WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.399
Imagine trying to navigate these really complex

00:00:03.399 --> 00:00:06.200
currents of religious scholarship, political

00:00:06.200 --> 00:00:09.259
commentary, and mainstream media, all while challenging

00:00:09.259 --> 00:00:12.359
conventional wisdom, sparking, you know, intense

00:00:12.359 --> 00:00:15.359
debate. Today we're diving deep into the life

00:00:15.359 --> 00:00:17.719
and work of a figure who really embodies this

00:00:17.719 --> 00:00:20.929
very journey. Our deep dive today is into Reza

00:00:20.929 --> 00:00:23.589
Aslan. He's an Iranian -American scholar, writer,

00:00:23.670 --> 00:00:26.469
television host. And his career has consistently

00:00:26.469 --> 00:00:28.489
well pushed boundaries and provoked thought.

00:00:28.989 --> 00:00:31.710
He's known for his insightful analyses of religion,

00:00:32.429 --> 00:00:35.789
culture, politics. but also, yeah, for his remarkable

00:00:35.789 --> 00:00:38.329
ability to stir the pot, sometimes quite dramatically.

00:00:39.390 --> 00:00:41.530
And we've gathered quite a wealth of information

00:00:41.530 --> 00:00:43.250
for you today. We're looking at Aslan's entire

00:00:43.250 --> 00:00:45.609
career, really, his academic journey, all his

00:00:45.609 --> 00:00:48.229
writing, his TV projects, and even the major

00:00:48.229 --> 00:00:50.850
controversies he's faced along the way. Our mission,

00:00:51.009 --> 00:00:52.829
basically, is to extract the most important nuggets

00:00:52.829 --> 00:00:55.030
from all this material to help you understand

00:00:55.030 --> 00:00:57.189
not just what he's done, but maybe more importantly,

00:00:57.289 --> 00:00:59.789
why it matters and the broader implications of

00:00:59.789 --> 00:01:02.450
his, well, multi -faceted career. It's about

00:01:02.450 --> 00:01:04.510
giving you a kind of shortcut to truly grasp

00:01:04.510 --> 00:01:06.769
his unique impact. Exactly. We're going to journey

00:01:06.769 --> 00:01:09.549
through his personal story, explore how his academic

00:01:09.549 --> 00:01:12.810
rigor actually informs his popular works, unpack

00:01:12.810 --> 00:01:14.810
the significant impact of his media presence,

00:01:15.069 --> 00:01:16.930
and even delve into some of the really intense

00:01:16.930 --> 00:01:19.129
debates surrounding his approaches. It's a journey

00:01:19.129 --> 00:01:21.829
that reveals a lot, I think, about the intersection

00:01:21.829 --> 00:01:24.469
of scholarship and public life. So settle in

00:01:24.469 --> 00:01:25.750
because this is where it's really interesting.

00:01:26.409 --> 00:01:28.489
OK, let's unpack this journey by starting at

00:01:28.489 --> 00:01:31.140
the very beginning. laying the foundations, so

00:01:31.140 --> 00:01:34.540
to speak, of his multifaceted mind. Reza Aslan

00:01:34.540 --> 00:01:38.060
was born in Tehran, Iran. That was May 30, 1972.

00:01:38.680 --> 00:01:41.019
But his early life took a dramatic turn when

00:01:41.019 --> 00:01:43.719
his family fled the Iranian Revolution in 1979,

00:01:44.219 --> 00:01:46.640
a huge upheaval. They eventually settled in the

00:01:46.640 --> 00:01:49.000
San Francisco Bay Area, and he graduated from

00:01:49.000 --> 00:01:51.239
Delmar High School in San Jose back in 1990.

00:01:51.400 --> 00:01:53.280
I mean, I can only imagine what that displacement

00:01:53.280 --> 00:01:55.000
and cultural adaptation must have been like,

00:01:55.400 --> 00:01:57.540
fleeing a revolution, relocating across the world.

00:01:57.579 --> 00:02:00.519
He's even spoken about something quite poignant

00:02:00.519 --> 00:02:03.060
from that time about pretending to be Mexican

00:02:03.060 --> 00:02:05.519
in the 1980s, apparently because of the discrimination

00:02:05.519 --> 00:02:08.280
faced by Iranian Americans then. Yeah, that detail.

00:02:08.650 --> 00:02:11.370
about pretending to be Mexican. It isn't just

00:02:11.370 --> 00:02:14.689
a poignant anecdote. It really offers a raw glimpse

00:02:14.689 --> 00:02:17.189
into the immense pressures of assimilation, the

00:02:17.189 --> 00:02:19.830
complex social dynamics faced by immigrant communities,

00:02:20.349 --> 00:02:22.229
especially during periods of, well, heightened

00:02:22.229 --> 00:02:24.949
tension like the post -revolution hostage crisis

00:02:24.949 --> 00:02:28.189
era. What's truly fascinating is how this early

00:02:28.189 --> 00:02:30.889
experience, this displacement, and the fundamental

00:02:30.889 --> 00:02:33.990
need for cultural adaptation likely profoundly

00:02:33.990 --> 00:02:36.500
shaped his perspective. This personal struggle

00:02:36.500 --> 00:02:39.020
to navigate different cultural narratives, different

00:02:39.020 --> 00:02:41.319
identities, to understand where you fit and how

00:02:41.319 --> 00:02:43.659
you're perceived, it very likely fostered his

00:02:43.659 --> 00:02:46.180
ability to bridge those gaps in his later work.

00:02:46.800 --> 00:02:49.060
It allowed him to understand the nuances of identity

00:02:49.060 --> 00:02:52.439
and cultural friction in a way that maybe purely

00:02:52.439 --> 00:02:55.379
academic observation might not capture. It gives

00:02:55.379 --> 00:02:57.719
him an inherent lived empathy for the challenges

00:02:57.719 --> 00:03:00.000
of belonging and difference. And that's a powerful

00:03:00.000 --> 00:03:01.780
lens, right, for viewing his later studies on

00:03:01.780 --> 00:03:04.069
religion and society. Absolutely. That early

00:03:04.069 --> 00:03:06.090
navigation of identity clearly seems to have

00:03:06.090 --> 00:03:08.210
laid the groundwork for an incredibly impressive

00:03:08.210 --> 00:03:11.990
academic trajectory, which is nothing short of

00:03:11.990 --> 00:03:15.270
a scholarly deep dive itself. He's got a BA in

00:03:15.270 --> 00:03:17.270
religious studies from Santa Clara University.

00:03:17.639 --> 00:03:20.460
Okay. Then a master of theological studies. That's

00:03:20.460 --> 00:03:22.759
an MTS from Harvard Divinity School. Impressive.

00:03:23.319 --> 00:03:25.539
Then a master of fine arts and MFA in fiction

00:03:25.539 --> 00:03:27.020
writing from the University of Iowa's Writers

00:03:27.020 --> 00:03:28.860
Workshop. That's a different direction. And then

00:03:28.860 --> 00:03:30.960
a PhD in sociology from the University of California

00:03:30.960 --> 00:03:34.960
Santa Barbara. His 2009 dissertation, Global

00:03:34.960 --> 00:03:37.219
Jihadism as a Transnational Social Movement.

00:03:37.620 --> 00:03:40.259
A theoretical framework focused on contemporary

00:03:40.259 --> 00:03:42.460
Muslim political activism. Honestly, that makes

00:03:42.460 --> 00:03:45.560
my single degree feel a bit inadequate. How does

00:03:45.560 --> 00:03:47.969
one even manage such a breadth of without feeling

00:03:47.969 --> 00:03:50.669
completely pulled in different directions. It's

00:03:50.669 --> 00:03:53.909
truly remarkable, isn't it? This incredibly diverse

00:03:53.909 --> 00:03:57.050
educational background. I mean, spanning religious

00:03:57.050 --> 00:03:59.509
studies, theology, creative writing, and sociology.

00:04:00.490 --> 00:04:03.669
It provides him with a truly unique interdisciplinary

00:04:03.669 --> 00:04:05.969
lens through which he approaches complex subjects.

00:04:06.069 --> 00:04:09.389
And to your point, how does it all connect? Well,

00:04:09.729 --> 00:04:11.909
that master of fine arts in fiction writing from

00:04:11.909 --> 00:04:13.990
Iowa, no less. That's a crucial detail here,

00:04:13.990 --> 00:04:17.759
I think. Yeah. How so? It suggests an early and

00:04:17.759 --> 00:04:21.040
probably deep emphasis on narrative and communication.

00:04:21.720 --> 00:04:24.439
Not just what happened, but how stories are told

00:04:24.439 --> 00:04:26.980
and how they resonate with people. That skill

00:04:26.980 --> 00:04:29.439
set would prove absolutely critical for his later

00:04:29.439 --> 00:04:32.170
success in popular media. because, you know,

00:04:32.170 --> 00:04:34.329
it's not enough to simply know complex subjects.

00:04:34.350 --> 00:04:36.490
You have to know how to tell the story of that

00:04:36.490 --> 00:04:39.370
knowledge, make it engaging, accessible, capture

00:04:39.370 --> 00:04:42.410
a broad audience. He's a scholar who fundamentally

00:04:42.410 --> 00:04:44.589
understands the power of narrative. That makes

00:04:44.589 --> 00:04:46.829
sense, the storyteller aspect. Exactly. Now,

00:04:46.829 --> 00:04:49.509
his PhD in sociology, despite his strong religious

00:04:49.509 --> 00:04:51.790
studies background, that's actually a specific

00:04:51.790 --> 00:04:53.589
point of academic debate we'll unpack a bit later.

00:04:54.170 --> 00:04:56.610
It highlights the complexities of academic credentialing

00:04:56.610 --> 00:04:58.589
itself. But if we connect this to the bigger

00:04:58.589 --> 00:05:01.860
picture, right? This blend of rigorous analytical

00:05:01.860 --> 00:05:05.019
tools, from sociology understanding societal

00:05:05.019 --> 00:05:07.480
structures, social movements, combined with the

00:05:07.480 --> 00:05:10.420
narrative power of fiction writing, and the contextual

00:05:10.420 --> 00:05:13.379
depth of religious studies. It equips him not

00:05:13.379 --> 00:05:15.379
just with vast knowledge, but with that rare

00:05:15.379 --> 00:05:18.290
skill. the skill to articulate complex historical

00:05:18.290 --> 00:05:20.430
and religious phenomena to a broad audience.

00:05:20.910 --> 00:05:23.670
He makes dense topics understandable, captivating,

00:05:24.029 --> 00:05:26.350
essentially translating academic insights into

00:05:26.350 --> 00:05:29.149
relatable human stories. And that's incredibly

00:05:29.149 --> 00:05:31.670
valuable in today's media landscape. That rich

00:05:31.670 --> 00:05:33.790
academic tapestry is, well, it's further colored

00:05:33.790 --> 00:05:35.949
by his personal spiritual journey, which has

00:05:35.949 --> 00:05:38.730
been anything but static, it seems. He was born

00:05:38.730 --> 00:05:41.810
into a Twelver Shia Muslim family. That's a significant

00:05:41.810 --> 00:05:44.769
branch of Shia Islam. But then at age 15, he

00:05:44.769 --> 00:05:46.990
actually converted to evangelical Christianity.

00:05:47.170 --> 00:05:49.209
I mean, talk about a shift. A huge shift. Then,

00:05:49.370 --> 00:05:51.490
the summer before attending Harvard, he converted

00:05:51.490 --> 00:05:54.329
back to Islam, specifically identifying with

00:05:54.329 --> 00:05:56.569
Sufism, which is often described as the mystical

00:05:56.569 --> 00:05:59.350
introspective dimension of Islam. He completed

00:05:59.350 --> 00:06:03.120
his Harvard degree in 1999. By 2013, his views

00:06:03.120 --> 00:06:05.660
had evolved even further. He described Islam

00:06:05.660 --> 00:06:09.000
as, and this is a direct quote, a man -made institution

00:06:09.000 --> 00:06:12.220
and a set of symbols and metaphors for expressing

00:06:12.220 --> 00:06:15.579
faith. emphasizing that it's not more right or

00:06:15.579 --> 00:06:18.000
more wrong than any other symbols and metaphors.

00:06:18.459 --> 00:06:20.939
He even said, it's that all religions are nothing

00:06:20.939 --> 00:06:23.040
more than a language made up of symbols and metaphors

00:06:23.040 --> 00:06:25.519
to help an individual explain faith. And it's

00:06:25.519 --> 00:06:27.439
symbols and metaphors that I prefer, but it's

00:06:27.439 --> 00:06:29.459
not more right or more wrong than any other symbols

00:06:29.459 --> 00:06:31.060
and metaphors. It's a language. That's all it

00:06:31.060 --> 00:06:34.490
is. His personal journey through these different

00:06:34.490 --> 00:06:37.569
major phase, Shia Islam, Evangelical Christianity,

00:06:38.149 --> 00:06:40.189
then back to Islam, but with an adherence to

00:06:40.189 --> 00:06:43.189
Sufism, that's absolutely crucial for truly understanding

00:06:43.189 --> 00:06:46.029
his work. This direct lived experience with conversion,

00:06:46.250 --> 00:06:48.610
with reversion, it lends a unique empathetic

00:06:48.610 --> 00:06:51.009
insight into different belief systems. It's far

00:06:51.009 --> 00:06:53.089
beyond just an outsider's academic observation.

00:06:53.319 --> 00:06:55.620
Right. He's been on the inside of several traditions.

00:06:55.660 --> 00:06:58.600
Exactly. He has literally wrestled with faith

00:06:58.600 --> 00:07:01.519
on a deeply personal level from within multiple

00:07:01.519 --> 00:07:04.480
traditions and this deeply held view of religion

00:07:04.480 --> 00:07:08.660
as a man -made institution offering symbols and

00:07:08.660 --> 00:07:11.540
metaphors rather than some absolute singular

00:07:11.540 --> 00:07:14.839
truth. It's a core philosophical stance. It profoundly

00:07:14.839 --> 00:07:17.279
informs his scholarly approach. It allows him

00:07:17.279 --> 00:07:19.839
to analyze faiths comparatively, sociologically

00:07:19.839 --> 00:07:22.399
without ever claiming one is inherently superior

00:07:22.399 --> 00:07:24.740
or exclusively true. He sees them as different

00:07:24.740 --> 00:07:26.839
languages, you know, for the same human impulse

00:07:26.839 --> 00:07:29.220
toward the divine or toward meaning. So what

00:07:29.220 --> 00:07:31.100
does this offer you, the listener? Why is this

00:07:31.100 --> 00:07:33.040
personal journey so important? Well, it provides

00:07:33.040 --> 00:07:36.399
vital context for his analyses. It suggests a

00:07:36.399 --> 00:07:38.819
scholar who hasn't just read about faith in books.

00:07:38.980 --> 00:07:41.040
He's experienced it, lived it, struggled with

00:07:41.040 --> 00:07:43.480
it. That can make his explanations more relatable,

00:07:43.699 --> 00:07:46.279
perhaps more resonant, even when he's discussing

00:07:46.279 --> 00:07:48.680
dense theological concepts or historical details.

00:07:49.240 --> 00:07:51.680
This personal stake can make his analyses connect

00:07:51.680 --> 00:07:53.839
more deeply. especially when he's challenging

00:07:53.839 --> 00:07:56.600
conventional understandings or assumptions. It

00:07:56.600 --> 00:07:58.300
highlights that his scholarship isn't purely

00:07:58.300 --> 00:08:01.560
theoretical. It's informed by a profound personal

00:08:01.560 --> 00:08:04.560
quest for meaning. This profoundly personal understanding

00:08:04.560 --> 00:08:07.199
of faith, it undoubtedly shapes how he approaches

00:08:07.199 --> 00:08:09.980
writing about religion, which leads us directly

00:08:09.980 --> 00:08:12.769
into his impactful literary career. His early

00:08:12.769 --> 00:08:15.129
works really made a splash, didn't they? Deconstructing

00:08:15.129 --> 00:08:17.730
Islam for a Western audience, often challenging

00:08:17.730 --> 00:08:20.410
the prevailing narratives of the time. His 2005

00:08:20.410 --> 00:08:23.810
book, No God But God, The Origins, Evolution,

00:08:23.990 --> 00:08:26.370
and Future of Islam. That's a nonfiction work

00:08:26.370 --> 00:08:28.490
describing the history of Islam and advocating

00:08:28.490 --> 00:08:32.809
for a more liberal interpretation. It controversially

00:08:32.809 --> 00:08:34.889
attributes current controversies within Islam

00:08:34.889 --> 00:08:37.850
to factors like Western imperialism and what

00:08:37.850 --> 00:08:40.210
he calls self -serving misinterpretations of

00:08:40.210 --> 00:08:43.029
Islamic law by past scholars. This was a direct,

00:08:43.289 --> 00:08:45.490
powerful challenge to the whole Clash of Civilizations

00:08:45.490 --> 00:08:47.470
thesis that was so prevalent, especially post

00:08:47.470 --> 00:08:49.830
9 -11. Absolutely. A very direct challenge. Yeah.

00:08:49.870 --> 00:08:52.529
Then in 2009, he published How to Win a Cosmic

00:08:52.529 --> 00:08:55.559
War. God, globalization, and the end of terror,

00:08:55.919 --> 00:08:57.980
which was later re -released in 2010 as Beyond

00:08:57.980 --> 00:09:00.360
Fundamentalism, confronting religious extremism

00:09:00.360 --> 00:09:02.720
in the age of globalization. This book delved

00:09:02.720 --> 00:09:04.860
into the ideology of groups like Al Qaeda and

00:09:04.860 --> 00:09:07.299
the Taliban examining religious violence across

00:09:07.299 --> 00:09:10.340
Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. So a comparative

00:09:10.340 --> 00:09:12.980
approach. Aslan argues, and this is key, that

00:09:12.980 --> 00:09:15.220
the U .S. war on terror actually parallels the

00:09:15.220 --> 00:09:17.460
very cosmic war rhetoric of its adversaries.

00:09:17.960 --> 00:09:20.759
That mirroring effect. Exactly. He makes a crucial

00:09:20.759 --> 00:09:23.169
distinction between Islamism, which he argues

00:09:23.169 --> 00:09:25.389
has legitimate political goals and can potentially

00:09:25.389 --> 00:09:29.509
be negotiated with, and jihadism, which he says

00:09:29.509 --> 00:09:32.909
dreams of an idealized, unattainable pan -Islamic

00:09:32.909 --> 00:09:35.570
past and is fundamentally different. His prescription

00:09:35.570 --> 00:09:38.009
for winning this cosmic war involves engaging

00:09:38.009 --> 00:09:40.450
moderate Islamic political forces in democratic

00:09:40.450 --> 00:09:43.899
processes, stating, quote, Throughout the Middle

00:09:43.899 --> 00:09:46.200
East, whenever moderate Islamist parties have

00:09:46.200 --> 00:09:47.720
been allowed to participate in the political

00:09:47.720 --> 00:09:50.500
process, popular support for more extremist groups

00:09:50.500 --> 00:09:52.879
has diminished. The New Yorker praised it as

00:09:52.879 --> 00:09:55.279
a thoughtful analysis, and the Washington Post

00:09:55.279 --> 00:09:58.039
called it a very persuasive argument. So it got

00:09:58.039 --> 00:10:00.580
attention. It definitely did. And these early

00:10:00.580 --> 00:10:03.120
works clearly demonstrate Aslan's deep commitment

00:10:03.120 --> 00:10:05.419
to reframing the public's understanding of Islam,

00:10:05.980 --> 00:10:08.440
particularly in that post -911 era when so many

00:10:08.440 --> 00:10:11.220
simplistic, often fear -based narratives were

00:10:11.220 --> 00:10:14.559
taking hold. No God but God is that direct challenge

00:10:14.559 --> 00:10:17.340
to reductionist views, offering a much more nuanced

00:10:17.340 --> 00:10:20.120
historical theological perspective, pushing back

00:10:20.120 --> 00:10:22.259
against the idea of Islam being monolithic or

00:10:22.259 --> 00:10:25.149
inherently violent. Then, How to Win a Cosmic

00:10:25.149 --> 00:10:27.730
War provides that critical lens on the language

00:10:27.730 --> 00:10:30.990
of conflict itself. His core insight there is

00:10:30.990 --> 00:10:33.990
fascinating. When we, in the West, frame conflicts

00:10:33.990 --> 00:10:36.590
like the war on terror in absolute good versus

00:10:36.590 --> 00:10:40.070
evil terms, we inadvertently mimic the cosmic

00:10:40.070 --> 00:10:43.009
war rhetoric of our adversaries. Yeah. He highlights

00:10:43.009 --> 00:10:45.789
the idea of cosmic war as a kind of ritual drama.

00:10:45.909 --> 00:10:48.529
where earthly battles are seen to reflect heavenly

00:10:48.529 --> 00:10:51.210
ones, and how American rhetoric inadvertently

00:10:51.210 --> 00:10:54.210
created this cosmic dualism with al -Qaeda's

00:10:54.210 --> 00:10:56.830
jihad narrative. So understanding that helps

00:10:56.830 --> 00:10:59.529
avoid fueling the fire. That's the argument.

00:10:59.950 --> 00:11:02.269
By understanding this mirroring effect, we could

00:11:02.269 --> 00:11:04.649
avoid inadvertently empowering extremist narratives.

00:11:04.889 --> 00:11:07.269
We can pursue more nuanced strategies instead.

00:11:07.549 --> 00:11:09.929
His distinction between Islamism and Jihadism

00:11:09.929 --> 00:11:12.830
is a key analytical tool he offers. It invites

00:11:12.830 --> 00:11:15.029
a more sophisticated policy approach than just

00:11:15.029 --> 00:11:17.389
a blanket condemnation of all Islamic political

00:11:17.389 --> 00:11:19.669
movements, urging instead an understanding of

00:11:19.669 --> 00:11:22.190
their diverse motivations and goals. And his

00:11:22.190 --> 00:11:24.610
concrete policy suggestion about engaging moderate

00:11:24.610 --> 00:11:27.070
Islamist parties, that's a strong, actionable

00:11:27.070 --> 00:11:29.649
takeaway, even if complex to implement. So these

00:11:29.649 --> 00:11:32.590
books, they offer you, the listener, a framework,

00:11:33.110 --> 00:11:36.029
not just for understanding Islamic history or

00:11:36.029 --> 00:11:38.649
extremism, but also the broader dynamics, religious

00:11:38.649 --> 00:11:41.570
conflict, global politics. They challenge simple

00:11:41.570 --> 00:11:43.570
narratives and provide tools for more critical

00:11:43.570 --> 00:11:45.830
engagement with the news, with discourse around

00:11:45.830 --> 00:11:47.909
these topics. Exactly. It encourages looking

00:11:47.909 --> 00:11:50.649
beyond those surface level interpretations to

00:11:50.649 --> 00:11:53.809
grasp the underlying ideological structures at

00:11:53.809 --> 00:11:57.080
play. A deeper dive, really. OK, so from reinterpreting

00:11:57.080 --> 00:11:59.860
Islam's past and present, Aslan then turned his

00:11:59.860 --> 00:12:02.340
scholarly gaze to a figure at the heart of another

00:12:02.340 --> 00:12:05.080
major world religion. This led to one of his

00:12:05.080 --> 00:12:07.700
most widely discussed and certainly debated works,

00:12:08.299 --> 00:12:11.019
Zealot, The Life and Times of Jesus of Nazareth.

00:12:11.370 --> 00:12:14.330
Published in 2013, this book offers a historical

00:12:14.330 --> 00:12:16.149
account of Jesus, portraying him not just as

00:12:16.149 --> 00:12:18.830
a spiritual leader, but as a political, rebellious,

00:12:18.970 --> 00:12:21.509
and eschatological Jew whose proclamation of

00:12:21.509 --> 00:12:23.909
the coming kingdom of God was essentially a direct

00:12:23.909 --> 00:12:26.629
call for regime change against Roman rule and

00:12:26.629 --> 00:12:28.570
the corrupt aristocratic priesthood in Roman

00:12:28.570 --> 00:12:31.950
Judea at the time. It was immensely provocative,

00:12:31.990 --> 00:12:34.289
to say the least, and certainly challenged many

00:12:34.289 --> 00:12:36.269
conventional Christian understandings of Jesus.

00:12:36.870 --> 00:12:39.809
Provocative is definitely the word. A bold scholarly

00:12:39.809 --> 00:12:42.879
move. It's really interesting and quite controversial.

00:12:43.279 --> 00:12:47.779
The media firestorm part. July 2013, Aslen was

00:12:47.779 --> 00:12:50.600
interviewed on Spirited Debate by Fox News chief

00:12:50.600 --> 00:12:52.990
religion correspondent, Lauren Green. Green,

00:12:53.350 --> 00:12:56.110
well, she seemed clearly unsatisfied with Aslan's

00:12:56.110 --> 00:12:58.870
credentials, or perhaps his background. She repeatedly

00:12:58.870 --> 00:13:00.929
questioned why a Muslim would write a book about

00:13:00.929 --> 00:13:03.610
Jesus. Mm -hmm. The central focus of the interview,

00:13:03.629 --> 00:13:06.429
really. Right. Aslan, understandably, defended

00:13:06.429 --> 00:13:08.909
himself quite strongly. He stated, quote, because

00:13:08.909 --> 00:13:11.370
it's my job as an academic, I'm a professor of

00:13:11.370 --> 00:13:13.350
religion, including the New Testament. That's

00:13:13.350 --> 00:13:15.769
what I do for a living. The interview, it lasted

00:13:15.769 --> 00:13:18.070
about 10 minutes, focused much more on his background

00:13:18.070 --> 00:13:20.250
than the actual content of the book, Zealot.

00:13:20.269 --> 00:13:23.750
And it went viral. massively viral. It did. And

00:13:23.750 --> 00:13:26.269
that virality, perhaps ironically or perhaps

00:13:26.269 --> 00:13:28.850
predictably in today's media climate, it propelled

00:13:28.850 --> 00:13:31.250
zealot up the charts. Number four on the New

00:13:31.250 --> 00:13:33.029
York Times hardcover bestseller list, number

00:13:33.029 --> 00:13:35.669
one on Amazon's U .S. bestseller list. It was

00:13:35.669 --> 00:13:38.070
an accidental but incredibly effective marketing

00:13:38.070 --> 00:13:41.070
campaign, wasn't it? Absolutely. But The incident

00:13:41.070 --> 00:13:43.889
sparked significant debate, right? Not just in

00:13:43.889 --> 00:13:46.330
the media, but within academia itself. Oh, yes.

00:13:46.710 --> 00:13:48.490
Elizabeth Castelli, she's a professor of religion.

00:13:48.669 --> 00:13:51.850
She criticized Green's, quote, anti -Muslim bias

00:13:51.850 --> 00:13:54.549
and the conflation of the academic study of religion

00:13:54.549 --> 00:13:57.649
with personal religious identification, which,

00:13:57.889 --> 00:14:00.110
as you highlighted, is a common misunderstanding

00:14:00.110 --> 00:14:03.149
in public discourse. Her point was that a scholar's

00:14:03.149 --> 00:14:05.850
personal face or lack thereof shouldn't automatically

00:14:05.850 --> 00:14:08.610
invalidate their academic inquiry. That's basic

00:14:08.610 --> 00:14:10.950
academic freedom. But Castelli also raised some

00:14:10.950 --> 00:14:13.009
questions about Aslan's credentials, didn't she?

00:14:13.269 --> 00:14:15.509
She did. She expressed some concern over Aslan

00:14:15.509 --> 00:14:18.429
describing himself simply as a historian. She

00:14:18.429 --> 00:14:20.789
suggested he could legitimately claim expertise

00:14:20.789 --> 00:14:23.289
in history of religions, which aligns more closely

00:14:23.289 --> 00:14:26.389
with his UCSB sociology, PhDs, interdisciplinary

00:14:26.389 --> 00:14:29.830
nature, but felt that his claims are more grandiose

00:14:29.830 --> 00:14:32.929
than that, that the label historian implied a

00:14:32.929 --> 00:14:35.250
different kind of training. OK. And the Washington

00:14:35.250 --> 00:14:37.610
Post journalist Manuel Roig Francia echoed this

00:14:37.610 --> 00:14:40.529
critique, noting UCSB doesn't offer specific

00:14:40.529 --> 00:14:42.850
degrees in history of religion per se. So there

00:14:42.850 --> 00:14:45.389
was pushback even from within academia about

00:14:45.389 --> 00:14:48.730
how he framed his expertise. There was. But it's

00:14:48.730 --> 00:14:50.450
important to acknowledge the counterpoints that

00:14:50.450 --> 00:14:53.549
emerged too. Aslan's own dissertation advisor,

00:14:53.970 --> 00:14:56.309
Mark Juergensmeyer, who's a very respected scholar,

00:14:56.850 --> 00:14:59.129
robustly defended Aslan's characterization of

00:14:59.129 --> 00:15:02.179
his doctorate. He pointed to the inherently interdisciplinary

00:15:02.179 --> 00:15:05.120
nature of UCSB's program and Aslan's extensive

00:15:05.120 --> 00:15:07.799
coursework in religion. The Philadelphia Inquirer

00:15:07.799 --> 00:15:10.759
also observed that UCSB's program allows students

00:15:10.759 --> 00:15:13.440
to, quote, tailor their studies around a topic,

00:15:13.700 --> 00:15:16.519
not a department. Which supports the idea that

00:15:16.519 --> 00:15:18.460
his chosen field of study was effectively the

00:15:18.460 --> 00:15:21.059
history of religion, just housed within a sociological

00:15:21.059 --> 00:15:23.440
framework. So the debate itself really highlights

00:15:23.440 --> 00:15:25.960
the complexities, maybe even the occasional silliness

00:15:25.960 --> 00:15:29.220
of academic boundaries and labels. Okay, on one

00:15:29.220 --> 00:15:32.019
hand, zealot itself represents this bold scholarly

00:15:32.019 --> 00:15:34.799
move, challenging traditional Christian interpretations

00:15:34.799 --> 00:15:37.440
of Jesus, placing him firmly in his historical

00:15:37.440 --> 00:15:40.059
Jewish context as a revolutionary figure. It

00:15:40.059 --> 00:15:43.100
forces us, or you, the reader, to consider Jesus

00:15:43.100 --> 00:15:44.940
through a different historically grounded lens,

00:15:45.159 --> 00:15:47.539
whether you ultimately agree or not. Right, it

00:15:47.539 --> 00:15:49.240
sparks that critical thinking. But on the other

00:15:49.240 --> 00:15:52.039
hand, the Fox News interview became this massive

00:15:52.039 --> 00:15:55.600
flashpoint. illustrating a broader public misunderstanding

00:15:55.600 --> 00:15:58.980
or maybe, sometimes, a deliberate mis -framing

00:15:58.980 --> 00:16:02.460
of academic expertise in religious studies. It

00:16:02.460 --> 00:16:04.840
powerfully highlighted the discomfort some audiences

00:16:04.840 --> 00:16:07.799
and some media outlets have with scholars from

00:16:07.799 --> 00:16:10.440
outside a particular religion studying its foundational

00:16:10.440 --> 00:16:12.879
figures. It raises really critical questions,

00:16:13.019 --> 00:16:15.440
doesn't it? Absolutely. This entire episode serves

00:16:15.440 --> 00:16:17.299
as a powerful case study for you, the listener,

00:16:17.700 --> 00:16:20.179
on the potent intersection of scholarship, media,

00:16:20.340 --> 00:16:23.320
and public perception. It raises truly critical

00:16:23.320 --> 00:16:26.419
questions we all need to consider. Like, can

00:16:26.419 --> 00:16:29.259
a scholar's personal faith background legitimately

00:16:29.259 --> 00:16:32.139
invalidate their academic research? Or is that

00:16:32.139 --> 00:16:35.120
itself a form of prejudice? How do media narratives

00:16:35.120 --> 00:16:37.720
shape the reception of scholarly work, especially

00:16:37.720 --> 00:16:40.100
when that work challenges deeply held beliefs?

00:16:40.500 --> 00:16:42.940
And perhaps most importantly, how do we, as consumers

00:16:42.940 --> 00:16:46.259
of information, evaluate expertise? Especially

00:16:46.259 --> 00:16:48.179
when that expertise comes from an unexpected

00:16:48.179 --> 00:16:50.960
source or challenges our own in -grade perspectives.

00:16:51.200 --> 00:16:53.779
It encourages a deeper look at the whole public

00:16:53.779 --> 00:16:55.919
square of ideas, how information is presented

00:16:55.919 --> 00:16:58.759
and received. That's I see. OK, so while zealot

00:16:58.759 --> 00:17:01.240
certainly catapulted him into the public consciousness,

00:17:01.860 --> 00:17:04.500
Aslan didn't stop there. He continued to explore

00:17:04.500 --> 00:17:07.099
the vast landscape of faith and other significant

00:17:07.099 --> 00:17:11.599
works. In 2017, he released God, a human history.

00:17:11.849 --> 00:17:14.970
Here he explores the history of religion, theorizes

00:17:14.970 --> 00:17:17.289
how humans began to conceive of supernatural

00:17:17.289 --> 00:17:20.609
beings, and eventually God, all presented in

00:17:20.609 --> 00:17:22.829
that accessible scholarly style he's known for.

00:17:22.890 --> 00:17:25.230
Right, tackling the big concept of God itself.

00:17:25.769 --> 00:17:27.710
Then he turned to a more specific historical

00:17:27.710 --> 00:17:30.809
narrative in 2022 with an American martyr in

00:17:30.809 --> 00:17:33.869
Persia, the epic life and tragic death of Howard

00:17:33.869 --> 00:17:36.710
Baskerville. Kirkus Reviews called it an intriguing

00:17:36.710 --> 00:17:39.230
read that breeds life into a pivotal moment of

00:17:39.230 --> 00:17:41.470
Persian -Iranian history, connecting back to

00:17:41.470 --> 00:17:44.450
his heritage there. A fascinating lesser -known

00:17:44.450 --> 00:17:47.210
story. And most recently, in 2024, he published

00:17:47.210 --> 00:17:49.569
a kid's book about Israel and Palestine. I mean,

00:17:49.690 --> 00:17:51.650
that's quite a reign, isn't it? From the conceptual

00:17:51.650 --> 00:17:54.029
history of God to a specific historical biography

00:17:54.029 --> 00:17:56.789
to a children's book on a deeply complex ongoing

00:17:56.789 --> 00:17:59.380
political issue. It really is an impressive breath,

00:17:59.960 --> 00:18:02.539
and each work offers a unique facet of his intellectual

00:18:02.539 --> 00:18:05.039
curiosity and his commitment to communication,

00:18:05.700 --> 00:18:08.880
God. A human history, for example, showcases

00:18:08.880 --> 00:18:12.000
his ability to synthesize vast amounts of anthropological,

00:18:12.440 --> 00:18:14.960
archaeological, theological information into

00:18:14.960 --> 00:18:16.940
a compelling narrative about the evolution of

00:18:16.940 --> 00:18:19.599
human spirituality. It shifts the focus from

00:18:19.599 --> 00:18:21.960
specific doctrines of individual religions to

00:18:21.960 --> 00:18:24.579
that universal human impulse. The impulse to

00:18:24.579 --> 00:18:26.940
understand the divine tracing how our conception

00:18:26.940 --> 00:18:29.559
of God has changed over millennia. It's not just

00:18:29.559 --> 00:18:31.460
about what people believe but why we believe

00:18:31.460 --> 00:18:34.000
and how those beliefs evolved. That seems fascinating.

00:18:34.299 --> 00:18:36.819
Then his work on Howard Baskerville, an American

00:18:36.819 --> 00:18:39.420
martyr in Persia that demonstrates his continued

00:18:39.420 --> 00:18:41.759
interest in Iranian history and cross -cultural

00:18:41.759 --> 00:18:43.759
narratives, connecting back to his own heritage,

00:18:43.880 --> 00:18:46.700
as you said. This book tells the largely forgotten

00:18:46.700 --> 00:18:49.119
story of an American missionary who went to Persia,

00:18:49.220 --> 00:18:52.400
now Iran, in the early 20th century. got deeply

00:18:52.400 --> 00:18:54.740
involved in Iran's constitutional revolution,

00:18:55.220 --> 00:18:58.240
and ultimately died fighting alongside the constitutionalists,

00:18:58.599 --> 00:19:01.180
became a hero there. It breeds life into a specific

00:19:01.180 --> 00:19:03.859
historical moment, showing how individual actions

00:19:03.859 --> 00:19:06.640
can have profound international impact. Wow.

00:19:07.140 --> 00:19:09.299
And a kid's book about Israel and Palestine?

00:19:10.039 --> 00:19:12.180
That's a fascinating move. It suggests a new

00:19:12.180 --> 00:19:14.920
and important avenue for him. Engaging with complex

00:19:14.920 --> 00:19:17.180
emotionally charged topics at an accessible level,

00:19:17.579 --> 00:19:19.740
trying to foster understanding from a young age,

00:19:20.099 --> 00:19:22.359
presumably by simplifying core historical narratives

00:19:22.359 --> 00:19:25.140
without taking a definitive side. That's a challenging

00:19:25.140 --> 00:19:28.980
task. It certainly is. So these works, taken

00:19:28.980 --> 00:19:32.220
together, they really highlight Aslan's consistent

00:19:32.220 --> 00:19:35.259
dedication, don't they? making complex religious

00:19:35.259 --> 00:19:37.819
and historical topics understandable to a wider

00:19:37.819 --> 00:19:40.099
audience, regardless of their prior knowledge

00:19:40.099 --> 00:19:42.279
or background. It's clear he's not just writing

00:19:42.279 --> 00:19:44.700
for academics in an ivory tower. He's writing

00:19:44.700 --> 00:19:47.059
for the general public, seeking to broaden their

00:19:47.059 --> 00:19:50.180
perspectives. Exactly. That commitment to accessibility

00:19:50.180 --> 00:19:53.700
is a hallmark of a scholar aiming for broad public

00:19:53.700 --> 00:19:56.069
impact. not just academic recognition within

00:19:56.069 --> 00:19:58.109
a narrow field. And that commitment extends beyond

00:19:58.109 --> 00:20:00.170
his own writing, too, right? You mentioned he's

00:20:00.170 --> 00:20:02.710
also actively shaped the literary landscape by

00:20:02.710 --> 00:20:04.529
curating the voices of others. That's right.

00:20:04.630 --> 00:20:06.609
And this is another fascinating dimension of

00:20:06.609 --> 00:20:11.089
his work. In 2011, he edited tablet and pen literary

00:20:11.089 --> 00:20:13.269
landscapes from the modern Middle East. This

00:20:13.269 --> 00:20:16.450
is a major anthology featuring nearly 200 pieces,

00:20:16.769 --> 00:20:19.769
poems, short stories, essays, many translated

00:20:19.769 --> 00:20:22.569
into English for the very first time from Arabic.

00:20:22.750 --> 00:20:25.710
Persian Urdu and Turkish literature the sheer

00:20:25.710 --> 00:20:28.369
scale of that project compiled with a team of

00:20:28.369 --> 00:20:31.269
regional editors and get this 77 translators

00:20:31.269 --> 00:20:33.809
It truly underscores the monumental effort involved

00:20:33.809 --> 00:20:36.789
Wow 77 translators. That's a huge undertaking

00:20:36.789 --> 00:20:39.589
But what's the core takeaway here? Why does this

00:20:39.589 --> 00:20:42.349
work as an editor matter beyond just you know

00:20:42.349 --> 00:20:44.650
being a lot of hard work? Well, these editorial

00:20:44.650 --> 00:20:46.869
projects profoundly reflect Aslan's commitment

00:20:46.869 --> 00:20:48.890
to cultural exchange and interfaith dialogue.

00:20:49.369 --> 00:20:51.150
It's a consistent thread running through his

00:20:51.150 --> 00:20:54.250
career. Tablet and Pen is a significant effort

00:20:54.250 --> 00:20:57.289
to expose Western audiences to the rich, diverse

00:20:57.289 --> 00:20:59.970
literary traditions of the Middle East, directly

00:20:59.970 --> 00:21:02.490
challenging stereotypes and fostering understanding

00:21:02.490 --> 00:21:05.450
through shared human stories, poetry, narratives.

00:21:05.890 --> 00:21:08.650
It's a direct antidote to those monolithic portrayals

00:21:08.650 --> 00:21:10.849
of the region we often see. Giving voice to the

00:21:10.849 --> 00:21:13.670
region itself? Precisely. And simultaneously,

00:21:13.910 --> 00:21:16.970
also in 2011, he co -edited Muslims and Jews

00:21:16.970 --> 00:21:20.250
in America, commonalities, contentions, and complexities

00:21:20.250 --> 00:21:22.950
with Aaron J. Hunt Tapper. This collection of

00:21:22.950 --> 00:21:25.190
essays directly explores contemporary Jewish

00:21:25.190 --> 00:21:27.930
-Muslim relations right here in the United States,

00:21:28.250 --> 00:21:30.430
highlighting his dedication to fostering understanding

00:21:30.430 --> 00:21:33.509
in complex intergroup relations, especially at

00:21:33.509 --> 00:21:35.509
a time when such dialogue is often fractured

00:21:35.509 --> 00:21:37.819
or fraught. The key insight is that he's not

00:21:37.819 --> 00:21:40.039
just a commentator, he's an active bridge builder

00:21:40.039 --> 00:21:42.759
in the literary and cultural spheres, using his

00:21:42.759 --> 00:21:45.180
platform to amplify other voices. This commitment

00:21:45.180 --> 00:21:47.619
to storytelling and cultural dialogue extends

00:21:47.619 --> 00:21:50.859
far beyond the printed page, as Aslan has also

00:21:50.859 --> 00:21:52.819
made significant waves in the world of television

00:21:52.819 --> 00:21:55.660
and media production. He founded Aslan Media,

00:21:55.779 --> 00:21:57.640
which you mentioned was a platform for alternative

00:21:57.640 --> 00:21:59.960
coverage of the Middle East and its global diaspora.

00:22:00.299 --> 00:22:03.059
And back in 2006, he co -founded BoomGen Studios

00:22:03.059 --> 00:22:06.200
with Mahad Tusi. a studio specifically focused

00:22:06.200 --> 00:22:08.240
on bringing nuanced Middle Eastern stories to

00:22:08.240 --> 00:22:10.839
American audiences. This sounds like a very deliberate

00:22:10.839 --> 00:22:13.400
strategy. These ventures are indeed a testament

00:22:13.400 --> 00:22:16.180
to Aslan's proactive approach to shaping narratives

00:22:16.180 --> 00:22:19.019
about the Middle East. He recognized, I think,

00:22:19.119 --> 00:22:21.779
that writing books, while impactful, isn't the

00:22:21.779 --> 00:22:23.980
only way to reach a mass audience in the 21st

00:22:23.980 --> 00:22:26.940
century. Right. Visual media is huge. Exactly.

00:22:27.440 --> 00:22:30.480
He moved beyond merely writing about it to actively

00:22:30.480 --> 00:22:33.769
producing and influencing visual media. BoomGen

00:22:33.769 --> 00:22:36.349
Studios, in particular, demonstrates a strategic

00:22:36.349 --> 00:22:39.009
effort, integrating diverse cultural stories

00:22:39.009 --> 00:22:41.650
into mainstream entertainment, aiming to shift

00:22:41.650 --> 00:22:43.890
perceptions, create empathy through the power

00:22:43.890 --> 00:22:46.369
of visual storytelling. They've consulted on

00:22:46.369 --> 00:22:48.970
major projects like Disney's Prince of Persia,

00:22:49.130 --> 00:22:51.609
the Broadway musical of Aladdin, John Stewart's

00:22:51.609 --> 00:22:54.569
directorial debut, Rosewater, and the Oscar -nominated

00:22:54.569 --> 00:22:57.549
documentary, The Square, about the Egyptian Revolution.

00:22:58.170 --> 00:23:00.940
So real mainstream projects. Absolutely. They

00:23:00.940 --> 00:23:03.579
even executive produced ABC's biblical epic of

00:23:03.579 --> 00:23:05.900
Kings and Prophets, which was a retelling of

00:23:05.900 --> 00:23:08.920
King David's story filmed in South Africa, showcasing

00:23:08.920 --> 00:23:11.059
this range and ambition. So what does this mean

00:23:11.059 --> 00:23:13.140
for you, the listener? Why should you care about

00:23:13.140 --> 00:23:15.940
these production ventures? Well, it means that

00:23:15.940 --> 00:23:19.099
more nuanced, more diverse stories about the

00:23:19.099 --> 00:23:21.579
Middle East are actively being brought to your

00:23:21.579 --> 00:23:24.420
screens and stages. potentially enriching your

00:23:24.420 --> 00:23:26.660
understanding beyond what traditional news or

00:23:26.660 --> 00:23:29.640
entertainment might typically offer. It's a powerful

00:23:29.640 --> 00:23:31.700
reminder that who gets to tell the stories and

00:23:31.700 --> 00:23:34.420
from what perspective profoundly impacts how

00:23:34.420 --> 00:23:38.079
we perceive entire regions and cultures. Aslan's

00:23:38.079 --> 00:23:40.400
move into production highlights his deep understanding

00:23:40.400 --> 00:23:42.940
of this power and his strategic effort to leverage

00:23:42.940 --> 00:23:45.920
it for what he presumably sees as better cross

00:23:45.920 --> 00:23:48.420
-cultural understanding. His influence in television

00:23:48.420 --> 00:23:50.559
wasn't just limited to production, though. He

00:23:50.559 --> 00:23:52.700
also stepped into significant creative and on

00:23:52.700 --> 00:23:55.480
-screen roles himself. In 2015, Aslan served

00:23:55.480 --> 00:23:57.559
as a consulting producer for the second and third

00:23:57.559 --> 00:24:00.000
seasons of that critically acclaimed HBO series,

00:24:00.119 --> 00:24:02.759
The Leftover. Ah, yes, great show. He was apparently

00:24:02.759 --> 00:24:05.059
instrumental in shaping the protagonist Kevin

00:24:05.059 --> 00:24:08.500
Garvey's character arc in season two. That demonstrates

00:24:08.500 --> 00:24:10.920
his ability to apply his understanding of complex

00:24:10.920 --> 00:24:13.839
human psychology, spiritual searching, to fictional

00:24:13.839 --> 00:24:17.000
drama. That's a fascinating application of his

00:24:17.000 --> 00:24:19.099
expertise, isn't it? Taking academic insights

00:24:19.099 --> 00:24:21.420
and applying them to a character's internal journey

00:24:21.420 --> 00:24:24.960
on a major TV show. It really is. It shows how

00:24:24.960 --> 00:24:27.220
his deep thinking about religion and meaning

00:24:27.220 --> 00:24:29.920
could translate into compelling narrative arcs.

00:24:30.059 --> 00:24:33.180
Then, in 2016, 2016, he hosted Rough Draft with

00:24:33.180 --> 00:24:36.160
Reza Aslan on the Ovation Network. This was a

00:24:36.160 --> 00:24:38.099
talk show where he conversed with acclaimed authors,

00:24:38.299 --> 00:24:41.200
writers in film, TV, journalism, positioning

00:24:41.200 --> 00:24:43.740
himself as an intellectual interviewer, leveraging

00:24:43.740 --> 00:24:45.960
his natural curiosity and communication skills

00:24:45.960 --> 00:24:48.319
to extract insights from other storytellers.

00:24:48.319 --> 00:24:50.619
Right, showcasing another side of his communication

00:24:50.619 --> 00:24:53.619
skills. Showing yet another facet of his work,

00:24:53.799 --> 00:24:56.000
he co -wrote a sitcom pilot called Allah and

00:24:56.000 --> 00:24:58.819
the Family, which was based on his own experiences

00:24:58.819 --> 00:25:01.119
as an Iranian immigrant growing up in Oklahoma.

00:25:01.529 --> 00:25:03.930
ABC actually bought the pilot, though it hasn't

00:25:03.930 --> 00:25:05.869
been produced yet, as far as we know. But still,

00:25:06.009 --> 00:25:08.930
that's a stark contrast to consulting on a dark

00:25:08.930 --> 00:25:11.910
drama like The Leftovers. These projects truly

00:25:11.910 --> 00:25:14.509
showcase his remarkable versatility, don't they?

00:25:14.690 --> 00:25:17.170
And his continuous drive to engage with ideas

00:25:17.170 --> 00:25:20.390
across different forms and genres. From the profound,

00:25:20.609 --> 00:25:23.069
almost esoteric discussions on belief and suffering

00:25:23.069 --> 00:25:25.950
in The Leftovers, to the potentially relatable

00:25:25.950 --> 00:25:28.509
and comedic exploration of immigrant identity

00:25:28.509 --> 00:25:31.619
in Allah and the family. It's a compelling demonstration

00:25:31.619 --> 00:25:34.319
of how he translates his scholarly insights into

00:25:34.319 --> 00:25:37.160
accessible entertainment. Aiming to connect with

00:25:37.160 --> 00:25:39.339
diverse audiences on multiple levels, drama,

00:25:39.599 --> 00:25:42.000
interview, humor, he understands that different

00:25:42.000 --> 00:25:43.900
mediums require different approaches to effectively

00:25:43.900 --> 00:25:46.950
communicate complex ideas. However... It was

00:25:46.950 --> 00:25:48.710
a different television project that would thrust

00:25:48.710 --> 00:25:51.950
him into one of his most significant public controversies,

00:25:52.309 --> 00:25:55.109
one that really became a major flashpoint. This

00:25:55.109 --> 00:25:58.230
was CNN's spiritual travel series Believer, which

00:25:58.230 --> 00:26:01.349
premiered in 2017. The show followed Aslan as

00:26:01.349 --> 00:26:03.869
he immersed himself in and experienced various

00:26:03.869 --> 00:26:06.230
fringe and often, let's say, disreputable or

00:26:06.230 --> 00:26:08.170
misunderstood religious traditions internationally.

00:26:08.809 --> 00:26:12.329
He himself compared it to Anthony Bourdain. Parts

00:26:12.329 --> 00:26:15.109
Unknown, a show known for its immersive, sometimes

00:26:15.109 --> 00:26:17.630
edgy, cultural experiences. Like setting a certain

00:26:17.630 --> 00:26:20.569
expectation. The very first episode, which focused

00:26:20.569 --> 00:26:23.589
on the Aghori sect of Hinduism in India, became

00:26:23.589 --> 00:26:26.170
a massive point of contention almost immediately.

00:26:26.670 --> 00:26:29.089
Aslan was heavily criticized for sensationalism

00:26:29.089 --> 00:26:31.829
for alleged anti -Hinduism, notably for that

00:26:31.829 --> 00:26:34.269
infamous scene where he ate part of a human brain

00:26:34.269 --> 00:26:37.329
while meeting Aghori Sadhus, which was widely

00:26:37.329 --> 00:26:40.109
seen as a provocative stunt. That scene got a

00:26:40.109 --> 00:26:42.559
lot of attention. The backlash was swift and

00:26:42.559 --> 00:26:44.980
severe, coming from numerous Hindu -American

00:26:44.980 --> 00:26:47.500
organizations. The United States India Political

00:26:47.500 --> 00:26:49.559
Action Committee stated the show characterized

00:26:49.559 --> 00:26:52.819
Hinduism as cannibalistic amidst what they described

00:26:52.819 --> 00:26:55.799
as rising anti -Indian hate -fueled attacks at

00:26:55.799 --> 00:26:58.759
the time. Context matters there. Vamshi Juluri,

00:26:59.039 --> 00:27:01.640
a professor of media studies, called the episode

00:27:01.640 --> 00:27:05.359
reckless, racist, and anti -immigrant. Strong

00:27:05.359 --> 00:27:08.299
words. While Aseem Shukla of the Hindu -American

00:27:08.299 --> 00:27:20.869
Foundation accused Aslan of being And the criticisms

00:27:20.869 --> 00:27:22.869
didn't stop at just the general tone or that

00:27:22.869 --> 00:27:25.529
one specific scene. Critics pointed to specific

00:27:25.529 --> 00:27:28.069
alleged mischaracterizations and inaccuracies

00:27:28.069 --> 00:27:30.509
in the portrayal. For instance, the show calling

00:27:30.509 --> 00:27:33.289
Varanasi the City of the Dead, which While it's

00:27:33.289 --> 00:27:35.690
a major site for pilgrimage and cremation, critics

00:27:35.690 --> 00:27:38.170
argued reduces a deeply spiritual and vibrant

00:27:38.170 --> 00:27:40.589
city to a morbid cliché. They also mentioned

00:27:40.589 --> 00:27:42.990
referring to the sacred immersion of ashes in

00:27:42.990 --> 00:27:46.430
the Gantes River as dumping, which sounds disrespectful

00:27:46.430 --> 00:27:49.769
rather than ritualistic. Furthermore, critics

00:27:49.769 --> 00:27:52.990
argued the show portrayed the Agors, a very small,

00:27:53.410 --> 00:27:56.269
extreme sect, almost as representative or as

00:27:56.269 --> 00:27:58.230
an exception in the struggle against the caste

00:27:58.230 --> 00:28:01.640
system in a way that was misleading. and that

00:28:01.640 --> 00:28:03.599
it fundamentally misunderstood the distinction

00:28:03.599 --> 00:28:06.000
between Varna, the four broad classes in ancient

00:28:06.000 --> 00:28:09.799
Indian society, and Jati, the far more numerous

00:28:09.799 --> 00:28:12.880
specific hereditary groups or castes. Complex

00:28:12.880 --> 00:28:15.059
social structures being simplified. Right, nuances

00:28:15.059 --> 00:28:17.740
lost. They also accused him of misrepresenting

00:28:17.740 --> 00:28:20.460
the very notion of God in Hinduism itself, which

00:28:20.460 --> 00:28:23.059
is incredibly diverse. And adding another layer

00:28:23.059 --> 00:28:25.460
to the controversy, organizations like American

00:28:25.460 --> 00:28:27.359
Hindus Against Defamation and the Hindu American

00:28:27.359 --> 00:28:29.980
Foundation questioned why Aslan's own religion,

00:28:29.980 --> 00:28:32.380
Islam, was not covered in the series, asking

00:28:32.380 --> 00:28:34.519
if there was a double standard. How did Aslan

00:28:34.519 --> 00:28:36.880
respond to that? Aslan responded that he had

00:28:36.880 --> 00:28:38.539
actually planned to cover the Ashura Festival

00:28:38.539 --> 00:28:41.319
in Pakistan for the show, but had to abandon

00:28:41.319 --> 00:28:43.740
it due to prohibitive insurance costs related

00:28:43.740 --> 00:28:46.380
to security concerns there. And he pledged to

00:28:46.380 --> 00:28:49.660
cover Islam if the series continued. But, well,

00:28:49.660 --> 00:28:52.529
it didn't. This entire controversy really serves

00:28:52.529 --> 00:28:55.049
as a microcosm, doesn't it? Of the huge challenges

00:28:55.049 --> 00:28:57.089
in presenting nuanced cultural and religious

00:28:57.089 --> 00:28:59.950
practices to a mass audience, especially when

00:28:59.950 --> 00:29:02.650
filtered through a Western media lens, and especially

00:29:02.650 --> 00:29:05.049
when focusing on practices considered fringe

00:29:05.049 --> 00:29:07.829
or shocking. The Aghori episode exposed that

00:29:07.829 --> 00:29:10.549
very fine line between immersive journalism and

00:29:10.549 --> 00:29:13.150
outright sensationalism, igniting a significant

00:29:13.150 --> 00:29:15.470
debate about representation, cultural sensitivity,

00:29:15.589 --> 00:29:18.309
and the potential perpetuation of harmful stereotypes,

00:29:18.369 --> 00:29:21.029
particularly about on Western religions. And

00:29:21.029 --> 00:29:23.190
then things escalated further, leading to the

00:29:23.190 --> 00:29:27.089
show's cancellation. On June 9, 2017, CNN canceled

00:29:27.089 --> 00:29:29.529
Believer's Plan's second season. This happened

00:29:29.529 --> 00:29:32.210
after Aslan posted some profane anti -Trump tweets

00:29:32.210 --> 00:29:34.710
following the London Bridge attack. Aslan called

00:29:34.710 --> 00:29:36.990
President Trump, quote, a piece of shit and a

00:29:36.990 --> 00:29:39.750
man baby. Very strong language. Very strong,

00:29:39.930 --> 00:29:42.170
very public language. Aslan issued a statement

00:29:42.170 --> 00:29:45.150
afterwards saying, I am not a journalist, I am

00:29:45.150 --> 00:29:48.089
a social commentator and scholar, and so I agree

00:29:48.089 --> 00:29:51.150
with CNN that it is best that we part ways. He

00:29:51.150 --> 00:29:53.450
also defended the Aghori episode itself in a

00:29:53.450 --> 00:29:56.470
separate Facebook post. But for CNN, the tweets

00:29:56.470 --> 00:29:59.109
seem to be the final straw. It really shows how

00:29:59.109 --> 00:30:01.630
a public persona, especially a politically -charged

00:30:01.630 --> 00:30:04.930
one, can clash with a major media organization's

00:30:04.930 --> 00:30:07.490
brand identity. Exactly. And that cancellation

00:30:07.490 --> 00:30:09.970
highlights a crucial point, how an individual's

00:30:09.970 --> 00:30:12.150
commentary, even if made outside their primary

00:30:12.150 --> 00:30:14.170
professional role, maybe on their personal Twitter,

00:30:14.809 --> 00:30:17.589
can have significant repercussions in today's

00:30:17.589 --> 00:30:19.869
highly polarized, politically -charged media

00:30:19.869 --> 00:30:22.769
landscape. Aslan's distinction, his argument

00:30:22.769 --> 00:30:25.250
that he's a journalist versus a social commentator

00:30:25.250 --> 00:30:27.670
and scholar is key to understanding his perspective

00:30:27.670 --> 00:30:30.289
on this fallout. How so? He was essentially arguing,

00:30:30.309 --> 00:30:33.130
I think, that his academic and commentary roles

00:30:33.130 --> 00:30:35.089
allowed for a different kind of expression, a

00:30:35.089 --> 00:30:37.849
more opinionated stance, perhaps more advocacy

00:30:37.849 --> 00:30:40.450
than a traditional journalist might typically

00:30:40.450 --> 00:30:43.309
adhere to, where impartiality is often seen as

00:30:43.309 --> 00:30:46.190
paramount. But clearly, CNN disagreed about where

00:30:46.190 --> 00:30:48.589
that line should be drawn when he was representing

00:30:48.589 --> 00:30:51.680
their brand on air. Right. The platform matters.

00:30:52.279 --> 00:30:54.900
Absolutely. So for you, our listener, this whole

00:30:54.900 --> 00:30:57.640
believer incident is a powerful case study on

00:30:57.640 --> 00:31:01.319
media ethics, cultural representation, the responsibilities

00:31:01.319 --> 00:31:03.359
of public figures operating across different

00:31:03.359 --> 00:31:05.779
platforms. It prompts us to critically examine

00:31:05.779 --> 00:31:08.380
how fringe cultures, how non -Western religious

00:31:08.380 --> 00:31:11.519
practices are portrayed, the potential for misinterpretation,

00:31:11.759 --> 00:31:14.240
for sensationalism, and the broader implications

00:31:14.240 --> 00:31:16.240
of a host's personal political statements on

00:31:16.240 --> 00:31:18.799
their professional projects. It also challenges

00:31:18.799 --> 00:31:21.740
us, maybe, to consider our own biases when encountering

00:31:21.740 --> 00:31:24.059
unfamiliar religious practices and how we consume

00:31:24.059 --> 00:31:26.579
information about them, a vital lesson in critical

00:31:26.579 --> 00:31:29.039
media consumption. Beyond his media projects,

00:31:29.319 --> 00:31:31.460
Aslan has consistently engaged with the broader

00:31:31.460 --> 00:31:34.059
political and philosophical discussions of our

00:31:34.059 --> 00:31:37.039
time, often with equally strong opinions, as

00:31:37.039 --> 00:31:39.640
we've just seen. This brings us back to a thread

00:31:39.640 --> 00:31:41.599
we first encountered when discussing his book,

00:31:41.640 --> 00:31:45.079
How to Win a Cosmic War. Let's revisit that cosmic

00:31:45.079 --> 00:31:47.440
war concept and maybe do a deeper dive into his

00:31:47.440 --> 00:31:50.420
political analysis there. Aslan's analysis of

00:31:50.420 --> 00:31:52.599
the war on terrorism, first presented in that

00:31:52.599 --> 00:31:55.440
book, describes al -Qaeda's jihad not just as

00:31:55.440 --> 00:31:58.890
holy war, but as a cosmic war. a kind of ritualistic

00:31:58.890 --> 00:32:01.170
drama where participants believe they are enacting

00:32:01.170 --> 00:32:04.130
a heavenly battle right here on earth. He argues

00:32:04.130 --> 00:32:06.529
that American rhetoric of a war on terrorism

00:32:06.529 --> 00:32:09.329
inadvertently mirrored this cosmic dualism with

00:32:09.329 --> 00:32:11.950
al -Qaeda's jihad, effectively creating or at

00:32:11.950 --> 00:32:14.130
least reinforcing the very narrative it claimed

00:32:14.130 --> 00:32:16.730
to fight against. This analysis provides a really

00:32:16.730 --> 00:32:18.910
sophisticated framework, I think, for understanding

00:32:18.910 --> 00:32:22.309
religiously motivated conflicts. It moves beyond

00:32:22.309 --> 00:32:25.670
a simple good versus evil binary. By highlighting

00:32:25.670 --> 00:32:27.609
the rhetorical similarities between opposing

00:32:27.609 --> 00:32:30.650
sides, he challenges conventional wisdom. He

00:32:30.650 --> 00:32:33.390
urges a reconsideration of strategy. His core

00:32:33.390 --> 00:32:35.369
argument is that by labeling the conflict in

00:32:35.369 --> 00:32:38.589
such existential absolute terms, the U .S. inadvertently

00:32:38.589 --> 00:32:40.849
played into Al Qaeda's own narrative, their narrative

00:32:40.849 --> 00:32:43.269
of a final apocalyptic showdown between pure

00:32:43.269 --> 00:32:45.470
good and pure evil. Which empowers them, in a

00:32:45.470 --> 00:32:48.640
way. Potentially, yes. His emphasis on democratic

00:32:48.640 --> 00:32:51.640
engagement of moderate forces offers a practical,

00:32:52.180 --> 00:32:55.099
if obviously complex, alternative to purely military

00:32:55.099 --> 00:32:58.500
solutions. It's rooted in a sociological understanding

00:32:58.500 --> 00:33:00.920
of how social movements gain or lose legitimacy.

00:33:01.880 --> 00:33:04.259
He consistently differentiates between Islamism,

00:33:04.319 --> 00:33:06.619
which he argues often has negotiable, sometimes

00:33:06.619 --> 00:33:09.279
legitimate political goals, and Jihadism, which

00:33:09.279 --> 00:33:11.799
he sees as dreaming of an idealized, uncompromising,

00:33:11.980 --> 00:33:14.609
pan -Islamic past. His proposed solution remains

00:33:14.609 --> 00:33:16.970
engaging those moderate Islamic political forces

00:33:16.970 --> 00:33:19.789
in democratic processes. Because, as he stated,

00:33:20.230 --> 00:33:22.069
popular support for more extremist groups has

00:33:22.069 --> 00:33:24.190
diminished in scenarios where that happens. It

00:33:24.190 --> 00:33:26.809
gives people a legitimate democratic outlet for

00:33:26.809 --> 00:33:28.750
political grievances rather than forcing them

00:33:28.750 --> 00:33:31.029
into extremist camps. That makes sense, providing

00:33:31.029 --> 00:33:33.549
alternatives. Exactly. And if we connect this

00:33:33.549 --> 00:33:35.750
to the bigger picture, how might this framework

00:33:35.750 --> 00:33:39.019
apply to other global conflicts? where religious

00:33:39.019 --> 00:33:41.480
or ideological narratives are deeply intertwined

00:33:41.480 --> 00:33:44.180
with political objectives. Think about conflicts,

00:33:44.740 --> 00:33:47.240
even seemingly secular ones, where groups adopt

00:33:47.240 --> 00:33:49.700
an almost existential us -versus -them narrative,

00:33:50.240 --> 00:33:53.400
total opposition. Aslan's framework encourages

00:33:53.400 --> 00:33:56.400
us to analyze if, in those situations, both sides

00:33:56.400 --> 00:33:58.380
might be inadvertently playing into a similar

00:33:58.380 --> 00:34:01.180
ritual drama, where the enemy isn't just an opponent,

00:34:01.539 --> 00:34:04.200
but an embodiment of absolute wrong. This forces

00:34:04.200 --> 00:34:06.119
a deeper look at the rhetoric, the motivations,

00:34:06.440 --> 00:34:08.719
the underlying ideological structures that truly

00:34:08.719 --> 00:34:11.119
drive these conflict situations. It's a potentially

00:34:11.119 --> 00:34:13.119
powerful tool for de -escalation and promoting

00:34:13.119 --> 00:34:15.639
understanding, not just reaction. This nuanced

00:34:15.639 --> 00:34:18.159
perspective on conflict seems to extend to his

00:34:18.159 --> 00:34:20.760
vigorous advocacy for fundamental human rights

00:34:20.760 --> 00:34:24.599
and religious pluralism as well. Aslan has been

00:34:24.599 --> 00:34:26.840
an outspoken advocate for religious freedom,

00:34:27.139 --> 00:34:28.880
for the protection of religious minorities throughout

00:34:28.880 --> 00:34:32.039
the Middle East. He has specifically called for...

00:34:32.039 --> 00:34:42.219
That's a significant stance to take, isn't it?

00:34:42.380 --> 00:34:45.699
Especially given his Iranian heritage. critiquing

00:34:45.699 --> 00:34:48.139
the government there so directly on this issue.

00:34:48.420 --> 00:34:51.079
It really is significant. His advocacy here demonstrates

00:34:51.079 --> 00:34:54.320
a consistent commitment to universal human rights

00:34:54.320 --> 00:34:57.360
that seems to transcend specific religious affiliations

00:34:57.360 --> 00:34:59.960
or even national loyalties. His call for the

00:34:59.960 --> 00:35:01.800
protection of the Baha 'i community in Iran is

00:35:01.800 --> 00:35:03.420
particularly noteworthy given his background.

00:35:03.940 --> 00:35:06.079
It highlights his willingness to critique practices

00:35:06.079 --> 00:35:08.539
within a country connected to his own heritage,

00:35:09.000 --> 00:35:11.019
even when it might be personally or politically

00:35:11.019 --> 00:35:13.820
uncomfortable. This isn't just a detached academic

00:35:13.820 --> 00:35:16.219
observation. It comes across as a passionate

00:35:16.219 --> 00:35:19.659
plea for justice. He also issued a very strong

00:35:19.659 --> 00:35:22.400
warning, saying that the persecution and displacement

00:35:22.400 --> 00:35:24.719
of Middle Eastern Christian communities represent,

00:35:25.179 --> 00:35:27.860
quote, nothing less than a regional religious

00:35:27.860 --> 00:35:30.360
cleansing that will soon prove to be a historic

00:35:30.360 --> 00:35:33.960
disaster for Christians and Muslims alike. That

00:35:33.960 --> 00:35:36.320
underscores the gravity he sees in the situation

00:35:36.320 --> 00:35:38.739
for these vulnerable communities and the broader

00:35:38.739 --> 00:35:40.960
implications for the region's cultural and religious

00:35:40.960 --> 00:35:43.750
diversity. He sees it as a loss for everyone.

00:35:44.409 --> 00:35:47.210
So the takeaway for you, the listener, from this

00:35:47.210 --> 00:35:50.050
advocacy? It highlights the urgency, really,

00:35:50.210 --> 00:35:52.170
of interfaith understanding and the protection

00:35:52.170 --> 00:35:55.050
of minorities, especially in conflict zones or

00:35:55.050 --> 00:35:57.610
under authoritarian regimes. It grounds these

00:35:57.610 --> 00:35:59.610
sometimes theoretical discussions about religion

00:35:59.610 --> 00:36:02.769
and rights in very real, very human consequences.

00:36:03.150 --> 00:36:05.809
It urges your attention to ongoing human rights

00:36:05.809 --> 00:36:08.110
issues, reminding us that religious freedom isn't

00:36:08.110 --> 00:36:10.389
just an abstract concept talked about in universities.

00:36:10.750 --> 00:36:12.889
It's a matter of life and death, of cultural

00:36:12.889 --> 00:36:15.469
survival for millions of people. His strong stance

00:36:15.469 --> 00:36:17.929
on religious freedom, his deep understanding

00:36:17.929 --> 00:36:21.030
of faith traditions, it naturally led him to

00:36:21.030 --> 00:36:24.050
engage, and often clash quite publicly, with

00:36:24.050 --> 00:36:26.969
prominent voices in the new atheist movement.

00:36:27.340 --> 00:36:30.679
Back in a 2014 interview, Aslan criticized what

00:36:30.679 --> 00:36:33.219
he termed the armchair atheism of figures like

00:36:33.219 --> 00:36:36.099
Sam Harris and Bill Maher, arguing they lacked

00:36:36.099 --> 00:36:37.980
formal training in religious studies and were

00:36:37.980 --> 00:36:40.619
therefore, in his view, unable to effectively

00:36:40.619 --> 00:36:42.840
comment on how religion actually shapes human

00:36:42.840 --> 00:36:46.539
behavior in nuanced ways. questioning their credentials

00:36:46.539 --> 00:36:48.619
to speak on the topic. He even called Richard

00:36:48.619 --> 00:36:51.760
Dawkins a buffoon in that context, contrasting

00:36:51.760 --> 00:36:53.940
them with what he called the philosophical atheism

00:36:53.940 --> 00:36:56.139
of earlier thinkers, perhaps like Nietzsche or

00:36:56.139 --> 00:36:59.380
Marx, who he said were experts in religion, people

00:36:59.380 --> 00:37:01.820
who understood religious texts and history deeply

00:37:01.820 --> 00:37:04.199
before critiquing them. It's a strong critique,

00:37:04.300 --> 00:37:06.500
focusing heavily on academic credentials versus

00:37:06.500 --> 00:37:10.139
maybe popular commentary. It is. And one could

00:37:10.139 --> 00:37:12.619
argue, as you hinted earlier, that perhaps a

00:37:12.619 --> 00:37:14.699
common person's experience of faith, or their

00:37:14.699 --> 00:37:17.559
reasons for lacking faith, is also a valid perspective,

00:37:18.059 --> 00:37:19.960
even if it's an armchair observation from an

00:37:19.960 --> 00:37:23.300
academic standpoint. Is Aslan's position perhaps

00:37:23.300 --> 00:37:26.380
too dismissive of lived, non -academic experiences?

00:37:26.679 --> 00:37:28.880
Yeah, that's the counterargument, isn't it? It's

00:37:28.880 --> 00:37:31.159
a very fair question, and it really gets to the

00:37:31.159 --> 00:37:33.800
heart of that particular debate. Aslan's position,

00:37:33.820 --> 00:37:36.380
as he articulated it, reveals him as a staunch

00:37:36.380 --> 00:37:38.960
defender of nuanced, contextualized religious

00:37:38.960 --> 00:37:42.500
understanding against what he perceives as simplistic

00:37:42.500 --> 00:37:45.869
and often prejudiced critiques. His arguments

00:37:45.869 --> 00:37:48.289
against armchair atheism center on the importance

00:37:48.289 --> 00:37:51.610
of academic rigor, historical context, sociological

00:37:51.610 --> 00:37:54.469
understanding when analyzing complex social phenomena

00:37:54.469 --> 00:37:56.769
like religion. He believes that without that

00:37:56.769 --> 00:37:59.429
deep academic grounding, one risks making broad,

00:37:59.670 --> 00:38:01.809
inaccurate, potentially harmful generalizations.

00:38:02.369 --> 00:38:04.989
For him, a lived, non -academic experience is

00:38:04.989 --> 00:38:07.190
certainly valid for personal belief or non -belief.

00:38:07.320 --> 00:38:09.460
But not necessarily for making scholarly judgments

00:38:09.460 --> 00:38:12.099
or broad public pronouncements about global religious

00:38:12.099 --> 00:38:14.800
trends or the fundamental nature of faith itself.

00:38:15.340 --> 00:38:17.619
So it's about the scope of the claims being made.

00:38:17.739 --> 00:38:19.800
Exactly. This isn't just a casual disagreement.

00:38:19.920 --> 00:38:22.900
It's a fundamental clash of methodologies of

00:38:22.900 --> 00:38:26.289
worldviews. pitting a kind of social scientific

00:38:26.289 --> 00:38:30.030
historical approach against a more philosophical

00:38:30.030 --> 00:38:33.269
or sometimes purely observational critique. And

00:38:33.269 --> 00:38:35.530
this clash played out very dramatically on CNN

00:38:35.530 --> 00:38:39.889
in September 2014. Aslan criticized comedian

00:38:39.889 --> 00:38:42.269
Bill Maher quite strongly for characterizing

00:38:42.269 --> 00:38:45.849
female genital mutilation FGM as simply an Islamic

00:38:45.849 --> 00:38:48.849
problem. In addition to Maher making several

00:38:48.849 --> 00:38:51.050
other sweeping generalizations about the faith

00:38:51.050 --> 00:38:53.210
of Islam. Right, that debate got a lot of traction.

00:38:53.550 --> 00:38:55.650
Aslan directly challenged Maher, stating, quote,

00:38:56.130 --> 00:38:58.329
to say Muslim countries as though Pakistan and

00:38:58.329 --> 00:39:00.590
Turkey are the same, it's frankly, and I use

00:39:00.590 --> 00:39:03.880
this word seriously, stupid. Very direct. He

00:39:03.880 --> 00:39:06.460
also highlighted what he saw as U .S. hypocrisy,

00:39:06.760 --> 00:39:08.900
condemning ISIS actions while simultaneously

00:39:08.900 --> 00:39:11.239
partnering closely with Saudi Arabia, pointing

00:39:11.239 --> 00:39:13.119
out that Saudi Arabia had, according to reports

00:39:13.119 --> 00:39:16.099
he cited, beheaded 19 people during the very

00:39:16.099 --> 00:39:18.300
time ISIS actions were being intensely discussed,

00:39:18.860 --> 00:39:20.679
drawing a direct, uncomfortable parallel that

00:39:20.679 --> 00:39:23.380
put Marha on the defensive. That debate became

00:39:23.380 --> 00:39:25.800
a significant flashpoint for Aslan's argument.

00:39:26.650 --> 00:39:29.989
that generalizing about an entire religion, especially

00:39:29.989 --> 00:39:32.510
one as vast and diverse as Islam with over a

00:39:32.510 --> 00:39:35.869
billion followers, is not only reductive, but,

00:39:35.869 --> 00:39:39.289
in his words, bigoted. He followed up with an

00:39:39.289 --> 00:39:41.409
article in the New York Times in October 2014

00:39:41.409 --> 00:39:44.730
titled, Bill Maher isn't the only one who misunderstands

00:39:44.730 --> 00:39:47.349
religion. Where he wrote, and this is key, Bill

00:39:47.349 --> 00:39:49.889
Maher is right to condemn religious practices

00:39:49.889 --> 00:39:52.670
that violate fundamental human rights. Religious

00:39:52.670 --> 00:39:55.050
communities must do more to counter extremist

00:39:55.050 --> 00:39:57.710
interpretations of their faith. So he's not defending

00:39:57.710 --> 00:39:59.829
the practices. Right. He acknowledges the problem.

00:39:59.969 --> 00:40:02.889
But he continues, failing to recognize that religion

00:40:02.889 --> 00:40:05.630
is embedded in culture and making a blanket judgment

00:40:05.630 --> 00:40:07.769
about the world's second largest religion is

00:40:07.769 --> 00:40:11.219
simply bigotry. No. So Aslan isn't defending

00:40:11.219 --> 00:40:13.820
harmful practices themselves. He's attacking

00:40:13.820 --> 00:40:16.099
the analytical framework used to critique them,

00:40:16.440 --> 00:40:18.260
arguing for much more precision and cultural

00:40:18.260 --> 00:40:20.840
context. Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater,

00:40:20.840 --> 00:40:23.099
essentially. Okay. But this wasn't a one -sided

00:40:23.099 --> 00:40:25.280
discussion, right? There were counter -critiques

00:40:25.280 --> 00:40:28.119
to Aslan's points as well. Oh, absolutely. And

00:40:28.119 --> 00:40:30.300
it's crucial to acknowledge those counter -critiques

00:40:30.300 --> 00:40:33.340
to get the full picture. Eric Sassen, writing

00:40:33.340 --> 00:40:35.900
in The New Republic, directly challenge some

00:40:35.900 --> 00:40:38.300
of Aslan's claims from that CNN interview with

00:40:38.300 --> 00:40:41.380
Marr. For instance, Sassen pointed out Human

00:40:41.380 --> 00:40:43.699
Rights Watch reports indicating a significant

00:40:43.699 --> 00:40:47.000
rollback of women's rights in places like Indonesia

00:40:47.000 --> 00:40:49.940
and Turkey. even though those countries had elected

00:40:49.940 --> 00:40:53.360
female leaders at times, which complicated Aslan's

00:40:53.360 --> 00:40:55.639
argument about the necessarily progressive nature

00:40:55.639 --> 00:40:58.699
of moderate Islamist parties in power. OK, so

00:40:58.699 --> 00:41:01.019
pushing back on that specific point. Yes. Saz

00:41:01.019 --> 00:41:03.940
also noted that FGM, the issue Maher raised,

00:41:04.380 --> 00:41:06.760
is documented as a significant issue in Muslim

00:41:06.760 --> 00:41:09.320
-majority Malaysia, not just confined to Central

00:41:09.320 --> 00:41:11.480
Africa, as Aslan seemed to imply in the debate,

00:41:12.039 --> 00:41:14.119
suggesting the problem was perhaps more widespread

00:41:14.119 --> 00:41:17.179
within diverse Muslim contexts than Aslan presented.

00:41:17.190 --> 00:41:20.409
David Packman, another commentator, also cast

00:41:20.409 --> 00:41:23.489
doubt on some of Aslan's broader claims, particularly

00:41:23.489 --> 00:41:26.570
regarding the universality or uniqueness of certain

00:41:26.570 --> 00:41:29.409
types of religious violence he discussed. And

00:41:29.409 --> 00:41:31.530
Sam Harris, one of the prominent new atheists

00:41:31.530 --> 00:41:33.570
Aslan had initially critiqued, fired back as

00:41:33.570 --> 00:41:36.469
well. Harris criticized Aslan for what he saw

00:41:36.469 --> 00:41:38.650
as a tendency to consistently blame individuals

00:41:38.650 --> 00:41:41.130
or political factors or misinterpretations rather

00:41:41.130 --> 00:41:43.730
than Islam itself for violence committed in its

00:41:43.730 --> 00:41:47.139
name. labeling Aslan's arguments as postmodernist

00:41:47.139 --> 00:41:49.800
nonsense that essentially absolve religion of

00:41:49.800 --> 00:41:52.619
any inherent responsibility. So a real back and

00:41:52.619 --> 00:41:54.980
forth about where responsibility lies, individuals,

00:41:55.460 --> 00:41:57.519
interpretations, culture, or the religion's core

00:41:57.519 --> 00:42:00.730
tenets. Exactly. This extended dialogue, this

00:42:00.730 --> 00:42:02.969
whole controversy, it really challenges you,

00:42:03.050 --> 00:42:06.269
the listener, to consider the pitfalls of generalizations.

00:42:06.909 --> 00:42:09.469
Especially when discussing vast and diverse religious

00:42:09.469 --> 00:42:12.010
traditions, it encourages a critical examination

00:42:12.010 --> 00:42:15.250
of both religious defenses and secular critiques,

00:42:15.670 --> 00:42:17.570
prompting crucial questions about how we can

00:42:17.570 --> 00:42:19.730
discuss sensitive cultural and religious issues

00:42:19.730 --> 00:42:23.059
responsibly and accurately. How do we avoid both

00:42:23.059 --> 00:42:25.480
uncritical acceptance of problematic practices

00:42:25.480 --> 00:42:28.739
and prejudice condemnation of entire groups or

00:42:28.739 --> 00:42:31.019
traditions? It's a difficult balance. It is.

00:42:31.219 --> 00:42:33.599
And it also powerfully exposes the complexity

00:42:33.599 --> 00:42:36.019
of international relations human rights debates,

00:42:36.719 --> 00:42:39.500
reminding us that there are rarely simple, universally

00:42:39.500 --> 00:42:42.260
agreed -upon answers, and that even the definitions

00:42:42.260 --> 00:42:44.539
of things like progress or responsibility or

00:42:44.539 --> 00:42:46.880
causation can be intensely debated depending

00:42:46.880 --> 00:42:49.539
on your framework. It's a crucial lesson in critical

00:42:49.539 --> 00:42:52.230
engagement with public discourse. These public

00:42:52.230 --> 00:42:56.530
engagements, from academic debates to media firestorms,

00:42:56.750 --> 00:42:58.969
they really reveal a scholar deeply embedded

00:42:58.969 --> 00:43:01.530
in the contemporary world whose professional

00:43:01.530 --> 00:43:03.989
life intertwines significantly with his personal

00:43:03.989 --> 00:43:08.099
journey and, well, public recognition. On a more

00:43:08.099 --> 00:43:09.800
personal note, just to round out the picture,

00:43:10.139 --> 00:43:11.980
Aslan was previously engaged to the journalist

00:43:11.980 --> 00:43:14.059
Amanda Fortini, but that relationship ended back

00:43:14.059 --> 00:43:17.500
in 2008. He then married Jessica Jackley in 2011.

00:43:18.139 --> 00:43:20.079
She's an entrepreneur and author known for co

00:43:20.079 --> 00:43:22.980
-founding Kiva, and she is Christian. So they

00:43:22.980 --> 00:43:24.639
formed an interfaith family. They have three

00:43:24.639 --> 00:43:27.400
sons together, which really brings home his message

00:43:27.400 --> 00:43:29.840
of bridging divides quite literally within his

00:43:29.840 --> 00:43:32.159
own home. It really does. His personal life,

00:43:32.239 --> 00:43:33.980
particularly his interfaith marriage to Jessica

00:43:33.980 --> 00:43:37.239
Jackley, provides a very tangible living example

00:43:37.239 --> 00:43:39.480
of the principles he often espouses in his work.

00:43:40.000 --> 00:43:42.320
It reflects his broader message of bridging divides,

00:43:42.760 --> 00:43:44.599
finding common ground across different belief

00:43:44.599 --> 00:43:47.280
systems, demonstrating how diverse faiths can

00:43:47.280 --> 00:43:49.900
coexist and apparently thrive within a single

00:43:49.900 --> 00:43:52.269
household. It shows a practical application of

00:43:52.269 --> 00:43:55.250
his philosophical stance that religion is, perhaps

00:43:55.250 --> 00:43:58.289
primarily, a personal language of faith. The

00:43:58.289 --> 00:44:00.329
mention of his aunt being the well -known Iranian

00:44:00.329 --> 00:44:04.510
-American pop singer Layla Farohar, or his interest

00:44:04.510 --> 00:44:07.369
as a fan of Las Vegas Raiders professional football

00:44:07.369 --> 00:44:10.900
team. These details also help humanize a figure

00:44:10.900 --> 00:44:13.320
often at the center of intense academic and political

00:44:13.320 --> 00:44:16.219
debates, reminding us that even public intellectuals

00:44:16.219 --> 00:44:18.519
are complex individuals with varied interests,

00:44:18.960 --> 00:44:21.000
family ties, passions, just like anyone else.

00:44:21.340 --> 00:44:23.360
It gives you a more complete picture of the person

00:44:23.360 --> 00:44:25.960
behind the public persona. And it's clear Aslan

00:44:25.960 --> 00:44:28.380
is a figure who has not only contributed significantly

00:44:28.380 --> 00:44:30.679
to public discourse, but has also been recognized

00:44:30.679 --> 00:44:33.340
formally for those contributions. He's received

00:44:33.340 --> 00:44:35.599
several awards and honors over the years, including

00:44:35.599 --> 00:44:38.900
the 2014 Intersections Honoree, the 2013 Media

00:44:38.900 --> 00:44:40.940
Bridge Builder Award from the Tannenbaum Center

00:44:40.940 --> 00:44:43.420
for Interreligious Understanding that seems particularly

00:44:43.420 --> 00:44:46.360
apt. Ever -fitting, yes. The 2013 Peter J. Gomes

00:44:46.360 --> 00:44:49.000
Memorial Honor from his alma mater, Harvard Divinity

00:44:49.000 --> 00:44:52.139
School, and the 2012 East West Media Award from

00:44:52.139 --> 00:44:54.889
the Levantine Center. These various awards really

00:44:54.889 --> 00:44:57.570
underscore the perceived impact of his work in

00:44:57.570 --> 00:45:01.170
specific circles, particularly in fostering interreligious

00:45:01.170 --> 00:45:04.489
dialogue, bridging cultural divides, challenging

00:45:04.489 --> 00:45:07.409
conventional narratives. That Media Bridge Builder

00:45:07.409 --> 00:45:10.090
Award in particular highlights his unique ability

00:45:10.409 --> 00:45:13.130
or at least the recognition of his ability to

00:45:13.130 --> 00:45:15.750
translate complex scholarly ideas into accessible

00:45:15.750 --> 00:45:18.389
public conversations across various platforms,

00:45:19.010 --> 00:45:20.610
which is precisely what we've been unpacking

00:45:20.610 --> 00:45:23.309
today. These honors indicate that despite the

00:45:23.309 --> 00:45:26.150
controversies, despite the criticisms, his overarching

00:45:26.150 --> 00:45:28.250
mission of promoting understanding and nuanced

00:45:28.250 --> 00:45:31.380
perspectives is widely valued. at least within

00:45:31.380 --> 00:45:33.559
certain institutions or organizations dedicated

00:45:33.559 --> 00:45:36.639
to similar goals, it showcases the duality of

00:45:36.639 --> 00:45:39.199
his public perception, a figure who both sparks

00:45:39.199 --> 00:45:42.059
significant debate and earns significant recognition.

00:45:42.380 --> 00:45:44.039
So where is he now? What's the current chapter?

00:45:44.420 --> 00:45:47.179
Today, Reza Aslan remains a professor of creative

00:45:47.179 --> 00:45:49.300
writing at the University of California, Riverside.

00:45:49.550 --> 00:45:52.250
A role that seems to perfectly blend his academic

00:45:52.250 --> 00:45:54.630
background with his narrative skill. He also

00:45:54.630 --> 00:45:57.170
serves on various boards, including the National

00:45:57.170 --> 00:46:00.690
Iranian American Council, or NIAC, which advocates

00:46:00.690 --> 00:46:03.989
for the interests of Iranian Americans. In 2015,

00:46:04.230 --> 00:46:07.150
as an NIAC member, he notably supported the Joint

00:46:07.150 --> 00:46:09.750
Comprehensive Plan of Action that was the Iran

00:46:09.750 --> 00:46:12.510
Nuclear Program Agreement, a highly contentious

00:46:12.510 --> 00:46:14.650
political issue at the time and still debated.

00:46:14.829 --> 00:46:17.590
Right, placing him firmly in certain policy debates.

00:46:17.789 --> 00:46:20.230
Exactly. He is also a member of key academic

00:46:20.230 --> 00:46:22.409
organizations like the American Academy of Religion

00:46:22.409 --> 00:46:24.949
and the International Quranic Studies Association.

00:46:25.159 --> 00:46:27.639
cementing his ongoing standing within the academic

00:46:27.639 --> 00:46:30.260
community, despite any public debates about his

00:46:30.260 --> 00:46:32.699
specific credentials or interpretations, his

00:46:32.699 --> 00:46:35.440
continued academic role at UC Riverside, his

00:46:35.440 --> 00:46:37.920
involvement with organizations like NIAC, various

00:46:37.920 --> 00:46:40.659
advisory boards. It all demonstrates an ongoing

00:46:40.659 --> 00:46:43.659
commitment to both scholarly pursuits and political

00:46:43.659 --> 00:46:46.559
advocacy. His support for the Iran nuclear deal

00:46:46.559 --> 00:46:48.820
highlights his engagement with real world policy

00:46:48.820 --> 00:46:51.400
issues, consistent perhaps with his earlier call

00:46:51.400 --> 00:46:53.880
to engage moderate political forces. It shows

00:46:53.880 --> 00:46:56.420
a continuity between his academic analysis and

00:46:56.420 --> 00:46:58.260
his practical involvement in current affairs.

00:46:59.099 --> 00:47:00.800
So, wrapping things up after this deep dive.

00:47:01.119 --> 00:47:03.260
Well, what we've really seen today is the journey

00:47:03.260 --> 00:47:06.039
of a scholar who simply refuses to stay in any

00:47:06.039 --> 00:47:08.099
single link, doesn't he? From navigating deeply

00:47:08.099 --> 00:47:11.059
personal religious conversions, to penning bestselling

00:47:11.059 --> 00:47:12.760
books that fundamentally challenge historical

00:47:12.760 --> 00:47:15.119
narratives about both Islam and Christianity,

00:47:15.739 --> 00:47:17.800
to producing television that seeks to illuminate

00:47:17.800 --> 00:47:20.949
diverse, sometimes controversial cultures. Aslan

00:47:20.949 --> 00:47:23.309
has consistently aimed to unpack complex truths

00:47:23.309 --> 00:47:25.889
for a broad audience, even when it means facing

00:47:25.889 --> 00:47:27.969
intense scrutiny, professional consequences,

00:47:28.309 --> 00:47:31.170
or accusations from multiple sides. His career

00:47:31.170 --> 00:47:33.389
is really a master class in intellectual boundary

00:47:33.389 --> 00:47:35.050
pushing, for better or worse, depending on your

00:47:35.050 --> 00:47:37.730
view. Yeah, he reminds us that expertise isn't

00:47:37.730 --> 00:47:40.750
always neatly confined to a single academic department

00:47:40.750 --> 00:47:43.349
or a single perspective, and that challenging

00:47:43.349 --> 00:47:45.550
established narratives, whether religious or

00:47:45.550 --> 00:47:48.369
political or historical, often comes with both

00:47:48.369 --> 00:47:51.849
accolades and fear. criticism. It's rarely a

00:47:51.849 --> 00:47:54.130
smooth ride. Whether you agree with his interpretations

00:47:54.130 --> 00:47:56.570
or his conclusions or not, his career forces

00:47:56.570 --> 00:47:58.849
us to critically examine how we understand faith,

00:47:59.389 --> 00:48:02.369
politics, history, and media in our incredibly

00:48:02.369 --> 00:48:05.889
interconnected, often polarized world. He makes

00:48:05.889 --> 00:48:08.349
us ask tough questions about how we consume and

00:48:08.349 --> 00:48:11.409
evaluate information and from whom. So maybe

00:48:11.409 --> 00:48:13.929
a final thought after this deep dive. You might

00:48:13.929 --> 00:48:17.389
ask yourself this. In an age absolutely saturated

00:48:17.389 --> 00:48:19.530
with instant information, with very strong opinions

00:48:19.530 --> 00:48:21.730
flying everywhere, how much are we truly willing

00:48:21.730 --> 00:48:24.690
to engage? To engage with ideas that come from

00:48:24.690 --> 00:48:26.929
unexpected sources, perhaps from someone with

00:48:26.929 --> 00:48:29.530
a different background than we expect, or ideas

00:48:29.530 --> 00:48:31.650
that genuinely challenge our own preconceived

00:48:31.650 --> 00:48:33.750
notions about who is allowed to tell certain

00:48:33.750 --> 00:48:35.869
stories or what the correct interpretation should

00:48:35.869 --> 00:48:37.610
be. That's a question worth pondering, isn't

00:48:37.610 --> 00:48:39.789
it? As you continue your own deep dives into

00:48:39.789 --> 00:48:41.250
the complex world around you,