WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.100
Welcome back to The Deep Dive. Our mission today,

00:00:03.279 --> 00:00:06.019
well, it's pretty straightforward. We're tracking

00:00:06.019 --> 00:00:12.220
the career of a performer who's genuinely paradoxical,

00:00:12.220 --> 00:00:15.500
I think. An actor who's just mastered being deeply

00:00:15.500 --> 00:00:19.480
uncomfortable, intensely dramatic, and, you know,

00:00:19.500 --> 00:00:22.059
utterly absurd, sometimes all at once. Yeah,

00:00:22.079 --> 00:00:23.839
it's quite something. Looking past the faces

00:00:23.839 --> 00:00:26.079
you see on your streaming queue and really diving

00:00:26.079 --> 00:00:28.559
into the life and work of Brett Gelman. It is

00:00:28.559 --> 00:00:31.399
a remarkable journey to map out. Absolutely.

00:00:31.620 --> 00:00:33.799
Gelman has sort of perfected playing that intense,

00:00:34.259 --> 00:00:37.520
hyper -focused, often paranoid outsider figure.

00:00:37.780 --> 00:00:39.960
But what's really fascinating, I find, is how

00:00:39.960 --> 00:00:42.679
his training, you know, from classical theater

00:00:42.679 --> 00:00:44.920
all the way to really avant -garde comedy, how

00:00:44.920 --> 00:00:46.700
that prepared him to anchor some of the most

00:00:46.700 --> 00:00:50.619
complex, character -driven, prestige TV we've

00:00:50.619 --> 00:00:52.619
seen in the last decade or so. Absolutely. And

00:00:52.619 --> 00:00:54.200
when we talk about Gelman, I mean, two roles

00:00:54.200 --> 00:00:56.060
just immediately leap out, right? They really

00:00:56.060 --> 00:00:58.189
anchor this whole discussion. Yeah. First, obviously,

00:00:58.329 --> 00:01:00.829
Murray Baillman, the conspiracy theorist, former

00:01:00.829 --> 00:01:03.530
journalist in Stranger Things, global phenomenon.

00:01:03.810 --> 00:01:07.989
Can't miss him. And second, Martin, the perpetually

00:01:07.989 --> 00:01:12.290
abrasive, just morally corrosive husband in Viggy

00:01:12.290 --> 00:01:15.730
Waller -Bridge's Fleabag. Incredible show. Incredible.

00:01:15.769 --> 00:01:18.650
Yeah. We've pulled together a... pretty comprehensive

00:01:18.650 --> 00:01:22.310
overview here looking at his life his career

00:01:22.310 --> 00:01:24.930
really from the mid -2000s right up to today

00:01:24.930 --> 00:01:27.049
okay and we're looking for those threads you

00:01:27.049 --> 00:01:29.530
know the things that connect the experimental

00:01:29.530 --> 00:01:32.629
sketch guy the writer producer the ucb regular

00:01:32.629 --> 00:01:35.329
to the well the established character actor he

00:01:35.329 --> 00:01:38.150
is now tackling these big historical dramatic

00:01:38.150 --> 00:01:41.409
roles right we really want you the listener to

00:01:41.409 --> 00:01:43.890
get a handle on not just what he's been in but

00:01:43.890 --> 00:01:46.590
how he got so good at juggling these these extremes

00:01:46.590 --> 00:01:48.890
okay Great. Let's unpack that journey then. Let's

00:01:48.890 --> 00:01:50.629
start right at the beginning, section one. The

00:01:50.629 --> 00:01:53.189
foundations of a comedic voice. It's interesting

00:01:53.189 --> 00:01:55.150
because, you know, we often think of modern sketch

00:01:55.150 --> 00:01:57.230
and improv folks maybe bypassing traditional

00:01:57.230 --> 00:01:59.629
training. But Gelman, he took a really formal

00:01:59.629 --> 00:02:01.930
route first. Yeah. And that's, I think, a crucial

00:02:01.930 --> 00:02:03.870
detail. Explains a lot about the gravitas he

00:02:03.870 --> 00:02:06.150
brings later. Brett Gelman was born October 6,

00:02:06.349 --> 00:02:09.509
1976. So that makes him 49 today, October 10,

00:02:09.650 --> 00:02:12.469
2025. Raised Jewish family roots in Illinois.

00:02:12.750 --> 00:02:15.550
His dad was a photo salesman. His younger sister

00:02:15.550 --> 00:02:17.490
became a speech pathologist. pathologist. And

00:02:17.490 --> 00:02:19.509
he graduated high school from Highland Park High

00:02:19.509 --> 00:02:22.030
in Illinois. So, you know, that initial Midwestern

00:02:22.030 --> 00:02:24.349
grounding. But the real pivot education wise.

00:02:24.430 --> 00:02:28.169
Yeah. The foundation, maybe. That explains how

00:02:28.169 --> 00:02:30.650
he can hold those intense dramatic scenes later.

00:02:30.870 --> 00:02:33.330
That's college, right? Absolutely. He graduated

00:02:33.330 --> 00:02:35.009
from the University of North Carolina School

00:02:35.009 --> 00:02:38.009
of the Arts, UNCSA. Got a Bachelor of Fine Arts

00:02:38.009 --> 00:02:40.810
degree. And this wasn't, you know, Improv 101.

00:02:41.090 --> 00:02:44.710
This was pure discipline classical theater training.

00:02:44.930 --> 00:02:47.250
Wow. Yeah. And if you think about what that involves,

00:02:47.509 --> 00:02:49.780
classical training, I mean. Yeah. Voice projection,

00:02:49.979 --> 00:02:52.259
physical commitment, deep character work, analyzing

00:02:52.259 --> 00:02:55.819
text. It demands this discipline that, you know,

00:02:55.840 --> 00:02:58.139
can seem totally opposite to the sort of anarchic

00:02:58.139 --> 00:03:01.099
yes and vibe of improv. Right. Different worlds.

00:03:01.259 --> 00:03:03.680
Totally. But it's precisely that grounding, I

00:03:03.680 --> 00:03:05.780
think, that lets him commit so fully to the most

00:03:05.780 --> 00:03:08.139
outlandish characters later on without sort of

00:03:08.139 --> 00:03:10.000
winking at the audience. He treats the absurdity

00:03:10.000 --> 00:03:13.300
with like serious theatrical weight. Okay, that

00:03:13.300 --> 00:03:16.319
makes sense. So after that intense formal discipline,

00:03:16.560 --> 00:03:19.360
he immediately just throws himself into the New

00:03:19.360 --> 00:03:21.620
York City comedy scene. First graduation. Yep.

00:03:21.740 --> 00:03:23.879
Moved there with a schoolmate, the actor John

00:03:23.879 --> 00:03:26.219
Daly. They were ready to, you know, make their

00:03:26.219 --> 00:03:28.300
mark on that really competitive scene. In New

00:03:28.300 --> 00:03:30.759
York in the 2000s, that path pretty much meant

00:03:30.759 --> 00:03:33.240
one thing, right? Oh, yeah. Immersion in the

00:03:33.240 --> 00:03:37.139
Upright Citizens Brigade Theater. UCB. That's

00:03:37.139 --> 00:03:39.669
where he really... developed his rhythm, cemented

00:03:39.669 --> 00:03:43.770
his roots in improv and sketch. UCB was, I mean,

00:03:43.789 --> 00:03:47.449
at that time, it was the absolute hub for alternative,

00:03:47.610 --> 00:03:50.509
often dark, boundary -pushing comedy. It required

00:03:50.509 --> 00:03:52.949
you to be quick, inventive, and importantly,

00:03:53.090 --> 00:03:55.490
not afraid of confrontation. And he wasn't just

00:03:55.490 --> 00:03:57.689
like hanging around the edges. He was central

00:03:57.689 --> 00:03:59.969
to a couple of specific groups that really defined

00:03:59.969 --> 00:04:02.530
that early, very idiosyncratic style. That's

00:04:02.530 --> 00:04:05.009
right. He was half of the comedy duo Cracked

00:04:05.009 --> 00:04:07.469
Out with John Daly. Right. And he was also in

00:04:07.469 --> 00:04:10.550
the sketch group called Mr. Bay. Chuckles. Yeah.

00:04:10.590 --> 00:04:12.629
The names alone tell you something. They really

00:04:12.629 --> 00:04:16.290
do. An embrace of the abrasive and the ridiculous,

00:04:16.649 --> 00:04:20.209
Cracked Out was known for this like manic, aggressive

00:04:20.209 --> 00:04:24.600
energy. This is where... That persona, the super

00:04:24.600 --> 00:04:27.560
intense, fast talking, maybe slightly unhinged

00:04:27.560 --> 00:04:30.860
guy was really forged. It was kind of the perfect

00:04:30.860 --> 00:04:34.139
counter training to the structure of UNCSA. Classical

00:04:34.139 --> 00:04:36.459
training taught him how to perform. UCB taught

00:04:36.459 --> 00:04:39.079
him what to perform. Digging into uncomfortable

00:04:39.079 --> 00:04:42.000
truths through absurdity. Now, here's a fantastic

00:04:42.000 --> 00:04:44.360
little bit of history. It really speaks to the

00:04:44.360 --> 00:04:47.259
financial reality of trying to make experimental

00:04:47.259 --> 00:04:49.480
art in New York, how he funded his early work.

00:04:50.100 --> 00:04:52.680
It's brilliant, actually. A loop of luck and

00:04:52.680 --> 00:04:55.139
creativity. Oh, it's the classic starving artist

00:04:55.139 --> 00:04:58.500
story, but with this amazing lucky twist. The

00:04:58.500 --> 00:05:00.399
sources mention that a popular and surprisingly

00:05:00.399 --> 00:05:02.939
lucrative New York lottery commercial gave him

00:05:02.939 --> 00:05:05.279
the financial runway he needed. Really? Yeah.

00:05:05.519 --> 00:05:08.300
To keep pursuing those riskier, you know, non

00:05:08.300 --> 00:05:10.000
-commercial projects, he wasn't just relying

00:05:10.000 --> 00:05:11.939
on like waiting tables. This commercial work

00:05:11.939 --> 00:05:13.860
funded the fun stuff. He was a little bit of

00:05:13.860 --> 00:05:15.720
luck guy, wasn't he? In the Take Five campaign.

00:05:15.939 --> 00:05:19.370
Ran for like three years, 2008 to 2011. Exactly.

00:05:19.370 --> 00:05:22.589
Which meant, you know, a constant low level bit

00:05:22.589 --> 00:05:25.589
of visibility and importantly, income, which

00:05:25.589 --> 00:05:27.790
is just gold for an experimental artist trying

00:05:27.790 --> 00:05:30.129
to make rent and, you know, put on weird shows.

00:05:30.230 --> 00:05:32.350
Yeah. Yeah. And there's even this detail that

00:05:32.350 --> 00:05:34.430
Gelman said the character's inspiration was the

00:05:34.430 --> 00:05:37.430
rock guitarist. Guthrie Govan. Isn't that great?

00:05:37.509 --> 00:05:39.569
It just shows his commitment to characterization,

00:05:39.769 --> 00:05:41.810
even for a quick commercial spot. He's looking

00:05:41.810 --> 00:05:45.470
for a specific, intense energy source. Govan's

00:05:45.470 --> 00:05:47.949
known for, you know, technical brilliance, but

00:05:47.949 --> 00:05:51.110
also this distinct kind of eccentric stage presence.

00:05:51.389 --> 00:05:54.790
And that funding, that lottery money, it directly

00:05:54.790 --> 00:05:57.449
allowed him to develop and workshop his really

00:05:57.449 --> 00:06:00.689
ambitious one -man show, 1 ,000 Cats. He did

00:06:00.689 --> 00:06:03.410
it at various small venues around the city, pure

00:06:03.410 --> 00:06:05.810
personal experimental theater. And while he's

00:06:05.810 --> 00:06:07.990
doing these experimental shows, he's also starting

00:06:07.990 --> 00:06:09.829
to get his foot in the door with TV and sketch

00:06:09.829 --> 00:06:12.290
writing. Yeah. Doing voice work, early live action

00:06:12.290 --> 00:06:14.649
stuff. Yeah. Getting exposure beyond the UCB

00:06:14.649 --> 00:06:16.730
bubble. Yeah, definitely. We see him popping

00:06:16.730 --> 00:06:18.589
up on key comedy shows at that time, like the

00:06:18.589 --> 00:06:20.589
Colbert Report. He did some writing for the MTV

00:06:20.589 --> 00:06:23.610
sketch series Human Giant, which was seminal.

00:06:23.629 --> 00:06:26.149
And he landed recurring voice roles on shows

00:06:26.149 --> 00:06:28.779
like The Life and Times of Tim. Which kind of

00:06:28.779 --> 00:06:31.079
laid the groundwork for his later animation career,

00:06:31.180 --> 00:06:33.040
which is often overlooked but actually pretty

00:06:33.040 --> 00:06:36.579
significant for him. Okay, so by the early 2010s...

00:06:37.040 --> 00:06:39.600
He's got the discipline foundation, the experimental

00:06:39.600 --> 00:06:43.180
spirit, a clear comedic voice, and crucially,

00:06:43.199 --> 00:06:45.860
some financial stability thanks to a lottery

00:06:45.860 --> 00:06:48.779
ad. Wild. Pretty wild, yeah. Which sets the stage

00:06:48.779 --> 00:06:51.459
perfectly for Section 2, the Adult Swim era and

00:06:51.459 --> 00:06:53.720
the Dawn of Dark comedy. This is really when

00:06:53.720 --> 00:06:57.620
his unique signature becomes nationally recognized,

00:06:57.920 --> 00:07:00.779
wouldn't you say? Absolutely. This period, roughly

00:07:00.779 --> 00:07:03.720
2010 to 2016, this is where he goes from being

00:07:03.720 --> 00:07:07.160
maybe more of an NYC specific name to a national

00:07:07.160 --> 00:07:10.259
comedy workhorse. Always balancing those experimental

00:07:10.259 --> 00:07:12.759
niche projects with, you know, more mainstream

00:07:12.759 --> 00:07:15.620
broadcast gigs. And the sheer volume of work

00:07:15.620 --> 00:07:17.420
he did then is kind of staggering. It really

00:07:17.420 --> 00:07:19.860
is. On the network side, you've got him co -starring

00:07:19.860 --> 00:07:23.300
as Mr. K on NBC's Go On that starred Matthew

00:07:23.300 --> 00:07:26.490
Perry. Right. Post France. Yeah. That's 22 episodes,

00:07:26.829 --> 00:07:30.810
mainstream multi -can sitcom, 2012 -2013. So

00:07:30.810 --> 00:07:33.870
he's proving he can play a recognizable, if quirky,

00:07:34.009 --> 00:07:36.230
supporting role in a very traditional format.

00:07:36.470 --> 00:07:38.730
But at the exact same time, he's deeply embedded

00:07:38.730 --> 00:07:41.310
in the cable and alternative scene. He's holding

00:07:41.310 --> 00:07:44.110
down multiple regular roles that needed that

00:07:44.110 --> 00:07:47.209
distinct high -intensity Gelman style. Like Eagleheart.

00:07:47.370 --> 00:07:50.170
Exactly. Brett Mobley, Chris Elliott's sidekick

00:07:50.170 --> 00:07:52.790
in the live -action adult swim series Eagleheart.

00:07:52.910 --> 00:07:56.920
That was 26 episodes. 2011 to 2014. And he was

00:07:56.920 --> 00:07:59.740
AJ on the FX comedy Married. Critically respected,

00:07:59.959 --> 00:08:01.779
maybe a bit niche, but that was 23 episodes.

00:08:02.120 --> 00:08:04.339
And then just tons of sporting work all over

00:08:04.339 --> 00:08:06.699
cable. He was Mr. Gilbert, the aggressive headmaster

00:08:06.699 --> 00:08:08.800
in the Inbetweeners remake. Yep, seven episodes

00:08:08.800 --> 00:08:11.079
of that. Hamish Crassus in another period for

00:08:11.079 --> 00:08:13.720
20 episodes. That show was nuts. Hilarious. And

00:08:13.720 --> 00:08:15.759
Ronnie in Blunt Talk with Patrick Stewart, six

00:08:15.759 --> 00:08:19.470
episodes there. He was just... Everywhere. Adapting

00:08:19.470 --> 00:08:21.930
his tone slightly for each, but always bringing

00:08:21.930 --> 00:08:24.610
that that underlying intensity. And he's getting

00:08:24.610 --> 00:08:26.870
those foundational film appearances to small

00:08:26.870 --> 00:08:29.649
roles, but important. The other guys in 2010

00:08:29.649 --> 00:08:33.210
and he played the super stressed pizza boss in

00:08:33.210 --> 00:08:36.110
30 minutes or less in 2011. Right. So this whole

00:08:36.110 --> 00:08:38.629
period, it's really about proving he could translate

00:08:38.629 --> 00:08:41.990
that niche persona into commercial appeal across

00:08:41.990 --> 00:08:44.690
basically every medium possible. However. Yeah.

00:08:45.259 --> 00:08:47.860
The work that really defined the Brett Gelman

00:08:47.860 --> 00:08:49.879
experience for a lot of people back then. Yeah.

00:08:49.960 --> 00:08:52.899
The stuff that maybe prepared audiences for how

00:08:52.899 --> 00:08:55.240
uncomfortable Martin and Fleabag would be. Yeah.

00:08:55.340 --> 00:08:57.320
That has to be his Adult Swim Dinner specials.

00:08:57.320 --> 00:08:59.960
Oh, absolutely. Those specials were... Something

00:08:59.960 --> 00:09:02.620
else. Highly controversial, deeply unsettling,

00:09:02.620 --> 00:09:04.960
totally unique. They weren't just sketches. They

00:09:04.960 --> 00:09:06.700
felt like intentional performance art designed

00:09:06.700 --> 00:09:09.879
to make you squirm. There may be the purest distillation

00:09:09.879 --> 00:09:12.019
of his whole gel mania philosophy, but in video

00:09:12.019 --> 00:09:14.440
form. The first one, Dinner with Friends with

00:09:14.440 --> 00:09:17.120
Brett Gelman and friends. That was 2014. It set

00:09:17.120 --> 00:09:19.960
the template. Take a civilized event, the dinner

00:09:19.960 --> 00:09:22.360
party, and just systematically dismantle it with

00:09:22.360 --> 00:09:25.120
awkwardness, passive aggression, outright hostility.

00:09:25.399 --> 00:09:28.000
And they didn't just stop there, right? The sources

00:09:28.000 --> 00:09:30.860
say they escalated conceptually. There were sequels.

00:09:31.340 --> 00:09:33.879
Dinner with family with Brett Gelman and Brett

00:09:33.879 --> 00:09:37.340
Gelman's family in 2015, which, you know, likely

00:09:37.340 --> 00:09:40.179
turned that psychological spotlight inward onto

00:09:40.179 --> 00:09:42.940
core family dynamics. Probably even more uncomfortable.

00:09:43.299 --> 00:09:45.879
Probably. And then the really provocative one.

00:09:46.409 --> 00:09:48.970
Dinner in America with Brett Gelman in 2016.

00:09:49.509 --> 00:09:52.549
The source material specifically points out its

00:09:52.549 --> 00:09:56.340
focus was on racism. These were never easy watches.

00:09:56.580 --> 00:09:59.600
They combined his classical ability to sustain

00:09:59.600 --> 00:10:02.620
a really committed, dramatic performance within

00:10:02.620 --> 00:10:05.399
this unbearable, almost theatrical reality. Pushing

00:10:05.399 --> 00:10:07.620
the boundaries of what comedy even meant on cable

00:10:07.620 --> 00:10:10.240
TV, they felt like intentional acts of confrontation.

00:10:10.320 --> 00:10:12.399
Which is a perfect parallel to his podcasting

00:10:12.399 --> 00:10:14.019
work at the time, actually. Totally. This era

00:10:14.019 --> 00:10:17.200
also saw him get really involved in the burgeoning

00:10:17.200 --> 00:10:19.860
podcast scene. Another crucial outlet for his

00:10:19.860 --> 00:10:21.639
whole approach to comedy. He was constantly on

00:10:21.639 --> 00:10:25.049
comedy. Bang, bang. A fixture there, yeah. And

00:10:25.049 --> 00:10:28.230
he launched his own podcast, Gelmania, in 2011

00:10:28.230 --> 00:10:31.409
on the Earwolf Network. And this show, maybe

00:10:31.409 --> 00:10:34.090
more than any visual work, really cemented his

00:10:34.090 --> 00:10:37.049
comedic manifesto, I think. He gave this absolutely

00:10:37.049 --> 00:10:39.509
perfect description of what he wanted the show

00:10:39.509 --> 00:10:41.610
to be. And honestly, it feels like a mission

00:10:41.610 --> 00:10:43.769
statement for his whole career. He said he wanted

00:10:43.769 --> 00:10:46.490
Gelmania to, quote, reflect a lot of the fears

00:10:46.490 --> 00:10:49.230
and anger and sadness of the world, but do that

00:10:49.230 --> 00:10:51.610
through a really stupid lens. And if you just

00:10:51.610 --> 00:10:54.559
take that quote. It explains everything, doesn't

00:10:54.559 --> 00:10:56.759
it? It really does. Murray Bauman's paranoia.

00:10:56.779 --> 00:10:59.799
It reflects real societal fears, right? Shadowy

00:10:59.799 --> 00:11:03.129
government stuff, misinformation. Presented through

00:11:03.129 --> 00:11:05.450
the lens of this highly theatrical, slightly

00:11:05.450 --> 00:11:08.110
ridiculous character who, you know, needs a Russian

00:11:08.110 --> 00:11:11.529
translator and vodka. Martin in Fleabag reflects

00:11:11.529 --> 00:11:14.269
the deep sadness and anger of a toxic relationship.

00:11:14.529 --> 00:11:16.870
But filtered through the stupid lens of a guy

00:11:16.870 --> 00:11:19.090
who's just so oblivious and self -involved, it

00:11:19.090 --> 00:11:22.210
becomes darkly comical. That idea of taking real

00:11:22.210 --> 00:11:24.850
emotional truth and filtering it through controlled

00:11:24.850 --> 00:11:27.929
theatrical stupidity. Yeah. That feels like the

00:11:27.929 --> 00:11:30.929
key to understanding him. I think so. And even

00:11:30.929 --> 00:11:33.190
though Gelmania moved off Earwolf for its second

00:11:33.190 --> 00:11:36.350
season in 2014, that philosophy was locked in.

00:11:36.490 --> 00:11:39.110
It defines his approach. And then late 2016,

00:11:39.309 --> 00:11:41.769
we hit this huge turning point. His complete

00:11:41.769 --> 00:11:45.230
split from Cartoon Network and Adult Swim. And

00:11:45.230 --> 00:11:48.029
it wasn't quiet. It was a very public... principled

00:11:48.029 --> 00:11:50.110
stand. Yeah, a massive moment, really significant

00:11:50.110 --> 00:11:53.730
for his public persona. November 2016, he announces

00:11:53.730 --> 00:11:56.409
he's severing ties. And the reasons he gave were

00:11:56.409 --> 00:12:00.210
serious, multifaceted. First, he cited the network's

00:12:00.210 --> 00:12:02.610
alleged poor treatment of female employees. Right.

00:12:02.669 --> 00:12:05.610
And second, he specifically called out the network

00:12:05.610 --> 00:12:07.710
for promoting the controversial sketch show,

00:12:07.850 --> 00:12:10.710
Million Dollar Extreme Presence, World Peace.

00:12:11.009 --> 00:12:12.490
Which was getting a lot of heat at the time.

00:12:12.590 --> 00:12:14.690
A lot of heat. So this departure was huge because

00:12:14.690 --> 00:12:17.049
Adult Swim had basically been his creative home

00:12:17.049 --> 00:12:19.529
turf for years. It gave him the platform for

00:12:19.529 --> 00:12:22.009
his most unique, defining stuff, like the dinner

00:12:22.009 --> 00:12:24.009
specials. Stepping away from that, from that

00:12:24.009 --> 00:12:26.690
niche but reliable platform, purely on principle.

00:12:26.850 --> 00:12:29.570
That's a massive career risk. Huge. It signaled

00:12:29.570 --> 00:12:31.690
Gelman was willing to put his moral and political

00:12:31.690 --> 00:12:34.710
beliefs ahead of, you know, financial and creative

00:12:34.710 --> 00:12:37.850
security. But maybe, maybe closing that door

00:12:37.850 --> 00:12:40.289
immediately opened the next one, the one to international

00:12:40.289 --> 00:12:43.070
mainstream success. Which brings us right into

00:12:43.070 --> 00:12:45.509
section three. The breakthrough in dramatic range.

00:12:45.649 --> 00:12:48.149
Yeah, the timing is just incredible. Almost immediately

00:12:48.149 --> 00:12:50.909
after that very public split, his career just

00:12:50.909 --> 00:12:54.230
explodes onto the international stage, starting

00:12:54.230 --> 00:12:56.610
with the arrival, basically simultaneously, of

00:12:56.610 --> 00:12:59.990
his two most recognizable roles in 2016 and 2017.

00:13:00.450 --> 00:13:03.110
Okay, let's start with Fleabag. He's cast as

00:13:03.110 --> 00:13:05.529
Martin, Claire's husband, series regular across

00:13:05.529 --> 00:13:08.929
both seasons, seven episodes total, 2016 to 2019.

00:13:09.309 --> 00:13:12.419
And this role may be more than any other. showed

00:13:12.419 --> 00:13:14.639
how his specific brand of uncomfortable comedy

00:13:14.639 --> 00:13:17.820
could translate into really powerful drama. Martin

00:13:17.820 --> 00:13:20.220
is just, he's the absolute antithesis of the

00:13:20.220 --> 00:13:22.519
typical sitcom husband, isn't he? He's repulsive,

00:13:22.740 --> 00:13:25.139
self -pitying, psychologically manipulative.

00:13:25.200 --> 00:13:27.519
But Gelman commits to it with the precision of

00:13:27.519 --> 00:13:29.600
a classical actor. He doesn't play Martin just

00:13:29.600 --> 00:13:31.779
for laughs. He plays the toxicity for an uncomfortable

00:13:31.779 --> 00:13:35.059
reality. That's the key point, I think. When

00:13:35.059 --> 00:13:38.029
you watch Martin... you feel the tension and

00:13:38.029 --> 00:13:40.610
the trauma he inflicts on Claire. That classical

00:13:40.610 --> 00:13:43.210
training allowed him to ground the character's

00:13:43.210 --> 00:13:46.070
emotional truth, which made his absurdly inappropriate

00:13:46.070 --> 00:13:48.970
behavior like, you know, lying about a miscarriage

00:13:48.970 --> 00:13:51.570
land with genuine dramatic force, not just as

00:13:51.570 --> 00:13:53.669
a punchline. Exactly. It totally shifted audience

00:13:53.669 --> 00:13:55.769
perception. Suddenly, he wasn't just the weird

00:13:55.769 --> 00:13:58.330
guy from Adult Swim. He was a performer capable

00:13:58.330 --> 00:14:01.029
of carrying serious dramatic weight within this

00:14:01.029 --> 00:14:04.409
universally acclaimed narrative. And almost at

00:14:04.409 --> 00:14:07.429
the exact same time, He gets announced for Stranger

00:14:07.429 --> 00:14:10.610
Things as Murray Bauman. Starts out recurring

00:14:10.610 --> 00:14:13.470
season two and three. Perfect blend of comedy

00:14:13.470 --> 00:14:16.289
and investigation in that role. But the character

00:14:16.289 --> 00:14:19.809
became so essential to the plot, you know, handling

00:14:19.809 --> 00:14:22.250
exposition, driving the paranoia, that he got

00:14:22.250 --> 00:14:24.730
promoted. Main cats for the massive fourth season.

00:14:25.230 --> 00:14:27.230
Solidified his international stardom right there.

00:14:27.480 --> 00:14:29.960
Murray Bauman is Gelman's comedic philosophy

00:14:29.960 --> 00:14:31.960
just packaged for a mass audience, isn't it?

00:14:32.039 --> 00:14:34.980
He's the embodiment of those fears and anger

00:14:34.980 --> 00:14:38.879
of the world, shadowy government. Russians, monsters,

00:14:39.080 --> 00:14:42.580
filtered through that really stupid, albeit functional

00:14:42.580 --> 00:14:45.860
lens of a slightly unhinged reporter living in

00:14:45.860 --> 00:14:48.259
a bunker. He's great at handling exposition,

00:14:48.259 --> 00:14:51.100
too. He really is. Think about those long scenes

00:14:51.100 --> 00:14:53.259
in season three where Murray's translating Russian

00:14:53.259 --> 00:14:56.120
or explaining complicated plans. Because he has

00:14:56.120 --> 00:14:59.019
that UCB background, that speed, and that intense

00:14:59.019 --> 00:15:01.679
stage presence from classical training, he can

00:15:01.679 --> 00:15:04.620
deliver dense, rapid -fire dialogue while staying

00:15:04.620 --> 00:15:07.360
physically and vocally intense. He keeps you

00:15:07.360 --> 00:15:09.899
hooked, even when it's just information. Yeah,

00:15:09.960 --> 00:15:12.120
totally. Now, while he's hitting it big as an

00:15:12.120 --> 00:15:14.419
actor, he also made sure he kept control over

00:15:14.419 --> 00:15:17.559
his own creative voice. The 2017 dark comedy

00:15:17.559 --> 00:15:20.580
film Lemon feels like his self -authored thesis

00:15:20.580 --> 00:15:22.340
statement on the kind of comedy he wants to make.

00:15:22.480 --> 00:15:24.659
Lemon was a huge creative step. He co -wrote

00:15:24.659 --> 00:15:26.480
it, starred as Isaac Lockman, this struggling,

00:15:26.580 --> 00:15:28.720
abrasive actor spiraling out. And crucially,

00:15:28.799 --> 00:15:31.519
it was directed by his then -spouse, Janice Bravo.

00:15:31.899 --> 00:15:34.059
So you had this intimate, collaborative environment

00:15:34.059 --> 00:15:36.080
allowing him to just dive into the absolute.

00:15:36.169 --> 00:15:38.450
depths of discomfort. Premiered at Sundance,

00:15:38.529 --> 00:15:40.909
it was a challenging watch, definitely. A really

00:15:40.909 --> 00:15:43.590
uncomfortable character study. It proved that

00:15:43.590 --> 00:15:45.809
even with Stranger Things blowing up, he was

00:15:45.809 --> 00:15:47.889
still committed to that intentionally abrasive

00:15:47.889 --> 00:15:51.269
niche work that defined his... adult swim stuff.

00:15:51.429 --> 00:15:53.450
Right. And look at the supporting cast, Judy

00:15:53.450 --> 00:15:56.289
Greer, Michael Cera, Nia Long, Gillian Jacobs.

00:15:56.610 --> 00:15:59.029
That tells you about his growing cachet within

00:15:59.029 --> 00:16:01.950
the indie film world by then. Definitely. And

00:16:01.950 --> 00:16:04.230
this whole era, it wasn't just live action either.

00:16:04.309 --> 00:16:06.610
While he's taking on these main dramatic roles

00:16:06.610 --> 00:16:09.169
like George in HBO's Camping or Roland Finkelstein

00:16:09.169 --> 00:16:12.450
in Mr. Mercedes, he kept up a really significant

00:16:12.450 --> 00:16:15.509
and diverse voice acting portfolio. Yeah. Which

00:16:15.509 --> 00:16:17.149
is smart. It's the practical work that keeps

00:16:17.149 --> 00:16:20.190
an actor versatile and, frankly, busy. He had

00:16:20.190 --> 00:16:23.169
the main voice role as Jeff in Jeff and some

00:16:23.169 --> 00:16:25.070
Aliens for 10 episodes. Right. Then moved into

00:16:25.070 --> 00:16:27.809
Netflix animation pretty heavily. Voiced Marcellus

00:16:27.809 --> 00:16:30.690
in I Heart Arlo for 18 episodes. And maybe his

00:16:30.690 --> 00:16:33.659
most beloved recent animated role. Magic Mike,

00:16:33.820 --> 00:16:37.299
the cynical, perpetually annoyed mushroom creature

00:16:37.299 --> 00:16:40.899
inside Job. Oh, Magic Mike is pure Gelman. Totally.

00:16:40.960 --> 00:16:43.759
It's that voice, right? Extreme frustration,

00:16:44.240 --> 00:16:47.500
weary cynicism delivered with just perfect comedic

00:16:47.500 --> 00:16:50.500
timing and the ability to shift from the timing

00:16:50.500 --> 00:16:53.259
needed for an animated mushroom to the really

00:16:53.259 --> 00:16:57.250
serious, dramatic roles he tackled in 2024. That's

00:16:57.250 --> 00:16:58.909
the definition of the range we're talking about.

00:16:58.990 --> 00:17:00.450
And that's where you see the full circle land.

00:17:00.710 --> 00:17:03.570
The industry now fully trusts his ability to

00:17:03.570 --> 00:17:06.769
handle genuinely dark, complex, dramatic material.

00:17:07.230 --> 00:17:11.250
In 2024 alone, two deeply grounded serious roles.

00:17:11.569 --> 00:17:14.029
Yeah. First, the main role as Milton in the Apple

00:17:14.029 --> 00:17:16.410
TV Plus drama series Lady and the Lake. Seven

00:17:16.410 --> 00:17:19.049
episodes, high profile production needs grounded

00:17:19.049 --> 00:17:21.769
dramatic focus. And second, he took on playing

00:17:21.769 --> 00:17:24.130
Terry Nichols in the historical drama film McVeigh.

00:17:24.390 --> 00:17:26.329
Nichols being, of course, the co -conspirator

00:17:26.329 --> 00:17:29.369
in the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing. Wow. That

00:17:29.369 --> 00:17:31.950
transition from voicing Magic Malick to portraying

00:17:31.950 --> 00:17:34.049
Terry Nichols. That's a stunning endorsement

00:17:34.049 --> 00:17:36.009
of his dramatic abilities. It confirms that classical

00:17:36.009 --> 00:17:38.799
training. from decades ago is now fully informing

00:17:38.799 --> 00:17:41.339
his mainstream dramatic work. Absolutely. He

00:17:41.339 --> 00:17:43.279
truly contains multitudes. I mean, he also slipped

00:17:43.279 --> 00:17:45.220
in playing the family film villain Mr. Grumps

00:17:45.220 --> 00:17:50.460
in Lyle Crocodile back in 2022. Right. Can't

00:17:50.460 --> 00:17:52.759
forget Mr. Grumps. It just speaks to the power

00:17:52.759 --> 00:17:54.339
of the character actor today, doesn't it? If

00:17:54.339 --> 00:17:56.839
you define a new commit to it, eventually you

00:17:56.839 --> 00:17:59.079
become essential. You can move fluidly between

00:17:59.079 --> 00:18:01.759
genre, between media. And that intense commitment

00:18:01.759 --> 00:18:05.700
to his beliefs, his voice, whether it's artistic,

00:18:06.179 --> 00:18:08.559
Yeah. That brings us straight to section four,

00:18:08.700 --> 00:18:12.019
personal life and vocal activism, because this

00:18:12.019 --> 00:18:14.400
part of his story shows that the confrontation

00:18:14.400 --> 00:18:16.799
we saw in his comedy, it's now very much part

00:18:16.799 --> 00:18:19.380
of his public identity. Yeah. First, though,

00:18:19.460 --> 00:18:21.920
let's touch on the personal history, which. Kind

00:18:21.920 --> 00:18:24.119
of delightfully circles right back to where his

00:18:24.119 --> 00:18:26.700
career funding came from. Oh, yeah. Gellman married

00:18:26.700 --> 00:18:30.059
director Janitza Bravo in December 2015. They

00:18:30.059 --> 00:18:32.299
met in New York City while working on, and this

00:18:32.299 --> 00:18:34.880
is almost too perfect, a New York lotto commercial.

00:18:35.220 --> 00:18:37.599
Get out. That's amazing. Isn't it? The commercial

00:18:37.599 --> 00:18:39.819
gives him the stability, which lets him do the

00:18:39.819 --> 00:18:41.940
experimental comedy, which leads to the collaboration

00:18:41.940 --> 00:18:44.539
that produced Lemon. And, oh, by the way, it's

00:18:44.539 --> 00:18:47.599
where he met his first wife. That lottery spot

00:18:47.599 --> 00:18:51.599
really was a pivotal bit of luck. Wow. Okay.

00:18:51.720 --> 00:18:54.960
They divorced in 2018. Right. And more recently,

00:18:55.059 --> 00:18:57.720
he announced his engagement to actress and model

00:18:57.720 --> 00:19:01.660
Ari Dayan on Instagram in April 2023. And they

00:19:01.660 --> 00:19:04.220
got married in 2025. Okay. Now let's address

00:19:04.220 --> 00:19:06.880
his vocal activism. This has put him squarely

00:19:06.880 --> 00:19:09.099
into some very high stakes public discussions,

00:19:09.339 --> 00:19:12.440
especially around global politics. And it's really

00:19:12.440 --> 00:19:14.660
vital here that we just report this impartially.

00:19:14.839 --> 00:19:17.220
Convey what the sources say without taking sides

00:19:17.220 --> 00:19:19.420
or endorsing any views. We're just conveying

00:19:19.420 --> 00:19:21.690
the reported facts of it. his public life. Agreed.

00:19:21.690 --> 00:19:24.170
The source material is very clear on this. Gelman

00:19:24.170 --> 00:19:26.569
has been described as a, quote, vocal supporter

00:19:26.569 --> 00:19:29.589
of Israel on Instagram throughout the Gaza war.

00:19:30.009 --> 00:19:32.309
And this activism wasn't just, you know, posting

00:19:32.309 --> 00:19:35.269
things online. It led to a significant, organized

00:19:35.269 --> 00:19:38.970
public confrontation in November 2023. Directed

00:19:38.970 --> 00:19:41.049
at TikTok, the social media platform. Exactly.

00:19:41.410 --> 00:19:43.990
Gelman was part of a group, a collective of creators

00:19:43.990 --> 00:19:46.329
and celebrities who publicly addressed TikTok

00:19:46.329 --> 00:19:49.529
executives in an open letter. And the core allegation

00:19:49.529 --> 00:19:52.230
in that letter was very specific. Extremely specific.

00:19:52.569 --> 00:19:55.710
The creators claimed the app was directly facilitating

00:19:55.710 --> 00:19:58.549
and amplifying the spread of anti -Semitism on

00:19:58.549 --> 00:20:01.690
its platform. That's a direct claim about algorithmic

00:20:01.690 --> 00:20:05.000
behavior and content moderation policy. And the

00:20:05.000 --> 00:20:07.519
source material details TikTok's response. As

00:20:07.519 --> 00:20:10.500
a huge global platform, they reportedly countered

00:20:10.500 --> 00:20:13.440
those claims publicly. They stated that they

00:20:13.440 --> 00:20:16.240
regularly moderate anti -Semitic content as well

00:20:16.240 --> 00:20:19.059
as anti -Arab racist and Islamophobic content.

00:20:19.299 --> 00:20:21.440
But crucially. Crucially, they drew a distinction

00:20:21.440 --> 00:20:24.180
stating they do not moderate or amplify content

00:20:24.180 --> 00:20:26.940
that is expressing political criticism of the

00:20:26.940 --> 00:20:29.279
Israeli government. And that conflict right there

00:20:29.279 --> 00:20:31.599
just perfectly illustrates the incredibly complex

00:20:31.599 --> 00:20:33.819
challenge these platforms face, right? Right.

00:20:33.900 --> 00:20:36.160
Balancing free expression, political critique

00:20:36.160 --> 00:20:38.299
and hate speech moderation, especially during

00:20:38.299 --> 00:20:41.079
active global conflicts. Yeah. For Gelman, though,

00:20:41.180 --> 00:20:44.000
this was clearly an active, high profile way

00:20:44.000 --> 00:20:46.500
of translating his discomfort with systemic issues

00:20:46.500 --> 00:20:49.200
into public action, taking a stand. And it wasn't

00:20:49.200 --> 00:20:51.519
just aimed at American platforms. Later that

00:20:51.519 --> 00:20:54.920
same year, 2023, the source notes he actually

00:20:54.920 --> 00:20:57.680
appeared on Eretz Neheteret, which is a hugely

00:20:57.680 --> 00:21:01.119
popular Israeli sketch comedy show. Right. And

00:21:01.119 --> 00:21:02.700
the Times of Israel described his appearance

00:21:02.700 --> 00:21:06.079
as specifically, quote, skewering the anti -Israel

00:21:06.079 --> 00:21:08.259
sentiment in the American left and especially

00:21:08.259 --> 00:21:11.160
on campus. So that confirms his willingness to

00:21:11.160 --> 00:21:13.500
engage directly in that political and cultural

00:21:13.500 --> 00:21:16.500
debate using comedy as his platform, much like

00:21:16.500 --> 00:21:19.059
the Adult Swim specials, maybe, but this time

00:21:19.059 --> 00:21:21.720
with incredibly real world political stakes.

00:21:21.960 --> 00:21:23.859
And there's a clear indication that this advocacy

00:21:23.859 --> 00:21:26.900
came at a personal cost. The source notes Gelman

00:21:26.900 --> 00:21:31.710
himself stated in November 2023, quote, Wow.

00:21:32.230 --> 00:21:34.809
That one sentence really underscores the high

00:21:34.809 --> 00:21:37.170
stakes of his vocal position. It completes the

00:21:37.170 --> 00:21:39.369
picture, doesn't it, of a performer who seems

00:21:39.369 --> 00:21:42.269
unable or unwilling to separate his personal

00:21:42.269 --> 00:21:44.650
convictions from his public platform. That willingness

00:21:44.650 --> 00:21:47.210
to engage in uncomfortable confrontation, which

00:21:47.210 --> 00:21:49.490
maybe started as a comedic tool to explore truth,

00:21:49.650 --> 00:21:52.710
is now manifesting as very serious, potentially

00:21:52.710 --> 00:21:55.910
isolating public advocacy. He just does not shy

00:21:55.910 --> 00:21:58.210
away from the abrasive. Which brings us nicely

00:21:58.210 --> 00:22:01.430
to our synthesis, our final takeaways. When we

00:22:01.430 --> 00:22:03.890
look back at the whole career path, there's this

00:22:03.890 --> 00:22:06.470
fascinating and consistent pattern. You've got

00:22:06.470 --> 00:22:08.529
the intense discipline of classical training

00:22:08.529 --> 00:22:11.410
providing the bedrock. Then the experimental

00:22:11.410 --> 00:22:15.349
confrontational world of UCB and Adult Swim providing

00:22:15.349 --> 00:22:18.049
the unique voice. And those two things together

00:22:18.049 --> 00:22:21.329
led to this sustained mainstream career where

00:22:21.329 --> 00:22:23.529
he constantly plays characters who are paranoid.

00:22:24.000 --> 00:22:27.339
or intense or morally ambiguous. His true genius,

00:22:27.440 --> 00:22:30.460
I think, lies in using that classical commitment

00:22:30.460 --> 00:22:33.720
to ground the deeply absurd. His signature isn't

00:22:33.720 --> 00:22:36.539
just being awkward. It's the intense, believable

00:22:36.539 --> 00:22:39.160
commitment to an unbearable situation, whether

00:22:39.160 --> 00:22:41.119
he's hosting a horrific dinner party, translating

00:22:41.119 --> 00:22:43.420
Russian in a bunker or being the psychological

00:22:43.420 --> 00:22:45.819
tormentor Martin and Fleabag. And we can't forget

00:22:45.819 --> 00:22:48.519
that lovely, almost perfect narrative loop of

00:22:48.519 --> 00:22:50.319
the New York lottery commercial. It's great.

00:22:50.420 --> 00:22:52.440
The financial little bit of luck that funded

00:22:52.440 --> 00:22:54.470
the early risky. comedy and also the place he

00:22:54.470 --> 00:22:56.150
met the collaborator who helped him realize his

00:22:56.150 --> 00:22:59.829
most ambitious film vision, Lemon, that initial

00:22:59.829 --> 00:23:02.549
lottery win truly funded his entire creative

00:23:02.549 --> 00:23:04.950
path in a way. And what really stands out looking

00:23:04.950 --> 00:23:07.849
across the whole timeline is the profound consistency

00:23:07.849 --> 00:23:11.900
of His character, maybe. He takes risks, creatively

00:23:11.900 --> 00:23:14.599
leaving Adult Swim on principle and politically

00:23:14.599 --> 00:23:17.519
through his very public activism. Now, his whole

00:23:17.519 --> 00:23:20.119
persona seems predicated on confrontation, whether

00:23:20.119 --> 00:23:22.339
that confrontation is artistic or ideological.

00:23:22.579 --> 00:23:24.700
So what does this all mean for you, the listener?

00:23:24.880 --> 00:23:27.450
Yeah. We've seen Gelman move definitively into

00:23:27.450 --> 00:23:30.869
really serious, heavy, dramatic territory. Roles

00:23:30.869 --> 00:23:33.329
like Milton in Lady and the Like, playing Terry

00:23:33.329 --> 00:23:35.329
Nichols and McVeigh. Yeah, which raises a really

00:23:35.329 --> 00:23:36.670
interesting question for you to think about.

00:23:36.789 --> 00:23:39.930
How will his history, all that time spent injecting

00:23:39.930 --> 00:23:42.970
genuine, awkward, often painful truth into comedy,

00:23:43.150 --> 00:23:45.509
how will that continue to inform these increasingly

00:23:45.509 --> 00:23:48.009
serious, dramatic roles? Will that comedic background

00:23:48.009 --> 00:23:50.390
make his dramatic villains more complex, more

00:23:50.390 --> 00:23:53.990
sort of painfully human, or maybe just more theatrical?

00:23:54.730 --> 00:23:56.950
using drama to heighten absurdity. Now maybe

00:23:56.950 --> 00:23:59.509
he has to use absurdity to heighten drama. And

00:23:59.509 --> 00:24:04.029
what is his entire journey? You know, from an

00:24:04.029 --> 00:24:06.309
Illinois kid with classical training to an international

00:24:06.309 --> 00:24:08.410
character actor taking really high stakes political

00:24:08.410 --> 00:24:10.750
stands. What does that tell us about the power

00:24:10.750 --> 00:24:13.390
and maybe the necessary unpredictability of the

00:24:13.390 --> 00:24:16.289
character actor today? He seems like proof that

00:24:16.289 --> 00:24:19.269
embracing that niche confrontational voice can,

00:24:19.430 --> 00:24:21.789
if it's backed by real discipline, lead you right

00:24:21.789 --> 00:24:24.029
to the heart of mainstream artistic success.

00:24:24.599 --> 00:24:26.960
Yeah. And maybe an interesting final thought

00:24:26.960 --> 00:24:28.880
to leave you with, connecting right back to the

00:24:28.880 --> 00:24:31.619
start of our deep dive. Gilman said his original

00:24:31.619 --> 00:24:34.920
comedic goal was to reflect the fears and anger

00:24:34.920 --> 00:24:36.440
and sadness of the world, but do that through

00:24:36.440 --> 00:24:38.960
a really stupid lens. Right. As he portrays figures

00:24:38.960 --> 00:24:41.319
like Murray Barman or even historical figures

00:24:41.319 --> 00:24:44.660
like Terry Nichols. How much of his current dramatic

00:24:44.660 --> 00:24:48.400
work is maybe just a more refined but still present

00:24:48.400 --> 00:24:51.180
application of that exact same truth -telling

00:24:51.180 --> 00:24:53.900
stupid lens? Is he still doing the same thing,

00:24:53.940 --> 00:24:56.920
just on a different stage? That's a compelling

00:24:56.920 --> 00:24:59.039
thought to chew on. Thank you for joining us

00:24:59.039 --> 00:24:59.740
on the Deep Dive.
