WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:01.639
Welcome back to The Deep Dive, where we take

00:00:01.639 --> 00:00:04.839
a monumental career, stack up the evidence, and

00:00:04.839 --> 00:00:08.119
really try to extract the singular story that

00:00:08.119 --> 00:00:10.679
defines it. And today we're tackling a big one,

00:00:10.759 --> 00:00:13.480
a really big one. We are. We're attempting to

00:00:13.480 --> 00:00:17.519
map the truly, well, chameleonic landscape that

00:00:17.519 --> 00:00:20.339
is the career of John Arthur Lithgow. It is a

00:00:20.339 --> 00:00:22.620
vast landscape, definitely. I mean, this is a

00:00:22.620 --> 00:00:24.780
career that just completely defies the kind of

00:00:24.780 --> 00:00:27.179
boxes we usually put performers in, you know?

00:00:27.219 --> 00:00:31.199
Totally. He's 79 now. as of october 2024 and

00:00:31.199 --> 00:00:34.100
you look at his work it's not just acting no

00:00:34.100 --> 00:00:38.100
not at all it's acting in like every medium imaginable

00:00:38.100 --> 00:00:42.159
film tv stage plus authorship music even poetry

00:00:42.700 --> 00:00:44.560
He's basically a polymath, isn't he? Someone

00:00:44.560 --> 00:00:46.920
who just refuses to specialize. Absolutely. And

00:00:46.920 --> 00:00:48.520
when you look at his accomplishments, it's not

00:00:48.520 --> 00:00:51.539
just dabbling. He's achieved real mastery in

00:00:51.539 --> 00:00:53.840
fields most actors wouldn't even, well, attempt.

00:00:54.100 --> 00:00:56.259
Right. Think about it. He's the goofy alien commander

00:00:56.259 --> 00:00:58.719
from Third Rock. Dick Solomon. Yeah. Hilarious.

00:00:58.759 --> 00:01:00.460
But then he's also Arthur Mitchell, the Trinity

00:01:00.460 --> 00:01:02.479
killer. Terrifying. Butterly terrifying. And

00:01:02.479 --> 00:01:04.680
then he's Winston Churchill. A revered historical

00:01:04.680 --> 00:01:08.319
figure. And on top of all that, he might genuinely

00:01:08.319 --> 00:01:11.140
be your kid's favorite author. It's kind of mind

00:01:11.140 --> 00:01:14.340
bending. All wrapped up in one, you know, extremely

00:01:14.340 --> 00:01:17.040
tall package. Yeah, he is tall, isn't he? But

00:01:17.040 --> 00:01:20.079
that kind of versatility, it only really matters

00:01:20.079 --> 00:01:22.379
if the quality holds up across the board. And

00:01:22.379 --> 00:01:24.680
with Lithgow, it absolutely does. The quality

00:01:24.680 --> 00:01:26.879
is, well, it's certified. You just look at the

00:01:26.879 --> 00:01:30.219
awards. Exactly. The institutional acclaim is

00:01:30.219 --> 00:01:32.879
undeniable. We're talking, what, a total of six

00:01:32.879 --> 00:01:37.260
primetime Emmy Awards? Six Emmys. Two Golden

00:01:37.260 --> 00:01:39.920
Globes. Two Tonys, the big ones for Broadway.

00:01:40.159 --> 00:01:42.739
And a Laurence Olivier Award from London's West

00:01:42.739 --> 00:01:46.159
End, plus four Drama Desk Awards. It's incredible.

00:01:46.400 --> 00:01:49.000
That means he's hit the absolute top tier in

00:01:49.000 --> 00:01:52.239
American TV comedy, American TV drama, Broadway

00:01:52.239 --> 00:01:54.319
theater, and London theater. It's astonishing

00:01:54.319 --> 00:01:57.140
consistency across different forms and, frankly,

00:01:57.200 --> 00:01:59.340
different countries' theatrical traditions. And

00:01:59.340 --> 00:02:01.120
the nominations. They tell an even broader story

00:02:01.120 --> 00:02:03.420
about just how far his reach extends. Oh, yeah.

00:02:03.519 --> 00:02:06.400
Two Academy Award nominations for film. A BAFTA

00:02:06.400 --> 00:02:09.039
nomination, too. Right. British Academy Film

00:02:09.039 --> 00:02:12.180
Award, four Grammy nominations. That's for his

00:02:12.180 --> 00:02:14.360
music and spoken word stuff. Which is a whole

00:02:14.360 --> 00:02:16.400
other area we need to get into. And four Screen

00:02:16.400 --> 00:02:18.580
Actors Guild Awards nominations as well from

00:02:18.580 --> 00:02:21.139
his peers. So this isn't just, you know, a talented

00:02:21.139 --> 00:02:23.879
actor. This is a genuine cultural powerhouse.

00:02:24.180 --> 00:02:27.360
Someone whose success just translates seemingly

00:02:27.360 --> 00:02:30.080
effortlessly across every single form of media.

00:02:30.259 --> 00:02:32.159
And that's what's really fascinating here, isn't

00:02:32.159 --> 00:02:34.139
it? That's the core of our deep dive today. How

00:02:34.139 --> 00:02:37.400
does he do it? How does he manage those? extreme

00:02:37.400 --> 00:02:39.919
pivots from high art to pop culture and back

00:02:39.919 --> 00:02:43.139
again yeah moving so smoothly between really

00:02:43.139 --> 00:02:45.840
demanding intellectual work think shakespeare

00:02:45.840 --> 00:02:48.979
on stage like king lear right very highbrow and

00:02:48.979 --> 00:02:51.539
then you know huge populist entertainment animated

00:02:51.539 --> 00:02:54.960
movies network sitcoms family comedies our mission

00:02:54.960 --> 00:02:57.900
then is to try and connect these dots these seemingly

00:02:57.900 --> 00:03:00.830
completely separate parts of his career And trace

00:03:00.830 --> 00:03:03.569
how maybe his intellectual, his academic foundation

00:03:03.569 --> 00:03:05.710
actually provided the structure that allowed

00:03:05.710 --> 00:03:08.530
him to master pretty much every genre he decided

00:03:08.530 --> 00:03:11.210
to touch. From really sharp political satire.

00:03:11.310 --> 00:03:13.870
To these incredibly sensitive, deep character

00:03:13.870 --> 00:03:16.689
studies. That intellectual foundation does sound

00:03:16.689 --> 00:03:19.810
key. So, OK, let's unpack this. Let's start right

00:03:19.810 --> 00:03:23.710
at the beginning. The roots. What gave him this

00:03:23.710 --> 00:03:26.669
remarkable discipline, this flexibility we see

00:03:26.669 --> 00:03:29.599
throughout his career? Indeed. Let's go back.

00:03:29.680 --> 00:03:33.560
John Lithgow, born October 19, 1945, Rochester,

00:03:33.900 --> 00:03:36.719
New York. But his world was theatrical from,

00:03:36.780 --> 00:03:39.159
well, from day one. Born into it. Pretty much.

00:03:39.240 --> 00:03:42.539
His father, Arthur Lithgow, was a highly regarded

00:03:42.539 --> 00:03:46.060
theatrical producer, director, too. Probably

00:03:46.060 --> 00:03:48.639
best known for running the McCarter Theater in

00:03:48.639 --> 00:03:50.719
Princeton, New Jersey. A very prestigious place.

00:03:50.939 --> 00:03:54.150
And his mother? His mother, Sarah Jane. was a

00:03:54.150 --> 00:03:56.509
retired actress herself. So, wow. He wasn't just

00:03:56.509 --> 00:03:58.289
aware of the theater. He was practically raised

00:03:58.289 --> 00:04:00.689
backstage. Exactly. You can picture it, right?

00:04:00.770 --> 00:04:03.090
The kid doing his homework in the wings while,

00:04:03.189 --> 00:04:05.270
I don't know, Chekhov is being rehearsed on stage.

00:04:05.509 --> 00:04:07.810
He lived and breathed it. The family absolutely

00:04:07.810 --> 00:04:09.930
did. And his childhood, it was really defined

00:04:09.930 --> 00:04:12.189
by movement and observation. Essential tools

00:04:12.189 --> 00:04:14.870
for any great character actor, right? Constantly

00:04:14.870 --> 00:04:17.370
adapting. Because his father's job meant they

00:04:17.370 --> 00:04:21.029
moved around. A lot. frequently. And this is

00:04:21.029 --> 00:04:23.129
where we get some of those really surprising,

00:04:23.370 --> 00:04:26.829
almost, wait, what? Anecdotes? Okay, yeah, lay

00:04:26.829 --> 00:04:29.269
them on us. The Coretta Scott King one still

00:04:29.269 --> 00:04:31.889
blows my mind every time I hear it. It's genuinely

00:04:31.889 --> 00:04:34.509
remarkable, isn't it? A real historical footnote.

00:04:34.670 --> 00:04:37.870
It just illuminates the kind of intellectual

00:04:37.870 --> 00:04:40.389
and socially engaged environment he was growing

00:04:40.389 --> 00:04:43.110
up in. So where was this? They lived for a time

00:04:43.110 --> 00:04:45.889
in Yellow Springs, Ohio. And yes, the activist

00:04:45.889 --> 00:04:48.389
Coretta Scott King was actually his babysitter.

00:04:48.759 --> 00:04:51.519
Just imagine that, the conversations, the atmosphere.

00:04:52.579 --> 00:04:56.259
The proximity to major historical figures during

00:04:56.259 --> 00:04:58.319
your formative years. It's incredible. It really

00:04:58.319 --> 00:05:00.959
speaks volumes about the circles his family moved

00:05:00.959 --> 00:05:03.420
in. Not just theater people, but, you know, plugged

00:05:03.420 --> 00:05:05.699
into the broader currents of American thought

00:05:05.699 --> 00:05:07.779
and activism at the time. So it wasn't just Yellow

00:05:07.779 --> 00:05:10.040
Springs. No, he also spent time in other places.

00:05:10.100 --> 00:05:12.120
They lived at Stan Highwood Hall in Akron for

00:05:12.120 --> 00:05:14.259
a while. Wow, the former Cyberling estate. That's

00:05:14.259 --> 00:05:17.300
amazing. Yeah, and then Lakewood, Ohio. Before

00:05:17.300 --> 00:05:19.620
the family finally settled more permanently in

00:05:19.620 --> 00:05:23.540
Princeton. All that moving around. It must have

00:05:23.540 --> 00:05:25.819
demanded a huge amount of adaptability from him

00:05:25.819 --> 00:05:27.980
as a kid. You'd have to think so. Constantly

00:05:27.980 --> 00:05:30.680
assessing new environments, new people, new social

00:05:30.680 --> 00:05:33.500
dynamics, new expectations. It's actually perfect

00:05:33.500 --> 00:05:36.360
training, in a way, for someone who would later

00:05:36.360 --> 00:05:38.660
need to inhabit dozens of completely different

00:05:38.660 --> 00:05:41.319
characters. Makes sense. And that adaptability,

00:05:41.379 --> 00:05:43.699
that intelligence, it clearly extended to his

00:05:43.699 --> 00:05:47.360
schoolwork. His academic record is, well, seriously

00:05:47.360 --> 00:05:50.279
impressive. Oh, definitely. After graduating

00:05:50.279 --> 00:05:52.959
from Princeton High School in 63, he went straight

00:05:52.959 --> 00:05:55.879
to Harvard College. And studied. History and

00:05:55.879 --> 00:05:58.180
English literature. So we're talking a classical,

00:05:58.259 --> 00:06:00.980
rigorous, liberal arts education. And he wasn't

00:06:00.980 --> 00:06:02.959
just coasting either. Not at all. This wasn't

00:06:02.959 --> 00:06:06.459
a casual degree. He graduated in 1967 with an

00:06:06.459 --> 00:06:09.540
AB Magna Cum Laude. Which means... With great

00:06:09.540 --> 00:06:12.680
distinction. Exactly. And he was elected to Phi

00:06:12.680 --> 00:06:15.480
Beta Kappa, the academic honor society, this

00:06:15.480 --> 00:06:18.319
intellectual firepower, this deep dive into narrative,

00:06:18.379 --> 00:06:21.579
history, human motivation. You feel like that's

00:06:21.579 --> 00:06:23.779
the unseen engine driving his versatility later

00:06:23.779 --> 00:06:26.319
on. He didn't just learn how to act. He learned

00:06:26.319 --> 00:06:29.670
why people act the way they do. Precisely. And

00:06:29.670 --> 00:06:32.430
that connection to academia, it stuck with him.

00:06:32.569 --> 00:06:34.889
He even served on the Harvard Board of Overseers

00:06:34.889 --> 00:06:36.870
later in life. So he's got this brilliant academic

00:06:36.870 --> 00:06:40.569
mind. Yeah. What was the moment, the spark, that

00:06:40.569 --> 00:06:42.889
really turned this history scholar towards being

00:06:42.889 --> 00:06:45.139
a full -time performer? Was there a specific

00:06:45.139 --> 00:06:47.420
point? He actually credits a specific student

00:06:47.420 --> 00:06:49.519
performance he did at Harvard. It was a production

00:06:49.519 --> 00:06:52.740
of Gilbert and Sullivan's Utopia Limited. A comedic

00:06:52.740 --> 00:06:55.379
operetta. Interesting. Yeah. Apparently doing

00:06:55.379 --> 00:06:58.220
that, experiencing the joy of that kind of performance,

00:06:58.459 --> 00:07:01.019
it just crystallized his decision. This is what

00:07:01.019 --> 00:07:03.300
he wanted to do. But he didn't just, you know,

00:07:03.300 --> 00:07:06.160
pack his bags for New York right away. No. Characteristically,

00:07:06.220 --> 00:07:08.639
he doubled down on training first. classical

00:07:08.639 --> 00:07:11.720
training. He won a Fulbright scholarship, which

00:07:11.720 --> 00:07:14.420
allowed him to go study across the pond at the

00:07:14.420 --> 00:07:17.480
London Academy of Music and Dramatic Art, LMDA.

00:07:17.740 --> 00:07:19.720
Which is one of the top acting conservatories

00:07:19.720 --> 00:07:22.540
in the world. Absolutely. So that path is really

00:07:22.540 --> 00:07:24.899
crucial, I think. First, the intellectual rigor

00:07:24.899 --> 00:07:28.279
of Harvard, then the classical stagecraft of

00:07:28.279 --> 00:07:32.160
LMDA. That combination, it gives you an actor

00:07:32.160 --> 00:07:36.639
who can handle incredibly stylized farce, but

00:07:36.639 --> 00:07:40.540
with like surgical precision and also deep drama

00:07:40.540 --> 00:07:43.660
right and even after lmda he didn't rush things

00:07:43.660 --> 00:07:46.399
before he hit broadway he actually served as

00:07:46.399 --> 00:07:48.160
the director of the arts and literature department

00:07:48.160 --> 00:07:51.500
at wbai the pacifica radio station in new york

00:07:51.500 --> 00:07:54.540
that's the one which shows this early interest

00:07:54.540 --> 00:07:57.420
in like curating and administering culture not

00:07:57.420 --> 00:08:00.360
just performing it he had this broader holistic

00:08:00.360 --> 00:08:03.839
view of the arts world from the start Okay. Before

00:08:03.839 --> 00:08:06.339
we jump into his professional career taking off,

00:08:06.399 --> 00:08:09.800
we absolutely have to mention that other wild

00:08:09.800 --> 00:08:12.420
factoid. The genealogical stuff. Oh, yeah. The

00:08:12.420 --> 00:08:14.540
finding your roots discoveries. It's truly astonishing.

00:08:14.560 --> 00:08:17.079
So he finds out he's a direct descendant of how

00:08:17.079 --> 00:08:19.600
many Mayflower passengers? Eight. eight Mayflower

00:08:19.600 --> 00:08:21.759
passengers, including William Bradford, the colonial

00:08:21.759 --> 00:08:24.439
governor. So his roots go right back to the literal

00:08:24.439 --> 00:08:26.259
beginning of the American historical narrative.

00:08:26.439 --> 00:08:28.180
It's incredible. And if that wasn't enough...

00:08:28.180 --> 00:08:30.279
There's more. The findings also showed he's related

00:08:30.279 --> 00:08:33.379
to the show's host, Henry Lewitt Gates Jr., and

00:08:33.379 --> 00:08:36.659
he's distant cousins with this unbelievable roster

00:08:36.659 --> 00:08:39.500
of American cultural figures. Like who? Okay,

00:08:39.539 --> 00:08:42.879
get this. Chef Julia Child. Wow. The famously

00:08:42.879 --> 00:08:46.200
reclusive author Thomas Pynchon. No way. Pynchon.

00:08:46.259 --> 00:08:49.759
Yeah. And actors like Alec Baldwin, Clint Eastwood,

00:08:49.799 --> 00:08:52.879
and Sally Field. That is an insane collection

00:08:52.879 --> 00:08:54.940
of relatives. It really is. And if you pause

00:08:54.940 --> 00:08:56.960
for a second and kind of connect this surprising

00:08:56.960 --> 00:09:00.419
lineage to his career, maybe it starts to make

00:09:00.419 --> 00:09:03.840
a strange sort of sense. How so? Well, he literally

00:09:03.840 --> 00:09:06.580
contains this huge swath of American cultural

00:09:06.580 --> 00:09:09.019
history within his family tree, right? From pilgrims

00:09:09.019 --> 00:09:12.480
and governors to celebrity chefs, literary enigmas,

00:09:12.480 --> 00:09:14.960
Hollywood icons. So you're saying inhabiting

00:09:14.960 --> 00:09:16.799
all these different American personas. Yeah.

00:09:16.860 --> 00:09:19.620
From the highbrow intellectual to the, you know.

00:09:20.139 --> 00:09:23.179
deeply populist entertainer, it's almost like

00:09:23.179 --> 00:09:25.919
a birthright for him. Maybe. It suggests he has

00:09:25.919 --> 00:09:27.919
both the intellectual grounding and this kind

00:09:27.919 --> 00:09:30.440
of deep, almost familial connection to play all

00:09:30.440 --> 00:09:32.679
these different American cultural roles authentically.

00:09:33.200 --> 00:09:35.559
Interesting angle. Speaking of authenticity,

00:09:35.899 --> 00:09:38.919
let's trace his rise, starting with this stage,

00:09:39.100 --> 00:09:41.559
which really feels like the core of his artistic

00:09:41.559 --> 00:09:44.080
identity, doesn't it? Absolutely. The thespian

00:09:44.080 --> 00:09:47.120
core. So we're looking at roughly 1972 to 1995.

00:09:48.009 --> 00:09:50.370
This period where he just dominates Broadway

00:09:50.370 --> 00:09:53.490
almost immediately and then gets massive film

00:09:53.490 --> 00:09:56.389
recognition. His professional launch was, frankly,

00:09:56.549 --> 00:10:00.730
explosive. Made his Broadway debut in 73. David

00:10:00.730 --> 00:10:03.250
Story's play, The Changing Room. And the reaction.

00:10:03.570 --> 00:10:06.210
Immediate. Overwhelming. He won his very first

00:10:06.210 --> 00:10:08.789
Tony Award right there. Best featured actor in

00:10:08.789 --> 00:10:11.500
a play. And a Drama Desk Award, too. For his

00:10:11.500 --> 00:10:14.580
debut, that's incredibly rare. It just signals

00:10:14.580 --> 00:10:18.000
that all that training, Harvard, LAMDA, the radio

00:10:18.000 --> 00:10:20.580
work, it paid off instantly. The discipline was

00:10:20.580 --> 00:10:23.019
there. Totally. And that success kept him focused

00:10:23.019 --> 00:10:25.279
on the stage initially. He did major work in

00:10:25.279 --> 00:10:27.399
other plays, like My Fat Friend opposite Lynn

00:10:27.399 --> 00:10:29.480
Redgrave. And more Tony nominations followed.

00:10:29.600 --> 00:10:32.360
Yep. He was nominated again in 1985 for Requiem

00:10:32.360 --> 00:10:34.480
for a Heavyweight. That was written by Rod Serling,

00:10:34.539 --> 00:10:36.750
actually. Wow, the Twilight Zone creator. The

00:10:36.750 --> 00:10:39.470
very same. Then came that critically acclaimed

00:10:39.470 --> 00:10:42.850
run in M. Butterfly in 1988 opposite B .D. Wong.

00:10:43.169 --> 00:10:45.470
Got another Tony nomination for that. So the

00:10:45.470 --> 00:10:47.870
stage wasn't just a launch pad. It was his anchor,

00:10:47.970 --> 00:10:51.149
his home base. Absolutely. But while he was conquering

00:10:51.149 --> 00:10:54.309
Broadway, he was also quietly building this parallel

00:10:54.309 --> 00:10:57.649
career in film. And that really exploded in the

00:10:57.649 --> 00:10:59.490
early 80s. What was the turning point there?

00:10:59.950 --> 00:11:02.990
Well, his film debut was actually 72 in a movie

00:11:02.990 --> 00:11:05.830
called Dealing or the Berkeley to Boston 40 brick

00:11:05.830 --> 00:11:09.169
lost bag blues. Bit of a mouthful. Yeah, just

00:11:09.169 --> 00:11:11.730
rolls off the tongue. But he gained serious traction

00:11:11.730 --> 00:11:14.049
playing a character based loosely on the choreographer

00:11:14.049 --> 00:11:16.230
Michael Bennett in Bob Fosse's All That Jazz

00:11:16.230 --> 00:11:20.090
in 1979. Oh, right. Great film. Intense. Super

00:11:20.090 --> 00:11:22.590
intense. And that role alone showed he could

00:11:22.590 --> 00:11:25.549
handle Fosse's really complex mix of, you know,

00:11:25.549 --> 00:11:28.490
musicality, drama, psychological depth. And this

00:11:28.490 --> 00:11:30.710
leads us right into the period that cemented

00:11:30.710 --> 00:11:33.289
his screen credibility. Those back -to -back

00:11:33.289 --> 00:11:35.710
Oscar nominations. Yeah, it's such a testament

00:11:35.710 --> 00:11:37.629
to his range that these nominations came for

00:11:37.629 --> 00:11:40.629
two completely different kinds of performances,

00:11:40.909 --> 00:11:44.769
both emotionally rich, but so distinct. First

00:11:44.769 --> 00:11:49.000
one was 82, The World According to Garp. Playing

00:11:49.000 --> 00:11:52.019
Roberta Muldoon, the transgender ex -football

00:11:52.019 --> 00:11:54.919
player. A groundbreaking role for its time, surely,

00:11:55.159 --> 00:11:57.779
especially in mainstream film. Absolutely. It

00:11:57.779 --> 00:12:00.120
demanded incredible sensitivity, real emotional

00:12:00.120 --> 00:12:02.840
honesty. He had to portray this character who

00:12:02.840 --> 00:12:05.620
was, let's face it, often misunderstood or even

00:12:05.620 --> 00:12:08.120
caricatured back then. How did he manage to make

00:12:08.120 --> 00:12:11.440
it so moving, so sensitive, rather than, you

00:12:11.440 --> 00:12:14.169
know, playing it for laughs or shock value? I

00:12:14.169 --> 00:12:15.950
think it comes back to that intellectual approach,

00:12:16.070 --> 00:12:17.610
that respect for the character's complexity.

00:12:17.950 --> 00:12:21.029
He approached Roberta as a fully realized human

00:12:21.029 --> 00:12:23.830
being. Focused on her internal life, her dignity,

00:12:24.009 --> 00:12:26.129
not just the external transformation. And the

00:12:26.129 --> 00:12:28.549
nomination itself was a huge validation of that

00:12:28.549 --> 00:12:30.929
nuanced approach. Definitely. It showed he could

00:12:30.929 --> 00:12:33.350
access that profound emotional depth right away

00:12:33.350 --> 00:12:36.470
on screen. And then, incredibly, he follows that

00:12:36.470 --> 00:12:39.269
up the very next year, 1983, with another nomination.

00:12:39.629 --> 00:12:42.129
Second consecutive nod for Best Supporting Actor,

00:12:42.330 --> 00:12:44.730
this time for Terms of Endearment. Plain Sam

00:12:44.730 --> 00:12:47.990
Burns, the quiet, lonely banker who has the affair

00:12:47.990 --> 00:12:51.200
with Debra Winger's character. Oh, Shirley MacLaine's

00:12:51.200 --> 00:12:53.120
character. Right. Shirley MacLaine's character,

00:12:53.320 --> 00:12:56.080
Emma, he provides this sort of quiet, grounded

00:12:56.080 --> 00:12:59.840
counterpoint to her chaotic life. That contrast

00:12:59.840 --> 00:13:03.419
is just amazing. From the pioneering, life -altering

00:13:03.419 --> 00:13:06.159
journey of Roberta Muldoon. To the understated,

00:13:06.159 --> 00:13:09.179
almost mundane, relatable sadness of Sam Burns.

00:13:09.460 --> 00:13:12.779
Those two roles back -to -back, they really cemented

00:13:12.779 --> 00:13:15.179
his reputation, didn't they? As this dynamic...

00:13:15.600 --> 00:13:18.840
emotionally articulate, super reliable screen

00:13:18.840 --> 00:13:21.120
actor, no matter the genre. Totally. He could

00:13:21.120 --> 00:13:22.960
do anything. And the rest of the 80s proved it.

00:13:23.000 --> 00:13:24.799
It was like an absolute genre playground for

00:13:24.799 --> 00:13:27.120
him, just showcasing that ability to jump between

00:13:27.120 --> 00:13:30.220
high art and, well, pure, sometimes frantic entertainment.

00:13:30.700 --> 00:13:32.639
Okay, so let's talk about that 80s run. Where

00:13:32.639 --> 00:13:35.419
does he go after the Oscar nods? Well, the transition

00:13:35.419 --> 00:13:38.539
from respected nominee to genuine horror icon

00:13:38.539 --> 00:13:41.820
happened pretty quickly. 1983, Twilight Zone,

00:13:42.039 --> 00:13:44.659
the movie. Ah, yes. Nightmare at 20 ,000 Feet.

00:13:45.100 --> 00:13:47.460
The gremlin on the wing. He plays that terrified

00:13:47.460 --> 00:13:49.980
passenger, John Valentine. And his performance

00:13:49.980 --> 00:13:53.279
is just sheer, unadulterated psychological terror.

00:13:53.480 --> 00:13:55.799
It's riveting. He actually said in an interview,

00:13:55.860 --> 00:13:58.200
I think, with Bill Moyers that this was his favorite

00:13:58.200 --> 00:14:00.600
film role he ever did. And that tells you so

00:14:00.600 --> 00:14:02.740
much, doesn't it? He loves roles that demand

00:14:02.740 --> 00:14:06.720
that total, almost unhinged commitment to a specific

00:14:06.720 --> 00:14:10.220
psychological state. The anxiety, the manic energy

00:14:10.220 --> 00:14:13.200
he sustains. It's incredible. Then, the very

00:14:13.200 --> 00:14:17.120
next year. 1984, he delivers maybe the ultimate

00:14:17.120 --> 00:14:20.539
high camp sci -fi villain performance. Dr. Emilio

00:14:20.539 --> 00:14:24.120
Lizardo slash Lord John Worfen. In the adventures

00:14:24.120 --> 00:14:26.360
of Buckaroo Banzai across the eighth dimension.

00:14:26.600 --> 00:14:29.100
An absolute cult classic. And that performance

00:14:29.100 --> 00:14:31.240
is the polar opposite of the contained terror

00:14:31.240 --> 00:14:33.779
in Twilight Zone. Totally. It's bizarre. It's

00:14:33.779 --> 00:14:36.100
over the top. Slightly cartoonish, maybe, but

00:14:36.100 --> 00:14:38.360
delivered with absolute unwavering commitment.

00:14:38.559 --> 00:14:40.580
He just goes for it. It proves he understands

00:14:40.580 --> 00:14:42.899
perfectly when a performance needs to lean into

00:14:42.899 --> 00:14:45.820
theatricality, into absurdism. He was also in

00:14:45.820 --> 00:14:47.980
a more mainstream sci -fi film that same year,

00:14:48.039 --> 00:14:50.559
wasn't he? Yeah, the big sequel, 2010, The Year

00:14:50.559 --> 00:14:54.120
We Make Contact, played Dr. Walter Kernow. More

00:14:54.120 --> 00:14:56.679
grounded, but still in that sci -fi realm. And

00:14:56.679 --> 00:14:58.620
we can't forget, even amidst the genre stuff,

00:14:58.759 --> 00:15:01.100
he was still touching on serious themes. That

00:15:01.100 --> 00:15:03.799
minor but impactful role in The Day After. Right,

00:15:03.879 --> 00:15:06.779
1983, the TV movie about nuclear apocalypse.

00:15:07.179 --> 00:15:10.000
Huge cultural event at the time. And he got an

00:15:10.000 --> 00:15:11.820
Emmy nomination for that, even for a smaller

00:15:11.820 --> 00:15:14.620
part. Shows his ability to contribute meaningfully

00:15:14.620 --> 00:15:17.519
to serious social commentary. And this period

00:15:17.519 --> 00:15:19.919
also loops back to his early radio experience.

00:15:19.940 --> 00:15:24.059
Remember WBAI? Oh, yeah. How so? He voiced Yoda.

00:15:24.399 --> 00:15:27.940
Get out. Really? Yep. In the classic NTR radio

00:15:27.940 --> 00:15:30.399
drama adaptations of The Empire Strikes Back

00:15:30.399 --> 00:15:32.559
and Return of the Jedi. That's fantastic. What

00:15:32.559 --> 00:15:35.000
a great piece of trivia. It shows his versatility,

00:15:35.080 --> 00:15:37.639
again, using just his voice to create such an

00:15:37.639 --> 00:15:40.480
iconic character. Exactly. Not relying on visuals

00:15:40.480 --> 00:15:43.659
at all. Pure vocal performance. Okay, so as we

00:15:43.659 --> 00:15:47.480
move out of the 80s and into the 90s, his villainous

00:15:47.480 --> 00:15:50.600
streak, it seems to continue, maybe even intensify.

00:15:51.000 --> 00:15:53.360
especially in action and thrillers. Absolutely.

00:15:53.419 --> 00:15:56.440
He really embraced playing the dangerous antagonist.

00:15:56.480 --> 00:15:59.460
In 91, he was terrifying opposite Denzel Washington

00:15:59.460 --> 00:16:02.139
in Ricochet, played the criminal Earl Talbot

00:16:02.139 --> 00:16:04.779
Blake. Vicious role. Really nasty. Then came

00:16:04.779 --> 00:16:07.379
the Brian De Palma thriller Raising Cain in 92.

00:16:07.679 --> 00:16:09.379
Where he played a guy with multiple personality

00:16:09.379 --> 00:16:12.179
disorder. Right, which for an actor like him

00:16:12.179 --> 00:16:14.549
is like a gift, isn't it? allowed him to explore

00:16:14.549 --> 00:16:17.169
several distinct characters within one physical

00:16:17.169 --> 00:16:20.649
body, a real acting showcase. And then the big

00:16:20.649 --> 00:16:24.490
one, the blockbuster action villain role. Eric

00:16:24.490 --> 00:16:27.649
Qualen, the sophisticated, ruthless terrorist

00:16:27.649 --> 00:16:30.370
leader in Cliffhanger. Opposites to Lone, 1993,

00:16:30.929 --> 00:16:34.909
high -altitude thrills. He was the perfect 90s

00:16:34.909 --> 00:16:38.809
bad guy, intelligent, articulate. but utterly

00:16:38.809 --> 00:16:41.549
without mercy. He really nailed that archetype,

00:16:41.549 --> 00:16:43.889
but even amidst all the action and thrills, the

00:16:43.889 --> 00:16:46.049
weight of history pulls him back again, connecting

00:16:46.049 --> 00:16:48.330
to that academic background. How so this time?

00:16:48.590 --> 00:16:51.769
1994. He portrays President Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

00:16:52.509 --> 00:16:55.450
Wow. And what? An NBC miniseries called World

00:16:55.450 --> 00:16:58.009
War II, when lions roared, starred alongside

00:16:58.009 --> 00:17:00.929
Michael Caine as Stalin and Bob Hoskins as Churchill.

00:17:01.149 --> 00:17:04.190
Talk about a heavyweight cast. That's huge. Tackling

00:17:04.190 --> 00:17:05.890
FDR, that's stepping into massive historical

00:17:05.890 --> 00:17:08.369
shoes. How did he prepare for a role like that,

00:17:08.430 --> 00:17:10.589
an icon everyone recognizes? Immense commitment,

00:17:10.829 --> 00:17:13.609
both physically and historically. To mirror FDR's

00:17:13.609 --> 00:17:15.910
paralysis from polio, Lithgow actually wore these

00:17:15.910 --> 00:17:18.470
heavy, cumbersome leg braces throughout the filming.

00:17:18.549 --> 00:17:20.890
That kind of physical transformation, we see

00:17:20.890 --> 00:17:23.210
it again later with Churchill. He's not afraid

00:17:23.210 --> 00:17:25.130
of the practical discomfort if it helps embody

00:17:25.130 --> 00:17:27.730
the character. Exactly. And he spoke about the

00:17:27.730 --> 00:17:30.789
pressure, too. The weight of playing such a revered

00:17:30.789 --> 00:17:32.910
figure. He mentioned that when he told his mother

00:17:32.910 --> 00:17:35.230
he got the role, she apparently burst into tears.

00:17:35.450 --> 00:17:37.809
Wow. Just shows the emotional significance it

00:17:37.809 --> 00:17:40.509
held, even within his own family. So that ability

00:17:40.509 --> 00:17:44.150
to handle intense prep, high expectations, deep

00:17:44.150 --> 00:17:47.470
historical context. That really sets the stage

00:17:47.470 --> 00:17:49.549
perfectly for his next phase, the phase where

00:17:49.549 --> 00:17:51.710
he becomes a true household name, an established

00:17:51.710 --> 00:17:54.869
icon across all mediums. Right. Let's pivot now

00:17:54.869 --> 00:17:58.630
to that period, say 1996 through to about 2015.

00:17:59.009 --> 00:18:01.329
Okay. And this phase really kicks off with the

00:18:01.329 --> 00:18:03.910
role that for a whole generation of TV viewers

00:18:03.910 --> 00:18:06.650
is John Lithgow. Dr. Dick Solomon. Dr. Dick Solomon,

00:18:06.890 --> 00:18:09.769
high commander of the alien expedition, NBC sitcom

00:18:09.769 --> 00:18:13.490
Third Rock from the Sun, ran from 96 to 2001.

00:18:13.869 --> 00:18:16.250
It was such a bizarre concept. it worked brilliantly.

00:18:16.369 --> 00:18:19.910
Aliens trying and mostly failing to understand

00:18:19.910 --> 00:18:24.190
basic human life. and his performance it required

00:18:24.190 --> 00:18:26.609
this incredible amount of physical comedy really

00:18:26.609 --> 00:18:30.769
stylized movements big facial expressions a complete

00:18:30.769 --> 00:18:34.309
180 from the contained menace of qualen or blake

00:18:34.309 --> 00:18:36.390
you really see the stage training coming through

00:18:36.390 --> 00:18:38.829
there don't you absolutely that kind of high

00:18:38.829 --> 00:18:41.769
level physical comedy it needs incredible precision

00:18:41.769 --> 00:18:46.230
timing control stamina his serious theater background

00:18:46.230 --> 00:18:49.769
actually enabled him to pull off the manic exaggerated

00:18:49.769 --> 00:18:53.400
movements of an alien commander who's like piloting

00:18:53.400 --> 00:18:55.539
a human body doesn't quite understand. And the

00:18:55.539 --> 00:18:57.460
awards voters noticed. Big time. Yeah, yeah.

00:18:57.599 --> 00:19:00.900
Six consecutive Emmy nominations for Outstanding

00:19:00.900 --> 00:19:03.599
Lead Actor in a Comedy Series. Every single year

00:19:03.599 --> 00:19:05.339
the show is on the air. And he won three times,

00:19:05.380 --> 00:19:10.119
right? Three wins. 1996, 1997, and 1999. It's

00:19:10.119 --> 00:19:12.180
genuinely hard to think of another actor who

00:19:12.180 --> 00:19:14.680
made that specific pivot so successfully. From

00:19:14.680 --> 00:19:16.740
two back -to -back dramatic Oscar nominations.

00:19:17.099 --> 00:19:19.319
To winning three Emmys in four years for this

00:19:19.319 --> 00:19:21.900
wild, high -concept physical comedy. It's just

00:19:21.900 --> 00:19:23.779
extraordinary range. And wasn't his son on the

00:19:23.779 --> 00:19:25.740
show too? Yeah, just a nice little detail. His

00:19:25.740 --> 00:19:28.700
son, Ian Lithgow, appeared regularly as Leon,

00:19:28.920 --> 00:19:32.539
one of Dick's physics students. Nice. Okay, so

00:19:32.539 --> 00:19:35.640
hot on the heels of Third Rock wrapping up 2001

00:19:35.640 --> 00:19:41.380
comes this voice acting role. that became, well,

00:19:41.559 --> 00:19:44.579
unexpectedly massive. Totally massive. And apparently

00:19:44.579 --> 00:19:47.000
nobody saw it coming. Least of all Lithgow himself.

00:19:47.460 --> 00:19:50.079
Lord Farquaad. Lord Farquaad, the diminutive,

00:19:50.279 --> 00:19:53.380
power -hungry, hilarious villain in DreamWorks

00:19:53.380 --> 00:19:55.140
Shrek. And the story behind that is pretty funny,

00:19:55.180 --> 00:19:56.950
right? Yeah, the anecdote is great. It really

00:19:56.950 --> 00:19:59.089
reveals how much the animation landscape was

00:19:59.089 --> 00:20:01.190
changing then. Lithgow admitted he initially

00:20:01.190 --> 00:20:03.529
just thought it was, quote, like a Saturday morning

00:20:03.529 --> 00:20:06.210
cartoon. You know, not a big deal. He didn't

00:20:06.210 --> 00:20:07.990
realize it would be a phenomenon. Not at all,

00:20:07.990 --> 00:20:10.450
because the production took so long with lots

00:20:10.450 --> 00:20:13.230
of delays. He apparently just came back once

00:20:13.230 --> 00:20:15.549
every eight months or so to record some new material.

00:20:15.609 --> 00:20:18.269
He had no idea it was going to become this global

00:20:18.269 --> 00:20:20.710
mega hit. But his vocal performance was instantly

00:20:20.710 --> 00:20:23.509
iconic. Critics loved it. They did. They often

00:20:23.509 --> 00:20:25.690
compared his delivery of that kind of delicious,

00:20:25.829 --> 00:20:28.490
sophisticated, slightly theatrical villainy to

00:20:28.490 --> 00:20:31.869
actors like Kelsey Grammer or Alan Rickman, masters

00:20:31.869 --> 00:20:35.430
of the voice. He managed to convey all that arrogance,

00:20:35.650 --> 00:20:37.750
the pettiness, the ambition just through his

00:20:37.750 --> 00:20:40.369
voice. Incredible. But even while conquering

00:20:40.369 --> 00:20:43.230
TV comedy and blockbuster animation, the stage

00:20:43.230 --> 00:20:45.809
was always calling him back. It remained his

00:20:45.809 --> 00:20:48.150
artistic center. So he returns to Broadway. In

00:20:48.150 --> 00:20:50.450
2002. And proves he can handle musical theater,

00:20:50.549 --> 00:20:53.759
too. He wins his second Tony Award. Second Tony,

00:20:53.900 --> 00:20:56.720
this time four. Best leading actor in a musical

00:20:56.720 --> 00:20:59.839
for Sweet Smell of Success. Playing J .J. Hunsaker.

00:21:00.809 --> 00:21:03.769
The cynical, powerful newspaper columnist. Right.

00:21:03.849 --> 00:21:06.970
A character worlds away from Dick Solomon. Deeply

00:21:06.970 --> 00:21:09.750
bitter, manipulative, dark. How demanding is

00:21:09.750 --> 00:21:12.069
that switch? Going from that high -energy sitcom

00:21:12.069 --> 00:21:15.529
grind to carrying a complex musical drama like

00:21:15.529 --> 00:21:17.349
that. It requires completely different muscles,

00:21:17.609 --> 00:21:20.230
artistically speaking. Hunsecker needed serious

00:21:20.230 --> 00:21:23.349
vocal control for the songs, that dramatic gravitas

00:21:23.349 --> 00:21:26.029
for the character, and the sheer physical discipline

00:21:26.029 --> 00:21:28.549
of doing eight shows a week in a musical. His

00:21:28.549 --> 00:21:30.549
dedication to theater just shines through. He

00:21:30.549 --> 00:21:32.309
got another nomination soon after, didn't he?

00:21:32.410 --> 00:21:35.789
Yeah, a few years later, 2005, for the musical

00:21:35.789 --> 00:21:39.049
comedy Dirty Rotten Scoundrels. Though in a fun

00:21:39.049 --> 00:21:41.470
twist, he actually lost the Tony that year to

00:21:41.470 --> 00:21:44.329
his co -star Norbert Leo Butz. Still, that commitment

00:21:44.329 --> 00:21:46.529
to the stage was formally recognized around then,

00:21:46.569 --> 00:21:49.329
too. Yes. He was inducted into the American Theatre

00:21:49.329 --> 00:21:52.549
Hall of Fame in 2005, which acknowledged not

00:21:52.549 --> 00:21:54.750
just his work in straight plays, but also his

00:21:54.750 --> 00:21:57.380
surprising work in opera. He'd performed in productions

00:21:57.380 --> 00:22:00.839
by Verdi and Wagner. Opera too. Is there anything

00:22:00.839 --> 00:22:03.420
he can't do? Apparently not. And that same year,

00:22:03.440 --> 00:22:06.940
2005, really highlights that unique blend he

00:22:06.940 --> 00:22:09.079
has, the performer and the intellectual. Oh,

00:22:09.099 --> 00:22:11.400
so. He went back to his alma mater, Harvard,

00:22:11.599 --> 00:22:14.259
and became the first actor ever invited to deliver

00:22:14.259 --> 00:22:16.940
the main commencement speech. Wow. That's usually

00:22:16.940 --> 00:22:19.259
reserved for presidents, Nobel laureates, CEOs.

00:22:19.440 --> 00:22:21.559
Exactly. It was a huge honor. And Harvard also

00:22:21.559 --> 00:22:23.579
gave him an honorary doctor of arts degree that

00:22:23.579 --> 00:22:26.200
day. Okay, so we've got the lovable alien, the

00:22:26.200 --> 00:22:29.359
Broadway star, the respected intellectual. And

00:22:29.359 --> 00:22:31.779
then, just as maybe audiences were getting comfortable

00:22:31.779 --> 00:22:34.900
with that image, he delivered a performance so

00:22:34.900 --> 00:22:37.319
chilling, it completely redefined his dramatic

00:22:37.319 --> 00:22:39.859
side for a whole new generation. The Trinity

00:22:39.859 --> 00:22:43.559
Killer. Arthur Mitchell. Dexter Morgan's terrifying

00:22:43.559 --> 00:22:47.180
nemesis in the 2009 season of Dexter. This role,

00:22:47.299 --> 00:22:50.039
maybe more than any other single role, just shattered

00:22:50.039 --> 00:22:52.359
whatever lingering public perception there was

00:22:52.359 --> 00:22:55.140
of John Lithgow as primarily a comedic actor.

00:22:55.420 --> 00:22:57.720
It showed he could harness that quiet intensity

00:22:57.720 --> 00:23:01.019
we saw way back in terms of Endearment or even

00:23:01.019 --> 00:23:04.240
Raising Cain. But infuse it with this deep, chilling,

00:23:04.380 --> 00:23:06.900
terrifying malice. The horror of Arthur Mitchell

00:23:06.900 --> 00:23:10.049
was that duality, wasn't it? The outwardly normal,

00:23:10.230 --> 00:23:12.329
pious family man, the Sunday school teacher.

00:23:12.569 --> 00:23:15.309
Who was secretly this meticulous, radialistic

00:23:15.309 --> 00:23:17.890
serial killer, operating completely under the

00:23:17.890 --> 00:23:21.009
radar for decades. His performance was a masterclass

00:23:21.009 --> 00:23:23.990
in controlled menace. Total containment. His

00:23:23.990 --> 00:23:26.349
approach felt almost clinical, highlighting the

00:23:26.349 --> 00:23:28.609
structure, the control that Arthur Mitchell exerted

00:23:28.609 --> 00:23:31.190
over his double life. And it resonated so deeply

00:23:31.190 --> 00:23:33.349
because it tapped into that fear of the ordinary

00:23:33.349 --> 00:23:36.549
turning monstrous, the monster next door. And

00:23:36.549 --> 00:23:39.250
again, the awards followed. A Golden Globe for

00:23:39.250 --> 00:23:42.730
this role. Yep. Golden Globe Award. And another

00:23:42.730 --> 00:23:45.509
Primetime Emmy Award, this time for Outstanding

00:23:45.509 --> 00:23:49.049
Guest Actor in a Drama Series. He even came back

00:23:49.049 --> 00:23:52.069
briefly for the Revival Series in 2021. You want

00:23:52.069 --> 00:23:54.150
the ultimate career contrast. Just put those

00:23:54.150 --> 00:23:56.849
Emmy wins side by side. Right. The triple Emmy

00:23:56.849 --> 00:23:59.650
winning manic physical comedy of Dick Solomon.

00:23:59.890 --> 00:24:02.710
And the Globe. and Emmy -winning, tightly controlled,

00:24:02.890 --> 00:24:05.950
psychopathic terror of Arthur Mitchell. It perfectly

00:24:05.950 --> 00:24:08.150
illustrates the whole point of this deep dive,

00:24:08.269 --> 00:24:10.329
doesn't it? His chameleonic talent isn't just

00:24:10.329 --> 00:24:13.089
superficial. It's about diving deep into the

00:24:13.089 --> 00:24:15.509
psychological structure of a character, whether

00:24:15.509 --> 00:24:18.049
that character operates on, you know, comedic

00:24:18.049 --> 00:24:21.690
alien logic or pure cold sociopathy. But this

00:24:21.690 --> 00:24:24.609
era wasn't all just dark TV drama. He kept the

00:24:24.609 --> 00:24:27.009
stage work going, too. Absolutely. He maintained

00:24:27.009 --> 00:24:29.150
that theatrical commitment, played the big one,

00:24:29.210 --> 00:24:31.839
Shakespeare's King Lear. title role. Where was

00:24:31.839 --> 00:24:34.460
that? In 2014 at Shakespeare in the Park in New

00:24:34.460 --> 00:24:36.339
York, which was actually his first time performing

00:24:36.339 --> 00:24:39.359
there since way back in 1975. A big return. And

00:24:39.359 --> 00:24:40.859
he was still championing smaller independent

00:24:40.859 --> 00:24:43.680
films too, right? Yes. Showing his support for

00:24:43.680 --> 00:24:45.779
complex, character -driven indie filmmaking.

00:24:46.299 --> 00:24:50.119
Around that same time, 2014, he got a lot of

00:24:50.119 --> 00:24:52.460
critical attention for his role opposite Alfred

00:24:52.460 --> 00:24:55.039
Molina in Love is Strange. Oh, I remember that

00:24:55.039 --> 00:24:58.279
film. Beautifully done. About an older gay couple

00:24:58.279 --> 00:25:00.140
facing difficulties after finally getting getting

00:25:00.140 --> 00:25:02.880
married. Exactly. It got great reviews, something

00:25:02.880 --> 00:25:06.220
like 94 percent on Rotten Tomatoes, four Independent

00:25:06.220 --> 00:25:09.700
Spirit Award nominations. Critics really praised

00:25:09.700 --> 00:25:12.619
the graceful, sensitive portrayal of this long

00:25:12.619 --> 00:25:15.279
term relationship by both him and Molina. It

00:25:15.279 --> 00:25:17.559
just shows that his star power, his recognizability

00:25:17.559 --> 00:25:20.000
could help elevate these smaller, important films

00:25:20.000 --> 00:25:22.660
alongside the big blockbusters and hit TV shows.

00:25:22.819 --> 00:25:25.099
It confirms that pattern we see throughout his

00:25:25.099 --> 00:25:27.960
career. He seems to use the visibility and frankly,

00:25:28.059 --> 00:25:30.130
the financial success from his TV and film work

00:25:30.130 --> 00:25:32.950
to sustain and enable the more demanding, often

00:25:32.950 --> 00:25:35.349
less commercial artistic work that clearly feeds

00:25:35.349 --> 00:25:38.130
his curiosity, like stage work or indie film.

00:25:38.309 --> 00:25:40.450
Which brings us neatly into his most recent phase,

00:25:40.630 --> 00:25:44.029
say 2016 to the present. This period feels marked

00:25:44.029 --> 00:25:46.569
by incredibly high prestige projects, a lot of

00:25:46.569 --> 00:25:48.970
historical transformation, and even direct political

00:25:48.970 --> 00:25:51.369
commentary. Definitely. And the role that really

00:25:51.369 --> 00:25:53.589
defined this later career prestige, especially

00:25:53.589 --> 00:25:56.069
for the huge global streaming audiences, has

00:25:56.069 --> 00:25:58.170
to be Winston Churchill. And Netflix is the crown.

00:25:58.750 --> 00:26:02.369
Season 1, 2016. Right. And for this, bang, another

00:26:02.369 --> 00:26:05.329
Primetime Emmy Award. And a Screen Actors Guild

00:26:05.329 --> 00:26:07.829
Award, too. Outstanding supporting actor in a

00:26:07.829 --> 00:26:11.089
drama series for both. Taking on Churchill. That's

00:26:11.089 --> 00:26:14.769
maybe even bigger than FDR. So many iconic portrayals

00:26:14.769 --> 00:26:17.390
already exist. You're inviting constant comparison.

00:26:17.690 --> 00:26:20.529
How did he approach it? He said he had... No

00:26:20.529 --> 00:26:22.829
hesitation about taking the role, which is pretty

00:26:22.829 --> 00:26:25.390
bold. But he did his homework. Extensive research,

00:26:25.529 --> 00:26:27.690
reading biographies, watching archival footage,

00:26:27.910 --> 00:26:30.069
listening to speeches. But the physical transformation

00:26:30.069 --> 00:26:32.809
must have been immense. Oh, huge. That was perhaps

00:26:32.809 --> 00:26:34.970
the most challenging part. He apparently spent

00:26:34.970 --> 00:26:37.630
two full days just getting fitted for the necessary

00:26:37.630 --> 00:26:40.559
fat suit, the wig, and even the special... Mouth

00:26:40.559 --> 00:26:42.960
plumpers? Mouth plumpers. To change his speech.

00:26:43.200 --> 00:26:45.700
Exactly. Designed to help mimic Churchill's very

00:26:45.700 --> 00:26:48.279
specific cadence and diction, the slight jolliness.

00:26:48.599 --> 00:26:51.720
That level of commitment to physical alteration,

00:26:51.720 --> 00:26:54.519
it's a hallmark of his work, isn't it? He's not

00:26:54.519 --> 00:26:56.420
afraid of the makeup chair, the prosthetics,

00:26:56.460 --> 00:26:59.680
the discomfort. It helps them find the character's

00:26:59.680 --> 00:27:01.819
essence. Totally. And the performance itself

00:27:01.819 --> 00:27:03.619
was lauded because it wasn't just imitation.

00:27:03.680 --> 00:27:06.559
It was layered. He captured not just the famous

00:27:06.559 --> 00:27:09.539
wartime leaders, bombast and strength, but also

00:27:09.539 --> 00:27:11.619
the complexities. Yeah. The vulnerability of

00:27:11.619 --> 00:27:15.019
a great man aging, grappling with potential irrelevance

00:27:15.019 --> 00:27:18.119
after the war, battling his black dog, his depression.

00:27:18.279 --> 00:27:21.480
It felt like a performance rooted again in that

00:27:21.480 --> 00:27:23.460
deep understanding of history and psychology.

00:27:23.720 --> 00:27:26.039
Thanks to that academic background. And around

00:27:26.039 --> 00:27:28.279
the same time, we see this other fascinating

00:27:28.279 --> 00:27:31.539
shift. Lithgow, the intellectual, the observer,

00:27:31.779 --> 00:27:35.500
starts moving into direct political satire, using

00:27:35.500 --> 00:27:37.819
his art to comment on the contemporary American

00:27:37.819 --> 00:27:40.559
scene. Which is pretty unusual for an actor of

00:27:40.559 --> 00:27:42.380
his stature and generation, right? Yes. To be

00:27:42.380 --> 00:27:45.359
so overtly topical. Very. So what form did this

00:27:45.359 --> 00:27:48.279
take? Well, he authored books. Two books of satirical

00:27:48.279 --> 00:27:50.460
poems focused squarely on the Trump administration.

00:27:51.000 --> 00:27:55.240
Really? Poetry? Yep. Dumpty. The Age of Trump

00:27:55.240 --> 00:27:58.299
Inverse came out of 2019. It was actually a bestseller

00:27:58.299 --> 00:28:00.960
hit number three on the New York Times hardcover

00:28:00.960 --> 00:28:03.680
nonfiction list. Wow. And then he followed it

00:28:03.680 --> 00:28:05.900
up with Trumpty Dumpty Wanted a Crown in 2020.

00:28:06.220 --> 00:28:08.079
He didn't just write, though. He used performance,

00:28:08.180 --> 00:28:10.740
too, didn't he? Oh, yeah. He played Donald Trump

00:28:10.740 --> 00:28:12.839
in a live reading of excerpts from the Mueller

00:28:12.839 --> 00:28:15.779
report in 2019. It was called The Investigation,

00:28:16.039 --> 00:28:18.880
A Search for the Truth in 10 Acts. And he became

00:28:18.880 --> 00:28:22.140
a fixture on late night TV for a while. portraying

00:28:22.140 --> 00:28:25.119
Rudy Giuliani. In a whole series of recurring

00:28:25.119 --> 00:28:27.140
sketches on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert,

00:28:27.339 --> 00:28:31.180
he completely nailed Giuliani's mannerisms around

00:28:31.180 --> 00:28:33.660
that time. He also lent his voice to that parody

00:28:33.660 --> 00:28:35.880
children's book. Right, the audiobook version

00:28:35.880 --> 00:28:38.440
of A Day in the Life of Marlon Bundo, the book

00:28:38.440 --> 00:28:41.400
that gently satirized Mike Pence's family rabbit

00:28:41.400 --> 00:28:44.559
book by telling a story about a gay rabbit. So

00:28:44.559 --> 00:28:46.740
he's really putting his recognizable voice and

00:28:46.740 --> 00:28:49.200
versatile talents right into the middle of immediate

00:28:49.200 --> 00:28:51.920
cultural and political conversations. Fearlessly,

00:28:52.039 --> 00:28:54.819
it seems. But shifting back to more traditional

00:28:54.819 --> 00:28:58.059
dramatic roles, he took on another really complex,

00:28:58.119 --> 00:29:00.380
controversial figure from the political media

00:29:00.380 --> 00:29:02.980
world. Roger Hills. Roger Hills, the Fox News

00:29:02.980 --> 00:29:07.119
CEO, in the 2019 film Bombshell. Another figure

00:29:07.119 --> 00:29:10.539
who inspired intense loyalty from some and utter

00:29:10.539 --> 00:29:14.319
condemnation from others. How did Lithgow approach

00:29:14.319 --> 00:29:17.599
that minefield? He was very clear about his intention.

00:29:17.920 --> 00:29:20.819
He stated publicly that his goal with the portrayal

00:29:20.819 --> 00:29:24.039
was specifically, quote, to trouble people, unsettle

00:29:24.039 --> 00:29:25.619
people with the fact that they shouldn't have

00:29:25.619 --> 00:29:28.420
sympathy for the devil. So he wasn't trying to

00:29:28.420 --> 00:29:30.710
find the good in ales. Doesn't sound like it.

00:29:30.730 --> 00:29:33.150
It shows an actor really thinking about the narrative

00:29:33.150 --> 00:29:35.730
impact, the moral responsibility of portraying

00:29:35.730 --> 00:29:38.710
someone so powerful and polarizing. He wanted

00:29:38.710 --> 00:29:40.750
the audience to confront the difficult reality

00:29:40.750 --> 00:29:43.450
of the man's actions, not find easy empathy.

00:29:43.769 --> 00:29:46.210
And he's kept up this incredible pace of high

00:29:46.210 --> 00:29:48.990
profile, dramatic work just in the last few years.

00:29:49.170 --> 00:29:51.769
Absolutely. He was great as the sort of fading

00:29:51.769 --> 00:29:54.690
old guard lawyer, Elias Burchard, E .B. Jonathan

00:29:54.690 --> 00:29:58.089
in HBO's Perry Mason reboot back in 2020. And

00:29:58.089 --> 00:30:01.190
then he stars. opposite Jeff Bridges in that

00:30:01.190 --> 00:30:04.220
excellent Hulu thriller The Old Man. in 2022

00:30:04.220 --> 00:30:06.920
right playing the fbi assistant director harold

00:30:06.920 --> 00:30:09.160
harper got another golden globe nomination for

00:30:09.160 --> 00:30:12.039
that his ability to just anchor these prestige

00:30:12.039 --> 00:30:14.819
streaming dramas often playing these morally

00:30:14.819 --> 00:30:18.200
complex ambiguous characters shows his appeal

00:30:18.200 --> 00:30:21.740
is still incredibly strong with top tier creators

00:30:21.740 --> 00:30:25.160
and he popped up in scorsese's huge epic yep

00:30:25.160 --> 00:30:27.859
join the incredible cast of martin scorsese's

00:30:27.859 --> 00:30:31.009
killers of the flower moon in 2023 plain prosecutor

00:30:31.009 --> 00:30:35.089
leeward and just recently in 2024 another intriguing

00:30:35.089 --> 00:30:38.150
film role conclave the conspiracy thriller set

00:30:38.150 --> 00:30:41.210
during a papal election he plays one of the cardinals

00:30:41.210 --> 00:30:43.930
cardinal trembley critics called his performance

00:30:43.930 --> 00:30:47.109
intriguingly slippery so he still has that capacity

00:30:47.109 --> 00:30:49.829
for subtle unpredictable menace when he needs

00:30:49.829 --> 00:30:52.009
it seems so and we're still seeing him triumph

00:30:52.009 --> 00:30:55.329
on the global stage too just this year 2024 he

00:30:55.329 --> 00:30:57.490
won the lawrence olivier award for best actor

00:30:57.490 --> 00:31:00.190
london's highest theater honor For what role?

00:31:00.329 --> 00:31:02.509
For portraying the author Roald Dahl in the West

00:31:02.509 --> 00:31:05.690
End production of a play called Giant. Wow. Another

00:31:05.690 --> 00:31:08.670
major award late in his career. It just confirms

00:31:08.670 --> 00:31:11.009
his stage vitality is completely undiminished.

00:31:11.109 --> 00:31:14.410
And critics apparently noted his uncanny resemblance

00:31:14.410 --> 00:31:16.789
to the writer in the role, that physical transformation

00:31:16.789 --> 00:31:19.529
again. And looking even further ahead, he's not

00:31:19.529 --> 00:31:22.470
slowing down. He's stepping into another absolutely

00:31:22.470 --> 00:31:25.299
iconic, generation -defining role soon. It was

00:31:25.299 --> 00:31:28.220
confirmed just recently, February 20, 25, I believe.

00:31:28.279 --> 00:31:30.559
He's going to play Albus Dumbledore. Dumbledore.

00:31:30.619 --> 00:31:33.440
In the new HBO Harry Potter series. That is a

00:31:33.440 --> 00:31:36.880
massive role. Huge cultural weight. Immense expectations

00:31:36.880 --> 00:31:40.240
from fans. It solidifies his presence across

00:31:40.240 --> 00:31:42.779
yet another generation of popular culture, doesn't

00:31:42.779 --> 00:31:44.779
it? Yeah. Kids who read his children's books.

00:31:44.839 --> 00:31:48.220
Adults who watch Third Rock or The Crown. They'll

00:31:48.220 --> 00:31:50.400
all engage with his work in this new, iconic

00:31:50.400 --> 00:31:53.579
way. It's an amazing capstone, potentially, though

00:31:53.579 --> 00:31:56.240
knowing him, probably not the final one. Probably

00:31:56.240 --> 00:31:58.960
not. Okay, before we try to wrap our heads around

00:31:58.960 --> 00:32:01.339
this whole staggering career, we absolutely have

00:32:01.339 --> 00:32:03.579
to touch on his completely separate creative

00:32:03.579 --> 00:32:06.259
life. The thing that really marks him as a Renaissance

00:32:06.259 --> 00:32:09.200
man. His work for children. Exactly. Yeah. It

00:32:09.200 --> 00:32:11.039
often gets overshadowed by the acting awards,

00:32:11.180 --> 00:32:13.990
but he's a... Genuinely prolific and successful

00:32:13.990 --> 00:32:16.769
children's author. He really is. He's written

00:32:16.769 --> 00:32:19.029
and sometimes illustrated several bestsellers.

00:32:19.029 --> 00:32:22.269
Books like Marsupial Sioux, Macabre, I'm a Manatee,

00:32:22.269 --> 00:32:25.609
The Remarkable Farkle McBride. And these aren't

00:32:25.609 --> 00:32:28.069
just quick celebrity cash -ins, are they? They

00:32:28.069 --> 00:32:31.410
feel like thoughtful, often funny contributions

00:32:31.410 --> 00:32:34.450
to children's literature, often celebrating creativity,

00:32:34.690 --> 00:32:37.950
music. Precisely. And that dedication extends

00:32:37.950 --> 00:32:40.910
to performing music for children, too. He released

00:32:40.910 --> 00:32:43.410
three albums of kids' music. I remember Singing

00:32:43.410 --> 00:32:45.930
in the Bathtub from 1999. Yeah, that was the

00:32:45.930 --> 00:32:48.309
first one. Then Farkle and Friends in 2002. He

00:32:48.309 --> 00:32:50.490
dedicated that one to the country singer Waylon

00:32:50.490 --> 00:32:53.269
Jennings, oddly enough. Unexpected. And The Sunny

00:32:53.269 --> 00:32:55.490
Side of the Street in 2006. And he actually performs

00:32:55.490 --> 00:32:57.750
these songs sometimes. Makes appearances accompanying

00:32:57.750 --> 00:33:00.450
himself on guitar. What's truly unique, though,

00:33:00.509 --> 00:33:03.589
may be the absolute peak of his bizarrely diverse

00:33:03.589 --> 00:33:07.180
artistic life. is the ballet connection. It's

00:33:07.180 --> 00:33:09.720
unparalleled for an actor, surely. He wrote the

00:33:09.720 --> 00:33:11.960
narrations for a ballet by the choreographer

00:33:11.960 --> 00:33:14.319
Christopher Wheldon. It's called Carnival of

00:33:14.319 --> 00:33:16.819
the Animals. Based on the Sansan's music. Exactly.

00:33:17.039 --> 00:33:19.079
But not only did he write the narration, he actually

00:33:19.079 --> 00:33:21.839
performed in the ballet with major companies

00:33:21.839 --> 00:33:24.400
like the New York City Ballet. Doing what? Not

00:33:24.400 --> 00:33:27.279
dancing, surely? Oh, no, not plies. He played

00:33:27.279 --> 00:33:29.920
a character, an elephant named Nurse Mabel Bunce,

00:33:29.980 --> 00:33:33.619
which required him to blend like physical comedy,

00:33:33.740 --> 00:33:36.700
narration, and somehow engage with high art ballet

00:33:36.700 --> 00:33:39.000
choreography all at once. Okay, that intersection

00:33:39.000 --> 00:33:42.960
right there, Oscar nominee, sitcom star, Shakespearean

00:33:42.960 --> 00:33:45.059
leave, political satirist, children's author,

00:33:45.279 --> 00:33:49.039
and ballet elephant. That might just be the perfect

00:33:49.039 --> 00:33:51.589
summation of John Lithgow's versatility. It's

00:33:51.589 --> 00:33:54.609
pretty close. And just briefly, on the personal

00:33:54.609 --> 00:33:56.849
and professional recognition side beyond the

00:33:56.849 --> 00:33:59.170
performance awards, he has a star on the Hollywood

00:33:59.170 --> 00:34:01.529
Walk of Fame. He's in the American Theater Hall

00:34:01.529 --> 00:34:03.650
of Fame. And reflecting that intellectual side

00:34:03.650 --> 00:34:06.109
again, he was elected to the American Philosophical

00:34:06.109 --> 00:34:09.730
Society in 2019. Right. Very prestigious. Shows

00:34:09.730 --> 00:34:12.530
his deep engagement with ideas beyond his performance.

00:34:12.590 --> 00:34:15.530
And personally, he's been married to Mary Yeager,

00:34:15.630 --> 00:34:18.989
a UCLA history professor, since 1981. Long marriage.

00:34:19.210 --> 00:34:22.409
Yeah. He has three children, one from his first

00:34:22.409 --> 00:34:24.590
marriage to Jean Tainton, which ended back in

00:34:24.590 --> 00:34:28.670
1980. Okay, so we have cataloged this career

00:34:28.670 --> 00:34:33.690
of just staggering, almost dizzying diversity.

00:34:34.150 --> 00:34:37.449
Stage triumphs, Oscar drama, blockbuster action,

00:34:37.989 --> 00:34:40.909
triple Emmy comedy, high prestige history, political

00:34:40.909 --> 00:34:43.989
satire, children's books, music, ballet. Where

00:34:43.989 --> 00:34:46.170
do you even begin to summarize it? I think John

00:34:46.170 --> 00:34:47.929
Lithgow's career is basically the definition

00:34:47.929 --> 00:34:51.010
of a masterclass in adaptation. His success isn't

00:34:51.010 --> 00:34:53.550
defined by just one thing, one medium, one genre.

00:34:53.710 --> 00:34:56.309
It's defined by his unique ability to reach the

00:34:56.309 --> 00:34:59.309
absolute highest levels in wildly different arenas,

00:34:59.389 --> 00:35:02.070
conquering the stage, whether it's classic Shakespeare

00:35:02.070 --> 00:35:04.710
like Lear or winning an Olivier for playing Roald

00:35:04.710 --> 00:35:06.769
Dahl. While simultaneously dominating television

00:35:06.769 --> 00:35:08.769
in roles that could not be more different from

00:35:08.769 --> 00:35:10.829
each other. He just refuses to be put in a box,

00:35:10.969 --> 00:35:14.079
refuses to be contained by any single... And

00:35:14.079 --> 00:35:16.960
that profound chameleonic nature. Maybe he's

00:35:16.960 --> 00:35:19.480
best understood, as we touched on, by just revisiting

00:35:19.480 --> 00:35:21.619
the sheer emotional distance between those three

00:35:21.619 --> 00:35:24.699
key Emmy -winning TV roles. It's the perfect

00:35:24.699 --> 00:35:27.000
illustration. You've got Dick Solomon, hyper

00:35:27.000 --> 00:35:29.360
-physical, manic, but incredibly disciplined

00:35:29.360 --> 00:35:32.739
comedic timing. An alien leader. Then you've

00:35:32.739 --> 00:35:37.380
got Arthur Mitchell, the Trinity Killer. Terrifyingly

00:35:37.380 --> 00:35:40.840
controlled, psychologically complex, pure contained

00:35:40.840 --> 00:35:44.199
menace. A serial killer. And then Winston Churchill.

00:35:44.460 --> 00:35:48.000
Nuanced, complex, revered, burdened. A historical

00:35:48.000 --> 00:35:51.630
icon. He achieved top tier award winning success,

00:35:51.829 --> 00:35:54.269
embodying three completely different modes of

00:35:54.269 --> 00:35:57.530
human or, well, alien experience. It really does

00:35:57.530 --> 00:35:59.670
raise a fundamental question, doesn't it? A provocative

00:35:59.670 --> 00:36:02.190
one, maybe for all of us. We live in a world,

00:36:02.230 --> 00:36:04.570
especially now, that seems to reward narrow focus,

00:36:04.829 --> 00:36:07.230
specialization, building a personal brand around

00:36:07.230 --> 00:36:09.489
one thing. Right. Find your niche and stick to

00:36:09.489 --> 00:36:11.730
it. But Lithgow achieved success at the highest

00:36:11.730 --> 00:36:14.329
levels in the most demanding roles across comedy,

00:36:14.489 --> 00:36:17.679
drama, film, stage, literature. Precisely because

00:36:17.679 --> 00:36:20.280
he refused to limit himself. He constantly sought

00:36:20.280 --> 00:36:23.340
reinvention. So what does his career, this massive

00:36:23.340 --> 00:36:26.260
spectrum of accomplishment, suggest about the

00:36:26.260 --> 00:36:28.860
actual value of refusing to specialize? About

00:36:28.860 --> 00:36:30.920
the power of remaining adaptable and curious

00:36:30.920 --> 00:36:33.559
across disciplines? Maybe it suggests that true

00:36:33.559 --> 00:36:36.820
mastery can come from breadth as well as depth.

00:36:37.079 --> 00:36:39.579
Something to think about. A profound thought

00:36:39.579 --> 00:36:43.119
indeed. Something for you, our listeners, to

00:36:43.119 --> 00:36:45.300
carry forward long after this deep dive ends.

00:36:45.789 --> 00:36:47.989
Thank you for joining us. Thanks, everyone. We'll

00:36:47.989 --> 00:36:49.449
see you next time on the Deep Dive.
