WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.120
Welcome back to The Deep Dive. We take the sources,

00:00:02.399 --> 00:00:04.459
you send us articles, interviews, all that research,

00:00:04.820 --> 00:00:07.059
and we really try to build a strategic picture

00:00:07.059 --> 00:00:09.419
of the people and ideas shaping things around

00:00:09.419 --> 00:00:12.140
us. Today, we're getting into someone, well,

00:00:12.359 --> 00:00:14.619
pretty fascinating in the comedy world. A real

00:00:14.619 --> 00:00:18.000
lightning rod. Anthony Jezelnik. And our goal

00:00:18.000 --> 00:00:20.219
here, really, is to get past just saying, oh,

00:00:20.280 --> 00:00:22.859
he does dark comedy. We want to dig into the

00:00:22.859 --> 00:00:25.179
actual mechanics, you know, the rhetorical tools,

00:00:25.460 --> 00:00:27.719
the career moves, the strategy behind building

00:00:27.719 --> 00:00:31.100
this brand as the guy who just doesn't care.

00:00:31.660 --> 00:00:35.539
Yeah, to deep dive into... A real strategic commitment,

00:00:35.640 --> 00:00:37.359
isn't it? Because when you actually look at his

00:00:37.359 --> 00:00:38.979
work, source by source, he's not just telling

00:00:38.979 --> 00:00:41.320
edgy jokes. He's built this incredibly specific,

00:00:41.700 --> 00:00:44.200
ah, meticulously structured stage persona. And

00:00:44.200 --> 00:00:46.119
the sources really highlight what defines it.

00:00:46.520 --> 00:00:48.679
That ironic misdirection, the non sequiturs,

00:00:48.700 --> 00:00:50.719
he's really biting insults. Livered with that

00:00:50.719 --> 00:00:53.799
super arrogant deadpan thing. Exactly. And crucially,

00:00:53.939 --> 00:00:56.240
this persona that just consistently takes these

00:00:56.240 --> 00:00:58.740
immoral stances on things. What's so interesting,

00:00:58.759 --> 00:01:01.140
I think, is realizing his style isn't just one

00:01:01.140 --> 00:01:03.020
thing. It's like you said, it's calculated. It's

00:01:03.020 --> 00:01:06.540
this mix, almost a cocktail, of different comedy

00:01:06.540 --> 00:01:08.959
genres. That's spot on. That's the calculation.

00:01:09.260 --> 00:01:12.750
The sources point to him pulling from... black

00:01:12.750 --> 00:01:15.230
comedy, shock humor for the themes, obviously,

00:01:15.750 --> 00:01:18.569
but then blending that with the tight structure

00:01:18.569 --> 00:01:20.989
of observational comedy and that deadpan delivery.

00:01:21.010 --> 00:01:23.609
There's more, too. Right. Oh, yeah. He folds

00:01:23.609 --> 00:01:26.730
in the kind of confrontational vibe of insult

00:01:26.730 --> 00:01:28.870
comedy, that awkwardness you get from cringe

00:01:28.870 --> 00:01:31.489
comedy, and even the sort of intellectual step

00:01:31.489 --> 00:01:33.969
back of satire. It's like he doesn't just tell

00:01:33.969 --> 00:01:36.469
a joke. He's deploying this whole complex toolkit.

00:01:36.750 --> 00:01:40.370
OK, so let's trace this back. Where did this

00:01:40.370 --> 00:01:43.769
super technical specific and kind of amoral persona

00:01:43.769 --> 00:01:46.969
actually start, because the roots are maybe not

00:01:46.969 --> 00:01:48.590
what you'd expect. All right, let's unpack this,

00:01:48.689 --> 00:01:50.510
because yeah, the start of this journey for this

00:01:50.510 --> 00:01:54.230
really calculated comic is, well, it seems pretty

00:01:54.230 --> 00:01:56.209
normal on the surface. Grew up the oldest of

00:01:56.209 --> 00:01:59.390
five kids, Catholic family, upper Sinclair, Pennsylvania.

00:02:00.189 --> 00:02:02.560
Seems worlds away from the guy on stage. It really

00:02:02.560 --> 00:02:05.859
does. And that contrast, that friction is probably

00:02:05.859 --> 00:02:07.760
exactly what a comedian needs, right? His dad

00:02:07.760 --> 00:02:11.159
was a lawyer, mom a housewife. It's a very structured

00:02:11.159 --> 00:02:14.919
middle -class scene. Rules, morality, probably

00:02:14.919 --> 00:02:17.439
pretty predictable. So for someone whose whole

00:02:17.439 --> 00:02:20.360
thing becomes about flipping expectations and

00:02:20.360 --> 00:02:24.520
messing with moral norms, having that solid structure

00:02:24.520 --> 00:02:27.060
to kind of push against, that's gold. And the

00:02:27.060 --> 00:02:29.680
sources actually point to this one... really

00:02:29.680 --> 00:02:32.180
key moment, like a light bulb moment, back in

00:02:32.180 --> 00:02:34.680
elementary school. It wasn't just about being

00:02:34.680 --> 00:02:37.139
funny, it was about understanding the power behind

00:02:37.139 --> 00:02:39.780
comedy. Oh yeah, the postcard story. Right. A

00:02:39.780 --> 00:02:41.860
classmate was moving to a town that wasn't seen

00:02:41.860 --> 00:02:44.580
as great, and Jezelnik makes a sarcastic crack

00:02:44.580 --> 00:02:47.020
about sending a postcard to their, you know,

00:02:47.219 --> 00:02:49.379
lesser new address. And the key thing wasn't

00:02:49.379 --> 00:02:51.659
the joke itself, really. It was who laughed.

00:02:51.800 --> 00:02:53.780
The teacher. The teacher laughed. The authority

00:02:53.780 --> 00:02:57.500
figure. And that apparently taught him this fundamental

00:02:57.500 --> 00:02:59.879
rule he kind of built his career on. He put it

00:02:59.879 --> 00:03:02.120
later as realizing, if you're smart enough that

00:03:02.120 --> 00:03:03.979
adults get it, you can get away with anything.

00:03:04.300 --> 00:03:06.759
It's this insight that being clever, having that

00:03:06.759 --> 00:03:08.520
tight structure, it's not just how you make the

00:03:08.520 --> 00:03:11.039
joke funny. It's the shield. It lets the dark

00:03:11.039 --> 00:03:13.240
stuff get through because people almost have

00:03:13.240 --> 00:03:16.259
to admire the construction first before they

00:03:16.259 --> 00:03:18.400
can react to the content. That makes sense. And

00:03:18.400 --> 00:03:20.879
that focus on structure wasn't just random. After

00:03:20.879 --> 00:03:23.139
high school in 97, he goes to Tulane, gets a

00:03:23.139 --> 00:03:25.139
degree in English lit with a business minor finish

00:03:25.139 --> 00:03:28.560
in 2001. That's not exactly the path to stand

00:03:28.560 --> 00:03:30.939
up. No, and that English lit background, I think

00:03:30.939 --> 00:03:32.580
that's absolutely crucial. He wasn't trying to

00:03:32.580 --> 00:03:36.080
be like an improv guy. His first big dream was

00:03:36.080 --> 00:03:38.620
to write the great American novel. Right. So

00:03:38.620 --> 00:03:41.259
he thinks like a writer first. That explains

00:03:41.259 --> 00:03:43.360
the focus on, you know, getting every word right,

00:03:43.659 --> 00:03:46.560
the precision, the super tight, almost mathematical

00:03:46.560 --> 00:03:49.300
structure of his jokes. A Jeselnik joke is like

00:03:49.300 --> 00:03:52.060
a tiny, perfect, dark short story. So when did

00:03:52.060 --> 00:03:54.780
he shift from wanting to write novels? Well,

00:03:54.780 --> 00:03:57.020
during college, he did an internship out in LA.

00:03:57.060 --> 00:04:00.379
Yeah. And that apparently showed him there were

00:04:00.379 --> 00:04:03.500
other avenues for a writer, as he put it. Still

00:04:03.500 --> 00:04:06.159
focused on writing, though, just maybe not fiction.

00:04:06.379 --> 00:04:09.020
And he was in a fraternity too, Alpha Tau Omega.

00:04:09.879 --> 00:04:12.659
Again, seems pretty standard college stuff, kind

00:04:12.659 --> 00:04:14.819
of clashes with the later persona. Totally, and

00:04:14.819 --> 00:04:16.500
then there's that story from his senior year,

00:04:16.639 --> 00:04:19.100
the sort of personal tragedy turned material.

00:04:19.459 --> 00:04:21.720
His girlfriend accidentally burns down his apartment.

00:04:22.120 --> 00:04:24.959
Ouch! Yeah, but it became fodder for his early

00:04:24.959 --> 00:04:27.199
stand -up attempts, which is, you know, a perfect

00:04:27.199 --> 00:04:29.420
little preview of his whole method, stepping

00:04:29.420 --> 00:04:31.959
back from... personal disaster, observing it,

00:04:32.240 --> 00:04:34.639
finding the dark joke in it. So he moves to LA,

00:04:34.720 --> 00:04:37.959
early 2000s, does the classic LA grind thing,

00:04:38.139 --> 00:04:40.379
working at Borders First. Yep, Borders Bookstore.

00:04:40.860 --> 00:04:43.379
And then he finds these comedy workshops, Greg

00:04:43.379 --> 00:04:46.620
Dean's in Santa Monica, and decides to actually

00:04:46.620 --> 00:04:48.620
try stand -up. And how did that first time go?

00:04:48.899 --> 00:04:52.079
Oh, an absolute train wreck, towards a disaster,

00:04:52.220 --> 00:04:54.160
by his own account. He tried doing this impression

00:04:54.160 --> 00:04:57.189
of his dad getting stung by wasps. Physical comedy.

00:04:57.370 --> 00:05:00.329
Broad. Died. Completely died. He said it lasted

00:05:00.329 --> 00:05:02.930
like one minute but felt like ten. Zero laughs.

00:05:03.170 --> 00:05:05.009
Okay, so that failure becomes really important

00:05:05.009 --> 00:05:09.089
then. Hugely important. Because it made him swear

00:05:09.089 --> 00:05:12.050
off physical comedy forever. It wasn't just,

00:05:12.170 --> 00:05:13.870
oh I prefer wordplay. It was like, nope, that's

00:05:13.870 --> 00:05:16.790
not my weapon. His comedy had to succeed purely

00:05:16.790 --> 00:05:20.339
on the words. The structure. the deadpan. He

00:05:20.339 --> 00:05:23.220
basically narrowed his own focus, forcing himself

00:05:23.220 --> 00:05:26.100
to master that linguistic side. So after Borders,

00:05:26.180 --> 00:05:28.959
he gets a job kind of adjacent to the industry.

00:05:29.120 --> 00:05:31.740
Right. Smart move. Worked behind the scenes as

00:05:31.740 --> 00:05:34.120
an accounting clerk for Deadwood. Great show,

00:05:34.339 --> 00:05:37.019
but he's doing the numbers during the day. And

00:05:37.019 --> 00:05:39.279
then hitting open mics at night, honing the act.

00:05:39.620 --> 00:05:41.339
And just to round out that background picture,

00:05:41.439 --> 00:05:44.100
he's of Slovenian descent, identifies an atheist.

00:05:44.969 --> 00:05:47.230
Which you know gives him that necessary distance

00:05:47.230 --> 00:05:49.470
from the Catholic upbringing to really dissect

00:05:49.470 --> 00:05:52.829
faith Morality death without getting personally

00:05:52.829 --> 00:05:54.629
tangled up in it. He can stand outside the thing.

00:05:54.689 --> 00:05:56.990
He's taking apart. Okay, so he's got the writer's

00:05:56.990 --> 00:05:58.790
brain He's ditched the physical stuff. He's all

00:05:58.790 --> 00:06:02.519
in on the words But that specific voice, that

00:06:02.519 --> 00:06:04.899
trademark dark twist that still needed some shaping,

00:06:05.480 --> 00:06:07.139
he talks about influences, right? Yeah. Yeah.

00:06:07.180 --> 00:06:09.220
And the influences he mentions are kind of like

00:06:09.220 --> 00:06:11.639
the recipe for his style. You've got the really

00:06:11.639 --> 00:06:15.079
precise, economical, one -liner guys like Mitch

00:06:15.079 --> 00:06:17.579
Hedberg and Steven Wright. Joke's like a little

00:06:17.579 --> 00:06:19.980
math problem. Right. Very tight structure. Exactly.

00:06:20.439 --> 00:06:24.040
But then you also have the sharper edge, the

00:06:24.040 --> 00:06:26.139
intelligence of Dennis Miller and Sarah Silverman

00:06:26.139 --> 00:06:30.089
people who used observation, but gave it a real

00:06:30.089 --> 00:06:33.170
bite. Sometimes pretty aggressive. But finding

00:06:33.170 --> 00:06:36.649
his own specific thing, that dark twist moment,

00:06:36.889 --> 00:06:38.569
that apparently took a couple of years of grinding

00:06:38.569 --> 00:06:40.750
it out. Yeah, about two years in, he writes this

00:06:40.750 --> 00:06:43.870
joke that's just weird and dark. And the audience

00:06:43.870 --> 00:06:46.290
reaction was so strong, he had this moment of

00:06:46.290 --> 00:06:48.050
clarity, like, OK, this is it. This is the corner

00:06:48.050 --> 00:06:50.069
I need to own. And do we know which joke it was?

00:06:50.209 --> 00:06:52.430
We do. It's the one called My Girlfriend Loves

00:06:52.430 --> 00:06:54.750
to Eat Chocolate. Yeah. It ended up on his first

00:06:54.750 --> 00:06:57.600
album, Shakespeare. And if you break that joke

00:06:57.600 --> 00:07:00.259
down, it's pure jeslinic. It starts relatable

00:07:00.259 --> 00:07:04.160
almost sweet Then there's this bizarre non sequitur

00:07:04.160 --> 00:07:06.920
that just veers into darkness totally unexpected

00:07:06.920 --> 00:07:10.740
and then the punchline lands with absolute deadpan

00:07:10.740 --> 00:07:14.019
seriousness It's the way he delivers the absurd

00:07:14.019 --> 00:07:16.639
that technical precision that lets you laugh

00:07:16.639 --> 00:07:19.759
at the structure Even while you're maybe recoiling

00:07:19.759 --> 00:07:22.040
from the idea itself. Okay, so he finds the voice

00:07:22.220 --> 00:07:24.180
then he needs the right place to sharpen it.

00:07:24.480 --> 00:07:26.779
And that place was the Comedy Cellar in New York.

00:07:27.220 --> 00:07:29.379
Yeah, finding a home base there was huge. They

00:07:29.379 --> 00:07:31.800
apparently gave him earlier sets, which helped

00:07:31.800 --> 00:07:33.860
him juggle things, you know, between L .A. and

00:07:33.860 --> 00:07:36.160
the movie to New York. And the cellar itself

00:07:36.160 --> 00:07:39.019
had a specific vibe, right? Oh, absolutely. It

00:07:39.019 --> 00:07:42.980
was and is famously this intense, crucible, hyper

00:07:42.980 --> 00:07:45.079
-competitive comedians just constantly ripping

00:07:45.079 --> 00:07:47.519
on each other, busting chops, as they say. Sounds

00:07:47.519 --> 00:07:49.660
rough. It required you to be incredibly quick,

00:07:49.920 --> 00:07:52.180
have perfect timing, and basically grow rhino

00:07:52.180 --> 00:07:54.839
skin. All things that fed directly into developing

00:07:54.839 --> 00:07:57.360
that arrogant, insult -heavy part of his stage

00:07:57.360 --> 00:07:59.379
character. He mentioned specific people there

00:07:59.379 --> 00:08:01.399
who were masters of that. Yeah, he pointed to

00:08:01.399 --> 00:08:03.680
guys like Jim Norton, Colin Quinn, Bobby Kelly,

00:08:03.819 --> 00:08:06.220
Keith Robinson. Said they were the best at that

00:08:06.220 --> 00:08:08.560
aggressive, super quick style. He learned the

00:08:08.560 --> 00:08:10.939
rhythm, the cadence, for delivering those sharp

00:08:10.939 --> 00:08:13.339
insults from watching them. Especially in that

00:08:13.339 --> 00:08:15.449
small, intense room. And that boot camp paid

00:08:15.449 --> 00:08:17.629
off pretty quickly then. Seems like it. Yeah.

00:08:17.850 --> 00:08:21.189
By 2009, he gets his Comedy Central presence

00:08:21.189 --> 00:08:23.889
special. Yeah. Big break. That put him on the

00:08:23.889 --> 00:08:25.930
map for the network. Right. And they named him

00:08:25.930 --> 00:08:27.769
one of their breakout comedians that year. Look

00:08:27.769 --> 00:08:31.069
at the list. Nick Kroll, Aziz Ansari, Whitney

00:08:31.069 --> 00:08:33.370
Cummings, Donald Glover. Wow. That's a heavy

00:08:33.370 --> 00:08:35.990
hitting class. Exactly. And he stood out in that

00:08:35.990 --> 00:08:40.669
crowd with his very specific dark stuff. Proved

00:08:40.669 --> 00:08:43.850
it could work. Which leads to the first album

00:08:43.850 --> 00:08:46.850
in 2010 Shakespeare. Yeah Shakespeare even the

00:08:46.850 --> 00:08:48.490
title is a statement, right? It's like you saying

00:08:48.490 --> 00:08:51.190
these short nasty perfectly built jokes. This

00:08:51.190 --> 00:08:53.950
is high art. This is literature It elevates the

00:08:53.950 --> 00:08:55.970
whole project. Okay, this next part feels like

00:08:55.970 --> 00:08:58.610
a really critical moment a strategic fork in

00:08:58.610 --> 00:09:02.169
the road Maybe he lands a job 2009 first season

00:09:02.169 --> 00:09:05.019
of late night with Jimmy Fallon Staff writer.

00:09:05.419 --> 00:09:08.460
And by his own account, this was the dream job

00:09:08.460 --> 00:09:11.059
before stand -up was even the dream. Right. He

00:09:11.059 --> 00:09:12.480
just wanted to be in that writer's room, you

00:09:12.480 --> 00:09:14.539
know. Throw out jokes with people you respected.

00:09:14.740 --> 00:09:17.299
That was the goal. So what was the problem? The

00:09:17.299 --> 00:09:20.519
problem was him. Or rather, the voice he'd spent

00:09:20.519 --> 00:09:23.940
years crafting at the cellar. It was just fundamentally

00:09:23.940 --> 00:09:26.759
incompatible with what Fallon needed for a big

00:09:26.759 --> 00:09:29.620
mainstream network late night show. His pitches

00:09:29.620 --> 00:09:32.940
kept getting rejected. Too dark. Always too dark.

00:09:33.120 --> 00:09:34.940
Is there a specific example of that? Yeah, the

00:09:34.940 --> 00:09:37.220
source has given a perfect one. There was this

00:09:37.220 --> 00:09:39.240
obesity joke he really believed in. He pitched

00:09:39.240 --> 00:09:41.779
it relentlessly every single day for a month,

00:09:41.980 --> 00:09:45.279
apparently. Wow, persistence. Totally. And Fallon

00:09:45.279 --> 00:09:48.440
apparently liked the joke privately, but he wouldn't

00:09:48.440 --> 00:09:51.039
do it on the show. Why? Because Fallon's brand

00:09:51.039 --> 00:09:54.269
is all about being likable, relatable. He was

00:09:54.269 --> 00:09:56.350
worried that joke would alienate obese viewers,

00:09:56.850 --> 00:09:58.529
hurt his connection with that part of the audience.

00:09:58.629 --> 00:10:00.490
Which is the exact opposite of what Jeselnik

00:10:00.490 --> 00:10:02.690
was building. Exactly. It crystallized the whole

00:10:02.690 --> 00:10:07.570
conflict. Fallon needs universal appeal. Jeselnik's

00:10:07.570 --> 00:10:09.970
brand, the one he was developing, required a

00:10:09.970 --> 00:10:12.509
certain level of repulsion, almost. It needed

00:10:12.509 --> 00:10:14.750
him to be willing to not be liked by everyone.

00:10:15.230 --> 00:10:17.690
The persona was designed to push away the very

00:10:17.690 --> 00:10:20.789
people Fallon had to embrace. So the job just

00:10:20.789 --> 00:10:24.309
became... Yeah, he described it as, you know,

00:10:24.549 --> 00:10:26.190
working hard all day, trying to write in this

00:10:26.190 --> 00:10:29.169
voice that wasn't his, feeling constrained, then

00:10:29.169 --> 00:10:30.929
going straight to the Comedy Cellar, having a

00:10:30.929 --> 00:10:32.870
big stiff drink, and finally getting to do his

00:10:32.870 --> 00:10:35.470
act, the dark stuff. It was tearing him in two,

00:10:35.649 --> 00:10:38.309
basically. Professional duty versus artistic

00:10:38.309 --> 00:10:40.789
identity. And that's a key thing for anyone listening,

00:10:41.009 --> 00:10:42.570
right? Choosing your path. Absolutely. Yeah.

00:10:42.730 --> 00:10:45.740
And he made his choice. March 2010, he leaves,

00:10:46.139 --> 00:10:48.779
walks away from the prestige, the dream job,

00:10:49.360 --> 00:10:51.059
and apparently the producers got it immediately.

00:10:51.320 --> 00:10:53.059
They basically told him, we understand you want

00:10:53.059 --> 00:10:55.440
to go be Anthony Jeselnik. He chose the persona,

00:10:55.740 --> 00:10:58.639
the uncompromising voice he'd found over conventional

00:10:58.639 --> 00:11:01.740
success. That's the moment the amoral stage villain

00:11:01.740 --> 00:11:04.000
wasn't just an act. It became his professional

00:11:04.000 --> 00:11:06.799
path. It had to be. So leaving Fallon was this

00:11:06.799 --> 00:11:09.220
huge gamble, right? But the sources show it paid

00:11:09.220 --> 00:11:11.679
off almost immediately, because he pivoted straight

00:11:11.679 --> 00:11:14.500
into the absolute perfect arena for his kind

00:11:14.500 --> 00:11:17.379
of comedy, the Comedy Central Roasts. Oh, right.

00:11:17.379 --> 00:11:19.919
The Roasts. Perfect fit. Totally. He started

00:11:19.919 --> 00:11:22.980
writing for them in 2010. He loved the Roasts,

00:11:23.080 --> 00:11:25.460
called them the Super Bowl of Comedy. So he starts

00:11:25.460 --> 00:11:27.379
as a writer again? Yeah. First wrote for the

00:11:27.379 --> 00:11:29.559
David Hasselhoff Roast. But here's the thing.

00:11:29.720 --> 00:11:33.360
His jokes, even just on paper, were so sharp,

00:11:33.620 --> 00:11:36.679
so distinctly him that the Comedy Central execs

00:11:36.679 --> 00:11:38.720
noticed him. They saw the potential and offered

00:11:38.720 --> 00:11:40.820
him a spot on the dais as a performer. And his

00:11:40.820 --> 00:11:43.340
first one was the Trump roast in 2011. That was

00:11:43.340 --> 00:11:45.820
it. The roast of Donald Trump. And he knew he

00:11:45.820 --> 00:11:48.360
said he knew this is his big shot, his inflection

00:11:48.360 --> 00:11:50.659
point. Why were the roasts so perfect for him?

00:11:50.879 --> 00:11:53.559
Because the entire format demands cruelty and

00:11:53.559 --> 00:11:56.980
arrogance. The audience expects it. It's a controlled

00:11:56.980 --> 00:11:59.799
environment for insults. He didn't have to apologize

00:11:59.799 --> 00:12:02.539
for his material or ease people into it. The

00:12:02.539 --> 00:12:05.580
roast was the context. It perfectly showcased

00:12:05.580 --> 00:12:08.600
his style. And the reaction. Massive. He called

00:12:08.600 --> 00:12:11.519
it one of my favorite moments of my life. Because

00:12:11.519 --> 00:12:13.679
no one knew who I was, and it just really caught

00:12:13.679 --> 00:12:16.200
everybody by surprise. And the next day, my life

00:12:16.200 --> 00:12:18.600
was completely different. Instantaneous jump

00:12:18.600 --> 00:12:22.629
from nobody to viral sensation. basically. Because

00:12:22.629 --> 00:12:25.429
people finally saw the joke construction in its

00:12:25.429 --> 00:12:28.470
purest form. I think so. Before that roast, you

00:12:28.470 --> 00:12:30.809
know, he might headline a club, but maybe half

00:12:30.809 --> 00:12:32.950
the audience wasn't ready for how dark or detached

00:12:32.950 --> 00:12:36.110
he was. After the Trump roast, the crowds got

00:12:36.110 --> 00:12:37.850
bigger, sure. But more importantly, they knew

00:12:37.850 --> 00:12:39.330
what they were getting. They came for gentlemen.

00:12:39.570 --> 00:12:41.870
That let him be even more himself on stage. And

00:12:41.870 --> 00:12:44.429
the network noticed that shift, too. Immediately.

00:12:44.909 --> 00:12:46.710
Comedy Central comes back right after the roast

00:12:46.710 --> 00:12:49.330
and offers him this big three point deal. An

00:12:49.330 --> 00:12:52.049
hour special. commitments for three more roasts

00:12:52.049 --> 00:12:54.490
and a development deal for his own show. That's

00:12:54.490 --> 00:12:56.669
huge. That's basically the network saying, OK,

00:12:57.029 --> 00:12:59.309
we're investing in this specific polarizing thing

00:12:59.309 --> 00:13:03.009
you do. Exactly. It was strategic validation,

00:13:03.789 --> 00:13:06.769
proof that his gamble, leaving Fallon sticking

00:13:06.769 --> 00:13:10.610
to his guns, had worked. And he delivered on

00:13:10.610 --> 00:13:14.240
those roasts, too. Charlie Sheen in 2011, Roseanne

00:13:14.240 --> 00:13:16.679
Barr in 2012. They were just one -offs. They

00:13:16.679 --> 00:13:18.820
were the engine that solidified his transition

00:13:18.820 --> 00:13:21.899
from being a writer who performed to being the

00:13:21.899 --> 00:13:24.399
performer, Anthony Jeselnik. So that development

00:13:24.399 --> 00:13:26.980
deal leads directly to the Jeselnik Offensive.

00:13:27.320 --> 00:13:30.639
His own show on Comedy Central 2013 ran for two

00:13:30.639 --> 00:13:33.960
seasons, 18 episodes, and he was creator, writer,

00:13:34.299 --> 00:13:36.809
executive producer, host. The whole package.

00:13:36.889 --> 00:13:38.889
Full creative control, which was obviously crucial

00:13:38.889 --> 00:13:40.870
for him after the Fallon experience. What was

00:13:40.870 --> 00:13:43.269
the initial idea behind the show? Was it always

00:13:43.269 --> 00:13:45.570
meant to be his specific kind of thing? Well,

00:13:45.610 --> 00:13:47.649
the context is interesting. Comedy Central was

00:13:47.649 --> 00:13:49.330
actually looking for something to potentially

00:13:49.330 --> 00:13:51.769
follow the Colbert Report. They initially thought

00:13:51.769 --> 00:13:53.990
about maybe a four nights a week show, something

00:13:53.990 --> 00:13:56.669
called Midnight, but Jeselnik had a much clearer,

00:13:56.929 --> 00:13:59.710
maybe more defensive vision. His main drive,

00:13:59.730 --> 00:14:02.289
shaped by being shut down at Fallon, was just

00:14:02.289 --> 00:14:04.539
to have a platform for his monologue. A place

00:14:04.539 --> 00:14:06.919
where he could finally tell all those dark jokes

00:14:06.919 --> 00:14:10.100
that network TV wouldn't touch. So he didn't

00:14:10.100 --> 00:14:12.299
want the typical late night format. Interviews,

00:14:12.440 --> 00:14:15.159
sketches. He actively pushed back against it.

00:14:15.440 --> 00:14:17.440
They apparently did a test interview with a celebrity

00:14:17.440 --> 00:14:20.639
for the pilot and he hated it. Said it felt so

00:14:20.639 --> 00:14:23.600
wrong. It just fit me like a bad suit. He knew

00:14:23.600 --> 00:14:26.000
his strength was the crafted joke, not chit chat.

00:14:26.500 --> 00:14:28.860
The show was built around the writing. Which

00:14:28.860 --> 00:14:31.340
brings us to maybe the most talked about moment

00:14:31.340 --> 00:14:35.279
of that show. The cancer segment. Ah, yes. The

00:14:35.279 --> 00:14:37.139
cancer support group segment. Which you wanted

00:14:37.139 --> 00:14:39.379
to put in the first episode. Right. Talk about

00:14:39.379 --> 00:14:42.019
a statement of intent. This was basically the

00:14:42.019 --> 00:14:44.019
ultimate test of his whole comedic philosophy,

00:14:44.059 --> 00:14:46.860
wasn't it? If the joke structure justifies the

00:14:46.860 --> 00:14:49.440
darkness, then doing cancer jokes for cancer

00:14:49.440 --> 00:14:51.740
survivors and leading your series with that,

00:14:51.960 --> 00:14:53.700
I mean, that's throwing down the gauntlet. It's

00:14:53.700 --> 00:14:57.240
basically asking, can pure intentional darkness

00:14:57.240 --> 00:15:00.480
work as intellectual performance art? Exactly.

00:15:00.700 --> 00:15:04.370
And the network. understandably freaked out a

00:15:04.370 --> 00:15:06.690
bit. I bet. He said he had to really fight with

00:15:06.690 --> 00:15:08.850
Comedy Central to put that on the first episode.

00:15:09.509 --> 00:15:11.690
They were worried, you know, that it was just

00:15:11.690 --> 00:15:13.429
too much too soon, it would turn off too many

00:15:13.429 --> 00:15:15.750
people right out of the gate. They wanted to

00:15:15.750 --> 00:15:18.250
like gradually introduce the darkness. But he

00:15:18.250 --> 00:15:21.129
argued against that. Brilliantly, apparently.

00:15:21.909 --> 00:15:25.200
He used comedy history as his defense. He pointed

00:15:25.200 --> 00:15:27.840
to the premiere of Chappelle's show, specifically,

00:15:28.080 --> 00:15:30.840
that really provocative sketch with Clayton Bigsby,

00:15:31.019 --> 00:15:34.679
the blind white supremacist. Ah, okay. Bold comparison.

00:15:34.779 --> 00:15:38.080
His argument was, look, if your show is gonna

00:15:38.080 --> 00:15:40.240
be edgy, if it's gonna push boundaries constantly,

00:15:40.500 --> 00:15:42.299
you have to signal that immediately. You have

00:15:42.299 --> 00:15:44.440
to establish the rules or the lack of rules right

00:15:44.440 --> 00:15:47.080
from the start. And it worked. It worked. The

00:15:47.080 --> 00:15:49.559
sketch opened the first episode, got a lot of

00:15:49.559 --> 00:15:51.919
positive critical buzz, actually. Even got a

00:15:51.919 --> 00:15:55.179
call. from Jay Leno, of all people, praising

00:15:55.179 --> 00:15:57.940
the segment, its bravery, its execution. It really

00:15:57.940 --> 00:16:00.720
cemented his reputation. This guy understands

00:16:00.720 --> 00:16:02.919
the line perfectly, which is exactly why he could

00:16:02.919 --> 00:16:05.279
step over it so deliberately. So while all this

00:16:05.279 --> 00:16:06.779
is happening with the show, he's still doing

00:16:06.779 --> 00:16:09.100
standup specials, too. Oh, yeah. Released his

00:16:09.100 --> 00:16:12.080
second one, Caligula, in 2013. Again, that title

00:16:12.080 --> 00:16:15.340
invoking Roman excess and cruelty. It's all part

00:16:15.340 --> 00:16:18.220
of the package. Yeah. And then by 2015, his profile

00:16:18.220 --> 00:16:20.929
is high enough that NBC taps him. to host Last

00:16:20.929 --> 00:16:23.049
Comic Standing for a season. Which is interesting

00:16:23.049 --> 00:16:25.250
because that's a pretty mainstream gig. Right.

00:16:25.549 --> 00:16:27.639
It showed he could do the broader... hosting

00:16:27.639 --> 00:16:30.379
thing competently. It proved the dark persona

00:16:30.379 --> 00:16:33.259
was a strategic choice, not like the only tool

00:16:33.259 --> 00:16:36.139
he had. OK. So after navigating network TV, the

00:16:36.139 --> 00:16:38.639
next logical step seems to be streaming. Netflix,

00:16:38.820 --> 00:16:40.500
right? Where you can really control the final

00:16:40.500 --> 00:16:42.580
product, no commercial breaks, fewer content

00:16:42.580 --> 00:16:44.620
restrictions. Yes. Netflix became the perfect

00:16:44.620 --> 00:16:47.279
home for his style. Yeah. Longer specials, totally

00:16:47.279 --> 00:16:50.360
uncensored. And his output there has been pretty

00:16:50.360 --> 00:16:51.659
steady. He started with Thoughts and Prayers

00:16:51.659 --> 00:16:55.049
in 2015. Critically acclaimed, but also Different

00:16:55.049 --> 00:16:57.190
for him, structurally. How so? What changed?

00:16:57.909 --> 00:17:00.690
Well, the first chunk, maybe 40 minutes, it's

00:17:00.690 --> 00:17:04.269
classic Jeselnik. Pure, cold, precision -engineered,

00:17:04.329 --> 00:17:07.750
dark jokes. One -liners like daggers. But then,

00:17:07.809 --> 00:17:10.890
the last 20 minutes or so, he pivots. He starts

00:17:10.890 --> 00:17:13.529
telling these personal stories, anecdotes. Some

00:17:13.529 --> 00:17:15.710
of them pretty vulnerable, actually. Really?

00:17:16.009 --> 00:17:18.190
That seems like a big shift away from the detached

00:17:18.190 --> 00:17:21.750
persona. It was huge. Because it kind of humanized

00:17:21.750 --> 00:17:24.650
the monster. He didn't drop the darkness entirely,

00:17:25.130 --> 00:17:27.549
but he gave the audience a peek behind the curtain.

00:17:28.170 --> 00:17:30.349
He talked about his grandmother's funeral, his

00:17:30.349 --> 00:17:32.690
reaction to the Boston Marathon bombing, getting

00:17:32.690 --> 00:17:35.210
the Jeselnik offensive canceled, even the death

00:17:35.210 --> 00:17:37.789
threats he gets. So why do that? Why add that

00:17:37.789 --> 00:17:41.240
personal layer? I think strategically, it grounds

00:17:41.240 --> 00:17:44.839
the preceding darkness. It suggests, maybe, that

00:17:44.839 --> 00:17:47.779
the source material for all that calculated amorality

00:17:47.779 --> 00:17:51.460
actually comes from grappling with real messy

00:17:51.460 --> 00:17:54.359
human stuff. The detachment becomes the coping

00:17:54.359 --> 00:17:57.079
mechanism, the armor. It added this necessary

00:17:57.079 --> 00:17:59.539
depth to what could have seemed like just a two

00:17:59.539 --> 00:18:01.339
-dimensional villain character. That makes sense.

00:18:01.420 --> 00:18:02.980
And he's kept putting out specials on Netflix

00:18:02.980 --> 00:18:06.039
since then. Yep. Fire in the maternity ward in

00:18:06.039 --> 00:18:08.380
2019, and then Bones and All just came out recently,

00:18:08.500 --> 00:18:11.599
end of November 2024. These specials really show

00:18:11.599 --> 00:18:13.940
him sticking to his guns, refining that unique

00:18:13.940 --> 00:18:16.400
joke architecture, even as the cultural landscape

00:18:16.400 --> 00:18:18.720
around comedy keeps shifting. Now, parallel to

00:18:18.720 --> 00:18:20.740
the stand -up, he's had this other massive success,

00:18:20.880 --> 00:18:24.319
right? The podcast. JRVP. Yeah. The Jessalynick

00:18:24.319 --> 00:18:27.400
and Rosenthal Vanity Project. And strategically,

00:18:27.539 --> 00:18:29.519
the podcast is brilliant because it's the complete

00:18:29.519 --> 00:18:32.279
opposite of the stage persona. How did that start?

00:18:32.380 --> 00:18:35.599
It actually began back in 2015 on NFL .com, believe

00:18:35.599 --> 00:18:37.740
it or not. It was RJVP then, the Rosenthal and

00:18:37.740 --> 00:18:39.920
Jessalyn McVanity Project, with his old college

00:18:39.920 --> 00:18:42.319
buddy from Tulane, Greg Rosenthal. So it had

00:18:42.319 --> 00:18:44.660
this sports anchor initially. But the podcast

00:18:44.660 --> 00:18:48.119
is like this release valve. On stage, he's the

00:18:48.119 --> 00:18:50.799
controlled cold villain. On the podcast, he's

00:18:50.799 --> 00:18:53.660
just Anthony. witty, smart, but conversational,

00:18:53.740 --> 00:18:56.660
arguing about sports, news, whatever, with Rosenthal

00:18:56.660 --> 00:18:58.819
and their producer, Erica Tamposi. So when he

00:18:58.819 --> 00:19:00.440
signed that deal with Comedy Central again in

00:19:00.440 --> 00:19:02.799
2018, the podcast came back with him. Yeah, they

00:19:02.799 --> 00:19:04.720
brought it back under the slightly flipped name,

00:19:04.859 --> 00:19:08.119
JRVP, and it's been huge. I mean, hundreds of

00:19:08.119 --> 00:19:10.599
episodes now, over 240 as of earlier this year.

00:19:10.640 --> 00:19:14.359
Wow. And that weekly relaxed format. lets him

00:19:14.359 --> 00:19:16.799
show off his actual personality, his intelligence,

00:19:17.220 --> 00:19:20.420
his humor, without the amoral shield. Which,

00:19:20.619 --> 00:19:23.480
in a way, makes the stage persona seem even more

00:19:23.480 --> 00:19:25.480
like a deliberate, crafted performance when he

00:19:25.480 --> 00:19:27.440
puts it back on. He also did that interview show,

00:19:27.480 --> 00:19:29.960
Good Talk. Right, Good Talk, with Anthony Jesonleik

00:19:29.960 --> 00:19:32.259
in 2019. Six episodes where he interviewed other

00:19:32.259 --> 00:19:35.380
comedians. Using his platform to talk craft,

00:19:35.680 --> 00:19:37.799
which also kind of reinforces his position as

00:19:37.799 --> 00:19:40.359
a comedian's comedian, someone deeply invested

00:19:40.359 --> 00:19:42.099
in the mechanics of joke -telling. So when you

00:19:42.099 --> 00:19:44.430
look at it all together, rigid specials, the

00:19:44.430 --> 00:19:47.369
confrontational TV show, the loose podcast. It's

00:19:47.369 --> 00:19:50.470
like different facets of a very carefully managed

00:19:50.470 --> 00:19:52.490
intellectual brand. I think that's a great way

00:19:52.490 --> 00:19:54.950
to put it. It's sophisticated compartmentalization.

00:19:55.190 --> 00:19:57.950
He keeps the ruthless writer persona separate

00:19:57.950 --> 00:20:02.289
from but also complementary to the engaging conversational

00:20:02.289 --> 00:20:05.450
guy. Hashtag outro. So looking back at this whole

00:20:05.450 --> 00:20:08.599
arc. Going from wanting to write the great American

00:20:08.599 --> 00:20:11.119
novel to becoming, you know, maybe the great

00:20:11.119 --> 00:20:14.000
American dark comedian. It really feels like

00:20:14.000 --> 00:20:16.200
a master class in applying literary discipline

00:20:16.200 --> 00:20:19.160
to stand up. Taking that love of precise language

00:20:19.160 --> 00:20:21.660
and aiming it at the most uncomfortable subjects

00:20:21.660 --> 00:20:24.440
imaginable. Yeah, and understanding crucially

00:20:24.440 --> 00:20:26.859
that the structure itself would be his shield.

00:20:27.210 --> 00:20:29.690
So the big takeaway then for you listening is

00:20:29.690 --> 00:20:31.829
probably that Juzelnik's success really comes

00:20:31.829 --> 00:20:34.809
down to this incredibly disciplined, almost stubborn

00:20:34.809 --> 00:20:38.410
commitment to that specific persona. Absolutely.

00:20:39.109 --> 00:20:41.250
He walked away from the Fallon dream job. He

00:20:41.250 --> 00:20:43.269
fought the network over that cancer segment on

00:20:43.269 --> 00:20:46.029
the offensive because he knew instinctively that

00:20:46.029 --> 00:20:47.970
if he compromised the persona, if he softened

00:20:47.970 --> 00:20:50.069
the edges, the whole thing that calculated cruelty

00:20:50.069 --> 00:20:52.789
that defines his act would just fall apart. That

00:20:52.789 --> 00:20:55.250
commitment is the brand. And yet... Underneath

00:20:55.250 --> 00:20:58.470
the totally detached amoral presentation, we've

00:20:58.470 --> 00:21:01.250
seen the real world anchors, right? The Catholic

00:21:01.250 --> 00:21:03.710
upbringing he pushes against, the long friendship

00:21:03.710 --> 00:21:05.710
with Greg Rosenthal, his relationship with Amy

00:21:05.710 --> 00:21:09.490
Schumer, the subject matter itself, death, religion,

00:21:09.769 --> 00:21:12.049
family. It's all deeply human stuff just delivered

00:21:12.049 --> 00:21:15.289
with that cold, writerly precision. Which brings

00:21:15.289 --> 00:21:17.250
us to maybe a final thought to leave you with.

00:21:17.670 --> 00:21:20.869
His style is all about these super tight, structured

00:21:20.869 --> 00:21:24.150
jokes, often short. punchlines built on these

00:21:24.150 --> 00:21:27.170
amoral, sometimes shocking ideas. So in today's

00:21:27.170 --> 00:21:29.089
world, where sensitivity levels are arguably

00:21:29.089 --> 00:21:31.190
higher, where certain subjects instantly cause

00:21:31.190 --> 00:21:35.289
outrage, does the craft involved, does the obvious

00:21:35.289 --> 00:21:37.450
intelligence and effort poured into constructing

00:21:37.450 --> 00:21:40.069
that joke, the phrasing, the timing, the structure,

00:21:40.589 --> 00:21:42.750
does that meticulous construction itself act

00:21:42.750 --> 00:21:45.599
as a kind of moral defense? regardless of how

00:21:45.599 --> 00:21:47.640
dark the subject is. Is the architecture the

00:21:47.640 --> 00:21:49.680
justification? Yeah, is the sheer quality of

00:21:49.680 --> 00:21:52.380
the build enough to justify the darkness it contains?

00:21:53.140 --> 00:21:54.680
Something to chew on next time you hear a joke

00:21:54.680 --> 00:21:56.640
that makes you laugh. Maybe makes you wince a

00:21:56.640 --> 00:21:57.039
little bit too.
