WEBVTT

00:00:04.549 --> 00:00:30.440
Thank you. Okay, so there's something that has

00:00:30.440 --> 00:00:33.560
been a kind of a trend in academics over the

00:00:33.560 --> 00:00:36.840
last like decade or so, probably longer actually,

00:00:36.920 --> 00:00:40.460
where academics have to constantly defend the

00:00:40.460 --> 00:00:43.200
value of the work that they do. And I mean...

00:00:43.630 --> 00:00:47.289
defended in the sense of the pragmatics for students

00:00:47.289 --> 00:00:49.909
on whether or not they'll be able to find a job

00:00:49.909 --> 00:00:52.429
with the major that they have, whether or not

00:00:52.429 --> 00:00:54.070
they're getting the training they need in order

00:00:54.070 --> 00:00:56.270
to find a job, to make a living, to advance in

00:00:56.270 --> 00:01:00.219
the workplace, yada, yada, yada, right? And it's

00:01:00.219 --> 00:01:02.520
honestly frustrating. I don't know many academics

00:01:02.520 --> 00:01:05.260
who enjoy doing this. It seems more like a necessary

00:01:05.260 --> 00:01:08.079
part of the job to ensure the survival of the

00:01:08.079 --> 00:01:11.040
department by getting enough students to, you

00:01:11.040 --> 00:01:14.099
know, major in that particular academic field

00:01:14.099 --> 00:01:18.040
or to, you know, secure funding from donors or

00:01:18.040 --> 00:01:20.299
from administrators of universities to convince

00:01:20.299 --> 00:01:25.439
them to throw money to that department. And,

00:01:25.480 --> 00:01:27.900
you know, I had to play along with a lot of this.

00:01:27.939 --> 00:01:31.200
You know, anytime there's like a major fair,

00:01:31.400 --> 00:01:33.180
you know, where students are going around and

00:01:33.180 --> 00:01:34.739
asking different departments about the different

00:01:34.739 --> 00:01:37.760
majors, I had a whole spiel that I would have

00:01:37.760 --> 00:01:39.939
ready for students, right? It would go something

00:01:39.939 --> 00:01:42.379
along these lines, right? Philosophy teaches

00:01:42.379 --> 00:01:44.900
you the basic reading, writing, and critical

00:01:44.900 --> 00:01:47.439
thinking skills that you need to be successful

00:01:47.439 --> 00:01:50.560
at any job. And it trains you really well, probably

00:01:50.560 --> 00:01:54.299
better than any other field. The evidence is

00:01:54.299 --> 00:01:58.079
in reports of earnings that students tend to

00:01:58.079 --> 00:02:00.340
make with that particular degree, maybe 10 years,

00:02:00.459 --> 00:02:03.840
15 years after college. You know, I could also

00:02:03.840 --> 00:02:06.640
point to how philosophy majors tend to score

00:02:06.640 --> 00:02:09.240
some of the highest scores on standardized tests

00:02:09.240 --> 00:02:11.240
for professional and graduate schools, particularly

00:02:11.240 --> 00:02:14.020
the LSAT, which a lot of philosophy majors are

00:02:14.020 --> 00:02:16.439
planning on doing is going to law school. So

00:02:16.439 --> 00:02:19.860
they need to take the LSAT. Or the GREs, this

00:02:19.860 --> 00:02:22.219
is for people going to graduate school or for,

00:02:22.400 --> 00:02:26.639
I think they accept it for business schools now,

00:02:26.719 --> 00:02:30.770
the GRE exam, right? I have all these things

00:02:30.770 --> 00:02:33.969
that I could point to as pragmatic reasons to,

00:02:33.969 --> 00:02:37.270
you know, major in philosophy, to convince students

00:02:37.270 --> 00:02:39.490
that it's something worthwhile, that they're

00:02:39.490 --> 00:02:42.490
not going to be a miserable failure and be living

00:02:42.490 --> 00:02:44.289
in their parents' basement playing video games

00:02:44.289 --> 00:02:46.349
for the rest of their life or end up teaching

00:02:46.349 --> 00:02:50.689
at some mediocre, you know, like, you know, school

00:02:50.689 --> 00:02:52.990
somewhere that has nothing to do with philosophy

00:02:52.990 --> 00:02:55.430
and they don't ever make use of anything they

00:02:55.430 --> 00:02:57.349
learn in philosophy classes, right? Like, I'm

00:02:57.349 --> 00:02:59.490
trying to ease a lot of these anxieties that

00:02:59.490 --> 00:03:02.030
people tend to have, even if they might be interested

00:03:02.030 --> 00:03:04.770
in philosophy in terms of the topics that we

00:03:04.770 --> 00:03:07.990
discuss, right? So there's a lot of this selling

00:03:07.990 --> 00:03:10.310
of the major, and this is... Primarily because

00:03:10.310 --> 00:03:12.789
it feels like education has become some kind

00:03:12.789 --> 00:03:17.370
of a commodity. People are looking to get a return

00:03:17.370 --> 00:03:19.469
on their investment. We use a lot of these economic

00:03:19.469 --> 00:03:23.550
terms that has creeped into the educational sector.

00:03:23.889 --> 00:03:25.830
And so you're not going to pay for college, especially

00:03:25.830 --> 00:03:28.330
given how expensive college is nowadays. You

00:03:28.330 --> 00:03:30.250
don't want to pay for college unless you're going

00:03:30.250 --> 00:03:33.629
to get something monetarily out of it, a return

00:03:33.629 --> 00:03:35.629
on your investment. So they want to make sure

00:03:35.629 --> 00:03:38.430
that whatever they major in will help them get

00:03:38.430 --> 00:03:40.759
a job. to get their money's worth, get something

00:03:40.759 --> 00:03:47.719
in return. And this is actually, from my experience,

00:03:47.800 --> 00:03:50.620
not something that most of these instructors

00:03:50.620 --> 00:03:54.960
actually want to do. Most instructors just want

00:03:54.960 --> 00:03:58.800
students to be genuinely interested in whatever

00:03:58.800 --> 00:04:02.419
it is that philosophy explores. And for students

00:04:02.419 --> 00:04:05.360
to value philosophy for its own sake, not as

00:04:05.360 --> 00:04:09.030
some instrumental benefit to their career. Plus,

00:04:09.030 --> 00:04:12.150
I personally feel dirty. This is just the personal

00:04:12.150 --> 00:04:15.409
side. I feel dirty trying to spew out these data

00:04:15.409 --> 00:04:17.709
points on philosophy majors of success and all

00:04:17.709 --> 00:04:19.470
this stuff. The truth is that the discipline

00:04:19.470 --> 00:04:22.470
attracts deep thinkers. So I imagine there's

00:04:22.470 --> 00:04:26.170
a lot of self -selecting going on. So more correlation

00:04:26.170 --> 00:04:28.829
maybe rather than actual causation. It's not

00:04:28.829 --> 00:04:32.730
as if philosophy necessarily produces the most

00:04:32.730 --> 00:04:34.550
intelligent people. I think a lot of people who

00:04:34.550 --> 00:04:38.230
are quite intelligent, who love challenges. love

00:04:38.230 --> 00:04:40.970
to think deeply are just naturally kind of drawn

00:04:40.970 --> 00:04:46.589
to philosophy as a field. It is true that philosophy

00:04:46.589 --> 00:04:48.449
does train you well. I mean, one of the core

00:04:48.449 --> 00:04:50.569
classes we teach in philosophy is critical thinking

00:04:50.569 --> 00:04:54.110
and logic, right? And these two are fundamental

00:04:54.110 --> 00:04:59.990
for any sort of evaluating of arguments or analyzing

00:04:59.990 --> 00:05:04.600
of data, right? I'm not going to try to sell

00:05:04.600 --> 00:05:08.459
you on philosophy as an instrumental value, right?

00:05:08.579 --> 00:05:10.819
I want to do something different. Rather, I want

00:05:10.819 --> 00:05:14.199
to explain how the deeper, more abstract questions

00:05:14.199 --> 00:05:18.100
in philosophy are genuinely relevant to the way

00:05:18.100 --> 00:05:20.939
you view the world and the way that you approach

00:05:20.939 --> 00:05:25.230
real -life decisions. If you thought that philosophy

00:05:25.230 --> 00:05:28.730
just contemplates stuff that you will never actually

00:05:28.730 --> 00:05:33.170
use, that it's just an exercise in abstract thinking

00:05:33.170 --> 00:05:36.170
for the sake of abstract thinking, I want to

00:05:36.170 --> 00:05:38.920
argue that... That kind of perspective of philosophy

00:05:38.920 --> 00:05:42.439
is actually a mistake. So one of my goals in

00:05:42.439 --> 00:05:46.779
this series is to attempt to sway the general

00:05:46.779 --> 00:05:50.160
public in understanding that there's a deep importance

00:05:50.160 --> 00:05:54.180
in engaging with these philosophical questions,

00:05:54.220 --> 00:05:57.819
that it is not a mere abstract exercise. that

00:05:57.819 --> 00:06:01.040
it has real implications for the way that you

00:06:01.040 --> 00:06:04.300
navigate your day -to -day life, the way that

00:06:04.300 --> 00:06:07.160
you view the world, view relationships, the way

00:06:07.160 --> 00:06:10.160
that you view your role in society, the way that

00:06:10.160 --> 00:06:13.540
you just view truth, reality, right? These all

00:06:13.540 --> 00:06:16.300
are shaped by fundamental philosophical questions

00:06:16.300 --> 00:06:18.720
that, I'll be honest with you, I'm assuming that

00:06:18.720 --> 00:06:23.180
most people... have some sort of position. It's

00:06:23.180 --> 00:06:25.899
just that they haven't necessarily grappled with

00:06:25.899 --> 00:06:28.000
it directly. And I think philosophy is one of

00:06:28.000 --> 00:06:30.300
those spaces where you're kind of forced into

00:06:30.300 --> 00:06:35.300
grappling with the deeper questions, whether

00:06:35.300 --> 00:06:39.050
you might have wanted to or not sometimes. It

00:06:39.050 --> 00:06:41.129
could be very difficult and personally challenging.

00:06:41.810 --> 00:06:44.730
But there's also actually a secondary reason

00:06:44.730 --> 00:06:47.449
that I'm starting this series on explaining why

00:06:47.449 --> 00:06:51.350
philosophy matters. And the reason is that it

00:06:51.350 --> 00:06:54.709
has to do with learning, right? People don't

00:06:54.709 --> 00:06:58.069
actually learn anything well unless they see

00:06:58.069 --> 00:06:59.949
the relevance in what they're learning. I mean,

00:06:59.970 --> 00:07:02.089
there's plenty of research in this area about

00:07:02.089 --> 00:07:05.709
what motivates people, when we feel drained while

00:07:05.709 --> 00:07:07.550
we're learning. One of the reasons we might feel

00:07:07.550 --> 00:07:11.050
disconnected from the stuff that we're learning

00:07:11.050 --> 00:07:13.670
is that we don't see its relevance, right? It's

00:07:13.670 --> 00:07:17.750
hard to get excited or to be invested in learning

00:07:17.750 --> 00:07:21.509
something if you can't see that it has some relevance

00:07:21.509 --> 00:07:23.980
to you. And by relevance, I'm not talking about

00:07:23.980 --> 00:07:26.120
pragmatic relevance. I'm not talking about like

00:07:26.120 --> 00:07:28.540
how it'll help me with my job. I mean, that's

00:07:28.540 --> 00:07:30.680
one way to see there's relevance in what you're

00:07:30.680 --> 00:07:33.480
learning. But no, what I mean is something much

00:07:33.480 --> 00:07:36.740
more deeply personal for you, right? Like relevance

00:07:36.740 --> 00:07:41.279
to the things that you already value, not instrumentally,

00:07:41.279 --> 00:07:45.420
but inherently, right? Does this stuff that I'm

00:07:45.420 --> 00:07:49.259
learning matter to me given my own life experience

00:07:49.259 --> 00:07:51.639
given the things that i care about given the

00:07:51.639 --> 00:07:53.459
things that you know really are important to

00:07:53.459 --> 00:07:55.860
me right does it actually does the subject matter

00:07:55.860 --> 00:08:00.379
connect to something in my personal life right

00:08:00.879 --> 00:08:02.800
Which, I mean, this makes perfect sense, right?

00:08:02.860 --> 00:08:04.879
Why care to learn something if you don't see

00:08:04.879 --> 00:08:06.939
any reason for learning it, right? So one of

00:08:06.939 --> 00:08:09.279
the things that I do want to point out in this

00:08:09.279 --> 00:08:11.620
series are the many ways, and again, it's going

00:08:11.620 --> 00:08:13.019
to be different for each person because each

00:08:13.019 --> 00:08:15.319
person has a different set of stuff that they

00:08:15.319 --> 00:08:17.199
really care about, right? What they really value.

00:08:17.579 --> 00:08:20.300
But one of the things that I'm hoping to get

00:08:20.300 --> 00:08:23.379
out of it is to throw, to give students these,

00:08:23.379 --> 00:08:27.660
you know, ways of connecting. what seems to be

00:08:27.660 --> 00:08:31.560
very disconnected, abstract ideas and thoughts

00:08:31.560 --> 00:08:35.080
to something that actually might matter more

00:08:35.080 --> 00:08:37.799
to the students than they might have initially

00:08:37.799 --> 00:08:41.879
thought. So the secondary reason for this series

00:08:41.879 --> 00:08:45.360
is to provide specifically my students and specifically

00:08:45.360 --> 00:08:48.840
in all my introductory courses to give them a

00:08:48.840 --> 00:08:51.519
way of connecting with the material in a much

00:08:51.519 --> 00:08:55.639
more personal way. In a way that, you know, directly

00:08:55.639 --> 00:08:58.700
addresses some of the concerns, some of the decisions,

00:08:58.840 --> 00:09:01.720
some of the topics that matter in their day to

00:09:01.720 --> 00:09:05.299
day life. The hope is a show that through philosophical

00:09:05.299 --> 00:09:11.259
inquiries that we are. In the background, there's

00:09:11.259 --> 00:09:14.460
so much that is actually shaping the way that

00:09:14.460 --> 00:09:16.419
we make sense of the world and the way we engage

00:09:16.419 --> 00:09:19.039
with others and the way we make decisions. And

00:09:19.039 --> 00:09:22.200
as we make these connections a little bit clearer,

00:09:22.460 --> 00:09:26.759
then I hope that students find something much

00:09:26.759 --> 00:09:32.860
more meaningful in what it is that they're actually

00:09:32.860 --> 00:09:35.970
studying. Right. Whether it's like some of these

00:09:35.970 --> 00:09:38.649
old thinkers that you might think are from generations

00:09:38.649 --> 00:09:41.090
ago who don't understand what's going on today

00:09:41.090 --> 00:09:44.269
or like all the random stuff that we tend to

00:09:44.269 --> 00:09:46.190
throw out there as reading requirements for a

00:09:46.190 --> 00:09:49.409
philosophy course. I hope that students can make

00:09:49.409 --> 00:09:52.940
those connections in part. in the hopes that

00:09:52.940 --> 00:09:55.860
they actually end up being more motivated to

00:09:55.860 --> 00:09:58.840
learn, but also, as a result, learn much more

00:09:58.840 --> 00:10:02.120
effectively and produce much better results,

00:10:02.340 --> 00:10:05.820
both in terms of outcomes of whatever testing

00:10:05.820 --> 00:10:08.700
method there is, but also just in terms of what

00:10:08.700 --> 00:10:13.340
they carry with them moving forward. So for my

00:10:13.340 --> 00:10:15.240
students who are having difficulty with philosophy,

00:10:15.440 --> 00:10:18.299
with the readings, who are feeling disconnected

00:10:18.299 --> 00:10:21.039
from it, This might be a good place to start.

00:10:22.740 --> 00:10:25.659
Let's consider exactly how the bigger questions

00:10:25.659 --> 00:10:29.279
that we are trying to answer in these courses,

00:10:29.379 --> 00:10:32.039
how it's connected to something a bit more personal

00:10:32.039 --> 00:10:35.080
to you. And you'll find that the material becomes

00:10:35.080 --> 00:10:37.879
much easier to digest, much easier to understand,

00:10:38.240 --> 00:10:41.600
and that you'll find yourself a lot less disinterested

00:10:41.600 --> 00:10:46.399
when you understand these connections. In that

00:10:46.399 --> 00:10:49.419
respect, I hope that you gain something truly

00:10:49.419 --> 00:10:54.840
valuable from my introduction, my selling of

00:10:54.840 --> 00:10:56.379
why philosophy matters.
