WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:01.720
Have you ever noticed how some actors, they just

00:00:01.720 --> 00:00:05.160
have this distinct energy? Like, you know who

00:00:05.160 --> 00:00:07.259
it is instantly, even if the role is totally

00:00:07.259 --> 00:00:09.119
different from the last thing you saw them in.

00:00:09.339 --> 00:00:12.080
It's not just the face, it's this unpredictable

00:00:12.080 --> 00:00:15.039
spark, that kind of, you know, ginseng. They're

00:00:15.039 --> 00:00:18.079
like chameleons, always adapting, but always

00:00:18.079 --> 00:00:20.260
them. Well, today we're taking a deep dive into

00:00:20.260 --> 00:00:22.640
one of those talents, the fascinating career,

00:00:22.760 --> 00:00:26.219
the vibrant life of Parker Christian Posey. And

00:00:26.219 --> 00:00:28.140
yeah, right from the start, she got that famous

00:00:28.140 --> 00:00:31.559
nickname, Queen of the Indies. It's huge, right?

00:00:31.899 --> 00:00:33.939
To find her public image. But as we're going

00:00:33.939 --> 00:00:35.600
to find out, it was kind of complicated too.

00:00:35.659 --> 00:00:37.939
Sometimes it held her back. So yeah, let's really

00:00:37.939 --> 00:00:40.469
unpack this story. Our mission today basically

00:00:40.469 --> 00:00:42.950
is to explore how Parker Posey carved out this

00:00:42.950 --> 00:00:45.130
amazing niche in independent film, right? But

00:00:45.130 --> 00:00:47.549
then how she navigated moving into bigger studio

00:00:47.549 --> 00:00:50.609
movies and TV, and crucially, how she kept that

00:00:50.609 --> 00:00:53.030
unique, often kind of eccentric acting style

00:00:53.030 --> 00:00:55.229
going through it all. She's become, I mean, one

00:00:55.229 --> 00:00:56.829
of the most beloved character actors out there,

00:00:57.009 --> 00:00:58.869
instantly recognizable. We'll be digging into

00:00:58.869 --> 00:01:01.789
a whole overview of her life, her career, looking

00:01:01.789 --> 00:01:04.109
for those key moments, those surprising facts,

00:01:04.290 --> 00:01:06.689
the bold choices really that shaped her path.

00:01:06.840 --> 00:01:08.799
Yeah, and what's really fascinating, I think,

00:01:09.180 --> 00:01:12.400
is how those early experiences, the choices she

00:01:12.400 --> 00:01:14.439
made back then, they really set the stage for

00:01:14.439 --> 00:01:16.159
everything else. It wasn't just about talent,

00:01:16.219 --> 00:01:18.340
though obviously she has tons of that. It was

00:01:18.340 --> 00:01:21.280
these specific, sometimes pretty unconventional

00:01:21.280 --> 00:01:23.599
choices she made that set her apart. And that's

00:01:23.599 --> 00:01:25.620
what let her kind of bridge these different worlds

00:01:25.620 --> 00:01:27.980
in Hollywood, you know, the indie scene, the

00:01:27.980 --> 00:01:30.760
big studios. It's almost like a roadmap for creating

00:01:30.760 --> 00:01:32.879
a unique identity in a field that often wants

00:01:32.879 --> 00:01:35.599
you to fit in. Totally. So get ready for some

00:01:36.939 --> 00:01:39.500
aha moments probably about an actress you've

00:01:39.500 --> 00:01:41.359
definitely seen you probably admired her work

00:01:41.359 --> 00:01:44.420
but her story well it runs a lot deeper it's

00:01:44.420 --> 00:01:47.000
much richer than you might realize let's really

00:01:47.000 --> 00:01:50.260
dig into Parker Posey okay so our journey starts

00:01:50.260 --> 00:01:53.200
in Baltimore Maryland that's where Parker Christian

00:01:53.200 --> 00:01:57.189
Posey was born November 8th 1968 And her name,

00:01:57.650 --> 00:01:59.310
Parker Christian Posey. It's got a bit of flair,

00:01:59.390 --> 00:02:01.590
doesn't it? She was actually named after Susie

00:02:01.590 --> 00:02:04.049
Parker, the famous fashion model. Maybe a little

00:02:04.049 --> 00:02:06.750
hint of a future in the public eye. And fun fact,

00:02:06.870 --> 00:02:09.340
she has a twin brother, Christopher. Her childhood,

00:02:09.360 --> 00:02:11.919
though, was mostly spent down south. After Baltimore,

00:02:12.060 --> 00:02:14.419
the family moved to Monroe, Louisiana. They were

00:02:14.419 --> 00:02:16.599
there for 11 years, a big chunk of her childhood.

00:02:17.120 --> 00:02:19.020
Then they moved again to Laurel, Mississippi,

00:02:19.340 --> 00:02:22.319
her parents, Linda and Chris. Interesting jobs.

00:02:22.780 --> 00:02:25.020
Her mom, Linda, was a chef and later taught culinary

00:02:25.020 --> 00:02:27.580
arts for Viking Range Corporation. Pretty cool.

00:02:28.000 --> 00:02:30.060
And her dad, Chris, owned a car dealership. She

00:02:30.060 --> 00:02:31.759
was raised Catholic too, just another piece of

00:02:31.759 --> 00:02:33.879
the puzzle of her background. But here's something

00:02:33.879 --> 00:02:35.960
that really jumps out, gives you a real window

00:02:35.960 --> 00:02:38.659
into those early years. Parker Posey herself,

00:02:38.879 --> 00:02:42.840
she once said she was born into turbulence. And

00:02:42.840 --> 00:02:45.020
she called her family fabulous southern characters.

00:02:45.219 --> 00:02:46.580
I mean, it's quite a description, right? You'd

00:02:46.580 --> 00:02:49.000
paint a picture of a really lively household,

00:02:49.060 --> 00:02:51.639
maybe a bit theatrical. Oh, absolutely. And that

00:02:51.639 --> 00:02:53.340
immediately makes you wonder, doesn't it? How

00:02:53.340 --> 00:02:55.460
much does that kind of environment, you know,

00:02:55.599 --> 00:02:58.199
a family full of characters, how much does that?

00:02:58.439 --> 00:03:00.740
push someone towards becoming a character actor.

00:03:00.979 --> 00:03:03.060
Her own quote is so telling. I'm a character

00:03:03.060 --> 00:03:05.259
actor because I come from a family of characters.

00:03:05.259 --> 00:03:08.080
It's like right there. It suggests her knack

00:03:08.080 --> 00:03:10.759
for embodying these unique, quirky, memorable

00:03:10.759 --> 00:03:13.740
people isn't just training. It's something deeper,

00:03:13.879 --> 00:03:16.479
rooted in how she grew up, what she saw, who

00:03:16.479 --> 00:03:19.439
she interacted with. Imagine being a kid just

00:03:19.439 --> 00:03:21.919
soaking up all these dynamic personalities all

00:03:21.919 --> 00:03:23.780
the time. It could have really sharpened her

00:03:23.780 --> 00:03:25.879
observation skills, made her comfortable with

00:03:25.879 --> 00:03:28.099
eccentricity, maybe even gave her that amazing

00:03:28.099 --> 00:03:30.960
comedic timing super early on, a real foundation

00:03:30.960 --> 00:03:33.139
for her performances. That's a really powerful

00:03:33.139 --> 00:03:35.580
link, yeah. It makes you think about how our

00:03:35.580 --> 00:03:38.259
personal history really can foreshadow what we

00:03:38.259 --> 00:03:40.020
end up doing, sometimes in ways we don't see

00:03:40.020 --> 00:03:43.080
till later. And speaking of callings, it seems

00:03:43.080 --> 00:03:45.840
like performing was in her blood early on. As

00:03:45.840 --> 00:03:48.039
a kid, she loved being in the spotlight, performing.

00:03:48.460 --> 00:03:50.699
She even went to Strong River Camp and Farm in

00:03:50.699 --> 00:03:53.360
Panola, Mississippi. Sounds kind of perfect for

00:03:53.360 --> 00:03:56.180
fostering creativity. She also trained seriously

00:03:56.180 --> 00:03:58.639
in ballet. Travels for summer programs at the

00:03:58.639 --> 00:04:00.219
University of North Carolina School of the Arts,

00:04:00.280 --> 00:04:04.000
which is a big deal. That kind of intense training

00:04:04.000 --> 00:04:06.400
and something so demanding, especially young,

00:04:06.900 --> 00:04:08.919
it says a lot about her drive, her commitment,

00:04:09.060 --> 00:04:11.219
her work ethic. Things you definitely need in

00:04:11.219 --> 00:04:13.879
acting too. Okay, now this next part, this is

00:04:13.879 --> 00:04:15.979
a real what if moment, a major turning point.

00:04:16.360 --> 00:04:18.079
When she was just 12, she auditioned for the

00:04:18.079 --> 00:04:20.439
super competitive ballet department there. She

00:04:20.439 --> 00:04:22.839
didn't get in, she wasn't accepted. Huge moment

00:04:22.839 --> 00:04:26.110
of redirection, right? But her dad sounds like

00:04:26.110 --> 00:04:28.589
he had some good insight, saw her talent, maybe

00:04:28.589 --> 00:04:30.589
sensed another path for her. He encouraged her

00:04:30.589 --> 00:04:33.569
to try acting instead. And obviously, that advice?

00:04:33.879 --> 00:04:35.980
maybe coming after what felt like a setback,

00:04:36.199 --> 00:04:38.360
it just completely changed her life's direction.

00:04:38.899 --> 00:04:40.740
Steered her away from ballet, straight towards

00:04:40.740 --> 00:04:42.800
the stage and screen. It's like rejection, opening

00:04:42.800 --> 00:04:45.420
the door to destiny, you know? Exactly. That

00:04:45.420 --> 00:04:47.980
single moment, that rejection, followed by her

00:04:47.980 --> 00:04:50.180
dad's advice, it absolutely set her on the path

00:04:50.180 --> 00:04:52.839
that defined her career. It really highlights

00:04:52.839 --> 00:04:55.300
how random almost career paths can be, especially

00:04:55.300 --> 00:04:57.620
in the arts. You know, people often find their

00:04:57.620 --> 00:04:59.420
true calling through redirection, not just a

00:04:59.420 --> 00:05:02.160
straight line. But that discipline from ballet,

00:05:02.240 --> 00:05:04.939
that wasn't wasted. The rigor, the physical awareness,

00:05:05.060 --> 00:05:06.660
the attention to detail, that almost certainly

00:05:06.660 --> 00:05:08.779
transferred right into acting. Super valuable

00:05:08.779 --> 00:05:11.399
skills. Absolutely. You can see how that foundational

00:05:11.399 --> 00:05:14.259
training would shape her as an artist, even if

00:05:14.259 --> 00:05:16.720
it wasn't acting school per se. So with that

00:05:16.720 --> 00:05:19.680
push from her dad, she pivoted to acting. Went

00:05:19.680 --> 00:05:23.220
to study drama at SUNY Purchase, State University

00:05:23.220 --> 00:05:25.519
of New York at Purchase. Had a well -respected

00:05:25.519 --> 00:05:28.360
program, known for churning out talent. And while

00:05:28.360 --> 00:05:30.639
she was still studying, a talent agent saw her

00:05:30.639 --> 00:05:33.490
in a play. Spotted her potential. That was the

00:05:33.490 --> 00:05:35.649
big break. Signed her immediately, and suddenly

00:05:35.649 --> 00:05:38.350
she's getting auditions for indie films, off

00:05:38.350 --> 00:05:40.370
-Broadway stuff. Her entry into the professional

00:05:40.370 --> 00:05:43.149
world was like bam. Super fast, kind of dramatic.

00:05:43.389 --> 00:05:45.189
She actually dropped out of college less than

00:05:45.189 --> 00:05:46.730
three weeks before she was supposed to graduate.

00:05:46.970 --> 00:05:49.529
Why? Because she landed her first professional

00:05:49.529 --> 00:05:52.009
acting gig. An eight -episode role as Tess Shelby

00:05:52.009 --> 00:05:54.810
on the soap opera, As the World Turns. This was

00:05:54.810 --> 00:05:57.290
1992. Talk about hitting the ground running from

00:05:57.290 --> 00:05:59.600
student to working actor just like that. Yeah,

00:05:59.720 --> 00:06:01.060
and if you look at the bigger picture in the

00:06:01.060 --> 00:06:03.209
industry, it's actually not... that uncommon

00:06:03.209 --> 00:06:05.930
for successful actors to get their start in daytime

00:06:05.930 --> 00:06:09.050
TV. It's like a boot camp. Seriously, you learn

00:06:09.050 --> 00:06:12.189
so much, so fast, memorizing tons of dialogue

00:06:12.189 --> 00:06:14.649
quickly, heading marks, delivering big emotions

00:06:14.649 --> 00:06:17.069
on demand, adapting to constant script changes,

00:06:17.269 --> 00:06:19.529
tight schedules. So that jump from student to

00:06:19.529 --> 00:06:22.089
pro that fast, it really speaks volumes about

00:06:22.089 --> 00:06:24.170
her raw talent, right? And that people saw her

00:06:24.170 --> 00:06:26.329
screen presence immediately. It also kind of

00:06:26.329 --> 00:06:28.769
hints at a practical side, maybe? Willing to

00:06:28.769 --> 00:06:30.629
grab a real career opportunity over finishing

00:06:30.629 --> 00:06:32.560
the degree, a gamble that definitely paid off

00:06:32.560 --> 00:06:34.800
for her. No kidding, she did not waste any time.

00:06:35.180 --> 00:06:36.899
And once she started hitting the big screen,

00:06:37.259 --> 00:06:39.920
things really took off, especially in that whole

00:06:39.920 --> 00:06:42.699
indie film explosion happening in the 90s. Her

00:06:42.699 --> 00:06:45.220
first feature film appearances were in 93. She

00:06:45.220 --> 00:06:47.699
was Stephanie in Coneheads, Irene Kildare in

00:06:47.699 --> 00:06:49.819
Joey Breaker, little glimpses of what she could

00:06:49.819 --> 00:06:52.199
do. But let's be honest, for most people watching

00:06:52.199 --> 00:06:54.180
back then, the big introduction, the one everyone

00:06:54.180 --> 00:06:56.720
remembers, was Richard Linklater's Dazed and

00:06:56.720 --> 00:06:59.959
Confused. Her role is Darla Marks, the senior

00:06:59.959 --> 00:07:02.480
who just loved hazing the freshmen. Unforgettable.

00:07:02.959 --> 00:07:04.620
She totally put herself on the map with that.

00:07:04.819 --> 00:07:06.819
She owned that character, commanded attention

00:07:06.819 --> 00:07:10.660
even in that huge ensemble cast. Classic. Then

00:07:10.660 --> 00:07:13.160
in 1994, she started working with director Hal

00:07:13.160 --> 00:07:15.500
Hartley, which became a really important relationship

00:07:15.500 --> 00:07:17.980
for her indie career. First in his short film,

00:07:18.000 --> 00:07:20.879
opera number one, then his crime comedy amateur.

00:07:21.160 --> 00:07:23.730
She played a girl squatter. Memorable. That same

00:07:23.730 --> 00:07:25.850
year she popped up elsewhere, too. She was a

00:07:25.850 --> 00:07:28.709
rollerblader in Nora Ephron's Mixed Nuts. She

00:07:28.709 --> 00:07:31.089
was in a thriller called Final Combination, played

00:07:31.089 --> 00:07:33.170
Athena in Sleep With Me, just building that resume.

00:07:33.569 --> 00:07:35.149
But the real breakthrough, the one that really

00:07:35.149 --> 00:07:37.569
made her an indie darling, that was 1995 Daisy

00:07:37.569 --> 00:07:40.389
Von Scherler Mayer's Party Girl. She was just

00:07:40.389 --> 00:07:42.649
perfect as this free -spirited New York City

00:07:42.649 --> 00:07:45.410
party girl who has to get serious. The character

00:07:45.410 --> 00:07:47.430
felt like it was written for her. And the film

00:07:47.430 --> 00:07:50.579
itself. Total indie spirit made for like a hundred

00:07:50.579 --> 00:07:54.279
and fifty thousand dollars shot in just 19 days

00:07:54.279 --> 00:07:56.959
Incredible efficiency fueled by passion now.

00:07:57.100 --> 00:07:59.040
Here's a really wild detail about party girl

00:07:59.040 --> 00:08:02.439
often gets missed, but it's huge It wasn't just

00:08:02.439 --> 00:08:04.379
an arthouse hit. It was apparently the first

00:08:04.379 --> 00:08:07.079
feature film ever premiered on the internet Can

00:08:07.079 --> 00:08:09.800
you even imagine? Streaming a movie online back

00:08:09.800 --> 00:08:12.279
then, before Netflix, before broadband was common,

00:08:12.680 --> 00:08:14.339
it was so ahead of its time, pushing boundaries

00:08:14.339 --> 00:08:16.699
when dial -up was still the norm, and Roger Ebert,

00:08:16.800 --> 00:08:18.740
the critic, he totally got her appeal. He called

00:08:18.740 --> 00:08:20.959
it a showcase leading role for Parker Posey.

00:08:21.040 --> 00:08:23.399
who obviously has his stuff, and generates wacky

00:08:23.399 --> 00:08:26.040
charm hyprase. And man was she busy then. The

00:08:26.040 --> 00:08:27.939
mid to late 90s she was just everywhere, showing

00:08:27.939 --> 00:08:30.920
incredible versatility. 1995 alone was packed.

00:08:31.060 --> 00:08:33.360
She played Debbie in Drunks, a recovering alcoholic

00:08:33.360 --> 00:08:35.419
obsessed with Jonas Joplin. Then she was in Hal

00:08:35.419 --> 00:08:37.639
Hartley's flirt. She was the eternal love slave

00:08:37.639 --> 00:08:39.759
in Greg Araki's cult film The Doom Generation.

00:08:40.429 --> 00:08:42.549
Completely different, a serial killer in Frisk.

00:08:42.629 --> 00:08:44.629
Talk about range. And she was also in Noah Baumbach's

00:08:44.629 --> 00:08:46.429
first movie, Kicking and Screaming, as a college

00:08:46.429 --> 00:08:49.230
student. Just an amazing run of diverse roles.

00:08:49.450 --> 00:08:51.610
That period is absolutely critical to understanding

00:08:51.610 --> 00:08:53.590
her, yeah. It wasn't just about getting credits.

00:08:53.629 --> 00:08:56.269
It was about tackling this incredibly diverse,

00:08:56.490 --> 00:08:59.230
often risky, sometimes experimental stuff, all

00:08:59.230 --> 00:09:01.450
within the indie world. Doing all those different

00:09:01.450 --> 00:09:03.929
characters back to back, let her seriously sharpen

00:09:03.929 --> 00:09:06.850
her skills, build this reputation for being unpredictable,

00:09:07.309 --> 00:09:10.639
and develop a really fearless approach. Going

00:09:10.639 --> 00:09:13.159
from vulnerable alcoholic to cold -blooded killer,

00:09:13.320 --> 00:09:16.779
that takes guts. That immersion in unconventional

00:09:16.779 --> 00:09:19.639
roles shaped her unique style, maybe even her

00:09:19.639 --> 00:09:22.080
improv skills, and definitely stopped her from

00:09:22.080 --> 00:09:24.259
getting typecast early on. Became her signature,

00:09:24.580 --> 00:09:26.740
really. Totally. That fearlessness became her

00:09:26.740 --> 00:09:29.240
trademark. And then came another huge collaboration,

00:09:29.980 --> 00:09:32.840
Christopher Guest. She entered his unique mockumentary

00:09:32.840 --> 00:09:36.159
universe with Waiting for Guffman in 1996. Her

00:09:36.159 --> 00:09:38.320
Libby Mae Brown, the super perky Dairy Queen

00:09:38.320 --> 00:09:41.580
employee, hilarious. Memorable. That was the

00:09:41.580 --> 00:09:43.659
start of something really special. Creative partnership

00:09:43.659 --> 00:09:45.860
that gave us some of her absolute best comedic

00:09:45.860 --> 00:09:47.700
work. Oh, yeah, and that whole Christopher Guest

00:09:47.700 --> 00:09:49.159
world. It brings up this really interesting point

00:09:49.159 --> 00:09:51.919
about ensemble acting and improv, right? How

00:09:51.919 --> 00:09:54.799
does that environment foster creativity in a

00:09:54.799 --> 00:09:56.980
way that was clearly perfect for Parker Posey?

00:09:57.139 --> 00:10:00.000
Guest films are so unique. She became part of

00:10:00.000 --> 00:10:02.460
this loose group of actors, his repertory group.

00:10:02.539 --> 00:10:04.940
They improvise a lot, working more from detailed

00:10:04.940 --> 00:10:07.220
backstories than a strict script. And what's

00:10:07.220 --> 00:10:09.659
also fascinating is how they were. Everyone apparently

00:10:09.659 --> 00:10:11.639
gets the same fee, same profit shared, speaks

00:10:11.639 --> 00:10:13.779
to this really collaborative ensemble first spirit.

00:10:14.080 --> 00:10:17.049
It's not about one star. And that unconventional,

00:10:17.330 --> 00:10:19.789
trust -based setup just let her shine. Her comedic

00:10:19.789 --> 00:10:21.470
timing, her quick wit, her knack for creating

00:10:21.470 --> 00:10:23.750
these fully -formed, eccentric characters, totally

00:10:23.750 --> 00:10:26.509
on the fly. It was brilliant. Shows her adaptability

00:10:26.509 --> 00:10:28.750
and improv genius. Yeah, she definitely thrived

00:10:28.750 --> 00:10:30.809
there. And her acclaim in the indie world just

00:10:30.809 --> 00:10:33.990
kept growing. 1996, she was in Linklater Suburbia.

00:10:34.309 --> 00:10:36.070
She played the real -life gallery owner Mary

00:10:36.070 --> 00:10:38.990
Boone in Basquiat, Julian Schnabel's film. And

00:10:38.990 --> 00:10:41.110
she was Jo Malone, the kind of... wonderfully

00:10:41.110 --> 00:10:43.830
apathetic sister in The Day Trippers. Janet Maslin

00:10:43.830 --> 00:10:45.250
of the New York Times called her character the

00:10:45.250 --> 00:10:48.450
apotheosis of Blasey Cool. Perfect description.

00:10:49.169 --> 00:10:52.649
Then, 97, Clock Watchers. Great ensemble cast

00:10:52.649 --> 00:10:55.950
Lisa Kudrow, Toni Collette, Alana Ubach, It was

00:10:55.950 --> 00:10:58.149
called the jewel of a film, and Posey got singled

00:10:58.149 --> 00:10:59.909
out for being winning and humorous as a temp

00:10:59.909 --> 00:11:02.370
worker. And that same year, she got rave reviews

00:11:02.370 --> 00:11:04.649
for the House of Yes, playing that delusional

00:11:04.649 --> 00:11:07.029
woman in love with her brother. Intense stuff.

00:11:07.250 --> 00:11:09.289
Owned Gleiberman at Entertainment Weekly famously

00:11:09.289 --> 00:11:11.830
said, Marker Posey may never have a role that

00:11:11.830 --> 00:11:14.129
suits her as perfectly, and she won a special

00:11:14.129 --> 00:11:16.470
recognition for acting award at Sundance for

00:11:16.470 --> 00:11:18.830
it. It was obvious. She wasn't just an indie

00:11:18.830 --> 00:11:21.190
darling anymore. She was becoming an icon. And

00:11:21.190 --> 00:11:23.009
speaking of icons, it was Time Magazine, also

00:11:23.009 --> 00:11:25.470
in 1997, that officially gave her that nickname.

00:11:25.710 --> 00:11:27.830
Queen of the Indies. It stuck, right, became

00:11:27.830 --> 00:11:30.230
such a defining part of her image. Really captured

00:11:30.230 --> 00:11:32.870
that moment in independent film. So what's that

00:11:32.870 --> 00:11:35.870
like, being crowned like that by a major magazine?

00:11:36.269 --> 00:11:38.370
Sounds great, but as we've kind of hinted, that

00:11:38.370 --> 00:11:40.970
title, it turned out to be a bit complex for

00:11:40.970 --> 00:11:43.940
her career. A double -edged sword. Exactly. It's

00:11:43.940 --> 00:11:46.500
fascinating how these labels work. Posey herself

00:11:46.500 --> 00:11:48.519
talked about this quite a bit, especially later.

00:11:48.860 --> 00:11:51.120
She said the title, while maybe flattering at

00:11:51.120 --> 00:11:53.240
first, actually became a hindrance. She mentioned

00:11:53.240 --> 00:11:56.519
in a 2012 IndieWire interview, getting feedback

00:11:56.519 --> 00:11:58.600
from agents like, oh, she's too much of an indie

00:11:58.600 --> 00:12:00.899
queen for the big studio movie. So it literally

00:12:00.899 --> 00:12:03.720
blocked opportunities. But then the flip side,

00:12:03.740 --> 00:12:06.639
the paradox, was that her name, even with all

00:12:06.639 --> 00:12:08.559
the critical love, apparently couldn't always

00:12:08.559 --> 00:12:11.039
get financing for indie films over a certain

00:12:11.049 --> 00:12:13.990
budget, say over a million dollars, it illustrates

00:12:13.990 --> 00:12:16.570
that classic problem of being pigeonholed. If

00:12:16.570 --> 00:12:19.009
studios see you as too indie, you don't have

00:12:19.009 --> 00:12:21.490
that mainstream bankability they want. But then

00:12:21.490 --> 00:12:23.610
indie producers needing a bit more money, maybe

00:12:23.610 --> 00:12:26.070
in that one five million dollar range, often

00:12:26.070 --> 00:12:28.470
need someone with some studio pull to secure

00:12:28.470 --> 00:12:30.649
distribution. So she was caught in the middle.

00:12:30.860 --> 00:12:33.500
Her quote really nails it. It's really a challenging

00:12:33.500 --> 00:12:35.740
path because I know so much about the indie side

00:12:35.740 --> 00:12:38.159
of the business, but it's different times, and

00:12:38.159 --> 00:12:40.600
this stuff gets projected onto me. She even pointed

00:12:40.600 --> 00:12:42.620
out, like, hey, I haven't done that many indies

00:12:42.620 --> 00:12:44.740
recently. Mentioning Broken English was five

00:12:44.740 --> 00:12:47.000
years prior. You can feel her frustration at

00:12:47.000 --> 00:12:49.860
being misunderstood and stuck in that box. Wow.

00:12:50.220 --> 00:12:52.720
Yeah, that really clarifies how a seemingly positive

00:12:52.720 --> 00:12:55.360
label can create real, practical roadblocks.

00:12:55.519 --> 00:12:58.620
Ouch. But despite those frustrations, she didn't

00:12:58.620 --> 00:13:01.120
just sit back. She very deliberately started

00:13:01.120 --> 00:13:03.379
branching out, moving into major studio films,

00:13:03.519 --> 00:13:05.679
getting into television right around the turn

00:13:05.679 --> 00:13:08.320
of the millennium. Her first really big studio

00:13:08.320 --> 00:13:11.200
movie credit was Nora Ephron's You've Got Mail

00:13:11.200 --> 00:13:14.899
in 1998. Remember that. She played Patricia Eden,

00:13:15.179 --> 00:13:17.440
the kind of abrasive, neurotic publisher. She

00:13:17.440 --> 00:13:19.320
totally held her own with Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan.

00:13:19.639 --> 00:13:22.019
That was a smart move, a big leap from the micro

00:13:22.019 --> 00:13:24.240
-budget indies. And the movie was a huge hit,

00:13:24.279 --> 00:13:26.840
made over $250 million worldwide, put her in

00:13:26.840 --> 00:13:29.059
front of a massive new audience. And she proved

00:13:29.059 --> 00:13:30.960
she could bring that unique humor and edge to

00:13:30.960 --> 00:13:33.600
a mainstream rom -com and still stand out. Late

00:13:33.600 --> 00:13:36.080
90s, she was also in Hal Hartley's Henry Fool,

00:13:36.240 --> 00:13:38.019
as Faye Grimm will come back to her. She did

00:13:38.019 --> 00:13:39.759
a comedy, What Rats Won't Do, played the lead

00:13:39.759 --> 00:13:41.870
in The Misadventures of Margaret. And she was

00:13:41.870 --> 00:13:43.870
in The Venice Project with Dennis Hopper and

00:13:43.870 --> 00:13:45.789
Lauren Bacall, just showing up at different kinds

00:13:45.789 --> 00:13:48.250
of productions. Moving into the 2000s, her career

00:13:48.250 --> 00:13:49.970
really became this incredible balancing act.

00:13:50.149 --> 00:13:52.049
She kept up those amazing collaborations with

00:13:52.049 --> 00:13:54.409
Christopher Guest. People loved those mockumentaries.

00:13:54.789 --> 00:13:58.090
2000, best in show. Her Meg Swan, the super anxious

00:13:58.090 --> 00:14:00.690
yuppie with the Weimaraner. Hilarious. The film's

00:14:00.690 --> 00:14:03.470
still beloved, like 93 % on Rot Tomatoes. Her

00:14:03.470 --> 00:14:05.490
character, with the perfect hair and the dog

00:14:05.490 --> 00:14:08.429
obsession, was just comedic gold. Then a mighty

00:14:08.429 --> 00:14:11.870
wind in 2003, she played Sissy Knox, former juvenile

00:14:11.870 --> 00:14:14.169
delinquent turned folk singer. Had that deadpan

00:14:14.169 --> 00:14:15.950
humor, but also some real heart. And get this,

00:14:15.950 --> 00:14:18.090
she actually learned to play the mandolin for

00:14:18.090 --> 00:14:20.769
the role. And sang her own parts. That's dedication.

00:14:21.269 --> 00:14:23.169
The whole cast won best cast from the Florida

00:14:23.169 --> 00:14:25.330
Film Critics Circle. They were amazing together.

00:14:25.889 --> 00:14:28.269
And she did one more with Guest in 2006 for Your

00:14:28.269 --> 00:14:30.370
Consideration, playing Callie Webb, an actress

00:14:30.370 --> 00:14:32.629
caught up in Oscar buzz madness. But outside

00:14:32.629 --> 00:14:34.429
the Guest movies, she was really mixing it up,

00:14:34.450 --> 00:14:36.250
genre -wise, showing she could do anything. In

00:14:36.250 --> 00:14:38.750
2000, she was in Scream 3, played Jennifer Jolie,

00:14:38.850 --> 00:14:40.850
the actress playing Gail Weathers in the Stab

00:14:40.850 --> 00:14:43.009
movies. She brought this great medic comedy vibe

00:14:43.009 --> 00:14:45.690
to it, got great reviews, even an MTV Movie Award

00:14:45.690 --> 00:14:48.009
nomination for best comedic performance. And

00:14:48.009 --> 00:14:51.509
the movie made bank $161 million globally. Next

00:14:51.509 --> 00:14:54.379
year, 2001, she played Fiona. the over -the -top

00:14:54.379 --> 00:14:56.879
villainous record exec and Josie and the Pussycats.

00:14:57.240 --> 00:14:59.139
That movie kind of bombed at first, but it totally

00:14:59.139 --> 00:15:01.360
became a cult classic later. People love its

00:15:01.360 --> 00:15:03.559
satire, and Posey's villain is a huge part of

00:15:03.559 --> 00:15:05.940
that. Then, 2004, she jumped into action horror

00:15:05.940 --> 00:15:09.600
with Blade, Trinity. Played Dana Catalos, a badass

00:15:09.600 --> 00:15:12.100
vampire leader, alongside Wesley Snipes, Ryan

00:15:12.100 --> 00:15:15.820
Reynolds, Jessica Biel, made $132 million worldwide.

00:15:16.059 --> 00:15:17.899
She could definitely handle genre stuff. But

00:15:17.899 --> 00:15:19.940
probably her biggest studio role that decade,

00:15:20.039 --> 00:15:23.139
scale -wise, was Superman Returns in 2006, directed

00:15:23.139 --> 00:15:25.379
by Bryan Singer. She played Kitty Kowalski, Lex

00:15:25.379 --> 00:15:27.639
Luthor's kind of ditzy sidekick. It was a deliberate

00:15:27.639 --> 00:15:29.600
callback to Eve Teschmacher from the original

00:15:29.600 --> 00:15:32.120
1978 Superman. She brought this great quirky

00:15:32.120 --> 00:15:34.399
classic henchwoman energy to it. And what's really

00:15:34.399 --> 00:15:36.200
fascinating there, it tells you so much about

00:15:36.200 --> 00:15:39.059
her unique appeal, is that director Bryan Singer

00:15:39.059 --> 00:15:41.799
apparently said Parker Posey was the only actress

00:15:41.799 --> 00:15:44.379
he considered for Kitty Kowalski. Think about

00:15:44.379 --> 00:15:46.639
that. It just highlights her unmatched ability

00:15:46.639 --> 00:15:49.179
to embody these quirky, memorable characters,

00:15:49.440 --> 00:15:52.399
even in a giant blockbuster. It wasn't just comedy,

00:15:52.539 --> 00:15:54.679
it was that specific Parker posiness he wanted.

00:15:55.100 --> 00:15:57.259
Her unique persona, the one she built in indie

00:15:57.259 --> 00:15:59.879
films, was seen as this huge asset that could

00:15:59.879 --> 00:16:02.419
work in a huge franchise, bringing that charm,

00:16:02.519 --> 00:16:04.759
that ironic humor, that surprising depth no one

00:16:04.759 --> 00:16:06.940
else could do it quite like her. It showed she

00:16:06.940 --> 00:16:09.159
could elevate even a supporting role into something

00:16:09.159 --> 00:16:11.700
special. Wow, the only choice. That's amazing

00:16:11.700 --> 00:16:13.879
for a role that big. And yeah, Superman Returns

00:16:13.879 --> 00:16:17.039
was massive, budget over $200 million. grossed

00:16:17.039 --> 00:16:19.980
$391 million worldwide, still her highest -grossing

00:16:19.980 --> 00:16:22.659
film, and she got a Saturn Award nomination for

00:16:22.659 --> 00:16:25.299
Best Supporting Actress for it, too. Well -deserved.

00:16:25.720 --> 00:16:28.620
But her versatility wasn't just film. The 2000s

00:16:28.620 --> 00:16:31.379
were big for her on stage and TV, too, showed

00:16:31.379 --> 00:16:33.500
she could handle different mediums. She made

00:16:33.500 --> 00:16:36.139
her Broadway debut in 2001. Elaine Mays played

00:16:36.139 --> 00:16:38.519
taller than a dwarf, showing off those theater

00:16:38.519 --> 00:16:41.679
chops. She did voice work, too. memorable characters

00:16:41.679 --> 00:16:44.440
on Futurama, Umbriel, and The Simpsons, Becky,

00:16:44.860 --> 00:16:47.620
around 2000 -2001, and she guest starred on Will

00:16:47.620 --> 00:16:50.440
and Grace as Darlene. That was a huge show. Plus,

00:16:50.519 --> 00:16:53.200
in 2002, she got a Golden Globe nomination, Best

00:16:53.200 --> 00:16:55.440
Supporting Actress for the TV movie Hell on Heels,

00:16:55.779 --> 00:16:58.240
The Battle of Mary Kay. She played the ambitious

00:16:58.240 --> 00:17:00.220
rival. That's a crazy range right there. Comedy,

00:17:00.279 --> 00:17:02.720
drama, animation, Broadway. And even with all

00:17:02.720 --> 00:17:04.359
these bigger projects, she definitely didn't

00:17:04.359 --> 00:17:06.500
ditch her indie roots. She kept finding and doing

00:17:06.500 --> 00:17:08.319
acclaimed independent films all through the early

00:17:08.319 --> 00:17:11.819
2000s, stayed loyal to that world. 2002, she

00:17:11.819 --> 00:17:14.400
was Judy Webb, a terrified bride and the sweetest

00:17:14.400 --> 00:17:16.460
thing. Roger Ebert wasn't wild about the movie,

00:17:16.779 --> 00:17:19.220
but he specifically called her performance invaluable.

00:17:19.859 --> 00:17:22.500
She could shine anywhere. Same year, she was

00:17:22.500 --> 00:17:25.160
fantastic as Greta in Rebecca Miller's personal

00:17:25.160 --> 00:17:28.160
velocity. Three portraits about women escaping

00:17:28.160 --> 00:17:31.099
tough lives. Really powerful stuff. Got nominated

00:17:31.099 --> 00:17:32.880
for best female lead at the Independent Spirit

00:17:32.880 --> 00:17:35.059
Awards for that and was runner up for best supporting

00:17:35.059 --> 00:17:36.859
actress from the New York Film Critics Circle.

00:17:37.240 --> 00:17:40.279
Major critical love. 2003, she was in the event

00:17:40.279 --> 00:17:42.819
playing an assistant DA. More serious drama.

00:17:43.609 --> 00:17:46.410
2005, Adam and Steve, she played Rhonda, an unfunny

00:17:46.410 --> 00:17:48.869
stand -up comic friend. The director, Craig Chester,

00:17:49.210 --> 00:17:51.369
compared her to Bette Davis, praised her passion,

00:17:51.470 --> 00:17:53.829
her high standards. That's intense praise. She

00:17:53.829 --> 00:17:56.269
also did David Rabe's play Hurly Burly off Broadway

00:17:56.269 --> 00:17:59.970
that year. Then 2006, Hal Hartley's Faye Grimm.

00:18:00.710 --> 00:18:02.769
She reprised her character from Henry Foole.

00:18:03.069 --> 00:18:04.809
And here's what's cool. Hartley was apparently

00:18:04.809 --> 00:18:06.690
so impressed by her in the first film, even in

00:18:06.690 --> 00:18:09.130
a smaller role, that he wrote the sequel specifically

00:18:09.130 --> 00:18:11.730
for her, focusing the whole story on Faye. That

00:18:11.730 --> 00:18:14.130
says a lot about her impact. In 2007, Broken

00:18:14.130 --> 00:18:16.430
English directed by Zoe Cassavetes. She starred

00:18:16.430 --> 00:18:18.609
as Nora Wilder, single career woman in New York.

00:18:18.809 --> 00:18:21.369
Screened at Sundance, Moscow Film Festival. Got

00:18:21.369 --> 00:18:23.509
another best female lead nomination at the Spirit

00:18:23.509 --> 00:18:26.430
Awards. Still totally relevant in the indie scene.

00:18:27.289 --> 00:18:29.789
So after all that incredible film and stage work,

00:18:30.190 --> 00:18:32.630
she signed on for her first regular TV series

00:18:32.630 --> 00:18:35.690
role, The Return of Jessville James, in 2008.

00:18:35.900 --> 00:18:38.859
She was playing Sarah Tompkins, a successful

00:18:38.859 --> 00:18:40.660
children's book editor who couldn't have kids,

00:18:40.980 --> 00:18:43.519
so she asked her estranged sister to be her surrogate.

00:18:43.700 --> 00:18:45.819
Sound promising, right? Big step into series

00:18:45.819 --> 00:18:48.950
television. Man, that show just hit some major

00:18:48.950 --> 00:18:50.990
roadblocks. Really shows how volatile TV can

00:18:50.990 --> 00:18:53.349
be. It got a 13 episode order initially, which

00:18:53.349 --> 00:18:55.490
is good. But then, because everyone was expecting

00:18:55.490 --> 00:18:57.190
a big writer strike, they cut the order down

00:18:57.190 --> 00:18:59.329
to just seven episodes before they even aired.

00:18:59.730 --> 00:19:02.089
And then it got canceled after only three episodes

00:19:02.089 --> 00:19:04.569
aired because the ratings were low. Just a really

00:19:04.569 --> 00:19:06.490
rough, disappointing start for her first regular

00:19:06.490 --> 00:19:08.589
TV gig. Yeah, that whole situation really brings

00:19:08.589 --> 00:19:10.769
up that question about how volatile TV production

00:19:10.769 --> 00:19:13.650
is. How outside forces, like a strike, can just

00:19:13.650 --> 00:19:16.170
kill a project prematurely. Especially tough

00:19:16.170 --> 00:19:18.980
for an a - making that first big series commitment.

00:19:19.259 --> 00:19:21.440
It's a stark reminder, isn't it? Even with great

00:19:21.440 --> 00:19:24.539
talent involved, a good concept, TV is just unpredictable.

00:19:25.019 --> 00:19:27.539
Network decisions, audience reactions, industry

00:19:27.539 --> 00:19:30.799
politics, labor issues, all things totally outside

00:19:30.799 --> 00:19:32.940
an actor's control. Really underscores the risks

00:19:32.940 --> 00:19:34.839
involved in trying to build a steady presence

00:19:34.839 --> 00:19:36.700
in a new medium. Definitely a tough lesson in

00:19:36.700 --> 00:19:38.960
how the business works. At the end of that decade,

00:19:39.099 --> 00:19:41.460
the late 2000s, her film workout kind of mixed

00:19:41.460 --> 00:19:44.400
reviews, some hits, some misses critically. 2008,

00:19:44.579 --> 00:19:47.180
she was in the eye. the horror remake, played

00:19:47.180 --> 00:19:49.400
the sister of the woman who gets the eye transplant.

00:19:49.819 --> 00:19:51.500
Critics weren't kind, but it made decent money.

00:19:51.779 --> 00:19:54.980
$58 million worldwide. Found its audience. 2009

00:19:54.980 --> 00:19:57.660
spring breakdown. Started with Amy Poehler, Rachel

00:19:57.660 --> 00:20:00.140
Dratch. Sounds like a powerhouse comedy cast.

00:20:00.759 --> 00:20:02.980
But one critic at Sundance called it the annual

00:20:02.980 --> 00:20:06.160
Sundance what the eff moment. Gave it zero stars.

00:20:06.839 --> 00:20:08.900
Ouch. Even while admitting the actresses were

00:20:08.900 --> 00:20:12.009
good. And happy tears that same year, playing

00:20:12.009 --> 00:20:14.430
a daughter dealing with her aging dad. David

00:20:14.430 --> 00:20:17.130
fear at time out was brutal. Not even the reliable

00:20:17.130 --> 00:20:19.450
Posey can salvage this slaggy. So yeah, definitely

00:20:19.450 --> 00:20:22.450
some bumps critically as decade close out. Okay,

00:20:22.470 --> 00:20:24.450
moving into the 2010s. Parker Posey just kept

00:20:24.450 --> 00:20:26.269
showing incredible versatility. Strong comeback

00:20:26.269 --> 00:20:28.430
on TV, continued getting critical acclaim, had

00:20:28.430 --> 00:20:30.349
a couple of films in 2011, Inside Out and The

00:20:30.349 --> 00:20:32.150
Love Guide that got kind of mixed reactions.

00:20:32.670 --> 00:20:34.990
But then her next one, Price Check in 2012, an

00:20:34.990 --> 00:20:37.079
indie comedy. People loved her in it. Critics

00:20:37.079 --> 00:20:40.059
praised her gonzo enthusiasm and expert comic

00:20:40.059 --> 00:20:42.839
timing as Susan Felder's. That sounds like classic

00:20:42.839 --> 00:20:45.359
Parker Posey, right? And she did a bunch of really

00:20:45.359 --> 00:20:47.900
memorable TV guest spots around 2011, 2012. Made

00:20:47.900 --> 00:20:49.920
a big impression everywhere she popped up, like

00:20:49.920 --> 00:20:52.200
on Parks and Recreation as Lindsay Carlile. Shay,

00:20:52.299 --> 00:20:55.519
remember her? So good. The big C. The good wife

00:20:55.519 --> 00:20:58.599
is Vanessa Gold. New girl is Casey. Just showing

00:20:58.599 --> 00:21:00.619
she could fit into any show and steal scenes.

00:21:01.059 --> 00:21:02.440
But the one that really got everyone talking

00:21:02.440 --> 00:21:05.720
was her four episode arc on Louie in 2012, playing

00:21:05.720 --> 00:21:08.660
Liz. Louis C .K.'s love interest. Lindsay Barrett

00:21:08.660 --> 00:21:10.599
Entertainment Weekly said Posey used her arsenal

00:21:10.599 --> 00:21:13.279
of talent to bring Liz to life, making her messy

00:21:13.279 --> 00:21:15.579
but totally endearing. And Andy Greenwald of

00:21:15.579 --> 00:21:17.319
Grantland just flat out called her one of the

00:21:17.319 --> 00:21:20.119
most gifted actors alive. I mean, that's huge

00:21:20.119 --> 00:21:22.099
praise. Really shows how she could connect with

00:21:22.099 --> 00:21:24.240
people and leave a mark, even in just a few episodes.

00:21:24.940 --> 00:21:26.920
Same year, 2012, she did something totally different.

00:21:27.279 --> 00:21:29.220
Played Mary Walsh Hemingway in the HBO movie

00:21:29.220 --> 00:21:31.859
Hemingway and Gellhorn, with Nicole Kidman and

00:21:31.859 --> 00:21:34.599
Clive Owen. Big historical drama. And she didn't

00:21:34.599 --> 00:21:36.599
neglect the stage either. She originated the

00:21:36.599 --> 00:21:39.119
role of Pony Jones in Will Eno's play The Realistic

00:21:39.119 --> 00:21:42.339
Joneses in 2012 at Yale Rep. Had an Excellence

00:21:42.339 --> 00:21:44.680
in Acting award for it, still killing it in theater.

00:21:45.160 --> 00:21:47.960
Film -wise, she did Hair Brained in 2013, Highland

00:21:47.960 --> 00:21:50.980
Park. And now a word from our sponsor. Giving

00:21:50.980 --> 00:21:53.680
busy in the indie world. Reunited with Nicole

00:21:53.680 --> 00:21:56.609
Kidman and Grace of Monaco in 2014. played Madge

00:21:56.609 --> 00:21:58.650
Tiffy Falkong, Grace Kelly's Lady in Waiting.

00:21:58.809 --> 00:22:00.430
Unfortunately, that movie didn't get great reviews

00:22:00.430 --> 00:22:03.069
at Cannes, but she also reunited with Hal Hartley

00:22:03.069 --> 00:22:06.009
for Ned Rifle in 2014, the final film in his

00:22:06.009 --> 00:22:08.509
Henry Foole trilogy, bringing back Faye Grimm.

00:22:09.009 --> 00:22:11.589
And here's a cool modern indie film detail. Hartley

00:22:11.589 --> 00:22:13.690
actually funded it through Kickstarter, raised

00:22:13.690 --> 00:22:16.769
almost $400 ,000. Parker Posey even did promotional

00:22:16.769 --> 00:22:19.029
videos to help get fans to support it, shows

00:22:19.029 --> 00:22:21.190
how indie film funding was changing, and how

00:22:21.190 --> 00:22:23.210
actors could get directly involved. Then came

00:22:23.210 --> 00:22:25.230
a really interesting chapter, working with Woody

00:22:25.230 --> 00:22:27.930
Allen. first in Rational Man in 2015. She played

00:22:27.930 --> 00:22:30.170
Rita Richards, an unhappy professor opposite

00:22:30.170 --> 00:22:32.430
Joaquin Phoenix and Emma Stone. Really strong

00:22:32.430 --> 00:22:34.430
performance. Yeah, and what's really fascinating

00:22:34.430 --> 00:22:37.269
about that is how much it meant to her personally.

00:22:37.349 --> 00:22:39.730
She described getting cast not just as a job,

00:22:39.769 --> 00:22:42.410
but as a profound relief. She said, and this

00:22:42.410 --> 00:22:44.670
is a direct quote, The independent film way of

00:22:44.670 --> 00:22:47.210
working is something that was in my bones. It's

00:22:47.210 --> 00:22:49.470
like being a part of a punk band, but no one's

00:22:49.470 --> 00:22:51.970
singing punk rock anymore. Only a few bands are

00:22:51.970 --> 00:22:53.710
able to play and Woody Allen is one of them.

00:22:53.710 --> 00:22:57.339
That's why I cried. Hmm, wow. That quote just

00:22:57.339 --> 00:22:59.539
perfectly captures her feeling about how indie

00:22:59.539 --> 00:23:02.259
film had changed, how that raw, character -driven

00:23:02.259 --> 00:23:05.099
style she loved was getting harder to find. Working

00:23:05.099 --> 00:23:06.980
with Alan felt like coming home, creatively.

00:23:07.599 --> 00:23:09.380
And critics loved her performance too, praised

00:23:09.380 --> 00:23:11.819
its desperation and amusing acerbity. She could

00:23:11.819 --> 00:23:14.119
always bring those complex layers, that sharp

00:23:14.119 --> 00:23:16.900
wit. She found Alan's set was a place where that

00:23:16.900 --> 00:23:19.519
kind of work could still happen. You can really

00:23:19.519 --> 00:23:21.579
feel her passion for that specific way of working.

00:23:21.849 --> 00:23:23.829
And she worked with Helen again in Cafe Society

00:23:23.829 --> 00:23:26.589
in 2016. Period piece. She played this witty,

00:23:26.890 --> 00:23:29.900
engaging modeling agency owner. Another great

00:23:29.900 --> 00:23:32.559
ensemble turn, and she kept doing diverse guest

00:23:32.559 --> 00:23:34.940
spots and acclaimed indies. Recurring role on

00:23:34.940 --> 00:23:37.880
Granite Flats in 2015. Played Mary Phelps Jacob

00:23:37.880 --> 00:23:40.279
on Drunk History Hilarious. Went back to Christopher

00:23:40.279 --> 00:23:43.160
Guest's World for Mascots in 2016. Played Cindy

00:23:43.160 --> 00:23:45.400
Babineau, an aging dancer in elaborate mascot

00:23:45.400 --> 00:23:48.220
costumes. Got good notices again for that. Then

00:23:48.220 --> 00:23:50.539
a quieter, acclaimed role in Cogonotas Columbus

00:23:50.539 --> 00:23:53.740
in 2017. Played Eleanor, an assistant to a scholar.

00:23:53.930 --> 00:23:56.309
Critics called her vibrant and excellent, showed

00:23:56.309 --> 00:23:58.490
her range in more subtle character pieces, too.

00:23:58.910 --> 00:24:01.089
And then in 2018, something totally different.

00:24:01.170 --> 00:24:03.049
She published a book. Her first book, You're

00:24:03.049 --> 00:24:05.549
on an Airplane, a self -mythologizing memoir,

00:24:05.970 --> 00:24:07.769
just another side of her creativity. And it wasn't

00:24:07.769 --> 00:24:10.190
just a standard memoir. It had this really cool,

00:24:10.309 --> 00:24:12.329
quirky concept. The reader sitting next to her

00:24:12.329 --> 00:24:14.190
on a plane, and she's just telling you stories,

00:24:14.490 --> 00:24:16.630
mixes personal anecdotes, random funny observations,

00:24:16.849 --> 00:24:19.490
life stories, even her own homemade photo collages.

00:24:19.710 --> 00:24:21.670
Sounds totally Parker Posey, right? Eccentric,

00:24:21.849 --> 00:24:24.799
personal, unique. And it got great reviews. Ella

00:24:24.799 --> 00:24:27.079
called it humor -packed, irreverent, eccentric.

00:24:27.339 --> 00:24:29.380
Ask where I said, Posey is a natural storyteller.

00:24:29.460 --> 00:24:31.259
She's gathered some good ones. Successful author

00:24:31.259 --> 00:24:34.009
too. Late 2010, she also fully embraced streaming

00:24:34.009 --> 00:24:37.109
TV and even audio. From 2018 to 2021, she had

00:24:37.109 --> 00:24:39.410
a major role in Netflix's Lost in Space remake.

00:24:39.890 --> 00:24:42.269
Played Dr. Smith, the manipulative criminal who

00:24:42.269 --> 00:24:44.410
cons her way onto the ship. Right, and her Dr.

00:24:44.490 --> 00:24:46.509
Smith got a kind of mixed reviews, which is always

00:24:46.509 --> 00:24:48.549
interesting. It shows how people interpret iconic

00:24:48.549 --> 00:24:51.650
roles differently. Some critics, like David Griffin

00:24:51.650 --> 00:24:54.640
at IGN, felt she was maybe... unsophisticated

00:24:54.640 --> 00:24:57.440
and one -dimensional, wanting maybe a more straightforward

00:24:57.440 --> 00:25:01.000
villain. But others totally loved her take. Jen

00:25:01.000 --> 00:25:03.900
Shaney at Vulture praised her understated sly

00:25:03.900 --> 00:25:07.099
comedic touches. Beth Elderkin at Gizmodo noted

00:25:07.099 --> 00:25:09.519
her trademark levity and humor, appreciating

00:25:09.519 --> 00:25:11.940
her unique style. It really highlights how her

00:25:11.940 --> 00:25:14.599
specific, often ironic approach can land differently,

00:25:14.740 --> 00:25:16.900
especially in a big, family -friendly franchise.

00:25:17.380 --> 00:25:19.539
Some wanted classic evil, others dug her more

00:25:19.539 --> 00:25:21.839
comedic, unpredictable spin. But either way,

00:25:22.059 --> 00:25:24.240
she made an impact got a Saturn Award nomination

00:25:24.240 --> 00:25:26.539
for Best Supporting Actress in Streaming, clearly

00:25:26.539 --> 00:25:28.599
resonated. That's a great point about how her

00:25:28.599 --> 00:25:30.480
style sparks different reactions, make things

00:25:30.480 --> 00:25:33.039
interesting. And in 2019, she went further into

00:25:33.039 --> 00:25:35.960
audio, headlining an eight episode fiction podcast

00:25:35.960 --> 00:25:38.559
called Hunted, voiced to U .S. Deputy Marshall,

00:25:39.019 --> 00:25:41.240
showed she was up for exploring new ways to tell

00:25:41.240 --> 00:25:44.680
stories just using her voice. OK, so now we're

00:25:44.680 --> 00:25:47.559
into the 2020s and Parker Posey is absolutely

00:25:47.559 --> 00:25:49.819
still going strong, delivering really powerful

00:25:49.819 --> 00:25:53.410
TV and stage work. In 2022, she was chillingly

00:25:53.410 --> 00:25:55.589
good as the prosecutor Frida Black in HBO's The

00:25:55.589 --> 00:25:57.930
Staircase miniseries, based on the True Crime

00:25:57.930 --> 00:26:00.329
doc. And what's amazing about that role is how

00:26:00.329 --> 00:26:02.589
deep she went in her preparation. She studied

00:26:02.589 --> 00:26:04.970
hours of video of the real Frida Black to get

00:26:04.970 --> 00:26:07.089
her mannerisms, her voice, her courtroom style

00:26:07.089 --> 00:26:09.410
down perfectly. Even talked to people who knew

00:26:09.410 --> 00:26:11.990
Black personally, really immersed herself. She

00:26:11.990 --> 00:26:14.089
called it a homecoming, maybe tapping into those

00:26:14.089 --> 00:26:16.029
southern roots, but also a distinct honor to

00:26:16.029 --> 00:26:18.130
play a real person. That feels significant for

00:26:18.130 --> 00:26:20.289
an actor known for creating such unique fictional

00:26:20.289 --> 00:26:22.960
characters. shows her commitment. Same year,

00:26:23.019 --> 00:26:24.740
she guest starred on Tales of the Walking Dead,

00:26:25.140 --> 00:26:27.700
jumping into the zombie genre again. And in 2023,

00:26:27.799 --> 00:26:30.000
she was back on stage, off Broadway, in the Siegel

00:26:30.000 --> 00:26:32.339
Woodstock, NY. Still flexing those theater muscles.

00:26:32.900 --> 00:26:35.059
Film performances are still getting raised, too.

00:26:35.740 --> 00:26:39.539
Ari Aster's totally wild -synced, but Bo's afraid

00:26:39.539 --> 00:26:42.980
in 2023. She played Elaine Bray, the main character's

00:26:42.980 --> 00:26:45.759
first love, reunited with Joaquin Phoenix, didn't

00:26:45.759 --> 00:26:47.259
have a ton of screen time, but critics noticed.

00:26:47.900 --> 00:26:50.339
David Rooney said her performance was fabulous

00:26:50.339 --> 00:26:52.920
and fearlessly in line with Astra's nightmarish

00:26:52.920 --> 00:26:55.579
vision, making a huge impact in a tough role.

00:26:56.279 --> 00:26:58.640
And in Thelma, that premiered in 2024, she played

00:26:58.640 --> 00:27:01.380
Gail, the daughter, a more grounded emotional

00:27:01.380 --> 00:27:03.650
role in a really well received film. And the

00:27:03.650 --> 00:27:05.990
recognition just keeps coming. Recent and upcoming

00:27:05.990 --> 00:27:08.470
stuff is huge. For a guest role on Mr. and Mrs.

00:27:08.650 --> 00:27:11.029
Smith on Prime Video in 2024, she got a Primetime

00:27:11.029 --> 00:27:13.390
Emmy nomination. Outstanding Geth actress in

00:27:13.390 --> 00:27:16.069
a drama series. That's major props, right? Shows

00:27:16.069 --> 00:27:17.890
she can still walk into a show for just a couple

00:27:17.890 --> 00:27:19.730
of episodes and blow everyone away. It's kind

00:27:19.730 --> 00:27:21.490
of been her superpower throughout her career.

00:27:21.849 --> 00:27:24.349
And the big news. 2025, she's joining the main

00:27:24.349 --> 00:27:26.750
cast of The White Lotus Season 3. Playing Victoria

00:27:26.750 --> 00:27:28.809
Ratliff, described as a wealthy matriarch. That

00:27:28.809 --> 00:27:30.410
show is huge, and putting her in that ensemble

00:27:30.410 --> 00:27:32.910
sounds amazing. And get this, she spent six months

00:27:32.910 --> 00:27:35.049
filming in Thailand for it. Started back in February

00:27:35.049 --> 00:27:38.069
2024. The buzz is already building. People are

00:27:38.069 --> 00:27:39.690
praising her performance, especially her Southern

00:27:39.690 --> 00:27:42.109
accent. Full circle back to those roots, right?

00:27:42.250 --> 00:27:44.589
She also has a movie called The Parenting coming

00:27:44.589 --> 00:27:47.349
in 2025. Playing an eccentric neighbor sounds

00:27:47.349 --> 00:27:50.240
perfect. And another film, Wild Horse 9, is in

00:27:50.240 --> 00:27:52.019
post -production. Plus, you might have seen her

00:27:52.019 --> 00:27:53.880
in those Hyundai Palisade commercials recently.

00:27:53.980 --> 00:27:56.420
She's everywhere, still a major force. And beyond

00:27:56.420 --> 00:27:58.359
all the roles, her personal life sounds just

00:27:58.359 --> 00:28:00.880
as interesting and varied. She dated actor Stuart

00:28:00.880 --> 00:28:04.079
Townsend back in the late 90s, early 2000s. Dated

00:28:04.079 --> 00:28:07.599
musician Ryan Adams from 2003 to 2005. She even

00:28:07.599 --> 00:28:10.400
sang backup on some of his records. Another creative

00:28:10.400 --> 00:28:12.839
outlet. and visual artist Scott Lenhart in the

00:28:12.839 --> 00:28:15.839
late 2000s, early 2010s. Connecting with other

00:28:15.839 --> 00:28:18.039
creative people seems like a theme. Her hobbies

00:28:18.039 --> 00:28:21.200
are cool too. Pottery, sewing, she does Ashtanga

00:28:21.200 --> 00:28:23.799
yoga, follows Ayurvedic medicine, discovered

00:28:23.799 --> 00:28:26.380
that filming the eye back in 08. lived in Greenwich

00:28:26.380 --> 00:28:28.500
Village, the East Village in New York, really

00:28:28.500 --> 00:28:31.220
soaking up that vibrant artistic city life, bids

00:28:31.220 --> 00:28:32.799
a picture of someone really engaged with the

00:28:32.799 --> 00:28:34.619
world outside acting. Absolutely. And if you

00:28:34.619 --> 00:28:37.119
connect all that back to her work, those diverse

00:28:37.119 --> 00:28:41.180
interests, pottery, sewing, yoga, Ayurveda, they

00:28:41.180 --> 00:28:44.519
reflect this deeply curious, grounded, multi

00:28:44.519 --> 00:28:47.059
-faceted person. And that richness that's not

00:28:47.059 --> 00:28:48.680
just separate from her acting, it almost certainly

00:28:48.680 --> 00:28:51.160
feeds into it. It gives her this incredible depth,

00:28:51.319 --> 00:28:53.180
this wellspring of understanding to draw from

00:28:53.180 --> 00:28:55.150
when she's creating these characters. the really

00:28:55.150 --> 00:28:57.750
eccentric ones. It allows her to imbue them with

00:28:57.750 --> 00:29:00.470
this real humanity, complexity, maybe even a

00:29:00.470 --> 00:29:03.289
quiet strength. It really feels like living a

00:29:03.289 --> 00:29:05.670
full, engaged, creative life is part of what

00:29:05.670 --> 00:29:07.690
makes her performances so authentic and resonant.

00:29:07.730 --> 00:29:09.710
It all connects. What an incredible journey,

00:29:09.829 --> 00:29:12.190
right? following Parker Posey from that kid -loving

00:29:12.190 --> 00:29:14.650
performance in the South, through being crowned

00:29:14.650 --> 00:29:16.829
Queen of the Indies, then making that smart crossover

00:29:16.829 --> 00:29:21.049
to mainstream film and TV, and always, always

00:29:21.049 --> 00:29:23.950
delivering these memorable, quirky, deeply felt

00:29:23.950 --> 00:29:26.470
performances that just stick with you. That mix

00:29:26.470 --> 00:29:28.990
of humor, intelligence, and total unpredictability

00:29:28.990 --> 00:29:31.630
really makes her stand out. So for you listening,

00:29:31.769 --> 00:29:33.170
here's something to think about, a final thought

00:29:33.170 --> 00:29:36.559
on Parker Posey's amazing career. What does it

00:29:36.559 --> 00:29:39.420
really mean for an actor to be truly well -informed

00:29:39.420 --> 00:29:41.920
in their craft? When someone can navigate the

00:29:41.920 --> 00:29:44.859
intimate indie world, the giant scale of blockbusters,

00:29:45.059 --> 00:29:47.339
the grind of TV, and even write a critically

00:29:47.339 --> 00:29:50.200
acclaimed memoir. And through it all, keep this

00:29:50.200 --> 00:29:52.859
singular, recognizable, authentic, artistic voice.

00:29:53.400 --> 00:29:55.200
Maybe your career isn't just about great acting.

00:29:55.519 --> 00:29:57.420
Maybe it's more like a master class in constant

00:29:57.420 --> 00:30:00.180
artistic rediscovery and adapting and thriving

00:30:00.180 --> 00:30:02.059
in an industry that's always changing. Yeah,

00:30:02.059 --> 00:30:04.380
and that raises this really essential question,

00:30:04.400 --> 00:30:06.599
doesn't it? In Hollywood, which loves to label

00:30:06.599 --> 00:30:09.019
and pigeonhole talent, how does someone like

00:30:09.019 --> 00:30:11.619
Parker Posey not just resist that, but actually

00:30:11.619 --> 00:30:14.680
thrive by embracing new things, challenging expectations,

00:30:14.880 --> 00:30:17.420
bringing her whole self to every project, her

00:30:17.420 --> 00:30:19.519
whole career? suggests that maybe true artistic

00:30:19.519 --> 00:30:21.619
longevity, real intact doesn't come from fitting

00:30:21.619 --> 00:30:23.500
in. Maybe it comes from that fierce commitment

00:30:23.500 --> 00:30:26.299
to being authentic, versatile, and having the

00:30:26.299 --> 00:30:28.440
guts to stay the character in a world that often

00:30:28.440 --> 00:30:29.279
just wants stars.
