WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.259
people think i don't love session but this is

00:00:02.259 --> 00:00:09.240
actually me happy rage is my happy place does

00:00:09.240 --> 00:00:14.039
that make me weird welcome to county connection

00:00:14.599 --> 00:00:16.460
the official podcast of the Washington State

00:00:16.460 --> 00:00:18.879
Association of Counties, where we dive into the

00:00:18.879 --> 00:00:20.859
legislative issues shaping the future of our

00:00:20.859 --> 00:00:23.739
communities. From budgets to public safety, infrastructure

00:00:23.739 --> 00:00:26.660
to elections, we'll break down what's happening

00:00:26.660 --> 00:00:29.440
in Olympia and how it impacts counties from across

00:00:29.440 --> 00:00:32.579
the Evergreen State. Stay informed, stay engaged,

00:00:32.679 --> 00:00:35.520
and join us as we amplify the voice of Washington's

00:00:35.520 --> 00:00:39.820
39 counties. Welcome back, everybody, to the

00:00:39.820 --> 00:00:43.329
County Connection podcast, the number one. county

00:00:43.329 --> 00:00:46.070
-related podcast in Washington state. I don't

00:00:46.070 --> 00:00:47.549
know if that's true, but we're going with it.

00:00:47.750 --> 00:00:49.710
This is the official podcast of the Washington

00:00:49.710 --> 00:00:51.409
State Association of Counties. I'm your host,

00:00:51.509 --> 00:00:53.390
Paul Jewell, and government relations director

00:00:53.390 --> 00:00:57.689
for the association. We are right at the end

00:00:57.689 --> 00:01:00.469
of the third week of session. Kelsey's back.

00:01:01.289 --> 00:01:03.509
Good to see you, Kelsey. It's kind of a dreary

00:01:03.509 --> 00:01:06.590
gray day out there, but it's bright and sunny

00:01:06.590 --> 00:01:08.950
here in the studio. Of course it is. I'm happy

00:01:08.950 --> 00:01:11.530
to be here, Paul. You bet, yeah. It wouldn't

00:01:11.530 --> 00:01:14.390
be any other way unless it were you, of course.

00:01:14.549 --> 00:01:16.430
So I don't know what that means. I think you

00:01:16.430 --> 00:01:18.930
got that backwards, but... Yeah, it doesn't matter.

00:01:19.069 --> 00:01:24.849
Let's just plow forward, shall we? And by plow

00:01:24.849 --> 00:01:28.430
forward, I mean work. That was a little Easter

00:01:28.430 --> 00:01:30.609
egg into what we're going to talk about today.

00:01:31.409 --> 00:01:35.170
So what is it? Well, we're here to talk about

00:01:35.170 --> 00:01:38.569
agritourism. Agritourism. How do you spell that?

00:01:38.950 --> 00:01:43.989
A -G -R -I -T -O -U -R -I -S -M. So agriculture,

00:01:44.329 --> 00:01:47.810
it's a portmanteau of agriculture and tourism.

00:01:47.950 --> 00:01:50.689
Squish them together. Portmanteau. I haven't

00:01:50.689 --> 00:01:52.890
heard that in a long time. You're welcome. Yeah.

00:01:53.709 --> 00:01:57.670
I'd like to take a poll of our listeners to see

00:01:57.670 --> 00:01:59.890
how many have actually ever heard that term in

00:01:59.890 --> 00:02:03.370
their entire life. I think you wildly underestimate

00:02:03.370 --> 00:02:07.269
our listeners. Maybe so. Maybe so. Listeners,

00:02:07.269 --> 00:02:10.030
you can take that up with Paul. Yeah. Well, we'll

00:02:10.030 --> 00:02:12.830
try to get that poll online. Probably not. So

00:02:12.830 --> 00:02:16.949
agritourism. Yes, sir. You said it was the combination.

00:02:17.710 --> 00:02:21.389
of the two words coming together. So I assume

00:02:21.389 --> 00:02:23.370
people are going out to farms and they're doing

00:02:23.370 --> 00:02:26.370
stuff. Part of the challenge around this, and

00:02:26.370 --> 00:02:29.250
we've seen a lot of conversation and a lot of

00:02:29.250 --> 00:02:35.110
legislative ideas and attempts to regulate, constrain,

00:02:35.110 --> 00:02:38.550
or enable different types of agritourism. And

00:02:38.550 --> 00:02:40.090
part of the challenge in all of that is that

00:02:40.090 --> 00:02:43.150
agritourism is a very broad term. So it could

00:02:43.150 --> 00:02:46.080
include pretty much... Any use of agricultural

00:02:46.080 --> 00:02:50.280
land that isn't farming or growing an agricultural

00:02:50.280 --> 00:02:53.759
product. But it's supposed to be in the spirit

00:02:53.759 --> 00:02:56.810
of agritourism. It's a use that isn't exactly

00:02:56.810 --> 00:02:59.110
farming, but it's supposed to be a use that supports

00:02:59.110 --> 00:03:01.449
continued agricultural use of the land. So it's

00:03:01.449 --> 00:03:05.650
supportive of the traditional farming and whether

00:03:05.650 --> 00:03:09.189
that's livestock farming or crop farming or whatever

00:03:09.189 --> 00:03:12.349
it may be. Farming adjacent. So give us some

00:03:12.349 --> 00:03:14.629
examples of what an agritourism type facility

00:03:14.629 --> 00:03:19.189
might be. So we've heard stories from members

00:03:19.189 --> 00:03:21.250
and others around the legislature of everything

00:03:21.250 --> 00:03:26.819
from roadhouse -style, quote -unquote, tasting

00:03:26.819 --> 00:03:28.979
rooms that are at the end of the county road,

00:03:29.240 --> 00:03:33.280
but things like tasting rooms at a winery or

00:03:33.280 --> 00:03:38.479
corn mazes or pumpkin patches or farm stands.

00:03:39.460 --> 00:03:43.719
Oh, gosh. By farm stand, you mean like a fruit

00:03:43.719 --> 00:03:45.939
stand or a vegetable stand? Fruits, vegetables,

00:03:46.060 --> 00:03:49.560
sometimes value -added products. Jams, jellies,

00:03:49.560 --> 00:03:52.300
maybe honey. Maybe even livestock products. Livestock

00:03:52.300 --> 00:03:54.860
products, right? So you've got your beef sticks

00:03:54.860 --> 00:03:57.020
and your teriyaki and your... Cheese and your

00:03:57.020 --> 00:04:00.379
milk. Exactly. Your soap and all those sorts

00:04:00.379 --> 00:04:01.599
of things. Yep, your goat milk soap and all that

00:04:01.599 --> 00:04:03.719
kind of good stuff. It also includes things like

00:04:03.719 --> 00:04:08.319
petting zoo style, come and hang out with the

00:04:08.319 --> 00:04:13.280
animals, goat yoga. Goat yoga, that's not my

00:04:13.280 --> 00:04:16.829
favorite. I actually really enjoy yoga and really

00:04:16.829 --> 00:04:19.209
enjoy goats, but I do not enjoy goat yoga. So

00:04:19.209 --> 00:04:21.069
I'm with you on that. The combination together.

00:04:21.189 --> 00:04:23.129
I prefer them separate. Have you actually tried

00:04:23.129 --> 00:04:30.509
goat yoga? No, because I know goats. So goats,

00:04:30.670 --> 00:04:34.449
you know I'm going to go there, right? So by

00:04:34.449 --> 00:04:37.610
you saying, I know goats, what you're saying

00:04:37.610 --> 00:04:44.110
is they're not particularly, shall we say, particular

00:04:44.110 --> 00:04:47.810
about where they might drop certain things that

00:04:47.810 --> 00:04:52.389
come from their bodies. I think you mean their

00:04:52.389 --> 00:04:56.009
butts, but that actually wasn't even my concern,

00:04:56.129 --> 00:04:58.149
but I appreciate you going there immediately.

00:04:58.370 --> 00:05:00.410
My thought was just that goats aren't particularly

00:05:00.410 --> 00:05:05.930
focused, meditative, athletic, organized. So

00:05:05.930 --> 00:05:08.089
when you put them in the middle of a yoga class,

00:05:08.350 --> 00:05:10.769
they cause chaos, right? And especially because

00:05:10.769 --> 00:05:12.689
usually... when we're talking about goat yoga,

00:05:12.750 --> 00:05:14.490
we're talking about baby goats, right? Like cute

00:05:14.490 --> 00:05:16.149
little goats that people want to hang out with

00:05:16.149 --> 00:05:18.930
and cuddle, but they're still going to, you know,

00:05:18.949 --> 00:05:20.230
they're going to run into you. They're going

00:05:20.230 --> 00:05:22.170
to climb on you. They're going to nibble on your

00:05:22.170 --> 00:05:24.810
hair or your clothes or whatever. So it's just,

00:05:24.850 --> 00:05:27.649
it's not my cup of tea. Okay. I feel like we

00:05:27.649 --> 00:05:29.389
could talk about that for a while, but we probably

00:05:29.389 --> 00:05:32.569
shouldn't. So let's keep going on agritourism.

00:05:32.589 --> 00:05:35.050
But if anybody's interested in a goat yoga class

00:05:35.050 --> 00:05:36.870
in Olympia, I'm happy to refer you. So please

00:05:36.870 --> 00:05:38.850
feel free to reach out. Yeah. Reach out directly

00:05:38.850 --> 00:05:42.240
to Kelsey for goat yoga. Back to agritourism.

00:05:46.220 --> 00:05:48.899
It could be a lot of different things. Yes. Because

00:05:48.899 --> 00:05:51.560
farms are varied. What happens in kind of rural

00:05:51.560 --> 00:05:54.699
areas are varied. You could have a cidery, for

00:05:54.699 --> 00:05:57.000
instance, where you've got an orchard and, you

00:05:57.000 --> 00:05:59.379
know, they're making cider from the apples themselves,

00:05:59.600 --> 00:06:02.379
some kind of either hard cider or just regular

00:06:02.379 --> 00:06:04.480
cider, and they might want to open a tasting

00:06:04.480 --> 00:06:06.540
room. Same thing could be for a winery that's

00:06:06.540 --> 00:06:09.600
got a vineyard. Same thing could be for a hop

00:06:09.600 --> 00:06:12.600
farm that maybe wants to make their own beer,

00:06:12.759 --> 00:06:18.550
for instance. Or a petting zoo type of operation

00:06:18.550 --> 00:06:21.850
with farm animals. You know, a farm stand we've

00:06:21.850 --> 00:06:26.329
kind of mentioned. I know there are also like

00:06:26.329 --> 00:06:29.610
barn dance kind of facilities out there. There

00:06:29.610 --> 00:06:34.750
are farm to table hosted dinners. Wedding venues,

00:06:34.949 --> 00:06:37.470
event venues. Yeah, different things like that.

00:06:38.670 --> 00:06:41.430
How do we know which of these are actually agritourism

00:06:41.430 --> 00:06:45.290
and which ones are really just a repurposing

00:06:45.290 --> 00:06:50.009
of the land for another use? Therein lies the

00:06:50.009 --> 00:06:53.829
complication. Okay. Creating a set framework

00:06:53.829 --> 00:06:58.610
around – from how you define agritourism to what

00:06:58.610 --> 00:07:02.009
is necessary to enable that to coexist with agriculture

00:07:02.009 --> 00:07:05.310
on the same – potentially the same landscape.

00:07:05.449 --> 00:07:08.319
Right. That's really where it becomes complicated.

00:07:09.180 --> 00:07:13.339
Everything from issues of noise and dust and,

00:07:13.360 --> 00:07:15.399
you know, kind of the normal stuff that comes

00:07:15.399 --> 00:07:17.660
along with operating equipment in an agricultural

00:07:17.660 --> 00:07:21.379
setting or on a, you know, for an agricultural

00:07:21.379 --> 00:07:25.680
purpose to things like, are there appropriate...

00:07:27.850 --> 00:07:30.009
sanitation facilities? Yeah, for public health

00:07:30.009 --> 00:07:32.470
concerns. Exactly. Is there sufficient parking?

00:07:32.670 --> 00:07:34.230
So if you're going to open up your venue for,

00:07:34.290 --> 00:07:36.529
you know, say crowd to people, do you have all

00:07:36.529 --> 00:07:38.189
these other things taken care of and addressed

00:07:38.189 --> 00:07:40.170
like you would in any other commercial operation?

00:07:40.750 --> 00:07:43.569
Correct. If you have some, if your agritourism

00:07:43.569 --> 00:07:45.949
business is something where large numbers of

00:07:45.949 --> 00:07:47.910
people are coming. especially if they're staying

00:07:47.910 --> 00:07:50.170
for quite a while, you're going to need a different

00:07:50.170 --> 00:07:52.350
level of infrastructure and different types of

00:07:52.350 --> 00:07:54.310
things in place to enable that than you might

00:07:54.310 --> 00:07:57.790
for, say, the farm stand we talked about before,

00:07:57.889 --> 00:07:59.389
where somebody is just swinging through to pick

00:07:59.389 --> 00:08:02.410
up some vegetables and a quart of cider or something.

00:08:02.750 --> 00:08:04.850
And that's, again, going to be different from

00:08:04.850 --> 00:08:07.730
what you might need to enable a pumpkin patch

00:08:07.730 --> 00:08:09.850
and corn maze in the fall or something like that.

00:08:10.060 --> 00:08:12.019
So it strikes me that when we're talking about

00:08:12.019 --> 00:08:13.519
rural lands, we're talking about agricultural

00:08:13.519 --> 00:08:16.720
lands, and we're thinking about maybe the scope

00:08:16.720 --> 00:08:19.019
and breadth of what an agritourism operation

00:08:19.019 --> 00:08:22.779
could or could not be. You know, it could be

00:08:22.779 --> 00:08:26.579
something very small, right, and has very little

00:08:26.579 --> 00:08:29.259
impact like a farm stand. Or it could be something

00:08:29.259 --> 00:08:31.600
that has a lot of impact where you need to consider

00:08:31.600 --> 00:08:34.039
everything from, like we were talking about,

00:08:34.139 --> 00:08:37.059
kind of public safety and public health to traffic

00:08:37.059 --> 00:08:39.139
impacts. You know, rural roads are not built

00:08:39.139 --> 00:08:42.559
to house large commercial activities. They're

00:08:42.559 --> 00:08:45.379
not built for a lot of average daily traffic.

00:08:45.799 --> 00:08:49.019
They are built to move products to market and

00:08:49.019 --> 00:08:51.019
equipment from field to field. And how does that

00:08:51.019 --> 00:08:54.259
get? You know, how can that be compatible with

00:08:54.259 --> 00:08:57.080
some sort of an event center, for instance? It

00:08:57.080 --> 00:09:00.019
also strikes me that farms are not necessarily

00:09:00.019 --> 00:09:05.320
designed to be accessible to the population,

00:09:05.519 --> 00:09:09.600
right? Whether you're able -bodied or not, there

00:09:09.600 --> 00:09:11.539
could be some challenges there. And not only

00:09:11.539 --> 00:09:14.679
that, but, you know, most of the farms that I've

00:09:14.679 --> 00:09:18.320
been to, when you think about kind of how they're

00:09:18.320 --> 00:09:20.629
laid out and how the operations work, There's

00:09:20.629 --> 00:09:24.250
a lot of risks out there. Farming is not a safe

00:09:24.250 --> 00:09:29.070
activity, right? There are injuries on the farm

00:09:29.070 --> 00:09:32.590
all the time, either from equipment or from livestock

00:09:32.590 --> 00:09:36.350
or from... you know, any other multitude of hazards

00:09:36.350 --> 00:09:38.289
that are out there. You know, if you think about

00:09:38.289 --> 00:09:40.210
the fencing materials that they use, right? Think

00:09:40.210 --> 00:09:42.470
about the irrigation pipes that could be laying

00:09:42.470 --> 00:09:44.990
around. Think about the fact that almost every

00:09:44.990 --> 00:09:47.049
farm that I've ever been to that's at least a

00:09:47.049 --> 00:09:48.830
legacy farm that's been around for a while has

00:09:48.830 --> 00:09:52.350
a boneyard of old equipment and parts that they

00:09:52.350 --> 00:09:55.149
keep on hand just in case, you know, something

00:09:55.149 --> 00:09:57.129
breaks down and they need to salvage, right?

00:09:57.350 --> 00:09:59.409
I mean, there's just many, many, many, many things

00:09:59.409 --> 00:10:02.029
out there that... people could trip over, fall

00:10:02.029 --> 00:10:07.070
into, get cut by, get run over by, etc. And there's

00:10:07.070 --> 00:10:08.909
a lot of consideration that needs to be made

00:10:08.909 --> 00:10:12.929
if you're thinking about bringing an agritourism

00:10:12.929 --> 00:10:15.269
type operation to that sort of environment as

00:10:15.269 --> 00:10:18.330
well. Correct. Yeah. So what's the legislature?

00:10:18.450 --> 00:10:20.450
You mentioned that there's been some attempts

00:10:20.450 --> 00:10:26.009
by the legislature to look into this. What are

00:10:26.009 --> 00:10:28.830
they trying to do? Are they trying to regulate

00:10:28.830 --> 00:10:30.870
it? Are they trying to allow it? Are they trying

00:10:30.870 --> 00:10:34.570
to, I don't know. What are some of the bills,

00:10:34.629 --> 00:10:36.110
what are some of the proposals that they've got

00:10:36.110 --> 00:10:38.370
in front of us? Well, I'd say the answer to whether

00:10:38.370 --> 00:10:40.690
they're trying to regulate or allow it is yes.

00:10:41.230 --> 00:10:44.990
Oh, yes to both. Yes. So you've got bills that

00:10:44.990 --> 00:10:48.929
are trying to maybe stop certain things? Yes.

00:10:49.110 --> 00:10:52.210
And you have bills that are trying to allow certain

00:10:52.210 --> 00:10:57.559
things. Correct. For example, one of the threads

00:10:57.559 --> 00:11:04.440
that is always part of this conversation is what

00:11:04.440 --> 00:11:08.080
is an appropriate way to support farmers in staying

00:11:08.080 --> 00:11:10.500
on farms? We know that that is a challenge in

00:11:10.500 --> 00:11:12.860
Washington and everywhere else. We want to see

00:11:12.860 --> 00:11:16.460
farmers be able to stay on their land. In some

00:11:16.460 --> 00:11:19.139
cases, that is going to require them having supplemental

00:11:19.139 --> 00:11:22.519
sources of income to perhaps whatever. you know,

00:11:22.519 --> 00:11:24.860
typical agricultural use they have had on the

00:11:24.860 --> 00:11:27.759
farm. Creating those options and opportunities

00:11:27.759 --> 00:11:31.019
for them can be really helpful in terms of keeping

00:11:31.019 --> 00:11:33.440
them on their land. So from that perspective,

00:11:33.759 --> 00:11:36.919
legislators, especially in more rural communities,

00:11:37.059 --> 00:11:39.360
are trying to enable those uses, right, to find

00:11:39.360 --> 00:11:41.500
ways to support their farming communities and

00:11:41.500 --> 00:11:44.080
staying on their land. On the other side of the

00:11:44.080 --> 00:11:49.039
balance sheet are the litany of challenges and

00:11:49.039 --> 00:11:51.000
issues that we've kind of talked through, whether

00:11:51.000 --> 00:11:54.019
it's parking or infrastructure or neighbor complaints,

00:11:54.360 --> 00:11:59.039
noise, dust, all the things that can be a challenge

00:11:59.039 --> 00:12:03.960
and may require regulation are kind of what we

00:12:03.960 --> 00:12:06.440
see as balancing out the conversation of how

00:12:06.440 --> 00:12:08.919
do we create opportunities for those farmers,

00:12:09.039 --> 00:12:11.679
but how do we do it in a way that keeps communities

00:12:11.679 --> 00:12:18.200
safe and Minimizes conflicts between those two

00:12:18.200 --> 00:12:22.360
uses. Do we have any idea? I think two questions

00:12:22.360 --> 00:12:25.440
pop into mind right off the bat as you were talking.

00:12:25.759 --> 00:12:29.639
Do we have any idea how many agricultural producers,

00:12:29.799 --> 00:12:32.500
farmers are interested in pursuing some level

00:12:32.500 --> 00:12:37.019
of agritourism to supplement their income or

00:12:37.019 --> 00:12:40.159
transition some of their facilities? Do we have

00:12:40.159 --> 00:12:43.580
any idea at all? I don't have a number for you,

00:12:43.620 --> 00:12:47.639
but my sense is a lot, both just in what I've

00:12:47.639 --> 00:12:50.519
seen here in the local community and how farmers

00:12:50.519 --> 00:12:52.940
operate here in Thurston County and what we're

00:12:52.940 --> 00:12:54.840
hearing in testimony and what we're hearing from

00:12:54.840 --> 00:12:59.820
legislators across the board is that farmers

00:12:59.820 --> 00:13:04.889
are looking for more options. We are interested

00:13:04.889 --> 00:13:06.950
in helping them do that, but again, want to do

00:13:06.950 --> 00:13:09.230
it in a way that's going to be safe and reasonable,

00:13:09.389 --> 00:13:11.750
can be planned for, and that we can make sure

00:13:11.750 --> 00:13:13.590
the infrastructure is in place to support not

00:13:13.590 --> 00:13:15.129
just the farmers, but the communities around

00:13:15.129 --> 00:13:17.250
them. There's been a trend in the agricultural

00:13:17.250 --> 00:13:20.950
industry over the last several decades where,

00:13:21.049 --> 00:13:22.669
you know, the smaller farmers kind of getting

00:13:22.669 --> 00:13:26.509
squeezed and the really big operations are continuing

00:13:26.509 --> 00:13:28.490
to get bigger and bigger and bigger. These are

00:13:28.490 --> 00:13:30.490
the big commodity operations. You know, if you

00:13:30.490 --> 00:13:34.070
think about the giant fields of corn or the giant

00:13:34.070 --> 00:13:36.309
fields of wheat or whatever like that, oftentimes

00:13:36.309 --> 00:13:41.149
it's fewer farmers and bigger corporations having

00:13:41.149 --> 00:13:43.669
bigger chunks of land, and there's a lot less

00:13:43.669 --> 00:13:46.009
of the smaller kind of farmer out there that

00:13:46.009 --> 00:13:49.909
used to be the norm, right? I was talking to

00:13:49.909 --> 00:13:52.690
a dairy farmer just a couple of years ago, and

00:13:52.690 --> 00:13:54.210
he was talking about in the area there used to

00:13:54.210 --> 00:13:56.409
be, I think, like 16. dairies and now there's

00:13:56.409 --> 00:13:59.970
six they're producing actually more milk uh than

00:13:59.970 --> 00:14:02.809
the 16 were before yes as far as total volume

00:14:02.809 --> 00:14:04.809
but that must make it really hard for the smaller

00:14:04.809 --> 00:14:06.929
farmer is it is it really kind of smaller ones

00:14:06.929 --> 00:14:09.629
that are uh the more specialized or boutique

00:14:09.629 --> 00:14:11.629
ones that are looking at this option more so

00:14:11.629 --> 00:14:14.460
than the bigger corporate outfits That feels

00:14:14.460 --> 00:14:16.860
like a bit of a leading question, Paul, but I

00:14:16.860 --> 00:14:18.980
think, yes, you're seeing it a lot from the small

00:14:18.980 --> 00:14:21.139
ones and the mid -sized farmers, right? So perhaps

00:14:21.139 --> 00:14:24.419
not Dairy Gold, for example, although even Dairy

00:14:24.419 --> 00:14:26.299
Gold is a consortium, we could get into that.

00:14:26.440 --> 00:14:31.539
Sure. But I think farms of all sizes are looking

00:14:31.539 --> 00:14:36.860
for additional revenue streams. So my next question

00:14:36.860 --> 00:14:38.879
then that I was thinking about when you were

00:14:38.879 --> 00:14:43.360
describing all of that was we kind of talked

00:14:43.360 --> 00:14:46.220
about, this wide range of what agritourism could

00:14:46.220 --> 00:14:49.379
be? Has anybody really tried to define exactly

00:14:49.379 --> 00:14:51.919
what it is? So for instance, you know, from say

00:14:51.919 --> 00:14:57.340
pumpkin patches to event venues, is there a wide

00:14:57.340 --> 00:15:00.220
agreement that all of that, if it's on a farm,

00:15:00.259 --> 00:15:03.419
is agritourism or is there a disagreement? Hard

00:15:03.419 --> 00:15:06.139
question to answer because I think the understanding

00:15:06.139 --> 00:15:09.019
seems to be that there are a wide variety of

00:15:09.019 --> 00:15:12.529
uses. Once you get out to the margins. of how

00:15:12.529 --> 00:15:17.110
big, how many people, is it something that operates

00:15:17.110 --> 00:15:19.429
all year long, or is it seasonal, or those kinds

00:15:19.429 --> 00:15:21.610
of questions, I'd say there is debate about what

00:15:21.610 --> 00:15:25.269
is appropriate and what is not appropriate under

00:15:25.269 --> 00:15:28.990
that definition of agritourism. So that's part

00:15:28.990 --> 00:15:32.129
of the conversation that we are very much committed

00:15:32.129 --> 00:15:35.070
to remaining a part of as we've seen bills move

00:15:35.070 --> 00:15:36.769
through the legislature that are trying to get

00:15:36.769 --> 00:15:39.730
at different pieces of this, but without necessarily

00:15:39.730 --> 00:15:43.909
setting a framework that could be used statewide

00:15:43.909 --> 00:15:47.190
to understand what are the different needs of

00:15:47.190 --> 00:15:49.450
these different types of businesses? Do we treat

00:15:49.450 --> 00:15:51.929
businesses, agribusinesses of different sizes

00:15:51.929 --> 00:15:54.750
differently? And if so, what does that mean?

00:15:54.909 --> 00:15:57.250
What does it look like? How do we do that in

00:15:57.250 --> 00:16:00.190
a way that is fair to those producers? But it

00:16:00.190 --> 00:16:02.970
sounds like it's not well defined anywhere in

00:16:02.970 --> 00:16:07.019
the law. Correct. Okay. So that just by itself

00:16:07.019 --> 00:16:10.340
kind of creates a lot of gray area that's just

00:16:10.340 --> 00:16:12.360
going to be inviting for all kinds of different

00:16:12.360 --> 00:16:16.480
proposals. Exactly. Okay. So in 2025, we saw

00:16:16.480 --> 00:16:19.360
a couple of different proposals. Some of them

00:16:19.360 --> 00:16:22.070
are focused on agritourism. at least labeled

00:16:22.070 --> 00:16:24.250
as agritourism. We also see things that poke

00:16:24.250 --> 00:16:27.029
at incidental uses on agricultural land. Yeah,

00:16:27.049 --> 00:16:28.909
I remember some of those bills. Which gets at

00:16:28.909 --> 00:16:32.070
the same idea, but is just sort of a different

00:16:32.070 --> 00:16:36.690
way in. So in 2025, Senator Warnick was very

00:16:36.690 --> 00:16:38.610
involved in that conversation. She had a bill

00:16:38.610 --> 00:16:42.250
that was called Promoting Agritourism. We also

00:16:42.250 --> 00:16:46.490
saw Senator Leis bring in a bill about open space

00:16:46.490 --> 00:16:49.149
incidental use, which again was... kind of a

00:16:49.149 --> 00:16:51.929
different way of poking at some of these same...

00:16:51.929 --> 00:16:54.049
Yeah, from a tax classification point of view.

00:16:54.169 --> 00:16:57.710
Issues and problems. Yeah. This year in 20...

00:16:57.710 --> 00:17:00.549
So that's sort of where this conversation has

00:17:00.549 --> 00:17:03.629
been during this biennial cycle. This year in

00:17:03.629 --> 00:17:06.789
2026, there's a couple of bills that I just wanted

00:17:06.789 --> 00:17:09.890
to highlight for folks. One is not specifically

00:17:09.890 --> 00:17:13.490
an agritourism bill, but Senator Mazzal, who

00:17:13.490 --> 00:17:18.109
himself is a farmer and is one of very few active...

00:17:19.529 --> 00:17:21.450
farmers that are in the legislature. I think

00:17:21.450 --> 00:17:24.589
we've got three, if I'm remembering correctly.

00:17:24.890 --> 00:17:27.170
I don't know for sure. So it's not many, right?

00:17:27.250 --> 00:17:30.089
We don't have a lot of legislators who, when

00:17:30.089 --> 00:17:32.549
they leave Olympia, are driving back to the farm

00:17:32.549 --> 00:17:35.269
and continuing to try and produce agricultural

00:17:35.269 --> 00:17:39.450
products. Senator Mazzal has a lot of credibility

00:17:39.450 --> 00:17:42.390
in this space for exactly that reason. He has

00:17:42.390 --> 00:17:45.509
put forth a bill, Senate Bill 6104, which is

00:17:45.509 --> 00:17:48.509
called Supporting Agriculture. And what it is

00:17:48.509 --> 00:17:53.470
doing is trying to require essentially agricultural

00:17:53.470 --> 00:17:57.730
impact statements when... agricultural land is

00:17:57.730 --> 00:18:00.329
pulled out of agricultural use for one reason

00:18:00.329 --> 00:18:02.430
or another, whether land is transferring hands

00:18:02.430 --> 00:18:05.529
or somebody is going to develop a parcel of it.

00:18:05.609 --> 00:18:08.250
So he's got that's not the only thing the bill

00:18:08.250 --> 00:18:10.950
does, but his bill is interesting to me into

00:18:10.950 --> 00:18:14.349
this conversation because what he is doing there

00:18:14.349 --> 00:18:19.430
is saying, let's keep closer track of where how

00:18:19.430 --> 00:18:22.630
agricultural land is being used. where it is

00:18:22.630 --> 00:18:28.089
being lost and what we can do to, to beneficially

00:18:28.089 --> 00:18:30.710
impact that situation. Does he define what an

00:18:30.710 --> 00:18:33.210
agricultural impact statement is and what he's

00:18:33.210 --> 00:18:35.490
trying to actually, I mean, besides, you know,

00:18:35.509 --> 00:18:37.990
what you said, it sounds like he's trying to

00:18:37.990 --> 00:18:40.650
just kind of better understand how things are

00:18:40.650 --> 00:18:43.009
changing maybe in the landscape, but does, does

00:18:43.009 --> 00:18:46.509
he kind of define exactly what needs to be in

00:18:46.509 --> 00:18:48.670
that and who's responsible for putting it together?

00:18:50.000 --> 00:18:54.579
He does. He defines the agricultural impact statement

00:18:54.579 --> 00:18:58.319
fairly closely, which I'm not going to read to

00:18:58.319 --> 00:19:02.079
folks, but they are welcome to check out. And

00:19:02.079 --> 00:19:05.539
then the agricultural impact statement would

00:19:05.539 --> 00:19:09.079
be done by the jurisdiction. So the county or

00:19:09.079 --> 00:19:12.519
the city? Correct. Okay. I think it's fair to

00:19:12.519 --> 00:19:14.380
assume most times it would be the county itself.

00:19:15.450 --> 00:19:17.170
because there's not going to be a lot of farmland

00:19:17.170 --> 00:19:18.589
in cities. Not a ton of city farms. There's a

00:19:18.589 --> 00:19:22.170
few out there, but right, not very many. So if

00:19:22.170 --> 00:19:27.130
the land is converted to another use, it would

00:19:27.130 --> 00:19:29.369
probably be through some sort of platting process.

00:19:30.109 --> 00:19:33.609
So I assume a county or city could require that

00:19:33.609 --> 00:19:35.670
as part of their application that that analysis

00:19:35.670 --> 00:19:38.609
was performed. So that way it wouldn't necessarily

00:19:38.609 --> 00:19:41.349
fall on the backs of the taxpayers to actually

00:19:41.349 --> 00:19:43.589
do it, but whoever is proposing the development.

00:19:44.139 --> 00:19:48.700
Okay. Interesting. That was Senate Bill... 6104.

00:19:48.900 --> 00:19:50.920
Okay. And I think there's a few others, right?

00:19:51.059 --> 00:19:52.720
There's one other one that I really wanted to

00:19:52.720 --> 00:19:57.859
talk about today, which is House Bill 2129, fortifying

00:19:57.859 --> 00:20:01.400
agritourism. That is one that... Fortifying.

00:20:01.880 --> 00:20:04.059
Fortifying. That's a strong word. It is a strong

00:20:04.059 --> 00:20:08.779
word. And that bill was brought by our friend,

00:20:08.880 --> 00:20:11.910
Representative Lowe, and... We appreciate his

00:20:11.910 --> 00:20:13.789
work on that issue, of course, and appreciate

00:20:13.789 --> 00:20:17.549
that he is doing some good work on behalf of

00:20:17.549 --> 00:20:21.349
his constituents. Representative Lowe, of course,

00:20:21.390 --> 00:20:23.849
is a council member from Snohomish County. Exactly.

00:20:23.849 --> 00:20:26.170
So he's near and dear to the county's family,

00:20:26.269 --> 00:20:28.930
and we always appreciate his work. We testified

00:20:28.930 --> 00:20:33.130
other on that bill and shared. Essentially, the

00:20:33.130 --> 00:20:35.009
conversation that we've been having here that

00:20:35.009 --> 00:20:39.690
we do think that there is a need to have some

00:20:39.690 --> 00:20:42.430
clear definitions and cleaner definitions, some

00:20:42.430 --> 00:20:45.250
clear expectations for what businesses of different

00:20:45.250 --> 00:20:48.289
sizes are going to be expected to do to mitigate

00:20:48.289 --> 00:20:51.150
impacts on the surrounding communities, for example.

00:20:52.150 --> 00:20:55.049
But that we need that conversation to move forward.

00:20:55.970 --> 00:20:58.750
Representative Lowe's bill, very well intentioned,

00:20:58.750 --> 00:21:02.640
but would sort of. open things up even more to

00:21:02.640 --> 00:21:05.500
permit more of these or to allow more of these

00:21:05.500 --> 00:21:07.519
businesses to exist. And we have some concerns

00:21:07.519 --> 00:21:11.200
about what that would look like, especially absent

00:21:11.200 --> 00:21:15.200
those guardrails and framework and specific definition

00:21:15.200 --> 00:21:18.180
that we discussed. Why did he title it Fortifying

00:21:18.180 --> 00:21:22.440
Agritourism? I don't know. I think he titled

00:21:22.440 --> 00:21:24.680
it that way because he's trying to make a strong

00:21:24.680 --> 00:21:27.099
statement. And that's strong language to say,

00:21:27.180 --> 00:21:30.220
we need to do something to support farmers and

00:21:30.220 --> 00:21:33.140
producers. We are not doing that right now. And

00:21:33.140 --> 00:21:34.920
we need to take action. And I think that's what

00:21:34.920 --> 00:21:37.420
he's trying to spawn is that affirmative action

00:21:37.420 --> 00:21:39.880
in the direction of how do we keep farmers on

00:21:39.880 --> 00:21:41.819
their land and keep them doing what it is they

00:21:41.819 --> 00:21:44.809
do best. When you say fortifying, it almost seems

00:21:44.809 --> 00:21:46.690
to me like he's trying to really protect that.

00:21:46.829 --> 00:21:47.910
And that's what I'm getting from what you're

00:21:47.910 --> 00:21:52.710
saying is, from what I'm hearing you say, it

00:21:52.710 --> 00:21:55.410
feels like the intention of the bill is really

00:21:55.410 --> 00:21:58.329
to put in a lot of protections for agritourism

00:21:58.329 --> 00:22:00.650
versus some of the other bills we talked about

00:22:00.650 --> 00:22:04.029
that want to maybe regulate agritourism. Correct.

00:22:04.210 --> 00:22:07.049
Okay. Okay. All right. Well, where is this going

00:22:07.049 --> 00:22:10.089
to go, do you think? I mean, you mentioned that

00:22:10.089 --> 00:22:15.039
we didn't necessarily... support strongly Representative

00:22:15.039 --> 00:22:17.680
Lowe's bill, and we're hopeful that maybe it

00:22:17.680 --> 00:22:19.519
would move forward so that some other conversations

00:22:19.519 --> 00:22:22.200
could. Where do you think this goes in the future?

00:22:22.519 --> 00:22:24.460
So we've had a great conversation with Senator

00:22:24.460 --> 00:22:28.559
Warnick about continuing, about having a dedicated

00:22:28.559 --> 00:22:31.220
conversation and actually dedicating some funding

00:22:31.220 --> 00:22:33.519
to bringing together stakeholders to talk about

00:22:33.519 --> 00:22:35.900
what does a reasonable framework look like? How

00:22:35.900 --> 00:22:38.079
do we define these things and what is our way

00:22:38.079 --> 00:22:40.720
forward? So we're really excited about engaging

00:22:40.720 --> 00:22:43.140
in that conversation. in the interim and hopefully

00:22:43.140 --> 00:22:47.220
coming back next year rather than having a variety

00:22:47.220 --> 00:22:49.500
of these bills that are all kind of trying to

00:22:49.500 --> 00:22:50.759
get at this problem. Just here and there and

00:22:50.759 --> 00:22:52.980
everywhere. Right. Rather than a piecemeal approach,

00:22:53.220 --> 00:22:57.430
having a focused strategy. To say, you know,

00:22:57.430 --> 00:22:59.009
here's what we're going to do to really support

00:22:59.009 --> 00:23:01.049
these folks that I think we all want to support.

00:23:01.190 --> 00:23:04.210
Okay. Okay. Well, I've seen that proviso, as

00:23:04.210 --> 00:23:07.430
you know, and let's hope that that actually makes

00:23:07.430 --> 00:23:09.710
it into the budget. WASAC would actually take

00:23:09.710 --> 00:23:13.710
the lead on that process to develop that recommendation.

00:23:13.829 --> 00:23:17.809
But at the end, we would have a focused. kind

00:23:17.809 --> 00:23:20.430
of holistic approach that would do some fundamental

00:23:20.430 --> 00:23:22.529
things, right? Like define what agritourism is

00:23:22.529 --> 00:23:25.849
and what it's not and figure out, okay, how do

00:23:25.849 --> 00:23:27.950
we make sure that these are the things, since

00:23:27.950 --> 00:23:30.130
we've decided these are the things that it is,

00:23:30.190 --> 00:23:32.250
how do we protect them? How do we make sure that

00:23:32.250 --> 00:23:35.769
they can be on the landscape in a way that's

00:23:35.769 --> 00:23:38.130
appropriate, right? That considers all kind of

00:23:38.130 --> 00:23:41.930
the risks and the roads and the traffic and all

00:23:41.930 --> 00:23:43.670
these other impacts, the public safety, the public

00:23:43.670 --> 00:23:45.859
health that we were talking about before. We're

00:23:45.859 --> 00:23:49.519
really planting a seed here. Very good. You're

00:23:49.519 --> 00:23:51.759
welcome. That was excellent. Well, hopefully

00:23:51.759 --> 00:23:55.160
it'll grow into something that... Why do you

00:23:55.160 --> 00:23:57.200
keep doing this to me? The last podcast, I couldn't...

00:23:57.200 --> 00:23:59.420
We're going to reap the benefits in 2027. Oh

00:23:59.420 --> 00:24:02.559
my gosh. I feel like that was a softball. That

00:24:02.559 --> 00:24:07.660
was a softball. Kelsey, you outshine me once

00:24:07.660 --> 00:24:11.480
again in the play on words and the puns. I'm

00:24:11.480 --> 00:24:13.240
going to have to get a little sharper. I'm not

00:24:13.240 --> 00:24:15.400
bad at it, but I need some time to think about

00:24:15.400 --> 00:24:18.640
it. Which this medium does not necessarily lend

00:24:18.640 --> 00:24:20.220
itself to. No, it doesn't, because you've got

00:24:20.220 --> 00:24:24.380
to be quick witter. Oh, my gosh. This has been

00:24:24.380 --> 00:24:27.769
Paul Jewell for The Washington Post. Anyways,

00:24:27.869 --> 00:24:30.130
Kelsey, always a pleasure. Thanks for coming

00:24:30.130 --> 00:24:32.730
by. We've got to run because I know you've got

00:24:32.730 --> 00:24:34.589
some meetings and I've got some meetings. It's

00:24:34.589 --> 00:24:37.750
a big day today. We are looking forward to next

00:24:37.750 --> 00:24:40.470
week. What is next Wednesday? Next Wednesday

00:24:40.470 --> 00:24:43.650
is House of Origin Policy Committee Cutoff. That

00:24:43.650 --> 00:24:46.289
is one of the best days of the session. So we're

00:24:46.289 --> 00:24:48.170
looking forward to that. Until then, take care.

00:24:48.309 --> 00:24:53.089
Thank you so much. Thanks for tuning in to County

00:24:53.089 --> 00:24:55.450
Connection. Stay in the loop by subscribing to

00:24:55.450 --> 00:24:57.630
us through your preferred podcasting app and

00:24:57.630 --> 00:25:00.250
following us on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Instagram.

00:25:00.490 --> 00:25:02.670
And don't forget to join The Hub, your go -to

00:25:02.670 --> 00:25:04.650
source for the latest news and updates from the

00:25:04.650 --> 00:25:07.049
Washington State Association of Counties. Until

00:25:07.049 --> 00:25:09.309
next time, stay connected and stay informed.
