WEBVTT

00:00:04.269 --> 00:00:10.609
What is a podcast? A question that has been increasing

00:00:10.609 --> 00:00:16.370
in frequency for, I would say, the last five

00:00:16.370 --> 00:00:21.289
to seven years. Pete Davidson has a new show

00:00:21.289 --> 00:00:24.530
on Netflix that they're calling a podcast, despite

00:00:24.530 --> 00:00:27.829
the fact that it's only on Netflix and that there

00:00:27.829 --> 00:00:32.070
is no audio version of it. Some would say that

00:00:32.070 --> 00:00:37.000
the core of a podcast is that at the very least

00:00:37.000 --> 00:00:44.000
you could consume it via audio only on youtube

00:00:44.000 --> 00:00:48.280
if you have youtube premium you can turn your

00:00:48.280 --> 00:00:52.539
device screen off and still listen to the audio

00:00:52.539 --> 00:00:56.979
this is as far as i know at least not the case

00:00:56.979 --> 00:01:01.119
with netflix you need to have your device on

00:01:01.119 --> 00:01:06.140
for netflix To keep playing. But this isn't the

00:01:06.140 --> 00:01:08.200
first time, nor will it be the last, that people

00:01:08.200 --> 00:01:13.959
ask, what is a podcast? Some people, many people,

00:01:14.079 --> 00:01:17.859
have told me that if it's video, it's not a podcast.

00:01:18.239 --> 00:01:21.219
I think we're getting away from that idea, though.

00:01:22.260 --> 00:01:25.560
More people have told me that it's not a podcast

00:01:25.560 --> 00:01:29.939
if it doesn't have an RSS feed. But if you have

00:01:29.939 --> 00:01:35.310
a podcast... only on Spotify, where people can

00:01:35.310 --> 00:01:38.049
listen only on Spotify, but they can listen to

00:01:38.049 --> 00:01:41.609
audio only, I would say that's just a poorly

00:01:41.609 --> 00:01:47.730
distributed podcast. If we look at the word podcast,

00:01:47.890 --> 00:01:52.010
which is a portmanteau of iPod and broadcast,

00:01:52.469 --> 00:01:57.109
linguists can argue that if it's not on an iPod,

00:01:57.109 --> 00:02:03.480
it's not a podcast. But I'm not really here to

00:02:03.480 --> 00:02:08.020
have this debate. I think this is a tired debate.

00:02:08.520 --> 00:02:11.219
I think if you want to make content, you should

00:02:11.219 --> 00:02:16.419
make content where you want to. But the line

00:02:16.419 --> 00:02:21.939
is blurring between what is a podcast and what

00:02:21.939 --> 00:02:25.580
is a YouTube video. What's the difference between

00:02:25.580 --> 00:02:31.310
the two? It's certainly not length. An increase

00:02:31.310 --> 00:02:36.469
in the number of short podcast episodes that

00:02:36.469 --> 00:02:40.689
are really focused. It's not about video. Lots

00:02:40.689 --> 00:02:44.490
of podcasts also publish video. No, I actually

00:02:44.490 --> 00:02:48.650
think it's a lot simpler than that. When I was

00:02:48.650 --> 00:02:54.169
in Italy in 2016, the Euro Cup was happening.

00:02:54.870 --> 00:03:01.500
And I was gobsmacked that as we... traveled down

00:03:01.500 --> 00:03:05.099
the country first starting in Venice ending in

00:03:05.099 --> 00:03:09.120
Sorrento that when there was a game on there

00:03:09.120 --> 00:03:12.280
were people gathered everywhere there were people

00:03:12.280 --> 00:03:16.780
in Sorrento in the streets in lawn chairs all

00:03:16.780 --> 00:03:20.639
watching the game together it was an incredible

00:03:20.639 --> 00:03:28.050
communal experience but it wasn't a fully gathered

00:03:28.050 --> 00:03:30.310
mass all in the same place there were people

00:03:30.310 --> 00:03:32.330
at the stadium there were people watching at

00:03:32.330 --> 00:03:34.030
home there were people watching in the streets

00:03:34.030 --> 00:03:35.710
there were people watching in other countries

00:03:35.710 --> 00:03:45.229
now compare that to something like a college

00:03:45.229 --> 00:03:48.090
football game or a high school football game

00:03:48.090 --> 00:03:53.289
a broadway show maybe is an even better example

00:03:53.289 --> 00:04:00.849
where the majority of the people consuming that

00:04:00.849 --> 00:04:05.389
content are all together in the same place where

00:04:05.389 --> 00:04:12.509
they can react and interact together. This is

00:04:12.509 --> 00:04:22.050
how I view podcasts versus a YouTube video. Podcasts

00:04:22.050 --> 00:04:25.399
and the thing that makes podcasts great. is that

00:04:25.399 --> 00:04:29.040
they are open. They are on an RSS feed. They

00:04:29.040 --> 00:04:36.860
are distributed in multiple apps. But that makes

00:04:36.860 --> 00:04:42.639
engagement in a single town hall or town square,

00:04:42.860 --> 00:04:48.519
we'll say, really difficult. There are people

00:04:48.519 --> 00:04:51.040
who are going to consume an Apple podcast, some

00:04:51.040 --> 00:04:54.259
in Spotify. Some in Pocket Cast or Overcast.

00:04:54.319 --> 00:04:57.560
Maybe you're just listening to this on the website.

00:04:58.959 --> 00:05:02.379
Maybe you've downloaded the audio and you're

00:05:02.379 --> 00:05:04.500
listening to it somewhere else. Maybe you are

00:05:04.500 --> 00:05:10.399
listening to it on YouTube. But unless I, as

00:05:10.399 --> 00:05:16.519
the host, get to some critical mass where I can

00:05:16.519 --> 00:05:22.759
point people to a single place to interact, It's

00:05:22.759 --> 00:05:26.500
going to be hard to get that engagement. And

00:05:26.500 --> 00:05:28.579
I don't want to get too technical here, but I

00:05:28.579 --> 00:05:33.160
do know that in the podcasting 2 .0 spec, there

00:05:33.160 --> 00:05:38.000
are features that allow for things like live

00:05:38.000 --> 00:05:41.980
streaming and podcast apps and some sort of engagement.

00:05:41.980 --> 00:05:48.420
I know there's a proposal for adding comments

00:05:48.420 --> 00:05:53.250
or donating. And at rss .com, we support a lot

00:05:53.250 --> 00:05:56.009
of those features. Full disclosure, I am the

00:05:56.009 --> 00:05:58.250
rss .com evangelist. I'm also a podcast host

00:05:58.250 --> 00:06:02.089
and a podcast coach. And so I've been around

00:06:02.089 --> 00:06:05.170
the block. But I know that rss .com and a few

00:06:05.170 --> 00:06:08.910
other podcast hosts and podcast apps support

00:06:08.910 --> 00:06:13.769
stuff like that. But not all of them do. And

00:06:13.769 --> 00:06:17.009
certainly the major ones don't. I mean, Spotify

00:06:17.009 --> 00:06:22.300
does have comments and polls. Apple Podcasts

00:06:22.300 --> 00:06:24.759
at this point, at this time in recording, doesn't.

00:06:25.279 --> 00:06:32.540
And countless other apps definitely don't. So

00:06:32.540 --> 00:06:35.040
if I want engagement from my audience, I'm going

00:06:35.040 --> 00:06:38.560
to have to say, go to Spotify or go to YouTube

00:06:38.560 --> 00:06:43.459
or go to streamlinedpodcaster .com and click

00:06:43.459 --> 00:06:48.519
on this post and comment or go to a generic forum.

00:06:49.670 --> 00:06:52.350
And that's hard. It's a lot harder than what

00:06:52.350 --> 00:06:56.269
you have on YouTube, which is a comment section

00:06:56.269 --> 00:07:00.910
right under the video. And so as we think about

00:07:00.910 --> 00:07:05.529
what is a podcast, what is a YouTube video, or

00:07:05.529 --> 00:07:11.050
you, dear podcaster, dear solopreneur or small

00:07:11.050 --> 00:07:13.389
business owner who is listening to this wondering,

00:07:13.589 --> 00:07:20.360
should I put my podcast on YouTube? I think the

00:07:20.360 --> 00:07:22.579
answer to that is yes, like you just want your

00:07:22.579 --> 00:07:27.500
content everywhere. But should you have parity

00:07:27.500 --> 00:07:32.699
between YouTube and your podcast? I think no.

00:07:33.639 --> 00:07:36.019
Because if we go back to that soccer example

00:07:36.019 --> 00:07:43.980
or football example, it's like dressing for American

00:07:43.980 --> 00:07:48.519
football when you're going to play soccer or.

00:07:49.519 --> 00:07:52.360
what the rest of the world really calls football

00:07:52.360 --> 00:07:56.000
you're wearing pads and a helmet and it's hard

00:07:56.000 --> 00:08:00.819
to see and move quickly and that's just not optimized

00:08:00.819 --> 00:08:08.959
for how quickly soccer moves and conversely if

00:08:08.959 --> 00:08:11.439
you are just for soccer and playing football

00:08:11.439 --> 00:08:14.959
you're going to get deeply injured there is content

00:08:14.959 --> 00:08:19.250
that is more suitable For this audio only medium

00:08:19.250 --> 00:08:23.930
and more content that is suitable for the YouTube

00:08:23.930 --> 00:08:28.230
video medium. And I know I've talked about this

00:08:28.230 --> 00:08:30.870
before, but I've been thinking a lot about the

00:08:30.870 --> 00:08:34.250
direction of Streamline Solopreneur, my, I guess

00:08:34.250 --> 00:08:37.730
we'll call it my flagship podcast, and how I

00:08:37.730 --> 00:08:40.210
want to approach YouTube. And I think I've worked

00:08:40.210 --> 00:08:47.149
out my next experiment, at least. I want the

00:08:47.149 --> 00:08:50.730
Streamlined Solopreneur to be largely solo episodes.

00:08:50.809 --> 00:08:53.370
I am wrapping up my last couple of interviews,

00:08:53.509 --> 00:09:00.110
but I suspect by April of this year, the show

00:09:00.110 --> 00:09:04.950
is going to switch fully to solo episodes where

00:09:04.950 --> 00:09:08.330
I'm really focused on solving a specific problem.

00:09:09.730 --> 00:09:14.710
Those solo episodes are going to provide me content.

00:09:15.740 --> 00:09:20.139
for not just the show, but articles and newsletters,

00:09:20.179 --> 00:09:22.460
right? Or it could be the other way around. Usually

00:09:22.460 --> 00:09:24.379
I write my newsletter and then I record the podcast

00:09:24.379 --> 00:09:27.799
episode. Neither here nor there. All of that

00:09:27.799 --> 00:09:31.480
is around the thought leadership, long form content,

00:09:31.639 --> 00:09:37.139
adding my voice to the internet. But I really

00:09:37.139 --> 00:09:41.799
like doing interviews. I love talking to other

00:09:41.799 --> 00:09:44.629
people. I love getting their perspective. In

00:09:44.629 --> 00:09:49.070
the 10 years I've been doing this show, the Streamline

00:09:49.070 --> 00:09:52.970
Solopreneur show, I've learned a lot. It's had

00:09:52.970 --> 00:09:55.950
a positive impact on my business, and I think

00:09:55.950 --> 00:09:59.970
it's important to not just be in a silo or an

00:09:59.970 --> 00:10:02.710
echo chamber. So how do I square that circle?

00:10:03.870 --> 00:10:07.690
Well, the other thing I've been struggling with

00:10:07.690 --> 00:10:13.059
is live streams on YouTube. When I was a programmer

00:10:13.059 --> 00:10:15.840
and when I was heavily in the WordPress space,

00:10:16.159 --> 00:10:20.179
live streams were super easy for me. I would

00:10:20.179 --> 00:10:24.899
get on and start writing some code and showing

00:10:24.899 --> 00:10:29.600
people some stuff. When I wasn't coding, I was

00:10:29.600 --> 00:10:34.559
usually demoing some new software and showing

00:10:34.559 --> 00:10:38.200
people how it worked. But since moving away from

00:10:38.200 --> 00:10:42.519
the WordPress space to... Let's say a more 10

00:10:42.519 --> 00:10:46.659
,000 foot view of how I can help people. It's

00:10:46.659 --> 00:10:49.899
been hard. Building automations on live streams

00:10:49.899 --> 00:10:54.820
is not fun. There's a lot of silence and silent

00:10:54.820 --> 00:10:58.059
live streams are just not my thing. I don't really

00:10:58.059 --> 00:11:04.480
think they're a lot of people's thing. And so.

00:11:05.680 --> 00:11:09.120
I've been at a loss for how to consistently live

00:11:09.120 --> 00:11:12.159
stream in a way that makes sense for me. Well,

00:11:12.360 --> 00:11:15.480
you could probably see where the puck is going

00:11:15.480 --> 00:11:17.679
here if I'm going to add more sports analogies.

00:11:18.379 --> 00:11:23.440
I think I'm going to do interviews or let's say

00:11:23.440 --> 00:11:27.100
joint live streams with other people on YouTube

00:11:27.100 --> 00:11:33.220
where I can get questions ahead of time from

00:11:33.220 --> 00:11:35.539
my mailing list, but then people can show up

00:11:35.539 --> 00:11:39.000
in the chat and ask questions and we can react

00:11:39.000 --> 00:11:43.500
to them in real time. Or if I don't have a guest,

00:11:43.559 --> 00:11:49.139
then I can do a Q &A where I show something off,

00:11:49.240 --> 00:11:52.820
but mostly answer questions. And I can engage

00:11:52.820 --> 00:11:57.240
with my audience in a way that I really can't

00:11:57.240 --> 00:12:04.669
on my podcast. Platform control and creating

00:12:04.669 --> 00:12:08.669
walled gardens is not really one of my favorite

00:12:08.669 --> 00:12:14.289
things, but it does have some benefits. YouTube

00:12:14.289 --> 00:12:22.889
and Substack and Spotify are walled gardens in

00:12:22.889 --> 00:12:26.389
a sense. Yes, you can embed a YouTube video anywhere.

00:12:26.669 --> 00:12:30.370
YouTube has an API. It's a little less of a walled

00:12:30.370 --> 00:12:34.600
garden. than, say, Substack, which is a completely

00:12:34.600 --> 00:12:40.820
walled garden. But having platform control in

00:12:40.820 --> 00:12:46.039
the way that YouTube does has benefits. Just

00:12:46.039 --> 00:12:49.500
like if you want to watch a football game live,

00:12:49.600 --> 00:12:52.539
you have to go to a stadium, and that's a totally

00:12:52.539 --> 00:12:55.240
different experience than watching it at home.

00:12:56.220 --> 00:12:59.580
Bringing people together on a single platform

00:12:59.580 --> 00:13:02.519
allows for... more of the type of engagement

00:13:02.519 --> 00:13:07.179
I'm talking about. So I know that this was a

00:13:07.179 --> 00:13:12.840
little bit of a thought experiment. I'm thinking

00:13:12.840 --> 00:13:17.320
out loud. But this is what I'm going to run with.

00:13:19.000 --> 00:13:20.940
Podcasts are great for deepening relationships

00:13:20.940 --> 00:13:24.379
on a one -to -many level. People will listen

00:13:24.379 --> 00:13:26.779
to my show. They'll hear what I'm about. Most

00:13:26.779 --> 00:13:28.899
of what I'm talking about on my podcast is not

00:13:28.899 --> 00:13:35.320
time sensitive. And my podcast gives me the opportunity

00:13:35.320 --> 00:13:39.980
to create other forms of content. If people want

00:13:39.980 --> 00:13:44.080
to engage directly with me in real time, YouTube

00:13:44.080 --> 00:13:46.960
is the place for me to do that. And YouTube live

00:13:46.960 --> 00:13:49.059
streams are going to be a place for me to maybe

00:13:49.059 --> 00:13:51.919
talk about some news or current events or things

00:13:51.919 --> 00:13:54.399
that are happening, as well as bring on guests

00:13:54.399 --> 00:13:58.919
and create more of a communal experience. Now,

00:13:58.960 --> 00:14:01.480
where does that leave the Pete Davidson show?

00:14:03.340 --> 00:14:07.620
Where it's neither audio nor is there a way to

00:14:07.620 --> 00:14:12.179
engage? It's a television show. Simple as that.

00:14:14.860 --> 00:14:17.639
That's it for this episode of the Streamlined

00:14:17.639 --> 00:14:20.419
Podcaster. I hope you enjoyed it. Let me know

00:14:20.419 --> 00:14:24.399
what you think. Do you have an idea for how you're

00:14:24.399 --> 00:14:26.399
going to treat your podcast and YouTube differently?

00:14:27.230 --> 00:14:29.570
Should they not be different? Are you someone

00:14:29.570 --> 00:14:31.990
who believes that it's only a podcast if it's

00:14:31.990 --> 00:14:36.309
on an iPod? Let me know over at streamlinedfeedback

00:14:36.309 --> 00:14:40.330
.com. Thanks so much for listening. And until

00:14:40.330 --> 00:14:43.690
next time, I hope you find some space in your

00:14:43.690 --> 00:14:43.950
week.
