WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.520
Welcome to The Deep Dive, your shortcut to getting

00:00:02.520 --> 00:00:06.679
up to speed. Today, well, we're tackling a career

00:00:06.679 --> 00:00:09.019
that really acts like a mirror, doesn't it? Reflecting

00:00:09.019 --> 00:00:12.300
the last, what, 30 years of American media shifts.

00:00:12.500 --> 00:00:15.820
Exactly. We're digging into the, let's say, unfiltered

00:00:15.820 --> 00:00:19.079
evolution of Nicholas Rocco DiPaolo. Yeah, Nick

00:00:19.079 --> 00:00:24.519
DiPaolo. And when you trace his path, you're

00:00:24.519 --> 00:00:26.820
not just looking at a comedian born in... You

00:00:26.820 --> 00:00:28.780
know, Beverly, Massachusetts, back in 62. Right.

00:00:28.879 --> 00:00:31.859
You're actually tracking this this really controversial,

00:00:32.159 --> 00:00:35.219
often confrontational voices. It moves from like

00:00:35.219 --> 00:00:38.719
the traditional local standup clubs to writing

00:00:38.719 --> 00:00:41.979
for Emmy nominated TV shows, then becoming a

00:00:41.979 --> 00:00:44.340
fixture in that whole shock radio era. Huge part

00:00:44.340 --> 00:00:46.420
of it. Oh, absolutely. And finally landing where

00:00:46.420 --> 00:00:49.140
he is now. Yes. Hosting his own very independent,

00:00:49.259 --> 00:00:52.020
very political digital show. It's quite the journey.

00:00:52.299 --> 00:00:54.320
That's exactly our mission today, then, to trace

00:00:54.320 --> 00:00:56.640
that whole arc, which is, frankly, pretty complex.

00:00:56.659 --> 00:00:59.899
It's a real study in, well, adapting on one hand,

00:00:59.920 --> 00:01:01.960
but also refusing to compromise on the other.

00:01:02.100 --> 00:01:04.040
We're looking at the whole timeline. From those

00:01:04.040 --> 00:01:06.379
first open mics in Boston, what, the late 80s,

00:01:06.379 --> 00:01:09.939
all the way to his current setup. I mean, the

00:01:09.939 --> 00:01:12.879
guy's been everything. Stand -up, writer, actor,

00:01:13.120 --> 00:01:16.780
radio guy, podcast host. A true multi -hyphenate,

00:01:16.840 --> 00:01:20.430
as they say. And his specific style. Which, yeah,

00:01:20.469 --> 00:01:22.730
we'll break down later that mix of observational

00:01:22.730 --> 00:01:25.590
stuff, black comedy, insult humor. It was so

00:01:25.590 --> 00:01:28.590
consistent. Right. And that consistency actually

00:01:28.590 --> 00:01:30.409
let him succeed in all these different, sometimes

00:01:30.409 --> 00:01:34.719
conflicting media worlds. It also set him up

00:01:34.719 --> 00:01:36.959
for some major clashes, you know, with the powers

00:01:36.959 --> 00:01:39.200
that be, the gatekeepers. Yeah, you can see that

00:01:39.200 --> 00:01:41.120
coming. I mean, he was key to tough crowd with

00:01:41.120 --> 00:01:43.060
Colin Quinn, always popping up on the Comedy

00:01:43.060 --> 00:01:45.620
Central roast, a regular voice on massive shows

00:01:45.620 --> 00:01:48.879
like Opie and Anthony, Howard Stern. His career

00:01:48.879 --> 00:01:51.689
pattern seems to be. Get in, do incredibly well,

00:01:51.790 --> 00:01:54.409
push the boundaries and then often get pushed

00:01:54.409 --> 00:01:57.250
out only to like immediately rebuild somewhere

00:01:57.250 --> 00:01:59.390
else. OK, let's unpack all of that. We really

00:01:59.390 --> 00:02:01.349
need to start at the beginning, right? The foundations.

00:02:02.510 --> 00:02:04.670
There's this surprising academic background.

00:02:04.890 --> 00:02:06.549
Yeah, that's interesting. And apparently it was

00:02:06.549 --> 00:02:08.990
sheer desperation, not ambition that got him

00:02:08.990 --> 00:02:10.689
on stage in the first place. Yeah, it's funny.

00:02:10.750 --> 00:02:15.050
His early life. Gives you almost no clue about

00:02:15.050 --> 00:02:17.509
the kind of political and controversial figure

00:02:17.509 --> 00:02:19.150
he'd become. It's pretty standard New England

00:02:19.150 --> 00:02:21.889
stuff. Right. Born in Beverly. Grew up in Danvers,

00:02:21.909 --> 00:02:24.949
Mass. Followed a pretty traditional path, actually.

00:02:25.590 --> 00:02:27.469
Academics, sports. He went to the University

00:02:27.469 --> 00:02:32.060
of Maine. Graduated in 84. Major. Marketing.

00:02:32.379 --> 00:02:35.659
Marketing. That's almost the opposite of his

00:02:35.659 --> 00:02:37.639
later persona, isn't it? Marketing is usually

00:02:37.639 --> 00:02:39.800
about, well, politeness, persuasion. Exactly.

00:02:39.840 --> 00:02:42.180
Not roasting celebrities till they cry. It's

00:02:42.180 --> 00:02:44.360
a fascinating contrast. And yeah, he was apparently

00:02:44.360 --> 00:02:46.400
quite the athlete, too. A running back for the

00:02:46.400 --> 00:02:49.159
university football team. Oh, wow. And he was

00:02:49.159 --> 00:02:52.639
in a fraternity, Sigma Nu. So you see maybe a

00:02:52.639 --> 00:02:55.060
bit of that competitive team player background,

00:02:55.280 --> 00:02:57.379
maybe even, you know, disciplined in a certain

00:02:57.379 --> 00:02:59.360
way. That competitive drive. Yeah, that makes

00:02:59.360 --> 00:03:01.259
sense when you look at the sheer volume of work

00:03:01.259 --> 00:03:04.020
he put in later in comedy. Totally. And competition

00:03:04.020 --> 00:03:06.139
was kind of in the family, it seems. His brother

00:03:06.139 --> 00:03:08.340
was also at Maine doing play by play for the

00:03:08.340 --> 00:03:10.520
Black Bears hockey team, worked alongside Gary

00:03:10.520 --> 00:03:12.740
Thorne, the big time announcer. No kidding. Gary

00:03:12.740 --> 00:03:16.120
Thorne. Yeah. So. You know, the world around

00:03:16.120 --> 00:03:18.879
him valued performance, quick commentary. Yeah.

00:03:18.939 --> 00:03:21.159
Even if it was focused on sports initially. But

00:03:21.159 --> 00:03:23.759
OK, so he graduates with this marketing degree

00:03:23.759 --> 00:03:27.259
that doesn't jump into comedy. No, not right

00:03:27.259 --> 00:03:30.280
away. The sources say he tried the, you know,

00:03:30.280 --> 00:03:33.659
the expected path first office job in marketing.

00:03:33.800 --> 00:03:37.319
OK. But the job that really seems to define that

00:03:37.319 --> 00:03:40.120
period or rather the failure that defined his

00:03:40.120 --> 00:03:43.259
later success was selling meat and seafood. Door

00:03:43.259 --> 00:03:45.620
to door. Door to door meat sales. That sounds

00:03:45.620 --> 00:03:47.900
character building, let's say. Character building

00:03:47.900 --> 00:03:50.580
or soul crushing. Maybe both. But that seems

00:03:50.580 --> 00:03:52.759
to be the key, the motivator. He said he was

00:03:52.759 --> 00:03:55.020
always a fan of comedy, watched Carson, Letterman,

00:03:55.120 --> 00:03:59.379
Leno, Robert Klein, all the greats. But he just

00:03:59.379 --> 00:04:02.020
didn't have, in his own words, the guts to try

00:04:02.020 --> 00:04:04.460
it himself. It took hating that sales job so

00:04:04.460 --> 00:04:06.280
much, that grind that finally pushed him. He

00:04:06.280 --> 00:04:08.439
literally said, desperation led me to the stage,

00:04:08.539 --> 00:04:11.860
not ambition. Wow. I think a lot of people, especially

00:04:11.860 --> 00:04:14.740
creatives, can probably relate to that. You know,

00:04:14.780 --> 00:04:17.079
the pain of the safe job finally getting worse

00:04:17.079 --> 00:04:19.439
than the fear of trying the thing you actually

00:04:19.439 --> 00:04:22.100
love. It's that existential push, right? Makes

00:04:22.100 --> 00:04:24.579
you take the risk. So what was that first actual

00:04:24.579 --> 00:04:27.139
step onto the stage like? Oh, the origin story

00:04:27.139 --> 00:04:30.860
is perfect. Summer of 86, open mic night, Stitches

00:04:30.860 --> 00:04:35.259
Club in Boston. Okay. But he didn't just like...

00:04:35.420 --> 00:04:38.240
calmly prepare he apparently came straight from

00:04:38.240 --> 00:04:42.180
a family barbecue oh having had and i quote about

00:04:42.180 --> 00:04:45.019
22 beers in me 20 okay that's not just loosening

00:04:45.019 --> 00:04:47.220
up that's anesthesia yeah it tells you something

00:04:47.220 --> 00:04:49.920
about the anxiety level maybe but he did his

00:04:49.920 --> 00:04:52.079
five minutes that it went pretty well and crucially

00:04:52.079 --> 00:04:54.980
he knew right then instantly this is what he

00:04:54.980 --> 00:04:57.120
had to do he found the thing he found the thing

00:04:57.120 --> 00:05:00.519
but uh life intervened slightly that sales job

00:05:00.519 --> 00:05:03.019
moved him temporarily to rhode island ah okay

00:05:03.019 --> 00:05:05.810
so a slight detour It's just a brief one. It

00:05:05.810 --> 00:05:09.050
wasn't until spring of 87 that he got back to

00:05:09.050 --> 00:05:11.189
Boston properly and started hitting those open

00:05:11.189 --> 00:05:14.170
mic nights regularly. So 87, that's really the

00:05:14.170 --> 00:05:15.649
starting pistol for the career we're talking

00:05:15.649 --> 00:05:18.209
about today. Trading scallops for hecklers. Pretty

00:05:18.209 --> 00:05:21.009
much. Yeah. A definite upgrade, I imagine. So

00:05:21.009 --> 00:05:24.529
1987, he commits. And from what the sources say,

00:05:24.709 --> 00:05:27.449
he just went all in. Right. Hit the ground running.

00:05:27.610 --> 00:05:29.629
Absolutely relentless. He worked that whole New

00:05:29.629 --> 00:05:32.839
England circuit. The comedy vault, the comedy

00:05:32.839 --> 00:05:34.959
correction places like that, pretty much nonstop

00:05:34.959 --> 00:05:38.500
until about 92. This was his boot camp. Forging

00:05:38.500 --> 00:05:41.439
the act in the fires of Tuesday night crowds

00:05:41.439 --> 00:05:43.819
in Providence. Exactly. Pressure testing the

00:05:43.819 --> 00:05:45.899
material constantly. So what was his style like

00:05:45.899 --> 00:05:47.500
back then? Was he already doing the political

00:05:47.500 --> 00:05:50.720
stuff, the really aggressive bits? Not quite

00:05:50.720 --> 00:05:53.660
yet, it seems. The descriptions from that time

00:05:53.660 --> 00:05:57.040
focus more on the technical side. A rapid -fire

00:05:57.040 --> 00:06:00.819
approach. He aimed for four or five punches attached

00:06:00.819 --> 00:06:03.259
to every joke. Dense. Like a machine gun setup

00:06:03.259 --> 00:06:06.000
punchline delivery. Yeah. Aggressive in pace.

00:06:06.360 --> 00:06:09.420
Trying to just overwhelm you with jokes. It sounds

00:06:09.420 --> 00:06:11.319
like he was really focused on the craft, the

00:06:11.319 --> 00:06:14.240
mechanics of stand -up. His early manager, Barry

00:06:14.240 --> 00:06:17.100
Katz, mentioned he did over 300 nights in his

00:06:17.100 --> 00:06:21.579
first year. 300 nights. That's insane. That kind

00:06:21.579 --> 00:06:23.860
of dedication, you just don't see that as often

00:06:23.860 --> 00:06:26.379
anymore. It's serious work ethic. And that kind

00:06:26.379 --> 00:06:28.399
of grind, well, it naturally leads you to the

00:06:28.399 --> 00:06:30.540
next level, which for comedians then was New

00:06:30.540 --> 00:06:33.120
York City. Right. The big move. And this is where

00:06:33.120 --> 00:06:35.680
a pretty major connection happens, isn't it?

00:06:35.699 --> 00:06:38.279
His roommate in New York. Yeah. None other than

00:06:38.279 --> 00:06:41.019
Louis C .K. Wow. OK. So they were sharing an

00:06:41.019 --> 00:06:43.860
apartment back then. But the move wasn't just

00:06:43.860 --> 00:06:45.959
about networking, right? It actually shifted

00:06:45.959 --> 00:06:49.720
his comedy itself. It seems so. NYC was the catalyst.

00:06:50.490 --> 00:06:52.949
For him getting more political. And how he did

00:06:52.949 --> 00:06:54.709
it is really interesting, especially thinking

00:06:54.709 --> 00:06:57.129
about his later stuff. He said he started reading

00:06:57.129 --> 00:07:00.009
all the local papers, the Post, the Times, Daily

00:07:00.009 --> 00:07:03.050
News. The whole spectrum. Right. The liberal

00:07:03.050 --> 00:07:05.459
ones, the conservative ones. And he'd compare

00:07:05.459 --> 00:07:07.480
how they covered the same story. He was mining

00:07:07.480 --> 00:07:10.319
the differences, the contradictions. Ah, okay.

00:07:10.399 --> 00:07:12.480
So he's actively looking for the tension in how

00:07:12.480 --> 00:07:14.139
things are reported. That makes perfect sense.

00:07:14.379 --> 00:07:16.980
It explains why his later commentary often feels

00:07:16.980 --> 00:07:19.040
like it's hitting from multiple angles. It's

00:07:19.040 --> 00:07:21.680
comedy born from comparing the narratives. Exactly.

00:07:21.680 --> 00:07:24.600
That method, that discipline of looking at conflicting

00:07:24.600 --> 00:07:27.300
media views. You could see the seeds of his news

00:07:27.300 --> 00:07:30.259
satire approach right there. decades before his

00:07:30.259 --> 00:07:33.040
own show. But, you know, comedy dreams often

00:07:33.040 --> 00:07:36.759
lead West to L .A. Yep. In 92, he relocates again.

00:07:37.410 --> 00:07:40.189
Los Angeles this time. Yeah. The goal was TV

00:07:40.189 --> 00:07:42.870
and film roles. And did that L .A. move pay off?

00:07:43.069 --> 00:07:45.470
Pretty quickly, yeah. He got some really crucial

00:07:45.470 --> 00:07:48.350
early national exposure out there. A spot on

00:07:48.350 --> 00:07:50.529
the Arsenio Hall show, which was massive at the

00:07:50.529 --> 00:07:53.310
time. And he did one of ASPO's Young Comedians

00:07:53.310 --> 00:07:55.250
specials. That was a really important launch

00:07:55.250 --> 00:07:57.509
pad for comics back then. Put you on the industry

00:07:57.509 --> 00:08:01.089
radar. So L .A. gives him visibility, but then

00:08:01.089 --> 00:08:03.769
he gets pulled back east. He does. The call came

00:08:03.769 --> 00:08:06.069
from Chris Rock. The Cricks Rock. The Chris Rock,

00:08:06.170 --> 00:08:07.910
offering him a writing job on The Chris Rock

00:08:07.910 --> 00:08:10.490
Show, which filmed in New York. So DiPaolo takes

00:08:10.490 --> 00:08:12.790
it, moves back, settles in Queens around 2001.

00:08:13.209 --> 00:08:16.329
Now, this writing gig, this is important, isn't

00:08:16.329 --> 00:08:18.129
it? Because it kind of pushes back against the

00:08:18.129 --> 00:08:20.329
idea that he was only ever about shock value

00:08:20.329 --> 00:08:23.850
or just insult comedy. Absolutely. Critical context.

00:08:23.910 --> 00:08:26.689
This was high -level, prestigious writing. The

00:08:26.689 --> 00:08:29.050
show was huge, critically acclaimed. He wrote

00:08:29.050 --> 00:08:32.200
for two seasons. And in 2001... He and the whole

00:08:32.200 --> 00:08:35.120
writing team got nominated for an Emmy. Wow.

00:08:35.700 --> 00:08:38.120
Outstanding writing for a variety music or comedy

00:08:38.120 --> 00:08:41.299
program. And get this, it was actually his second

00:08:41.299 --> 00:08:44.200
Emmy nomination overall. Second. Okay, see, that's

00:08:44.200 --> 00:08:46.259
the kind of detail people might miss. He wasn't

00:08:46.259 --> 00:08:48.700
just a club comic who stumbled into radio. He

00:08:48.700 --> 00:08:51.159
had serious writing credentials recognized at

00:08:51.159 --> 00:08:53.580
the highest level. Totally. It proves the skill

00:08:53.580 --> 00:08:56.509
set went way beyond the stage persona. Being

00:08:56.509 --> 00:08:59.230
able to craft sophisticated comedy for TV, getting

00:08:59.230 --> 00:09:01.590
multiple Emmy nods, that underpins everything

00:09:01.590 --> 00:09:03.950
else. It's that combination, the sharp writing

00:09:03.950 --> 00:09:06.649
mind and the increasingly confrontational delivery

00:09:06.649 --> 00:09:09.090
that really fueled the next big phase. Which

00:09:09.090 --> 00:09:12.450
was? Radio on the roasts. This where that unfiltered

00:09:12.450 --> 00:09:15.009
style found its kind of perfect home for a while.

00:09:15.070 --> 00:09:17.289
We're talking major guest spots. Howard Stern,

00:09:17.509 --> 00:09:19.399
Opie and Anthony. Okay, let's talk about shock

00:09:19.399 --> 00:09:21.240
radio for a second, because that term gets thrown

00:09:21.240 --> 00:09:23.259
around. For listeners, you have to understand,

00:09:23.419 --> 00:09:27.919
these shows in the late 90s, early 2000s, they

00:09:27.919 --> 00:09:30.279
were a different beast. Totally different. They

00:09:30.279 --> 00:09:33.419
operated largely outside the FCC rules that governed

00:09:33.419 --> 00:09:36.480
regular radio and TV. They were built on being

00:09:36.480 --> 00:09:39.519
edgy, pushing boundaries, being confrontational.

00:09:39.789 --> 00:09:41.990
So for a comedian like DePaulo, whose whole thing

00:09:41.990 --> 00:09:44.129
was becoming about saying the unsayable insult,

00:09:44.289 --> 00:09:47.690
humor, dark jokes, these shows weren't just tolerating

00:09:47.690 --> 00:09:49.590
him. They were inviting it. Yeah. They needed

00:09:49.590 --> 00:09:52.190
that kind of content. It was the perfect ecosystem

00:09:52.190 --> 00:09:54.789
for his style at that time. And that radio heat,

00:09:54.809 --> 00:09:57.330
it bled back into TV, specifically with Tough

00:09:57.330 --> 00:09:59.980
Crowd. Yeah. Tough crowd with Colin Quinn. Ran

00:09:59.980 --> 00:10:03.340
2002 to 2004 on Comedy Central. Such a foundational

00:10:03.340 --> 00:10:05.740
show for that era. It was basically just comedians

00:10:05.740 --> 00:10:08.039
arguing about the news. Unscripted, political,

00:10:08.320 --> 00:10:10.899
often really heated. The perfect training ground

00:10:10.899 --> 00:10:13.360
for his later podcast, you could argue. That

00:10:13.360 --> 00:10:15.940
rapid fire debate style. Absolutely. And then,

00:10:15.980 --> 00:10:18.139
of course, the ultimate showcase for that aggressive

00:10:18.139 --> 00:10:22.620
style. The Comedy Central roasts. Ah, yes. The

00:10:22.620 --> 00:10:25.340
roasts. He became a staple there. Oh, yeah. Hugh

00:10:25.340 --> 00:10:28.620
Hefner, Pam Anderson, Dennis Leary. Jeff Foxworthy,

00:10:28.740 --> 00:10:31.580
Larry the Cable Guy, he was on a bunch of them.

00:10:31.659 --> 00:10:33.639
And the roast stage is basically a laboratory

00:10:33.639 --> 00:10:36.200
for insult comedy, isn't it? Mixed with maybe

00:10:36.200 --> 00:10:38.539
some of that black comedy stuff. Exactly. You

00:10:38.539 --> 00:10:40.740
could take that aggression, that precise joke

00:10:40.740 --> 00:10:43.620
writing skill he'd honed since Boston, and just

00:10:43.620 --> 00:10:46.360
unleash it in this high profile televised format.

00:10:46.970 --> 00:10:49.389
This period really cemented his public image

00:10:49.389 --> 00:10:51.950
as the guy who'd say anything, the unfiltered

00:10:51.950 --> 00:10:54.669
one. Okay, so before we get into how things started

00:10:54.669 --> 00:10:56.929
to shift with mainstream media, we should probably

00:10:56.929 --> 00:10:59.210
nail down the specific kind of comedy he was

00:10:59.210 --> 00:11:01.049
doing and talk about the key people he worked

00:11:01.049 --> 00:11:03.409
with. Right. The sources list out his genres

00:11:03.409 --> 00:11:06.330
pretty clearly. Observational humor, black comedy,

00:11:06.590 --> 00:11:09.929
insult comedy, news satire, and off -color humor.

00:11:10.330 --> 00:11:12.429
It's quite a mix. Let's unpack maybe two of those.

00:11:12.490 --> 00:11:15.029
Insult comedy is pretty obvious from the roasts,

00:11:15.029 --> 00:11:16.990
right? Yeah, that's straightforward. But black

00:11:16.990 --> 00:11:18.750
comedy is really important for understanding

00:11:18.750 --> 00:11:21.710
him. In his case, it means finding humor in really

00:11:21.710 --> 00:11:25.169
dark, controversial, or taboo subjects. Things

00:11:25.169 --> 00:11:28.330
like race relations, death, social issues people

00:11:28.330 --> 00:11:31.129
usually whisper about. And he uses observational

00:11:31.129 --> 00:11:34.100
humor to pick those apart. Seems like it. pointing

00:11:34.100 --> 00:11:36.399
out hypocrisy or absurdity within those dark

00:11:36.399 --> 00:11:39.019
areas, which is probably why PC culture became

00:11:39.019 --> 00:11:41.500
such a frequent target for him. He's looking

00:11:41.500 --> 00:11:44.059
for the uncomfortable truths, often through a

00:11:44.059 --> 00:11:46.799
deliberately offensive lens. And this style wasn't

00:11:46.799 --> 00:11:49.399
developed in a vacuum. He had some really long

00:11:49.399 --> 00:11:52.220
-standing collaborations. The Lee C .K. one is

00:11:52.220 --> 00:11:54.799
maybe the biggest, started as roommates. It just

00:11:54.799 --> 00:11:56.919
kept going. It wasn't just a brief thing. This

00:11:56.919 --> 00:11:59.159
was a creative partnership that lasted, what,

00:11:59.220 --> 00:12:02.000
two decades? Across different projects. Like

00:12:02.000 --> 00:12:06.500
what? Well, DiPaolo played the super on CK's

00:12:06.500 --> 00:12:09.659
HBO show Lucky Louie. He was in like a dozen

00:12:09.659 --> 00:12:12.440
episodes of Louie on FX, often playing a version

00:12:12.440 --> 00:12:14.460
of himself or characters close to his persona.

00:12:14.519 --> 00:12:17.240
Right, I remember him on Louie. And even as recently

00:12:17.240 --> 00:12:19.879
as 2022, he was in CK's film Fourth of July,

00:12:20.100 --> 00:12:22.360
playing that really obnoxious Uncle Kevin character.

00:12:22.519 --> 00:12:25.360
Stole scenes in that. So that long collaboration,

00:12:25.620 --> 00:12:29.379
it's just a real... Mutual respect or understanding

00:12:29.379 --> 00:12:32.500
of each other's comedic voice. Even if CK's path

00:12:32.500 --> 00:12:34.919
took its own controversial turns later, they

00:12:34.919 --> 00:12:37.940
both seemed drawn to uncomfortable realism. Definitely

00:12:37.940 --> 00:12:40.360
seems that way. Another big partnership, maybe

00:12:40.360 --> 00:12:44.399
a bit more wild, was with Artie Lange. Ah, Artie

00:12:44.399 --> 00:12:46.779
Lange. Met him at a pilot audition, apparently.

00:12:46.980 --> 00:12:48.639
They became good friends and toured together

00:12:48.639 --> 00:12:50.720
a lot. They even went overseas for the troops,

00:12:50.960 --> 00:12:53.539
right? They did. The Operation Mirth USO tour

00:12:53.539 --> 00:12:57.679
in 2008. Went to Afghanistan, Lange headlined,

00:12:57.820 --> 00:13:01.200
DiPaolo was with him. And, you know, performing

00:13:01.200 --> 00:13:04.820
that kind of edgy material in a war zone, it

00:13:04.820 --> 00:13:06.659
said something about their shared no boundaries

00:13:06.659 --> 00:13:08.980
approach. That partnership even became a formal

00:13:08.980 --> 00:13:10.740
show for a while. Yeah, the Nick and Artie show.

00:13:11.399 --> 00:13:14.159
Launched in 2011. It was a syndicated sports

00:13:14.159 --> 00:13:16.539
talk radio show, but with their comedic spin.

00:13:16.860 --> 00:13:19.360
How long did that last with Nick? He left in

00:13:19.360 --> 00:13:22.820
January 2013, so about a year and a half. But

00:13:22.820 --> 00:13:24.639
it was a significant move into being a dedicated

00:13:24.639 --> 00:13:27.259
host, not just a guest. Showed he could carry

00:13:27.259 --> 00:13:30.179
a show, bring that opinionated, funny take to

00:13:30.179 --> 00:13:32.039
sports talk. And we can't really talk about his

00:13:32.039 --> 00:13:34.019
development without mentioning Colin Quinn again.

00:13:34.320 --> 00:13:37.200
Absolutely not. Quinn was huge. Tough Crowd was

00:13:37.200 --> 00:13:39.600
obviously the big platform Quinn gave him, which

00:13:39.600 --> 00:13:42.080
honed that political debate skill. But Quinn

00:13:42.080 --> 00:13:45.299
also apparently titled DePaulo's first two stand

00:13:45.299 --> 00:13:47.460
-up albums. Oh, really? Which ones? Born This

00:13:47.460 --> 00:13:51.639
Way from 99 and Road Rage from 2004. Huh. Interesting.

00:13:51.720 --> 00:13:54.139
So there is this whole interconnected group feeding

00:13:54.139 --> 00:13:56.059
off each other, shaping each other's brands.

00:13:56.200 --> 00:13:57.919
Yeah, it was definitely a scene. They kind of

00:13:57.919 --> 00:14:00.220
created an environment where that aggressive

00:14:00.220 --> 00:14:03.440
truth telling style was the currency. And speaking

00:14:03.440 --> 00:14:07.159
of odd pairings and creative ideas, we have to

00:14:07.159 --> 00:14:09.139
touch on that animated show. Shorties watching

00:14:09.139 --> 00:14:11.600
Shorties. Oh, my God. Shorties. That show was

00:14:11.600 --> 00:14:15.580
peak early 2000s Comedy Central weirdness. Totally.

00:14:15.950 --> 00:14:18.389
It was animated. DiPaolo and Patrice O 'Neill,

00:14:18.490 --> 00:14:20.909
another legend gone too soon, voiced these two

00:14:20.909 --> 00:14:23.110
babies. Yeah, unsupervised babies just sitting

00:14:23.110 --> 00:14:25.309
in diapers, watching clips of other comedians

00:14:25.309 --> 00:14:27.389
and, like, commenting on them in these really

00:14:27.389 --> 00:14:30.210
foul -mouthed, cynical ways. It sounds bizarre,

00:14:30.289 --> 00:14:32.929
but what's fascinating is why they did it. The

00:14:32.929 --> 00:14:34.669
network apparently wanted to capture the chemistry

00:14:34.669 --> 00:14:36.809
between DiPaolo and O 'Neill, which was known

00:14:36.809 --> 00:14:40.480
to be volatile but hilarious from radio. Right.

00:14:40.559 --> 00:14:42.299
They couldn't just put them on another panel

00:14:42.299 --> 00:14:44.559
show, maybe. Maybe not. Tough Crowd was already

00:14:44.559 --> 00:14:46.879
doing that. Yeah. Apparently, DiPaolo himself

00:14:46.879 --> 00:14:49.860
came up with the idea for the babies, which is

00:14:49.860 --> 00:14:51.659
kind of brilliant, right? Using these innocent

00:14:51.659 --> 00:14:53.899
-looking characters to say the absolute most

00:14:53.899 --> 00:14:56.679
offensive, cutting stuff. He made a commentary

00:14:56.679 --> 00:14:59.740
almost. Totally. It really shows his knack for

00:14:59.740 --> 00:15:03.279
blending that intense commentary with these weirdly

00:15:03.279 --> 00:15:05.659
creative formats. Okay, so summing up this phase.

00:15:06.220 --> 00:15:08.740
He is a proven Emmy -nominated writer, a successful

00:15:08.740 --> 00:15:12.240
niche actor, a master of insult and black comedy,

00:15:12.419 --> 00:15:15.019
honed in the wild west of shock radio and shows

00:15:15.019 --> 00:15:17.950
like Tough Crowd. But the media landscape was

00:15:17.950 --> 00:15:19.590
starting to change. Yeah, and that's where the

00:15:19.590 --> 00:15:22.789
friction really starts to build. His style versus

00:15:22.789 --> 00:15:25.870
the changing times. So the early 2000s, he's

00:15:25.870 --> 00:15:27.570
pretty established within the system, right?

00:15:27.629 --> 00:15:29.429
He's got the writing cred, the radio presence.

00:15:29.470 --> 00:15:32.370
He can draw crowds. Definitely an insider. He

00:15:32.370 --> 00:15:34.809
even got his own solo radio hosting gig for a

00:15:34.809 --> 00:15:39.590
bit. Late 2006 on WFNY in New York City. An afternoon

00:15:39.590 --> 00:15:42.029
show. How long did that last? Only till about

00:15:42.029 --> 00:15:46.419
December 2007. The station flipped formats. Which

00:15:46.419 --> 00:15:49.779
happens. After that, though, he became a go -to

00:15:49.779 --> 00:15:53.039
fill -in host for some big names. Jerry Doyle,

00:15:53.080 --> 00:15:55.720
Dennis Miller, Dan Patrick. So he was trusted

00:15:55.720 --> 00:15:58.320
talent, someone the networks could rely on to

00:15:58.320 --> 00:16:01.159
deliver that edgy but still manageable content

00:16:01.159 --> 00:16:02.820
within their framework. Exactly. He was working

00:16:02.820 --> 00:16:05.159
within the system. But you could feel the cultural

00:16:05.159 --> 00:16:07.399
ground shifting underneath, couldn't you? That

00:16:07.399 --> 00:16:09.460
kind of confrontational humor was starting to

00:16:09.460 --> 00:16:12.169
run up against Will. Evolving corporate ideas

00:16:12.169 --> 00:16:14.669
about sensitivity. Yeah. The landscape was changing.

00:16:14.730 --> 00:16:16.690
Yeah. And that tension eventually boiled over

00:16:16.690 --> 00:16:19.429
around 2017, 2018. It did. He got another big

00:16:19.429 --> 00:16:22.970
shot. His own dedicated evening show on Sirius

00:16:22.970 --> 00:16:26.710
XM on the Faction Talk channel. Started May 2017.

00:16:27.129 --> 00:16:29.730
Okay, Sirius XM, satellite radio, that was supposed

00:16:29.730 --> 00:16:31.929
to be the safe zone, right? The place edgy comedy

00:16:31.929 --> 00:16:34.909
could still thrive away from FCC regs? The successor

00:16:34.909 --> 00:16:37.330
to old -school shock radio, in a way? That was

00:16:37.330 --> 00:16:39.549
the perception, yeah. But even satellite radio,

00:16:39.610 --> 00:16:43.210
by the late 2010s, had its limits. Or maybe the

00:16:43.210 --> 00:16:45.230
public nature of social media changed the game

00:16:45.230 --> 00:16:48.629
for everyone, regardless of platform. Ah. So

00:16:48.629 --> 00:16:50.690
what was the specific incident? What finally

00:16:50.690 --> 00:16:52.289
broke the connection with the big institutions?

00:16:52.690 --> 00:16:55.730
It was a tweet. A direct collision between his

00:16:55.730 --> 00:16:58.629
unfiltered style, the immediacy of Twitter, and

00:16:58.629 --> 00:17:01.610
corporate HR policies, basically. What's a tweet

00:17:01.610 --> 00:17:03.690
say? According to the sources, he posted something

00:17:03.690 --> 00:17:05.930
like, school shooters, please confine yourself

00:17:05.930 --> 00:17:09.309
to call campuses, specifically faculty lounges

00:17:09.309 --> 00:17:12.329
at Berkeley, Fresno State, et cetera. Oof. Okay,

00:17:12.390 --> 00:17:15.089
yeah, that's textbook DePaulo black comedy, right?

00:17:15.250 --> 00:17:17.569
Hyper -political, off -collar, hitting a raw

00:17:17.569 --> 00:17:21.049
nerve, extremely dark satire. Exactly. The kind

00:17:21.049 --> 00:17:22.690
of thing he might have said on Opie and Anthony

00:17:22.690 --> 00:17:25.390
10 years earlier, maybe it was some controversy,

00:17:25.569 --> 00:17:28.089
but likely survivable within that bubble. Yeah.

00:17:28.109 --> 00:17:30.410
But posted on his own Twitter account, while

00:17:30.410 --> 00:17:32.549
employed by a major corporation like SiriusXM

00:17:32.549 --> 00:17:35.309
in 2018, the context was entirely different.

00:17:35.410 --> 00:17:38.089
The reaction was swift. Immediate. SiriusXM fired

00:17:38.089 --> 00:17:40.609
him. Termination. And his response, did he apologize?

00:17:40.650 --> 00:17:43.329
Walk it back. Not really apologize for the joke

00:17:43.329 --> 00:17:46.029
itself. His public stance was that SiriusXM completely

00:17:46.029 --> 00:17:48.890
overreacted. He called the tweet poorly worded,

00:17:48.890 --> 00:17:51.710
but argued it was only worth a suspension at

00:17:51.710 --> 00:17:54.269
best. So he wasn't backing down on the intent

00:17:54.269 --> 00:17:57.630
of the humor, the satire. He was arguing about

00:17:57.630 --> 00:18:00.940
the punishment. Precisely. He was basically defending

00:18:00.940 --> 00:18:03.420
his right to make that kind of joke, framing

00:18:03.420 --> 00:18:05.799
the firing as corporate overreach and attack

00:18:05.799 --> 00:18:08.579
on comedic freedom. It perfectly encapsulates

00:18:08.579 --> 00:18:10.619
his whole philosophy about speech and offense.

00:18:10.900 --> 00:18:12.920
It makes you wonder, though, with his track record,

00:18:13.059 --> 00:18:15.680
the Emmy nods, the connections, why not just

00:18:15.680 --> 00:18:18.759
soften the edges a bit? Play the game to stay

00:18:18.759 --> 00:18:21.180
within those big platforms instead of essentially

00:18:21.180 --> 00:18:23.940
burning that bridge with Sirius XM. I think for

00:18:23.940 --> 00:18:26.220
him, compromising the material, softening the

00:18:26.220 --> 00:18:28.700
edges would have been like abandoning the entire

00:18:28.700 --> 00:18:30.730
point. His whole brand, his whole philosophy

00:18:30.730 --> 00:18:34.130
was built on not doing that, on pushing back

00:18:34.130 --> 00:18:36.970
against exactly those kinds of pressures. So

00:18:36.970 --> 00:18:39.569
the firing, in a weird way, might have been inevitable.

00:18:39.750 --> 00:18:42.410
It forced the next step. Which was? The independent

00:18:42.410 --> 00:18:44.990
leap. He had to build his own platform where

00:18:44.990 --> 00:18:46.609
he couldn't be fired for being himself. Then

00:18:46.609 --> 00:18:48.829
he moved fast on that, didn't he? Incredibly

00:18:48.829 --> 00:18:51.670
fast. Yeah. The SiriusXM firing was April 2018.

00:18:51.890 --> 00:18:54.910
By July 9th, 2018, just a few months later, the

00:18:54.910 --> 00:18:57.460
Nick DiPaolo show launched. audio and video podcast

00:18:57.460 --> 00:19:01.319
wow that's the modern playbook isn't it get deplatformed

00:19:01.319 --> 00:19:03.660
by the old guard immediately pivot to your own

00:19:03.660 --> 00:19:06.220
audience directly online textbook example don't

00:19:06.220 --> 00:19:08.200
wait don't complain too long just build your

00:19:08.200 --> 00:19:10.039
own thing let's look at how he built it because

00:19:10.039 --> 00:19:12.160
the structure seems pretty smart for this kind

00:19:12.160 --> 00:19:14.319
of unfiltered content it's basically talk radio

00:19:14.319 --> 00:19:17.140
but redesigned for the internet age an hour long

00:19:17.140 --> 00:19:19.920
four days a week he broadcasts live from his

00:19:19.920 --> 00:19:22.220
own studio setup and how does he manage reach

00:19:22.220 --> 00:19:25.559
versus revenue smartly The live show streams

00:19:25.559 --> 00:19:28.420
free on YouTube. They get some maximum eyeballs,

00:19:28.660 --> 00:19:32.160
keep some visible. But the real money, the dedicated

00:19:32.160 --> 00:19:34.960
fan base, that comes through Patreon. Premium

00:19:34.960 --> 00:19:37.759
content, archives, extras. And the Patreon name

00:19:37.759 --> 00:19:41.220
itself is a statement. Oh, yeah. Creating an

00:19:41.220 --> 00:19:44.880
unsafe space for all. Chuckles. Okay. That's

00:19:44.880 --> 00:19:46.960
pretty direct. It's defiant branding, isn't it?

00:19:46.980 --> 00:19:49.940
A direct flip of the safe space idea. It clearly

00:19:49.940 --> 00:19:52.000
signals exactly what you're getting. The opposite

00:19:52.000 --> 00:19:54.359
of PC culture. That's his core audience. And

00:19:54.359 --> 00:19:57.160
his topics reflect that. News, politics, modern

00:19:57.160 --> 00:20:00.920
society, race, social justice, all through his

00:20:00.920 --> 00:20:03.839
specific lens. And this setup allows him to talk

00:20:03.839 --> 00:20:06.619
to whoever he wants, right? A guest who might

00:20:06.619 --> 00:20:08.740
also be a bit too controversial for mainstream

00:20:08.740 --> 00:20:11.559
platforms. Exactly. He's had people like Kurt

00:20:11.559 --> 00:20:13.940
Metzger, A .J. Rice, Colin Quinn comes back,

00:20:14.039 --> 00:20:16.559
Anthony Cumia. He's created his own ecosystem.

00:20:16.839 --> 00:20:18.359
But here's where it gets interesting, right?

00:20:18.539 --> 00:20:22.440
He achieves this total independence. But he doesn't

00:20:22.440 --> 00:20:26.079
stay completely isolated in his own digital world.

00:20:26.240 --> 00:20:28.380
No, he doesn't. And this is a really key development.

00:20:28.579 --> 00:20:31.480
Since 2021, our sources say he's been a contributing

00:20:31.480 --> 00:20:34.299
writer for Greg Gutfeld's show on Fox News Channel.

00:20:34.440 --> 00:20:37.460
Gutfeld, the late night show, writing for them.

00:20:37.599 --> 00:20:40.000
Yeah, providing material, helping write, opening

00:20:40.000 --> 00:20:42.519
monologues sometimes. It's a subtle but significant

00:20:42.519 --> 00:20:45.460
shift. He went from being fired by a generally

00:20:45.460 --> 00:20:48.599
neutral corporation like Sirius XM to contributing

00:20:48.599 --> 00:20:51.440
content within a specifically political conservative

00:20:51.440 --> 00:20:55.039
media structure like Fox News. It's just that

00:20:55.039 --> 00:20:57.740
even for an independent, some kind of alignment

00:20:57.740 --> 00:21:00.640
might be necessary or desirable for visibility

00:21:00.640 --> 00:21:02.920
or stability. He's aligning his writing talent,

00:21:03.039 --> 00:21:04.900
which we know is top notch, with a very specific

00:21:04.900 --> 00:21:07.420
political brand. And that alignment trend continued.

00:21:08.119 --> 00:21:11.680
In March 2023, he officially joined Mug Club.

00:21:11.859 --> 00:21:14.000
Stephen Crowder's network. Right. Which puts

00:21:14.000 --> 00:21:17.180
him alongside other very polarizing, mostly conservative

00:21:17.180 --> 00:21:20.660
figures like Alex Jones, Brian Callen. It's another

00:21:20.660 --> 00:21:23.599
move away from pure independence towards joining

00:21:23.599 --> 00:21:26.319
a larger politically defined digital platform.

00:21:26.519 --> 00:21:29.799
So the journey seems to be. Traditional media

00:21:29.799 --> 00:21:32.440
code, it gets pushed out, it creates independent

00:21:32.440 --> 00:21:35.539
platform, aligns independent platform with larger

00:21:35.539 --> 00:21:38.700
politically specific networks. That seems to

00:21:38.700 --> 00:21:41.180
be the trajectory. The traditional gatekeepers

00:21:41.180 --> 00:21:44.220
are gone, but maybe new politically aligned gatekeepers

00:21:44.220 --> 00:21:45.980
offer a different kind of structure and reach.

00:21:46.180 --> 00:21:48.660
It's less about content neutrality and more about

00:21:48.660 --> 00:21:51.029
finding your specific audience block. Throughout

00:21:51.029 --> 00:21:53.529
all these shifts, radio, firing, independence,

00:21:53.930 --> 00:21:55.890
alignment, he kept putting out stand -up specials,

00:21:55.890 --> 00:21:58.049
right? Those seem like key markers of his evolution.

00:21:58.349 --> 00:22:00.509
Absolutely. They're like snapshots of his material

00:22:00.509 --> 00:22:02.190
and worldview at different points. We mentioned

00:22:02.190 --> 00:22:05.369
the early ones, Born This Way, 99, Road Rage,

00:22:05.369 --> 00:22:09.210
04, What Came After. Funny How, in 2008. Then

00:22:09.210 --> 00:22:12.470
Raw Nerve in 2011. That one was interesting because

00:22:12.470 --> 00:22:14.769
it was released both as a Comedy Central Presents

00:22:14.769 --> 00:22:17.690
half hour and as a full special on Showtime.

00:22:17.970 --> 00:22:20.130
Still working within the traditional system then.

00:22:20.430 --> 00:22:22.650
But then things started to change, even in how

00:22:22.650 --> 00:22:24.970
he released them. Yeah, by 2014, with another

00:22:24.970 --> 00:22:27.009
senseless killing, you see him choosing a very

00:22:27.009 --> 00:22:30.170
specific vibe. He filmed it at Acme, a small

00:22:30.170 --> 00:22:32.430
club in Minneapolis. Really intimate setting.

00:22:32.549 --> 00:22:34.970
Going for that raw, immediate feel, like being

00:22:34.970 --> 00:22:37.650
back on the circuit. Seems like it. Less polish,

00:22:37.730 --> 00:22:40.509
more intensity. Then came Inflammatory in 2017,

00:22:40.809 --> 00:22:43.690
just before the SiriusXM stuff hit the fan. But

00:22:43.690 --> 00:22:45.769
the really strategic one, the one that reflects

00:22:45.769 --> 00:22:48.390
the big pivot, seems to be a breath of fresh

00:22:48.390 --> 00:22:51.410
air in 2019, released right after the firing.

00:22:51.650 --> 00:22:55.210
And he put it out. How? For free. Directly onto

00:22:55.210 --> 00:22:56.690
YouTube. Okay, that's a major statement. Why

00:22:56.690 --> 00:22:59.589
free? His stated reason was explicit. He wanted

00:22:59.589 --> 00:23:01.930
to release it without any media industry filter.

00:23:02.170 --> 00:23:04.569
No network notes from Netflix or Comedy Central.

00:23:04.730 --> 00:23:07.509
No executive demanding cuts to avoid controversy.

00:23:07.890 --> 00:23:10.289
So it was partly artistic control, but also a

00:23:10.289 --> 00:23:12.410
business move, bypassing the gatekeepers entirely.

00:23:13.099 --> 00:23:15.960
Exactly. Get it directly to the audience. Maximize

00:23:15.960 --> 00:23:18.380
reach. Find everyone who might be looking for

00:23:18.380 --> 00:23:21.420
exactly that kind of unsiltered comedy, but maybe

00:23:21.420 --> 00:23:23.640
wouldn't pay for a subscription or buy a special

00:23:23.640 --> 00:23:27.019
site unseen. It was a direct pipeline using YouTube

00:23:27.019 --> 00:23:30.140
as the distribution network. Very smart. Very

00:23:30.140 --> 00:23:32.000
much of the moment. And his personal life also

00:23:32.000 --> 00:23:35.440
kind of mirrors this political trajectory, doesn't

00:23:35.440 --> 00:23:37.539
it? His physical location. Yeah, that's another

00:23:37.539 --> 00:23:40.640
layer. He married his wife, Andrea. Back in March

00:23:40.640 --> 00:23:43.220
2003, they'd been together since 94, so a long

00:23:43.220 --> 00:23:45.160
-term relationship. Right. And they lived around

00:23:45.160 --> 00:23:48.259
the New York area for years. Queens, then Tarrytown,

00:23:48.440 --> 00:23:51.980
then Newcastle by 2004. Standard suburban New

00:23:51.980 --> 00:23:54.299
York life for a successful comic. But then came

00:23:54.299 --> 00:23:58.349
the big move. The big move. April 2019. Right

00:23:58.349 --> 00:24:00.109
after he'd launched his independent show and

00:24:00.109 --> 00:24:02.549
really leaned into the anti -establishment vibe,

00:24:02.789 --> 00:24:05.210
he and Andreu moved to Georgia. And he didn't

00:24:05.210 --> 00:24:07.789
just move quietly. He made a point of why he

00:24:07.789 --> 00:24:10.410
was moving. Oh, yeah. He made a very public,

00:24:10.509 --> 00:24:13.509
very provocative statement calling New York a

00:24:13.509 --> 00:24:16.289
liberal shirt hole. Wow. OK, so he's literally

00:24:16.289 --> 00:24:19.309
using his geographic move as content, as part

00:24:19.309 --> 00:24:22.150
of his brand narrative. Totally. It fused everything

00:24:22.150 --> 00:24:24.869
together. His personal life choice, his political

00:24:24.869 --> 00:24:27.690
stance, his comedy content. It became the symbol

00:24:27.690 --> 00:24:30.730
of him escaping the perceived liberal oppression

00:24:30.730 --> 00:24:34.170
of New York for the freedom of the South. Powerful

00:24:34.170 --> 00:24:36.839
storytelling for his base. And all of this, this

00:24:36.839 --> 00:24:39.720
whole journey, it really comes back to a core

00:24:39.720 --> 00:24:42.039
belief he seems to have held for a long, long

00:24:42.039 --> 00:24:45.240
time about offense, about words. Absolutely.

00:24:45.259 --> 00:24:47.279
It's remarkably consistent. There was a New York

00:24:47.279 --> 00:24:50.700
Times article way back in 2007. This is pre Twitter

00:24:50.700 --> 00:24:53.119
firing, pre Trump even, that talked about him

00:24:53.119 --> 00:24:56.059
and the. Shock Radio Brethren after the Don Imus

00:24:56.059 --> 00:24:58.400
controversy. And what did it say about DiPaolo

00:24:58.400 --> 00:25:01.079
specifically? It highlighted his stance against

00:25:01.079 --> 00:25:03.660
PC culture even back then. It quoted a bit he

00:25:03.660 --> 00:25:05.460
did mocking some kind of employee sensitivity

00:25:05.460 --> 00:25:08.460
training manual. The manual was apparently titled

00:25:08.460 --> 00:25:12.380
Words Hurt and Harm. OK. And DiPaolo's punchline,

00:25:12.400 --> 00:25:14.900
his core argument was right away we're starting

00:25:14.900 --> 00:25:17.099
with a false premise because words don't hurt.

00:25:17.500 --> 00:25:20.140
Words don't hurt. That's basically the key to

00:25:20.140 --> 00:25:22.059
understanding his entire approach, isn't it?

00:25:22.140 --> 00:25:24.559
It really is. It's the engine behind the insult

00:25:24.559 --> 00:25:26.819
comedy, the black comedy, the political jabs.

00:25:26.859 --> 00:25:29.720
It's his justification for saying anything, for

00:25:29.720 --> 00:25:32.119
pushing boundaries in every single environment

00:25:32.119 --> 00:25:34.960
he's been in, regardless of the fallout. His

00:25:34.960 --> 00:25:36.920
whole move towards independence, you could argue,

00:25:37.099 --> 00:25:40.480
was about finding or creating a space where that

00:25:40.480 --> 00:25:43.660
single premise, words don't hurt, could exist

00:25:43.660 --> 00:25:46.759
without institutional punishment. Okay, so looking

00:25:46.759 --> 00:25:48.619
back at this whole trajectory, Nick DiPaolo's

00:25:48.619 --> 00:25:51.380
career, it really is like a microcosm, isn't

00:25:51.380 --> 00:25:53.920
it? A case study of a performer whose style,

00:25:54.039 --> 00:25:57.140
that consistent confrontational style, it brought

00:25:57.140 --> 00:26:00.299
him success, but eventually just became incompatible

00:26:00.299 --> 00:26:02.700
with where mainstream media was heading on sensitivity.

00:26:03.390 --> 00:26:05.349
Yeah, he didn't really change his core product.

00:26:05.430 --> 00:26:07.670
The market around him changed. So he didn't bend

00:26:07.670 --> 00:26:10.609
his brand to fit the market. He found a new market

00:26:10.609 --> 00:26:13.349
or rather built his own venue for it. And he

00:26:13.349 --> 00:26:15.529
showed it's possible, right, to go from the traditional

00:26:15.529 --> 00:26:18.430
Heights Emmy nominations, big radio shows to

00:26:18.430 --> 00:26:20.950
being essentially kicked out and then successfully

00:26:20.950 --> 00:26:23.130
launching your own independent thing, your own

00:26:23.130 --> 00:26:25.470
profitable media company, basically on YouTube

00:26:25.470 --> 00:26:28.609
and Patreon. Definitely. And for you, the listener,

00:26:28.730 --> 00:26:30.650
that's maybe the big practical takeaway here.

00:26:30.920 --> 00:26:35.880
His path shows that modern reality for creators,

00:26:36.160 --> 00:26:38.819
especially those with strong, maybe controversial

00:26:38.819 --> 00:26:42.559
viewpoints, if you prioritize unfiltered content

00:26:42.559 --> 00:26:45.259
over playing it safe within the old institutions.

00:26:45.720 --> 00:26:47.519
The tools are there now. The tools are there.

00:26:47.619 --> 00:26:50.079
The tech allows the audience to find you, to

00:26:50.079 --> 00:26:52.460
follow the content directly, even if the big

00:26:52.460 --> 00:26:54.779
networks or platforms try to sideline you. That's

00:26:54.779 --> 00:26:56.880
the optimistic view, the independent success

00:26:56.880 --> 00:26:59.849
story. It is, but... And here's where it gets

00:26:59.849 --> 00:27:01.769
really, really interesting. And this is the final

00:27:01.769 --> 00:27:03.410
thought we want to leave you with today. Okay.

00:27:03.529 --> 00:27:05.470
We saw him make that move. Break free from the

00:27:05.470 --> 00:27:07.549
networks. Build a successful independent show.

00:27:07.910 --> 00:27:10.690
Run it for, what, five plus years now? Total

00:27:10.690 --> 00:27:13.569
control? Right. The unsafe space for all. Exactly.

00:27:13.750 --> 00:27:17.609
But then, recently, he takes these steps back

00:27:17.609 --> 00:27:20.470
towards larger structures. He joins Steven Crowder's

00:27:20.470 --> 00:27:22.769
Mug Love Network. He starts writing for Gutfeld.

00:27:23.259 --> 00:27:26.400
on Fox News aligning himself with big established

00:27:26.400 --> 00:27:29.240
politically specific brands not neutral platforms

00:27:29.240 --> 00:27:32.720
but ideologically aligned ones precisely so what

00:27:32.720 --> 00:27:36.000
does that tell us ultimately about how viable

00:27:36.000 --> 00:27:38.900
truly independent media or comedy is in the long

00:27:38.900 --> 00:27:42.480
run is that Total autonomy, that lone wolf status,

00:27:42.660 --> 00:27:44.880
actually sustainable for years and years. Or

00:27:44.880 --> 00:27:47.319
do you eventually need to hook your wagon to

00:27:47.319 --> 00:27:49.700
some kind of larger structure, even if it's a

00:27:49.700 --> 00:27:52.200
politically specific one, to maintain reach,

00:27:52.480 --> 00:27:55.519
stability, maybe relevance? Does that political

00:27:55.519 --> 00:27:57.680
alignment eventually have to replace the old

00:27:57.680 --> 00:27:59.799
institutional support in today's media world?

00:28:00.559 --> 00:28:02.799
Can you be truly independent and still thrive

00:28:02.799 --> 00:28:05.460
long term? Or does the need for audience and

00:28:05.460 --> 00:28:07.880
structure inevitably pull you into one camp or

00:28:07.880 --> 00:28:10.059
another? Does the desire for reach eventually

00:28:10.059 --> 00:28:12.680
compromise the purity of that independence? Hmm.

00:28:13.519 --> 00:28:15.359
That is definitely something to chew on. Yeah.

00:28:15.420 --> 00:28:16.980
A question about the future of media, really.

00:28:17.400 --> 00:28:19.940
Fascinating stuff. OK, that wraps up our deep

00:28:19.940 --> 00:28:22.099
dive into the unfiltered evolution of Ingrid

00:28:22.099 --> 00:28:23.839
Paolo. Thanks for joining us. See you next time.
