WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.240
Welcome back to The Deep Dive, where we sift

00:00:02.240 --> 00:00:04.740
through the sources, extract the vital knowledge,

00:00:04.940 --> 00:00:07.360
and give you the essential context you need to

00:00:07.360 --> 00:00:10.740
truly understand a subject. Today, we are undertaking

00:00:10.740 --> 00:00:14.599
a deep dive into an American icon, Katharine

00:00:14.599 --> 00:00:17.320
Hepburn. And we're not just, you know, summarizing

00:00:17.320 --> 00:00:19.579
her filmography. We're really trying to investigate

00:00:19.579 --> 00:00:22.480
the architecture of her success. Exactly. I mean,

00:00:22.480 --> 00:00:24.820
here's a woman whose career spans six decades.

00:00:25.059 --> 00:00:28.780
She moved so effortlessly between like high flying

00:00:28.780 --> 00:00:31.620
screwball comedy and these incredibly intense

00:00:31.620 --> 00:00:35.159
literary dramas. So our mission today is really

00:00:35.159 --> 00:00:37.140
to unpack the contradictions of her life. We

00:00:37.140 --> 00:00:39.159
want to understand how a performer who at one

00:00:39.159 --> 00:00:41.649
point was. effectively shunned by the industry.

00:00:41.729 --> 00:00:44.049
I mean, literally labeled box office poison.

00:00:44.130 --> 00:00:46.609
A death sentence in that era. Right. How did

00:00:46.609 --> 00:00:48.289
she manage to orchestrate one of the greatest

00:00:48.289 --> 00:00:50.609
comebacks in Hollywood history? And how was her

00:00:50.609 --> 00:00:54.049
fiercely independent image both a natural part

00:00:54.049 --> 00:00:56.329
of her and also this brilliantly cultivated strategy?

00:00:56.750 --> 00:00:58.890
It's that strategy part that's so fascinating.

00:00:59.369 --> 00:01:01.990
We're looking at an artist who had a remarkable

00:01:01.990 --> 00:01:05.109
level of control over her own narrative. She

00:01:05.109 --> 00:01:07.549
consistently challenged the rigid studio system

00:01:07.549 --> 00:01:10.250
and she forced the industry to accept her on

00:01:10.250 --> 00:01:14.489
her own terms. Even when those terms were highly

00:01:14.489 --> 00:01:16.670
inconvenient for them. Oh, incredibly inconvenient

00:01:16.670 --> 00:01:19.750
and controversial and often just the complete

00:01:19.750 --> 00:01:21.650
opposite of what the public thought they wanted.

00:01:22.000 --> 00:01:24.739
She wasn't just talented. She was, I think, an

00:01:24.739 --> 00:01:27.120
unparalleled professional strategist. OK, so

00:01:27.120 --> 00:01:30.040
let's unpack this. How did this person who, you

00:01:30.040 --> 00:01:32.060
know, refused to sign autographs, famously wore

00:01:32.060 --> 00:01:33.760
trousers everywhere, got nicknamed Catherine

00:01:33.760 --> 00:01:37.159
of Arrogance. How does she end up defining the

00:01:37.159 --> 00:01:40.079
modern woman for the entire 20th century? Well,

00:01:40.159 --> 00:01:41.500
to answer that, you have to start at the beginning.

00:01:41.599 --> 00:01:43.299
And that beginning is way outside the Hollywood

00:01:43.299 --> 00:01:44.840
bubble. It's in Connecticut. Right. With your

00:01:44.840 --> 00:01:47.019
family. You really want to understand Catherine

00:01:47.019 --> 00:01:52.579
Hepburn. You have to start with the sheer. radicalism

00:01:52.579 --> 00:01:55.599
of her upbringing. She was born May 12, 1907

00:01:55.599 --> 00:01:58.799
in Hartford, Connecticut, into a household that

00:01:58.799 --> 00:02:01.879
was, by the standards of the time, just a crucible

00:02:01.879 --> 00:02:04.280
of progressive social reform. And her parents

00:02:04.280 --> 00:02:06.980
weren't just, you know, casual liberals. They

00:02:06.980 --> 00:02:10.180
were expert activists. Their home was basically

00:02:10.180 --> 00:02:12.500
the ideological headquarters for their campaigns.

00:02:13.229 --> 00:02:15.169
And these are deeply controversial campaigns

00:02:15.169 --> 00:02:16.949
at the time. Oh, absolutely. I mean, look at

00:02:16.949 --> 00:02:19.110
her father, Thomas Hepburn. He was a prominent

00:02:19.110 --> 00:02:21.490
urologist, and he co -founded the New England

00:02:21.490 --> 00:02:23.770
Social Hygiene Association. Which sounds very

00:02:23.770 --> 00:02:25.830
polite, but what it actually meant was... It

00:02:25.830 --> 00:02:28.129
meant he was educating the public about venereal

00:02:28.129 --> 00:02:31.810
disease. In the 1910s, this was a topic that

00:02:31.810 --> 00:02:34.710
was completely unmentionable in polite society.

00:02:35.250 --> 00:02:38.469
His work took immense courage. And her mother

00:02:38.469 --> 00:02:41.110
was, if anything, even more radical in the public

00:02:41.110 --> 00:02:43.539
eye. Totally. Catherine Martha Houghton Hepburn,

00:02:43.620 --> 00:02:46.379
her mother, was a tireless feminist campaigner.

00:02:46.620 --> 00:02:49.240
She headed the Connecticut Woman Suffrage Association,

00:02:49.599 --> 00:02:51.879
putting her right on the front lines of that

00:02:51.879 --> 00:02:54.379
battle. But also, crucially, she campaigned for

00:02:54.379 --> 00:02:56.840
birth control right alongside Margaret Sanger.

00:02:57.020 --> 00:02:59.800
Exactly. And Margaret Sanger was an absolutely

00:02:59.800 --> 00:03:02.460
incendiary figure to many conservative groups

00:03:02.460 --> 00:03:04.759
at the time. So this wasn't some abstract thing

00:03:04.759 --> 00:03:06.860
for young Catherine. She was immersed in it.

00:03:07.000 --> 00:03:09.599
The sources confirm she actually joined her mother

00:03:09.599 --> 00:03:12.620
on votes for women demonstrations. Just try to

00:03:12.620 --> 00:03:14.620
imagine being a child growing up with a mother

00:03:14.620 --> 00:03:18.020
who was publicly debating, challenging authority,

00:03:18.379 --> 00:03:21.620
facing down moral outrage pretty much every single

00:03:21.620 --> 00:03:23.560
day. That kind of environment would instill a

00:03:23.560 --> 00:03:26.259
profound family ethos, wouldn't it? The kids

00:03:26.259 --> 00:03:28.219
weren't just raised to be independent thinkers.

00:03:28.400 --> 00:03:30.340
They were trained to exercise absolute freedom

00:03:30.340 --> 00:03:32.879
of speech. They were expected to question everything.

00:03:33.370 --> 00:03:36.409
to debate any topic, no matter how sacred, if

00:03:36.409 --> 00:03:38.469
you're trained from birth to defend your position

00:03:38.469 --> 00:03:41.229
against seasoned activists like your own parents,

00:03:41.710 --> 00:03:45.030
well, you develop a pretty formidable intellectual

00:03:45.030 --> 00:03:48.729
armor. She called it enormously lucky. And you

00:03:48.729 --> 00:03:50.530
can see why. It didn't just give her confidence.

00:03:50.789 --> 00:03:54.090
It gave her this framework that was totally different

00:03:54.090 --> 00:03:56.129
from the typical Hollywood starlet she was later

00:03:56.129 --> 00:03:58.550
expected to be. So when the studio tried to tell

00:03:58.550 --> 00:04:01.550
her how to dress or what to say... She saw it

00:04:01.550 --> 00:04:04.629
as an infringement on her rights, a concept her

00:04:04.629 --> 00:04:07.210
parents had spent their entire lives fighting

00:04:07.210 --> 00:04:10.210
for. But this intellectual side was matched by

00:04:10.210 --> 00:04:13.150
an equally intense physical discipline, and that

00:04:13.150 --> 00:04:15.949
came mostly from her father. That's right. The

00:04:15.949 --> 00:04:18.310
young Hepburn was a self -proclaimed tomboy.

00:04:18.410 --> 00:04:21.629
She kept her hair short, often insisted on being

00:04:21.629 --> 00:04:24.529
called Jimmy. And this was all encouraged. Her

00:04:24.529 --> 00:04:26.389
father believed that the children had to use

00:04:26.389 --> 00:04:28.990
their minds and their bodies to the limit. And

00:04:28.990 --> 00:04:30.949
this wasn't just like playing outside. It was

00:04:30.949 --> 00:04:33.290
competitive, disciplined athleticism. Oh, for

00:04:33.290 --> 00:04:36.110
sure. He taught them to swim, run, dive, wrestle,

00:04:36.250 --> 00:04:39.790
and to master sports like tennis and golf. She

00:04:39.790 --> 00:04:41.910
got genuinely good at golf, even reaching the

00:04:41.910 --> 00:04:44.189
semifinal of the Connecticut Young Women's Golf

00:04:44.189 --> 00:04:46.629
Championship. That level of focus training is

00:04:46.629 --> 00:04:48.550
exactly what she brought to her acting later

00:04:48.550 --> 00:04:51.529
on. It is. And it extended to her daily routine.

00:04:52.240 --> 00:04:55.040
The sources all point to these almost ascetic

00:04:55.040 --> 00:04:57.560
health habits, like taking ice -cold baths every

00:04:57.560 --> 00:04:59.740
morning. Why? It wasn't about enjoyment. It was

00:04:59.740 --> 00:05:02.860
about self -mastery. She had this belief, and

00:05:02.860 --> 00:05:04.980
I'm quoting her here, the bitterer the medicine,

00:05:05.240 --> 00:05:08.000
the better it was for you. That one phrase just

00:05:08.000 --> 00:05:10.500
defines her entire professional philosophy, doesn't

00:05:10.500 --> 00:05:12.839
it? It really does. She sought out difficulty,

00:05:13.240 --> 00:05:15.899
believing that hardship was essential for growth.

00:05:16.360 --> 00:05:18.680
But this whole narrative of strength and enlightenment

00:05:18.680 --> 00:05:22.339
and discipline, it gets severely tested by an

00:05:22.339 --> 00:05:24.839
immense trauma that hit the family when she was

00:05:24.839 --> 00:05:29.399
just 13. In March 1921, Catherine experienced

00:05:29.399 --> 00:05:31.860
something that just permanently altered her.

00:05:32.279 --> 00:05:34.519
She discovered the body of her older brother

00:05:34.519 --> 00:05:37.740
Tom, who was 15. He had died from an apparent

00:05:37.740 --> 00:05:40.660
suicide by hanging. And the way the family handled

00:05:40.660 --> 00:05:43.000
this is so crucial to understanding her later

00:05:43.000 --> 00:05:45.819
on, especially her emotional guardedness. It

00:05:45.819 --> 00:05:48.379
is. The Hepburn family maintained a lifelong

00:05:48.379 --> 00:05:51.519
public and private denial. They insisted it was

00:05:51.519 --> 00:05:54.000
some kind of experiment gone wrong, rather than

00:05:54.000 --> 00:05:56.819
acknowledging it was a suicide. Which is, well,

00:05:56.920 --> 00:05:58.759
that's a psychologically significant detail,

00:05:58.879 --> 00:06:01.079
isn't it? The need to suppress a horrific truth

00:06:01.079 --> 00:06:03.600
and replace it with a controlled narrative. It

00:06:03.600 --> 00:06:05.860
seems to have directly translated into Catherine's

00:06:05.860 --> 00:06:08.420
adult need to control her own public image and

00:06:08.420 --> 00:06:10.220
just keep everyone at an emotional distance.

00:06:10.579 --> 00:06:13.379
The immediate impact was devastating. The sources

00:06:13.379 --> 00:06:15.819
say the incident made the teenage Hepburn nervous,

00:06:16.120 --> 00:06:19.180
moody, and deeply suspicious. This fearless,

00:06:19.339 --> 00:06:23.560
outspoken kid suddenly just recreated. Yeah,

00:06:23.600 --> 00:06:25.439
she dropped out of her school, the Oxford School,

00:06:25.680 --> 00:06:28.699
and she needed several years of private tutoring.

00:06:28.779 --> 00:06:31.639
Her discipline, which had been a tool for achievement,

00:06:31.920 --> 00:06:34.980
now became, you know, a defense mechanism. And

00:06:34.980 --> 00:06:37.480
that guardedness became a core part of her identity.

00:06:37.600 --> 00:06:39.819
I mean, it's so telling that she adopted Tom's

00:06:39.819 --> 00:06:42.540
birthday, November 8th, as her own for many,

00:06:42.639 --> 00:06:44.660
many years. She only revealed her true birth

00:06:44.660 --> 00:06:48.220
date decades later in her 1991 autobiography.

00:06:48.279 --> 00:06:50.939
She literally merged her identity with her lost

00:06:50.939 --> 00:06:53.660
brother. It's a powerful lifelong effort to manage

00:06:53.660 --> 00:06:55.939
her own story, which is exactly the skills she

00:06:55.939 --> 00:06:58.120
would use in Hollywood. So she emerges from this

00:06:58.120 --> 00:07:00.699
period disciplined but deeply guarded. And her

00:07:00.699 --> 00:07:03.019
next step is college, which she didn't seem too

00:07:03.019 --> 00:07:05.639
excited about. No, not at all. She went to Bryn

00:07:05.639 --> 00:07:07.800
Mawr College mostly to please her mother. She

00:07:07.800 --> 00:07:09.639
got a degree in history and philosophy but found

00:07:09.639 --> 00:07:12.480
the whole scholastic environment pretty unfulfilling.

00:07:12.639 --> 00:07:14.680
She struggled at first, was even suspended once

00:07:14.680 --> 00:07:16.899
for smoking in her room. But then she figured

00:07:16.899 --> 00:07:19.779
out how to leverage the system. She did. She

00:07:19.779 --> 00:07:21.850
realized that... Roles in the college plays,

00:07:22.029 --> 00:07:24.290
which she desperately wanted, were conditional

00:07:24.290 --> 00:07:26.910
on having good grades. A little motivation. A

00:07:26.910 --> 00:07:29.949
lot of motivation. Once her marks improved, she

00:07:29.949 --> 00:07:32.029
was performing regularly. She starred in the

00:07:32.029 --> 00:07:34.029
senior play, The Woman and the Moon. And that

00:07:34.029 --> 00:07:36.329
experience, that immediate validation from an

00:07:36.329 --> 00:07:38.589
audience, that's what cemented her ambition.

00:07:38.949 --> 00:07:41.089
So once she graduated, she just went for it.

00:07:41.170 --> 00:07:43.910
With that same fanatical focus, she applied to

00:07:43.910 --> 00:07:46.189
everything else. She was determined, and she

00:07:46.189 --> 00:07:47.930
got hired pretty quickly in repertory theater.

00:07:49.899 --> 00:07:51.939
The move from college plays to the professional

00:07:51.939 --> 00:07:55.980
world was, well, it was brutal. She had the confidence,

00:07:56.079 --> 00:07:58.939
but not the technique. Not at all. She faced

00:07:58.939 --> 00:08:01.939
immediate, harsh criticism. She landed a starring

00:08:01.939 --> 00:08:04.519
role in The Big Pond and was fired after only

00:08:04.519 --> 00:08:07.480
four weeks. Directors complained about her shrill

00:08:07.480 --> 00:08:10.139
voice, her tendency to mix up lines, speaking

00:08:10.139 --> 00:08:13.439
way too quickly. She was just not very good yet.

00:08:13.680 --> 00:08:17.300
To be blunt, no. And that led to this painful

00:08:17.300 --> 00:08:20.300
cycle of hiring and firing. She was fired from

00:08:20.300 --> 00:08:23.600
death. Takes a holiday. Later, the star Leslie

00:08:23.600 --> 00:08:26.139
Howard had her fired from the animal kingdom

00:08:26.139 --> 00:08:28.879
because he just disliked her and found her difficult.

00:08:29.160 --> 00:08:32.220
It's amazing to think about this fearless, privileged

00:08:32.220 --> 00:08:35.980
young woman facing that much rejection. The playwright

00:08:35.980 --> 00:08:38.039
Philip Berry told her, to be brutally frank,

00:08:38.320 --> 00:08:40.460
you weren't very good. And that's a brutal thing

00:08:40.460 --> 00:08:43.840
to hear. But those failures forced her to analyze

00:08:43.840 --> 00:08:46.840
her weaknesses and refine her craft. It's the

00:08:46.840 --> 00:08:49.600
classic Hepburn response to a problem. And her

00:08:49.600 --> 00:08:52.580
breakthrough finally came in 1932 on Broadway.

00:08:52.799 --> 00:08:54.759
Yes, in a play called The Warrior's Husband.

00:08:54.980 --> 00:08:57.139
This was the role that clicked, and it was all

00:08:57.139 --> 00:08:59.000
because of that physical discipline her father

00:08:59.000 --> 00:09:01.539
instilled in her. The role required aggressive

00:09:01.539 --> 00:09:03.919
energy and athleticism. She had to leap down

00:09:03.919 --> 00:09:06.440
a steep staircase carrying a stag over her shoulder.

00:09:06.639 --> 00:09:09.960
In a short silver tunic, no less. She was literally

00:09:09.960 --> 00:09:13.799
leaping into the spotlight. Her energy just captivated

00:09:13.799 --> 00:09:16.830
the critics. The show ran for three months, and

00:09:16.830 --> 00:09:19.129
that unique physical performance is what finally

00:09:19.129 --> 00:09:21.610
caught Hollywood's attention. A scout for agent

00:09:21.610 --> 00:09:24.009
Leland Hayward saw her and immediately set up

00:09:24.009 --> 00:09:26.850
a screen test for the RKO film A Bill of Divorcement.

00:09:26.990 --> 00:09:29.929
And the director, George Cukor, who had become

00:09:29.929 --> 00:09:33.289
a lifelong friend, was impressed. He called her

00:09:33.289 --> 00:09:35.870
an odd creature, but he loved the way she just

00:09:35.870 --> 00:09:38.690
picked up a glass. Some tiny gesture that told

00:09:38.690 --> 00:09:41.129
him she was a star. But here's the critical business

00:09:41.129 --> 00:09:43.909
move. Despite being a complete unknown in Hollywood,

00:09:44.210 --> 00:09:47.350
she showed immediate savvy. She demanded a huge

00:09:47.350 --> 00:09:50.909
salary. An unusually high salary, yeah. $1 ,500

00:09:50.909 --> 00:09:53.730
a week on a temporary contract. She insisted

00:09:53.730 --> 00:09:55.789
on being treated like a star before she'd proven

00:09:55.789 --> 00:09:58.610
she was one. And RKO agreed. The gamble paid

00:09:58.610 --> 00:10:01.669
off instantly. The film was a success, critics

00:10:01.669 --> 00:10:03.990
hailed her performance, and she was signed to

00:10:03.990 --> 00:10:06.809
a long -term contract. The ascent was just meteoric.

00:10:06.830 --> 00:10:09.029
She won the Academy Award for Best Actress for

00:10:09.100 --> 00:10:12.240
her third film, Morning Glory, a role she had

00:10:12.240 --> 00:10:14.240
insisted on getting after seeing the script.

00:10:14.399 --> 00:10:17.279
And in classic Hepburn fashion, showing her complete

00:10:17.279 --> 00:10:19.419
disdain for the Hollywood machine, she didn't

00:10:19.419 --> 00:10:21.559
even show up to the ceremony. Never did. Then

00:10:21.559 --> 00:10:24.240
her next film, Little Women, was one of the biggest

00:10:24.240 --> 00:10:26.980
hits the industry had seen. She played Jo and

00:10:26.980 --> 00:10:28.440
always said it was one of her favorite roles.

00:10:28.620 --> 00:10:30.659
She felt nobody could be as good in that part

00:10:30.659 --> 00:10:33.500
as she was. That confidence was just unshakable

00:10:33.500 --> 00:10:36.779
at this point. But that peak. led almost immediately

00:10:36.779 --> 00:10:40.159
into a severe, severe trough. This is the infamous

00:10:40.159 --> 00:10:44.240
box office poison era from 34 to 38. And the

00:10:44.240 --> 00:10:46.620
transition from Golden Girl to Public Enemy was

00:10:46.620 --> 00:10:49.039
shockingly fast. It started with a catastrophic

00:10:49.039 --> 00:10:52.279
return to Broadway in 1933 with a play called

00:10:52.279 --> 00:10:55.370
The Lake. The director was terrible. The script

00:10:55.370 --> 00:10:57.590
wasn't right for her. And that is where we get

00:10:57.590 --> 00:11:00.490
maybe the most famous, devastating line of theatrical

00:11:00.490 --> 00:11:02.990
criticism in history. Dorothy Parker. Dorothy

00:11:02.990 --> 00:11:05.570
Parker's immortal quip. She runs the gamut of

00:11:05.570 --> 00:11:08.250
emotions all the way from A to B. Ouch. That

00:11:08.250 --> 00:11:10.250
didn't just hurt her. It destroyed the show's

00:11:10.250 --> 00:11:12.889
run. Sales plummeted. But instead of just letting

00:11:12.889 --> 00:11:16.559
it die a slow death, Hepburn took control. She

00:11:16.559 --> 00:11:19.879
paid the director, Jed Harris, $14 ,000, most

00:11:19.879 --> 00:11:22.240
of her life savings, to close the production

00:11:22.240 --> 00:11:25.399
immediately. She paid him. She paid him. That

00:11:25.399 --> 00:11:27.879
financial sacrifice taught her a permanent lesson.

00:11:28.559 --> 00:11:31.379
If something is hurting your career, you have

00:11:31.379 --> 00:11:35.639
to take dramatic, costly action to regain control.

00:11:35.960 --> 00:11:38.899
And meanwhile, her films were failing, one after

00:11:38.899 --> 00:11:41.970
another. the little minister, Mary of Scotland,

00:11:42.230 --> 00:11:45.330
audiences were just rejecting her. And this all

00:11:45.330 --> 00:11:47.789
culminated with bringing up Baby in 1938 with

00:11:47.789 --> 00:11:51.269
Cary Grant. Today, it's seen as an absolute masterpiece,

00:11:51.529 --> 00:11:54.090
right? A screwball classic. A total classic.

00:11:54.350 --> 00:11:56.990
But commercially, it was a flop. And the theater

00:11:56.990 --> 00:11:59.570
owners, they blamed Hepburn. They claimed her

00:11:59.570 --> 00:12:02.149
presence was alienating audiences. And that's

00:12:02.149 --> 00:12:03.990
when they made it official. The Independent Theater

00:12:03.990 --> 00:12:06.769
Owners of America publicly listed her as box

00:12:06.769 --> 00:12:09.629
office poison. It wasn't just a bad review. It

00:12:09.629 --> 00:12:12.029
was a powerful industrial statement. They were

00:12:12.029 --> 00:12:14.269
essentially saying, don't hire this woman. So

00:12:14.269 --> 00:12:16.970
why? Why the fierce public rejection? It wasn't

00:12:16.970 --> 00:12:19.049
about talent. No, the sources are really clear

00:12:19.049 --> 00:12:21.529
on this. It was a profound image clash. She just

00:12:21.529 --> 00:12:24.309
refused to conform. She was openly rude to the

00:12:24.309 --> 00:12:25.889
press. She wouldn't sign autographs. She got

00:12:25.889 --> 00:12:28.509
that nickname, Catherine of Arrogance. She baffled

00:12:28.509 --> 00:12:30.730
the public with her boyish behavior and wearing

00:12:30.730 --> 00:12:33.350
trousers. She was too modern for the 1930s. Way

00:12:33.350 --> 00:12:35.470
too modern, too intellectual, too aggressive.

00:12:35.789 --> 00:12:39.120
And the studio. RKO, they tried to force her

00:12:39.120 --> 00:12:41.620
into this truly terrible B -movie Mother Carries

00:12:41.620 --> 00:12:44.779
Chickens. But Hepburn having learned her lesson

00:12:44.779 --> 00:12:46.840
from the lake, made a decisive revolutionary

00:12:46.840 --> 00:12:50.159
move. To refuse. To refuse the film and paid

00:12:50.159 --> 00:12:53.720
RKO $75 ,000 to buy out her own contract. You

00:12:53.720 --> 00:12:56.039
cannot overstate how radical that was in 1938.

00:12:56.519 --> 00:13:00.059
The studio system relied on locking actors into

00:13:00.059 --> 00:13:02.340
these long contracts where they basically owned

00:13:02.340 --> 00:13:04.460
you. They owned your image, your roles, everything.

00:13:04.639 --> 00:13:07.100
For an actor to proactively pay to get out and

00:13:07.100 --> 00:13:09.610
become an independent agent? It was almost unheard

00:13:09.610 --> 00:13:11.850
of. It took immense wealth, which she had from

00:13:11.850 --> 00:13:14.750
her early success, and just ironclad conviction.

00:13:15.070 --> 00:13:18.309
She chose freedom over stability. And that decision

00:13:18.309 --> 00:13:20.470
wasn't just an escape. It was the foundation

00:13:20.470 --> 00:13:23.929
of this genius, masterminded comeback. She knew

00:13:23.929 --> 00:13:26.090
she needed a vehicle perfectly tailored to her

00:13:26.090 --> 00:13:28.809
unique personality. And she found it. The Philadelphia

00:13:28.809 --> 00:13:31.899
Story? The play by Philip Barry. The role of

00:13:31.899 --> 00:13:34.139
Tracy Lord was written specifically to accommodate

00:13:34.139 --> 00:13:37.460
all of Hepburn's contradictions. Her humor, her

00:13:37.460 --> 00:13:39.779
aggression, her high -class background, and her

00:13:39.779 --> 00:13:41.840
vulnerability. It was the only way the public

00:13:41.840 --> 00:13:44.220
would accept her again. And the financial maneuvering

00:13:44.220 --> 00:13:47.059
was brilliant. Her partner at the time, Howard

00:13:47.059 --> 00:13:49.240
Hughes, bought her the film rights to the play

00:13:49.240 --> 00:13:51.639
before it even debuted on Broadway. Which gave

00:13:51.639 --> 00:13:54.299
her total control. a massive asset. The play

00:13:54.299 --> 00:13:56.460
was a phenomenal success on Broadway, running

00:13:56.460 --> 00:14:00.080
for over 400 performances. That restored her

00:14:00.080 --> 00:14:02.360
reputation. But the film deal she struck with

00:14:02.360 --> 00:14:05.600
MGM, that was the strategic masterpiece. She

00:14:05.600 --> 00:14:09.009
sold the rights to MGM on two conditions. She

00:14:09.009 --> 00:14:11.269
would be the star, and she would pick her director

00:14:11.269 --> 00:14:13.929
and her co -stars. George Cukor, Cary Grant,

00:14:14.090 --> 00:14:16.809
and James Stewart. Not a bad team. Not bad at

00:14:16.809 --> 00:14:19.590
all. And she even insisted on a key piece of

00:14:19.590 --> 00:14:22.090
image rehabilitation in the film's opening scene.

00:14:22.269 --> 00:14:24.389
Right. She wanted Grant to knock her flat on

00:14:24.389 --> 00:14:27.269
her backside. Exactly. Yeah. She said moviegoers

00:14:27.269 --> 00:14:30.830
thought she was too la -di -da, too cold. She

00:14:30.830 --> 00:14:33.250
needed the audience to laugh at her enough that

00:14:33.250 --> 00:14:35.629
they would ultimately sympathize with her. It

00:14:35.629 --> 00:14:37.809
was this moment of intentional public humiliation

00:14:37.809 --> 00:14:40.389
designed to make the intimidating Katharine Hepburn

00:14:40.389 --> 00:14:42.830
relatable. And my God, did it work. The Philadelphia

00:14:42.830 --> 00:14:46.610
story was one of the biggest hits of 1940. Time

00:14:46.610 --> 00:14:49.370
magazine declared, come on back, Katie, all is

00:14:49.370 --> 00:14:52.210
forgiven. She earned her third Oscar nomination

00:14:52.210 --> 00:14:55.159
and reestablished herself as a major star. all

00:14:55.159 --> 00:14:57.840
completely on her own terms. And her next huge

00:14:57.840 --> 00:15:00.100
strategic move came with Woman of the Year in

00:15:00.100 --> 00:15:03.440
1942, which led directly to the most consequential

00:15:03.440 --> 00:15:06.120
relationship of her entire life. Spencer Tracy.

00:15:06.299 --> 00:15:09.100
Spencer Tracy. They met on that set, and their

00:15:09.100 --> 00:15:11.740
very first exchange just perfectly captured their

00:15:11.740 --> 00:15:13.700
dynamic. The story goes she said something like,

00:15:13.820 --> 00:15:16.100
I'm afraid I'm too tall for you. And he replied,

00:15:16.360 --> 00:15:17.980
don't worry, Miss Hepburn, I'll soon cut you

00:15:17.980 --> 00:15:21.070
down to my size. And that spark ignited this

00:15:21.070 --> 00:15:23.370
relationship that was both a professional blessing

00:15:23.370 --> 00:15:26.450
and a huge private demand, spanning nine films

00:15:26.450 --> 00:15:29.049
together. Woman of the Year was another massive

00:15:29.049 --> 00:15:31.950
hit, and it led to her signing a new star contract

00:15:31.950 --> 00:15:34.929
with MGM. And it's crucial to point out, she

00:15:34.929 --> 00:15:36.870
later admitted this partnership significantly

00:15:36.870 --> 00:15:40.210
advanced her career. Tracy was the more popular

00:15:40.210 --> 00:15:43.029
star at the time. She benefited from being tied

00:15:43.029 --> 00:15:46.080
to his bankability. She did. But this partnership

00:15:46.080 --> 00:15:49.019
came with profound demands. The first one being

00:15:49.019 --> 00:15:51.879
absolute secrecy. Right, because Tracy was married

00:15:51.879 --> 00:15:55.240
and his wife, Louise, would never agree to a

00:15:55.240 --> 00:15:57.620
divorce. So this was a hidden relationship that

00:15:57.620 --> 00:16:00.879
lasted until his death in 1967. They maintained

00:16:00.879 --> 00:16:03.039
separate residences. They were meticulous about

00:16:03.039 --> 00:16:05.360
never being seen together publicly. This was

00:16:05.360 --> 00:16:08.340
a major long -term commitment that demanded constant

00:16:08.340 --> 00:16:10.840
vigilance. And the demands went beyond secrecy,

00:16:10.860 --> 00:16:12.980
didn't they? She really put her career on the

00:16:12.980 --> 00:16:14.960
back burner for him at times. She did. It's a

00:16:14.960 --> 00:16:17.559
huge contradiction with her public image. She

00:16:17.559 --> 00:16:19.679
slowed her career in the 40s to support Tracy,

00:16:19.860 --> 00:16:22.399
who was suffering from severe alcoholism, moodiness,

00:16:22.519 --> 00:16:25.480
and insomnia. The sources say she devoted herself

00:16:25.480 --> 00:16:28.480
to making his life easier. She took on this.

00:16:29.419 --> 00:16:31.820
This mothering role, often obeying him, it's

00:16:31.820 --> 00:16:34.179
fascinating. The woman who fought the entire

00:16:34.179 --> 00:16:37.039
studio system was privately submissive to the

00:16:37.039 --> 00:16:40.480
man she loved. And this professional slowdown

00:16:40.480 --> 00:16:43.559
was compounded by politics. In the late 40s,

00:16:43.559 --> 00:16:46.240
with the anti -communist hysteria, Hepburn's

00:16:46.240 --> 00:16:48.539
outspoken opposition to the movement led directly

00:16:48.539 --> 00:16:50.539
to a nine -month period where she couldn't find

00:16:50.539 --> 00:16:53.220
work. She was labeled dangerously progressive.

00:16:53.700 --> 00:16:55.639
Even though she denied ever being a communist

00:16:55.639 --> 00:16:58.460
sympathizer. But still, their on -screen partnership

00:16:58.460 --> 00:17:01.179
powered through. They finished the decade with

00:17:01.179 --> 00:17:04.359
Adam's Rib in 1949, a brilliant battle of the

00:17:04.359 --> 00:17:06.880
sexes comedy written specifically for them. Which

00:17:06.880 --> 00:17:09.420
became one of their most profitable films together.

00:17:09.740 --> 00:17:12.380
The 1950s then marked a pivotal shift in her

00:17:12.380 --> 00:17:15.440
career. She was nearing her 50s, and she started

00:17:15.440 --> 00:17:18.319
consciously seeking out really difficult, dramatic

00:17:18.319 --> 00:17:21.160
material to prove her artistic merit beyond just

00:17:21.160 --> 00:17:23.259
the Tracy Hepburn formula. She was building a

00:17:23.259 --> 00:17:25.700
serious legacy. Her first move was back to the

00:17:25.700 --> 00:17:28.180
stage, tackling Shakespeare in As You Like It.

00:17:28.339 --> 00:17:30.759
A deliberate artistic risk. She was operating

00:17:30.759 --> 00:17:33.940
under her personal mantra. It's better to try

00:17:33.940 --> 00:17:35.900
something difficult and flop than to play it

00:17:35.900 --> 00:17:38.019
safe all the time. The play did well financially,

00:17:38.279 --> 00:17:40.740
but her next film was a massive global success.

00:17:40.819 --> 00:17:43.579
And this time it was entirely without Tracy.

00:17:43.680 --> 00:17:48.039
The African Queen in 1951 opposite Humphrey Bogart.

00:17:48.119 --> 00:17:51.710
And that film was a true test of endurance. It

00:17:51.710 --> 00:17:54.190
was her first in Technicolor, filmed mostly on

00:17:54.190 --> 00:17:56.769
location in the Belgian Tongo. She embraced the

00:17:56.769 --> 00:17:58.490
conditions, though, didn't she? The heat, the

00:17:58.490 --> 00:18:00.970
insects, even getting dysentery. It was like

00:18:00.970 --> 00:18:03.170
proof of her toughness linking back to her childhood.

00:18:03.170 --> 00:18:06.750
It was. And the film reestablished her as a major

00:18:06.750 --> 00:18:09.789
box office draw, independent of Tracy, and got

00:18:09.789 --> 00:18:12.190
her a fifth Oscar nomination. Through the mid

00:18:12.190 --> 00:18:14.710
-50s, she successfully carved out this really

00:18:14.710 --> 00:18:16.869
specific niche. She started playing what she

00:18:16.869 --> 00:18:19.869
called the maiden aunt, these mature, unmarried,

00:18:19.869 --> 00:18:22.549
intellectually sharp women. Like Rosie Sayre

00:18:22.549 --> 00:18:25.150
in The African Queen or Jane Hudson in Summertime.

00:18:25.430 --> 00:18:27.470
Her performance in Summertime got her another

00:18:27.470 --> 00:18:29.670
Oscar nomination, even though she got a chronic

00:18:29.670 --> 00:18:31.789
eye infection from doing a stunt fall into a

00:18:31.789 --> 00:18:34.630
canal in Venice. Even in her 50s, she's still

00:18:34.630 --> 00:18:37.099
doing her own stunts. Embracing the discomfort.

00:18:37.339 --> 00:18:40.380
And that desire for challenging roles led her

00:18:40.380 --> 00:18:43.720
to a really dark, intense period, culminating

00:18:43.720 --> 00:18:47.660
in Suddenly, last summer in 1959. She took on

00:18:47.660 --> 00:18:50.200
the role of the creepy, controlling antagonist,

00:18:50.220 --> 00:18:53.220
Aunt Violet Venable. Which was completely against

00:18:53.220 --> 00:18:56.119
type for her. Totally. And the filming was an

00:18:56.119 --> 00:18:58.259
absolute ordeal. She had terrible clashes with

00:18:58.259 --> 00:19:01.140
the director, Joseph L. Mankiewicz. The tension

00:19:01.140 --> 00:19:03.990
got so bad that... Famously, it ended with Hepburn

00:19:03.990 --> 00:19:06.910
actually spitting at him. She did what? She spat

00:19:06.910 --> 00:19:09.430
at him in frustration. And yet, that fraught

00:19:09.430 --> 00:19:11.650
performance earned her an eighth Oscar nomination.

00:19:12.069 --> 00:19:14.390
But the film she considered her best work was

00:19:14.390 --> 00:19:16.789
Long Day's Journey Into Night. Without a doubt.

00:19:17.150 --> 00:19:20.069
the 1962 adaptation of eugene o 'neill's masterpiece

00:19:20.069 --> 00:19:22.329
she called the role of the morphine addicted

00:19:22.329 --> 00:19:24.930
mary tyrone the most challenging female role

00:19:24.930 --> 00:19:27.109
in american drama and believed it was the single

00:19:27.109 --> 00:19:29.130
best performance of her career it got her another

00:19:29.130 --> 00:19:31.710
oscar nomination and the best actress award at

00:19:31.710 --> 00:19:34.269
khan but right after this artistic high point

00:19:34.269 --> 00:19:37.309
she made a monumental sacrifice a complete five

00:19:37.309 --> 00:19:40.390
-year hiatus from all professional work she stopped

00:19:40.390 --> 00:19:42.910
everything to care for the ailing spencer tracy

00:19:43.440 --> 00:19:46.140
This period is the deepest contrast between her

00:19:46.140 --> 00:19:48.980
public image of iron independence and her private

00:19:48.980 --> 00:19:51.460
devotion. And her return to cinema after that

00:19:51.460 --> 00:19:54.380
break. It began the spectacular, record -breaking

00:19:54.380 --> 00:19:57.160
final phase of her career. She returned for Guess

00:19:57.160 --> 00:20:00.279
Who's Coming to Dinner in 1967, her final film

00:20:00.279 --> 00:20:03.299
with Tracy, who tragically died just 17 days

00:20:03.299 --> 00:20:05.740
after filming wrapped. The film was a massive

00:20:05.740 --> 00:20:08.299
success, and it won Hepburn her second Academy

00:20:08.299 --> 00:20:11.599
Award for Best Actress, 34 years after her first.

00:20:11.980 --> 00:20:14.359
She felt it was an honor for Tracy as much as

00:20:14.359 --> 00:20:16.839
for her. And she didn't pause. She went immediately

00:20:16.839 --> 00:20:18.900
back to work playing Eleanor of Aquitaine and

00:20:18.900 --> 00:20:21.180
the Lion in Winter. And that performance won

00:20:21.180 --> 00:20:23.859
her her third Academy Award the very next year,

00:20:23.980 --> 00:20:27.240
a rare tie with Barbra Streisand, two consecutive

00:20:27.240 --> 00:20:30.180
Oscars after once being labeled poison. That's

00:20:30.180 --> 00:20:32.299
just incredible resilience. She even conquered

00:20:32.299 --> 00:20:35.180
Broadway one last time in the musical Coco. Admitted

00:20:35.180 --> 00:20:37.200
she wasn't a strong singer, but just compensated

00:20:37.200 --> 00:20:40.180
with pure guts and star power. Her crowning cinematic

00:20:40.180 --> 00:20:42.640
achievement, though, came late in life with On

00:20:42.640 --> 00:20:46.599
Golden Pond in 1981 with Henry Fonda. A colossal

00:20:46.599 --> 00:20:50.000
success. At 74, she was still demonstrating that

00:20:50.000 --> 00:20:52.759
vitality, doing a stunt where she dives fully

00:20:52.759 --> 00:20:55.880
clothed into a lake. And that film secured her

00:20:55.880 --> 00:20:59.400
record fourth Academy Award. A record that still

00:20:59.400 --> 00:21:02.680
stands. It's just an incredible career arc. But

00:21:02.680 --> 00:21:04.859
for a star who commanded so much public attention,

00:21:05.259 --> 00:21:08.940
she was fiercely, almost violently private. This

00:21:08.940 --> 00:21:10.920
is where the nickname Catherine of Arrogance

00:21:10.920 --> 00:21:13.779
comes from, isn't it? It is. She refused interviews

00:21:13.779 --> 00:21:16.079
and autographs for most of her career. She'd

00:21:16.079 --> 00:21:18.079
literally wrestle cameras away from photographers.

00:21:18.480 --> 00:21:22.079
Her idea of stardom demanded distance, not accessibility.

00:21:22.519 --> 00:21:24.240
Her personal life reflected that. She was only

00:21:24.240 --> 00:21:27.259
married once, very briefly. To Ludlow Ogden Smith.

00:21:27.519 --> 00:21:29.720
And the anecdote about the name is so telling.

00:21:29.859 --> 00:21:32.259
He actually changed his name to S. Ogden Ludlow

00:21:32.259 --> 00:21:34.180
at her request because she didn't want to be

00:21:34.180 --> 00:21:36.380
known as Kate Smith, a name she found too plain.

00:21:36.640 --> 00:21:38.960
She later admitted she was a terrible pig for

00:21:38.960 --> 00:21:41.720
prioritizing her career entirely over her marriage.

00:21:41.880 --> 00:21:44.920
It shows that total uncompromising focus. And

00:21:44.920 --> 00:21:47.940
after her divorce, she had relationships, notably

00:21:47.940 --> 00:21:50.680
with Howard Hughes, who desperately wanted to

00:21:50.680 --> 00:21:54.029
marry her. But she refused because she was laser

00:21:54.029 --> 00:21:56.670
-focused on engineering her career comeback.

00:21:56.910 --> 00:22:00.069
No personal commitment could supersede her professional

00:22:00.069 --> 00:22:02.430
ambition. And she made another radical choice

00:22:02.430 --> 00:22:05.329
for that era. She decided not to have children.

00:22:05.450 --> 00:22:08.849
A conscious and unflinching choice. She believed

00:22:08.849 --> 00:22:11.309
motherhood required a full -time commitment she

00:22:11.309 --> 00:22:13.890
was unwilling to make, calling herself a very

00:22:13.890 --> 00:22:16.710
selfish human being. And she didn't mean it as

00:22:16.710 --> 00:22:19.130
a negative, but as an explanation for her singular

00:22:19.130 --> 00:22:21.519
devotion to her art. You have to put yourself

00:22:21.519 --> 00:22:24.380
in that era for a woman to make that choice and

00:22:24.380 --> 00:22:28.000
state it so plainly was huge. It was. And that

00:22:28.000 --> 00:22:31.039
intense focus is what allowed her to manage the

00:22:31.039 --> 00:22:34.019
impossibly complex dynamic of the Spencer Tracy

00:22:34.019 --> 00:22:36.380
relationship. The depth of her feeling for him

00:22:36.380 --> 00:22:38.400
is clear. She wrote, it was a unique feeling

00:22:38.400 --> 00:22:40.339
that I had for him. I would have been anything

00:22:40.339 --> 00:22:42.920
for him. That was the private woman hidden behind

00:22:42.920 --> 00:22:46.079
those walls of independence. The devotion, especially

00:22:46.079 --> 00:22:48.460
during his final years when she quit her career

00:22:48.460 --> 00:22:50.859
to care for him. It's the ultimate measure of

00:22:50.859 --> 00:22:54.019
their bond. And after he died, out of consideration

00:22:54.019 --> 00:22:56.640
for his family, she didn't even attend his funeral.

00:22:56.960 --> 00:23:00.079
And she stayed publicly silent about their 27

00:23:00.079 --> 00:23:03.099
-year relationship for decades. She only spoke

00:23:03.099 --> 00:23:05.480
about it after Tracy's wife, Louise, died in

00:23:05.480 --> 00:23:09.019
1983. This level of self -contained grief and

00:23:09.019 --> 00:23:11.720
respect, it speaks to a private morality that

00:23:11.720 --> 00:23:14.339
few in Hollywood could match. Her personal beliefs

00:23:14.339 --> 00:23:17.099
were just as defiant. She called herself a dedicated

00:23:17.099 --> 00:23:20.119
Democrat. openly promoted birth control, her

00:23:20.119 --> 00:23:22.799
mother's cause, and supported the right to abortion.

00:23:22.980 --> 00:23:26.039
On religion, she was blunt. I'm an atheist, and

00:23:26.039 --> 00:23:28.480
that's it. And this nonconformity translated

00:23:28.480 --> 00:23:31.839
powerfully into her fashion legacy. By defiantly

00:23:31.839 --> 00:23:34.259
wearing slacks and sandals everywhere, she helped

00:23:34.259 --> 00:23:36.940
redefine modern female fashion. She just said

00:23:36.940 --> 00:23:39.059
she disliked the stocking situation, but it was

00:23:39.059 --> 00:23:41.140
more than that, wasn't it? By refusing to conform

00:23:41.140 --> 00:23:43.559
to the confining expectations of female dress,

00:23:43.799 --> 00:23:46.339
she helped normalize trousers for women. She

00:23:46.339 --> 00:23:48.160
made them a symbol of functional, comfortable,

00:23:48.359 --> 00:23:50.920
intellectual female power. And the Council of

00:23:50.920 --> 00:23:52.759
Fashion Designers of America eventually gave

00:23:52.759 --> 00:23:55.099
her a Lifetime Achievement Award for it. Her

00:23:55.099 --> 00:23:57.440
personal comfort became a massive cultural statement.

00:23:57.660 --> 00:24:01.400
So her legacy is just... Immense. The American

00:24:01.400 --> 00:24:03.500
Film Institute named her the greatest female

00:24:03.500 --> 00:24:06.200
star of classic Hollywood cinema. And her strong,

00:24:06.259 --> 00:24:09.220
unconventional characters and lifestyle cemented

00:24:09.220 --> 00:24:12.640
her as an icon of the emancipated woman influencing

00:24:12.640 --> 00:24:15.339
gender attitudes for the entire century. But

00:24:15.339 --> 00:24:17.420
there's a contradiction there, isn't there? A

00:24:17.420 --> 00:24:20.000
critic, Richard Schickel, noted that her typical

00:24:20.000 --> 00:24:22.359
beloved screen role like in the Philadelphia

00:24:22.359 --> 00:24:25.680
story or Woman of the Year was usually a high

00:24:25.680 --> 00:24:29.390
class or stuck up. girl who is brought down to

00:24:29.390 --> 00:24:31.869
earth by an earthy type. Yes. In other words,

00:24:31.910 --> 00:24:34.750
her intimidating high status persona almost always

00:24:34.750 --> 00:24:38.049
had to be softened or humbled by a more conventional

00:24:38.049 --> 00:24:41.509
male lead. Usually Tracy, before mass audiences

00:24:41.509 --> 00:24:44.089
could fully embrace her. So Hollywood was packaging

00:24:44.089 --> 00:24:46.269
her independence, making it palatable for the

00:24:46.269 --> 00:24:48.589
mainstream. You could say that. They made sure

00:24:48.589 --> 00:24:51.109
the strong female was ultimately, as Schickel

00:24:51.109 --> 00:24:53.690
put it, restored to a safe position within the

00:24:53.690 --> 00:24:56.200
status quo. But the core of that independence

00:24:56.200 --> 00:24:59.319
was still very, very real. And despite that compromise,

00:24:59.640 --> 00:25:01.660
she remains one of the most distinctive voices

00:25:01.660 --> 00:25:05.059
in film history. That precise, clipped, patrician

00:25:05.059 --> 00:25:08.400
accent became inseparable from her persona. Her

00:25:08.400 --> 00:25:10.960
final years saw her shift to television, where

00:25:10.960 --> 00:25:13.640
critics said she was essentially playing a fictionalized,

00:25:13.700 --> 00:25:17.079
feisty version of herself. Her last theatrically

00:25:17.079 --> 00:25:20.720
released film was Love Affair in 1994, when she

00:25:20.720 --> 00:25:23.400
was 87. And though she looked frail, they said

00:25:23.400 --> 00:25:26.400
her magnificent spirit was still present. By

00:25:26.400 --> 00:25:28.660
the 80s, she developed that noticeable tremor,

00:25:28.680 --> 00:25:31.240
a permanently shaking head, and toward the end

00:25:31.240 --> 00:25:33.990
showed signs of dementia. She died from cardiac

00:25:33.990 --> 00:25:38.069
arrest on June 29, 2003 at 96 in her beloved

00:25:38.069 --> 00:25:40.250
family home in Connecticut. The tributes were

00:25:40.250 --> 00:25:42.750
widespread. President George W. Bush called her

00:25:42.750 --> 00:25:45.309
one of the nation's artistic treasures. Broadway

00:25:45.309 --> 00:25:47.910
lights were dimmed. Her legacy is preserved in

00:25:47.910 --> 00:25:50.509
memorials all over. So looking back at this deep

00:25:50.509 --> 00:25:53.559
dive. Katherine Hepburn's career is just a masterclass

00:25:53.559 --> 00:25:55.920
in professional resilience and strategic self

00:25:55.920 --> 00:25:59.019
-creation. A meteoric rise, a staggering public

00:25:59.019 --> 00:26:01.559
rejection, and then an engineered comeback that

00:26:01.559 --> 00:26:04.539
demanded complete creative control. She leveraged

00:26:04.539 --> 00:26:06.700
that long, complicated partnership with Tracy

00:26:06.700 --> 00:26:09.799
and evolved into this beloved independent star.

00:26:10.329 --> 00:26:12.450
And what we learn is that her independence wasn't

00:26:12.450 --> 00:26:14.890
accidental. It was forged by her radical upbringing,

00:26:15.150 --> 00:26:17.970
polished by brutal setbacks, and strategically

00:26:17.970 --> 00:26:20.890
financed by brilliant business moves. Her life

00:26:20.890 --> 00:26:23.730
was defined by iron discipline and the fierce

00:26:23.730 --> 00:26:26.769
defense of her personal style. She was the embodiment

00:26:26.769 --> 00:26:29.309
of a woman pushing boundaries, refusing to be

00:26:29.309 --> 00:26:32.410
categorized. And yet, here's the provocative

00:26:32.410 --> 00:26:35.410
thought for you to consider as we wrap up. Hepburn.

00:26:35.849 --> 00:26:38.549
A star who won a record four Oscars playing strong,

00:26:38.630 --> 00:26:41.430
complex women famously believed that women cannot

00:26:41.430 --> 00:26:44.369
have it all, meaning a family and a truly demanding

00:26:44.369 --> 00:26:47.490
career. She made that choice. She sacrificed

00:26:47.490 --> 00:26:49.950
marriage and motherhood for her ambition and

00:26:49.950 --> 00:26:52.230
her devotion to Tracy. So what does her success

00:26:52.230 --> 00:26:55.029
built on that very explicit belief in necessary

00:26:55.029 --> 00:26:57.890
sacrifice? Tell us about the pressures and choices

00:26:57.890 --> 00:27:00.609
faced by modern, ambitious individuals today.

00:27:00.809 --> 00:27:03.390
Is her triumph a celebration of boundless independence?

00:27:03.710 --> 00:27:06.150
Or is it a cautionary tale about the necessity

00:27:06.150 --> 00:27:08.809
of profound sacrifice? That is the fittingly

00:27:08.809 --> 00:27:11.089
difficult question she leaves us with. A final

00:27:11.089 --> 00:27:12.869
reflection from a woman whose life was defined

00:27:12.869 --> 00:27:15.779
by uncompromising choices. you for joining us

00:27:15.779 --> 00:27:18.660
on this deep dive into the extraordinary life

00:27:18.660 --> 00:27:20.559
of catherine hepburn we'll see you next time
