WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:01.860
Welcome back to the Deep Dive. You've given us

00:00:01.860 --> 00:00:03.779
the sources and we're here to pull out the most

00:00:03.779 --> 00:00:07.320
fascinating, need -to -know stuff. That's the

00:00:07.320 --> 00:00:09.820
plan. Today, we're diving deep into the career

00:00:09.820 --> 00:00:14.359
of Douglas Steven Benson, comedian, actor, host.

00:00:14.960 --> 00:00:18.050
It's quite a ride. It really is. We're looking

00:00:18.050 --> 00:00:20.510
at this arc, you know, from being an extra on

00:00:20.510 --> 00:00:23.910
classic movie sets through reality TV and then

00:00:23.910 --> 00:00:26.609
really hitting his stride in the kind of early

00:00:26.609 --> 00:00:29.449
days of podcasting and weed culture commentary.

00:00:29.690 --> 00:00:32.170
Exactly. And this isn't just about listing credits.

00:00:32.270 --> 00:00:35.289
It's about a whole brand, right? A career built

00:00:35.289 --> 00:00:37.770
on, yeah, the comedy, observational, satire,

00:00:37.770 --> 00:00:40.890
sarcasm, all that. But it's fundamentally linked

00:00:40.890 --> 00:00:44.869
to his very public, very open advocacy for recreational

00:00:44.869 --> 00:00:47.270
drug use. That's key. And what's really interesting

00:00:47.270 --> 00:00:49.810
is how he used that persona, that specific angle,

00:00:49.869 --> 00:00:53.649
to become this central figure in comedy podcasts

00:00:53.649 --> 00:00:55.950
when they were still pretty niche. Yeah, pioneer

00:00:55.950 --> 00:00:58.710
almost. Totally. And then translating that super

00:00:58.710 --> 00:01:02.270
specific brand to TV, even ending up with a legally

00:01:02.270 --> 00:01:04.530
binding court show. It's kind of wild when you

00:01:04.530 --> 00:01:07.129
lay it all out. A real study in mastering a niche.

00:01:07.310 --> 00:01:10.030
So our mission for you, listening in, is pretty

00:01:10.030 --> 00:01:12.900
straightforward. We want to synthesize all this

00:01:12.900 --> 00:01:15.840
diverse work, but, you know, go deeper than just

00:01:15.840 --> 00:01:18.120
the surface level. We're connecting the dots.

00:01:18.299 --> 00:01:20.819
How do you go from being a face in the background

00:01:20.819 --> 00:01:24.599
in, like, 80s movies to launching multiple hit

00:01:24.599 --> 00:01:27.939
shows focused on very specific things and dominating

00:01:27.939 --> 00:01:30.640
panel shows? It's the details. Exactly. We're

00:01:30.640 --> 00:01:34.019
zeroing in on the specific projects, the strategic

00:01:34.019 --> 00:01:37.459
moves, the little details that make his whole

00:01:37.459 --> 00:01:39.859
body of work so unique in comedy. Okay, let's

00:01:39.859 --> 00:01:47.400
do it. Okay, let's untap. All right, so the basics.

00:01:48.340 --> 00:01:51.319
Douglas Stephen Benton, born in San Diego, California,

00:01:51.500 --> 00:01:55.560
July 2, 1962. So he's 63 now. Okay. And the family

00:01:55.560 --> 00:01:57.480
background. It's kind of interesting given where

00:01:57.480 --> 00:01:59.579
he ended up. His mom was a pharmacy clerk. His

00:01:59.579 --> 00:02:02.219
dad was an English teacher who later went into

00:02:02.219 --> 00:02:04.640
sales. So pretty grounded middle class background.

00:02:04.879 --> 00:02:07.700
Very much. Southern California upbringing, which

00:02:07.700 --> 00:02:09.699
makes his later sort of counterculture persona

00:02:09.699 --> 00:02:11.919
stand out more. And even back in high school,

00:02:12.000 --> 00:02:14.259
Grossmont High, he was already creating stuff,

00:02:14.360 --> 00:02:16.259
right? Not just acting. Yeah, that's a great

00:02:16.259 --> 00:02:17.639
point. He was in the drama department. Sure,

00:02:17.759 --> 00:02:20.060
that's common. But the thing that jumps out is

00:02:20.060 --> 00:02:22.719
him making these like eight millimeter action

00:02:22.719 --> 00:02:25.759
and thriller short films. With a friend. Wow.

00:02:25.840 --> 00:02:29.319
OK, so hands on filmmaking. Right. Junior, senior

00:02:29.319 --> 00:02:31.800
year. He wasn't just performing. He was thinking

00:02:31.800 --> 00:02:35.419
about structure, storytelling, the whole cinematic

00:02:35.419 --> 00:02:38.639
process. Even then. Which maybe explains his

00:02:38.639 --> 00:02:40.780
later obsession with movie details and rules.

00:02:41.099 --> 00:02:43.479
I think it connects directly. It shows he came

00:02:43.479 --> 00:02:45.520
into the entertainment world with not just a

00:02:45.520 --> 00:02:48.819
performer's view, but also thinking about like

00:02:48.819 --> 00:02:51.409
the mechanics of media. How things are put together.

00:02:51.509 --> 00:02:53.689
We totally see that later with his podcast games.

00:02:53.889 --> 00:02:55.849
And speaking of mechanics, there was that personal

00:02:55.849 --> 00:02:59.009
health detail. Something about his eyes. Yeah,

00:02:59.009 --> 00:03:01.069
this is interesting. As a kid, he apparently

00:03:01.069 --> 00:03:03.949
struggled with vertigo and had poor depth perception.

00:03:04.250 --> 00:03:06.710
So it was because his eyes are close set. Huh.

00:03:06.889 --> 00:03:09.509
So literally seeing the world a bit differently.

00:03:10.009 --> 00:03:12.710
Possibly, yeah. Having to navigate with maybe

00:03:12.710 --> 00:03:15.979
a slightly skewed or flatter... visual field.

00:03:16.240 --> 00:03:18.819
You wonder, does that difficulty with spatial

00:03:18.819 --> 00:03:22.080
stuff maybe push someone towards more analytical,

00:03:22.120 --> 00:03:24.599
structured thinking? Like creating really complex

00:03:24.599 --> 00:03:27.599
trivia games instead of relying on, say, physical

00:03:27.599 --> 00:03:30.259
comedy. Could be. It might partly explain why

00:03:30.259 --> 00:03:32.280
his biggest successes are built around these

00:03:32.280 --> 00:03:35.240
intricate, detail oriented. Game structures.

00:03:35.439 --> 00:03:37.759
It definitely leans into the intellectual side

00:03:37.759 --> 00:03:39.800
of things. So after Grismont College, he does

00:03:39.800 --> 00:03:42.120
the classic thing, Moose to L .A. to act. Yep,

00:03:42.199 --> 00:03:45.120
the 1980s Hollywood hustle. Taking those stand

00:03:45.120 --> 00:03:47.939
-in jobs, extra work, trying to make rent while

00:03:47.939 --> 00:03:50.319
looking for actual roles. And those gigs put

00:03:50.319 --> 00:03:52.240
him right in the middle of some iconic films.

00:03:52.479 --> 00:03:54.979
Absolutely. He worked as a stand -in a lot, but

00:03:54.979 --> 00:03:58.080
also popped up as an extra or in tiny parts in

00:03:58.080 --> 00:04:00.629
huge movies from that era. We're talking Blade

00:04:00.629 --> 00:04:03.469
Runner. Wow. Fast Times at Ridgemont High. Right.

00:04:03.550 --> 00:04:05.990
About last night. This period is crucial. It's

00:04:05.990 --> 00:04:08.050
where he soaked up all that film trivia, learned

00:04:08.050 --> 00:04:10.449
about production, credits. The stuff that literally

00:04:10.449 --> 00:04:13.550
becomes the basis for Doug Love's movies. Exactly.

00:04:13.629 --> 00:04:16.730
That deep, almost obsessive knowledge of how

00:04:16.730 --> 00:04:18.850
movies are made and who's in them. And the weirdest

00:04:18.850 --> 00:04:21.629
detail from that time. The Disney thing. Oh,

00:04:21.649 --> 00:04:25.430
yeah. Captain EO. 1986. He was apparently a backup

00:04:25.430 --> 00:04:29.209
dancer in this huge 3D Michael Jackson sci -fi

00:04:29.209 --> 00:04:31.170
musical attraction at Disneyland. Directed by

00:04:31.170 --> 00:04:34.310
Coppola. That's wild. It really is. From the

00:04:34.310 --> 00:04:39.350
grit of Blade Runner to sparkly MJ choreography

00:04:39.350 --> 00:04:43.230
in 3D, it just shows the sheer variety of gigs

00:04:43.230 --> 00:04:45.069
you had to take to survive in Hollywood back

00:04:45.069 --> 00:04:47.610
then. Total adaptability. But the acting wasn't

00:04:47.610 --> 00:04:49.670
the thing that clicked career wise. It was stand

00:04:49.670 --> 00:04:52.449
up. Right. And kind of by accident. Yeah. The

00:04:52.449 --> 00:04:55.350
stand up origin story is classic. Age 22. Wasn't

00:04:55.350 --> 00:04:57.290
like a burning desire apparently. He and two

00:04:57.290 --> 00:04:59.449
buddies dared each other to try it. And the friends

00:04:59.449 --> 00:05:01.610
bailed. Pretty much. One didn't show the other

00:05:01.610 --> 00:05:03.410
signed up too late. But Benson actually did it.

00:05:03.430 --> 00:05:05.990
Got on stage. Did what he called three minutes

00:05:05.990 --> 00:05:07.970
of whatever. And people laughed. Yeah. He said

00:05:07.970 --> 00:05:09.790
people actually laughed. And that's often all

00:05:09.790 --> 00:05:11.649
it takes. Right. That little bit of validation

00:05:11.649 --> 00:05:14.310
to turn you from someone watching comedy to someone

00:05:14.310 --> 00:05:16.860
doing it. But the whole stoner comic thing, that

00:05:16.860 --> 00:05:19.199
wasn't immediate. That's the key timeline thing

00:05:19.199 --> 00:05:22.430
people miss. Crucial point. He was doing stand

00:05:22.430 --> 00:05:26.189
-up for like six years before that persona really

00:05:26.189 --> 00:05:29.889
formed. He became a dedicated stoner, as he puts

00:05:29.889 --> 00:05:32.649
it later, around age 28. After smoking with other

00:05:32.649 --> 00:05:34.870
comics? Yeah, apparently after a week of hanging

00:05:34.870 --> 00:05:37.189
out and smoking pot after gigs with Brian Posen

00:05:37.189 --> 00:05:39.790
and Greg Proops. So it wasn't like some teenage

00:05:39.790 --> 00:05:42.629
discovery. It was an adult choice. Right. And

00:05:42.629 --> 00:05:45.129
he later folded that lifestyle choice into his

00:05:45.129 --> 00:05:47.290
comedy. It wasn't the reason he started comedy.

00:05:47.569 --> 00:05:50.399
Exactly. It fit his style, that observational

00:05:50.399 --> 00:05:52.519
kind of analytical approach. And then he just

00:05:52.519 --> 00:05:55.079
leaned into it hard, turned a personal habit

00:05:55.079 --> 00:05:57.709
into a whole media identity. So while that identity

00:05:57.709 --> 00:05:59.870
was forming, he was still grinding away, getting

00:05:59.870 --> 00:06:03.389
TV spots. Those late 80s, early 90s appearances

00:06:03.389 --> 00:06:05.470
on Comedy Central shows like The A -List, Two

00:06:05.470 --> 00:06:07.970
Drink Minimum, Building Credits. And The Writing

00:06:07.970 --> 00:06:10.389
Work. Important, too. Wrote for that MTV game

00:06:10.389 --> 00:06:13.050
show Trash to 94. Again, you see the interest

00:06:13.050 --> 00:06:14.769
in game structure, learning how to burn those

00:06:14.769 --> 00:06:17.250
mechanics. Foreshadowing. Totally. And he was

00:06:17.250 --> 00:06:19.689
in Joel Hodgson's pilot, The TV Wheel, after

00:06:19.689 --> 00:06:22.850
MST3K. Part of that alt -comedy scene. And all

00:06:22.850 --> 00:06:24.370
this kind of comes together with the marijuana

00:06:24.370 --> 00:06:26.250
lugs, right? That seems like a big step. Huge

00:06:26.250 --> 00:06:28.810
step. Co -creating and performing that stage

00:06:28.810 --> 00:06:31.910
show with Arch Barker and Tony Kamen. It ran

00:06:31.910 --> 00:06:35.189
for a long time, toured. That really cemented

00:06:35.189 --> 00:06:38.009
his public connection between comedy and cannabis.

00:06:38.129 --> 00:06:40.430
It set the stage perfectly for what came next.

00:06:40.649 --> 00:06:42.529
Okay, so this is where things really explode

00:06:42.529 --> 00:06:44.889
for him, right? The move into podcasting. This

00:06:44.889 --> 00:06:46.750
feels like the turning point. Absolutely. Around

00:06:46.750 --> 00:06:49.350
2006, he launches I Love Movies with Doug Benson,

00:06:49.529 --> 00:06:52.769
quickly becomes Doug Loves Movies, DLM. And back

00:06:52.769 --> 00:06:56.310
in 2006, podcasting was... Different, much more

00:06:56.310 --> 00:06:58.629
of a Wild West. Oh, yeah. Very niche. And what

00:06:58.629 --> 00:07:00.970
he did was smart recording it live, usually at

00:07:00.970 --> 00:07:03.829
UCD in L .A. That gave it an energy, that live

00:07:03.829 --> 00:07:06.329
comedy club feel that a lot of early, you know,

00:07:06.329 --> 00:07:08.889
recorded in a closet podcasts didn't have. The

00:07:08.889 --> 00:07:10.889
format seems simple on the surface. Talk about

00:07:10.889 --> 00:07:13.970
movies, have comedians on. Right. But the execution,

00:07:14.149 --> 00:07:16.430
the structure, that's where the genius is and

00:07:16.430 --> 00:07:18.930
the absolute core of it. The thing that's driven

00:07:18.930 --> 00:07:21.689
it for, what, nearly two decades now? The Leonard

00:07:21.689 --> 00:07:23.829
Moulton game. Okay, break this down for anyone

00:07:23.829 --> 00:07:25.810
who hasn't heard it. It's more complicated than

00:07:25.810 --> 00:07:28.129
it sounds. Definitely. People call it Name That

00:07:28.129 --> 00:07:30.350
Tune With Movies, which is kind of right. But

00:07:30.350 --> 00:07:33.850
way nerdier. Way nerdier. Needs super deep film

00:07:33.850 --> 00:07:36.709
knowledge. So, Benson reads bits from a movie

00:07:36.709 --> 00:07:38.930
review, usually from Leonard Moulton's old guides.

00:07:39.389 --> 00:07:42.430
The guests then have to wager. Wager on what?

00:07:42.550 --> 00:07:45.230
On how many names. Read from the bottom of the

00:07:45.230 --> 00:07:47.449
cast list upwards. It'll take them to guess.

00:07:47.500 --> 00:07:49.920
the movie. Okay, so the lower the bid, the harder

00:07:49.920 --> 00:07:53.040
it is. Exactly. If you bid, say, five names,

00:07:53.199 --> 00:07:56.480
he reads the fifth to last actor credited. Usually,

00:07:56.540 --> 00:07:59.079
as someone pretty obscure, if you bid one name,

00:07:59.259 --> 00:08:01.560
you're banking on recognizing the movie just

00:08:01.560 --> 00:08:03.959
from the very last credited actor, often like

00:08:03.959 --> 00:08:06.579
Man Hashtag 2 or something. It rewards that insane

00:08:06.579 --> 00:08:09.759
recall for character actors and bit parts, the

00:08:09.759 --> 00:08:11.579
kind of knowledge he probably picked up being

00:08:11.579 --> 00:08:14.980
a stand -in. Precisely. It taps into that deep

00:08:14.980 --> 00:08:17.519
cinephile knowledge base and it creates these

00:08:17.519 --> 00:08:20.100
like legendary moments on the show. Like the

00:08:20.100 --> 00:08:22.279
negative names thing. That sounds impossible.

00:08:22.540 --> 00:08:25.459
Right. Sean Sakame, a fan who won an auction

00:08:25.459 --> 00:08:27.600
to be on, won the Tournament of Champions in

00:08:27.600 --> 00:08:31.519
2013. Then to qualify the next year, he guessed

00:08:31.519 --> 00:08:34.460
Titanic in negative names, meaning he guessed

00:08:34.460 --> 00:08:36.600
it correctly just from the review before Benson

00:08:36.600 --> 00:08:38.879
even read any names from the cast list. Just

00:08:38.879 --> 00:08:41.519
pure deduction and confidence shows the level

00:08:41.519 --> 00:08:43.710
of obsession the game inspires. And there's the

00:08:43.710 --> 00:08:46.210
big annual championship, the Christmas special.

00:08:46.289 --> 00:08:49.389
Yeah, the 12 Guests of Christmas, huge two -hour

00:08:49.389 --> 00:08:51.870
elimination -style game with a dozen or more

00:08:51.870 --> 00:08:54.090
comics. It's like the DLM Super Bowl. And there

00:08:54.090 --> 00:08:56.549
are rivalries, recurring champs. Oh, yeah. Scott

00:08:56.549 --> 00:08:58.330
Aukerman won the first one, then won again years

00:08:58.330 --> 00:09:01.370
later in 2015. Graham Elwood had a dominant run

00:09:01.370 --> 00:09:03.610
for a couple years. Rikki Lindholm had a big

00:09:03.610 --> 00:09:06.570
win over Jimmy Pardo in 2014. It creates this

00:09:06.570 --> 00:09:09.409
whole meta -narrative within the L .A. comedy

00:09:09.409 --> 00:09:12.490
podcast world. But DLM isn't just the Maltin

00:09:12.490 --> 00:09:15.250
game. He invented a ton of other segments, right?

00:09:15.529 --> 00:09:18.309
That speaks to his creativity, too. Absolutely.

00:09:18.370 --> 00:09:21.490
The sheer number and variety of games show his

00:09:21.490 --> 00:09:25.110
knack for structure and, frankly, absurdity.

00:09:25.429 --> 00:09:27.610
We don't need to list all 20, but some are just

00:09:27.610 --> 00:09:30.169
brilliant concepts. Like Lincoln or Bane. Perfect

00:09:30.169 --> 00:09:32.730
example. He reads a quote. You have to say if

00:09:32.730 --> 00:09:34.529
it was Abraham Lincoln or Bane from The Dark

00:09:34.529 --> 00:09:36.570
Knight Rises. Because they both have that kind

00:09:36.570 --> 00:09:39.769
of slow, formal delivery. Exactly. The juxtaposition

00:09:39.769 --> 00:09:44.850
is hilarious. Or now Buscemi, now you don't.

00:09:44.850 --> 00:09:46.909
Which is. It's like the shell game, but with

00:09:46.909 --> 00:09:48.389
pictures of Steve Buscemi because, you know,

00:09:48.389 --> 00:09:50.250
Buscemi's in everything. It's a running commentary

00:09:50.250 --> 00:09:52.929
on character actors. So it's trivia mixed with

00:09:52.929 --> 00:09:55.889
meta commentary. Totally. And doing lines with

00:09:55.889 --> 00:09:58.590
Mark Wahlberg, just quoting Wahlberg movie lines.

00:09:59.689 --> 00:10:02.070
ABCD's nuts. He's constantly finding ways to

00:10:02.070 --> 00:10:04.710
twist movie trivia into reputable, funny formats.

00:10:05.009 --> 00:10:07.090
And the closing catchphrase saga is fascinating,

00:10:07.309 --> 00:10:10.490
too. The Willem Dafoe thing. Oh, man. Yeah. For

00:10:10.490 --> 00:10:13.470
years, he ended every show with, as always, Willem

00:10:13.470 --> 00:10:16.070
Dafoe is a shithead. Which was pure satire, right?

00:10:16.129 --> 00:10:19.129
Like, Dafoe is so respected, it's absurd to attack

00:10:19.129 --> 00:10:22.409
him. That was the joke. Benson thought it was

00:10:22.409 --> 00:10:25.519
the most random, illogical thing to say. But

00:10:25.519 --> 00:10:27.720
a lot of listeners didn't get the satire at all.

00:10:27.820 --> 00:10:30.080
They thought he genuinely hated Willem Dafoe.

00:10:30.240 --> 00:10:33.460
Yeah. He got confused emails, people asking what

00:10:33.460 --> 00:10:35.960
Dafoe ever did to him. The joke just didn't land

00:10:35.960 --> 00:10:38.120
universally. So he had to explain it over and

00:10:38.120 --> 00:10:40.259
over. Right. Eventually, he kind of retired it,

00:10:40.320 --> 00:10:44.159
let Dafoe rest. But the concept lived on for

00:10:44.159 --> 00:10:47.379
a while until 2019. The runner -up in the Malton

00:10:47.379 --> 00:10:49.879
game got to name their own shithead as a consolation

00:10:49.879 --> 00:10:52.220
prize. A little moment of catharsis for losing.

00:10:52.519 --> 00:10:55.580
Pretty much. But that ended. Now the closing

00:10:55.580 --> 00:10:58.360
is positive energy. Which is a tribute. Yeah,

00:10:58.419 --> 00:11:00.299
a direct tribute to his friend, the comedian

00:11:00.299 --> 00:11:02.620
Brody Stevens, who passed away and used that

00:11:02.620 --> 00:11:05.840
phrase a lot. So it shifted from absurdist satire

00:11:05.840 --> 00:11:08.679
to something more genuinely causative. It shows

00:11:08.679 --> 00:11:10.899
evolution. Yeah. And beyond his own show, he

00:11:10.899 --> 00:11:13.919
became like podcasting royalty, guesting everywhere.

00:11:14.379 --> 00:11:18.419
Oh, absolutely. Comedy bang. Bang. WTF, Joe Rogan,

00:11:18.440 --> 00:11:20.559
nerdist. If you had a comedy podcast, you wanted

00:11:20.559 --> 00:11:23.080
Benson on. He was reliable, quick, knowledgeable,

00:11:23.220 --> 00:11:25.360
brought that energy. He became a connector in

00:11:25.360 --> 00:11:28.519
that whole scene. The cannabis -centric media,

00:11:28.679 --> 00:11:30.620
documentaries, talk shows, and legal rulings.

00:11:31.100 --> 00:11:33.840
Okay, so DLM gives him this huge dedicated audience.

00:11:34.120 --> 00:11:37.000
And that platform lets him really dive into the

00:11:37.000 --> 00:11:39.779
media that fully embraces the cannabis brand.

00:11:40.379 --> 00:11:43.299
Starting with Super Jaime. 2007 release, right?

00:11:43.399 --> 00:11:45.519
The title obviously playing on Supersize Me.

00:11:45.659 --> 00:11:48.460
Exactly. Morgan Spurlock ate McDonald's for 30

00:11:48.460 --> 00:11:51.279
days. Benson's experiment was 30 days no marijuana,

00:11:51.519 --> 00:11:54.259
then 30 days smoking as much as possible. A pretty

00:11:54.259 --> 00:11:56.940
bold public experiment. Totally. Part comedy

00:11:56.940 --> 00:11:59.679
stunt, part personal advocacy. And the results,

00:11:59.740 --> 00:12:01.580
at least as presented in the film. Minimal negative

00:12:01.580 --> 00:12:04.360
effects, right? Yeah. Based on his tests, cognitive

00:12:04.360 --> 00:12:06.200
checks, general health monitored in the doc,

00:12:06.399 --> 00:12:08.440
the conclusion was that the heavy use period

00:12:08.440 --> 00:12:10.960
didn't really harm him significantly, which was,

00:12:10.980 --> 00:12:12.960
you know, a big statement against the prevailing

00:12:12.960 --> 00:12:15.220
anti -drug messaging at the time. It gave the

00:12:15.220 --> 00:12:17.559
pro -legalization side a kind of funny, relatable

00:12:17.559 --> 00:12:20.240
data point, even if it was just one guy. Right.

00:12:20.320 --> 00:12:22.820
Look, I did this, professionally documented it,

00:12:22.840 --> 00:12:25.419
and I'm fine. It resonated. But things got messy

00:12:25.419 --> 00:12:27.320
after the film's success. There was a lawsuit.

00:12:27.679 --> 00:12:30.059
Yeah, that happens. The other producers wanted

00:12:30.059 --> 00:12:33.179
to release a sequel, Super High Me Redux, using

00:12:33.179 --> 00:12:36.220
leftover footage. Benson sued them around 2014,

00:12:36.519 --> 00:12:39.759
2015 to stop it. So clearly some friction there

00:12:39.759 --> 00:12:41.980
about control and maybe how the original is being

00:12:41.980 --> 00:12:44.259
exploited later. Then came the talk show, Getting

00:12:44.259 --> 00:12:46.759
Dug With High. This feels like the ultimate expression

00:12:46.759 --> 00:12:49.279
of his brand at the time. For sure. Ran from

00:12:49.279 --> 00:12:52.860
2013 to 2019. weekly show on YouTube, streamed

00:12:52.860 --> 00:12:55.480
live, usually Wednesdays at a very specific time.

00:12:55.659 --> 00:12:59.000
4 .15 p .m. Pacific. Yep. Setting up the main

00:12:59.000 --> 00:13:01.899
event. The 4 .20 smoke session. Exactly. The

00:13:01.899 --> 00:13:04.759
core ritual. He'd have guests on, huge names,

00:13:04.980 --> 00:13:07.820
Snoop Dogg, Sarah Silverman, Cheech Marin, Jack

00:13:07.820 --> 00:13:09.700
Black, tons of comics, and they'd all light up

00:13:09.700 --> 00:13:13.200
together right at 4 .20 PST during the live stream.

00:13:13.220 --> 00:13:15.559
And talk. Yeah, talk about whatever. Usually

00:13:15.559 --> 00:13:19.139
cannabis -related comedy movies. Very relaxed,

00:13:19.279 --> 00:13:21.789
obviously. How did they handle the live audience

00:13:21.789 --> 00:13:25.269
shows? Couldn't exactly hotbox the venue. Good

00:13:25.269 --> 00:13:28.190
question. They adapted. Often used vaporizers,

00:13:28.330 --> 00:13:31.029
with guests inhaling from those big bags of vapor.

00:13:31.230 --> 00:13:34.370
It kept the ritual intact, visually, without

00:13:34.370 --> 00:13:37.669
violating venue rules or smoking laws. A smart

00:13:37.669 --> 00:13:39.990
workaround. And the ending. The magic trick.

00:13:40.230 --> 00:13:43.240
Always. Every single show, no matter who the

00:13:43.240 --> 00:13:45.879
guest was or how high they were, ended with Benson

00:13:45.879 --> 00:13:48.659
making them watch a magic trick. Just pure, delightful

00:13:48.659 --> 00:13:51.980
Benson weirdness. Totally. A signature, absurd

00:13:51.980 --> 00:13:54.840
little flourish. Okay, but the absolute weirdest,

00:13:54.940 --> 00:13:57.879
most ambitious project has to be the High Court.

00:13:58.440 --> 00:14:01.440
2017, Comedy Central. This one is fascinating.

00:14:01.620 --> 00:14:04.139
It's a court show. Yeah. Like Judge Judy or People's

00:14:04.139 --> 00:14:06.679
Court, standard format. The judge is Doug Benson,

00:14:06.840 --> 00:14:09.740
and he's high, openly. Yes, that's the entire

00:14:09.740 --> 00:14:12.580
premise. He's the judge. ruling on cases while

00:14:12.580 --> 00:14:14.639
admittedly under the influence of cannabis during

00:14:14.639 --> 00:14:16.860
the taping. Now, the crucial detail here, the

00:14:16.860 --> 00:14:18.360
thing that makes it more than just a sketch,

00:14:18.559 --> 00:14:21.120
the cases were real. Absolutely real. These were

00:14:21.120 --> 00:14:23.720
actual small claims disputes. And his rulings

00:14:23.720 --> 00:14:27.759
were legally binding. Yes. That's the mind -bending

00:14:27.759 --> 00:14:30.620
part. It worked like binding arbitration. The

00:14:30.620 --> 00:14:33.059
people bringing their cases, signed contracts,

00:14:33.159 --> 00:14:35.919
agreeing to accept Judge Doug's decision, whatever

00:14:35.919 --> 00:14:39.269
it was, high or not. So real legal consequences

00:14:39.269 --> 00:14:42.169
decided by a comedian who's openly stoned on

00:14:42.169 --> 00:14:44.669
camera. Pretty much sums it up. Yeah. And the

00:14:44.669 --> 00:14:46.610
show played into it. There'd be segments where

00:14:46.610 --> 00:14:49.830
Judge Doug and the bailiff would retire to chambers,

00:14:50.090 --> 00:14:52.350
which meant they'd go smoke weed while deliberating

00:14:52.350 --> 00:14:55.389
the case. It's performance art meets actual legal

00:14:55.389 --> 00:14:58.110
process. It's kind of brilliant commentary, actually.

00:14:58.330 --> 00:15:00.610
It really is. Pushing the boundaries of comedy,

00:15:00.789 --> 00:15:05.429
reality TV and the justice system all at once.

00:15:05.529 --> 00:15:08.230
And quickly. The Benson interruption. That started

00:15:08.230 --> 00:15:10.370
live, too. Yeah, long -running live show where

00:15:10.370 --> 00:15:12.269
he'd literally interrupt other comedians during

00:15:12.269 --> 00:15:14.590
their sets. Very confrontational, funny stuff.

00:15:14.789 --> 00:15:16.730
Got a TV version on Comedy Central for a bit.

00:15:16.850 --> 00:15:20.129
One season in 2010. But then, naturally, he spun

00:15:20.129 --> 00:15:23.750
it off into a podcast in 2011. Audio only, longer,

00:15:23.929 --> 00:15:27.269
unedited sets and chats. Again, adapting a successful

00:15:27.269 --> 00:15:30.429
live concept for the podcast medium he knew so

00:15:30.429 --> 00:15:33.610
well, Consistent Pattern. So we've seen the podcast

00:15:33.610 --> 00:15:36.570
The Weed Shows. But we also need to talk about

00:15:36.570 --> 00:15:39.230
his sheer output of traditional stand -up. He's

00:15:39.230 --> 00:15:41.669
released, what, 10 comedy albums? At least 10,

00:15:41.769 --> 00:15:43.789
yeah. Starting with Professional Humorudian back

00:15:43.789 --> 00:15:47.870
in 2008. And he has this specific goal with the

00:15:47.870 --> 00:15:50.389
albums, right? The timing. Yeah, it's very deliberate

00:15:50.389 --> 00:15:52.529
branding. He aims to record a new album every

00:15:52.529 --> 00:15:54.970
April 20th. Naturally. Naturally. For a release

00:15:54.970 --> 00:15:57.409
later that summer, he wants to keep that streak

00:15:57.409 --> 00:16:00.159
going for as long as possible. It's smart. It

00:16:00.159 --> 00:16:01.960
ties his stand -up directly to the 420 date,

00:16:02.039 --> 00:16:04.379
reinforces the brand, creates anticipation. He

00:16:04.379 --> 00:16:06.679
becomes the official comedic chronicler of that

00:16:06.679 --> 00:16:09.019
date, in a way. And the titles reflect the brand,

00:16:09.080 --> 00:16:11.740
too. Potty Mouth, Smug Life. Smug Life is a great

00:16:11.740 --> 00:16:14.019
one. Very self -aware of his stage persona. Then

00:16:14.019 --> 00:16:16.820
Gateway Doug. Gateway Doug 2. Forced fun and

00:16:16.820 --> 00:16:19.159
promotional tool. He's definitely in on the joke

00:16:19.159 --> 00:16:21.639
about his own marketing. Absolutely. He knows

00:16:21.639 --> 00:16:24.740
the game. But beyond his own albums... He was

00:16:24.740 --> 00:16:27.220
also making waves in mainstream TV competitions

00:16:27.220 --> 00:16:29.340
and panel shows. Right, last comic standing in

00:16:29.340 --> 00:16:31.440
2007. He was actually a contestant. Yeah, fifth

00:16:31.440 --> 00:16:34.000
season. And he did really well. Got significant

00:16:34.000 --> 00:16:36.779
exposure. Made it pretty deep. Finished sixth

00:16:36.779 --> 00:16:39.620
overall, I think. So his niche comedy style could

00:16:39.620 --> 00:16:42.059
play to a broader audience. It showed it. It

00:16:42.059 --> 00:16:44.179
could translate, yeah. And he was a regular on

00:16:44.179 --> 00:16:46.940
VH1's Best Week Ever for years doing that pop

00:16:46.940 --> 00:16:49.440
culture commentary thing. The dry, sarcastic

00:16:49.440 --> 00:16:52.860
take. Exactly. Plus that G4 special in 2009,

00:16:53.019 --> 00:16:55.320
The High Road, following him and Graham Elwood

00:16:55.320 --> 00:16:58.320
on tour. More proof people were interested in

00:16:58.320 --> 00:17:00.600
him as a personality, not just a performer. But

00:17:00.600 --> 00:17:02.720
his biggest competitive stage was probably at

00:17:02.720 --> 00:17:05.220
midnight, right? The Comedy Central show. Oh,

00:17:05.220 --> 00:17:08.259
he owned that show. It ran from 2013 to 2017,

00:17:08.480 --> 00:17:10.660
all about rapid fire jokes based on Internet

00:17:10.660 --> 00:17:12.900
stuff. Perfectly suited for his quick wit. And

00:17:12.900 --> 00:17:16.299
his record was insane. Unmatched. He holds the

00:17:16.299 --> 00:17:18.160
record for both the most appearances and the

00:17:18.160 --> 00:17:20.980
most wins on the show. Like by a lot. He was

00:17:20.980 --> 00:17:22.740
the undisputed champ. To the point where they

00:17:22.740 --> 00:17:26.019
basically built a week around him. Yeah. January

00:17:26.019 --> 00:17:28.779
2016, they did the Benson Bowl, a whole week

00:17:28.779 --> 00:17:31.400
of competition, and lots of the games were specifically

00:17:31.400 --> 00:17:34.480
tweaked to have weed themes. It showed how central

00:17:34.480 --> 00:17:36.779
his persona was, even to that fast -paced format.

00:17:36.980 --> 00:17:40.059
The show literally adapted to him. And all this

00:17:40.059 --> 00:17:42.319
time, he's still popping up in acting roles occasionally.

00:17:42.599 --> 00:17:45.579
Kept his hand in, yeah. Small parts, but on huge

00:17:45.579 --> 00:17:49.160
shows. Mr. Show, Friends. Friends, really? Yep.

00:17:49.460 --> 00:17:51.240
Curb Your Enthusiasm, How I Met Your Mother,

00:17:51.380 --> 00:17:54.490
Sarah Silverman Program. Yes, dear. just steadily

00:17:54.490 --> 00:17:56.710
working, showing up in the background of major

00:17:56.710 --> 00:17:59.329
sitcoms. And more recently. Trailer Park Boys,

00:17:59.589 --> 00:18:02.289
you're the worst, did voice work on Bob's Burgers.

00:18:02.369 --> 00:18:04.910
And the voice of Bane in the Lego movie. Right,

00:18:05.009 --> 00:18:08.410
the Lego Batman movie in 2017. Full circle back

00:18:08.410 --> 00:18:10.869
to movies, using that distinctive voice for a

00:18:10.869 --> 00:18:13.910
major villain parody. Kind of perfect. Okay,

00:18:13.990 --> 00:18:16.500
so we've tracked this huge... successful, very

00:18:16.500 --> 00:18:18.619
specific career. But if we're looking at the

00:18:18.619 --> 00:18:20.460
whole picture, we absolutely have to talk about

00:18:20.460 --> 00:18:22.599
the red eye incident. March 2009. This feels

00:18:22.599 --> 00:18:24.579
like a major bump in the road. It's more than

00:18:24.579 --> 00:18:28.259
a bump. A really stark example of how comedy,

00:18:28.380 --> 00:18:30.720
especially satire, and that kind of deliberately

00:18:30.720 --> 00:18:34.200
ignorant persona can just crash headlong into

00:18:34.200 --> 00:18:37.559
real world tragedy and politics. With serious

00:18:37.559 --> 00:18:40.240
consequences. So the setup. He's on Greg Gutfeld's

00:18:40.240 --> 00:18:42.240
show, Red Eye, on Fox News. They're talking about

00:18:42.240 --> 00:18:44.859
Canada's military. Yes, specifically a comment

00:18:44.859 --> 00:18:47.599
by a Canadian general, Andrew Leslie, who'd suggested

00:18:47.599 --> 00:18:49.960
the Canadian forces might need a year -long break

00:18:49.960 --> 00:18:53.140
after their mission in Afghanistan ended in 2011.

00:18:53.519 --> 00:18:55.559
And Gutfeld started with jokes about them doing

00:18:55.559 --> 00:18:58.019
yoga and painting. Standard stuff. Playing on

00:18:58.019 --> 00:19:00.259
stereotypes. But then Benson chimed in. And his

00:19:00.259 --> 00:19:02.220
comments were... First, I didn't even know they

00:19:02.220 --> 00:19:04.190
were in the war. Then... I thought, that's where

00:19:04.190 --> 00:19:06.650
you go if you don't want to fight. Go chill in

00:19:06.650 --> 00:19:10.630
Canada. Oof. Okay. Playing dumb, but... Playing

00:19:10.630 --> 00:19:12.710
dumb at the worst possible moment. The timing

00:19:12.710 --> 00:19:15.329
was just catastrophic. Why? What had just happened?

00:19:15.569 --> 00:19:18.289
The segment aired, or at least hit YouTube, just

00:19:18.289 --> 00:19:20.390
three days after four Canadian soldiers had been

00:19:20.390 --> 00:19:23.410
killed in Afghanistan. Oh, wow. Okay. That changes

00:19:23.410 --> 00:19:26.720
everything. Completely. It transforms the joke

00:19:26.720 --> 00:19:29.720
from maybe slightly lazy satire into something

00:19:29.720 --> 00:19:32.759
deeply disrespectful, appearing to mock a nation

00:19:32.759 --> 00:19:35.440
actively grieving its soldiers. And Canada's

00:19:35.440 --> 00:19:37.859
role wasn't minor, right? They were heavily involved.

00:19:38.240 --> 00:19:40.079
Critically involved. Yeah. They were leading

00:19:40.079 --> 00:19:42.759
the NATO mission in Kandahar province, the Taliban's

00:19:42.759 --> 00:19:45.339
heartland. Sources say Kandahar had some of the

00:19:45.339 --> 00:19:47.460
highest casualty rates for coalition forces.

00:19:47.700 --> 00:19:49.440
So for Benson to say, I didn't even know they

00:19:49.440 --> 00:19:52.289
were in the war. looked like profound, willful

00:19:52.289 --> 00:19:54.930
ignorance of real sacrifice. Exactly. And the

00:19:54.930 --> 00:19:57.950
reaction in Canada was furious, immediate. Official

00:19:57.950 --> 00:20:00.170
reaction, too. Oh, yeah. The Canadian defense

00:20:00.170 --> 00:20:02.690
minister, Peter McKay, personally demanded an

00:20:02.690 --> 00:20:05.869
apology from Fox News, called the comments despicable,

00:20:06.069 --> 00:20:09.109
hurtful, and ignorant. This wasn't just online

00:20:09.109 --> 00:20:11.390
chatter. It was a diplomatic incident. And it

00:20:11.390 --> 00:20:13.970
hit Benson directly. Canceled shows. Yep. He

00:20:13.970 --> 00:20:16.490
had gigs scheduled in Edmonton, Canada. The club

00:20:16.490 --> 00:20:19.099
owner canceled them, citing threats of Bodily

00:20:19.099 --> 00:20:21.460
injury against Benson. Real serious backlash.

00:20:21.720 --> 00:20:24.579
So how did Benson respond? To his credit, he

00:20:24.579 --> 00:20:26.940
seemed to grasp the severity pretty quickly.

00:20:27.099 --> 00:20:30.220
Yeah. He went on Canadian TV, CTV News, and gave

00:20:30.220 --> 00:20:33.299
a direct, seemingly sincere apology. What did

00:20:33.299 --> 00:20:35.720
he say? Admitted he was ignorant about the situation

00:20:35.720 --> 00:20:38.380
in Afghanistan. Said the timing was completely

00:20:38.380 --> 00:20:40.019
out of line. He didn't try to hide behind it.

00:20:40.039 --> 00:20:42.819
It was just a joke. He owned it. Seemed to. Said

00:20:42.819 --> 00:20:45.259
things like, I honestly said things in retrospect

00:20:45.259 --> 00:20:48.099
I completely regret. and he vowed he'd never

00:20:48.099 --> 00:20:50.720
appear on Red Eye again. It was a full mea culpa,

00:20:50.940 --> 00:20:53.380
a real wake -up call about the limits of edgy

00:20:53.380 --> 00:20:55.740
comedy when it bumps up against raw national

00:20:55.740 --> 00:20:59.640
pain. Hashtag have DJ Z -Sive. Outro. Okay, so

00:20:59.640 --> 00:21:01.759
let's try and wrap this up. Looking back at this

00:21:01.759 --> 00:21:03.940
whole deep dive on Doug Benson, what are the

00:21:03.940 --> 00:21:05.900
big takeaways? For me, it's that incredible consistency,

00:21:06.220 --> 00:21:08.920
the prolific output, 10 albums, the super long

00:21:08.920 --> 00:21:11.319
-running podcast, the cannabis shows, all very

00:21:11.319 --> 00:21:13.759
focused, very structured. Definitely the focus.

00:21:13.799 --> 00:21:16.400
And his ability to fuse that pop culture knowledge

00:21:16.400 --> 00:21:19.400
with the personal advocacy, making his unique

00:21:19.400 --> 00:21:21.960
selling proposition. He really rode the wave

00:21:21.960 --> 00:21:24.420
of new media. Podcasts, especially. Yeah, he

00:21:24.420 --> 00:21:27.240
mastered that space. But the career also shows

00:21:27.240 --> 00:21:30.119
maybe the power of finding that very specific

00:21:30.119 --> 00:21:33.099
niche, right? Absolutely. Marrying comedy with

00:21:33.099 --> 00:21:35.160
a lifestyle choice built him this incredibly

00:21:35.160 --> 00:21:38.359
dedicated fan base. But as the red eye thing

00:21:38.359 --> 00:21:42.589
showed, there are real world lines. Satire has

00:21:42.589 --> 00:21:45.210
boundaries, especially when it touches on things

00:21:45.210 --> 00:21:47.789
like national sacrifice or tragedy. You can't

00:21:47.789 --> 00:21:49.789
always play dumb. It highlights the responsibility

00:21:49.789 --> 00:21:51.930
that comes with having that platform, even if

00:21:51.930 --> 00:21:54.710
your platform is built on being irreverent. Right.

00:21:54.990 --> 00:21:56.950
Which leads us to that final thought, something

00:21:56.950 --> 00:21:59.690
for you, the listener, to chew on. It ties back

00:21:59.690 --> 00:22:02.390
to the high court. The legally binding rulings

00:22:02.390 --> 00:22:05.009
from the high judge. Exactly. Considering he

00:22:05.009 --> 00:22:07.930
actually had the power to make real legally binding

00:22:07.930 --> 00:22:11.730
decisions in that community context. What responsibility

00:22:11.730 --> 00:22:14.349
does a comedian take on when their persona, their

00:22:14.349 --> 00:22:16.930
act, crosses over into roles usually reserved

00:22:16.930 --> 00:22:19.970
for serious authority figures? Even if the whole

00:22:19.970 --> 00:22:22.369
thing is presented as comedy, does the context

00:22:22.369 --> 00:22:24.470
erase the responsibility that comes with the

00:22:24.470 --> 00:22:26.509
power? Yeah. What stands out to you about that

00:22:26.509 --> 00:22:29.740
blurring of lines? The comedian as judge. Literally.

00:22:29.759 --> 00:22:32.099
Where does the performance end and the real world

00:22:32.099 --> 00:22:34.619
impact begin? Something to think about. Definitely.

00:22:34.779 --> 00:22:37.519
How media keeps playing with those boundaries

00:22:37.519 --> 00:22:40.599
between entertainment and authority. Always evolving.

00:22:41.200 --> 00:22:43.259
We'll catch you next time for another deep dive.
