WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.640
Welcome back to the Deep Dive. Today we're taking

00:00:02.640 --> 00:00:05.919
a look at an artist who has just, I mean, consistently

00:00:05.919 --> 00:00:09.000
managed to reinvent herself, moving from, you

00:00:09.000 --> 00:00:11.539
know, the queen of team comedy to one of the

00:00:11.539 --> 00:00:14.919
most acclaimed and frankly daring artists working

00:00:14.919 --> 00:00:17.239
today. We are talking about Emily Jean Stone.

00:00:17.500 --> 00:00:19.760
Better known to the world, of course, as Emma

00:00:19.760 --> 00:00:21.820
Stone. And we're going to get into that name

00:00:21.820 --> 00:00:24.260
change. Oh, absolutely. But what's so compelling

00:00:24.260 --> 00:00:26.600
when you dig into the research is how her biggest,

00:00:26.719 --> 00:00:28.940
well... what you might call weaknesses, actually

00:00:28.940 --> 00:00:31.339
became her greatest strengths. It's an incredible

00:00:31.339 --> 00:00:35.079
story. It starts with this almost debilitating

00:00:35.079 --> 00:00:38.140
childhood anxiety. Crippling anxiety. And it

00:00:38.140 --> 00:00:40.439
transforms into a career that nets her not one,

00:00:40.539 --> 00:00:44.039
but two Academy Awards for Best Actress. For

00:00:44.039 --> 00:00:47.640
La La Land and then... Poor things. And that's

00:00:47.640 --> 00:00:49.560
not even counting the BAFTAs or the fact that

00:00:49.560 --> 00:00:52.079
in 2017 she was the highest paid actress in the

00:00:52.079 --> 00:00:54.500
entire world. That's the real story here. It's

00:00:54.500 --> 00:00:56.939
not just critical acclaim. It's commercial power.

00:00:57.119 --> 00:00:59.700
It's influence. I mean, Time magazine named her

00:00:59.700 --> 00:01:02.159
one of their 100 most influential people. So

00:01:02.159 --> 00:01:04.500
our mission today really is to trace the four

00:01:04.500 --> 00:01:07.359
major acts of her career. We want to zero in

00:01:07.359 --> 00:01:09.299
on those personal challenges she had to overcome

00:01:09.299 --> 00:01:12.739
and the. The really calculated risks she took.

00:01:12.959 --> 00:01:15.219
Especially the recent moves. The shift toward

00:01:15.219 --> 00:01:18.640
these big auteur collaborations and maybe most

00:01:18.640 --> 00:01:21.560
importantly, her new identity as a hands -on

00:01:21.560 --> 00:01:23.719
producer. Because it's not luck, is it? It's

00:01:23.719 --> 00:01:26.659
a strategy. Not at all. It's strategy. And I

00:01:26.659 --> 00:01:28.700
think it's driven by a deep need for control.

00:01:29.019 --> 00:01:31.620
This is the story of how she deliberately broke

00:01:31.620 --> 00:01:35.079
out of that star ingenue box and built this incredible

00:01:35.079 --> 00:01:37.400
career, you know, without any classical training.

00:01:37.519 --> 00:01:40.739
It was all... instinct and a willingness to pick

00:01:40.739 --> 00:01:42.760
the harder path. It's a fascinating blueprint

00:01:42.760 --> 00:01:44.959
for how to survive and thrive as an A -lister

00:01:44.959 --> 00:01:47.739
today. Okay, so let's set the stage because this

00:01:47.739 --> 00:01:49.540
story doesn't start in Hollywood. It starts in

00:01:49.540 --> 00:01:52.239
Scottsdale, Arizona. Right. Emily Jean Stone,

00:01:52.439 --> 00:01:56.120
born November 6, 1988. And her family, they were

00:01:56.120 --> 00:01:57.900
completely outside of the entertainment industry.

00:01:58.019 --> 00:01:59.700
Her father, Jeffrey Charles Stone, he was the

00:01:59.700 --> 00:02:02.400
CEO of a general contracting company. Exactly.

00:02:02.700 --> 00:02:05.799
And her mother, Krista, was a homemaker. She

00:02:05.799 --> 00:02:08.099
also has a younger brother, Spencer, a very,

00:02:08.139 --> 00:02:10.379
you know, normal suburban upbringing on the surface.

00:02:10.599 --> 00:02:12.539
And there's an interesting detail about her ancestry,

00:02:12.699 --> 00:02:14.919
even about the name itself. Yeah, it's a small

00:02:14.919 --> 00:02:17.300
thing, but it's part of that classic Hollywood

00:02:17.300 --> 00:02:20.479
story of reinvention. Her family has German,

00:02:20.599 --> 00:02:23.759
English, Irish, Scottish, and Swedish roots.

00:02:24.180 --> 00:02:27.960
And that surname, Stone, was actually anglicized.

00:02:28.099 --> 00:02:31.400
From what? From the original Swedish, Sten. S

00:02:31.400 --> 00:02:35.750
-T -E -N. So even the name is a kind of performance,

00:02:35.830 --> 00:02:38.009
a professional adaptation, which is a theme that

00:02:38.009 --> 00:02:40.289
comes up again and again. And speaking of defining

00:02:40.289 --> 00:02:42.710
features, we have to talk about her voice. It's

00:02:42.710 --> 00:02:44.430
one of the first things you notice, that husky

00:02:44.430 --> 00:02:46.569
sort of low register voice. It's her trademark.

00:02:46.669 --> 00:02:48.550
And the story behind it is pretty surprising.

00:02:48.650 --> 00:02:50.090
It's not genetic or something she developed.

00:02:50.169 --> 00:02:52.289
It actually comes from infancy. Really? How?

00:02:52.490 --> 00:02:54.650
The sources say she suffered from baby colic,

00:02:54.650 --> 00:02:57.030
which meant she was crying constantly and very

00:02:57.030 --> 00:03:00.219
intensely. All that strain on her vocal cords

00:03:00.219 --> 00:03:03.340
as a baby caused her to develop nodules and calluses.

00:03:03.520 --> 00:03:06.800
So a physical result of distress in her infancy

00:03:06.800 --> 00:03:10.500
gave her this voice that became a huge professional

00:03:10.500 --> 00:03:13.340
asset. Exactly. It has that perfect quality for

00:03:13.340 --> 00:03:15.740
both, you know, sharp -witted comedy and real

00:03:15.740 --> 00:03:18.180
dramatic weight. But the real core of her origin

00:03:18.180 --> 00:03:20.259
story, the thing that seems to drive everything

00:03:20.259 --> 00:03:23.139
else, is this battle with anxiety. A profound,

00:03:23.419 --> 00:03:26.860
paralyzing anxiety. She said herself that she

00:03:26.860 --> 00:03:30.719
was loud and bothy as a child, which often is

00:03:30.719 --> 00:03:33.300
just a way to mask a deep sense of insecurity.

00:03:33.960 --> 00:03:36.080
And it wasn't just, you know, normal childhood

00:03:36.080 --> 00:03:38.539
worries. This was something else. It was debilitating.

00:03:38.639 --> 00:03:40.939
It started around age seven with severe panic

00:03:40.939 --> 00:03:44.280
attacks. And she's been very open about how it

00:03:44.280 --> 00:03:46.240
just destroyed her social skills. There's one

00:03:46.240 --> 00:03:47.960
specific story she tells about her first ever

00:03:47.960 --> 00:03:50.599
panic attack, right? Yes. And it's so revealing.

00:03:50.939 --> 00:03:53.919
She was at a friend's house and she became utterly

00:03:53.919 --> 00:03:56.560
convinced with every fiber of her being that

00:03:56.560 --> 00:03:58.759
the house was on fire. Just a total break from

00:03:58.759 --> 00:04:00.939
reality. A total break. She thought they were

00:04:00.939 --> 00:04:03.080
all going to die. And it wasn't a one -off thing.

00:04:03.340 --> 00:04:05.120
She said for the next three years, she lived

00:04:05.120 --> 00:04:07.240
in this constant state of terror, this fear of

00:04:07.240 --> 00:04:09.780
chaos and the unknown. That sounds absolutely

00:04:09.780 --> 00:04:12.479
unbearable for a child. How did she even function

00:04:12.479 --> 00:04:15.159
day to day? It was incredibly difficult. She

00:04:15.159 --> 00:04:17.100
needed constant reassurance from her mother.

00:04:17.459 --> 00:04:19.939
She described having to ask her mom to tell her

00:04:19.939 --> 00:04:22.379
what the plan for the day was over and over again,

00:04:22.459 --> 00:04:25.100
just to confirm that no one was going to die

00:04:25.100 --> 00:04:27.019
and nothing was going to change. That need for

00:04:27.019 --> 00:04:30.139
structure, for a predictable narrative. And that

00:04:30.139 --> 00:04:32.639
is the key. That's the pivot point. Because that

00:04:32.639 --> 00:04:35.639
deep -seated need for structure is what led her

00:04:35.639 --> 00:04:39.660
to theater. So acting became a kind of self -prescribed

00:04:39.660 --> 00:04:42.079
medicine. The perfect medicine. Think about it.

00:04:42.160 --> 00:04:44.759
The real world is unpredictable. It's chaotic.

00:04:45.259 --> 00:04:49.019
But a play. A play has a script. It has a beginning,

00:04:49.120 --> 00:04:51.920
a middle, an end. The lines are all written down

00:04:51.920 --> 00:04:54.519
for you. The anxiety is channeled into performance,

00:04:54.720 --> 00:04:57.379
which is a controllable form of anxiety. Precisely.

00:04:57.790 --> 00:04:59.589
She was even homeschooled for two years during

00:04:59.589 --> 00:05:01.990
this period because her anxiety was so bad, and

00:05:01.990 --> 00:05:03.850
she just threw herself into local theater. And

00:05:03.850 --> 00:05:05.709
she wasn't just dabbling in it. She was serious.

00:05:07.110 --> 00:05:09.850
Very serious. By the time she dropped out of

00:05:09.850 --> 00:05:12.569
Xavier College Preparatory, after just one semester,

00:05:12.910 --> 00:05:15.850
she had already been in 16 productions at the

00:05:15.850 --> 00:05:19.089
Valley Youth Theater in Phoenix. Wow. Her debut

00:05:19.089 --> 00:05:21.509
was at age 11, playing Otter in the Wind in the

00:05:21.509 --> 00:05:24.810
Willows. And crucially, she was also performing

00:05:24.810 --> 00:05:27.259
with an improv comedy troupe. Which is interesting

00:05:27.259 --> 00:05:29.500
because improv is the opposite of a script. It's

00:05:29.500 --> 00:05:31.959
all about reacting in the moment. Right. But

00:05:31.959 --> 00:05:34.839
it's structured chaos. It gave her the adaptability

00:05:34.839 --> 00:05:37.420
and the quick comedic timing that would become

00:05:37.420 --> 00:05:39.860
so important later. So she had both the structure

00:05:39.860 --> 00:05:42.339
of theater and the spontaneity of improv. And

00:05:42.339 --> 00:05:44.480
this all culminates in one of the most audacious,

00:05:44.500 --> 00:05:47.959
almost legendary Hollywood origin stories ever.

00:05:48.120 --> 00:05:50.660
A pitch. The legendary Project Hollywood. She's

00:05:50.660 --> 00:05:53.480
15 years old. 15. And she decides that Phoenix

00:05:53.480 --> 00:05:55.060
is not going to cut it. She has to get to Los

00:05:55.060 --> 00:05:58.100
Angeles. How do you convince your parents, one

00:05:58.100 --> 00:06:00.720
of whom is a CEO, to let you drop out of school

00:06:00.720 --> 00:06:03.180
and chase this dream? You don't frame it as a

00:06:03.180 --> 00:06:05.839
dream. You frame it as a business plan. She created

00:06:05.839 --> 00:06:08.779
a full -on PowerPoint presentation. I love this

00:06:08.779 --> 00:06:11.240
detail. It wasn't just begging. It was a corporate

00:06:11.240 --> 00:06:14.980
pitch. A detailed strategic proposal. And get

00:06:14.980 --> 00:06:17.699
this. The sources say she had it soundtracked

00:06:17.699 --> 00:06:20.420
to Madonna's song, Hollywood. Of course she did.

00:06:21.079 --> 00:06:23.899
That is brilliant. It shows that same need for

00:06:23.899 --> 00:06:26.240
control and structure. But now she's applying

00:06:26.240 --> 00:06:28.980
it to her own destiny. And it worked. She and

00:06:28.980 --> 00:06:32.420
her mother moved to L .A. in January 2004. But,

00:06:32.480 --> 00:06:34.759
you know, the reality of the industry hit pretty

00:06:34.759 --> 00:06:36.699
hard. It wasn't an overnight success. No, it

00:06:36.699 --> 00:06:39.579
was a real grind. Years of auditions. She auditioned

00:06:39.579 --> 00:06:41.899
for everything. Every Disney Channel show, every

00:06:41.899 --> 00:06:45.300
sitcom. She said, I ended up getting none. So

00:06:45.300 --> 00:06:47.519
while she was going to online high school, she

00:06:47.519 --> 00:06:50.060
had to work. At the Dog Treat Bakery. The Dog

00:06:50.060 --> 00:06:52.680
Treat Bakery. A humbling reminder of the early

00:06:52.680 --> 00:06:54.639
hustle. And this is also when she had to make

00:06:54.639 --> 00:06:57.000
that final change to her professional identity,

00:06:57.339 --> 00:06:59.680
the name. Right. When she went to register with

00:06:59.680 --> 00:07:02.740
the Screen Actors Guild at 16, Emily Stone was

00:07:02.740 --> 00:07:05.100
already taken. A common problem for actors. So

00:07:05.100 --> 00:07:07.199
she tried Riley Stone for a bit, but she said

00:07:07.199 --> 00:07:08.860
she couldn't answer to it. It just didn't feel

00:07:08.860 --> 00:07:11.240
right. So she eventually landed on Emma. As an

00:07:11.240 --> 00:07:13.879
homage to Emma Bunton from the Spice Girls. Baby

00:07:13.879 --> 00:07:17.040
Spice. A little pop culture nod for a very practical

00:07:17.040 --> 00:07:19.240
reason. But there's a really interesting full

00:07:19.240 --> 00:07:21.430
circle moment with her name. That's happened

00:07:21.430 --> 00:07:25.290
recently. There is. In 2024, she revealed that

00:07:25.290 --> 00:07:27.990
while Emma Stone is her professional name, she

00:07:27.990 --> 00:07:30.250
really prefers that people who work with her,

00:07:30.269 --> 00:07:34.490
her friends, call her Emily. So now at the absolute

00:07:34.490 --> 00:07:36.949
peak of her power as an artist and a producer,

00:07:37.230 --> 00:07:39.269
she's reclaiming her given name. It's like the

00:07:39.269 --> 00:07:42.470
public persona, Emma, did its job. And now the

00:07:42.470 --> 00:07:45.449
private self, Emily. is the one in control so

00:07:45.449 --> 00:07:47.990
that period of grinding it out from about 2004

00:07:47.990 --> 00:07:52.529
to 2007 was all about these small tv parts she

00:07:52.529 --> 00:07:54.829
was in that reality show insert to the new partridge

00:07:54.829 --> 00:07:56.870
family i remember that and guest spots on shows

00:07:56.870 --> 00:07:59.350
like medium and lucky louie but the moment that

00:07:59.350 --> 00:08:02.350
really defined the end of that phase was a huge

00:08:02.350 --> 00:08:04.889
rejection her rock bottom moment as she called

00:08:04.889 --> 00:08:06.970
it not getting the part of claire bennett in

00:08:06.970 --> 00:08:09.610
heroes exactly a massive hit show at the time

00:08:09.610 --> 00:08:12.420
she said she left that audition just completely

00:08:12.420 --> 00:08:15.839
devastated. But, as it so often happens, that

00:08:15.839 --> 00:08:18.439
rejection was the catalyst for her big break.

00:08:18.680 --> 00:08:20.759
Later that same year, she gets her first movie.

00:08:20.959 --> 00:08:23.759
She gets Superbad. And it's an absolute launch

00:08:23.759 --> 00:08:26.439
pad. I mean, Superbad was more than a hit. It

00:08:26.439 --> 00:08:28.860
was a cultural moment. It defined that whole

00:08:28.860 --> 00:08:32.679
wave of R -rated comedies. Huge success. Grossed

00:08:32.679 --> 00:08:36.600
almost $170 million. and it immediately put her

00:08:36.600 --> 00:08:38.480
on the map. It's also where the red hair comes

00:08:38.480 --> 00:08:40.840
from. She's a natural blonde, but she had to

00:08:40.840 --> 00:08:43.379
dye it red for the part. And that look just stuck.

00:08:43.580 --> 00:08:46.899
For years, that was her image, the witty, sarcastic,

00:08:46.919 --> 00:08:49.340
red -headed girl next door. For a while, yeah.

00:08:49.539 --> 00:08:51.299
And she followed it up with a couple of other

00:08:51.299 --> 00:08:54.200
comedies to really cement that persona. She was

00:08:54.200 --> 00:08:56.320
in The Rocker in 2008. Well, she had to learn

00:08:56.320 --> 00:08:59.340
to play bass guitar. Yeah, an early sign of her

00:08:59.340 --> 00:09:01.899
willingness to really... put in the technical

00:09:01.899 --> 00:09:03.879
work for a role. And then she was in The House

00:09:03.879 --> 00:09:05.860
Bunny that same year. Another one where she got

00:09:05.860 --> 00:09:08.059
to show off her musical side. She did that cover

00:09:08.059 --> 00:09:11.059
of I Know What Boys Like. She did. Yeah. And

00:09:11.059 --> 00:09:13.299
even in those early, maybe not so great films,

00:09:13.519 --> 00:09:15.759
critics were starting to single her out. They

00:09:15.759 --> 00:09:18.080
were already saying she was well on her way to

00:09:18.080 --> 00:09:20.759
becoming a star. Which set the stage perfectly

00:09:20.759 --> 00:09:24.759
for her real breakout moment in 2010. The film

00:09:24.759 --> 00:09:27.159
that proved she could carry a movie all by herself.

00:09:27.759 --> 00:09:31.220
Easy A. Her first true leading role. And this

00:09:31.220 --> 00:09:33.480
is a part she really fought for. Oh yeah, she

00:09:33.480 --> 00:09:35.659
actively chased that script. She said it was

00:09:35.659 --> 00:09:38.039
so different and unique from anything I'd read

00:09:38.039 --> 00:09:41.340
before. Yeah. And the movie was just a critical

00:09:41.340 --> 00:09:44.340
darling. The reviews were phenomenal and they

00:09:44.340 --> 00:09:46.500
were all about her. They called her the film's

00:09:46.500 --> 00:09:49.230
prime asset. They talked about her terrific performance,

00:09:49.470 --> 00:09:52.190
her knowing drawl. She managed to take all that

00:09:52.190 --> 00:09:54.870
improv skill and comedic timing and blend it

00:09:54.870 --> 00:09:57.549
with this really genuine vulnerability. And that's

00:09:57.549 --> 00:09:59.990
what got her the big awards nominations. Yeah.

00:10:00.070 --> 00:10:02.970
BAFTA Rising Star, Golden Globe for Best Actress.

00:10:03.090 --> 00:10:05.149
And this is where that strategic mind, that need

00:10:05.149 --> 00:10:08.029
for control. Kicks in again because after Easy

00:10:08.029 --> 00:10:11.230
A, the biggest danger was being typecast. She

00:10:11.230 --> 00:10:13.070
could have just been the sarcastic interest of

00:10:13.070 --> 00:10:15.250
the guy forever. Exactly. The witty sidekick.

00:10:15.309 --> 00:10:17.789
So she makes this huge calculated pivot. She

00:10:17.789 --> 00:10:20.169
deliberately goes after a serious dramatic role

00:10:20.169 --> 00:10:22.309
in a period piece. She goes for the help. It

00:10:22.309 --> 00:10:25.129
was a massive swing from a modern high school

00:10:25.129 --> 00:10:28.230
comedy to a story set during the civil rights

00:10:28.230 --> 00:10:31.509
movement. She had to completely shed that modern

00:10:31.509 --> 00:10:33.710
persona. And she did some serious preparation

00:10:33.710 --> 00:10:36.929
for it. A ton. Yeah. It wasn't just about learning

00:10:36.929 --> 00:10:39.370
a southern accent. She did deep research into

00:10:39.370 --> 00:10:41.409
the civil rights movement, reading books, watching

00:10:41.409 --> 00:10:45.710
films. She really invested in earning the credibility

00:10:45.710 --> 00:10:48.389
for that role. And it paid off in a huge way,

00:10:48.529 --> 00:10:51.210
critically but also commercially. Immensely.

00:10:51.250 --> 00:10:54.649
The film made over $200 million. That kind of

00:10:54.649 --> 00:10:57.389
box office success gives you power in Hollywood.

00:10:57.610 --> 00:11:00.149
It proved she could deliver in a drama. And at

00:11:00.149 --> 00:11:02.710
the same time, she's securing her blockbuster

00:11:02.710 --> 00:11:05.250
status. She dives into the superhero world with

00:11:05.250 --> 00:11:07.190
the amazing Spider -Man. Right, playing Gwen

00:11:07.190 --> 00:11:09.169
Stacy. Another different kind of challenge. She

00:11:09.169 --> 00:11:10.909
went back to her natural blonde hair for that

00:11:10.909 --> 00:11:13.330
and really had to school herself on the comics.

00:11:13.549 --> 00:11:15.629
I think her take on the character is really important

00:11:15.629 --> 00:11:17.870
here. She was very clear that Gwen wasn't just

00:11:17.870 --> 00:11:21.409
a damsel in distress. Absolutely. She... famously

00:11:21.409 --> 00:11:23.950
said, she saves him more than he saves her. He's

00:11:23.950 --> 00:11:26.190
the muscle, she's the brains. She was always

00:11:26.190 --> 00:11:28.830
looking for roles with agency for characters

00:11:28.830 --> 00:11:31.110
who were intellectual equals. And critics really

00:11:31.110 --> 00:11:33.320
responded to that. One of them called her the

00:11:33.320 --> 00:11:36.620
Heath Ledger of this series. High praise. It

00:11:36.620 --> 00:11:38.620
showed she could bring real dramatic weight even

00:11:38.620 --> 00:11:41.299
to a massive franchise film. And that movie,

00:11:41.379 --> 00:11:44.840
making over $750 million worldwide, didn't hurt

00:11:44.840 --> 00:11:46.860
either. And throughout all this, she's still

00:11:46.860 --> 00:11:48.659
keeping a foot in the comedy world, especially

00:11:48.659 --> 00:11:51.240
with Saturday Night Live. Yeah, she hosted SNL

00:11:51.240 --> 00:11:53.759
multiple times. It was the perfect venue for

00:11:53.759 --> 00:11:55.980
her improv skills. She called her first time

00:11:55.980 --> 00:11:58.330
hosting the greatest week of my life. It shows

00:11:58.330 --> 00:12:01.470
that that live high wire performance energy still

00:12:01.470 --> 00:12:03.970
really appealed to her. It did. And it all adds

00:12:03.970 --> 00:12:06.909
up to this picture of an actress who by 2013

00:12:06.909 --> 00:12:10.230
was incredibly versatile, completely bankable

00:12:10.230 --> 00:12:12.610
and still genuinely funny. She had all the pieces

00:12:12.610 --> 00:12:15.450
in place. So by 2014, Emma Stone is a bona fide

00:12:15.450 --> 00:12:18.070
star. But this next phase is where she really

00:12:18.070 --> 00:12:21.230
enters that, you know, prestige acting category.

00:12:21.309 --> 00:12:23.870
And it starts with Birdman. Birdman was a game

00:12:23.870 --> 00:12:28.370
changer. An audacious, surrealist film from Alejandro

00:12:28.370 --> 00:12:31.110
Gonzalez -Señoritu that goes on to win Best Picture.

00:12:31.269 --> 00:12:33.289
And the whole thing is filmed to look like one

00:12:33.289 --> 00:12:35.909
continuous shot. That must have been an incredible

00:12:35.909 --> 00:12:38.090
technical challenge for the actors. Immense.

00:12:38.110 --> 00:12:41.330
It was basically like doing a play. Long, unbroken

00:12:41.330 --> 00:12:44.289
takes. And she's playing Sam, the recovering

00:12:44.289 --> 00:12:46.129
addict daughter of Michael Keaton's character.

00:12:46.409 --> 00:12:50.230
It's a really raw, intense role. And it got her

00:12:50.230 --> 00:12:53.210
her first Oscar nomination, Best Supporting Actress.

00:12:53.330 --> 00:12:55.830
Deservedly so. There's this one monologue she

00:12:55.830 --> 00:12:58.070
has where she just tears into her father, and

00:12:58.070 --> 00:13:00.210
a critic described it as being delivered like

00:13:00.210 --> 00:13:04.240
a knitting needle to the gut. Wow. That's a powerful

00:13:04.240 --> 00:13:06.159
description. It really captures the ferocity

00:13:06.159 --> 00:13:08.559
of that performance. So she has this huge critical

00:13:08.559 --> 00:13:10.720
success with Birdman, and then she decides to

00:13:10.720 --> 00:13:12.759
take on a massive personal challenge, something

00:13:12.759 --> 00:13:15.120
that goes right at her lifelong anxiety. She

00:13:15.120 --> 00:13:17.779
goes back to the stage. For real this time. On

00:13:17.779 --> 00:13:20.059
Broadway. Starring as Sally Bowles in The Revival

00:13:20.059 --> 00:13:22.509
of Cabaret. That's a terrifying prospect for

00:13:22.509 --> 00:13:24.690
any actor, let alone someone who has struggled

00:13:24.690 --> 00:13:28.429
with panic attacks. Live audience, singing, dancing,

00:13:28.529 --> 00:13:31.610
every single night. She said it was the most

00:13:31.610 --> 00:13:34.610
nerve -wracking thing ever. And she had this

00:13:34.610 --> 00:13:38.009
interesting coping mechanism. To prepare for

00:13:38.009 --> 00:13:41.049
the intensity, she would listen to a French radio

00:13:41.049 --> 00:13:44.250
station backstage. Just to sort of anchor herself

00:13:44.250 --> 00:13:46.690
in something else before going out there? I think

00:13:46.690 --> 00:13:49.750
so. A way to get out of her own head. And while

00:13:49.750 --> 00:13:52.470
her singing got mixed reviews, her acting was

00:13:52.470 --> 00:13:55.710
universally praised. Critics said she was a perfect

00:13:55.710 --> 00:13:58.110
fit for the role's intensity. It just shows that

00:13:58.110 --> 00:14:00.070
willingness to embrace the things that scare

00:14:00.070 --> 00:14:02.710
her. But this period also had a pretty significant

00:14:02.710 --> 00:14:05.169
stumble, didn't it? The Aloha controversy. It

00:14:05.169 --> 00:14:06.990
did, and it was a crucial learning moment for

00:14:06.990 --> 00:14:09.610
her. In that Cameron Crowe film, she was cast

00:14:09.610 --> 00:14:11.870
as a character named Allison Nang, who was meant

00:14:11.870 --> 00:14:13.950
to be of Asian, Hawaiian, and Swedish descent.

00:14:14.110 --> 00:14:17.259
And she is. None of those things. Right. And

00:14:17.259 --> 00:14:19.720
it sparked a huge and very necessary conversation

00:14:19.720 --> 00:14:22.279
about whitewashing in Hollywood. The backlash

00:14:22.279 --> 00:14:24.700
was immediate and intense. But what's important

00:14:24.700 --> 00:14:27.639
is how she responded to it. That's the key. She

00:14:27.639 --> 00:14:29.879
didn't hide. She later came out and expressed

00:14:29.879 --> 00:14:32.820
real regret for taking the role. She publicly

00:14:32.820 --> 00:14:35.139
said that whitewashing is a major problem in

00:14:35.139 --> 00:14:37.159
the industry and that she had learned a valuable

00:14:37.159 --> 00:14:40.419
lesson. That willingness to own it and self -correct

00:14:40.419 --> 00:14:43.120
is pretty rare. It is. And it showed a level

00:14:43.120 --> 00:14:45.759
of maturity and awareness that was really important

00:14:45.759 --> 00:14:49.940
for her public image. And then, in 2016, everything

00:14:49.940 --> 00:14:53.200
just explodes. La La Land. The film that cements

00:14:53.200 --> 00:14:55.779
her as a Hollywood legend. Her third movie with

00:14:55.779 --> 00:14:58.740
Ryan Gosling. A massive cultural phenomenon,

00:14:58.899 --> 00:15:00.960
and it just completely steamrolled the awards

00:15:00.960 --> 00:15:03.759
season. It's another role that feels deeply personal

00:15:03.759 --> 00:15:06.700
for her, playing Mia, this struggling actress

00:15:06.700 --> 00:15:08.799
in L .A. going on all these horrible auditions.

00:15:08.980 --> 00:15:11.200
Absolutely. And the director, Damien Chazelle,

00:15:11.279 --> 00:15:12.960
actually saw her when she was doing Cabaret on

00:15:12.960 --> 00:15:14.899
Broadway. Yeah. He knew he needed someone who

00:15:14.899 --> 00:15:16.840
could handle the demands of a musical but still

00:15:16.840 --> 00:15:19.389
feel grounded and modern. Her preparation for

00:15:19.389 --> 00:15:21.809
it was intense, too, watching all those old Fred

00:15:21.809 --> 00:15:24.429
Astaire and Ginger Rogers movies. She really

00:15:24.429 --> 00:15:27.169
committed. And she's on six of the songs on the

00:15:27.169 --> 00:15:30.450
soundtrack. That big emotional ballad, Audition,

00:15:30.450 --> 00:15:32.870
The Fools Who Dream, that was the centerpiece

00:15:32.870 --> 00:15:35.350
of her Oscar campaign. And it worked. The awards

00:15:35.350 --> 00:15:39.009
just poured in. Golden Globe, BAFTA, SAG Award,

00:15:39.210 --> 00:15:41.409
and, of course, the big one, her first Academy

00:15:41.409 --> 00:15:45.090
Award for Best Actress. One critic put it perfectly.

00:15:45.210 --> 00:15:48.549
They said, Stone has never been better. Superbly

00:15:48.549 --> 00:15:52.629
smart, witty, vulnerable, her huge doe eyes radiating

00:15:52.629 --> 00:15:54.830
intelligence even when they are filling with

00:15:54.830 --> 00:15:57.929
tears. So she reaches the absolute summit of

00:15:57.929 --> 00:16:00.309
Hollywood success. And what does she do next?

00:16:00.679 --> 00:16:02.340
She immediately pivots to something completely

00:16:02.340 --> 00:16:05.220
different. She uses that Oscar capital to play

00:16:05.220 --> 00:16:08.019
tennis legend Billie Jean King in Battle of the

00:16:08.019 --> 00:16:10.759
Sexes. Which required a major physical transformation.

00:16:10.840 --> 00:16:13.440
A huge one. She had to look like a world -class

00:16:13.440 --> 00:16:16.659
athlete. So she put on 15 pounds of muscle, working

00:16:16.659 --> 00:16:18.480
with a trainer, drinking these high -calorie

00:16:18.480 --> 00:16:20.580
protein shakes. It's another one of those roles

00:16:20.580 --> 00:16:23.059
that's completely against type. She's not playing

00:16:23.059 --> 00:16:26.059
the witty ingenue anymore. It's not at all. She's

00:16:26.059 --> 00:16:28.720
playing this determined, complex, real -life

00:16:28.720 --> 00:16:31.940
icon. And critics saw it as one of the best performances

00:16:31.940 --> 00:16:34.519
of her career, precisely because it showed her

00:16:34.519 --> 00:16:36.639
range and her capacity for that kind of deep

00:16:36.639 --> 00:16:39.159
transformation. It proved her talent was about

00:16:39.159 --> 00:16:42.580
skill, not just star power. OK, so that brings

00:16:42.580 --> 00:16:45.200
us to the most recent and I think maybe the most

00:16:45.200 --> 00:16:47.700
interesting phase of her career. This is where

00:16:47.700 --> 00:16:50.840
she transforms from a bankable star into a true

00:16:50.840 --> 00:16:53.740
artistic force. And that transformation is defined

00:16:53.740 --> 00:16:58.399
by one key. The Yorgos Lanthimos era. Exactly.

00:16:58.419 --> 00:17:01.500
She makes this deliberate choice to align herself

00:17:01.500 --> 00:17:04.279
with this Greek auteur director whose films are,

00:17:04.319 --> 00:17:07.500
let's be honest, weird. They're dark. They're

00:17:07.500 --> 00:17:09.640
absurd. They're not your typical Hollywood fare.

00:17:10.009 --> 00:17:11.950
Their first collaboration was The Favorite in

00:17:11.950 --> 00:17:14.529
2018, a period piece, but a very strange one.

00:17:14.670 --> 00:17:17.269
A very strange one. And she's the only American

00:17:17.269 --> 00:17:19.789
in the lead trio playing opposite Olivia Colman

00:17:19.789 --> 00:17:22.710
and Rachel Weisz, two British titans. So she

00:17:22.710 --> 00:17:24.710
had the technical challenge of mastering that

00:17:24.710 --> 00:17:26.710
specific accent and just holding her own against

00:17:26.710 --> 00:17:29.519
them. Which she did. Brilliantly. It earned her

00:17:29.519 --> 00:17:32.299
another Oscar nomination, her third. It was a

00:17:32.299 --> 00:17:35.259
signal to the industry that she was now prioritizing

00:17:35.259 --> 00:17:38.200
challenging, interesting material over anything

00:17:38.200 --> 00:17:40.880
else. And that partnership just gets deeper and

00:17:40.880 --> 00:17:43.599
more ambitious, culminating in the film that

00:17:43.599 --> 00:17:47.539
wins her second Oscar. Poor things. And this

00:17:47.539 --> 00:17:49.900
time, she's not just the star, she's a producer.

00:17:50.259 --> 00:17:52.539
She has a real stake in getting this bizarre,

00:17:52.619 --> 00:17:55.440
wonderful film made. And the role of Bella Baxter,

00:17:55.579 --> 00:17:57.880
I mean, it's one of the most physically and emotionally

00:17:57.880 --> 00:18:00.980
demanding roles I can imagine. It's a huge swing.

00:18:01.180 --> 00:18:03.759
She's playing a woman who is brought back to

00:18:03.759 --> 00:18:06.740
life and has to relearn how to exist, but without

00:18:06.740 --> 00:18:08.640
any of the shame or social conditioning that

00:18:08.640 --> 00:18:10.880
we all have. For someone who fought anxiety her

00:18:10.880 --> 00:18:12.900
whole life, she said playing a character with

00:18:12.900 --> 00:18:15.559
zero anxiety was extremely freeing. The performance

00:18:15.559 --> 00:18:18.440
was just universally described as fearless. Fearless

00:18:18.440 --> 00:18:20.839
is the word. The physical comedy, the journey

00:18:20.839 --> 00:18:23.200
from this toddler -like state to a brilliant

00:18:23.200 --> 00:18:25.640
intellectual, and of course the extensive nudity

00:18:25.640 --> 00:18:27.680
and sex scenes, which were handled in this very

00:18:27.680 --> 00:18:30.799
philosophical, non -exploitative way. The awards

00:18:30.799 --> 00:18:34.759
just followed. The Golden Globe, the BAFTA, and

00:18:34.759 --> 00:18:37.440
her second Oscar for Best Actress. But you mentioned

00:18:37.440 --> 00:18:39.079
the producer credit. That feels like the most

00:18:39.079 --> 00:18:41.450
important. piece of this it's the whole story

00:18:41.450 --> 00:18:44.130
she also got an oscar nomination for best picture

00:18:44.130 --> 00:18:46.910
as a producer she's not just an actress for hire

00:18:46.910 --> 00:18:49.970
anymore she's a creator she's helping to steer

00:18:49.970 --> 00:18:52.730
the ship to protect the director's vision and

00:18:52.730 --> 00:18:54.990
this collaboration with lanthimos just keeps

00:18:54.990 --> 00:18:57.670
going it's clearly a very fruitful partnership

00:18:57.670 --> 00:19:00.089
incredibly they did a short film called bleat

00:19:00.579 --> 00:19:03.240
Then the anthology film Kinds of Kindness, where

00:19:03.240 --> 00:19:05.339
she plays three different characters. And their

00:19:05.339 --> 00:19:07.500
next film is called Bugonia. And there's a great

00:19:07.500 --> 00:19:09.940
story about her commitment to that project, right?

00:19:10.099 --> 00:19:12.339
Yeah, it shows her dedication. She had to shave

00:19:12.339 --> 00:19:14.720
her head completely for the role. But to keep

00:19:14.720 --> 00:19:16.559
it a secret and not let it leak to the press,

00:19:16.720 --> 00:19:19.839
she wore wigs in public for months. All just

00:19:19.839 --> 00:19:21.779
to protect the integrity of the project. That's

00:19:21.779 --> 00:19:23.960
the dedication of an auteur's collaborator, not

00:19:23.960 --> 00:19:26.119
just a movie star. And at the same time, she's

00:19:26.119 --> 00:19:29.220
also making these really smart moves into prestige

00:19:29.220 --> 00:19:32.519
television. Right. She starred in and executive

00:19:32.519 --> 00:19:34.720
produced the Netflix series Maniac with Jonah

00:19:34.720 --> 00:19:36.960
Hill, and more recently, the Showtime series

00:19:36.960 --> 00:19:40.599
The Curse. Another really strange satirical show.

00:19:40.900 --> 00:19:44.359
These are not mainstream roles. They are challenging,

00:19:44.559 --> 00:19:47.740
dark comedies that allow her to explore these

00:19:47.740 --> 00:19:50.680
complex characters that wouldn't really fit in

00:19:50.680 --> 00:19:53.099
a two -hour movie. And all of this artistic freedom

00:19:53.099 --> 00:19:56.500
is really powered by one thing, her own production

00:19:56.500 --> 00:19:59.640
company. Fruit Tree. She founded it in 2020 with

00:19:59.640 --> 00:20:01.940
her husband, Dave McCary. This is the ultimate

00:20:01.940 --> 00:20:04.740
expression of that Project Hollywood mindset,

00:20:04.980 --> 00:20:07.900
isn't it? Total control. It's the endgame. She

00:20:07.900 --> 00:20:09.220
doesn't have to wait for good scripts anymore.

00:20:09.400 --> 00:20:11.200
She can go out and find them, develop them, and

00:20:11.200 --> 00:20:13.380
get them made. And they immediately partnered

00:20:13.380 --> 00:20:16.500
with A24. The indie powerhouse, which tells you

00:20:16.500 --> 00:20:18.240
exactly what kind of films they want to make.

00:20:18.299 --> 00:20:20.980
It does. They're backing unique directors, like

00:20:20.980 --> 00:20:23.440
Jesse Eisenberg. They produced his films When

00:20:23.440 --> 00:20:25.640
You Finish Saving the World and A Real Pain.

00:20:26.119 --> 00:20:29.380
They backed the surreal comedy Problemista, even

00:20:29.380 --> 00:20:31.839
a horror film I saw the TV glow. So it's all

00:20:31.839 --> 00:20:34.799
about nurturing fresh, unconventional voices.

00:20:35.519 --> 00:20:37.700
Which is a direct reflection of her own artistic

00:20:37.700 --> 00:20:40.559
journey. And while all of this is happening professionally,

00:20:40.980 --> 00:20:43.579
she's also building a family. She married Dave

00:20:43.579 --> 00:20:46.319
McCaffrey in 2020. They had a daughter in 2021.

00:20:46.859 --> 00:20:49.720
And they made a pretty significant move geographically.

00:20:49.740 --> 00:20:51.799
They did. They sold their homes in L .A. and

00:20:51.799 --> 00:20:54.599
Malibu and now live primarily in Austin, Texas.

00:20:54.839 --> 00:20:56.799
Moving out of the Hollywood spotlight. Another

00:20:56.799 --> 00:20:59.660
act of controlling her environment and her privacy.

00:20:59.940 --> 00:21:02.359
Precisely. The same way she curates her artistic

00:21:02.359 --> 00:21:05.240
projects, she's curating her personal life to

00:21:05.240 --> 00:21:07.400
protect it from the chaos of fame. So when you

00:21:07.400 --> 00:21:10.220
put it all together, this journey from anxious

00:21:10.220 --> 00:21:13.539
teenager in Arizona to Oscar -winning producer

00:21:13.539 --> 00:21:16.759
in Texas, what does her public persona look like

00:21:16.759 --> 00:21:18.579
today? Well, she still holds this incredible

00:21:18.579 --> 00:21:21.349
influence in multiple arenas. Stylistically,

00:21:21.509 --> 00:21:24.710
she's a global fashion icon. Vogue loves her.

00:21:24.769 --> 00:21:26.890
They always talk about her old Hollywood glamour.

00:21:26.910 --> 00:21:29.210
It's a very polished classic look, which is an

00:21:29.210 --> 00:21:31.630
interesting contrast to the weird avant -garde

00:21:31.630 --> 00:21:35.069
role she's taking. It is. And financially, she

00:21:35.069 --> 00:21:37.650
still has that power. We have to remember that

00:21:37.650 --> 00:21:41.170
in 2017, Forbes named her the highest paid actress

00:21:41.170 --> 00:21:44.309
in the world with earnings of $26 million that

00:21:44.309 --> 00:21:46.660
year. And that commercial success is what buys

00:21:46.660 --> 00:21:49.019
you the artistic freedom to do something like

00:21:49.019 --> 00:21:51.539
poor things. It's the capital that allows you

00:21:51.539 --> 00:21:54.559
to take those risks. But her influence now goes

00:21:54.559 --> 00:21:57.619
way beyond style and money. It's become philosophical,

00:21:57.940 --> 00:22:00.430
even political. Starting with her own personal

00:22:00.430 --> 00:22:03.190
spiritual journey. Right. She was raised Lutheran,

00:22:03.190 --> 00:22:05.490
but she's talked about how organized religion

00:22:05.490 --> 00:22:07.950
just filled her with guilt, especially around

00:22:07.950 --> 00:22:10.710
sexuality and what it means to be a woman. And

00:22:10.710 --> 00:22:12.849
she found a different path to deal with that.

00:22:13.029 --> 00:22:16.210
She found Jungian therapy. And she says that's

00:22:16.210 --> 00:22:18.049
what really helped her unpack all of that and

00:22:18.049 --> 00:22:20.569
accept that being complex and complicated and

00:22:20.569 --> 00:22:23.470
female was okay. You can draw a straight line

00:22:23.470 --> 00:22:25.710
from that realization to a character like Bella

00:22:25.710 --> 00:22:29.039
Baxter. A completely straight line. And she still

00:22:29.039 --> 00:22:31.240
questions those big narratives. There's a quote

00:22:31.240 --> 00:22:33.500
from 2025 where she's talking about the traditional

00:22:33.500 --> 00:22:37.339
idea of God. And she says, I can't imagine he

00:22:37.339 --> 00:22:39.680
wouldn't be loving and generous. That's what

00:22:39.680 --> 00:22:42.079
bothers me. That's the story we've been told

00:22:42.079 --> 00:22:44.789
for so long. Always questioning the established

00:22:44.789 --> 00:22:47.329
script. Always. And you see that in her public

00:22:47.329 --> 00:22:50.369
advocacy work, too. She's been a huge supporter

00:22:50.369 --> 00:22:53.130
of cancer awareness, working with Revlon and

00:22:53.130 --> 00:22:55.309
Stand Up to Cancer for years. And she's been

00:22:55.309 --> 00:22:58.309
a very vocal advocate for women's rights. A very

00:22:58.309 --> 00:23:00.410
consistent one. She was one of the co -founders

00:23:00.410 --> 00:23:02.869
of the Time's Up initiative back in 2018 to fight

00:23:02.869 --> 00:23:05.269
sexual harassment in the industry. And she's

00:23:05.269 --> 00:23:07.109
a visible supporter of Planned Parenthood. And

00:23:07.109 --> 00:23:09.049
then most recently, she's taken a public stance

00:23:09.049 --> 00:23:11.890
on a very sensitive international issue. And

00:23:11.890 --> 00:23:13.849
we should be clear. We're simply reporting what

00:23:13.849 --> 00:23:17.569
the sources say here. Absolutely. In 2025, she

00:23:17.569 --> 00:23:19.789
reportedly signed the Film Workers for Palestine

00:23:19.789 --> 00:23:22.309
letter. And what did that letter entail? Well,

00:23:22.369 --> 00:23:24.230
the letter pledged that it signifies would not

00:23:24.230 --> 00:23:27.329
work with Israeli film institutions that, and

00:23:27.329 --> 00:23:28.930
this is quoting from the letter's text, were

00:23:28.930 --> 00:23:31.910
implicated in genocide and apartheid against

00:23:31.910 --> 00:23:35.349
Palestinians. So a very direct and highly politicized

00:23:35.349 --> 00:23:37.869
public statement. It is. And it confirms that

00:23:37.869 --> 00:23:40.230
she sees her platform as something that extends

00:23:40.230 --> 00:23:43.529
beyond just her. artistic work into the realm

00:23:43.529 --> 00:23:46.690
of global politics. So when you synthesize all

00:23:46.690 --> 00:23:49.210
of that, the career choices, the producing, the

00:23:49.210 --> 00:23:52.950
activism, what's the final critical take on Emma

00:23:52.950 --> 00:23:56.130
Stone? The consensus is that she is just uniquely

00:23:56.130 --> 00:23:58.779
adaptable. She built this brilliant career without

00:23:58.779 --> 00:24:01.059
classical training based purely on instinct,

00:24:01.259 --> 00:24:03.940
performative skill, and incredibly careful choices.

00:24:04.200 --> 00:24:06.940
She mastered the girl next door persona and then

00:24:06.940 --> 00:24:09.140
masterfully evolved beyond it. She found a new

00:24:09.140 --> 00:24:11.400
model for what a movie star can be, right? Someone

00:24:11.400 --> 00:24:13.519
who can navigate a blockbuster and a strange,

00:24:13.559 --> 00:24:16.299
low -budget indie film with equal success. Hashtag

00:24:16.299 --> 00:24:18.220
tag outro. When you look at the whole story,

00:24:18.299 --> 00:24:20.099
it really is defined by this central contradiction,

00:24:20.279 --> 00:24:22.339
isn't it? As a kid, she runs away from chaos

00:24:22.339 --> 00:24:24.200
and finds safety in the predictable structure

00:24:24.200 --> 00:24:27.460
of a script. Exactly. The theater script was

00:24:27.460 --> 00:24:30.319
her refuge from a world that felt like it was

00:24:30.319 --> 00:24:33.160
on fire. And yet, as a mature artist, she now

00:24:33.160 --> 00:24:35.700
actively seeks out the most chaotic, the most

00:24:35.700 --> 00:24:38.160
strange, the most unpredictable roles she can

00:24:38.160 --> 00:24:42.000
find. Because that need for certainty that she

00:24:42.000 --> 00:24:45.960
had as a child has evolved. It's now a professional

00:24:45.960 --> 00:24:49.279
drive to control the artistic narrative. She's

00:24:49.279 --> 00:24:51.039
not just following the script anymore. She's

00:24:51.039 --> 00:24:53.400
writing it. She's building the structure herself

00:24:53.400 --> 00:24:56.289
through her production company. So what does

00:24:56.289 --> 00:24:58.069
that leave us with? What does this mean for the

00:24:58.069 --> 00:25:00.269
future of the A -list star? Well, I think it

00:25:00.269 --> 00:25:01.730
leaves us with a really provocative question.

00:25:01.930 --> 00:25:04.690
Given this decisive move toward riskier material

00:25:04.690 --> 00:25:07.509
and her willingness to align with these sensitive

00:25:07.509 --> 00:25:10.150
political causes, does her success now depend

00:25:10.150 --> 00:25:12.910
on her constantly pushing boundaries? Or has

00:25:12.910 --> 00:25:14.950
she reached a point as a producer where she's

00:25:14.950 --> 00:25:16.750
just completely independent of those traditional

00:25:16.750 --> 00:25:19.549
Hollywood pressures? That's the thing. She doesn't

00:25:19.549 --> 00:25:21.769
have to just find the challenging roles anymore.

00:25:22.160 --> 00:25:25.299
She has achieved the power to simply decide to

00:25:25.299 --> 00:25:28.440
make them. And that fundamental shift from being

00:25:28.440 --> 00:25:30.759
reactive to being proactive, from an actor to

00:25:30.759 --> 00:25:33.099
a creator, that might just be the new blueprint

00:25:33.099 --> 00:25:35.980
for celebrity power. The power not just to play

00:25:35.980 --> 00:25:38.779
the game, but to change the rules entirely. A

00:25:38.779 --> 00:25:41.160
compelling thought to end on. Thank you for joining

00:25:41.160 --> 00:25:43.480
us for this deep dive into the incredible career

00:25:43.480 --> 00:25:44.279
of Emma Stone.
