WEBVTT

00:00:18.670 --> 00:00:21.750
Welcome back to the Monkey Mind Lab. On today's

00:00:21.750 --> 00:00:24.530
episode, we have with us Professor Amit Prakash,

00:00:24.809 --> 00:00:27.329
a visiting assistant professor of international

00:00:27.329 --> 00:00:31.170
and global studies at Middlebury College. Professor

00:00:31.170 --> 00:00:34.570
Prakash also serves as the director of the Rohatyn

00:00:34.570 --> 00:00:38.469
Global Fellows Program. A historian by training,

00:00:38.630 --> 00:00:41.130
his research delves into the intersections of

00:00:41.130 --> 00:00:44.409
imperialism, anti -colonialism, and migration.

00:00:45.149 --> 00:00:48.659
He is the author of Empire on the Seine, The

00:00:48.659 --> 00:00:53.060
Policing of North Africans in Paris, 1925 -1975,

00:00:53.500 --> 00:00:56.299
which examines the policing and state control

00:00:56.299 --> 00:00:59.420
of North African colonial immigrants in Paris

00:00:59.420 --> 00:01:03.219
during the period of decolonization. At Middlebury,

00:01:03.460 --> 00:01:05.840
Professor Prakash teaches courses on policing,

00:01:06.099 --> 00:01:09.200
borders and identification, and anti -colonialism.

00:01:09.400 --> 00:01:12.120
His teaching encourages students to critically

00:01:12.120 --> 00:01:14.980
examine how state power and identification practices

00:01:14.980 --> 00:01:18.829
shape societies. Beyond academia, He also co

00:01:18.829 --> 00:01:21.150
-hosts the history and current events podcast,

00:01:21.549 --> 00:01:24.370
'No Politics at the Dinner Table', and has been

00:01:24.370 --> 00:01:26.870
featured in the documentary, 'The Price of Safety'.

00:01:27.530 --> 00:01:30.609
Please join me in welcoming Professor Amit Prakash.

00:01:30.909 --> 00:01:33.810
Thank you very much for having me. So let's begin

00:01:33.810 --> 00:01:36.569
with the three questions that I ask my guests.

00:01:37.969 --> 00:01:40.609
What do you teach? Why do you teach it? And how

00:01:40.609 --> 00:01:44.290
did you get into it? Okay. So I teach courses

00:01:44.290 --> 00:01:47.939
broadly conceived around, let's call it, critical

00:01:47.939 --> 00:01:52.000
security analysis, but from a historical perspective.

00:01:52.319 --> 00:01:55.120
So I'm trained as a historian. My specialized

00:01:55.120 --> 00:01:58.280
work is on France and its empire, and particularly

00:01:58.280 --> 00:02:00.200
around questions of surveillance, migration,

00:02:00.359 --> 00:02:05.439
and security, and the discourses around it. And

00:02:05.439 --> 00:02:11.360
I think, you know, for the reason why, I guess

00:02:11.360 --> 00:02:15.319
one major reason that sort of transformed me

00:02:15.319 --> 00:02:20.830
is 9 -11. So 9/11, obviously 2001 and 2002,

00:02:20.990 --> 00:02:24.030
I started graduate school. And what I started

00:02:24.030 --> 00:02:26.810
to understand by following politics and also

00:02:26.810 --> 00:02:29.530
noticing the type of courses that were being

00:02:29.530 --> 00:02:31.430
offered where I went, which was Columbia University,

00:02:31.729 --> 00:02:35.889
were very much centered around this new age of

00:02:35.889 --> 00:02:39.990
security. And I think the post 9/11 era becomes

00:02:39.990 --> 00:02:42.849
kind of intelligible as such when we think about

00:02:42.849 --> 00:02:45.919
security as the dominant theme. which I see as

00:02:45.919 --> 00:02:49.680
mostly as ill, but one could say for good or

00:02:49.680 --> 00:02:53.280
ill. How I got into this, the reason I went to

00:02:53.280 --> 00:02:55.240
graduate school was basically teaching. I taught

00:02:55.240 --> 00:02:57.360
high school for a number of years before I went

00:02:57.360 --> 00:03:00.219
to graduate school, and I thought, who am I to

00:03:00.219 --> 00:03:01.560
be teaching this stuff? I need to know more.

00:03:01.759 --> 00:03:05.560
And so I needed more historical training, and

00:03:05.560 --> 00:03:07.939
teaching is still one of my favorite things to

00:03:07.939 --> 00:03:11.439
do about the job. All right, so shall we delve

00:03:11.439 --> 00:03:14.180
into today's big question? Sure, let's do it.

00:03:14.479 --> 00:03:17.680
So here's the question. If you decolonize the

00:03:17.680 --> 00:03:20.419
mind, what happens to the culture it carries?

00:03:21.919 --> 00:03:25.560
It's a very big question, right? So let's talk

00:03:25.560 --> 00:03:30.080
about, let's break it up. Decolonizing the mind,

00:03:30.180 --> 00:03:34.439
right? So this is the title of a book by a literary

00:03:34.439 --> 00:03:38.280
scholar named Thiong'o, who recently retired from

00:03:38.280 --> 00:03:42.650
NYU. And he basically made this argument about

00:03:42.650 --> 00:03:45.370
what decolonizing the mind requires, which basically

00:03:45.370 --> 00:03:49.669
means purging post -colonial societies of the

00:03:49.669 --> 00:03:54.389
linguistic traces of the colonial masters. Because

00:03:54.389 --> 00:03:57.949
the argument goes is that our thoughts are made

00:03:57.949 --> 00:04:02.090
precise and possible by the linguistic structures

00:04:02.090 --> 00:04:06.610
in our minds. So what is sayable is basically

00:04:06.610 --> 00:04:11.500
the limits of what is thinkable. And so the argument

00:04:11.500 --> 00:04:14.539
being that, well, in African societies, because

00:04:14.539 --> 00:04:17.939
French and English had been imposed by the sword

00:04:17.939 --> 00:04:21.360
and other linguistic traditions purposely crushed

00:04:21.360 --> 00:04:23.980
or at least sidelined, the reanimation of those

00:04:23.980 --> 00:04:27.399
traditions would allow for a full flourishing

00:04:27.399 --> 00:04:32.259
of, in this case, African cultures in distinction

00:04:32.259 --> 00:04:36.399
to what the colonial establishment tried to replace

00:04:36.399 --> 00:04:39.779
it with, right? So that's one approach, which

00:04:39.779 --> 00:04:43.800
is, okay, let's get rid of the old language.

00:04:44.100 --> 00:04:46.939
And we've seen this pop up in various ways. You

00:04:46.939 --> 00:04:50.540
know, Madras becomes Chennai and so on in India.

00:04:50.639 --> 00:04:53.500
So there's these sort of elements and strategies

00:04:53.500 --> 00:04:59.079
to try to sort of get rid of, I guess, the symbolic

00:04:59.079 --> 00:05:03.540
power of the past masters. I'm of two minds about

00:05:03.540 --> 00:05:06.480
how effective that is. Because sometimes it can

00:05:06.480 --> 00:05:09.360
be all style and no substance, if you like, right?

00:05:09.800 --> 00:05:12.040
So that, sure, you can change the name and so

00:05:12.040 --> 00:05:14.500
on, but you've, let's take the case of India,

00:05:14.639 --> 00:05:17.019
you'd change the names of some of the major cities

00:05:17.019 --> 00:05:19.699
and so on. Fine, it's your country, you can name

00:05:19.699 --> 00:05:23.639
what you want. But if you retain about 80 % of

00:05:23.639 --> 00:05:27.000
British colonial law and retain that system,

00:05:27.220 --> 00:05:31.459
how much actually, it seems like a cosmetic change

00:05:31.459 --> 00:05:34.540
more so than a substantive one. So there's limits

00:05:34.540 --> 00:05:37.740
to that approach. I understand where that's coming

00:05:37.740 --> 00:05:39.779
from, but there's limits to that even if you

00:05:39.779 --> 00:05:43.240
went full, you know, whole hog on it. The other

00:05:43.240 --> 00:05:46.180
element is, and this is the one I'm sort of more

00:05:46.180 --> 00:05:49.879
affiliated with or endorse, which is understanding

00:05:49.879 --> 00:05:53.819
that colonialism at its base is a set of relationships.

00:05:54.730 --> 00:05:57.810
It's producing a set of relationships that are

00:05:57.810 --> 00:06:00.310
hierarchical in order. And in different colonies

00:06:00.310 --> 00:06:02.129
around the world, there were different rationales

00:06:02.129 --> 00:06:05.790
for that hierarchy. But fundamentally, colonialism

00:06:05.790 --> 00:06:08.689
is in between things. It's not the thing itself.

00:06:08.850 --> 00:06:12.870
It's how we organize things. And so if you get

00:06:12.870 --> 00:06:16.410
at that, decolonizing the mind, well, that means,

00:06:16.569 --> 00:06:19.310
first of all, doing an analysis of what colonialism

00:06:19.310 --> 00:06:22.259
actually was. And I don't think we fully understood

00:06:22.259 --> 00:06:25.720
that yet. No, it's percolated into nooks and

00:06:25.720 --> 00:06:28.019
crevices, which people wouldn't even have thought

00:06:28.019 --> 00:06:30.379
that it's influenced by colonialism, but it's

00:06:30.379 --> 00:06:33.579
very much that. Yeah, yeah. Just the basic way

00:06:33.579 --> 00:06:37.500
we see the world and so on is very much sort

00:06:37.500 --> 00:06:41.819
of dominated by a colonial perspective whose

00:06:41.819 --> 00:06:44.899
ramifications I think we still need to study.

00:06:44.959 --> 00:06:48.240
So before you can get to decolonization, I think

00:06:48.240 --> 00:06:52.079
you need to fully understand. the import of colonization.

00:06:52.579 --> 00:06:54.959
So we might be jumping the gun, if you like,

00:06:55.040 --> 00:06:56.759
to say that, oh, let's decolonize this, let's

00:06:56.759 --> 00:07:00.540
decolonize that. It might be, I understand the

00:07:00.540 --> 00:07:03.240
impulse, right? And I'm ethically sympathetic

00:07:03.240 --> 00:07:07.800
to it, but it might end up being misguided or

00:07:07.800 --> 00:07:10.420
sort of short -termist in terms of what you're

00:07:10.420 --> 00:07:14.139
actually doing because a quick victory of a name

00:07:14.139 --> 00:07:16.639
change or something like that, you know, while

00:07:16.639 --> 00:07:19.259
it does have symbolic, it's not nothing. So what

00:07:19.259 --> 00:07:22.620
I would say is this very simply that symbolism

00:07:22.620 --> 00:07:26.779
matters. It's something, but it's not everything.

00:07:26.959 --> 00:07:31.519
Of course. Yeah. So looking at, speaking of decolonizing,

00:07:31.579 --> 00:07:35.360
is it, and we've kind of answered this, but is

00:07:35.360 --> 00:07:38.680
it really about just removing statues, tearing

00:07:38.680 --> 00:07:41.660
down paintings, burning books, rewriting history,

00:07:41.879 --> 00:07:44.000
or is it something deeper, like changing the

00:07:44.000 --> 00:07:46.439
way we think, speak and see ourselves? There

00:07:46.439 --> 00:07:49.029
has been a push. even in India, to change the

00:07:49.029 --> 00:07:53.089
name to Bharat, but also speak more Indian languages,

00:07:53.189 --> 00:07:56.290
less of English. But before we can go all of

00:07:56.290 --> 00:07:58.750
that, yes, we know some of it is performative.

00:07:58.790 --> 00:08:00.430
Some of it does make a difference on a scale

00:08:00.430 --> 00:08:03.870
of like pride or something. But let's start with

00:08:03.870 --> 00:08:06.410
a real question. Keeping in mind that India,

00:08:06.529 --> 00:08:08.329
for example, is a country that's been through

00:08:08.329 --> 00:08:10.230
two series of empires. You've had the Mughal

00:08:10.230 --> 00:08:12.329
Empire, you have the British Empire. There have

00:08:12.329 --> 00:08:13.689
been other countries which have been ruled by

00:08:13.689 --> 00:08:15.790
the French, the Dutch. It's all over the world.

00:08:16.560 --> 00:08:21.019
Who owns culture? Are museums, language policies,

00:08:21.180 --> 00:08:24.800
education systems still very, very colonial?

00:08:25.000 --> 00:08:27.180
And it goes beyond that, like on a sociocultural

00:08:27.180 --> 00:08:30.759
level, the way people interact, the certain customs

00:08:30.759 --> 00:08:32.700
that people have. We looked at Hindu traditions

00:08:32.700 --> 00:08:36.059
a while back and looking at how that's been influenced

00:08:36.059 --> 00:08:38.120
by colonialism. I think the real question is,

00:08:38.240 --> 00:08:41.940
culture as we know it today, is it still owned

00:08:41.940 --> 00:08:47.580
by our colonial rulers? and overlords or is it

00:08:47.580 --> 00:08:49.259
something that we've kind of made into our own

00:08:49.259 --> 00:08:52.000
thing today okay so you have a couple questions

00:08:52.000 --> 00:08:53.899
in there i'll start with the first one in terms

00:08:53.899 --> 00:08:57.559
of is it a matter of destroying the sort of cultural

00:08:57.559 --> 00:09:01.120
treatise left over and so on i'll just say i'm

00:09:01.120 --> 00:09:03.519
no matter what book i'm not in favor of ever

00:09:03.519 --> 00:09:07.179
burning a book um whatever the book is again

00:09:07.179 --> 00:09:09.019
i think that's just sort of a misguided attempt

00:09:09.019 --> 00:09:13.659
at erasure and is fundamentally unthinking, right?

00:09:13.740 --> 00:09:17.200
So I'll start with that premise. In terms of

00:09:17.200 --> 00:09:23.340
cultural transformation and sort of starting

00:09:23.340 --> 00:09:26.399
out by uprooting something, really root and branch,

00:09:26.519 --> 00:09:30.039
uprooting and then starting anew, I think that

00:09:30.039 --> 00:09:34.879
is historically diluted, is how I would put it.

00:09:34.960 --> 00:09:38.039
Colonialism happened, and it created some irrevocable

00:09:38.039 --> 00:09:42.100
changes. Colonialism on the one hand, is probably

00:09:42.100 --> 00:09:45.179
the most powerful form of globalization that

00:09:45.179 --> 00:09:47.759
we've seen. It brought the world together and

00:09:47.759 --> 00:09:50.179
knitted the world together, but it knitted the

00:09:50.179 --> 00:09:52.919
world together just so in a hierarchical way

00:09:52.919 --> 00:09:56.720
with asymmetric power and wealth being located

00:09:56.720 --> 00:10:02.960
in former metropoles. And so that history can't

00:10:02.960 --> 00:10:08.419
just be forgotten about. And there are some important

00:10:08.419 --> 00:10:12.259
changes to the cultures that have been integrated,

00:10:12.360 --> 00:10:14.659
quite frankly, into those cultures and are now

00:10:14.659 --> 00:10:19.940
part of those cultures. I think the idea that,

00:10:20.100 --> 00:10:22.179
OK, let's just for the sake of argument talk

00:10:22.179 --> 00:10:26.100
about English, right? If, say, Nigeria or India

00:10:26.100 --> 00:10:28.919
and so on wanted to say, you know, we're going

00:10:28.919 --> 00:10:34.139
to get rid of English from all. aspects of Indian

00:10:34.139 --> 00:10:36.639
or Nigerian culture. Well, what then you have

00:10:36.639 --> 00:10:39.240
are going to be gatekeepers who are going to

00:10:39.240 --> 00:10:41.399
decide, well, this is what Nigerian culture is,

00:10:41.440 --> 00:10:44.360
and then this is what Indian culture is. So the

00:10:44.360 --> 00:10:47.679
idea of an authentic culture either to return

00:10:47.679 --> 00:10:51.340
to or to produce for the future is fundamentally

00:10:51.340 --> 00:10:53.460
based on those who have the power to define it.

00:10:53.700 --> 00:10:57.240
So really the question of who owns culture is

00:10:57.240 --> 00:10:59.490
really a question of who has the power. And so

00:10:59.490 --> 00:11:01.649
if you have the power, you have the power to

00:11:01.649 --> 00:11:05.230
say this is this, that is that. This is Indian.

00:11:05.789 --> 00:11:10.029
This is coming from Timur (Taimur) or something like that.

00:11:10.070 --> 00:11:12.090
And therefore it's coming from outside. And not

00:11:12.090 --> 00:11:16.029
so even though the cultural, political, and social

00:11:16.029 --> 00:11:20.230
contributions of the Mughal descendants are inescapable

00:11:20.230 --> 00:11:23.009
in India. I teach a course that has the title

00:11:23.009 --> 00:11:25.190
of Who Owns Culture? And it's about culture and

00:11:25.190 --> 00:11:28.950
decolonization. The title's kind of facetious

00:11:28.950 --> 00:11:33.210
because there's a lot of things sort of assumed

00:11:33.210 --> 00:11:36.309
in that question, which is, first of all, that

00:11:36.309 --> 00:11:38.950
culture is something to be owned. It's predicated

00:11:38.950 --> 00:11:41.070
on this idea of a sort of possessive liberal

00:11:41.070 --> 00:11:43.970
subject that commodifies everything and owns

00:11:43.970 --> 00:11:47.350
things. Culture is constantly in flux. It's constantly

00:11:47.350 --> 00:11:50.429
being produced, and which makes it both very

00:11:50.429 --> 00:11:54.110
democratic and egalitarian, but it's also...

00:11:54.570 --> 00:11:57.049
within a matrix of power. And therefore those

00:11:57.049 --> 00:12:00.230
who have the most power in the society have hegemony,

00:12:00.269 --> 00:12:05.610
right? So, and they get to decide this is authentically

00:12:05.610 --> 00:12:07.830
India, right? And I always sort of think about

00:12:07.830 --> 00:12:11.529
the stuff with food, for instance, how do you

00:12:11.529 --> 00:12:15.929
make authentic Indian dishes, especially after

00:12:15.929 --> 00:12:19.730
Columbus, right? So that with the Columbian exchange,

00:12:19.830 --> 00:12:22.269
you get potatoes and things like that, that make

00:12:22.269 --> 00:12:25.000
their way to India. that utterly transformed

00:12:25.000 --> 00:12:27.539
the cuisine there. And there's a lot of dishes

00:12:27.539 --> 00:12:30.740
with potato in India that are seen as, you know,

00:12:30.759 --> 00:12:33.019
fundamentally authentic, but they were only possible,

00:12:33.200 --> 00:12:36.559
you know, 15, 16th century onwards, right? But

00:12:36.559 --> 00:12:38.419
India has been around for a much longer. So who

00:12:38.419 --> 00:12:40.440
decides then which is the authentic, right? It's

00:12:40.440 --> 00:12:42.580
not been authentic to the continent because it

00:12:42.580 --> 00:12:44.580
didn't grow there, but it's now a fundamental

00:12:44.580 --> 00:12:49.039
part of people will eat the aloo with dosas.

00:12:49.100 --> 00:12:52.059
People will have aloo parathas. Aloo paratha

00:12:52.059 --> 00:12:54.610
is the biggest. thing of like, oh, Indian culture.

00:12:54.830 --> 00:12:58.370
Is it Indian? Yeah. Yeah. And so one could say

00:12:58.370 --> 00:13:01.750
the same thing for like the kind of Hindi English

00:13:01.750 --> 00:13:04.570
vernacular that's developed in India. Right.

00:13:04.649 --> 00:13:07.149
So that a lot of people speak this way, this

00:13:07.149 --> 00:13:10.090
sort of this mishmash of let's call them indigenous

00:13:10.090 --> 00:13:12.830
Indian languages, but with smatterings of English

00:13:12.830 --> 00:13:15.169
and stuff like that, I don't think it's necessarily

00:13:15.169 --> 00:13:18.809
an indication of their minds being colonized.

00:13:19.240 --> 00:13:22.399
But they've appropriated that language, intermixed

00:13:22.399 --> 00:13:25.960
it, and made something new. And sometimes this

00:13:25.960 --> 00:13:28.419
is called in the literature indigenization, right,

00:13:28.500 --> 00:13:31.360
where you sort of assimilate what were once,

00:13:31.419 --> 00:13:34.419
let's call them foreign elements, but then you've

00:13:34.419 --> 00:13:37.159
sort of tamed them, if you like, naturalized

00:13:37.159 --> 00:13:41.460
them and made them your own. So, you know, in

00:13:41.460 --> 00:13:45.659
terms of, you know, the culture, as your sort

00:13:45.659 --> 00:13:49.779
of first question was asking about, kept in the

00:13:49.779 --> 00:13:55.019
sort of the culture you know the only way to

00:13:55.019 --> 00:13:59.059
actually purge a culture of elements that you

00:13:59.059 --> 00:14:03.720
decide are foreign is through force and force

00:14:03.720 --> 00:14:06.840
does not necessarily produce belief it produces

00:14:06.840 --> 00:14:10.220
compliance but it doesn't necessarily mean you've

00:14:10.220 --> 00:14:12.399
actually decolonized the mind in the way you

00:14:12.399 --> 00:14:15.399
want to right you may have the mimicry of this

00:14:15.399 --> 00:14:19.000
but you don't actually know what people are actually

00:14:19.000 --> 00:14:22.860
thinking because they might well be afraid. And

00:14:22.860 --> 00:14:25.200
we see a lot of that in the world today. Yeah,

00:14:25.200 --> 00:14:27.720
yeah. I mean, there's a lot of nationalist movements

00:14:27.720 --> 00:14:30.620
around the world. I mean, it's interesting. They're

00:14:30.620 --> 00:14:34.740
all post -colonial in their own ways, you know.

00:14:34.779 --> 00:14:38.500
So Hungary and Poland are good examples. They're

00:14:38.500 --> 00:14:41.879
coming from the post -Soviet empire. We have

00:14:41.879 --> 00:14:45.340
it in India. We have it in America now. Yeah.

00:14:45.399 --> 00:14:47.860
And we have to remember that America was also

00:14:47.860 --> 00:14:51.720
a colony. Of the British, yeah. And that's sometimes

00:14:51.720 --> 00:14:54.960
forgotten. You know, there's a quotation from

00:14:54.960 --> 00:14:58.059
a thinker, Étienne Balibar, that I like a lot,

00:14:58.179 --> 00:15:00.899
which basically says, and he's talking about

00:15:00.899 --> 00:15:03.639
borders in this case, and he basically makes

00:15:03.639 --> 00:15:06.100
the argument is that every country in the world,

00:15:06.259 --> 00:15:10.379
as we know it, was either colonized or was colonizing.

00:15:10.860 --> 00:15:13.019
and sometimes both at the same time, right? So

00:15:13.019 --> 00:15:14.960
that's what the modern world is. That's the sort

00:15:14.960 --> 00:15:18.120
of cauldron in which it was forged to get beyond

00:15:18.120 --> 00:15:21.200
it, to decolonize it. Again, I still think we

00:15:21.200 --> 00:15:24.460
need to have a fuller reckoning with what we

00:15:24.460 --> 00:15:26.820
were given before we can decide what we want

00:15:26.820 --> 00:15:30.840
to do when we want to move on. So we still have

00:15:30.840 --> 00:15:34.320
a lot to unpack about colonialism. I think we

00:15:34.320 --> 00:15:36.700
really need to sit down and look at... The extent

00:15:36.700 --> 00:15:38.740
to which it influences our lives today, even

00:15:38.740 --> 00:15:40.019
though people, oh yeah, the British are gone

00:15:40.019 --> 00:15:42.820
or the French are gone. They may not be there

00:15:42.820 --> 00:15:45.519
physically, but their ideals are still very much

00:15:45.519 --> 00:15:49.779
influencing society and laws being made today,

00:15:49.860 --> 00:15:52.539
especially in India, looking at the legalization

00:15:52.539 --> 00:15:56.379
of the LGBTQ community. It took 75 years and

00:15:56.379 --> 00:16:00.059
it's still not legal to get married. Same -sex

00:16:00.059 --> 00:16:03.419
couples are not acknowledged. The West has moved

00:16:03.419 --> 00:16:06.509
on. Why are we still sticking to the Victorian

00:16:06.509 --> 00:16:10.090
norms of it. Right. Right, right, right. And

00:16:10.090 --> 00:16:12.450
so there's different things to think about. There

00:16:12.450 --> 00:16:14.389
might be some elements that are contributions

00:16:14.389 --> 00:16:16.549
from, let's say, French and British cultures

00:16:16.549 --> 00:16:19.590
that you want, right? There might well be things

00:16:19.590 --> 00:16:22.389
that you want to retain. And that's why this

00:16:22.389 --> 00:16:26.269
sort of either -orism, and it's sort of, I think

00:16:26.269 --> 00:16:28.850
it's predicated on this idea that these cultures

00:16:28.850 --> 00:16:31.169
are hermetically sealed and then they clash and

00:16:31.169 --> 00:16:33.070
one was just sort of juxtaposed on the other,

00:16:33.149 --> 00:16:36.000
or superimposed, I should say. Not really the

00:16:36.000 --> 00:16:38.820
case, right? That's not how culture works. You

00:16:38.820 --> 00:16:40.820
know, anthropologists have been demonstrating

00:16:40.820 --> 00:16:45.740
this for decades now, that culture is something

00:16:45.740 --> 00:16:49.279
that's alive, is not static. And that's precisely

00:16:49.279 --> 00:16:53.460
what makes it so valuable. And it's also precisely

00:16:53.460 --> 00:16:57.580
what makes it so political. You can see that

00:16:57.580 --> 00:16:59.860
every movement, these nationalist movements,

00:17:00.159 --> 00:17:02.960
they all start as cultural movements. And they

00:17:02.960 --> 00:17:06.160
identify an element in their given culture that

00:17:06.160 --> 00:17:08.539
they think is objectionable. And then they organize

00:17:08.539 --> 00:17:12.140
politics around it. So, you know, which is a

00:17:12.140 --> 00:17:14.140
long way of saying politics is downstream from

00:17:14.140 --> 00:17:16.940
culture. Yep. There's this one joke which a comedian

00:17:16.940 --> 00:17:19.859
made, which basically said, in India, you have

00:17:19.859 --> 00:17:22.279
to plan a political campaign around suppressing

00:17:22.279 --> 00:17:26.599
a minority to get elected. Yeah. It's like, which

00:17:26.599 --> 00:17:27.980
one are you going to pick? Right, right, right.

00:17:28.140 --> 00:17:31.039
And which, again, is an old tactic, right? That's

00:17:31.039 --> 00:17:34.670
as old. legislative or electoral politics tactic

00:17:34.670 --> 00:17:38.930
that I think in modern politics was really perfected

00:17:38.930 --> 00:17:41.190
around the turn of the century, around 1900,

00:17:41.650 --> 00:17:44.990
the last century, I should say, in Vienna, right,

00:17:45.029 --> 00:17:48.549
around antisemitism, right? So that it's Viennese

00:17:48.549 --> 00:17:51.470
mayoral politics were utterly transformed by

00:17:51.470 --> 00:17:56.410
the political innovation of mobilizing antisemitism

00:17:56.410 --> 00:17:59.049
to whip up votes. And now you can just sort of...

00:17:59.720 --> 00:18:03.000
identify a minority identify a vulnerable community

00:18:03.000 --> 00:18:07.400
that cannot have much pushback had used them

00:18:07.400 --> 00:18:09.660
politically and it's been unfortunately very

00:18:09.660 --> 00:18:15.059
effective so let's move on to the next aspect

00:18:15.059 --> 00:18:20.140
of it uh mental colonization you mentioned a

00:18:20.140 --> 00:18:23.160
couple of thinkers or historians who've worked

00:18:23.160 --> 00:18:28.859
on this and they explored how empire lived and

00:18:28.859 --> 00:18:32.579
lives in the mind shaping desires self -image

00:18:32.579 --> 00:18:36.299
and what is seen to be civilized or polished

00:18:36.299 --> 00:18:41.240
like even today in india there are certain activities

00:18:41.240 --> 00:18:45.099
or certain things that you do that classify you

00:18:45.099 --> 00:18:49.700
as a sophisticated upper class rich person but

00:18:49.700 --> 00:18:53.400
they're inherently very british drinking chai

00:18:53.400 --> 00:18:56.019
in india very common people drink chai on the

00:18:56.019 --> 00:18:57.890
side of the road But when you have high tea,

00:18:57.990 --> 00:19:01.289
it's suddenly when it gets really fancy. Still

00:19:01.289 --> 00:19:06.230
the same thing, but it's all in the mind. So

00:19:06.230 --> 00:19:10.650
how would we look at those activities today and

00:19:10.650 --> 00:19:13.049
look at what these thinkers have to say about

00:19:13.049 --> 00:19:18.470
it and then maybe be aware of or adapt? Yeah,

00:19:18.490 --> 00:19:23.329
so Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o, we talked about already a

00:19:23.329 --> 00:19:28.319
little bit. would make the argument of trying

00:19:28.319 --> 00:19:31.039
to actually rid the society of that practice

00:19:31.039 --> 00:19:37.599
and use, and by practice, I mean using consumption

00:19:37.599 --> 00:19:44.539
of a given good as a metric to status. So that's

00:19:44.539 --> 00:19:46.480
part of the colonial, that's the relationship,

00:19:46.819 --> 00:19:50.519
right? So the chai is the chai, but if you change

00:19:50.519 --> 00:19:54.960
the context in which it's being drunk, then suddenly

00:19:54.960 --> 00:19:58.980
you can start making class and status assumptions

00:19:58.980 --> 00:20:03.240
and associations, right? And so I think that's,

00:20:03.240 --> 00:20:04.940
you know, that would be the target is that try

00:20:04.940 --> 00:20:08.440
to get rid of that relationship, which would

00:20:08.440 --> 00:20:11.119
be difficult, right? Which would be difficult

00:20:11.119 --> 00:20:14.359
and would take probably decades, if not centuries,

00:20:14.539 --> 00:20:17.000
right? But that would be the sort of the long

00:20:17.000 --> 00:20:21.220
game. Fanon would make an argument really about

00:20:21.220 --> 00:20:24.180
going, what he says, going to the people. right,

00:20:24.200 --> 00:20:27.940
going to the masses and not thinking about what

00:20:27.940 --> 00:20:31.759
he calls colonized intellectuals, of which he

00:20:31.759 --> 00:20:35.539
is one, but that he believes that the colonized

00:20:35.539 --> 00:20:40.480
intellectual is a little bit too indebted and

00:20:40.480 --> 00:20:45.039
therefore sympathetic to the presuppositions

00:20:45.039 --> 00:20:47.500
of the colonial ruler, that they don't even sort

00:20:47.500 --> 00:20:49.380
of challenge them, that this wouldn't even, a

00:20:49.380 --> 00:20:51.200
question like that wouldn't even come up for

00:20:51.200 --> 00:20:52.980
them, right? It wouldn't even be on their radar.

00:20:54.269 --> 00:20:57.630
But if you go to the chaiwala, right, and speak

00:20:57.630 --> 00:21:00.490
with them and about their everyday life and the

00:21:00.490 --> 00:21:02.750
sort of consumptive activities of the laborers

00:21:02.750 --> 00:21:05.690
that come and so on, you could then say, well,

00:21:05.730 --> 00:21:08.589
this is actually something that's popular in

00:21:08.589 --> 00:21:11.009
the French sense. It's coming from the masses

00:21:11.009 --> 00:21:13.190
or it's coming from the people, right? And if

00:21:13.190 --> 00:21:16.210
that's then the case, sure, the British might

00:21:16.210 --> 00:21:18.569
have made tea and opium plantations and done

00:21:18.569 --> 00:21:21.309
all these terrible things and so on, but it's

00:21:21.309 --> 00:21:24.910
been integrated into the everyday life. And it's

00:21:24.910 --> 00:21:27.450
a pause from labor. It's a way to talk to your

00:21:27.450 --> 00:21:29.950
friends. It's a way to be with family. All of

00:21:29.950 --> 00:21:34.089
those things, it makes certain types of social

00:21:34.089 --> 00:21:36.309
life possible, right? And if that's then the

00:21:36.309 --> 00:21:38.750
case, you know, there's not a problem with it.

00:21:38.869 --> 00:21:43.690
Yes. But they would both agree that making distinctions

00:21:43.690 --> 00:21:48.710
based on consumptive habits to then put human

00:21:48.710 --> 00:21:51.210
beings in a hierarchy, that's fundamentally what's

00:21:51.210 --> 00:21:53.789
colonial about it. Interesting. Yeah, they've

00:21:53.789 --> 00:21:56.490
always had a policy of, well, divide and rule.

00:21:56.690 --> 00:21:58.390
And that's how you do that. Yeah, yeah. And look,

00:21:58.410 --> 00:22:00.349
we can just talk about the Indian case. They

00:22:00.349 --> 00:22:03.029
found it a little bit easier precisely because

00:22:03.029 --> 00:22:05.289
of the caste system. Yes. Right? So that they

00:22:05.289 --> 00:22:07.930
further weaponized the caste system, let me put

00:22:07.930 --> 00:22:10.210
it that way. It's a myth that the British, like,

00:22:10.250 --> 00:22:14.970
they didn't invent it, but that they fully mobilized

00:22:14.970 --> 00:22:16.650
it where it hadn't been, you know. It was there,

00:22:16.730 --> 00:22:18.990
they just made it worse. Yeah, it's been there.

00:22:19.089 --> 00:22:24.019
Sometimes it's been. fairly neutral, and sometimes

00:22:24.019 --> 00:22:26.980
it's been really malevolent. In the British case,

00:22:27.319 --> 00:22:30.200
you know, again, it's a sort of fundamental mystery.

00:22:30.299 --> 00:22:32.079
They saw the caste system and they saw, aha,

00:22:32.200 --> 00:22:34.839
we have a class system. You know, we understand

00:22:34.839 --> 00:22:37.579
that, right? And therefore we can make these

00:22:37.579 --> 00:22:40.400
distinctions. And what about the Africans in

00:22:40.400 --> 00:22:43.599
France? Yeah, so there, you know, there's the

00:22:43.599 --> 00:22:47.839
interesting thing there is that many of the North

00:22:47.839 --> 00:22:50.640
Africans who end up in France, especially the

00:22:50.640 --> 00:22:54.099
first generation, even though, you know, they

00:22:54.099 --> 00:22:57.480
eventually learn French and so on, but they make

00:22:57.480 --> 00:23:03.920
efforts to try to assimilate to a certain degree.

00:23:04.519 --> 00:23:07.640
Okay. And, you know, they wear French clothing

00:23:07.640 --> 00:23:10.440
and they speak French in the home. They want

00:23:10.440 --> 00:23:12.380
their children to speak French, et cetera, et

00:23:12.380 --> 00:23:18.740
cetera. And they're still rejected. by the official

00:23:18.740 --> 00:23:20.700
policies of the French state, right? So it's

00:23:20.700 --> 00:23:23.920
not even just a sort of de facto rejection by

00:23:23.920 --> 00:23:27.559
the society, but there's explicit policy by the

00:23:27.559 --> 00:23:30.599
French state that hopes to further segregate

00:23:30.599 --> 00:23:34.319
them. And so the response has been interesting

00:23:34.319 --> 00:23:37.759
because generations later, you've got a sort

00:23:37.759 --> 00:23:44.220
of turn to Islam and a turn to learning Arabic

00:23:44.220 --> 00:23:46.019
and things like that, things that hadn't been

00:23:46.019 --> 00:23:50.099
taught in the home. precisely because of the

00:23:50.099 --> 00:23:53.980
produced social isolation of these communities,

00:23:54.220 --> 00:23:57.180
right? So whereas there was a kind of a window

00:23:57.180 --> 00:24:03.220
where, let's call it, a more benevolent or benign

00:24:03.220 --> 00:24:07.019
kind of integration was possible, this happened

00:24:07.019 --> 00:24:10.119
during colonialism. So these groups were still

00:24:10.119 --> 00:24:13.200
thought of as fundamentally other and need to

00:24:13.200 --> 00:24:16.460
be reminded as such in the metropole. So hence,

00:24:16.519 --> 00:24:18.259
they had a separate police for them. There was

00:24:18.259 --> 00:24:20.359
obvious neighborhoods where they weren't welcome

00:24:20.359 --> 00:24:23.400
and where they should be. There were buildings

00:24:23.400 --> 00:24:26.700
that were built for them that were then concierged

00:24:26.700 --> 00:24:30.619
by former French paratroopers who had done their

00:24:30.619 --> 00:24:32.920
work in Indochina and Algeria during the wars

00:24:32.920 --> 00:24:35.220
and so on, and who were thought to know the natives

00:24:35.220 --> 00:24:38.559
the best and so on. So there was a sort of very

00:24:38.559 --> 00:24:43.299
concerted effort to mark the line of difference.

00:24:44.319 --> 00:24:46.880
between these peoples while keeping the line

00:24:46.880 --> 00:24:51.920
of French Republican universalism, which doesn't

00:24:51.920 --> 00:24:54.500
quite work. Yeah, I was just thinking, I mean,

00:24:54.519 --> 00:24:57.839
for all we've studied about Germany and Nazis,

00:24:58.059 --> 00:25:01.079
the French fought it, but it sounds very similar

00:25:01.079 --> 00:25:04.559
to the Gestapos and exactly what they fought

00:25:04.559 --> 00:25:08.380
against. That's a good point. So Fanon's teacher,

00:25:08.619 --> 00:25:11.940
Aimé Césaire, also from Martinique. great poet

00:25:11.940 --> 00:25:13.920
of the 20th century and then becomes a politician

00:25:13.920 --> 00:25:18.299
in Martinique itself. He made this argument in

00:25:18.299 --> 00:25:21.220
a short pamphlet called The Discourse on Colonialism.

00:25:21.380 --> 00:25:26.000
And he basically said that Nazism, Hitlerism

00:25:26.000 --> 00:25:32.480
was so objectionable and people were so repulsed

00:25:32.480 --> 00:25:36.279
by it is because they were doing colonialism

00:25:36.279 --> 00:25:39.950
in Europe against white people rather. than in

00:25:39.950 --> 00:25:42.549
Asia, South America, and Africa, where it was

00:25:42.549 --> 00:25:45.150
seen as perfectly permissible to do such things.

00:25:45.670 --> 00:25:48.529
Because when you look at most forms of colonialism,

00:25:48.789 --> 00:25:52.589
it's basically racist authoritarianism. Pretty

00:25:52.589 --> 00:25:55.210
much. That there's different sets of rules. There's

00:25:55.210 --> 00:25:57.690
a definition of difference in order to rule people

00:25:57.690 --> 00:26:01.690
differently, right? So, yeah, the French did

00:26:01.690 --> 00:26:05.079
it a lot, and they did it for a long time. And

00:26:05.079 --> 00:26:06.720
then, of course, we do have to remember that

00:26:06.720 --> 00:26:08.759
there were a number of French that were all too

00:26:08.759 --> 00:26:11.660
willing to collaborate with the Nazis, as there

00:26:11.660 --> 00:26:14.660
were with a number of other countries in Europe,

00:26:14.720 --> 00:26:17.319
which tells us something. Including one of the

00:26:17.319 --> 00:26:20.079
former British monarchs. Yeah. Oh, yeah, of course.

00:26:20.140 --> 00:26:22.859
Of course. And, you know, significant portions

00:26:22.859 --> 00:26:25.880
of the British aristocracy in general, various

00:26:25.880 --> 00:26:29.000
lords and so on. But if you can go all around

00:26:29.000 --> 00:26:33.000
Europe, this is one thing to remember about empire

00:26:33.000 --> 00:26:36.769
is that. all empires require local collaborators

00:26:36.769 --> 00:26:40.150
for them to actually operate. Unfortunately,

00:26:40.529 --> 00:26:44.690
the Nazis found many willing collaborators. And

00:26:44.690 --> 00:26:48.049
the argument, Césaire's argument, is that they

00:26:48.049 --> 00:26:49.829
were prepped for that precisely because of the

00:26:49.829 --> 00:26:55.890
history of European imperialism. That's one to

00:26:55.890 --> 00:27:01.230
think about. So the French, they famously say

00:27:01.230 --> 00:27:05.829
that The race stuff is all Anglo -American. We

00:27:05.829 --> 00:27:08.529
don't do race, right? We maybe have a history

00:27:08.529 --> 00:27:12.250
of religion and religious persecution and stuff

00:27:12.250 --> 00:27:14.650
like that, but that's precisely why we have laicite

00:27:14.650 --> 00:27:18.670
and secularism in our laws. We've sort of mastered

00:27:18.670 --> 00:27:22.269
the church and all that. But when you actually

00:27:22.269 --> 00:27:24.309
look at the colonial record, there's race laws

00:27:24.309 --> 00:27:26.829
all over that colonial record. In some cases,

00:27:26.829 --> 00:27:29.450
it's very explicit. The Black Code is very explicit.

00:27:29.690 --> 00:27:31.970
In other cases, it's more muted where they're

00:27:31.970 --> 00:27:36.000
talking about French Muslims of Algeria, which

00:27:36.000 --> 00:27:38.559
is a category of citizenship. But it's not just

00:27:38.559 --> 00:27:40.900
French. There's all these other add -ons, right?

00:27:41.019 --> 00:27:43.619
So they're French, but not quite. They're French

00:27:43.619 --> 00:27:46.200
with an asterisk. And what that ends up meaning

00:27:46.200 --> 00:27:49.740
is that they're treated differently by society

00:27:49.740 --> 00:27:54.400
and the state. That's unfortunate. A while back,

00:27:54.440 --> 00:27:59.680
you mentioned how acts of what could be perceived

00:27:59.680 --> 00:28:02.400
as colonial influence are now becoming popular.

00:28:02.990 --> 00:28:07.569
So looking at, let's say, Senegal and hip hop

00:28:07.569 --> 00:28:11.950
or Bollywood in India or a specific type of literature

00:28:11.950 --> 00:28:14.349
in the Caribbean, I can't remember the name of

00:28:14.349 --> 00:28:17.849
it. Do these still carry the colonial ghosts

00:28:17.849 --> 00:28:21.430
with them? Or is this a sort of individual step

00:28:21.430 --> 00:28:25.650
out saying this is inherently Indian or this

00:28:25.650 --> 00:28:28.750
is inherently Caribbean or this is we're breaking

00:28:28.750 --> 00:28:32.029
out of colonialism? Well, it depends on what

00:28:32.029 --> 00:28:34.589
we're talking about. What, you know, what type

00:28:34.589 --> 00:28:38.329
of Bollywood film. Yeah. Right. You know, so

00:28:38.329 --> 00:28:42.970
in one, you know, Lagan, there's like there's

00:28:42.970 --> 00:28:46.970
these anti -colonial, you know, messages built

00:28:46.970 --> 00:28:49.829
into some of these films. Right. So but in the

00:28:49.829 --> 00:28:51.769
end, this is for a commercial enterprise and

00:28:51.769 --> 00:28:53.390
it's really about making money. You mentioned

00:28:53.390 --> 00:28:55.789
that because I'm in an Indian cinema class this

00:28:55.789 --> 00:28:57.609
semester and one of the perspectives we looked

00:28:57.609 --> 00:29:01.190
at was. This isn't anti -colonial. It's pro -Indian.

00:29:01.549 --> 00:29:04.329
What? And it's basically about looking at the

00:29:04.329 --> 00:29:06.190
unity of everybody. And it's not talking about

00:29:06.190 --> 00:29:08.569
the British, but inherently they are doing that.

00:29:09.190 --> 00:29:13.890
Yeah. So, look, one thing to think about is that

00:29:13.890 --> 00:29:18.650
the British Empire produced modern India. Oh,

00:29:18.650 --> 00:29:22.930
yeah. Right. So that in much the same way that

00:29:22.930 --> 00:29:26.220
the world was brought together in a very... unfair

00:29:26.220 --> 00:29:28.480
and unfortunate way but it was brought together

00:29:28.480 --> 00:29:30.859
by colonialism in the same way india was brought

00:29:30.859 --> 00:29:34.720
together by british colonialism uh through newspapers

00:29:34.720 --> 00:29:36.900
railroads and things like that these sort of

00:29:36.900 --> 00:29:40.099
far reaches of india where the lingua franca

00:29:40.099 --> 00:29:42.259
ended up being english because the tamilians

00:29:42.259 --> 00:29:44.700
don't speak hindi and vice versa and so on right

00:29:44.700 --> 00:29:52.480
so that the idea of india as one thing is actually

00:29:53.379 --> 00:29:57.200
almost as far as we know, has to go through colonialism

00:29:57.200 --> 00:30:00.980
for that to even be an idea, right? So even the

00:30:00.980 --> 00:30:05.259
call for Indian unity will forever rely upon

00:30:05.259 --> 00:30:08.259
that history. Colonialism, yeah. We had so many

00:30:08.259 --> 00:30:11.259
Maharajas and districts. Yeah, yeah. It was never

00:30:11.259 --> 00:30:13.960
united. Yeah, and even during British rule, there

00:30:13.960 --> 00:30:15.920
were still a lot of technicalities of sort of

00:30:15.920 --> 00:30:17.619
principalities and stuff like that that were

00:30:17.619 --> 00:30:22.319
notionally independent. even before, even post

00:30:22.319 --> 00:30:26.880
-1757 to 1857, that period there was a period

00:30:26.880 --> 00:30:30.779
of, you know, consolidation of power that was

00:30:30.779 --> 00:30:35.500
still highly fragmented. So, you know, any call

00:30:35.500 --> 00:30:39.480
for the total unity of India is fundamentally

00:30:39.480 --> 00:30:42.680
a colonial idea because it's talking about anti,

00:30:42.759 --> 00:30:45.700
it's responding, it's a dialectical response

00:30:45.700 --> 00:30:49.279
to colonialism. Anti -colonial nationalism is

00:30:49.279 --> 00:30:53.460
a response to that. Had there not been British

00:30:53.460 --> 00:30:56.119
colonialism or colonialism at all, we might be

00:30:56.119 --> 00:30:58.079
talking about many different countries in this

00:30:58.079 --> 00:31:00.680
vast land. Yeah, that is something we have to

00:31:00.680 --> 00:31:02.720
give to them. They did whip it together well

00:31:02.720 --> 00:31:06.940
at whatever horrible cost. At far too high a

00:31:06.940 --> 00:31:09.720
cost, right? And it's not even like this is a

00:31:09.720 --> 00:31:13.480
net positive or whatever. It's a brute fact,

00:31:13.599 --> 00:31:17.559
right? It's an inescapable fact that you have

00:31:17.559 --> 00:31:22.039
to recognize. You know, one way is about thinking

00:31:22.039 --> 00:31:24.480
about, I don't know, decolonization for me is,

00:31:24.480 --> 00:31:29.779
it's a tough word. I like to think more of like

00:31:29.779 --> 00:31:33.559
going beyond colonialism, right? Because full

00:31:33.559 --> 00:31:37.900
decolonization, well, where do we end there,

00:31:37.980 --> 00:31:40.000
right? Because the Mughals came and colonized

00:31:40.000 --> 00:31:43.180
as well. I mean, we can just layer upon layer.

00:31:43.279 --> 00:31:47.019
There's sort of a vast amount of, especially

00:31:47.019 --> 00:31:49.849
in a place like India. A vast amount of political

00:31:49.849 --> 00:31:53.170
sedimentation. Different people who, are we going

00:31:53.170 --> 00:31:54.910
back to Alexander? You know, I mean, like, how

00:31:54.910 --> 00:31:57.470
far are we going here, right? And there were

00:31:57.470 --> 00:31:59.789
Indian empires that had as well. You had the

00:31:59.789 --> 00:32:02.630
Mauryan Empire. You had Ashoka. You had the Gupta

00:32:02.630 --> 00:32:04.650
Empire. I mean, it just goes on. Sure, sure.

00:32:04.809 --> 00:32:06.630
And you're right about the sedimentation. It's

00:32:06.630 --> 00:32:08.269
suddenly the Mughals have become a part of Indian

00:32:08.269 --> 00:32:11.089
history. Yes, there are certain political parties

00:32:11.089 --> 00:32:15.710
that would like to rid that and have more. Again,

00:32:15.710 --> 00:32:18.730
nationalist context in history. So that's another

00:32:18.730 --> 00:32:22.190
way of supposedly decolonizing it. But it's more

00:32:22.190 --> 00:32:25.670
accepted that the Mughal Empire is now Indian

00:32:25.670 --> 00:32:28.130
history. And then you have colonial history,

00:32:28.269 --> 00:32:30.730
which is the British, which, funnily enough,

00:32:30.769 --> 00:32:33.109
is not taught in any of the British curricula.

00:32:33.329 --> 00:32:37.069
I did the IGCSE myself. They don't mention it.

00:32:37.710 --> 00:32:41.170
So interesting that they have left out a huge

00:32:41.170 --> 00:32:43.400
part of British history. They don't teach in

00:32:43.400 --> 00:32:45.019
A -levels, they don't teach in the O -levels,

00:32:45.019 --> 00:32:48.519
nor in the IG. Wow. That's interesting. Yeah.

00:32:49.539 --> 00:32:51.779
So this is what I'm talking about, is that the

00:32:51.779 --> 00:32:54.819
colonial fact has yet to be fully confronted.

00:32:54.980 --> 00:32:58.680
Yeah. Right? So if you haven't confronted that,

00:32:58.759 --> 00:33:04.359
and if there hasn't been a wide -ranging conversation

00:33:04.359 --> 00:33:06.640
with many participants and many perspectives,

00:33:07.140 --> 00:33:10.680
what exactly are we decolonizing? Yeah. Right?

00:33:10.779 --> 00:33:14.400
I think that's... you know it it becomes well

00:33:14.400 --> 00:33:17.319
whatever the person who's shouting the word says

00:33:17.319 --> 00:33:22.119
it is whoever has the loudest voice and on a

00:33:22.119 --> 00:33:26.259
very superficial level we're decolonizing but

00:33:26.259 --> 00:33:30.099
it's it's more about tokenism and the danger

00:33:30.099 --> 00:33:33.799
of that right like okay we replaced a statue

00:33:33.799 --> 00:33:36.920
we put up an indian leader over there or we changed

00:33:36.920 --> 00:33:40.829
the name of a road from uh Better Road did some

00:33:40.829 --> 00:33:43.710
long name, which I have no idea what it is. Or

00:33:43.710 --> 00:33:45.670
we changed the name of the train stations. Okay,

00:33:45.789 --> 00:33:47.509
great, you're doing that, but it's still at a

00:33:47.509 --> 00:33:50.130
very superficial level. And like we spoke about

00:33:50.130 --> 00:33:52.690
earlier, it's more about the symbolic, less about

00:33:52.690 --> 00:33:56.529
the structural efforts on a... I wouldn't even

00:33:56.529 --> 00:33:58.329
say a global decolonization movement, right?

00:33:58.349 --> 00:34:00.890
Because you can... There are so many countries

00:34:00.890 --> 00:34:05.910
of the Commonwealth that you can't get rid of.

00:34:06.089 --> 00:34:08.980
You can't get rid of the fact that... It happened,

00:34:09.079 --> 00:34:12.159
but you can, like we spoke about, revamp it,

00:34:12.260 --> 00:34:15.480
integrate it into your own society or make it

00:34:15.480 --> 00:34:19.320
your own and move on. But it's still at a very

00:34:19.320 --> 00:34:21.920
superficial level. We haven't begun to fully

00:34:21.920 --> 00:34:25.539
understand the depths of colonization and what

00:34:25.539 --> 00:34:27.960
a decolonized future would look like. Yeah, I

00:34:27.960 --> 00:34:30.300
mean, in terms of the question of tokenism, again,

00:34:30.519 --> 00:34:34.079
to a certain extent, there has to be some of

00:34:34.079 --> 00:34:37.530
that because you need... the pioneering people

00:34:37.530 --> 00:34:39.409
who are in these positions and so on, who have

00:34:39.409 --> 00:34:42.809
been systematically shut out, right? So those

00:34:42.809 --> 00:34:44.610
are achievements. I don't want to say that those

00:34:44.610 --> 00:34:47.909
mean nothing, right? But if it remains at that,

00:34:48.070 --> 00:34:54.389
they remain just symbolic achievements. And as

00:34:54.389 --> 00:35:01.730
time passes, they can then be mobilized to perpetuate

00:35:01.730 --> 00:35:04.329
the status quo. And if you think the status quo

00:35:04.329 --> 00:35:08.090
needs amending, that's a dangerous thing to alight

00:35:08.090 --> 00:35:10.849
upon because then you just have this sort of

00:35:10.849 --> 00:35:13.289
plausible deniability, but look, we've had, we

00:35:13.289 --> 00:35:15.289
had a black president, so racism's over, you

00:35:15.289 --> 00:35:18.030
know, that sort of thing, right? So you can make

00:35:18.030 --> 00:35:20.030
such pronouncements and people do, I mean, and

00:35:20.030 --> 00:35:24.210
it ends up being quite effective. So my kind

00:35:24.210 --> 00:35:26.469
of mantra here is that the reckoning with the

00:35:26.469 --> 00:35:30.110
past, there's, I'm going to mess up the line,

00:35:30.130 --> 00:35:33.480
but there's a line from James Baldwin. It goes

00:35:33.480 --> 00:35:37.219
something like this. Not all things that are

00:35:37.219 --> 00:35:41.780
faced can be kind of transcended, but you can't

00:35:41.780 --> 00:35:44.699
transcend anything until you face it, right?

00:35:44.800 --> 00:35:49.280
So that hasn't happened, right? That has not

00:35:49.280 --> 00:35:51.880
happened. And if anything, there's been the reverse,

00:35:52.000 --> 00:35:55.460
which has been the purification of the colonial

00:35:55.460 --> 00:35:59.280
adventure, if you like, as something that is

00:35:59.280 --> 00:36:02.239
positive, that... the British and the French

00:36:02.239 --> 00:36:04.639
and the Dutch and so on should be proud of, and

00:36:04.639 --> 00:36:07.840
they've been made to feel bad about it. But actually,

00:36:08.000 --> 00:36:10.679
there were these sort of humanitarian aspects

00:36:10.679 --> 00:36:13.719
to it, right? I think that's the wrong direction

00:36:13.719 --> 00:36:16.360
to go. Unfortunately, that seems to be the direction

00:36:16.360 --> 00:36:19.360
most societies are going in. Even if you're talking

00:36:19.360 --> 00:36:22.300
about like reparations and stuff, I saw this

00:36:22.300 --> 00:36:24.800
really ridiculous thing that there's this British

00:36:24.800 --> 00:36:27.260
reporter who's saying, if a country can afford

00:36:27.260 --> 00:36:29.940
to put their flag on the moon, we shouldn't be

00:36:29.940 --> 00:36:35.280
giving them and helping them out with finances

00:36:35.280 --> 00:36:39.579
and stuff. The trillions of dollars worth of

00:36:39.579 --> 00:36:42.960
stuff that has been taken away, one, I don't

00:36:42.960 --> 00:36:44.320
think they can afford to give the money back

00:36:44.320 --> 00:36:46.440
as such. Like they can't afford to just pick

00:36:46.440 --> 00:36:48.880
up a bunch of trillion dollars and just give

00:36:48.880 --> 00:36:52.019
it back to India. Two, I think maybe just too

00:36:52.019 --> 00:36:53.900
corrupt in India now to do that. What will they

00:36:53.900 --> 00:36:56.780
do with the money? Yeah, well, I mean, I think

00:36:56.780 --> 00:37:00.690
there's in the question of reparations is, It's

00:37:00.690 --> 00:37:03.550
a very dangerous one for the former colonial

00:37:03.550 --> 00:37:07.269
masters, right? Because if, especially at the

00:37:07.269 --> 00:37:11.969
national level, right? So different sort of regions

00:37:11.969 --> 00:37:14.630
and municipalities have done this across the

00:37:14.630 --> 00:37:17.349
former metropolitan world, let's call it that.

00:37:17.750 --> 00:37:20.489
But it's never been adopted by the national state

00:37:20.489 --> 00:37:22.949
because that is a precedent. Once that precedent

00:37:22.949 --> 00:37:26.110
comes, there's going to be a lot of people knocking

00:37:26.110 --> 00:37:31.989
on the doors, right? To a certain extent, I understand

00:37:31.989 --> 00:37:38.130
why they would be reticent to do this for their

00:37:38.130 --> 00:37:42.250
own finances, for the political blowback that

00:37:42.250 --> 00:37:45.110
would come. National pride. Yeah, yeah. And the

00:37:45.110 --> 00:37:48.250
amount of people balking at this in domestic

00:37:48.250 --> 00:37:51.889
politics would be huge. The flip side is, of

00:37:51.889 --> 00:37:54.750
course, that if you go to law school, one of

00:37:54.750 --> 00:37:57.869
the first classes you take. is something called

00:37:57.869 --> 00:38:01.530
torts, right? Which is just the French for wrongs,

00:38:01.530 --> 00:38:04.010
right? And, you know, so when you've been wronged,

00:38:04.010 --> 00:38:06.309
you take somebody to court and usually, you know,

00:38:06.309 --> 00:38:08.590
it's civil compensation, right? You get the civil

00:38:08.590 --> 00:38:12.570
compensation. Well, we have records for a lot

00:38:12.570 --> 00:38:15.030
of this stuff, right? I mean, there's a lot of

00:38:15.030 --> 00:38:19.690
torts that happened and it's pretty easy. So

00:38:19.690 --> 00:38:22.309
when people say, well, how much, how would we

00:38:22.309 --> 00:38:24.679
distribute it? It was like, well, we have. a

00:38:24.679 --> 00:38:27.219
process for that actually pre -existing in our

00:38:27.219 --> 00:38:30.760
court system to adjudicate that. And this would

00:38:30.760 --> 00:38:34.579
just be a matter of scaling and mobilizing researchers

00:38:34.579 --> 00:38:36.820
who are specialists in certain regions, stuff

00:38:36.820 --> 00:38:39.739
like that, to do the tabulations of, you know,

00:38:39.739 --> 00:38:42.420
measuring labor extracted or resource extraction,

00:38:42.659 --> 00:38:44.880
whatever it may be. It could all be done. It's

00:38:44.880 --> 00:38:47.719
just a matter of political will, right? So I

00:38:47.719 --> 00:38:51.320
think I always just say that reparations have

00:38:51.320 --> 00:38:54.480
happened already. it's just that the slave owners

00:38:54.480 --> 00:38:56.380
got the reparations for their loss of property

00:38:56.380 --> 00:39:00.139
right so that the british crown made the slave

00:39:00.139 --> 00:39:03.300
owners whole after in the 1830s they banned slavery

00:39:03.300 --> 00:39:06.840
and it was half the crown's wealth for one year

00:39:06.840 --> 00:39:09.039
that they handed over to former slave owners

00:39:09.039 --> 00:39:14.639
Haiti, who famously had not only a democratic

00:39:14.639 --> 00:39:19.099
revolution an anti -colonial revolution an anti

00:39:19.099 --> 00:39:21.980
-slavery revolution but also an anti -racist

00:39:21.980 --> 00:39:25.539
revolution, they were rewarded for that with

00:39:25.539 --> 00:39:28.960
basically an indemnity to pay until 1944 to the

00:39:28.960 --> 00:39:31.500
French for effectively loss of property by their

00:39:31.500 --> 00:39:34.659
slave colony, right? So whenever you're wondering

00:39:34.659 --> 00:39:37.440
why Haiti is the poorest country in the Western

00:39:37.440 --> 00:39:40.679
hemisphere, it was meant to be by such policies.

00:39:40.840 --> 00:39:44.320
There's a clear logic there, right? So those

00:39:44.320 --> 00:39:47.679
reparations have happened, right? Reparations

00:39:47.679 --> 00:39:50.500
from colonialism and slavery have happened. just

00:39:50.500 --> 00:39:52.239
not in the direction you think they might have

00:39:52.239 --> 00:39:56.679
gone. Yeah. And of late, there's been talk of

00:39:56.679 --> 00:40:03.360
the British museums and them lending out or having

00:40:03.360 --> 00:40:05.159
like a timeshare sort of thing where they'd be

00:40:05.159 --> 00:40:06.840
like, okay, the Kohinoor spent six months in

00:40:06.840 --> 00:40:08.760
India, six months here, or even with the Greek

00:40:08.760 --> 00:40:11.659
statues, they tried that for a while. So there

00:40:11.659 --> 00:40:15.480
are some efforts being taken to kind of give

00:40:15.480 --> 00:40:19.460
back, but not really give back in... in the form

00:40:19.460 --> 00:40:21.619
that they can give back things that were taken

00:40:21.619 --> 00:40:23.880
or acknowledged, at least on the side of the

00:40:23.880 --> 00:40:25.880
government. Fun fact, the British government

00:40:25.880 --> 00:40:29.780
has never apologized for Jallianwala Bagh. They've

00:40:29.780 --> 00:40:33.940
just expressed their sympathies or their empathy

00:40:33.940 --> 00:40:37.360
towards the situation. So I think you can start

00:40:37.360 --> 00:40:41.079
with an apology. I think that would be a great

00:40:41.079 --> 00:40:44.900
way to look at that. But let's shift direction

00:40:44.900 --> 00:40:47.710
a little bit here. So something, and I hope I'm

00:40:47.710 --> 00:40:49.769
not outing you on this, your students may not

00:40:49.769 --> 00:40:52.949
know is that you are also a DJ. Oh, yeah. Okay.

00:40:53.050 --> 00:40:57.829
Yeah, sure. And that you, you're into various

00:40:57.829 --> 00:41:02.510
kinds of music, especially vinyl. And looking

00:41:02.510 --> 00:41:06.170
at your experience as a historian and now along

00:41:06.170 --> 00:41:08.909
with music, let's look at music and the arts

00:41:08.909 --> 00:41:12.869
as a sort of voice either for or against colonialism.

00:41:13.719 --> 00:41:17.119
and how the arts can play a role in a potentially

00:41:17.119 --> 00:41:21.000
decolonized future. Now, I've heard of instances

00:41:21.000 --> 00:41:25.260
of freedom songs in Algeria being sung, or underground

00:41:25.260 --> 00:41:27.940
techno at protest movements. From your knowledge

00:41:27.940 --> 00:41:32.219
of both these fields, where would you say the

00:41:32.219 --> 00:41:34.219
arts have, what role do the arts have to play

00:41:34.219 --> 00:41:36.739
in decolonizing? Yeah, I mean, they have a massive

00:41:36.739 --> 00:41:40.199
role, right? Because this is precisely why colonists,

00:41:40.239 --> 00:41:44.929
modern colonialism, focused on the indigenous

00:41:44.929 --> 00:41:48.949
cultures to try to either suppress them, segregate

00:41:48.949 --> 00:41:51.710
them, certainly make them appear a second tier

00:41:51.710 --> 00:41:55.550
because they understood that cultural identification,

00:41:55.949 --> 00:42:01.309
cultural pride does not make a docile subject.

00:42:01.630 --> 00:42:06.670
Right. So, so, um, you know, I think culture

00:42:06.670 --> 00:42:12.639
is, is supremely important. Um, and it can. have

00:42:12.639 --> 00:42:18.260
an effect, I think, in movements for anti -colonialism.

00:42:19.460 --> 00:42:22.780
In movements of decolonization, such as we're

00:42:22.780 --> 00:42:24.780
talking about it, right? So, you know, we're

00:42:24.780 --> 00:42:27.760
after colonialism, but the colonial mentalities

00:42:27.760 --> 00:42:29.719
and practices are still there. So how do we rid

00:42:29.719 --> 00:42:31.340
ourselves of those? I think that's a different

00:42:31.340 --> 00:42:38.460
thing. So with anti -colonialism, there's a very

00:42:38.460 --> 00:42:42.489
sort of clear distinction between friends and

00:42:42.489 --> 00:42:45.190
enemies right so that we know that this is the

00:42:45.190 --> 00:42:49.650
enemy um and it's reflected in the lyrics and

00:42:49.650 --> 00:42:52.329
stuff like that of the songs that come out with

00:42:52.329 --> 00:42:57.309
decolonization what that would look like would

00:42:57.309 --> 00:43:02.469
that then mean um the french rapper does not

00:43:02.469 --> 00:43:07.730
rap in french but they rap and say arabic but

00:43:07.730 --> 00:43:11.320
they are living in france but they're rapping

00:43:11.320 --> 00:43:13.500
in Arabic and they've just shrunk their audience.

00:43:14.380 --> 00:43:18.380
And so who's listening, right? So this is fundamentally

00:43:18.380 --> 00:43:21.440
the question that anti -colonial writers were

00:43:21.440 --> 00:43:24.099
dealing with in the 40s and 50s, which is that,

00:43:24.139 --> 00:43:27.539
do I want to have the largest platform possible

00:43:27.539 --> 00:43:31.900
in order to get my ideas out? And that usually

00:43:31.900 --> 00:43:35.519
means acknowledging the fact that the native

00:43:35.519 --> 00:43:39.909
languages of my region have been crushed. And

00:43:39.909 --> 00:43:42.030
what's left is English or French or something

00:43:42.030 --> 00:43:45.489
like that. Some people opted for that, right?

00:43:45.550 --> 00:43:51.349
So Chinua Achebe, things fall apart. He had a

00:43:51.349 --> 00:43:54.510
big debate with Thiong'o about this because Thiong'o

00:43:54.510 --> 00:43:56.230
was basically saying, no, no, no, we have to

00:43:56.230 --> 00:43:59.369
step away. Achebe is saying, no, there's not,

00:43:59.409 --> 00:44:02.489
you know, the other aspect of colonialism is

00:44:02.489 --> 00:44:05.690
the miseducation of our people and therefore

00:44:05.690 --> 00:44:09.460
our native languages weren't taught. And the

00:44:09.460 --> 00:44:12.019
schooling was, you know, was not a focus. And

00:44:12.019 --> 00:44:14.920
therefore, I want to be able to speak not only

00:44:14.920 --> 00:44:17.260
to those who are in power in my country, but

00:44:17.260 --> 00:44:19.800
then sort of the global stage. And therefore,

00:44:20.000 --> 00:44:22.380
you know, global English is the language that

00:44:22.380 --> 00:44:24.840
has to be embraced. It's a strategic decision.

00:44:25.000 --> 00:44:28.719
I don't think there's a right or wrong take.

00:44:28.820 --> 00:44:33.019
I mean, there's good moral and political arguments

00:44:33.019 --> 00:44:36.320
on both sides of that, which I find attractive.

00:44:36.920 --> 00:44:46.960
But I think, you know, let's say music. Music

00:44:46.960 --> 00:44:53.920
is tricky because if it's not an obvious colonial

00:44:53.920 --> 00:44:58.679
master, right, you're basically trying to tell

00:44:58.679 --> 00:45:01.840
your listener, first of all, you have to believe

00:45:01.840 --> 00:45:04.960
me that there is this colonial shadow being cast

00:45:04.960 --> 00:45:11.309
on our society. and that my song has lyrics attacking

00:45:11.309 --> 00:45:13.929
it. And by the way, my song's really catchy,

00:45:14.050 --> 00:45:18.489
right? And you like it, right? And so often with

00:45:18.489 --> 00:45:21.170
especially music these days, the last part comes

00:45:21.170 --> 00:45:23.309
first because musicians are just struggling.

00:45:23.550 --> 00:45:28.969
And so the commodification part becomes quite

00:45:28.969 --> 00:45:32.889
important. And if it doesn't, the audience is

00:45:32.889 --> 00:45:36.210
very small. So this is, you know, one of those

00:45:36.210 --> 00:45:39.489
sort of tensions of art and commerce that I think

00:45:39.489 --> 00:45:43.909
could end up defanging, let's call it, decolonizing

00:45:43.909 --> 00:45:47.269
music, right? Or one that self -styles itself

00:45:47.269 --> 00:45:51.809
that way. It's possible, but I don't know. From

00:45:51.809 --> 00:45:56.190
history, I think, you know, there's also a lot

00:45:56.190 --> 00:45:59.349
of projection from the present that, oh, well,

00:45:59.449 --> 00:46:04.289
we look back at, say, like the 60s. And, you

00:46:04.289 --> 00:46:05.849
know, what is the music that they were listening

00:46:05.849 --> 00:46:09.530
to then? It's like The Doors and Creedence Clearwater

00:46:09.530 --> 00:46:12.349
Revival with some anti -war songs and stuff like

00:46:12.349 --> 00:46:17.250
that. Right. OK, sure. Fine. But that was just

00:46:17.250 --> 00:46:20.309
a tiny element of what people were listening

00:46:20.309 --> 00:46:23.170
to then. Yeah. And so the idea that this was

00:46:23.170 --> 00:46:26.349
the soundtrack of the revolution, I think, might

00:46:26.349 --> 00:46:31.519
be a little bit misguided and might be. us wishing

00:46:31.519 --> 00:46:33.599
it was that way where it was not necessarily

00:46:33.599 --> 00:46:38.360
that way there's a whole literature from really

00:46:38.360 --> 00:46:43.920
the 10s onward 1910s through the 1970s which

00:46:43.920 --> 00:46:45.900
i would just describe as sort of anti -colonial

00:46:45.900 --> 00:46:49.840
literature which you know you know it's become

00:46:49.840 --> 00:46:53.619
canonical in various ways but it in also in the

00:46:53.619 --> 00:46:55.440
worst ways that people refer to it but they don't

00:46:55.440 --> 00:47:00.059
read it um you know so i think Everybody from

00:47:00.059 --> 00:47:06.860
Gandhi to Césaire to Fanon to Amílcar Cabral

00:47:06.920 --> 00:47:10.139
There's a number of people who should be read

00:47:10.139 --> 00:47:14.840
deeply, slowly, and carefully because they actually

00:47:14.840 --> 00:47:18.159
have a lot to say about right now, even though

00:47:18.159 --> 00:47:20.139
they've been writing about a century ago at this

00:47:20.139 --> 00:47:29.599
point. What would it be? So I guess one big thing

00:47:29.599 --> 00:47:33.460
is that before you can have something like decolonization,

00:47:33.699 --> 00:47:38.900
we have to look at colonialism in the face and

00:47:38.900 --> 00:47:42.500
fully understand it in order to properly decolonize,

00:47:42.500 --> 00:47:47.380
should that ever happen. And it's definitely

00:47:47.380 --> 00:47:51.780
more than just barbaric acts of breaking statues

00:47:51.780 --> 00:47:57.639
and defacing monuments. burning books and tearing

00:47:57.639 --> 00:48:00.900
up pieces of art, it goes on to a much deeper

00:48:00.900 --> 00:48:05.599
level, I would say. It's something that we can't

00:48:05.599 --> 00:48:08.860
necessarily break away from. We just sometimes

00:48:08.860 --> 00:48:10.860
have to adapt. Some things we can get rid of,

00:48:10.960 --> 00:48:12.500
but some things I think you just have to adapt

00:48:12.500 --> 00:48:14.800
and move on because it happened. Yeah. I mean,

00:48:14.820 --> 00:48:18.599
I think the major point here is that the purpose

00:48:18.599 --> 00:48:22.340
to study this stuff is to think about the social

00:48:22.340 --> 00:48:25.449
relationships and norms that it produced. that

00:48:25.449 --> 00:48:31.050
we often unconsciously reproduce. And then to

00:48:31.050 --> 00:48:32.630
think about that is like, do we want to reproduce

00:48:32.630 --> 00:48:35.349
it? Maybe we do, maybe we don't, but we can only

00:48:35.349 --> 00:48:40.409
have a thoughtful understanding of it once we've

00:48:40.409 --> 00:48:43.710
done the proper analysis of what thing colonialism

00:48:43.710 --> 00:48:46.929
actually was. Yeah. And just to be aware that

00:48:46.929 --> 00:48:49.949
activities in our day -to -day life that may

00:48:49.949 --> 00:48:52.869
not seem to be influenced by colonialism is just

00:48:52.869 --> 00:48:56.079
something that we're doing. might have colonial

00:48:56.079 --> 00:48:59.019
roots. So think about that. Be aware about that.

00:48:59.320 --> 00:49:01.340
And that's some homework for you guys and all

00:49:01.340 --> 00:49:04.739
our listeners to do. Thank you so much for joining

00:49:04.739 --> 00:49:07.019
us. Thanks. That was fun. This was a very interesting

00:49:07.019 --> 00:49:09.320
conversation. And that brings us to the end of

00:49:09.320 --> 00:49:11.239
our episode. Thank you so much for monkeying

00:49:11.239 --> 00:49:13.719
around with us. Stay tuned for the next episode

00:49:13.719 --> 00:49:14.639
of the Monkey Mind Lab.
