WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.259
So I've got to ask, how much reindeer did you

00:00:02.259 --> 00:00:05.599
eat? I ate a lot of reindeer. Did you leave some

00:00:05.599 --> 00:00:08.500
for Santa Claus? I mean, he didn't eat them anymore.

00:00:08.560 --> 00:00:15.279
It was after Christmas. That's cold. That is

00:00:15.279 --> 00:00:20.620
cold, Jamie. Welcome to County Connection. the

00:00:20.620 --> 00:00:22.739
official podcast of the Washington State Association

00:00:22.739 --> 00:00:25.160
of Counties, where we dive into the legislative

00:00:25.160 --> 00:00:27.199
issues shaping the future of our communities.

00:00:27.480 --> 00:00:29.660
From budgets to public safety, infrastructure

00:00:29.660 --> 00:00:32.579
to elections, we'll break down what's happening

00:00:32.579 --> 00:00:35.359
in Olympia and how it impacts counties from across

00:00:35.359 --> 00:00:38.479
the Evergreen State. Stay informed, stay engaged,

00:00:38.600 --> 00:00:41.460
and join us as we amplify the voice of Washington's

00:00:41.460 --> 00:00:47.420
39 counties. Welcome everyone to the County Connection

00:00:47.420 --> 00:00:49.880
Podcast. I'm Paul Jewell, the Government Relations

00:00:49.880 --> 00:00:52.020
Director for the Washington State Association

00:00:52.020 --> 00:00:56.020
of Counties and your host for the podcast. Welcome

00:00:56.020 --> 00:00:59.079
to 2026. This is our first podcast of the new

00:00:59.079 --> 00:01:02.259
year. Hopefully all of you listened to every

00:01:02.259 --> 00:01:04.180
podcast that we had last year. I don't know if

00:01:04.180 --> 00:01:05.739
you saw the notice that went out, but believe

00:01:05.739 --> 00:01:09.840
it or not, we actually recorded 50 podcasts last

00:01:09.840 --> 00:01:12.769
year for our first year. Hard to believe we got

00:01:12.769 --> 00:01:15.849
that many done. But now we find ourselves right

00:01:15.849 --> 00:01:18.629
back at the very beginning of the new legislative

00:01:18.629 --> 00:01:23.829
session. It's early January. Jamie Bodden is

00:01:23.829 --> 00:01:28.290
back. Jamie's back, everybody. Say hello. Say

00:01:28.290 --> 00:01:31.609
something to your fans out there, Jamie. Hi,

00:01:31.750 --> 00:01:35.930
Mom. Hi, Dad. Mom and Dad back in Wisconsin.

00:01:35.969 --> 00:01:38.450
Good to be back. Good to see you. Happy session,

00:01:38.609 --> 00:01:40.969
Paul. Happy session to you. I know you're excited

00:01:40.969 --> 00:01:44.709
to be here. I just get that little tingly feeling

00:01:44.709 --> 00:01:47.370
at the beginning of every session. I'm not sure

00:01:47.370 --> 00:01:51.250
if it's terror or excitement, but it's definitely

00:01:51.250 --> 00:01:54.049
adrenaline. Stress. It could be. I think it's

00:01:54.049 --> 00:01:56.390
stress. A little bit of stress. It probably is.

00:01:56.849 --> 00:01:59.790
Speaking of stress, you just got back from a

00:01:59.790 --> 00:02:03.060
hearing. Yes. Yes, we've had a busy first week

00:02:03.060 --> 00:02:06.540
of session already and had a hearing this morning

00:02:06.540 --> 00:02:11.680
on Senate Bill 5967. A lot of emotional testimony

00:02:11.680 --> 00:02:14.560
in that hearing this morning. Yes, a lot of testimony

00:02:14.560 --> 00:02:18.699
from a number of doctors, particularly pediatricians,

00:02:18.699 --> 00:02:20.719
around the importance of preventive services

00:02:20.719 --> 00:02:24.500
and just preserving our ability in Washington

00:02:24.500 --> 00:02:27.580
State to access them and also pay for them through

00:02:27.580 --> 00:02:30.039
health insurance. Yeah, so an important bill

00:02:30.039 --> 00:02:32.580
this session? Yes, a very important bill this

00:02:32.580 --> 00:02:34.840
session. It's one of WSALFO's priority bills.

00:02:35.180 --> 00:02:39.479
The companion bill, House Bill 2242, is being

00:02:39.479 --> 00:02:41.819
heard tomorrow. What was the Senate one again?

00:02:41.919 --> 00:02:46.580
What was the number? 5967. See, and people thought

00:02:46.580 --> 00:02:49.139
we were going to have probably our first legislative

00:02:49.139 --> 00:02:51.259
podcast of the year would be a little bit of

00:02:51.259 --> 00:02:52.900
a lead -in, but we're jumping right into the

00:02:52.900 --> 00:02:55.620
heart of the matter. We're giving you meat right

00:02:55.620 --> 00:02:58.180
out of the gate here. Speaking of meat, we were

00:02:58.180 --> 00:02:59.740
just talking about reindeer a little earlier,

00:03:01.120 --> 00:03:04.639
We'll leave that for later. What else you got

00:03:04.639 --> 00:03:08.449
for us? So that's our big policy bill. This week

00:03:08.449 --> 00:03:11.430
we've also testified in both appropriations and

00:03:11.430 --> 00:03:14.310
ways and means on the governor's budget, particularly

00:03:14.310 --> 00:03:16.389
around foundational public health services funding,

00:03:16.650 --> 00:03:21.870
FPHS. That funding has been a perennial priority

00:03:21.870 --> 00:03:24.409
for WSALFO. It's been a priority for WSAC in

00:03:24.409 --> 00:03:26.750
the past as well. We lost some of that last year,

00:03:26.789 --> 00:03:28.629
right? It's going to be another tough budget

00:03:28.629 --> 00:03:31.270
year this year. If people remember back to our

00:03:31.270 --> 00:03:34.949
podcasts from 2025, that was a lot of what we

00:03:34.949 --> 00:03:36.219
were talking about. about, there was a lot of

00:03:36.219 --> 00:03:38.520
budget discussion. There's always a lot of budget

00:03:38.520 --> 00:03:40.819
discussion in the first year of the biennium,

00:03:40.900 --> 00:03:42.780
but last year there was a lot more because the

00:03:42.780 --> 00:03:45.879
state found itself in a little bit of an unfamiliar

00:03:45.879 --> 00:03:48.500
position compared to the previous years in that

00:03:48.500 --> 00:03:51.719
decade, well, really the last decade, and that

00:03:51.719 --> 00:03:54.319
was in the position of facing some pretty stiff

00:03:54.319 --> 00:03:56.860
deficits. And here we are in 2026. They made

00:03:56.860 --> 00:03:59.860
a lot of changes to the budget last year, some

00:03:59.860 --> 00:04:02.139
pretty big tax increases. They're finding themselves

00:04:02.139 --> 00:04:05.979
in another $2 .3 billion deficit. Part of their

00:04:05.979 --> 00:04:08.900
solution last year was to kind of take back some

00:04:08.900 --> 00:04:13.960
of the FPHS or foundational public health. revenue

00:04:13.960 --> 00:04:17.699
gains that we had made in previous years. And

00:04:17.699 --> 00:04:20.199
then are we looking at more cuts this year? Yes.

00:04:20.240 --> 00:04:23.100
Yeah. The budget situation, you know, I feel

00:04:23.100 --> 00:04:25.079
like last year everybody was like, the budget's

00:04:25.079 --> 00:04:28.220
bad. And reality became, yeah, the budget's bad.

00:04:28.319 --> 00:04:31.079
This year I feel like we're starting in the dark

00:04:31.079 --> 00:04:33.860
place in which we ended last year in terms of

00:04:33.860 --> 00:04:36.660
the budget. Like it never quit, right? It never

00:04:36.660 --> 00:04:41.019
quit. It never had. Last year felt like there

00:04:41.019 --> 00:04:44.040
were some glimmers of hope. This year doesn't

00:04:44.040 --> 00:04:46.790
necessarily feel. Like that, it's a very different

00:04:46.790 --> 00:04:50.310
tenor. But yes, last year in the state operating

00:04:50.310 --> 00:04:55.189
budget, FPHS was reduced by $24 million or $12

00:04:55.189 --> 00:04:59.470
million each fiscal year. So for the two -year

00:04:59.470 --> 00:05:01.790
biennium, a combined amount of $24 million. Yes.

00:05:01.790 --> 00:05:04.730
So fiscal year 26, a $12 million reduction. Fiscal

00:05:04.730 --> 00:05:08.110
year 27, a $12 million reduction. And then something

00:05:08.110 --> 00:05:10.350
happened at the end of session that is further

00:05:10.350 --> 00:05:14.449
compounding kind of our concerns around the FPHS.

00:05:14.759 --> 00:05:18.519
account in FPHS funding, and that is policy was

00:05:18.519 --> 00:05:22.079
passed that changed how tobacco and nicotine

00:05:22.079 --> 00:05:24.779
products and vapor products revenue was collected.

00:05:25.550 --> 00:05:28.250
And a lot of that got swept into the general

00:05:28.250 --> 00:05:32.029
fund unintentionally. Oh, was that supposed to

00:05:32.029 --> 00:05:35.990
go to FPHS? Changing how the FPHS account, which

00:05:35.990 --> 00:05:39.089
funds a portion of FPHS. It's not the full funding

00:05:39.089 --> 00:05:41.110
source of FPHS, but it funds a portion of it.

00:05:41.230 --> 00:05:46.089
And it changed how that account was. uh funded

00:05:46.089 --> 00:05:48.689
and they were trying to capture nicotine products

00:05:48.689 --> 00:05:52.170
that weren't being taxed before right because

00:05:52.170 --> 00:05:54.610
i think the laws were based on tobacco products

00:05:54.610 --> 00:05:56.629
and now there's a lot of alternative products

00:05:56.629 --> 00:05:58.769
that contain nicotine whether they're vapor products

00:05:58.769 --> 00:06:01.910
or uh there's packets right those zin packets

00:06:01.910 --> 00:06:04.649
or something that yeah I don't know what you

00:06:04.649 --> 00:06:05.850
do with them. They're like pouches. Do you actually

00:06:05.850 --> 00:06:07.750
chew on them? You just put them in your mouth

00:06:07.750 --> 00:06:10.290
and kind of... Kind of like chewing tobacco?

00:06:10.649 --> 00:06:12.449
Okay. So they wanted to make sure that they were

00:06:12.449 --> 00:06:14.829
capturing those in the tax structure as well.

00:06:15.370 --> 00:06:17.550
And I think there was even a tax increase, if

00:06:17.550 --> 00:06:19.970
I'm not mistaken, on top of that. Yeah. And so

00:06:19.970 --> 00:06:23.750
what happened was a lot of the revenue that we

00:06:23.750 --> 00:06:25.870
were collecting and putting into the FPHS account

00:06:25.870 --> 00:06:29.089
then got swapped out of that account. So now

00:06:29.089 --> 00:06:32.250
we're faced with, for fiscal year 26, a small

00:06:32.250 --> 00:06:34.779
shortfall. in that account where we actually

00:06:34.779 --> 00:06:37.500
have the spending authority to spend the funding.

00:06:37.720 --> 00:06:40.519
We just don't have the actual funding, the dollars

00:06:40.519 --> 00:06:43.120
in the bank to spend. It's great to have spending

00:06:43.120 --> 00:06:45.040
authority. Great to have spending authority,

00:06:45.139 --> 00:06:47.500
but you need the money to actually get to do

00:06:47.500 --> 00:06:48.500
it, right? If you don't actually have the dollars,

00:06:48.600 --> 00:06:50.660
yeah. Sure, honey, you can go ahead and spend

00:06:50.660 --> 00:06:53.139
that million dollars, but if you don't have it,

00:06:53.180 --> 00:06:55.439
you can't spend it. I'd love to give people permission

00:06:55.439 --> 00:06:57.139
to spend a million bucks. Wouldn't that be nice?

00:06:57.199 --> 00:07:01.050
I don't have it. Go ahead, kids. Go crazy. Do

00:07:01.050 --> 00:07:04.689
your worst. And so we have a small one for this

00:07:04.689 --> 00:07:07.189
fiscal year. What's most concerning is that that

00:07:07.189 --> 00:07:10.509
grows significantly for fiscal year 27, which

00:07:10.509 --> 00:07:13.370
starts June 1st of this year. That estimated

00:07:13.370 --> 00:07:17.689
shortfall is just over $20 million, almost $21

00:07:17.689 --> 00:07:22.319
million. So we have that already kind of. So

00:07:22.319 --> 00:07:24.879
that's on top of the $24 million. That's on top

00:07:24.879 --> 00:07:26.879
of the $24 million. For the biennium, which is

00:07:26.879 --> 00:07:29.040
$12 million last year, $12 million this year.

00:07:29.060 --> 00:07:31.759
And then the governor has proposed an additional

00:07:31.759 --> 00:07:35.560
$29 million reduction into FPHS from the general

00:07:35.560 --> 00:07:41.579
fund account that funds FPHS. So $24 last year,

00:07:41.680 --> 00:07:44.079
governor's proposed a $29 million reduction,

00:07:44.300 --> 00:07:48.420
and then currently a $20 million shortfall in

00:07:48.420 --> 00:07:50.360
another account, which is essentially a reduction.

00:07:51.360 --> 00:07:54.519
All of that put together, it's about a 40 % decrease

00:07:54.519 --> 00:07:59.519
in FPHS funding total. And if folks have been

00:07:59.519 --> 00:08:02.379
around for a while, you'll recall FPHS has slowly

00:08:02.379 --> 00:08:05.879
been built over the past year, starting in 2019,

00:08:06.060 --> 00:08:08.600
where we kind of got that first initial funding

00:08:08.600 --> 00:08:11.500
and then built over time and then built through

00:08:11.500 --> 00:08:15.120
the pandemic. And so that 40 % rollback is a

00:08:15.120 --> 00:08:20.240
very severe, very fast. whiplash kind of reduction

00:08:20.240 --> 00:08:23.899
for FPHS? Public health is kind of the whipping

00:08:23.899 --> 00:08:27.399
boy, to use a really, really old term, during

00:08:27.399 --> 00:08:31.279
really tough budget, maybe the whipping post

00:08:31.279 --> 00:08:33.940
is a better term, during really tough budget

00:08:33.940 --> 00:08:38.779
seasons or periods of time, because FPHS really

00:08:38.779 --> 00:08:41.820
came out of all of the destructive cuts, both

00:08:41.820 --> 00:08:43.500
on the federal and state level, and even the

00:08:43.500 --> 00:08:45.759
local level, that were made during the Great

00:08:45.759 --> 00:08:49.379
Recession, right? And so, that was a big movement

00:08:49.379 --> 00:08:51.799
after the great recession. It gained acceleration

00:08:51.799 --> 00:08:54.440
and traction through the pandemic because there

00:08:54.440 --> 00:08:58.679
was a recognition. Oh yeah. The system isn't

00:08:58.679 --> 00:09:02.259
really sufficiently built up and funded to deal

00:09:02.259 --> 00:09:04.340
with now what we're facing this big, this big

00:09:04.340 --> 00:09:07.960
pandemic, but just like fires and floods, right?

00:09:08.539 --> 00:09:11.340
When the water recedes, when the flames go away

00:09:11.340 --> 00:09:15.299
and the smoke clears, we oftentimes forget conveniently

00:09:15.299 --> 00:09:18.250
and other things, you know, become front and

00:09:18.250 --> 00:09:21.210
center like a financial crisis. And here we are

00:09:21.210 --> 00:09:24.590
being probably a little bit penny wise and pound

00:09:24.590 --> 00:09:28.070
foolish when we think about what we need to do

00:09:28.070 --> 00:09:31.289
today to kind of make things work versus what

00:09:31.289 --> 00:09:34.490
it may cost us in the future and future damage

00:09:34.490 --> 00:09:36.629
to the system and its capability and viability.

00:09:36.929 --> 00:09:39.009
Yeah, that's a perennial, I think, struggle with

00:09:39.009 --> 00:09:41.210
public health in that we're focused on prevention.

00:09:41.350 --> 00:09:44.789
And so how do you say, well, we did this work

00:09:44.789 --> 00:09:49.690
and it didn't. And X didn't happen. We prevented

00:09:49.690 --> 00:09:51.769
something from happening, which is a good thing.

00:09:51.789 --> 00:09:54.830
You can't point to the crisis because you prevented

00:09:54.830 --> 00:09:57.409
it from happening. And that, I think, was the

00:09:57.409 --> 00:10:03.450
struggle. 2008, 2010, 2011, Great Recession,

00:10:03.490 --> 00:10:07.009
public health was cut across the system locally

00:10:07.009 --> 00:10:11.679
about 50%. FPHS has built back. a lot of those

00:10:11.679 --> 00:10:14.120
cuts, but we haven't even gotten to where we,

00:10:14.120 --> 00:10:20.299
you know, we were at in 2008, 2011. The pandemic

00:10:20.299 --> 00:10:23.159
and COVID certainly helped elevate that, oh,

00:10:23.220 --> 00:10:25.899
public health is really important. And, you know,

00:10:25.940 --> 00:10:28.259
we've been warning for a while, like we're not

00:10:28.259 --> 00:10:30.519
prepared. Our system does not have the infrastructure

00:10:30.519 --> 00:10:34.409
needed for a great crisis. COVID happened. really

00:10:34.409 --> 00:10:37.250
demonstrated that. But I also think it's important

00:10:37.250 --> 00:10:39.549
to highlight that public health is doing a lot

00:10:39.549 --> 00:10:44.149
of things that actually can be seen and are tangible

00:10:44.149 --> 00:10:47.210
and are stepping more into that space. And that's

00:10:47.210 --> 00:10:50.309
a lot of what FPHS covers and supports too. That's

00:10:50.309 --> 00:10:51.909
what it was intended to do, right? Is to kind

00:10:51.909 --> 00:10:55.070
of build up that system and fill the gaps in

00:10:55.070 --> 00:10:58.009
the communities where you didn't have funding

00:10:58.009 --> 00:10:59.730
and you didn't have infrastructure, but the need

00:10:59.730 --> 00:11:02.759
was really there and it was unmet. Yeah, so now

00:11:02.759 --> 00:11:08.100
we have programs around opioid overdose and response

00:11:08.100 --> 00:11:12.059
where we have public health being a center point

00:11:12.059 --> 00:11:16.179
for coalition building, working with community

00:11:16.179 --> 00:11:19.340
partners on treatment and community prevention

00:11:19.340 --> 00:11:22.779
services and other policy strategies. So kind

00:11:22.779 --> 00:11:25.820
of that multi -pronged approach. We have environmental

00:11:25.820 --> 00:11:31.169
health where... FPHS supports food safety things

00:11:31.169 --> 00:11:33.789
where it's not just inspecting, but it's also

00:11:33.789 --> 00:11:37.789
building up a more responsive network around

00:11:37.789 --> 00:11:41.049
complaints, but also just business support where

00:11:41.049 --> 00:11:45.909
if I'm a business owner and I have a question

00:11:45.909 --> 00:11:50.350
around, you know, can I implement this new. technology

00:11:50.350 --> 00:11:53.009
in my in my establishment what do i need to do

00:11:53.009 --> 00:11:55.250
to make sure it's the right thing we now have

00:11:55.250 --> 00:11:56.950
more infrastructure that can support questions

00:11:56.950 --> 00:12:00.019
like that where in the past you know We maybe

00:12:00.019 --> 00:12:02.980
could get to it, maybe, if we had that capacity

00:12:02.980 --> 00:12:06.360
to. So there's a lot of more things that public

00:12:06.360 --> 00:12:09.840
health is stepping into that FPHS has been really

00:12:09.840 --> 00:12:13.220
critical in shoring up in addition to a lot of

00:12:13.220 --> 00:12:15.659
that more behind -the -scenes preventative work

00:12:15.659 --> 00:12:18.620
that public health is known for doing. So is

00:12:18.620 --> 00:12:21.980
there a bill to try to fix the whole kind of

00:12:21.980 --> 00:12:25.279
nicotine tax piece? Yes. to replenish that piece?

00:12:25.419 --> 00:12:28.620
And then what are you doing about the 29 million

00:12:28.620 --> 00:12:31.000
in the governor's budget? And so when we testified

00:12:31.000 --> 00:12:33.620
earlier this week and were able to, you know,

00:12:33.620 --> 00:12:36.860
identify, you know, articulate 40 % potentially

00:12:36.860 --> 00:12:39.799
being reduced, I think that got the attention

00:12:39.799 --> 00:12:41.919
of a lot of legislators and certainly during

00:12:41.919 --> 00:12:43.679
legislative meetings that we've already been

00:12:43.679 --> 00:12:47.120
having. Talking about the FPHS account, there

00:12:47.120 --> 00:12:50.940
is a very strong desire to address and fix and

00:12:50.940 --> 00:12:53.399
correct that. You know, that 40 % number is,

00:12:53.399 --> 00:12:56.779
I'm sure, key and an eye -opener for a lot of

00:12:56.779 --> 00:12:59.159
them because time will go by and they'll make

00:12:59.159 --> 00:13:00.720
a little bit here and a little bit there and

00:13:00.720 --> 00:13:03.230
a little bit here and a little bit there. I can't

00:13:03.230 --> 00:13:04.990
tell you how many times I talk to a legislator

00:13:04.990 --> 00:13:07.450
and I'll say, hey, you know, it's another. And

00:13:07.450 --> 00:13:09.529
they say, yeah, but it's just a you know, it's

00:13:09.529 --> 00:13:11.409
just a little bit more. It's just a little bit

00:13:11.409 --> 00:13:13.509
of this or it's just another 10 million. And

00:13:13.509 --> 00:13:16.230
you go, but do you remember the previous years?

00:13:16.309 --> 00:13:18.529
And now you're up to 40 percent, 50 percent,

00:13:18.610 --> 00:13:21.809
60 percent. And they don't. Oftentimes they really

00:13:21.809 --> 00:13:24.269
don't. So it's up to us to kind of bring that

00:13:24.269 --> 00:13:26.129
information forward to them and make them aware

00:13:26.129 --> 00:13:29.269
of the cumulative impact over time of the decisions

00:13:29.269 --> 00:13:31.470
that they're making. So I'm sure that that's.

00:13:32.190 --> 00:13:34.929
Well, I want to say that's landing well with

00:13:34.929 --> 00:13:37.850
the members. It's probably landing like a thud,

00:13:37.870 --> 00:13:40.690
I would think, in many of their minds. Yeah,

00:13:40.730 --> 00:13:43.669
I think it's helpful in putting it into context

00:13:43.669 --> 00:13:46.889
of like, this isn't just a small reduction. 40

00:13:46.889 --> 00:13:50.679
% is a massive cut. And we want to do what we

00:13:50.679 --> 00:13:53.080
can to minimize anything that they might do.

00:13:53.220 --> 00:13:57.559
So we were encouraged. We have not one, not two,

00:13:57.700 --> 00:14:01.480
not three, but four policy bills that in various

00:14:01.480 --> 00:14:04.740
ways attempt to make that fix for the FPHS account.

00:14:04.919 --> 00:14:10.600
And that unintentional kind of. thing that happened

00:14:10.600 --> 00:14:13.179
last session we'll call it an unintentional diversion

00:14:13.179 --> 00:14:16.480
yeah and that's really encouraging um and we

00:14:16.480 --> 00:14:20.480
have two in the house two in the senate um ones

00:14:20.480 --> 00:14:23.419
from democrats and we have a proposal by republicans

00:14:23.419 --> 00:14:25.740
too so that is really encouraging it's a good

00:14:25.740 --> 00:14:27.259
bipartisan issue i mean public health should

00:14:27.259 --> 00:14:29.460
be for the most i see it as you know encouraging

00:14:29.460 --> 00:14:32.279
that both Democrats and Republicans want to solve

00:14:32.279 --> 00:14:35.659
this issue. And so, you know, our job now is

00:14:35.659 --> 00:14:38.360
to go through each of those four bills, identify,

00:14:38.360 --> 00:14:41.340
you know, what we like, what we don't like, what

00:14:41.340 --> 00:14:43.460
we think fixes it, what we think could be better

00:14:43.460 --> 00:14:47.059
and work towards getting up, you know, a policy

00:14:47.059 --> 00:14:50.600
that. addresses the needs that it needs to address

00:14:50.600 --> 00:14:55.039
on our end and move that forward. So which one

00:14:55.039 --> 00:14:57.639
will move? I don't know. There's a lot of, you

00:14:57.639 --> 00:15:00.860
know, it's still early game time. Right. But

00:15:00.860 --> 00:15:02.700
it's encouraging to see that there's already

00:15:02.700 --> 00:15:07.320
four proposals that are proposing to fix the

00:15:07.320 --> 00:15:10.039
FPHS account. Yeah, that is encouraging, especially

00:15:10.039 --> 00:15:12.139
when you consider that we're on the second half

00:15:12.139 --> 00:15:15.039
of the biennium. This is the second session or

00:15:15.039 --> 00:15:17.799
the second half session. And it's only 60 days.

00:15:17.820 --> 00:15:19.860
I was looking at the calendar. You know, after

00:15:19.860 --> 00:15:23.240
this week, there's only another two weeks and

00:15:23.240 --> 00:15:26.019
three days of hearings before the first cutoff.

00:15:26.460 --> 00:15:28.720
So things have to happen really fast and really

00:15:28.720 --> 00:15:31.460
rapidly in a short session. So the fact that

00:15:31.460 --> 00:15:35.240
you've got a head start is great. What can members

00:15:35.240 --> 00:15:38.720
do to support these, Jamie, as we kind of think

00:15:38.720 --> 00:15:41.379
about and move on to other subjects here? But

00:15:41.379 --> 00:15:42.960
for these two bills that you've talked about

00:15:42.960 --> 00:15:44.519
so far, is there any action that our members

00:15:44.519 --> 00:15:47.500
could take right away? So around the bills, you

00:15:47.500 --> 00:15:49.960
know, continuing to support good public health

00:15:49.960 --> 00:15:52.279
policy is always important. I would say around

00:15:52.279 --> 00:15:56.539
FPHS, the FPHS account is a little bit complicated

00:15:56.539 --> 00:15:59.519
and convoluted right now. It's going to become

00:15:59.519 --> 00:16:04.029
more. streamlined and less nuanced later in session

00:16:04.029 --> 00:16:07.169
as we kind of identify, okay, which is the bill

00:16:07.169 --> 00:16:09.049
that's moving? What are the parts that we like?

00:16:09.129 --> 00:16:11.809
I think the key message right now is we need

00:16:11.809 --> 00:16:14.970
to address and fix the FPHS account shortfall.

00:16:15.049 --> 00:16:17.330
That's the key message. And then there's the

00:16:17.330 --> 00:16:19.350
governor's budget proposal too. The governor

00:16:19.350 --> 00:16:22.730
proposes another $29 million reduction for fiscal

00:16:22.730 --> 00:16:26.350
year 27, and that's an ongoing reduction. That's

00:16:26.350 --> 00:16:30.500
a lot. Remember, they've already made $12 million

00:16:30.500 --> 00:16:33.559
reduction for fiscal year 27. Right, 24 combined

00:16:33.559 --> 00:16:36.940
for the biennium. So if our members have a chance

00:16:36.940 --> 00:16:41.549
to talk with their legislators. The message should

00:16:41.549 --> 00:16:44.429
be, let's go ahead and fix that, not the tobacco,

00:16:44.549 --> 00:16:47.149
the nicotine tax piece, right? And number two,

00:16:47.210 --> 00:16:50.289
if there's any way not to include that $29 million

00:16:50.289 --> 00:16:52.149
that the governor has proposed, that would be

00:16:52.149 --> 00:16:53.889
better for public health and better for counties.

00:16:54.090 --> 00:16:57.009
Absolutely. Because those reductions would have

00:16:57.009 --> 00:17:02.049
to be made somehow. Locals receive the majority

00:17:02.049 --> 00:17:05.539
of FPHS funds. Because they're the boots on the

00:17:05.539 --> 00:17:07.740
ground implementers of most public health programs

00:17:07.740 --> 00:17:10.980
and services. And so they would have cuts and

00:17:10.980 --> 00:17:14.519
they would face cuts. And $29 million is more

00:17:14.519 --> 00:17:17.940
than twice of what $12 million is. So the cuts

00:17:17.940 --> 00:17:20.599
that they had to make already, those would just

00:17:20.599 --> 00:17:23.119
get deeper and harder to make. And the impact

00:17:23.119 --> 00:17:25.339
to communities would be even more. So I encourage

00:17:25.339 --> 00:17:28.500
local elected officials to talk to your public

00:17:28.500 --> 00:17:31.220
health administrators and health officers and

00:17:31.220 --> 00:17:33.500
staff to learn about what cuts have been made.

00:17:33.609 --> 00:17:36.769
What cuts could they make? What cuts would they

00:17:36.769 --> 00:17:38.950
be forced to make with additional reductions?

00:17:39.230 --> 00:17:41.430
What the impact those are on those communities?

00:17:41.769 --> 00:17:44.690
We have a number of tools already for our local

00:17:44.690 --> 00:17:47.250
health jurisdictions. We have draft board resolutions.

00:17:47.410 --> 00:17:49.930
So if you're interested in passing a board resolution

00:17:49.930 --> 00:17:53.500
in support of FPHS and really... promoting and

00:17:53.500 --> 00:17:56.299
maintaining and preserving what we have. We have

00:17:56.299 --> 00:17:59.359
those drafted and available. We have talking

00:17:59.359 --> 00:18:01.660
points and we have one pagers as well to use

00:18:01.660 --> 00:18:05.359
as kind of messaging tools. Yeah, great. Well,

00:18:05.420 --> 00:18:09.099
Jamie, you know, we talked at the beginning about

00:18:09.099 --> 00:18:12.720
how the budget is really kind of shaping the

00:18:12.720 --> 00:18:14.619
session in many ways, just like it did last year.

00:18:14.859 --> 00:18:17.259
This is the second year in a row where the state's

00:18:17.259 --> 00:18:18.859
kind of dealing with the budget shortfall, which

00:18:18.859 --> 00:18:21.440
is very different than the previous several years.

00:18:22.179 --> 00:18:24.799
I think it's fair to say most of the legislators

00:18:24.799 --> 00:18:28.180
have not faced this issue, much less two years

00:18:28.180 --> 00:18:30.660
in a row. I've been up talking with a lot of

00:18:30.660 --> 00:18:33.000
legislators. You've been up talking with a lot

00:18:33.000 --> 00:18:35.519
of legislators. What do you think the mood is

00:18:35.519 --> 00:18:38.359
right now? And how do you think things are going

00:18:38.359 --> 00:18:41.039
to progress in the next couple weeks? I think,

00:18:41.180 --> 00:18:47.099
I don't want to say sour or grim or grumpy, but

00:18:47.099 --> 00:18:51.210
there's an underlying... feeling of just kind

00:18:51.210 --> 00:18:54.789
of grumpiness i think everybody realizes the

00:18:54.789 --> 00:18:58.470
task at hand it's not a pleasant task no right

00:18:58.470 --> 00:19:01.430
it's it's it's much more pleasant to be an elected

00:19:01.430 --> 00:19:05.109
official being able to say i get to fund your

00:19:05.109 --> 00:19:06.750
project yeah because you got resources right

00:19:06.750 --> 00:19:08.549
it's just it's just like being a county commissioner

00:19:08.549 --> 00:19:11.150
a little bit in that you took the job to get

00:19:11.150 --> 00:19:13.130
a few things done and if you're a legislator

00:19:13.130 --> 00:19:16.309
in today's legislative session you're getting

00:19:16.309 --> 00:19:19.589
told no a lot. Yeah. And that's not fun, right?

00:19:19.650 --> 00:19:23.009
You don't want to have to take resources away

00:19:23.009 --> 00:19:26.289
from any good work. And that's unfortunately

00:19:26.289 --> 00:19:30.069
the reality that our legislature has right now.

00:19:30.190 --> 00:19:34.430
So I think it's a very tough kind of vibe. You

00:19:34.430 --> 00:19:38.930
know, I think it's hard in that realm. But I

00:19:38.930 --> 00:19:43.710
also think that there's a lot of, you know, we're

00:19:43.710 --> 00:19:46.779
going to We're going to do what we can. We're

00:19:46.779 --> 00:19:48.700
taking the approach of we want to be helpful.

00:19:49.180 --> 00:19:51.420
So we want to be a resource. We want to be a

00:19:51.420 --> 00:19:53.500
place where, hey, what do you think about this

00:19:53.500 --> 00:19:56.960
idea or this idea? Or, you know, we want to hear

00:19:56.960 --> 00:19:59.200
what your budget priorities are. And we want

00:19:59.200 --> 00:20:01.640
to be helpful. We want to be a place of support.

00:20:01.759 --> 00:20:04.579
We want to be a thought partner. And we've heard

00:20:04.579 --> 00:20:06.619
that that is very much appreciated. We want to

00:20:06.619 --> 00:20:09.400
come with solutions instead of just ask. Do you

00:20:09.400 --> 00:20:13.079
really say thought partner? We have at times.

00:20:13.720 --> 00:20:16.460
Yes. Maybe that runs well with the public health

00:20:16.460 --> 00:20:18.319
community. I tell you, I'm not sure. I don't

00:20:18.319 --> 00:20:20.079
know. If you offered to be my thought partner,

00:20:20.200 --> 00:20:21.859
I'd be like, I don't know if I want a thought

00:20:21.859 --> 00:20:23.319
partner. We're always thought partners together,

00:20:23.539 --> 00:20:27.480
Paul. Come on. Come on. But yeah, we want to

00:20:27.480 --> 00:20:29.599
be helpful. We want to come with solutions. We

00:20:29.599 --> 00:20:31.599
want to have ideas. We don't want to just come

00:20:31.599 --> 00:20:33.599
with asks. And we don't want to just come with

00:20:33.599 --> 00:20:36.460
no. Like, please don't cut us. Well, I mean,

00:20:36.480 --> 00:20:38.359
that's what we want to do as an association always,

00:20:38.519 --> 00:20:40.720
right? But it's even more important in the difficult

00:20:40.720 --> 00:20:43.670
times to be problem solvers. Absolutely. To be

00:20:43.670 --> 00:20:46.170
collaborators and to be seen as people who want

00:20:46.170 --> 00:20:49.609
to roll up your sleeves and actually do the hard

00:20:49.609 --> 00:20:52.250
stuff to try to get the decisions to be better.

00:20:52.670 --> 00:20:55.670
than if you were just making across -the -board

00:20:55.670 --> 00:20:58.309
cuts so you could go home, right? Well, Jamie,

00:20:58.410 --> 00:21:00.829
thanks for the time. I know you're busy. Our

00:21:00.829 --> 00:21:03.109
members are busy. This time of year, of course,

00:21:03.130 --> 00:21:06.230
we try to keep these podcasts pretty tight. But

00:21:06.230 --> 00:21:08.650
you'll come back, and we'll talk about more maybe

00:21:08.650 --> 00:21:10.329
next week. Yeah, absolutely. And we'll see how

00:21:10.329 --> 00:21:13.289
this session goes. It's just the first week,

00:21:13.369 --> 00:21:15.569
everybody, so hold on to your socks. It'll be

00:21:15.569 --> 00:21:20.660
a fun one. Thanks, Jamie. Thanks, Paul. Thanks

00:21:20.660 --> 00:21:22.920
for tuning in to County Connection. Stay in the

00:21:22.920 --> 00:21:24.859
loop by subscribing to us through your preferred

00:21:24.859 --> 00:21:27.160
podcasting app and following us on LinkedIn,

00:21:27.319 --> 00:21:30.180
Facebook and Instagram. And don't forget to join

00:21:30.180 --> 00:21:32.279
the hub, your go to source for the latest news

00:21:32.279 --> 00:21:34.119
and updates from the Washington State Association

00:21:34.119 --> 00:21:36.819
of Counties. Until next time, stay connected

00:21:36.819 --> 00:21:37.819
and stay informed.
