WEBVTT

00:00:08.219 --> 00:00:11.060
Welcome to Nuclear Matters from the Australian

00:00:11.060 --> 00:00:13.960
National University College of Systems and Society.

00:00:14.519 --> 00:00:17.199
I'm your host, Liz Williams, a nuclear physicist

00:00:17.199 --> 00:00:19.559
and nuclear systems discipline lead for the ANU

00:00:19.559 --> 00:00:22.760
School of Engineering. On today's episode, I'm

00:00:22.760 --> 00:00:24.899
talking all things nuclear security with Jasmine

00:00:24.899 --> 00:00:27.940
Diab. Jazz is the managing director of Global

00:00:27.940 --> 00:00:30.579
Nuclear Security Partners and president of Women

00:00:30.579 --> 00:00:33.640
in Nuclear Australia. She is also a military

00:00:33.640 --> 00:00:35.659
veteran with a couple of decades of experience,

00:00:35.960 --> 00:00:38.240
thinking about how to secure nuclear technologies,

00:00:38.439 --> 00:00:42.619
both at home and abroad. I am personally fascinated

00:00:42.619 --> 00:00:45.439
by how experienced nuclear professionals grapple

00:00:45.439 --> 00:00:48.380
with changes in both technologies and geopolitics.

00:00:48.939 --> 00:00:50.380
I invited Jazz because I thought she could help

00:00:50.380 --> 00:00:53.140
me explore this in more depth. Long story short,

00:00:53.600 --> 00:01:01.380
she delivered. Let's listen in. Thank you so

00:01:01.380 --> 00:01:03.759
much, Jess, for joining us today on Nuclear Matters.

00:01:03.820 --> 00:01:06.560
It's so wonderful to have you here today. Thanks

00:01:06.560 --> 00:01:08.700
for having me, Liz. I'm excited to be able to

00:01:08.700 --> 00:01:11.480
chat nuclear. with you. Yeah. I think this is

00:01:11.480 --> 00:01:13.140
the first time we're doing this kind of thing

00:01:13.140 --> 00:01:16.120
on a podcast format. Usually it's in the context

00:01:16.120 --> 00:01:19.859
of women in nuclear, I think. Yeah. Normally

00:01:19.859 --> 00:01:22.859
we nerd out with a group of women talking about

00:01:22.859 --> 00:01:25.319
nuclear. Yeah. So it's interesting that it's

00:01:25.319 --> 00:01:28.140
just you and I today. I know. Slightly different

00:01:28.140 --> 00:01:31.750
dynamic. Let's dive right in though. You specialize

00:01:31.750 --> 00:01:33.510
in nuclear security and you have an interest

00:01:33.510 --> 00:01:35.750
in nuclear threat reduction and you are based

00:01:35.750 --> 00:01:38.430
in Australia, which doesn't have a civil nuclear

00:01:38.430 --> 00:01:41.390
industry. So I wanted to ask you how you came

00:01:41.390 --> 00:01:44.689
to specialize in nuclear security and how you

00:01:44.689 --> 00:01:48.040
ended up doing this work internationally. Bit

00:01:48.040 --> 00:01:51.439
of a weird career trajectory that I've had. I

00:01:51.439 --> 00:01:54.140
actually started out in the Australian Army.

00:01:54.319 --> 00:01:57.659
I did 22 years in uniform as a combat engineer

00:01:57.659 --> 00:02:01.299
officer. My undergraduate degree was in nuclear

00:02:01.299 --> 00:02:04.560
physics and explosive chemistry. So things that

00:02:04.560 --> 00:02:07.799
you could really only use in a military context

00:02:07.799 --> 00:02:10.860
most of the time. Had a really great career in

00:02:10.860 --> 00:02:13.819
the Army, looking at threat reduction from an

00:02:13.819 --> 00:02:18.659
operational response. capability. And so I lived

00:02:18.659 --> 00:02:21.580
all around Australia and I've done some tours

00:02:21.580 --> 00:02:25.580
around the world focused on predominantly countering

00:02:25.580 --> 00:02:28.360
chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear

00:02:28.360 --> 00:02:31.860
threats. And so when it came time for me to leave

00:02:31.860 --> 00:02:34.699
Army a couple of years ago, I got the tap on

00:02:34.699 --> 00:02:37.120
the shoulder from some colleagues over in the

00:02:37.120 --> 00:02:41.020
UK to get into nuclear security consulting. And

00:02:41.020 --> 00:02:45.080
so that's what I've done. 10, 12 years ago, I

00:02:45.080 --> 00:02:47.300
went and studied nuclear engineering, mainly

00:02:47.300 --> 00:02:51.780
to keep my nerd brain active. So I did that as

00:02:51.780 --> 00:02:54.819
a bit of a side hustle to get the technical understanding

00:02:54.819 --> 00:02:58.240
of the engineering of nuclear facilities. And

00:02:58.240 --> 00:03:00.719
so being able to bring my experience from Army,

00:03:00.960 --> 00:03:03.560
my nuclear engineering together, I'm able to

00:03:03.560 --> 00:03:07.210
specialise that into... security and how we make

00:03:07.210 --> 00:03:10.509
sure material is being secured appropriately,

00:03:10.969 --> 00:03:13.270
but still being able to be used for peaceful

00:03:13.270 --> 00:03:17.169
purposes. Because ultimately, that's what excites

00:03:17.169 --> 00:03:19.669
me about nuclear is the peaceful use of nuclear.

00:03:20.069 --> 00:03:23.669
And Australia has always been pretty anti -nuclear

00:03:23.669 --> 00:03:26.750
weapons. We were a country that was used in weapons

00:03:26.750 --> 00:03:30.189
testing in the 60s. And so I want to be able

00:03:30.189 --> 00:03:32.229
to use my skills to make sure that we can still

00:03:32.229 --> 00:03:35.819
use nuclear peacefully without proliferating

00:03:35.819 --> 00:03:39.180
the spread of weapons, all the information that

00:03:39.180 --> 00:03:41.479
leads to nuclear weapons and nuclear threats.

00:03:41.900 --> 00:03:44.300
So let's talk about some of those peaceful uses

00:03:44.300 --> 00:03:46.879
and how those are connected to some of the threats

00:03:46.879 --> 00:03:48.960
that you were just talking about. Can you give

00:03:48.960 --> 00:03:53.900
us a particular example of where nuclear technology

00:03:53.900 --> 00:03:57.400
for peaceful use might, if not properly secured,

00:03:58.039 --> 00:04:00.539
lead to an issue down the line? Yeah, so we see

00:04:00.539 --> 00:04:02.939
that with any kind of nuclear reactor, whether

00:04:02.939 --> 00:04:06.719
it's a research reactor, a nuclear medicine production

00:04:06.719 --> 00:04:10.800
facility or a power generating reactor. Whether

00:04:10.800 --> 00:04:13.960
it's the fuel itself, not so much unused fuel.

00:04:14.219 --> 00:04:17.540
Unused fuel is pretty stable in its natural form,

00:04:18.240 --> 00:04:22.120
but spent fuel, radioisotopes that come out of

00:04:22.120 --> 00:04:27.040
reactors, materials that a lot of threat groups

00:04:27.040 --> 00:04:30.839
like to be able to use to either create a credible

00:04:30.839 --> 00:04:34.550
weapon or in most cases, just create chaos and

00:04:34.550 --> 00:04:37.009
hysteria which gives them the outcome they want,

00:04:37.269 --> 00:04:41.269
which is terrorizing communities, governments,

00:04:41.790 --> 00:04:45.170
and just creating fear within a community or

00:04:45.170 --> 00:04:49.769
country. And so what we really do is work with

00:04:49.769 --> 00:04:53.360
those facilities to make sure that... it's unattractive

00:04:53.360 --> 00:04:55.439
for threat forces to get their hands on that

00:04:55.439 --> 00:04:58.579
material because the loss of that material is

00:04:58.579 --> 00:05:01.779
actually quite catastrophic. And so we work to

00:05:01.779 --> 00:05:04.759
make sure that it can be done in a way that is

00:05:04.759 --> 00:05:07.899
cost effective because someone standing there

00:05:07.899 --> 00:05:10.420
with a gun at a door is quite expensive and it's

00:05:10.420 --> 00:05:13.160
a bit overbearing in most cases. So there are

00:05:13.160 --> 00:05:15.399
smarter ways we can secure material, make it

00:05:15.399 --> 00:05:20.000
unattractive to be taken. And we work with facilities

00:05:20.000 --> 00:05:23.379
to tailor it for their their particular needs

00:05:23.379 --> 00:05:26.600
and each country varies as well. Big machine

00:05:26.600 --> 00:05:29.920
guns and towers in the US isn't as big of an

00:05:29.920 --> 00:05:32.040
issue as it would be here in Australia. If you

00:05:32.040 --> 00:05:36.660
had a huge machine gun tower outside a facility,

00:05:36.800 --> 00:05:38.740
let's say at Lucas Heights, for example, that

00:05:38.740 --> 00:05:41.779
would terrify the community. We have to be smarter

00:05:41.779 --> 00:05:44.620
and more nuanced in how we look at security for

00:05:44.620 --> 00:05:47.300
each of these facilities and countries. So what

00:05:47.300 --> 00:05:49.819
does nuclear security encompass and how does

00:05:49.819 --> 00:05:52.420
it interact with nuclear safety in particular?

00:05:52.639 --> 00:05:56.060
Yeah, a great question because a lot of times

00:05:56.060 --> 00:05:59.860
people look at security in a siloed manner and

00:05:59.860 --> 00:06:02.620
think it's just about guns, gates and guards,

00:06:02.740 --> 00:06:05.800
which is a very, I guess, old school way of looking

00:06:05.800 --> 00:06:08.860
at nuclear security. How we actually look at

00:06:08.860 --> 00:06:12.259
nuclear security is predominantly at how do you

00:06:12.259 --> 00:06:15.600
control and account for material to make sure

00:06:15.600 --> 00:06:18.139
only the right people have access to that material

00:06:18.139 --> 00:06:21.980
or information? leading to that and that it is

00:06:21.980 --> 00:06:25.019
being used in the appropriate manner and then

00:06:25.019 --> 00:06:28.079
disposed of in an appropriate manner as well.

00:06:28.199 --> 00:06:32.000
So how it links to safety systems is really in

00:06:32.000 --> 00:06:35.120
the materials accounting and control of material

00:06:35.120 --> 00:06:38.500
in making sure that facilities are designed to

00:06:38.500 --> 00:06:41.339
allow for that movement to occur within a facility

00:06:41.339 --> 00:06:44.660
in an appropriate manner that it doesn't impact

00:06:44.660 --> 00:06:48.259
the operations and safety. of that facility because

00:06:48.259 --> 00:06:51.560
if you have impacts on operational use, people

00:06:51.560 --> 00:06:53.779
aren't going to follow them because we're human

00:06:53.779 --> 00:06:56.839
and we like doing things the easiest way possible.

00:06:57.199 --> 00:06:59.240
So it's making sure those systems work closely

00:06:59.240 --> 00:07:02.220
together. But one of the big friction points

00:07:02.220 --> 00:07:05.579
we have when designing nuclear facilities between

00:07:05.579 --> 00:07:09.199
safety and security is in the event of a safety

00:07:09.389 --> 00:07:12.750
accident, let's say you want as many safety doors

00:07:12.750 --> 00:07:14.949
as possible to open up and allow people to run

00:07:14.949 --> 00:07:19.290
out and be safe and get to a control point. From

00:07:19.290 --> 00:07:22.470
a security perspective, all those doors, it's

00:07:22.470 --> 00:07:25.430
too much. You can't just let them unlock and

00:07:25.430 --> 00:07:28.889
go. So it's where's the right balance to allow

00:07:28.889 --> 00:07:31.009
for a facility to be safe enough for individuals,

00:07:31.089 --> 00:07:34.709
but at the same time, provide enough security

00:07:34.709 --> 00:07:39.279
measures to allow access control. to material.

00:07:39.360 --> 00:07:41.300
And so it's finding that nice balance. And this

00:07:41.300 --> 00:07:44.620
is where my background with nuclear engineering

00:07:44.620 --> 00:07:47.680
comes in handy because I can understand both

00:07:47.680 --> 00:07:50.560
sides of the fence. I can understand where safety

00:07:50.560 --> 00:07:53.540
is really paramount and you need to have the

00:07:53.540 --> 00:07:56.879
right safety features in place, but can also

00:07:56.879 --> 00:07:59.060
understand, hey, this has now become a security

00:07:59.060 --> 00:08:02.740
vulnerability and security needs to be taken

00:08:02.740 --> 00:08:05.879
into account in this circumstance. So it's a

00:08:05.879 --> 00:08:09.019
really fine balance, but it's I think it's something

00:08:09.019 --> 00:08:12.000
that the nuclear industry has been quite conscious

00:08:12.000 --> 00:08:16.620
about over at least the last five, six, seven

00:08:16.620 --> 00:08:19.459
years. I think the Russian invasion in Ukraine

00:08:19.459 --> 00:08:22.879
really highlighted it as well, is that hey, security

00:08:22.879 --> 00:08:26.160
and safety have to work closely together if you

00:08:26.160 --> 00:08:30.420
want facilities to continue operating as designed

00:08:30.420 --> 00:08:35.399
in a way that allows the general public to be

00:08:35.399 --> 00:08:37.830
comfortable that they're still running. in a

00:08:37.830 --> 00:08:40.870
war zone, for example, or in a country that might

00:08:40.870 --> 00:08:43.990
be having some instability. That's actually a

00:08:43.990 --> 00:08:46.389
really important question. I'm wondering, in

00:08:46.389 --> 00:08:50.909
your work, does what has been going on in Ukraine

00:08:50.909 --> 00:08:53.889
with Russia coming in and occupation of nuclear

00:08:53.889 --> 00:08:55.970
facilities, et cetera, is that influencing how

00:08:55.970 --> 00:08:59.190
you are advising clients, for instance, in terms

00:08:59.190 --> 00:09:02.269
of their security planning? Definitely. And we've

00:09:02.269 --> 00:09:04.789
done a little bit of work with Ukrainian critical

00:09:04.789 --> 00:09:08.450
infrastructure security forces to allow them

00:09:08.450 --> 00:09:11.210
to understand, OK, what are the crucial bits

00:09:11.210 --> 00:09:14.629
that need to be guarded and protected? And how

00:09:14.629 --> 00:09:18.289
do you do that from a nuclear security perspective?

00:09:18.350 --> 00:09:22.610
Because there is so much they need to do to keep

00:09:22.610 --> 00:09:27.129
just everything running to survive. And a war

00:09:27.129 --> 00:09:30.490
zone is very different to a a country that might

00:09:30.490 --> 00:09:33.309
have just general instability, political instability.

00:09:35.129 --> 00:09:37.529
We're talking about very different threats here

00:09:37.529 --> 00:09:41.490
that have much more sophisticated capabilities

00:09:41.490 --> 00:09:47.669
and probably some quite targeted things they

00:09:47.669 --> 00:09:49.610
would want to do to a nuclear facility. And we

00:09:49.610 --> 00:09:52.629
saw that with some of the Russian targeting of

00:09:52.629 --> 00:09:56.409
Zaprovitzia nuclear power plant. And so that's

00:09:56.059 --> 00:09:58.600
There are different challenges that the country

00:09:58.600 --> 00:10:01.200
in an active war zone needs to worry about from

00:10:01.200 --> 00:10:05.220
a nuclear security perspective. So that is something

00:10:05.220 --> 00:10:08.299
we do talk about with other clients, depending

00:10:08.299 --> 00:10:10.100
on what country they're in. And this is where

00:10:10.100 --> 00:10:13.759
when we see a lot of emerging nuclear nations,

00:10:14.080 --> 00:10:16.559
which is right that they want to embark on a

00:10:16.559 --> 00:10:19.679
power program, but it is, hey, there is so much

00:10:19.679 --> 00:10:22.940
more to nuclear security. That's not just about

00:10:22.940 --> 00:10:27.129
the fence around the reactor site. What is the

00:10:27.129 --> 00:10:29.610
security culture in general in this country?

00:10:30.210 --> 00:10:32.330
Where do we see the vulnerabilities and those

00:10:32.330 --> 00:10:37.350
threats? And so what the IAEA has as best practice

00:10:37.350 --> 00:10:39.750
is what we call the design basis threat for each

00:10:39.750 --> 00:10:42.409
country. Each country should have its own and

00:10:42.409 --> 00:10:45.610
internally to that it should have a design basis

00:10:45.610 --> 00:10:49.769
threat for civilian power plants, military nuclear

00:10:49.769 --> 00:10:53.019
uses. and that will tailor the kinds of threats

00:10:53.019 --> 00:10:55.720
that they need to protect against. And so that's

00:10:55.720 --> 00:10:57.740
the type of stuff we'll work with a facility

00:10:57.740 --> 00:11:00.860
with to say, hey, you don't need to really worry

00:11:00.860 --> 00:11:04.480
about an invasion from another country, but you

00:11:04.480 --> 00:11:07.299
do need to worry about insurgent activity, for

00:11:07.299 --> 00:11:10.340
example, or protestor, like violent protest activity

00:11:10.340 --> 00:11:13.820
or outlaw motorcycle gangs. And each of those

00:11:13.820 --> 00:11:16.919
will vary depending on location, the country

00:11:16.919 --> 00:11:20.629
itself, and then the country's... general security

00:11:20.629 --> 00:11:24.389
culture and stance, which might mean some reactors

00:11:24.389 --> 00:11:27.649
have quite heavy handed nuclear security measures,

00:11:27.690 --> 00:11:30.690
some might not. I'm curious about how you think

00:11:30.690 --> 00:11:32.629
across a life cycle for that. I mean, obviously,

00:11:32.850 --> 00:11:36.210
when you're looking at safety for a nuclear reactor,

00:11:37.149 --> 00:11:39.289
even in the early stages of the design process,

00:11:39.389 --> 00:11:41.309
you're planning for that decommissioning and,

00:11:41.309 --> 00:11:44.690
you know, waste handling in the long term. Security,

00:11:44.889 --> 00:11:47.960
it seems like It seems like you're looking at

00:11:47.960 --> 00:11:50.120
local conditions based on what you know about

00:11:50.120 --> 00:11:52.440
a country and the likely threats. But I'm wondering,

00:11:52.580 --> 00:11:54.440
I mean, those can change over time. How do you

00:11:54.440 --> 00:11:56.759
think through that? Or to what extent can you

00:11:56.759 --> 00:11:59.000
think through that, you know, for a given circumstance?

00:12:00.019 --> 00:12:03.940
Yes. So we design nuclear security systems against

00:12:03.940 --> 00:12:06.940
a probability of one so that it is guaranteed

00:12:06.940 --> 00:12:09.740
that this threat will happen to that facility.

00:12:09.740 --> 00:12:11.899
And that allows you to, I guess, design worst

00:12:11.899 --> 00:12:17.250
case scenario. But That does get reviewed throughout

00:12:17.250 --> 00:12:20.009
the lifetime of that facility because, as you

00:12:20.009 --> 00:12:23.769
say, threats will change, the local environment

00:12:23.769 --> 00:12:27.509
will change, and this is where we try to... If

00:12:27.509 --> 00:12:30.129
a facility is designed well at the start with

00:12:30.129 --> 00:12:33.409
its safety and security systems working closely

00:12:33.409 --> 00:12:37.009
together, then you shouldn't have too many large

00:12:37.009 --> 00:12:40.509
retrofit... requirements later down the lifetime

00:12:40.509 --> 00:12:44.029
of that facility, where we have seen facilities

00:12:44.029 --> 00:12:46.450
that have focused purely on safety at the start

00:12:46.450 --> 00:12:48.970
and a little bit on security. When they get a

00:12:48.970 --> 00:12:50.690
couple of years down the track and something

00:12:50.690 --> 00:12:53.450
happens, they're having to go back and retrofit

00:12:53.450 --> 00:12:57.730
security systems, which is so costly and unnecessarily

00:12:57.730 --> 00:13:00.409
costly if you just design all those features

00:13:00.409 --> 00:13:02.610
in at the start to work with the safety system.

00:13:03.409 --> 00:13:06.129
So security is constantly getting reviewed, much

00:13:06.129 --> 00:13:08.610
like Safety systems are constantly getting reviewed.

00:13:08.669 --> 00:13:12.070
They'll get upgrades if technology is advanced.

00:13:12.549 --> 00:13:14.649
Same sort of thing with nuclear security. If

00:13:14.649 --> 00:13:17.470
the technology advances, it can be upgraded to

00:13:17.470 --> 00:13:21.009
make it more reliable, more secure. Cyber security

00:13:21.009 --> 00:13:24.529
is probably a really great example of that, where

00:13:24.529 --> 00:13:28.350
digital systems need to constantly be upgraded

00:13:28.350 --> 00:13:32.210
and reviewed to make sure that external threat

00:13:32.210 --> 00:13:36.070
vectors can't target them. It is a constant review.

00:13:36.250 --> 00:13:38.590
You can't just design, build the facility and

00:13:38.590 --> 00:13:40.610
go, okay, it's secure for life. It's awesome.

00:13:41.429 --> 00:13:44.309
I wish. I wish it were that easy. That would

00:13:44.309 --> 00:13:47.850
be really great. But unfortunately, people that

00:13:47.850 --> 00:13:50.870
like being in the threat game aren't really nice

00:13:50.870 --> 00:13:54.750
people, right? And they will try to alter how

00:13:54.750 --> 00:13:57.860
they target facilities. to exploit the vulnerabilities,

00:13:58.080 --> 00:14:00.600
right? Some of these threat forces, and especially

00:14:00.600 --> 00:14:03.659
when you talk about nation states that want to

00:14:03.659 --> 00:14:06.139
influence a facility, they're patient and they'll

00:14:06.139 --> 00:14:09.399
wait to find your vulnerabilities. And so it's

00:14:09.399 --> 00:14:11.299
making sure that you can understand the vulnerabilities

00:14:11.299 --> 00:14:14.940
before they do to put the right mechanisms in

00:14:14.940 --> 00:14:18.210
place to reduce them. Yeah. This is making me

00:14:18.210 --> 00:14:20.129
think of Stuxnet. I'm wondering if you have any

00:14:20.129 --> 00:14:24.049
some like favorite lessons learned. Stuxnet is

00:14:24.049 --> 00:14:26.769
a really great example because it said whilst

00:14:26.769 --> 00:14:30.809
this facility might have had the perfect physical

00:14:30.809 --> 00:14:34.169
security measures in place, the fact that they

00:14:34.169 --> 00:14:37.549
were able to get access to the digital systems

00:14:37.549 --> 00:14:40.190
within this facility and exploit those digital

00:14:40.190 --> 00:14:43.190
systems to tweak them so that they weren't getting

00:14:43.190 --> 00:14:46.830
the output in their enrichment. centrifuges that

00:14:46.830 --> 00:14:50.490
they were hoping and it took a long time to realize

00:14:50.490 --> 00:14:54.629
that meant that it had degraded the output of

00:14:54.629 --> 00:14:57.230
that facility and meant they took a lot longer

00:14:57.230 --> 00:15:00.409
for them to be able to get the amount of enriched

00:15:00.409 --> 00:15:02.769
uranium that they wanted to potentially use in

00:15:02.769 --> 00:15:07.190
a weapons program. And so that's why I think

00:15:07.190 --> 00:15:11.250
a lot of nuclear facilities and digital systems

00:15:11.250 --> 00:15:14.740
like that is a big vulnerability. How do you

00:15:14.740 --> 00:15:17.960
reduce that? A lot of civilian nuclear power

00:15:17.960 --> 00:15:19.899
plants won't have a lot of their operational

00:15:19.899 --> 00:15:23.460
systems on the open net so that they can control

00:15:23.460 --> 00:15:25.600
those systems inside. That doesn't make them

00:15:25.600 --> 00:15:28.139
completely impenetrable. That now then puts the

00:15:28.139 --> 00:15:31.139
onus on the individuals in the operations room

00:15:31.139 --> 00:15:33.539
with access to those facilities that they have

00:15:33.539 --> 00:15:36.899
to be screened and they have to understand their

00:15:36.899 --> 00:15:40.740
security requirements and be trusted. And that's

00:15:40.740 --> 00:15:43.539
why nuclear jobs often pay really well because

00:15:43.539 --> 00:15:46.139
they don't want you to be exploited by a threat

00:15:46.139 --> 00:15:48.620
force to offer money. You should be comfortable

00:15:48.620 --> 00:15:52.779
and happy enough in your job. So it's very intertwined.

00:15:53.580 --> 00:15:57.039
It's a big network of people and systems. Absolutely.

00:15:57.320 --> 00:15:59.639
It's complicated. It is. For those of you who

00:15:59.639 --> 00:16:02.659
aren't aware of Stuxnet, basically the idea was

00:16:02.659 --> 00:16:05.919
they wanted to target a physical system within

00:16:05.919 --> 00:16:09.419
the enrichment facilities in Iran. And what they

00:16:09.419 --> 00:16:12.279
did was they put out a virus that only targeted

00:16:12.279 --> 00:16:15.720
those particular controllers. And that virus,

00:16:15.899 --> 00:16:18.139
they basically waited for it to be brought in

00:16:18.139 --> 00:16:21.159
on a USB stick inadvertently by staff members

00:16:21.159 --> 00:16:23.730
because the facility was not. on the network.

00:16:23.889 --> 00:16:27.009
It was set up to be a secure facility. And so

00:16:27.009 --> 00:16:29.389
eventually, of course, the USB stick came in

00:16:29.389 --> 00:16:32.990
because humans are humans. And that virus then

00:16:32.990 --> 00:16:35.750
caused physical damage to the facility itself.

00:16:36.549 --> 00:16:40.929
This does bring up, for me, the question of how

00:16:40.929 --> 00:16:44.649
to deal with emerging technologies in nuclear

00:16:44.649 --> 00:16:47.350
and, in particular, the security implications

00:16:47.350 --> 00:16:49.870
of such technologies. And I remember a while

00:16:49.870 --> 00:16:51.889
back, we actually had a chat about this. I think

00:16:51.889 --> 00:16:53.649
we were talking about fusion energy in particular.

00:16:53.690 --> 00:16:56.649
And I was wondering, this is something you're

00:16:56.649 --> 00:16:58.309
actively working on. Can you share some of the

00:16:58.309 --> 00:16:59.970
exciting developments in nuclear that we should

00:16:59.970 --> 00:17:02.370
be thinking about and planning for and what you

00:17:02.370 --> 00:17:03.929
and your colleagues are working on right now?

00:17:04.430 --> 00:17:07.309
Yeah, so there's some really interesting emerging

00:17:07.309 --> 00:17:10.890
technologies in nuclear that challenge our security

00:17:10.890 --> 00:17:13.569
and the nuclear safeguard system more broadly

00:17:13.569 --> 00:17:16.210
as well. And fusion is one of those technologies.

00:17:16.789 --> 00:17:20.910
There are lots of different ways people are conceptually

00:17:20.910 --> 00:17:24.049
building fusion power reactors. Each of them

00:17:24.049 --> 00:17:26.829
have a similar sort of requirement, which is

00:17:26.829 --> 00:17:29.750
a different kind of radioisotope as the starter

00:17:29.750 --> 00:17:33.970
fuel to then get their reaction going and a requirement.

00:17:34.109 --> 00:17:37.309
predominantly on tritium to keep those reactions

00:17:37.309 --> 00:17:41.970
going as well. Now, what we really worry about

00:17:41.970 --> 00:17:46.450
in nuclear security is any radioisotope or uranium,

00:17:46.549 --> 00:17:49.349
plutonium that can be weaponized. That's really

00:17:49.349 --> 00:17:53.369
what we're trying to prevent. Things like tritium

00:17:53.369 --> 00:17:57.309
historically haven't been as high on the radar

00:17:57.309 --> 00:18:01.430
because you didn't need a lot of it. in nuclear

00:18:01.430 --> 00:18:03.849
applications, whereas in fusion, you actually

00:18:03.849 --> 00:18:06.450
need a fair bit of tritium to keep your reaction

00:18:06.450 --> 00:18:11.309
going. A lot of tritium triggers a lot of stuff

00:18:11.309 --> 00:18:15.130
because tritium is often used as a starter for

00:18:15.130 --> 00:18:18.869
a weapon, a nuclear weapon, or it can be used

00:18:18.869 --> 00:18:23.170
in large components as a material that can be

00:18:23.170 --> 00:18:28.970
used to create fear in a... nuclear dirty bomb

00:18:28.970 --> 00:18:31.970
sense or radiological dispersion or exposure

00:18:31.970 --> 00:18:36.130
device. And so whilst looking at some of these

00:18:36.130 --> 00:18:39.150
emerging technologies, it is getting a good understanding

00:18:39.150 --> 00:18:42.630
of, OK, what radioisotopes are being used in

00:18:42.630 --> 00:18:46.430
these technologies? What's their half life? What

00:18:46.430 --> 00:18:50.190
form do these come in? Are they in a material

00:18:50.190 --> 00:18:54.130
form that can be easily proliferated, stolen,

00:18:54.549 --> 00:18:57.069
sold? And if that's the case, how do we secure

00:18:57.069 --> 00:19:01.029
them? And if they're in a state that is really

00:19:01.029 --> 00:19:05.630
difficult to move, sell, shift around, then okay,

00:19:05.829 --> 00:19:08.089
so what are the ways we're making sure that we

00:19:08.089 --> 00:19:12.019
can... keep it that way on a site. And I know

00:19:12.019 --> 00:19:15.079
a lot of the startup companies hate when I talk

00:19:15.079 --> 00:19:17.740
to them about nuclear security because a lot

00:19:17.740 --> 00:19:19.519
of people love fusion because, oh, there's no

00:19:19.519 --> 00:19:22.859
waste, there's no weaponizable material. You're

00:19:22.859 --> 00:19:25.440
like, look, as a bad person, you can weaponize

00:19:25.440 --> 00:19:27.640
anything. That's the problem with bad people.

00:19:28.140 --> 00:19:30.279
And so we want to prevent that from happening

00:19:30.279 --> 00:19:33.200
before commercialization of a lot of these technologies.

00:19:33.259 --> 00:19:35.319
So we understand the risks and vulnerabilities.

00:19:36.109 --> 00:19:38.009
And you just put the right mechanisms in place

00:19:38.009 --> 00:19:40.369
to prevent them and allow that to be understood.

00:19:41.069 --> 00:19:43.549
And so fusion's a really exciting one. I love

00:19:43.549 --> 00:19:45.509
that because I get to understand more about different

00:19:45.509 --> 00:19:48.210
types of isotopes, which gets the nerd in me

00:19:48.210 --> 00:19:51.769
happy. Another space we're looking at is commercial

00:19:51.769 --> 00:19:54.309
maritime and floating nuclear power plants, because

00:19:54.309 --> 00:19:58.329
that presents a different kind of security challenge.

00:19:58.809 --> 00:20:03.329
The safety around maritime nuclear is well understood.

00:20:03.650 --> 00:20:06.809
The US Navy, the British Navy, French navies

00:20:06.809 --> 00:20:10.130
have been using maritime nuclear for decades.

00:20:10.890 --> 00:20:13.569
And so safety is really well known around that.

00:20:13.910 --> 00:20:17.809
But often those reactors are pretty high enriched

00:20:17.809 --> 00:20:22.130
uranium. They're sealed units so you can't just

00:20:22.130 --> 00:20:25.549
open up a reactor core and take fuel and steal

00:20:25.549 --> 00:20:27.470
it, and you'd probably die if you gave that a

00:20:27.470 --> 00:20:31.750
go. But I don't recommend it. But it's, hey,

00:20:31.829 --> 00:20:34.430
these are vessels that could be out in the middle

00:20:34.430 --> 00:20:38.250
of nowhere, essentially. Who's now responsible

00:20:38.250 --> 00:20:41.569
for the security of that? Is it the commercial

00:20:41.569 --> 00:20:44.410
shipping merchant? Is it the state that that

00:20:44.410 --> 00:20:48.349
vessel is flagged under? What does the response

00:20:48.349 --> 00:20:50.190
force look like? Because I'm pretty sure a lot

00:20:50.190 --> 00:20:53.630
of these commercial shipping merchants aren't

00:20:53.630 --> 00:20:55.970
going to now pay for an armed security force

00:20:55.970 --> 00:20:59.329
to live on these vessels. So what are some other

00:20:59.329 --> 00:21:02.829
more sophisticated ways we can secure material

00:21:02.829 --> 00:21:06.410
utilizing the technology we currently have, utilizing

00:21:06.410 --> 00:21:10.529
sensors and detectors and tracking tools to be

00:21:10.529 --> 00:21:14.109
able to do that? And the joy of having a nuclear

00:21:14.109 --> 00:21:18.079
propelled... cargo vessel is you no longer need

00:21:18.079 --> 00:21:21.680
to hug the coastline where there are pirates.

00:21:22.299 --> 00:21:25.240
You can just sail really far away from them because

00:21:25.240 --> 00:21:27.400
you've got the speed, you've got the endurance.

00:21:28.420 --> 00:21:30.759
You no longer need to be a target for some of

00:21:30.759 --> 00:21:34.539
these pirates. So that's a really fascinating

00:21:34.539 --> 00:21:38.019
one because it is a security problem that hasn't

00:21:38.019 --> 00:21:42.640
really been grappled with before because maritime

00:21:42.640 --> 00:21:45.140
has predominantly been in the defence space where

00:21:45.140 --> 00:21:49.440
they've been state -owned, military people on

00:21:49.440 --> 00:21:51.539
board, security's not a problem there because

00:21:51.539 --> 00:21:53.839
they're providing the security. They are the

00:21:53.839 --> 00:21:57.500
security, yes. They are the security, yeah. So

00:21:57.500 --> 00:21:59.640
it's been, yeah, that's been a really interesting

00:21:59.640 --> 00:22:04.160
one because the carbon emissions from the maritime

00:22:04.160 --> 00:22:08.500
sector quite high globally because we rely on

00:22:08.500 --> 00:22:10.420
ships, especially here in Australia, all our

00:22:10.420 --> 00:22:13.960
stuff comes in by boat. If they've got the ability

00:22:13.960 --> 00:22:17.380
to decarbonize through how they propel their

00:22:17.380 --> 00:22:20.759
vessels, that's a great thing for us. We just

00:22:20.759 --> 00:22:23.160
want to make sure that the material is being

00:22:23.160 --> 00:22:25.480
secured and handled appropriately and it's not

00:22:25.480 --> 00:22:28.680
creating another vector for the threat forces

00:22:28.680 --> 00:22:31.559
to be able to get their hands on material. Yeah.

00:22:32.460 --> 00:22:35.730
The tritium As I understand it also connects

00:22:35.730 --> 00:22:38.670
to fission reactors, at least for some of the

00:22:38.670 --> 00:22:41.730
fuel cycles for these facilities that would involve,

00:22:41.809 --> 00:22:44.250
for instance, transport of tritium, etc. Is that

00:22:44.250 --> 00:22:45.990
something that you think about when you're looking

00:22:45.990 --> 00:22:48.650
at these things? Yeah, definitely. Transporter

00:22:48.650 --> 00:22:52.269
material is one of the more important aspects

00:22:52.269 --> 00:22:55.869
we look at for a facility because any material

00:22:55.869 --> 00:22:59.690
in transport is at risk and vulnerable. And there's

00:22:59.690 --> 00:23:03.569
a couple of case studies one pretty interesting

00:23:03.569 --> 00:23:08.710
one out of Mexico where a source was stolen off

00:23:08.710 --> 00:23:12.069
a truck while it was in transit. And so how material

00:23:12.069 --> 00:23:14.829
is being transported and how it's been secured

00:23:14.829 --> 00:23:19.430
in transport and tracked by the right authorities

00:23:19.430 --> 00:23:23.730
is really important so that you can reduce the,

00:23:23.730 --> 00:23:26.910
I guess, access to that material and make it

00:23:26.910 --> 00:23:29.680
unattractive for them to take it as well. So

00:23:29.680 --> 00:23:32.740
yes, the movement of tritium between sites is

00:23:32.740 --> 00:23:35.339
an important one that we look at from a security

00:23:35.339 --> 00:23:39.000
perspective, much like any kind of radioisotope

00:23:39.000 --> 00:23:44.119
being transported around. In terms of the maritime

00:23:44.119 --> 00:23:47.859
space, how big is the market for commercial maritime

00:23:47.859 --> 00:23:50.400
nuclear? Or do you have a sense of that? Is this

00:23:50.400 --> 00:23:53.339
growing? Where is this in terms of development?

00:23:53.980 --> 00:23:58.559
So this is growing and there are Organizations

00:23:58.559 --> 00:24:00.460
at the moment, so the one we're working with

00:24:00.460 --> 00:24:03.819
closely is called NEMO, the Nuclear Energy Maritime

00:24:03.819 --> 00:24:06.920
Organization. It's a not -for -profit that is

00:24:06.920 --> 00:24:13.480
helping shipping companies, regulators, and licensing

00:24:13.480 --> 00:24:18.279
authorities understand the problem around nuclear

00:24:18.279 --> 00:24:21.140
propulsion in general from the maritime space.

00:24:21.609 --> 00:24:24.009
There are some pretty clear laws of the sea through

00:24:24.009 --> 00:24:26.369
the International Maritime Organization, but

00:24:26.369 --> 00:24:28.990
the stuff on nuclear was written in the 80s and

00:24:28.990 --> 00:24:35.730
is pretty outdated. And so working with that

00:24:35.730 --> 00:24:39.210
organization to say, OK, well, what is in the

00:24:39.210 --> 00:24:41.289
realm of the possible? And this really comes

00:24:41.289 --> 00:24:45.930
from a responsibility and regulation side of

00:24:45.930 --> 00:24:49.430
the house. Where are these ships likely to be

00:24:49.430 --> 00:24:53.910
flagged? does that country have a legitimate

00:24:53.910 --> 00:24:57.670
nuclear regulator that is able to responsibly

00:24:57.670 --> 00:25:02.049
give a licence for a reactor on a vessel and

00:25:02.049 --> 00:25:04.089
make sure that those licence conditions are being

00:25:04.089 --> 00:25:07.269
met whilst out at sea? The thing is with commercial

00:25:07.269 --> 00:25:11.289
maritime, this is big companies that have large

00:25:11.289 --> 00:25:14.450
amounts of money and so they are willing to...

00:25:14.650 --> 00:25:17.369
to throw money at this problem to see how it

00:25:17.369 --> 00:25:22.269
can work and working with small modular reactor

00:25:22.269 --> 00:25:27.730
startups to get maritime small modular reactors

00:25:27.730 --> 00:25:30.670
that are suitable. There's interesting concepts

00:25:30.670 --> 00:25:34.390
about does the ship buy the reactor and keep

00:25:34.390 --> 00:25:37.750
it forever? Is it a leasing arrangement? What

00:25:37.750 --> 00:25:40.170
happens with fuel? So there's so many questions

00:25:40.170 --> 00:25:43.619
out there. It is figuring out What is the most

00:25:43.619 --> 00:25:48.359
viable and most responsible way to do this? And

00:25:48.359 --> 00:25:52.400
it will impact the shipping industry significantly

00:25:52.400 --> 00:25:55.200
because it will mean that ships that are flagged

00:25:55.200 --> 00:25:57.799
in countries like Tuvalu that have great tax

00:25:57.799 --> 00:26:01.740
breaks actually don't have a nuclear industry

00:26:01.740 --> 00:26:04.359
and might not be suitable for a nuclear propelled

00:26:04.359 --> 00:26:07.619
ship. So there's a lot of effort going into understanding

00:26:07.619 --> 00:26:11.579
the regulations and the challenges. once we've

00:26:11.579 --> 00:26:13.859
got that well understood, then I think it'll

00:26:13.859 --> 00:26:17.240
be pretty quick to get to a concept and operational

00:26:17.240 --> 00:26:20.819
state to do that because there is an impetus

00:26:20.819 --> 00:26:24.460
from the international commercial maritime to

00:26:24.460 --> 00:26:27.980
reduce their carbon emissions and their reliance

00:26:27.980 --> 00:26:31.660
on oil predominantly in their shipping because

00:26:31.660 --> 00:26:34.380
it costs them a lot of money and we're trying

00:26:34.380 --> 00:26:37.369
to be greener. in how we approach things. I am

00:26:37.369 --> 00:26:39.869
curious about how the work that you're doing

00:26:39.869 --> 00:26:43.650
for NEMO might impact international regulations

00:26:43.650 --> 00:26:47.750
with regards to nuclear maritime. I do want to

00:26:47.750 --> 00:26:49.869
know what is the connection there? Do you put

00:26:49.869 --> 00:26:52.809
out information for international regulatory

00:26:52.809 --> 00:26:55.799
authorities to consider? Yeah, so it's working

00:26:55.799 --> 00:26:58.779
with the IMO, the International Maritime Organization,

00:26:58.960 --> 00:27:01.859
who's responsible for all the laws and regulations

00:27:01.859 --> 00:27:05.440
out at sea, and in this case, also working with

00:27:05.440 --> 00:27:08.460
the International Atomic Energy Agency to make

00:27:08.460 --> 00:27:11.880
sure that they are also comfortable with the

00:27:11.880 --> 00:27:14.440
concept of this going forward. Because whilst

00:27:14.440 --> 00:27:18.039
the IAEA is not a regulator as such, like the

00:27:18.039 --> 00:27:22.599
IMO kind of is, it still needs to be... given

00:27:22.599 --> 00:27:24.839
the warm and fuzzies that this is responsible

00:27:24.839 --> 00:27:27.740
use of nuclear technology. Because if you don't

00:27:27.740 --> 00:27:32.319
have the IAEA on board, then other states aren't

00:27:32.319 --> 00:27:35.039
going to follow, right? Yeah, they're a key stakeholder.

00:27:35.619 --> 00:27:38.099
They are a very key stakeholder. So it's really

00:27:38.099 --> 00:27:40.619
working with those two big organizations in the

00:27:40.619 --> 00:27:43.759
first instance to make sure that, hey, these

00:27:43.759 --> 00:27:48.410
plans are suitable. and appropriate and manageable,

00:27:48.750 --> 00:27:50.950
because there will be safeguards elements to

00:27:50.950 --> 00:27:53.829
this that the IAEA will need to be deeply involved

00:27:53.829 --> 00:27:57.970
in and will change how they do safeguards in

00:27:57.970 --> 00:28:02.789
its current, I guess, land -based static facility

00:28:02.789 --> 00:28:07.750
kind of perspective. So it's working with them

00:28:07.750 --> 00:28:11.109
to make sure if everybody is comfortable with

00:28:11.109 --> 00:28:14.589
this conceptually, now how do we operationalise

00:28:14.589 --> 00:28:17.559
it? I find it really exciting because I don't

00:28:17.559 --> 00:28:20.400
think there's many other industries, aviation

00:28:20.400 --> 00:28:22.519
is probably the only other one in the world that

00:28:22.519 --> 00:28:28.539
has such rigorous international regulatory requirements,

00:28:29.400 --> 00:28:31.299
that being able to impact that and influence

00:28:31.299 --> 00:28:34.599
that is quite exciting because hopefully we can

00:28:34.599 --> 00:28:37.259
see commercial maritime being done successfully

00:28:37.259 --> 00:28:40.859
and peacefully into the future. I think that's

00:28:40.859 --> 00:28:44.950
a really, it'd be a great way to reduce operational

00:28:44.950 --> 00:28:46.809
costs of commercial shipping, which hopefully

00:28:46.809 --> 00:28:49.609
means things cost a little bit less to move around

00:28:49.609 --> 00:28:53.789
the world. My thought is that we in Australia

00:28:53.789 --> 00:28:56.230
right now are thinking about how to manage visits

00:28:56.230 --> 00:28:58.769
from or more visits, I should say, from nuclear

00:28:58.769 --> 00:29:00.130
submarines, for instance, and we're thinking

00:29:00.130 --> 00:29:01.730
about things like what about how do we handle

00:29:01.730 --> 00:29:03.549
the waste that's going to be produced through

00:29:03.549 --> 00:29:05.890
the maintenance process, etc. If you're thinking

00:29:05.890 --> 00:29:08.309
about maritime nuclear and you're thinking about,

00:29:08.309 --> 00:29:12.789
you know, doing that at a commercial scale. globally,

00:29:13.210 --> 00:29:15.670
are there things that countries need to be thinking

00:29:15.670 --> 00:29:19.170
about now with regards to preparing for that

00:29:19.170 --> 00:29:22.869
kind of shift? Yeah, definitely. I think countries

00:29:22.869 --> 00:29:26.329
that already have nuclear regulators and an industry

00:29:26.329 --> 00:29:29.470
need to be conscious that some of these regulations

00:29:29.470 --> 00:29:34.150
need to be reviewed and updated and working with

00:29:34.150 --> 00:29:37.309
the technology provider to make sure that they're

00:29:37.309 --> 00:29:42.430
working well together, not just very rigid, enforced

00:29:42.430 --> 00:29:46.089
regulations. That will stifle the ability to

00:29:46.089 --> 00:29:49.410
grow this kind of industry. And I think we're

00:29:49.410 --> 00:29:53.349
going to learn a lot from the increase in visiting

00:29:53.349 --> 00:29:56.880
nuclear ships, developing our own... nuclear

00:29:56.880 --> 00:30:00.319
submarine capability that will force us to understand,

00:30:00.619 --> 00:30:03.700
OK, how do we regulate something at sea? And

00:30:03.700 --> 00:30:06.259
yes, this is from a defence context, and it will

00:30:06.259 --> 00:30:09.720
be very different to commercial. But we can learn

00:30:09.720 --> 00:30:12.700
those lessons and the challenges and put that

00:30:12.700 --> 00:30:16.079
into a maritime context, which I think is really

00:30:16.079 --> 00:30:18.700
exciting for the Australian regulators. Hopefully

00:30:18.700 --> 00:30:22.730
our pans are as no. like that challenge, because

00:30:22.730 --> 00:30:25.490
this puts it clearly in their space, not in the

00:30:25.490 --> 00:30:28.369
defence regulator space, but it allows those

00:30:28.369 --> 00:30:30.450
regulators to work closely together, which is

00:30:30.450 --> 00:30:34.309
what we should see anyway from regulatory bodies

00:30:34.309 --> 00:30:38.170
in the nuclear space. Absolutely. So our PANZA

00:30:38.170 --> 00:30:42.710
is our civil safety regulator and ASNO is our...

00:30:42.710 --> 00:30:47.410
Well, they do both civil and defence security

00:30:47.410 --> 00:30:51.539
and safeguards regulation. for those of you who

00:30:51.539 --> 00:30:53.460
are not across all of the acronyms in the school,

00:30:53.720 --> 00:30:56.980
there are many of them. Should get better at

00:30:56.980 --> 00:30:59.980
spelling out the acronyms. I almost feel like

00:30:59.980 --> 00:31:02.380
I should release a like cheat sheet with this

00:31:02.380 --> 00:31:09.500
podcast sometimes. The lexicon. Well, there's

00:31:09.500 --> 00:31:12.839
one topic I wanted to specifically ask you about,

00:31:12.900 --> 00:31:15.359
but I do a lot of work on artificial intelligence

00:31:15.359 --> 00:31:19.559
and I do have conversations on a semi -regular

00:31:19.559 --> 00:31:22.420
basis about the increase in the availability

00:31:22.420 --> 00:31:27.880
of sensors and basically just information of

00:31:27.880 --> 00:31:31.880
all kinds that you can then combine and use both

00:31:31.880 --> 00:31:35.819
for good and for not so good, let's say. I'm

00:31:35.819 --> 00:31:39.079
wondering how you think about the technologies

00:31:39.079 --> 00:31:42.779
that you might be using for tracking from that

00:31:42.779 --> 00:31:44.759
perspective, from the perspective of, well, they

00:31:44.759 --> 00:31:48.299
can be used for useful purposes for security.

00:31:48.579 --> 00:31:51.519
They can be used to help improve the safety and

00:31:51.519 --> 00:31:54.380
security of a system, but they can also be used

00:31:54.380 --> 00:31:56.519
problematically. And how do you think through

00:31:56.519 --> 00:31:59.519
that? Yeah, so I think there's lots of opportunities

00:31:59.519 --> 00:32:03.559
for AI in the nuclear security space. Maybe not

00:32:03.559 --> 00:32:05.900
so much for operational facilities, but when

00:32:05.900 --> 00:32:08.819
we talk about decommissioned facilities or long

00:32:08.819 --> 00:32:12.599
-term waste and disposal sites, the ability to

00:32:12.599 --> 00:32:16.640
use sensors to track and alert and alarm when

00:32:16.640 --> 00:32:20.000
there is any change occurring within those sites

00:32:20.000 --> 00:32:23.119
or facilities. I think there's a really great

00:32:23.119 --> 00:32:26.339
way for AI to help do that, which reduces costs

00:32:26.339 --> 00:32:31.049
to those sites. because often the largest cost

00:32:31.049 --> 00:32:35.589
to a disposal site or a decommissioned site that's

00:32:35.589 --> 00:32:39.109
sitting laying dormant is insecurity forces.

00:32:39.529 --> 00:32:42.470
And so any way that you can supplement human

00:32:42.470 --> 00:32:46.150
with some digital systems reduces the costs.

00:32:46.190 --> 00:32:49.170
And I think the technology is getting to a point

00:32:49.170 --> 00:32:51.190
where you can get some assurance that you are

00:32:51.190 --> 00:32:55.230
getting some decent output there. There are risks

00:32:55.230 --> 00:32:58.109
and vulnerabilities, as you mentioned, too. that

00:32:58.109 --> 00:33:01.089
can be a way that a sophisticated threat actor

00:33:01.089 --> 00:33:03.910
can influence the information that's being fed

00:33:03.910 --> 00:33:08.869
to a response force or a security operation center.

00:33:09.710 --> 00:33:13.289
And so how do we ensure that those systems are

00:33:13.289 --> 00:33:17.509
being regularly checked and tested and not vulnerable

00:33:17.509 --> 00:33:22.230
to external influences? I think that there is

00:33:22.230 --> 00:33:25.430
a way that we can we can nuance that and we can

00:33:25.519 --> 00:33:28.240
be a bit smart and there are some sites globally

00:33:28.240 --> 00:33:30.779
that I think will be really great case studies

00:33:30.779 --> 00:33:34.700
for us to be able to do that and test it with

00:33:34.700 --> 00:33:37.500
the risk not being so extreme. I think we're

00:33:37.500 --> 00:33:39.740
a little way off doing that on operational sites

00:33:39.740 --> 00:33:44.119
where the material in use is quite spicy, I guess,

00:33:44.400 --> 00:33:49.740
as opposed to facilities where the material,

00:33:49.940 --> 00:33:52.589
like in a in a long -term disposal site, it is

00:33:52.589 --> 00:33:54.730
packaged in a way that makes it very difficult

00:33:54.730 --> 00:33:56.529
for someone to get their hands on the material

00:33:56.529 --> 00:33:59.769
they want. So it is really about just reducing

00:33:59.769 --> 00:34:03.230
access. And I think there are AI tools and systems

00:34:03.230 --> 00:34:06.069
that can be used to help. Probably part of that

00:34:06.069 --> 00:34:08.989
security architecture. But again, this is shifting

00:34:08.989 --> 00:34:14.070
mindsets of regulators that you're not just laying

00:34:14.070 --> 00:34:17.469
out the templated security plan of a fence and

00:34:17.469 --> 00:34:20.380
a gun and a gate. you're doing something that's

00:34:20.380 --> 00:34:24.099
a bit more nuanced and the assurances might be

00:34:24.099 --> 00:34:26.820
a little bit different. And I don't think different

00:34:26.820 --> 00:34:28.619
is bad. I think that's actually great for us

00:34:28.619 --> 00:34:32.940
to evolve the capabilities. I find that quite

00:34:32.940 --> 00:34:36.940
exciting. Yeah, it is. It's an interesting research

00:34:36.940 --> 00:34:39.039
problem in the sense that you're talking about

00:34:39.039 --> 00:34:41.099
assurance and there is an interplay between like

00:34:41.099 --> 00:34:44.179
the human actors within the facility that are

00:34:44.179 --> 00:34:46.340
charged with making sure that these facilities

00:34:46.340 --> 00:34:51.429
stay secure. and the AI tools that they might

00:34:51.429 --> 00:34:54.510
be using to do that. And I'm wondering, is that

00:34:54.510 --> 00:34:56.269
a discussion that is happening in your field

00:34:56.269 --> 00:35:00.210
right now? Yeah, it is. It is. And we are looking

00:35:00.210 --> 00:35:02.670
a lot towards academia to see what's in the realm

00:35:02.670 --> 00:35:08.010
of the possible and potentially, could you have

00:35:08.010 --> 00:35:14.130
a fully autonomous, secured site that robotics

00:35:14.489 --> 00:35:17.550
could be the responders or different kind of

00:35:17.550 --> 00:35:21.050
sensors trigger different kind of responses and

00:35:21.050 --> 00:35:24.389
that the humans in the loop might be delayed

00:35:24.389 --> 00:35:27.449
for a really big response, but it gives them

00:35:27.449 --> 00:35:32.289
time to get their traps, whatever threat actor

00:35:32.289 --> 00:35:34.690
has got to that site through other mechanisms.

00:35:34.989 --> 00:35:37.690
I think that is stuff we talk about and think

00:35:37.690 --> 00:35:41.369
about a lot. It is what country and facility

00:35:41.369 --> 00:35:46.139
is willing to take the plunge and do that. Unfortunately,

00:35:46.219 --> 00:35:49.079
I don't think it's Australia. I don't think the

00:35:49.079 --> 00:35:51.539
risk appetite is there. But I think there are

00:35:51.539 --> 00:35:53.820
some countries around Europe that would look

00:35:53.820 --> 00:35:57.880
to this as a viable thing to try. And as I was

00:35:57.880 --> 00:36:00.519
saying before, it would be on sites that are

00:36:00.519 --> 00:36:03.699
lower risk from an access to material perspective,

00:36:03.940 --> 00:36:06.780
like a waste site, like a decommissioned dormant

00:36:06.780 --> 00:36:10.139
site. Well, we could do that and improve the

00:36:10.139 --> 00:36:13.449
concept. Because that's a big deterrent to threat

00:36:13.449 --> 00:36:17.230
actors as well. Who's not terrified of the rise

00:36:17.230 --> 00:36:22.829
of the robots? They're much scarier than human

00:36:22.829 --> 00:36:26.630
security forces. Yeah, why scarier? You can distract

00:36:26.630 --> 00:36:29.409
a human with something shiny. A robot doesn't

00:36:29.409 --> 00:36:32.349
care about that. Let's go to Australia. I'm wondering,

00:36:32.530 --> 00:36:34.170
I mean, we've talked about the maritime case,

00:36:34.269 --> 00:36:37.199
but I'm wondering if given Australia's somewhat

00:36:37.199 --> 00:36:39.559
unique history with nuclear technologies, how

00:36:39.559 --> 00:36:42.500
engaged we are likely to be in these kinds of

00:36:42.500 --> 00:36:44.139
things. What roles do you think we should be

00:36:44.139 --> 00:36:47.480
playing in these conversations? So this is where

00:36:47.480 --> 00:36:52.440
I'm really torn because there are so many amazing

00:36:52.440 --> 00:36:55.780
nuclear startups in Australia. We've got some

00:36:55.780 --> 00:36:58.860
clever people that are developing technologies

00:36:58.860 --> 00:37:01.880
for things like nuclear batteries, so maritime

00:37:01.880 --> 00:37:05.639
nuclear reactors, the fusion reactors. But they

00:37:05.639 --> 00:37:10.460
get to a point where they can no longer do their

00:37:10.460 --> 00:37:13.260
research and build their prototypes here in Australia

00:37:13.260 --> 00:37:17.860
due to our laws and legislations. And then we

00:37:17.860 --> 00:37:20.519
lose them. They go offshore and they will take

00:37:20.519 --> 00:37:23.860
this technology and they will do that overseas,

00:37:24.420 --> 00:37:27.059
which is heartbreaking because we could be a

00:37:27.059 --> 00:37:29.820
really great player in the emerging tech space

00:37:29.820 --> 00:37:34.179
in nuclear globally and within our region. And

00:37:34.179 --> 00:37:37.340
what frustrates me from the nuclear security

00:37:37.340 --> 00:37:40.460
perspective is this is where we could understand

00:37:40.460 --> 00:37:42.980
some of the nuclear security challenges and help

00:37:42.980 --> 00:37:46.460
support our regional partners to lift their nuclear

00:37:46.460 --> 00:37:49.440
security as they take on some of these emerging

00:37:49.440 --> 00:37:53.320
technologies. And I'll use small modular reactors

00:37:53.320 --> 00:37:56.860
as an example here. There are countries within

00:37:56.860 --> 00:37:59.360
our region, the Indo -Pacific region, that are

00:37:59.360 --> 00:38:01.599
seriously considering small modular reactors

00:38:01.599 --> 00:38:04.219
because it's perfect for them as island nations

00:38:04.219 --> 00:38:07.199
to help reduce their carbon emissions, but to

00:38:07.199 --> 00:38:09.900
just have electricity because a lot of them don't

00:38:09.900 --> 00:38:16.539
have reliable electricity. So we could be a really

00:38:16.539 --> 00:38:19.139
great player in helping support that so that

00:38:19.139 --> 00:38:22.739
we can have strong nuclear security network around

00:38:22.739 --> 00:38:26.230
our region protecting Australia's borders too.

00:38:26.869 --> 00:38:30.210
But I think that some of our politics around

00:38:30.210 --> 00:38:32.829
nuclear technology really limits our ability

00:38:32.829 --> 00:38:35.170
to do that, which is really unfortunate. And

00:38:35.170 --> 00:38:39.869
I'd like to see us to be a bit more active in

00:38:39.869 --> 00:38:42.610
that space because we already have the young

00:38:42.610 --> 00:38:45.610
talent creating these amazing emerging technologies

00:38:45.610 --> 00:38:48.630
that are understanding what this technology looks

00:38:48.630 --> 00:38:52.849
like that can help shape how we can secure that

00:38:52.849 --> 00:38:55.889
and do it responsibly within our region. So I

00:38:55.889 --> 00:38:59.429
think no matter what side of the fence people

00:38:59.429 --> 00:39:02.150
sit on for civilian power in Australia, that

00:39:02.150 --> 00:39:06.170
doesn't matter. Our ability to use our clever

00:39:06.170 --> 00:39:11.070
people to help develop future nuclear technologies.

00:39:11.710 --> 00:39:15.389
is there we need to keep them and use that use

00:39:15.389 --> 00:39:18.429
that knowledge for good. It just breaks my heart

00:39:18.429 --> 00:39:21.210
when I meet these young people that are so excited

00:39:21.210 --> 00:39:23.349
and they get to a point and I've seen it with

00:39:23.349 --> 00:39:27.409
a couple of really great technologies and they

00:39:27.409 --> 00:39:29.329
go move overseas because that's the only way

00:39:29.329 --> 00:39:31.389
that they can get their technology off the ground.

00:39:31.989 --> 00:39:34.130
It would be good if we could do a better job

00:39:34.130 --> 00:39:36.070
of I think raising awareness of the fact that

00:39:36.070 --> 00:39:39.679
they're There we can pretend that there is a

00:39:39.679 --> 00:39:42.559
hard border around Australia where we don't have

00:39:42.559 --> 00:39:44.760
to think about nuclear but as you said we have

00:39:44.760 --> 00:39:47.159
neighbors who are thinking about it we have in

00:39:47.159 --> 00:39:49.860
around the globe pledges to increase the use

00:39:49.860 --> 00:39:53.019
of nuclear and in other nations energy mix and

00:39:53.019 --> 00:39:57.519
they those those things can and likely will down

00:39:57.519 --> 00:40:01.679
the line impact us and Australia has a history

00:40:01.679 --> 00:40:04.119
of playing a strong role in for instance the

00:40:04.119 --> 00:40:07.920
safeguards community and so How do you think

00:40:07.920 --> 00:40:11.219
we could move the needle on that in terms of

00:40:11.219 --> 00:40:14.340
how we see our involvement in that kind of work

00:40:14.340 --> 00:40:18.039
outside of small pockets who are already engaged

00:40:18.039 --> 00:40:21.719
within Australian nuclear? Yeah, so I think it's

00:40:21.719 --> 00:40:25.179
remaining engaged in the safeguard space and

00:40:25.179 --> 00:40:27.780
the nuclear security space globally as these

00:40:27.780 --> 00:40:30.440
emerging technologies come out and being able

00:40:30.440 --> 00:40:33.300
to support our regional partners in setting up

00:40:33.300 --> 00:40:36.179
the right security and safeguards frameworks

00:40:36.179 --> 00:40:40.860
to do that. IAEA is really good at supporting

00:40:40.860 --> 00:40:44.960
safety cases around technology, but not necessarily

00:40:44.960 --> 00:40:49.079
as strong in supporting security and safeguards

00:40:49.079 --> 00:40:53.119
because as the external verification, they can't

00:40:53.119 --> 00:40:57.699
really do that. It's hard to play both sides.

00:40:58.360 --> 00:41:01.519
But we could do that. We can support our regional

00:41:01.519 --> 00:41:04.159
partners because at the end of the day, it's

00:41:04.159 --> 00:41:09.110
about peaceful technology being used across the

00:41:09.110 --> 00:41:13.150
globe. We sometimes need to put our bias aside

00:41:13.150 --> 00:41:16.070
and support some of our neighbours so that they

00:41:16.070 --> 00:41:19.070
can benefit from peaceful nuclear. I mean, we've

00:41:19.070 --> 00:41:21.650
done it for 17 years with a research reactor.

00:41:21.730 --> 00:41:25.429
We have some really great lessons. It'd be a

00:41:25.429 --> 00:41:27.989
shame for us not to continue being engaged in

00:41:27.989 --> 00:41:31.159
that space. Is there anything that you've been

00:41:31.159 --> 00:41:32.699
working on lately that you want to share with

00:41:32.699 --> 00:41:34.599
our listeners that maybe we haven't touched on

00:41:34.599 --> 00:41:37.960
yet? I guess the thing that excites me, and this

00:41:37.960 --> 00:41:42.500
is again my nerdy side playing out, is the role

00:41:42.500 --> 00:41:46.280
that potentially micro reactors could take around

00:41:46.280 --> 00:41:50.719
the globe for either small nation states or small

00:41:50.719 --> 00:41:53.800
mine sites. So I live in Western Australia. We

00:41:53.800 --> 00:41:56.699
have quite a large mining community. A lot of

00:41:56.699 --> 00:42:00.360
that community is still on. diesel -powered generators

00:42:00.360 --> 00:42:04.719
or gas turbines. And I think what microreactors

00:42:04.719 --> 00:42:07.820
could do into the future is fascinating. That

00:42:07.820 --> 00:42:10.219
comes with its own security challenges. So this

00:42:10.219 --> 00:42:13.460
is the stuff that I kind of think about when

00:42:13.460 --> 00:42:15.380
I'm thinking about, hey, what's something that

00:42:15.380 --> 00:42:19.500
could be cool into the future here in WA? But

00:42:19.500 --> 00:42:22.639
how do you also ensure that it's being used responsibly?

00:42:22.980 --> 00:42:25.800
Because you're not going to have a staff of reactor

00:42:25.800 --> 00:42:28.960
operators. like running a shipping container

00:42:28.960 --> 00:42:33.159
size reactor, that's just unrealistic. So that's

00:42:33.159 --> 00:42:35.840
something that I guess personally spend a bit

00:42:35.840 --> 00:42:38.780
of time thinking about and conceptualizing because

00:42:38.780 --> 00:42:40.980
I see it as something that's pretty cool and

00:42:40.980 --> 00:42:43.800
interesting, a bit different. Do you have a favorite

00:42:43.800 --> 00:42:46.639
microreactor pilot project or design project?

00:42:47.239 --> 00:42:49.920
So I've been watching Project Pele out of the

00:42:49.920 --> 00:42:53.719
US Army. for quite a while now. I find that fascinating

00:42:53.719 --> 00:42:55.800
and maybe it's because I've come from an army

00:42:55.800 --> 00:42:58.559
background because they've designed this for

00:42:58.559 --> 00:43:01.760
deployable power and energy. You go to a place

00:43:01.760 --> 00:43:04.820
that's been devastated by a natural disaster

00:43:04.820 --> 00:43:08.380
and power is often a really big challenge. Rock

00:43:08.380 --> 00:43:12.150
up with it. shipping container that has a microreactor

00:43:12.150 --> 00:43:14.449
on there, and you've been able to power a whole

00:43:14.449 --> 00:43:17.369
city. Like, that's pretty cool. So Project Pelé

00:43:17.369 --> 00:43:20.050
is one that I've been watching, and that's predominantly

00:43:20.050 --> 00:43:23.989
looking at the Westinghouse -Evinci microreactor,

00:43:24.230 --> 00:43:26.150
which is pretty cool. The Koreans have a really

00:43:26.150 --> 00:43:29.690
cool one as well. Smart 100, I think, is what

00:43:29.690 --> 00:43:32.809
they've named that. And there's a few I'm keeping

00:43:32.809 --> 00:43:35.070
an eye on. I like microreactors. I think they're

00:43:35.070 --> 00:43:38.190
really great. Well, we can put a link or two

00:43:38.190 --> 00:43:41.010
in the show notes for people to check those out.

00:43:41.590 --> 00:43:43.929
Is there anything else you wanted to say anything

00:43:43.929 --> 00:43:45.630
about? You can tell people a little bit about

00:43:45.630 --> 00:43:47.789
Women in Nuclear, for instance. We mentioned

00:43:47.789 --> 00:43:52.809
that. Yeah. So Women in Nuclear is a global organization

00:43:52.809 --> 00:43:56.829
of professionals that believe in diversity and

00:43:56.829 --> 00:44:00.849
inclusion in the workforce. But it is an amazing

00:44:00.849 --> 00:44:03.809
network of professionals across all facets of

00:44:03.809 --> 00:44:07.340
nuclear and radiological technology. So as a

00:44:07.340 --> 00:44:10.059
bit of a nuclear tourist, if I want to travel

00:44:10.059 --> 00:44:12.239
somewhere, I'll reach out to one of my women

00:44:12.239 --> 00:44:15.159
in nuclear global friends and say, Hey, I'm coming

00:44:15.159 --> 00:44:18.159
here. Can we check this out? And it's an amazing

00:44:18.159 --> 00:44:21.500
network here in Australia. We have our own chapter

00:44:21.500 --> 00:44:24.760
women in nuclear Australia. We are across the

00:44:24.760 --> 00:44:27.300
whole of Australia. I think less Tassie. I don't

00:44:27.300 --> 00:44:29.519
think we have a member in Tassie yet and we need

00:44:29.519 --> 00:44:33.539
to get one. Look at that. Yeah. You Tass must

00:44:33.539 --> 00:44:36.650
have some sort of nuclear program there. But

00:44:36.650 --> 00:44:39.789
we are a network of professionals of any gender

00:44:39.789 --> 00:44:43.030
that work in the nuclear industry. And what we

00:44:43.030 --> 00:44:46.510
try to do is encourage young people for nuclear

00:44:46.510 --> 00:44:49.510
careers through networking and role modeling.

00:44:49.889 --> 00:44:52.909
And then for the rest of us that are just working

00:44:52.909 --> 00:44:57.150
in the industry is be able to have this amazing

00:44:57.150 --> 00:44:59.750
network of professionals to bounce ideas off

00:44:59.750 --> 00:45:04.150
to support one another. I think one of our most

00:45:04.150 --> 00:45:06.409
popular things we do is we have a newsletter

00:45:06.409 --> 00:45:08.869
every month and it has links to lots of different

00:45:08.869 --> 00:45:12.929
jobs and opportunities and we get access to various

00:45:12.929 --> 00:45:16.389
scholarships for short courses or activities.

00:45:16.769 --> 00:45:19.170
And so that's something we can provide our members.

00:45:19.289 --> 00:45:22.750
And it's free to join. You just jump on the website

00:45:22.750 --> 00:45:28.219
and join. And I love it. It's my village. That's

00:45:28.219 --> 00:45:31.340
how I met you, Liz. We have lots of chats through

00:45:31.340 --> 00:45:33.840
Women in Nuclear and some of my closest friends

00:45:33.840 --> 00:45:37.300
are Women in Nuclear colleagues, because we can

00:45:37.300 --> 00:45:41.619
have great chats about everything from nuclear

00:45:41.619 --> 00:45:44.780
stuff through to having to deal with some really

00:45:44.780 --> 00:45:47.920
difficult individual in the workplace. Everyone

00:45:47.920 --> 00:45:50.320
needs a community that they can bring those things

00:45:50.320 --> 00:45:56.480
to. Yeah, yeah, definitely. Well, I will put

00:45:56.480 --> 00:45:59.420
a link to Women in Nuclear Australia also in

00:45:59.420 --> 00:46:01.320
the notes that go with this show so that you

00:46:01.320 --> 00:46:04.320
can go have a look. And if you are interested,

00:46:04.559 --> 00:46:07.400
you are also welcome to join. So thank you so

00:46:07.400 --> 00:46:09.500
much, Jazz. I really appreciated this conversation.

00:46:09.539 --> 00:46:12.579
I learned so much from you. And I'm really glad

00:46:12.579 --> 00:46:14.920
because I feel like I know a lot more about what

00:46:14.920 --> 00:46:18.840
you do now. And so I'll get to nerd out with

00:46:18.840 --> 00:46:21.500
you a bit more in future conversations. Awesome.

00:46:21.800 --> 00:46:33.300
This has been really fun. Nuclear Matters is

00:46:33.300 --> 00:46:35.360
a production of the Australian National University

00:46:35.360 --> 00:46:38.239
College of Systems and Society. We acknowledge

00:46:38.239 --> 00:46:39.980
the traditional owners of the lands on which

00:46:39.980 --> 00:46:42.059
this podcast is being recorded on or listened

00:46:42.059 --> 00:46:44.739
to and pay our respects to their elders and all

00:46:44.739 --> 00:46:47.719
First Nations people. If you liked what you heard

00:46:47.719 --> 00:46:50.079
today, please share this episode with friends,

00:46:50.159 --> 00:46:52.809
family and colleagues. If you want to send us

00:46:52.809 --> 00:46:55.309
some feedback on an episode, please email us

00:46:55.309 --> 00:47:00.150
at nuclearmatterspodcast .anu .edu .au. Keep

00:47:00.150 --> 00:47:02.590
in mind that this podcast is intended for information

00:47:02.590 --> 00:47:05.610
and education only. The views and opinions expressed

00:47:05.610 --> 00:47:07.989
in each episode are those of the individual speakers

00:47:07.989 --> 00:47:10.650
and do not represent the official policy or position

00:47:10.650 --> 00:47:12.570
of the Australian National University College

00:47:12.570 --> 00:47:15.329
of Systems and Society or the university as a

00:47:15.329 --> 00:47:15.489
whole.
