You're tuned into Zero Signal, a show about what
they won't say and what you're probably already
thinking. No fluff, no filters, no bullshit.
Let's crack it open. I was reading this old news
article the other day about this weird wave of
drone sightings over New Jersey. Dozens of people
reported seeing these lights moving across the
sky in perfect formation, totally silent. No
one really knew what the hell was going on. And
the FAA didn't say much. Law enforcement just
called it commercial drones and kind of brushed
it off. But honestly, the videos looked way too
coordinated. too polished or too rehearsed. It
didn't feel like a prank. It felt like a test.
And I know some of this stuff has already been
debunked. I get that. I'm not trying to spin
up these conspiracy theories here, but something
about it stuck with me, and it brought up this
old ideal I hadn't thought about in years. It
was called Project Blue Beam. Have you heard
of it? The theory from the 90s about holograms
in the sky, fake miracles, and a global deception
meant to reshape religion and reality itself.
Back then, it sounded totally out there. But
now with everything we're seeing in the tech
space, drone light shows, AI generated content,
voice cloning, it's like... How far are we from
something that could actually fool the world?
Just today, I was watching this video of Trump
supposedly shutting down Tesla production in
the U .S. because Elon Musk pissed him off. I
knew this video wasn't real. It wasn't true.
But still, it was so convincing. It looked just
like Trump. It sounded like him. And it would
look like any other video that you would see
in the Oval Office. So that really made me think
if seeing is believing, what happens when you
can't trust what you see? That's what we're talking
about today. Might not be war or collapse. It
might be the deception. A kind that feels so
real, so divine, that people fall to their knees
without ever questioning it. The enemy doesn't
really need to bomb churches. He just needs to
rewrite reality until we're worshiping an illusion.
So yeah, I might be watching the sky, but I'm
also watching the feed. But let me throw it at
you. When you see all this tech that we've got
now, AI deepfakes, drone swarms, even voice cloning.
Do you think we're actually primed for something
like Project Bluebeam to take place? Yeah, man.
I think it's definitely interesting. The roots
of it are kind of unique. I spent a little bit
of time digging into Serge Monast and some of
his influences and his untimely suspicious death.
So Serge Monast was born in Quebec in 1945. He
was a journalist, poet. essayist and he contributed
to a lot of mainstream publications. Early life,
in early life, he shifted his focus in the conspiracy
theories. He was inspired by an interesting character
named William Guy Carr, who after looking through
some of his stuff, he was a big anti -Semite.
Mr. Carr was in the Navy. After his Navy career,
he got big into the conspiracy movement and a
lot of the conspiracies that evolved today originated
from him. guys like Hitler and everyone else
piggybacked off some of the anti -Semitic tendencies.
And he blamed a lot of the New World Order stuff
on the Jews. Back to Serge, he published a book
called Project Blue Bean. And this is where I
get a little bit suspicious because he claimed
to get a document from someone in NASA. stating
the steps to Project Bluebeam. But he never produced
it. I always find these conspiracy theories hard
to believe when somebody doesn't actually present
the evidence. Part of me thinks maybe the CIA
gave it to him. Stoke fear. You said he died
from a heart attack, right? Under unusual circumstances,
he was a relatively healthy man at that point
in time. Why do you think that is, though? Do
you know how old he was when that happened? He
was 51. Interesting story about him. He claims
after he published his book in 1994, that he
was being harassed, followed, and people were
trying to either put him in jail or put him in
the ground. Fast forward a year or so, he decided
that he didn't want his kids in public schools.
So all this background story, I did so much digging
and it's so hard to find any sort of credible
references. And I understand being in Canada
30 years ago, it's going to be hard to find any
sort of legal records, but he was arrested for
not putting his kids in public school. Place
Cain took his kids and then he eventually got
arrested. I think he spent a night or two in
jail and a night or two after he got released,
he died of a heart attack. Oh, a little bit sus
there, but as you and I can imagine, if you're
going through something as traumatic as having
your kids taken from you and you're not healthy
to begin with, you're in your fifties. How's
the diet? How's the lifestyle? Obviously he was
super paranoid. And he had a heart attack. So
was it self -triggered? There's some conspiracies
saying that the government used a heart attack
gun on him or was he poisoned when he was in
jail? That flip from getting out of the slammer
and to, you know, be on your deathbed was...
anywhere between 24 and 48 hours. It's really
interesting. I had a lengthy law enforcement
career and I've experienced this on myself. Anxiety
can really ramp up your, your heart rates, you
know, it can kind of get your blood pressure
out of whack and that can lead to some bad stuff,
right? Especially as we age, like I'm in my forties,
but as I get into my fifties and sixties, if
I were to carry on, our issues is probably not
outside of, especially if you're not taking care
of yourself. A lot of bad experiences during
that time, the government of Canada. for whatever
reason at that point in time, didn't think they
were properly educating his kids. I couldn't
imagine losing my son or daughter if they're
getting pulled away because not only they locking
them up, they're probably trying to pit their
kids in some version of CPS. Do you think there's
any credible evidence out there, at least during
that time, right? Cause I think when we talk
about conspiracy theories, there's always a grain
of truth and there's some false realities and
some real realities like that our government
doesn't want us to know. Like if you tuned in
a little bit earlier today, the government was
talking about UFOs and trying to release some
new information. So there's always like a grain
of truth to some of his theories. And I think
they're actually stronger today than they have
been historically, just because of the advancement
of technology that we're seeing out there now.
Do you think there was a reason why the CIA or
whatever the Canadian's version of that would
want to silence him at that time? Yeah, because
he claimed that the conspiracy, the roots of
it and him were between NASA and UN, you know,
kind of two bigger organizations. With my little
knowledge, it doesn't seem to be a whole lot
of communication between NASA being a United
States agency and the UN being something completely
separate. Why would the CIA want to silence him
or deceive him? I think some of this roots back
into his religious point of view, which we share
the same belief. We believe in Jesus. We love
Jesus. You know, the book of Revelation, there
is the Antichrist coming, one world government,
one world monetary system. You'd have to deceive
so many people for them to give up their religious
views, freedom, ability to work without a mark.
So I'll go back to his kids. I tried to dig around
because I was curious to see if any of his kids
ever spoke out after his death. I think his daughter
was seven. They claimed he had a son, but there's
no records of them. If they got taken into state
custody, I'm sure they got fostered out to another
family and those records are sealed forever.
But it's interesting no one's ever came forward
30 years after his death. At least say something,
make that claim. Being seven, five, six, seven,
maybe you don't even remember. There's stuff
from when we were kids we're not going to remember.
But no one's ever come forward and said that
was my dad. There's no record of his wife. I
spent so much time researching this guy, no marriage
records that I could find. There's no name given
to her. But you would think if her husband was
murdered and her kids would take away, there
would be some sort of legal documentation with
her getting the kids back. But none of that exists
that so that's kind of interesting in itself.
It's almost like that whole outside of him and
his, you know, the few interviews he did, which
were all in French. I do have some transcripts,
which we can talk about that are super interesting
later, but there's no mention of them. There's
no name. They don't have names. It's like they
didn't exist. It's like if they were real, which
I'm sure they were, they've been scrubbed from
the record, which is kind of scary and I think
gives a little credence to this story and the
possible murder of him. I think that's really
interesting too, right? He had to have some type
of mother to his children, right? Like as reading
through the stories, I just assumed he was divorced
and the sole caretaker of his kids during that
point because they made a big deal about it.
If he was doing something wrong, why didn't they
give it to the wife or the mother or whoever
was supporting those children? at that time,
since an interesting point I never actually thought
about. All the focus has always been on Surge
and what he did during that time. It really makes
me think. So I worked for Amazon Web Services
in about 2010 -ish, right? So sometime during
that decade. I spent about six years there, but
I met a lot of interesting people during that
time. One of the guys I met was named Howell
Hendershot. Howell spent a 30 -year career in
the federal government during... He was kind
of one of the grandfathers of bringing internet
around, right? Like he was working on and building...
the internet before is ever actually a thing,
right? But even before AOL was like actually
a thing when people start to like mess around
and chat words and he was developing and that
concept of how and his team and the rest of his
organization is our modern day internet today,
which was a really interesting guy that I worked
with, right? He worked across the FBI and all
these different spaces and they were developing
it for internal purposes. But I also makes me
wonder like a guy that's almost like a grandfather
figure of NASA. He probably knew about a lot
of technology. prior to the regular person that
he probably knew the things that were coming,
right? Like the drones. Now, have you seen the
pictures of the drone shows in China where they
don't really do fireworks anymore? They have
these drones flying around and they draw pictures
in the sky. There's thousands of drones that
are coordinated and it looks really impressive.
Now it's not going to convince anybody that's
the second coming of Jesus with these drones,
right? But we're in the early stages of it. And
it seems like almost every year, whether it's
in a combat or just in our society, drones are
really leaned into. it's like, how much further
can that go, right? Maybe he knew about some
of the early aspects of the technology that wasn't
released to the public yet. And I wonder, even
if let's say like the government did kill him,
right? I wonder if they're almost trying to shut
him up. We're not talking about this technology
because we don't want China or Russia to get
it as it was like when they were developing the
nukes back in the day in the United States. We
do have a lot of Nazi figures, whether it goes
to NASA or wherever, right? Like helping to develop
these things and like these competing empire.
So I almost wonder, was he going to kind of have
like loose slips, sink ships, right? Like, was
he going to start to talk about this modern day
technology that we know today? That's probably
10 years behind, whether the tech sector's working
on it or the government. And I wonder if that
was the biggest risk at that time, if they were
involved in it. Yeah, it's also interesting because,
you know, like Starlink, Elon Musk is shooting
up how many thousands of satellites a year. And
I think the goal is to have satellites all around
the world, thousands like there are now from
every government or every mega corporation. So.
I mean, it's plausible. Some of this stuff is
actually in popular culture now too. You ever
hear of the show called the three body problem?
Oh yeah, I haven't seen it, but I have heard
of it. Essentially what it is, is about an alien
civilization trying to come to earth, right?
So what they do is they have this technology,
I forget if it's like a proton electron, this
particle, and they can encompass the whole earth
in this particle and they can project anything
they want in the skies so they can have like
countdowns. They can, you know, have asteroids
flying through the surface and nothing's really
there. It's just a way to kind of screw with
the people and scare the hell out of them. A
lot of these theories are starting to kind of
slip in the modern culture. even through our
media, even through our entertainment. The satellite
thing is interesting because to think about technology
back in 94, the internet's still new. You know,
holographic technology was probably a freaking
joke, but now you're kind of starting to see
it like you said. And there was an interesting
thing back in 2015 where, and I don't know if
they'd debunked it as a hoax or some sort of
mirage, but there was a floating city in China
that they captured on video. If you have time
to look for it later, it's super interesting.
It's almost like in the distance, you can see
a city floating in the sky. Yeah. I actually
saw a news article on that. Like it actually
looks like a city in the sky. What we do know
is that people in China and different places,
even today, manipulate the weather, like through
cloud seeding and making it rain in an environment.
So they're already starting to get that control
of the sky. And as you start to shape it, it's
about influence. One of the things I always think
about is most people in this world say, you know,
I'll believe it when I see it. But we're getting
into the modern day and age now where just because
you see it. doesn't exactly mean you should believe
it. I think about the second coming of Christ.
Obviously, I'm a Christian. So it's something
we think about as we read through revelations.
One of the things they say in the Bible is that
everybody in the world is going to see it. Like
it's going to see it transpire. And generally
how I think about that is you're going to see
it on your phone. You may not be live in person,
but you're going to have some type of feed on
your phone or on your TV. Whereas you're seeing
this event is going to be breaking news. You're
going to see it on news sources that are not
actually suppressing it today, but you're going
to see it. And I think it starts to tie back
into some of that technology I was talking about.
I watched a video today where it looked like
Trump, it sounded like Trump, it looked like
the Oval Office, where he was just really mad
at Elon Musk, so he's preventing no Tesla's ever
going to be built in the United States again.
He's banning it. It'd be very easy to believe.
And we're talking about that modern day influence
now. So now we're seeing something that looks
identical to what we would perceive in real life
if we were standing there. But now everything's
starting to influence. Like if you go onto Facebook
or Twitter or TikTok, you have algorithms. Like
you look up the three body problem, like that
movie we're talking about. You look it up and
now all of a sudden your phone's filled with
images of that movie, people doing skits, or
if they want you to be a liberal instead of a
conservative, maybe they'll start showing you
those videos. How can they influence you and
change you during that time? But now you're starting
to see stuff that's fake. You're starting to
hear stuff. Like I could clone your voice and
I can make you say whatever I wanted you to say.
It starts to get really scary because that's
always been the old adage of our time. If you
see it, you will believe it. But now you can't
really believe what you see. And it's going to
start to be in the sky. Like, have you seen these
concerts where I saw one concert with Travis
Scott and he was dancing with Michael Jackson.
Obviously Michael Jackson has been dead for a
long time, but they're able to do a hologram
on the stage. And it looked like he was just
standing there. But I wonder how you start to
distort this. The one world order. That scares
the hell out of me, man, because what do you
believe? You have your religious principles,
but you can't always believe what your eyes are
telling you. Can't believe what you hear all
the time. What do you believe? Yeah, I mean,
it's definitely scary to piggyback off your point.
Technology has gotten to the point where you
really don't have to project anything to the
sky. Like you said, everyone has cell phones.
The algorithm slightly nudges you and nudges
you. It's essentially trying to rewire your brain
slowly over time with little nudges. It wants
to control what you're thinking. It wants to
control what you're seeing. You almost don't
need a projection in the sky. You can just do
it, like you said, all through your phone, all
through the TVs, all through the media you consume.
It's scary, but it would be pretty dramatic if
everyone saw something in the sky all at once.
That would be pretty mind blowing. But at the
same time, I think for most of us, especially
in today's society where a lot of people are
starting to wake up to some of this technology,
a lot of people might question it. Unless you
live in central Africa or the tribes of the Amazon,
or if you're not living in civilized society
where you have all this technology, I think a
lot of people are going to question it. Like
we've questioned a lot of things in the past
five, six, seven years. It's a good point, right?
And I think a lot of people do. I just think
trying to find that line in the sand of what
you can actually believe out of this modern day
world. A very simple example. Have you ever used
those jawbone microphones where you listen to
audio? It actually doesn't go on your ear. I
used to use them when I was a cop because you
want to to be able to hear all your surroundings
and it would vibrate up your jaw and then you
would hear it in your inner ear canal. That's
how you would listen to music, but you can still
hear your surroundings. There's way more technical
opportunities to do that with modern day technology
now. But now you don't know if you can believe
what you see. Like if you hear something where
you start to hear God talking to you, like. Can
I influence what you hear? Can I project it into
your ear? Maybe, maybe. So do you want to talk
about the four steps of Project Bluebeam? Do
we want to break it down into what he claims
the four steps are? Yeah, let's break it down.
Why don't you go ahead and kick it off. Yeah.
So different references have different wording,
but essentially breaks down. Step one is a breakdown
of all archeological and religious understanding.
So apparently in this phase, supposedly there's
going to be a stage earthquake. that would reveal
fake archeological discoveries undermining the
world's major religions. That one's a pretty
big one too. That almost seems just as big an
undertaking as projecting something in the sky.
But apparently, like I said, earthquakes going
to open the ground and they're going to find
something that is going to rewrite the way we
understand history, religion, where we came from.
That's pretty wild. You know, I've been reading
and I don't know a ton about this. Maybe you
do. They have the technology to fake earthquakes
now, to cause earthquakes if there are technological
means even today. So that can actually be staged
in our modern world. We can actually cause these
things to happen. And that's just almost like
planting something at that point, right? Scientists
claim they found secret chambers underneath the
pyramids that go hundreds of meters deep. and
they claim, and I don't believe this, that the
body of Jesus Christ is underneath that pyramid.
This gives a little bit of a check mark in old
Serge's column about fake archaeological discoveries,
but I thought that was wild when I heard it.
To piggyback off your thought about the earthquakes,
Nikolai Tesla, there is stories, like firsthand
accounts, whether or not they're verified or
not. We're going back. into the 1800s here, but
people said that he could go up to a building,
he stuck something on it and it would vibrate
the building and the building would start swaying
back and forth. And he said he claimed he was
able to do all this just through frequencies.
And there is a lot of frequency tech out there.
In theory, if you had a big enough projector
or big enough satellite, you could... shoot these
frequencies into a fault line and probably get
it to go off if it's, if it's strong enough.
I was really interested about that. I was reading
this the other day. Do you know who kind of like
quality checked all of Nikolai Tesla's work?
No, no, tell me, man. It was the uncle of Donald
Trump. Dude, I heard, I sometimes it's hard to
separate the bullshit from the truth. They claimed
that when Nikola Tesla died, he was broke, poor
desitute, that Donald Trump's uncle. was the
guy that went in there and took all of his documentation,
which is wild. Crazy. I read that article the
other day and I was like, wow, that is super
interesting. And there's actually a newspaper
clipping where he was reading through all of
it and like studying the material and like kind
of bringing it to the U S right at that time,
which I just thought was wild. This is completely
off subject, but there's a book called the last
president. And in the book, the last president's
name is Trump. And there's another book called
The Wonderful Adventures of Baron Trump. It's
about a time traveler. And a lot of the stuff,
if you stretch a little bit, you can make, the
argument is that they're time travelers and they're
able to travel through time because of Tesla's
inventions. These books were written about them
kind of giving hints to the future that we're
living in now. They haven't gone on a huge deep
dive. I've heard ramblings of it, but I just
thought it was super, super interesting. And
it's very speculative whether or not that stuff's
forged or Trump's a great marketer, great entertainer.
So who knows, you know. Stage two. So stage one
is an earthquake that reveals fake archaeological
discoveries undermining world religions, timelines,
histories. Stage two, massive space show via
holograms. So we kind of touched on that, but
essentially what it's saying is, say you live
in the Middle East, right? The projection is
going to be Muhammad or Allah. If you live in
a Christianized nation like Western Europe, North
America, South America, you're going to see Jesus.
If you live in like China, you're going to see
Buddha, so on and so forth, right? You get the
gist. But as this projection's going across the
world, these beings are going to merge into the
Antichrist. So he's going to look completely
different. He's going to have a message of world
harmony, peace, unity. So that's stage two of
this. Stage three is telepath... Oh, sorry. You
go ahead, man. No, it's all good. I'm obviously
a tech geek at heart and working for Amazon and
bringing tech to my new company. We deep dived
a lot of this technology stuff. But one of the
things that really freaks me out right now is
we talk about the implants, right? As you're
talking about Nikolai Tesla, the founder of Tesla
Motor Vehicles, which is Elon Musk, who is doing
the Neuralink. Obviously some great purposes,
like making people that are crippled able to
use their hands or use a computer. But a lot
of that's coming from a vanity perspective. Now,
one of the things I always think about is if
more people get this becomes more mainstream,
that's another way to manipulate somebody. If
you can make them walk, if you can make them
see, if you can make them use a computer when
they can never do that before, how much more
could you just manipulate them? Make them see
stuff that is not actually there. We're seeing
a lot of people, and we'll go into this in a
future episode, but a lot of people are going
for vanity purposes. I remember listening to
the Joe Rogan podcast where a guy for an AI company
that was there really believed in these implants.
And he said he was waiting to have children because
he didn't want to have that knowledge gap. He
wanted to implant his child from birth with some
type of neural link capability. They always talk
about those impressionable years in children.
They learn the most through. one through seven,
that's when they're the most impressionable.
And he wants to capture that period so that his
future kid grows up with this technology and
plant it into him, knows how to use it perfectly.
So I wonder if that starts to catch on mainstream.
I think that's another way to manipulate people.
I worry about my computer being hacked, but could
you imagine having your neural link hacked? When
we were growing up talking about like reading
the revelation, talking to mom, dad, grandma,
grandpa, whatever. Like you get to the point
where Everyone's going to have to get the mark
of the beast either on the right hand or the
forehead. I'm thinking to myself, who in a million
years would ever do that? Knowing that this is
in the Bible. So I just assumed by the time that
came around that all the Christians would be
dead or they'll just be so scared that they've
lost belief or whatever. But like the more I
think about it, the devil always gives you something
with the promise. I think about this neuro link.
I think about these implants. What if someone
came up to you and on the outside it's all. Above
board, like, you know, you're protected. What
if someone came up to you and said, Hey, if I
give you an implant, you're never going to get
sick again. You're not going to age. You're going
to live four or five, 600 years. You're going
to know everything in the world. A lot of people
saying, yeah, man, justifying it to themselves.
This is the future of human evolution. This is
the future of technology. Then once everyone
gets it or. The majority of people gets it. Then
it's used to track you. Then it's used as a kill
switch. If you don't believe you can't buy, then
you can't sell, you can't trade, you can't work.
Right? So society and the devil always gives
you something with this nice glossy, beautiful
expectation of greatness and beauty. It always
turns out as a way to control you and suppress
you and make you a slave. Yeah. So say if you
were blind. Would you get that implant if the
implant made you see again? Man, dude, that's
really tempting. You know, like I struggle with
that because you want, like as humans, you want
to justify it. I think, so I struggle with this
because I think in the book of Revelation, you
have to willingly take it knowing what it's for.
Like you're taking this mark to worship the beast.
Yes. Right? Correct. It would be super tempting.
Like, well, I don't want to get an implant so
I can open my door. I don't get an implant so
I can walk through my house and lights come on.
My AI can talk to me. I don't want that. But
if it's like, Hey, you lost your vision. How
about we put this in your head? You can see.
I might be like, all right. One of the reasons
why I bring it up is I think about COVID where
COVID was used to exact control on the population
by locking them down, by scaring people to get
vaccines during that time. And a lot of it was
fear mongering. Right? Like if you don't get
this vaccine, you are going to die. And now we
know the reality now is COVID has been around
for several years and we know it's very much
like the flu, but there is a lot of fear mongers.
I think, right? Like as we talk about the devil
and like certain and flu and set mark is if you're
not going to do this, whether it's restore your
site or whether you get sick, like if you're
not going to have this implant, you're not going
to survive. And that's kind of like where my
mind goes with it. Right. And then it obviously
goes down that bad track of project blue beam
and surge. was hot, right? But I almost wonder,
like from a convincing standpoint, it's kind
of like COVID, right? Like take this vaccine
or something really bad is going to happen. Right.
Let's get through the next two points because
I'd like to break down Serge Monast's interview
because it gets a lot more crazy. These high
level bullet points are kind of just like step
one through four than when he does this interview.
And I can give you the link if you want to post.
It's just a transcript of the interview. It's
in French so I didn't watch it. But step three
of this is telepathic mind control via LVLF and
LF waves. He's claiming that voices, I guess
God or this Antichrist is going to talk to you
through low frequency waves, like voices where
they project something at your head. Back in
94 seemed far fetched because there weren't a
ton of satellites floating around. There's 8
billion people on earth. Like, how are you going
to target everyone? to speak into their head.
We are kind of talking about that. When I was
talking about the jawbone microphone of its voice
conductive, right? So you're hearing in your
head. So far, we're three for three. Yeah, no,
you're right. And I know there's been documented
CIA documents where the CIA has harassed people
by projecting voices into their head. So it's
a technology that exists. It's just... upgrading
it to that mass scale could happen in a year.
But dude, do you ever hear about Lucille Ball
breaking up underground Japanese resistance during
World War II? What? This is a fun story. So this
had to do with a dental implant, right? You know,
so she was on Johnny Carson talking about it,
one of those late night shows back in the 70s
or 80s. She went in to get a dental filling.
What material they used escapes me. But essentially
she got her tooth filled. She was driving. And
she could hear music in her, in her head. And
she's like, what the hell is that? And she turned
the radio on and the song on the radio was playing.
She turned it off. She realized that whatever
reason this filling was conducting radio waves,
like the voice of Scholar of Technology we were
talking about. She could hear radio waves around
her wherever she was. I think one night, I might
be chopping the story up a little bit, but you'll
get the idea. But so one night again, driving
and she's hearing something in Japanese. And
she's like, what the hell? Like, what is this?
So anyway, another night she drives and hears
it again. Anyway, he turns around and gives it
to the U .S. government. They catch these guys
by triangulating the radio frequency. There's
a bunch of Japanese insurgents in the U .S. and
they broke them up. Wait, so she wasn't picking
up like AM FM. She was like picking up like radio.
She was picking up radio waves and she was catching
these guys. She was hearing these guys speaking
Japanese back and forth and eventually told somebody
because it was during the height of World War
Two. And I know a lot of Japanese got put into
internment camps, but she gave it to the US government
and they were able to triangulate where these
guys were. And in fact, they were trying to do
something nefarious. So my one question is, and
you may not know the answer to this because it's
an interesting story, but how did she understand
the Japanese in order to turn it over? I think
she just heard Japanese and she thought... given
the height of the conflict in the world at the
time, she realized she was hearing radio frequencies.
So she decided it would be best to tell the US
government what she was hearing. She couldn't
understand what they were saying. Just when they
went to investigate it, the US government was
able to find the signal and listen in on it and
break them up. It's really interesting. I remember
I Love Lucy, but I'm assuming that's the right
person, right? From I Love Lucy? Yeah. I didn't
realize color TV existed for many years because
I remember being little, watching I Love Lucy.
Leave It To Beaver. Yep. I love those shows.
Andy Griffin. We watched Andy Griffin as well.
And they were all black and white from what I
remember. Yep. It was those three shows and like
Saturday morning cartoons. We used to love those.
Yeah. I remember staying up late in my room and
watching those shows. It must've been like 10
o 'clock. At least it felt like 10 o 'clock at
night to me. My parents were in bed and I don't
know why I was interested in this, but that's
what I used to watch. I didn't know she was an
American hero. They were definitely good and
wholesome shows, a little bit different than
today's media. But anyway, on to stage four.
So stage four, we can kind of break this down
a little bit more. The stage four supernatural
events and stage alien invasion. Global chaos,
panic, and an engineered savior to kind of enforce
this totalitarian world government. So I'm just
going to recap the four stages quick so we can
keep everybody following along. It's an earthquake
that shows fake archeological evidence that rewrites
our history. Massive show via holograms, whatever
God that region worships gets projected into
the sky. They all emerge into the Antichrist.
Then we're going to have telepathic mind control
via these frequencies, some sort of crazy supernatural
event where the savior comes and keeps us out
of the... total destruction of the world. And
that's the engineered savior at that point in
time. Have you seen that guy that's come out
to say he's like the second coming of Jesus Christ?
And clearly he is a false prophet. Very much
so. Uh, but here, check out this clip. the successor
of Jesus Christ. I am the true and legitimate
Pope. I am the proof upon the Christians. I am
the son of the Muslims through my father and
the son of the Christians and the Jews through
my mother. I am the son of the East through my
father and the son of the West through my mother.
I am like Zulkarnain who with one horn in the
East and one in the West and I am the inheritor
of all that lies between. I am more knowledgeable
than any false pope, and I am appointed by name
and the will of the prophets. My name is also
on the tongue of Isaiah, who prophesied of the
righteous servant, and he said, He will see his
offspring and prolong his days, and the will
of the Lord will prosper in his hand. That is
like the first signs of blending faith, of trying
to throw this singular savior out there. And
I think you start to see that twisted faith.
Cause I think a lot of the Project Blue Beam,
when we talk about it, right? Like when they
say, if you live in this one region, you're going
to see Jesus Christ. If you live in this other
region, you're going to see Buddha. At some point,
as you get to the final stage and volume four,
all those people are going to start to merge
into one. Like Jesus and Buddha and Muhammad
are all going to to start to be the same person,
telling you, well, everybody worshiped the same
person all along. It was just your different
flavor of it at that time, which I find really
interesting. Not that I would ever believe it,
but I find it interesting that people would believe
that. I know exactly what you're talking about.
He's an interesting character, but yeah, I've
seen the videos where he claims to be the Pope.
He claims to be the Messiah. He claims to be
a direct descendant of Muhammad. He's claiming
to be the all in one world religious leader.
fulfills all prophecy. This project blue beam
is what this engineered fake savior is claiming
to be. He's interesting one because I think he's
in, he's either Turkey or Egypt to where he's
like has a following, but he's an American, which
is interesting. He kind of looks like a white
dude. If you look close enough, he's always wearing
some sort of beanie or something. Yeah, that
and he lived here for 25 years. He was making
movies and stuff out in Las Vegas and he's been
ingrained in our culture for a really long time.
Interesting. Yeah, another, before we get into
Manasseh's transcript, did you know that there
was a claim of another journalist that worked
on the project Blue Bean Book with him also died?
But you dig around, you can't find the guy's
name. It's all word of mouth. I don't know if
this was interjected into the conspiracy theory
after he died, but there was a claim that another
journalist died of a heart attack not too long
after Monass died of a heart attack somewhere
in Ireland. But you dig through the records,
publications at that time, like there's no obituaries
or newspaper clippings or any sort of articles
supporting that fact. I just thought that was
interesting caveat to the story about another
journalist also dying of the same. of the same
circumstances that Monast did. This journalist,
was he kind of reporting on Surge or part of
the same projects as they were working in the
past at NASA connected together? So that's where
this whole thing kind of falls apart. I know
your detective background, you're asking these
good questions because there's not real good
answers. They're just kind of spotty sources
claiming that this other journalist, Canadian,
was helping him on the project, but he wasn't
listed as a contributor. They claim he died of
a heart attack within a week or so of Manasseh's
death. It just seems a little bit too much if
you don't have names, even his family, no names
for the kids, no names for the wife. Now you
have this other journalist who they claim helped
him, but this guy is... just like another ghost
in the wind. Do you think it was being redacted,
right? Like the government or somebody else trying
to hide the facts or realities of the situation,
or do you think that most people don't know because
there's not a lot of reality in the situation?
I think it's, I don't know. I almost feel like
in this circumstance, you can kind of zero in
pretty quick. So he's a Canadian journalist,
died of a heart attack, apparently in Ireland.
I feel like if this person existed, you could
pinpoint that pretty quickly, even if he had
no publications or anything tying him with this
book. I think you or I, if we had the access
and time could cross reference people who died
in 1996, meeting those criteria and figure out
who it is, but nobody can seem to come up with
that name. So I almost think it's just interjected
the story to make it seem more grandiose than
it actually is. Yeah. It's kind of like what
I was saying earlier, right? I think there's
portions of this that are reality, and then there's
portions that are just made up. It's trying to
find the truth through the entire series of events.
And that's what we'll be doing as we talk through
many of these subjects. What is fact from fiction
as we go through it? If I was the government,
which I've worked for the government before,
what would be my reasoning for knocking a guy
off? Not that I ever did that from the government,
not saying they'd do that. But if I was, why
would I do that? Did he know too much about the
technology advancements that we were having during
that time? This guy was having delusions about
the technology that we had. And they were kind
of afraid he was going to spill the beans about
the drones and about the bone connected technology
and about all these things that were currently
being developed during that time that were still
classified. What's really fascinating is a lot
of people can come up with things, but as time
goes on and this technology gets released, it
starts to become more. mainstream fiction can
sometimes turn into fact, right? Because we can
start to see how that path develops and how we
get there. Some of it's based upon our fears
as Christian men who worry about the end of times.
It's our hope that Jesus returns. We worry about
all the bad things that are also associated with
that as we think about our children and our loved
ones. But I don't know, it just makes me wonder.
I think there's always that grain of truth, no
matter what we're talking about. It's kind of
like when you see the media, right? Like half
of its lies and half of its reality. Kind of
you meet in that middle to understand what it
is. And from a project Bluebeam standpoint, right?
Is that something that you believe in? Me personally,
I kind of want to piggyback off some things you
just said there. So we'll circle, but maybe we
conclude with what I think it really is. An interesting
thing to kind of refute some of his conclusions
is that there was a Star Trek. unproduced 1975
screenplay called The God Thing. And it essentially
lays out this premise, this theory that Monast
had. And there was a Star Trek The Next Generation
episode called The Devil's Do, which featured
similar descriptions that kind of lined up with
what Monast was saying. So there is some speculation
that somehow he came up with this theory based
off of some of these episodes and maybe he got
his hands on this screenplay, or maybe someone
gave it to him and he devised his own set of
conclusions and theories based off of those two
episodes, which is crazy. How does that align?
I don't know. That's a good question. I think
I always find it interesting when people go back
to the guy that really influenced him, Carr.
He was a Navy guy. He fought in World War I,
World War II, published books about naval warfare,
exercises. tactics theories, he was highly respected
and he took a hard right into this conspiracy
realm. A lot of his theories were used to promote
anti -Semitism around the world. I just find
that super interesting that Manasseh was inspired
by somebody like that, somebody who was a journalist
and essayist, so had a career that was pretty
mainstream and then took a hard right turn. Sometimes
I wonder if he wasn't being manipulated by the
government. I'm also under the assumption that
the government likes to leak some plans to see
how people are going to react. So I wonder if
you kind of came up with lots of, with all these
outside influences, being an investigative journalist,
trying to break a big story, your ego gets caught
up into it. And you come up with a theory that
you claim you got from NASA, but never produced
the documents. That's where I start to trip up.
If you can't produce the source, it starts to
be a product of your imagination. Yeah, that's
a good point. It's kind of defining that fact
from fiction, right? What is reality? I like
to think that all of us think we're the superhero
of our own movie. It's like that main character
syndrome that folks go through. It's kind of
how lies work, right? Like lies aren't always
big. Sometimes it's like, this is reality, but
I'm going to start to stretch it and make it
sound more impressive. So how can I start to
interject some of those themes to make my topic
more convincing that influence you to believe
what I am saying? I think he was probably onto
something. He had exposure to government technology
that folks were working on. And he probably had
real fears of what that technology could do.
As time went on, we're starting to see that,
right? About 20 years later, we're starting to
see that technology be introduced into the mainstream.
We're starting to see that technology on battlefields.
I wonder how much he knew. The truth is always
going to be stretched a little bit. I think maybe
Serge stretched a little bit of that truth, but
there was some reality mixed in. I also wondered
like in his earlier career when he was doing
God knows what, assume he didn't get a ton of
notoriety for his work. You publish something
and next thing you know, you're noticed and you
kind of revel in that notoriety. He didn't really
live too long after it. So I'm not sure he could
really add much more to it between the two years
of publication and his death. He was being interviewed
by Canadian TV. And we'll briefly talk about
that transcript. Did he finally find his niche?
Did he finally feel like he's about to get famous
because of it? I struggle because he chose to
take his kids out of public schools, lost his
kids because of it. Went to jail because of it.
That's a big price to pay to put a work of fiction
out there. It is, but there is also conflicting
theories, right? As a Christian guy, it's really
hard to send your kids to public school. because
we know what they're going to be teaching them.
They're going to be teaching them very liberal
things. They're going to be teaching them about
evolution. And that's not stuff I want my kids
to learn about, especially during their impressionable
years. So I could see how that could come about
just because he was a man of faith. But sometimes
that question, and this is a question for you,
do you know that all of his theories and how
the conspiracy theory was born did really come
out after his book or before? So that's interesting
because I was going to talk about this guy named
Sean T. Rust. In 2024, he published a book called
Project Blue Beam Exposed. So I dug around and
he doesn't have any social media. He's self -published
and the only way to get ahold of him would be
through Amazon, through leaving a review or Goodreads.
There's really not a whole lot known about this
fella. So he essentially takes monastic theories
and interjects updated technology, like the world
of technology today versus the mid nineties.
I thought that was interesting. And then, you
know, he doesn't have a whole lot of publications.
I'll just read them off here because they're
kind of. I assume he's from South America. I
could be completely wrong because one of his
publications was The Roots of El Salvador. It's
just a historical narrative of El Salvador. He
published another in December of 23 called El
Salvador's Buried Truth. It's a deep dive into
the 1981... I can't even say the name of the
tribe massacre. So he, you know, he explored
that. October 24, he published Storm Makers,
which is a geo engineering weather conspiracy
book. His most recent work is in January of 2025
called Project Stargate. Essentially the focus
is psychic espionage and Cold War mind control.
He popped up out of the blue in the past 10 months
and he's published five books. One of the kind
of critiques of his work is that it appears that
it could be AI generated based off of how it's
scripted, excuse me, how it's worded. But it's
just interesting because I know back in 2024
with all the New Jersey drone sightings, I don't
know if it's somebody who just hopped on the
bandwagon, wanted to make an extra buck, decided
to throw something in chat, GPT using NASA's
framework, updating the technology. But he's
published, what's that, five books in the past
10 months, which is Kind of out of nowhere. So
I don't know if this person, Sean T. Russ actually
exists or it's a pseudonym. Hell for all we know,
it could just be AI spitting shit out and throwing
it on Amazon to sell. Yeah, it's, it's interesting.
It's interesting too, right? Because it's like
when he came out with his theories, did he start
to make them a little crazier just to sell books?
As a published author, I don't sell a ton of
books, but I've sold a few in my life. It's like
modern day branding. Like what can I put it on
Facebook? Can I put it on Instagram so people
see it and want to buy it? But he didn't have
all those luxuries back in the early nineties,
besides, you know, MySpace. And a lot of people
weren't using it at that time. So it's like,
did he kind of blow himself up, blow up his theories
in order to gain a following and to sell books
and to gain that audience is sometimes what I
want. I think that's a pitfall. When you find
your niche, you try to squeeze all the juice
out of it. Maybe he did back in the nineties.
You probably want to get on talk shows, radio
shows, get bigger book publishing deals. The
world of conspiracy theories is very lucrative.
And sometimes I feel like the more outrageous
the claim, the more money you potentially could
inherit, the more fame and the more. Like I said,
notoriety. So it's a slippery slope if you're
not fully rooted in what you're doing. It's interesting.
All right. So you were talking about these French
manuscripts, right? That you recovered from surge.
What was that about? Yeah. So he had an interview
on some Canadian television show, but Obviously
the interview was in French and he has a pretty
lengthy transcription of what he was saying.
And I'm not going to go over the points that
we've already talked about. Obviously the four
phases, undermining religions, sky projections,
telepathic communications, and stage crises.
Essentially what he's saying like these are the
objectives of the new world order. The goal is
to abolish traditional religions and to establish
a one -world Luciferian religion based off the
cult of man. Also, he mentions that it's to eliminate
national sovereignty and Christian beliefs and
to create a global one -world government and
obviously using the advanced technology to deceive
populations into accepting the New World Order.
So the interesting part in this interview was
about the persecution of the non -compliant individuals.
This really gets kind of crazy and scary. So,
you know, to those who reject this new order,
especially Christians, in his viewpoint, the
main group that gets persecuted the most are
the Christians. Essentially, they will be sent
to concentration camps or re -education camps.
There's going to be a rainbow colored classification
system that will categorize the prisoners. So
essentially there's a rainbow color classification
that categorizes prisoners. So specifically for
Christian children, he alleges that they'll be
used for human sacrifice and black mass ceremonies
or as sex slaves. Classification two are prisoners
for medical experiments to test drugs and technologies
on. Classification three, healthy prisoners for
organ harvesting at an international human organ
center. And classification four, are healthy
individuals who will be used for slave labor
in underground facilities. So all that's pretty
freaking wild and terrifying if any of this is
even slightly true. But yeah, so those are some
of the scary takeaways from some of his claims.
He references unspecified, extremely low -frequency
communication and mind control technologies,
citing some Lieutenant Colonel Alexander military
review article. I didn't check that out. Just
kind of taking his word for it as Ipena. correct
source, whether or not he's twisting it to fit
his narrative or if it's technology that actually
does what he claims it does is open for interpretation.
He suggests satellites could feed artificial
thoughts into the genetic structure, enabling
global mind control. I mean, this kind of brings
me back to the vaccine conspiracy theory claims
where if you get injected with an MRA and vaccine,
you have stuff floating around your blood that
can resonate with certain frequencies. So that's
kind of, that's a weird drawback that my mind's
kind of. drawn the connection to. He claims that
the project was initially planned for release
in 1983, linking it to George Orwell's book,
1984. Obviously it never happened in 1983. Claims
that it was supposed to happen two or three other
dates. Again, it never happened. Obviously some
of the dates that he was claiming were after
his death. He could never explain why that didn't
happen. He references new age figures like Benjamin
Creme, David Spangler, Alice Bailey, Helena Bobflosky,
claiming they promote global Luciferian initiation
through a new Christian church and Masonic organizations.
So these are just some of the claims he made
during this interview. He frames the New World
Order as a satanic project incompatible with
Christian beliefs. and warns of a global dictatorship
hidden behind demonic, or I'm sorry, democratic
appearances. Freudians slip there. During this
interview, he did allege some harassment by authorities,
though he didn't really give any sort of accounts
or explanations. It was very vague and glossed
over. But yeah, so that was kind of the summary
of his transcript. So the four stages, the scary
part are the four classifications of people who
do not submit to the system. I thought that was
kind of interesting to read something direct
from his mouth, though I couldn't understand
it. So you can find the link to that transcript
in the description below if you're interested
to read it yourself. That's super interesting.
Did you actually listen to him talk? Obviously
you can't understand his words because he's speaking
in French, but did you actually listen to him
talk? And the reason why I'm asking this question,
right, is like... If you, I know it's maybe grainy
or maybe hard to hear. Did he, you know, like
when you hear Hitler talk, right? Like you're
like Hitler's a mad man. When you're hearing
him talk, did he sound like a rational person
as you heard his words? My opinion is that he
didn't look healthy. He looked, in my opinion,
disheveled, but we're going back to the stylistic
preferences of people back in the nineties. And
I can't remember what those were like. He sounded
tired, maybe. Just my kind of initial general
impressions. Sure. I just always find it interesting
because sometimes as you listen to people talk
or you look at them, you can start to see like
mental health kind of creep into the picture
because there's just something about it that
feels off. Do you know, like after these interviews,
did anybody like comment about him? this dude
seemed wild or this dude seemed a little bit
off his rock or, or do you know how that was
kind of reported? And I don't know. I'm sorry.
I don't know if you said, but like, who was this
interview? It was so Serge, obviously, but who
was he talking to at this time? Was it a news
reporter? Yeah, man, I could dig in and look
again. I don't exactly have the source of my
notes. Again, it's on, on YouTube and it's been
transcribed. So, but you know, the crazy thing
about Serge, which we've talked about a lot.
I almost feel like we're kind of beating the
dead horse. There is not a lot about him. There's
not a lot of people talking about him, other
than conspiracy theorists who this is all secondhand
hearsay from a lot of these people. But there's
not a lot of direct sources. It's so interesting
to me, right? Because that's what almost makes
me question it. Like I feel like he knew a little
bit, but not a whole lot is because we would
think that for like Abraham Lincoln, right? Like
somebody that was like such a historical figure,
but we're talking about the nineties. Like me
and you were both alive during this time. So
it's always so fascinating to me that like so
much information has obscured. Dude, let's get
crazy though. Like think about it, right? Don't
know who his wife is. Don't know who his kids
are. One interview televised I could find. One
transcript. He does have a bunch of publications
to his credit, but what if he was just put out
there to tell this story and they faked his death?
I mean, we know that happens. What if he was
purposely put out there to tell this story and
then they took him off the board and he just
lives a different life, doing something completely
different. He just kind of disappears from the
scene. You faked death. I mean, a heart attack.
I mean, obviously you went to jail. You go home
two days later, you're dead. It doesn't take
a whole lot of people to come in and say, Hey,
Serge, get out of here. Go live this life somewhere
else. Go write something else. Just change your
identity. It's just weird how usually there are
people that are that, I mean, it wasn't like
this happened in 1942 where everyone's dead or
everyone who's still alive is, you know, pushing
late, late life. But you can't seem to find anyone
that, Hey, I knew Serge and yeah, he was paranoid
or a guy was a wacko or the guy knew exactly.
There's no. there's no, no evidence. Yeah. It's
almost like he wanted to witness protection and
just kind of vanished. I don't know. I find this
so interesting though, right? Like, so if we're
talking about story manipulation, like why would
you say if the government just wanted him to
tell this story? Like why? You know, I've always
tried to pay that a little bit of attention when
I see some of these theories, like, are they
like telegraphing their punch to see how it's
going to be received or they feel like due to
their, whatever code they live by, they have
to tell you. So you internally accept it, then
you write it off as fiction. And then when it
happens, you're like, Oh, what the heck. So interesting
because I know a lot of criminals and they're
never going to actually tell you like, I'm going
to rub your house on Monday. I find that, you
know what I mean? I find it so interesting, but
it almost seems like theological at that point,
right? Like they're almost prophesying. you know,
Jesus did, or the figures in the Bible did, like,
this is going to happen. This is going to be
your Lord and savior. So I almost wonder if it
ties back into that biblical narrative where,
like, they're telling something, write it down,
it's going to happen. I mean, this is probably
the devil's playbook, right? But I almost wonder
if it kind of follows that form and fashion versus
thieves or robbers or what have you. Yeah, sometimes
it's too, is it predictive programming to get
you? Precondition to accept it if it does happen
like oh, yeah, I heard about this. Okay. Now
I know what's going on It sounds ridiculous,
but it does but it doesn't well, you know The
other interesting thing too is that you look
through social media sites Especially with this
uptick in the New Jersey drones all that those
weird sightings every post you see someone's
commenting project blue being project blue being
so it's out there in the ether man a lot of people
have it on the radar a lot of people kind of
know what it is I personally think that The theory
has evolved from this projection into the sky
of the Antichrist and it's more shifted toward
this fake alien invasion. They stage a fake alien
invasion. We fight against it. We look like we
win. We all come together as one world. And then,
then the ball starts rolling for a one world
government because we all need to come together
in case they come back and then we'll. then somehow
the Antichrist would find its way in that mix.
Yeah, you know, we think about that from a Christian
perspective, it's man, how do you get to a one
world government, right? Like there's so much
division, whether between us and Russia and China
and the Middle East, like there's so much division
and what brings people together to be rolled
by one, I think is a really interesting topic.
Obviously one we can't dive into today, but I
think it's what would could be so convincing
and perhaps it's aliens, perhaps it's, you know,
on part Project Blue Beam, right? Like how can
they convince folks? But it's super interesting
to think about. Did you ever hear of that Ronald
Reagan speech back in the, had it been in the
80s, where it was during the Cold War, but he
was essentially suggesting that the world would
come together if an alien force, he probably
didn't use those words exactly, but essentially
stating that the world would come together if
there was an outside alien force that can't come
invade the world. Yeah, that's really interesting.
You know, I always wonder because a lot of people
think, oh, it's the U .N. or some type of governing
body. Like, do you view it as one president for
the whole world or do you view it as like a unified
body? Oh, man, I would think I mean, I think
it would have to have to happen in stages. Right.
And there's lots of documentation about the North
American Union, South American Union, European
Union. the Asian Union. So I wonder if it doesn't
start like that where certain large segments
of countries come together. I mean, you look
at Europe, man, like Western Europe, you've been
there, you spend a lot of time in Western Europe.
Western Europe has however many countries, and
it's probably half the size of the US, I mean,
they could easily become the United countries
of Europe or the United Nations and have the
same political system we have and elect one president.
I think Asia could do... the same, you know,
he's the Middle East. And I wonder if sometimes
it's not going to be like a bunch of diplomats
coming together, but there is one figure at the
top who decides everything, but you don't know
really who it is or if it's a man, woman, if
it's the Antichrist, but there's one person really
making all the decisions and all these other
people. And I think it happens in the world today.
They take their orders from these people and
you see in the media, you talked about this the
other day at your house, you can look at news
stories and it's verbatim freaking same. verbatim.
They're all reading the script and I wonder if
it's not like that at the top. Like, hey, this
is a script, guys. Hey, president of this country,
that country, whatever. This is our agenda. Let's
implement it. You figure out how to do it in
your country. It's almost, you know, it's really
interesting to think about, right? Because a
lot of people will say the UN will mostly just
listen to the United States, whoever the president
is at that time, which I thought was really creepy
when they had the like the UN summit this week.
And did you see the video where the guy calls
him daddy? Okay, that's so weird. So like, I
almost wonder like, because like, obviously,
us is kind of in charge of that, right? Like
they're paying into the budget the most and they're
doing the thing. So if it's like a span of control,
but we have seen the powerful figures kind of
merged together. UK is a great example of that,
right? Like you had the Celts, you had the Nords,
you had all these, you know, the Vikings and
different things that were competing for land
and eventually united under the United Kingdom.
So we've seen that at a very small scale. We've
seen Russia now, right, with attacking Ukraine
and trying to like put back together the Soviet
Union. We've always seen it at that large of
scale, but from like a world domination perspective,
it's always failed. The Mongolians, which under
Genghis Khan, try to conquer the world and the
Roman Empire and different places. And I almost
wonder if the world is just too diverse to like
stand under one decentralized leader. Because
if, you know, you live in the United States and
Trump's your president, like if he's on the other
side of the world, like, are you really going
to listen to him? So I almost wonder if it's
like a union. That's kind of how I view it, right?
They're all gonna listen to like that the most
powerful person and kind of make those decisions
in and unison I don't know I think it's I think
it's different the more advanced technology gets
the more control you have over the currency the
more control you have over supply chains You
can wield a lot of power on countries Three four
or five thousand miles away like I'm just gonna
nuke you if you don't do this or I'm gonna cut
off your cut off your ports so I'm just gonna
Just make your currency worthless. Good luck
dealing with the starving population. Wait for
them to riot and put in a leader who's going
to follow us. There's a lot of stuff we could
do today that the Romans couldn't do, the Mongols
couldn't do. The Mongols could never cross the
sea and take over North America. They were not
technologically advanced enough. Now we can fly
bombers from Missouri and bomb Tehran in the
same day. Exactly, like 20 hours were dropping.
I think it was like one of the biggest bombs
ever deployed in the history of the world, obviously
not as big as the nukes, but you know, huge bombs
in 20 hours. And in five years, what's that going
to look like? Technology's changing every single
day. I think when you control the weapons, the
currency, the technology, and the food, I mean,
I think somebody wanted to do it in certain countries,
you could rule the whole world. Oh, 100%. It's
like it's rolling through influence. Scary stuff
to think about because I think we're so close,
right? Yeah, I agree too and it's scary. There's
still some stuff a bit prophetically that has
to happen before that ball really starts sliding
down the hill, but we're closer than we've been.
I don't know. I was watching a video of the rebuilding
of the third temple in Israel just today. So
it has to happen. They have like plans, they're
building them, they're showing like elevators
like go up on top of the temple. I'm shocked
to hear that because I think there's a mosque
on top of it. There is, but they're building
these prefabricated structures. I don't know,
I didn't get a chance to finish it all, but there's
plans. This lady was like, I'm in Jerusalem.
She was showing billboards of the rebuilding
of the third temple that were up. I feel like
it's right around the corner, man. If you see
all these bombs dropping in Israel right now
between Iran and Israel and Hamas, Even if you
were Israel, I'm not saying they would do this.
But if you really wanted a different temple there,
how easy is it just to say a bomb got dropped?
You know, there are some guys down in Texas that
were genetically engineering a perfect red heifer
for sacrifice for the third temple. And I think
they shipped like three of them over there, like
late last year or early this year. No, but the
story kind of died because of that October 7th
attack. Yeah. You haven't, I haven't really heard
much else about it, but they think there's a
theory that they've already slaughtered the red
heifers and they have the ashes waiting for the
temple i saw it the other day i didn't see the
slaughter but i saw a video on it where i think
it's like every year like they like genetically
modify these things or whatever and they have
the red heifers every single year yeah i think
i think so my limited knowledge they have to
be treated a certain way like they can't labor
or they can't you know, do certain things. But
they have to be a certain age. And if they have
a blemish or something with white hairs in their
fur, usually they can age out of it. So over
the past, like, a couple thousand years, they
haven't had one yet. But until recently, I think
they had three. Yeah, I just did a quick Google
search and it's like there's like 50 videos in
2025 of the Red Heifer. We might have to do a
podcast on that, dude. Yeah, super interesting.
All right. Yeah. Let's wrap up the one takeaway
that you want to leave with our audience today,
right? Like, is this a valid point? Is this something
that we should be concerned about or is this
fiction? I think it's a mix of both. If you have
understanding of Revelation and you understand
that there's going to be an Antichrist, there's
going to be the beast system, there's going to
be a one world currency, you're going to need
a chip. Maybe you sit down and think about how
could that happen? given today's technology.
And I'm sure you could probably piece together
a pretty cool movie plot. That's my opinion.
When you do these deep, internal dives of trying
to figure out the way the world works, what the
future may hold, you can take modern technology
and if you're creative enough, piece together
a pretty convincing narrative, just like the
movies we watch. Some of the stuff we watch is
so crazy, but when you're in it, when you're
watching it, it's super convincing until you
step out of that. box. The world is a scary place.
I think every day, unfortunately, is getting
worse. Like whether truth, a hoax, or perhaps
a prophecy, right? I think the ideal that the
next world changing event could be completely
manufactured remains chilling and as relevant
as ever. So stay awake, stay discerning because
deception won't look like a monster. You can't
believe what you see and you have to have discernment.
and perhaps may look like a miracle. You have
to make sure that it aligns with your worldview.
So I thank folks for tuning in today. It's been
an incredible opportunity to connect with you.
We have a whole hell of a lot more coming. It's
a crazy world. Anything you want to close out
with? Yeah, man. I think just, you know, stay
rooted in scripture. It's going to be hard to
be deceived if you understand the Bible. Jesus
loves you. We love you. Stay close to Christ.
Till next time. We've hit the zero hour. That's
a wrap on this week's transmission. New episodes
drop weekly, so stay tuned and don't miss the
next Signal. Follow, subscribe, and spread the
word. You've been listening to Zero Signal. We're
out.