WEBVTT 00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.779 Can a machine, an AI, really find those hidden 00:00:03.779 --> 00:00:06.280 patterns in financial markets? You know, the 00:00:06.280 --> 00:00:08.400 ones humans might miss and all that noise. Yeah, 00:00:08.539 --> 00:00:10.460 it's the big question, isn't it? Is it a really 00:00:10.460 --> 00:00:13.800 tool or just hype? Or just fantasy. Yeah. Well, 00:00:14.839 --> 00:00:17.280 we decided to look into a source that put that 00:00:17.280 --> 00:00:20.559 idea to a pretty tough test. A head -to -head 00:00:20.559 --> 00:00:24.539 showdown. Welcome to the Deep Dive. Today, we 00:00:24.539 --> 00:00:26.679 are digging into a really fascinating experiment. 00:00:27.260 --> 00:00:30.160 It's all about AI analyzing trading charts, crypto, 00:00:30.420 --> 00:00:33.960 stocks, Forex, the works. Yep. Our sources detail 00:00:33.960 --> 00:00:37.719 this big test pitting seven major AI models against 00:00:37.719 --> 00:00:39.960 each other. Pretty cool setup. And our mission 00:00:39.960 --> 00:00:43.280 here is to figure out which AI, if any, can actually 00:00:43.280 --> 00:00:45.859 be that reliable sidekick, that co -pilot for 00:00:45.859 --> 00:00:47.960 traders. And crucially, how you can potentially 00:00:47.960 --> 00:00:49.679 use what they found. We're going to walk through 00:00:49.679 --> 00:00:51.399 the whole thing. Exactly. The experiment itself, 00:00:51.600 --> 00:00:54.340 some... Surprising failures. Oh, yeah. There 00:00:54.340 --> 00:00:55.780 were definitely failures. The clear winners, 00:00:55.920 --> 00:00:57.539 and then we'll break down a step -by -step guide 00:00:57.539 --> 00:00:59.460 based on those findings. Sounds good. Let's jump 00:00:59.460 --> 00:01:02.320 in. So, you know, for ages, traders have been 00:01:02.320 --> 00:01:04.439 looking for that edge. Right. And for a long 00:01:04.439 --> 00:01:06.859 time, technical analysis has been a key part 00:01:06.859 --> 00:01:09.680 of that, staring at charts. Mm -hmm. Patience. 00:01:09.739 --> 00:01:13.140 A trained eye. Spotting things like a cup -and 00:01:13.140 --> 00:01:15.659 -handle pattern. Which looks just like it sounds. 00:01:15.959 --> 00:01:19.340 Signaling maybe a move higher. Right. Or a head 00:01:19.340 --> 00:01:21.359 and shoulders, maybe an inverse one suggesting 00:01:21.359 --> 00:01:24.519 a bottom. Or a bullish pennant, another sign 00:01:24.519 --> 00:01:26.900 of continuation. It's about reading the psychology 00:01:26.900 --> 00:01:28.780 and the price action. It's definitely an art 00:01:28.780 --> 00:01:31.560 form. Takes time. Takes skill. And that's where 00:01:31.560 --> 00:01:34.219 AI comes in with this incredible promise. Imagine 00:01:34.219 --> 00:01:37.260 something scanning thousands of charts, super 00:01:37.260 --> 00:01:40.659 fast, super precise. Working 2047, no emotions 00:01:40.659 --> 00:01:43.079 getting in the way. Exactly. And maybe costing 00:01:43.079 --> 00:01:45.239 less than your streaming service. It sounds amazing. 00:01:45.400 --> 00:01:48.599 But the reality has often been frustration. People 00:01:48.599 --> 00:01:50.859 just uploading a chart and asking, OK, AI, what 00:01:50.859 --> 00:01:52.819 happens next? Yeah, hoping for magic. And that's 00:01:52.819 --> 00:01:54.780 what this experiment really zeroed in on. Right. 00:01:54.859 --> 00:01:58.840 A serious test. Seven top AI models. Same chart, 00:01:58.920 --> 00:02:01.659 same task. Find a classic pattern, give a specific 00:02:01.659 --> 00:02:04.799 price target. And the first results, honestly, 00:02:05.120 --> 00:02:08.000 kind of shocking. Most of them just failed. Yeah, 00:02:08.060 --> 00:02:11.139 spectacularly. Hallucinating patterns, getting 00:02:11.139 --> 00:02:13.780 data wrong. It wasn't just unhelpful. It was 00:02:13.780 --> 00:02:16.240 potentially dangerous advice. Seriously misleading 00:02:16.240 --> 00:02:19.680 stuff. So boiling it down, what was that core 00:02:19.680 --> 00:02:23.139 promise of AI for trading that this experiment 00:02:23.139 --> 00:02:25.139 was really putting under the microscope? Basically. 00:02:25.550 --> 00:02:28.189 A tireless, emotionless co -pilot finding those 00:02:28.189 --> 00:02:31.129 market edges super fast. OK, so finding that 00:02:31.129 --> 00:02:35.229 reliable co -pilot needed a fair test. Consistent, 00:02:35.409 --> 00:02:38.409 repeatable. Definitely. And the goal wasn't really 00:02:38.409 --> 00:02:40.830 about predicting the future, right? Nobody can 00:02:40.830 --> 00:02:42.610 do that consistently. No, it was more fundamental. 00:02:42.830 --> 00:02:46.210 Can the AI even do the basic job of a human analyst, 00:02:46.469 --> 00:02:49.030 spotting and measuring a known pattern accurately? 00:02:49.349 --> 00:02:51.810 So the battlefield, as they called it. They chose 00:02:51.810 --> 00:02:56.009 a daily Bitcoin chart, BTCUSD. Why Bitcoin specifically? 00:02:56.310 --> 00:02:58.430 Well, a few good reasons. It's super visible, 00:02:58.629 --> 00:03:00.729 lots of eyes on it, so there's generally some 00:03:00.729 --> 00:03:03.050 agreement among human analysts on the big patterns. 00:03:03.069 --> 00:03:05.650 Good for comparison. Plus, it's volatile. That 00:03:05.650 --> 00:03:07.810 tends to create these big, clear patterns, easier 00:03:07.810 --> 00:03:10.289 to analyze visually. And the data is easy to 00:03:10.289 --> 00:03:13.009 get, I assume. Exactly. Historical data is readily 00:03:13.009 --> 00:03:16.150 available, crucial for the test setup. And each 00:03:16.150 --> 00:03:18.090 AI got two key things, right? The chart image? 00:03:18.210 --> 00:03:21.099 Yep. A clean, high -res screenshot, no clutter. 00:03:21.340 --> 00:03:24.159 And the raw data. Critically, yes. A CSV file 00:03:24.159 --> 00:03:26.740 with the daily open, high, low, close, volume, 00:03:27.000 --> 00:03:29.900 grounding the visual and actual numbers. Very 00:03:29.900 --> 00:03:32.240 important. Smart. Stops it from just guessing 00:03:32.240 --> 00:03:34.659 based on the picture. Precisely. And the contestants. 00:03:35.580 --> 00:03:38.699 Quite the mix. From the pricey stuff to free 00:03:38.699 --> 00:03:41.719 versions. Like it. Okay, so you had ChatGPT -03 00:03:41.719 --> 00:03:45.580 Pro. That's the $200 a month beast. Then ChatGPT 00:03:45.580 --> 00:03:48.039 -03, the $20 plus version, kind of the popular 00:03:48.039 --> 00:03:50.460 choice. The one many people use. Right. And the 00:03:50.460 --> 00:03:54.319 free one, ChatGPT -40. Also, Cloud Opus 4, Perplexity, 00:03:54.319 --> 00:03:57.259 that AI research tool. DeepSeek R1, which is 00:03:57.259 --> 00:04:00.219 open source. And Google's Gemini 2 .5 Pro. A 00:04:00.219 --> 00:04:01.960 real spectrum. And the challenge was the same 00:04:01.960 --> 00:04:04.000 for all of them. Identical instruction. Absolutely 00:04:04.000 --> 00:04:06.139 identical. Upload the image, upload the CSV, 00:04:06.360 --> 00:04:10.060 then find significant classic patterns, give 00:04:10.060 --> 00:04:12.819 specific price levels and dates for it, calculate 00:04:12.819 --> 00:04:15.659 a realistic target using standard rules. And 00:04:15.659 --> 00:04:18.560 show your work, basically. Exactly. Draw the 00:04:18.560 --> 00:04:21.680 pattern on the chart image and explain your reasoning. 00:04:21.879 --> 00:04:24.860 Clear, step by step. No wiggle room. So just 00:04:24.860 --> 00:04:28.300 to recap that key decision, why was Bitcoin chosen 00:04:28.300 --> 00:04:32.019 as the test case? Because it offered clear patterns 00:04:32.019 --> 00:04:34.779 and broad analyst agreement for a solid comparison. 00:04:35.100 --> 00:04:37.660 Got it. Okay, before we get to the winners, we 00:04:37.660 --> 00:04:39.959 really need to talk about the failures. Because 00:04:39.959 --> 00:04:43.139 understanding why they failed is, well, super 00:04:43.139 --> 00:04:45.000 important for anyone thinking of using these 00:04:45.000 --> 00:04:47.459 tools. Oh, absolutely. Knowing the pitfalls is 00:04:47.459 --> 00:04:49.939 half the battle. Let's start with the free chat 00:04:49.939 --> 00:04:52.600 GPT, the 4 .0 model. What happened there? It 00:04:52.600 --> 00:04:56.579 was like... An overly eager but completely untrained 00:04:56.579 --> 00:04:58.540 intern. That's how the source put it. It tried 00:04:58.540 --> 00:05:00.899 to find a cup and handle. OK. But it basically 00:05:00.899 --> 00:05:03.939 just drew lines on random noise. The cup wasn't 00:05:03.939 --> 00:05:06.519 real. The handle wasn't there. The price target 00:05:06.519 --> 00:05:08.800 was based on nothing. Like finding shapes and 00:05:08.800 --> 00:05:10.860 clouds, you said. Exactly. Finding faces and 00:05:10.860 --> 00:05:14.439 clouds. The big takeaway. Free general AI just 00:05:14.439 --> 00:05:16.420 isn't precise enough for this kind of financial 00:05:16.420 --> 00:05:18.600 work. You can't trust his answers. OK, so free 00:05:18.600 --> 00:05:21.160 is out for serious stuff. Right. What about Claude 00:05:21.160 --> 00:05:23.449 Opus 4? That one's pretty powerful. for it yeah 00:05:23.449 --> 00:05:27.550 known for handling lots of info but a big letdown 00:05:27.550 --> 00:05:30.509 here it said it found a descending triangle okay 00:05:30.509 --> 00:05:33.449 fine okay but the visualization it spat out this 00:05:33.449 --> 00:05:37.490 jumbled mess of ascii art like asterisks and 00:05:37.490 --> 00:05:40.930 slashes trying to make a picture completely unreadable 00:05:40.930 --> 00:05:42.889 so you couldn't even see what it claimed to find 00:05:42.889 --> 00:05:44.910 nope and if you can't see the pattern clearly 00:05:45.480 --> 00:05:47.620 the analysis is basically useless, right? It's 00:05:47.620 --> 00:05:49.779 just words. True. Need that visual confirmation. 00:05:50.120 --> 00:05:52.240 What about perplexity? Perplexity was interesting. 00:05:52.339 --> 00:05:56.000 It gave a nice chart image back. But the analysis, 00:05:56.360 --> 00:06:00.079 pure market commentary. Meaning? Stuff like post 00:06:00.079 --> 00:06:02.639 all -time high consolidation. Well, yeah, thanks. 00:06:02.759 --> 00:06:05.360 We can see that. But no actual trading pattern, 00:06:05.480 --> 00:06:08.540 no entry points, no targets, nothing actionable 00:06:08.540 --> 00:06:11.149 for a trader. So more like a news summary than 00:06:11.149 --> 00:06:13.930 analysis. Exactly. A research assistant, not 00:06:13.930 --> 00:06:16.730 a technical analyst, describes the past, doesn't 00:06:16.730 --> 00:06:18.990 help with future moves based on patterns. And 00:06:18.990 --> 00:06:20.870 then DeepSeek and Gemini, what went wrong there? 00:06:21.110 --> 00:06:23.810 Ah, the hallucination machines. This was maybe 00:06:23.810 --> 00:06:26.850 the scariest failure mode. They both confidently 00:06:26.850 --> 00:06:30.069 identified patterns, but got critical details 00:06:30.069 --> 00:06:34.230 totally wrong. DeepSeek found a double top, but 00:06:34.230 --> 00:06:36.610 the peaks it used were way too close together. 00:06:37.330 --> 00:06:40.389 Invalid pattern. Okay. Gemini claimed a symmetrical 00:06:40.389 --> 00:06:43.689 triangle, but the chart it drew looked nothing 00:06:43.689 --> 00:06:45.970 like the actual price data it was supposedly 00:06:45.970 --> 00:06:49.310 analyzing. A complete visual disconnect. Wow. 00:06:49.430 --> 00:06:51.990 So they just made stuff up confidently. That's 00:06:51.990 --> 00:06:54.970 the danger. High confidence, zero connection 00:06:54.970 --> 00:06:57.850 to reality. That's pure AI hallucination. And 00:06:57.850 --> 00:07:00.949 if you trade based on that, ouch, fastest way 00:07:00.949 --> 00:07:02.990 to lose money. It's like asking for directions 00:07:02.990 --> 00:07:04.829 and being told to turn left at the invisible 00:07:04.829 --> 00:07:07.139 unicorn. Perfect analogy. You just can't act 00:07:07.139 --> 00:07:09.240 on it. You know, honestly, I still wrestle with 00:07:09.240 --> 00:07:11.160 prompt drift myself sometimes when I'm trying 00:07:11.160 --> 00:07:13.139 new things with AI. What's prompt drift again? 00:07:13.279 --> 00:07:16.459 It's when the AI's output changes slightly over 00:07:16.459 --> 00:07:18.519 time. Even if you give it the exact same instructions, 00:07:18.639 --> 00:07:21.779 it just drifts. It really reminds you how incredibly 00:07:21.779 --> 00:07:24.000 precise you have to be with your prompts to get 00:07:24.000 --> 00:07:26.100 consistently good results. Yeah, that precision 00:07:26.100 --> 00:07:28.519 seems key. Yeah. So the common thread in these 00:07:28.519 --> 00:07:31.509 failures was. It seems to be this inability to 00:07:31.509 --> 00:07:34.550 properly combine visual pattern recognition with 00:07:34.550 --> 00:07:37.009 the strict mathematical precision and the rule 00:07:37.009 --> 00:07:39.889 -based logic needed for technical analysis. They 00:07:39.889 --> 00:07:42.629 couldn't bridge that gap reliably. So pulling 00:07:42.629 --> 00:07:44.170 that together, what's the most dangerous failure 00:07:44.170 --> 00:07:47.189 mode we saw with these AIs? Definitely those 00:07:47.189 --> 00:07:49.810 confident hallucinations that are just completely 00:07:49.810 --> 00:07:52.649 disconnected from the real data. Okay. So after 00:07:52.649 --> 00:07:55.019 wading through all those disappointments. The 00:07:55.019 --> 00:07:57.759 misleading answers, the hallucinations. Two models 00:07:57.759 --> 00:07:59.920 actually came through. They delivered. Yeah, 00:07:59.980 --> 00:08:02.180 finally, some good news. And the results were 00:08:02.180 --> 00:08:04.420 pretty interesting. The undisputed champion, 00:08:04.740 --> 00:08:08.759 ChatGPT -03 Pro, the expensive one. The $200 00:08:08.759 --> 00:08:11.920 a month one. How did it do? Flawlessly. Seriously, 00:08:12.019 --> 00:08:14.639 like a seasoned pro analyst, a chartered market 00:08:14.639 --> 00:08:16.639 technician, as the source described it. Wow. 00:08:16.740 --> 00:08:19.220 What did it find? It nailed a classic cup and 00:08:19.220 --> 00:08:22.139 handle on that Bitcoin chart, provided the exact 00:08:22.139 --> 00:08:24.259 price levels, the dates defining the pattern, 00:08:24.420 --> 00:08:26.360 showed it really processed the data. And the 00:08:26.360 --> 00:08:28.639 target. Calculated it perfectly using the textbook 00:08:28.639 --> 00:08:30.800 method. Yeah. Measured the cup depth, projected 00:08:30.800 --> 00:08:34.440 it up, came out to $149 ,000. And the visual. 00:08:34.779 --> 00:08:37.000 Spot on. Drew the pattern right on the chart, 00:08:37.080 --> 00:08:39.440 exactly where a human would, looked perfect. 00:08:39.580 --> 00:08:42.899 Any downsides? Well, the cost, obviously. $200 00:08:42.899 --> 00:08:45.879 a month is steep. And it was kind of slow, took 00:08:45.879 --> 00:08:48.879 over four minutes. But the quality was undeniable. 00:08:49.059 --> 00:08:51.200 Okay, so the expensive one worked great. Maybe 00:08:51.200 --> 00:08:52.879 not that surprising. You pay more, you expect 00:08:52.879 --> 00:08:56.200 more. Was that the real story here? Ah, but here's 00:08:56.200 --> 00:08:59.419 the twist. The real aha moment, the value champion, 00:08:59.519 --> 00:09:04.179 was ChatGPT03. The plus version. The $20 one. 00:09:04.379 --> 00:09:07.059 Wait, really? How close was it? Almost identical. 00:09:07.159 --> 00:09:09.740 We ran the exact same test. It also correctly 00:09:09.740 --> 00:09:12.539 identified the cup and handle. Its target calculation 00:09:12.539 --> 00:09:16.779 was $155 ,000. Super close. Using the same correct 00:09:16.779 --> 00:09:19.960 method. Wow. And get this. It was way faster. 00:09:20.080 --> 00:09:22.120 Did the whole analysis in about half the time 00:09:22.120 --> 00:09:24.340 of the pro version. So 90 % cheaper, almost the 00:09:24.340 --> 00:09:26.779 same result, and faster. Exactly. That's the 00:09:26.779 --> 00:09:28.559 sweet spot. For most people training crypto, 00:09:28.840 --> 00:09:32.179 stocks, forex. This $20 version hit that perfect 00:09:32.179 --> 00:09:35.139 balance of accuracy, speed, and cost. That was 00:09:35.139 --> 00:09:36.700 the truly astounding part. That is surprising. 00:09:36.980 --> 00:09:38.799 So what was the biggest surprise then from the 00:09:38.799 --> 00:09:41.000 winner's circle? That the affordable ChatGPT 00:09:41.000 --> 00:09:43.440 Plus delivered nearly identical high -quality 00:09:43.440 --> 00:09:46.740 results to the super expensive Pro version. Incredible. 00:09:47.179 --> 00:09:50.000 Okay, let's pause for a quick word from our sponsor, 00:09:50.440 --> 00:09:53.240 mid -roll sponsor, Reed. Welcome back to the 00:09:53.240 --> 00:09:56.460 Deep Dive. So we've seen the failures. We've 00:09:56.460 --> 00:09:58.960 seen the surprising winner. Now let's get practical. 00:09:59.440 --> 00:10:02.220 Based on all this testing, there's a clear step 00:10:02.220 --> 00:10:04.700 -by -step blueprint you can follow to get reliable 00:10:04.700 --> 00:10:07.580 results using that winning AI model. Yep. This 00:10:07.580 --> 00:10:09.980 is the formula distilled from weeks of testing 00:10:09.980 --> 00:10:12.960 designed for reliability. Think of it like building 00:10:12.960 --> 00:10:15.259 with Lego blocks. Follow the steps. Get a solid 00:10:15.259 --> 00:10:17.299 structure. Okay, step one. Get the right tool. 00:10:17.399 --> 00:10:20.909 Simple. ChatGPT Plus, the $20 version. It's the 00:10:20.909 --> 00:10:22.850 clear winner. Don't bother with the free one. 00:10:22.950 --> 00:10:25.129 Not for this. It's just not reliable. And the 00:10:25.129 --> 00:10:27.629 pro version. Overkill for most. Stick with plus. 00:10:27.809 --> 00:10:29.950 This is honestly the single most important choice. 00:10:30.129 --> 00:10:32.809 Don't skimp here. Got it. Step two. Prepare your 00:10:32.809 --> 00:10:35.090 chart image. Garbage in, garbage out, right? 00:10:35.309 --> 00:10:37.409 Needs to be super clean. Meaning no indicators, 00:10:37.570 --> 00:10:40.500 no lines already drawn on it. Exactly. Use the 00:10:40.500 --> 00:10:42.440 hide drawings feature in your platform, like 00:10:42.440 --> 00:10:44.759 trading view. Make sure the axes are clearly 00:10:44.759 --> 00:10:46.759 labeled, time on the bottom, price on the side, 00:10:46.919 --> 00:10:49.879 high resolution screenshot. And context. Crucial. 00:10:49.919 --> 00:10:52.559 Make sure the asset name, like Bitcoin or Apple, 00:10:52.740 --> 00:10:55.759 and time frame, like daily or four hour, are 00:10:55.759 --> 00:10:57.799 clearly visible on the image. Okay, clean chart 00:10:57.799 --> 00:11:01.279 image. Step three. Get the raw price data. This 00:11:01.279 --> 00:11:03.240 is the secret weapon against hallucinations. 00:11:03.740 --> 00:11:07.139 Give the AI the actual numbers open, high, low, 00:11:07.320 --> 00:11:10.360 close, volume, along with the picture. It forces 00:11:10.360 --> 00:11:12.700 it to connect the visual to the math. Precisely. 00:11:12.720 --> 00:11:16.019 You can usually export this as a CSV file. Paid 00:11:16.019 --> 00:11:18.139 platforms like TradingView make it easy. Free 00:11:18.139 --> 00:11:21.000 options. Yep. Sites like CoinCodex for crypto, 00:11:21.299 --> 00:11:24.080 Yahoo Finance for stocks, just need that raw 00:11:24.080 --> 00:11:26.799 daily or hourly data. Okay, image and data ready. 00:11:27.299 --> 00:11:30.159 Step four. Crafting your prompt. This is your 00:11:30.159 --> 00:11:32.940 instruction manual for the AI. Two main options 00:11:32.940 --> 00:11:35.159 worked really well. Option A. The comprehensive 00:11:35.159 --> 00:11:37.440 prompt. Plus, this is for detailed analysis. 00:11:37.580 --> 00:11:40.039 You basically tell it. Act as an expert technical 00:11:40.039 --> 00:11:42.440 analyst. Look for these classic patterns. Give 00:11:42.440 --> 00:11:45.120 me exact price levels and dates. Calculate a 00:11:45.120 --> 00:11:47.639 target and explain how. Draw it on the chart. 00:11:47.779 --> 00:11:50.700 Explain your reasoning. Very thorough. Leaves 00:11:50.700 --> 00:11:53.779 nothing to chance. Right. Option B is the simplified 00:11:53.779 --> 00:11:57.000 prompt. More for quick insights. More conversational. 00:11:57.139 --> 00:11:59.539 Something like, hey, analyze this chart. What 00:11:59.539 --> 00:12:01.870 patterns do you see? Pick the most likely one, 00:12:02.029 --> 00:12:03.789 show me the targets, and draw it on the chart 00:12:03.789 --> 00:12:05.950 for me. Still gets great results, just faster. 00:12:06.110 --> 00:12:09.350 Okay, prompt sent. What's step five? Verify. 00:12:09.899 --> 00:12:12.759 Then trust. And this honestly is the most important 00:12:12.759 --> 00:12:15.419 step. Cannot stress this enough. Don't just blindly 00:12:15.419 --> 00:12:18.399 follow the AI. Never. You are the senior analyst 00:12:18.399 --> 00:12:21.279 here. The AI is your assistant. First, check 00:12:21.279 --> 00:12:23.340 the chart it drew. Does the pattern fit cleanly? 00:12:23.360 --> 00:12:25.860 Does it look obvious or kind of forced? Makes 00:12:25.860 --> 00:12:28.500 sense. Then check the price levels it gave you. 00:12:28.600 --> 00:12:30.679 Do they match up on your own charting platform? 00:12:30.940 --> 00:12:34.320 Quick sanity check. And the math. Briefly double 00:12:34.320 --> 00:12:37.360 check the target calculation. Is it roughly right 00:12:37.360 --> 00:12:39.519 based on the pattern size? Just a quick look. 00:12:39.679 --> 00:12:43.860 The point is the AI finds and quantifies possibilities. 00:12:44.299 --> 00:12:47.960 But the decision to trade, that's on you. Always 00:12:47.960 --> 00:12:51.139 your capital, your decision. That human oversight 00:12:51.139 --> 00:12:53.779 is critical. It feels like that verification 00:12:53.779 --> 00:12:56.559 step being the senior analyst is one people might 00:12:56.559 --> 00:12:58.539 easily skip. Especially if they're impressed 00:12:58.539 --> 00:13:01.159 by the AI. You nailed it. Out of all these steps, 00:13:01.360 --> 00:13:04.320 which one is most often overlooked, leading to 00:13:04.320 --> 00:13:07.419 poor results? Skipping that crucial step of human 00:13:07.419 --> 00:13:09.519 verification. Absolutely. That's the biggest 00:13:09.519 --> 00:13:12.080 mistake people make. Trusting too quickly. Okay, 00:13:12.159 --> 00:13:13.740 so that's the core blueprint. But you mentioned 00:13:13.740 --> 00:13:17.179 something else. A bonus technique. Confluence. 00:13:17.659 --> 00:13:19.659 Ah, yes, confluence. This is where it gets really 00:13:19.659 --> 00:13:22.340 powerful. Confluence just means you have multiple 00:13:22.340 --> 00:13:24.779 independent reasons pointing to the same trade 00:13:24.779 --> 00:13:27.100 idea. Okay, how do we use that here? By combining 00:13:27.100 --> 00:13:29.659 the AI's analysis, especially on those bigger 00:13:29.659 --> 00:13:32.299 patterns, with automated tools built into charting 00:13:32.299 --> 00:13:35.059 platforms, like TradingView's All Chart Patterns 00:13:35.059 --> 00:13:37.940 indicator. So run the AI analysis, then turn 00:13:37.940 --> 00:13:39.960 on the indicator. Exactly. It's like getting 00:13:39.960 --> 00:13:42.620 a second opinion automatically. The AI might 00:13:42.620 --> 00:13:45.769 spot a huge multi -month... cup and handle that 00:13:45.769 --> 00:13:47.809 the indicator misses because it looks for shorter 00:13:47.809 --> 00:13:50.250 term stuff. And the indicator might find. Smaller 00:13:50.250 --> 00:13:52.830 patterns, like maybe a bull flag or a pennant 00:13:52.830 --> 00:13:54.870 within that larger cup and handle confirming 00:13:54.870 --> 00:13:57.409 the direction. It's a checks and balances system. 00:13:57.610 --> 00:13:59.629 So when the big picture from the AI lines up 00:13:59.629 --> 00:14:01.250 with the smaller details from the indicator. 00:14:01.370 --> 00:14:03.690 That's confidence. Your confidence in that setup 00:14:03.690 --> 00:14:06.090 goes way, way up. That's kind of the holy grail 00:14:06.090 --> 00:14:08.450 traders are always looking for. High probability 00:14:08.450 --> 00:14:10.750 setups. Can we walk through some examples? Like 00:14:10.750 --> 00:14:12.509 how would this play out in different markets? 00:14:12.750 --> 00:14:16.360 Sure. Crypto first. Bitcoin. We already know 00:14:16.360 --> 00:14:18.240 that AI found that big cup and handle target 00:14:18.240 --> 00:14:23.139 149K to 155K. Long term bullish. Right. Then 00:14:23.139 --> 00:14:25.399 you turn on the trading you indicator. And maybe 00:14:25.399 --> 00:14:27.759 it finds a smaller bullish pennant pattern right 00:14:27.759 --> 00:14:30.220 near the recent highs. Also pointing towards, 00:14:30.240 --> 00:14:34.179 say, 149K. Wow. OK. Two independent signals saying 00:14:34.179 --> 00:14:36.159 the same thing. Exactly. High confidence, long 00:14:36.159 --> 00:14:39.980 term bull case. Now stocks. Imagine a... Big 00:14:39.980 --> 00:14:42.940 tech stock, maybe Apple, maybe Nvidia, after 00:14:42.940 --> 00:14:45.519 it's had a nasty correction. Okay. You run the 00:14:45.519 --> 00:14:48.000 chart and data through the AI. It identifies 00:14:48.000 --> 00:14:50.100 an inverse head and shoulders pattern near the 00:14:50.100 --> 00:14:52.779 bottom. That's a classic bullish reversal pattern. 00:14:53.200 --> 00:14:55.379 Suggests the downtrend might be over, heading 00:14:55.379 --> 00:14:58.139 back up. So the AI gives you the potential reversal 00:14:58.139 --> 00:15:00.860 signal. Yep. And maybe the indicator confirms 00:15:00.860 --> 00:15:03.500 with some smaller bullish continuation patterns 00:15:03.500 --> 00:15:05.970 as it starts to move up. Again, confluence. Okay, 00:15:06.009 --> 00:15:08.429 one more. Forex. Let's take EURASD, maybe on 00:15:08.429 --> 00:15:11.789 a four -hour chart. The AI spots a descending 00:15:11.789 --> 00:15:14.730 triangle. That's usually a bearish pattern suggesting 00:15:14.730 --> 00:15:17.509 price might break down. It gives you a target 00:15:17.509 --> 00:15:19.970 below the current price. So the AI is suggesting 00:15:19.970 --> 00:15:22.490 a short setup. Right. Then you switch on the 00:15:22.490 --> 00:15:24.629 trading view patterns indicator, and bam, it 00:15:24.629 --> 00:15:26.850 finds a bear flag forming right there too. Right. 00:15:26.929 --> 00:15:29.429 Another bearish pattern signaling a likely move 00:15:29.429 --> 00:15:31.929 lower. Two bearish signals lining up. Exactly. 00:15:31.990 --> 00:15:34.740 High probability short setup. See how combining 00:15:34.740 --> 00:15:38.159 them increases conviction. Whoa. Yeah, I can 00:15:38.159 --> 00:15:41.179 see that. Imagine scaling this, analyzing hundreds, 00:15:41.320 --> 00:15:43.500 thousands of charts like this every single day 00:15:43.500 --> 00:15:46.000 across all these markets. I mean, that's a serious 00:15:46.000 --> 00:15:48.759 edge that just wasn't really possible for most 00:15:48.759 --> 00:15:51.059 people even a year ago. It really is a potential 00:15:51.059 --> 00:15:53.820 game changer. So boiling it down. What's the 00:15:53.820 --> 00:15:56.519 single biggest advantage of using both the AI 00:15:56.519 --> 00:15:58.820 and these automated indicators together? It just 00:15:58.820 --> 00:16:00.580 dramatically increases your confidence in the 00:16:00.580 --> 00:16:02.419 trading setups you find. Makes perfect sense. 00:16:02.639 --> 00:16:05.000 So wrapping it all up, the results from all this 00:16:05.000 --> 00:16:07.919 testing are pretty clear, I think. While, yeah, 00:16:08.019 --> 00:16:11.179 most AI models are not quite ready for primetime 00:16:11.179 --> 00:16:13.159 and financial analysis. Especially the free ones. 00:16:13.440 --> 00:16:17.620 Definitely. But ChatGPT +, the $20 version, when 00:16:17.620 --> 00:16:19.460 you use it the right way, following that blueprint. 00:16:20.240 --> 00:16:22.899 Clean data, good prompt, human verification. 00:16:23.460 --> 00:16:26.360 It really can act as that powerful, affordable, 00:16:26.759 --> 00:16:29.679 tireless copilot. For technical analysis. For 00:16:29.679 --> 00:16:32.139 technical analysis, yeah. Across any market, 00:16:32.240 --> 00:16:35.559 crypto, stocks, Forex, it's not about replacing 00:16:35.559 --> 00:16:37.399 the trader. It's about creating this strategic 00:16:37.399 --> 00:16:40.240 partnership with the AI, using its strengths 00:16:40.240 --> 00:16:42.480 to augment yours. It feels like the question 00:16:42.480 --> 00:16:44.940 isn't really if AI will change trading anymore. 00:16:45.019 --> 00:16:47.000 It seems like it already is. It absolutely is. 00:16:47.179 --> 00:16:49.539 So the only real question left is, are you going 00:16:49.539 --> 00:16:51.460 to be ahead of the curve learning how to use 00:16:51.460 --> 00:16:55.059 these tools effectively? Or are you going to 00:16:55.059 --> 00:16:57.330 get left behind? A provocative thought to end 00:16:57.330 --> 00:16:59.870 on. Something to think about. We definitely encourage 00:16:59.870 --> 00:17:02.809 you to explore these ideas more and see how these 00:17:02.809 --> 00:17:05.369 tools might fit into your own approach, your 00:17:05.369 --> 00:17:05.890 own journey.