WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.100
Welcome back to the Deep Dive, where we tear

00:00:02.100 --> 00:00:04.919
through a stack of sources and pull out the essential

00:00:04.919 --> 00:00:08.660
knowledge nuggets customized just for you. Today,

00:00:08.839 --> 00:00:12.140
we're tackling a figure who has built this really

00:00:12.140 --> 00:00:16.280
extraordinary career, sort of mastering a tightrope

00:00:16.280 --> 00:00:19.760
walk. Definitely. Between being an esteemed journalist,

00:00:19.899 --> 00:00:23.000
a hugely influential activist. And arguably maybe

00:00:23.000 --> 00:00:25.179
the most abrasive cultural provocateur of his

00:00:25.179 --> 00:00:27.199
generation. Yeah, that feels about right. We

00:00:27.199 --> 00:00:29.239
are deep diving into the life and work of Dan

00:00:29.239 --> 00:00:31.399
Savage. It's quite a career to unpack. It's truly

00:00:31.399 --> 00:00:34.799
sprawling. Yeah. Multifaceted. Born in 1964,

00:00:35.299 --> 00:00:38.119
Savage basically channeled his sex advice column,

00:00:38.280 --> 00:00:41.079
Savage Love, into this massive global platform.

00:00:41.399 --> 00:00:44.259
Books, TV, social campaigns. Right. And our mission

00:00:44.259 --> 00:00:46.119
today really is to understand the mechanics of

00:00:46.119 --> 00:00:48.679
that. How did he leverage talking frankly about

00:00:48.679 --> 00:00:51.740
sex and relationships into, well, a tool? A tool

00:00:51.740 --> 00:00:55.299
for progressive politics, for LGBTQ rights advocacy.

00:00:55.539 --> 00:00:57.240
And just, you know, relentless public debate,

00:00:57.399 --> 00:00:59.759
often very controversial debate. And when you

00:00:59.759 --> 00:01:01.520
look at the evidence, I mean, the success of

00:01:01.520 --> 00:01:04.040
that platform is just undeniable. Before we even

00:01:04.040 --> 00:01:05.900
get into the controversies or the whole media

00:01:05.900 --> 00:01:10.000
empire thing, let's try and nail down his core

00:01:10.000 --> 00:01:12.340
identity, his major achievements. Yeah, the writing

00:01:12.340 --> 00:01:14.950
and punditry are vital, sure. But you're right.

00:01:15.010 --> 00:01:16.950
The activism really defines him in many ways.

00:01:17.150 --> 00:01:19.069
So where do we start with that? What's the cornerstone?

00:01:19.250 --> 00:01:21.689
I think that has to be the starting point. The

00:01:21.689 --> 00:01:24.609
single most visible, most defining achievement

00:01:24.609 --> 00:01:28.189
of his activism is co -founding the It Gets Better

00:01:28.189 --> 00:01:30.950
project. Right. In 2010 with his husband, Terry

00:01:30.950 --> 00:01:34.689
Miller. Exactly. And this was a direct. digital

00:01:34.689 --> 00:01:37.709
intervention aimed squarely at preventing suicide

00:01:37.709 --> 00:01:41.150
among LGBTQ youth who were facing bullying. And

00:01:41.150 --> 00:01:43.090
that project, it really shifted the conversation,

00:01:43.310 --> 00:01:46.349
didn't it? Fundamentally, yeah. How society addresses

00:01:46.349 --> 00:01:50.650
queer youth, isolation, mental health. It was

00:01:50.650 --> 00:01:53.290
huge. An incredible achievement. Digital advocacy

00:01:53.290 --> 00:01:56.170
at its most impactful, really. And then like

00:01:56.170 --> 00:01:57.829
on the complete opposite end of the spectrum,

00:01:57.930 --> 00:01:59.549
but still talking cultural impact. You have to

00:01:59.549 --> 00:02:02.109
mention the language. Yes. His influence on just

00:02:02.109 --> 00:02:04.620
everyday sexual language. Yeah. The sources are

00:02:04.620 --> 00:02:07.200
clear. Savage and his readership, they officially

00:02:07.200 --> 00:02:12.020
coined the neologism pegging back in 2001. Defining

00:02:12.020 --> 00:02:15.400
a woman anally penetrating a man with his strap

00:02:15.400 --> 00:02:18.729
on dildo. Correct. And that word, it didn't just

00:02:18.729 --> 00:02:20.610
stay niche, did it? It wasn't just in the alt

00:02:20.610 --> 00:02:23.909
weeklies. No, not at all. It pretty quickly infiltrated

00:02:23.909 --> 00:02:27.110
mainstream sexual vocabulary. You hear it everywhere

00:02:27.110 --> 00:02:30.110
now. It's amazing. It is. And that little linguistic

00:02:30.110 --> 00:02:32.930
act, it kind of perfectly encapsulates his specific

00:02:32.930 --> 00:02:35.789
genius, I think. How so? Well, he treats sex

00:02:35.789 --> 00:02:38.210
advice seriously, right? Yeah. But he does it

00:02:38.210 --> 00:02:41.750
in a way that generates real cultural, even linguistic

00:02:41.750 --> 00:02:45.319
gravity. He turns these private. intimate things

00:02:45.319 --> 00:02:48.060
into public political discussion often with really

00:02:48.060 --> 00:02:50.719
surprising far -reaching results okay so let's

00:02:50.719 --> 00:02:52.960
unpack the origins then yeah because it's kind

00:02:52.960 --> 00:02:54.860
of hard to imagine the guy behind savage love

00:02:54.860 --> 00:02:57.139
starting out yeah well where he did yeah it's

00:02:57.139 --> 00:02:59.719
quite a journey how does a kid from chicago who

00:02:59.719 --> 00:03:02.400
is seriously considering the priesthood end up

00:03:02.400 --> 00:03:04.800
creating a sex advice empire right that brings

00:03:04.800 --> 00:03:07.759
us to section one the unexpected path to advice

00:03:07.759 --> 00:03:10.719
columnist so chicago native Savage. Yeah, Daniel

00:03:10.719 --> 00:03:14.139
Keenan Savage. Born in Chicago, October 7, 1964.

00:03:14.979 --> 00:03:18.580
And raised strictly Roman Catholic. Ah, okay.

00:03:18.680 --> 00:03:20.800
That upbringing, that's got to be a foundational

00:03:20.800 --> 00:03:23.379
layer, right? Even though he later moved away

00:03:23.379 --> 00:03:25.620
from it. Absolutely. He later identified more

00:03:25.620 --> 00:03:28.860
as an atheist, or maybe his term, a wishy -washy

00:03:28.860 --> 00:03:30.979
agnostic. But he still called himself culturally

00:03:30.979 --> 00:03:33.300
Catholic. You can almost feel that tension in

00:03:33.300 --> 00:03:35.639
his writing sometimes. You really can. That exploration

00:03:35.639 --> 00:03:39.789
of sin, morality, challenging dogma. It's all

00:03:39.789 --> 00:03:42.469
there. Baked in from the start. And his high

00:03:42.469 --> 00:03:44.969
school choice kind of reinforces this early religious

00:03:44.969 --> 00:03:48.069
path. He attended Quigley Preparatory Seminary

00:03:48.069 --> 00:03:50.889
North. Which was specifically for? For boys considering

00:03:50.889 --> 00:03:54.509
the priesthood. So a deep immersion in that formal

00:03:54.509 --> 00:03:57.229
religious structure, the rhetoric. It surely

00:03:57.229 --> 00:04:00.689
influenced his later style. His very formal rhetorical

00:04:00.689 --> 00:04:03.090
style sometimes. Definitely. But clearly the

00:04:03.090 --> 00:04:05.610
path shifted. Towards performance. It did. Big

00:04:05.610 --> 00:04:07.930
shift. He got a Bachelor of Fine Arts and acting

00:04:07.930 --> 00:04:10.370
degree from the University of Illinois at Urbana

00:04:10.370 --> 00:04:12.349
-Champaign. Okay, the acting background. That

00:04:12.349 --> 00:04:14.849
feels critical. It's hugely important. He wasn't

00:04:14.849 --> 00:04:17.430
just a writer. He was a performer. Yeah. He understood

00:04:17.430 --> 00:04:21.930
staging, rhetoric, shock value, how to grab public

00:04:21.930 --> 00:04:24.069
attention. You see it in his media appearances.

00:04:24.350 --> 00:04:27.089
Totally. And remember, he later worked as a theater

00:04:27.089 --> 00:04:30.089
director sometimes. Use the name Keenan Hollihan.

00:04:30.620 --> 00:04:33.319
His whole public persona has this theatrical,

00:04:33.519 --> 00:04:36.720
very intentional quality. Right. It's the performance

00:04:36.720 --> 00:04:39.800
degree that maybe makes him a media pundit, not

00:04:39.800 --> 00:04:43.180
just a journalist. Good point. So that performative

00:04:43.180 --> 00:04:45.139
flair, it eventually lands him in the right place,

00:04:45.180 --> 00:04:49.160
right time, early 90s. Where was he when Savage

00:04:49.160 --> 00:04:52.399
Love started bubbling up around 1991? He was

00:04:52.399 --> 00:04:55.819
in Madison, Wisconsin. working as the night manager

00:04:55.819 --> 00:04:58.220
at a video store. A video store? What kind? Called

00:04:58.220 --> 00:05:01.160
Four Star Fiction and Video, specialized in independent

00:05:01.160 --> 00:05:03.980
films. And crucially, this is where he befriended

00:05:03.980 --> 00:05:06.800
Tim Keck. Ah, Tim Keck of the Onion fame. One

00:05:06.800 --> 00:05:08.600
of the original co -founders, yeah. And then

00:05:08.600 --> 00:05:11.500
Keck makes the move, Seattle. Right, Keck moved

00:05:11.500 --> 00:05:13.819
to Seattle to start a new alternative weekly,

00:05:14.040 --> 00:05:16.160
The Stranger, and Savage gave him some advice.

00:05:16.420 --> 00:05:18.180
What was the advice? Savage told him the paper

00:05:18.180 --> 00:05:20.560
had to have an advice column. Said something

00:05:20.560 --> 00:05:23.160
like, everybody claims to hate him, but everybody

00:05:23.160 --> 00:05:27.000
seems to read him. Probably true. So Savage pitched

00:05:27.000 --> 00:05:29.899
himself, wrote a sample column. Keck was apparently

00:05:29.899 --> 00:05:31.980
blown away. Offered him the job. Offered him

00:05:31.980 --> 00:05:34.819
the job. Savage moved to Seattle, and that decision,

00:05:35.019 --> 00:05:37.720
as Savage himself said, forever altered his life

00:05:37.720 --> 00:05:41.180
path. A total pivot. So the column wasn't just

00:05:41.180 --> 00:05:45.279
like... A gig. He was conceived as cultural commentary

00:05:45.279 --> 00:05:48.139
from day one. Absolutely. What was the core idea,

00:05:48.279 --> 00:05:50.500
the philosophy behind it? It was provocative

00:05:50.500 --> 00:05:52.920
right out of the gate. Savage's stated intention

00:05:52.920 --> 00:05:57.060
was basically to provide mocking advice to heterosexuals.

00:05:57.060 --> 00:05:59.680
Mocking them? Why? He felt that the established,

00:05:59.699 --> 00:06:02.459
you know, street advice columnists were often

00:06:02.459 --> 00:06:05.040
judgmental or just clueless when they tried to

00:06:05.040 --> 00:06:07.439
answer letters from gay people. Ah, so he flipped

00:06:07.439 --> 00:06:10.240
the script. Exactly. Took a deliberately confrontational

00:06:10.240 --> 00:06:13.449
stance. to turn the tables on what he saw as

00:06:13.449 --> 00:06:16.350
the clueless cultural norm. And this leads directly

00:06:16.350 --> 00:06:20.269
to one of his most, let's say, infamous rhetorical

00:06:20.269 --> 00:06:22.529
moves, right in the formatting of the column

00:06:22.529 --> 00:06:25.509
itself, the salutation. Oh, yeah. His initial

00:06:25.509 --> 00:06:28.069
idea, which the editor shot down, was to call

00:06:28.069 --> 00:06:30.870
the whole column, hey, faggot. Oh. He wanted

00:06:30.870 --> 00:06:32.810
to reclaim the hate word. That was the idea.

00:06:33.310 --> 00:06:37.069
Editor said no to the title. But. For several

00:06:37.069 --> 00:06:39.889
years, he successfully used, hey, faggot, as

00:06:39.889 --> 00:06:42.810
the salutation at the start of every single printed

00:06:42.810 --> 00:06:45.870
letter. That is astonishing. For a newspaper

00:06:45.870 --> 00:06:48.990
column, that level of provocation. Right. He

00:06:48.990 --> 00:06:51.709
used that framing until 1999. That's nearly a

00:06:51.709 --> 00:06:54.209
decade. Why does he stop? He claimed he retired

00:06:54.209 --> 00:06:56.529
it only when he felt the reclamation had been

00:06:56.529 --> 00:06:58.769
successful, or maybe just when the shock value

00:06:58.769 --> 00:07:00.709
wasn't as useful anymore. What does that tell

00:07:00.709 --> 00:07:03.699
you, though? about his early strategy. It tells

00:07:03.699 --> 00:07:06.519
you Savage understood very early on that progressive

00:07:06.519 --> 00:07:09.139
social change could be driven by really aggressive,

00:07:09.319 --> 00:07:11.920
attention -grabbing confrontation. His column

00:07:11.920 --> 00:07:13.819
was engineered for that. Totally. Engineered

00:07:13.819 --> 00:07:16.079
as a vehicle for cultural critique, not just

00:07:16.079 --> 00:07:19.259
relationship help. Designed to force discomfort,

00:07:19.579 --> 00:07:22.699
make people notice. Well, that framing certainly

00:07:22.699 --> 00:07:25.959
worked to build an audience, which takes us right

00:07:25.959 --> 00:07:28.959
into section two, building the media platform.

00:07:29.819 --> 00:07:33.180
Once Savage Love found that defiant voice, it

00:07:33.180 --> 00:07:35.579
didn't stay local in Seattle for long. No, it

00:07:35.579 --> 00:07:37.220
blew up pretty quickly. It became internationally

00:07:37.220 --> 00:07:40.319
syndicated, popping up in alt weeklies all over

00:07:40.319 --> 00:07:43.319
the U .S., Canada, eventually further afield.

00:07:43.420 --> 00:07:45.779
But he wasn't just mailing it in from afar, right?

00:07:46.220 --> 00:07:48.680
He was involved with The Stranger. Deeply involved.

00:07:48.800 --> 00:07:50.920
He eventually became editor -in -chief and then

00:07:50.920 --> 00:07:53.259
editorial director there. Which gave him significant

00:07:53.259 --> 00:07:56.199
local political influence in Seattle. Huge clout,

00:07:56.220 --> 00:07:58.620
yeah. And while he's primarily known as an LGBTQ

00:07:58.620 --> 00:08:02.290
advocate, he was smart. He broadened his focus

00:08:02.290 --> 00:08:04.670
to what he called straight rights issues. Yeah,

00:08:04.730 --> 00:08:07.129
arguing that the sort of political war on sex

00:08:07.129 --> 00:08:09.689
was universal. How did he frame that? He basically

00:08:09.689 --> 00:08:12.990
made the case that the right -wingers and the

00:08:12.990 --> 00:08:15.649
fundies and the sexphobes, as he put it, weren't

00:08:15.649 --> 00:08:17.250
just targeting the queer community. They were

00:08:17.250 --> 00:08:20.220
coming for your asses, too. Exactly. His words.

00:08:20.279 --> 00:08:23.160
He focused on conservative opposition to things

00:08:23.160 --> 00:08:26.259
like the HPV vaccine, the morning after pill,

00:08:26.379 --> 00:08:29.040
stuff that affects everyone. So by fighting for

00:08:29.040 --> 00:08:31.800
access to mainstream sexual health stuff. He

00:08:31.800 --> 00:08:34.639
positioned sex positivity as a necessary defense

00:08:34.639 --> 00:08:37.860
for everyone against, you know, prudish government

00:08:37.860 --> 00:08:40.500
control over people's bodies and lives. It's

00:08:40.500 --> 00:08:42.980
actually a really brilliant way to broaden the

00:08:42.980 --> 00:08:45.779
political base for sexual freedom. Makes it universal.

00:08:46.350 --> 00:08:49.110
Totally. And that philosophy, that sex is universal,

00:08:49.389 --> 00:08:52.590
it translated perfectly into audio with the Savage

00:08:52.590 --> 00:08:55.490
Lovecast. Ah, yes, the podcast. Let's do a real

00:08:55.490 --> 00:08:57.490
deep dive here. How does the Lovecast actually

00:08:57.490 --> 00:09:00.450
work? So it's a weekly audio podcast, basically

00:09:00.450 --> 00:09:02.730
an extension of the column. But what makes it

00:09:02.730 --> 00:09:05.250
unique is how he gets the questions. How's that?

00:09:05.669 --> 00:09:07.950
Callers leave anonymous questions on a dedicated

00:09:07.950 --> 00:09:10.309
voice recorder, like an old school answering

00:09:10.309 --> 00:09:12.629
machine, essentially. OK. And then he answers

00:09:12.629 --> 00:09:14.769
them on the show. Right. And unlike typical radio

00:09:14.769 --> 00:09:16.620
call -in shows, he... he often actually returns

00:09:16.620 --> 00:09:19.659
the calls. So the live recorded conversation

00:09:19.659 --> 00:09:21.980
becomes part of the show itself. Oh, interesting.

00:09:22.500 --> 00:09:25.000
That must create a different kind of feel, more

00:09:25.000 --> 00:09:27.440
immediate. It really does. It creates this sense

00:09:27.440 --> 00:09:30.659
of intimacy, authenticity, and the structure

00:09:30.659 --> 00:09:33.519
is dynamic, you know? It's funny, it's serious.

00:09:33.840 --> 00:09:36.399
But he's careful with the advice, right? Especially

00:09:36.399 --> 00:09:39.000
medical stuff. Yeah, that's crucial. He's very

00:09:39.000 --> 00:09:41.879
responsible about expertise. For questions that

00:09:41.879 --> 00:09:44.879
are complex or medical, he often consults doctors,

00:09:45.019 --> 00:09:48.179
sex therapists, relationship experts, sometimes

00:09:48.179 --> 00:09:50.360
calls them live on the show. And he'll say it's

00:09:50.360 --> 00:09:53.600
above my pay grade. Explicitly, yeah. He's the

00:09:53.600 --> 00:09:55.820
funny, frank guide who knows exactly when to

00:09:55.820 --> 00:09:57.600
turn in the science or the therapy professional.

00:09:58.019 --> 00:10:00.840
The combination must be key to its success. I

00:10:00.840 --> 00:10:04.299
think so. That blend of, like, frank comedy and

00:10:04.299 --> 00:10:06.899
responsible fact -checking. It's why the Lovecast

00:10:06.899 --> 00:10:09.200
is consistently recognized. It's huge, right?

00:10:09.789 --> 00:10:12.090
Top of the iTunes charts in health. Routinely.

00:10:12.289 --> 00:10:14.509
Yeah. And often in the top 20 podcasts overall.

00:10:14.750 --> 00:10:17.110
Got nods from the AV Club, The Atlantic. It's

00:10:17.110 --> 00:10:19.610
a massive media success. Proving that whole alt

00:10:19.610 --> 00:10:22.070
-weekly vibe could really thrive in the digital

00:10:22.070 --> 00:10:24.970
age. Definitely. And beyond the core column in

00:10:24.970 --> 00:10:27.529
the podcast, he became a pretty central figure

00:10:27.529 --> 00:10:30.190
in broader media too. He certainly did. He had

00:10:30.190 --> 00:10:32.309
an early call -in show, Savage Love Live, way

00:10:32.309 --> 00:10:35.870
back 94 to 97. And an online column for ABC News.

00:10:36.090 --> 00:10:40.149
Yeah. Dear Dan, 98 -2000. He became a familiar

00:10:40.149 --> 00:10:42.720
voice on public radio, too. frequent contributor

00:10:42.720 --> 00:10:45.940
to This American Life. And politically on TV.

00:10:46.200 --> 00:10:49.120
He was a real -time, real reporter on HBO's Real

00:10:49.120 --> 00:10:51.399
Time with Bill Maher for a while. Always in the

00:10:51.399 --> 00:10:53.399
mix. And we can't forget those acting roots.

00:10:53.519 --> 00:10:55.279
You mentioned the theater work he did under the

00:10:55.279 --> 00:10:57.240
name Kenan Hollihan. Right, that acting background

00:10:57.240 --> 00:11:00.299
wasn't just history. It led him to found Seattle's

00:11:00.299 --> 00:11:03.139
Greek Active Theater. What was their thing? Known

00:11:03.139 --> 00:11:05.580
for taking classic works and giving them these

00:11:05.580 --> 00:11:09.059
queer interpretations. Staging a tragicomic Macbeth,

00:11:09.080 --> 00:11:11.840
for instance. playing with gender roles. It's

00:11:11.840 --> 00:11:14.200
that kind of theatrical impulse reinterpreting

00:11:14.200 --> 00:11:16.919
classics that you see in his cultural critiques

00:11:16.919 --> 00:11:19.519
later. Totally connects. Although, as our sources

00:11:19.519 --> 00:11:22.399
note, his own attempt at playwriting, Letters

00:11:22.399 --> 00:11:24.919
from the Earth in 2003. Oh yeah, what happened

00:11:24.919 --> 00:11:27.980
there? It got an absolutely scathing review from

00:11:27.980 --> 00:11:30.679
his own paper at The Stranger. Ouch, that's got

00:11:30.679 --> 00:11:34.720
a sting. Famously brutal, but also kind of self

00:11:34.720 --> 00:11:37.179
-aware for the paper, it highlighted that alt

00:11:37.179 --> 00:11:40.000
-weakly philosophy. Critique has to be ruthless,

00:11:40.220 --> 00:11:43.179
applied equally, even to the boss. Fair enough.

00:11:43.320 --> 00:11:45.419
Okay, let's shift to his television work. He

00:11:45.419 --> 00:11:48.879
had that MTV series, Savage U. But the really

00:11:48.879 --> 00:11:51.759
significant TV project was The Real O 'Neils

00:11:51.759 --> 00:11:53.480
on ABC, right? Yeah, that was a bigger deal.

00:11:53.580 --> 00:11:55.419
Savage was an executive producer on that, ran

00:11:55.419 --> 00:11:57.840
for two seasons on network TV. And it was based

00:11:57.840 --> 00:12:00.860
on his idea. Based on his concept, yeah. About

00:12:00.860 --> 00:12:04.200
this seemingly perfect, tight -knit, Irish -American

00:12:04.200 --> 00:12:07.259
Catholic family in Chicago. Whose secrets all

00:12:07.259 --> 00:12:10.100
come tumbling out. Exactly. Triggered when the

00:12:10.100 --> 00:12:12.759
middle child comes out as gay. This feels like

00:12:12.759 --> 00:12:15.240
his core political work smuggled onto mainstream

00:12:15.240 --> 00:12:19.259
TV. Like a Trojan horse. It really kind of is.

00:12:19.460 --> 00:12:22.580
The show reveals, okay, the middle kid's gay.

00:12:23.230 --> 00:12:25.389
The oldest daughter is anorexic. The youngest

00:12:25.389 --> 00:12:28.490
is maybe an atheist running some scam. And the

00:12:28.490 --> 00:12:30.950
parents want a divorce but are hiding it. Wow.

00:12:31.090 --> 00:12:33.809
All the secrets. It takes all that deeply personal

00:12:33.809 --> 00:12:36.269
pain and complexity, especially for queer youth

00:12:36.269 --> 00:12:38.870
in strict religious homes, and puts it right

00:12:38.870 --> 00:12:41.970
into a primetime network comedy. That's a deliberate

00:12:41.970 --> 00:12:45.309
act of normalization using major media exposure.

00:12:45.570 --> 00:12:48.629
Absolutely. That move from private pain to public

00:12:48.629 --> 00:12:51.269
platform, that's the perfect bridge to Section

00:12:51.269 --> 00:12:54.879
3. The blending of private life and public activism.

00:12:55.840 --> 00:12:58.240
Savage's personal life, it seems, has never really

00:12:58.240 --> 00:13:00.419
been separate from his political mission. No,

00:13:00.519 --> 00:13:02.519
they're completely intertwined. His own family

00:13:02.519 --> 00:13:04.919
life is totally central to his advocacy work.

00:13:05.240 --> 00:13:08.159
So he and Terry Miller, his husband, they married

00:13:08.159 --> 00:13:11.149
early, right? Before it was widely legal. They

00:13:11.149 --> 00:13:13.370
did. They first married in Vancouver, Canada

00:13:13.370 --> 00:13:16.629
back in 2005, long before same -sex marriage

00:13:16.629 --> 00:13:19.210
was recognized across most of the U .S. Just

00:13:19.210 --> 00:13:21.110
going to Canada to get married back then was

00:13:21.110 --> 00:13:23.549
a political act in itself. It absolutely was

00:13:23.549 --> 00:13:26.409
a form of protest, a statement. And then when

00:13:26.409 --> 00:13:28.690
Washington state finally legalized same -sex

00:13:28.690 --> 00:13:30.330
marriage, they made sure their commitment was

00:13:30.330 --> 00:13:32.830
highly visible. When it became legal in Washington

00:13:32.830 --> 00:13:35.950
in 2012, they were among the very first couples

00:13:35.950 --> 00:13:38.029
to get state marriage licenses. They got married

00:13:38.029 --> 00:13:40.350
publicly. Yeah, at Seattle City Hall, December

00:13:40.350 --> 00:13:43.429
9, 2012, along with other couples. It was a very

00:13:43.429 --> 00:13:45.889
calculated, very public declaration of equality.

00:13:46.450 --> 00:13:49.129
And the couple also adopted a son around 1998.

00:13:49.450 --> 00:13:52.149
Yeah, adopted their son DJ as an infant around

00:13:52.149 --> 00:13:55.450
1998. And Savage was incredibly public about

00:13:55.450 --> 00:13:57.250
that whole process. He wrote a book about it,

00:13:57.269 --> 00:13:59.690
didn't he? He did. Chronicled that whole intense

00:13:59.690 --> 00:14:03.509
personal journey in his 1999 book, The Kid. What

00:14:03.509 --> 00:14:05.629
happened after my boyfriend and I decided to

00:14:05.629 --> 00:14:07.960
go get pregnant? That book must have been really

00:14:07.960 --> 00:14:10.799
important for normalizing queer families. Hugely

00:14:10.799 --> 00:14:13.299
important. Showed the emotional side, the logistical

00:14:13.299 --> 00:14:16.659
hurdles, the legal realities of gay couples building

00:14:16.659 --> 00:14:19.580
a family through adoption. It basically turned

00:14:19.580 --> 00:14:22.240
their private story into foundational reading

00:14:22.240 --> 00:14:25.360
for the movement. OK, let's pivot to the It Gets

00:14:25.360 --> 00:14:28.419
Better project. The name itself is now like a

00:14:28.419 --> 00:14:31.200
global mantra. What was the specific tragedy

00:14:31.200 --> 00:14:33.460
that kicked it off? The project was founded September

00:14:33.460 --> 00:14:37.340
21st, 2010. Directly in response to the suicide

00:14:37.340 --> 00:14:40.000
of a 15 -year -old named Billy Lucas. Who was

00:14:40.000 --> 00:14:41.980
bullied. Relentlessly bullied, yeah, for his

00:14:41.980 --> 00:14:44.700
perceived sexual orientation. Savage and Miller

00:14:44.700 --> 00:14:47.259
saw this awful tragedy and just felt they had

00:14:47.259 --> 00:14:49.159
to do something. Leverage their platforms. And

00:14:49.159 --> 00:14:52.299
the idea was simple, but powerful. Incredibly

00:14:52.299 --> 00:14:55.690
effective. Just ask adults. queer straight famous

00:14:55.690 --> 00:14:59.990
regular folks to submit video testimonials messages

00:14:59.990 --> 00:15:03.509
assuring lgbtq youth that life absolutely gets

00:15:03.509 --> 00:15:05.610
better after the hell of high school bullying

00:15:05.610 --> 00:15:08.309
and isolation flood the internet with hope basically

00:15:08.309 --> 00:15:11.700
that was the goal and the response was just The

00:15:11.700 --> 00:15:13.620
scale tells you how desperately that message

00:15:13.620 --> 00:15:16.159
was needed. How big did it get? By November 2013,

00:15:16.480 --> 00:15:18.740
so just about three years later, the project

00:15:18.740 --> 00:15:22.480
had over 50 ,000 user -created videos, testimonials,

00:15:22.559 --> 00:15:27.090
and over 50 million views combined. Wow. That's

00:15:27.090 --> 00:15:28.909
incredible velocity from a heartfelt response

00:15:28.909 --> 00:15:30.950
to this massive digital movement. And it got

00:15:30.950 --> 00:15:33.730
major recognition to awards. Yeah. Won a Webby

00:15:33.730 --> 00:15:36.850
Award for special achievement in 2011 and significantly

00:15:36.850 --> 00:15:39.570
the Emmy Governor's Award in 2012. The Governor's

00:15:39.570 --> 00:15:41.289
Award. That's a big deal. It's for achievements

00:15:41.289 --> 00:15:44.129
beyond standard TV categories. Exactly. It's

00:15:44.129 --> 00:15:46.549
cemented. It gets better and not just as successful

00:15:46.549 --> 00:15:49.129
activism, but as like essential public service

00:15:49.129 --> 00:15:52.350
media. Really profound impact. OK, so moving

00:15:52.350 --> 00:15:56.840
from life saving activism to. Well, something

00:15:56.840 --> 00:15:59.899
very different. Boundary -pushing art. We have

00:15:59.899 --> 00:16:02.679
to talk about the annual HMP film festival that

00:16:02.679 --> 00:16:05.379
Savage coordinates. Right. The juxtaposition

00:16:05.379 --> 00:16:08.299
is classic Savage. That cognitive dissonance

00:16:08.299 --> 00:16:10.720
he relies on to keep everyone talking. It feels

00:16:10.720 --> 00:16:13.799
like a radical move. What exactly is HGMP? It's

00:16:13.799 --> 00:16:16.120
an annual pornography festival. It showcases

00:16:16.120 --> 00:16:19.100
short five -minute porn clips submitted by viewers.

00:16:19.519 --> 00:16:22.279
Basically, anyone can submit on any pornographic

00:16:22.279 --> 00:16:24.860
topic they want. And it's successful? It tours.

00:16:25.059 --> 00:16:27.279
Hugely successful. Tours theaters across the

00:16:27.279 --> 00:16:29.720
country every year. But the curation, the philosophy

00:16:29.720 --> 00:16:31.720
behind it, that's the key part, right? It's not

00:16:31.720 --> 00:16:35.720
just random homemade porn. No, exactly. The unique

00:16:35.720 --> 00:16:37.340
element, and this is the political statement,

00:16:37.519 --> 00:16:39.659
is the mixing. The winning submissions are all

00:16:39.659 --> 00:16:42.360
shown together. Mixing what? Deliberately mixing

00:16:42.360 --> 00:16:46.340
straight porn, gay male porn, bi, lesbian fetish

00:16:46.340 --> 00:16:49.440
stuff, all one after another in the same program.

00:16:49.639 --> 00:16:51.720
Ah, okay, breaking down the silos. Right. It

00:16:51.720 --> 00:16:53.919
challenges the traditional, highly segregated

00:16:53.919 --> 00:16:56.799
way the porn industry usually works, suggests

00:16:56.799 --> 00:16:59.159
all kinds of sexual experiences deserve space

00:16:59.159 --> 00:17:02.230
on the screen, together. And there's that final

00:17:02.230 --> 00:17:05.130
crucial detail. What happens to the films afterwards?

00:17:05.549 --> 00:17:07.789
Savage publicly destroys all the submissions

00:17:07.789 --> 00:17:10.910
after the tour ends. Destroys them. Why? It acts

00:17:10.910 --> 00:17:13.170
as a kind of protective mechanism for the filmmakers.

00:17:13.549 --> 00:17:16.869
By destroying the tapes, he ensures this ephemeral

00:17:16.869 --> 00:17:20.309
homemade art isn't permanently exploited or leaked

00:17:20.309 --> 00:17:22.589
outside the festival context. Is the amateur

00:17:22.589 --> 00:17:25.390
participants a layer of security? Exactly. Security

00:17:25.390 --> 00:17:27.910
that traditional commercial porn definitely doesn't

00:17:27.910 --> 00:17:31.460
offer. It's performance art, sure. but layered

00:17:31.460 --> 00:17:33.740
with these ethical considerations for the people

00:17:33.740 --> 00:17:36.460
involved. It really seems like Savage has this

00:17:36.460 --> 00:17:40.000
history of not just writing about things, but

00:17:40.000 --> 00:17:42.539
outright weaponizing language for his campaigns,

00:17:42.759 --> 00:17:46.059
which takes us perfectly into section four, campaigns

00:17:46.059 --> 00:17:48.859
and controversial neologisms. We absolutely have

00:17:48.859 --> 00:17:51.279
to start with the infamous Santorum campaign,

00:17:51.599 --> 00:17:54.119
2003. Yeah, that one's legendary. The catalyst

00:17:54.119 --> 00:17:56.809
was then U .S. Senator Rick Santorum. He gave

00:17:56.809 --> 00:17:59.789
this interview comparing homosexual sex to bestiality

00:17:59.789 --> 00:18:03.289
and incest. Awful stuff. Truly egregious. And

00:18:03.289 --> 00:18:06.529
Savage felt the attack was so harmful, so beyond

00:18:06.529 --> 00:18:09.210
the pale, that he needed a response beyond just

00:18:09.210 --> 00:18:12.410
a column. He launched a campaign, a cultural

00:18:12.410 --> 00:18:14.930
sabotage campaign, really. He sponsored a contest,

00:18:15.029 --> 00:18:17.589
right, to redefine Santorum's last name. Correct.

00:18:17.710 --> 00:18:20.450
Held a contest among his readers. And the result

00:18:20.450 --> 00:18:23.869
was coining the term centaurum. Defined as? Defined

00:18:23.869 --> 00:18:27.829
as the frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter

00:18:27.829 --> 00:18:30.410
that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex.

00:18:30.670 --> 00:18:33.529
Oh, my God. And he didn't just coin it. He successfully

00:18:33.529 --> 00:18:36.910
leveraged the Internet, set up a dedicated website

00:18:36.910 --> 00:18:40.220
spreading centaurum .com, I think it was. publicized

00:18:40.220 --> 00:18:42.900
the definition relentlessly. With the specific

00:18:42.900 --> 00:18:45.220
goal of dominating search engine results for

00:18:45.220 --> 00:18:47.460
the senator's name. Exactly. It was a modern,

00:18:47.519 --> 00:18:50.400
aggressive form of political action, using digital

00:18:50.400 --> 00:18:53.500
media, using gross -out humor, shock value, to

00:18:53.500 --> 00:18:55.819
inflict a very specific kind of reputational

00:18:55.819 --> 00:18:58.119
damage. And it worked, didn't it? Incredibly

00:18:58.119 --> 00:19:01.319
effective. Saravage essentially turned the senator's

00:19:01.319 --> 00:19:04.019
name into this widely known scatological joke.

00:19:04.220 --> 00:19:06.440
It overshadowed a lot of his political messaging

00:19:06.440 --> 00:19:08.400
for years. Did he ever offer to take it down?

00:19:08.700 --> 00:19:11.759
He did in 2010. But with the political price

00:19:11.759 --> 00:19:14.539
tag, he said he'd remove the website if Santorum

00:19:14.539 --> 00:19:17.380
donated $5 million to Freedom to Marry, the gay

00:19:17.380 --> 00:19:19.500
rights organization. Which Santorum obviously

00:19:19.500 --> 00:19:21.940
didn't do. He condemned the campaign. Of course.

00:19:22.200 --> 00:19:25.940
Called it hateful, disgusting. Savage, in response,

00:19:26.160 --> 00:19:28.559
basically argued that his campaign, while aggressive,

00:19:28.819 --> 00:19:31.680
was nonviolent. And it was a direct response

00:19:31.680 --> 00:19:34.579
to Santorum propagating real discrimination and

00:19:34.579 --> 00:19:37.059
harm. And that website or the definition, it's

00:19:37.059 --> 00:19:39.670
still out there. A permanent digital scar. It

00:19:39.670 --> 00:19:42.950
really proved the long -lasting power of a successfully

00:19:42.950 --> 00:19:46.109
weaponized neologism in the Internet age. And

00:19:46.109 --> 00:19:47.890
it wasn't a one -off strategy for him, was it?

00:19:47.970 --> 00:19:51.470
He used the same playbook in 2009 with the saddlebacking

00:19:51.470 --> 00:19:53.250
protest. Right, saddlebacking. That was aimed

00:19:53.250 --> 00:19:55.410
at Pastor Rick Warren, head of Saddleback Church.

00:19:55.690 --> 00:19:58.130
Why Warren? Warren was a very vocal supporter

00:19:58.130 --> 00:20:00.930
of California's Proposition 8, the ballot measure

00:20:00.930 --> 00:20:02.869
that banned same -sex marriage. And was there

00:20:02.869 --> 00:20:06.210
controversy because Obama invited it to the inauguration?

00:20:06.640 --> 00:20:09.259
Exactly. That heightened it. President Obama

00:20:09.259 --> 00:20:11.700
invited Warren to give the invocation at his

00:20:11.700 --> 00:20:14.920
first inauguration. Savage used the neologism

00:20:14.920 --> 00:20:17.980
to protest both Warren's politics and Obama's

00:20:17.980 --> 00:20:20.079
association with him. So what was the definition

00:20:20.079 --> 00:20:23.599
this time? Equally provocative. Oh yeah. It defined

00:20:23.599 --> 00:20:26.680
saddlebacking as the phenomenon of Christian

00:20:26.680 --> 00:20:30.039
teens engaging in unprotected anal sex to preserve

00:20:30.039 --> 00:20:34.099
their virginities. Wow. Okay. Linkey perceived

00:20:34.099 --> 00:20:36.799
hypocrisy about abstinence -only preaching. with

00:20:36.799 --> 00:20:39.400
specific, often undiscussed sexual behaviors

00:20:39.400 --> 00:20:42.180
among some religious youth, designed purely to

00:20:42.180 --> 00:20:44.980
provoke and critique. This kind of activism sometimes

00:20:44.980 --> 00:20:47.450
had consequences for him, though. Didn't a paper

00:20:47.450 --> 00:20:50.269
drop his column over Prop 8? Yeah, the sources

00:20:50.269 --> 00:20:52.490
mentioned that the Salt Lake City Weekly dropped

00:20:52.490 --> 00:20:55.309
Savage Love after he vowed to boycott Utah because

00:20:55.309 --> 00:20:57.529
of the strong Mormon church support for Prop

00:20:57.529 --> 00:20:59.970
8 there. So he was willing to take the hit. Seemed

00:20:59.970 --> 00:21:01.970
to be, yeah. If the goal was applying political

00:21:01.970 --> 00:21:04.549
pressure, and beyond these big national language

00:21:04.549 --> 00:21:07.630
-based campaigns, Savage was also a really powerful

00:21:07.630 --> 00:21:10.250
voice in local Seattle politics, mostly through

00:21:10.250 --> 00:21:12.509
The Stranger. What was his big local fight? His

00:21:12.509 --> 00:21:15.049
most high -profile local battle was against the

00:21:15.049 --> 00:21:17.650
Seattle Teen Dancers. ordinance, and the related

00:21:17.650 --> 00:21:20.569
crackdowns on all ages, music venues, and events.

00:21:20.809 --> 00:21:23.819
Fighting the no fun police. Basically. It was

00:21:23.819 --> 00:21:26.700
a fight against what he saw as moral panic disguised

00:21:26.700 --> 00:21:29.920
as city governance. Savage argued pretty forcefully

00:21:29.920 --> 00:21:32.819
that closing down supervised venues, places like

00:21:32.819 --> 00:21:36.119
Ground Zero or the Kirkland Teen Center, it didn't

00:21:36.119 --> 00:21:38.319
stop teenagers from getting together. It just

00:21:38.319 --> 00:21:40.240
pushed them somewhere else. Exactly. Pushed them

00:21:40.240 --> 00:21:43.000
into unsupervised, potentially more dangerous

00:21:43.000 --> 00:21:46.599
situations. He specifically cited like 7 -Eleven

00:21:46.599 --> 00:21:50.299
parking lots or unsupervised houses where boredom

00:21:50.299 --> 00:21:52.680
and lack of structure can lead to reckless behavior.

00:21:52.880 --> 00:21:55.259
It's the classic savage move, isn't it? Defend

00:21:55.259 --> 00:21:57.819
youth, defend fun, defend sex or dancing. And

00:21:57.819 --> 00:22:00.339
use that as a wedge issue to fight broader government

00:22:00.339 --> 00:22:03.779
control and, you know, moral prudishness. Looking

00:22:03.779 --> 00:22:06.500
at the pattern, national or local, he consistently

00:22:06.500 --> 00:22:09.319
frames these fights against sexphobes as fights

00:22:09.319 --> 00:22:12.319
for freedom, for self -determination. And often,

00:22:12.380 --> 00:22:14.799
crucially, for the physical safety and well -being

00:22:14.799 --> 00:22:17.240
of young people. That consistency, though, it

00:22:17.240 --> 00:22:20.539
brings us to Section 5, the hot zones of viewpoints

00:22:20.539 --> 00:22:23.859
and controversy. Because while Savage is generally

00:22:23.859 --> 00:22:26.420
seen as liberal, the source is making clear he

00:22:26.420 --> 00:22:29.440
has this fierce contrarian streak. Oh, definitely.

00:22:29.740 --> 00:22:31.720
Which sometimes led him to attack his own allies

00:22:31.720 --> 00:22:34.460
or use language that just generated huge backlash.

00:22:34.900 --> 00:22:37.759
His politics are, yeah, broadly liberal, but

00:22:37.759 --> 00:22:40.700
with these really undeniable libertarian and

00:22:40.700 --> 00:22:43.960
contrarian impulses just woven through. He constantly

00:22:43.960 --> 00:22:46.660
used his column to push readers, encourage them

00:22:46.660 --> 00:22:49.380
to voice opinions on politicians, get active,

00:22:49.420 --> 00:22:52.269
not passive. An early sign of that libertarian

00:22:52.269 --> 00:22:55.450
side was his opposition to laws banning the sale

00:22:55.450 --> 00:22:58.130
of sex toys. Yeah, that came up. When an adult

00:22:58.130 --> 00:23:00.309
video store owner in Mississippi got arrested

00:23:00.309 --> 00:23:03.130
after some local journalist did an expose. What

00:23:03.130 --> 00:23:05.490
did Savage do? He satirically suggested that

00:23:05.490 --> 00:23:07.630
his readers should mail all their unwanted sex

00:23:07.630 --> 00:23:09.710
toys directly to the journalist who wrote the

00:23:09.710 --> 00:23:12.569
story, Candace Krohn. Huh. Turned the moral enforcement

00:23:12.569 --> 00:23:15.289
into a logistical nightmare. Exactly. Use humor

00:23:15.289 --> 00:23:17.430
and absurdity to push back against what he saw

00:23:17.430 --> 00:23:19.930
as prudish overreach. Okay, but now we need -

00:23:19.950 --> 00:23:21.950
to get into the comments where his aggressive

00:23:21.950 --> 00:23:25.069
style really backfired, where he had to issue

00:23:25.069 --> 00:23:27.990
public apologies. Let's start with that 2006

00:23:27.990 --> 00:23:30.390
comment about the Green Party candidate Carl

00:23:30.390 --> 00:23:33.470
Romanelli. Right. Savage believed Romanelli was

00:23:33.470 --> 00:23:36.309
basically a spoiler candidate funded by Republicans

00:23:36.309 --> 00:23:39.650
to siphon votes. And in an interview, his rhetoric

00:23:39.650 --> 00:23:43.339
just went. Way over the top. Way over. He suggested

00:23:43.339 --> 00:23:45.740
Romanelli should be dragged behind a pickup truck

00:23:45.740 --> 00:23:47.799
until there's nothing left but the rope or just

00:23:47.799 --> 00:23:50.519
run over. I mean, that's extreme language, even

00:23:50.519 --> 00:23:53.019
for him. Absolutely extreme. And the condemnation

00:23:53.019 --> 00:23:55.920
was swift and widespread. Savage had to immediately

00:23:55.920 --> 00:23:59.359
issue a regret and an apology. Calling it? Calling

00:23:59.359 --> 00:24:01.700
the truck metaphor stupid, rude, thoughtless.

00:24:01.900 --> 00:24:04.359
He emphasized he didn't mean the threat literally

00:24:04.359 --> 00:24:06.440
at all, but it really highlighted the risks of

00:24:06.440 --> 00:24:09.220
using that kind of violent hyperbole in political

00:24:09.220 --> 00:24:12.359
talk. It wasn't an isolated incident. A few years

00:24:12.359 --> 00:24:14.940
later, 2011, he did something similar on real

00:24:14.940 --> 00:24:18.640
time with Bill Maher during that tense debt negotiation

00:24:18.640 --> 00:24:21.579
period. That's right. He was expressing his utter

00:24:21.579 --> 00:24:23.180
frustration with the congressional Republicans

00:24:23.180 --> 00:24:26.420
blocking things, and he just blurted out, I wish

00:24:26.420 --> 00:24:28.680
the Republicans were all fucking dead. Another

00:24:28.680 --> 00:24:31.579
immediate walk back required. Yep. Had to apologize

00:24:31.579 --> 00:24:34.519
quickly later that night on his blog. Said he

00:24:34.519 --> 00:24:36.960
didn't actually feel that way. Call it a flubbed

00:24:36.960 --> 00:24:39.819
expression of disgust. These moments really show

00:24:39.819 --> 00:24:42.420
that constant tension in his work. Between wanting

00:24:42.420 --> 00:24:45.220
to use shocking language for effect. And the

00:24:45.220 --> 00:24:48.000
literal harm or offense such language can actually

00:24:48.000 --> 00:24:50.880
cause, even if not intended literally. But maybe

00:24:50.880 --> 00:24:53.720
the most audacious and personally consequential

00:24:53.720 --> 00:24:56.779
act of political provocateurism came much earlier.

00:24:56.960 --> 00:25:00.259
The 2000 Iowa caucuses incident. Oh yeah, that

00:25:00.259 --> 00:25:03.559
story's wild. Savage went to Iowa to cover the

00:25:03.559 --> 00:25:06.480
caucuses for Salon magazine. And he was initially

00:25:06.480 --> 00:25:09.259
going to write about Gary Bauer. The conservative

00:25:09.259 --> 00:25:11.559
candidate. Yeah. He apparently intended to write

00:25:11.559 --> 00:25:14.420
a sort of humanizing piece on Bauer. But then

00:25:14.420 --> 00:25:17.339
Bauer's anti same sex marriage comments just

00:25:17.339 --> 00:25:20.299
enraged Savage so much that he abandoned the

00:25:20.299 --> 00:25:22.539
whole journalistic approach completely. And what

00:25:22.539 --> 00:25:25.019
he claimed he did next was just shocking. What

00:25:25.019 --> 00:25:27.450
do you claim? He'd been sick with the flu. So

00:25:27.450 --> 00:25:30.130
he claimed he volunteered for the Bauer campaign

00:25:30.130 --> 00:25:32.910
specifically to try and spread the flu to Bauer

00:25:32.910 --> 00:25:36.009
and his staff. Good out. He claimed he licked

00:25:36.009 --> 00:25:38.609
doorknobs, coffee cups, other surfaces in the

00:25:38.609 --> 00:25:42.150
campaign office. And the most infamous detail

00:25:42.150 --> 00:25:46.009
allegedly coated a pen in his saliva right before

00:25:46.009 --> 00:25:48.730
handing it directly to Gary Bauer himself. He

00:25:48.730 --> 00:25:51.390
claimed he licked a pen and gave it to a presidential

00:25:51.390 --> 00:25:54.410
candidate. That's that's next level provocation.

00:25:54.490 --> 00:25:57.119
It truly is. And the description. when published

00:25:57.119 --> 00:25:59.380
in Salon led to immediate and harsh criticism.

00:25:59.880 --> 00:26:02.900
Camille Paclia, who also wrote for Salon, called

00:26:02.900 --> 00:26:05.960
the described behavior sociopathic. Did Savage

00:26:05.960 --> 00:26:08.380
stand by the story? He later clarified, said

00:26:08.380 --> 00:26:10.480
the story was highly exaggerated for comedic

00:26:10.480 --> 00:26:12.759
effect, more like journalistic performance art,

00:26:12.900 --> 00:26:15.039
claimed the doorknob licking was made up and

00:26:15.039 --> 00:26:17.039
insisted he was actually no longer contagious

00:26:17.039 --> 00:26:19.160
by the time he joined the campaign team. But

00:26:19.160 --> 00:26:21.559
the controversy didn't stop with just the sensational

00:26:21.559 --> 00:26:24.480
claims, did it? There were actual legal consequences

00:26:24.480 --> 00:26:26.920
from that Iowa trip. That's right. It wasn't

00:26:26.920 --> 00:26:29.220
just performance. While he was there, Savage

00:26:29.220 --> 00:26:31.339
illegally registered and voted in the Republican

00:26:31.339 --> 00:26:34.210
caucus. He actually voted illegally. He did,

00:26:34.349 --> 00:26:36.450
and he later pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor

00:26:36.450 --> 00:26:39.170
charge. Fraudulent voting. What was the penalty?

00:26:39.450 --> 00:26:42.309
Got probation, had to do community service, and

00:26:42.309 --> 00:26:44.549
pay a fine. It's kind of a sobering reminder

00:26:44.549 --> 00:26:46.849
that pushing boundaries with performance art

00:26:46.849 --> 00:26:49.509
journalism can have very real, tangible costs.

00:26:49.869 --> 00:26:52.670
Definitely. Okay, let's pivot a bit to his views

00:26:52.670 --> 00:26:57.230
on social issues, sexuality itself. He's described

00:26:57.230 --> 00:27:00.509
his approach to family as conservative, which

00:27:00.509 --> 00:27:03.250
seems... counterintuitive given his public image

00:27:03.250 --> 00:27:05.690
yeah it sounds odd but his point is that he values

00:27:05.690 --> 00:27:08.369
commitment building a stable family unit, which

00:27:08.369 --> 00:27:10.269
is conservative in that traditional structural

00:27:10.269 --> 00:27:13.109
sense. Okay. However, he is deeply skeptical

00:27:13.109 --> 00:27:15.650
of what he calls simplistic views of monogamy.

00:27:15.829 --> 00:27:18.549
His column has consistently been a space to discuss,

00:27:18.769 --> 00:27:21.009
explore, and frankly normalize non -monogamy

00:27:21.009 --> 00:27:23.490
and polyamory for his readers, pushing boundaries

00:27:23.490 --> 00:27:26.230
there constantly. And he caused a huge stir back

00:27:26.230 --> 00:27:29.430
in 1997 with a very blunt take on the AIDS crisis.

00:27:29.690 --> 00:27:32.230
Oh, yeah. A reader wrote in and asked, simply,

00:27:32.329 --> 00:27:35.269
is the AIDS crisis over? And Savage answered.

00:27:35.329 --> 00:27:38.609
Just answered, yes. One word. Wow. That must

00:27:38.609 --> 00:27:40.829
have generated some heat. It generated weeks

00:27:40.829 --> 00:27:43.210
of intense discussion and debate right there

00:27:43.210 --> 00:27:46.849
in his column. His argument, contextually, was

00:27:46.849 --> 00:27:49.289
based on the medical reality emerging then. The

00:27:49.289 --> 00:27:51.190
new treatments. Right, the arrival of effective

00:27:51.190 --> 00:27:54.089
antiretroviral combination therapies. They were

00:27:54.089 --> 00:27:56.109
transforming HIV aids, at least in developed

00:27:56.109 --> 00:27:58.349
countries with access, from a near certain death

00:27:58.349 --> 00:28:00.650
sentence into a manageable chronic condition.

00:28:01.009 --> 00:28:03.089
So he was saying the crisis of mass death was

00:28:03.089 --> 00:28:05.500
ending. That was his point. Acknowledging the

00:28:05.500 --> 00:28:07.599
shift in the medical paradigm in places like

00:28:07.599 --> 00:28:10.000
the U .S., of course, it was hugely controversial

00:28:10.000 --> 00:28:13.099
given the ongoing global pandemic, the high transmission

00:28:13.099 --> 00:28:16.440
rates, the lack of access elsewhere. But he was

00:28:16.440 --> 00:28:18.920
forcing his readers to confront that specific

00:28:18.920 --> 00:28:21.519
medical shift. He seems willing to push against

00:28:21.519 --> 00:28:24.380
orthodoxy from any direction, left or right,

00:28:24.500 --> 00:28:26.819
which leads us, I think, to the most complex

00:28:26.819 --> 00:28:30.049
area of controversy surrounding him. His repeated

00:28:30.049 --> 00:28:32.930
clashes with parts of the LGBTQ plus community

00:28:32.930 --> 00:28:36.609
itself and allies, specifically around transgender

00:28:36.609 --> 00:28:39.049
issues. Yeah, this is a significant and recurring

00:28:39.049 --> 00:28:41.730
point of friction in the sources. Savage has

00:28:41.730 --> 00:28:44.450
faced repeated sustained criticism for his use

00:28:44.450 --> 00:28:46.390
of slurs targeting the transgender community.

00:28:46.630 --> 00:28:50.029
Slurs like? Specifically the word tranny. And

00:28:50.029 --> 00:28:52.470
also for other remarks on trans issues, like

00:28:52.470 --> 00:28:55.190
jokingly suggesting former Washington Attorney

00:28:55.190 --> 00:28:58.289
General Rob McKenna was a transgender man, just

00:28:58.289 --> 00:29:01.470
generally seen as insensitive or harmful comments.

00:29:01.730 --> 00:29:03.829
And these comments didn't just stay in the column,

00:29:03.910 --> 00:29:06.210
did they? They spilled out into real world protests.

00:29:06.490 --> 00:29:09.289
They did. Most famously, he was glitter bombed

00:29:09.289 --> 00:29:11.970
three times. Glitter bombed. Yeah. Protesters

00:29:11.970 --> 00:29:13.930
threw glitter on him during public appearances

00:29:13.930 --> 00:29:18.759
twice in 2011, once in 2012. explicitly alleging

00:29:18.759 --> 00:29:21.400
that his column and comments promoted transphobia.

00:29:21.539 --> 00:29:23.960
And the controversy really came to a head during

00:29:23.960 --> 00:29:26.279
a seminar at the University of Chicago in 2014.

00:29:26.680 --> 00:29:29.359
That was a major flashpoint. Savage was there,

00:29:29.480 --> 00:29:31.339
talking about his own history with using the

00:29:31.339 --> 00:29:34.160
word tranny, discussing the idea of reclaiming

00:29:34.160 --> 00:29:37.160
slurs. And a student objected. A student asked

00:29:37.160 --> 00:29:39.759
him to please use the term T -slur instead of

00:29:39.759 --> 00:29:42.220
saying the actual word. Savage objected to that,

00:29:42.240 --> 00:29:44.720
the policing of language, he felt. And to make

00:29:44.720 --> 00:29:47.519
his point about discussing slurs openly, he apparently

00:29:47.519 --> 00:29:49.839
listed examples of various other slurs. Which

00:29:49.839 --> 00:29:53.220
did not go over well. No. Some students in the

00:29:53.220 --> 00:29:55.400
room claim they felt threatened, deeply uncomfortable,

00:29:55.680 --> 00:29:59.140
targeted by his use of those words. even as examples.

00:29:59.440 --> 00:30:01.940
It illustrates that central paradox of his whole

00:30:01.940 --> 00:30:04.599
career, doesn't it? Perfectly. His goal, presumably,

00:30:04.819 --> 00:30:08.079
was to talk about repurposing hurtful words for

00:30:08.079 --> 00:30:10.359
empowerment, something he genuinely believes

00:30:10.359 --> 00:30:12.920
in and practiced with faggot. Exactly. That was

00:30:12.920 --> 00:30:15.759
his defense. A university representative backed

00:30:15.759 --> 00:30:18.299
him up, saying he was clearly discussing the

00:30:18.299 --> 00:30:20.579
process of reclaiming language, not directing

00:30:20.579 --> 00:30:22.880
slurs at anyone in the room. But the impact was

00:30:22.880 --> 00:30:24.940
different for some listeners. Right. And Savage

00:30:24.940 --> 00:30:27.240
himself later demanded a public apology from

00:30:27.240 --> 00:30:29.220
the students or critics who had accused him of

00:30:29.220 --> 00:30:32.380
actual hatred. It just perfectly captures how

00:30:32.380 --> 00:30:34.960
volatile using abrasive language for progressive

00:30:34.960 --> 00:30:38.220
aims can be. The attempt to reclaim can simultaneously

00:30:38.220 --> 00:30:41.660
cause genuine offense and alienate the very allies

00:30:41.660 --> 00:30:44.019
you might need. OK, we also need to touch on

00:30:44.019 --> 00:30:46.200
his controversial comments from back in 2001

00:30:46.200 --> 00:30:49.079
about child sexuality. This is obviously an extremely

00:30:49.079 --> 00:30:52.049
sensitive area. Extremely. And the context is

00:30:52.049 --> 00:30:55.150
absolutely crucial here. Savage was arguing against

00:30:55.150 --> 00:30:57.410
what he saw as cultural hysteria surrounding

00:30:57.410 --> 00:31:00.009
children. Saying society assumes what? Saying

00:31:00.009 --> 00:31:02.289
society wrongly assumes children have absolutely

00:31:02.289 --> 00:31:05.309
no sexual agency or desire, that childhood is

00:31:05.309 --> 00:31:07.630
completely asexual, which he disputed. Okay.

00:31:07.950 --> 00:31:10.289
But then he brought Anambita into it. Yes. And

00:31:10.289 --> 00:31:12.049
this is where it got really complicated and drew

00:31:12.049 --> 00:31:15.089
criticism. He critiqued Ambele, the North American

00:31:15.089 --> 00:31:17.829
man -boy love association, saying that group

00:31:17.829 --> 00:31:20.549
packages potentially reasonable arguments about

00:31:20.549 --> 00:31:23.390
teen sexuality and age of consent laws alongside

00:31:23.390 --> 00:31:26.130
irrational, insane arguments about seven -year

00:31:26.130 --> 00:31:28.470
-olds. And that mixing, even just to critique

00:31:28.470 --> 00:31:32.269
Ambele, muddied the waters. Hugely. Savage argued

00:31:32.269 --> 00:31:34.609
that because of Anambita's toxic association

00:31:34.609 --> 00:31:37.210
with pedophilia, any rational public discussion

00:31:37.230 --> 00:31:39.630
about acknowledging teen sexuality or debating

00:31:39.630 --> 00:31:41.769
age of consent laws becomes impossible. It just

00:31:41.769 --> 00:31:44.410
gets simply shouted down. Yeah. So he was trying

00:31:44.410 --> 00:31:46.230
to distinguish between acknowledging healthy

00:31:46.230 --> 00:31:49.250
teen sexuality and protecting children from abuse.

00:31:49.549 --> 00:31:53.190
But the mere proximity of his critique to NMBLA,

00:31:53.349 --> 00:31:57.009
even to condemn their conflation, drew immediate

00:31:57.009 --> 00:32:00.069
and intense backlash. Very difficult territory.

00:32:00.549 --> 00:32:02.349
Another major moment of public confrontation

00:32:02.349 --> 00:32:04.730
happened during an anti -bullying speech he gave

00:32:04.730 --> 00:32:07.140
in 2012. Right. He was... Speaking to the National

00:32:07.140 --> 00:32:09.319
High School Journalism Convention. High school

00:32:09.319 --> 00:32:11.940
students. And during the speech, he encouraged

00:32:11.940 --> 00:32:15.119
them to. He encouraged the students to learn

00:32:15.119 --> 00:32:17.880
to ignore the bullshit in the Bible about gay

00:32:17.880 --> 00:32:20.960
people. Okay. That's direct. Very direct. And

00:32:20.960 --> 00:32:23.339
it prompted a walkout by some Christian students

00:32:23.339 --> 00:32:26.420
and advisors in the audience. How did Savage

00:32:26.420 --> 00:32:28.980
react to the walkout? His immediate reaction

00:32:28.980 --> 00:32:31.579
was apparently to call the walkout a pansy -assed

00:32:31.579 --> 00:32:34.279
move. He later apologized specifically for that

00:32:34.279 --> 00:32:36.359
comment, for the name -calling. But not for the

00:32:36.359 --> 00:32:39.099
core message? No. He stood firmly by the central

00:32:39.099 --> 00:32:41.420
point of his speech, which was anti -bullying

00:32:41.420 --> 00:32:43.619
and challenging religious justifications for

00:32:43.619 --> 00:32:46.299
bigotry against gay people. His contrarian streak,

00:32:46.440 --> 00:32:48.920
like you said, even hit close to home, inside

00:32:48.920 --> 00:32:51.220
his own newspaper. We have to mention the criticism

00:32:51.220 --> 00:32:53.539
he got from his colleague Lindy West about fat

00:32:53.539 --> 00:32:56.279
shaming. Yeah, that's an important one. In 2011,

00:32:56.740 --> 00:32:59.519
Lindy West, who worked with Savage at The Stranger

00:32:59.519 --> 00:33:02.460
Them, published this really powerful piece directly

00:33:02.460 --> 00:33:05.240
criticizing him. For what specifically? For repeated

00:33:05.240 --> 00:33:07.380
comments he'd made in his columns. about fat

00:33:07.380 --> 00:33:10.220
people, saying things like, rolls of exposed

00:33:10.220 --> 00:33:13.559
flesh are unsightly, just casual digs. And West's

00:33:13.559 --> 00:33:17.099
argument was? That this was just a cruel, subjective

00:33:17.099 --> 00:33:20.259
opinion, and she called the act of shaming an

00:33:20.259 --> 00:33:23.960
already marginalized and shamed population shameful,

00:33:24.380 --> 00:33:27.089
especially coming from someone like Savage. And

00:33:27.089 --> 00:33:29.430
this internal friction, this disagreement within

00:33:29.430 --> 00:33:31.650
the progressive media world there, it was later

00:33:31.650 --> 00:33:34.309
fictionalized, right? Yeah, it became a significant

00:33:34.309 --> 00:33:37.349
storyline in the Hulu series Shrill, which was

00:33:37.349 --> 00:33:39.849
based on West's memoir. It really shows that

00:33:39.849 --> 00:33:42.490
even Savage's closest colleagues and allies sometimes

00:33:42.490 --> 00:33:45.130
felt compelled to publicly challenge his rhetorical

00:33:45.130 --> 00:33:47.349
choices and blind spots. Okay, finally on the

00:33:47.349 --> 00:33:49.670
controversy front. Yeah. How did he respond in

00:33:49.670 --> 00:33:52.349
2017 to the allegations against Kevin Spacey?

00:33:52.599 --> 00:33:54.680
That was a moment where he applied his sharp

00:33:54.680 --> 00:33:57.539
moral line very clearly. When Kevin Spacey put

00:33:57.539 --> 00:34:00.279
out that statement, coming out as gay almost

00:34:00.279 --> 00:34:02.480
simultaneously with Anthony Rapp accusing him

00:34:02.480 --> 00:34:04.900
of assault when Rapp was only 14, Savage's reaction

00:34:04.900 --> 00:34:07.940
was quick and unequivocal. He tweeted something

00:34:07.940 --> 00:34:10.500
like, There's no amount of drunk or closeted

00:34:10.500 --> 00:34:13.880
that excuses or explains away assaulting a 14

00:34:13.880 --> 00:34:16.260
year old child. Drawing a very bright line. Yeah.

00:34:16.380 --> 00:34:19.179
Using his platform instantly to say basically

00:34:19.179 --> 00:34:22.320
child abuse is child abuse. Full stop. Regardless

00:34:22.320 --> 00:34:24.619
of the alleged perpetrator's sexual orientation

00:34:24.619 --> 00:34:27.340
or status or whatever else was in that messy

00:34:27.340 --> 00:34:30.300
statement. OK. Wow. So we have covered a lot

00:34:30.300 --> 00:34:33.139
of ground here. Video stores, Catholic seminary,

00:34:33.159 --> 00:34:36.679
search engine warfare, Emmy Awards. Glitter bombs.

00:34:36.960 --> 00:34:38.739
It's time to try and pull this all together.

00:34:38.900 --> 00:34:40.760
Yeah, synthesize it. What's the essential summary?

00:34:41.219 --> 00:34:44.199
Savage's impact, his legacy as seen through these

00:34:44.199 --> 00:34:46.599
sources. I think Savage's career is uniquely

00:34:46.599 --> 00:34:49.699
defined by these three simultaneous and often

00:34:49.699 --> 00:34:52.139
really contradictory pillars. Okay, pillar one.

00:34:52.219 --> 00:34:53.840
First, he's the essential guide, the voice of

00:34:53.840 --> 00:34:56.960
reason, science, empathy, and savage love, the

00:34:56.960 --> 00:34:59.480
person people turn to for actual advice. Pillar

00:34:59.480 --> 00:35:02.510
two. Second, he's the massively successful activist,

00:35:02.670 --> 00:35:04.889
the co -founder of the Emmy -winning, genuinely

00:35:04.889 --> 00:35:08.530
life -saving It Gets Better project. That's undeniable

00:35:08.530 --> 00:35:12.429
impact. And pillar three, the messy one. Third,

00:35:12.449 --> 00:35:14.809
and maybe the most defining, yeah, he's the relentless

00:35:14.809 --> 00:35:18.889
cultural provocateur. The guy who invented Santorum,

00:35:19.050 --> 00:35:21.769
who claimed he licked pens for political protests,

00:35:22.050 --> 00:35:25.550
who constantly uses abrasive, shocking language

00:35:25.550 --> 00:35:28.429
to force difficult conversations into the public

00:35:28.429 --> 00:35:31.710
square. Like her or not. His career really feels

00:35:31.710 --> 00:35:34.489
like the ultimate test case for blending radical

00:35:34.489 --> 00:35:37.389
sex positivity with super aggressive political

00:35:37.389 --> 00:35:39.969
commentary and highly visible public advocacy.

00:35:40.170 --> 00:35:42.349
He didn't wait for change. He instigated it using

00:35:42.349 --> 00:35:44.409
every single medium available to him. And his

00:35:44.409 --> 00:35:46.710
influence, it's recognized well beyond just the

00:35:46.710 --> 00:35:49.809
alt -weekly world or the LGBTQ community. Oh,

00:35:49.829 --> 00:35:52.090
yeah. The awards for his books alone show that.

00:35:52.480 --> 00:35:54.519
The kid won a Penn and West Award back in 99.

00:35:54.780 --> 00:35:56.980
Skipping Towards Gamora won a Lambda Literary

00:35:56.980 --> 00:35:59.380
Award in 2002. And he got that Humanist of the

00:35:59.380 --> 00:36:01.460
Year Award. Right, from the American Humanist

00:36:01.460 --> 00:36:05.260
Association in 2013, specifically for his advocacy

00:36:05.260 --> 00:36:07.980
of church -state separation and, crucially, his

00:36:07.980 --> 00:36:11.400
work for LGBTQ youth. He has a legitimate claim,

00:36:11.480 --> 00:36:13.039
I think, to being one of the most culturally

00:36:13.039 --> 00:36:15.679
influential columnists of the last, what, 30

00:36:15.679 --> 00:36:18.480
years? He really does. Yeah. But the sources

00:36:18.480 --> 00:36:21.099
also consistently show that his specific method,

00:36:21.239 --> 00:36:25.119
that enthusiastic, hypercharged, abrasive language,

00:36:25.260 --> 00:36:28.980
even when used arguably in the name of reclaiming

00:36:28.980 --> 00:36:32.460
slurs or advancing progressive causes, it frequently

00:36:32.460 --> 00:36:35.739
led to public apologies or intensified scrutiny,

00:36:35.940 --> 00:36:38.559
not just from opponents, but often from allies.

00:36:39.150 --> 00:36:41.989
That paradox is what defines him. Savage proved

00:36:41.989 --> 00:36:44.750
that shock tactics absolutely generate visibility.

00:36:45.130 --> 00:36:47.309
They can win campaigns like the Santorum effort

00:36:47.309 --> 00:36:50.230
undeniably. The cost. The cost, as we saw with

00:36:50.230 --> 00:36:52.269
the transgender controversies, the fat shaming

00:36:52.269 --> 00:36:54.989
critiques, is often paid in trust, in alliance.

00:36:55.090 --> 00:36:57.889
Within the very coalition he was at least ostensibly

00:36:57.889 --> 00:37:00.280
trying to build or support. Which brings us perfectly

00:37:00.280 --> 00:37:02.480
to our final provocative thought for you, the

00:37:02.480 --> 00:37:04.500
listener, to maybe chew on. When you're navigating

00:37:04.500 --> 00:37:07.119
these really complex cultural and political issues,

00:37:07.320 --> 00:37:09.960
especially ones that require huge shifts in public

00:37:09.960 --> 00:37:13.340
opinion, is the success of a movement better

00:37:13.340 --> 00:37:17.360
served by, well, Savage's signature style? That

00:37:17.360 --> 00:37:20.079
enthusiastic, abrasive provocation that grabs

00:37:20.079 --> 00:37:23.380
attention dominates headlines. Or is it better

00:37:23.380 --> 00:37:25.840
served by more measured, maybe more careful language?

00:37:26.510 --> 00:37:29.750
Language that deliberately seeks to avoid alienating

00:37:29.750 --> 00:37:33.050
potential allies, that prioritizes building broader,

00:37:33.170 --> 00:37:36.050
even if maybe slower, coalitions. Savage's entire

00:37:36.050 --> 00:37:38.369
legacy forces us to confront that fundamental

00:37:38.369 --> 00:37:41.409
choice, rhetorical velocity versus rhetorical

00:37:41.409 --> 00:37:44.050
patience. It's a powerful dilemma, a really potent

00:37:44.050 --> 00:37:46.090
question to leave you with. We've covered everything

00:37:46.090 --> 00:37:48.369
from seminary to sovereignty, from scandal to

00:37:48.369 --> 00:37:51.010
success, and that's our deep dive into the complicated

00:37:51.010 --> 00:37:53.210
career of Dan Savage. Thank you for joining us.

00:37:53.369 --> 00:37:54.369
Dive deeper next time.
