WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.019
So if you're using AI just to write slightly

00:00:04.019 --> 00:00:06.259
better emails, or maybe summarize some text,

00:00:06.639 --> 00:00:09.419
you might be missing out on, well, a lot. That

00:00:09.419 --> 00:00:12.240
kind of basic stuff is fine, sure, but it really...

00:00:12.009 --> 00:00:14.070
barely scratches the surface of what's possible

00:00:14.070 --> 00:00:17.390
when you get into more complex work. That's really

00:00:17.390 --> 00:00:20.250
true. You know, when you look at any real project

00:00:20.250 --> 00:00:22.870
like building software, planning a marketing

00:00:22.870 --> 00:00:25.690
campaign, even something physical like a carpenter

00:00:25.690 --> 00:00:28.109
building a table, it all follows this fundamental

00:00:28.109 --> 00:00:31.489
pattern. Input, then processing, then output

00:00:31.489 --> 00:00:34.969
IPO. And our goal really is just to maximize

00:00:34.969 --> 00:00:37.549
the value of that final output. Systematically

00:00:37.549 --> 00:00:40.909
using AI helps us do that. Welcome to the Deep

00:00:40.909 --> 00:00:43.320
Dive. Today our mission is to help you turn AI

00:00:43.320 --> 00:00:46.200
from maybe a random chat partner into a real

00:00:46.200 --> 00:00:48.909
systematic partner for design for strategy. We're

00:00:48.909 --> 00:00:50.429
pulling the best ideas from the source material

00:00:50.429 --> 00:00:52.729
we looked at on how to build these powerful workflows.

00:00:53.189 --> 00:00:55.130
Yeah, we've got a pretty clear path laid out.

00:00:55.229 --> 00:00:58.049
First, we're going to properly define that IPO

00:00:58.049 --> 00:01:00.689
structure, input, processing, output, what it

00:01:00.689 --> 00:01:02.929
means. Second, we'll talk about the essential

00:01:02.929 --> 00:01:05.430
tools you kind of need and some setup tips you

00:01:05.430 --> 00:01:08.250
can't skip, especially around AI memory. That's

00:01:08.250 --> 00:01:10.870
key. And finally, we'll walk through two really

00:01:10.870 --> 00:01:13.730
specific examples using AI and product design.

00:01:13.920 --> 00:01:16.019
and then for creating social media content at

00:01:16.019 --> 00:01:18.840
scale. Okay, let's unpack this IPO model first

00:01:18.840 --> 00:01:23.180
then. The simple brilliance here is that AI can

00:01:23.180 --> 00:01:26.560
actually help at all three stages. It's not just

00:01:26.560 --> 00:01:28.560
something you plug in at the end to maybe clean

00:01:28.560 --> 00:01:30.980
up your writing. It can speed things up everywhere.

00:01:31.260 --> 00:01:34.260
Exactly. So start with input. This is where AI

00:01:34.260 --> 00:01:36.599
tackles, well, the messiness of real life. Tools

00:01:36.599 --> 00:01:38.879
like VoicePal or Grain were mentioned. They're

00:01:38.879 --> 00:01:40.799
important because they take messy, stuff -spoken

00:01:40.799 --> 00:01:42.739
ideas, rambling voice notes, maybe an hour -long

00:01:42.739 --> 00:01:45.540
meeting, and turn it into organized text the

00:01:45.540 --> 00:01:47.620
AI can actually understand and work with. They

00:01:47.620 --> 00:01:49.519
handle that transcription and maybe some initial

00:01:49.519 --> 00:01:52.219
source. Right. So that cleaned up data then moves

00:01:52.219 --> 00:01:54.359
into processing. This is like the central hub,

00:01:55.000 --> 00:01:57.340
the brain of the operation. You need a strong

00:01:57.340 --> 00:02:00.239
foundation here. That's why something like Claude

00:02:00.239 --> 00:02:03.120
was recommended. What's important about Claude

00:02:03.120 --> 00:02:06.500
or similar advanced models is that big context

00:02:06.500 --> 00:02:08.860
window. Yeah. And that context window is absolutely

00:02:08.860 --> 00:02:11.259
essential. It holds the memory for a complex

00:02:11.259 --> 00:02:14.509
project. It does the heavy lifting. organizing,

00:02:14.650 --> 00:02:16.990
checking data fast, planning things out, even

00:02:16.990 --> 00:02:20.289
drafting, all while keeping the project's history

00:02:20.289 --> 00:02:22.409
sort of in mind. And then get the output. This

00:02:22.409 --> 00:02:24.330
is where the finished thing comes out. Polished.

00:02:24.370 --> 00:02:27.789
We saw some neat specialized examples. Firecut

00:02:27.789 --> 00:02:30.550
for video edits or Gamma turning text drafts

00:02:30.550 --> 00:02:32.810
into presentation slides pretty quickly. So the

00:02:32.810 --> 00:02:34.639
toolkit kind of mirrors the structure. Right.

00:02:34.939 --> 00:02:36.939
Input tools for cleaning up, central processing

00:02:36.939 --> 00:02:39.300
brain, and then output tools for getting it done

00:02:39.300 --> 00:02:41.680
fast. OK. So thinking about that central processing

00:02:41.680 --> 00:02:43.340
hub, the one holding all the project memory.

00:02:43.360 --> 00:02:46.180
Yeah. What would you say is the absolute most

00:02:46.180 --> 00:02:48.560
crucial first step before you even start a complex

00:02:48.560 --> 00:02:52.340
project? Ah. You have to teach the AI who it

00:02:52.340 --> 00:02:55.080
is and what the mission is. Precisely, yeah.

00:02:55.479 --> 00:02:57.580
If you want the AI to act like a professional

00:02:57.580 --> 00:02:59.659
partner, you absolutely have to personalize it.

00:02:59.979 --> 00:03:02.379
The most critical setup step is making sure that

00:03:02.379 --> 00:03:05.460
memory is solid. This really means avoiding having

00:03:05.460 --> 00:03:08.340
to explain your job or the company voice or the

00:03:08.340 --> 00:03:10.439
whole project background every single time you

00:03:10.439 --> 00:03:13.460
log in. That step is so vital because otherwise

00:03:13.460 --> 00:03:17.120
the AI just defaults to generic textbook answers.

00:03:17.379 --> 00:03:19.639
Right, right. And speaking of context, another

00:03:19.639 --> 00:03:22.759
key setup piece is file uploads. You need to

00:03:22.759 --> 00:03:26.300
feed it your own data, PDFs, spreadsheets, style

00:03:26.300 --> 00:03:29.139
guides, so it can check things against your actual

00:03:29.139 --> 00:03:32.310
real -world situation. your constraints. Mm -hmm.

00:03:32.569 --> 00:03:34.569
You're basically setting up a clear data structure,

00:03:34.710 --> 00:03:37.310
not just randomly dumping files in. You're telling

00:03:37.310 --> 00:03:40.810
the AI, this is the hierarchy of knowledge for

00:03:40.810 --> 00:03:43.770
this specific task. You know, I still... Well,

00:03:43.969 --> 00:03:45.770
actually, I still wrestle with prompt drift myself

00:03:45.770 --> 00:03:47.930
sometimes. I remember trying to map out a new

00:03:47.930 --> 00:03:50.590
hiring plan in a chat where I'd just been drafting

00:03:50.590 --> 00:03:53.150
like... casual messages to friends. And suddenly

00:03:53.150 --> 00:03:55.150
the AI started talking about aligning core values,

00:03:55.189 --> 00:03:57.409
but using like really aggressive slang. Total

00:03:57.409 --> 00:03:59.069
meat of the tongue. Got completely confused.

00:03:59.389 --> 00:04:01.509
Oh, yeah, that's a classic problem. And that's

00:04:01.509 --> 00:04:03.949
exactly why the source material really emphasized

00:04:03.949 --> 00:04:06.310
the project's feature tip. You've got to create

00:04:06.310 --> 00:04:09.430
separate, dedicated spaces, like one called Q4

00:04:09.430 --> 00:04:12.050
marketing strategy, another personal blog ideas.

00:04:12.550 --> 00:04:14.849
It keeps the information quarantined, stops the

00:04:14.849 --> 00:04:16.509
AI from getting rixed up, keeps things focused.

00:04:16.610 --> 00:04:18.790
So when we use these dedicated projects, these

00:04:18.790 --> 00:04:22.000
separate spaces. Yeah. What's the key confusion

00:04:22.000 --> 00:04:24.519
we're stopping the AI from making? It stops the

00:04:24.519 --> 00:04:26.720
AI from blending your different job contexts

00:04:26.720 --> 00:04:29.259
together, keeps work separate. Okay, this is

00:04:29.259 --> 00:04:30.800
where it starts to get really practical. Let's

00:04:30.800 --> 00:04:34.259
test this theory. Workflow one, using AI as a

00:04:34.259 --> 00:04:36.540
product manager. Let's imagine we're designing

00:04:36.540 --> 00:04:38.759
a simple budget app for students. We'll call

00:04:38.759 --> 00:04:41.839
it student money. Right. So step one needs really

00:04:41.839 --> 00:04:44.180
clear instructions in the prompt. Define the

00:04:44.180 --> 00:04:47.259
user, the persona. You tell the AI to act like

00:04:47.259 --> 00:04:50.149
an expert user researcher. And you ask for specifics,

00:04:50.509 --> 00:04:53.470
deep specifics, target audience. Vietnamese university

00:04:53.470 --> 00:04:56.430
students may be 18 to 22 years old. And crucially,

00:04:56.750 --> 00:04:59.589
you define their main pain point. Maybe they

00:04:59.589 --> 00:05:02.009
feel lazy and just avoid writing down every single

00:05:02.009 --> 00:05:04.810
expense. That emotional detail matters. Yeah,

00:05:04.810 --> 00:05:07.290
if you don't give it that level of emotional

00:05:07.290 --> 00:05:09.730
context about the user, the AI will probably

00:05:09.730 --> 00:05:11.790
just give you a generic feature list, not a real

00:05:11.790 --> 00:05:14.769
solution. Exactly. Then step two is designing

00:05:14.769 --> 00:05:18.209
the user flow. Based on that lazy persona, let's

00:05:18.209 --> 00:05:21.610
call him Anne, you prompt the AI to design the

00:05:21.610 --> 00:05:24.670
absolute easiest flow possible. Goal, add an

00:05:24.670 --> 00:05:28.069
expense in under five seconds. So maybe the AI

00:05:28.069 --> 00:05:30.750
guesses the category. If Anne types fuk long,

00:05:31.290 --> 00:05:33.769
does it just assume coffee? OK, but hang on.

00:05:33.790 --> 00:05:36.250
If we make it that simple, just relying on guesswork,

00:05:37.170 --> 00:05:39.689
don't we lose accuracy? How do we make sure Anne

00:05:39.689 --> 00:05:41.649
isn't just tagging everything as coffee and maybe

00:05:41.649 --> 00:05:45.389
missing big things, like rent or a tuition payment?

00:05:45.550 --> 00:05:47.870
That's the exact question you posed to the AI.

00:05:48.110 --> 00:05:50.129
You ask it to analyze that specific trade -off.

00:05:50.449 --> 00:05:52.269
You set the hard constraint under five seconds,

00:05:52.329 --> 00:05:54.850
and the AI has to suggest the compromise, how

00:05:54.850 --> 00:05:56.670
to balance speed and accuracy. See, it shifts

00:05:56.670 --> 00:05:58.709
your job from designing every little screen yourself

00:05:58.709 --> 00:06:01.829
to basically challenging the AI's design assumptions.

00:06:02.269 --> 00:06:04.709
Ah, OK. That makes a lot of sense. So we've defined

00:06:04.709 --> 00:06:06.790
the user, the flow, debated the trade -offs.

00:06:07.370 --> 00:06:10.189
Mid -roll sponsor, read, placeholder. Welcome

00:06:10.189 --> 00:06:12.089
back to the Deep Dive. We've got our user Anne

00:06:12.089 --> 00:06:14.470
and the quick expense adding flow defined for

00:06:14.470 --> 00:06:18.269
our student money app. What's step three? Ah,

00:06:18.550 --> 00:06:22.000
right. Ask for a simple model. A prototype. So

00:06:22.000 --> 00:06:24.459
we instruct the AI to create a clickable prototype,

00:06:24.680 --> 00:06:26.779
but we specify exactly what screens we need,

00:06:27.079 --> 00:06:29.459
and the key elements, like home screen needs

00:06:29.459 --> 00:06:32.939
a huge O plus button, input screen, only show

00:06:32.939 --> 00:06:34.899
the number keyboard, keep it minimal, and then

00:06:34.899 --> 00:06:37.319
maybe an automatic done screen after input. Yeah,

00:06:37.379 --> 00:06:39.500
this is where the AI does that translation, takes

00:06:39.500 --> 00:06:41.540
those abstract rules you set and turns them into

00:06:41.540 --> 00:06:43.920
something tangible, something visual you can

00:06:43.920 --> 00:06:46.699
react to. You're not painstakingly drawing boxes

00:06:46.699 --> 00:06:48.500
and arrows, you're giving the system the rule

00:06:48.500 --> 00:06:50.790
to design for you. And then we hit step four,

00:06:51.110 --> 00:06:53.810
test and fix. iteration, we challenge the AI's

00:06:53.810 --> 00:06:56.290
prototype, throw an edge case at it, like, how

00:06:56.290 --> 00:06:58.629
does this super simple app handle a loan Anne

00:06:58.629 --> 00:07:01.509
gave to a friend? We make the AI analyze the

00:07:01.509 --> 00:07:03.649
trade -off again. Do we add complexity, like

00:07:03.649 --> 00:07:05.730
a loan section, or does that break the core simplicity

00:07:05.730 --> 00:07:08.069
needed for Anne? And the big lesson here, really,

00:07:08.069 --> 00:07:10.050
is you don't need to be a coder. You don't even

00:07:10.050 --> 00:07:12.350
need to be great at wireframing tools. You just

00:07:12.350 --> 00:07:14.389
need to be incredibly clear about describing

00:07:14.389 --> 00:07:16.329
the requirement, the problem you're trying to

00:07:16.329 --> 00:07:19.649
solve for the user. The AI handles the translation

00:07:19.649 --> 00:07:22.660
into a testable model. So what core function

00:07:22.660 --> 00:07:25.180
is the AI really performing in this whole design

00:07:25.180 --> 00:07:28.160
loop then? It quickly translates abstract ideas

00:07:28.160 --> 00:07:31.259
into a tangible model for review. Okay, let's

00:07:31.259 --> 00:07:35.139
switch gears. Workflow 2. AI as a content strategist.

00:07:35.579 --> 00:07:38.180
Thinking about fast platforms like TikTok or

00:07:38.180 --> 00:07:41.540
Reels, often the hardest bit isn't making the

00:07:41.540 --> 00:07:43.959
video. It's coming up with ideas that actually

00:07:43.959 --> 00:07:46.800
connect, that resonate. Step one here is about

00:07:46.800 --> 00:07:48.740
getting emotionally effective hook ideas. We

00:07:48.740 --> 00:07:51.100
don't just want generic topics. The prompt needs

00:07:51.100 --> 00:07:53.660
to tell the AI acting now as a social media marketing

00:07:53.660 --> 00:07:56.779
strategist to generate maybe 20 ideas and then

00:07:56.779 --> 00:07:58.600
crucially sort them by psychological triggers

00:07:58.600 --> 00:08:01.019
that would work for our user and things like

00:08:01.019 --> 00:08:04.259
pain point, curiosity, quick win. I really like

00:08:04.259 --> 00:08:07.259
that focus. It forces the ideas to be relevant

00:08:07.259 --> 00:08:10.259
right from the start. Something like why you're

00:08:10.259 --> 00:08:12.860
always broke by the 20th and how to fix it in

00:08:12.860 --> 00:08:15.699
30 seconds. hits a pain point, offers a quick

00:08:15.699 --> 00:08:18.720
win. Exactly. Then comes step two, which is critical.

00:08:19.220 --> 00:08:21.660
The human filter. You have to apply your feeling.

00:08:22.060 --> 00:08:24.439
The AI gives you 20 psychologically sorted ideas,

00:08:24.720 --> 00:08:26.459
yeah. But you only pick the best, maybe three

00:08:26.459 --> 00:08:28.579
to five that genuinely resonate with you, that

00:08:28.579 --> 00:08:30.399
feel right for your voice. You're the curator

00:08:30.399 --> 00:08:33.779
here. Wow. Just imagine scaling that. Testing

00:08:33.779 --> 00:08:36.460
thousands of those kinds of psychologically angled

00:08:36.460 --> 00:08:39.740
concepts in like minutes, that speed for strategic

00:08:39.740 --> 00:08:41.480
planning, it's kind of mind blowing compared

00:08:41.480 --> 00:08:43.320
to traditional brainstorming. It really is a

00:08:43.320 --> 00:08:45.580
total acceleration of that early creative phase.

00:08:46.379 --> 00:08:48.779
Okay, so now step three, creating a detailed

00:08:48.779 --> 00:08:51.279
script. Right. You take one of your chosen hooks,

00:08:51.639 --> 00:08:53.360
let's use this while you're always broke by the

00:08:53.360 --> 00:08:56.039
20th, and you prompt the AI for a full, say,

00:08:56.159 --> 00:08:59.019
30 second script. The key here is using a structured

00:08:59.019 --> 00:09:01.659
format, like a table, time column, words column,

00:09:01.879 --> 00:09:04.700
visual column, and you need specific visual directions

00:09:04.700 --> 00:09:07.379
in there, like zero three seconds, close up shot

00:09:07.379 --> 00:09:10.639
of your face looking serious, or 10, 15 seconds,

00:09:11.019 --> 00:09:13.580
fast cuts showing three small, impulsive buys

00:09:13.580 --> 00:09:16.480
coffee snacks. Which leads perfectly into step

00:09:16.480 --> 00:09:18.600
four, and this is maybe the most important point,

00:09:18.960 --> 00:09:21.690
adaptation. Do not just copy and paste that script.

00:09:21.809 --> 00:09:23.990
Please don't. Read it. Understand the structure,

00:09:24.110 --> 00:09:26.049
the flow, but then you absolutely have to adapt

00:09:26.049 --> 00:09:28.590
it. Use your own voice, your tone, your humor.

00:09:29.009 --> 00:09:31.490
The final video, the final content, it must feel

00:09:31.490 --> 00:09:33.970
like it came from you, a real person. Beyond

00:09:33.970 --> 00:09:36.309
just making it relatable, why is keeping your

00:09:36.309 --> 00:09:39.070
own specific voice so crucial in that final step?

00:09:39.210 --> 00:09:41.649
What risk are we avoiding? Authenticity ensures

00:09:41.649 --> 00:09:45.110
the content feels human. Avoid sounding generic

00:09:45.110 --> 00:09:48.190
or predictable like an algorithm wrote it. So

00:09:48.190 --> 00:09:51.070
just to quickly recap the big ideas for you listening,

00:09:51.750 --> 00:09:54.309
AI really shines when you integrate it properly

00:09:54.309 --> 00:09:57.350
into that input processing output system. That

00:09:57.350 --> 00:10:00.090
random one -off use, it needs to evolve. Yeah,

00:10:00.129 --> 00:10:03.169
and critically, AI shifts from just being a tool

00:10:03.169 --> 00:10:06.110
to being a real partner, like a product manager

00:10:06.110 --> 00:10:08.470
or a content strategist, but only when you give

00:10:08.470 --> 00:10:11.149
it super detailed role -specific instructions.

00:10:11.210 --> 00:10:12.929
You got to treat it like a highly skilled con...

00:10:12.750 --> 00:10:15.350
and Sultan you've hired, be specific. And these

00:10:15.350 --> 00:10:16.789
workflows we talked about, they're really just

00:10:16.789 --> 00:10:18.529
the beginning. The source material hinted at

00:10:18.529 --> 00:10:21.090
more advanced stuff. Things like using AI to

00:10:21.090 --> 00:10:22.970
understand feedback from thousands of customers

00:10:22.970 --> 00:10:25.570
automatically, or even building out a whole online

00:10:25.570 --> 00:10:28.090
course structure from just a basic outline. Pretty

00:10:28.090 --> 00:10:30.409
powerful extensions. So here's a final thought

00:10:30.409 --> 00:10:33.169
to chew on. If you get really good at defining

00:10:33.169 --> 00:10:36.110
the problem perfectly, and defining the user

00:10:36.110 --> 00:10:38.850
persona with deep clarity, and setting those

00:10:38.850 --> 00:10:41.090
strict rules for the AI to execute the plan,

00:10:41.850 --> 00:10:45.230
Are you still the creator in the old sense? Or

00:10:45.230 --> 00:10:47.370
have you become something else, maybe a highly

00:10:47.370 --> 00:10:50.830
effective curator of intelligence? Definitely

00:10:50.830 --> 00:10:52.669
something to think about. We really encourage

00:10:52.669 --> 00:10:55.509
you to stop using AI just randomly. Start thinking

00:10:55.509 --> 00:10:58.149
about and maybe building your own IPO systems

00:10:58.149 --> 00:11:00.429
today. Thanks so much for joining this deep dive.

00:11:00.730 --> 00:11:01.289
Until next time.
