WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.799
Welcome to the Deep Dive, where we take the complexity

00:00:02.799 --> 00:00:05.860
of a massive multi -decade career and try to

00:00:05.860 --> 00:00:09.179
boil it down to the essential, fascinating, and

00:00:09.179 --> 00:00:13.099
sometimes... wildly unexpected takeaways. And

00:00:13.099 --> 00:00:15.580
today we are immersing ourselves in the life

00:00:15.580 --> 00:00:18.640
and sound of a musician, a composer, a band leader

00:00:18.640 --> 00:00:22.739
who didn't just define modern jazz. He then sort

00:00:22.739 --> 00:00:25.640
of casually redefined funk, electro and hip hop

00:00:25.640 --> 00:00:27.699
right after. We are, of course, talking about

00:00:27.699 --> 00:00:30.339
Herbert Jeffrey Hancock, born April 12th, 1940.

00:00:30.679 --> 00:00:32.759
And if you need, you know, just a quick metric

00:00:32.759 --> 00:00:34.579
to understand the sheer weight of his talent,

00:00:34.700 --> 00:00:37.579
look no further than a 2024 ranking from the

00:00:37.579 --> 00:00:39.820
Daily Telegraph. I saw this one. They named him

00:00:39.820 --> 00:00:42.049
flat out. the greatest keyboard player of all

00:00:42.049 --> 00:00:44.350
time. Of all time. That's pretty high bar. It

00:00:44.350 --> 00:00:46.229
is. And that's the kind of legacy of continuous

00:00:46.229 --> 00:00:48.350
innovation we're tasked with unpacking today.

00:00:48.570 --> 00:00:50.869
So that's our mission for this deep dive. We're

00:00:50.869 --> 00:00:53.369
going to trace that almost unbelievable arc from

00:00:53.369 --> 00:00:56.149
a classical prodigy to a post -bop architect

00:00:56.149 --> 00:00:59.450
in, I mean, the most famous jazz quintet of the

00:00:59.450 --> 00:01:02.280
20th century. And then all the way through to

00:01:02.280 --> 00:01:04.280
him just blowing up the whole concept of jazz

00:01:04.280 --> 00:01:07.480
by embracing synthesizers and, you know, crossing

00:01:07.480 --> 00:01:10.219
over to the global pop charts. It's really about

00:01:10.219 --> 00:01:12.659
his philosophy, this constant restless drive.

00:01:13.290 --> 00:01:16.109
And how that mind, which was equally good at

00:01:16.109 --> 00:01:18.870
engineering and improvisation, just continuously

00:01:18.870 --> 00:01:21.510
redefined what a keyboard could even do in modern

00:01:21.510 --> 00:01:23.670
music. Right. Whether it was an acoustic piano

00:01:23.670 --> 00:01:26.469
or a wall of synthesizers. And we'll definitely

00:01:26.469 --> 00:01:28.549
be hitting some of those foundational compositions.

00:01:28.989 --> 00:01:30.950
I mean, they're basically part of the language

00:01:30.950 --> 00:01:33.530
of jazz now. Standards like cantaloupe island,

00:01:33.769 --> 00:01:37.069
watermelon man, maiden voyage. And of course.

00:01:37.609 --> 00:01:40.670
These aren't just songs. They're more like architectural

00:01:40.670 --> 00:01:43.890
blueprints for entire genres. Okay, so let's

00:01:43.890 --> 00:01:47.269
unpack the foundation of this genius. Hancock

00:01:47.269 --> 00:01:50.409
was born in Chicago, Illinois. His parents, Winnie

00:01:50.409 --> 00:01:53.049
Bell, a secretary, and Wayman Edward Hancock,

00:01:53.209 --> 00:01:55.790
a meat inspector. They named him after the singer

00:01:55.790 --> 00:01:58.629
and actor Herb Jeffries. But the critical starting

00:01:58.629 --> 00:02:00.310
point, the thing that really informs everything

00:02:00.310 --> 00:02:02.670
else, is the classical training. Right from the

00:02:02.670 --> 00:02:04.859
very beginning. Absolutely. Like a lot of the

00:02:04.859 --> 00:02:07.620
great jazz pianists of his generation, thinking

00:02:07.620 --> 00:02:10.139
of giants like Keith Jarrett or Chick Corea,

00:02:10.139 --> 00:02:12.819
he started young, classical piano lessons at

00:02:12.819 --> 00:02:15.819
age seven. But the label Child Prodigy for Hancock,

00:02:16.000 --> 00:02:19.699
it wasn't just hype. No, not at all. He had the

00:02:19.699 --> 00:02:21.879
documentation, you know, to prove it. At the

00:02:21.879 --> 00:02:25.680
incredible age of 11 on February 5, 1952, he

00:02:25.680 --> 00:02:27.500
wasn't just playing in a little recital. No,

00:02:27.560 --> 00:02:29.620
this is the big leagues. He performed the first

00:02:29.620 --> 00:02:32.560
movement of Mozart's Piano Concerto No. 26 in

00:02:32.560 --> 00:02:36.259
D major, K5 -Z7, the famous Coronation Concerto.

00:02:36.439 --> 00:02:38.419
With the Chicago Symphony Orchestra? With the

00:02:38.419 --> 00:02:41.259
CSO. I mean, that is an enormous stage for a

00:02:41.259 --> 00:02:43.740
preteen. It requires not just the technique,

00:02:43.879 --> 00:02:46.979
but a really profound understanding of classical

00:02:46.979 --> 00:02:50.099
structure. And that experience, that really instills

00:02:50.099 --> 00:02:52.620
in him this... foundational understanding of

00:02:52.620 --> 00:02:55.360
musical architecture, precision, which he would

00:02:55.360 --> 00:02:58.900
later just apply to the fluidity of jazz. But

00:02:58.900 --> 00:03:01.080
the academic side gives us an equally important

00:03:01.080 --> 00:03:03.620
clue to his later mastery of electronics. He

00:03:03.620 --> 00:03:05.300
went to Hyde Park High School and then graduated

00:03:05.300 --> 00:03:08.020
from Grinnell College in 1960. And this is the

00:03:08.020 --> 00:03:10.180
part that always gets me. He walks out of college

00:03:10.180 --> 00:03:12.759
not just with a music degree. Right. But with

00:03:12.759 --> 00:03:15.280
degrees in both music and electrical engineering.

00:03:15.439 --> 00:03:17.139
Electrical engineering. And this is not just

00:03:17.139 --> 00:03:19.620
a footnote. No, we cannot stress this enough.

00:03:20.009 --> 00:03:22.550
That engineering background seems to inform his

00:03:22.550 --> 00:03:25.030
fascination, his quick adoption, and then his

00:03:25.030 --> 00:03:28.030
eventual mastery of electronic instruments decades

00:03:28.030 --> 00:03:29.889
down the line. It's the perfect combination.

00:03:30.330 --> 00:03:31.949
It really is. You have the structure of circuits

00:03:31.949 --> 00:03:34.509
on one hand and the fluidity of sound waves on

00:03:34.509 --> 00:03:36.849
the other. It creates a mind that sees music

00:03:36.849 --> 00:03:39.349
not just as notes, but as systems, as patterns,

00:03:39.509 --> 00:03:43.629
as programmable sonic colors. A mind that understands

00:03:43.629 --> 00:03:46.810
how things work. and therefore how they can be

00:03:46.810 --> 00:03:49.210
broken and rebuilt. Exactly. And just to put

00:03:49.210 --> 00:03:51.490
a physical stamp on that engineering mind early

00:03:51.490 --> 00:03:54.689
on, we should probably mention the car. Ah, yes.

00:03:55.150 --> 00:03:59.870
Yeah. The famous 1963 AC Shelby Cobra. Precisely.

00:03:59.870 --> 00:04:02.110
So this kid who just graduated with an engineering

00:04:02.110 --> 00:04:05.810
degree moves to New York and in 1963 buys a brand

00:04:05.810 --> 00:04:09.729
new Shelby Cobra for $6 ,000. It's serial number

00:04:09.729 --> 00:04:14.159
CSX 2006, the sixth Cobra ever produced. The

00:04:14.159 --> 00:04:16.560
sixth one. And the fact that he still owns it

00:04:16.560 --> 00:04:18.199
today, which makes him the longest continuous

00:04:18.199 --> 00:04:21.139
owner of a Cobra, that says so much about the

00:04:21.139 --> 00:04:24.360
value he places on mechanism, history, and perfection.

00:04:24.759 --> 00:04:27.180
It's like a physical manifestation of the structure

00:04:27.180 --> 00:04:29.339
and precision that defines his classical and

00:04:29.339 --> 00:04:31.180
his engineering roots. Totally. A phenomenal

00:04:31.180 --> 00:04:33.790
detail. But during those college years, you know,

00:04:33.790 --> 00:04:35.670
he didn't have a formal jazz teacher. He was

00:04:35.670 --> 00:04:37.769
self -taught, just absorbing everything by ear.

00:04:38.029 --> 00:04:40.149
And that reliance on the ear over formal instruction,

00:04:40.370 --> 00:04:42.490
that's so crucial. For sure. He was just soaking

00:04:42.490 --> 00:04:44.970
in the giants, the aggressive rhythms of hard

00:04:44.970 --> 00:04:48.670
bop from Art Blakey's Jazz Messengers, the coolness

00:04:48.670 --> 00:04:51.730
of Miles Davis's Birth of the Cool, and, of course,

00:04:51.750 --> 00:04:54.470
the intricate piano playing of Bill Evans, George

00:04:54.470 --> 00:04:58.089
Shearing, Errol Garner, Oscar Peterson. It was

00:04:58.089 --> 00:05:02.500
a rigorous, self -curated education. harmonic

00:05:02.500 --> 00:05:06.800
aha moment the one that unlocked his signature

00:05:06.800 --> 00:05:09.759
harmonic sound it came from a place completely

00:05:09.759 --> 00:05:12.160
outside of the jazz world absolutely the turning

00:05:12.160 --> 00:05:14.279
point wasn't a horn player it wasn't a famous

00:05:14.279 --> 00:05:16.600
jazz pianist it was this highly sophisticated

00:05:16.600 --> 00:05:19.740
vocal group the high lows and their arranger

00:05:19.740 --> 00:05:22.680
Claire Fisher that's amazing why the high lows

00:05:22.680 --> 00:05:25.629
specifically What was he hearing there that he

00:05:25.629 --> 00:05:28.110
wasn't getting from, say, Bill Evans? He was

00:05:28.110 --> 00:05:31.129
hearing density and ambiguity. Fisher's arrangements

00:05:31.129 --> 00:05:34.430
used what Hancock called much farther out voicings.

00:05:34.430 --> 00:05:37.670
Farther out voicings. OK, so. What does that

00:05:37.670 --> 00:05:40.470
actually mean for a pianist? Well, in jazz terms,

00:05:40.689 --> 00:05:43.829
it means moving beyond the simple, you know,

00:05:43.829 --> 00:05:46.550
the root, third, fifth structures. The basics.

00:05:46.850 --> 00:05:49.250
Exactly, the basics. He started using things

00:05:49.250 --> 00:05:52.269
like chordal harmonies chords built on intervals

00:05:52.269 --> 00:05:55.689
of fourths, or these really complex, often rootless

00:05:55.689 --> 00:05:58.529
voicings that just sort of float above the underlying

00:05:58.529 --> 00:06:00.589
harmony. So he heard that in their vocal arrangements.

00:06:00.930 --> 00:06:03.370
Right. The Heilers used these tight, complex

00:06:03.370 --> 00:06:06.410
vocal cluster chords, and Hancock realized...

00:06:06.439 --> 00:06:08.579
he could translate that dense, shimmering quality

00:06:08.579 --> 00:06:10.980
to the piano. That's the signature sound you

00:06:10.980 --> 00:06:13.220
hear on albums like Speak Like a Child. It gave

00:06:13.220 --> 00:06:15.240
his music this sophisticated, almost cinematic

00:06:15.240 --> 00:06:17.439
quality that was pretty rare in hard bop at the

00:06:17.439 --> 00:06:19.600
time. That's a powerful insight. It really confirms

00:06:19.600 --> 00:06:21.319
he was always a synthesis, right? Taking these

00:06:21.319 --> 00:06:23.920
disparate parts, classical structure, vocal harmony,

00:06:24.079 --> 00:06:26.319
engineering, and just integrating them into his

00:06:26.319 --> 00:06:28.800
own unique thing. And he did try some formal

00:06:28.800 --> 00:06:31.660
composition study briefly with Vittorio Giannini

00:06:31.660 --> 00:06:34.660
in New York in 1960. But it was brief. Very brief.

00:06:34.740 --> 00:06:37.600
And he also cited the relatively unknown Chicago

00:06:37.600 --> 00:06:41.680
pianist Chris Anderson as his harmonic guru just

00:06:41.680 --> 00:06:45.259
after hearing him play once in 1960. Wow. It

00:06:45.259 --> 00:06:47.500
just shows that his ear was so refined he could

00:06:47.500 --> 00:06:50.680
absorb this profound career changing insight

00:06:50.680 --> 00:06:53.399
from a single session. So all of this grounding

00:06:53.399 --> 00:06:56.939
leads directly to his professional debut. He

00:06:56.939 --> 00:06:59.300
moves back to Chicago after college, works with

00:06:59.300 --> 00:07:01.620
some huge figures like Donald Byrd and Coleman

00:07:01.620 --> 00:07:04.139
Hawkins. Yeah. And then he lands his first major

00:07:04.139 --> 00:07:06.540
record deal. That was the album taken off for

00:07:06.540 --> 00:07:09.259
Blue Note Records in 1962, a really confident

00:07:09.259 --> 00:07:12.100
swinging debut. But the key track on there was

00:07:12.100 --> 00:07:14.600
his composition Watermelon Man. A monster hit.

00:07:14.699 --> 00:07:17.019
Huge success. It crossed into the pop landscape

00:07:17.019 --> 00:07:18.899
when it became a hit single for the Latin jazz

00:07:18.899 --> 00:07:21.860
conga player Mongo Santa Maria. But the truly

00:07:21.860 --> 00:07:24.339
critical moment wasn't the hit single itself.

00:07:24.970 --> 00:07:27.649
It wasn't the commercial success. It was the

00:07:27.649 --> 00:07:30.829
listener it attracted. Exactly. Taken off and

00:07:30.829 --> 00:07:32.970
the melodic strength of Watermelon Man caught

00:07:32.970 --> 00:07:35.350
the attention of Miles Davis. Who at that very

00:07:35.350 --> 00:07:38.189
moment was in the process of dismantling his

00:07:38.189 --> 00:07:40.889
existing band and putting together what would

00:07:40.889 --> 00:07:44.310
become the second great quintet. It was a direct

00:07:44.310 --> 00:07:47.079
consequence of that early mastery. The success

00:07:47.079 --> 00:07:49.180
of that debut track didn't just get him attention.

00:07:49.480 --> 00:07:52.800
It got him the most coveted job in jazz, a job

00:07:52.800 --> 00:07:54.500
that would fundamentally change the course of

00:07:54.500 --> 00:07:57.540
jazz history and his own artistic direction forever.

00:07:57.899 --> 00:08:00.699
OK, so as we move into part two, we're in 1963.

00:08:01.540 --> 00:08:04.279
This is a pivot point not just for Hancock, but

00:08:04.279 --> 00:08:06.980
really for the entire progression of jazz. Miles

00:08:06.980 --> 00:08:09.819
Davis seeks him out in May of 63, recognizing

00:08:09.819 --> 00:08:11.860
him as one of the most promising talents. And

00:08:11.860 --> 00:08:13.740
maybe one of the only pianists willing to break

00:08:13.740 --> 00:08:16.000
the rules Miles wanted to break. And what Miles

00:08:16.000 --> 00:08:18.120
put together was, by all accounts, one of the

00:08:18.120 --> 00:08:19.819
greatest rhythm sections in the history of the

00:08:19.819 --> 00:08:21.980
music. No question. It was Hancock on piano,

00:08:22.240 --> 00:08:25.000
Ron Carter on bass, and a 17 -year -old Tony

00:08:25.000 --> 00:08:28.860
Williams on drums. Just incredible. And when

00:08:28.860 --> 00:08:31.279
Wayne Shorter joined on tenor saxophone, the

00:08:31.279 --> 00:08:33.659
second great quintet was fully formed. They were

00:08:33.659 --> 00:08:35.840
just a great band, though. They fundamentally

00:08:35.840 --> 00:08:38.500
changed the language of the music. The sources

00:08:38.500 --> 00:08:41.740
all confirmed this rhythm section. Hancock, Carter,

00:08:41.960 --> 00:08:44.840
and Williams were the primary architects of the

00:08:44.840 --> 00:08:46.899
post -bop sound. And this is where we need to

00:08:46.899 --> 00:08:49.139
slow down and really define what post -bop even

00:08:49.139 --> 00:08:52.820
means. Hard bop, the style Miles had previously

00:08:52.820 --> 00:08:55.929
mastered. It relied on these defined chord changes

00:08:55.929 --> 00:08:59.190
and a steady swing. Right. Post -bop, which this

00:08:59.190 --> 00:09:01.870
quintet pioneered, was characterized by radical

00:09:01.870 --> 00:09:04.809
freedom. They moved away from fixed, predetermined

00:09:04.809 --> 00:09:07.330
chord sequences. They were using modal structures

00:09:07.330 --> 00:09:10.470
and they embraced rhythmic displacement. Rhythmic

00:09:10.470 --> 00:09:12.409
displacement. That's the key interaction, isn't

00:09:12.409 --> 00:09:14.649
it? It's everything. Tony Williams, despite his

00:09:14.649 --> 00:09:17.090
age, was a revolutionary. He wasn't just keeping

00:09:17.090 --> 00:09:19.490
time. He was actively breaking it up, constantly

00:09:19.490 --> 00:09:21.669
providing rhythmic commentary. And Rainn Carter.

00:09:22.110 --> 00:09:24.909
His bass lines became melodic and mobile, not

00:09:24.909 --> 00:09:27.649
just playing the root notes for support. And

00:09:27.649 --> 00:09:30.269
Hancock sat right in the middle, using that harmonic

00:09:30.269 --> 00:09:33.830
ambiguity, those Claire Fisher voicings, to allow

00:09:33.830 --> 00:09:37.480
the music to just shift direction suddenly. So

00:09:37.480 --> 00:09:40.000
the whole rhythm section was acting like three

00:09:40.000 --> 00:09:43.259
independent but hyper -aware voices. Exactly.

00:09:43.519 --> 00:09:45.840
Constantly reacting, constantly challenging each

00:09:45.840 --> 00:09:48.620
other. It created a sound that was fluid and

00:09:48.620 --> 00:09:51.320
interactive rather than structured and repetitive.

00:09:51.720 --> 00:09:54.139
That concept of constant interaction must have

00:09:54.139 --> 00:09:57.159
been, I mean... Exhausting, but also incredibly

00:09:57.159 --> 00:10:00.159
fertile for Hancock's compositional mind. Immensely

00:10:00.159 --> 00:10:03.220
fertile. His style under Miles evolved so rapidly,

00:10:03.480 --> 00:10:06.320
he moved away from that busy block chord style

00:10:06.320 --> 00:10:09.419
of bop piano and developed a more spacious, reflective

00:10:09.419 --> 00:10:11.659
approach. Leaving more room for Miles and Shorter.

00:10:11.779 --> 00:10:14.240
Exactly. He learned the value of silence for

00:10:14.240 --> 00:10:16.299
Miles when not to play, which made his contributions

00:10:16.299 --> 00:10:19.129
that much more impactful. And while he's redefining

00:10:19.129 --> 00:10:21.289
the rhythm section on the road with Miles, he's

00:10:21.289 --> 00:10:23.470
simultaneously having this tremendously prolific

00:10:23.470 --> 00:10:26.029
career under his own name at Blue Note. Oh, he

00:10:26.029 --> 00:10:28.590
was recording constantly, both as a leader and

00:10:28.590 --> 00:10:31.750
a sideman, producing albums that really cemented

00:10:31.750 --> 00:10:34.210
his status as a major composer. His Blue Note

00:10:34.210 --> 00:10:37.090
output during this period is just... Yeah. It

00:10:37.090 --> 00:10:39.490
really is. Albums like My Point of View in 63,

00:10:39.809 --> 00:10:42.350
Speak Like a Child in 68, The Prisoner in 69.

00:10:42.529 --> 00:10:45.710
They're all essential. But the absolute compositional

00:10:45.710 --> 00:10:48.529
peak of this era and maybe his entire acoustic

00:10:48.529 --> 00:10:52.429
career is Maiden Voyage from 1965. Maiden Voyage

00:10:52.429 --> 00:10:55.049
is iconic. But how does that album specifically

00:10:55.049 --> 00:10:58.230
reflect the synthesis of his background? You

00:10:58.230 --> 00:11:00.610
know, the engineer meeting the improviser. It's

00:11:00.610 --> 00:11:02.610
the perfect demonstration of controlled structure

00:11:02.610 --> 00:11:05.919
leading to limitless freedom. Maiden Voyage is

00:11:05.919 --> 00:11:08.639
a modal jazz piece built around four chords that

00:11:08.639 --> 00:11:11.519
cycle very slowly. So it's sparse. Very sparse.

00:11:11.580 --> 00:11:14.019
It's built primarily on those chordal harmonies

00:11:14.019 --> 00:11:16.200
chords built in fourths, sounding open and cool,

00:11:16.259 --> 00:11:18.320
far from the dense chord changes of traditional

00:11:18.320 --> 00:11:21.519
jazz. So this sparse, structured framework, that's

00:11:21.519 --> 00:11:23.539
the engineer side, it creates this incredible

00:11:23.539 --> 00:11:26.419
sense of space. It's just the vast ocean the

00:11:26.419 --> 00:11:29.279
album's concept invokes. And then the improvisers,

00:11:29.299 --> 00:11:31.740
the jazz side, they use that simple, profound

00:11:31.740 --> 00:11:34.960
structure to just... build these expansive emotional

00:11:34.960 --> 00:11:38.820
landscapes exactly it's elegant deceptively simple

00:11:38.820 --> 00:11:41.980
and deeply profound it became one of the most

00:11:41.980 --> 00:11:44.580
played standards in jazz history for a reason

00:11:44.580 --> 00:11:46.600
and he wasn't just limiting himself to the core

00:11:46.600 --> 00:11:49.100
quintet either he was the keyboardist of choice

00:11:49.100 --> 00:11:51.519
for pretty much Everyone coming through Blue

00:11:51.519 --> 00:11:54.740
Note. He was everywhere. Grant Green, Eric Dolphy,

00:11:54.840 --> 00:11:57.059
Wayne Shorter on his solo work, Freddie Hubbard.

00:11:57.139 --> 00:12:00.539
I mean, if you were in New York's mid -60s jazz

00:12:00.539 --> 00:12:02.600
scene, you were playing with Herbie Hancock.

00:12:02.759 --> 00:12:05.120
And he got experimental on his own records, too,

00:12:05.200 --> 00:12:07.120
pushing the boundaries of what even Blue Note

00:12:07.120 --> 00:12:09.629
would accept. For sure. Take Inventions and Dimensions

00:12:09.629 --> 00:12:12.529
from 1963. It was an album of almost entirely

00:12:12.529 --> 00:12:15.590
improvised music. Wow. Just him, Paul Chambers

00:12:15.590 --> 00:12:18.769
on bass, and two Latin percussionists. This willingness

00:12:18.769 --> 00:12:21.429
to explore unstructured spur -of -the -moment

00:12:21.429 --> 00:12:23.649
composition was always simmering under the surface,

00:12:23.889 --> 00:12:26.330
a kind of counterpoint to his precise classical

00:12:26.330 --> 00:12:28.710
training. Speaking of structured exploration,

00:12:29.190 --> 00:12:31.370
this is also the period where he started to venture

00:12:31.370 --> 00:12:34.190
into film and commercial music. Right. Bridging

00:12:34.190 --> 00:12:36.950
that gap between sophisticated jazz and commercial

00:12:36.950 --> 00:12:39.690
appeal, which might surprise some people, he

00:12:39.690 --> 00:12:42.389
composed the score for Michelangelo Antonioni's

00:12:42.389 --> 00:12:45.850
seminal 1966 film Blow Up. That was his very

00:12:45.850 --> 00:12:48.889
first feature film soundtrack. It was, but he

00:12:48.889 --> 00:12:51.769
also used his precise musical skill to write

00:12:51.769 --> 00:12:54.269
catchy themes for TV commercials. The things

00:12:54.269 --> 00:12:56.110
you would never associate with a jazz genius.

00:12:56.389 --> 00:12:59.379
Right. Pillsbury Space Food Sticks, Standard

00:12:59.379 --> 00:13:03.340
Oil, Tab Diet Cola, and even Virginia Slims and

00:13:03.340 --> 00:13:05.899
Silverthins cigarettes. And this commercial work

00:13:05.899 --> 00:13:08.460
often led to these great insider music anecdotes.

00:13:08.659 --> 00:13:10.960
Tell us the Sylva Thins story because it really

00:13:10.960 --> 00:13:13.299
highlights his adaptability. It's a classic case

00:13:13.299 --> 00:13:15.759
of artistic repurposing. So he wrote this cool

00:13:15.759 --> 00:13:18.860
spy type theme for a series of Sylva Thins commercials

00:13:18.860 --> 00:13:22.200
in 1967. Okay. He genuinely liked the melody

00:13:22.200 --> 00:13:24.039
and the harmony so much that he wanted to record

00:13:24.039 --> 00:13:26.980
it as a proper song for an album. But the ad

00:13:26.980 --> 00:13:29.279
agency held the rights to the original arrangement

00:13:29.279 --> 00:13:31.820
and wouldn't let him record it verbatim for commercial

00:13:31.820 --> 00:13:35.980
release. So what did the engineers like? He basically

00:13:35.980 --> 00:13:39.340
self -sampled and rearranged it. he kept the

00:13:39.340 --> 00:13:42.600
core harmonic idea but he significantly rewrote

00:13:42.600 --> 00:13:45.759
the piece he changed the harmony the tempo the

00:13:45.759 --> 00:13:49.080
tone and released it as the track he who lives

00:13:49.080 --> 00:13:53.600
in fear on his 1969 album the prisoner that's

00:13:53.600 --> 00:13:56.379
incredible it's a remarkable example of adapting

00:13:56.379 --> 00:13:59.700
and reusing complex material and similarly the

00:13:59.700 --> 00:14:02.539
sublime maiden voyage that beautiful tranquil

00:14:02.539 --> 00:14:04.899
standard don't tell me it actually originated

00:14:04.899 --> 00:14:08.159
as a theme for a cologne advertisement he Proved

00:14:08.159 --> 00:14:10.580
that genius can be applied to any brief. That

00:14:10.580 --> 00:14:12.639
commercial work just proves he was already bridging

00:14:12.639 --> 00:14:14.659
that gap between sophisticated jazz composition

00:14:14.659 --> 00:14:17.299
and commercial hooks way before he became a pop

00:14:17.299 --> 00:14:19.860
star. For sure. But the biggest structural change

00:14:19.860 --> 00:14:22.620
came right as he was leaving Miles Davis. The

00:14:22.620 --> 00:14:25.259
electric shift. Yes. The transition to electric

00:14:25.259 --> 00:14:28.039
keyboards was forced on him, but it was utterly

00:14:28.039 --> 00:14:30.399
pivotal. Towards the end of his time with Miles,

00:14:30.559 --> 00:14:32.659
Davis was pushing the band towards rock and popular

00:14:32.659 --> 00:14:35.000
music elements, a move that would culminate in

00:14:35.000 --> 00:14:38.250
Bitches Brew in 1970. And Hancock, coming from

00:14:38.250 --> 00:14:39.889
that acoustic tradition, was initially pretty

00:14:39.889 --> 00:14:42.389
reluctant to play electric piano. But Miles insisted,

00:14:42.610 --> 00:14:45.549
right? He did. Miles convinced Hancock to start

00:14:45.549 --> 00:14:47.889
doubling on electric keyboards, most notably

00:14:47.889 --> 00:14:50.830
the Fender Rhodes electric piano. Which is a

00:14:50.830 --> 00:14:52.490
completely different sound. A totally different

00:14:52.490 --> 00:14:55.190
beast. The Rhodes doesn't have that bell -like

00:14:55.190 --> 00:14:57.590
clarity or dynamic range of an acoustic piano.

00:14:58.049 --> 00:15:01.830
It has this metallic, sustained, slightly gritty

00:15:01.830 --> 00:15:05.309
tone. And that change from the organic sound

00:15:05.309 --> 00:15:08.750
of wood and felt hammers to the sustained, electrified

00:15:08.750 --> 00:15:11.870
tone of tines and pickups, it fundamentally shaped

00:15:11.870 --> 00:15:14.879
the second half of his career. So many jazz purists

00:15:14.879 --> 00:15:17.720
felt that the electric keyboard diminished the

00:15:17.720 --> 00:15:19.940
acoustic purity of the music. I mean, that led

00:15:19.940 --> 00:15:23.019
to huge riffs in the jazz world. Did Hancock

00:15:23.019 --> 00:15:25.019
ever talk about that controversy, about Miles

00:15:25.019 --> 00:15:27.740
forcing that shift? He certainly did. He saw

00:15:27.740 --> 00:15:31.000
it initially as an unwelcome intrusion. But later,

00:15:31.179 --> 00:15:33.820
in retrospect, he recognized that Miles was forcing

00:15:33.820 --> 00:15:36.960
him and the entire genre to confront modern technology

00:15:36.960 --> 00:15:39.500
and popular culture. A push he desperately needed.

00:15:39.679 --> 00:15:41.980
Exactly. And he adapted quickly, recognizing

00:15:41.980 --> 00:15:44.139
the possibilities for new textures and sounds

00:15:44.139 --> 00:15:45.879
that the acoustic instrument just couldn't provide.

00:15:46.159 --> 00:15:48.059
And then he formed his own sextet in the summer

00:15:48.059 --> 00:15:50.440
of 68 after being dismissed from Davis's band.

00:15:50.759 --> 00:15:52.820
Yeah, for returning late from his honeymoon in

00:15:52.820 --> 00:15:55.820
Brazil. He was late, Miles was strict, and that

00:15:55.820 --> 00:15:58.299
was that. But even after he was officially fired,

00:15:58.759 --> 00:16:01.480
His influence was so crucial that he continued

00:16:01.480 --> 00:16:03.879
to appear on subsequent groundbreaking Davis

00:16:03.879 --> 00:16:07.460
records like In a Silent Way and On the Corner

00:16:07.460 --> 00:16:10.279
for a few more years. The connection wasn't totally

00:16:10.279 --> 00:16:12.639
severed, but the baton had definitely been passed.

00:16:12.940 --> 00:16:15.919
So moving into the 1970s, Hancock's electronic

00:16:15.919 --> 00:16:19.000
exploration just accelerates rapidly. This is

00:16:19.000 --> 00:16:21.200
driven by the freedom he got after leaving Blue

00:16:21.200 --> 00:16:24.139
Note in 1969 and signing with Warner Bros. And

00:16:24.139 --> 00:16:27.080
his first ever was surprisingly R &amp;B inflected.

00:16:27.340 --> 00:16:29.379
He composed the soundtrack for that Bill Cosby

00:16:29.379 --> 00:16:31.440
animated special, Hey Hey Hey, It's Fat Albert.

00:16:31.620 --> 00:16:33.820
Right, with the music included on the album Fat

00:16:33.820 --> 00:16:36.639
Albert Rotunda, it had a strong R &amp;B and jazz

00:16:36.639 --> 00:16:39.379
flavor moving closer to the popular groove. But

00:16:39.379 --> 00:16:42.299
then came the deep, abstract dive into pure electronic

00:16:42.299 --> 00:16:45.399
exploration, heavily influenced by Miles Davis'

00:16:45.639 --> 00:16:47.940
Bitches Brew and this emerging world of modular

00:16:47.940 --> 00:16:50.840
synthesis. This led to his most abstract and

00:16:50.840 --> 00:16:53.639
technically demanding phase, the Mondishi era.

00:16:54.000 --> 00:16:56.320
Absolutely. This is where the engineering and

00:16:56.320 --> 00:16:59.720
musical minds just collide dramatically. He became

00:16:59.720 --> 00:17:01.899
obsessed with electronic musical instruments.

00:17:02.120 --> 00:17:04.059
And the Wandishi period, running roughly from

00:17:04.059 --> 00:17:08.119
71 to 73, was based around this incredible sextet

00:17:08.119 --> 00:17:10.880
or septet. It was a monster band. Buster Williams,

00:17:11.220 --> 00:17:13.519
Billy Hart, Eddie Henderson, Julian Priester,

00:17:13.640 --> 00:17:16.059
and Benny Maupin. And critically, they brought

00:17:16.059 --> 00:17:19.200
in Patrick Gleason specifically to handle the

00:17:19.200 --> 00:17:22.000
complex, state -of -the -art synthesizers. The

00:17:22.000 --> 00:17:24.519
name itself, Wandishi. is a statement of intent

00:17:24.519 --> 00:17:27.420
right it's swahili for writer it implies creation

00:17:28.329 --> 00:17:31.829
Deep conceptual work. And the music was so far

00:17:31.829 --> 00:17:34.470
removed from post -box swing. It was cosmic,

00:17:34.589 --> 00:17:37.029
textural, highly abstract. It was sonic science

00:17:37.029 --> 00:17:39.869
fiction. Totally. Characterized by strong improvisational

00:17:39.869 --> 00:17:42.210
aspects and showing a heavy influence from contemporary

00:17:42.210 --> 00:17:44.569
classical electronic composers like Karlheinz

00:17:44.569 --> 00:17:47.750
Stockhausen. It was deep avant -garde jazz fusion.

00:17:48.150 --> 00:17:50.730
And the specific year here really tells the story

00:17:50.730 --> 00:17:52.349
of the sound. It wasn't just the Fender Rhodes

00:17:52.349 --> 00:17:54.569
anymore. This was a technological fortress. It

00:17:54.569 --> 00:17:57.250
was a massive rig for the early 70s. They used

00:17:57.250 --> 00:18:00.500
the Rhodes. Sure. But they layered in these pioneering

00:18:00.500 --> 00:18:04.200
modular synths, the ARP Odyssey, the huge ARP

00:18:04.200 --> 00:18:06.980
2600. Which was known for its flexibility. Exactly.

00:18:07.240 --> 00:18:11.240
And the ARP Pro Soloist synthesizer and the colossal

00:18:11.240 --> 00:18:14.539
room size Moog synthesizer, the third. The Mellotron

00:18:14.539 --> 00:18:16.599
was also key. For the listener who might not

00:18:16.599 --> 00:18:18.980
be familiar, what does a Mellotron bring to that

00:18:18.980 --> 00:18:22.789
sound compared to a pure synthesizer? The Mellotron

00:18:22.789 --> 00:18:25.549
is an electromechanical keyboard. It uses tape

00:18:25.549 --> 00:18:28.210
loops of recorded instrument strings, brass,

00:18:28.450 --> 00:18:31.650
a choir, to create this lush, eerie, and often

00:18:31.650 --> 00:18:35.130
unstable sonic texture. So in the context of

00:18:35.130 --> 00:18:37.450
Mondishi, it provided those sprawling atmospheric

00:18:37.450 --> 00:18:40.309
textures that made the albums Mondishi, Crossings,

00:18:40.309 --> 00:18:42.589
and Sextant sound so much larger and more ambient

00:18:42.589 --> 00:18:45.329
than traditional jazz records. They truly pushed

00:18:45.329 --> 00:18:47.009
the instruments to their limits. It was high

00:18:47.009 --> 00:18:49.089
art fusion, but high art is often commercially

00:18:49.089 --> 00:18:51.349
challenging. Yeah, the Mondishi era, while...

00:18:51.369 --> 00:18:53.410
artistically fertile was not commercially sustainable.

00:18:53.789 --> 00:18:57.789
So in 1973, Hancock made an abrupt but very calculated

00:18:57.789 --> 00:19:00.829
pivot. He made a deliberate decision to reconnect

00:19:00.829 --> 00:19:03.549
with his Chicago roots and the R &amp;B grooves he

00:19:03.549 --> 00:19:06.059
loved. Right. He argued that he needed to play

00:19:06.059 --> 00:19:08.240
music that people could feel and relate to instantly,

00:19:08.460 --> 00:19:11.099
so he streamlined the band, kept only Benny Martin,

00:19:11.380 --> 00:19:13.960
and formed the Headhunters. Adding the funk masters

00:19:13.960 --> 00:19:16.720
Paul Jackson on bass, Bill Summers on percussion,

00:19:17.059 --> 00:19:19.500
and Harvey Mason on drums. And this change of

00:19:19.500 --> 00:19:22.099
focus resulted in the album Headhunters in 1973.

00:19:22.539 --> 00:19:24.839
This was the revolution that defined the genre

00:19:24.839 --> 00:19:27.339
for a generation. It was instantaneous. Completely.

00:19:28.140 --> 00:19:30.420
Headhunters stripped away the ambient complexity

00:19:30.420 --> 00:19:33.740
of Muandishi and focused instead on rhythmically.

00:19:33.769 --> 00:19:36.789
lock, and deep funk groove, all delivered through

00:19:36.789 --> 00:19:39.970
a precise electronic medium. It became a massive

00:19:39.970 --> 00:19:42.210
commercial hit, crossed over to pop audiences,

00:19:42.490 --> 00:19:45.349
got widespread recognition. But we do have to

00:19:45.349 --> 00:19:47.710
note the critique. For sure. Within the strict

00:19:47.710 --> 00:19:50.450
academic jazz community, it faced a lot of criticism

00:19:50.450 --> 00:19:54.089
for being too commercial, too simple. for prioritizing

00:19:54.089 --> 00:19:57.769
groove over complex harmonic improvisation. So

00:19:57.769 --> 00:20:00.210
how did the success of Headhunters change the

00:20:00.210 --> 00:20:02.529
internal dynamics of the jazz world at that time?

00:20:02.589 --> 00:20:04.890
Was the scene a selling out or innovating? It

00:20:04.890 --> 00:20:07.650
was absolutely divisive. For older jazz musicians,

00:20:08.049 --> 00:20:10.950
it was selling out. It replaced the intellectual

00:20:10.950 --> 00:20:14.250
purity of post -bop with the relentless syncopation

00:20:14.250 --> 00:20:16.890
of funk. But for the younger generation, it was

00:20:16.890 --> 00:20:19.430
pure innovation. A sign that jazz could engage

00:20:19.430 --> 00:20:21.460
with the music of the street. It was a bridge.

00:20:21.700 --> 00:20:24.779
Exactly. And the enduring impact is massive.

00:20:24.859 --> 00:20:27.460
The sources confirm AllMusic noted that it still

00:20:27.460 --> 00:20:30.000
sounds fresh and vital three decades after its

00:20:30.000 --> 00:20:32.380
initial release, and its genre bending proved

00:20:32.380 --> 00:20:35.599
vastly influential on not only jazz, but funk,

00:20:35.740 --> 00:20:38.279
soul, and hip -hop. You just have to listen to

00:20:38.279 --> 00:20:40.859
the track, Chameleon. That bass line, played

00:20:40.859 --> 00:20:42.880
by Paul Jackson, is often cited as one of the

00:20:42.880 --> 00:20:45.559
most foundational funk grooves of the 20th century.

00:20:45.920 --> 00:20:48.700
It's repetitive, heavily syncopated, and perfectly

00:20:48.700 --> 00:20:51.200
synthesized. It's the engineer's mind applying

00:20:51.200 --> 00:20:54.220
structural rigor to dance music. And they revisited

00:20:54.220 --> 00:20:56.359
Watermelon Man from his debut, but they just

00:20:56.359 --> 00:20:58.460
transformed it. Totally. They added indigenous

00:20:58.460 --> 00:21:01.460
sounds, but kept that core groove. This was fusion

00:21:01.460 --> 00:21:03.960
defined. The success was immediate. They quickly

00:21:03.960 --> 00:21:06.920
released a follow -up thrust in 74, which saw

00:21:06.920 --> 00:21:09.920
Mike Clark replace Harvey Mason on drums. And

00:21:09.920 --> 00:21:12.359
they released that excellent live album from

00:21:12.359 --> 00:21:16.460
Japan, Flood, in 1975. The Headhunters proved

00:21:16.460 --> 00:21:19.180
that electrified, funky jazz was commercially

00:21:19.180 --> 00:21:22.859
viable both in the studio and on stage. Alongside

00:21:22.859 --> 00:21:25.579
this jazz -funk trajectory, he was still balancing

00:21:25.579 --> 00:21:27.960
his scoring work. He composed the score for the

00:21:27.960 --> 00:21:30.119
controversial film The Spook, who sat by the

00:21:30.119 --> 00:21:32.960
door in 73. A work that blended funk and experimental

00:21:32.960 --> 00:21:36.019
sounds, yeah. And the following year, the soundtrack

00:21:36.019 --> 00:21:39.130
for the first Death Wish film. So the transition

00:21:39.130 --> 00:21:41.549
toward more commercial jazz funk sounds continued

00:21:41.549 --> 00:21:44.049
right through the mid 70s with albums like Man

00:21:44.049 --> 00:21:46.759
Child and Secrets. And while these featured members

00:21:46.759 --> 00:21:49.119
of the Headhunters, they weren't billed as the

00:21:49.119 --> 00:21:51.859
full group anymore. Right. Hancock was building

00:21:51.859 --> 00:21:54.420
an empire based on groove and electronic texture.

00:21:54.599 --> 00:21:57.039
This period really represents the pinnacle of

00:21:57.039 --> 00:21:59.000
his shift from the acoustic architect of post

00:21:59.000 --> 00:22:01.420
-bop to the electronic innovator of jazz funk.

00:22:01.599 --> 00:22:04.079
He successfully navigated that really challenging

00:22:04.079 --> 00:22:07.680
terrain between artistic purity and massive commercial

00:22:07.680 --> 00:22:11.039
success. And in doing so, he fundamentally changed

00:22:11.039 --> 00:22:13.400
the expectations of a jazz musician's career.

00:22:14.349 --> 00:22:16.930
As we move into the late 70s and 80s, Hancock's

00:22:16.930 --> 00:22:19.710
career becomes this fascinating exercise in dichotomy.

00:22:19.930 --> 00:22:22.730
He's simultaneously embracing an acoustic revival,

00:22:23.069 --> 00:22:26.299
cementing his jazz legacy. While diving headfirst

00:22:26.299 --> 00:22:29.319
into electronic disco and pioneering hip -hop

00:22:29.319 --> 00:22:31.880
sounds, he was truly living two musical lives.

00:22:32.079 --> 00:22:34.220
Let's look at the acoustic work first, because

00:22:34.220 --> 00:22:36.539
it was so vital to balance all that electronic

00:22:36.539 --> 00:22:39.240
experimentation. For sure. He recorded a significant

00:22:39.240 --> 00:22:42.000
duet album with Chick Corea, which must have

00:22:42.000 --> 00:22:43.720
been a satisfying collaboration, considering

00:22:43.720 --> 00:22:45.720
Corea had replaced him in the Miles Davis band

00:22:45.720 --> 00:22:48.400
years earlier. And he also released the solo

00:22:48.400 --> 00:22:51.880
acoustic album The Piano in 1979. And this is

00:22:51.880 --> 00:22:54.930
where the VSOP era began. Very special one -time

00:22:54.930 --> 00:22:58.190
performance. It started around 76, and it essentially

00:22:58.190 --> 00:23:00.089
became an acoustic reunion tour for the Miles

00:23:00.089 --> 00:23:02.690
Davis Rhythm Section. It was a beautiful return

00:23:02.690 --> 00:23:05.710
to form, touring with his legendary former partners,

00:23:05.990 --> 00:23:09.230
Tony Williams and Ron Carter. They proved that

00:23:09.230 --> 00:23:11.329
the magic of that rhythm section hadn't faded

00:23:11.329 --> 00:23:14.190
at all. They recorded albums like Herbie Hancock

00:23:14.190 --> 00:23:17.630
Trio in 1981. Right. They were reaffirming the

00:23:17.630 --> 00:23:19.910
integrity of the acoustic tradition at the very

00:23:19.910 --> 00:23:22.069
same time they were defining the electronic future.

00:23:22.619 --> 00:23:26.140
The VSOP concept then expanded into VSOP2 when

00:23:26.140 --> 00:23:28.579
Hancock, Williams and Carter toured internationally

00:23:28.579 --> 00:23:31.579
with the emerging stars of the new traditionalist

00:23:31.579 --> 00:23:34.140
movement, the Marsalis Brothers. Winton and Brantford,

00:23:34.200 --> 00:23:36.839
yeah. That quintet is featured on Wynton Marsalis'

00:23:37.079 --> 00:23:40.460
debut album in 1981. They even performed at the

00:23:40.460 --> 00:23:43.519
Playboy Jazz Festival in 84 as a sextet, adding

00:23:43.519 --> 00:23:46.200
the vocal brilliance of Bobby McBaron. So on

00:23:46.200 --> 00:23:48.680
one hand, he's cementing his acoustic jazz legend

00:23:48.680 --> 00:23:50.759
status. But in the other, he's embracing the

00:23:50.759 --> 00:23:53.460
era of disco and synthesized pop with gusto.

00:23:54.039 --> 00:23:57.019
From 78 to 82, he recorded several albums of

00:23:57.019 --> 00:23:58.980
jazz -inflected disco using the technological

00:23:58.980 --> 00:24:01.839
tools he'd perfected in the Melon Dishi and Headhunters

00:24:01.839 --> 00:24:04.779
eras for pure commercial appeal. And the album

00:24:04.779 --> 00:24:07.900
Sunlight from 78 is notable because it introduced

00:24:07.900 --> 00:24:10.500
his distinctive use of the vocoder. Right. A

00:24:10.500 --> 00:24:13.160
device that uses a synthesizer to modify the

00:24:13.160 --> 00:24:15.960
human voice. The vocoder allowed him to sing,

00:24:16.000 --> 00:24:19.119
but in this totally synthetic robotic way, which

00:24:19.119 --> 00:24:21.960
was extremely novel at the time. And this resulted

00:24:21.960 --> 00:24:24.819
in the British hit, I Thought It Was You. It

00:24:24.819 --> 00:24:27.819
did. And he continued that vocoder sound with

00:24:27.819 --> 00:24:31.799
Feats' Don't Fail Me Now in 79, which gave him

00:24:31.799 --> 00:24:34.640
another UK hit, You Bet Your Love. Critics at

00:24:34.640 --> 00:24:37.980
the time were, let's say, largely unimpressed

00:24:37.980 --> 00:24:40.420
with this commercial direction. But Herbie was

00:24:40.420 --> 00:24:43.079
just exploring the absolute limits of the tools

00:24:43.079 --> 00:24:45.500
at his disposal. He was preparing for the next,

00:24:45.559 --> 00:24:48.910
even larger leap. That exploration paid off massively

00:24:48.910 --> 00:24:51.890
in 1983 with his collaboration with the experimental

00:24:51.890 --> 00:24:55.170
bassist and producer Bill Laswell. This partnership

00:24:55.170 --> 00:24:57.750
truly pushed him into the global pop stratosphere.

00:24:57.930 --> 00:24:59.970
This is where his engineering mind and his sense

00:24:59.970 --> 00:25:01.990
of rhythm found their perfect 80s expression.

00:25:02.250 --> 00:25:04.670
The collaboration resulted in the Future Shock

00:25:04.670 --> 00:25:06.710
trilogy, starting with the album Future Shock

00:25:06.710 --> 00:25:10.349
in 83, and the seismic single Rocket. An international

00:25:10.349 --> 00:25:12.990
pop hit, a Grammy Award winner, and one of the

00:25:12.990 --> 00:25:15.400
defining songs of the decade. And it's historically

00:25:15.400 --> 00:25:18.180
cited as the first jazz hip hop song. It just

00:25:18.180 --> 00:25:20.279
exploded the boundaries of what a jazz musician

00:25:20.279 --> 00:25:22.700
could accomplish. Rocket became an anthem for

00:25:22.700 --> 00:25:25.380
break dancers worldwide and a foundational text

00:25:25.380 --> 00:25:27.579
for the hip hop movement in the 80s. But its

00:25:27.579 --> 00:25:30.019
revolutionary aspect was intensely technical.

00:25:30.259 --> 00:25:33.359
It was the first mainstream non -rap single by

00:25:33.359 --> 00:25:36.200
an established jazz artist, no less to feature

00:25:36.200 --> 00:25:38.599
scratching so prominently. OK, let's clarify

00:25:38.599 --> 00:25:41.130
that for the audience. What exactly was scratching

00:25:41.130 --> 00:25:43.829
and why was it so shocking to hear on a global

00:25:43.829 --> 00:25:47.990
pot hit in 1983? So scratching is the rhythmic

00:25:47.990 --> 00:25:50.690
manipulation of a vinyl record by a turntab list.

00:25:50.869 --> 00:25:53.589
In this case, the great DJ Grand Mixer, DXT,

00:25:53.750 --> 00:25:56.069
while the needle is playing. It creates these

00:25:56.069 --> 00:25:58.809
unique, percussive and often abrasive sounds.

00:25:59.150 --> 00:26:01.410
And before Rocket, this was almost exclusively

00:26:01.410 --> 00:26:03.950
the domain of underground hip hop DJs. Completely.

00:26:03.990 --> 00:26:07.190
So putting that raw, urban, technically demanding

00:26:07.190 --> 00:26:09.809
and entirely new sonic texture front and center

00:26:09.809 --> 00:26:12.210
on a Grammy winning record, it meant Hancock

00:26:12.210 --> 00:26:14.930
instantly legitimized the turntable as a genuine

00:26:14.930 --> 00:26:24.160
musical instrument. And the music video was just

00:26:24.160 --> 00:26:26.900
as revolutionary. Directed by Godley and Krem

00:26:26.900 --> 00:26:29.819
with these incredible, unsettling, robot -like

00:26:29.819 --> 00:26:32.279
artworks by Jim Whiting. A visual masterpiece

00:26:32.279 --> 00:26:35.279
that matched the futurism of the music. It was

00:26:35.279 --> 00:26:38.019
an instant smash on the fledgling MTV network,

00:26:38.119 --> 00:26:40.660
and it won five awards at the very first MTV

00:26:40.660 --> 00:26:43.859
Video Music Awards. A true multimedia phenomenon.

00:26:44.779 --> 00:26:47.380
he wasn't just chasing trends, he was dictating

00:26:47.380 --> 00:26:49.769
them. And his electronic experimentation with

00:26:49.769 --> 00:26:52.569
Laswell continued, cementing his status as a

00:26:52.569 --> 00:26:55.289
sonic futurist on the Grammy -winning Sound System

00:26:55.289 --> 00:26:58.390
in 84 and Perfect Machine in 88. But while he

00:26:58.390 --> 00:27:00.410
was pushing the boundaries of technology, he

00:27:00.410 --> 00:27:02.609
didn't abandon his more traditional musical skills.

00:27:02.869 --> 00:27:05.630
In fact, he achieved his highest non -music industry

00:27:05.630 --> 00:27:08.150
honor during this period by combining his acting

00:27:08.150 --> 00:27:10.329
and scoring abilities. That would be the Academy

00:27:10.329 --> 00:27:12.609
Award. He won the Oscar for Best Original Music

00:27:12.609 --> 00:27:15.990
Score for the film Round Midnight in 1986, a

00:27:15.990 --> 00:27:18.269
beautiful film about... the jazz scene in which

00:27:18.269 --> 00:27:20.549
he also acted, playing the character Eddie Wayne.

00:27:20.869 --> 00:27:23.490
Winning an Oscar in the mid 80s while you have

00:27:23.490 --> 00:27:25.769
top 10 electro funk hits and you're touring with

00:27:25.769 --> 00:27:28.509
Wynton Marsalis is, I mean, that's a staggering

00:27:28.509 --> 00:27:31.109
feat of professional versatility. It's a level

00:27:31.109 --> 00:27:34.029
few artists in history have ever matched. And

00:27:34.029 --> 00:27:36.789
he had a prolific film scoring run during this

00:27:36.789 --> 00:27:40.829
time, including A Soldier's Story. Joe Dancer,

00:27:40.970 --> 00:27:43.930
Your Life is Calling, Action Jackson, and Colors.

00:27:44.049 --> 00:27:46.390
And he was still exploring world music textures,

00:27:46.470 --> 00:27:49.309
which just speaks to his restless nature. He

00:27:49.309 --> 00:27:51.589
recorded Village Life with the Gambian Chora

00:27:51.589 --> 00:27:54.839
player Foday Musasuso. and the live Jazz Africa

00:27:54.839 --> 00:27:57.720
in 87. After the perfect machine tour, having

00:27:57.720 --> 00:27:59.799
pushed the limits of Columbia Records for 15

00:27:59.799 --> 00:28:02.559
years, he decided to leave the label ready for

00:28:02.559 --> 00:28:04.859
the next phase of reinvention. So as we move

00:28:04.859 --> 00:28:07.480
into the 1990s and beyond, Hancock enters this

00:28:07.480 --> 00:28:10.059
phase defined by profound tributes, critical

00:28:10.059 --> 00:28:12.519
institutionalization, and continuous high -profile

00:28:12.519 --> 00:28:14.660
collaborations. Proving he was still determined

00:28:14.660 --> 00:28:17.279
to reinvent himself every few years, even as

00:28:17.279 --> 00:28:19.519
he entered his 50s and 60s. The decade started

00:28:19.519 --> 00:28:21.700
with a major touring group. He toured with Jack

00:28:21.700 --> 00:28:24.450
D. Jeanette, Dave Colin, and Pat Metheny on the

00:28:24.450 --> 00:28:28.150
1990 Parallel Realities Tour, a powerhouse quartet

00:28:28.150 --> 00:28:30.750
of modern virtuosos. But the most significant

00:28:30.750 --> 00:28:34.609
reunion came in 1994. That was the A Tribute

00:28:34.609 --> 00:28:37.150
to Miles album. He reunited with the surviving

00:28:37.150 --> 00:28:39.569
members of the second great quintet Ron Carter,

00:28:39.849 --> 00:28:42.569
Tony Williams, and Wayne Shorter, with Wallace

00:28:42.569 --> 00:28:44.849
Roney playing Davis' trumpet part. That must

00:28:44.849 --> 00:28:46.609
have been a critical moment for the jazz world.

00:28:46.750 --> 00:28:49.349
Oh, it was huge. It demonstrated the enduring

00:28:49.349 --> 00:28:51.730
power and structural integrity of that original

00:28:51.730 --> 00:28:54.730
rhythm section. It won a Grammy for Best Group

00:28:54.730 --> 00:28:57.750
Album. But true to form, after this return to

00:28:57.750 --> 00:29:00.690
acoustic jazz royalty, he immediately swung back

00:29:00.690 --> 00:29:03.670
to genre bending. Right. Releasing the acid jazz

00:29:03.670 --> 00:29:07.549
album This Is Da Drum in 1994, fully integrating

00:29:07.549 --> 00:29:09.950
the complex rhythmic structures of hip hop and

00:29:09.950 --> 00:29:12.930
electronica into his compositional ideas. He

00:29:12.930 --> 00:29:15.009
was never content to stay in one lane for long.

00:29:15.210 --> 00:29:17.430
And he proved his willingness to engage with

00:29:17.430 --> 00:29:19.549
contemporary popular music from a compositional

00:29:19.549 --> 00:29:22.990
standpoint, too. In 1995, his album The New Standard.

00:29:23.329 --> 00:29:25.490
Right. It featured an all -star band interpreting

00:29:25.490 --> 00:29:28.069
pop songs by giants like Nirvana. They did all

00:29:28.069 --> 00:29:30.569
apologies. Stevie Wonder, Prince, and The Beatles.

00:29:31.150 --> 00:29:33.069
That's a radical way of looking at what constitutes

00:29:33.069 --> 00:29:36.109
a standard. He was basically arguing that musical

00:29:36.109 --> 00:29:38.890
longevity isn't just confined to Broadway tunes

00:29:38.890 --> 00:29:41.930
or old jazz classics. Exactly, that it's inherent

00:29:41.930 --> 00:29:45.009
in quality pop composition. Then he released

00:29:45.009 --> 00:29:48.190
a significant duet album in 97, One Plus One,

00:29:48.410 --> 00:29:50.869
with his longtime collaborator Wayne Shorter.

00:29:51.089 --> 00:29:53.730
Their musical connection had always been profound.

00:29:54.089 --> 00:29:56.630
And one of the compositions, Aung San Suu Kyi,

00:29:56.910 --> 00:29:59.650
was recognized with a Grammy for Best Instrumental

00:29:59.650 --> 00:30:02.400
Composition. just showcasing their continued,

00:30:02.559 --> 00:30:05.440
nuanced, compositional output. And he closed

00:30:05.440 --> 00:30:07.700
out the decade with a massive commercial and

00:30:07.700 --> 00:30:10.660
critical hit, Gershwin's World, in 98. It achieved

00:30:10.660 --> 00:30:13.579
great success by featuring this wide array of

00:30:13.579 --> 00:30:15.839
guest stars, Stevie Wonder, Kathleen Battle,

00:30:16.059 --> 00:30:18.619
Joni Mitchell, linking his classical and jazz

00:30:18.619 --> 00:30:21.359
roots to the great American songbook. Moving

00:30:21.359 --> 00:30:24.299
into the 21st century, he continued his electronica

00:30:24.299 --> 00:30:27.940
focus. Future 2 Future in 2001 reunited him with

00:30:27.940 --> 00:30:30.690
Bill Laswell. And brought in the modern turntablist

00:30:30.690 --> 00:30:33.329
Rob Swift, demonstrating that he was still adapting

00:30:33.329 --> 00:30:35.569
to new sound technology and staying relevant,

00:30:35.750 --> 00:30:37.869
not just becoming a jazz traditionalist resting

00:30:37.869 --> 00:30:40.049
on his laurels. But the straight jazz tradition

00:30:40.049 --> 00:30:43.650
wasn't forgotten. Also in 2001, he partnered

00:30:43.650 --> 00:30:46.069
with Michael Brecker and Roy Hargrove for the

00:30:46.069 --> 00:30:49.170
live album Directions in Music, live at Massey

00:30:49.170 --> 00:30:51.710
Hall. A tribute to Miles Davis and John Coltrane.

00:30:52.190 --> 00:30:54.950
It won a Grammy for best jazz instrumental album.

00:30:55.170 --> 00:30:57.589
He was proving he could move effortlessly between

00:30:57.589 --> 00:30:59.829
the most demanding acoustic jazz and cutting

00:30:59.829 --> 00:31:02.869
-edge electronic sounds. Then came the high -profile

00:31:02.869 --> 00:31:06.910
pop duets of the mid -2000s. The 2005 album Possibilities

00:31:06.910 --> 00:31:09.950
featured duets with commercial powerhouses. Carlos

00:31:09.950 --> 00:31:12.470
Santana, Paul Simon, Annie Lennox, Christina

00:31:12.470 --> 00:31:15.710
Aguilera, Sting. This was a clear strategy to

00:31:15.710 --> 00:31:17.650
reach the broadest possible audience with his

00:31:17.650 --> 00:31:20.839
unique musicality and compositional rigor. The

00:31:20.839 --> 00:31:23.180
pinnacle of his modern success has to be his

00:31:23.180 --> 00:31:25.160
tribute to his friend and collaborator, Joni

00:31:25.160 --> 00:31:28.559
Mitchell. Oh, River. The Joni Letters from 2007

00:31:28.559 --> 00:31:30.900
was a masterpiece of restraint and interpretation.

00:31:31.339 --> 00:31:34.220
It featured vocalists like Nora Jones, Tina Turner,

00:31:34.420 --> 00:31:36.440
and Corinne Bailey Ray, with Mitchell herself

00:31:36.440 --> 00:31:39.259
appearing, and Leonard Cohen contributing a spoken

00:31:39.259 --> 00:31:42.140
piece. He approached Mitchell's intensely personal

00:31:42.140 --> 00:31:45.200
and complex compositions with the same harmonic

00:31:45.200 --> 00:31:47.900
sophistication he used in Post Bop. And this

00:31:47.900 --> 00:31:51.470
album was history -making. It won the 2008 Grammy

00:31:51.470 --> 00:31:53.589
for Album of the Year. Which is critical to remember.

00:31:53.730 --> 00:31:55.630
It made it only the second time in history a

00:31:55.630 --> 00:31:59.069
jazz album had won that prestigious cross -genre

00:31:59.069 --> 00:32:01.589
award. Right. It speaks volumes about the universality

00:32:01.589 --> 00:32:04.130
and the structural appeal of his musicianship.

00:32:04.210 --> 00:32:06.470
He continued that collaborative, global focus

00:32:06.470 --> 00:32:10.210
with the Imagine Project in 2010. And beyond

00:32:10.210 --> 00:32:12.950
recording, his legacy is now cemented in the

00:32:12.950 --> 00:32:16.000
academic world. For sure. Since 2012, Hancock

00:32:16.000 --> 00:32:18.539
has been a professor at the UCLA Herb Alpert

00:32:18.539 --> 00:32:21.119
School of Music. And he holds a foundational

00:32:21.119 --> 00:32:23.299
leadership role as the chairman of the Herbie

00:32:23.299 --> 00:32:25.880
Hancock Institute of Jazz, which was formerly

00:32:25.880 --> 00:32:28.720
known as the Thelonious Monk Institute until

00:32:28.720 --> 00:32:31.759
2019. He was also named a UNESCO Goodwill Ambassador

00:32:31.759 --> 00:32:34.740
for Intercultural Dialogue in 2011. These aren't

00:32:34.740 --> 00:32:37.019
just honorary titles. They're active roles in

00:32:37.019 --> 00:32:39.240
shaping the future of music education. But for

00:32:39.240 --> 00:32:41.880
those truly interested in the intellectual scaffolding

00:32:41.880 --> 00:32:44.200
behind his music, his most... significant academic

00:32:44.200 --> 00:32:47.220
contribution might be those Charles Eliot Norton,

00:32:47.359 --> 00:32:49.539
professor of poetry lectures he delivered at

00:32:49.539 --> 00:32:52.920
Harvard in 2014. Yeah, focused entirely on the

00:32:52.920 --> 00:32:55.700
theme, the ethics of jazz. This is where he really

00:32:55.700 --> 00:32:57.940
formalized that philosophical connection between

00:32:57.940 --> 00:33:00.720
his engineering mind, his Buddhist practice,

00:33:00.880 --> 00:33:03.299
and his improvisational music. And he's still

00:33:03.299 --> 00:33:06.599
actively creating and looking forward. His upcoming

00:33:06.599 --> 00:33:08.880
album is being produced by modern heavyweights

00:33:08.880 --> 00:33:10.980
like Terrace Martin. And it's stacked with the

00:33:10.980 --> 00:33:13.460
vanguard of contemporary music, Kendrick Lamar,

00:33:13.660 --> 00:33:16.460
Kamasi Washington, Thundercat, Flying Lotus,

00:33:16.740 --> 00:33:19.720
Snoop Dogg. It just shows he is still connecting

00:33:19.720 --> 00:33:22.339
with new generations and new sonic textures.

00:33:22.640 --> 00:33:25.059
His career awards snapshot is just staggering.

00:33:25.319 --> 00:33:28.900
14 Grammy Awards, the 86 Academy Award, Kennedy

00:33:28.900 --> 00:33:32.019
Center Honors in 2013. And he was even named

00:33:32.019 --> 00:33:34.980
a 2025 laureate for the prestigious Polar Music

00:33:34.980 --> 00:33:37.960
Prize. He is one of the very few artists whose

00:33:37.960 --> 00:33:40.619
influence is recognized. across every major field

00:33:40.619 --> 00:33:42.960
of performance and composition, from the concert

00:33:42.960 --> 00:33:45.359
hall to the DJ booth. We've covered the music,

00:33:45.480 --> 00:33:48.079
the technology, and the academic legacy, but

00:33:48.079 --> 00:33:50.380
the deep dive always looks beyond the discography

00:33:50.380 --> 00:33:52.859
for the personal stories and philosophies that

00:33:52.859 --> 00:33:54.880
ground the legend. Right. Herbie Hancock has

00:33:54.880 --> 00:33:57.240
been married to Gigi Meixner since 1968, and

00:33:57.240 --> 00:34:00.099
they have a daughter. And Gigi is clearly a vital

00:34:00.099 --> 00:34:02.579
pillar of his life and career. He described her

00:34:02.579 --> 00:34:05.180
in his memoir as deeply compassionate, but also

00:34:05.180 --> 00:34:07.400
as someone who won't let you get away with anything,

00:34:07.660 --> 00:34:10.179
noting that she was the one who kept him honest.

00:34:10.559 --> 00:34:13.000
That suggests a crucial source of grounding and

00:34:13.000 --> 00:34:16.000
accountability in a life full of creative upheaval

00:34:16.000 --> 00:34:19.280
and professional pressures. Absolutely. Tragedy

00:34:19.280 --> 00:34:21.260
did strike, however, during his commercial peak.

00:34:21.440 --> 00:34:23.760
We should mention the loss of his sister, Jean.

00:34:24.400 --> 00:34:26.400
She's a computer consultant and a really talented

00:34:26.400 --> 00:34:29.960
lyricist who wrote for him, for Earth, Wind and

00:34:29.960 --> 00:34:32.539
Fire, and others. And she was tragically killed

00:34:32.539 --> 00:34:35.840
in the 1985 Delta Airlines Flight 191 crash.

00:34:36.199 --> 00:34:39.219
That kind of sudden loss is just immense. And

00:34:39.219 --> 00:34:42.340
speaking of immense personal struggles, his 2014

00:34:42.340 --> 00:34:45.239
memoir Possibilities revealed a very difficult

00:34:45.239 --> 00:34:48.260
period in the 1990s where he bravely discussed

00:34:48.260 --> 00:34:51.079
his battle with crack cocaine addiction. He detailed

00:34:51.079 --> 00:34:53.440
that his wife and daughter orchestrated an intervention

00:34:53.440 --> 00:34:56.019
to get him help. He described the moment not

00:34:56.019 --> 00:34:58.579
just as embarrassing, but also as a massive relief.

00:34:58.840 --> 00:35:01.340
Realizing the struggle and the secret were finally

00:35:01.340 --> 00:35:04.099
going to end. Exactly, allowing him to get sober.

00:35:04.460 --> 00:35:07.519
This resilience and ability to confront massive

00:35:07.519 --> 00:35:10.340
personal challenges is often overlooked, but

00:35:10.340 --> 00:35:12.539
it perfectly mirrors the philosophical basis

00:35:12.539 --> 00:35:15.920
of his art. Continuous, radical self -transformation.

00:35:16.260 --> 00:35:19.010
And this resilience. This capacity for change

00:35:19.010 --> 00:35:21.969
is so strongly connected to his spiritual life.

00:35:22.230 --> 00:35:26.090
Since 1972, Hancock has practiced Nichiren Buddhism

00:35:26.090 --> 00:35:28.190
as a member of the Soka Gakkai International.

00:35:28.670 --> 00:35:31.110
Part of his practice includes the daily recitation

00:35:31.110 --> 00:35:33.829
of the Buddhist chant Nam -myoho -renge -kyo.

00:35:34.269 --> 00:35:36.889
So how does this spiritual focus connect with

00:35:36.889 --> 00:35:38.750
the restless innovator we've been discussing?

00:35:38.989 --> 00:35:41.949
The connection is central to his worldview. Nichiren

00:35:41.949 --> 00:35:44.710
Buddhism emphasizes the concept of changing poison

00:35:44.710 --> 00:35:47.309
into medicine, turning personal struggle into

00:35:47.309 --> 00:35:50.150
positive action, and the inherent interconnectedness

00:35:50.150 --> 00:35:52.510
of cause and effect. And crucially, it promotes

00:35:52.510 --> 00:35:54.389
the idea that you contain everything you need

00:35:54.389 --> 00:35:56.150
to transform your life and your environment.

00:35:56.530 --> 00:35:59.230
So for an artist who constantly rejects stagnation

00:35:59.230 --> 00:36:01.889
and embraces new genres every five years, the

00:36:01.889 --> 00:36:03.909
philosophy of continuous self -transformation

00:36:03.909 --> 00:36:06.949
and pushing one's own perceived limits is a perfect

00:36:06.949 --> 00:36:10.059
spiritual anchor. It makes complete sense. The

00:36:10.059 --> 00:36:11.980
relentless pursuit of the next phase is driven

00:36:11.980 --> 00:36:14.820
by an internal philosophical mandate, not just

00:36:14.820 --> 00:36:17.059
commercial ambition. And the dialogue between

00:36:17.059 --> 00:36:19.860
Hancock, Wayne Shorter and Soka Gakkai International

00:36:19.860 --> 00:36:23.780
President Daisaku Akeda on jazz, Buddhism and

00:36:23.780 --> 00:36:27.219
life was published in 2013, which formalized

00:36:27.219 --> 00:36:29.519
this link. He also explicitly connected these

00:36:29.519 --> 00:36:32.840
ideas in his 2014 Harvard lecture titled Buddhism

00:36:32.840 --> 00:36:35.880
and Creativity. Now, for the final detail that

00:36:35.880 --> 00:36:38.219
perfectly encapsulates this blend of mechanical

00:36:38.219 --> 00:36:41.139
structure and pure cool. Let's go back to the

00:36:41.139 --> 00:36:43.340
car we mentioned earlier. It's more than just

00:36:43.340 --> 00:36:45.619
a rich man's hobby. It's a symbol of his. early

00:36:45.619 --> 00:36:49.739
engineering focus the 1963 ac shelby cobra he

00:36:49.739 --> 00:36:51.940
bought it at age 23 for six thousand dollars

00:36:51.940 --> 00:36:54.119
and he still owns it it's legendary among car

00:36:54.119 --> 00:36:57.960
collectors it is serial number csx 2006 the sixth

00:36:57.960 --> 00:37:00.860
cobra ever produced that alone is rare but the

00:37:00.860 --> 00:37:03.739
details make it unique it's one of only 75 originally

00:37:03.739 --> 00:37:06.679
produced with a smaller 260 cubic inch engine

00:37:06.679 --> 00:37:08.960
and it is the only cobra ever equipped with a

00:37:08.960 --> 00:37:11.179
two barrel carburetor that level of uniqueness

00:37:11.179 --> 00:37:13.400
and detail the absolute one -off configuration

00:37:13.400 --> 00:37:16.349
is extraordinary The fact that he recognized

00:37:16.349 --> 00:37:19.650
that detail, bought that machine, kept it running,

00:37:19.789 --> 00:37:22.909
and still appreciates its mechanical singularity

00:37:22.909 --> 00:37:25.230
today, it perfectly aligns with the electrical

00:37:25.230 --> 00:37:27.550
engineer side of his personality. Someone who

00:37:27.550 --> 00:37:29.610
understands and cherishes the inner workings

00:37:29.610 --> 00:37:32.329
of a complex, groundbreaking machine. That car

00:37:32.329 --> 00:37:34.150
is now estimated to be worth more than $2 million.

00:37:34.670 --> 00:37:37.469
And he plans to give the vehicle, which has been

00:37:37.469 --> 00:37:39.829
with him through the Miles Davis Quintet, the

00:37:39.829 --> 00:37:42.489
Mondishi era, the Headhunters revolution, and

00:37:42.489 --> 00:37:45.380
the hip -hop phenomenon. to his grandson. Wow.

00:37:45.900 --> 00:37:48.679
It passing on not just an asset, but a piece

00:37:48.679 --> 00:37:50.940
of history and a symbol of his life's journey.

00:37:51.539 --> 00:37:54.000
When you look back at Herbie Hancock's extraordinary

00:37:54.000 --> 00:37:57.139
multifaceted journey, what stands out is his

00:37:57.139 --> 00:38:00.139
relentless, almost philosophical commitment to

00:38:00.139 --> 00:38:02.719
continuous radical change. He took classical

00:38:02.719 --> 00:38:05.300
piano precision and applied it to post -bop innovation.

00:38:06.059 --> 00:38:08.059
Then he harnessed the structural rigor of his

00:38:08.059 --> 00:38:10.559
engineering mind to master complex electronic

00:38:10.559 --> 00:38:13.219
synthesizers, fusing them flawlessly with funk,

00:38:13.340 --> 00:38:15.840
hip -hop, and pop. His legacy isn't defined by

00:38:15.840 --> 00:38:18.920
one genre or one era, but by his unique ability

00:38:18.920 --> 00:38:21.039
to integrate these seemingly disparate elements.

00:38:21.420 --> 00:38:24.480
From the modal calm of Maiden Voyage to the deep

00:38:24.480 --> 00:38:27.059
groove of Headhunters and the technological shock

00:38:27.059 --> 00:38:30.019
of Rocket, he never stopped pushing the sonic

00:38:30.019 --> 00:38:33.019
envelope. He always saw the keyboard as an endless

00:38:33.019 --> 00:38:35.480
palette of possibilities. So what does this all

00:38:35.480 --> 00:38:38.019
mean for you, the learner? The fact that he was

00:38:38.019 --> 00:38:40.099
trained in electrical engineering, the fact that

00:38:40.099 --> 00:38:42.480
he practices a form of Buddhism focused on cause

00:38:42.480 --> 00:38:44.679
and effect and internal change, and the fact

00:38:44.679 --> 00:38:46.920
that he built a career on improvisation and structure.

00:38:47.719 --> 00:38:50.440
These three elements are inextricably linked

00:38:50.440 --> 00:38:53.519
in his art. They define him as the ultimate synthesist.

00:38:53.619 --> 00:38:55.820
Which raises an important question for you, the

00:38:55.820 --> 00:38:59.190
listener, to mull over. What creative power lies

00:38:59.190 --> 00:39:01.710
in Hancock's synthesis of rigid structure like

00:39:01.710 --> 00:39:04.889
engineering or classical music and constant intentional

00:39:04.889 --> 00:39:07.610
change like his Buddhist philosophy and his commitment

00:39:07.610 --> 00:39:09.929
to improvisation? And how does that approach,

00:39:10.110 --> 00:39:12.710
that refusal to stagnate, continue to shape the

00:39:12.710 --> 00:39:15.590
evolution of jazz and popular music today, influencing

00:39:15.590 --> 00:39:17.730
everyone from Flying Lotus to Kendrick Lamar?

00:39:17.929 --> 00:39:20.210
It's a deep dive that keeps going. We highly

00:39:20.210 --> 00:39:22.590
recommend exploring his Charles Elliot Norton

00:39:22.590 --> 00:39:25.320
Professor of Poetry lectures at Harvard. particularly

00:39:25.320 --> 00:39:27.960
the ethics of jazz, to delve further into that

00:39:27.960 --> 00:39:30.400
complex connection between philosophy and performance.

00:39:30.760 --> 00:39:33.159
Thank you for joining us for the deep dive into

00:39:33.159 --> 00:39:36.059
the extraordinary life and machines of Herbie

00:39:36.059 --> 00:39:36.480
Hancock.
