.420
wife Sarah. They weren't just buyers, they were

00:18:48.420 --> 00:18:51.559
cultural gatekeepers. Gertrude Stein famously

00:18:51.559 --> 00:18:53.779
attributed the launch of her famous Saturday

00:18:53.779 --> 00:18:56.859
evening salons, which became the epicenter of

00:18:56.859 --> 00:18:59.380
modernism, to Matisse. That's right. She said

00:18:59.380 --> 00:19:01.440
people initially came just to see his paintings

00:19:01.440 --> 00:19:04.720
after the 1905 scandal, and eventually her living

00:19:04.720 --> 00:19:06.980
room became the hub where collectors, critics,

00:19:07.119 --> 00:19:10.319
and artists all mingled. Sarah Stein in particular

00:19:10.319 --> 00:19:12.839
was intensely focused on collecting Matisse.

00:19:13.059 --> 00:19:15.920
But the true bulk buyers. The financial stabilizers

00:19:15.920 --> 00:19:18.880
for both Matisse and Picasso were the Cohn sisters

00:19:18.880 --> 00:19:21.619
from Baltimore. Claribel and Etta Cohn. They

00:19:21.619 --> 00:19:24.380
were phenomenal. Incredibly smart, somewhat eccentric,

00:19:24.660 --> 00:19:26.859
and absolutely committed to the avant -garde.

00:19:27.039 --> 00:19:29.099
And they acquired hundreds of works. Hundreds

00:19:29.099 --> 00:19:31.579
of works by Matisse and Picasso, often buying

00:19:31.579 --> 00:19:33.599
directly from the artists during their periods

00:19:33.599 --> 00:19:36.640
of intense need. That collection is now the bedrock

00:19:36.640 --> 00:19:39.420
of the Baltimore Museum of Art. Their early and

00:19:39.420 --> 00:19:41.660
sustained belief provided Matisse with immense

00:19:41.660 --> 00:19:44.519
financial and psychological stability. It's interesting

00:19:44.519 --> 00:19:47.220
that despite all his success and notoriety, Matisse

00:19:47.220 --> 00:19:50.019
was also dedicated to instruction. He created

00:19:50.019 --> 00:19:53.460
the Academy Matisse. Yes, between 1907 and 1911,

00:19:53.720 --> 00:19:56.640
his friends and patrons, including the Steins,

00:19:56.740 --> 00:19:59.359
actually financed and organized this private,

00:19:59.440 --> 00:20:02.000
non -commercial school. He was instructing young

00:20:02.000 --> 00:20:04.859
artists, reinforcing that for Matisse, radical

00:20:04.859 --> 00:20:07.700
expressive color was never divorced from disciplined

00:20:07.700 --> 00:20:10.349
draftsmanship. Freedom is only possible through

00:20:10.349 --> 00:20:12.789
mastery. A powerful statement about his philosophy,

00:20:12.990 --> 00:20:14.910
exactly. And of course, that continuing Russian

00:20:14.910 --> 00:20:17.329
connection with Shukin provided him the opportunity

00:20:17.329 --> 00:20:20.799
to work on a grand... monumental scale. Shukin's

00:20:20.799 --> 00:20:23.140
support meant Matisse could experiment with size

00:20:23.140 --> 00:20:25.980
and complexity in a way most contemporary artists

00:20:25.980 --> 00:20:28.440
simply couldn't. It wasn't just about selling

00:20:28.440 --> 00:20:30.440
a canvas. It was about creating environmental

00:20:30.440 --> 00:20:34.119
decorative pieces that redefined space. That

00:20:34.119 --> 00:20:36.559
capacity to conceive of art as an environment

00:20:36.559 --> 00:20:39.039
is something that surrounds and envelops the

00:20:39.039 --> 00:20:41.519
viewer. It's a critical takeaway that really

00:20:41.519 --> 00:20:45.420
foreshadows his final great period. That monumental,

00:20:45.680 --> 00:20:48.599
structured period then gave way to a geographical

00:20:48.599 --> 00:20:52.960
and stylistic shift in 1917 when Matisse relocated

00:20:52.960 --> 00:20:55.819
to Simier, a suburb of Nice on the French Riviera.

00:20:55.960 --> 00:20:59.259
And this move marked a definite relaxation and

00:20:59.259 --> 00:21:02.349
softening in his work. It's important to contextualize

00:21:02.349 --> 00:21:04.970
this, though. After the immense trauma of World

00:21:04.970 --> 00:21:07.890
War I, there was a widespread European artistic

00:21:07.890 --> 00:21:11.210
impulse for a return to order. Artists across

00:21:11.210 --> 00:21:14.549
disciplines like Picasso and Stravinsky embraced

00:21:14.549 --> 00:21:17.769
neoclassicism, seeking stability and recognizability.

00:21:18.109 --> 00:21:20.569
And for Matisse, this translated into his popular

00:21:20.569 --> 00:21:24.269
Orientalist Odelies paintings, replete with sumptuous

00:21:24.269 --> 00:21:26.849
interiors, geometric patterning, soft light.

00:21:27.200 --> 00:21:28.920
They were immensely popular and commercially

00:21:28.920 --> 00:21:31.019
successful, but they did draw some criticism.

00:21:31.299 --> 00:21:33.220
Some critics dismiss them as just decorative.

00:21:33.519 --> 00:21:35.700
Indeed. They claim they lacked the intellectual

00:21:35.700 --> 00:21:38.500
rigor of his pre -war work, but that, I think,

00:21:38.539 --> 00:21:40.519
misses the point of his commitment to the decorative.

00:21:40.779 --> 00:21:43.279
How so? He was upholding the classical French

00:21:43.279 --> 00:21:46.099
tradition of figure painting, but using his unique

00:21:46.099 --> 00:21:48.859
understanding of pattern and space. The use of

00:21:48.859 --> 00:21:51.579
elaborate screens, patterned fabrics, and the

00:21:51.579 --> 00:21:53.579
intense heat of the Mediterranean sun allowed

00:21:53.579 --> 00:21:56.380
him to explore the structural use of light and

00:21:56.490 --> 00:21:59.430
rhythm in a way that defied simple realism. So

00:21:59.430 --> 00:22:01.309
they aren't just pretty. Not at all. They are

00:22:01.309 --> 00:22:04.250
meticulously structured studies in interior spatial

00:22:04.250 --> 00:22:07.710
relationships. Yet after 1930, we see another

00:22:07.710 --> 00:22:11.150
shift, a new vigor and a bolder simplification.

00:22:11.650 --> 00:22:14.609
He pulls away from the lush details of the odalisques

00:22:14.609 --> 00:22:17.809
towards starker, flatter forms. That new energy

00:22:17.809 --> 00:22:19.950
was largely driven by the massive commission

00:22:19.950 --> 00:22:22.309
he received from Albert C. Barnes for the Barnes

00:22:22.309 --> 00:22:24.809
Foundation in Pennsylvania. The mural, The Dance

00:22:24.809 --> 00:22:28.559
2. Yes, completed in 1932. The sheer scale, 45

00:22:28.559 --> 00:22:31.759
feet by 15 feet, forced him to simplify his forms

00:22:31.759 --> 00:22:34.440
drastically, using the flat, unmodulated areas

00:22:34.440 --> 00:22:36.660
of color that were necessary for such a huge

00:22:36.660 --> 00:22:39.420
architectural piece. And this need for precision,

00:22:39.579 --> 00:22:42.359
even in simplification, is evidenced by the documentation

00:22:42.359 --> 00:22:44.740
we have of his process. I'm thinking of the large

00:22:44.740 --> 00:22:48.190
reclining nude in 1935. The 22 progressive photographs

00:22:48.190 --> 00:22:51.970
he took, yes. He meticulously tracked every stage

00:22:51.970 --> 00:22:54.430
of the painting's evolution and sent them to

00:22:54.430 --> 00:22:57.539
his patron, Etta Cohn. That detailed documentation

00:22:57.539 --> 00:23:00.240
is just incredibly telling. It completely debunks

00:23:00.240 --> 00:23:03.240
the idea that his simplification was lazy or

00:23:03.240 --> 00:23:05.779
merely decorative. It shows an artist obsessed

00:23:05.779 --> 00:23:08.480
with the process of achieving the perfect, final,

00:23:08.559 --> 00:23:12.380
simplified form. Every line, every shape was

00:23:12.380 --> 00:23:14.799
rigorously interrogated and adjusted through

00:23:14.799 --> 00:23:18.140
22 different iterations. And this period of intense

00:23:18.140 --> 00:23:20.940
creative output suddenly collided with immense

00:23:20.940 --> 00:23:23.599
personal and political upheaval leading into

00:23:23.599 --> 00:23:28.460
World War II. Alone is, well, it's a lot. It

00:23:28.460 --> 00:23:31.880
was high drama. In 1939, after 41 years of marriage,

00:23:32.079 --> 00:23:34.859
his wife, Amelie, divorced him. And this was

00:23:34.859 --> 00:23:36.779
fueled by her suspicion that he was involved

00:23:36.779 --> 00:23:39.619
with his young Russian emigre companion, Lydia

00:23:39.619 --> 00:23:42.240
Delektorskaya. Yes, and the fallout was shocking.

00:23:42.619 --> 00:23:44.779
Delektorskaya attempted suicide. She shot herself

00:23:44.779 --> 00:23:47.619
in the chest. Unbelievable. Miraculously, she

00:23:47.619 --> 00:23:49.680
survived without serious long -term injury and

00:23:49.680 --> 00:23:51.559
returned to Matisse's side. But she didn't just

00:23:51.559 --> 00:23:54.220
return as a companion. No, she became his true

00:23:54.220 --> 00:23:57.279
collaborator and indispensable assistant. She

00:23:57.279 --> 00:23:59.920
ran his entire household, managed his complex

00:23:59.920 --> 00:24:02.680
business dealings, kept his extensive records,

00:24:02.900 --> 00:24:05.420
and crucially, assisted him daily in the studio.

00:24:05.740 --> 00:24:07.960
She provided the necessary structure for the

00:24:07.960 --> 00:24:10.160
aging master to continue his creative freedom.

00:24:10.440 --> 00:24:12.940
And then came the invasion of France by the Nazis

00:24:12.940 --> 00:24:17.400
in June 1940. Matisse was in Paris, but he returned

00:24:17.400 --> 00:24:20.880
to Nice. in what became Vichy France. His son

00:24:20.880 --> 00:24:23.039
Pierre, who was running a successful gallery

00:24:23.039 --> 00:24:26.380
in New York, begged him to leave Europe. He wanted

00:24:26.380 --> 00:24:29.400
him to flee to Brazil. But Matisse was adamantly

00:24:29.400 --> 00:24:32.140
principled in his refusal to leave. His reasoning,

00:24:32.299 --> 00:24:34.440
which he expressed to Pierre in September 1940,

00:24:34.880 --> 00:24:38.039
frames his decision as patriotic and deeply personal.

00:24:38.279 --> 00:24:42.799
He said, If everyone who has any value leaves

00:24:42.799 --> 00:24:45.619
France, what remains of France? He chose to stay,

00:24:45.740 --> 00:24:47.960
even under occupation, aligning himself with

00:24:47.960 --> 00:24:50.220
the fate of his country. This decision cemented

00:24:50.220 --> 00:24:52.319
his status as a national figure, but it placed

00:24:52.319 --> 00:24:54.359
him in a morally ambiguous position regarding

00:24:54.359 --> 00:24:56.670
the occupied art world. The Nazis deemed his

00:24:56.670 --> 00:24:59.170
work degenerate art, yet he was allowed to exhibit.

00:24:59.329 --> 00:25:02.250
It was a complex political reality. While the

00:25:02.250 --> 00:25:04.710
Nazis were aggressively purging degenerate artists

00:25:04.710 --> 00:25:08.230
and art in Germany, they were comparatively more

00:25:08.230 --> 00:25:10.809
lenient in occupied Paris. A form of cultural

00:25:10.809 --> 00:25:13.690
appeasement. Exactly. So Matisse, along with

00:25:13.690 --> 00:25:16.089
other former Fauves and Cubists, could exhibit,

00:25:16.170 --> 00:25:18.839
but there was a moral price. All Jewish artists

00:25:18.839 --> 00:25:21.599
were purged, and non -Jewish French artists had

00:25:21.599 --> 00:25:23.900
to sign an oath confirming their Aryan status

00:25:23.900 --> 00:25:26.420
to exhibit publicly. And Matisse was among those

00:25:26.420 --> 00:25:28.920
who signed? He was, which allowed him to continue

00:25:28.920 --> 00:25:31.299
working while others suffered. But while Matisse

00:25:31.299 --> 00:25:33.740
maintained a somewhat isolated artistic life,

00:25:33.920 --> 00:25:37.380
dedicated to work, his family was plunging headfirst

00:25:37.380 --> 00:25:40.079
into the dangerous world of the resistance. Their

00:25:40.079 --> 00:25:43.160
involvement was profound and just harrowing.

00:25:43.240 --> 00:25:46.880
His son, Pierre, used his New York gallery to

00:25:46.880 --> 00:25:50.220
actively aid Jewish and anti -Nazi artists escaping

00:25:50.220 --> 00:25:52.720
occupied France. He organized that legendary

00:25:52.720 --> 00:25:56.920
Artist in Exile exhibition in 1942. He did. And

00:25:56.920 --> 00:26:00.200
back in France, his estranged wife, Amélie, worked

00:26:00.200 --> 00:26:02.480
as a typist for the French underground and paid

00:26:02.480 --> 00:26:05.059
a heavy price. She was jailed for six months.

00:26:05.299 --> 00:26:06.980
And then there's his daughter, Marguerite. Her

00:26:06.980 --> 00:26:10.680
story is just almost beyond belief. She was intensely

00:26:10.680 --> 00:26:13.480
involved in the resistance, arrested and then

00:26:13.480 --> 00:26:15.940
tortured almost to death by the Gestapo in a

00:26:15.940 --> 00:26:19.359
Wren prison. Her resilience is astonishing. She

00:26:19.359 --> 00:26:21.339
was sentenced to the horrors of the Ravensbrück

00:26:21.339 --> 00:26:24.200
concentration camp. But she escaped. In a moment

00:26:24.200 --> 00:26:27.779
of high cinematic drama, yes. While being transported

00:26:27.779 --> 00:26:30.160
on a train to Ravensbrück, the train was stopped

00:26:30.160 --> 00:26:33.000
during an Allied air raid. She seized the moment,

00:26:33.140 --> 00:26:35.519
jumped from the train, and survived by hiding

00:26:35.519 --> 00:26:37.460
in the woods. And she was eventually rescued

00:26:37.460 --> 00:26:39.779
by fellow resistance fighters. In the closing

00:26:39.779 --> 00:26:42.839
days of the war, it's a stark, powerful realization.

00:26:43.339 --> 00:26:45.559
While Matisse sought sanctuary in his studio,

00:26:45.799 --> 00:26:49.000
his entire personal world was consumed by the

00:26:49.000 --> 00:26:52.019
brutal reality of occupation and sacrifice. This

00:26:52.019 --> 00:26:54.440
period of confinement. both the country's confinement

00:26:54.440 --> 00:26:57.119
under occupation and the trauma inflicted on

00:26:57.119 --> 00:26:59.779
his family, it serves as the emotional and psychological

00:26:59.779 --> 00:27:03.819
backdrop to his final, miraculous, artistic reinvention.

00:27:04.039 --> 00:27:06.140
That wartime period and the family's subsequent

00:27:06.140 --> 00:27:08.599
trauma directly preceded the physical collapse

00:27:08.599 --> 00:27:11.740
that forced his final artistic shift. In 1941,

00:27:12.240 --> 00:27:14.720
Matisse was diagnosed with duodenal cancer and

00:27:14.720 --> 00:27:17.559
underwent major surgery. He survived, but the

00:27:17.559 --> 00:27:19.759
complications left him permanently reliant on

00:27:19.759 --> 00:27:23.140
a wheelchair, often confined to his bed. Conventional

00:27:23.140 --> 00:27:25.420
painting and sculpture were now physically impossible.

00:27:25.900 --> 00:27:28.500
And this physical necessity led directly to the

00:27:28.500 --> 00:27:32.039
genesis of the cutouts, or decoupage. This wasn't

00:27:32.039 --> 00:27:34.059
just finding a substitute, it was discovering

00:27:34.059 --> 00:27:36.819
a whole new world. With the help of indispensable

00:27:36.819 --> 00:27:40.000
assistants like Lydia Delektorskaya, he developed

00:27:40.000 --> 00:27:43.559
this new art form. The process was simple, but

00:27:43.559 --> 00:27:54.579
revolutionary. And he would then, using long

00:27:54.579 --> 00:27:57.180
-handled scissors while seated or in bed, cut

00:27:57.180 --> 00:27:59.519
them into shapes. These shapes were then arranged

00:27:59.519 --> 00:28:01.680
and pinned onto the wall, forming compositions.

00:28:02.200 --> 00:28:04.779
He described this period, despite his confinement,

00:28:04.960 --> 00:28:07.559
as his second life. I love that quote. He said

00:28:07.559 --> 00:28:10.539
this medium allowed him to wander through gardens

00:28:10.539 --> 00:28:13.119
in the form of his cutouts. It's an incredibly

00:28:13.119 --> 00:28:15.740
poetic description of turning physical limitation

00:28:15.740 --> 00:28:18.200
into ultimate creative freedom. And the results

00:28:18.200 --> 00:28:21.079
were utterly distinct. This medium is not quite

00:28:21.079 --> 00:28:24.299
painting, but not quite sculpture. It's a synthesis.

00:28:24.640 --> 00:28:27.160
It's painting because it uses color and composition.

00:28:27.420 --> 00:28:29.720
But it's sculpture because the colors are defined

00:28:29.720 --> 00:28:32.279
by the physical edge of the cut paper existing

00:28:32.279 --> 00:28:34.559
in relief against the wall. He was essentially

00:28:34.559 --> 00:28:36.920
drawing with scissors, allowing the negative

00:28:36.920 --> 00:28:39.559
space of the wall to become as vital a compositional

00:28:39.559 --> 00:28:42.339
element as the positive shapes he cut. It's true

00:28:42.339 --> 00:28:44.519
that the technique had some utilitarian origins

00:28:44.519 --> 00:28:47.180
much earlier. Oh, yes. The first recorded use

00:28:47.180 --> 00:28:50.400
was in 1919 when he used cut paper designs to

00:28:50.400 --> 00:28:53.220
plan the decor for Igor Stravinsky's opera Le

00:28:53.220 --> 00:28:56.000
Chant de Rossignol. He also used them between

00:28:56.000 --> 00:29:00.039
1937 and 1938 for preparatory work on sets and

00:29:00.039 --> 00:29:02.279
costumes for the Ballet Russes. So they were

00:29:02.279 --> 00:29:04.420
initially just planning tools, a means to an

00:29:04.420 --> 00:29:07.119
end. Exactly. But the necessity of his physical

00:29:07.119 --> 00:29:09.380
condition transformed the technique from utility

00:29:09.380 --> 00:29:12.599
into his primary mode of expression. The first

00:29:12.599 --> 00:29:15.420
major independent project was his female artist's

00:29:15.420 --> 00:29:18.900
book, Jazz, published in 1947. Jazz consisted

00:29:18.900 --> 00:29:22.019
of 20 striking, vibrant plates designed using

00:29:22.019 --> 00:29:24.279
the cutout method. and while they were initially

00:29:24.279 --> 00:29:27.579
conceived as designs for stencil prints the process

00:29:27.579 --> 00:29:29.839
itself proved so exhilarating that by the time

00:29:29.839 --> 00:29:32.799
he wrote the introduction in 1946 he had realized

00:29:32.799 --> 00:29:35.680
the profound possibilities of the medium this

00:29:35.680 --> 00:29:38.359
realization gave birth to one of his most powerful

00:29:38.359 --> 00:29:41.400
philosophical statements from the period an artist

00:29:41.400 --> 00:29:43.930
must never be a prisoner of himself Prisoner

00:29:43.930 --> 00:29:46.210
of style, prisoner of a reputation, prisoner

00:29:46.210 --> 00:29:48.210
of success. He was literally cutting himself

00:29:48.210 --> 00:29:50.849
free from his own legacy as a painter. And that

00:29:50.849 --> 00:29:53.230
intellectual freedom led to a dramatic increase

00:29:53.230 --> 00:29:56.910
in scale. The cutouts became monumental. The

00:29:56.910 --> 00:29:59.630
series of works he created in 1946, like Ocean

00:29:59.630 --> 00:30:02.250
of the Sky and Ocean of the Sea, were mural -sized.

00:30:02.640 --> 00:30:04.960
And these pieces, evoking the plant and animal

00:30:04.960 --> 00:30:07.680
life of the Pacific, were directly inspired by

00:30:07.680 --> 00:30:10.299
his earlier trip to Tahiti, showing how his whole

00:30:10.299 --> 00:30:13.180
life's visual catalog was now feeding this final

00:30:13.180 --> 00:30:15.779
medium. It's said that Lydia, his assistant,

00:30:16.019 --> 00:30:18.039
would essentially direct his paper symphony,

00:30:18.180 --> 00:30:21.220
loosely pinning the silhouettes, the birds, the

00:30:21.220 --> 00:30:23.460
marine vegetation, the stylized figures onto

00:30:23.460 --> 00:30:26.000
the walls of his room, turning his studio into

00:30:26.000 --> 00:30:28.799
a giant, constantly changing, immersive environment.

00:30:29.230 --> 00:30:31.809
One particularly famous piece, the sheaf from

00:30:31.809 --> 00:30:35.269
1953, showing a bundle of stylized leaves, was

00:30:35.269 --> 00:30:37.589
even adapted to ceramic for American collectors,

00:30:37.930 --> 00:30:40.569
further blurring the lines between media. The

00:30:40.569 --> 00:30:43.529
final great artistic and spiritual consolidation

00:30:43.529 --> 00:30:46.609
of this cutout method was the Chapelle du Rosaire

00:30:46.609 --> 00:30:49.269
de Vence, the Chapel of the Rosary, which he

00:30:49.269 --> 00:30:52.849
worked on between 1948 and 1951. This was a deeply

00:30:52.849 --> 00:30:55.680
personal project. Conceived and designed in honor

00:30:55.680 --> 00:30:58.000
of his former wartime nurse, Monique Bourgeois,

00:30:58.220 --> 00:31:01.079
who had since become a Dominican nun. This wasn't

00:31:01.079 --> 00:31:03.140
just a painting project. It was total design.

00:31:03.460 --> 00:31:05.680
He designed the entire environment. The stained

00:31:05.680 --> 00:31:08.420
glass windows, the murals depicting the stations

00:31:08.420 --> 00:31:11.700
of the cross, the priest's chasuables, the tabernacle

00:31:11.700 --> 00:31:14.720
door, all planned meticulously using the cutout

00:31:14.720 --> 00:31:17.019
method as the maquette stage. And he created

00:31:17.019 --> 00:31:19.440
one of the most serene and vibrant sacred spaces

00:31:19.440 --> 00:31:22.220
of the 20th century. Using his most radical late

00:31:22.220 --> 00:31:24.950
career technique. The windows, designed using

00:31:24.950 --> 00:31:27.390
simple, powerful shapes of blue, yellow, and

00:31:27.390 --> 00:31:30.269
green, just flood the interior with pure, joyful

00:31:30.269 --> 00:31:32.609
light, the ultimate synthesis of his lifelong

00:31:32.609 --> 00:31:35.029
obsession with color. He completed his final

00:31:35.029 --> 00:31:37.970
painting in 1951, and his final sculpture was

00:31:37.970 --> 00:31:40.630
finished the year before. Until his death in

00:31:40.630 --> 00:31:45.150
1954, the paper cutout was his sole focus. His

00:31:45.150 --> 00:31:47.809
absolute final work was the design for a stained

00:31:47.809 --> 00:31:50.170
glass window for the Union Church of Pocantico

00:31:50.170 --> 00:31:52.670
Hills near the Rockefeller Estate north of New

00:31:52.670 --> 00:31:55.279
York. David Rockefeller confirmed that the maquette

00:31:55.279 --> 00:31:57.279
for that very window was hanging on his bedroom

00:31:57.279 --> 00:31:59.519
wall when he died. It was installed posthumously

00:31:59.519 --> 00:32:02.579
in 1956. Even on his deathbed, the last thing

00:32:02.579 --> 00:32:04.740
Matisse was reaching for was light, structure

00:32:04.740 --> 00:32:06.900
and pure color. The institutional recognition

00:32:06.900 --> 00:32:09.500
was swift. The Matisse Museum was established

00:32:09.500 --> 00:32:13.279
in his birthplace. Le Cateau, in 1952, two years

00:32:13.279 --> 00:32:16.039
before his passing. And the Municipal Musée Matisse

00:32:16.039 --> 00:32:18.380
in Nice, where he spent his final productive

00:32:18.380 --> 00:32:21.980
years, opened in 1963 and holds one of the world's

00:32:21.980 --> 00:32:24.319
largest collections of his work. Henri Matisse

00:32:24.319 --> 00:32:26.440
died of a heart attack at the age of 84 on November

00:32:26.440 --> 00:32:30.319
3, 1954, and is buried in Nice. But his influence

00:32:30.319 --> 00:32:31.859
flows directly into the heart of the American

00:32:31.859 --> 00:32:34.460
art market, thanks to his son. Pierre Matisse.

00:32:34.599 --> 00:32:37.000
His son established his modern art gallery in

00:32:37.000 --> 00:32:39.940
New York City in 1931, operating it for nearly

00:32:39.940 --> 00:32:43.400
six decades until 1989. And this gallery was

00:32:43.400 --> 00:32:45.859
an absolutely vital bridge between the European

00:32:45.859 --> 00:32:48.180
avant -garde and the American collecting public.

00:32:48.420 --> 00:32:51.900
A huge bridge. He exhibited major European artists

00:32:51.900 --> 00:32:55.119
like Joan Miró, Marc Striol, Alberto Giacometti,

00:32:55.180 --> 00:32:57.700
and Jean Dubuffet, often introducing them to

00:32:57.700 --> 00:33:00.319
the U .S. for the very first time. The Matisse

00:33:00.319 --> 00:33:03.960
legacy extended beyond creation and into curation.

00:33:04.259 --> 00:33:06.700
And while the artistic legacy is one of light

00:33:06.700 --> 00:33:09.599
and joy, we do have to briefly acknowledge the

00:33:09.599 --> 00:33:12.349
shadows of history that still affect his provenance,

00:33:12.369 --> 00:33:15.859
the issue of Nazi -looted art. Right. This is

00:33:15.859 --> 00:33:18.259
an ongoing, painful process that underscores

00:33:18.259 --> 00:33:20.819
how political turbulence permanently scars art

00:33:20.819 --> 00:33:23.819
history. During the Nazi years, numerous artworks

00:33:23.819 --> 00:33:26.859
by Matisse were seized, looted from Jewish collectors,

00:33:27.140 --> 00:33:29.900
or sold under duress. We've seen some significant

00:33:29.900 --> 00:33:32.380
restitutions in recent years. Works like Limer

00:33:32.380 --> 00:33:34.779
Rose were returned from France's Pompidou Museum

00:33:34.779 --> 00:33:37.420
to the heirs of its rightful owners. Even pieces

00:33:37.420 --> 00:33:39.579
discovered in the famous Munich art horde, like

00:33:39.579 --> 00:33:41.920
Femme Assise, have these complicated, troubled

00:33:41.920 --> 00:33:44.799
provenance dating back to the war. German Lost

00:33:44.799 --> 00:33:47.480
Art Foundation currently lists 38 artworks by

00:33:47.480 --> 00:33:50.119
Matisse in their database. So the work of tracking

00:33:50.119 --> 00:33:52.180
down and returning these masterpieces continues

00:33:52.180 --> 00:33:55.279
today. It does. And finally, let's close with

00:33:55.279 --> 00:33:57.759
the perfect anecdote that encapsulates the legacy

00:33:57.759 --> 00:34:00.359
of a man who constantly challenged the foundations

00:34:00.359 --> 00:34:03.220
of perception right up until the very end. Here's

00:34:03.220 --> 00:34:05.980
where it gets really interesting. In 1961, seven

00:34:05.980 --> 00:34:08.639
years after his death, one of his famous gouache

00:34:08.639 --> 00:34:12.670
cutouts, Le Bateau de Boat, from 1954, was hung

00:34:12.670 --> 00:34:15.690
in the Museum of Modern Art in New York. It was

00:34:15.690 --> 00:34:19.230
mistakenly displayed upside down. Wait. A major

00:34:19.230 --> 00:34:21.670
work by Henri Matisse, one of the twin pillars

00:34:21.670 --> 00:34:24.530
of 20th century art, hanging in the Museum of

00:34:24.530 --> 00:34:26.969
Modern Art, the global temple of modernism, was

00:34:26.969 --> 00:34:30.670
upside down? For how long? 47 days. 47 days.

00:34:30.869 --> 00:34:33.690
Almost seven full weeks passed before an astute

00:34:33.690 --> 00:34:36.269
observer realized the work was oriented incorrectly.

00:34:36.710 --> 00:34:38.349
So what does that mean for the legacy of Henri

00:34:38.349 --> 00:34:40.610
Matisse? I think it means that his final art,

00:34:40.730 --> 00:34:43.469
born from confinement and necessity, achieved

00:34:43.469 --> 00:34:46.090
a level of pure abstraction and structural liberation

00:34:46.090 --> 00:34:49.130
so profound that the traditional rules of up

00:34:49.130 --> 00:34:51.989
and down, right and wrong, just, they ceased

00:34:51.989 --> 00:34:54.679
to apply. He liberated color and form completely.

00:34:54.920 --> 00:34:57.420
He didn't just redefine painting. He redefined

00:34:57.420 --> 00:34:59.460
the fundamental relationship between the viewer,

00:34:59.639 --> 00:35:02.579
the shape, and the canvas, forcing us to constantly

00:35:02.579 --> 00:35:05.699
question what we think we know. A legacy so powerful,

00:35:05.880 --> 00:35:08.980
they named a crater on Mercury after him in 1976.

00:35:09.579 --> 00:35:12.000
From provincial court administrator to a named

00:35:12.000 --> 00:35:14.000
feature on another planet, what a deep dive.

00:35:14.159 --> 00:35:15.039
Thank you for joining us.
