Welcome back to the Deep Dive. This is where
we really get into the weeds, pulling apart the
blueprints behind some truly global phenomena
just for you. Right. And today we're tackling
someone everyone thinks they know, Jennifer Aniston.
Exactly. You know, Rachel Green, the headlines,
all of that. But we want to move past just the
surface familiarity. We really do. Because when
you actually look at the data, the career path
from, say, 1994 right up to today. It's not just
an actress. It's this incredibly well -managed,
really adaptable business powerhouse. She's basically
an architect of staying power in a business known
for, well, chewing people up and spitting them
out. An architect of longevity. I like that.
And that's our mission today, isn't it? To understand
the actual blueprint for this sustained, decades
-long career. Yeah, we're synthesizing everything
from those, you know, tough early years right
up to now where she's producing. She's an entrepreneur.
Winning awards for Prestige TV, still one of
the... The highest paid women in the whole industry,
even just last year, 2023. It's kind of amazing.
And just to give you a sense of the scale we're
talking about here, born February 11th, 1969,
Los Angeles. Okay. Her net worth estimated at
around U .S. $300 million. Wow. $300 million.
Yeah. and her films. Collectively, they've pulled
in over $1 .6 billion worldwide. Her name on
a project means something commercially. But it's
not just commercial success. That's key here.
She's got the industry respect, too. Absolutely.
A primetime Emmy, a Golden Globe, multiple Screen
Actors Guild Awards. I mean, she's proven herself
across basically every medium she's touched.
That really is the definition of a lasting legacy.
So let's start at the beginning. Unpack those
foundations, how her background maybe set the
stage. It's pretty Hollywood -centric, isn't
it? It really is. You can't ignore that her roots
are deep in the industry. Daughter of two actors,
John Aniston and Nancy Dow. John Aniston, right?
Greek -born. I read his family was from Crete.
That's right, yeah. So there's that Greek heritage
there from her father's side. Adds a specific
cultural layer early on. And the connections
were there from the start. Wasn't Tully Savalas
her godfather? Yeah. Kojak himself, a very close
friend of her father's. So, you know, she's born
near stardom, you could say. But they didn't
stay in L .A., did they? They moved. Correct.
The family moved and she mostly grew up in New
York City. Those were her formative years. And
her education path is interesting. A Waldorf
school. Uh -huh. Started there when she was about
six. And it was actually at the Waldorf School
around age 11 that she first really discovered
acting. Found her path. Seems like it. And once
she found it, she went for it seriously. She
got into Fiorello H. LaGuardia High School of
Music and Art and Performing Arts. That's a fame
school, right? A serious performing arts high
school in Manhattan. Exactly. You have to be
committed to get in and thrive there. And the
source material mentions she was already doing
pretty heavy stuff like The Sign and Sidney Brustein's
Window and Chekhov's Three Sisters. Wow, Chekhov
in high school. That kind of pushes back against
the idea that she was just, you know, destined
for sitcoms. It really does. She had serious
stage -based dramatic training very early on,
long before Rachel Green ever became a thing.
But, okay, graduates high school and then hits
the reality of being a working actor. Yeah. Which
sounds like it was pretty brutal for a while.
Oh, absolutely. The Hollywood grind. Late 80s,
early 90s. She was doing all sorts of part -time
jobs just to support herself while auditioning.
What kind of jobs are we talking? The list is
kind of amazing, actually. Telemarketer, waitress,
and even a bike messenger. A bike messenger.
In New York City. Yep. Can you picture it? Jennifer
Aniston, future $300 million brand, dodging traffic
to deliver packages. It shows you the hustle.
She was really working for it. And the acting
gigs she did get back then weren't exactly stellar.
No kidding. Started with, like, an uncredited
tiny part in that sci -fi movie Mac and Me in
88. Critics hated it. Oh, I remember that one.
Yikes. Then trying to make ends meet, she was
on The Howard Stern Show in 89 as a spokesmodel
for Nutrisystem. Wow, just taking whatever work
came along. Pretty much. And the TV roles. A
string of quick cancellations. Malloy in 1990,
then the TV version of Ferris Bueller's Day Off,
also 1990. Both gone almost instantly. That's
got to be tough. Four shows in a row just failing.
Devastating for a young actor. Constant rejection
from the market, basically. Which leads us to
The Leprechaun. Ah, yes. 1993, the horror comedy
she later said she was pretty embarrassed about.
Entertainment Weekly called it her worst role
ever, didn't they? Famously, yes. So look at
the picture. This isn't some smooth ride to fame.
It's marked by a role she kind of regretted,
failed pilots. It makes sense the sources say
she was feeling pretty down around this time.
Right before the big break. And the story of
how that happened is almost like movie script
stuff itself. It really is. She's literally at
a gas station in L .A. Just pumping gas. Apparently.
And runs into Warren Littlefield, who was the
head of NBC Entertainment back then. No way.
Yes way. And she actually goes up to him kind
of desperate, asking if she should even keep
trying. Wow. Totally. And he encourages her,
tells her to hang in there. And then just months
later, Littlefield is instrumental in getting
her cast and friends. Persistence meeting opportunity
at a gas pump. But here's the really crucial
part, the strategy bit. She had another huge
offer right at that same time. That's right.
A spot as a featured player on Saturday Night
Live. Which in the early 90s was like. The absolute
pinnacle for comedy talent, right? Yeah. A guaranteed
springboard. You bet. SNL meant stability, massive
visibility, a clear path. Friends was just another
pilot, one of dozens hoping to make it. And remember
her track record with pilots up to that point.
So turning down SNL for Friends was a massive
gamble. Huge risk. Why do you think she did it?
Maybe. Maybe she saw something in the Friends
script. Yeah. Or the ensemble. After four failed
shows, maybe she felt an ensemble was safer or
just had a better feeling about it. I think it
points to a really calculated risk assessment
on her part. She must have had incredible faith
in that specific material, the chemistry maybe
she sensed with the cast. So she traded the known
quantity of SNL. For the potential. The much
bigger potential of a hit ensemble sitcom being
in millions of homes every week, really building
a character connection. That choice, that gamble
basically defined the next 10 years of television.
And boy, did that gamble pay off. The second
that someone frantic the airwaves. Instant validation.
But it's funny, you know, she wasn't even the
first choice for Rachel Green. Oh, yeah. Who
were they thinking of? Well, they initially asked
her to audition for Monica Geller. Really? Yeah.
But Courtney Cox ended up as Monica and Aniston
got shifted to Rachel, which, you know, turned
out to be incredibly fortunate. Rachel just clicked.
Clicked is an understatement. The show wasn't
just a hit. It was a cultural singularity. Yeah,
exactly. Instant global recognition for her and
Rachel Green. Probably the most popular character.
The style, the hair. The hair. We have to talk
about the hair later. But also the whole Ross
and Rachel thing. That on -again, off -again
romance was voted TV's favorite couple so many
times. But beyond the pop culture buzz, let's
talk money. Because that's where Friends became
truly revolutionary, especially towards the end.
Oh, absolutely. That final season's salary. One
million dollars. per episode each for her and
the other female co -stars specifically. A million
bucks an episode. That number is just wild. But
it's how they got it. That's the real lesson,
right? Exactly. It wasn't just a record payday,
though it was that two Guinness World Record
highest paid TV actress ever at the time. The
key insight, as the sources point out, is that
the six main actors banded together. They negotiated
as a group. Yes. Realized their collective power
was way more than any individual leverage. They
went in as a unit. A unified front. So basically
saying you want any of us. You pay all six of
us the same massive amount. Precisely. It forced
wage parity and stopped the studio from playing
them off each other. A brilliant strategic move.
It fundamentally changed the game for how major
ensemble casts negotiated after that. Real business
savvy. So huge commercial success, record -breaking
money. But did the critical respect follow during
the Friends years? It did. She got five primetime
Emmy nominations for Friends over the run. Five.
And she won the big one, lead actress, in 2002.
Then followed it up with the Golden Globe for
best actress in 2003. So yeah, she reached the
absolute peak of TV success, critically and commercially.
Okay, so she conquers TV. Yeah. But the big challenge
is always the lead to movies, right? So many
TV stars flame out trying to make that jump.
How did she manage it? Well, she started kind
of cautiously leveraging that friend's charm.
Her first real starring movie was Picture Perfect
in 97. Romantic comedy. Yep. Critics were kind
of lukewarm on the movie itself, but most agree
she had undeniable screen presence. She could
carry a film, that was clear. And she mixed it
up a bit too, didn't she? Like office space.
Right. Playing the waitress in that cult classic
in 99 showed a different side. But the really
smart move, the key to long term film survival,
was proving she could do more than comedy while
Friends was still on. Establishing dramatic cred
early. Exactly. And that came with The Good Girl
in 2002, an independent dramedy. That was a definite
pivot. Wasn't she playing like a very unglamorous
character? Totally. A cashier in a dead end job
in a small town cheating on her husband miles
away from Rachel Green's world. It was a deliberate
strategic choice. And how did that go over? Critics.
Loved it. Roger Ebert called it her breakthrough.
Said she'd finally, decisively broken the Friends
mold. And for an indie film, it did well commercially,
too. Made over $14 million. It proved she had
range that she wasn't a one -trick pony. So smart.
Building that critical foundation before the
safety net of the show ended. Genius, really.
It meant when Friends wrapped, she wasn't just
seen as racial trying to be a movie star. She'd
already proven she could act. And then, bam,
right after that critical win, she goes full
blockbuster, Bruce Almighty with Jim Carrey in
2003. Huge. She played the girlfriend, and that
movie was a monster hit. Pulled in, what, $484
million worldwide? Wow. Fifth highest grossing
movie of the entire year. That cemented her as
a massive global draw, no question. And she kept
that momentum going, right? Right. Long came
Pauly with Ben Stiller the next year. Yep. 2004,
another solid hit, $172 million worldwide. So
that whole decade, basically 1994 to 2004, she
solidified everything. TV icon, record -breaking
earner, bankable film lead, and someone who could
deliver critically acclaimed performances. A
true double threat. Okay, so Friends ends in
2004. The pressure must have been immense then,
right? To prove she could sustain it without
the show. Oh, absolutely. The post -sitcom era
is notoriously difficult. But her strategy of
consistent commercial film work basically guaranteed
her survival, even if the reviews weren't always
glowing. Let's look at that run, say 2005 to
2013. The number of actual hits is pretty remarkable.
It really is. She just kept headlining these
big comedies and dramedies that delivered at
the box office. Take the breakup in 2006 with
Vince Vaughn. Right. I remember that one. Reviews
were kind of mixed. Yeah, some were harsh. One
critic actually said it was like we were on a
breakup episode of Friends Stretched Out Too
Long. Ouch. Ouch indeed. But did it make money?
Oh, yeah. $204 million worldwide. It proved her
name alone could open a movie, regardless of
what critics thought. Then came Marley and Me
in 2008. That felt like a different kind of hit,
more emotional. Totally. And it was massive.
Set a record for the biggest Christmas Day opening
ever at the time, like $14 .75 million in one
day. Just one day. Wow. And the total worldwide
take was almost $243 million. It showed she could
do the heartfelt family drama thing, too, broadening
her appeal beyond just rom -coms. Kept that America's
Sweetheart vibe going. And she kept pairing up
with reliable comedy partners, too. Adam Sandler
and Just Go With It in 2011. And Horrible Bosses
the same year. Both crossed the $200 million
mark globally. Her role in Horrible Bosses was
definitely different. Playing against type. Right.
The sexually aggressive dentist. It was kind
of... Brilliant, actually. Showed she wasn't
afraid to get raunchy and subversive within that
commercial comedy framework. A smart risk. And
the hits just kept coming. Where are the Millers
in 2013? Huge financial success. Made something
like $269 million on a pretty modest $37 million
budget. She became, you know, the go -to star
if you wanted your mainstream comedy to make
serious money. Okay, so commercially she's absolutely
rock solid through this period. But you mentioned
strategy. Was she still pushing for those critical...
roles too. Yes. And this is where the strategy
gets really interesting again. She didn't just
rest on the commercial success. She made another
major push for dramatic respect. And that culminated
in the 2014 film Cake. Cake. Right. That felt
like a much bigger leap than The Good Girl, didn't
it? Absolutely. Low budget, really difficult
subject matter. She played Claire Simmons, a
woman dealing with severe chronic pain. Very
abrasive, totally unglamorous. It was all about
the performance. A deliberate move for critical
acclaim, basically. Purely a high stakes play
designed to prove yet again her dramatic depth.
And the critics, they went nuts for it. Instantly
started buzzing about Oscar worthy. Yeah, I remember
the praise. Heartbreakingly good. A complete
performance. The industry definitely knew. notice.
It wasn't just coasting. She was actively seeking
out these challenging, transformative roles.
And it paid off in terms of recognition, right?
Awards nominations. You bet. Golden Globe nomination,
SAG Award nomination, Critics' Choice nomination
for Best Actress. Cake was the validation. It
showed she could consistently deliver both huge
box office and serious critical acclaim. While
all this is happening on screen, she's also making
moves behind the scenes, right? Yes. Building
power there, too. She'd co -founded Plan B Entertainment
way back in 2002. You mean Brad Pitt, right?
Uh -huh. Though she left that company in 2005.
But the key takeaway is she understood the need
for control. So she co -founded her own production
company, Echo Films, in 2008. Okay, Echo Films.
That's a big step from actor to owner. Vital.
Moving from just being a hired talent to actually
generating the projects, owning the IP. That's
real power in Hollywood. She even directed a
short film. Yeah, back in 2006. a short called
Room 10 for a Glamour magazine film series. Apparently,
she was inspired by Gwyneth Paltrow doing something
similar, a show she's always looking to learn
ad skills. And then the big shift back to TV,
but in a totally new way. 2019, The Morning Show
on Apple TV+. Right. Not just starring, but executive
producing, too. Her first main TV role since
Friends ended 15 years earlier. And we should
probably clarify what prestige TV means here
compared to network TV like Friends. Good point.
Prestige TV, you know, the stuff on streamers
like Apple or HBO usually has much higher production
values, looks more cinematic. Bigger budgets.
Definitely. And often tackles more complex, serialized
stories. The morning show dealt with really timely,
tough stuff like the hashtag MeToo movement,
workplace dynamics, a world away from the comfort
food of a network sitcom. And did this return
to TV work out for her? Critically. Hugely. She
won the Screen Actors Guild Award for Best Actress
in a Drama Series right out of the gate for the
first season. Wow. And she's kept getting nominations,
Emmys, Golden Globes across the later seasons
too. Importantly, often recognized as an executive
producer as well as for her acting. So she's
now operating as this producer -star hybrid.
Using her brand power to get these sophisticated
and expensive shows made. Exactly. And things
like The Friends, The Reunion Special, which
got an Emmy nomination for her as a producer.
Right. And those Netflix movies with Adam Sandler,
the Murder Mystery ones. Yeah, Murder Mystery
1 and 2, both big hits for Netflix. It all just
proves her drawing power is as strong as ever,
no matter the platform streaming, film, reunion
specials, you name it. Okay, let's shift gears
now to the engine behind the star, the business
side. Aniston's been a huge endorsement figure
for ages, but there's an evolution there too,
isn't there? Oh, definitely. She started out
fairly traditionally, you know, lending her face
to big brands like L 'Oreal hair products, even
did a Heineken ad back in 2005. Standard celebrity
spokesperson stuff. Right. But she was smart
early on, setting up these really long -term,
high -value deals that went beyond just a single
campaign. Like Smartwater, she's... Been with
them forever, it feels like. Since 2007. And
the impact her brand has is just measurable.
Remember that YouTube video she did in 2011 that
Jennifer Aniston goes viral on? Vaguely, yeah.
Reports say online interest in Smartwater tripled
within 24 hours of that video dropping. That's
not just visibility, that's actual conversion
power. Which means she can command top dollar
for these deals. Absolutely. When she signed
on as the face of Aveeno Skincare in 2013, the
sources mentioned she got an eight figures fee.
Eight figures. So minimum $10 million for that
one deal. That's what it implies. Puts her in
the absolute top tier of celebrity endorsers
easily. Shows how much trust and value is baked
into her brand image. But the really interesting
shift, the more recent strategy, is moving beyond
just being a... paid spokesperson, right? Taking
ownership. Exactly. That's the genius move. In
2012, she co -founded the hair care brand Living
Proof. She wasn't just the face. She had equity.
She owned a piece of it. Ah, so she benefits
if the company does well overall. Precisely.
It's a difference between getting a salary and
owning part of the factory. When Living Kroof
was sold to Unilever in 2016, she cashed out
not just from fees, but from the increased value
of the company itself. That's building real wealth,
moving from talent to asset generator. And she's
continued that model. Yes. She launched her own
fully owned hair care company, Lola V, in 2021.
Lola V. Right. So now she has complete control.
Total control. Product, marketing, and crucially,
all the profits. It's that vertical integration
of her brand. Very savvy. We should also touch
on her fragrances. That's a more classic celebrity
venture, but still significant. For sure. Launched
her first perfume in 2010. Interestingly, it
was originally called Lola V. The name she used
later for the hair company. Exactly. They changed
the perfume name to just Jennifer Aniston, which
itself says something about the power of her
name as the brand. And she released more after
that. Yep. Seven others through 2020. Jay, Near
Dusk, Beachscape, the chapter series. She really
leveraged every commercial avenue available to
someone with her level of fame. And with this
huge platform comes philanthropy. Seems like
she's been pretty consistent with that, too.
Very consistent. And it's not just showing up
at events. She's been a longtime advocate for
places like St. Jude's Children's Research Hospital.
She hosted the Stand Up to Cancer show back in
2008. Any more direct action? Yeah. She directed
and starred in a video for the It Can't Wait
campaign, which was focused on freeing Burma.
So using her skills for advocacy, too. And actual
donations. The financial side. Significant ones.
After the earthquake in Haiti, she gave $500
,000, slitting it between Doctors Without Borders,
Partners in Health, and AmeriCares. Wow, half
a million. And then in 2017, for hurricane relief,
she donated a million dollars total to the Red
Cross and the Ricky Martin Foundation. These
aren't small checks. They're substantial contributions.
And her advocacy extends to social issues, too.
I remember something about a Glee Award. Right.
She received G .L.'s Vanguard Award in 2007.
That's where people have made a big difference
in promoting understanding and visibility for
the LGBT community. So her platform use is quite
broad. OK, this final section might be the most
fascinating and maybe the most challenging. How
she's managed her public image, especially against
just. Relentless media attention. She got that
America's sweetheart label early on. She did.
Yeah. Came straight out of Friends. It's just,
you know, charm, relatability, conventional appeal.
What's kind of amazing is how long it stuck for
nearly 25 years. And the most beautiful list
definitely played into that. Oh, yeah. People
magazine's most beautiful woman. She topped that
list twice, 2004 and again in 2016. GQ's first
woman of the year in 2005. And men's health readers
voted her the sexiest woman of all time in 2011.
What was their reasoning for men's health? That
seems specific. They apparently praised her for
being refreshingly human and attainable, which
points to that careful balancing act she's maintained
a global superstar, yet somehow seeming approachable.
Of course, you can't talk about her image without
talking about it. The hair. The Rachel. It was
more than a haircut. It was a global phenomenon
in the mid -90s. Salons everywhere were doing
it. But didn't she say she actually hated it?
She did. Hated the style she had for the first
couple of years of Friends, which is just wild,
right? Shows how media and pop culture can create
something totally beyond the individual's control.
The haircut became bigger than her preference.
Okay, now for the really intense part. The scrutiny
over her personal life, especially your relationships.
The marriage to Brad Pitt. 2000 to 2005. That
relationship, and especially the divorce, was
just tabloid hyperdrive. The whole Team Aniston
versus Team Jolie thing. It was everywhere. Everywhere.
Pure media frenzy fueled by speculation about
infidelity, who was the victim, who was the villain.
It was incredibly invasive. But she didn't really
lean into that. victim narrative publicly, did
she, over time? No, she actually tried to diffuse
it later on. She gave that quote, you know, nobody
did anything wrong. It was just like sometimes
things happen. Trying to offer a more mature
take, refusing the role the tabloids assigned
her. But the scrutiny didn't stop after that
relationship ended. It just shifted, didn't it?
It did. Through her marriage to Justin Theroux
from 2015 to 2017, and just generally, the focus
became almost obsessive about one thing. Why
she hadn't had children. The bump watch, the
constant speculation. Relentless. And that became
the biggest battleground for control over her
own narrative. Which led her to fight back pretty
publicly that essay she wrote for the Huffington
Post in 2016. That felt like a major turning
point. Huge. It was sparked by yet another round
of false pregnancy rumors. But the essay went
way beyond just denying it. It was this powerful
critique of how women are objectified and scrutinized
by the media. What was the core message? It was
about self -definition. That famous line, we
are complete with or without a mate. With or
without a child, we get to determine our own
happily ever after for ourselves. That's a really
powerful statement. Basically, taking back control
of her own story. Absolutely. It shifted her
public persona from being someone constantly
defined by her relationships or lack of children
to someone actively defining her own completeness
and value. And then years later, she shared even
more about that struggle. the ivf journey yes
in 2022 that was incredibly brave she revealed
she'd gone through in vitro fertilization trying
really hard to conceive in her late 30s and 40s
said she was throwing everything at it yeah ivf
chinese teas the works and she called the whole
process really hard sharing that vulnerability
after decades of silence and speculation was
kind of revolutionary it must have resonated
with so many people going through similar things
change your image again maybe from sweetheart
to something more Resilient. Honest. I think
so. It added this layer of profound honesty and
resilience. And it gave context to all those
years of tabloid noise. Suddenly you understood
the private struggle behind the public face.
There's that lovely detail, too, about Adam Sandler's
family. Oh, yeah. That she mentioned his family
sends her flowers every Mother's Day. Just a
small human touch acknowledging her journey.
Really touching. And then she actually used this
very personal experience publicly, didn't she?
In a more political context recently. She did.
Yeah. It was in July 2024. There were comments
made by the Republican VP nominee, J .D. Vance.
Right. About childless cat ladies. I remember
that. Yeah. And questioning IVF, I think. Exactly.
And Aniston, well, she responded directly on
social media. Using her own story. Precisely.
She basically said she hoped his daughter wouldn't
need IVF because, in her view, he was trying
to restrict access to it, trying to take that
away from her, too. So connecting her personal
struggle directly to a policy debate, it's a
powerful way to use her platform. Definitely.
Taking control of that narrative, as you said,
and weaponizing her own vulnerability for advocacy.
It's the ultimate statement of reclaiming her
story from the media machine. Finally, just briefly,
what about the personal disciplines? What keeps
someone going through all that? Well, she's talked
about practicing hatha yoga and buddha kankarati
for physical and mental health. Okay. Any spiritual
practices? Yeah, she's mentioned being a practitioner
of transcendental meditation and also reportedly
practicing Buddhism since around 2014. Suggests
a focus on internal resilience. And there's one
other thing about a diagnosis she got later in
life. Right, dyslexia. Diagnosed in her 20s,
she said it was a revelation, finally explaining
why she struggled so much in school, feeling
like she wasn't smart. Wow, that must have changed
her perspective on her own past. She called it
understanding a childhood trauma. It adds another
layer to the resilience needed to navigate her
path, overcoming not just industry hurdles, but
personal learning challenges too. Hashtag tag
outro outro. So when you pull it all together,
this deep dive into Jennifer Aniston's career,
what's the big picture? the architecture i think
the clearest thing is her incredible adaptability
she didn't just survive leaving a massive tv
show like friends which easily could have typecast
her forever no she's systematically built a second
act right became this consistently bankable movie
star delivering huge box office returns especially
in comedy but crucially didn't just do the commercial
stuff She kept pushing for those respected dramatic
roles, too. Exactly. Balancing the blockbusters
with the critical plays like The Good Girl, Cake,
The Morning Show, getting the nominations, proving
the range. And becoming a mogul behind the scenes.
Echo Films, Lola V, taking ownership. Building
an eight -figure endorsement empire, becoming
a producer, an entrepreneur. She mastered multiple
domains. Adaptability really is her superpower.
But maybe. Maybe the biggest achievement, the
most enduring part of her legacy is how she handled
her image. I think you're right. Transforming
herself in the public eye from being the constant
subject of tabloid gossip, you know, the Team
Aniston drama. To becoming this really powerful,
self -defined advocate. Yeah. Using her massive
platform, even that record -breaking Instagram
debut, to talk openly about tough personal things
like IVF, like dyslexia. She essentially took
back control, didn't she? defined herself on
her own terms, finally pushing back against decades
of media trying to define her by who she was
dating or whether she had kids. Exactly. Achieving
that ultimate form of celebrity power, narrative
control. So maybe the final thought for you,
the listener, to chew on is this. What does it
actually take for someone under that kind of
intense, decades long global spotlight to not
just endure it? But to fundamentally reshape
their own story, to wrestle back control and
define their identity, both within the industry
and in the wider culture on their own terms.
That transformation, that journey from America's
sweetheart to authentic advocate and architect
of her own brand. Maybe that's the most remarkable
part of the Jennifer Aniston story. A fascinating
deep dive. Indeed. We hope you enjoyed it. We'll
catch you on the next one.